﻿
<hansard noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.2">
  <session.header>
    <date>2026-08-17</date>
    <parliament.no>3</parliament.no>
    <session.no>1</session.no>
    <period.no>0</period.no>
    <chamber>House of Reps</chamber>
    <page.no>0</page.no>
    <proof>1</proof>
  </session.header>
  <chamber.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-SODJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SODJobDate">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;" />
            <a href="Chamber" type="">Monday, 17 August 2026</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The SPEAKER (</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Hon.</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">
            </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Milton Dick</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">) </span>took the chair at 10:00, made an acknowledgement of country and read prayers.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Line" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Line"> </span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>1</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I am pleased to advise the House that in the gallery today we are recognising the Youth Parliament members from across Australia. We look forward to welcoming all of the youth members and we will shortly be formally launching the program with Her Excellency the Governor-General at the conclusion of this morning.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear, hear!</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>1</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petitions Committee</title>
          <page.no>1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the 13th report of the Petitions Committee for the 48th Parliament.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The report read as follows—</inline></para>
<quote><para class="block">HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PETITIONS COMMITTEE</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">REPORT No. 13</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Petitions and Ministerial Responses</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">17 August 2026</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Chair Ms Jodie Belyea MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Deputy Chair Mr Leon Rebello MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Cameron Caldwell MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Emma Comer MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Trish Cook MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Rowan Holzberger MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Llew O'Brien MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Tracey Roberts MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">This committee is supported by staff of the Department of the House of Representatives</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Report summarising the petitions and ministerial responses being presented.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The committee met in private session in the 48th Parliament on 26 May, 2 June, 23 June, 30 June and 4 August 2026.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1. The committee resolved to present the following 19 1 petitions in accordance with standing order 207:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified on 26 May 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting regional fusion energy hubs and incentives for employment (EN7946)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting an industrial strategy for fusion energy (EN7947)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting a fusion energy export strategy (EN7948)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting fusion energy research and household energy affordability measures (EN7949)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting inclusion of fusion energy in grid planning (EN7950)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting measures relating to violent extremism and public safety (EN9102)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting measures relating to immigration, citizenship and counter-extremism (EN9103)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting legislation relating to antisemitism and hate speech (EN9105)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting cessation of Al Jazeera operations in Australia (EN9107)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 151 petitioners—requesting legislative requirements for restrictions imposed by financial institutions (EN9869)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners—requesting compassionate leave and bereavement benefits for pet owners (EN9874)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting support for a cultural and tourism festival (EN9875)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners—regarding changes to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (EN9876)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 18 petitioners—requesting cessation of immigration (EN9883)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 64 petitioners—requesting legal representation in Veterans' Review Board proceedings and removal of penalties (EN9888)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners—requesting amendment of the <inline font-style="italic">Marriage Act 1961 </inline>to permit multiple marriages (EN9891)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting reduced service periods for Commonwealth long service awards (EN9895)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting inclusion of superannuation in the Financial Claims Scheme (EN9896)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners—requesting prohibition of artificial intelligence use in government and service delivery (EN9897)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1703 petitioners—requesting protection measures for Athrotaxis communities (EN9898)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners—requesting divestment from artificial intelligence companies (EN9901)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners—requesting review of income support payments (EN9903)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 17 petitioners—requesting strengthened protections for assistance dogs and handlers (EN9906)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11 petitioners—requesting changes to social media minimum age laws (EN9908)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 39 petitioners—requesting actions and increased funding for endometriosis care (EN9909)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 54 petitioners—requesting artificial intelligence labelling for music releases and artist protections (EN9910)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 62 petitioners—requesting stronger visitor visa sponsor obligations (EN9911)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 412 petitioners—requesting changes to the regulation of entheogenic plants and fungi (EN9915)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 13 petitioners—requesting protection of Commonwealth war graves in Gaza (EN9917)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3137 petitioners—requesting changes to restrictions on the importation and sale of <inline font-style="italic">Moringa oleifera </inline>(EN9921)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2155 petitioners—requesting the appointment of a Minister for Men (EN9924)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 13 petitioners—requesting stronger verification of international qualifications in licensed occupations (EN9925)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 61 petitioners—requesting investigation of aerial spraying (EN9927)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting advertising requirements for novated leases (EN9928)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting consideration of company tax changes (EN9929)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting national coordination of organised crime policing (EN9931)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners—requesting an audit of First Nations program funding (EN9935)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 56 petitioners—requesting review of foreign ownership laws for farmland (EN9941)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners—requesting eligibility changes for veterans' benefits (EN9942)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 46 petitioners—requesting government-owned grocery stores (EN9945)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners—requesting Friday evening penalty rates for hospitality and retail workers (EN9964)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 31 petitioners—requesting mining taxation reform and a sovereign wealth fund (EN9965)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners—requesting taxation reform relating to residential rental payments and income (EN9966)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 28 petitioners—requesting reinstatement of capital punishment (EN9968)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners—requesting actions regarding government-funded employment services (EN9969)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting biometric security for government services (EN9970)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified on 2 June 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting funding for fusion energy projects (EN7951)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting inclusion of fusion energy in Indo-Pacific cooperation (EN7952)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting scholarships and education programs relating to fusion energy (EN7953)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting inclusion of fusion energy in resilience and emergency planning (EN7954)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting long-term funding for fusion energy programs (EN7955)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting investigation of foreign influence relating to political protests (EN9110)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting a review of measures relating to extremist ideologies (EN9116)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting investigation of matters relating to extremist ideologies (EN9117)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting investigation and review of measures relating to extremist ideologies (EN9118)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting a review of counter-terrorism powers (EN9119)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting changes to visa cancellation and removal arrangements (EN9952)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 31 petitioners—requesting broader access to magnetic resonance imaging services (EN9974)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 208 petitioners—requesting changes to capital gains tax discount arrangements for property investments (EN9975)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 51 petitioners—requesting regulation of artificial intelligence technologies (EN9976)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 617 petitioners—requesting changes to screening requirements for disability support workers (EN9977)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 476 petitioners—requesting changes to allied health funding arrangements for veterans (EN9980)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 39 petitioners—regarding negative gearing arrangements for residential investment properties (EN9982)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 757 petitioners—requesting constitutional amendment relating to election commitments (EN9985)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 56 petitioners—requesting retention of taxation arrangements relating to investment and business structures (EN9987)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 274 petitioners—requesting changes to child support enforcement arrangements (EN9992)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 77 petitioners—regarding capital gains tax and negative gearing arrangements (EN9993)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2039 petitioners—requesting reconsideration of land divestment at Kokoda Barracks (EN9996)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners—requesting retention of participant choice in National Disability Insurance Scheme plan management (EN9997)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1715 petitioners—requesting changes to taxation arrangements relating to residential housing construction (EN9999)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 33 petitioners—requesting changes to taxation arrangements for gas exporters (EN10003)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2083 petitioners—requesting restoration of Parent Visa places (EN10015)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 17 petitioners—regarding capital gains tax concessions for business owners (EN10019)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—regarding Queensland legislation relating to political expression (EN10026)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting changes to funding of employment services (EN10031)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 27 petitioners—requesting repeal of income and other taxes (EN10033)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting a review of cost of living, housing and taxation policies (EN10036)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 17 petitioners—requesting measures relating to intergenerational policy (EN10037)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11 petitioners—requesting regulation of edible surplus food disposal (EN10040)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 14 petitioners—requesting changes to Medicare and private billing arrangements (EN10041)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 80 petitioners—requesting a review of Commonwealth laws and policies relating to sex and gender (EN10043)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 19 petitioners—requesting a review of economic management (EN10044)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 49 petitioners—requesting a motion of no confidence (EN10047)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3200 petitioners—requesting review of capital gains tax and discretionary trust taxation changes (EN10049)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 19 petitioners—requesting funding for Lifeline services (EN10052)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified on 23 June 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting trials of fusion energy systems for resource sector energy supply (EN7956)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting inclusion of fusion energy in Australia's hydrogen strategy (EN7957)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting investment in fusion energy for medical research (EN7958)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting support for fusion energy pilot projects (EN7959)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting use of fusion energy in agricultural development (EN7960)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—regarding the application of Australian law (EN9122)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—regarding counter-terrorism strategy (EN9123)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—regarding the national response to Islamophobia (EN9125)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners—requesting review of a visa held by an individual (EN9127)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting a review of extremism in Australia (EN9152)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners—requesting support services for current and former Australian Defence Force members (EN9953)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting changes to employment services participation requirements (EN10053)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 94 petitioners—requesting a ban on generative artificial intelligence (EN10057)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 15 petitioners—requesting changes to parliamentary expenses regulations (EN10058)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11 petitioners—requesting prioritisation of Skilled Regional visa (subclass 887) application processing (EN10060)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting a nationwide ban on single-use plastics (EN10061)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4807 petitioners—requesting anti-bullying measures in schools (EN10063)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners—requesting review of proposed budget measures (EN10064)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners—requesting regulation of surplus food disposal in the hospitality sector (EN10065)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 438 petitioners—requesting changes to laws relating to sex and gender (EN10067)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting changes to discretionary trust taxation (EN10071)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting a pension scheme for older JobSeeker Payment recipients (EN10073)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11 petitioners—requesting housing, pension and health care for returned service members (EN10074)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting changes to capital gains tax reforms (EN10077)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 223 petitioners—requesting temporary closure of the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (EN10079)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting a ban on drone ownership (EN10080)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 58 petitioners—requesting research funding for alternatives to sodium fluoroacetate-based pest control (EN10081)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting negative gearing for new construction (EN10083)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners—requesting restrictions on facial recognition technology (EN10084)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8036 petitioners—regarding investigations by the Office of the Special Investigator (EN10088)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting an Australian commemorative coin relating to diabetes (EN10089)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners—regarding Australia's position on Cuba and United States sanctions (EN10090)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners—requesting changes to lobbying disclosure (EN10091)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting a workplace entitlement for cultural and religious observances (EN10095)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 35 petitioners—requesting access to treatments for vulvodynia and vestibulodynia (EN10100)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 284 petitioners—requesting recognition of chronic conditions in Department of Veterans' Affairs allied health funding (EN10104)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners—requesting retention of the capital gains tax discount for listed shares (EN10110)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 23 petitioners—requesting regulation of political polling during federal elections (EN10113)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners—requesting changes to Higher Education Loan Program debt indexation (EN10114)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 516 petitioners—requesting Medicare rebates for lipedema surgery (EN10115)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 152 petitioners—requesting action in relation to human rights in Vietnam (EN10117)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting early access to superannuation for emergencies (EN10118)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 14 petitioners—requesting changes to minimum wages for junior workers (EN10119)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1150 petitioners—requesting recognition of Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) visa (subclass 491) residence for family assistance payments (EN10120)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 54 petitioners—requesting safeguards for automation in government processes (EN10125)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 55 petitioners—requesting amendments to responsible lending laws relating to rental histories (EN10126)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting review of long-term baseload power options (EN10127)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 15 petitioners—requesting a ban on data mining (EN10129)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting review of the Child Support assessment formula (EN10131)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting changes to insurance exemptions under the <inline font-style="italic">Sex Discrimination Act 1984 </inline>(EN10132)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 72 petitioners—requesting skilled migration age concessions for doctorate graduates (EN10134)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners—requesting a ban on autonomous vehicles (EN10135)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 400 petitioners—requesting travel industry consumer protection legislation (EN10136)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting a public education campaign regarding e-cigarettes (EN10137)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 15 petitioners—requesting reporting on the fiscal impacts of immigration (EN10138)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 28 petitioners—requesting paid privacy options for social media platforms (EN10139)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting review of negative gearing and capital gains tax changes (EN10140)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 33 petitioners—requesting citizenship requirements for income support payments (EN10146)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting citizenship test exemptions for long-term permanent residents (EN10147)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting changes to federal electoral arrangements (EN10148)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 223 petitioners—requesting a motion of no confidence (EN10158)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 219 petitioners—requesting humanitarian funding for southern Lebanon (EN10160)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting changes to employment services funding (EN10161)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting an Australian medical research award (EN10162)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 51 petitioners—requesting sanctions against Israel (EN10163)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting protocols for displaying national flags (EN10164)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified on 30 June 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting use of fusion energy for national water infrastructure (EN7961)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1 petitioner—requesting fusion-powered inland development corridors (EN7962)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners—requesting prioritisation of fusion energy deployment in regional Australia (EN7963)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting implementation of the Bradfield Scheme using fusion energy (EN7964)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting fusion energy hubs in northern Australia (EN7965)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting review of extremism in Australia (EN9161)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners—regarding the application of Australian law (EN9162)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting investigation of extremism in Australia (EN9176)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners—requesting review of eligibility and security requirements for public office holders (EN9177)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting citizenship requirements for election candidates (EN9958)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting protections for religious expression (EN9959)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners—requesting changes to parental leave entitlements (EN9962)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 46 petitioners—requesting measures to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander businesses (EN10166)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners—requesting parental exemptions from social media age restrictions (EN10169)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting restoration of streaming services in remote areas (EN10170)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 30 petitioners—requesting changes to the Child Support assessment formula (EN10173)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 60 petitioners—regarding the use of beagles in medical research (EN10174)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 68 petitioners—requesting mobile phone coverage along Summerland Way in New South Wales (EN10176)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting additional annual leave for parents with dependent children (EN10179)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2 petitioners—requesting regulations for travel agents (EN10180)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners—requesting regulated access to peptide therapies (EN10181)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting restrictions on salary increases for federal politicians (EN10183)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 29 petitioners—requesting restrictions on salary increases for federal politicians (EN10184)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners—requesting changes to the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard and vehicle repair requirements (EN10185)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1091 petitioners—requesting an increase to higher degree by research stipend payments (EN10186)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners—requesting an agreement with the United States on access to artificial intelligence systems (EN10188)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 79 petitioners—requesting regulation of light-emitting diode vehicle headlights (EN10189)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 437 petitioners—requesting expanded healthcare roles for nurses and paramedics (EN10190)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 77 petitioners—requesting review of artificial intelligence, data centre and taxation policy (EN10191)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners—requesting installation of a new weather radar in the Gladstone region (EN10199)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 462 petitioners—requesting changes to the <inline font-style="italic">Sex Discrimination Act 1984</inline>(EN10202)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 125 petitioners—requesting additional parental leave for parents of premature babies (EN10205)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 65 petitioners—regarding support services for Australian Defence Force members and veterans (EN10207)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 25 petitioners—requesting the imposition of sanctions under the <inline font-style="italic">Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 </inline>(EN10208)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners—requesting changes to Higher Education Loan Program repayment arrangements (EN10210)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 702 petitioners—requesting a pathway to permanent residency for long-term bridging visa holders (EN10211)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 763 petitioners—requesting social security arrangements for former Temporary Humanitarian Concern visa (subclass 786) holders (EN10212)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 55 petitioners—requesting an increase to the Goods and Services Tax registration threshold (EN10213)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 61 petitioners—requesting greater access to superannuation (EN10214)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1229 petitioners—requesting construction of a Traralgon bypass (PN0658)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">2. The following 23 ministerial responses to petitions were received.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ministerial responses received by the Committee on 30 June 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs to a petition regarding the human rights situation in Afghanistan (EN6998)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister to a petition requesting the establishment of a royal commission into foreign interference (EN9406)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Early Childhood Education to a petition regarding policy and funding for children with additional needs (EN9415)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ministerial responses received by the Committee on 4 August 2026</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Special Minister of State to a petition regarding truth in political advertising (EN7252)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Special Minister of State to a petition regarding wages and renumeration for Parliamentarians (EN7321)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme to a petition regarding fraud against the National Disability Insurance Scheme (EN8485)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting restrictions on entry of individuals who have served in a foreign military (EN9292)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Veterans' Affairs to a petition requesting financial assistance for veterans during legislative transition (EN9327)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Ageing to a petition requesting an inquiry into COVID-19 vaccines (EN9397)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Education to a petition requesting an inquiry into arts education and training (EN9412)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting changes to eligibility timeframes for regional skilled migration visas (EN9416)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting changes to processing times and eligibility for regional migration visas (EN9433)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs to a petition regarding the welfare of former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan (EN9537)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Ageing to a petition requesting national standards for allergen management (EN9575)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention to a petition regarding regulation of digital mental health tools (EN9586)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting consideration of listing an Iranian opposition group as a terrorist organisation (EN9592)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations to a petition requesting an inquiry into employment arrangements in the aviation sector (EN9621)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for the Environment and Water to a petition regarding the proposed Dittmer Project gold mine (EN9634)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting changes to visa eligibility for Israeli Defense Force personnel (EN9667)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister to a petition requesting a motion of no confidence (EN9673)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations to a petition requesting the introduction of menstrual leave entitlements (EN9679)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme to a petition requesting changes to financial transparency requirements for disability service providers (EN9712)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister for Immigration to a petition requesting intervention for a family to remain in Australia (PN0657)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Jodie Belyea MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Chair—Petitions Committee</para></quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>6</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Presentation</title>
          <page.no>6</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the following 191 petitions:</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>6</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>6</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>6</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>6</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>7</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>7</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>7</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Antisemitism</title>
          <page.no>7</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Media</title>
          <page.no>8</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Banking and Financial Services</title>
          <page.no>8</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Workplace Relations</title>
          <page.no>8</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tourism Industry: Infrastructure</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Homelessness</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Marriage</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Workplace Relations</title>
          <page.no>10</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>10</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>10</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Environment</title>
          <page.no>10</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security: Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pensions and Benefits</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Service Animals</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cybersafety</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Endometriosis</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>12</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Visitor Visas</title>
          <page.no>12</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Health Care</title>
          <page.no>13</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>War Graves</title>
          <page.no>13</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Food Imports</title>
          <page.no>13</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Men</title>
          <page.no>13</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>14</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Environment</title>
          <page.no>14</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Novated Leases</title>
          <page.no>14</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crime</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Indigenous Australians</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Agriculture Industry: Foreign Investment</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Competition Policy</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Wages and Salaries</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sovereign Capability</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation: Housing</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capital Punishment</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Employment Agencies</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cybersecurity</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>18</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>18</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>19</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>19</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Visa Refusal or Cancellation</title>
          <page.no>19</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medicare</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capital Gains Tax</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>21</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Negative Gearing</title>
          <page.no>21</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Constitution</title>
          <page.no>21</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>22</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Family Law</title>
          <page.no>22</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>22</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Defence Properties</title>
          <page.no>23</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>23</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>23</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gas Industry: Taxation</title>
          <page.no>24</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>24</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>24</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Freedom of Speech</title>
          <page.no>24</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Employment Agencies</title>
          <page.no>25</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>25</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Society</title>
          <page.no>25</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>26</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Food Regulation</title>
          <page.no>26</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medicare</title>
          <page.no>26</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gender and Sexual Orientation</title>
          <page.no>27</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>27</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government</title>
          <page.no>27</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>27</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Lifeline</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Law</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>28</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Islamophobia</title>
          <page.no>29</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Haddad, Mr Wissam</title>
          <page.no>29</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>29</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Defence Personnel</title>
          <page.no>30</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>People with Disability</title>
          <page.no>30</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>30</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians' Expenditure</title>
          <page.no>30</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>31</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Plastics Regulation</title>
          <page.no>31</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bullying in Schools</title>
          <page.no>31</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Budget</title>
          <page.no>32</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Food Regulation</title>
          <page.no>32</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gender and Sexual Orientation</title>
          <page.no>32</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>33</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pensions and Benefits</title>
          <page.no>33</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>33</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capital Gains Tax</title>
          <page.no>33</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran</title>
          <page.no>34</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Drone Regulation</title>
          <page.no>34</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Feral Animal Management</title>
          <page.no>34</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Negative Gearing</title>
          <page.no>34</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Personal Information and Privacy</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Office of the Special Investigator</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Currency</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>United Nations</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Workplace Relations</title>
          <page.no>36</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Women's Health</title>
          <page.no>36</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>36</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capital Gains Tax</title>
          <page.no>37</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Political Polling</title>
          <page.no>37</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tertiary Education and Training</title>
          <page.no>37</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Lipedema</title>
          <page.no>37</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Vietnam</title>
          <page.no>38</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>38</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Wages and Salaries</title>
          <page.no>38</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>38</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Government Decision-making</title>
          <page.no>38</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Banking and Financial Services</title>
          <page.no>39</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Energy</title>
          <page.no>39</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Internet Content</title>
          <page.no>39</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Family Law</title>
          <page.no>39</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Car Insurance</title>
          <page.no>40</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Skilled Migration</title>
          <page.no>40</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Autonomous Vehicles</title>
          <page.no>40</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Consumer Protection</title>
          <page.no>41</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>E-Cigarettes and Vaping Products</title>
          <page.no>41</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>41</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Internet Content</title>
          <page.no>41</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>41</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pensions and Benefits</title>
          <page.no>42</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Citizenship</title>
          <page.no>42</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Parliament</title>
          <page.no>42</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government</title>
          <page.no>42</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Lebanon: International Humanitarian Assistance</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Employment Agencies</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Scolyer, Professor Richard Anthony, AO</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Middle East</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian National Flag</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Water</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>45</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>45</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>46</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Citizenship</title>
          <page.no>46</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Discrimination</title>
          <page.no>46</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Paid Parental Leave Scheme</title>
          <page.no>46</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Indigenous Business</title>
          <page.no>46</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cybersafety</title>
          <page.no>47</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Rural, Regional and Remote Australia: Services</title>
          <page.no>47</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Family Law</title>
          <page.no>47</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Animal Testing</title>
          <page.no>47</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Telecommunications</title>
          <page.no>48</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Workplace Relations</title>
          <page.no>48</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Travel Industry</title>
          <page.no>48</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Peptides</title>
          <page.no>49</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians' Entitlements</title>
          <page.no>49</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians' Entitlements</title>
          <page.no>49</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Electric Vehicles</title>
          <page.no>49</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tertiary Education and Training</title>
          <page.no>50</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>50</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Road Safety</title>
          <page.no>50</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medical Workforce</title>
          <page.no>50</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Artificial Intelligence</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bureau of Meteorology: Infrastructure</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gender and Sexual Orientation</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Paid Parental Leave Scheme</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Middle East</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tertiary Education and Training</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Goods and Services Tax</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Victoria: Roads</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>54</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Responses</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the following 23 ministerial responses to petitions previously presented:</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Human Rights: Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Israel</title>
          <page.no>55</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Early Childhood Education and Care</title>
          <page.no>55</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Political Advertising</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians' Entitlements</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fraud</title>
          <page.no>57</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Israel Defense Forces</title>
          <page.no>58</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans: Compensation</title>
          <page.no>59</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19 Vaccines</title>
          <page.no>59</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Education</title>
          <page.no>60</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>60</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pakistan: Human Rights</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Food Labelling: Allergens</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Mental Health</title>
          <page.no>62</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Mujahedin-e Khalq</title>
          <page.no>62</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Workplace Relations: Aviation Industry</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Copper and Gold Mining: Dittmer Project</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Israel Defense Forces</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Labor Government</title>
          <page.no>64</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Women's Reproductive Health</title>
          <page.no>64</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>65</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Visa Cancellation or Refusal</title>
          <page.no>65</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>66</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Statements</title>
          <page.no>66</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The petitions being presented address issues such as antibullying measures in schools, critically endangered trees, allied health funding for veterans, and defence land divestment. Twelve of the petitions being presented gained more than 1,000 signatures each, with a petition regarding the Office of the Special Investigator attaining over 8,000 signatures.</para>
<para>There are currently 116 petitions open for signatures on the House e-petitions website covering a range of topics including visas, immigration, veterans affairs and artificial intelligence. More certifications will follow at the committee's next meeting.</para>
<para>In relation to the inquiry into the standing orders relating to petitions, the committee is continuing to examine the evidence to present a report to the House with practical recommendations to support the petitions process in the next couple of months. A reminder for those wishing to petition government: please ensure you submit a petition that meets federal government responsibilities. A large percentage of petitions being received are deemed out of order because they are the responsibility of either state or local government. We are keen to hear from you with regard to the issues and needs you have at a federal level.</para>
<para>I look forward to updating the House further on the work of the Petitions Committee.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>66</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>66</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7511" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>66</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>66</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LLEW O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
    <electorate>Wide Bay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Firstly, I acknowledge those who have previously contributed to this bill, particularly the former member for Dawson, George Christensen; Senator Matt Canavan, the Leader of The Nationals; and Senator Alex Antic.</para>
<para>Of the thousands of international treaties, conventions and agreements to which Australia has committed itself, surely those that protect the most vulnerable among us deserve our highest priority.</para>
<para>Indeed, if every international obligation Australia had ever undertaken were swept away and only one could remain, for me it would be the one that protects the fundamental human rights of our children.</para>
<para>The Convention on the Rights of the Child is such an obligation. When Australia ratified the convention in 1990, it became obliged under international law to recognise that every child has an inherent right to life and to ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that child's survival and development.</para>
<para>Article 6 of the convention is not merely a prohibition against deliberately killing children. It imposes a positive obligation directed towards survival. Article 24 further commits us to recognising every child's right to the 'highest attainable standard of health' and to facilities for treatment and rehabilitation. Under the convention, Australia must strive to ensure that no child is deprived of access to healthcare services.</para>
<para>Yet, tragically, when it comes to some of the most vulnerable children imaginable, that commitment can be disregarded.</para>
<para>This private member's bill seeks to remedy that terrible breach.</para>
<para>It addresses the circumstances in which a child has been subjected to an attempted abortion and is born alive. And this is an all-too-frequent event.</para>
<para>A 2023 Senate committee inquiry examined legislation intended to protect children born alive following an abortion heard that 724 babies in Victoria and Queensland were recorded as born alive (according to the World Health Organisation's definition) over a 10-year period. Medical professionals opposing the legislation did not dispute these figures, although they noted that the records provided limited information about the circumstances of the births.</para>
<para>I believe that when a procedure performed within our health system ends an independent person's life without that person's consent, information relating to that person and procedure should be thoroughly reported at a national level, and this bill seeks to address that failing.</para>
<para>All abortions are a tragedy, and those that occur at or after 20 weeks gestation present a greater risk of a live birth.</para>
<para>A 2018 study of 241 abortions performed without feticide between 20 and 24 weeks found that more than half resulted in live births. Median survival was 32 minutes, with one baby surviving for 267 minutes.</para>
<para>During the Senate inquiry, abortions at or after 20 weeks were described as 'uncommon', accounting for approximately one to two per cent of all abortions. But one to two per cent of approximately 88,000 abortions a year in Australia represent around 900 to 1,700 late-term abortions each year.</para>
<para>That is not an uncommon occurrence and presents a great risk of babies being born alive after an attempted abortion.</para>
<para>In my home state of Queensland, the most recent available data reported that in 2023, 75 terminations of pregnancy resulted in live births, more than triple the 22 reported a decade earlier, in 2013.</para>
<para>For medical professionals to play down or deny the frequency of babies being born alive after an attempted abortion is more than concerning.</para>
<para>In these all-too-frequent cases, a baby's reliance on her mother's life-sustaining biology transfers to the care of what is often a world-leading health system dedicated to preserving life, relieving suffering, and restoring health.</para>
<para>But not necessarily in the case of this little baby. That she was marked to die by abortion means that, depending on the state or territory in which her little body lies, the treatment she needs may be withheld.</para>
<para>In South Australia and New South Wales, state law enshrines requirements to provide clinically safe care appropriate to her medical condition.</para>
<para>These laws are sensible and exist for a reason.</para>
<para>But where a state or territory has not enshrined in law a medical professional's duty to treat her like a patient and not the byproduct of an abortion, clinical guidelines can recommend the withholding of treatment. In the absence of a clear statutory duty, clinical guidelines may substantially determine how a child born alive is treated in practice.</para>
<para>The current Northern Territory guideline still directs that, where a live birth occurs following termination, the baby is to be handled gently, kept warm and supported with family contact, but includes the direction, 'Do not provide life-sustaining treatment', including gastric tubes, IV lines and oxygen therapy.</para>
<para>Clinical guidelines have an important place in medicine. But clinical guidelines should never determine whether one class of human beings is entitled to a lesser standard of care.</para>
<para>The death in the Northern Territory of baby Jessica Jane serves as a tragic reminder of what can occur when a baby is unexpectedly born alive.</para>
<para>In the early hours of 14 July 1998, at Darwin Private Hospital, a procedure was undertaken with the express purpose of terminating a pregnancy. The expected outcome was the delivery of an aborted foetus.</para>
<para>That is not what happened.</para>
<para>At 2.45 am, a baby girl was born alive. Her name was Jessica Jane. She weighed 515 grams. She cried. She moved. She breathed. Her heart was beating.</para>
<para>After initially being placed in a metal kidney dish, a midwife, recognising those signs of life, wrapped her in a warm blanket and placed her in a 'clean-up area'; as Jessica's cries continued, she had a sheet placed over her and was checked on every 10 to 15 minutes. The doctor responsible for the termination was contacted and told that Jessica was alive but did not attend to her or provide instructions for her medical care.</para>
<para>Eighty long minutes after being removed from her mother, Jessica's little body could fight no more; her cries gave way to silence, and she died at 4.05 am. Her death was reported to the Northern Territory coroner. Coroner Greg Cavanagh later observed that what had been expected was the delivery of an aborted foetus; what occurred instead was the unexpected delivery of 'a live baby human being'. Coroner Cavanagh recommended that protocols be put in place, 'by statute, regulation or otherwise', to ensure that a child who survives a termination is immediately medically assessed for gestational age and viability.</para>
<para>In his report, Cavanagh cited another coronial inquest by the deputy state coroner at Westmead in Sydney, where a baby had died under similar circumstances only two days before Jessica Jane.</para>
<para>The Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026 is founded on a simple principle: every child born alive is a person and deserves equal care and protection under the law.</para>
<para>The bill makes clear that a child who survives an attempted termination is entitled to the same standard of medical care and treatment as any other child born alive. The circumstances of that child's birth must not determine the value placed on their life or the care they receive.</para>
<para>Importantly, the bill recognises that appropriate care will depend on the circumstances. It may involve life-saving emergency treatment, or it may involve compassionate palliative care. What cannot be a consideration is simply that the child was born as the result of a termination.</para>
<para>The bill also creates an offence where a health practitioner breaches a duty to provide appropriate care and requires live births following terminations to be reported so that, for the first time, meaningful national statistics can be produced.</para>
<para>Those reports cannot identify either the mother or the child, and the bill specifically protects the mother from prosecution under its offence provisions.</para>
<para>Ultimately, this bill is about birth equality before the law: once a child is born alive, that child deserves the same dignity, protection and care as every other Australian babies. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is there a seconder of the motion?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Penfold</name>
    <name.id>248895</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the bill and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>68</page.no>
        <type>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>68</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House acknowledges that the Government is supporting Australians to earn more, keep more of what they earn, and retire with more, with a range of policies that came into effect on 1 July 2026, including:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) payday superannuation reforms, benefiting the retirement incomes of millions of Australians through more frequent and earlier superannuation contributions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) a 4.75 per cent increase to the minimum wage, marking the first time the national minimum wage is above $1,000 a week;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) expanding government paid parental leave to 130 days, with parents to be paid superannuation contributions on Commonwealth funded paid parental leave for the first time; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) delivering:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) a new $1,000 instant tax deduction without proof of receipts; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) another tax cut of up to $268 for over 14 million Australians.</para></quote>
<para>Every member who walked into this chamber this morning at its opening looked up into the gallery and saw fresh faces. We saw beaming smiles of so many young people from across the breadth of our great nation coming to our nation's capital to participate in the very first National Youth Parliament.</para>
<para>One of the people in that sea is Karima, who is the best youth parliamentarian; she is the youth member for Moreton. All of those young people are here today because they're passionate about their communities. All those young people are here today because they want to change the world and they want to change our country. All of those young people are here today because they want to support Australians. I'm delighted that today in this private member's business that's what we're focused on: letting the young people and other people of this country know and understand that we, as a Labor government, are focused on supporting Australians every single day.</para>
<para>There was a very important milestone for that support, and it happened on 1 July. On 1 July there was good news for all Australians. It was a day where that support came in the form of relief. It was a day where that support came in the form of earning more. It was a day where that support came in terms of retiring with more as well. We know that, as people face challenging circumstances across this country and when the chips are down, what people need more than ever is more support.</para>
<para>I do want to reflect on a number of those changes that came in on 1 July. Pay day super reforms will benefit the retirement incomes of millions of Australians by making sure that, when you earn superannuation, you are paid it, because superannuation is not only a great Labor achievement, it's also part of your wage. It's not an extra and it's not a bonus. On 1 July, the Albanese Labor government made sure that it was paid when it was earned.</para>
<para>A 4.75 per cent increase to the minimum wage marks the first national minimum wage above $1,000 a week. When we talk about the contrast between us on this side of the chamber and those on the other side of the chamber, there couldn't be a starker one when it comes to wages for some of our most vulnerable people—our lowest paid Australians. While the Albanese government has been hard at work ensuring that we are backing in wage increases for everyday Australians, those opposite, when they were in government, decided that it would be a deliberate design feature of their government to keep wages low. Those back-to-back-to-back wage increases not only put money in the pockets of hardworking Australians, they also mean that those hardworking Australians are respected at work and can have dignity for the work that they do.</para>
<para>Government paid parental leave is being expanded to six months with superannuation on top. This is about making sure that mums and dads can be there with their kids in the very early years of their children's lives. Expanding paid parental leave is not only a no-brainer to make sure that the first months of some of our youngest Australians are spent with their parents but also a no-brainer in terms of injecting productivity into the economy over the long term as well.</para>
<para>Labor is also delivering a new $1,000 instant tax deduction without receipts as proof. This comes on the back of many tax cuts for the Australian people. A $1,000 tax deduction means that, instead of spending your time sifting through shoeboxes, you can have a tax deduction with a tax cut because of a Labor government. That tax cut, when you add it up, is $2,800 for the average Australian. This is a government that will always support Australians every day and did so on 1 July.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Rob Mitchell</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VENNING</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This Labor government changed the standing rules to ban that four-letter word that rhymes with 'pies', and they did that so they could bring forward motions like this. Labor tells us that Australians are earning more and keeping more of what they earn. But is that really true? Absolutely not—and you don't need a damn spreadsheet to quantify it. You'll find the answer by merely walking about this place and asking any Australian whether they feel more economically secure today than they did four years ago.</para>
<para>In nominal terms, wages are up 14 per cent, which sounds great until we come to the reality and you put this number into real terms after inflation. For those playing along at home, do you really think real wages have gone up, or have they gone down? Well, if you guessed 'down', well done. Real wages have gone down 1.7 per cent over Labor's term of government. So, contrary to the spin we hear about 'earning more under Labor', you, in fact, are earning less.</para>
<para>But Australians aren't just earning less; they're keeping less of what they earn. While Labor's new, toxic taxes are punishing aspiration, bracket creep is quietly taxing Australians more and more each and every day. After four years of Labor, this sneaky tax grab is leaving the average Australian $2,000 a year worse off. But I come bearing some good news, because the coalition has a plan to fix this. Our tax-back guarantee will end bracket creep by indexing tax brackets to inflation. We will deliver real tax reform that is fair, simple and honest.</para>
<para>While the coalition has a plan to fix the economy and restore our way of life, Labor's fiscal failure is sending Australia backwards. Under Labor, Australians are earning less and keeping less of what they earn. And this is no accident. Labour productivity is the fundamental, long-run driver of real wage growth, and what could possibly have nosedived since Labor came to office? Productivity! Labor has presided over more bureaucracy, more regulation and more red tape. It's no wonder that real wages are going backwards.</para>
<para>While bracket creep is costing the average worker $2,000 a year, Labor are congratulating themselves on giving you back up to $268 a year—roughly 73c a day. That's 73c a day set against electricity prices, which are up 40 per cent; gas, up 40 per cent; and food prices, up 18 per cent. That is not 'keeping more of what you earn'; that is paying for a feast and getting served a toastie.</para>
<para>On paid parental leave, the coalition's stance is clear. We support paid parental leave and have no plans to change the current scheme. The debate is not about whether families should receive it; the debate is about flexibility and choice. Labor tells families they are getting six months of leave from 1 July. What Labor doesn't tell them is that, in a two-parent household, four weeks are reserved on a 'use it or lose it' basis. The primary carer can generally access 22 weeks, not 26. If the other parent cannot take those four weeks, the family does not get them. They are lost. Families hear '26 weeks', but many will only see 22.</para>
<para>Every family is different. They have different work arrangements, different finances and different caring responsibilities. In my electorate, the second parent is often the farmer midseeding or the shift worker on a roster. These are not jobs from which you can just take four weeks off because a scheme designed in Canberra said so.</para>
<para>When the leave runs out, families in Grey meet the next problem: the worst access to child care in Australia, where only two in three children can get a place. The coalition's approach is simple: we will trust families and restore choice. Parents, not politicians, know what is best for their children, and government should support the choices families make, not dictate arrangements made by Labor.</para>
<para>This House is being asked to congratulate a government for making Australians poorer. I will not do it.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:24</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ROB MITCHELL</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
    <electorate>McEwen</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It is important that we put this stuff on the record. It's important that we note from the last election that the coalition of the Liberals and the Nationals, and their new bedfellows, One Nation, wanted to go to an election promoting higher taxes for working Australians. They wanted to go against pay rises for minimum wage workers. They actually wanted to make things tougher. And now, as we stand here this week, we hear the latest from the potential deputy prime minister of a Liberal-National-One Nation government, the member for New England, about how they've got to remove superannuation. This is from the party who came into this place under Treasurer Hockey and said: 'The Age of Entitlement is over.' There would be no aged pension for young people. So all these young people sitting up there in the gallery would be subject to having no aged pension when they're older because this lot wanted to get rid of it.</para>
<para>We brought in compulsory superannuation for one reason: to make sure that when people got older they would have the opportunity to have dignity in their retirement and make sure they had money there to be able to sustain themselves as Australians live longer. They live longer because we've got a better Medicare system, a system that actually supports people. It doesn't matter about your wealth or your postcode, as long as you've got your Medicare card, you can get the support you need.</para>
<para>We've been bringing in tax cuts every year to make sure we help people who need help the most, because a lot of people, no matter how hard you work in some jobs, are not going to get paid a lot of money. That's just a simple fact. If we all got paid $1 million a week, which is about where they think people should be, inflation would be through the roof.</para>
<para>When we came into government, inflation was over six per cent and rising, and we had interest rates rising—and we've been trying to pull them back. We've been working very hard to make sure that we're focusing on limiting the issues that people face through what's happening globally. And there is absolutely no shadow of a doubt that the global situation we face now is a lot harder than it was two years ago and four years ago.</para>
<para>Deputy Speaker Buchholz, you're only a young fella but I'm sure you can remember we had the nineties recession and the Asian crisis. These things happen. We used to get one economic shock every 10 years. Since COVID, we have had three economic shocks in four years. No wonder people are feeling hard done by. No wonder they're getting angry with the system. But this is a global situation that we are faced with, and it's a global situation we're dealing with—with the best possible way forward. It is when times are tough that you know you can rely on a Labor government to actually help families out, whether it's through superannuation, tax cuts or an instant asset write-off. Now, with taxation, you can have your tax done and deduct $1,000 without needing receipts. They sit there and scoff at that and say, 'Oh, that's not important.' I'll tell you what. To a lot of people who are working to just put food on the table and pay the bills, it's very helpful. It's very helpful to be able to go in and say, 'Here's my tax,' get it done, get your refund and go on and live your life comfortably.</para>
<para>It's so important, when we talk about looking after Australians, that we look after those who really need the support the most. We've been dealing with issues in relation to superannuation. How many times have we heard it, over and over, that big businesses—backed by that lot over there—shut their doors and walk away, and the workforce who are out there every day putting their labour on the line, building that business up and getting out the products that are needed come home to say, 'Oh, the boss hasn't been paying me super.' These people are not only out of work and struggling in a situation where we've got low unemployment but they then find out they haven't had their super paid for six months or two years. That impacts them not only now but into the future.</para>
<para>We had that Liberal government for nine years, and there seems to be a black hole of memory in those opposite. That nine years in government returned some of the worst economic performances ever seen. We all remember them standing up here going, 'Yes, we're going to deliver a budget surplus each and every year we're in government.' And how did they go? Zero for nine—not one. They were going to pay off the debt. What did they do? They doubled the debt, nearly tripled it before COVID, and then had an influx of spending on COVID.</para>
<para>We've been returning money, back in, to pay out that debt. We've delivered budget surpluses and we've delivered cost-of-living relief for every single Australian. We know people are doing it tough. We know that globally we're facing some of the worst conditions we've ever seen, but we're not shying away from it. Every day, we are trying to do things that help people get through. Because it is so important that we help people that need the help the most, we're not sitting there at the big end of town flying around on billionaires' jets; we're actually out there helping the people that drive this country.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REBELLO</name>
    <name.id>316547</name.id>
    <electorate>McPherson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This motion is yet another motion that's moved by a member of the government asking us to congratulate this government for making Australians' lives poorer. We've got another self-congratulating motion, and this time it focuses on the government's delivery of what they refer to as a tax cut of up to $268 for over 14 million Australians. For context, it's a tax cut of about $5.15 every week. There are people in the gallery here today, many of whom would have seen this and heard about it through the media.</para>
<para>What those on this side of the House are trying to say is at odds with what the previous member said, which was that our view is that tax cuts are not important. That's not what we're saying. We're saying that tax cuts of $268, or $5.15 every week, are not helping Australians when, structurally, we're having to pay more because of inflation and we're having to pay more because of a government that has lost control of our economy, which means our prices are rising on everything across the board. Ultimately, the effect of a $5.15 tax cut on Australians is very much watered down. That is the argument of those on this side of the parliament. We are seeking meaningful tax reform. We're seeking meaningful lower taxes that improve Australians' long-term ability to keep more of what they earn. That's the difference between the ideology of those on this side of the House and those in government.</para>
<para>The previous speaker said, 'When times are tough, you can rely on a Labor government to help out.' Times are tough. We've got the member for Casey at the front table, and I know that he hears this all the time from constituents in his electorate. I hear this all the time from people in my electorate. Times are really tough. They're tough for people who are trying to get into their first home. They're tough for people who are just trying to run a business. They're tough for people who have decided to, on the back of their own initiative, start their business or start and invest in something and make a better life for them and for their kids.</para>
<para>Times are tough for all of those people, but at the end of the day the government is not making their lives easier. In fact, we're consistently getting people finding it even harder not just to do business in Australia but to live, to work and to run a household. So I think it's hypocritical for the member opposite to say that, when times are tough, you can rely on a Labor government to help, because the actions do speak louder than words. It's very clear what the government is trying to do. They're treating Australians for mugs. They think that Australians can't see this. They think that, if we give you a little bit here and then we take a lot more from the other hand, we're going to be able to get re-elected. Australians can see right through that.</para>
<para>At a time when we are on our knees as a country and Australians are really struggling to get ahead, you would think that any rational government would say: 'Okay, we get it. There are issues here. There are issues with how the economy is running. We need to start reining in how much we're spending. We need to have an upfront conversation with the Australian people,' and say, 'There are some tough decisions that are going to be made, but we're doing them for a reason: to make your life easier.' They're not saying that. They're not doing those things. They're wanting the short-term sugar hits that sound good in announcements and sound good in press releases, but they're making Australia go backwards and they're making Australians go backwards, and that is problematic.</para>
<para>It's the same thing with the other policy in this motion, a 4.75 per cent increase to the minimum wage. We have nothing against making sure that Australians are adequately and fairly remunerated for the work that they do. We have nothing against that; in fact, we support that. But it means nothing if that wage increase is eaten away by inflation. It means nothing if real wages in this country continue to go down. Again, we've got a situation where the government is handing Australians something with one hand and taking away a hell of a lot more with the other. So, yet again, we have another self-congratulating motion from this government that is without basis. And while we sit here or stand here and debate this, Australians continue to see their quality of life going down. They continue to see a situation where we are not improving, we're not growing as a country and Australians are worse off.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:35</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KARA COOK</name>
    <name.id>316537</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Deputy Speaker, if you want to know what supporting Australians looks like, you can look at what has changed since 1 July. Workers are earning more, Australians are paying less tax, super is being paid on payday, and parents are getting more time with their babies and getting super while they are on paid parental leave. In my community of Bonner, more than 20,000 people have now walked through the doors of not one but two Medicare urgent care clinics, which Labor has now made a permanent part of Medicare.</para>
<para>These are not abstract policy announcements. They are changes that people can actually see in their everyday lives. In Bonner more than 83,000 people are employed. They are the people getting up early, going to work, raising families, running businesses and keeping our community moving. Labor believes that if you work hard you deserve to be rewarded for it. That is why, from 1 July, award wages increased by 4.75 per cent. The national minimum wage is now more than $1,000 a week. This is the first time that has ever happened. That matters to the retail worker in my community in Carindale. It matters to the hospitality worker finishing a late shift down in Mansfield, and it matters to the cleaners, the early childhood educators and the aged-care workers, who get up early every single day to look after someone else's family. These are real workers in my community, and they deserve a government that backs them every single day.</para>
<para>Since 1 July, payday super has commenced. Super is not a gift from your employer; it is your money. You earned it. And now, instead of taking months to be paid into your super account, contributions are being made alongside your pay. That means your super can start earning for your retirement sooner. It also makes it easier for workers to see what they are actually receiving and what they're entitled to. For a young worker in Bonner, that might seem like a small change today, but over a working life it can make a really big difference.</para>
<para>Then there is tax. From 1 July more than 14 million Australians received another tax cut. That includes millions of working Australians in Queensland. And we are making tax time simpler, too, with a new $1,000 deduction for eligible work related expenses, without the need to keep receipts for that deduction. These measures are about one simple principle: when you work hard for your money you should be able to earn more and keep more of what you earn.</para>
<para>Supporting Australians is also about supporting families. Bonner is home to more than 45,000 families. Almost 22,000 are couple families with children, and nearly 6,800 are single-parent families. So I know how important it is for families to have support when they need it most. Since 1 July, paid parental leave has expanded to six months, and, for the first time ever, superannuation is being paid on paid parental leave. That is a really important reform that will make a genuine difference to people in my community, because taking time out of paid work to care for a new baby should not mean taking time out of building your retirement. And we know that, historically, that penalty has disproportionately fallen on women. Labor is changing that.</para>
<para>But perhaps nowhere is the difference more visible in my community than when it comes to Medicare. Before I was elected, Bonner had no Medicare urgent care clinics providing local services. Now we have not one but two. The Carina-Carindale and the Capalaba Medicare urgent care clinics are open seven days a week with no appointment needed and no out-of-pocket cost. More than 20,000 people have now walked through their doors in my community. Think about that: more than 20,000 people in my community have been able to get urgent medical care without having to pay one cent. A sick child, a nasty infection, a sprained ankle or what we had in my house last week—a bike fall and a sore wrist—those people can now get care close to home for free. That is Medicare working, and Labor has made sure that these are not going anywhere. They are now a permanent part of Medicare.</para>
<para>This is what supporting Australians looks like. It is higher pay. It is more urgent-care clinics where we need them most. It's super paid on payday and it's a tax cut for millions of Australians. We know that there's more to do, but we are delivering for all Australians.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to oppose this motion, because Australians deserve the whole story, not the parts that the Albanese Labor government wants you to hear. Labor wants Australians to look at what it gives, but Australians need to look at what Labor takes through inflation, bracket creep and the rising cost of living. That is the sleight of hand of this motion. A government cannot keep taking more from the pockets of hardworking families and then expect applause when it decides to give a small fraction back.</para>
<para>Award wages rose 4.75 per cent, and the national minimum wage rose just over $1,000 per week. The coalition agrees that Australians should earn more and have more at the end of the week in their back pocket, but wage growth alone is not a cost-of-living strategy. When Labor drives inflation and housing costs continue to climb, lifting wages without addressing the underlying economic pressures only shifts the burden onto struggling small businesses and risks feeding further price increases. Real relief comes from backing the cost of living at its core, not just chasing higher numbers on the payslip that are instantly wiped out at the supermarket checkout.</para>
<para>What about the superannuation changes? Prime Minister Albanese loves to talk about superannuation as a national asset to be leveraged for nation-building projects, but let's be clear: superannuation is not a government piggy bank to fund policy agendas. It belongs to the Australian workers who have earnt it.</para>
<para>But the real test of this motion is tax. The government boasts about delivering a cut of up to $268, but for the average worker that amounts to just $5 a week. That money barely lands in the bank and has been completely swallowed up by bracket creep, by soaring energy bills, by rising rent and expensive groceries. The bigger story is what happens beyond this year. According to the independent Parliamentary Budget Office, personal income tax receipts are projected to surge from 12.6 per cent to 14.7 per cent of our entire economy over the next decade. And what is driving that? It is bracket creep. It is the ultimate stealth tax when. When inflation forces wages up just so families can tread water even though they're not better off in real terms, that system drags them into higher brackets, and that means a bigger tax. Australians are working harder, but this government is pocketing the difference. This is not tax reform. It's a pittance in a broken system that continues to siphon more from working Australians every week.</para>
<para>The coalition's tax-back guarantee addresses this fundamental problem at its source by indexing tax thresholds, directly linking to inflation. It will protect around 85 per cent of income earners from bracket creep, ensuring that a pay rise intended to keep a family on pace with the cost of living does not push them into the higher tax bracket.</para>
<para>Paid parental leave is where the question of family choice becomes impossible to ignore. The coalition supports paid parental leave. We support Australian families. But crucial to our vision is that we must trust families to make their own choices. This government announced that families get 26 weeks of leave, but look at the fine print. In a partnered family, 20 days are strictly set aside for the second parent. If that parent cannot or does not take them, the family cannot simply pass those days to the primary carer. In practice, to access the full 130 days, both parents must be eligible and must each claim their specific share. It is six months in the headline but four weeks reserved in the fine print. Parents know what works best for their own households. The government should trust parents' judgement rather than penalising them with rigid bureaucratic conditions.</para>
<para>Australians need a government that helps them get ahead, not one that gives with one hand while reaching for their wallet with the other. They do not need a government that celebrates when it gives while deliberately ignoring what it takes. They need lower taxes, have genuine choice and a government that stops claiming credit for returning a tiny fraction of what Australians have already earned.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JORDAN-BAIRD</name>
    <name.id>316021</name.id>
    <electorate>Gorton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Let me tell you a little bit about the community I'm really proud to represent, the electorate of Gorton in Melbourne's western suburbs. We are home to established communities like in Keilor, Deer Park and Taylors Lakes, where schools, businesses, childcare centres and community organisations have flourished for a very long time. We are also home to the western growth corridor. These are communities being built almost from scratch. New streets, new parks, new schools and new shops are appearing alongside new homes. The Victorian government's planning framework envisaged Fraser Rise and Deanside, ultimately supporting 20,000 homes and 14,000 jobs. In Rockbank, houses are appearing where there were paddocks only a few years ago. In Aintree you'll find streets full of young families—people who have bought their first home, unpacked their boxes and are starting to put down roots. You'll also find in Deanside and Fraser Rise that behind every one of those new houses is a family, a family building a home and building their future, hard-working Aussies who are working hard for the Australian dream but who are doing it tough.</para>
<para>There is something simple that Australians expect. If you work hard, you should be able to get ahead, you should earn a decent wage, you should be able to keep more of what you earn, and, after a lifetime of work, you should be able to retire with dignity and security. That idea, the idea of having a fair go, is at the heart of who we are as Australians, and it is exactly these values and the families like those in my community which drove our 1 July changes, which the Albanese Labor government introduced just over a month ago. 1 July this year was a really big day because from 1 July we have delivered practical reforms that make a real difference. That day serves as the day that the Albanese Labor government recognised the role that young people play in today's Australia.</para>
<para>I'm a proud millennial, and now millennials and gen Z make up around two-thirds of Australian taxpayers, and our tax system should reflect that. For 13.3 million Australian taxpayers, 1 July this year meant another tax cut, with the $250 working Australians tax offset. That's $250 off working Australians tax bills permanently as well as a $1,000 instant tax deduction without receipts. It has increased the effective tax-free threshold for workers by $1,785. All of this means that the average worker is benefiting by up to $3,000, with past payday super. The ATO estimates that $5.2 billion in super went unpaid in 2021-22. That's $100 million every week that workers earned but never received. That's not right.</para>
<para>Workers deserve to get paid their full entitlements, and Australians deserve to retire with confidence and with financial security. That's why we've also seen a 4.75 per cent increase to the minimum wage, marking the first time the national minimum wage is above $1,000 a week. This is because Aussies who work hard deserve to get ahead. For families trying to get ahead while juggling it all, paid parental leave is absolutely invaluable. I've seen the value of paid parental leave and the effect it has for women and families in my own life, like my sister Emily and my beautiful nephew, Jamie. I'm so proud that we're giving those same opportunities to families across Australia.</para>
<para>Since 1 July this year, we have expanded government paid parental leave to 130 days. This makes a real difference to the entire household, because it means both parents have access to paid parental leave, giving families freedom of choice and that precious time spent with your little one. For the first time, parents are being paid super on top of Commonwealth funded paid parental leave—that is huge.</para>
<para>Our 1 July changes mean something real for Australians in my community and across the country. We're backing the next generation of Aussies, helping Aussies earn more, keep more of what they earn and retire with more as well, because this is what our communities deserve and this is what Australians deserve.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONAGHAN</name>
    <name.id>279991</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm pleased to rise to speak to this motion. In fact, when I read it, I actually laughed out loud. I didn't realise that the member for Moreton had such a good sense of humour. It's either that or she's quite deluded as to how well she thinks that Labor is dealing with the economy right now. While they pat themselves on the back over there for a $268 tax cut—an average of about $45 a week before tax—they completely ignore three key and indisputable facts.</para>
<para>The first is that this Labor government is now officially the highest taxing government in Australian history, so well done to them for that remarkable milestone. I'm sure that the Australian people won't forget it coming up to the next election. The second is that national debt under this government has reached over $1 trillion for the first time in Australian history. The third is that almost every fiscal decision this government has made over the past four years has only added to homegrown inflation, rendering the paltry figures meaningless when compared to the year prior.</para>
<para>We know that Australia is in a per capita recession and it's of this government's making. Every dollar an Australian makes is buying less than it did last year. Unfortunately, some of the policies being celebrated across that side right now are going to add more pain to Australian people. GDP per person has declined in 10 quarters under Labor. It declined again in the most recent quarter. Australia has experienced its longest household recession in history. There are a lot of first times here this morning.</para>
<para>According to the ACCC, groceries are up over 25 per cent since 2022. Electricity is up 38 per cent over that same period. It's no wonder that some of our senior citizens are choosing not to put the air conditioner on in summer or the heater on in winter. Rent is up 34 per cent. Insurance costs are out of control. But don't worry; those across the floor will give you a thousand-dollar instant tax deduction without proof of receipts, which is cold comfort for the thousands of dollars that Australians are worse off due to rampant inflation.</para>
<para>Then there are small-business insolvencies. I talk to business owners every single day of the week. In regional Australia, small businesses are our lifeblood. They not only provide the majority of our goods and services; they employ our communities, they train our young people and they keep us afloat. In New South Wales, more than 15,600 businesses have entered insolvency in the past three years. Across the country, 2025 was the worst year on record for business closures. I've met with those people. They're not just businesses closing; they're mums and dads. There are hard workers out there who have put it all on the line and, because of the policies of this government, have lost it all.</para>
<para>At every mobile office and forum I hold, small businesses are telling me it's never been harder and they're barely keeping their heads above water, and many are considering closing within the next 12 months. When I ask them about the effect the new wage increases would have on their businesses, the answer is consistent: 'We'll have to let somebody go. We just can't afford it.' It's either that or increase their price, and we know that their customers can't afford to pay any more.</para>
<para>We on this side of the floor are serious about getting the economy moving, rewarding hard work and supporting our business communities. We'll axe these government policies that have made it so, so difficult for average punters and business owners out there.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today in strong support of this motion, because the changes that came into effect on 1 July are about something very simple: helping Australians earn more, keep more of what they earn and retire with more. These are not abstract policy changes; they are practical changes that make a real difference to household budgets, pay packets, superannuation balances and financial security families can build for the future.</para>
<para>Across my electorate of Petrie, I speak with families who are working hard, raising kids, paying off their mortgages or paying rent, filling up their car and doing everything they can to get ahead. People judge governments by whether the decisions we make actually make an improvement on their lives. That is exactly what these changes are about: delivering real change for Australians.</para>
<para>From 1 July, the minimum wage increased by 4.75 per cent. For the first time, the national minimum wage is now above $1,000 a week. For someone working full time on minimum wage, that means more money coming through the door every week and a little more room in the family budget for when the electricity bill arrives, when kids need something for school or when it's time to do the weekly grocery shop. Labor believes that if you work hard, you should be able to get ahead, and that means making sure wages move in the right direction.</para>
<para>But earning more is only part of the story. We also want Australians to keep more of what they earn. That is why more than 14 million Australian taxpayers are receiving another tax cut of up to $268. From this financial year, Australians can also claim the new $1,000 instant tax deduction without having to keep receipts for every eligible expense covered by that deduction. For working people, that means a simpler tax system and more money staying in their pocket. Cost-of-living relief needs to be practical, and it needs to reach people where they actually feel it: in their wages, in their tax bill and in their weekly household budget.</para>
<para>We're also thinking about Australia's financial security not just for today but for decades into the future. Payday Super is an important part of that. Superannuation is money workers have earned, and Australians should not have to wait months for that money to reach their super account. Under these reforms, contributions will be made more frequently and earlier, giving millions of Australians more time for their retirement savings to grow. The difference might look small from one payday to the next, but across the entire working life it can make a significant difference.</para>
<para>I'm particularly proud of the changes to paid parental leave. Government paid parental leave is now expanded to 130 days, giving parents more time with their new baby during the most important periods of their lives. For the first time, parents receiving Commonwealth paid parental leave will also receive superannuation contributions. For too long, taking time out of the workforce to care for a child could also mean missing out on retirement savings. Because women still take on the majority of parental leave, they have disproportionately carried that cost. Caring for a newborn should not come with a penalty in retirement, and paying super on paid parental leave is addressing that.</para>
<para>Taken together, these reforms tell a very clear story about the priorities of this government: higher wages, lower taxes, stronger superannuation, better paid parental leave and greater financial security for Australian families. Each measure matters individually, but together they are about making sure Australians can earn more today, keep more of what they earn and build a stronger retirement for tomorrow.</para>
<para>There's always more work to do. Nobody is pretending that one tax cut, one wage increase or one policy change will remove every pressure facing Australian households. But these measures are delivering real change. They mean more money in people's pay packets, more money staying in their pockets, more support for parents when they welcome a new child and more money being invested into Australians' retirement. That is the direction I want our country to keep moving in, and it is what I will keep fighting for as the member for Petrie: better wages, more secure jobs, stronger retirement incomes and practical cost-of-living relief that makes a genuine difference. Australians work hard for what they earn, and they deserve a government that works just as hard to help them get ahead. I proudly support this motion.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CALDWELL</name>
    <name.id>306489</name.id>
    <electorate>Fadden</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It gives me great pleasure to rise today to speak in relation to this motion, just to give people a little bit more context to exactly what Labor are trying to swindle them with in relation to the terms of this motion. They talk about Australians earning more and keeping more of what they earn. You might have heard that before. It was a tagline that they used before the last election. They've now added to it 'and retire with more'. But the problem is this. This Labor government has never been strong on accounting. What they're doing is absolutely failing to account for the everyday expenses that Australians are suffering under this Labor government.</para>
<para>It is no accident that they're using words like 'financial hardship'. It's no accident that people are experiencing a housing crisis. It's no accident that people are experiencing a cost-of-living crisis. All of these things are on the other side of the equation from what has been cherry-picked for this motion this morning. I think the member for Petrie would genuinely like to see people get more money in their pay packets. That is an admirable objective and something that we all support. But what we don't support is that the rate of costs that Australians are going through is exceeding any one of those measures of increases that they are seeing in their pay packet. This is like doing a profit and loss and only counting the top part. What Labor want you to believe is that there are no expenses that are exceeding your income.</para>
<para>I have a bit of a truth bomb for the Labor members here today. The standard of living in Australia has fallen through the floor. It has dropped faster and more dramatically than in any other advanced economy. What we've seen under this Labor government over four years is 15 interest rate rises. We've seen inflation that is completely out of control. It's still hovering around 3.8 per cent, notwithstanding the fact that the Reserve Bank would like to see it between two and three per cent. Every single Australian, when they go to the grocery store, is getting less and less in their basket of goods for the same amount of money.</para>
<para>Our country needs to change course or our standard of living will continue to fall through the floor. That is why the coalition has a plan to fix the economy and protect Australians' way of life. That is exactly what they deserve. What they don't deserve are the shocking numbers we've seen under this Labor government over the last four years, where electricity has gone up by 39 per cent. Rent has gone up 24 per cent. Education and health expenses have gone up by more than 20 per cent. This is a completely unsustainable financial pathway for many Australians. We recognise that things must be done differently. That's why we say that Australians deserve lower taxes. That's why we say Australians deserve lower power prices. That's why we say we should tie migration to the number of houses we can actually deliver in the economy. It's why we must put Australians first in every decision of government. Nothing less will suffice.</para>
<para>One of the key platforms that we have in our plan is to lower taxes, to axe Labor's taxes—the changes to capital gains tax, the changes to negative gearing and the minimum 30 per cent tax on trusts.</para>
<para>One thing that we are going to do is end Labor's sneaky bracket creep tax that keeps clawing away more and more of your pay rises each year by pushing you into higher tax brackets. What we are going to do is index those tax brackets. From 2028-29 we will index the bottom two income tax thresholds to inflation to fully protect around 85 per cent of taxpayers from bracket creep. That would deliver around $250 in tax relief in the first year, growing to more than $1,000 by year 4. This is a plan with a united coalition that will actually get this country back to the place that it deserves to be—the leader of the pack, not the bottom of the pack.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I believe the member for Pearce would like to present a copy of a speech for incorporation into the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 6 November 2025.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ROBERTS</name>
    <name.id>157125</name.id>
    <electorate>Pearce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para> () (): <inline font-style="italic">The incorporated speech reads as follows—</inline></para>
<para>Thank you, Deputy Speaker</para>
<para>I would like to support this motion acknowledging the Albanese Labor government's reforms to help Australians earn more, keep more of what they earn and retire with more.</para>
<para>For people across Pearce, the cost of living is not an abstract concern. It is reflected in the weekly grocery bill, the mortgage or rent payment, electricity costs, fuel, school expenses, medical appointments and childcare.</para>
<para>Australians are working hard and doing the right thing. They deserve a government that recognises that effort and delivers practical support. The measures that came into effect on 1 July do exactly that.</para>
<para>The first is payday superannuation.</para>
<para>Under these reforms, employers are required to pay superannuation contributions at the same time as wages, rather than waiting until the end of the quarter. This gives workers greater visibility over their retirement savings and ensures that their contributions begin working for them sooner.</para>
<para>For many Australians, superannuation is one of their most important long-term assets. Yet too many workers have experienced delays, errors or unpaid superannuation.</para>
<para>Payday super will help address those problems. It means a young worker beginning their first job can see their super building from the outset. It means a parent returning to work can have greater confidence that their retirement savings are being maintained.</para>
<para>These contributions may seem small one payday at a time, but over a working life they can make a substantial difference. That is why payday super is not merely an administrative change. It is a reform that will help millions of Australians retire with more.</para>
<para>The second measure is a 4.75 per cent increase to modern award wages. This supports workers in industries such as retail, hospitality, care, cleaning, administration and transport—people who are often particularly exposed to rising household costs.</para>
<para>The national minimum wage is now above $1,000 a week, at $1,004.90 per week or $26.44 an hour for a 38-hour week.</para>
<para>A worker on the minimum wage should not have to choose between paying an electricity bill and putting food on the table. Fair wage increases help workers meet those costs and support local economies, because people with more money in their pockets are better able to spend at local shops and businesses.</para>
<para>We also recognise the contribution of small and family businesses in Pearce. Responsible wage growth provides businesses with certainty while ensuring that workers receive a fair return for their labour.</para>
<para>The third measure is the expansion of Commonwealth paid parental leave to 130 days, equivalent to 26 weeks for parents taking leave over a five-day working week.</para>
<para>From July 2026, eligible parents will receive additional parental leave pay, with superannuation contributions paid on Commonwealth-funded parental leave for the first time.</para>
<para>This is an important reform for Australian families. Taking time away from paid employment to care for a new child should not result in a lasting financial penalty.</para>
<para>Parents face significant costs when raising a child, while household income can fall and superannuation contributions can pause. By extending paid parental leave and paying superannuation on that leave, the government is recognising the value of caring work and helping strengthen parents' long-term financial security.</para>
<para>The fourth set of measures will help Australians keep more of what they earn.</para>
<para>The new $1,000 instant tax deduction will make tax time simpler for eligible workers. It allows taxpayers to reduce their taxable income by up to $1,000 for work-related expenses without keeping receipts for that deduction.</para>
<para>This will reduce paperwork and provide workers with a simpler, more certain way to claim modest work-related costs.</para>
<para>The government is also delivering another tax cut of up to $268 for more than 14 million Australians. For households under pressure, that relief could help with groceries, bills, transport costs, school expenses or rent.</para>
<para>Taken together, these measures form a coherent plan from the Albanese Labor government.</para>
<para>They help Australians earn more through stronger wages, keep more through tax relief, maintain their retirement savings while caring for a child, and retire with more through superannuation paid on every payday.</para>
<para>For the people of Pearce, these reforms mean greater support for working households, more security for parents and stronger confidence in the future.</para>
<para>Our economy is strongest when work is properly rewarded, families are supported and Australians can approach retirement with dignity and confidence.</para>
<para>Thank you, Deputy Speaker</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Renewable Energy</title>
          <page.no>77</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
    <electorate>New England</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) condemns the Government for its continued rollout of renewable energy precincts in regional communities, including the New England Renewable Energy Zone and Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, without due regard for the impact on agriculture, landowners, community, infrastructure and the productive landscape;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) regional Australians are being asked to carry the burden of a policy that is driving up the cost of living, increasing pressure on electricity prices, and undermining reliable and affordable power for households, small businesses and industry; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the rollout of large-scale wind, solar, battery and transmission projects is desecrating rural landscapes, creating uninsurable properties, dividing communities, and imposing industrial-scale infrastructure across farms, towns and natural environments that have sustained regional Australia for generations;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the Government's approach amounts to the socialisation of private assets, where public money, public guarantees and publicly backed schemes are used to underwrite private renewable energy developments and transmission projects; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) intermittent power does not provide the affordable or reliable base load electricity needed to run a modern economy, and that the failure of intermittent generation is being masked by secretive capacity investment schemes and opaque market interventions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) further notes, with concern, the severe impact on small regional communities from the construction of renewable energy precincts, including the arrival of hundreds of temporary workers, demand for already limited housing, pressure on local roads, health services, schools, water, policing and emergency services, and disruption to community life;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) calls on the Government to immediately pause the rollout of renewable energy precincts where local communities have not been properly consulted and where the full economic, social, environmental and infrastructure costs have not been independently assessed; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(6) supports the establishment of a Royal Commission into the rollout of renewable energy precincts across regional Australia, including their effect on cost of living, energy reliability, private property rights, public expenditure, local infrastructure, community cohesion and the long-term future of regional landscapes.</para></quote>
<para>It's amazing. I read today that now the Greens in Tasmania have an issue with intermittent power, the swindle factory wind turbines, and they have joined with One Nation in their opposition to the wind towers because they kill one raptor per year per tower. And then the transmission lines are another mechanism that is killing the wildlife. So, the ecology and the environmental benefit of these are an absolute load of tripe. They are a swindle. They are there for the benefit of billionaires and overseas companies supported by secret capacity investment schemes.</para>
<para>That me moves on to another thing I read in the paper about the coalition. They're onto the case of the secret capacity investment schemes, and they've got major questions to ask. I've been asking those questions for years. What's it all about? They're an absolute rip off. How can you have a secret agreement with the taxpayers' money and then believe there's some virtue in it. Even in the budget papers, it's NFP—not for publication. For so long I've been saying 'look under the bonnet of this', and we now see the major mastheads in the media asking major questions because it is just so murky. It is just so sleazy. It is just so sneaky and it's causing so much hurt.</para>
<para>Now I can assure you that the intermittent power sector is quickly running out of friends. In our areas now they talk about 1,200 workers flying in and flying out, going to villages of 300 and 800 in another area. People are predominantly coming in from overseas. There are no police to look after them, no hospitals. How do you deal with the crime rates and issues like that? How do we manage it? But it doesn't matter because we're in regional Australia and the virtue of it is so people can say, 'I'm doing something about climate change.' You're not actually. You're just helping a select clique of people become incredibly wealthy, and you're totally naive in your process of doing that. There's no change to the weather because of this. It's just a massive change to people's bank balances as other people become poorer. Pensioners become poorer.</para>
<para>At Tomago the other day they came up with a $2.5 billion package. I'm fascinated by this. I went back and read what Neville Wran said. He used to be a genuine Labor Party member back in 1984, and he was talking about how good it was opening Eraring, a big coal-fired power station, and how the coal-fired power stations of the Hunter Valley had supported the opening of a new massive aluminium industry in Tomago. Now it's his own party closing it down. Unless you change the price of energy Tomago is gone. And when did it work really well? When it had coal-fired power. There were no support packages for Tomago when it had coal-fired power.</para>
<para>When we remove the secrecy of these agreements and capacity investment schemes—and One Nation will—they'll lose their legitimacy. When we see that something is not quite right, One Nation will take this to a royal commission. If the royal commissioner can come up with a brief that says there was corruption, then some of these people can trot off to jail, because that's what you do when you come up with dirty, sneaky little agreements; we're trying to work out how they got so much money, but at the time they wouldn't tell you. They won't tell you how much money they're dishing out to these people.</para>
<para>For us, it's quite obvious. We have seen what has happened to regional Australia with the transmission lines and the fields of photovoltaic black. When we look into those now, we find that all they're worried about is the value of what they've put on, not the efficacy with which it works. We're getting all the time breakdowns, wrong cabling, fires and areas with wind towers where they can't produce what their plate value said. One Nation has led the charge; now other people are joining, and there are no votes in this anymore. It is a deadset vote loser. If there's only one thing I get out of the swindling, intermittent power sector, it's this: every time Minister Bowen or someone from the Labor Party talks about it, your vote goes down, and our vote goes up.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is there a seconder?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Farley</name>
    <name.id>62329</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I represent Petrie in South-East Queensland. I do not pretend that my community has exactly the same experiences as a farmer hosting transmission infrastructure or a small regional town dealing with sudden construction workforce. Those impacts are real, and regional communities deserve to be listened to. But Australia's energy system does not stop at electorate boundaries. The electricity generated in regional Australia powers homes, hospitals and businesses right across the country. Its reliability and affordability matter just as much to the families in Redcliffe, Fitzgibbon, North Lakes and Deception Bay as they do to communities like New England or Central-West Orana. And we have to deal with the energy system we actually have.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Joyce</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The clock was not started for the Member for Petrie.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the honourable member. In continuation, I give the call to the member for Petrie. You've got an extra couple of minutes, now.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Fabulous. Thank you, Deputy Speaker, and thank you, Member for New England. Australia's coal-fired power stations are aging, breaking down, becoming more unreliable and retiring. For a decade, the former government, which the member for New England was a part of, delayed the investment needed to replace them. Twenty-four out of 28 coal-fired power stations brought forward their closure dates while the coalition was in office. And, just to remind you, the member for New England was a member of that coalition.</para>
<para>The question is not whether our electricity system changes; it is how we manage that change in the cheapest, most reliable and most responsible way. AEMO's 2026 Integrated System Plan is clear: renewable energy connected by upgraded networks, firmed by storage and backed up by gas is the cheapest pathway as coal retires. CSIRO's latest GenCost report also finds solar and onshore wind form the basis of the lowest-cost generation mix for Australia. That matters, because this motion claims renewable energy is driving power prices up. The evidence does not support this claim.</para>
<para>The Australian Energy Regulator's Default Market Offer 2026-27 is delivering lower prices in South-East Queensland. Standard residential prices are down 7.2 per cent, and time-of-use prices are down 10.7 per cent. Small business's reductions are larger again. The Australian Energy Market Commission has also warned that delays to renewable energy generation and transmission risk putting upward pressure on electricity costs. Pausing this transition is not a plan for cheaper power; it risks making the problem worse.</para>
<para>Supporting renewable energy does not mean giving developers a blank cheque or telling regional communities to simply put up with whatever change comes their way. If projects put pressure on housing, roads, health services or emergency services, that needs to be planned for.</para>
<para>Landholders deserve fair treatment, good information and genuine consultation, and developers should be held to proper standards. That is why this government has strengthened the Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner, supported by the Developer Rating Scheme, and established national guidelines for community engagement and benefit sharing around transmission projects. The answer to legitimate concerns is better consultation, stronger standards and fairer benefits; it is not stopping the infrastructure the country needs or debating the economic benefits of renewables, all while ageing coal generators continue to retire.</para>
<para>The member for New England also gives the impression that renewable energy and agriculture cannot coexist, but the department estimates that less than 0.1 per cent of agricultural land in the National Electricity Market jurisdictions would directly host renewable energy infrastructure under the relevant AEMO scenario. We also know that many landholders can continue agricultural production while receiving additional income from renewable projects. And I, for one, want to see additional income go to our farmers; they're the backbone of our country.</para>
<para>There's another part of this debate worth remembering. The member for New England has not always spoken about renewable energy the way he does in this motion. In 2017, he said renewable energy was 'an important part of the national energy mix', and then he celebrated that New England 'is leading the way in renewable energy production'. He was right then, and we are right now.</para>
<para>Regional Australia can be an energy powerhouse. It can attract investment, create jobs, provide new income streams for landholders and help power the nation. But those communities must be partners in the transition, not an afterthought. We can support regional communities and build renewable energy. We can protect agricultural land and modernise the grid. We can demand proper consultation and still get on with replacing ageing coal. What we cannot do—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the honourable member for her contribution. I give the call to the most honourable member for Farrer.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FARLEY</name>
    <name.id>62329</name.id>
    <electorate>Farrer</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>You cannot operate, manufacture, live or defend a nation with intermittent energy. You cannot run an electrical grid on intermittent energy. Europe proved that this summer. Ask any child; there is no fun in a flat battery. We are seeing superficial public displays of moral correctness and not-in-my-backyard attitudes that seek personal virtue: 'I will pollute and destroy your backyard. Who are you to challenge my virtuous intentions from my city based operations?' CO2 does not distinguish between a coal-fired power plant, a concrete plant and a steel mill. The only distinction is that one is honest about its footprint while the other markets its footprint as virtue seeking.</para>
<para>This is irresponsible investment for future generations. We've got hundreds of thousands of hectares of black solar panels across prime agricultural land. Some of these installations have arrived with PFAS chemicals that will pollute that land forever. Agricultural land and, more importantly, in some areas, major irrigated agricultural land will be lost to this nonsense.</para>
<para>Solar panels are actually interfering with the natural ecology of the entomology and the life cycles of our farming operations. They're not allowing frost to reach the soil to eliminate overwintering of pest insects. They're even going further. Tasmania is identified already as only having 500 pairs of wedge-tailed eagles. To date, we've had 321 reported incidences, of which 271 have killed wedge-tailed eagles. To put that in perspective, we can't even push past a thousand pairs in Australia. They're the numbers we know, not the numbers we don't know.</para>
<para>It's positioning us not to be internationally competitive, priced with electricity. It's got a limited operational life. It is not an intergenerational investment. When you study the prospectuses, it's also got built-in price inflation. More importantly, the liability of this infrastructure—where does it stay? It's not socialised. It stays with the landholder. It stays within the regional communities. Just have a look at the Wellington solar fire and the travesty behind that.</para>
<para>But you'd have to ask yourself while all this is going on and as the world advances past us: why is Australia a laggard in exploring nuclear energy? All we're doing at the moment is building a system of an imperfect grid to allow the system to be rorted. We're actually building another Enron—those that convert their solar energy into batteries and wait for the price to spike at night, then deliver to the grid. Again, this is Enron version 2.0, coming to Australia.</para>
<para>The institutional spin frames the issue as a storage problem we've got with our electrical grid. It's more than that; it's the system itself. The system is revealing that the fundamental is in the design flaw. We're delivering the next generation of Australians a liability—a liability that they can't operate with, they can't grow with and they can't manufacture with. More importantly, they will be responsible for dissembling and burying non-recyclable products.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next day of sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Aged Care</title>
          <page.no>79</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VIOLI</name>
    <name.id>300147</name.id>
    <electorate>Casey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the My Aged Care system is broken, causing widespread hardship and distress for ageing Australians;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing recently confirmed that the current wait time for an older person of standard priority for a Support at Home package is between 300 to 330 days;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) a recent report by KPMG found that 96,709 people are still waiting in the National Priority System for a Home Care Package at their approved level; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) residents in rural and regional parts of Australia are finding that once they finally get services approved, there are no available service providers to deliver the required supports; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) requires the Minister for Health and Ageing to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) immediately explain and address the ongoing and increasing delays with the My Aged Care and Support at Home programs; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) outline what specific measures the Government will take to address provider scarcity and workforce issues in outer-metropolitan and regional electorates, where approved funding is currently failing to translate into actual bedside care and support at home.</para></quote>
<para>On a daily basis, my office receives call after call from residents and their families who are at breaking point because of the My Aged Care system. Labor promised four years ago a simpler, fairer and more responsive aged-care system. Four years on, our older Australians are waiting longer, receiving less care and, in many cases, dying before help arrives.</para>
<para>The coalition's position is simple: if an older Australian has been assessed as needing care, they should receive the care that they have been assessed as needing—not a fraction of it, not after months of waiting and certainly not after they have died. As it stands, there are over 100,000 older Australians waiting for a Support at Home package on the national priority system. The median wait times for the Support at Home package have blown out to more than 10 months, compared with between 30 and 90 days under the coalition.</para>
<para>But this is about so much more than numbers; it's about people, and it's about lives. It's about Australians who have worked their entire lives, paid their taxes and contributed to this country and who are dying while their name sits on a waitlist. It's about the families and carers carrying the burden of care alone because the government system is failing.</para>
<para>Don't take my word for it; I want to read from an article in my local newspaper written by Oliver Winn. The article begins:</para>
<quote><para class="block">A Warburton man with stage four cancer and three months to live was given a six-month wait time for aged care payments.</para></quote>
<para>Three months to live—a six-month wait time under this government. It continues:</para>
<quote><para class="block">79-year-old Tony … fears he will die from stomach cancer before getting access to $59,660 for domestic and personal care services.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Rostron was diagnosed with stomach cancer in October last year and after exhausting all treatment options, he was given three months to live.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">He was assessed for a Level One package before being reassessed to Level Seven, which gave him access to $59,660 for domestic and personal care services.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">But the package was then designated medium priority …</para></quote>
<para>Stomach cancer and three months to live—and this government have said that is of medium priority, with an estimated wait time of six to seven months. Could you be more out of touch than the Prime Minister of this country and the minister, who say stomach cancer and three months to live is of a medium priority? In his own words, Mr Rostron said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">"I could die the next day," …</para></quote>
<para>The reality is that almost 5,000 older Australians died in 2024 and 2025 while in priority waitlists for their home-care package. When people are dying before the system delivers the care they have been assessed as needing, there is no longer an administrative failure. It is a policy failure overseen by this prime minister.</para>
<para>The other issue that has been raised with my office is the inability to find services. Tom from Gruyere is up for reassessment and he's been waiting for nine months. He's 91 and needs assistance. My Aged Care says there is no occupational therapist available to come out. Now, my office has been contacted by numerous residents who have been given a list of providers by My Aged Care and who have taken on the task of calling them, but they've been told there are no services available in the Dandenongs or Healesville or Warburton. Elderly Australians are being told the books are closed. Providers don't have funding or they don't serve particular areas. It is an absolute disgrace and shame that the Labor government and Anthony Albanese are treating Australians like this. The elderly should not have to fight the system to get the care that they have been assessed as needing. It is common decency. It is a basic right. This government continues to fail these older Australians.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Pike</name>
    <name.id>300120</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOLZBERGER</name>
    <name.id>88411</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The first thing I'd say to the member for Casey is that all of us, as local members, hear stories from constituents about what's happening in aged care. It is truly heartbreaking to hear of what people are battling in a time where they are at their most vulnerable. I know that the Minister for Aged Care has asked for those sorts of stories to go to him directly, because we want to do what we can to help people. So I encourage the member for Casey to send that through.</para>
<para>But let's remember. When we look at the motion that he's moved saying that the My Aged Care system is broken, I think it just shows a spectacular lack of self-reflection to call this a broken aged care system when the very system which the now opposition presided over was summed up in a report by the royal commission called <inline font-style="italic">Neglect</inline>. And so, with all of the difficulties that exist in the system today, they really do pale in comparison to the sort of problems that I've been dealing with over the years with people in the community—people that really should have been treated a lot better.</para>
<para>I also remind the member for Casey that the system that we have in place now was a system negotiated in good faith with the opposition and supported by the opposition. So, when the opposition criticises this system, they are actually criticising a system which they have supported but are now using as an opportunity to politicise for their own personal reasons.</para>
<para>There are also gross misrepresentations going on around there. They managed to put it in writing in their motion about median wait times. But, if you actually look at the median wait times now, you see that, for the standard priority, it's now down to seven or eight months 10 to 11 months as it was just in November last year. Again, I know from personal experience—I was elected only last year, but I've been working in the community for a long time—that sometimes it would take people up to a year just to get an assessment, let alone actually get approved for a package and end up on the waiting list. And now those assessment times have come down to around a month or below. And so I think that what we have seen is that we were given a broken system, we worked with the opposition to try to fix this broken system and now we've got an opposition that wants to politicise it even though we are clearly making gains, even though we are clearly seeing the wait times down for packages and the wait times really coming down for assessment.</para>
<para>The government doesn't pretend this system is perfect; in fact, we've said that we are open to change. Just recently, we made a massively significant change in—I'm going to forget the categories, but I think it's these—independent living, where showering, continence care and wound management attracted a co-payment for people newly coming onto the to the Support at Home program. We listened to the community, and we moved that into clinical care, where people can get those essential services without having to attract a co-payment. I can't think of any clearer example than that to show the government's willingness to listen and to make changes. I'd encourage the opposition: rather than making those political points in here and using an individual's plight to score some cheap point, continue to work with the government, continue to improve the system and continue to advocate for the individuals that we all come across as local members.</para>
<para>I just finish up by saying that I think there needs to be some comprehension of the scale of the problem, which gets lost in all of this. These figures aren't exact, of course, but something like 15,000 Australians turned 80 in 2011. Next year, 90,000 Australians are turning 80. We have to build a new residential aged-care facility every three days in Australia for the next 20 years to meet the demand that's out there. I think the scale of this problem is reflected in the willingness of the government to invest $47 billion this year, to listen, to make the changes and to give people the care that they have thoroughly deserved and worked hard for.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PIKE</name>
    <name.id>300120</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>After a lifetime of working, raising families, paying taxes and contributing to our communities, older Australians should be able to expect that, when they need help, help will be there for them. But today, too many Australians are finding that the aged-care system is broken, and it is causing real hardship, distress and uncertainty for aging Australians and their families. It's not just about statistics and a government report; it's about people who are trying to remain independent in their own homes but cannot get the support that they've been assessed as needing. It's about families who are desperately trying to navigate a very complicated system while watching their parents, grandparents or loved ones struggle.</para>
<para>The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing has recently confirmed that an older person assessed as a standard priority for a Support at Home package is currently waiting between 300 and 330 days—almost a year. For someone who is healthy and independent, 300 days might not sound like that long of a time, but for an 80- or 90-year-old who cannot safely shower without assistance, who struggles to prepare meals or who is at risk at falling, who needs help simply to remain living independently, 300 days is an eternity.</para>
<para>A recent KPMG report found that almost 100,000 Australians who have already been assessed as needing a particular level of care are still waiting for that care to become available. These people just want the government to deliver the support that they have been assessed as requiring. Even when an older Australian finally gets their funding approved, that does not necessarily mean they will receive the care that they're expecting. Many families are increasingly finding that there simply aren't enough providers or workers available to deliver the services that they've been approved for.</para>
<para>This is something I've heard directly from many of my constituents within the Redlands. A few months ago, I conducted a My Aged Care survey to hear from local families about their experiences within the system. The response was deeply concerning: 52 per cent of respondents reported waiting nine months or more for their approved aged-care package to become available, and 62 per cent of respondents reported facing issues with a lack of supplier providers once their package was provided.</para>
<para>In particular, one constituent, an 82-year-old man living alone after suffering a stroke, told me about his experience. He has a level 2 Home Care Package, but it is completely inadequate for his needs. He cannot stand without a walker. He's scared of falling when he showers, when he shaves and even when he gets out of bed. Two years ago, he requested a reassessment, for which he said he is still waiting. And, because of the limited support he receives, he cannot visit his wife, who's currently living in a nearby nursing home. Another constituent who tried to arrange care for her mother was given a list of 116 providers and told to contact them one by one to compare services, cost and availability. Imagine being an elderly person or the child of an elderly person and being told that after finally navigating the very complex assessment process you must now call more than 100 providers yourself to find out whether anyone can actually help. The system isn't just difficult; it's exhausting, and it is failing the people it is designed to support.</para>
<para>We need to remember what aged care is supposed to be about. It is supposed to provide dignity, independence and security for older Australians. It is supposed to give families confidence that when their loved ones need help they will not be left to navigate an endless bureaucratic maze. And it is supposed to make it possible for older Australians to remain safely within their own home for as long as they possibly can. Instead, too many Australians are being left waiting, too many families are being left frustrated, and too many approved home care packages are failing to translate into actual care for older people within our communities.</para>
<para>The government cannot simply announce another reform and declare the job done. The Minister for Health and Ageing must immediately explain why these delays continue, what specific action is being taken to reduce them, and what they are doing to make sure that when an older Australian receives an approved package there is actually someone available to deliver these services. These are all reasonable questions and are the questions being asked by people within my electorate. We cannot accept a system where an older person can be approved for care but cannot access it. We cannot accept a system where someone can wait nearly a year for support. And we cannot accept a system where families are left to pick up the pieces where government bureaucracies fail.</para>
<para>Older Australians have spent their lives building this country. When an older Australian needs care, waiting almost a year is simply not good enough. The government must fix My Aged Care, address these growing concerns and take the action required.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CLUTTERHAM</name>
    <name.id>316101</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I recently had the privilege of standing with the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors at Amber Aged Care in the suburb of Paradise in the north-east part of my electorate of Sturt as this government announced significant funding for new aged-care beds in Adelaide. The announced funding totalled an additional $34½ million of federal money and, importantly, went towards unlocking $134 million of investment in metropolitan Adelaide to deliver 268 residential aged-care beds. At Amber Aged Care the $10.4 million allocated will deliver 48 new aged-care beds. Planning is already underway, and construction will commence in December of this year. These new aged-care beds will go towards ensuring that every older Australian receives high-quality, dignified aged care, which is what they deserve and what their families expect.</para>
<para>I've seen firsthand that the team at Amber Aged Care, under the leadership of CEO Dominique Evele, have already been providing this high-quality, dignified care over a long period of time. With this investment they will be called upon to do it on a much larger scale, because the facility is more than doubling. And what do we need if a service offering is more than doubling in size? We need more qualified people to provide these critical services. We need to provide an environment where aged-care workers, including nurses, are valued, where they are paid fairly and recognised for their work and where the criticality, urgency and immeasurable impact of their work are valued.</para>
<para>The Albanese Labor government recognises this. To the aged-care workers and nurses out there: This government values you. This government does not dismiss your work as being of low value because it forms part of the care economy. This government does not accept that the care economy has exploded in an adverse or unproductive way. This government does not accept that workers in the care economy have been disproportionately awarded hefty pay rises or that the taxpayer funding used to underwrite these fair and justified pay rises is wasteful spending. We don't accept any of that.</para>
<para>That is why, on 1 August this year, aged-care nurses got their fifth pay rise under this government. This means that a registered nurse on the most common classification is now more than $36,000 a year better off than in 2022. An enrolled nurse on the most common classification is almost $32,000 a year better off. That means they'll stay in their profession. That means there will be workers to provide care to the elderly Australians who will take up a place in one of the 48 additional aged-care beds at Amber Aged Care. Extra beds are only one piece of the puzzle; qualified workers are another.</para>
<para>So I'm tired of hearing the care economy dismissed as unimportant. Getting older and becoming elderly is a blessing, and, with a bit of luck, every single member of this place and the other place will get old, be elderly and need aged care. When you need it, you won't dismiss it. You'll be deeply, deeply grateful for it, and so will your family. So to those who dismiss it as reckless spending I say: change your attitude because, although you might not need it now, other Australians do and you owe those Australians your support.</para>
<para>In South Australia we have seen elderly Australians staying in hospital longer than necessary when they should be in an aged-care bed. That is what this recent funding announcement is about. It is about making sure that when a hospital is no longer the appropriate clinical setting and an aged-care bed is that the aged-care system is equipped to respond to that demand.</para>
<para>There is no single answer to the challenge of reforming the aged-care system, which is a generational challenge. Sustainable, effective and efficient investment in the aged-care sector is a key pillar of the Albanese Labor government's agenda. We will continue to invest in residential aged-care capacity such as at Amber and across Adelaide. We will continue to invest in in-home care and we will continue to invest in workers in order to overturn the neglect that characterised the aged-care system when we came to government in 2022.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>There are many times that I've got up in this House or in the Federation Chamber to address this issue of aged care and the failures that our elderly Australians are experiencing under this government. The incompetence is mind-boggling. We have 100,000 people waiting to be assessed. We have 100,000 people who have been assessed, albeit with the failures within that system, who are now waiting to actually receive the care they have been approved for. So we have 200,000 people. The waiting times are blowing out for those who are sick, who are frail already and who have waited to be assessed on the phone in the regions and then had an algorithm applied to see what level of care they need and then waited until there is a service provider in the region who can actually provide that care.</para>
<para>I hear over and over again tragic stories from people in my electorate who cannot find a provider. We're talking about the Commonwealth Home Support Program and we're talking about Support at Home, just to be confusing for everybody to understand. Then the end of the road is residential aged care. By 'the end of the road' I mean that most Australians want to age safely in their homes. That is not unreasonable. But what we have is a government that is slow to act and slow to implement. Even when they do implement, it might be 60 per cent of an actual package that is delivered. A person may be assessed for a package and the government think they're playing very cute by providing only 60 per cent of that package. So people might be able to have an occupational therapist come to their home. They might be able to go to a physiotherapist. But that funding is going to run out. The pressure that has been put on those elderly to pay additional out-of-pocket costs then is frankly outrageous.</para>
<para>We have a government who are happy to spend additional dollars or, in fact, rip out funding from those in private health insurance so they can apparently spend an additional $11 billion on residential aged care that people largely don't want to go to and would not need if they were provided with the care they could have at home and therefore costing the taxpayer a huge amount of money. Every aged-care bed in a residential aged-care facility costs a whole lot more than a Commonwealth Home Support Program package or Support at Home. So we have a government and a minister who are flailing around at the edges pretending that they're acting and dealing with the wait times. Instead, they are dealing with algorithm assessments that mean people are not getting the care they need. The delays between being assessed and having a package approved mean people's actual needs can go from a level 2, which is some support, to a level 4. Guess what happens then? They have to go through the assessment process again.</para>
<para>I happen to have an elderly blind man in my electorate who was assessed over the phone. I want to know which bureaucrat can actually make an assessment over the phone of what a blind man is able to do in his home. Most of the people in my electorate are pretty tough, I can tell you. There are a lot of men who are pretty tough, and this is an elderly blind man. If he's asked if he can do X, Y or Z in his home, if he's asked if he can shower, I guarantee you his answer would be, 'Yes, I can do that.' It's because he doesn't want to be weak. He doesn't want to be in need. But the fact of the matter is that, if an occupational therapist had done that assessment, they would have seen very clearly that he does need additional care. I've got to say that this government is out of touch. They're fantastic with the headlines, they're fantastic with the marketing—go them! That is not governing for Australia and it's not governing for elderly Australians' needs and rights as they age.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BYRNES</name>
    <name.id>299145</name.id>
    <electorate>Cunningham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Albanese Labor government is delivering the most significant aged-care reforms in a generation. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety laid bare a broken system that had been neglected for years under successive coalition governments. This won't be fixed overnight. Our government is working to make sure that every Australian can age with dignity through a $5.6 billion investment, delivering on 58 recommendations of the royal commission.</para>
<para>Over our first term, the Albanese Labor government invested $35.2 billion to improve safety, dignity and quality in the aged-care sector. We've delivered historic pay rises for aged-care workers, with a registered nurse now $430 a week better off under Labor, and there is now a registered nurse onsite in aged care more than 99 per cent of the time, with older Australians receiving an extra 4.8 million minutes of care every single day. At the same time, there has been a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of residents experiencing chemical and physical restraint, falls that cause major injury, and significant unplanned weight loss.</para>
<para>We've provided $53.2 million for states to deliver aged-care assessments faster, and last financial year we rolled out 83,000 new Support at Home packages, with a further 32,000 additional packages due this financial year. The recent budget invested $3.7 billion for more aged-care beds, more home-care packages and better care for older Australians. We're making personal care services like showering and continence management free under Support at Home so older Australians can stay in their homes safer for longer, and we'll deliver an additional 5,000 aged-care beds every year from 2029.</para>
<para>I'm really pleased to see that investment is also being delivered locally in my electorate. The Illawarra has been suffering from a critical shortage of aged-care beds for years thanks to significant underinvestment by both state and federal coalition governments. It has put enormous pressure on our local hospitals and led to poorer outcomes for local families. Since I was elected, I have worked closely across all levels of government, industry and the community sector to drive innovative solutions that work for our region. I have been so heartened by the collaborative approach of the New South Wales health minister and member for Keira, Ryan Park; the member for Wollongong, Paul Scully; Lord Mayor Tania Brown of Wollongong City Council; and the local health district under the leadership of the incredible Margot Mains. This has only been possible thanks to passionate aged care and community sectors with advocates like Val Fell, the Illawarra Aged Care Taskforce and the Community Industry Group. Together we have secured substantial state and federal government investment into our local health and aged-care systems, which is really making a difference.</para>
<para>In May this year we brought all of these sectors together with the Regional Development Australia Illawarra Shoalhaven with a clear focus on solutions to develop shovel-ready aged-care projects for our region, building on the work of the local Aged Care Taskforce. The member for Whitlam and I worked closely with the Minister for Aged Care, Sam Rae, to ensure that the Illawarra was named as one of four priority areas under a special round of the Aged Care Capital Assistance Program for projects that would build new aged-care beds within two years. I am absolutely thrilled that we have now announced $25.9 million for investment to build 73 new aged-care beds across our region.</para>
<para>The projects include expansions and upgrades at Hillside at Figtree, Uniting Farmborough in Unanderra, IRT in Woonona and Tarrawanna, Marco Polo Woonona and Warrigal Mount Terry. That's 73 more beds to take pressure off Wollongong Hospital. Importantly, it means that more older people in our community can age with dignity close to home and close to their families. These new aged-care beds come on top of a number of really important local aged-care investments that I worked closely with the previous minister, Anika Wells, to deliver. We've delivered $15.8 million for IRT's Marco Polo facility in Unanderra, supporting 48 additional beds due in early 2027. In 2023 we delivered 20 transitional beds at Figtree Hospital under the Transition Care Program to help ease pressure on Wollongong Hospital. We also supported Community Industry Group's Illawarra— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd really like to thank the member for Casey for bringing this motion to the House. The baby boomer generation is beginning to turn 80 in 2026, and Australia's aged-care system is not equipped to handle the current demand, let alone the approaching silver tsunami. There are several actions that I'd like this government to take immediately. Once a person is approved for Support at Home, they lose access to equipment and home adjustments through the Commonwealth Home Support Program, the CHSP. This measure is intended to stop double dipping, but it can leave some people facing gaps in their access to technology while they wait for their new Assistive Technology and Home Modifications funding. I wrote to the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors about this on 25 May. I've not yet received a substantive response to this concern. We need to make sure that older people aren't left without the equipment that they need or forced to pay for it out of their own pocket because of gaps in our system.</para>
<para>I'm pleased to see that older people living with motor neurone disease now have priority access to ongoing support at home and immediate priority under the Assistive Technology and Home Modifications scheme. I raised this issue in my recent Support at Home submission. But the fact remains that there are countless other Australians with other neurodegenerative and progressive medical conditions which are associated with rapid changes in their functional capacities. Our aged care needs to recognise and act when people's circumstances demand immediate access to therapies.</para>
<para>The government is now allowing use of AT-HM funding for equipment obtained through private rental arrangements. Rental models work under the NDIS. We've seen that equipment rental is estimated to save the scheme as much as 85 per cent of the cost of purchasing new equipment outright. Permitting clients to use their funds for aged care is a start, but I call on the government to invest in existing equipment loan services, like MND Victoria's assistive technology equipment loan service, to deliver a complete and robust national assistive technology loan scheme.</para>
<para>I'm also calling on the government to take action on data collection in aged care. Fast healthcare interoperability resources, or FHIR health record standards, are an international standard for exchanging health information. FHIR was actually created by an Australian, yet our country has not yet adopted these standards widely in aged care. The fact remains that about 6,000 Australians every year move between residential aged care and our hospital system. If we're serious about reducing bed block, we need to ensure that functional assessments and other health data follow older Australians to whatever healthcare setting they find themselves in. This would reduce costs, it would reduce wastage, and it would reduce resource requirements across our healthcare and aged-care systems.</para>
<para>I also ask the government to urgently address the gaps between Support at Home and the Commonwealth Home Support Program. I ask the government to ensure Support at Home and ATHM funding are made synchronous to fund proven equipment loan programs for services like assistive technology home modifications, and to urgently adopt interoperability standards to improve the supports provided to older Australians and to reduce the costs of delivering them.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In the time remaining for this debate, I'd like to make a contribution. I want to talk about the latest Support at Home quarterly data, which shows wait times for care have continued to come down since the program began, with tens of thousands more older Australians now receiving care in their own homes as the Albanese Labor government continues to deliver its aged-care reforms. While demand for aged care continues to grow, what matters to older people is how quickly they can access care, and we're making significant progress in driving these times down and will continue to invest so every older Australian can access the care they need sooner. While we know there's much to do, these numbers are encouraging signs, and methodical work to secure more care for more older Australians than ever is making a material impact. Older people told us they want care they can trust close to home, and we've listened. Labor's getting things moving in the right direction to ensure every older Australian can get the care they deserve sooner.</para>
<para>Since our generational reforms and the Support at Home program began on 1 November last year, estimated wait times for an ongoing place have again fallen across all priority categories. As of 30 June this year, every person classified as urgent continues to get their funding within a month. High priority is now one month, down from 1.5 to two to 2.5 months, and the medium priority is now five to six months, down from eight to nine months. Standard priority is now seven to eight months, down from 10 to 11 months at 1 November 2025. The median wait for an assessment remains consistently under one month, and the time for in-hospital assessments remains under one day. This is down from as high as 10 months under the previous government.</para>
<para>Demand for the program remains unprecedented. The government is responding by releasing 32,000 new Support at Home places this financial year, on top of the 83,000 additional places released in 2025-26. Once delivered almost three times as many older Australians will have a Support at Home place compared to those with a home-care package in 2020.</para>
<para>Last week, the second Aged Care Act 2024 wait time report was also published on the department's website, showing elapsed times for Support at Home dropping by around 50 days and elapsed times for other forms of aged care being relatively stable. This is important reform that's been conducted by the Albanese Labor government in an area that we all care so deeply about—ensuring that aged Australians are looked after at home as a priority and then supported into aged care if that is what's required. I know that my family, like families around the country, are pleased to see the wait times coming down, particularly that in-hospital assessment, because that's when families are worrying most. I'd like to thank Minister Rae for the work that he's doing. I know that his intention is to continue this work to ensure that we have an incredibly positive aged-care system in this country, with as many Australians needing Support at Home as can get it. It's a government that cares about this issue, and we want to see it continue.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>DZY</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned, and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for a later hour.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>86</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026, Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>86</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <p>
              <a href="r7515" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026</span>
                </p>
              </a>
            </p>
            <a href="r7516" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>86</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I declare that, unless otherwise ordered, Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026 and Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026 stand referred to the Federation Chamber for further consideration at the adjournment of the debate on the motion for second reading of each bill.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH</title>
        <page.no>86</page.no>
        <type>GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Address-in-Reply</title>
          <page.no>86</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I remind members that today the House adjourns at 4.30 pm for the purposes of us being able to go and present the address-in-reply to the Governor-General.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>NOTICES</title>
        <page.no>86</page.no>
        <type>NOTICES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Postponement</title>
          <page.no>86</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>There is a procedural motion on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline> in my name. There are some amendments to that being negotiated. Either later today or tomorrow a new one will be moved. So, with that in mind, rather than have us deal with what's on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline>, I simply move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That notice No. 1, government business, be postponed until a later hour this day.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>86</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>86</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>86</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>86</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WELLS</name>
    <name.id>264121</name.id>
    <electorate>Lilley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>This bill is a companion to the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, which is expected to introduce new restrictions on inducement-based marketing and establish the Wagering Advertising Opt-out Register. This bill ensures that the costs of administering, operating and enforcing those reforms, should they be needed, can be recovered from the wagering industry.</para>
<para>Government has listened carefully to the evidence presented during the recent Senate inquiry and through ongoing stakeholder engagement. We are particularly concerned by evidence about wagering inducements and the role these practices can play in encouraging gambling and exacerbating gambling-related harm.</para>
<para>It is expected that the government's reforms will respond to these concerns by introducing new restrictions on inducement-based marketing and establishing the Wagering Advertising Opt-out Register, which will provide Australians with a 'one-stop shop' to opt out of seeing wagering advertising on online platforms.</para>
<para>The Australian Communications and Media Authority will be responsible for implementing and enforcing these reforms, including monitoring compliance with the new restrictions and establishing and administering the opt-out register.</para>
<para>This bill enables the ACMA to recover the costs of those activities through a levy imposed on licensed interactive wagering service providers. It is appropriate that the wagering industry, rather than taxpayers, bears the costs of regulating these activities.</para>
<para>The levy established by this bill is intended solely to recover the costs associated with administering, operating and enforcing these reforms.</para>
<para>I commend the bill to the House and look forward to members contributions.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>87</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7515" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>87</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
    <electorate>Lindsay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026. The bill comprises nine schedules to make minor and technical amendments across social services, child support and family assistance legislation to ensure the legislation reflects the administrative practices being undertaken for the delivery of payments.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 of the bill amends the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 to allow the automation of applications for advanced payments so people can apply for a payment online, as well as over the phone or in person. More than 2.7 million advance payments were processed in the past financial year, an essential lifeline for people who find themselves in a difficult situation, with urgent bills to pay, like electricity and gas bills, repairs to homes or replacing essential items like fridges, unexpected medical costs, or buying work supplies like boots or tools for a new job. These changes will allow requests for advance payments to be made online so people can apply for them when they need them and in a way that best suits their needs. The changes in this schedule will also support people by introducing more flexibility around their social security repayment amounts. If people find they are in a position to make their repayments quicker, they'll be able to do so. Equally, if they need more time to repay the debt, that can be approved too.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 of the bill will amend the Administrative Review Tribunal Act and the family assistance act to allow the secretary to alter certain social services decisions undergoing a review at the Administrative Review Tribunal to ensure decisions reflect the most up-to-date information available. It is hoped that this will expedite some decisions that end up in the ART and ensure both the ART and Services Australia have the most up-to-date information when considering appeals of decisions.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 will amend the family assistance acts to ensure the agency can use pre-issue income data from the ATO to complete reconciliations of a person's entitlement to family tax benefit. Pre-issue income data is the income a person has on file with the ATO. Essentially, it uses what has been reported by your employer as your income to date to determine what your income is. This information can also be used to determine a person's entitlement to FTB or the single-income family supplement and apply end-of-year notification requirements to recipients who are not required to lodge a tax return. The use of a person's pre-issue income data will help Services Australia make more accurate payment decisions and should lead to fewer debts being created. Most importantly, these changes do not take away a person's right to seek a review of any decision or appeal that decision, should they disagree with it.</para>
<para>Flowing on from that, schedule 4 of the bill will amend the family assistance act to allow the pre-issue income data to be used for childcare subsidy reconciliations and to ensure a person's entitlement is updated when their income changes. Again, this will help ensure a person's payment is accurate and large debts aren't created.</para>
<para>While stakeholders support the use of pre-issue income data at a general level, Economic Justice Australia and Single Mother Families Australia have raised some concerns about the long-term use of pre-issue income data where it differs from a person's final assessment amount. I would strongly encourage the Minister for Social Services and her department to carefully consider this point, because it is important that we have correct assessments. A person's final assessment amount should be used as soon as possible to make a determination on their payment entitlement.</para>
<para>Schedule 5 of the bill will amend the child support act to also allow a person's pre-issue income data to be used for child support assessments. This change is particularly important. Single Mother Families Australia, Relationships Australia and even the Commonwealth Ombudsman are supportive of these changes, because getting child support payments right really matters. Relationships Australia have said that the use of pre-issue income data will help address the weaponisation of the child support system by thwarting a payer's attempts to delay assessment of their tax obligations by ensuring that we have more current and accurate child support assessments.</para>
<para>Just last week, I highlighted that outstanding child support debts have hit record high levels, with more than $2 billion now owed to children across the country. These are children that are now missing out. I'm personally appalled that, under the Albanese Labor government, child support debt has skyrocketed. That's $2 billion that should be in the pockets of parents and carers to raise children.</para>
<para>We are in a cost-of-living crisis where we know families are struggling to keep a roof over their heads and to put food on the table. When I hear about parents who are doing the wrong thing—going on overseas holidays, buying new cars and boats, and failing to lodge their tax returns, so their payments don't add up—it makes me really angry, and every single person in this place should be angry. Around 230,000 parents owe a debt, with the average debt sitting at over $8,600. Astoundingly, the highest debt owed is $2 million. Ten parents have debts of more than a million dollars, and another 190 parents owe more than $150,000 in child support payments. Of the 230,000 parents that owe a debt, only 33,000 have wage-garnishing orders in place to recover the debt from their pay. That's just 14 per cent of parents with a debt. Worse, there are only just over 4,000 departure prohibition orders in place to stop parents travelling overseas if they owe a debt—under two per cent of parents. Child support payments are not optional. Parents have a moral and legal obligation to pay child support. This money is to help raise, feed and clothe children. It has nothing to do with an ex-partner. It is always about putting children and their welfare first.</para>
<para>The Albanese Labor government needs to be using every power it can to start collecting these debts because it is unacceptable that kids are going without. Schedule 6 of the bill will amend the family assistance act to enable merit reviews of decisions to use tax refunds to offset family assistance debts like the family tax benefit. Schedule 7 of the bill will amend the Paid Parental Leave Act to ensure that a person's paid parental leave superannuation contribution reflects the settings of the scheme. This will ensure that if a person's paid parental leave amount is later changed, the superannuation contribution is based on the actual entitlement. Schedule 8 will make minor amendments to the Social Security Act to confirm in the legislation that a restriction on requesting urgent payments is triggered once a person has been paid their 10th urgent payment rather than when their next request is rejected. Schedule 9 of the bill will fix minor cross-referencing errors in the legislation between this bill and the last technical bill in 2025.</para>
<para>As I said at the outset, this bill is technical in nature, and the coalition will support the passage of this legislation through the parliament.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>88</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7516" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>88</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LEESER</name>
    <name.id>109556</name.id>
    <electorate>Berowra</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026. In speaking on this bill we need to be clear about why we're here. Sadly, we are here cleaning up yet another mess left behind by the former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus, the member for Isaacs. The member for Isaacs abolished the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. He committed around $1 billion of taxpayers' money to establish its replacement and deal with the associated pressures in the migration system, and he told Australians the new system at a cost of $1 billion would be better. What a total joke that statement is! He was warned, but he refused to listen because, as always, he knew better. Politics came before the efficient use of taxpayers' money.</para>
<para>Less than two years after the Administrative Review Tribunal commenced operation, parliament is once again being asked to fix it up. This isn't the first repair; it is another bill, another set of amendments, another round of changes to a tribunal which Labor told Australians had been properly designed and another reminder that the member for Isaacs's signature reform was nowhere near as settled or successful as he and Labor claimed it was.</para>
<para>This bill is not a triumph of reform; it is another clean-up job. The scale of this exercise matters. Australians who work, who run businesses, who pay mortgages and who pay their taxes are entitled to expect competence from their government in return. They're entitled to expect that parliament will not have to keep returning to the same legislation to correct omissions and operational problems.</para>
<para>The Administrative Review Tribunal commenced operations on 14 October 2024. Since then, there's been the original legislation, there have been miscellaneous measures, there have been further amendments to the ART and related legislation, and now there's this bill. At the same time, the Albanese Labor government has committed a further $69 million to continuing to deal with the backlog of tribunal cases created by the mess left by the member for Isaacs. So, after the upheaval, after the abolition of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, after around $1 billion was committed to the new system, there is a very simple question: is this new Administrative Review Tribunal actually delivering the better system that Australians were promised? The tribunal's own figures answer that question, and they are damning. As at 31 May this year, the tribunal had more than 131,000 cases on hand. Five years ago, under the former coalition government, that figure was around 65,000. What an indictment on the Albanese government. The caseload has doubled. Over the same period, the median time to finalise an application has blown out by 22 weeks, and only 43 per cent of the applications are now finalised within 12 months of lodgement, well below the tribunal's own target. That is a record, and it's after around $1 billion was committed by the former Attorney.</para>
<para>The test of an administrative review system is whether it actually works for the Australians who rely on it, not the press release, not the ministerial announcement and not the new name on the door. On the tribunal's own figures, the new system is an abysmal failure. Governments make thousands of decisions that affect people directly—decisions about taxation, social security, veterans' entitlements, disability services, aged care and migration. For the person affected, a review application may involve their livelihood, their finances, their family or their future.</para>
<para>One of the most significant changes in this bill to clean up the mess left behind by the former Attorney involves the role of registrars. The bill expands the powers which the president may authorise a registrar to exercise. Those powers include dismissing an application which has no reasonable prospect of success. They include requiring the tribunal's leave before further applications of a specified kind may be made and reinstating an application in circumstances where a registrar has the power to dismiss that application. There's a clear case for these reforms. Tribunal members are a finite resource. Their time should be focused on substantive disputes. Matters which plainly have no reasonable prospect of success should not consume resources indefinitely while other Australians wait for their cases to be heard. The explanatory memorandum gives a straightforward example—an applicant who cannot meet a visa criterion requiring them to be in Australia when they are in fact outside Australia. That's not a matter which should consume disproportionate tribunal resources.</para>
<para>Some submitters argued that allowing registrars to make decisions about reasonable prospects goes beyond an administrative function because it involves judgement, but the legislation contains safeguards around the use of those powers. The president may impose conditions on an authorisation, and a dismissal is not necessarily the end of the road. The legislation provides mechanisms for an application to be reinstated where appropriate.</para>
<para>It's also worth remembering who these registrars are. At the end of July, based on the statistics provided by the tribunal, it had 112 registrars, and more than nine in 10 held qualifications in law, dispute resolution or both. These are appropriately qualified people being asked to undertake functions that can free tribunal members to focus on the matters which genuinely require their attention.</para>
<para>The bill also makes it easier for obvious errors in decisions or statements of reasons made by registrars to be corrected. Again, that's sensible. Where there is a clear clerical or administrative error, there should be a straightforward mechanism to fix it. A person shouldn't have to navigate an unnecessary additional process because the tribunal lacks a simple power to correct an obvious mistake. But, if registrars are being given more powers, parliament should also know how those powers are being used. How many applications are dismissed and how many are reinstated? Are these powers actually helping bring the backlog down? Are they freeing tribunal members to determine more substantive matters? After the amount of taxpayers' money committed to this tribunal, Australians are entitled to answers. That's why the coalition supports stronger annual reporting—so parliament can see whether these changes are producing measurable results. We will move such an amendment in the Senate.</para>
<para>The bill also makes a series of other practical changes to the internal operation of the tribunal. It clarifies that the president is assigned to every jurisdictional area. It provides greater flexibility in the appointment and status of non-judicial members. It deals with the correction of particular errors. It updates the definition of an exempt security record decision. It excludes the period of 24 December to 14 January from the calculation of time for decision-makers to provide certain documents to the tribunal. Individually some of those measures may appear technical, but collectively they're directed at making the tribunal operate more efficiently and, given the backlog confronting the tribunal, efficiency matters.</para>
<para>The bill also contains significant measures relating to migration review. Once these provisions commence, applications for review of specified migration and protection decisions will be required to be lodged using an approved form. That should reduce the amount of time spent seeking information and help the tribunal identify the actual issues in the dispute earlier.</para>
<para>The bill also clarifies that, although a person has no entitlement to examine or cross-examine a witness under section 366D of the Migration Act, the tribunal may permit a person who is appearing before it to examine or cross-examine another person giving evidence. And it removes duplication in notifications that the tribunal must give the Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs when an application is dismissed. Again, these are sensible changes.</para>
<para>The bill creates a new regime under which, in appropriate migration matters, the tribunal may make its decision orally and give its reasons orally, with a written statement of reasons available on request. Written reasons will continue to be required for social security, veterans entitlements, aged-care and NDIS matters, and any other categories prescribed by the regulations for matters decided on the papers and for decisions confirming a dismissal. The coalition supports that change.</para>
<para>Under the bill, the 35-day period for applying to the Federal Circuit and Family Court for judicial review will run from notification of the oral decision. Some submitters argued that this period should instead begin when written reasons are provided. The coalition doesn't agree. Where the tribunal gives an oral decision, the applicant is told both the outcome and the reasons for that outcome when the decision is made. They're not left wondering why their application failed. If written reasons are required, an applicant in a migration matter will ordinarily have 14 days to request them and the tribunal will ordinarily have 14 days to provide them. Importantly, the court retains the power to extend the 35-day period where it's satisfied that an extension is necessary in the interests of the administration of justice.</para>
<para>There's also a practical problem with tying the commencement of the judicial review period to a request for written reasons. An applicant could prevent the clock from starting simply by never making the request. That would undermine finality and allow matters to remain unresolved unnecessarily. Australians are entitled to a review system where decisions eventually bring proceedings to an end, and finality serves genuine applicants most of all. Every matter that drags on unnecessarily is another matter consuming resources while someone else waits.</para>
<para>This bill is not confined to the tribunal. It also deals with judicial review in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, which hears challenges to the legality of migration decisions, including decisions of the tribunal itself. Migration is now the largest part of that court's work after family law. More than 18,000 migration applications were pending at the end of the last reporting year. That pressure is being felt across the system, and Australians involved in every other kind of case before that court are affected when its resources are consumed by an ever-growing migration case load.</para>
<para>The bill introduces identity verification requirements for prescribed migration and protection review applicants who are not in immigration detention at the time the application is made. In the tribunal an applicant may be required to verify their identity in accordance with the prescribed processes. An application must be dismissed where that applicant does not comply. An applicant will retain the ability to seek reinstatement under the existing Migration Act mechanism and the tribunal may reinstate the application where it considers that appropriate.</para>
<para>In the Federal Circuit and Family Court the bill appropriately preserves judicial discretion, consistent with the court's status as a chapter III court. That distinction is appropriate. Unlike the tribunal, the court exercises judicial power and the bill leaves the court with discretion over the consequences of noncompliance. An applicant who doesn't comply with the identity requirement will generally require the leave of the court to continue. The court will have discretion to dismiss the proceedings. The principle behind these provisions is straightforward. The system should be satisfied that the person whose matter is before the tribunal or the court is genuinely participating in it. The detail of this scheme will sit in regulations made under the Migration Act, and the coalition expects those regulations to be subject to the ordinary disallowance processes so that this parliament retains oversight.</para>
<para>Another important part of the bill concerns taxation review. The bill restores the standard 28-day period for seeking review of certain decisions by the Commissioner of Taxation, refusing an extension of time. The coalition supports that correction. But this provision also tells us something about the quality of the original exercise. When Labor abolished the AAT and created its replacement, that time frame was not properly carried across. The explanatory memorandum itself describes the amendment as correcting an unintended consequence of the establishment of the tribunal. For the government, that might be described as a technical correction. For the taxpayer who is affected by it, it is anything but technical. The statutory deadline can determine whether a person can seek review of any decision at all. So, yes, this bill corrects the problem, but, once again, we're correcting something that should not have required correction in the first place.</para>
<para>There's one further issue which arose through the examination of this bill. It concerns cases where there is a clear and objectively identifiable administrative error in an original migration decision. Under section 85 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act, the tribunal may remit a decision to the original decision-maker for reconsideration while the review remains on foot. That's already a power which the president may authorise a registrar to exercise. The department confirmed to the committee that the president has done so, limited to cases where the parties agree.</para>
<para>Migration matters are different. The Migration Act expressly provides that section 85 does not apply to reviews of reviewable migration decisions or reviewable protection decisions. Instead, section 349 provides a separate power to set aside a decision and remit it to the original decision-maker for reconsideration where the decision relates to a prescribed matter. But critically that remittal is itself a substantive decision on the review. It's not the same kind of interim remittal available under section 85 while the review remains on foot, and that raises a practical question. If an obvious administrative error has been made in the original decision and that error can be readily identified, should the applicant, the department and the tribunal really have to proceed to a substantive merits review outcome simply to correct it? The tribunal's principal registrar at the hearing into this bill described such a mechanism as, and I quote, 'certainly an efficiency'.</para>
<para>The coalition believes there is merit in the government considering a tightly confined mechanism within the framework of the Migration Act developed in consultation with the tribunal and the Department of Home Affairs. If everybody can see the mistake and it can be corrected quickly, there is little sense in forcing the machinery of merits review to continue merely to arrive at the same point. That would save the tribunal resources. That would save the department resources. That would save taxpayers' money, and that would allow other Australians waiting in the queue to have their matters heard sooner.</para>
<para>There's a broader lesson in all of this. Governments should be judged by what their reforms actually deliver. The member for Isaacs was very keen to abolish the administrative tribunal. A major institution was abolished. A new one was announced. Around $1 billion was committed. Australians were told, promised, that the system would be better. Making it work has proved so much harder, and this bill is further evidence that the job was nowhere near finished when Labor claimed it was. If it had been, we wouldn't be back here yet again.</para>
<para>The coalition will not oppose these sensible reforms. Where the bill improves the system, we will support it. Where it gives appropriately qualified registrars sensible powers, we will support it. Where it removes duplication, we will support it. Where it provides greater finality, we will support it. Where it makes the migration review system operate more efficiently, we will support it.</para>
<para>But our support should not allow this government to rewrite the record. A tribunal that Australians were told was properly designed is already back before this parliament for further significant surgery. Australians are entitled to know where the waiting times are improving. They're entitled to know whether the backlog is coming down. They're entitled to know whether the expanded registrar powers are producing results and they're entitled to know whether the institution the member for Isaacs created is actually delivering the improvements he promised.</para>
<para>The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee has recommended the bill be passed. The coalition supports that recommendation. Ultimately, there is one simple measure of success: does the system work better for Australians? It is not 'does it generate more legislation', not 'does it require more taxpayer money' and not 'does it allow another minister to announce another reform'. Does it reach decisions more efficiently? Does it bring hopeless matters to an end? Does it use skilled tribunal members where their expertise is genuinely required? Does it correct obvious mistakes quickly? And does it give Australians value for the extraordinary amount of their money already committed to this project?</para>
<para>Those are the tests that the Albanese government must now meet. The coalition will support this bill because Australians deserve a tribunal that works. We will support the clean-up, but Labor should not expect us to pretend there was no mess to clean up in the first place. The former Attorney-General, the member for Isaacs, created all this. Taxpayers have paid for it and, once again, the parliament is being asked to fix it.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>91</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7501" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>91</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm pleased to have some time, in continuation, to speak on the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026. This bill proposes two major reforms. The first is a managed growth funding system that better aligns university places with Australia's future workforce needs. The second is a new, demand-driven, needs based funding model that recognises some students need additional support if we are serious about improving participation and completion at university.</para>
<para>The recommendation of adopting a new funding model for higher education that is planned, sustainable and focused on the skills we'll need in the future is exactly what the managed growth funding model seeks to achieve. Around 80 per cent of Australia's workforce will need a certificate, diploma or degree by 2050, so we cannot afford to leave capable Australians behind simply because of where they live or the circumstances they face. We know the areas where we can find the most students to increase those numbers are regional areas and those in the outer suburbs. This reform will effectively remove the cap on Commonwealth supported places for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds and students from regional Australia, because talent should never be limited by family income or postcode and the students that we need to do these courses can be found in the outer suburbs and in the regions.</para>
<para>The bill also establishes the framework for the commission to exercise its existing function in allocating international student places. This is about creating certainty—certainty for universities, certainty for students and certainty that Australia's higher education system is growing in a planned, strategic and sustainable way with, I would suggest, a clear sight on domestic students, their capacity and the support they need to get us to those targets.</para>
<para>This bill will also formalise the role of the ATEC in allocating Commonwealth supported places. Under this legislation, an extra 230,000 Commonwealth supported places are expected to be delivered over the next decade. Next year alone, 16,000 additional CSPs will be available. That means 16,000 more Australians will have the opportunity to become nurses, teachers, allied health professionals and social workers—ultimately opportunities for Australia to build the highly skilled workforce it will need in the decades ahead.</para>
<para>The second major reform in this bill is the introduction of the needs based funding model. Essentially, this model will provide extra funding to support students who come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, First Nations students and students studying at regional campuses. These students are no less capable than anyone else. If we believe that talent is spread across every community in Australia, then we must also recognise that opportunity is not. Students who face greater barriers often require greater support if they are to achieve the same outcomes. That is the principle underpinning this reform. In many respects it reflects the same philosophy that underpins needs based school funding.</para>
<para>As a former teacher and principal, I know all too well that different students require different levels of support to achieve their full potential. That principle transformed the conversation around school funding, and this bill applies that same principle to higher education. This has been my experience over decades in secondary education witnessing and knowing the support that some high school students will need if they are going to be successful at tertiary education. And some of that is just about building their confidence and creating a space where they feel comfortable and supported, that the system has faith that they can achieve, rather than them having to stride out and be that aspirational in their own progression.</para>
<para>The legislation sets a new base equity amount of $1,535 per eligible student and a base regional amount of $1,398. To put that into perspective: under previous similar programs, funding averaged around $600 per student. This is more than double the support available and will support universities to support those students to complete their studies. What it means in practice is that universities will be able to use this money where it matters most, from tutoring and mentoring to academic and transition support. It means more scholarships and emergency financial assistance. It means greater access to counselling, wellbeing services and peer support. The bill also recognises the additional costs associated with delivering education at regional campuses, ensuring students studying in regional areas are not disadvantaged because of where they live. If the first half of this bill is about opening the door to university, the second half is about helping students walk through that door, supporting them along the way and helping them graduate. This is how we're building a stronger workforce and this is how we ensure Australia's higher education system reflects the aspirations of the people it serves.</para>
<para>These reforms will matter enormously to communities like the one I represent in the outer suburbs of Melbourne, Lalor is one of the youngest and fastest-growing communities in Australia. Wyndham City is now home to more than 330,000 people, and over the next two decades it is expected to grow by almost another 200,000 residents. This growth presents enormous opportunities, but it also presents enormous demand—demand for more teachers in our classrooms, nurses and allied health professionals in our hospitals and more skilled workers across every sector of our community. The people who will fill those roles are sitting in classrooms across my electorate today, and this legislation is designed to support them into tertiary education.</para>
<para>When I visit schools in my electorate, I meet students who are eager to become doctors, engineers, teachers and scientists. I meet parents who work incredibly hard to ensure their children have opportunities they themselves may not have had. I meet adults returning to study because they know new skills will create new opportunities for their families. And one thing I have never questioned about Lalor is its ambition. The challenge has always been ensuring that opportunity keeps pace with that ambition. That's why this legislation is so important. Through these reforms, more people in my community will have the opportunity to access university and to see it through to graduation.</para>
<para>There's a clear difference in philosophy between this government and those opposite, this government and the previous government. This Labor government believes education is an investment in Australia's future. Those opposite have too often treated it as a budget line to be managed. The other side of this House may ask whether Australia can afford this investment. I would ask a different question. The question is: do you perceive it as an investment, or do you only see it as a cost? Educating young Australians, to me, is an absolute investment in the future and one that Australia can't afford not to do. We can't afford to ignore the accord's finding that, by 2050, 80 per cent of jobs will require a certificate, diploma or degree. That means education beyond secondary education. Can we afford to continue leaving talented Australians behind while our economy changes? I do not believe we can, and I believe the biggest danger to social cohesion is people who are frustrated because they haven't reached their potential and who have given up on reaching that potential. That's why these initiatives are so important.</para>
<para>The Universities Accord makes it clear that the skills our country will need over the coming decades cannot be delivered by a higher education system designed for the challenges of the past. We need a system that plans ahead and ensures that every capable Australian has the opportunity to contribute. This is exactly what this proposed legislation sets out to achieve. This legislation is not simply a higher education reform but also an economic reform, a workplace reform and, importantly, an opportunity reform. That is why I support this bill. For communities like the one I represent, where families have worked hard, sacrificed and placed their faith in the power of education, this bill sends an important message: your ambition matters, your contribution matters and your future matters. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Higher education should open doors of opportunity for every Australian, no matter their postcode, background or bank balance. For people in regional Australia, access to education matters deeply and has long-lasting consequences. The landmark universities accord review, released in early 2024 and led by Professor Mary O'Kane, argued that Australia must increase the share of the workforce with tertiary qualifications from around 60 per cent today to at least 80 per cent by 2050. That's a nation-building task and one on which our productivity nationally depends, but we will miss that target if higher education remains harder to reach for people from low-income backgrounds, First Nations people or people with disability, and it will not be achieved if regional Australia is left behind.</para>
<para>The Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026 seeks to make the higher education funding system more responsive to student demand and provide additional support for students who face the greatest barriers to participation. I support this ambition and I will support the passage of this bill through the House, but not before I table what are some significant concerns, including overly broad ministerial powers in this bill, the allocation of international student places and the removal of equity funding for regional and rural students. It is a fact that people from regional areas are less likely to attend university than their metropolitan peers, and we really need to close this gap. In my electorate of Indi, just 17 per cent of adults have a bachelor's degree or higher—well below the national average of 26 per cent. Higher levels of educational attainment are clearly associated with better health, higher incomes, stronger workforce participation and overall improved wellbeing. In a nutshell, higher education means greater prosperity.</para>
<para>But educational attainment shapes more than a person's individual outcomes; it shapes an entire community. We need people with all kinds of skills and talents to build strong communities. We need higher levels of tertiary attainment rates because that means regional communities can attract and retain the skilled workforce that we need. Research from the Grattan Institute shows that when a school leaver moves to a major city for university, only one in five return to the regions within a decade. By contrast, when regional students study at a regional campus close to home, three-quarters of them stay local for the long term. Strong tertiary options close to home mean more young people can build a future for themselves in the community that raised them, and the community sees the benefit of nurturing their young. It means more teachers in our schools, more nurses in our hospitals, more engineers shaping our infrastructure—more skilled workers helping regional Australia truly prosper for generations to come. It also means more opportunity for people at every stage of life to pursue further study—mid-career people, people changing their careers and people undertaking higher research degrees.</para>
<para>Beyond supporting our workforce pipelines, regional universities play a central role in research and help communities seize new economic opportunities and innovation. Some of the most fantastic ideas and innovative solutions come from the regional universities. That's why regional universities like La Trobe and Charles Sturt University are so important to the electorate of Indi and so important across rural and regional areas. They don't just provide education; they are an investment in the long-term productivity and prosperity of our regions. The role that they play in the electorate of Indi is truly transformative.</para>
<para>This bill amends several acts relating to higher education. First, it establishes a managed growth funding system. Instead of the current system, where funding is measured not by student places but by a total dollar amount given to each university, the new system will revolve around a national allocation pool. This pool, measured in total student places, will be set by the minister and allocated by the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, or ATEC. That pool could grow on the commission's advice, particularly to meet demand from students from low-socioeconomic, regional and remote backgrounds.</para>
<para>The bill also introduces needs based funding supplements. Universities will receive additional funding for every student they enrol from a low-socioeconomic background, every First Nation student and every student studying at a regional campus. However, it won't provide a supplement for students from a regional area, and I'll return to this soon. The bill also creates a new system for allocating international student places, with the minister setting an overall international allocation pool. It also authorises the commission to allocate commencing overseas student places to providers.</para>
<para>Overall, the higher education sector has welcomed the intent of the bill. Most universities and stakeholders support its passage, but they have cautioned against rushing this bill through the parliament. The CEO of Universities Australia, Luke Sheehy, has said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The ambition is right, but the detail matters.</para></quote>
<para>He also said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Changes of this scale need to be scrutinised closely to make sure we get them right for students, universities and the nation.</para></quote>
<para>I agree. The government should not move this bill through either house before the Senate inquiry has reported. If the ambition is right, then the parliament must take the time to get the detail right and prevent any perverse outcomes that shut the door.</para>
<para>I want to focus on the managed growth system that this bill creates. Some stakeholders, particularly those with a metropolitan focus, have warned that the introduction of a managed growth system could reduce student choice. This argument is linked to new penalties if a university enrols above its allocation, something known as overenrolment. Some universities argue the penalties will make them more cautious about offering places, and the aggregate drop could disproportionately affect access for rural, First Nations and low-socioeconomic students. However, I've listened to universities in my electorate who believe the concerns around managed growth impacting access are overblown and misguided. These regional universities argue that, when a metropolitan university over enrols students, it disproportionately pulls students away from smaller universities and those in rural areas. A core focus of smaller and regional universities is to expand higher education for underrepresented students, and they do an outstanding job supporting equity and regional enrolments. La Trobe University, for example, has 7,388 students from a regional area, and, of that, 4,991 are studying at a regional campus. In 2025-26, their regional campus retention rate was an astonishing 89 per cent. These are strong outcomes that demonstrate the value of well-supported regional institutions, so measures that support their viability, like controlling the risk of over enrolments, are actually welcome to regional universities.</para>
<para>An area of this bill warranting closer examination is the treatment of regional students under the new needs based funding model. Until now, being from a regional area has been recognised as a form of educational disadvantage in its own right and attracted supplementary funding. This reflects that regional students face unique barriers and ensures providers are funded to support them. Under the new arrangements, concerningly regional students are no longer recognised as a separate equity cohort. Regional campuses will continue to receive some funding to reflect the higher costs of delivering education in regional Australia, but universities who make efforts to enrol regional students won't receive any extra support for those efforts. La Trobe University has warned that, compared to the previous arrangements, the new model will make it harder to fund support programs targeted at regional students unless they qualify on other equity grounds. This is because any additional supports would have to be covered by universities' own budgets. If increasing higher education participation for regional Australians is a goal of the accord—and I know that it is a goal—it's difficult to understand why regionality in and of itself will cease to be a basis for additional support.</para>
<para>I'm also concerned about the breadth of powers that will allow the minister to impose funding conditions in writing on any individual university. Unlike the funding agreements the new system replaces, which were required to be published on the department's website within 28 days, these determinations do not have to be published at all. This is a departure from existing transparency arrangements and weakens public accountability and parliamentary oversight of higher education funding. Universities Australia wants these powers removed, and Monash University wants the power to sit with ATEC instead. The Regional Universities Network describes the powers in this bill as 'excessive and unnecessary' overreach, warning that they raise serious questions about university autonomy. The Australian Technology Network of Universities makes an important point that these powers are not just for today but will be inherited by governments of the future. The questions for this parliament are whether these powers are appropriate and what risks they might pose for the higher education sector into the future.</para>
<para>I am also concerned about the proposed power for the commission to allocate international student places. While moving this power from the minister to the commissioner is absolutely an improvement, I am yet to be convinced that powers of this kind will benefit domestic students, universities or the Australian economy. The universities accord did not recommend enrolment caps and warned restrictions of this kind would largely benefit metropolitan institutions. I remain concerned that this proposal could damage Australia's international reputation, suppress a significant driver of our economy and undermine the viability of regional universities.</para>
<para>Let's not forget that international education is Australia's fourth-largest export, bringing in $54 billion nationally and $18 billion into Victoria alone. International education as a revenue raiser should never become an end in and of itself though, so the challenge is to get the balance right. For regional universities, revenue from international enrolments helps underwrite delivery of regional campuses, courses and services. Strong and sensible regulation is, of course, necessary without scapegoating international students. Without doubt, we should stamp out unscrupulous actors and ensure the sector is sustainable and operates with complete integrity, but we should also be careful that allocation powers are not self-defeating and don't ultimately undermine the sector's ability to deliver quality education to Australian students.</para>
<para>I support further reform of the sector, including reform of the Job-ready Graduates Package. I voted for the bill that implemented Job-ready Graduates at the time because it also delivered important reforms for regional communities, including the tertiary access payment and regional university study hubs, but I criticised the Job-ready Graduates fee structure at the time for its sheer lack of evidence. We know now that these concerns were indeed very well founded. The package has not meaningfully shifted students into so-called priority courses. Instead, it's simply left this cohort of students in more debt. It's overdue for reform, and the government has had more than four years to respond to the evidence. If the purpose of the universities accord is to 'open doors of opportunity', then we must fix the policies that have proven to place unnecessary barriers in front of some students.</para>
<para>The parliament must act to make higher education affordable, available and accessible for all Australians, whether they live in a regional area, come from a low-income background, are the first in their family to study or face other barriers to participation. Studying at a university or TAFE should not send you broke. It should not force you to leave your community, and it should not depend on whether a regional institution has been weakened by policy decisions made without proper regard for regional consequences. The government's ambition is right. More Australians should be able to access tertiary education, and the system should better support the students who face the greatest barriers. But with that ambition we must not disregard detail. Detail matters. Our task as a parliament is to open doors of opportunities for students. That's the standard by which this reform must be judged.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MASCARENHAS</name>
    <name.id>298800</name.id>
    <electorate>Swan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Neither of my parents finished high school, and my nana-in-law, Nana Dawn, never got to start high school. What's interesting is that sometimes you might think that these people do not value education, but I'd say that it is exactly the opposite. These people did not have access to education, and they wanted their children to make sure that they had access to good-quality education.</para>
<para>I was born in Kalgoorlie and grew up in a nickel-mining town called Kambalda in regional Western Australia. My dad was a metal worker. My mum was the lollipop lady and a kindergarten cleaner. My parents migrated from Kenya to Kalgoorlie, and they did that because they fundamentally wanted their children to have access to something that they did not have, which was a better education. Education has always been important in my family, and I know that for many families across Australia it is exactly the same. One of the proudest things for my parents was seeing both of their daughters finish high school but also go to university.</para>
<para>When I was 15 years old, my old man was made redundant. He had worked for Western Mines for 19 years and he was really distraught that that had happened. He had worked for four decades. But he wanted to make sure that that did not distract from my goals and what my future would be. Money was really tight. As a high school student, I worked at Woolworths. I never asked Mum and Dad for money. I paid for my own ball dress. For me, going to university, I was really worried about the cost and so I applied for as many scholarships as I could. I applied for scholarships where you talk yourself up. So I talked about my academic record, my volunteer work in the community and my academic achievements. They're not the scholarships that I was offered. I also applied for some HECS exemption merit scholarships where I talked about all the things that weren't in my favour. That included being from a regional town. It included being the child of migrants. It included studying in a male-dominated area and also the fact that my old man had been made redundant. So I ended up getting offered a HECS exemption scholarship, and I have to say that that was life changing. I'm really grateful that that happened.</para>
<para>But I know that not all students have access to that. Sometimes there are these barriers that get in the way. So the thing that excites me about this particular bill is that, if I was finishing school in the goldfields, the odds of going to university would be significantly increased. Under this bill, a student from the country is not left hoping to win a scholarship. A funded place built in the system for them will now be law. Some regional kids want to study in the regions. Then there are some that don't. That was me. In the town where I grew up, it sometimes felt like the options were to get stoned, get pregnant or work on the mines. For me, I wanted to get out. I still had a career that was on the mines, but I absolutely wanted to move to the big smoke and go to university. I have to say that my first year of university in particular was amazing. I got to meet students from all across WA—from regional places but also the city, from private schools and public schools. The double degree of chemistry and chemical engineering at Curtin University was phenomenal. I made lifelong friendships, including with some amazing women: Pippa, Yong, Vanessa and Joelle. They were amazing girlfriends who I'm still friends with today.</para>
<para>I want to make sure that more people have access to the opportunity of going to university. The Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026 builds on the work of the <inline font-style="italic">Australian Universities Accord: final report</inline>, which is one of the most significant reviews of higher education this country has undertaken in a generation. That review set out a blueprint for reform not just for the recent budget or for this term but for the next decade and the decades that will come after. The Albanese Labor government has already implemented a majority of the accord's 47 recommendations. This is the seventh bill to come out of that work.</para>
<para>This bill changes how university places are funded and allocated in the first place. It puts new funding behind students who need extra support once they get there. At the centre of that first change is something called the Commonwealth supported place, a university place where the government covers part of the cost of the student's degree so that a student pays a subsidised fee instead of the full cost upfront.</para>
<para>My electorate of Swan is home to Curtin University, one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse electorates in Western Australia. The students who walk onto that campus every day come from all across Perth, all across WA and sometimes all across the continent. But there are many students that come from Cannington, Belmont, Vic Park, Rivervale and Como. Some are the first in their family to study at university. Some are new to this country. Some are balancing study with work and family responsibilities that their peers just don't have to think about. There are often invisible stresses that push more and more young people away from attending university because, when signing up to further their education, they're also signing up to debt, which sometimes can follow Australians for a large part of their lives. For years, the number of these places a university could offer was based largely on how it had enrolled in the past, not on what students actually needed in the present. That meant that a student's chance often came down to timing and luck as much as ability. This bill is changing that.</para>
<para>It hands the job of planning growth in our university system to the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, the independent body this parliament established to steward the system as a whole. Under the new system, the government sets out a total number of funded places available each year. The commission then allocates them to universities in two parts. The first is its core allocation. It locks in the number of places a university already has so that no university sees its funding cut or its student numbers shrink because of this change. A growth allocation is then applied on top, directed to where it's needed most, including to students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds and from regional and remote Australia. If the commission decides that it isn't enough to meet demand, it can ask the government to lift the pool. In practice, for these students, the cap comes off. If you have the marks, if you have what it takes, you get a place.</para>
<para>Over the next decade, this reform is expected to fund an extra 230,000 commencing domestic students backed by $3.6 billion. That's 230,000 more students walking onto university campuses all around Australia. That's 230,000 chances for a young person from Rivervale, Cannington or a mining town like Kambalda, where I grew up, to do exactly what I was able to do. This bill also cleans up a system where some universities have been enrolling students they cannot be fully funded to teach. It gives underenrolled universities a temporary funding floor while they transition, and it hands the allocation of international student places to the commission as well within an overall pool set by the government.</para>
<para>The part of the bill that I want to return to is the part that speaks most directly to students like the one I once was. Getting in the door is only half the job; staying there is the other half. This bill legislates needs based funding for students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds, First Nations students and students studying at regional campuses. The more support a student needs, the more funding follows them. Universities can put this funding towards tutoring, mentoring, scholarships and emergency grants. It's the kind of support that helps a student not just start a degree but also finish it. The bill sets the base equity amount at $1,535 and the regional base amount at $1,398, both indexed every year. Under the old scheme, the universities received as little as $600 per student. This more than doubles it, and it's demand driven. The more students a university enrols who meet the criteria, the more funding it receives. A student's background should never decide their future.</para>
<para>It's interesting when I think of my time at Curtin University. Often the first year was the year when you would see the most people drop out of university. Often it was because of these barriers that related to financial circumstances at home or to moving from one town to another or, alternatively, to just not having the right supports in place. I think, if you are lucky enough to get a place at university, we should be doing everything that we can to make sure that we help you actually finish your study. That principle doesn't just stop on university campuses. It should follow students to their learning within the workforce.</para>
<para>That is why the government has also acted on paid prac, a complementary accord reform sitting alongside the changes in this bill. A few months ago, a young woman who was studying physiotherapy called Gabby came to see me in my office to raise her concerns about the hardships allied health students face in being able to afford to live, study and complete unpaid clinical prac placements. Gabby's in her second year at Curtin University. She moved from down south to Perth, and she's passionate about her physiotherapy career. Like every physiotherapy student, she must complete 1,000 hours of unpaid clinical prac placement before she can graduate. For a long time, that meant weighing up her degree against her ability to pay rent or pay for groceries.</para>
<para>This is where we have said that we want to make sure that we fix this system. Paid prac was already supporting teachers, students, midwives and social workers. As we announced last month, the Albanese government is now extending Commonwealth prac payment to 10 more frontline health professions, including physiotherapy. This is a huge testament to Gabby and the other advocates who had the courage to step up and speak out for their peers, who now have access to paid prac. For students relocating to complete placements in regional and remote Australia, where health workforce shortages are most often more acute, the support can be the difference between undertaking the placement at all or turning it down. As Education Minister Jason Clare said, students on placement deserve to be able to afford something that's more nutritious than two-minute noodles.</para>
<para>For Gabby, this announcement has lifted a huge weight off her shoulders. In her words, she feels relief. This announcement means that she can finally focus more on now, rather than fearing homelessness and hunger while she trains to help others. Gabby also asked me to pass on her gratitude to everyone who's fought for paid prac over many years so that she can graduate without burnout before her professional career even begins. I want to add my thanks, too, to Gabby, for having the courage to come speak to me and to speak to her local member of parliament, and to every physiotherapy, nursing, psychology or allied health student across Australia who's training to look after the rest of us. Gabby's story is one of a thousand students' across this country who have benefited from this government chipping away at the barriers to higher education.</para>
<para>Since we've come into office, we've cut student debt by 20 per cent for 3.2 million Australians, wiping off more than $16 billion in the process. We've capped indexation to lower the CPI and wages so that debt can never again grow faster than what people earn. We've doubled the number of university study hubs, with 20 new regional hubs and 14 in the suburbs. We've made bridging courses free. We've also established the National Student Ombudsman and a national code to prevent and respond to gender-based violence so that a young woman's degree does not end because of what someone did to her on campus. We've made the Commonwealth supported places demand driven for First Nations students who get the marks. And we've established the Australian Tertiary Education Commission so that somebody is finally stewarding this whole system, rather than each piece working in isolation. Every one of these changes was a door opened a little wider, and this bill is the next step.</para>
<para>For me, my path went from Kalgoorlie to Curtin to Canberra, and I now represent the electorate of Swan, where I live, where I studied and where I met my husband on campus. What I would say is that there is more work to do, but a substantial next step is the chance for a student like Gabby to stay and finish her studies. It's a chance for a student like I once was to actually start university. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BIRRELL</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
    <electorate>Nicholls</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I went from Dookie to Shepparton. That was my university pathway. I, too, rise to speak on the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026. We have a bill before us that I think requires greater scrutiny and we haven't finalised our position on this. We will refer this bill to a Senate committee for inquiry and report, and we will make our decision based on the evidence that comes through that process. If the bill comes to a vote in this House before the committee reports, we won't oppose it here, but we're not ready to endorse it yet. This does make significant structural changes to the higher education system, and it does deserve to be examined closely.</para>
<para>On the process of this bill: the sector has raised concerns with us about how this bill was developed. The universities did not see the bill before it was tabled, there was no exposure draft, the stakeholders were shown limited material under confidentiality arrangements, and elements of the drafting have actually surprised the sector. When you're rewriting the architecture of higher education in this country, it shouldn't be done in a surprised way; it should be a collaborative approach with the sector and people affected by these changes.</para>
<para>When you take away the title's 'opening the doors of opportunity'—it sounds great; 'opportunity' was the key word in my maiden speech—what the bill actually does is, one: let the minister determine the total pool of Commonwealth supported places distributed through ATEC, the Australian Tertiary Education Commission; two: let the minister determine the pool of international student places, again distributed through ATEC; three: give the minister the power to allocate places directly, give binding directions to ATEC and impose conditions on providers; and four: establish needs based funding, with the key details set out in ministerial guidelines rather than legislation. The common thread in all four things that this bill does is expanded ministerial control, and that is a major transfer of control from institutions to executive government. That is a central issue—not the funding and not the places but the power and where that power resides. I think that's something that needs to be examined further.</para>
<para>In relation to the money, the minister's public sales pitch talks of $3.6 billion over the decade and 230,000 extra university places. In the explanatory memorandum, it says something different. It refers to $2.5 billion in additional net funding over 11 years from 2020-25 and 200,000 additional commencing domestic students over the next decade. Those two documents were tabled on the same day, and they're $1.1 billion apart, so I've got some questions in good faith for the minister: Where does that extra $1.1 billion come from? Where did the additional 30,000 places come from? And why do MYEFO papers show $2.5 billion over 11 years, when the minister is out announcing $3.6 billion over a decade? If the numbers changed, why wasn't there an update in the budget? Was it offset by this government's cuts to research, or is it more debt? And are Australians able to trust that the $3.6 billion that the minister is talking about does not become a higher number in the future? These are matters for the minister to come in and straighten out and explain.</para>
<para>Under this bill, the minister will control the size of domestic student loans, and the minister will control how these domestic places are allocated. The minister sets the international student pool and influences where those places land. He controls the key settings of needs based funding through the guidelines—and student fees and Commonwealth contributions are the lifeblood of a university's finances. What we're talking about here is basically ministerial leverage over the financial viability of every single provider in the country.</para>
<para>In relation to the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, it was sold to us on the basis that ATEC sits at the centre of the system as an independent body. But let's look at what ATEC actually is. The ATEC commissioners can be terminated by the minister where the minister is satisfied performance has been unsatisfactory for a significant period, but those terms aren't defined. ATEC cannot employ its own staff or people assisting it; departmental employees are made available by the secretary. ATEC cannot engage its own contractors or consultants. The secretary does that on behalf of the Commonwealth. ATEC must take account of the minister's short-term and long-term priorities, and that's subject to ministerial direction. And ATEC should have but does not have a regional commissioner. ATEC is independent of the universities, but it's not independent of the government, and that is something of concern, needing clarification and possibly some changes.</para>
<para>The issues here are where this parliament sits and the way a democracy should work. In relation to this bill, ministerial decisions on the domestic and international student pools are not disallowable. Direct ministerial allocations of demand-driven places are not legislative instruments and so are not disallowable. And conditions imposed on a specific provider are not legislative instruments, so they're not disallowable and not subject to a merits review. So a provider who is on the wrong end of one of these decisions has very little to fall back on beyond judicial review. And there's a real question about accountability, transparency and procedural fairness and what role this parliament has in this decision-making process. That's the sort of question we want a Senate committee to look at.</para>
<para>This bill doesn't seem to be built on competition, deregulation or institutional autonomy. It's not built on central allocation and ministerial control. That's a philosophical shift, and it should be named as one. The bill treats competition between universities as a problem to be managed. But competition between universities can benefit students. It can drive institutions to compete on quality, on student experience, on career outcomes, on reputation and on what they actually offer.</para>
<para>I acknowledge that there are legitimate concerns about the market power of very large universities; of course there are. But a concern about the misuse of market power is not necessarily a reason to switch the competition off altogether. Under the current system, universities are permitted to enrol more students than they are funded for; they educate more students for the same taxpayer dollars. This bill calls that overenrolment and creates a financial penalty for it. But why would you penalise a university for doing more with the same amount of money? And some can. So this bill shifts from a capped funding model to a capped places model, and different courses attract different Commonwealth contributions. If you change the course mix, you change the cost. The committee should examine whether this bill carries that unquantified fiscal risk.</para>
<para>This bill also establishes needs based funding grants with an equity component and a regional component. And I want to be really constructive, particularly on this issue, because regional components of how this bill operates really matter. The equity component covers Indigenous students. But, beyond that, eligibility depends on the needs based funding grant guidelines, and that's determined by the minister. The amount paid depends on the base amounts and modifier amounts, which are also determined by the minister through guidelines. So, how generous this scheme really is and who qualifies is not settled by this parliament; it's settled by the minister. Regional students deserve more certainty than that.</para>
<para>I don't want to leave the House with the impression, after this contribution, that there's nothing here. The sector does have real problems. There are quality concerns as well as challenges of AI, which are coming down the line on all of us. There's pressure on rankings and access that is uneven and can be uneven across regions and across outer suburbs. This bill does hand government some very powerful tools, and, used powerfully and transparently, those tools could I think be used quite well, particularly when it comes to regional universities. Directions to ATEC, direct allocation to demand-driven places and prioritisation of courses tied to regional workforce could be turned into a supporting economic opportunity in places like the Goulburn Valley and Bendigo and right across those regional cities where there are good-quality regional standalone universities or where the city universities have campuses.</para>
<para>My own example is a bachelor of applied science degree at the University of Melbourne—the Dookie campus, which is the old ag college. What a wonderful degree that was. Then I had the opportunity, a bit later in life, to do an MBA. I couldn't go to Melbourne to do an MBA, and online is not really for me. But La Trobe University offers a regional MBA—in your seat of Bendigo, Deputy Speaker Chesters, and in Albury-Wodonga, in Mildura and in Collins Street. That MBA regional delivery through teleconference and facilitators was really a wonderful educational opportunity. This bill also opens Commonwealth supported places to non-table-A providers for priority classes of courses, replacing the narrower national priority concept. That's a simpler pathway for private providers to deliver in areas where there is genuine workforce need.</para>
<para>This contribution about the bill is a bit 'I want to know more and I want a Senate committee to examine it more'. I think there are some real opportunities in this. We are going to examine this bill very closely. It's always difficult. Handing many powers to the minister can create some opportunity, it can create some risk, and I think we need to have a further conversation about that.</para>
<para>There are major concerns about centralisation, accountability, competition and institutional autonomy. The Senate committee process—and I hope this does get referred to a Senate committee—should test the practical effects, the fiscal risks and the safeguards: what potentially could happen and how we could constructively put some safeguards around that. Our final position will be based on the evidence and on the national interest. I hope this bill receives that level of scrutiny.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MILLER-FROST</name>
    <name.id>296272</name.id>
    <electorate>Boothby</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This government knows that for this country to prosper we need to harness the skills and talents of all Australians. Educational opportunities are an important part of that, ranging from an early childhood education with our three-day guarantee to fully funding public schools, fee-free TAFE and the Universities Accord. All stages and pathways of education are important to the future prosperity of the country and to the opportunities and lives that all Australians can live. A country can only be as good as the educational opportunities it affords all of its citizens, including its most disadvantaged communities, because, as we all know, education can mean the difference between getting a leg up in life and falling behind.</para>
<para>In this place many of us, including myself, are the first in our families to have gone to university. Some are the first to complete a trade qualification or even high school, and each one of us carries with us the knowledge of what that education has meant to our lives, and the opportunities that we've been afforded. It is the pathway that brought us here to this place to debate the best possible future for Australia and for all Australians.</para>
<para>We're confronted with the following challenge: Australians from lower socioeconomic backgrounds or from rural or regional Australia are less likely to get a degree. If they start, they are less likely to complete it. Educational justice—the pursuit of fairness and equity within our education systems—should be available to all Australians. We often say education changes lives, because it's true. It changes our lives, and it changes the lives of our families. In my previous career in public health, it was known that the best way to reduce infant mortality and improve child health was to educate mothers. The answers have always been clear, but the execution has often fallen short.</para>
<para>The Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026 will ensure that higher education can be accessible to more Australians. As the Prime Minister has stated, 'in Australia the doors of opportunity are open to all of us', a sentiment that has echoed down the decades since Gough Whitlam first declared in 1972 that 'education is the key to equality of opportunity'.</para>
<para>This bill comes in the wake of the government's <inline font-style="italic">Australian Universities Accord</inline> final report that was handed down two years ago—the biggest review into our higher education sector in nearly two decades, which sets in motion plans for higher education reform for the next two decades. The Albanese Labor government has already taken up 30 of the 47 recommendations. We have cut HECS debt by 20 per cent, indexed HECS to the lower of the CPI or the WPI, implemented a marginal repayment system based on income and raised the minimum repayment threshold. We've introduced paid prac for teaching, nursing, midwifery and social work students. During the winter break, we announced a further 10 types of health degrees where paid prac will now apply.</para>
<para>We have doubled university study hubs, with 20 new regional study hubs and 24 suburban. We've increased the number of free bridging courses, helping students build the foundation skills necessary to enter university. We've introduced the National Student Ombudsman and a national code to prevent and respond to gender-based violence. We have made demand-driven Commonwealth supported places available to all eligible First Nations students, and we've established the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, with responsibility for independent stewardship of the higher education system.</para>
<para>The report also recommends a new funding model for higher education that is planned and managed by the ATEC through mission based compacts. It recommends increasing the number of students from underrepresented backgrounds and establishing mechanisms to facilitate their success, because Australia will need to increase its accredited workforce—those with a certificate, diploma or degree—to 80 per cent by 2050 in order to meet the demands of the future.</para>
<para>With an investment of $3.6 billion over the next decade, the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill will equip more Australians with future skills while entrenching educational justice in our higher education system. It will do this in three ways: by introducing a managed-growth funding system, by introducing demand-driven needs based funding and by formalising the ATEC's ability to allocate Commonwealth supported places.</para>
<para>Firstly, the managed-growth funding system will uncap the number of places for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds and regional and rural areas. The Minister for Education will have the power to set the total allocation pool or the total number of Commonwealth supported places each year, while the ATEC will have responsibility for allocating these places to universities and other providers. This will make the system fairer and better for all. It will mean 16,000 more university students year on year—19,000 from 2030 and, in total, 230,000 commencing domestic students over the next decade.</para>
<para>The demand-driven needs based funding model will provide extra funding to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, First Nations students and students based at regional campuses. Funding will be proportionate; if universities have more students that meet these criteria, they will accordingly receive more funding. The equity amount will be set at $1,535 and the base regional amount at $1,398, and these amounts will be subject to indexation every year. This uncapped model is a significant change from the uncapped model that was part of the previous Higher Education Participation and Partnership Program. The needs based funding will now mean that the amount of funding will more than double per head in certain instances, from what was as little as $600 under the previous HEPPP.</para>
<para>Universities can invest the additional funds in much-needed programs and supports, including mentoring and tutoring, remedial writing programs and writing centres, scholarships and grants allowing students to focus on their studies rather than take on multiple jobs, and covering the higher costs of operating regional campuses. This change is not only about making education accessible to a wider group of Australians; it's also about making the education experience for those students sustainable in the long term, especially for those who come from communities with generally lower attainment and attendance rates.</para>
<para>In my electorate of Boothby, the Albanese Labor government's commitment to equitable access to higher education and investment in growing the accredited workforce is one of the strategies I'm most excited about. The government and Flinders University have jointly committed to a $300 million new healthcare centre, a 10-storey health education facility that will produce 1,300 health professionals: nurses, social workers, occupational therapists, speech pathologists, paramedics, physios, psychologists and other allied health workers every year—a fantastic contribution to our growing health workforce.</para>
<para>Through its Health2GO student-led allied health clinic, it will provide more than 10,000 additional free or low-cost appointments for members of the public to access allied health services. The clinic provides valuable clinical placements that are part of allied health training. They will also work with the adjacent Flinders Medical Centre to assist with triaging waiting lists, as they have with ophthalmology waiting lists, reducing a four-year waiting list to four months and fast-tracking those with active disease to a rapid specialist review.</para>
<para>Flinders uni was started 60 years ago, and one of its main aims was to establish an alternative university for the southern suburbs. Flinders is now a global leader in educational justice. At the university's city campus, which was established to provide—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This debate is interrupted in accordance with standing order 43. The debate may be resumed at a later hour, and the member will have leave to continue speaking when the debate is resumed.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</title>
        <page.no>101</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gun Control</title>
          <page.no>101</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GEE</name>
    <name.id>261393</name.id>
    <electorate>Calare</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The state and federal gun buyback for New South Wales is an absolute insult to every law-abiding gun owner and firearm business across our state. What a farce! Forcing around 50,000 law-abiding citizens to hand over hundreds of thousands of guns but only paying cents on the dollar is a disgrace. The amounts on offer are well below market value, penalising honest Australians who obey the law. They are rightly outraged.</para>
<para>Look at what they're doing to our firearm businesses. Pathetic, inadequate grants of up to $25,000 are not going to stop our gun shops and firearm businesses from going broke to the cost of our regional communities. It's not good enough. Taxpayers are going to be slugged up to a billion dollars, all because the state and federal governments wanted to make a kneejerk political point following the horrific Bondi terrorist attack. What we need to be doing is going after the illegal firearms that our streets are awash with. The crooks aren't going to be handing in their guns under this buyback. When police do lock up crims for illegal guns, the sentences are so weak that they're back on the street all too quickly. Let's get to the bottom of the real issues behind this attack, including security and intelligence failures, and go after the real criminals. Bin this junk policy and leave honest, peace-loving Australians alone. Stop making them scapegoats for government failures.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>McGrail-Bateup, Mr Joseph Leigh</title>
          <page.no>101</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DAVID SMITH</name>
    <name.id>276714</name.id>
    <electorate>Bean</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today I sadly rise to acknowledge the passing of Joseph McGrail Bateup. Joseph would be known by most as the world's loudest man, having been recognised by Guinness World Records for recording the world's loudest shout. Joseph was able to clock 122.4 decibels, being louder than a jet taking off, a chainsaw, a police siren or a clap of thunder. But his impact on the community was far greater. This wasn't his only world record; he also held the world record for the fastest time to shoot 10 arrows into a target set in Bean at the Tuggeranong Archery Club. And, for as long as I can remember, he was our town crier, a focus of goodwill and welcome at so many community events. Joseph hosted the popular online trivia show <inline font-style="italic">The No-Name Trivia Show</inline>, and a couple of months ago I was able to enjoy his commanding performance in the Irish Community Players' production of <inline font-style="italic">Peter Lalor at Eureka</inline> down at the Canberra Irish Club. My thoughts are with his family, his friends and the many Canberrans whose lives he touched as his voice rang out across the region and echoed right back at us.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Whistleblower Protection</title>
          <page.no>101</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SPENDER</name>
    <name.id>286042</name.id>
    <electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak about the fantastic news that last week whistleblower and Wentworth constituent David McBride was released from prison on parole. I send all my wellwishes to David, his friends and, of course, his dog. But the truth is that David should never have gone to prison. A man who exposed alleged war crimes in Afghanistan was prosecuted by the Australian government and found guilty, despite attempting to rely on the public-interest defence, and then sentenced to five years and eight months in prison. David's name is well known. So is Richard Boyle's—prosecuted after exposing aggressive debt-collection tactics at the ATO. But, for every name we know, there will be many more who saw wrongdoing and stayed silent because they watched and they saw what happened to people who spoke up.</para>
<para>Our world and our country are better off for having whistleblowers. They can be one of the strongest mechanisms of accountability that both the public sector and the private sector have, but they cannot exist if whistleblowers are not protected. We need a strong whistleblower protection authority, called for by successive governments and expert reviews. We need whistleblower protections consolidated into one clear act instead of scattered across different pieces of legislation. This government, who say they want to rebuild trust, should be encouraging people to come forward instead of deterring them by making public examples of them. We should not wait for another brave individual to expose gaps in our laws by sacrificing themselves, their career or their freedom. We should be proactive in protecting them for the sake of our country.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Strathfield Massacre</title>
          <page.no>101</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SITOU</name>
    <name.id>298121</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks 35 years since the Strathfield massacre. On 17 August 1991, seven innocent people were killed and six others seriously injured in 10 terrifying minutes at Strathfield Plaza. Today we remember Roberta Armstrong, Carole Dickinson, George Mavris, Rachelle Milburn, Joyce Nixon, Patricia Rowe and Robertson Kan Hock Voon. We remember them not simply as names on a memorial but as people who were loved—family members, friends and neighbours whose lives were taken far too soon.</para>
<para>We also remember the extraordinary courage shown that afternoon. Greg Read, a Vietnam War veteran, ran ahead of the gunman through the plaza and into the car park, warning people to take cover even as shots were being fired around him. Police later estimated that his actions saved at least eight people. He was rightly awarded the Star of Courage. And we acknowledge the police, paramedics and other first responders who ran towards danger to protect others, including then 19-year-old Constable Liam Pigott, one of the first officers on the scene. Thirty-five years on, the pain of that day remains part of Strathfield's story, and we honour and remember those who were lost.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Warringah Men's Stronger Together Breakfast</title>
          <page.no>102</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STEGGALL</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
    <electorate>Warringah</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>We hosted the inaugural Warringah Men's Stronger Together Breakfast at Queenscliff Surf Life Saving Club, bringing together boys and men of all ages. Manly Sea Eagles head coach Kieran Foran spoke with extraordinary openness about his own mental health struggles, gambling and substance abuse, suicide attempt and the devastating loss to suicide of a close family member. Kieran urged us to dig deeper when checking in on our mates and men in our lives. His message was powerful: Don't stop at 'Are you okay?' Create the space for the real answer.</para>
<para>Suicide is the 11th leading cause of death for Australian men. Construction workers are nine times more likely to die by suicide than from a work health and safety incident. Support can start with something as simple as going for a walk, digging deeper when a mate seems off or creating the space for a young person to talk. A huge thank you to all the organisations who joined us from fathers' walking groups to men's sheds, from peer mentoring to activity based social groups, and local mental health services and community building programs. The overwhelming message was that we are all stronger together.</para>
<para>It is so important to be good role models, be able to acknowledge weakness and vulnerabilities, and share your mistakes. The message overwhelmingly was that no one mistake defines you, and everything can be rebuilt. So reach out for help to all of these organisations.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gorton Electorate: Roads</title>
          <page.no>102</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JORDAN-BAIRD</name>
    <name.id>316021</name.id>
    <electorate>Gorton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>If you find yourself driving along the Calder Freeway in Melbourne's north-west, you'll pass a turn off to Calder Park drive. That interchange connects our community with the rest of Melbourne and on to the Macedon Ranges. Thousands of locals use that interchange every single day, and for these people commuting to and from work it means dealing with a dangerous U-turn onto the busy Calder Freeway, having to quickly match the speed of oncoming traffic.</para>
<para>More people on our roads is a symptom of our community's growth. But, as our community grows, the infrastructure simply needs to keep up. That's why last year, along with the minister for infrastructure and transport and members for Hawke and McEwen, we announced $300 million towards the Calder Park Drive interchange project. And just last week I announced an update to the project's scope. This project will deliver a full diamond interchange by raising the freeway over Calder Park Drive. This will significantly improve safety, and it will mean increasing the speed limit over the interchange to 100 kilometres per hour.</para>
<para>That's not all we're doing. We're investing a $1 billion upgrade into the Western Freeway between Caroline Springs and Melton. I'm so excited to announce that our recent budget draws down on $50 million to get pre-construction under way on this much needed upgrade. More lanes and better interchanges—our community is crying out for this. This isn't just about transport; it's also about fairness. For too long, westies have been left behind, and it's this Labor government that understands— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Manufacturing Industry</title>
          <page.no>102</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RICK WILSON</name>
    <name.id>198084</name.id>
    <electorate>O'Connor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>O'Connor's nickel workers have every right to ask why jobs in the Hunter Valley are treated as a national priority while jobs in the Goldfields are left to the mercy of the market. This Labor government has committed $2.5 billion to keep the Tomago aluminium smelter operating. Over the decade from 2028, that equates to around $250,000 every year, per job, in taxpayer support. The Prime Minister says the intervention is justified because manufacturing capability, supply chains and industrial jobs are in the national interest.</para>
<para>If that's true for the Hunter, why isn't it true for the Goldfields? In 2024, when nickel operations closed and 3,000 workers lost their jobs, Goldfields communities were told to wait for market conditions to improve. Now we're seeing a growing list of taxpayer-funded rescues: Tomago, Boyne, Whyalla, Mount Isa and Nyrstar. The question is, why are so many strategic industries needing bailouts in the first place? Rising costs and Labor's Safeguard Mechanism are eroding Australia's competitiveness and undermining industries that should be our economic strength.</para>
<para>When energy costs rise, productivity falls, investment leaves and jobs disappear. Under Labor's carbon crusade, more Australian industries are being brought to their knees. Unless we restore our competitiveness, lower energy costs and back the industries that create wealth, this bailout will not be the last.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petition: Aircraft Noise</title>
          <page.no>103</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REPACHOLI</name>
    <name.id>298840</name.id>
    <electorate>Hunter</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to present a petition concerning aircraft overflights and holding patterns above the Pokolbin vineyards district.</para>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The petition read as follows—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The Pokolbin region in New South Wales, a major grape production area and a centre of premium wine and tourism industries, is suffering from the detrimental impacts of aircraft overflights and holding pattern activities. These impacts include: 1. Air Emissions Pokolbin vineyards, renowned for producing globally recognized premium wines (Hunter Regional Plan 2041) is subjected to harmful aviation emissions. Persistent contrails over the Pokolbin region demonstrate the extent of aviation activities causing atmospheric pollution. 2. Noise Pokolbin is a designated "noise sensitive site" (Hot Spot Analysis study 2020, conducted by Engage Airservices in early 2021). Aircraft overflights from passenger, freight, international, domestic and local aircraft, occurring 24/7, disturb and threaten our tourism industry. Broken Back Range further amplifies noise impact. 3. Visual Intrusion Aircraft overflights and holding patterns negatively affect identified "visually significant areas", including the Pokolbin Flora Reserve, Pokolbin State Forest, Telecommunications Towers, and Pokolbin Lookout. These activities compromise the globally recognized rural scenic character of the region, threatening its tourism-based identity and economy.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">We therefore ask the House to: 1. Immediately stop all aviation overflights and holding pattern activities over the Pokolbin vineyards district including, but not limited to: Pokolbin Flora Reserve, Pokolbin State Forest, Telecommunications Towers, and Pokolbin Lookout. 2. Declare the Pokolbin Vineyards district a permanent aviation exclusion zone from all forms of aircraft overflight and holding pattern activities, to safeguard the long-term sustainability of New South Wales wine and tourism industries.</para></quote>
<para>from 537 citizens (Petitions no. PN0659)</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REPACHOLI</name>
    <name.id>298840</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The petition has been considered by the Petitions Committee and found to be in order. I acknowledge the principal petitioner, Clara, and the 537 people who have added their names to this petition.</para>
<para>Pokolbin is one of the great wine and tourism destinations of Australia. It is home to internationally recognised vineyards, cellar doors, accommodation, restaurants and also, some of the most beautiful landscapes in the Hunter. The petitioners have raised concerns about the frequency of aircraft movements over the area, especially the impact of aircraft noise, aviation emissions and the visual impact of overflights and holding patterns.</para>
<para>I have visited this site myself and spent time listening to the residents and hearing the aircraft noise firsthand. I appreciate that managing our airspace is complex and aircraft movements need to balance a range of operational and community considerations, but the concerns being raised by the residents and local businesses deserve to be examined, especially given Pokolbin's importance to the Hunter Valley wine and tourism economy.</para>
<para>The petition calls for stronger protections for the Pokolbin vineyard district, including restrictions on aircraft overflights and holding patterns. I ask the minister to carefully consider this petition, engage with the community and relevant aviation authorities and look closely at what can reasonably be done to address these concerns.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>103</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VENNING</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Labor has delivered a trifecta of failures on housing: fewer homes, higher rents and confidence in the market smashed. In any market, supply is the key determinant of price. Lower supply equals higher prices. As a result of Labor's toxic taxes, their own budget is forecasting 35,000 fewer homes will be constructed. A housing crisis isn't solved through taxes. It is solved by supply and demand, something this government simply doesn't understand.</para>
<para>Then there is confidence—mortgage applications at Westpac have fallen 20 per cent since the budget. The warning from economists are clear: weaker mortgage demand means fewer transactions, less construction and tighter supply. A tighter market is felt hardest at the entry level. The units and townhouses that first home buyers get will be impacted the most.</para>
<para>Labor has made it harder and more expensive to build. The National Construction Code now runs past 2,000 pages, adding cost and complexity to every home. The coalition wants a basic Australian building standard that keeps home safe without gold-plating them. We need faster approvals and greater use of modern construction methods. Labor's answer is higher taxes, more red tape and hoping prices will fall. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>C91.3FM</title>
          <page.no>103</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>For a quarter of a century, C91.3 has been much more than a radio station; it's been the voice of our community; keeping locals informed, entertained and connected. From Campbelltown and Camden through to the broader Macarthur region, C91.3 has been there to celebrate our successes, support local organisations and businesses, promote local events and shine a light on the people and stories that make our community of Macarthur such a great place to live.</para>
<para>Amplifying local voices is so important. The unique role that C91.3 plays in giving residents a platform to make sure local issues and stories are heard is absolutely vital. Whether it's Ally Redondo on the breakfast shift, David Archer during the work day or Scott Frappell on the drive home, C91.3 provides continuous engagement with our local listeners.</para>
<para>Their engagement with our community extends well beyond the radio waves with their road crew and presenters attending local events and celebrations from sporting club open days, community festivals and school fairs through to when we have terrible events like fires and floods affect our community. 25 years is an extraordinary achievement, and I thank them for all the work and thank all the people that have worked there, including my own daughter Amelia, the presenters, volunteers, staff and, of course, the listeners who have tuned in year after year. Congratulations, C 91.3, and here's to another successful 25 years.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>104</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The economic geniuses in the Labor Party never cease to amaze me because not only have they driven rents up for so many Australians but they've made housing much more expensive and the number of homes that are now being built is actually less than 35,000 less according to their own budget papers.</para>
<para>What we're seeing in the marketplace is absolute pandemonium. We're seeing total lack of confidence. In Brisbane we're seeing auction clearance rates of less than 50 per cent. People are speaking with their feet. Young potential homeowners, first homeowners, are putting their hands in their pockets. They don't want to catch a falling knife in a falling market. Fair enough. Not only are those economic geniuses opposite driving rents higher and the value of homes lower but Australians now are voting with their feet, and we're just not seeing the real estate sector moving. That means builders losing jobs. There are so many Australians who are doing it tough because of this government's— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tonkin Highway Corridor</title>
          <page.no>104</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr TRISH COOK</name>
    <name.id>312871</name.id>
    <electorate>Bullwinkel</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last Friday, Minister Keogh, Steven Price MLA and I visited the Tonkin Highway Corridor interchange upgrade projects, and we saw firsthand the significant work that's under way to improve one of the most crucial transport links in the east of Perth.</para>
<para>These upgrades are a major investment in the future of our communities, helping to reduce congestion and travel times for both commuters and freight operators, improve safety and support economic growth across our rapidly expanding eastern suburbs. The Australian government is proud to be partnering with the Western Australian government on this important project, contributing $333 million towards the upgrades and recently providing a further $40 million to support the delivery of these critical works.</para>
<para>Investing in infrastructure like this doesn't just create jobs during construction. It lays the foundation for our future growth. It strengthens local economies and ensures our transport networks can meet the demands of the future. The Australian government is committed to building Australia's future, and the Tonkin Highway Corridor upgrades are a clear example of that commitment in action.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Goldstein Electorate: Acknowledgements</title>
          <page.no>104</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TIM WILSON</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
    <electorate>Goldstein</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Every MP should be aware of their own political mortality, and I can assure you from personal experience I know that better than most. So I congratulate with trepidation Archie McKay for being Goldstein's delegate to the Youth Parliament this year. Well done to Archie and to all the delegates selected to represent their communities. We hope they have a ripper time in Canberra.</para>
<para>I'd also like to congratulate the members of the Australian Rowing Team, the Rowsellas, participating in the 2026 World Championships at Lake Varese in Italy. Five of the Rowsellas call our community home—Hayley Verburnt, Emmie Frederico, Benjamin Canham, dual Olympian Amanda Bateman OLY and Dominic Frederico.</para>
<para>Finally, congratulations to Brighton Grammar, who pulled off four teams in four grand finals in basketball, soccer, rugby and football on Saturday for the APS. They are now the reigning premiers for both rugby and footy, particularly in footy because the team was undefeated all year. We're cheering you all on because we want a country that's built from responsible citizens taking responsibility for themselves, being able to improve their communities and seeking to achieve excellence and prowess. To every one of you that is making the bold step, I want to say congratulations.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>104</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOLZBERGER</name>
    <name.id>88411</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I notice the National Youth Parliament is rolling in, and somewhere there is Jasper. I'm not sure that I can see him, but, Jasper, you are definitely an asset to the youth parliament. You're an asset to Forde. I'm really happy to see you all here today.</para>
<para>Here we can talk about young people. There was a time when young people could buy a house in Australia, and there was also a time when people wrote letters to the editor. Back on Monday 4 June 2007, Ian from Shailer Park, a constituent in Forde, wrote to the <inline font-style="italic">Courier-Mail</inline> saying:</para>
<quote><para class="block">IF Prime Minister John Howard and Treasurer Peter Costello want to take credit for the economy, they also must accept the blame for the housing affordability crisis threatening our country.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">House prices do not double of their own accord in five years. They were stagnant for much of the 1990s. I don't know what levers Howard and Costello pulled to cause this doubling, but I do know that, as a result, Australia is facing one of the greatest social disasters possible—a generation of people who cannot afford their own home in the once lucky country. Many parents will see their superannuation disappear very quickly as they try to assist their children buy a home. The legacy of the Government's pursuit of an ill-considered ideology will blight this country for several generations.</para></quote>
<para>Ian from Shailer Park, you are a genius. It's a shame that John Howard and Peter Costello didn't listen to you at the time, but it is a credit to the Albanese government that we have listened to first home buyers and we are doing real change to restore that Australian dream for all Australians.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>105</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>You cannot solve a housing shortage by taxing housing investment, smashing market confidence and making it harder to get new homes built. Labor seem to think that, by crashing the housing market, young Australians would suddenly rush in and buy homes, but that's not what has happened. Westpac mortgage applications have crashed by 20 per cent since the budget. NAB's mortgage lending has dropped by 15 per cent, and they expect it to get worse. Real estate agents are reporting no-shows at auctions. Clearing rates have fallen by 50 per cent. A weaker market doesn't help young buyers. When builders stop pouring slabs and construction slows, supply dries up. You get fewer choices and rising rents, making it harder for everyday Australians to save for a deposit.</para>
<para>In an admission of total failure, even Labor's own budget forecasts show that they will build 35,000 fewer homes. This isn't economic management; it's pure sabotage. When you make it harder to build, you make it harder for the next generation to get a foot in the door. When will this government learn? You cannot tax housing and expect to get more homes built. When you tax something, you get less of it. Young Australians don't need a government that crashes confidence; they need a government that builds opportunity. Australians need a Liberal-National government.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>EMILY's List Australia</title>
          <page.no>105</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BERRY</name>
    <name.id>23497</name.id>
    <electorate>Whitlam</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Hi, Josh. I rise today to speak about EMILY'S List. EMILY'S List has played a critically important role in strengthening women's representation and advancing gender equality in Australia. In the early 1990s, it became clear to many progressive women that structural change was needed to ensure there were opportunities for women to become political candidates and elected representatives. At that time, after almost a century of suffrage in Australia, women's participation in parliaments across the nation was barely over single figures, with women making up just 14 per cent of elected representatives.</para>
<para>Established in Australia in 1996, EMILY'S List was created to provide women with the support needed to even the playing field for women aspiring to political life. This year, EMILY'S List celebrates its 30th anniversary, marking three decades of campaigning for greater representation and policy change focused on promoting the rights of women. The impact of EMILY'S List can be measured by its record. EMILY'S List has supported 651 Labor women in their political campaigns, with 315 elected to parliament. These women have made a significant contribution to Australian political life. Our parliaments would not be as strong without them. I recognise the determination of generations of women who have challenged barriers and helped make Australian political life more representative.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>105</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CALDWELL</name>
    <name.id>306489</name.id>
    <electorate>Fadden</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Labor government has reached the trifecta of housing failures: fewer homes, higher rents and confidence in the market completely smashed. The great Australian dream under this Labor government has, sadly, turned into a nightmare. On every metric that you can use to measure their policies, they are a failure.</para>
<para>Let's put to one side the 1.2 million homes that they are clearly not going to deliver during their term in office. Labor loves talking about its Housing Australia Future Fund, but so does the Auditor-General, and do you know what the Auditor-General has told us? Against their 40,000 home HAFF and accord facility program, just 1,432 homes were delivered to May, but—guess what?—only 762 of those were actually constructed.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CALDWELL</name>
    <name.id>306489</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Cue the awes, alright. That's outrageous. In the March quarter, dwelling commencements have dropped by 11 per cent, and, for renters, Labor's housing crisis arrives every week when the rent is due. Did you know that at the moment 33 per cent of the median income is used on rent? That is completely outrageous. Sadly only the coalition will be the ones to restore homeownership as the centrepiece of the Australian dream. Step No. 1 is winding back Labor's toxic taxes.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Business</title>
          <page.no>106</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The great promise of Australian egalitarianism is that everyone gets a fair chance to succeed. Everyone has the chance to go further and dream of something better. It is the apprentice who becomes the tradie who later starts a business and the entrepreneur who has an idea, takes a risk and creates jobs. It is the nurse who studies after a long shift, the farmer who rises before dawn and the young Australian who believes they can create something amazing. Social justice means opening doors, giving every Australian a fair chance to learn, to work, to build and to succeed. This is the ambition behind Labor's pro-aspiration agenda. Fee-free TAFE and expanded apprenticeships, the National Reconstruction Fund investing in Australian businesses and a Future Made in Australia are backing our workers and backing our innovators and entrepreneurs to build the industries of tomorrow. When a business succeeds, it not only creates wealth; it creates jobs, skills, apprenticeships and opportunity—work, build, create, innovate. The person who dreams bigger does not diminish the rest of us. They expand our idea of what is possible. My message to our young leaders here today is to not cut down the tall poppies. Grow your own. Let the tall poppies grow.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Agriculture Industry</title>
          <page.no>106</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I have one question for the Albanese government. Why do they hate farmers? I want to acknowledge the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and the really uphill battle that she's got with the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, who is busy destroying agriculture across this great nation. Agriculture is the backbone of Australia's GDP, and they need the support that the climate change and energy minister is not giving them.</para>
<para>What we have on the table now is productive farms becoming carbon sinks or hotels for very bad species, vile pests and diseases, vermin. We have lines, mines and turbines attacking our agricultural land, and our farmers have had enough. There is no social licence. The Labor Party is completely ignoring the voices of the community, and across Mallee, my electorate, the voices are very loud. My urge is that the Prime Minister pay attention to those voices and get the balance right on energy. I can tell you the Labor Party does not have that energy balance right.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>106</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>When you think about public policy failures through history, what comes to mind? Some of you might be thinking about WorkChoices, the legislation that stripped away working Australians' rights, and some of you might be thinking about robodebt, which had a significant and profound psychological impact on many of our most vulnerable Australians, but not Senator Bragg. No, Senator Bragg reckons it's superannuation, and he called it 'one of the biggest public policy failures since Federation'. It gives you a real insight into how this opposition, how the coalition and how One Nation think about superannuation, because the target of their policy contempt is a system built on fairness and sustainability. The target of their policy contempt ensures long-term economic security for Australians, and the target of their policy contempt ensures dignity in retirement. What really grinds their gears is the fact that the largest pot of capital in this country sits with working people.</para>
<para>On this side of the chamber, Labor are the proud inventors of superannuation. We're backing it in with payday super. We're backing it in with super on paid parental leave. We're backing it in by boosting the LISTO. While we make superannuation better, all the parties of the right want to do is tear it down.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! In accordance with standing order 43, the time for members' statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</title>
        <page.no>106</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Indonesia Earthquake, Indonesian Independence: 81st Anniversary</title>
          <page.no>106</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australians have been saddened to hear reports over the weekend of the devastating earthquake in eastern Indonesia, with at least 53 people reported killed and many more than that injured. On behalf of the Australian government and people, I extend my sympathies to all those affected by this tragic event. We stand with the Indonesian government and its people at this sad and difficult time, as we have always done and we always will do.</para>
<para>Today also marks 81 years of Indonesian independence. The Indonesian people's heroic struggle for independence was one of the most momentous turning points of the 20th century, and Australians are rightly proud that we were among the first to recognise the establishment of Indonesia as a sovereign independent nation. Then, as today, Australia's peace, security and stability are dependent on the security of our region and, in turn, on a united, stable and sovereign Indonesia. To us, no relationship is more important, and that's why my first bilateral visits after being elected, first in 2022 and then in 2025, were to our great northern neighbour. It's why earlier this year I signed the Australia-Indonesia Treaty on Common Security, the Jakarta treaty, with my friend President Prabowo.</para>
<para>That treaty makes clear that the best way to secure the peace and stability of our region is by acting together, and it reaffirms the force of the 2006 Lombok treaty that Australia unwaveringly respects Indonesia's territorial integrity and sovereignty. I note that this is a bipartisan position across this parliament. This historic agreement was only possible because the bonds between our nations are stronger and surer than ever.</para>
<para>I extend best wishes and hearty congratulations to our neighbour on this anniversary.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TAYLOR</name>
    <name.id>231027</name.id>
    <electorate>Hume</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm grateful for the opportunity to echo the Prime Minister's sentiments and fine words. Indonesia is one of Australia's closest friends, and we are proud to be one of its oldest friends. Our thoughts are with the Indonesians at this difficult time.</para>
<para>Today we wish the good, decent and democratic people of Indonesia a very happy Independence Day. It's been 81 years, as the Prime Minister said, since independence was declared, and Australia supported Indonesia's independence from the outset. Indeed, in the 1940s Australia played a very significant role in working with the Indonesians and the Dutch to achieve independence for Indonesia. As the DFAT produced history covering the issue said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The involvement of the Security Council in Indonesian independence, involvement that was instigated and strongly supported by Australia, led to one of its earliest and most emphatic successes. Instead of prolonged military conflict, as occurred in France's colonies … the parties to this conflict had been involved in a process of peaceful decolonisation, led by the Security Council, and resulting in the birth of an independent Indonesian state.</para></quote>
<para>Former prime minister John Howard said that 'by reason of destiny and geography, the Australian and Indonesian people will be forever linked'. That's one reason why the Howard government enhanced Australia's security operation with Indonesia in 2006 under the Lombok treaty, as the Prime Minister pointed out. That treaty signals our respect for each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It was signed in the wake of two tragedies. The Bali bombings of 2002 that we remember so well was a tragedy where 88 Australians were murdered by Islamic extremists. As we mark the 24th anniversary of that attack this year, we will also remember and commend the Indonesian people—the bystanders who helped injured Australians in the wake of the bombings, the doctors and nurses who treated the wounded, the police and investigators who worked with Australian authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice. The second tragedy, of course, was the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami. Indonesia's Aceh province was one of the very hardest hit, and more than 167,000 Indonesians lost their lives. In the wake of that disaster, we stood with our Indonesian friends and we sent military personnel, medical staff, supplies and teams to assist with reconstruction.</para>
<para>As natural disaster hits Indonesia again, the coalition stands with the government in any assistance it seeks to provide our Indonesian friends. Whether it's responding to tragedy, working together to stop people smugglers or calling out acts of coercion and aggression in our region, there is much Australia and Indonesia have done and will continue to do as neighbours, as partners, as friends.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MINISTRY</title>
        <page.no>107</page.no>
        <type>MINISTRY</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Temporary Arrangements</title>
          <page.no>107</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:05</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I inform the House that the Deputy Prime Minister will be absent from question time today. He has travelled to Papua New Guinea and the Solomons. The Minister for Defence Industry will answer questions on his behalf.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>107</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>107</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Before we move to question time, it gives me enormous pleasure to inform the House that present in the southern gallery today are representatives of the first ever National Youth Parliament. Joining us, we have 150 young people representing all 150 electorates in this country. They have travelled from every corner of Australia, bringing with them a diverse range of perspectives and ideas, to experience Australian democracy firsthand. Over the next few days, youth members will participate in simulated parliamentary debates and in workshops with political leaders and will grapple with real-world policy challenges, gaining a deeper understanding of how parliament works and the process by which bills are drafted, debated and passed into law. There's never been a more important time for our youth to be involved in civics education. I wish every one of you the best of luck as you participate in this historic program. Welcome to question time.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear, hear!</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>on indulgence—It was my great pleasure to address the National Youth Parliament members just a short time ago up in the Mural Hall. And it was a great pleasure. There are people from all 150 electorates represented here. I do want to say as well that this is an opportunity for you to contribute ideas. Your future is longer than that of most of us on this floor will be, so you have a very real interest in what happens in this country and in shaping change. The young men and women with whom I was able to have exchanges showed why you are here. It is because you are people of ideas and you are people who are committed to Australia's future.</para>
<para>Mr Speaker, I do also want to say congratulations to you. This is your initiative as Speaker of the House of Representatives. It's an example of the way in which you are using the high position that you hold to promote democracy. It is to your great credit that you have achieved this, and to that of all the members and senators from across both sides of the chamber who were there as well, talking and engaging with their young people. That was really good to see. I'd encourage the members of the Youth Parliament who haven't made contact and engaged personally with their local members of parliament who are here to please do so.</para>
<para>Lastly, have fun while you're here in Canberra.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TEHAN</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
    <electorate>Wannon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>on indulgence—Speaker, I join the Prime Minister in saying thank you for what you've done to make sure that democracy is spread right throughout Australia, especially with young people, because it is facing challenges. It is facing headwinds, and your initiative is fantastic.</para>
<para>It was wonderful to join with you this morning. We went up to the roof of parliament and we had the great honour and privilege, with all these young people, of unfurling the Australian flag and then winding it back up, and that flag is going to be sent around the nation. The whole way this has been done has been quite extraordinary.</para>
<para>I will finish on this note. I say to you all: be very, very ready because, if someone gets booted out today, then you might have to come down and substitute in their spot! So be on your toes, because this is a new initiative we're going to bring. Well done, Speaker.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm happy to oblige. We shall move to questions without notice.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>108</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>108</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VIOLI</name>
    <name.id>300147</name.id>
    <electorate>Casey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Welcome, Jack. It's good to have you here. My question is to the Minister for Housing. A thousand dollars has been wiped off the value of homes in Melbourne's Mount Waverley in the last 90 days. Minister, how many homeowners in your electorate of Hotham are now in negative equity?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:10</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
    <electorate>Hotham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Casey asked me about the impact of the landmark housing tax reforms that our government has undertaken on our housing market in this country. We have made very significant changes to housing taxation in this country, and we've done that because we recognise that homeownership is the most important aspiration of most Australian families. What the member for Casey has left out of his question is the fact that these changes will lead to a reversal of 10 years of decline in the homeownership rate in our country. There are 750,00 households, who are today stuck in a rent trap, are going to get access to their own home because of these policies.</para>
<para>Isn't it just so fascinating that those opposite have taken the first question of this question time today, when we have the young leaders of our country gathered up there in the gallery—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister will pause and just resume her seat. The manager, on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tehan</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It goes to relevance, Mr Speaker. On 27 March 2024, you said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The minister was asked a specific question. She is not entitled to then start talking about broad portfolio issues. She will need to keep her answer efficient to the question.</para></quote>
<para>It's got nothing to do with the opposition; it's to do with negative equity. She's not even listening.</para>
<para>Honourable members interjecting—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The manager has raised his point of order. The minister was asked a fairly specific question about one area and her own electorate, so she's going to have to make the answer relevant to the question that she was asked. The manager is correct: she wasn't asked about opposition policy. To be fair to the minister, she hasn't gone into opposition policy; she was talking about the question she was asked. So it was a bit of a jump there before, because she was just saying that she was asked about it, and that's when you took the point of order. The point of order on relevance is taken. She won't be able to talk about opposition policy. If she does, I'll sit her down and we'll move to the next question.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I was asked about house prices in my electorate and around Australia. I say again to those opposite speaker: when are they going to stop and listen to what our country is telling us about what's gone wrong for housing in Australia? The reason that we have taken this significant step to address issues in our housing market is for the benefit of the young people who are sitting today in the public gallery. I say respectfully to those on the other side of the chamber that house prices have gone up 400 per cent in the last 25 years in our country—400 per cent. At what point are those opposite willing to accept that we have a significant problem with housing in our country? And, if we allow this to continue for another generation, then opportunity and aspiration in our country are going to mean something fundamentally different.</para>
<para>I'll just finish by saying this: I was raised in an incredibly patriotic household, and I was raised to believe that the most important thing about our country is that it was equal and fair. That is changing about our nation because of our broken housing market. We've got homeownership rates for young people falling through the floor. A low income young couple is half as likely to own their own home in Australia today than they were in the year that I was born—and they want to do absolutely nothing about it. Well, we have a different view. We represent all Australians, especially those young people in the gallery.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The minister has completed her answer. She's not being relevant to the question. Resume your seat. We're moving to the next question. Ministers have to also follow the standing orders. When I give an instruction or advice to the House not to talk about the opposition that means don't talk about the opposition.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>109</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COFFEY</name>
    <name.id>312323</name.id>
    <electorate>Griffith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I give a warm welcome to Grace. My question is to the Prime Minister. How is the Albanese Labor government working to strengthen and defend Australia's world-leading superannuation system? What threatens these objectives?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you very much to the fantastic member for Griffith. She's the best member that Griffith have had for some time—since Kevin Rudd—it must be said. It's fantastic.</para>
<para>Labor built universal superannuation. Labor has strengthened it, and Labor will always defend it. In our first term, we legislated the objective of super because we believe that Australians deserve dignity in their retirement. Then we took the superannuation guarantee all the way up to 12 per cent. You will recall that that was the policy, but it was paused when the coalition won government. We made sure that low-income workers and young Australians can retire with bigger super balances. We delivered a full six months of paid parental leave, and then we made sure that superannuation gets paid on top of it. That was part of addressing the gender gap which was there in retirement incomes between women and men. And we changed the law so that superannuation gets paid on payday. This will make an enormous difference over time for the young people who are in the gallery today. The difference that that will make in building up year after year after year will mean that they retire with much stronger balances than they would have otherwise.</para>
<para>We know also that superannuation has assisted the economy, because it provides an investment pool as well, making sure that superannuation is used to maximise the benefits for superannuants, but it also, of course, provides a really important investment vehicle. This is, of course, part of the real change that Labor is delivering.</para>
<para>But we know that it is at risk because the Liberals, the Nationals and One Nation all want to decimate universal super. Not only do they want to drag Australians back to the past; they want to damage their future as well. And they've made that very clear. Senator Bragg was talking about superannuation and said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That's communism. … there'll be superannuation for cats and dogs soon.</para></quote>
<para>Then he called it 'one of the biggest public policy failures since Federation'. Of course, the shadow treasurer has called it 'a form of economic insanity' and went on, at a different time, to call it 'a form of economic social engineering'. Well, Senator Hanson has joined in. She said, just yesterday:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I think the whole system is broken.</para></quote>
<para>She has made it very clear—wants to make it easier to sack workers but also wants to make it harder— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>109</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TIM WILSON</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
    <electorate>Goldstein</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I give a warm welcome to Archie Mackay. My question is to the Minister for Housing. Minister, why has the number of first home buyers dropped by more than six per cent this calendar year?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
    <electorate>Hotham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Goldstein for his question. On average, there have been more first home buyers each and every year under our government than there have ever been under any other government in Australian history. And do you know what? We're actually really, really proud of that. One of the main drivers of it is the five per cent deposit program. This program has now helped 260,000 Australians get into a home of their own. Of course, those landmark housing tax reforms that we made in the federal budget are going to provide even more opportunity for first home buyers around the country. We'll see 75,000 rental households get into their first home, which will reverse a decade's worth of decline in the homeownership rate.</para>
<para>I just want to provide a quick contrast with those opposite, who want to rebreak the housing market. They want to take away first-home-owner supports.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Goldstein on a point of order.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tim Wilson</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>On relevance: it was an extremely tight question, and it didn't ask for alternative proposals, as you would well know.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Leader of the House.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Burke</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>To the point of order, the minister just referred to the fact that she was going to contrast, and the concept of ministers being able to compare and contrast has always been allowed.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We'll hear from the Manager of Opposition Business.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tehan</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member can contrast but has to contrast in relation to the question, which was a very tight question: this calendar year, how much has the number of first homebuyers dropped? That was the question.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, you're both right. As Speaker Smith indicated on 26 February 2020, probably all Speakers in the last 20 or 30 years have allowed ministers to compare and contrast briefly. The minister was on her feet and she was about to compare. I don't know what the compare and contrast is—perhaps if we'd waited to hear what that was first. We're just going to allow her, if she's doing a compare and contrast, to make sure it's directly relevant to this answer. She can't compare and contrast other topics. She wasn't asked about that. Consistent with previous rulings, we'll allow the minister to continue and to make sure that she's being directly relevant.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you, Speaker. I'm just talking about the fantastic new homeownership pathways that have been opened up by our government, and I've spoken about some of the numbers that are relevant to this question. But of course you don't actually need to take my word for it. We all read the newspapers of a Sunday morning, and for the first time in my life they are peppered with article after article about first home buyers around the country who are going to auctions and winning. And it's not rocket science. There's a very simple reason they're winning auctions. For the first time in 25 years, first home buyers are standing on a level playing field.</para>
<para>And I want to remind the public that, up until this point, those opposite have engineered a system where the young people of this country have been paying taxes to subsidise the investor next to them to outbid them at auctions every Saturday. We have bought that system to an end, and we are damn proud to have done it.</para>
<para>I want to talk about a recent sale, in the electorate of Fraser, of a house in Footscray that sold for $817,000. The real estate agent said there was 'a bit of emotion' when the vendors and the buyers met post-auction, as the vendors had bought that as their first home, and they were handing it to a young couple who were after their first home. And in the electorate of the fantastic member for Wills, a three-bedroom townhouse on a converted squash court sold in post-auction negotiations for $810,000 to a first home buyer. The real estate agent said: 'A lot of first home buyers walked through this one. There are a lot of buyers around that are first home buyers. They are the ones that are still moving in a timely manner.'</para>
<para>We're on the side of first home buyers, and I think we can see from those opposite that they are the last man standing, defending the broken housing market in this country. We're making the real change that Australians are asking for on housing.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>110</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHESTERS</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
    <electorate>Bendigo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to give a shout-out to Oliver, who is in the gallery. My question is to the Treasurer. What is the Albanese Labor government doing to strengthen Australia's superannuation system? And what risks have emerged?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>A very big thankyou to the member for Bendigo, a champion for working people and their retirement incomes in her community and around the country. And a big thankyou to Tenzin for being the youth member for Rankin.</para>
<para>Labor is the party of superannuation. We built it, we are strengthening it and we will defend it forever from the attacks of those opposite. They don't support superannuation, because they don't support working people. It's that simple. This side of the House is working around the clock to strengthen the superannuation system, which is the envy of the world. About a quarter of household wealth in this country is super. We've got the fourth-biggest pool of retirement income savings in the world—four decades of universal super at risk from those opposite.</para>
<para>In the four years we have been in office we've got the super guarantee to 12 per cent, we've got payday super, we're paying super on paid parental leave and we're lifting member standards. We're putting a lot of effort into strengthening the superannuation system, making it sustainable into the future. And on Wednesday the Assistant Treasurer will be talking about important consumer protections. This side of the House works very hard to strengthen superannuation; those opposite work around the clock to undermine and diminish it.</para>
<para>The stakes at the next election will be very high for a number of reasons. One of those is that the future of superannuation will be at stake at the next election. We know that because in the last week or so, whether it's Senator Bragg, Senator Hume, Senator Canavan or the Leader of One Nation, they have all made it very clear that, if any combination or coalition of Liberals, Nationals and One Nation win the next election, they will end universal superannuation as we know it. They represent the biggest risk to universal super in the 40-year history since it became compulsory. They've made it very clear, equating superannuation for young workers with super for cats and dogs and describing it as economic insanity, as the shadow treasurer did. That's the same person who said that people on low and middle incomes could be considered to be taken out of the system entirely. This is what they really think about superannuation. Their divisive and dangerous antiworker and antisuper agenda will leave every Australian worker worse off if they get their hands on superannuation. That is now clear.</para>
<para>Another thing is very clear: we will always back the working people and wages and retirement incomes of people who work for a living in this country. Those opposite will always attack them. They don't support super, because they don't support workers. They've made that now very clear. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>111</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>111</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm pleased to inform the House that present in the Speaker's gallery today is Mr Jeremy Hanson CSC MLA, the Speaker of the ACT Legislative Assembly. We also have the Rt Hon. John Lord Spellar of Smethwick, the United Kingdom's trade envoy to Australia. Welcome, Lord Spellar. Also present in the gallery today are representatives of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, who are in Canberra attending their annual political training seminar; delegates from Common Grace's annual Let Justice Flow Conference, which brings Christian advocates to Parliament House; a number of students and leaders and staff from the Islamic College of Brisbane, who are visiting Parliament House to learn more about Australia's system of democracy; and Lachlan Hunter MLA, the member for Central Wheatbelt and WA shadow minister for agriculture. Welcome to you all.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear, hear!</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>111</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>SunRice: Employment</title>
          <page.no>111</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
    <electorate>New England</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Leader of the House, representing the Minister for Environment and Water. I heard you today talking about your support for workers, so I put the challenge to you: we have 79 workers at Deniliquin and Leeton who've received their redundancy notice because of the peculiarity that you are unable to credit floodwaters as environmental flow. This is merely a bureaucratic decision. Do you promise those workers, members of the United Workers Union, that you will change this decision and give them back their jobs before they get flushed down the river?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Anything that goes to the condition of individual workers in the way that's just been described—I haven't been briefed on what's been described, but I take it from the way the member has put it—equates to a significant issue, particularly for those involved. I'm happy to find out about that, get briefed on it and report directly to the member.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>111</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MASCARENHAS</name>
    <name.id>298800</name.id>
    <electorate>Swan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I give a shout-out to Sumayyah, the youth member for Swan. My question is to the Assistant Treasurer and the Minister for Financial Services. How is the Albanese Labor government delivering a stronger, fairer, more secure superannuation system for Australians, and are there any risks to this approach?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Swan for her question and acknowledge that she has been a champion for superannuation throughout her time in this chamber. She has defended every increase in the superannuation guarantee, every one of which has been opposed tooth and nail by those opposite. The Albanese Labor government believes that all Australians deserve dignity, security and independence in retirement. That's why we're focused on building a superannuation system that is stronger, fairer and more resilient, a superannuation system that delivers better outcomes for working Australians, not just today but for generations to come. Members on this side believe in superannuation. We are members of a party that built superannuation.</para>
<para>Since coming to office, the Albanese Labor government has delivered a comprehensive reform agenda to strengthen retirement outcomes for Australian workers. We have increased the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent, which will deliver more for retirees; we have increased the low-income superannuation tax offset, boosting the retirement savings of 1.3 million Australian low-income workers, including around 750,000 women and including around 550,000 Australians under the age of 30; and we have legislated the objective of superannuation for the first time. Australians deserve confidence that their hard-earned savings are protected, and that is exactly what this government will be doing.</para>
<para>I'm asked about what risks there are to our system. The Liberals, Nationals and One Nation might be different political parties, but they have the same old agenda, and they will destroy superannuation if they get a chance. They share a deeply concerning anti-worker, anti-super agenda that would destroy the economic security and retirement outcomes of millions of Australians. Their longstanding hostility to universal superannuation threatens one of the most important retirement systems in the world. We know that the shadow treasurer, for a long time, has been deeply sceptical about universal superannuation, calling it idiocy, and just last week Senator Bragg called it 'one of the biggest public policy failures since Federation'. These are not the words of people who are going to support that system or build on it.</para>
<para>We know now that Senator Hanson and the member for New England are joining this group, considering options to allow people to take out their retirement savings early. SMC found that a person aged 30 who withdrew $20,000 as part of the COVID-era early-release scheme is now expected to retire with around $93,600 less in superannuation. That is an insight into what would happen if those opposite got their hands on the superannuation system. Labor is the party of superannuation. We built it and we continue to strengthen it. The Liberals, Nationals and One Nation are coming after your superannuation, and they will leave you worse off in retirement.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capacity Investment Scheme</title>
          <page.no>112</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LLEW O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
    <electorate>Wide Bay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. The minister has repeatedly refused to say how much taxpayer money has been handed to foreign companies under the Capacity Investment Scheme. Today, we learned that CIS backed companies have spent nearly $40 billion on so-called social licence commitments, including cash payments, opening ceremonies and Indigenous artworks. Minister, how much money have you handed to foreign investors under the Capacity Investment Scheme?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the honourable member for the question, and I particularly appreciate the notice the opposition gave on the front page of the<inline font-style="italic"> Australian</inline> today, which says:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The Coalition on Monday will launch a parliamentary attack on Labor's marquee scheme …</para></quote>
<para>I thought it was questions without notice, Mr Speaker, but there you go. You learn something every day. I guess, given it's the first time the opposition has asked me a question since April, it's a big deal and you have to flag it on the front page of the national broadsheet. It's a big day for the opposition.</para>
<para>It is the case, in keeping with longstanding practice when the government is running an auction, that those auction results are commercial in confidence. That was the result. For example, when the then minister for energy ran the UNGI scheme, if he had released the documents that showed how many bids had been received, it would have been clear there had been none, because no kilowatts were created. That would have been a suboptimal result. When you are operating an auction, what you are doing is calling on people to put forward bids. If you reveal the outcome of those decisions, you're undermining the position of the taxpayer.</para>
<para>The honourable gentleman criticises the fact that there was community benefit in projects supported by the Capacity Investment Scheme. That is a fundamental difference of approach, because I happen to think that's a good thing. I happen to think that, if developers of renewable energy projects in regional Australia provide bill relief and rebates to people in regional Australia, I think that's a good thing.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister was asked a question involving the Capacity Investment Scheme. He was just referencing the Capacity Investment Scheme and funding that he was asked about, so it's going to be very difficult to take the point of order on relevance. I think everyone was in the room when he heard him say that. The manager on a point of order.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tehan</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It goes to relevance. How much have you handed to foreign investors under the Capacity Investment Scheme? That was the question. It was a very specific question. You haven't attempted to answer it.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There was a very long question, and it wasn't just that; there were other things in the question. Everyone heard the question. As I said, the minister was referring to the Capacity Investment Scheme. He was talking about the funding. I appreciate you would like a yes or no answer. I can't deliver that—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Sorry, a figure. I appreciate the opposition would like a figure. But, as they know, I can't compel—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Leader of the Opposition will cease interjecting. I can't compel the minister to do that under the standing orders. What I can compel him to do is be directly relevant. As I indicated to the House, he is being directly relevant around the question he was asked, and I'll ask him to continue.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I certainly will be, because the honourable member referred to community benefits and complained that the community was receiving benefits from these projects. Now, I can confirm that the same FOI document the coalition received confirmed that there were 65 projects announced that had at that point committed to $35.5 billion in Australian and New Zealand local content, including $1.1 billion in local steel. I think that's a good thing. Those opposite think it's a bad thing. And I also make no apologies for some First Nations communities receiving benefits from these programs, including the program in Wellington, which has negotiated five per cent equity for local First Nations people—five per cent ownership—which I don't think is a bad thing. I think it's a good thing, and people on this side of the House are proud of it.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>113</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr NEUMANN</name>
    <name.id>HVO</name.id>
    <electorate>Blair</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Welcome, Hayley from Blair. My question is to Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations. How is the Albanese Labor government delivering a more secure retirement for working Australians, and what could place this progress at risk?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RISHWORTH</name>
    <name.id>HWA</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingston</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to thank the member for Blair for that question. Of course, as the Treasurer clearly said, it was Labor that created superannuation, and it is Labor that believes in it. And that is why the Albanese government has strengthened our superannuation system to deliver a better retirement for working Australians.</para>
<para>And, in recognition of the importance of superannuation in retirement, the Albanese Labor government, of course, made superannuation clearly outlined in the Fair Work Act as a workplace right. This recognises that superannuation is critical to a good standard of living in retirement for workers, just as wages are good in their working life. Now, our government has passed legislation to ensure that superannuation is paid at the same time wages are, giving workers better oversight and a bigger balance at retirement.</para>
<para>Now, of course, the Albanese Labor government is paying superannuation on government paid parental leave, improving the economic security of thousands of families in retirement. And it is this Labor government that ensured that the legislated superannuation guarantee rate of 12 per cent was actually achieved.</para>
<para>Now, I am asked about what could place this at risk, and, unfortunately, the biggest risk to hardworking Australians' retirements is those sitting opposite—the Liberals, the Nationals and One Nation. Now, of course, we know that the Liberals have never supported superannuation. When they were last in government, they froze the legislated superannuation guarantee for six whole years, and they've continually undermined superannuation with their policies of encouraging workers to decimate their retirement savings.</para>
<para>And, of course, if anyone was wondering about what their position is today, they only have to listen to Senator Bragg, who last week continued to expose the coalition's disdain for universal superannuation by saying it was one of the biggest public policy failures since Federation. Although, he did continue with this argument in the same speech, where he suggested that paying young workers superannuation was the same as giving super to cats and dogs. I couldn't quite follow that one, but I'm sure he'll explain it in a future press conference.</para>
<para>But it's not just the Liberal Party and National Party that are on a crusade, of course; it's One Nation as well, who confirmed over the weekend that they fundamentally oppose the principle of universal superannuation. It is only Labor that can be trusted with the retirement savings of millions of Australians, while those opposite would decimate them. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Energy</title>
          <page.no>113</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TEHAN</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
    <electorate>Wannon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. Minister, would you just cut the crap and tell Australians how much your Capacity Investment Scheme is costing taxpayers?</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Burke</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Speaker, on a point of order: there may well be a replacement available in the gallery, but that's not representative of how we normally conduct question time.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>No. I'm going to deal with this. We've all tried to improve standards, or I hope that's the goal of all members of parliament. We've had some serious incidents, as people know. That sort of language is beneath the dignity of this House. Manager, if you wish to say that in your own time and your own capacity, go for it. But, while I'm the Speaker, I want certain standards and for the decorum to be lifted and raised. I'm not happy with that sort of level of disrespect not to me but to the parliament. So I'm tempted to rule that question out and just move to the next one. But I want this to be a final warning that people cannot use that language in here. It is completely unacceptable. The member for Warringah on the point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Steggall</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In respect to your comments, Mr Speaker, it's incumbent on him, as the Manager of Opposition Business, to show respect and to show leadership. He should be asked to leave the chamber. That question is not in order. If we can't set the standards here, when will we?</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There is to be no disrespect to members. The manager was heard. The leader was heard. The member for Warringah is going to be shown that same courtesy as well. She's got a right to rise on the point of order. She's done that. We're going to deal with this properly, efficiently and effectively.</para>
<para>Government members interjecting—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Members on my right will cease interjecting. We're going to reset. I've made my views clear. I'm going to ask the manager to restate the question, use appropriate language and show respect in this House.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TEHAN</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. Will the minister just cut the faecal matter and tell Australians how much Labor's secret Capacity Investment Scheme is costing taxpayers?</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That is a direct defiance of what I just addressed to the House. I gave the member a fair go and he's completely disrespected me and the House. He'll leave the chamber under 94(a) and we will move to the next question. The language must improve. I respect the traditions and conventions of this House, and I want to uphold them. I'm asking all members to do so, for goodness sake.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The member for Wannon then left the chamber.</inline></para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>114</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PAYNE</name>
    <name.id>144732</name.id>
    <electorate>Canberra</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Welcome, Sage, the younger member for Canberra. My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Women. What actions has the Albanese Labor government taken to grow women's super, and what other approaches is the government being asked to consider?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CATHERINE KING</name>
    <name.id>00AMR</name.id>
    <electorate>Ballarat</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I give a shout-out to Maggie from Ballarat. Apologies for the juvenile behaviour we just saw. I thank the member for Canberra for her question. I particularly want to acknowledge her for the work that she does in this place, advocating for her constituents but also advocating for women, while she balances work and family life.</para>
<para>It's a really familiar story. Striking the right balance between work and family is something that families across the country have to do each and every single day. Every family will make the choice that is right for them, and that choice shouldn't come with a financial penalty on top. Caring now shouldn't mean financial insecurity in your retirement. Missing out on super to have kids adds up and, on average, women approaching retirement have 26 per cent less superannuation than men of the same age.</para>
<para>That's why the government has reformed the Paid Parental Leave scheme to ensure parents can have more time off and more money. We've also expanded paid parental leave to six months, and, as of July last year, parents receive superannuation on their paid parental leave. It is a crucial reform, and it will matter for women in retirement. It will help close that super gap between Australian men and women. It is great news for families, and it's just one of the ways we're supporting women and their superannuation.</para>
<para>We're reforming the low-income super tax offset to support low-income women to save more for their retirement, and we've introduced payday super to support earlier, more frequent employer super contributions. All of this, of course, builds on the progress that we are making in lifting wages and closing the gender pay gap now at a historic low of 11.3 per cent. That is how we make sure that women have economic choices and that they can live with dignity in their retirement.</para>
<para>Labor built superannuation, and we're strengthening it to ensure that working women are better off in their retirement. But, in the last week alone, we know we have seen the Liberals, the Nationals and One Nation again go back to form and threaten the existence of superannuation. They have described superannuation as a loss of liberty, they have confirmed they do not support universal contributions and they've bragged about their past policies. They would seek to start dismantling the superannuation scheme. That would see people with thousands of dollars less in their retirement incomes. That will particularly affect women.</para>
<para>Make no mistake; the Liberals, the Nationals and One Nation have never, ever supported a universal superannuation scheme. They don't support it. They don't like it. They've attempted, at every opportunity, to undermine it, and, if they're given the chance, that is exactly what they will do again. And the people who actually suffer as a result of that will primarily be Australian women on their retirement.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Capacity Investment Scheme</title>
          <page.no>115</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAMILTON</name>
    <name.id>291387</name.id>
    <electorate>Groom</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. Will the minister just tell Australians how much Labor's secret Capacity Investment Scheme is costing taxpayers?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for the question, and I recognise Maddison from McMahon, who is with us in the gallery today. The Capacity Investment Scheme is treated in the budget in a very similar way—in fact, in an identical way—to previous government programs of a similar nature, including programs that were administered by the then minister for energy, the Underwriting New Generation Investments program, the Snowy 2.0 business case that the member for Hume was responsible for, changes to the Clean Energy Regulator that the member for Wannon was responsible for and the Australian Naval Infrastructure that the member for Wannon was responsible for, all of which are noted as commercial in confidence in budget measures No. 2.</para>
<para>The point is that these projects that are supported by the Capacity Investment Scheme are all designed to bring more of the cheapest form of energy to the availability of Australians, a fact that was recognised—credit where it's due—by the member for Wannon last week. He issued a press release, and I must say I was touched. I don't get emotional much these days, but I was touched. It says the shadow minister for energy and emissions reduction, Dan Tehan, said Labor's net zero agenda was delivering the cheap and affordable energy Australia requires. It's so eloquent! I was very moved to read it.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Page, on a point of order.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Hogan</name>
    <name.id>218019</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The point of order is on relevance. The minister now has diverted into a whole lot of topics that have nothing to do with the Capacity Investment Scheme, and I ask him to return to the—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister has concluded his answer.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Paid Parental Leave Scheme</title>
          <page.no>115</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DAVID SMITH</name>
    <name.id>276714</name.id>
    <electorate>Bean</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Welcome to Darius from Bean. My question is to the Minister for Social Services. How is the Albanese Labor government delivering real change for Australian families now and into the future with expanded paid parental leave? What are the risks to this?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PLIBERSEK</name>
    <name.id>83M</name.id>
    <electorate>Sydney</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Thanks so much to the member for Bean for his question. More than 2,000 parents in his electorate benefited from paid parental leave last year, and, as the Minister representing the Minister for Women pointed out, paying superannuation on paid parental leave is one of the most important ways that we can end that retirement income gap that has been so prevalent in Australia for so many years. There is a big difference between those opposite and those on this side when it comes to super. We want people to have more when they retire, and you want people to have less when they retire.</para>
<para>When it comes to paid parental leave, we have increased paid parental leave since coming to government in 2022 to almost $30,000 for that leave. It's more than double what it was in 2022, and for just over a year we've been also paying superannuation on top of that. I released figures today that, in that first year of paying paid paying superannuation on paid parental leave, 200,000 people have benefited to the tune of 285½ million dollars. Now this is a huge difference for those mums when they retire. If you've got a woman with a median superannuation balance, she would be about $5,400 better off in retirement because of the change that we've made. Let's just take a fictional example: Let's call her Rachel. She's 25, she goes on to have three children and she takes paid parental leave for each of those children. Because of our changes in paying superannuation on top of that paid parental leave, Rachel could retire with an extra $17,600 in retirement. That's the difference that we're talking about.</para>
<para>One Nation have made it clear they want people to have less money in retirement. The Liberals have made that clear. They want people to have less in retirement. The Nationals have made it clear that they want people to have less money in retirement. We, on the other hand, are delighted that not only are we dealing with the gender pay gap and not only are we helping mums when they take time off work to look after their precious new babies but we are not condemning them to poverty in retirement as well. Welcome Caelan.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>115</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr SCAMPS</name>
    <name.id>299623</name.id>
    <electorate>Mackellar</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Welcome to Mila from Mackellar. My question is to the Minister for Health and Ageing and Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme. During the recent Senate inquiry, there were extensive warnings from disability advocates and state ministers that alternative foundational supports are not ready, fully funded or guaranteed to be operational before participants are moved off the scheme. Understandably, parents and carers are terrified that their kids could be left without the supports they need and rely on. How will the government ensure that no NDIS participant is exited from the scheme until appropriate foundation supports are fully funded and operational?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BUTLER</name>
    <name.id>HWK</name.id>
    <electorate>Hindmarsh</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you to the member for Mackellar and thank you to Zoe for representing Adelaide's western suburbs up there in the southern speaker's gallery. The way we'll ensure that is by making sure foundational supports are agreed by 1 January 2028. That is the agreement that all jurisdictions made with the Prime Minister through their heads of government, the premiers and chief ministers. This is not something that came out of the blue earlier this year. It was a decision of National Cabinet, back in 2023, to accept and endorse the core recommendations of the NDIS review that Bruce Bonyhady and Lisa Paul conducted back then, a central recommendation of which was to build that second tier of disability supports that was always envisaged by the Productivity Commission when recommending that our government back then put in place an NDIS. The tragedy is that those second tier supports weren't put in place. Many of them did pre-exist the NDIS, as the member knows, and were either dismantled entirely by state governments or at least degraded to a significant degree.</para>
<para>Back in 2023, when heads of government were making that decision, there was also a commitment for $10 billion—half funded by the Commonwealth and half collectively by states and territories—to fund what were called foundational supports, as recommended by the NDIS review. As the member knows, Thriving Kids is well under way. I've seen implementation plans, I think, by all state governments, with the exception of Queensland. We're very satisfied with progress being made there. They will start to ramp up from 1 October, with the expectation that they will be fully rolled out from 1 January 2028, when access and eligibility rules change for that cohort, which, as the member knows, is children under the age of nine.</para>
<para>For other participants or potential participants who would not satisfy the new substantially reduced functional capacity test that is currently being developed by the technical advisory group—I had my second meeting with them the week before last—yes, foundational support systems will have to be built for them as well. For kids over the age of nine and adults who might not end up being on the NDIS as a result of that new test being introduced, there's a lot of work for state governments and the Commonwealth to do there. We're committed to doing that work. The minister for the NDIS, Senator McAllister, met with her disability minister colleagues again on Friday. That was reaffirmed as an agreed commitment by all state governments.</para>
<para>Now, I understand people are nervous about these changes. I understand that they are significant changes about which we have had very constructive discussions with the opposition, which I want to acknowledge right now. And there's a lot of work to do, but we are absolutely committed to doing that. And as the Prime Minister and I have made clear, obviously we will not let Australians fall between two stools without proper supports. We will have them in place by 1 January.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>116</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Labor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Through you, Speaker, I'd like to welcome Bodhi, from Lalor, and address a question to the Minister for Housing. How is the Albanese Labor government helping to deliver security and stability by helping Australians into a home of their own? Is the minister aware of any risks to this work?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
    <electorate>Hotham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I acknowledge my friend Grisha, who's from Hotham and up in the public gallery, and I also thank the member for Lalor for her question. You're not going to believe this, but almost 6½ thousand of her constituents have got into their first home with the support of our government, and I want everyone she represents to know that she is in this parliament every day fighting for first home buyers to get the fair opportunities that they deserve.</para>
<para>Our government delivered a big housing budget in May, with $2 billion for last-mile infrastructure to build 65,000 more homes and landmark tax reforms to make our housing market fairer for every Australian. Labor believes that secure housing is the foundation of a decent life in this country. So is security in retirement, and Australians should not have to choose between the two, but, increasingly, that is what those opposite are trying to force Australians to do.</para>
<para>Now, if there is one truth emerging today in Australian politics, it is this: the coalition cannot govern this country alone. The numbers simply aren't there. Their only pathway back into government is in some kind of coalition with One Nation. But, instead of these parties pulling each other towards sensible solutions, what we increasingly see them do is chase each other down these extremist rabbit holes. And we see this in housing.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister will pause. The manager on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tehan</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>On relevance, as you say: the compare and contrast, or the risk, can be about the policy she's talking about, not going down rabbit holes, as she said, to completely irrelevant things.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister was asked about risks to the policy question that she was asked for about secure and stable housing, so I'm just going to make sure that she's covering that part of the compare and contrast, not a general topic.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We are increasingly seeing this prevail in our debate about housing. The Liberals have said they want Australians to raid their super to buy a home. Now, I remind the parliament that this is an idea that Saul Eslake said was the worst public policy idea in 60 years in our country. And now we've got Pauline Hanson getting on the same train.</para>
<para>Australians are really smart about housing and they know exactly what these policies will do. They will push house prices even higher, they will create a massive wealth transfer from the young people of our country to the older generation that own the most property wealth and they'll leave so many Australians without much super in their retirement. But what's worse is that those opposite are basically saying they're not even going to try to fix our broken housing market. Instead, they'll leave a broken system in place and ask Australians to raid their retirement to try to survive it. It is not the job of Australians to pay for a broken housing system by trashing their retirement. It is the job of this parliament to change our broken housing system, and that's exactly what our government is doing.</para>
<para>Australians deserve housing security and they deserve retirement security. The coalition and One Nation are going to make you sacrifice one to get the other. Labor is going to protect both.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>117</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to give a shout-out to Matilda as she leaves the gallery. My question is to the Minister for Veterans' Affairs. Minister, more than 20 veterans and family members are in Parliament House today—they're in the gallery as I speak—to raise their concerns about your broken promise to impose a $5,000 cap on veterans allied health services. Minister, these veterans have travelled to parliament to be heard. Why have you refused to meet them? What or who could possibly be more important?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KEOGH</name>
    <name.id>249147</name.id>
    <electorate>Burt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for his question. I give a shout-out to Alicia, who's the representative for Burt for the National Youth Parliament.</para>
<para>The promises element of the question that was made is completely unclear to me, but what is really important is what we are doing when it comes to allied health. It's about making it easier for our veteran community to access allied health services, because we have been hearing for a very long time that providers have been cutting back on providing these services or threatening to cut back on these services because of the fees paid to them.</para>
<para>We have committed nearly $170 million to make the biggest increase in fees being paid to allied health service providers in 20 years. This is incredibly important. We are matching that with removing the burdensome 12-session allied health treatment cycle, where veterans have to continually go back to see a GP to get a new referral every 12 sessions. As part of that, we're replacing that with an initial $5,000 threshold, and, as part of moving to that $5,000 threshold, we have committed to engaging with the veteran community to make sure that that works as seamlessly as possible.</para>
<para>I've been engaging with the veteran community, with ex-service organisations and with the practitioners that deliver that support. We were in the process of finalising a discussion paper to be able to deliver that consultation process.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister will pause. The member for Riverina on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCormack</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>My point of order is on relevance. I asked why the minister won't meet these veterans today.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister was asked a specific question. He'll need to confine his remarks to the question. I've given him some latitude, but he'll have to be short in his response.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KEOGH</name>
    <name.id>249147</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We're in the process of putting together a discussion paper that will be released for broad consultation with the veteran community. As I informed those people who wished to meet with me—</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! Members on my left will cease interjecting.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KEOGH</name>
    <name.id>249147</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thought they wanted an answer to the question.</para>
<para>Opposition members: We do.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister can come to his conclusion.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KEOGH</name>
    <name.id>249147</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>As they were informed last week by my office, I am unable to meet with them today, but, as I have continually said, and I engage with many ex-service organisations, we wish to engage with them and the practitioners in allied health services to make sure that we deliver a service that is available with no gap in service while they are accessing the clinically required allied health services.</para>
<para>We want to improve this access by paying allied health service providers more and by making it easier for veterans to access this without having to continually go back to a GP. We will continue to engage with the veterans sector. I am sure that as part of those engagements those people who have visited today will participate in providing feedback and engaging in the consultation forums that we will be running so that we get these reforms right.</para>
<para>If the opposition continue to want to shout instead of actually engaging in the policy development process, they're going to be incredibly unhelpful in getting those positive outcomes— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCormack</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I seek leave to table the minister's letter of refusal to meet with those heroes.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Burke</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Leave is not granted.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gun Control</title>
          <page.no>118</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAXALE</name>
    <name.id>299174</name.id>
    <electorate>Bennelong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Home Affairs. How is the Albanese Labor government progressing the gun buyback scheme to help keep people safe? What other approaches have been advanced in recent days?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Bennelong for raising the issue. After the appalling antisemitic terror attack which occurred in Bondi, we had an emergency sitting of this House where we took action on both the motivation and the method that was used in that attack. And the royal commission, in its interim report, called for the Commonwealth and the states to be implementing the buyback scheme. The government has now provided to all the states and territories, to all jurisdictions—because most of them have implemented it, in slightly different ways—a flexible system to allow them to participate in the buyback. Effectively, once any state is part of the buyback, they can then choose to include what the price points are and what ammunition, accessories and dealer compensation would be, and, wherever that lands within their compensation model, the cost is shared fifty-fifty with the Commonwealth. For example, phase 2 of the New South Wales buyback scheme, which starts in early 2027, will provide a pathway to compensation for eligible higher-value firearms with an indicative market value above $3,000.</para>
<para>I respect that when we established the buyback scheme it was not bipartisan across the parliament. Part of what didn't surprise me was that there would be a private member's bill in the Senate that would look at undoing this. But what stunned me—absolutely stunned me—with the private senator's bill that is in the Senate right now, moved by Senator Mckenzie, which I presume has the support of the National Party, the Liberal Party and One Nation, is that it doesn't just go against the aspects of the government's changes that deal with the number of firearms and the firearms that were used at Bondi. We all accept and we all know that the majority of gun owners are responsible people who use firearms for work, for sport and for recreation. But I'll tell you what stunned me: that legislation in the Senate right now, supported by all three of those parties, calls for the undoing of the restrictions we did on 3D printed weapons. These are the weapons where, if you get the software and the files, you can print firearms at home without regulation, something I thought was supported only by organised crime, only by the worst elements of our society. Just think that there is right now, on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline> in the Senate, a piece of legislation that would undo that says everything about who that crowd are trying to appeal to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>118</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STEGGALL</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
    <electorate>Warringah</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you to Gemma from Warringah for representing us. My question is to the Treasurer. Migrants fill critical workforce shortages across Australia, including doctors and nurses and in agriculture, aged care, child care and construction, where migrants can make up 30 per cent or more of the workforce. What modelling has Treasury done on the economic and productivity damage from cuts to skilled migration and working holiday maker visas? And which sectors or essential services would need to be scaled back because of worker shortages?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to thank the honourable member for the serious and considered way that she comes at this really important part of public policy in this country, and that is about migration and its contribution to the economy. For a really long time now in this country, migrants have made an essential contribution, not just to our economy but to our society. It's not always been the case that that's been recognised by everyone in this parliament, but it's recognised by this side of the parliament, and I believe that it's recognised in that part of the parliament as well.</para>
<para>A lot of work goes into ensuring that we're making the most of the economic benefit provided by migration. The Treasury has the Centre for Population. The Productivity Commission has done a bunch of work. The OECD has, and the Reserve Bank and others. And the consistent conclusion of all of that work over time is that migrants are more likely than not to make a big contribution to our economy. Often they provide a big part of the dynamism and the innovation in our economy. I know that the small business minister, who I engage with on this regularly, understands that truth—that so much of the innovation, creativity and dynamism, which is all about productivity, comes from migrant communities.</para>
<para>So our job, the responsibility that we embrace, is to make the most of that economic opportunity, fed by that considered methodical analysis that we get from all those places to make sure we're making the most of this opportunity, at the same time as getting net overseas migration down by 45 per cent below its peak, and with some further distance to travel as well.</para>
<para>I'm conscious that the honourable member asked about the damage done to our economy if we go about managing the migration system in the wrong way. We have, unfortunately, heard, in recent times in particular, that there are some in our community—and especially, in our politics, sitting over there—whose primary purpose, when it comes to thinking about and dealing with migration in this country, is to try and divide the community. We reject that irresponsible approach. The approach that they take in talking down our economy and dividing our community is bad for our economy, and it's bad for our society as well. So we will continue to work with anyone of goodwill who recognises that you can get net overseas migration down, as we are doing, at the same time that you can recognise and not diminish the really important role played by migrants in our economy and in our society as well.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>119</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:10</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SITOU</name>
    <name.id>298121</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. How are the government's reforms supporting young people to get into homeownership? What impact are they having on housing supply? Is there any opposition to this policy?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Reid for her question, and I thank her for welcoming me to Five Dock yesterday for Ferragosto, a celebration of the Italian Australian community commemorating the ascension into heaven of the Virgin Mary. That is an important event in Italy, and one of the great things about our multicultural Australia is that we get to celebrate events that are held right around the world right here in Australia, in the Australian way.</para>
<para>The Labor government is delivering real change through our $47 billion Homes for Australia plan. We have more first home buyers than we've ever seen before. Over 490,000 loans have been issued to first home buyers under Labor. The important thing is that young people are getting a fair crack. At auctions around Australia on Saturday, unlike what was previously happening, young people could go and they weren't competing against investors seeking to use negative gearing, and they were getting access to their own home. That was the objective, because the primary purpose of housing is to get a roof over people's heads. That is the primary purpose of housing, and that is being achieved by young people right around the country.</para>
<para>But I'm also asked about what the impact is on supply. What we have done is make sure that, if you want to participate in negative gearing, you still can. But the difference is that you will not only be investing in your future and your future assets; you'll be investing in the nation by investing in a new build. And the figures released by the ABS last Friday show that it is working. In the June quarter, there was a 27 per cent increase in investor loans for new builds and a 20 per cent increase for construction loans. Now, there are a few people who know about building in Australia, like Harry Triguboff and others, who are all saying that this is having a positive impact on new builds. That is why the policy was designed that way, very deliberately, to separate out first home buyers. It gives them a fair crack, but, at the same time, it boosts supply, along with the other measures that we have in place that are boosting supply, including through the Housing Australia Future Fund and the Build to Rent scheme. All these measures aimed at boosting supply in this country are making a difference.</para>
<para>On that note, Mr Speaker, I ask that further questions be placed on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline>.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>119</page.no>
        <type>BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Leave of Absence</title>
          <page.no>119</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That leave of absence until 17 September 2026 be given to Mr Young for personal reasons.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH</title>
        <page.no>119</page.no>
        <type>GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Address-in-Reply</title>
          <page.no>119</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'll just remind the House that the address-in-reply will be presented to Her Excellency the Governor-General at Government House at 5.30 pm this afternoon. I would be glad if the mover and seconder, together with other honourable members, would accompany me to present the address.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DOCUMENTS</title>
        <page.no>120</page.no>
        <type>DOCUMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Presentation</title>
          <page.no>120</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Documents are tabled in accordance with the list circulated to honourable members earlier today. Full details of the documents will be recorded in the <inline font-style="italic">Votes and Proceedings</inline>.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MOTIONS</title>
        <page.no>120</page.no>
        <type>MOTIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel</title>
          <page.no>120</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Attempted Censure</title>
            <page.no>120</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr THOMPSON</name>
    <name.id>281826</name.id>
    <electorate>Herbert</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Herbert from moving the following motion immediately:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House censures the Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister for Defence Personnel for failing to meet today with veterans about the Government's cruel cuts to allied health services for veterans.</para></quote>
<para>This is a national shame. This should not be occurring. The minister couldn't even stay and answer this himself. He hasn't met with the veterans who've served this nation who are demanding, demanding that this Labor government's cruel cuts to allied health services be revoked. A $5,000 cut for allied health for those that have served this nation is a disgrace. It's a disgrace.</para>
<para>Right now, veterans around the country are hurting. Say you have post-traumatic stress disorder, a shoulder injury, lumbar spondylosis, a knee injury and you're not doing too well. You look up, and the only light you can see is that you're getting treatment. When you hit that $5,000 cap, that light gets taken away, and it goes dark. What are you supposed to do? The minister says: 'Just call the department.' How? Get on the phone for 45 minutes, four hours, nobody knows. When you're not doing well this is not what you should have to go through.</para>
<para>I've been told by veterans in towns all around the country: 'I will not be a burden on my family. I will not be a burden.' Do you know what that means? That's a plan. That's someone who's made a plan that, when the $5,000 cap runs out in about three months for them, they won't be here anymore. That's what veterans are saying. That's what veterans that came here to parliament today are saying. But the minister couldn't clear a diary schedule, couldn't miss lunch for a day, couldn't just change something to meet with these veterans. There is nothing more important than making sure that our veterans, those that we've asked to serve, can get to see their minister. They can stand there and say, 'we don't agree'. The minister doesn't have to agree, but he must listen.</para>
<para>This is simply not good enough. I've spoken about my own experiences, about my own mental illness, in this place before. I know how difficult it is when you're going through it, when those days turn into nights and you can't remember the last time you've slept, when you don't know what the pain medication you had or you don't know if you started or stopped, when you don't know who to call and when the only things you're thinking about are how tough it is and how the department's not listening. That next call determines whether you're here or not. If they don't answer or you can't get the support or the mental health treatment that you need—I know what happens next because I've carried the coffins of my friends. I know what happens next because I've been in that hole. I know what happens next because Julie-Ann Finney is sitting in the gallery holding a photo of her son.</para>
<para>We must get rid of this cap. We had veterans, allied health services, a GP and an OT sitting in the gallery. To say that they're screaming out for this cap to be placed on top of veterans is not true. It is not true, and it shouldn't be there. It is not what we want. It's not what my friends want. It's not what the guys that are calling me on the weekend going, 'mate, I don't know how much longer I will have if this $5,000 cap is there' want. 'Where am I supposed to get the support I need? Who do I call? Where does the help come from?' It doesn't.</para>
<para>Those families who have that extra burden placed on top of them look at their loved one. They look at that person who is their trusted rock and who served this nation proudly, whether in peacekeeping, humanitarian or combat operations. Their person is hurting and their person can't get the support they need. What happens next? I don't have the answer, and clearly the minister doesn't either. The minister's job is to listen, work and deliver for the veteran community.</para>
<para>That's why this motion is so important, and that's why the suspension is so important, because he's not meeting with the veteran community. He's not listening. He's not working for and he's definitely not delivering for them. He's decided to cut and run during this suspension. He didn't answer the question in question time. We had a bunch of veterans and family members stand up so he could see them and so that they could be counted, and all he looked at was the shadow minister and wanted to point and say that he shouldn't have asked that question. It was not good enough. The Prime Minister should meet with these veterans and family members. I remember in government I was sat in the room with the then prime minister and with veterans who were red-hot mad at us. You know what? We stood there, we listened, we spoke to them, we understood, and—you know what?—we made changes. It went from not being a government policy to being a government policy because our job is to listen, work for and deliver on. These promises, that this government is looking after veterans, is false. It is not happening.</para>
<para>I'm sure that he's popped in unannounced, but, in the largest garrison city in the country, Townsville, we have the most veterans per capita. No-one that has come to my office has said, 'I'm really happy that the Labor government has decided to put a $5,000 cap on my allied health services.' They've never said that. They've said, 'Where am I going to get the support?' Family members have been crying down the phone to me going: 'How is my loved one supposed to get help? How is my loved one supposed to get their allied health practitioner on the phone or get the services?' These poor allied-health-service providers are going to start turning people away. That's why they flew to Canberra today. That's why they're here. They're not veterans, but they're standing there going, 'Our people, who we serve and who've served us aren't going to get the service any more.' From a knee injury or a back injury to shoulder or mental illness, once it's compounding and once it's all there, it will be unbearable. I know it's unbearable, because I've looked in the mirror and seen it myself. I know it's unbearable because I've taken two-o'clock-in-the-morning phone calls from veteran mates of mine who are talking about suicide, who have a plan. Veterans now are talking about not being a burden. That's a plan, and that's a worry. It's incumbent on every person in this parliament to make sure that not one veteran is worse off, let alone a veteran who could succumb to their war within and die by suicide, because of bad legislation.</para>
<para>This should be debated. It should have been answered in question time, but the minister should have just met with these veterans. It's just what he should do, and I expect him to come in here, stand at the despatch box and debate this. That's what he should be doing, but he's run out. Our veterans that were in here left before he finished speaking because of how disgusted they were. I want to be very clear they have very different political views than I do. They're from all walks of life and all different types of service. They walked out because their minister has refused to meet with them. Their minister wouldn't stand with them. Their minister has let them down and betrayed them. Those we send into dangerous places, those who we've sent on operations and all around, deserve the respect. On Anzac Day or Remembrance Day there is nothing more sure to me than a politician, especially a Labor politician, running to the first veteran and get a photo with their medals on their chest and post on their social media saying, 'Lest we forget.' 'Lest we forget' isn't a bunch of words. It's a commitment that we make in this parliament to make sure that we never let these brave men and women down, never, not on a Wednesday, not on Anzac Day—every single day. We need to be fighting for them, because right now this government isn't fighting for them. Right now this government is betraying them. I have veterans sending their medals back to me because of how upset they are and because of how betrayed they feel from this government.</para>
<para>You can't ask our men and women to serve this nation—fight for, defend, go on humanitarian missions—and then turn your back on them like you have today. You've turned your back on them. You have broken your commitment and your promise, and you should be ashamed of yourself. I would expect members of parliament, regardless of the colour of the shirt they wear, to support this suspension because it is the right thing to do. And, if you think it's not, then call your veterans up and tell them why, because the veterans from around the country that reach out to us are absolutely hurting, and so are their families.</para>
<para>The last thing I want to have to do is come in here, like I have before, and read out someone's service number or PMKeyS, their name and where they've served, because they have succumbed to their war within. We can prevent this. We can stop this. We do not need any more veteran suicides. This parliament has an ability today and every other day to put our veterans first, and this minister should come in here and answer to them.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is there a seconder for the motion?</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:25</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I certainly second the motion. Standing and sessional orders must be suspended for this most important motion. Up in the gallery is Julie-Ann Finney; she's the mum of a veteran who took his own life. We also had amongst us this morning—amongst those heroes, amongst those veterans, amongst those who served our nation—Andrew 'Horse' Hudson, a decorated former SAS operator and canine handler who served for 22 years. He deployed in Afghanistan many, many times. We had Dr Tim Nelson, a former RAAF fighter pilot, who's now actually a GP, helping veterans.</para>
<para>Our veterans need help. What they don't need is cuts. What they don't need is a $5,000 allied health services cap. The cap is insidious. It is cruel. It is unnecessary. This government, this Australian Labor Party, that came to office in May 2022 saying it would not leave anyone behind has deserted our veterans and has turned its back on our veterans, who deserve better.</para>
<para>This parliament sends our men and our women to war, and those men and women have our backs when we most need it—when the Australian people most need it. Yet, when they come back and they return to civilian life, some of them are broken. Many are not, but some of them need help—psychological help, mental help, physical assistance. What happens is you get a budget like we had in May. The government turned its back on our veterans with this $5,000 cap. Shame on Labor! Labor said, 'Well, it's not just all about a cut or a cap or anything like that.' But I tell you what, in the budget papers there was a $748 million save—a $748 million cut to veterans. It is $748 million of valuable and valued assistance that is now not going to our veterans.</para>
<para>I have a veteran in Wagga Wagga who ultimately lost his leg because it hit a bolt on the other side of a wall in the obstacle course at the home of the soldier, Blamey Barracks. He is now an amputee. He has mental health problems, and he has, obviously, physical problems, with the loss of a leg. How can he be expected to reduce that service that he needs from his country, our country, to just $5,000 when he's lost his leg for his country? It is simply not good enough.</para>
<para>You've got heroes in the gallery today—20 of them—who came to parliament from right across this nation and who just want a meeting with the minister, and the minister is too tied up—too busy. I've been in those meetings, as has shadow minister Thompson. I've been in those meetings where, yes, it is difficult to listen. Yes, they are not on your side. But you owe it to the veterans, you owe it to the constituents and you owe it to taxpayers to meet them, to look them in the eye, to listen to them and to do what's dignified—to give them respect. And our veterans deserve respect. They put on a military uniform, and they are the best of the best in this nation. And then you get a mum who lost her son. All she wants is 15 minutes with the minister—to sit beside those other heroes, those veterans, and tell the minister why they think he should go back to the drawing board on this cruel $5,000 cap.</para>
<para>There was no consultation on this cap prior to the budget, and Labor says, 'Well, we'll consult after.' Well, it's not good enough afterwards. It should have been done before the budget, and it wasn't. I don't know why it wasn't, but I tell you what: our veterans are angry. There is white-hot anger out there, and they have every reason to be angry, because they fought hard for this country. They deserve better from this country. And they deserve better from this minister, who's still got time to meet them today.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHARLTON</name>
    <name.id>I8M</name.id>
    <electorate>Parramatta</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the debate be adjourned.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question before the House is that the debate be adjourned.</para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
            <division.header>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:35]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Milton Dick) </p>
              </body>
            </division.header>
            <division.data>
              <ayes>
                <num.votes>86</num.votes>
                <title>AYES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Abdo, B. J.</name>
                  <name>Aly, A.</name>
                  <name>Ambihaipahar, A.</name>
                  <name>Belyea, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Berry, C. G.</name>
                  <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                  <name>Briskey, J. L.</name>
                  <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                  <name>Burnell, M. P.</name>
                  <name>Butler, M. C.</name>
                  <name>Byrnes, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Campbell, J. P.</name>
                  <name>Chalmers, J. E.</name>
                  <name>Charlton, A. H. G.</name>
                  <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                  <name>Clare, J. D.</name>
                  <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                  <name>Clutterham, C. L.</name>
                  <name>Coffey, R. K.</name>
                  <name>Coker, E. A.</name>
                  <name>Collins, J. M.</name>
                  <name>Comer, E. L.</name>
                  <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                  <name>Cook, K. M. G.</name>
                  <name>Cook, P. A.</name>
                  <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                  <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Fernando, C. J.</name>
                  <name>France, A. A.</name>
                  <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                  <name>French, T. A.</name>
                  <name>Garland, C. M. L.</name>
                  <name>Georganas, S.</name>
                  <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Gorman, P. P.</name>
                  <name>Gosling, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Gregg, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                  <name>Holzberger, R. A. V.</name>
                  <name>Jarrett, M. L.</name>
                  <name>Jordan-Baird, M. A. M.</name>
                  <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                  <name>Keogh, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                  <name>King, C. F.</name>
                  <name>King, M. M. H.</name>
                  <name>Lawrence, T. N.</name>
                  <name>Laxale, J. A. A.</name>
                  <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                  <name>Lim, S. B. C.</name>
                  <name>Mascarenhas, Z. F. A.</name>
                  <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                  <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                  <name>Miller-Frost, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                  <name>Moncrieff, D. S.</name>
                  <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                  <name>Neumann, S. K.</name>
                  <name>Ng, G. J.</name>
                  <name>O'Neil, C. E.</name>
                  <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Phillips, F. E.</name>
                  <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                  <name>Rae, S. T.</name>
                  <name>Reid, G. J.</name>
                  <name>Repacholi, D. P.</name>
                  <name>Rishworth, A. L.</name>
                  <name>Roberts, T. G.</name>
                  <name>Ryan, J. C.</name>
                  <name>Scrymgour, M. R.</name>
                  <name>Sitou, S.</name>
                  <name>Smith, D. P. B. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Smith, M. J. H.</name>
                  <name>Soon, X.</name>
                  <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Teesdale, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                  <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                  <name>Urquhart, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                  <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                  <name>White, R. P.</name>
                  <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
                  <name>Witty, S. J.</name>
                  <name>Zappia, A.</name>
                </names>
              </ayes>
              <noes>
                <num.votes>43</num.votes>
                <title>NOES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Aldred, M. R. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Batt, D. J.</name>
                  <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                  <name>Birrell, S. J.</name>
                  <name>Boyce, C. E.</name>
                  <name>Buchholz, S.</name>
                  <name>Caldwell, C. M.</name>
                  <name>Chaffey, J. L.</name>
                  <name>Chaney, K. E.</name>
                  <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                  <name>Farley, D.</name>
                  <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                  <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                  <name>Hogan, K. J.</name>
                  <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                  <name>Kennedy, S. P.</name>
                  <name>Landry, M. L. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Le, D. T.</name>
                  <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                  <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                  <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                  <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                  <name>McKenzie, Z. A.</name>
                  <name>O'Brien, E. L.</name>
                  <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                  <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                  <name>Penfold, A. L.</name>
                  <name>Pike, H. J.</name>
                  <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                  <name>Rebello, L. S.</name>
                  <name>Scamps, S. A.</name>
                  <name>Small, B. J.</name>
                  <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                  <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Thompson, P.</name>
                  <name>Venning, T. H.</name>
                  <name>Violi, A. A.</name>
                  <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                  <name>Watson-Brown, E.</name>
                  <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Wilkie, A. D.</name>
                  <name>Willcox, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                </names>
              </noes>
              <pairs>
                <num.votes>0</num.votes>
                <title>PAIRS</title>
                <names />
              </pairs>
            </division.data>
            <division.result>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.<br />Debate adjourned.</p>
              </body>
            </division.result>
          </division></subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>123</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Public Works Joint Committee</title>
          <page.no>123</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>123</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ZAPPIA</name>
    <name.id>HWB</name.id>
    <electorate>Makin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Standing Committee on Public Works, I present the committee report <inline font-style="italic">5/2026: Referral made March 2026</inline>.</para>
<para>Report made a parliamentary paper in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ZAPPIA</name>
    <name.id>HWB</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—This report considers two proposed works: Australian Federal Police—proposed fit-out of leased premises, 949 Ann Street, Brisbane, for an estimated budget of $89.3 million; and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation—upgrade and fit-out of Building 302 Research Way, Clayton, Victoria, for an estimated budget of $18.27 million.</para>
<para>In considering these proposed works, the committee received submissions, conducted site inspections, received private briefings and conducted public and in-camera hearings with relevant government officials and other interested parties. The committee travelled to Melbourne to visit the CSIRO Aspendale site, which is to be replaced by Building 302 Research Way at CSIRO Clayton, and the AFP Southern Command site to view the features that would be incorporated into the design of the proposed AFP Brisbane site—AFP Northern Command—upon completion of the project. After giving due consideration to the evidence that the committee received, the committee sees merit in these proposals and therefore recommends that it is expedient for both proposed works to proceed.</para>
<para>The fit-out of the proposed AFP Northern Command in Brisbane will provide essential accommodation and facilities to support the AFP's capacity in responding to an increasingly complex operational landscape. The committee was able to meet with some of the diligent AFP officers and staff during the site inspection in Melbourne and thanks those who took the time to demonstrate how these upgraded facilities support their work. The committee also commends the AFP's SHIELD program, which supports the health and wellbeing of officers at the forefront of protecting Australians from some of the most deplorable crimes, and notes how the proposed design of the AFP Northern Command will enhance access to these services. The committee acknowledges that Brisbane, and Queensland more broadly, is rapidly growing in strategic significance and accepts that a fit-for-purpose facility is essential for the AFP's continued efforts to secure Australia's future in the region.</para>
<para>The CSIRO Aspendale site has played a foundational role in putting Australia at the forefront of climate, ocean and atmospheric science for 50 years. At the site inspection, the committee were able to see firsthand how the very committed scientists and staff have continued to support Australia's resilience and productivity through world-leading research despite outdated, inefficient and inadequate facilities. The proposed work will address this by providing high-specification laboratory and fit-for-purpose technical spaces at its existing Clayton site. The committee accepts that this represents an effective and economic use of existing CSIRO assets and therefore considers it both operationally necessary and of value to the public.</para>
<para>I thank the secretariat for their assistance in both of these hearings and in this report and also my colleagues on the Public Works Committee, again, for their assistance and support in coming to the conclusions that we did. I commend the report to the House.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>124</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>124</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7501" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>124</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MILLER-FROST</name>
    <name.id>296272</name.id>
    <electorate>Boothby</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>At the Flinders University city campus, which was established to provide a more easily accessible campus for students from the northern suburbs of Adelaide, almost half the students are the first in their family to attend university. Flinders University's commitment to education equity is internationally recognised. It is now ranked fourth in the world for reducing socioeconomic inequality and for its exceptional facilitation of access for first-in-family students and students with disability and disadvantage. It's also ranked sixth in the world and first in Australia for gender equality. Flinders has also placed 36th out of more than 1000 universities in the global university impact ratings.</para>
<para>Last month, Flinders launched the 2050 alliance, which is committed to the Universities Accord goal of ensuring that 80 per cent of the workforce has a degree within the next few decades. The university continues to expand access to First Nations students, students with disability, gender-diverse students, women and refugees.</para>
<para>It's often said that education is a right and not a privilege. It's also said that Australia is the land of opportunity. And yet, for far too long, education has been a privilege and not a right. The opportunities have only been available to a select few Australians. The Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026 will ensure that someone's background is not a determinant of their educational success and their future success. Where funding is genuinely needed, funding will be given.</para>
<para>The bill also recognises the economic imperative of a more expansive higher education system, because the demand for workers with a certificate, diploma or degree is fast outpacing the number of graduates to meet that demand. We risk becoming a less competitive and less innovative country as a result. Education is crucial to Australia's economic future, and this bill will help to secure that future. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WATSON-BROWN</name>
    <name.id>300127</name.id>
    <electorate>Ryan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Universities Accord set worthy goals for the reform of Australia's tertiary education sector, and this bill makes progress in some areas: an increase in the number of Commonwealth supported places overall, additional funding for disadvantaged students and more support for regional institutions. These are all very welcome changes. However, this bill is currently subject to a Senate inquiry, and the submissions so far have highlighted numerous flaws. We do have some concerns about capping international students, reducing student choice and the risk of ministerial overreach. The Greens will explore these in the inquiry, reserving our position in the Senate.</para>
<para>This bill was a real opportunity for the government to make badly needed, lasting reforms to the university sector. Reforms include abolishing the disastrous Job-ready Graduates scheme, which Labor opposed before they were elected but have left in place for four years; abolishing HECS debt and incentivising our young people to pursue a tertiary education in the way the Prime Minister, I and others here in this place were able when we accessed university—for free; and improving housing affordability for students, who face such imposing power imbalances with corporate landlords and who are so often choosing between proper meals and textbooks.</para>
<para>But did the government pursue these crucial, ambitious reforms? No. Instead, they've stooped to the crudest, lowest common-denominator politics, which is 'us versus them', with a new proposal to slash the number of international students. These students come here to learn from our world-class institutions, to improve their prospects and to make a contribution. These students make tertiary education one of Australia's biggest and most valuable exports. These students, quite frankly, help to keep our universities afloat with their significant tuition fees. Rather than saying, 'Thanks so much for choosing to study here in Australia,' or, 'Thank you for contributing to our academic institutions,' or, 'Thank you for contributing so much to our economy,' the government is instead demonising international students. They're blaming them for Australia's economic woes—things like the housing crisis. The housing crisis is not the fault of international students; it's the fault of successive governments making wrong policy choices. Labor is picking an easy target rather than taking responsibility. Perhaps the government has forgotten its manners, because in my opinion that is no way to treat your guests.</para>
<para>An immigrant never privatised my Commonwealth Bank. An immigrant never flogged off my energy sector, my telecommunications or my toll roads. An immigrant did not give away our gas for free to multinational corporations. An immigrant never starved my schools and hospitals of funding. An immigrant never undercut wage growth and let inflation get out of hand. An immigrant never decimated public housing and handed our real estate market over to speculators and developers. You know who did all that? It was Labor and Liberal politicians. So it's no wonder who is looking to blame immigrants; it's the politicians.</para>
<para>Recent reports say that Labor is gearing up to blame immigrants for our dropping living standards, possibly cutting back on family visas and backpackers. It's a very convenient distraction. Labor, Liberals, One Nation—they all love this distraction. But does anyone really believe decreasing the number of family visas is going to make our lives better? No, it won't. In fact, it's the very opposite. The only thing this immigrant blaming will achieve is turning us against each other at the very moment when Australians, no matter where they come from, need to come together and say, 'Enough is enough with this corporate rip-off.' We're losing control of this country not to immigrants but to the massive corporations who hold the old parties in their thrall. And who is to blame for this? It's Liberal and Labor politicians. Labor and Liberal politicians for decades have accepted huge donations from big corporations, funding their election campaigns and paying for their perks. In return, those politicians roll over and do what they are told.</para>
<para>Australians aren't stupid. We can all see what's happening. We know that Labor and Liberal politicians do their corporate masters' bidding. But we must not fall for their latest distraction. We cannot allow them to divide us based on who we are or where we come from.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms THWAITES</name>
    <name.id>282212</name.id>
    <electorate>Jagajaga</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>At its heart, this bill, the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026, is about opportunity. It's about making sure that, wherever you grow up, whatever your parents earn or whatever your postcode is, is not determining what you can achieve. We on this side know that education changes lives. It opens doors and creates opportunities not only for individuals but for families, communities and our country. We also know that talented people who want to work hard and get ahead exist everywhere in this country. But, unfortunately, opportunity doesn't always exist everywhere, and that is what we are changing with this bill. This bill is about ensuring more Australians have the chance to study, to develop new skills and to build the careers they dream of while helping Australia to prepare for the future.</para>
<para>We're very aware that the jobs our children and our grandchildren will have in the future won't look the same as the jobs that many of us graduated from university or training into. Technology is transforming workplaces. Artificial intelligence is changing the way we work. The transition to clean energy is creating entirely new industries in our country. Medical science continues to make extraordinary breakthroughs. Our population is ageing, creating a greater demand for nurses, doctors, allied health professionals, teachers, social workers and carers. I do believe that these changes bring enormous opportunity, but they also require us to think differently about education.</para>
<para>The Australian Universities Accord that our government set up recognised that challenge that is in front of us. It's provided us with a blueprint for Australia's higher education system over the coming decades. It tells us that, by 2050, around 80 per cent of Australians will need a university degree, diploma or certificate to meet the demands of our future workforce. So this isn't simply an education challenge. It's an economic challenge that our country faces. It's a productivity challenge. It is a nation-building challenge. We are clear that Australia's greatest resource is not just what lies beneath our feet. It is in fact our people. It is their ideas, their skills, their creativity and their potential. So we must make sure we unlock that potential. If we want Australia to remain prosperous, competitive and resilient, we need to continue our investment in people, and that is exactly what this bill does.</para>
<para>Our government asked the Australian Universities Accord to consider a range of issues, including the former coalition's job-ready graduates scheme. We've now implemented every recommendation of the accord's interim report, and we've started the work of implementing recommendations from the final report. Over the last two years, we've implemented 31 of the 47 recommendations in full or in part. As the Minister for Education has said, there's more work to do. He has said that the scheme is unfinished business. I hear from people in my community who remain concerned about the job-ready graduates scheme. The government is and will keep working through the recommendations in the final report and will take advice from ATEC as well.</para>
<para>We have a good track record in this space. The Albanese government has made HECS fairer by cutting student debt by 20 per cent. We've fixed unfair education and raised the repayment threshold so that graduates keep more of what they earn. We've introduced an expanded paid prac for teaching, nursing, midwifery and social work students. We've expanded university study hubs across regional and suburban Australia, including one near my community in Epping. We've increased free university preparation courses. We've established the National Student Ombudsman and strengthened protections against gender based violence on campus. We've made Commonwealth-supported places demand driven for First Nations students who earn the marks to get in. We've established the Australian Tertiary Education Commission and we've made free TAFE permanent, which is already making a real difference for students at our local Greensborough and Heidelberg West polytechnic campuses. The reforms we're delivering through this work build on that, creating a new funding system that helps universities grow while making sure more Australians have the opportunity to study and to succeed. Australia needs more graduates, and universities need certainty to plan for that growth.</para>
<para>Students also deserve and need to know that there will be opportunities available to them. The new managed-growth funding system will help to make sure that that happens. It will allow the Commonwealth to better plan where university places are needed and to support universities to grow in a sustainable way. This bill also introduced demand-driven, needs based funding. This is one of the components of this legislation that will make the biggest difference, because, of course, getting into university is only part of the journey. We know that students also need the support to finish, and there have been too many cases where capable young Australians begin university only to, while they're there, find themselves struggling financially while they're juggling work commitments, caring responsibilities or perhaps simply feeling like they don't belong or they're not doing well enough. This bill recognises that struggle. Universities that educate more students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds, from First Nations communities and from regional campuses will receive additional funding to support those students. That funding can be used for tutoring, mentoring, academic support, scholarships, emergency financial assistance and wellbeing services. That is going to change the experience for those students who need it most. It is going to make sure that, as well as getting a pathway into university and higher education, they have the opportunity not just to stay there but to thrive while they are there.</para>
<para>Under this new, needs based funding system, the amount of funding per student will more than double next year in some cases. Like our Gonski funding for schools, the more students a university has that meet the criteria, the more funding they will receive to help those students to participate and to succeed at university. That's what fairness looks like. That's what helping Australians to get ahead looks like. It is what Labor governments have always believed in and how we deliver not just for Australians today but for the future of those to come and for our country as we build for the future.</para>
<para>One thing the Liberals, Nationals and One Nation have shown us time and time again is that they are unwilling to support fairness and opportunity for Australians who do want to get the skills and qualifications to get ahead. They opposed free TAFE. They opposed cutting student debt by 20 per cent. They opposed making student loan repayments fairer. Every time this government acts to open the doors of opportunity to more Australians, those opposite find a reason to vote no.</para>
<para>Just recently we saw another example of how they see Australians who deserve more support to get ahead. We saw that through Senator Bragg saying that Australians on lower incomes should simply accept lower quality housing. It tells you everything about the priorities of those opposite. Whether it's cutting free TAFE, our efforts to cut student debt, cheaper child care, strengthening paid parental leave or expanding Medicare, the choice is clear. Labor believes government should help people get ahead no matter where they come from or how much they earn. Those opposite have shown time and again that, when we act to give Australians a fair go, they will stand in our way.</para>
<para>In Jagajaga we're fortunate to have a fantastic local university, La Trobe University, which supports our community. For generations La Trobe has opened doors for students from Melbourne's north-east and from well beyond. It supports graduates who go on to strengthen not just our community but also those right across the nation. I know that La Trobe has for a very long time had a reputation of supporting students who do come from diverse backgrounds, who do come from a diverse range of socioeconomic backgrounds. We're seeing incredible work happening through the biomedical precinct, where research, education and health care are coming together to improve lives. We see exciting investment in emerging technologies, including quantum research, at La Trobe, helping to prepare Australia for the industries of tomorrow. I'm confident that the students studying there today will become tomorrow's innovators and our teachers, engineers, psychologists, researchers, climate scientists and business leaders.</para>
<para>I'm pleased that many of them come from suburbs across Jagajaga, from Heidelberg West, Bellfield, Macleod, Watsonia, Greensborough, Montmorency and Eltham. Some of them are the first in their family to attend university, and we want that to continue to be the case. We want to see that build. We know that, at the moment, a young person from a low-income family is still far less likely to attend university than someone from a wealthier background. We know that students from regional Australia continue to face additional barriers. We know that many First Nations students face challenges that others simply don't. None of that reflects a lack of ability; it reflects unequal opportunity. This bill is our government assuring Australians that we can and will do better.</para>
<para>These reforms are expected to support around 230,000 additional commencing domestic university students over the next decade. That's 230,000 more Australians with the opportunity to build a career they love, to contribute to our economy and to build a stronger society for all of us. That's the future teachers, nurses, engineers, researchers, scientists and innovators. That's the people who'll be in jobs that we can't even dream of at the moment. But doing this work now, setting our country up so that all Australians get the opportunity, is what being future ready looks like. It's not just about preparing people for their first job; it's about preparing Australians for the careers that will evolve over decades and giving people the skills to adapt, to continue learning and to embrace change throughout their lives, no matter what their background is.</para>
<para>I have this conversation regularly in my community. People look to government and say: 'Are you going to build us a stronger community going forward? In a time that feels uncertain, what are you doing to make sure that the Australian promise will continue to be there and that there is opportunity for all?' I assure those people in my community and around the country that that's what this government continues to be focused on—making sure that all Australians get that opportunity to get ahead, to get an education and, with our further reforms, to get a foot into the housing market. So I'm so pleased that we are delivering this work through this bill and through the universities accord, building a tertiary education system that's connected, flexible and focused on the future.</para>
<para>Labor has always believed that education is one of the greatest investments any government can make. Our track record is clear, and we are not resting on our laurels. We know that every generation benefits because previous generations invest in education, so our responsibility is to leave the next generation with more opportunities that we inherited. This bill backs aspiration. It prepares Australia for the future, no matter what that future may be. I am disappointed, as ever, that those opposite lack that ambition for Australians and lack that ambition for students now and into the future, and that they are not backing more opportunities but instead standing in the way of this progress. Wherever you grow up and whatever your circumstances are, if you have the talent and the determination to succeed, Australia should back you. That is what this government is doing with this bill. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>127</page.no>
        <type>BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Rearrangement</title>
          <page.no>127</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the following from occurring on Tuesday, 18 August 2026:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) immediately following the second reading of the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the bill being considered in detail and taken as a whole, with any detail amendments to be moved together as, one set for the government, one set for the opposition and one set per crossbench Member, unless a Minister requires otherwise, and:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) one question being put on any government amendments;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) one question being put on any opposition amendments;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iii) separate questions being put on any sets of amendments moved by crossbench Members; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iv) a separate question being put that the bill [as amended] be agreed to;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) debate on any amendments provided for under paragraph 1(a) being limited to up to ten minutes for each question unless a Minister requires the debate to be extended;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) at 5.30 pm, if consideration of the bill has not concluded, any amendments circulated [that have not been considered] being treated as if they had been moved [together] by the Member proposing them, unless a Minister requires otherwise, and all questions required to complete the detail stage being put immediately; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) the question being put immediately on the third reading;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) immediately following proceedings on the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, the order of the day for the resumption of the debate on the National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026 being called on and:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) any second reading amendments circulated being treated as if they had been moved by the Member proposing them;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the questions being put immediately on any second reading amendments and on the second reading of the bill;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the bill being considered in detail and taken as a whole, with any detail amendments circulated being treated as if they had been moved [together] by the Member proposing them, with:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) one question being put immediately on any government amendments;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) one question being put immediately on any opposition amendments; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iii) separate questions being put immediately on any sets of amendments moved by crossbench Members; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iv) a separate question being put that the bill [as amended] be agreed to; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) the question being put immediately on the third reading;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) immediately following proceedings on the National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026, the order of the day for the resumption of the debate on the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026 being called on and a cognate debate taking place with the News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2026, News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026, News Media Bargaining Charge Bill 2026 and the Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Bill 2026, and proceedings on the bills having priority until 7.30 pm;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) at 8 pm, notwithstanding standing order 31, the adjournment debate being interrupted, and debate on the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026 and four related bills having priority:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) until the bills have proceeded through all stages; or</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) 10 pm; or</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) a later time specified by a Minister prior to 10 pm;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">at which point, the House immediately adjourning until 9 am on Wednesday, 19 August; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) any variation to this arrangement being made only on a motion moved by a Minister.</para></quote>
<para>For the benefit of members, I'll explain what this means for tomorrow. Obviously today we finish at 4.30 pm because of a motion I moved last week. I have consulted with the Manager of Opposition Business on this, and I thank him for the consultation. At midday tomorrow we will vote on the second reading amendments and the second reading of the bill relating to gambling.</para>
<para>Given the need to finish the bill before 6.30 pm to make sure that we can conduct divisions here and we can get it across to the Senate, we need to time manage the remainder of the debate. I'm anticipating eight or nine sets of amendments on those bills. One set of what we will be doing is having government amendments, opposition amendments and then crossbench amendments—the normal thing of one government, one opposition, one crossbench. A minister can allow for someone to move a second. So, if someone's in that particular circumstance, they can let me know. After the MPI, we'll then return to consideration in detail.</para>
<para>On looking at the time currently, particularly by dealing with this now, this will give us an extra half-hour tomorrow. This is why I'm doing it now. It means we should actually have proper time to debate all the amendments before we hit 5.30. If we were to hit 5.30, then, effectively, everything that's been circulated will be taken as having been moved, and we would then go into consecutive votes until we finish the entire package. That entire package involves the debate we've been conducting cognately, as well as the additional bill that was introduced to the House this morning.</para>
<para>Once we have finished those bills, we will then move on to the debate on the news journalism payment bills. We will stay on that until 7.30. Then we'll pretend we're having an adjournment debate—five-minute speeches until eight—and we'll then go back to the news bargaining code bills. I don't know how many people will want to speak on that, but we'll keep the House going until 10 pm if speakers require us to do that. Then I expect it would be on Wednesday morning that we would deal with the remaining stages of that particular piece of legislation.</para>
<para>I commend the suspension to the House.</para>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>129</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>129</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7501" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>129</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SMALL</name>
    <name.id>291406</name.id>
    <electorate>Forrest</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Yet again, we find ourselves in this place debating a bill that's got a title that's pretty hard to disagree with. Labor want to pretend that this bill, the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026, is about funding and student places. They want to pretend that it's about increasing university funding to help poor kids, Indigenous kids and kids from the bush—kids from regional electorates—to get a go. If that's all this bill did, then the coalition would be in full support of it.</para>
<para>However, we have to reserve our position at this stage because this bill needs to go through a Senate inquiry so Australians can have their say. The reality is that, time and time again, through these inquiries, we see the sort of feedback that points out glaring holes in the government's legislation. We saw that just in the winter break, with the Senate gambling inquiry, which was fought tooth and nail by the government but exposed clear holes in the bill. And so it is with the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill that we're here to debate today.</para>
<para>Once we've received that evidence and the Australian people have had their say, we will consider what our position ultimately is in the Senate and what amendments are necessary, because this bill is worthy of close scrutiny. It makes significant structural changes to the higher education system. We note concerns that have already emerged from the tertiary education sector about the consultation process the government has run, and that includes the fact that universities hadn't seen this bill before it was tabled in the parliament, that there are elements of the bill's drafting that surprise the tertiary education sector, that no exposure draft has been released and that stakeholders have been shown limited material under strict confidentiality arrangements. If the government had nothing to hide and this bill did all that it is purported to do and nothing else, one wonders why such poor consultation was conducted under such secrecy.</para>
<para>If the bill ultimately comes to a vote in the House before that Senate committee reports, we will find ourselves in uncertain territory. But it is appropriate that, as a party of alternative government, we take the time, we consult and we get our position right.</para>
<para>Let's consider what the problems are with our universities today. Unfortunately, they either have lost or are losing their social licence in Australia, and I believe it's because, for too many years now, universities in Australia have pursued indoctrination over education time and time again. What should be institutions that are homes of freedom of speech and freedom of academic integrity are, in fact, places of censorship, academic pile-ons and ideological confrontation.</para>
<para>Universities Australia held a summit this year, and the whole sector focused on their social licence. They did so because it's reflected in the data that domestic enrolments in universities are falling. In 2022, there were some 1.1 million domestic students studying at university in Australia. According to the most recent data, that number has fallen since the Albanese government came to office. It is now the lowest number of enrolments since 2019, and it is getting lower. That sends a very stark message from both the boots and the wallets of Australian students: their confidence in the Australian tertiary sector is declining.</para>
<para>According to the Department of Education, since 2022, when the Albanese government came to power, the ratio of students to teaching staff has increased, and the number of administrative, technical and operational staff is growing twice as fast as that of frontline teaching and research staff. That's on the department's own numbers.</para>
<para>The 2025 Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching Graduate Outcomes Survey recorded a record-low graduate satisfaction of 74.9 per cent. I'll say that again. This year's survey recorded record-low graduate satisfaction among young Australians who are taking the time and incurring the cost of pursuing a degree at an Australian university. That's an appalling outcome. Undergraduate ratings for student support and services were even lower—71.2 per cent in 2023 and 2024, the lowest since 2015. Polling from the universities themselves reveals that the proportion of Australians with either 'quite a lot' or 'a great deal' of confidence in Australian universities has fallen. This reflects that loss of licence to operate in Australia that we see from institutions that pursue indoctrination over education.</para>
<para>Additionally, we've seen the government rip the guts out of research in this country—the same research that should drive productivity in our economy. It is one of the many reasons that productivity is absolutely flatlining in Australia, and we see a real loss of incomes as real GDP per capita sees the largest fall in living standards in the developed world. This has included cutting more than $2.3 billion out of university research through cuts to the Australia's Economic Accelerator program and abolishing the Trailblazer Universities Program, which saw co-investment by government and industry into research totalling more than $1.02 billion. We've seen the government slash our research capacity program by more than $920 million since the coalition was last in office. It is a cut which is significantly magnified in its effects because of the runaway inflation that we see in the economy today. On the government's own numbers, research spending in this country is projected to reach a decade low in 2029.</para>
<para>We haven't been the only ones to notice. Complaints by students and staff to TEQSA, the regulator, have almost quadrupled, from 237 complaints in 2022 to 942 last year. There is a serious problem in our university sector, and this bill, unfortunately, addresses none of those concerns. Safety data is particularly bad when you dive into the detail of those TEQSA complaints, because, in 2022, there were 16 TEQSA complaints in relation to gender based violence and other wellbeing and safety. It is now 76. Those figures don't include new data from the National Student Ombudsman, which received 1,711 complaints in its first six months.</para>
<para>Juxtaposed against that appalling deterioration in the safety of university campuses we've seen a spectacle, week after week, of encampments preaching hate against our country, against democracy and particularly against Jewish Australians. It is a shameful spectacle that sees ordinary Australian students, who have every right to get to the classes they're paying for, denied easy access and freedom of movement on their own university campuses by these extremists.</para>
<para>That has led to extraordinary levels of racist abuse and hatred on university campuses, as measured by the Racism@Uni survey. Above all, Jewish Australian students came out at the pointy end of that abuse and that hatred. But we believe that ultimately it stems from the basic failure of university leadership across the country to respond properly to the antisemitic hatred that we saw explode in Australia in October 2023. When you don't step in to stop encampments on campuses targeting one group of Australians, you send a message that it's actually okey. That's how university leadership has failed young Australians and indeed our country. With more than half of Australia's universities dropping in the world rankings in June this year, it comes as little wonder to us on the coalition side.</para>
<para>The universities themselves are complaining about having to comply with more than 300 pieces of legislation and regulation—which, admittedly, would have occurred under the watch of previous governments as well. But, based on a submission by TEQSA itself, there are now 15 different regulators and oversight bodies that universities report to. You might think that the 'opening the doors of opportunity' bill would be doing Australian universities a service by slashing the red tape and regulation that the university sector confronts. But, alas, we move on.</para>
<para>We've got repeated scandals in Australia about overseas cheating factories being used as a way to a degree. That diminishes the value of the Australian degrees that young people are paying good money for in this country. And over it all, of course, we've got the sector-wide challenge of confronting AI and the challenges it poses in a university setting. If AI is being used to mark work done by students, it makes humans redundant and the degree they receive pretty worthless. It's a massive challenge, and it's not being adequately addressed by the sector or by this bill.</para>
<para>So the message is pretty simple. Under Labor, our universities have become demonstrably, measurably worse as they have pursued a policy of indoctrination, not education. This bill, in centralising significant power over universities and higher education providers in the hands of the minister, is a central concern. It is absolutely beyond doubt that the minister has the best baritone in the building, but that doesn't make him the savant of all things when it comes to education and tertiary education. So we need to consider this very carefully as a bill that moves towards a centrally managed higher education system in our country, because the minister and indeed future ministers would gain extensive powers over domestic Commonwealth supported places, international student allocations, demand-driven higher education course places, the conditions placed on tertiary providers, needs based funding, and the priorities and directions given to ATEC.</para>
<para>That's a pretty startling sort of remit to give to one minister of any political stripe, because while these powers could be used for good—to address future serious policy problems within the sector—they also raise significant concern about competition, institutional autonomy, efficiency, parliamentary oversight and the degree of latitude afforded by ministerial discretion.</para>
<para>We do concede, though, in light of the foregoing, that the university sector itself faces some real problems. We've got quality concerns leading to that deterioration in the rankings of Australian universities. We've got the undeniable challenge and opportunity that AI presents to the university sector. We've seen that terrible rise in the scourge of antisemitism and the social cohesion challenges it presents, not only on our university campuses but, indeed, across society more broadly. We've got the situation with international student pressures in the context of managing Australia's migration system, which undeniably has seen the numbers too high and the standards too low overall. On the coalition side, we're honest about what we will do when it comes to tackling migration and getting the numbers down. We need the government to do the same. I look forward to Minister Burke finally making it to the Press Club to give that speech, which he was gagged from only last week.</para>
<para>We see a bill before the House that gives a future government powerful tools to respond to those problems, but there are legitimate concerns. Again, that's where our call for a Senate inquiry into this legislation is so important. It is important because these powers could be used by a minister in the national interest if they were applied carefully and transparently. There may well be a compelling case for additional safeguards to ensure that a future minister would make decisions that would benefit not only the university sector but every Australian student who forks out for a degree and, indeed, our nation overall. They could tackle some of the issues we saw, like our flatlining productivity, by enlivening research in Australia once more and seeing greater cooperation between the commercial and tertiary sectors—perhaps supercharged with the effective adoption of AI across the sector. We could see those very significant social cohesion concerns challenged and then corrected over time, if this legislation gets that balance right. It could see the freedom of speech and academic integrity restored to our university campuses, as it ought to be, and leave the nation a more prosperous place.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COFFEY</name>
    <name.id>312323</name.id>
    <electorate>Griffith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Every child begins life with abilities that deserve a chance to grow. But, in Australia today, where a child grows up still has too much influence over where their education can take them. Family income, distance and whether their parents went to university can shape their choices long before they submit an application to a tertiary provider. The Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026 is about changing that. It's about opening the doors of opportunity. For Labor, those words carry a clear promise: no child's postcode, family income or parents' education should set the limits of their future.</para>
<para>Education gives people choices. It gives them knowledge, confidence and the skills to build a secure life. It gives our communities the teachers, nurses, builders, engineers, artists and carers that we rely on. But opportunity is never created simply by declaring that a door is open. A student needs a place at a tertiary institution. They need the means to accept it. They need support to keep studying through financial pressure, family crisis or a difficult first year. Then they need a fair chance to finish. This bill responds to each part of that task. It establishes a managed growth funding system to provide more Commonwealth supported university places. It creates demand driven, needs based funding for students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds, First Nations students and students at regional campuses. Across the next decade, these reforms will invest another $3.6 billion in higher education and fund an estimated 230,000 additional commencing students. This is how we open the door wider and help more students reach the other side.</para>
<para>This is an issue that has shaped much of my working life. Before entering this place, I had the great honour of working alongside and supporting remarkable Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people from across Australia, including many from remote and regional communities. For 13 years I worked with the Australian Indigenous Education Foundation, most recently as its deputy CEO. During that time, AIEF provided transformational scholarships to more than 1,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people. As I said, many of these young people were from regional and remote communities. Many of those young people I now count among my friends. They have brought me enormous joy and inspiration. It has been a great honour to watch them thrive in their careers, their families and their communities.</para>
<para>Working alongside those students and their families for so many years shaped how I think about access to quality education. I saw young people travel vast distances to study and families place enormous trust in schools and support staff. I saw year 12 graduations become family celebrations and young people move into further study, apprenticeships and first jobs. I also saw how much work sits behind every successful transition.</para>
<para>One of those students was Injarra Harbour, who grew up in Winton in Queensland's central west. He was a student that I was able to go visit, along with his family, in their home in Winton. Injarra is academically minded and strongly supported by his family. I give a shout-out to his parents, Travis and Tracey, both absolutely remarkable individuals. A scholarship gave Injarra the chance to move about 1,300 kilometres to attend boarding school in Brisbane. Injarra later became only the second Indigenous student to captain his school. He went on to study law at QUT and he completed an internship in Sydney. Injarra knew his experience was exceptional though. He spoke about young people facing financial and social pressures that can narrow their choices before they reach university. He said, 'Many do not know their worth.' As Injarra put it, every kid has the potential to do wonderful things, but they need to have the stability to do so. That simple insight sits at the heart of this bill. Talent exists in every community. Our task is to provide the stability, support and opportunity to allow it to grow. Injarra's success belongs to him. It rests on his ability, hard work and the support of his family. But financial help brought an opportunity within reach, and ongoing guidance helped him make the most of it.</para>
<para>That experience taught me a lesson I have carried into this place. Access and success cannot be separated. An offer letter is important, but it can't pay the rent. A university place cannot help a student who cannot afford to leave home. Enrolment alone will not carry someone through a family crisis or a difficult first semester. We need to open the door and give students a fair chance to succeed.</para>
<para>The Universities Accord looked across the whole tertiary education system. By 2050, at least 80 per cent of working-age Australians will need a TAFE qualification, a university degree or another tertiary qualification. This bill reforms university funding, but it forms part of a much wider national task. Australia needs strong universities and a strong public TAFE system. We need clear pathways between them, and we need those pathways to work for school leavers, mature-age students and people changing careers.</para>
<para>We see both parts of that system at work across Brisbane's southside in my community. TAFE Queensland's South Bank campus sits in the heart of Griffith, surrounded by our galleries, theatres, museums and the state library. Students there train in nursing, early childhood education, community services, engineering, hospitality, information technology, business, justice and the creative arts. A nursing student can practice in a simulated hospital ward, while hospitality, music and game students learn with industry-standard facilities and technology.</para>
<para>In the south of my electorate, the Mount Gravatt campus gives southside students another local option. It offers courses in accounting, business, hospitality, education support, English language studies, justice and screen media. Mount Gravatt is also TAFE Queensland's fashion studies hub. Students use industry equipment and digital design software before showing their work at the annual Brisbane fashion parade.</para>
<para>I have loved visiting our local TAFE campuses several times with the assistant minister for skills and training. Each visit has reinforced the same point: TAFE gives practical skills, confidence and a direct path into secure work. These campuses open different doors for different people. A school leaver can train for a first job. A worker can gain a new qualification. A student can use a diploma as a pathway into university. At Griffith University's South Bank campus, the Queensland Conservatorium, the Queensland College of Art and Design and Griffith Film School educate the next generation of musicians, filmmakers, performers, artists and designers. Local students also study at QUT, UQ and campuses across Brisbane. Many combine classes with paid shifts while they have rising rent. Some care for children or relatives. Some are the first person in their family to enter tertiary education. Opportunity must meet those students where they are.</para>
<para>Close to half of Australians in their thirties hold a university degree. Among people from low-income families and regional communities the rate is about half that. Students from these backgrounds have a lower chance of entering university.</para>
<para>Debate interrupted.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It being 4.30 pm, the House stands adjourned until 12 noon tomorrow in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 12 August 2026.</para>
<para>House adjourned at 16:30</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>NOTICES</title>
        <page.no>132</page.no>
        <type>NOTICES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Presentation</title>
          <page.no>132</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
  </chamber.xscript>
  <fedchamb.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-MCJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-MCJobDate">
            <a href="Federation Chamber" type="">Monday, 17 August 2026</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">DEPUTY SPEAKER </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">(</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Mascarenhas</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">)</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">
            </span>took the chair at 10:30.</span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS</title>
        <page.no>134</page.no>
        <type>CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petition: Veterans</title>
          <page.no>134</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WATSON-BROWN</name>
    <name.id>300127</name.id>
    <electorate>Ryan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I table petition EM10124, 'Reject the $5,000 DVA allied health cap, uphold the veterans' covenant'. The petition has been considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions and found to be in order. More than 5,000 people signed this petition—these are veterans, family members of veterans, widows, dependants and people in our community who understand the true cost of serving. They've signed this petition because they know what these allied health caps really mean: more bureaucratic process, potentially longer wait times, and more frustration with a Department of Veterans' Affairs system that is overloaded and unprepared for these changes. Veterans rely on allied health services like physiotherapy, psychology and occupational therapy to live a decent life despite service caused injuries. I've heard from a large number of veterans from my electorate about how essential the allied health is for their wellbeing. I've also heard how frustrated they are with the unwieldy and difficult current system, where every claim feels like another battle for them. Based on current fees, $5,000 falls well short of the essential clinical needs of many veterans. For some, $5,000 won't last more than a few months.</para>
<para>This cap ignores the 2019 veterans' covenant, where parliament undertook to support all veterans as respected and valued members of the community. It also ignores the Royal Commission into Defence and Veterans Suicide, which identified financial and administrative barriers to care as major drivers of harm. Veterans in my electorate and across Australia are extremely concerned about the cap, and rightly so. I've heard that for many under these changes they'll be worse off than before the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. Frankly, from my discussions with veterans, it's clear that there is no trust in the DVA and no trust that the government has their best interests in mind—a pretty fair assessment if you look at the way DVA operates and the findings of the royal commission.</para>
<para>Announcing a cap without consulting veterans first or publishing specifics of how discretionary expansions work does little to rebuild that trust. These are people who have given so much at great personal cost. They deserve better than these careless cost-saving measures by the government. That's why I'm so proud to support this petition. It was started by Rebecca, a local veteran and former Air Force medic. Rebecca is a staunch advocate for her community and for a better, fairer world. This petition asks the House to reject the cap or, at minimum, exempt gold cardholders and legislate a detailed clinical need override and defer the measure until these protections are in place.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The petition read as follows—</inline></para>
<quote><para class="block">The 2026-27 Federal Budget imposes a $5,000 annual cap on Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) funded allied health services—including physiotherapy, psychology, occupational therapy, exercise physiology, podiatry and dietetics—commencing 1 July 2027. The cap applies to all Veteran Card holders under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation (Defence related Claims) Act 1988 and the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, including Gold Card holders, war widows and dependants. Veterans rely on multidisciplinary allied health for service-caused injuries. At current DVA fee schedules, $5,000 is exhausted by approximately twenty psychology sessions, or fifty physiotherapy sessions—well short of the clinical need of veterans with multiple accepted conditions typical of long service. The cap contradicts the Australian Defence Veterans' Covenant, enacted in 2019, by which the Parliament undertook to support all veterans as respected and valued members of the community. It is inconsistent with the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide, which identified financial and administrative barriers to care as drivers of poor outcomes. AIHW data shows the suicide rate for ex-serving Australian males remains substantially elevated compared to the general population.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">We therefore ask the House to : (a) reject the $5,000 annual allied health cap for DVA card holders; (b) at minimum, exempt Gold Card holders and legislate a statutory clinical-need override with published criteria, mandated decision timeframes and merits review by the Veterans' Review Board; and (c) defer commencement of the measure until these protections are legislated and operational.</para></quote>
<para>from 5,751 citizens (Petition No. EN10124)</para>
<para>Petition received.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Scullin Electorate: Community Events, Ilinden</title>
          <page.no>134</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GILES</name>
    <name.id>243609</name.id>
    <electorate>Scullin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Two years ago I visited Findon Primary School with my friend the member for Mill Park Lily D'Ambrosio to hear directly from students about their vision for their school. A dedicated years 5 and 6 swimming pool was among their more ambitious asks, but one very clear priority they shared with me was the refurbishment of student toilet blocks, so it was really thrilling to return earlier this month to officially open these new amenities, delivered thanks to the Albanese government's Schools Upgrades Fund. I'm really proud that our government helped make this happen, but I'm even more proud of those student leaders who advocated for this project, knowing that they would be unlikely to be there to benefit from them. It's a really powerful example of the leadership I see in so many young people—speaking up not only for themselves but also for those coming after them. I acknowledge Principal Anita Osavkovska and the former student leaders Deb and Lucy for their advocacy, vision and leadership.</para>
<para>The Northern Study Hub in Epping has just marked its first anniversary and, one year in, the numbers tell a compelling story about the importance of this critical initiative. Across two sites, 420 students are now being supported, more than half of them from low-SES backgrounds and more than one in three the first in family to attend tertiary studies. These figures matter because they show the Northern Study Hub is doing exactly what it was designed to do—making tertiary education more accessible and our education system fairer for all Australians. For students across the community, this is a model that breaks down barriers of distance, cost and circumstance too. It means tertiary education can be delivered closer to home so that more people in Melbourne's northern suburbs can see university or TAFE as something for them and, critically, feel supported through that tertiary education journey.</para>
<para>I'd like to acknowledge the many Ilinden celebrations that are taking place across Melbourne's north this month and to recognise in this place the proud and significant contribution Macedonian Australians have made to our local communities and indeed to this country. Ilinden is a time of reflection, remembrance and also of celebration—a moment to honour culture, history, identity and the enduring bonds of community. I think it also has to be a chance for us all to recognise the resilience, the pride and the contribution of Macedonian Australians in communities right around the country but especially in the northern suburbs of Melbourne.</para>
<para>In the north, it is part of our shared story because across generations Macedonian Australians have built families, businesses, organisations and cultural institutions, all of which form an indelible part of our community. I've been so fortunate to share many friendships with the local community. I thank them for the warmth, generosity and kindness they continue to show to me and the community more broadly. Cestit Ilinden. Happy Ilinden to everyone.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nationals Federal Conference</title>
          <page.no>135</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Nationals is a truly grassroots party, demonstrated by our incredible federal conference held in Canberra yesterday and over the weekend.</para>
<para>I want to commend all the young Nats who turned up. The conference room was hundreds of people wide, and there were so many present who lent their voices to motions that are incredibly important to them. I want to talk about some of them now. One of the motions from the Victorian nationals was moved by Ross Johns from Warracknabeal. It was to ensure that some of our best farming land is not converted into so-called carbon sinks. Cobungra Station in Victoria was mentioned. There are concerns about the future of Victoria's largest property, Telopea Downs in Mallee in my electorate, also becoming a carbon sink.</para>
<para>I want to say the words of the motion itself, because I think it's important: 'that this federal conference of the Nationals condemns the Albanese Labor government for (a) using taxpayer funded policies and incentives to take productive Australian farmland out of food and fibre production and lock it up as carbon sinks (b) calls for an immediate end to Commonwealth funding, subsidies and incentives that result in productive agricultural land being removed from food and fibre production for carbon sequestration and (c) affirms that Australia's productive agricultural land must be protected to safeguard our food security, farming communities and future generations.</para>
<para>I want to also mention Peter and Leanne Pola from Lalbert, also in my electorate of Mallee, who had two motions calling for local roads to stay open when mining, renewables or transmission projects are occurring; protecting the right to farm; and requiring progressive rehabilitation bond payments of rehabilitation bonds to cover full site rehabilitation at the end of any project. Their second one was calling for the removal of all taxpayer funded subsidies, taxation benefits and grants to mineral sands mining and renewable energy projects on all prime agricultural land—in other words, that these projects are self-funded.</para>
<para>I also had the opportunity to call for the conference to endorse my bill—the Prime Agricultural Land Protection Bill, moved by both the member for Lyne in the House and Senator Canavan in the Senate—that says no coalition funding will subsidise projects that trash prime agricultural land.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Mental Health, Central Coast Food Manufacturing Innovation Hub</title>
          <page.no>135</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBRIDE</name>
    <name.id>248353</name.id>
    <electorate>Dobell</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to speak about the best community in the country, the Central Coast of New South Wales, and how the Albanese Labor government is delivering for Dobell. One of the most significant achievements has been the opening of the new Tuggerah Medicare Mental Health Centre, right in the heart of our community. This centre provides free, high-quality mental health support that would otherwise cost people hundreds of dollars—removing one of the biggest barriers to getting help when it's needed.</para>
<para>But what really excites me most is not the building itself, although it is beautiful; it's the difference it's already making. We're seeing people come through the doors who would never have sought support. Why? Because we're breaking down the barriers that stop people from getting help: cost, distance, time and stigma. The centre is welcoming, accessible and designed to meet people where they're at.</para>
<para>Let me tell you about Will—not his real name, for privacy reasons. Will is in his mid-20s. Like many young men, he has faced mental health challenges. We know young men are often less likely to seek support, and the consequences can be devastating. But, because this service was there, because it was free, because it was easy to access and because it felt like a place where he could walk in and ask for help, Will did exactly that. That's what this is all about—people getting support earlier, people getting support closer to home, people getting support before they reach crisis point.</para>
<para>That is why this work matters—because strengthening Medicare isn't just about funding services. It's about making sure those services reach the people who need them most. Every young man like Will who walks through the door is proof that what we're doing is working. That is what strengthening Medicare looks like, and that is what delivering for Dobell looks like.</para>
<para>Another project making a real difference on the ground is the Central Coast Food Manufacturing Innovation Hub delivered by the Albanese government. From the name, people might think it's simply a large commercial kitchen. In reality, it's a more than $17 million investment in local jobs, local manufacturing and the future of food production on the Central Coast. This state-of-the-art hub will mean local businesses can trial, test and scale up new products before taking them to markets across Australia and around the world. That means more opportunities for local entrepreneurs, more opportunities for local manufacturers and more opportunities for local workers.</para>
<para>The Central Coast is home to some outstanding food and beverage producers: Sanitarium, MasterFoods, Eastcoast juice. This hub, delivered in partnership with Central Coast Industry Connect, is giving them the tools they need to innovate, expand and compete. Importantly, it's also creating hundreds of local jobs both during construction and into the future as businesses grow and invest. That is what economic development looks like—backing local talent, backing local industry, backing local jobs.</para>
<para>Whether it's helping a young man access support or helping local businesses take their products to new markets, the common thread is simple: we're backing our community.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fisher Electorate: King's Birthday Honours and Awards</title>
          <page.no>136</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to recognise six outstanding residents of Fisher who were honoured in the 2026 King's Birthday Honours list this year, in June. These awards recognise Australians who have given years and, in many cases, decades of service to their communities and to our region. I'm incredibly proud that six people from across my electorate were among those recognised earlier this year.</para>
<para>Dr Hope O'Chin AM of Kings Beach was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia for significant service to the Indigenous community as an artist and an educator. Dr Rebecca Spindler AM of Maleny was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia for significant service to conservation science, wildlife reproduction research and biodiversity protection. Judith Crighton OAM of Shelly Beach received the Medal of the Order of Australia for her service to conservation and wildlife. Jacqueline Gasson OAM of Ilkley was recognised for her service to the arts as a ceramicist. Neville Male OAM of Wurtulla received the Medal of the Order of Australia for his service to photography.</para>
<para>Christopher Symonds OAM of Montville was recognised for more than five decades of service to communities across Queensland through the Lions Club. Chris is a particularly good example of what community service looks like. After serving our nation in the Royal Australian Navy, he continued serving others for more than 50 years. Through Lions, he's helped communities recover from cyclones, raised funds for Blue Nurses, supported charitable organisations and helped provide meals for disadvantaged children right across Queensland. People like Chris do not volunteer because they expect recognition. They do it because they see something that needs to be done and they get on and they go and do it.</para>
<para>That same spirit of service is reflected in each of the six Fisher recipients. Whether it's through education, science, conservation, the arts—such as photography—or community volunteering, each of them has used their skills and their time to make life better for others. That is what makes the King's Birthday honours so important. They give us an opportunity to recognise people who, often quietly and without fanfare, have spent years contributing to something bigger than themselves. Our community on the Sunshine Coast is stronger because of people like them. So, on behalf of the people of Fisher, I congratulate them on this very well deserved recognition. Thank you for your service to our community, to Queensland, to Australia and, of course, also to the Sunshine Coast.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Glasgow Commonwealth Games, Boothby Volunteer Service Awards</title>
          <page.no>137</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MILLER-FROST</name>
    <name.id>296272</name.id>
    <electorate>Boothby</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Congratulations to artistic gymnast Jesse Moore, who won gold in the men's parallel bars at the recent Commonwealth Games and a further two bronze medals for team and all-around. Jesse grew up in Boothby and is now living here in Canberra, training at the AIS. Gymnastics SA, which is based in Boothby, is inordinately proud of all he's achieved. Congratulations also to swimmer Matthew Temple, who took home an amazing four medals—including gold in the men's 4 x 100 metre medley relay and the mixed 4 x 100 metre medley relay—and to Jasmin Fullgrabe, a member of the Marion Swimming Club, who placed fourth in the women's 100-metre backstroke S9 final.</para>
<para>Australia has led the medal count for 15 out of 22 Commonwealth Games, since the games first started in 1930, and we continue to lead the all-time Commonwealth Games medal tally. This year, our athletes once again proved unstoppable as we topped the medal table with a total of 171 medals, including 70 gold. Big congratulations to the Boothby athletes and to all the Australians who participated in the Glasgow Commonwealth Games.</para>
<para>In July, I was again proud to host the Boothby Volunteer Service Awards, celebrating the generosity and hard work of our volunteers here in Boothby. Congratulations to all the volunteers who received awards, representing a range of organisations across Boothby: Alex Galanos, and Di and Steve Camilleri, from Coastal Districts little athletics; Tracey Grigg and Indra Vithiananthan from Grow SA; Christopher Tyerman and Simon Cole from Somerton Yacht Club; Colin Camac from MarionLIFE; Leila Rodeghiero from the International Order of the Rainbow for Girls; Beverley Manns from Seacliff Recreation Centre; Dr Richard Le from Doctors for the Environment; Anne Day from the Holdfast Bay Rotary club; Russ Stovall from Glenelg Bowling Club; Julie Robbins, and Samantha and Nick Wilks, from Minda; Clint Garrett from Friends of Waite Conservation Reserve; Jason Hughes from the Belair park run Man Walk and Blackwood Ukulele Group; Paul Conroy from Marion Swimming Club; Maggie Turner from Marion Art Group; Rod Ellis from the Brownhill Creek association; and Rosalie Hancock from Kickstart for Kids.</para>
<para>As of the last census, 14.1 per cent of Australians volunteered. But in Boothby it's 18.1 per cent, and our community is stronger, safer, more diverse and more connected thanks to the amazing work that they do. Recipients of the volunteer service award demonstrated a commitment, a selflessness and a spirit of service that have made a lasting impact in the Boothby community, and they're an inspiration to us all.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Grey Electorate: Health Care, National Trust of South Australia</title>
          <page.no>137</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VENNING</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to talk about Leigh Creek, in the far north of my electorate, and the difficulty residents are facing in accessing basic health care. When the former hospital was demolished in 2023, a new health service was built at considerable cost to taxpayers. But residents tell me the model is not meeting the needs of their community. They are travelling more than 250 kilometres for medical dispensing, immunisation, suturing and wound care—services most Australians would take for granted.</para>
<para>I was first contacted about this by Hannah Morcomb. Hannah is a fantastic woman. Hannah saw a problem in her community and set out to fix it. Her petition has now passed more than 1,000 signatures. Hannah, who has got two young children, is sick and tired of travelling hundreds of kilometres to access basic medical care.</para>
<para>Unfortunately, Hannah's story is not unique. Kaeli from Depot Springs Station makes a 308-kilometre round trip to Hawker for her children's routine health checks and immunisation. Evie's 13-year-old son has hydrocephalus and a shunt. When he developed severe headaches, there was no local GP to assess him. The family drove 155 kilometres before he was transferred to Adelaide. These are not isolated stories. I hear the same thing right across the region. Let me be clear: this is no criticism of the health professionals at Leigh Creek. They are highly regarded and they are doing an outstanding job. The problem is the model, not the people.</para>
<para>I have called on the state government to consider an RFDS operating model, to work with the community and to deliver it. I'd like to quote Aria Bolkus, ex-staffer of the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mark Butler, and now member for Colton:</para>
<quote><para class="block">No one should be left behind when it comes to accessing health care—no matter where they live.</para></quote>
<para>Don't just say it; do it. I call her and the health minister to come out to Leigh Creek. Come out to Coober Pedy, Yorketown and Streaky Bay and see if the healthcare services are the same.</para>
<para>I welcome the reinstatement of the Moonta National Trust branch. It marks the end of a difficult period for many volunteers and the wider Moonta community. For those volunteers, this was never about titles or positions. It was about their community and protecting a history that belongs to all South Australians. Moonta's Cornish heritage is more than its buildings. It's the people who give their hours to bring the history to life, not just for their own town but for the visitors across the country and right around the world. This is a fresh start. Congratulations to everyone who worked to reach this point. I look forward to the trust and its local branches working well together into the future.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tertiary Education and Training</title>
          <page.no>138</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ROB MITCHELL</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
    <electorate>McEwen</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Recently, I had the pleasure of catching up with year 12 students in McEwen as they head to their final months of schooling. Everyone knows what a stressful time this can be, and I was very grateful to Mernda Central College and Wallan Secondary College for giving me the chance to swing by for a bit of a chat. For those students, whether they are looking at further study at university or TAFE, an apprenticeship, a full-time job or even a gap year, they don't have to have it all figured out.</para>
<para>If someone had told me at 18 that I'd be a federal MP, I would have thought they were smoking something or crazy. I was an apprentice shoemaker keen on cars and football and other things, but people change careers. They study later in life and discover new opportunities that they never expected.</para>
<para>School leavers, like the year 12s in Mernda and Wallan, are being supported by our government—the Albanese Labor government—in a variety of ways. The <inline font-style="italic">St</inline><inline font-style="italic">uff you should know</inline> publication is full of practical tips, from info on your identity documents, like your birth certificate, passports, Medicare card and tax file number to understanding how the government can assist with accessing further study through Commonwealth supported places and HECS-HELP loans.</para>
<para>We're expanding paid prac to people training in an additional 10 frontline health professions. This will provide cost-of-living relief for students and support our future healthcare workforce. We've made free TAFE a permanent feature of the national VET system. An investment of $1.6 billion to 2034-35 will support at least 100,000 free TAFE and VET places per year from 2027, and we've cut student debt by 20 per cent. To ease the pressure on the workforce—the workers and students across the country—more than $16 billion of debt for more than three million Australians has been wiped. We want the message to be clear: no matter where you live or how much your parents earn, the doors of opportunity are open; they're open to you.</para>
<para>I want to thank the year 12s for their insights. They showed remarkable understanding of the present political environment, in particular the need to reject far-right politics of hate and division. These young people have been lucky enough to grow up in an Australia that has embraced multiculturalism and know the benefits of it. I'm optimistic for a future shaped by these young community leaders.</para>
<para>Since 2022, the Albanese Labor government has been working to ensure young Australians have a genuine voice in shaping the policies that affect their lives. For too long, young people have felt they've been ignored by former governments, and we've made it a priority to ensure that their perspective is finally recognised. In doing things such as our environmental grants, we make sure that no-one on that committee is over the age of 21, because we want the young people to be involved in setting these things up because, as it goes forward, they're the ones who will be reaping the benefit from it and seeing it grow and develop. It's important that we give our young people the opportunity and the support they need to be part of the process.</para>
<para>So, best of luck with your exams and navigating the years ahead. Guaranteed—in 10 or 20 years time, you'll sit back and think, 'Gee, I wish I was at school again; it was so much easier.'</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bushman 83 Memorial</title>
          <page.no>138</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Three years ago, in the dark of the night near Lindeman Island, four of Australia's finest military aviators vanished from radar. An Army MRH-90 Taipanhelicopter, call sign Bushman 83, crashed during a night exercise, leaving our nation shattered. In a single heartbreaking moment, we lost Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs.</para>
<para>When news of this tragedy broke, a wave of heartbreak swept right across the Whitsundays. Our local emergency responders, rescue crews and volunteers immediately launched into the darkness, searching—desperately trying to bring our boys home. From that night onwards, the Whitsundays did not just mourn four soldiers; we adopted their memory, and we wrapped our arms around their families as our very own. Their story became our story.</para>
<para>Our fine men and women train as they fight: pushing themselves to the absolute limit, to ensure they have the skills needed to protect our great country. When they deploy and go to war, they go to win, because, in the defence of our nation, second place is never an option. That is the standard of excellence that our fine men and women from the military bring. And it is the standard our national security deserves.</para>
<para>Last month I stood with their loved ones, our local first responders and the 6th Aviation Regiment at Shute Harbour in the Whitsundays. There a lasting memorial, overlooking the Whitsunday Passage, was unveiled—a place where our region's beauty meets the heavy weight of our national grief.</para>
<para>The unbreakable bond between the Whitsundays and these four brave men was forged during the critical days of the search. Local Queensland police, volunteer marine rescue crews, RACQ CQ Rescue and selfless SES volunteers worked tirelessly alongside the Defence Force, braving treacherous tides, deep waters and the pitch darkness off Lindeman Island. Our community saw firsthand the unwavering grit and resolve of our local first responders, and they searched around the clock to bring our fallen heroes home. This defines the true spirit of Dawson and connects our region to Bushman 83 forever.</para>
<para>This memorial guarantees that the courage, devotion and sacrifice of Bushman 83 will never fade. To the families of the fallen: our community stands with you, today, tomorrow and forever. Your men will forever be held in a sacred place in the heart of the Whitsundays. Their duty is done. Their memory is secure. Lest we forget.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Reynolds, Mr James, Windellama Progress Association</title>
          <page.no>139</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBAIN</name>
    <name.id>281988</name.id>
    <electorate>Eden-Monaro</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to recognise an outstanding achievement by another one of Eden-Monaro's sporting champions, Pambula's own James 'Jimmy' Reynolds, following his recent gold medal success in the men's para bowls at the Commonwealth Games. Jimmy and his team-mate Damien Delgado nabbed gold in the finals against New Zealand, after thumping Scotland in the semis. The Glasgow gold is Jimmy's second medal at the Commonwealth Games. At the 2002 games he won a bronze for Australia.</para>
<para>His dedication to sport began early, claiming the New South Wales under-18s junior singles title at just 15 years of age. He has represented Australia at three Commonwealth Games and won gold at the 2023 World Bowls Championship. A 24-year playing career at the elite level is an outstanding achievement for any athlete, and it must qualify Jimmy as one of the most enduring sporting professionals in the nation. With this win, Jimmy joins just three other Australian athletes to have won at both the Commonwealth Games and World Bowls Championships.</para>
<para>His achievement has been celebrated right across Eden-Monaro, but nowhere more proudly than at his old primary school, Pambula Public School. Students and staff cheered Jimmy on, with a special viewing of the game at the morning assembly.</para>
<para>Jimmy Reynolds embodies the values of perseverance, determination and excellence. He has made his community and his country incredibly proud. I congratulate Jimmy on his achievement. I thank him for his contribution to Australian sport and for the inspiration he provides to generations across Eden-Monaro, and give a special shout-out, as a former schoolmate of Jimmy's: we love you, mate.</para>
<para>I would also like to acknowledge the efforts of the Windellama Progress Association, whose annual great cake auction has once again delivered an outstanding result for the community. This year's event raised more than $11,000 for Can Assist Goulburn, helping support local people and families facing a cancer diagnosis. It was a wonderful example of a community making a real difference in the lives of others. I was fortunate enough to secure the winning bid on a delicious white chocolate cheesecake, which was very well received by my team. The Windellama Progress Association plays a vital role in the local community. The association maintains the community hall, a place where residents come together for events, activities and the much-loved markets that help keep the town connected and thriving.</para>
<para>In rural and regional communities, organisations like the Windellama Progress Association are the backbone of the community. Through their hard work, dedication and countless volunteer hours, they create opportunities for people to connect, support one another and strengthen community spirit. I thank the members of the Windellama Progress Association for their extraordinary contribution to the Windellama community and congratulate them again on another highly successful great cake auction.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>298800</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In accordance with standing order 193, the time for constituency statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>139</page.no>
        <type>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Renewable Energy</title>
          <page.no>139</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) recognises that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) regional Australia is playing a vital role in hosting the infrastructure needed to facilitate the energy transition;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) there is a patchwork of community engagement and benefit obligations across and within states that makes it difficult for regional communities to know what to expect when dealing with renewable energy proponents;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) regional communities have varying experiences engaging with renewable energy proponents, with some proponents undertaking best practice community engagement and others, poor or absent engagement; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) poor community engagement and benefit processes are bad for communities, and undermine the energy transition;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the surge in artificial intelligence (AI) data centres has increased national awareness of the importance of community benefit for communities impacted by new largescale infrastructure developments; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) regional communities have been calling for a fair share of community benefits commensurate to their role in hosting Australia's energy transition, long before this conversation started about AI data centres; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) calls on the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) establish a permanent, nationally consistent community benefit framework that sets out minimum mandatory community benefit contributions to be paid by renewable energy proponents to community benefit funds that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) deliver intergenerational community benefit to regional communities who host their infrastructure; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) support local governments to navigate their increasing responsibilities in facilitating the energy transition; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) assign the implementation and oversight responsibility for this framework to the Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner.</para></quote>
<para>Regional and rural Australia are playing a vital role in hosting the infrastructure that powers the energy transition, yet many rural communities feel overlooked. Too often, they feel the transitioning is happening to them, without seeing clear benefits flowing through as things like lower energy bills or investment in key local priorities.</para>
<para>Regional Australia is not antirenewable. Many people in the regions are embracing the opportunity. Farmers are increasingly hosting energy generation and storage projects to diversify their income and help them continue to farm. Local governments are working with proponents to create future funds and deliver infrastructure that would otherwise be out of reach. Households are taking up batteries at record pace through the cheaper home battery scheme, a policy that we drove from the electorate of Indi. More than two in three regional Australians believe local communities can benefit from hosting renewable energy generation projects, if done right. That's where the disquiet is right now. There's a patchwork of rules and requirements between and within states and territories, making it hard for communities to know the benefits that they can expect from renewable projects.</para>
<para>In Victoria, there are community engagement and social value guidelines, renewable energy zones community benefit plans and payments in lieu of rates. These are all different schemes and guidelines that determine what proponents pay to local communities and councils. But, in practice, two neighbours either side of a REZ border or state or territory border can face major differences in what proponents are expected to bring to the table when the system is this complicated. It's the communities, the regional communities, that lose out.</para>
<para>I hear time and time again that communities are frustrated. They can't see the long-term investment in their towns, and they're unsure how to secure lasting benefits from the energy transition. Right now, in my electorate of Indi, there's a proposal in Euroa that would power as many as 40,000 houses in Melbourne without addressing local reliability and brownouts. The council and the community are in discussions right now with the proponents to see if they can fix this. That's what I'm talking about.</para>
<para>My motion proposes a solution: it calls on the government to establish a permanent, nationally consistent community benefit framework with minimum mandatory contributions paid by renewable energy proponents to communities hosting their infrastructure. The details—including payment value, recipients and governance—should be developed with those regional communities, the Energy Infrastructure Commissioner, the proponents themselves of course, RDAs and all levels of government. But two principles must be included if this framework is to work.</para>
<para>First, funding must flow into the communities hosting renewable energy infrastructure. It should be flexible enough to support local priorities and deliver long-term intergenerational projects, projects that actually improve the quality of life for the people who live in that area. We can still see the legacy of the gold rush and the wool boom in regional infrastructure today, and this new era of regional resources should also leave a lasting legacy for good for future generations. It should look like cheaper power or investment in childcare services, reliable telecommunications or key-worker housing. And some of these things are already happening in places like Dubbo and Armidale.</para>
<para>Second, the framework should support local governments to manage their growing role in delivering the energy transition on the ground, because councils are under increasing pressure to manage community concerns and engage with proponents, yet they lack the funding, the staff and the specialist expertise required. So a portion of community benefit funding should help councils access that expertise. This will support better outcomes for those strapped councils, for the communities, for the proponents and, ultimately, for the nation in the energy transition.</para>
<para>By and large, renewable proponents also support minimum community benefit expectations. Only this month, the Clean Energy Council called for a consistent, permanent, minimum renewable resources payment, similar to a royalty, to help rebuild trust. When communities and proponents alike are calling for this solution, it's really time that the government listened.</para>
<para>I welcome the growing recognition that communities should benefit when they host major infrastructure, and this conversation has become more prominent recently in relation to the proposed AI data centres. As that debate continues, we must recognise that regional communities have long called for a fair share of benefits for the important role they play in hosting renewable energy infrastructure. We can't ignore reality: the energy transition is happening. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make sure we get it right, and we owe it to the regions to get it right.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>298800</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is there a seconder for the motion?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Spender</name>
    <name.id>286042</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second this motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to talk about regional development and the enormous economic potential across the Northern Territory, and it goes to a few of the things that the previous speaker touched on. But the reality is that potential doesn't create jobs; investment does. The Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility helps get projects off the ground in northern Australia, where distance, remoteness and higher infrastructure costs can make attracting that private investment all that much more difficult.</para>
<para>Under the Albanese Labor government, the NAIF is here to stay, extended for another decade, and we can see what that backing delivers. Arafura Rare Earths' Nolans project, 135 kilometres north of Alice Springs, is a good example. The Nolans project will mine and process rare earths, right here in Australia. The NAIF has been instrumental in making Nolans a reality, helping to unlock around 600 construction jobs and 350 ongoing jobs. That means jobs for Territorians, opportunities for local businesses and regional development.</para>
<para>But that Commonwealth investment needs to be matched by delivery from the CLP NT government. Its own budget papers show net capital investment was underspent by $376 million in the 2025-26 financial year.</para>
<para>I've been advocating for a Territory economic development zone, to bring together investment in infrastructure, housing and, importantly, workforce measures, to get projects moving and to unlock more private investment—and I do welcome the NT Chief Minister finally getting on board with that approach. But now we need to turn that rhetoric into collaborative action. The Territory cannot afford to stand still.</para>
<para>I recently convened meetings in Darwin with senior members of the Australian Defence Force, members of Defence NT from the NT government, and National Intermodal, a government business enterprise whom we have funded to assist with the rollout of our $440 million federal government contribution towards establishing logistics hubs across the NT. These key federal government investments in logistics infrastructure will help drive resource and renewable energy development in the Territory. In this place, many times before, I've spoken about 'Territory gold'—the best solar radiation in the world. The Territory is at the forefront of Australia's energy transition, and projects like SunCable and Energy North are tapping into the incredible potential of solar energy to power local industry and meet the energy needs of our region and our neighbours.</para>
<para>Big IT players like Amazon, Google and Microsoft are very interested in 'Territory gold' to power their data-centre activities for AI and the cloud; they always have been interested. I encourage the NT Chief Minister to give up on continually saying no to Commonwealth support and to say yes to renewables and their rightful role. It is important that this AI demand in the Northern Territory taps into the geographical and institutional stability of the Northern Territory's place in Australia, our nation's membership in Five Eyes security arrangements along with access to the required telecommunications and other important infrastructure. But these investments must benefit the community, must deliver for the regions and deliver for the national interest. To achieve success, these operators must deliver ongoing acceptance and approval from local communities, stakeholders and the public—that is to say, they need social licence.</para>
<para>The federal government has set out expectations of data centre and AI infrastructure developers of what Australia requires from these data centre companies so the community can have confidence in their role and ensure that AI is sustainable and underpinned by strong social licence. These expectations put the needs of the Australian people ensuring our communities benefit directly through jobs, investment in skills and innovation, while strongly supporting Australia's clean energy transition and safeguarding our long-term water security.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SPENDER</name>
    <name.id>286042</name.id>
    <electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise in support of this motion, and I thank the member for Indi for moving it. We are at a critical juncture. First, we need to build power in this country, across the country, including in regional areas. This is critical for all of us, for the cheap energy of all Australians. It is critical for new and emerging energy needs such as in AI infrastructure, which is critical to our sovereignty as well. It's critical to our future opportunities. We need to build it fast and we need to build it predictably.</para>
<para>Second, the communities who host this energy infrastructure should receive a benefit from hosting it. This is obvious to most Australians but we do not yet have the proper legislative environment to make sure that actually happens and that is why this motion is so important. Regional mayors have told me of communities plunged into blackouts, unable to access the very energy infrastructure their towns host. When Broken Hill lost power after a storm destroyed transmission towers in 2024, the residents reasonably expected that the big battery powered by the solar and wind farm nearby would be able to keep the lights on. But it didn't. It took 10 days before an agreement was reached to allow the community to tap the source of energy they had been hosting in their own backyard.</para>
<para>Many communities in regional Australia are not opposed at all to the development of renewable energy and of batteries. Many support it. They see it as an opportunity. But what they do object to is being run roughshod over. Community benefit is a humble request for a partnership, one developers tell me that they are happy to meet. Community benefit isn't new. New industries have always struck grand bargains. In the past, those bargains have looked like investment in anchor infrastructure—roads, ports, dams, pipelines, assets with positive spillovers that outlast the boom that built them. It looked like a town pool and jobs for the locals. Today's infrastructure is more dispersed and passive—solar batteries, data centres—so the bargain will look different. Communities should have genuine agency over what that benefit looks like, shaped by their own needs.</para>
<para>But we also need national minimum standards. Clear expectations mean fewer fights and fewer delays, and a faster and fairer transition leaving host communities stronger. This is where the national government needs to step in, because we must go faster. Renewables reached 43 per cent of our electricity last year, so to reach 82 per cent by 2030 means almost doubling that in four years, yet just 2.3 gigawatts of new generation reached financial close in 2025. We are not building anywhere near the speed that is required.</para>
<para>Data centres bring new opportunities and new community concerns. Australia has a competitive advantage in our ability to house them with our abundance of land and our relative ease with which our continent can harness renewable energy. From a sovereignty point of view, from an economic point of view, I believe that we should take advantage of this opportunity to host these data centres. But we can only do that in a way that builds social licence and where we can build that quickly and efficiently, and that's where community benefit comes in.</para>
<para>Social licence is not a nicety. Its absence is not just bad for communities. It makes decisions less predictable and investment more uncertain. Merit appeals routines add more than a year to a project, with real costs in contract negotiations and financing and option costs, and those costs fall on all of us. The Productivity Commission found faster approvals reduce emissions, reduce costs for developers, attract investment and make energy cheaper, all supporting productivity growth. Accelerating wind farms and accompanying transmission by a single year could reduce electricity prices by seven per cent over the decade—seven per cent. That is the price of the fights we do not need to have.</para>
<para>So this is why this motion is so important. We need to manage this energy transition, we need to build abundant energy in this country, and we need to do that with the support of the communities that are hosting this. I come from the city. Many, in political terms, would say, 'Well, why do you care about this?' I care about this because the regional communities are hosting energy infrastructure that benefits me and my community, and I think it is fair that those communities that are hosting that get community benefit too. There are those in the parliament and across the country who seek to divide the city and the country. That is wrong and unnecessary, because if it's not fair to the communities in regional Australia then it's not going to be fair for this country either. So this is why all parliamentarians should be getting behind community benefit for this infrastructure in a way that gives better predictability and better speed of development and can actually accelerate this energy transition in a way that benefits communities.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REPACHOLI</name>
    <name.id>298840</name.id>
    <electorate>Hunter</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank my friend the member for Indi for moving this motion about community benefits and the role regional Australia is playing in our energy future. There is one thing I want to make very clear from the start: regional communities deserve straight answers, proper consultation and a fair share when they are asked to host major new infrastructure. It's just fair.</para>
<para>In the Hunter, we know what it means to power this beautiful country. For generations, our coalmines, power station workers, tradies and local businesses have helped keep the lights on here but also around the world. And, as our energy system changes, the Hunter will keep playing a big role here. But if we're going to ask communities from Wyee, Cameron Park and Cessnock through to Singleton to host new transmission, solar, batteries and other energy infrastructure then those communities need to be part of the conversation from day one. They can't be treated like an afterthought. We've seen what happens when engagement isn't good enough.</para>
<para>At Mitchells Flat, near Singleton, local people raised real concerns about a proposed solar farm on prime agricultural land. Farmers spoke up. Community groups spoke up. I spoke up. In the end, the developer decided not to proceed at that location. I said at the time that it was a great project; it was just the wrong location for that one. And that's the point. Supporting renewable energy doesn't mean every project belongs everywhere. We've got mining land and industrial land right across the Hunter. We should be looking hard at places like that before putting pressure on good farming country.</para>
<para>Good engagement means listening before decisions are locked in. It means talking to the people who live there, not just sending them a brochure when everything's been decided. And community benefit has to really mean something. It should mean local jobs. It should mean local apprenticeships. It should mean work for local contractors. It should mean opportunity for local manufacturers, truckies, and cafes and other small businesses. It should mean support for local roads, sporting clubs, community facilities and services, because, when a region hosts infrastructure that will operate for decades, the benefits should last for decades as well. We're already seeing that approach around the Hunter Transmission Project, where work is underway on a benefit-sharing package and opportunities for local businesses and workers.</para>
<para>Regional communities have been asking these questions for a long time. Long before the recent debate about AI data centres, people in places like the Hunter were already asking a simple question: if we're hosting the infrastructure, what does our community get back? The Albanese government has been working on that question. Through the Capacity Investment Scheme, the government is delivering more than $1.7 billion in shared community benefits, $1.9 billion in First Nations benefits and an estimated $35.8 billion in additional spending on local content and businesses. We've also strengthened the social licence requirements for projects supported through the Capacity Investment Scheme.</para>
<para>Importantly, the Developer Rating Scheme opened to industry in March this year. That scheme is about something I hear regularly from people in the Hunter—who are the good operators? If a developer engages early, deals honestly with landholders and treats the community with respect, that should count for something. And, if they don't, that also should count for something. The rating scheme gives communities more information and gives developers a reason to lift their game. We've also strengthened the role of the Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner and released national guidelines for community engagement and benefits for electricity transmission projects. But I do agree that we have to keep moving.</para>
<para>There are different rules across different states. There are different approaches between different projects, and that can be confusing for communities. Whatever framework we use, the test should be simple: Does the local community get a genuine say? Are landholders treated fairly? Are local workers and businesses getting opportunities? Are there real and lasting benefits for the towns doing the heavy lifting? And are developers held to a high standard? That's what matters to me. The Hunter knows better than most that changes must be practical. The Hunter has powered Australia for generations, and we're proud of that history, and we're proud of the workers who built it. But the next chapter has to be done with regional communities, not to them. If we get consultation right, put projects in the right places and make sure communities share the benefit, then we'll build stronger projects, stronger communities and stronger systems as well.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Indi for bringing this motion forward. I support strong communities, and I support communities receiving their fair share when they host infrastructure. But this motion does address the symptom and not the disease. The real problem is that Australia has built an energy transition around increasingly complex regulation before properly asking the most basic questions: Does the project work? Is the power reliable? What will it cost? And what happens to the land when the project is finished? Look at the Mt Challenger Wind Farm proposal in Dawson. Families around Proserpine and Kelsey Creek spent months living in needless uncertainty over massive turbines placed right next to their homes and also being developed on prime agricultural farmland. After six months of testing, Alinta finally confirmed what should have been obvious from day one—the site is not suitable. It should not take half a year of community anxiety to reach a conclusion that common sense should have dictated from the start. The community deserved better sequencing—test the site; establish the economics; establish the feasibility; and then ask communities to engage meaningfully with a serious proposal.</para>
<para>This is where the coalition offers a different vision. We believe in energy abundance, not energy scarcity. We support coal, gas, hydro and renewables where they make sense and are in the right place. We will also lift the prohibition on nuclear energy. Our policy is explicitly technology neutral and focused on affordable, reliable power—the source that will generate the most cost-effective and reliable electron—because net zero cannot be the destination at the expense of security and prosperity. Energy-intensive industries need electricity when they need it, not only when the sun shines or the wind blows. Look at Tomago Aluminium. The New South Wales government have bailed them out with a $2½ billion support package to secure the smelter's future. This proves the grid cannot deliver reliable and affordable industrial power at scale so billions are being spent propping up an energy transition that squeezes out manufacturers.</para>
<para>There are clear lessons from overseas. Let's look at Germany. It pursued an enormous energy transition built largely on renewables and imposed extraordinary costs on the energy system. The result is a country where consumers face some of the highest electricity costs in Europe while an energy-intensive industry faces electricity prices more than twice those paid in the United States. It is an economic story of ideology over people and prosperity. When energy becomes more expensive, everything becomes more expensive. Manufacturing becomes less competitive. Investment leaves. Jobs are put under pressure, and, eventually, the middle class starts asking a very simple question: how do we work this hard and somehow become poorer?</para>
<para>Australia is already heading in that direction. Two parents are working—two incomes in the household—and yet the mortgage, groceries, insurance, electricity and fuel consume more and more of what they earn because energy is the economy. We have the opportunity to learn from Europe's mistakes before we repeat them. We should not spend trillions of dollars building an energy system that makes Australian industry less competitive and Australian families poorer. And the question must be asked: Who pays later? Who pays to dismantle the turbines? Who restores the land? Who carries a liability when a company disappears, is sold or walks away?</para>
<para>Regional Australia must not be the graveyard of infrastructure, and prime agricultural land should not be permanently compromised. The coalition has already committed to protecting our farmers, requiring a social licence for energy infrastructure. That matters because food security is national security. Australia must be able to feed itself. We need reliable power, affordable power, securable power—power that supports manufacturing, agriculture, jobs and prosperity—and we need security before symbolism and prosperity before ideology. Net zero should never be the destination at which we sacrifice the things that actually make Australia prosperous. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>298800</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tertiary Education and Training</title>
          <page.no>144</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FERNANDO</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
    <electorate>Holt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) commends the Government for investing a further $158.4 million to expand the Commonwealth Prac Payment (CPP) to students training in ten additional frontline health professions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) acknowledges that, from 1 July 2027, this expansion will build on paid prac already available to eligible teaching, nursing, midwifery and social work students, with around 95,000 students expected to receive support each year;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) practical placements are a significant part of health degrees, making up more than a year of study in some courses; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) travel, accommodation and relocation costs can discourage students from undertaking placements in regional and remote Australia, where health workforce shortages are often most acute;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) notes that eligible students currently receive $338.60 a week, benchmarked to the single Austudy rate and indexed annually, providing real cost of living relief while they undertake mandatory placements; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) further acknowledges that expanding CPP will help more students complete their qualifications, growing the health workforce Australians rely on and strengthening Medicare.</para></quote>
<para>At the heart of this motion is a simple principle: no Australian should have to choose between completing the training our country needs or keeping a roof above their heads. Mandatory placements turn years of study into vital skills used in our classrooms, hospitals and communities. They are essential but can place enormous financial pressures on students. When placement begins, life does not pause. Rent is still due. Groceries still need to be bought. There is still petrol, parking and child care to pay for. At the same time, students often have to reduce their hours at work or give up paid employment altogether.</para>
<para>Before coming to this place, I spent almost 15 years as a pastry chef at Woolworths, working shifts to pay the bills and keep my household running. I know what it means to rely on a regular wage—and the stress that comes when your ability to earn is disrupted. For too many students, this becomes placement poverty. I have heard of students sleeping in their cars because they could not afford accommodation while completing their training. Others have come close to abandoning their qualifications not because they lacked ability, passion or commitment but because they could no longer carry the cost.</para>
<para>In 2024, the Albanese Labor government acted. We established the Commonwealth prac payment for nursing, midwifery, teaching and social work students. They receive $338.60 a week during mandatory placement, benchmarked to the single Austudy rate and indexed annually. This support comes when students need it most. It allows students to focus on learning, developing their professional judgement and gaining hands-on experience rather than on calculating which bill can wait.</para>
<para>This motion recognises that next step. The government is investing a further $158.4 million to expand paid prac. From July 2027, the payment will be available to eligible students in 10 more frontline health professions: clinical psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, paramedicine, radiography, pharmacy, rehabilitation therapy, audiology and podiatry. Each of these professions play an irreplaceable role in the lives of Australians. Australia needs these skills, but qualifying requires major commitment. In radiography, for example, practical training can account for more than a year of the degree. A student may need to relocate for weeks or months, cover travel and accommodation, and sometimes maintain rent in two places, all while earning less.</para>
<para>This challenge is greater outside our major cities. Regional placements often involve longer travel and higher relocation costs while regional and remote communities experience serious health workforce shortages. Removing these financial barriers makes it more realistic for students to train in those communities and consider building their careers there. With this expansion, around 95,000 students are expected to receive assistance each year. For families in Holt, this matters deeply. Holt is one of the youngest and fastest growing communities in Australia. Many young people want to build careers in health and care while their families work hard to manage the cost of rent, food and transport. Opportunities should depend on students' ability and determination, not on whether their family can afford months of compulsory unpaid training.</para>
<para>There is a clear difference in the approach of those opposite. At the last election, the coalition opposed replacing the Commonwealth Prac Payment with a concessional loan added to students' HELP debt. Under their plan, financial support during mandatory unpaid placements would have come at a cost of even more student debt. Through paid prac, the Albanese Labor government is helping more students complete their qualification, move into essential careers and strengthen the skilled workforce on which Medicare depends. It is practical reform that changes lives.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>DZY</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Gregg</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I commend the government for this expansion of the Commonwealth Prac Payment for 10 additional allied health disciplines and thank the member for Holt for bringing this motion to the House. This announcement has been welcomed by students, universities and the health sector. Since I arrived in this place, I have called often and loudly for adequate support of placements in all care disciplines. Practical placements are an essential component of many degrees. They're mandated for students seeking to become nurses, midwives, teachers, social workers, OTs, physiotherapists, psychologists, vets, dentists, doctors and other occupations that are indispensable for the wellbeing of our communities.</para>
<para>It's a complete false economy to require those students to shoulder the cost of these placements alone. Many students are expected to complete hundreds, even thousands, of hours of mandatory placements while buying groceries and paying for their rent, their transport, their insurances, their equipment and other expenses of daily life in what is a prolonged cost-of-living crisis. During prac placements, students are often unable to maintain their usual paid jobs. This causes financial stress, deferments and sometimes, tragically, noncompletion of their university courses.</para>
<para>I've heard from students from Kooyong and around the country of how difficult things are for them. One occupational therapy student told me they were required to take more than 640 hours of unpaid placement in their final year. To make ends meet, they had to resign from one job, significantly scale back hours at two other jobs and get help from their parents to cover their accommodation costs. Another described classmates who would finish a day of study, have a brief sleep in their cars, work overnight hospitality shifts and then return to class the next morning. A nursing student told me she'd been forced to defer her final year of study because of an increase in mandatory placement hours that made it impossible to take care of her child. Another student, a single parent studying nursing and midwifery, said that they ultimately withdrew from placements because they just could not cope with the cost of child care and travel.</para>
<para>These are not isolated stories. They're examples of a system that has relied on students paying their own way to complete necessary training at the cost of their own financial security when our communities desperately need the skills that those students are working for. I welcomed the introduction of the Commonwealth Prac Payment in the 2024-25 Federal Budget. I congratulate the Minister for Education on this expansion of the scheme. Providing financial support to students who are undertaking placements is a sensible measure. It will help more Australians complete their qualifications. It will help them enter sectors in which workforce shortages are acute.</para>
<para>But, while this expansion is positive, it's not the end of the conversation. Extending prac placement to students in clinical psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, paramedicine, radiography, pharmacy, rehabilitation therapies, audiology and podiatry on top of the existing coverage for nursing, midwifery, teaching and social work students, yes, is great cause for celebration, but the ongoing exclusion of other healthcare students is unfair and it is unsustainable.</para>
<para>Placement poverty is real. The Albanese government needs to explain to us and to the students who are experiencing that poverty why it has chosen to fix it for some but not for others—not for medical, dentistry, veterinary, nutrition and dietetics, optometry and osteopathy students. There is no fair, no equitable rationale for these omissions. They should be immediately addressed. Our health system, education system and our communities will be stronger when every student has the necessary support to complete their training and contribute their skills to Australia's health workforce.</para>
<para>If the objective of this expansion is to remove participation barriers and to strengthen Australia's future workforce, then the government must continue examining how this scheme can be fairly broadened and improved over time. The Albanese government has to continue closing the gap in education. It must extend paid prac to all care-sector students so that no-one has to interrupt their training to pay for their rent, to pay for their food and to look after their kids.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GREGG</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
    <electorate>Deakin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm very pleased to support this important motion by my good friend the member for Holt. Paid prac is good for students and it's good for the nation. The choice between making a living and pursuing your studies is not a real choice at all. If they can't pay the rent, there's no way they can finish their qualification. This isn't just a bad outcome for those individuals. It's a bad outcome for Australia, as it prevents smart, hardworking young people from entering the essential jobs we all rely on. When I was a teacher in regional Victoria, I met a lot of students who were choosing what they wanted to do next, and the requirement to do an unpaid placement was a decisive factor for them.</para>
<para>We're losing the very kinds of young people we're trying to push into professions. Regional kids are more likely to remain regional professionals, so it is essential that we ensure that opportunity is not decided by postcode or by income. A compulsory placement should be assessing whether you are ready to enter a profession, not whether your bank account can withstand a hit of weeks or months, and that's what it has become for too many young people trying to qualify for the jobs we really need them to enter into. If they need to do unpaid work, that turns completing a degree into a financial obstacle course. What paid prac does is address that last really important hurdle that ensures that they can finish their qualification if they're willing to do the hard work in order to complete it.</para>
<para>It is something that is critical to equity in our system. We are investing so much effort into ensuring that the opportunity to get a university qualification is available to all young people who are willing to do the work and have proved their capability to be successful. But it's become a financial minefield for far too many students. We've seen it in practical terms—people dropping out of courses simply because they can't afford to complete the final prac.</para>
<para>I think back to when I was training as a teacher. I was living in a caravan in a regional town, while eating mostly Easy Mac, and I was one of the lucky ones because I could afford to pay not only my rent but also to rent on a caravan park site. Not everyone could afford to do that.</para>
<para>A lot of students keep their heads just above water at the best of times, week by week, so they cannot afford to go weeks or months without a normal income, and that's what we expect them to do. Either students are required to give up a lot of their time working or they simply can't work at all because they're placed far away from where they normally reside. It's quite normal. A lot of young people cannot choose where they conduct their placement. Options and opportunities are limited, so sometimes they need to do these practicums far away from where they live, so they need somewhere to stay or they need to put more petrol in the car so they can get to and from there every day. We need to think of those practical issues when we're designing a system, because we can't separate our system from reality.</para>
<para>We know that this has been a problem for a very long time, and it is a barrier to entry to far too many Australians who would make terrific professionals. They have the right attitude, they have the capacity and this is just a small barrier that is really getting in the way of us achieving our goals.</para>
<para>We know that placement poverty is real and we know it's a barrier, so paid prac is there to alleviate that barrier for professionals that we really need to be expanding in number at this point in time. You look at the list of future allied health workers that this is supporting, and they're the very people we need with an ageing population and increasing support needs in our community. A shortage of these professionals would be unacceptable for most of our communities. I know that, in my own community of Deakin, we've got a lot of great young people, not all of whom could afford to make that sacrifice, but we also have an increasing number of older Australians who will be needing physiotherapists and those other allied health professionals as time goes on. So we need to make sure that we've got that pipeline of workers ready to meet that expanding demand for professionals that we already know are in short supply in many parts of Australia. It is essential that we confront and deal with this issue.</para>
<para>We've seen the success of paid prac in the professions that have already been enjoying it, including teachers and nurses, so we know it works. We know it makes a significant and material difference to the success of people completing these qualifications and that it ends a barrier confronted by far too many younger people, and other Australians of all ages, who are completing a qualification. It is just a small incentive, relative to the cost of investing in their degree. The last thing we want to do is invest a whole lot of money encouraging them to get into university and then invest a whole lot of money in getting them through units only for this final hurdle of a practicum to prevent them from completing the qualification. It undermines the financial investment we as the Commonwealth are making in these young people.</para>
<para>So this is a final piece of the puzzle. It's an essential piece of the puzzle, and I'm incredibly proud of the Albanese Labor government for stepping in with this really important initiative. I thank all those in the parliament who have given voice to the young people about this issue, because those have been important contributions as well, as have the contributions of many fellow members of the Albanese Labor government who've been pushing this for some time—and I include the wonderful member for Holt among them—because they realise that you can't separate— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm delighted to speak today on the expansion of Commonwealth prac payments to allied health students studying psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, paramedicine, radiography, pharmacy, rehabilitation therapies, audiology and podiatry. Eight weeks ago, Senator David Pocock and I brought a petition to this parliament, signed by more than 43,000 people, calling for the Commonwealth prac payments to be expanded to all allied health and medical students. As well as signing on to that call, thousands took the time to share their story with me about why they supported expanding Commonwealth prac payments. I've read hundreds of these stories and the member for Deakin has outlined some of the key themes that come from those stories—stories about the physical, financial and mental toll that mandatory unpaid placements are taking on our future healthcare professionals. A constituent of Indi wrote that her unpaid placement put her in such a financially vulnerable position that, one year on, her finances simply still have not recovered. Another constituent told me that they dropped out of uni altogether for this reason. What a loss. It's not just prospective students that support this. Senior clinicians, university lecturers, parents and everyday people put their names on this petition calling for more support for our healthcare students. One woman wrote, 'We need the workforce to save our lives.' She was a cancer survivor treated by radiation therapy.</para>
<para>We simply can't overestimate the impact of health professionals right across Australia. Every Australian relies on doctors, pharmacists, dentists, physios, psychologists and many, many other health professionals. But mandatory unpaid placements have been causing health students to delay and drop out altogether. It absolutely isn't good enough, and it's bad public policy.</para>
<para>That's why I'm so pleased that the government has listened to and acted on the calls of tens of thousands of Australians to expand Commonwealth prac payments to more allied health students, and I thank the member for Holt for bringing this motion to the House. It's an example of when government, Independents, backbenchers and frontbenchers work together with community to listen and improve things. I thank the Prime Minister and Minister Clare in particular for taking the next step in boosting the future of our health workforce. It's going to make a real difference to allied health students, and it will pay dividends.</para>
<para>But I have to call out the member for Deakin. It is not the final piece. The job is not done yet, because, unfortunately, some allied health professionals have been left out in the cold, along with medical, veterinary and dentistry students. I want to make the case for vets. I'm a rural Australian, and I've spoken in this place before about allied health and medical professions in detail. Regional Australia is in dire need of more vets, who do so much more in addition to looking after beloved household pets. A country vet is just as likely to be treating our horses, our cows and our sheep as our cats and dogs. Veterinarians are absolutely essential for protecting our biosecurity and agricultural productivity. Globally, they're playing a vital role in the early recognition of H5 bird flu, and we need more of them. We are crying out for them in the regions.</para>
<para>The Australian Veterinary Association's latest workforce survey found that 36 per cent of veterinary recruitment vacancies took 12 months or longer to fill, and, in regional areas, this number jumps to 44 per cent. Veterinary students need to complete 52 weeks of mandatory unpaid placement, so expanding Commonwealth prac payments to include veterinary students is a simple, practical way to support students—just as we're doing in the health sciences—to complete their degrees and address what is an absolutely manifestly problematic critical workforce shortage in rural and regional Australia.</para>
<para>The impacts of placement poverty caused by mandatory unpaid placements have been well established, as has the need for policies that grow our health and veterinary workforce. Knowing this, it's unclear to me what metric the government used to deem some students more deserving of Commonwealth prac payments than others. I congratulate the government on taking an important step in supporting more allied health students to complete their degrees, and I call on them: don't stop there. Students in medical, veterinary, dentistry and the remaining health degrees also deserve a fair chance at completing their studies, and we need them. I've said so many times in this place that health care is a team sport. We need our full team able to participate.</para>
<para>This practical placement policy is a solid policy. It's a commonsense policy. It is supported by the community, and I know it is already helping to secure Australia's future in health. We need to make sure it's expanded to those other professions, and we absolutely need to get our vets involved in this too.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KARA COOK</name>
    <name.id>316537</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Imagine knowing that, to complete your degree or training, you need to stop earning an income, not for a day or two but for weeks and sometimes even months. You still have rent to pay. You still have groceries, petrol, looking after kids, childcare fees—but you also have hundreds of hours of mandatory unpaid placement ahead of you, and, without completing it, you don't graduate. That has been the reality for far too many Australian students. We've heard, today, many stories about what this means for students. It has meant choosing, sometimes, between the qualification they have worked years towards and simply being able to pay their bills. We have heard from students cutting back shifts, burning through their savings, having to give up their jobs or, worse still, giving up their degree or training entirely. Labor is changing that.</para>
<para>In 2024, Labor announced paid prac—the type of policy that only a Labor government would make. For the first time, the Australian government helped eligible students with the cost of living with paid prac while they completed the mandatory placements they needed to graduate. This was a fundamental change, and now we're taking the next step. From 1 July 2027, Labor is expanding paid prac to 10 more frontline health professions: clinical psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, paramedicine, radiography, pharmacy, rehabilitation therapies, audiology and podiatry. If we think about how often Australians rely on these professions throughout their lives, it paints a picture of how important these professions are to our society. The paramedic who arrives on what might be the very worst day in a person's life, the physio helping you to walk again after surgery, the speech pathologist working with a child to find their voice—these professions matter, and we need more people choosing them.</para>
<para>In my electorate of Bonner, around 12,000 people already work in health care and social assistance, and, in the last census, more than 4½ thousand Bonner residents worked in hospitals alone and almost 9,000 people were studying at university or another higher education institution. Behind those numbers are thousands of people building careers and providing the services that families across my community depend on. Among those almost 9,000 students is the next generation of our health workforce.</para>
<para>We want students to graduate. We want them to take up these jobs, but, when we ask them to complete enormous amounts of unpaid practical training to get there, we limit their opportunity. For radiography students, practical training can add up to more than a year to their degree. Try fitting that around a normal work week. We cannot keep saying Australia needs more skilled health professionals while putting the financial barriers in the way of people trying to become them. Paid prac is about removing one of those barriers, but it is also part of something much bigger because a stronger Medicare isn't about just what we fund; it's about who is there to deliver.</para>
<para>You can invest in hospitals. You can open clinics. You can expand services, but ultimately somebody has to be there to provide the care. Australia needs these students, and we need to support them. Labor understands this. That is why we created paid prac, and it's why we're expanding it. It is all part of the government's commitment to a better future for all Australians. Paid prac is good cost-of-living policy. It is good education policy, and it's good health policy. Most importantly, it backs Australians who are putting in the work to build a better future for themselves and who will spend their careers looking after the rest of us.</para>
<para>Only Labor values these students, and we will continue to deliver and expand paid prac to support them.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONAGHAN</name>
    <name.id>279991</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I like to give credit where it's due in this place, and I commend the upcoming expansion of the Commonwealth Prac Payment. Any initiative that responsibly encourages our locally grown health workforce is to be commended and implemented as quickly as possible, so I take my hat off to the government for this policy. But this bill gives me an opportunity to make a further plea today on behalf of regional communities to go one step further and recognise the sectors of the health workforce that the current expansion ignores, sectors that we in the regions desperately need to be nurturing and increasing in number.</para>
<para>On this side of the floor, we absolutely welcome the inclusion of clinical psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, paramedicine, radiography, pharmacy, rehabilitation therapies, audiology and podiatry. But that list just needs to be a little larger. It should include medical students, those studying to be a GP or a specialist. It should include optometry. It should include dietitians, and it should include veterinary students.</para>
<para>As you would expect in regional and rural areas, our GP shortage is rapidly getting worse with every single passing year. Finding a timely appointment with a GP in my electorate on the Mid North Coast of New South Wales has never been harder, which is currently forcing residents in need into emergency departments. While the urgent care clinic in Coffs Harbour is a welcome addition—they need one in Taree—it isn't open in the hours that we were promised when it was launched, because of staff shortages. We know that the pipeline of new graduates replacing our existing GP network is almost non-existent, and we need to address this immediately to ensure that our primary care network doesn't further erode. But sadly that would-be workforce is not included in this expansion, making general practice less appealing for students struggling with those expenses.</para>
<para>Every medical industry body is passionately pointing this out to us—none more eloquently than the RACGP's president Michael Wright, who stated:</para>
<quote><para class="block">On-the-job training is what has given us such expert clinicians all around this country, but this unpaid training places a major financial burden on many medical students. Placements really can act as a barrier for some of our brightest students choosing to go into medicine, and it's particularly hard for people from disadvantaged populations, people in rural areas, and people from lower socioeconomic groups. Out of all of these courses the medical degree is the longest, and the impact of these placements on finances are the greatest for future doctors, so excluding them from this, it just doesn't make any sense.</para></quote>
<para>Then there are the allied health fields like optometry and dietetics. To best illustrate this, I want to read from a letter that I received from Poppy McIntyre from Port Macquarie. Poppy is an 18-year-old full-time pharmacy student at the University of Sydney, and she writes:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I know from experience that for many allied health students the greatest financial hardship occurs during mandatory clinical placements. These placements often require students to reduce or completely stop paid work while continuing to meet the cost of rent, transport, food, and study, placing many under severe financial stress. I was pleased to see the recent expansion of the Commonwealth Prac Payment to support more allied health students during mandatory placements, including me in pharmacy. But I was disappointed that students in other essential allied health disciplines remain excluded from this support, an exclusion that is difficult to justify given the placement requirements of these degrees.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Dietetics students are required to complete more than 800 hours of unpaid clinical placement, while optometry students typically undertake 400-600 hours of unpaid placement before they can graduate. The financial burden can be overwhelming and has the potential to discourage students from entering.</para></quote>
<para>She goes on:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I respectfully urge you to advocate for the Commonwealth Prac Payment to be extended to include dietetics, optometry, and all allied health students …</para></quote>
<para>Poppy, I couldn't have said it better myself.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Wild Dog Action Plan</title>
          <page.no>149</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
    <electorate>Gippsland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the significant contribution Australia's livestock producers make to regional economies, employment and the nation's food security;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) that wild dogs are a serious and growing threat to livestock, costing an estimated $302 million in production losses each year; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the burden carried by property owners to deal with the wild dog predation on stock;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the Government has cut important pest and invasive species management programs, despite the significant and growing economic impact of invasive species on Australian agriculture;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) federal funding for the National Wild Dog Management Coordinator is due to expire at the end of September 2026, with funding for the National Wild Dog Action Plan expiring a month later;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the coordinator and the plan provide a nationally agreed, evidence-based framework that enables coordinated control across state and territory borders; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) industry bodies have committed to co-funding the national wild dog program, yet the Government has chosen to ignore its responsibility to support coordinated wild dog control; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) urges the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) guarantee ongoing funding to maintain the National Wild Dog Management Coordinator role;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) renew funding for the National Wild Dog Action Plan to continue the second half of the ten year management program;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) recognise that a nationally coordinated approach to pests management is essential to protecting livestock, agricultural productivity and the prosperity of regional Australia; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) commit to ongoing investment in the coordinated management and control of wild dogs and other invasive species that threaten Australian agriculture, regional communities and the environment.</para></quote>
<para>I move this motion on behalf of our world-class livestock producers in Gippsland and throughout regional Australia. Wild dogs are one of the clearest examples of Labor governments at state and federal level failing to support our farmers, when pressure on them is actually increasing. This isn't a fringe issue. It goes to the heart of what regional communities expect from Canberra, which is certainty and action on the ground. Put simply, we need more boots and less suits—that's more boots on the ground, doing practical environmental work, and less suits in Canberra and Melbourne making excuses.</para>
<para>Wild dog predation costs Australian livestock producers in the order of $302 million a year in production costs. Those opposite may say this is primarily a state issue. Frankly, that is dodging their responsibility, because, while the state governments should not be let off the hook, there are very significant national issues that need to be dealt with in this place when it comes to invasive species.</para>
<para>When it comes to national food security, we have to work with the state governments and our landholders to protect them from losses associated with predators like wild dogs. When it comes to feeding the rest of the world with our imports, we need to make sure that our farmers can continue to produce that world-class protein that I referred to earlier. And, when it comes to invasive species, there needs to be some leadership in this place, in Canberra, to make sure we continue to keep the pressure on those species which are damaging the agricultural sector and our biodiversity, because our farmers cannot be expected to tackle these problems by themselves, particularly when it comes to wild dogs, which are emerging primarily from public land. Whether it be national parks, state forests or some other form of Crown land, the worst neighbour to have in many of our communities is public land managed by the state government. Wild dogs simply don't stop at the border of public land, and they don't stop at a state border.</para>
<para>The other point I want to make in relation to this issue before the House today is that this is also a mental health issue. Farmers and farming families are dealing with this issue on top of all of their other day-to-day tasks. On top of every other difficult issue they're dealing with on a day-to-day basis—trying to manage the regulation, trying to make sure they make a profit, dealing with seasonal conditions—they then have to protect their stock from predation by wild dogs emerging from public land. In electorates like Gippsland, which have many farms surrounded by public land, this is an ongoing challenge. I want to refer to one of my constituents, Stuart, a fifth-generation farmer from Benambra. He wrote to me and said, 'Given all the regular issues and struggles we deal with in this industry, we certainly can't afford the time and cost of this dog issue getting out of hand again.' He went on to say, 'Thankfully, I'm not particularly susceptible to mental health issues, but I was absolutely furious this morning when I found a gutted lamb. That could take a toll, potentially, in future; it's hard to know.'</para>
<para>The reason I'm raising this in the federal Parliament is because federal funding for the National Wild Dog Management Coordinator expires at the end of September this year, and funding for the National Wild Dog Action Plan expires a month after that. We are yet to hear from the Albanese government whether it will continue to fund those two important roles. Industry is seeking a federal commitment of just $250,000 a year over five years to keep the coordinator role and the action plan running. Again, in the context of a $302 million annual cost to livestock producers, that is a tiny amount of money to assist our world-class farming families.</para>
<para>I want to close by referencing one of our peak bodies, the National Farmers' Federation, just to demonstrate that this has nothing to do with party politics. When you have peak leadership groups in the farming sector on board with an issue, I call on the government to pay attention. The National Farmers' Federation president, Hamish McIntyre, has said, 'Wild dogs are especially cruel killers, often leaving livestock to suffer slow, painful deaths from their bites,' and: 'We're only halfway through a 10-year management plan. There's still a lot of important work ahead.' McIntyre also said, regarding the September deadline, 'It's vital that the national coordinator is reinstated come September. If funding isn't renewed, we'll be undoing more than a decade of progress.'</para>
<para>We simply can't afford to go backwards. This motion is not asking for something radical. It asks the government to keep funding what it was already funding previously, and keep doing what has been working in terms of other major pest species around the nation. Farmers have done their part. Industry has done its part by committing to co-funding. It's time for the government to do its part.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is there a seconder for this motion?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Birrell</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOLZBERGER</name>
    <name.id>88411</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to answer the question that some people might have: why is a member for an outer metro seat in Logan in the northern Gold Coast—between Brisbane and the Gold Coast—getting up to speak on this? There are two reasons: the first is that I never want to miss an opportunity in this place to let people know where I come from and to let people know what my roots are. I think the experiences which really drive my values are the ones that I had working as a station hand on outback sheep and cattle stations around Broken Hill—in fact, a couple of hundred kays west of Bourke, around a little town called Wanaaring.</para>
<para>The second reason I want to talk about this motion today is I'm probably one of the few people in this place, and may ever be in this place, who is able to actually give testimony to what happened when the dog fence fell apart in western New South Wales, because I was there. When the member for Gippsland talks about the federal government not having an interest in what goes on out there, I can tell you, as somebody who was actually there in western New South Wales when the dog fence fell apart in the early 2000s, it was the Liberal-National government who was in power at the time. So, when it comes to neglect, I think that they need to take a hard look at themselves and the fact that they're actually responsible for it. Because, as much as the member for Barker might have a little chuckle, I was actually working on the land, and I saw it fall apart in the space of two years or so, really.</para>
<para>It was the millennial drought, around 2000, when, over the course of one year—I can't remember which year, 2000 or 2001—we had about 180 points under the old system, which is just below two inches.</para>
<para>The place that I worked a lot on was owned by a family that owned four places which, combined, added up to about 300,000 or so acres. When I got there, they ran about 15,000 sheep across those four places, and, by the end of the millennium drought, there were about 2,000. So the drought knocked them down, but the broken fence kept them down. In that space of time, from when they had 15,000 sheep—the millennium drought was particularly harsh, lasing for two or three years—to the end of that, with 2,000 sheep, the dogs had moved in, and it was the dog problem that prevented them from restocking.</para>
<para>I got to work on sheep and cattle stations, but, after me, they were cattle stations. And, really, western New South Wales has barely recovered. I wanted to talk about this because, without listing all of the things that the Albanese government are doing around biosecurity or agriculture, and without trumpeting the fact that we are actually investing $20 million or so in a wild dog management plan and we do have the interests of our farmers at heart—families that really give me the values that I stand to represent in this place today—I think that we have, in the Albanese government, a complete change of philosophy.</para>
<para>The reason why the Howard government let the fence collapse and why the Albanese government is about rebuilding our fences and our industries is a change of philosophy. It's the same philosophy that is driving us to support our steel industry in Whyalla, our aluminium industry in Gladstone, our copper industry in Mount Isa and—just the other day—our aluminium industry in Tomago. It is a philosophy of 'nobody held back and nobody left behind'. The previous philosophy, of the Howard government and of the Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison governments, is summed up best by their daring the car industry to walk out.</para>
<para>Whether it is in agriculture, whether it is in manufacturing or whether it is in mining, this Albanese Labor government has a philosophy of protecting those industries, looking after our farmers and our workers and trying to fix the mess that we have been left with after 30 years of neglect. So I condemn this motion, really. I think that it hides the facts; it hides the history. I can tell that from a personal perspective because I was there.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BIRRELL</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
    <electorate>Nicholls</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to support the motion moved by the member for Gippsland. There is a lack of commitment by the Albanese government to the management of wild dogs. I appreciate the member for Forde giving us his experience, and, on behalf of the constituents and the farmers that I represent, I will appreciate the member for Forde advocating for the $250,000 a year that the industry is seeking.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Pasin</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>He's just said how important it is!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BIRRELL</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>He said how important it is, and I look forward to him going and advocating that to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.</para>
<para>Wild dog predation costs Australian livestock producers an estimated $302 million every year in production losses. I have been a livestock producer in my life, and I saw what wild dogs did to the livestock I was caring for. It's a very distressing thing—a very distressing thing. It's not just financial. People become emotionally attached to their livestock.</para>
<para>Farmers cannot tackle this problem alone. Wild dogs are continually moving across neighbouring land, national parks or Crown land. They don't stop at state borders, they don't stop at the boundary of a national park and they certainly don't stop at the boundary of a farmer's property.</para>
<para>Wild dogs are one part of a much bigger invasive species challenge facing Australian agriculture. Feral pigs are another example of the same pattern—animals moving through national parks and Crown land and onto productive farmland. It's the same with wild dogs; individual farmers are left to shoulder the cost of a problem that crosses land tenure and state boundaries.</para>
<para>The New South Wales coalition's $300 million biosecurity and feral animal package responds to this problem with a feral-pig bounty trial, aerial shooting, drone surveillance, five-year funding cycles and clear obligations on Crown land managers to pull their weight.</para>
<para>Federal funding for the National Wild Dog Management Coordinator expires at the end of September 2026. That's why it's timely that the member for Gippsland got up and moved this motion, which is going to be supported by the member for Barker. We understand how bad the problem is and the role that the federal government has to play.</para>
<para>We are only halfway through a 10-year management plan, and the government is walking away right when the continuity of this program matters most. Here's the kicker: the funding required is such a modest ask. Industry is seeking a federal commitment of $250,000 a year over five years to keep the coordinator role and the action plan running. That's a very small amount of money against a $302 million annual cost to the sector. Multiple industry bodies have already committed to the co-funding of the program, but government has not managed this commitment. The farmers and the industry, on behalf of the people who love the products of Australian livestock, shouldn't have to go cap in hand to this government, begging to properly fund invasive species management. It should be a part of what we all agree is partially the responsibility of government.</para>
<para>The Albanese government is treating wild dog management as the responsibility of states, territories and landholders alone. It's cut important pest and invasive species management programs, despite the growing economic impact of invasive species on agriculture. The federal government already funds national coordinators for feral pigs, deer, rabbits, cats and foxes. Why would we treat the problem of wild dogs differently to those species that I just outlined? In many cases, they cause a much bigger problem. If the government is serious about supporting regional Australia, protecting food security and managing invasive species—I reiterate what the member for Gippsland said—practical environmentalism such as this needs more boots and fewer suits. We need boots on the ground, proper practical environmentalism, and fewer bureaucrats in places like Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra talking about what should be done.</para>
<para>If the government's serious about supporting regional Australia, it must and it needs to properly fund the National Wild Dog Action Plan, $250,000 a year. I really look forward, given that he's outlined how much of an expert he is on this, to the member for Forde going over to the minister for agriculture and saying, 'On behalf of the Australian farmers, we, the Labor Party, need to get this done.'</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REPACHOLI</name>
    <name.id>298840</name.id>
    <electorate>Hunter</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to thank my good friend the member for Gippsland for bringing this motion before the House. There is a lot that I actually do agree with in this motion. Our livestock producers make an enormous contribution to this country. They put food on our tables, they support regional jobs and they keep local economies moving. In the Hunter we know that firsthand. From cattle properties around Lake Macquarie, Cessnock, Singleton to the smaller communities across our electorate, agriculture is part of who we are. These producers work bloody hard. They get up early, they work long days and they deal with drought, floods, rising costs, changing markets and pests.</para>
<para>Wild dogs are another challenge they shouldn't have to face alone. When a wild dog attacks livestock, it's not just a number on a spreadsheet; it's an animal that a farmer has raised, it's lost income and it's hours and hours of extra work. For a lot of farmers, it's extremely upsetting to walk into a paddock and see what's just happened. So I agree with the member for Gippsland that wild dogs are a serious issue and that they do need coordinated control measures. But I don't accept the suggestion that the Albanese Labor government has walked away from pest management and biosecurity.</para>
<para>The Commonwealth has invested more than $20 million to support wild dog management through the National Wild Dog Action Plan. We've also provided a $650,000 grant to Australian Wool Innovation through the Supporting Communities Manage Pest Animals and Weeds Program to support delivery of that plan. That matters because wild dogs don't care where one property ends and another one begins. They don't care about council boundaries. They don't care about state borders. If one landholder is doing the right thing but the property next door isn't involved in the program, the problem doesn't disappear. That's why farmers, governments, researchers and industry need to all work together. In our region, coordination matters because a wild dog can move through rough country and across multiple properties. No single farmer, no matter how hard they work, can solve this problem alone. That's exactly the sort of approach that works in places like the Hunter, where you've got farms, bushland, national parks and difficult country sitting alongside each other.</para>
<para>This government also understands that biosecurity is bigger than any one pest. Since 2022, we've invested more than $2 billion in additional biosecurity funding. That money is strengthening prevention, detection, response and recovery right across this country. We've invested in frontline biosecurity, we've backed preparedness for H5 bird flu and we've supported responses to the red imported fire ants. We're making sure our system is ready for the threats that can hurt our farmers, our environment and our economy.</para>
<para>Why does that matter? Because Australian agriculture is something worth protecting. Farm-gate production was on track to exceed $100 billion last financial year, four years ahead of the industry's 2030 target. That doesn't happen by accident. It happens because Australian farmers are among the best in the world; it happens because our produce is clean, safe and trusted; and it happens because governments, industry and farmers work together to protect that reputation.</para>
<para>I also want to recognise the burden that pest control puts on individual landholders. A farmer in the Hunter already has enough to do without spending more time and money dealing with wild dogs. They need support, they need practical information, they need neighbours working together and they need governments at every level doing their part. States and territories have the primary responsibility for managing established pest animals on the ground, but the Commonwealth has an important role in coordination, research and national leadership. We'll keep playing that role; we'll keep working with states and territories; we'll keep working with the industry; and, most importantly, we'll keep listening to the farmers who deal with these problems every single day.</para>
<para>There might be a political disagreement in this place about individual programs or where funding should sit. That's fine. But there shouldn't be a disagreement about the goal. We want fewer livestock lost to wild dogs, we want stronger regional communities, we want productive farms, and we want a biosecurity system that protects Australian agriculture for the long-term.</para>
<para>The farmers of the Hunter don't want speeches full of politics. They want practical results. That's what we'll keep fighting for, and that's what this government will keep delivering.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:17</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
    <electorate>Barker</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I agree with the statement the member for Hunter made—that we should listen to our farmers. So to the member for Hunter: listen up. My family and I farm, as does the member for Grey. In my case, we're livestock producers, so, when the beginning of a motion acknowledges the significant contribution Australian livestock producers make to regional economies, you've got me interested.</para>
<para>There is a special kind of torment that comes with a farmer knowing that there is a wild dog predating on their livestock. They go to bed at night praying that that dog isn't going to come back, because the scene isn't a dead lamb here or a dead ewe over there; it is a massacre. I've seen it—and not much curdles my blood, but it does. Not one ewe, not one lamb—we're talking about entire flocks, because, when a wild dog gets that taste, it doesn't stop. It's not killing because it needs to eat; it's killing for fun. And, quite frankly, the scene doesn't bear thinking about. That's why our nation has always given a particularly important role to the National Wild Dog Action Plan. Farmers are sitting at home worried about their livestock—livestock they care about; livestock they've spent a small fortune acquiring or breeding, but also a small fortune supporting, whether through treatments or other things.</para>
<para>So, when I hear those opposite say, 'We don't want to hear any more speeches about how important this is,' I couldn't agree more. But then I think to myself, 'Hang on—between the saying and the doing is an ocean.' On the one hand, we hear these lovely speeches. I heard one from the member from Hunter. I heard one from the member for Forde. They're people who are trotted out in this place to pretend like those opposite have an affinity with rural and regional producers, because, whilst they live in rural communities—or have, in the case of the member for Forde—they haven't been producers. The truth is that I then think to myself, 'Hang on—250 grand?' With respect, there are departments in this government's orbit that spend more in petty cash. To think that this is now at a point where this funding is uncertain—I can't understand. This is an economy that contributes $302 million annually. Those opposite are very quick to drape themselves in the imagery of rural Australia. But you have to actually back it up with actions, not just words.</para>
<para>So I'm going to suggest, contrary to what those opposite have suggested, that the current government is biased against agriculture. And how do I say that? As a former barrister, I need to be able to prove things. Let me start with banning live sheep exports. That wasn't a pro-farmer move, I think. I could then back it up by saying 'water buybacks in the Murray-Darling basin'. That's not a pro-farmer move, quite frankly. I could keep going, if you like.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Sorry, Member for Grey? We're freelancing here! What's your suggestion?</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Venning</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The free trade—it is not free trade.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That's right. So there are many examples here that I can point to of those opposite acting against the interests of farmers, and this is just another example.</para>
<para>The member for Forde wanted to wax lyrical about the dog fence. Before the member for Grey served in this place, I worked with the former member for Grey to secure $29 million to re-establish the dog fence across northern South Australia, protecting much of the member for Grey's seat and, in turn, protecting mine, because my livestock producers want the front line in this fight to be a long way from where they are. That stands opposed to the Victorian Labor government's—this should take your breath away; as a livestock producer from South Australia, can I tell you, it does for me—reintroduction of dingoes in the Grampians. Those opposite want to say they're backing livestock producers. Well, there are 250,000 ways you can do that, shortly, as opposed to the $29 million we contributed to the wild dog fence. All of my colleagues know that the reintroduction of the dingo close to sheep enterprises is a very bad idea.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned, and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Key Apprenticeship Program</title>
          <page.no>153</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FRENCH</name>
    <name.id>316550</name.id>
    <electorate>Moore</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) recognises the Government's Key Apprenticeship Program, which provides $10,000 incentive payments to new tradies, has already attracted 30,000 apprentices in the first 12 months;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) carpentry, plumbing and electrical trades are the most popular occupations for apprentices under the program; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the program is calibrated to offer incentive payments at milestones across the course of an apprenticeship, ensuring that apprentices are supported to reach the finish line of their apprenticeship, with data showing stronger retention rates;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) acknowledges that the program forms a key part of the Government's work to deliver targeted support for apprenticeships in industries where we need them most, particularly housing construction;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) affirms the Government's ongoing support for the program, with the budget locking in incentive settings for both apprentices and employers until 2029; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) expresses concern that despite multiple opportunities to clarify their position, neither the Opposition nor the One Nation party have made clear their support for the program, with the Shadow Minister for Skills and Training calling the program 'wrong' and 'throwing good money, after bad money'.</para></quote>
<para>I rise to move this motion because the Key Apprenticeship Program gets a basic part of the apprenticeship policy right. If we want more qualified tradies, we need to help apprentices stay in the trade long enough to finish, and we need to make it easier for businesses, especially small businesses, to take them on in the first place. I started my electrical apprenticeship at 25. The wages were not great. I know some people might laugh at the idea of an electrician ever being poorly paid, but every electrician starts somewhere, and most of us started on pretty modest wages. That is one of the reasons these payments are pretty useful. I received a similar apprenticeship incentive myself. It did not suddenly make the apprentice wages generous, but it helped with the costs that come with staying in the trade—tools, fuel, getting to work.</para>
<para>Did I spend every dollar wisely at 25? Probably not. A trip to Bali may have entered the equation. But take Aaron, a first-year electrical apprentice from Connolly in my electorate of Moore. He wanted to do a trade, and his family encouraged him to do electrical—clearly, the superior trade, with all due respect to the member for Hunter! Aaron says he plans to put his payment towards tools. Clearly, he has shown better judgement than I did. The current program gives apprentices support at key points through their apprenticeship, with help for things like tools, transport and the everyday cost of getting to work. That support can make a real difference. There will be times when money is tight, and there will be days when the work is hard. There will be times when someone looks at what their mates are earning elsewhere and wonders whether it is worth sticking out their apprenticeship. And that pressure can build really quickly. It can affect stress, confidence and mental health.</para>
<para>Getting someone into an apprenticeship is only the start. The real success is getting them through the qualification. The early signs of this program are encouraging, with the overwhelming majority of supported apprentices still in training.</para>
<para>But apprentices are only one side of this. There is no apprenticeship without an employer willing to give someone a start. And, for small business, that is a real commitment. A first-year apprentice needs supervision. A qualified tradie has to stop what they are doing, explain the job, show them how to do it, watch them do it and then check the work. Sometimes you can spend half an hour explaining a 10-minute job, and then 10 minutes fixing it. Every tradie has been there. That is how apprentices learn. But, for a small contractor, that time costs money, and a business can spend years training someone who either does not finish or moves on soon after they qualify.</para>
<para>That is why the employer payments in this program are also small business incentives. They help remove some of the cost and risk of taking on an apprentice. The government is focusing more of that support on small and medium businesses and group training organisations, where those incentives can have the biggest effect on hiring decisions.</para>
<para>The same principle applies to TAFE. The cost of formal training sits with the employer. So, when government makes apprentice TAFE free, that is an employer incentive. It removes another cost from taking on someone and training them.</para>
<para>I saw how quickly those costs can grow. When I started my apprenticeship, TAFE and private college in WA were around a thousand dollars. By the time I finished they had more than tripled, under the former Liberal government in Western Australia. For a large company, that increase might be easier to absorb, but, for a small contractor taking on one or two apprentices, it is another cost that has to be weighed up, and removing that cost makes the decision easier.</para>
<para>We need more businesses making that decision, because we cannot build more homes and major infrastructure, and deliver the energy transition, without more tradies. This program has already backed tens of thousands of apprentices in housing construction, including thousands in Western Australia.</para>
<para>The opposition is free to criticise it, but its own shadow minister has called the program wrong and accused the government of throwing good money after bad. If that is their position, then they should explain what they would do instead. At the moment, it is all sauce, no sausage roll, because the choice is pretty simple: we can make it harder for businesses to train the next generation, or we can remove the barriers that stand in their way. We can leave apprentices to carry the financial pressure on their own, or we can give them the support they need to help them finish.</para>
<para>I know what it means—what finishing an apprenticeship can give someone: a trade, a career and opportunities you probably cannot see when you're standing there as a first-year apprentice.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Moore. Is there a seconder for this motion?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Gregg</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VENNING</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to thank every Australian currently doing an apprenticeship. They are learning the skills that build our houses, run the mines, feed us and keep the lights on in this country.</para>
<para>But this motion does not ask the House to congratulate apprentices; it asks the House to congratulate the government. Does anyone really think this government deserves being congratulated on this matter? Labor talks a big game on apprenticeships and training, but, when you peek behind their points and look at the data, it tells a very different story. When the coalition left office in 2022, there were 426,000 Australians in apprenticeships and traineeships. The number today is 282,000. That's not a pipeline; that is a drain. Trade occupants alone are down 30,000 since Labor came to government. In data released by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research, training and apprenticeship commencements are down in 18 out of 19 industries under Labor: construction—down; manufacturing—down; healthcare—down; mining—down; agriculture, forestry and fishing—down; and the list goes on.</para>
<para>But, in what must be a proud moment for those opposite, there is one industry where commencements are growing: public administration. That's because, when they can't grow the economy, the only solution they have is to grow the public sector.</para>
<para>Labor's record on skills and training is worth remembering, and it is worth comparing. Apprentice and trainee numbers almost doubled under the Howard government; when Rudd and Gillard came to government, those numbers went into freefall. Before those opposite came to government, they were doing everything they could to spin a story and misrepresent the facts on apprenticeships and traineeships—so much that even the ABC fact checkers took a look. This is what they had to say about Labor's record:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The fall in traineeships was, in fact, larger under one year of Labor than under the first seven years of Coalition government.</para></quote>
<para>After six years of chaos under Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, the coalition inherited trainee and apprenticeship numbers in freefall. What did the coalition government do? Well, we delivered—$2.4 billion in upskilled apprenticeships, $3.7 billion for skills training, 800,000 supported trainee places under the National Skills Agreement. That's why, when we left office, the number of Australians in apprenticeships and traineeships had reached 426,000. Under Labor, it has declined year after year after year, and here they are, trying to congratulate themselves.</para>
<para>The record is clear. Labor spin the truth—they spin the narrative—while the coalition delivers for Australians. The Labor government has put more than $1.5 billion into fee-free TAFE and have somehow managed to get fewer Australians into apprenticeships and traineeships. Go figure.</para>
<para>And, disappointingly, like in most things this government does, regional, rural and remote Australians get bugger all. Take Coober Pedy, the opal city of the world—a town with a proud history that has been forgotten by the Canberra-bubble bureaucrats. They might have a TAFE building, but they have no pathway into the industry that built the town and sustains the town. Coober Pedy is half the size it was 30 years ago, and, sadly, this isn't a unique case in regional, rural and remote South Australia. Regional, rural and remote Australians have been forgotten for too long under this government. This government needs to start backing the engine room of our nation, and it needs to start now.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr NEUMANN</name>
    <name.id>HVO</name.id>
    <electorate>Blair</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Moore for his excellent motion. As someone who was an employer for 20 years before coming into this place, I know how important it is to get a job and to give a person a job. It really makes a huge difference. It changes their whole life; it changes their lifestyle and their livelihood and provides financial security for them and their family.</para>
<para>Now, like everyone on this side of the chamber, the member for Moore understands just how critical it is that we pull the full range of levers to ensure that more homes are built for Australia. In June this year, the Minister for Skills and Training and I visited a building site in Ipswich, in my fast-growing electorate, to meet with some first-year apprentices—including several female apprentices from the local group training organisation Apprenticeships Queensland, who are this year celebrating 40 years of supporting skills and training in the Ipswich region. These young people are completing their apprenticeships in carpentry and roof plumbing, and they're renovating one of the beautiful old Queenslander-style homes for which Ipswich is famous, as it is the heritage capital of Queensland. They provide a lot of work, these Queenslanders, I might add, for tradespeople.</para>
<para>I saw the minister was out this morning, meeting with a local builder and his carpentry apprentice here in Canberra. When he visited my electorate of Blair a couple of months ago, he dropped into a house at Karalee to meet with Moses, the owner of solar panel business Alpha Bright Solar, and his electrical apprentice, Makbol, who was undertaking a training course in solar panel installation and maintenance. They were working at that house at Karalee. All of these apprentices are benefiting from the Albanese government's Key Apprenticeship Program, which provides $10,000 bonuses for apprentices, paid in instalments, backing apprentices like Makbol to start and, more importantly, to finish their apprenticeships. Moses benefits too, as an employer, because he's among the thousands of small-business owners backed by an employer incentive scheme. The Albanese government inherited a skills shortage from the former Liberal and National Party government. It was the worst in 50 years, and no protestations over the other side can deny the reality. Together with Australians across the country, our government is working to turn that around.</para>
<para>New data shows the Albanese government's commitment to building the workforce for Australia's future is on track, with thousands of apprentices signed up to the Housing Construction Apprenticeship stream of the Key Apprenticeships Program. We now have 32,000 new housing construction apprentices who've signed up to the program in just the first year, with more than 7,400 in my home state of Queensland. That's 32,000 Australian apprentices who are backing to build more homes in every corner of the country, including 11,600 more carpentry apprentices, 6,700 more plumbing apprentices and almost 6,300 more electrical apprentices like Makbol. Indeed, apprentices in areas of carpentry, joining and electrical trades workers have been the top three housing construction occupations for commencement under the program in Queensland, alongside occupations like glaziers, tilers, plasterers, bricklayers and concreters, with more signing up every week. We're targeting support through this program to businesses like Moses' to take on apprentices and apprenticeships for people like Makbol to become qualified tradespeople.</para>
<para>On this side of the chamber, we're helping people to be trained and to build homes—to build homes in my home city of Ipswich. Under the former government's untargeted schemes, the former government also ripped billions of dollars in skills and training from TAFE. There was a 60 per cent drop-out rate under their former schemes, and the Leader of the Opposition can't even mention the word TAFE. I noticed that the previous speaker was pouring scorn on TAFE as he was speaking. We know the LNP doesn't support free TAFE, which has seen more than 814,000 people enrol in the last three years. In Queensland alone, we've seen 134,000 enrolments in free TAFE courses ranging from construction trades to high-priority areas like nursing, cybersecurity and disability support. Before the last election, the LNP opposition even threatened to abolish free TAFE. If you listen to the previous speaker, that remains their policy. They need to come clean: do they support free TAFE and the Key Apprenticeships Program that's delivering to Australian workers, businesses and apprentices, or do they support what they've said previously, where we were allegedly throwing good money after bad? It really makes no sense at all not to back small business and apprenticeships all the way.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>For the member for Blair's information, I support technical and further education. TAFE is a great pathway for young people in particular, and people of many ages besides, to get into employment. Just for the record, I hold a number of TAFE certificates—I'm very proud of that. I do believe that a TAFE certificate is worth every bit as much as a tertiary degree, and we should be applauding it as such.</para>
<para>This Wednesday is the first anniversary of the Economic Reform Roundtable, otherwise known as the productivity roundtable, which was held in Canberra   —in the national capital—from 19 to 21 August last year. Yet since then we've actually had a productivity decline. When we come to this motion brought to the parliament by the member for Moore, the stark reality is the actual data, the actual numbers. Nationally, 429,000 apprentices and trainees were in training in June 2022. That's just after Labor was elected to office. Labor closed the funding, and numbers have fallen every year since. This data is from the National Centre for Vocational Education Research. Total apprentices and trainees in training fell 11.3 per cent across the country in the 12 months to June 2025. Trade apprenticeship commencements were down 15.3 per cent nationally in the 12 months to June 2025. Non-trade commencements fell 13.9 per cent in the year to December 2024, and the centre directly attributed this to the closure of Boosting Apprenticeships Commencements. That scheme was making some sort of difference.</para>
<para>In September 2024, trade commencements fell 17.4 per cent nationally. Construction was down 18.6 per cent. Automotive and engineering were down 18 per cent. They're not my numbers. These are the numbers from this centre, which also stated that apprenticeship job postings nationally fell 27 per cent in 2024, now tracking below pre-pandemic 2019 levels. That is a real worry, and it's a real worry when Labor is talking up building a million homes. That number has changed and has varied.</para>
<para>But, when Labor talks about building the houses for the future, for the migrants, for young people, for first home buyers or whatever the case might be and we have Housing Industry Australia estimating that an additional 83,000 tradies would be required to meet Labor's housing target, then those two figures simply don't match. What we've also seen is the construction industry in freefall. The building industry is one of the hardest hit sectors at the moment. Another one is the transport sector, but in the building industry there were almost 3,500 insolvencies in 2025-26. This has to stop.</para>
<para>Labor talks about fee-free TAFE all the time. It's almost job-free TAFE at the moment because we've got the transport sector in freefall. We've got the construction sector hit like never before. We've got Labor members talking about the need to build a million new homes whilst at the same time absolutely smashing our real estate market, absolutely smashing the property market, and then taking pride in that—taking pride in the fact that our housing market is slumping, that the prices are coming down. They suggest and proclaim that there's never been a better time for a first home buyer.</para>
<para>Well, I tell you what, there have been much better times for our TAFE apprentices. For those people—whether they're in carpentry, an electrical trade or whatever the case—it must be a worry. They're going to TAFE. They might be learning on the job at the same time. But what future do they have when we see the number of bankruptcies and insolvencies in the construction sector? They might tune into question time. They might tune into parliament, and they hear Labor members talking about the property market and talking up what are fudged figures. They are. This disaster is Labor's own making. This disaster, this productivity freefall, is on Labor's watch.</para>
<para>There is a better way; it's the coalition way.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JORDAN-BAIRD</name>
    <name.id>316021</name.id>
    <electorate>Gorton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Tradies are who keep our country moving. I'm so proud to represent my community in the western suburbs, where hi-vis is a normal sight out at the shops. My family is full of tradies. I'm even married to one, a sparky from Melbourne's west.</para>
<para>That's why I'm so proud of the Albanese Labor government's focus on supporting tradies while they build the homes that our country needs, and we're doing this in a number of ways. I'm so glad that the member for Riverina raised the very important issue of TAFE. First and foremost, it is a Labor government who has invested in free TAFE, and now we've made it permanent. That's right; free TAFE is here to stay, helping more Aussies get better jobs with higher wages. We're doing that for at least 100,000 free TAFE and VET students per year from 2027, underpinned by the Free TAFE Act 2025. My family is the way it is because of free TAFE.</para>
<para>My husband, Chris, was able to make a career change later in life because of Labor's free TAFE. He's now a mature-age electrical apprentice in his third year studying at Victoria University TAFE in Sunshine. He loves what he does with the team at Rizzo Electrical in Airport West, a third-generation business in the north-west of Melbourne. In Victoria, free TAFE has had close to 150,000 enrolments since the start of the program. This has real impacts, putting thousands of Victorians on a pathway to jobs in nursing, construction, aged care, tech and early childhood education. It's real savings. For a Victorian training in a diploma for building and construction, free TAFE means savings of about $15,000.</para>
<para>We've also increased the living-away-from-home allowance for tradies. My cousin Nash grew up in the western suburbs. He's a qualified plumber and, currently, has moved to live up in Yarrawonga for work. He's living in a share house with other workers and apprentices who are working with agricultural sorting machinery. Moving away for work can create a real financial burden that you otherwise wouldn't have to bear. If you have to move away from home or your parents' or guardians' home to start or continue training as an Australian apprentice, you may be eligible to receive the living-away-from-home allowance to help you with the cost of living and being away. Our government is committed to supporting tradies like Nash, which is why we've upped this payment for all Australians.</para>
<para>We've also wiped 20 per cent off all student debt, and this isn't just university debt like HECS but all debt. That includes apprenticeship support and VET student loans as well. Our 20 per cent cut to student debt has meant more than $500 million saved from VET student loan and Australian apprenticeship support loan balances, and it's there to give VET students and apprentices a leg-up when they enter the workforce, with no applications or forms needed—just real cost-of-living relief.</para>
<para>Then there's the Key Apprenticeship Program, which is already making a real difference in attracting new apprentices to housing construction, driving Aussies towards the jobs we need to be building more homes for our growing communities and setting up our apprentices for success. We know this is working. In the first year since its launch on 1 July 2025, more than 32,000 apprentices commenced in housing construction trades under the program.</para>
<para>Unfortunately, not all sides of this chamber have seen the success of the program for what it is. The Liberals neglected our apprenticeship system for almost a decade. Labor inherited the worst skills shortage Australia has seen in 50 years after almost a decade of Liberal neglect. They ripped billions from TAFE and training and blew $7 million on untargeted schemes like 'hamburger university', which saw dropout rates as high as 60 per cent, while critical trades were ignored. The shadow minister for skills and training called our Key Apprenticeship Program 'inflationary', 'wrong' and 'not the answer'. Tell that to the tradies in my community in Melbourne's western suburbs. Tell that to the tradies around the country who are receiving $10,000 cash payments to help apprentices become the carpenters, the plumbers and the sparkies we'll need in the future and who are staying in trades and seeing their futures change thanks to Labor's free TAFE, because that's what building Australia's future looks like—delivering real change, helping young people get ahead and skilling up our workforce into the future.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REBELLO</name>
    <name.id>316547</name.id>
    <electorate>McPherson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I represent an electorate that has quite a broad tradie population, and they contribute immensely to our community on the Gold Coast. I represent an area that is experiencing one of the fastest periods of growth across the country, and we see it daily. People who are in the trade sector are the ones who enable us to grow and to develop, and that is something that's noteworthy.</para>
<para>What I will say, though, is that I will mention a figure: $1.5 billion. One point five billion dollars is no small amount of money, but that is the amount that the current Albanese government has spent on fee-free TAFE. Ordinarily, I'd say we encourage that sort of investment. We encourage investment in the next generation of people who are going to build our homes, especially in the midst of what is quite a concerning housing crisis across our country. But the point of me speaking on this motion today is that we're seeing a situation where, despite that investment of $1.5 billion, the skills shortage has only worsened. It's right in that instance, instead of the government coming in here and moving a motion commending their investment, for them to come here and say: 'Well, is it actually working? Is it an effective use of taxpayer funds, and, if not, how can we make it better?' I think it does call for a moment of self-reflection for those on the other side of this place.</para>
<para>We've seen apprenticeship completion rates fall unacceptably low. Over four years, we've seen completion rates go down from 50 per cent to 47.9 per cent. This is at a point where more than one in three occupations, about 36 per cent, are assessed as being in national shortage. I know that those opposite have made comparisons to when the coalition were in office. Well, if we look at the comparison, when we left office in June of 2022, there were 426,830 apprentices and trainees in training across the country. But today, that number has plummeted to just 282,430 as of December last year. This means we're seeing fewer skills at a time when this government is putting us through a housing crisis. We saw in the last budget overall funding for VET activities has dropped since we were in government, and that's been driven overwhelmingly by the government slashing employer incentives to take on those apprentices from just over $4 billion to $1.54 billion.</para>
<para>In my electorate, I have the Industry School in Robina. I've had the privilege of visiting the Industry School multiple times, spending time with those younger generations of tradies, the people who will be building our homes in the future. I'm very proud of that school because it is actually translating education into outcomes. The last I checked, about 96 per cent of people were walking straight into a job upon graduation and that's great for our community, it's great for our country and it's great for them. But what we're seeing with fee-free TAFE more broadly are others not adopting a similar model and not going down that path of employment.</para>
<para>I think the contribution from the member for Grey earlier was noteworthy because he mentioned that there's only one area where we're actually seeing the growth and that is in public administration. Now, that's not the area where we need to see the growth right now, and it's a testament to the government's priorities that, in reality, that is in fact what's happening. That $1.5 billion in taxpayer funds being spent by the government could be used more effectively and should be used more effectively. We need a system that ensures that the skills that are required in this country are supported through our education system, and not just through our education system but also through our broader policy base. I note that, since the government came to office, only 2.5 per cent of the people in our net overseas migration intake are in the construction sector. So on all accounts, when it comes to making sure we have the skills needed to face the next generation of Australia, the government are failing, and I'm surprised that they're moving this forward.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FERNANDO</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
    <electorate>Holt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Homes, homes and more homes—that is what Australians elected our government to deliver: more homes and more Australians being able to achieve the dream of owning their own home. But if we are serious about building more homes, we need the people to build them. We need more tradies. That is why I am proud to be a part of Labor government that is investing in TAFE, apprenticeships and vocational education.</para>
<para>I know first-hand just how important TAFE can be. Before coming to this place, I studied at TAFE. I know what it's like to walk through those doors, learn practical skills and build a pathway into the workforce. TAFE is not a second-best option; it is a pathway to a good career, a secure job, a better future for thousands of Australians. That is why, through our five-year National Skills Agreement, our government is investing more than $12.6 billion in Australia's vocational education and training sector. We are rebuilding TAFE after a decade of neglect under the former Liberal-National government. Through free TAFE, we have backed more than 814,000 enrolments in courses critical to Australia's future, including training for tradies, nurses, early childhood educators. These are not just numbers. These are people changing careers, young Australians learning a trade, people gaining new skills and pursuing new opportunities.</para>
<para>But we know that getting people into training is only the beginning. We also need to support people to complete their apprenticeships and enter the workforce. That is why Labor took to the election our Key Apprenticeship Program, providing a $10,000 incentive for new apprentices in housing construction. We listened to apprentices and employers, who told us that the cost of starting an apprenticeship can be a real barrier—the tools, the transportation, the expenses that are not always considered when someone decides to take up a trade. Under our program, eligible apprentices receive five $2,000 payments over the course of their apprenticeship. It is practical support at the times when apprentices need it the most. We are backing employers too, with an additional $5,000 incentive for eligible apprenticeships that commence in 2026.</para>
<para>In Victoria, this program is already making a real difference. It has supported 2,790 carpentry apprentices, 2,330 electrical apprentices, 2,447 plumbing apprentices and more. That is a total of 9,286 students contributing to our state. These are the people who will help build the homes our communities need. Their skills will be needed at every stage of construction. They will turn plans on a page into homes where Australian families can build their lives. According to Master Builders Australia, just one of these construction tradies will contribute the equivalent of 22 standalone houses over a 30-year career. And yet the opposition has described Labor's investment in TAFE and the trades as wasteful spending. Their shadow minister has called the Key Apprenticeship Program 'wrong' and said it is 'throwing good money after bad money'. I could not disagree more, because I know what TAFE has given me, and I know what a trade can give someone—practical skills, a career, independence and the opportunity to build a good life. If we want to build more homes, we need more tradies. If we want more tradies, we need to invest in TAFE. And, if we want apprentices to complete their training, we need to support them along the way. That is what the Albanese Labor government is doing. We are investing in our future workforce so that they can build the homes Australia needs. That is something I'm proud to support. I commend the Key Apprenticeship Program to this House, and I want—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Holt. The question is that the motion be agreed to. I give the call to the member for Cowper.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONAGHAN</name>
    <name.id>279991</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This private member's bill on the Key Apprenticeship Program is just another example of the spin and the tactical play of the Labor Party—divert, deflect and deny. They can sit over there and pat themselves on the back and talk about their policies and the supposed 30,000 apprentices that the Key Apprenticeship Program has attracted in its first 12 months. Of course, we need those apprenticeships. When Labor came into government in 2022, there were 429,000 apprenticeships, and, today, we see that that's down to 282,000. And we're wondering and scratching our heads why we're not building any houses! I know why those opposite are not talking about the data or putting it into a percentage. I'll tell you why: the latest data on the Australian apprenticeship system, released by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research, paints a very concerning picture for future skills needed to deliver the priorities in our country. In the 12 months to September 2025, trade apprenticeship commencements were down almost 10 per cent, while non-trade commitments were down over 18 per cent. New data shows that the completion of construction apprenticeships has fallen to a five year low. Coincidentally, five years is how long this government has been in power! The industry is telling us that Labor is slashing $266 million from apprenticeship incentives for employers. That will only compound the issue.</para>
<para>I recall, when we were in government in my first term, that our policy was that an employer was paid 50 per cent of the apprenticeship wage in the first year, 10 per cent in the second year and five per cent in the third year. That recognised that apprenticeship tradies are basically unskilled going into their first year, and it gave confidence to the employer that they would be able to pay that young apprentice's wage.</para>
<para>I note that the policy of the Labor government is a $5,000 payment to young apprentices. That's great; it's good. I can speak from experience. My two sons are 17 and 19. One's doing electrical trade, and the other one's doing construction building. They've both received the payments and they were both very welcoming of that money. But it doesn't stop the fact that I see many of their mates who have been through either Newman Senior Technical College up in Port Macquarie or TAFE unable to find jobs. My sons were very lucky that they found their jobs. They appreciate them and love them. But the fact is this government's policies are not giving employers confidence. It does not want them to bring people on. We've seen a record number of construction and building companies go into insolvency over the last 18 months to two years. That is reflective of this government's policies. It's reflective of what this government is failing to do.</para>
<para>The other side talk about building homes. But what I can say is that Labor is failing to provide investment into the basic infrastructure that is needed in regional and rural areas—such as Port Macquarie, Kempsey, Coffs Harbour—the sewer and water. There has been no new investment, and, if you don't have that new investment, then you cannot build. You can create as many tradies as you like, but, without that infrastructure investment, nothing will happen. And, unless you live in a Labor seat, nothing gets done. So I call on Labor to make sure that they treat all Australians equally and leave no-one behind, as promised.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I understand the member for Pearce would like to present a copy of her speech for incorporation into <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline>, in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 6 November 2025.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ROBERTS</name>
    <name.id>157125</name.id>
    <electorate>Pearce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para> () (): <inline font-style="italic">The incorporated speech read as follows—</inline></para>
<para>I would like to support this motion recognising the Albanese Labor government's Key Apprenticeship Program and its important contribution to building Australia's skilled workforce. The program is already delivering results. In its first 12 months, it has attracted more than 30,000 apprentices into training, giving young Australians the opportunity to begin a career in the trades while receiving practical financial support along the way. This is exactly the kind of targeted investment Australia needs.</para>
<para>Across Pearce and communities around the country, families want their children to have secure and rewarding careers. Local businesses want access to skilled workers. And Australia needs more people trained in the occupations that will help us build more homes, deliver the clean energy transition and strengthen our economy. The Key Apprenticeship Program helps meet all three of those needs.</para>
<para>Under the program, eligible full-time apprentices can receive up to $10,000 over the course of their apprenticeship. The payments are made at important milestones—at six, 12, 24 and 36 months and on completion. Part-time apprentices can receive up to $5,000.</para>
<para>That structure matters. Starting an apprenticeship is a significant commitment. An apprentice needs to purchase tools, travel to work and training, manage living expenses and often accept a lower income while developing their skills. The costs can be particularly challenging during the first year. Providing support at regular stages helps apprentices manage those costs. Just as importantly, it provides an incentive to stay the course. An apprenticeship is not completed on the day someone signs up. It requires persistence, practical learning and the support of employers, trainers, colleagues and families. By providing payments throughout the apprenticeship journey, the program is designed to support apprentices not only to begin but to reach the finish line.</para>
<para>The most popular occupations under the program include carpentry, plumbing and electrical trades. These are precisely the skills Australia needs as we work to increase housing supply and make sure new homes can be built more quickly. Every new home requires skilled workers. Carpenters, plumbers and electricians are essential to the construction process. Without enough qualified tradespeople, housing projects face delays, costs increase and communities wait longer for the homes they need. That is why the housing construction stream of the Key Apprenticeship Program is so important. It is targeted support, directed towards industries where the need is greatest. This is not a one-size-fits-all approach. It is a considered response to the national shortage of skilled workers and the urgent need to build more housing.</para>
<para>The program also supports employers. Eligible employers can receive incentives of up to $5,000 for taking on apprentices in priority occupations, helping offset some of the costs associated with recruitment, supervision and training. Small businesses play a critical role in training the next generation of tradies. Many apprentices learn their skills in small construction firms, plumbing businesses, electrical contractors and family owned enterprises. Supporting those employers makes it easier for them to offer opportunities to new apprentices. This is an investment in people, but it is also an investment in local businesses and local communities.</para>
<para>The Albanese Labor government has backed this program for the long term, with the budget locking in incentive settings for both apprentices and employers until 2029. That certainty matters. Apprentices need confidence that support will be available throughout their training. Employers need certainty when planning their workforce and taking on new trainees.</para>
<para>It is disappointing that, despite having multiple opportunities to clarify their position, neither the opposition nor One Nation has made clear whether they support this program. The shadow minister for skills and training has described the program as 'wrong' and as 'throwing good money after bad money'. But what is wrong about helping Australians gain valuable skills? What is wrong about supporting employers to train new workers? And what is wrong about investing in the trades that will help build the homes Australians need?</para>
<para>The alternative is not cost-free. Fewer apprentices means fewer qualified workers. That means greater pressure on existing tradespeople, more delays in construction and less capacity to deliver housing. The Albanese Labor government is choosing to invest in apprentices, employers and Australia's future.</para>
<para>For young Australians considering a career in carpentry, plumbing or electrical work, this program provides more than a payment; it provides encouragement, stability and a genuine pathway to a skilled and secure career. For employers, it provides practical assistance to take on the workers they need. And, for the broader community, it helps build the skilled workforce required to construct more homes and support a growing economy. The Key Apprenticeship Program is targeted, practical and already delivering results. I commend the government for backing it and I commend the motion to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today in strong support of this motion, and I thank the fantastic member for Moore for moving it. At its heart, this is about something pretty simple: Australia needs more tradies. We need more carpenters, more plumbers and more electricians, and we need to make sure that Australians who choose those careers know that their government backs them. For too long, there's been the idea that, when you finish school, the pathway to a good career has to mean going to university. University is a fantastic option for many people, but it is not the only option, and it's not the option that suits everyone. You can go to TAFE. You can start an apprenticeship. You can earn while you learn, build a great career, start your own business and one day employ and train the next generation.</para>
<para>In my electorate of Petrie, we are fortunate to have TAFE campuses at both Redcliffe and Bracken Ridge. I want young people across our community to know that walking through the doors of TAFE and learning a trade can open the door to a secure, rewarding and well-paid career. That is why our government established the Key Apprenticeship Program. New apprentices in housing construction can now receive up to $10,000, paid across their apprenticeship, to help with the real costs of getting started—buying tools, transport and other equipment that they need to complete their job.</para>
<para>Importantly, that support continues as they progress through their apprenticeships, helping more people reach that finish line. Early data shows that around 89 per cent of apprentices supported through the program are still in training. In this first year, more than 30,000 apprentices have been backed into the housing construction sector. In Queensland alone, that program has supported more than 7,400 commencements, including more than 3,000 carpentry apprentices.</para>
<para>This is more than just training; it is about housing. We can invest billions into housing. We can release land. We can support first home buyers and build more social and affordable homes. But someone still has to pour the slab, someone has to frame the house, somebody has to install the plumbing and someone has to wire it. We cannot build more homes without more tradies—more tradies means more homes. That is why backing apprentices is so important. We are backing young Australians into good careers, backing the small businesses that train them and building the skilled workforce that Australia needs. This is something every member of the House should be able to support.</para>
<para>When Labor came into government, Australia was facing skills shortages at a 50-year high. We've been working to turn that around, and the Jobs and Skills Australia data shows the proportion of occupations in shortage fell from 36 per cent in 2023 to 29 per cent in 2025. There is more work to do, and we are heading in the right direction. Free TAFE is part of that work too. There have now been more than 814,000 free TAFE enrolments in courses supporting the skills Australia needs, from tradies to nurses and early childhood educators.</para>
<para>The Key Apprenticeship Program makes sure that we are targeting support where Australia most needs workers. The 2026 budget has locked the program in until 2029, including the $10,000 incentive for apprentices and targeted incentives for small and medium-sized employers and group training organisations, because apprentices do not train themselves—behind so many apprentices is a small-business owner giving someone their first opportunity, teaching them the trade and investing their own time in the next generation of skilled workers.</para>
<para>That is why I was so disappointed to see the shadow minister for skills and training describe the program as 'wrong' and accuse the government of 'throwing good money after bad money'. Backing an apprentice is not throwing money away. Helping a young electrician afford their tools is not throwing money away. Supporting a small plumbing business to take on an apprentice is not throwing money away.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Energy</title>
          <page.no>161</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REBELLO</name>
    <name.id>316547</name.id>
    <electorate>McPherson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australians need look no further than their power bills to determine the effects of bad government policy on the ordinary lives of Australians. We are quite frustrated on this side, but we're not frustrated just because we're the opposition; we're frustrated because we're channelling the frustrations of those that we represent around the country. What does that look like? It looks like families who are struggling to afford their own energy costs. It looks like older Australians who—I represent parts of Queensland, and people are not prepared to turn on their air conditioning in summer, and I don't want to have to go through that again for people in my electorate. It looks like small businesses who are having to decide where they're going to cut in their day or in their staff because of the increased costs. And it looks like goods and services across this country getting more and more expensive due to the rising costs of energy.</para>
<para>Prior to the election of this government, Australians were promised a $275 cut to their power bills, and that promise extended to a $378 cut by 2030. But where have we got to? We've got to a situation where Australians are paying up to $1,300 more. We saw electricity costs rise by 21.5 per cent in the 12 months to December 2025. So, instead of those promises coming to fruition, we're seeing Australians having to deal with the opposite. There are 230,000 households in Australia at the moment in energy distress, up nearly 70 per cent in just 3½ years. That's the highest level of hardship on record. It's disheartening when I speak to those opposite and when we hear the contributions that they make and they're saying, 'These are all the things that we're doing as a government in this space,' and they're failing to recognise that it's not actually trickling down to Australians—to individuals, to businesses and to families.</para>
<para>I say to Australians, though, that there is an alternative The coalition has recently come out with our plan. Australia should be an energy superpower. There is no reason why we as a country should have our citizens dealing with the high cost of energy that they're dealing with today, and Australians deserve and need a government that's prepared to harness everything—every opportunity that we have as a country. We're blessed with so much of that, which is why, in contrast to what we're seeing under Labor, a Taylor coalition government will deliver cheaper power and an abundance of energy. We will do that through backing any technology that can deliver that affordable and reliable energy for Australian households and businesses. We will do that through working with coal-fired power plant operators to make sure that that generation is running as long and as hard as it can to get electricity prices down. We will do that through lifting the ban on nuclear power and through scrapping Labor's carbon taxes, including the safeguard mechanism—which in essence has turned into a carbon tax on business that's driving industry offshore—and Labor's other taxes on cars and utes, for example. We will do that with an ultimate aim of lowering emissions as quickly and responsibly as technology allows without imposing those additional costs on families or industries, especially at a time when we know that they just cannot absorb those costs. That is the alternative.</para>
<para>This government came to power promising cheaper energy, and it was a defining election promise for it—a $275 reduction that Australians never saw and a $378 reduction by 2030 that they still will not see. Instead, Australians have received the opposite: higher bills, greater uncertainty and a fragile grid that's underpinned by ideology, not economics. I speak on behalf of thousands and millions of Australians who say to this government that it is time for the government to come clean, to stop the spin and to deliver real, affordable and reliable energy, not just more of the broken promises that we've seen.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JARRETT</name>
    <name.id>298574</name.id>
    <electorate>Brisbane</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm really pleased to speak to this motion, because energy policy does matter and it's a big difference on this side of the House compared to the other. It matters because ultimately it comes down to something very simple: Australians pay every time they turn on the light, boil the kettle or charge their car. Families are already dealing with cost of living—groceries, housing and other everyday expenses. So energy bills matter. We get it.</para>
<para>Our government's approach has been to tackle this challenge on two fronts: to provide immediate cost-of-living relief while investing in cheaper, safer and more reliable energy systems for the future. That distinction is important. If we want lasting reductions in energy costs, Australians need to increase the supply of affordable electricity, and that means reducing our exposure to expensive fossil fuel generation.</para>
<para>So what's Labor doing? Well, under the Energy Bill Relief Fund, Australian households and eligible small businesses received up to $150 in electricity rebates delivered through two $75 credits on electricity bills, and that followed earlier rounds of energy bill relief. These rebates matter because they provide immediate assistance while longer term investments in Australia's electricity system are being built.</para>
<para>But Labor's energy policy isn't just about rebates. One of the biggest opportunities we have in Australia is in renewable energy. Australia has extraordinary solar and wind resources and, once renewable projects are constructed, coal and gas become far less relevant. Labor's objective is to increase renewable energy while ensuring we have the storage and infrastructure necessary to keep electricity reliable.</para>
<para>Through the Capacity Investment Scheme, we are supporting investment in renewable generation and dispatchable storage. Why does that matter to consumers? Because increasing supply of low-cost electricity, backed by batteries and other storage, puts downward pressure on wholesale electricity prices and reduces reliance on expensive fossil-fuel generation, especially during times of high demand.</para>
<para>That's why Labor is helping households produce and store more of their own renewable energy. Our Cheaper Home Batteries Program began last year, providing around a 30 per cent discount on the upfront costs of eligible batteries connected to rooftop solar. We know that there are millions of solar rooftops in Australia. The challenge, though, is that the solar produces enormous amounts of energy during the day, while households often consume large amounts of electricity in the evening. Batteries change that equation. With batteries, instead of exporting solar electricity during the middle of the day and then buying it back from the grid at night, households with a battery can now store more of their own electricity and use it later. It's estimated that eligible households could save around $4,000 on the upfront cost of an 11.5-kilowatt-hour battery. Australians have responded. I'm sure we've heard the minister—within the first six months of the program, more than 160,000 batteries were installed. Now, we see an uptake of approximately half a million, and the current program could help more than two million Australians install batteries by 2030.</para>
<para>Labor is also helping people make their homes more energy efficient. The $1 billion Household Energy Upgrades Fund supports discounted finance for improvements, including solar batteries, insulation, double glazing and efficient electric appliances. By April 2026, the program had helped finance more than 10,000 energy upgrades across 4,100 Australian homes.</para>
<para>The energy transition is not just about emissions targets. It is about household economics. It is about helping families use the electricity generated on their own roofs. It is about building enough renewable energy generation and storage so Australia has a reliable electricity system as ageing coal-fired power stations retire.</para>
<para>Retail electricity prices are affected by a lot of issues, but what governments can influence are the fundamentals. We can increase supply of renewable energy, we can encourage competition and investment, we can build storage, we can help households improve efficiency and we can make technologies like batteries more affordable. We heard from the member for McPherson about their new plan, allowing for nuclear energy—which we don't need when we have renewables—and running coal as hard as they can. That's in stark contrast to us.</para>
<para>Some of the best renewable energy resources in the world are here in Australia. Labor's goal is to make sure Australians don't just help produce that energy but share in the economic benefits of it. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PRICE</name>
    <name.id>249308</name.id>
    <electorate>Durack</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise in support of the motion moved by the member for Wannon. I support this motion because energy affordability affects every Australian. Whether they are a small-business owner, a parent or a pensioner, they are feeling the pinch of rising energy costs every day.</para>
<para>At the 2022 election, Labor promised lower power bills. He may not have said it 50 times, but the Prime Minister sure did say a lot, through that campaign, that power bills would go down by $275. There has not been a reduction in power bills—another broken promise by the Labor government. The reality is that electricity costs continue to rise, and households across regional Western Australia continue to pay higher prices. This motion notes that a record number of Australians are carrying energy debts, with many facing further increases in their power bills. The motion also notes that Australians were promised lower power prices and instead are paying more.</para>
<para>Despite the lecturing we get from those opposite regarding the cost-of-living support that the Labor government is providing, regional Western Australians are still dealing with the rising costs of groceries, insurance and fuel. Sadly, higher energy prices are adding another layer of financial stress to everyday Australians. In regional Western Australia, higher energy costs don't just affect the household budgets. They affect industry. From agriculture and mining to manufacturing and transport, affordable energy underpins our economic activity. When energy prices increase, those costs flow through to our families.</para>
<para>It is this government's failed energy policy that has caused electricity costs to rise by some 21.5 per cent in the 12 months to December 2025. Who doesn't love a rebate in their electricity bill? Well, I do. I'm sure everyone in this House appreciates that. But temporary relief does not reduce the underlying cost of electricity.</para>
<para>Good energy policy should deliver three things: affordability, reliability and sustainability. These three things are the basis of the coalition's energy policy. We believe that Australia should pursue a balanced energy mix that makes use of all available resources and technologies rather than placing all our energy security in the hands of one resource.</para>
<para>By scrapping net zero, this can be achieved. We all know that a policy of net zero costs everyday Australians and everyday taxpayers billions of dollars as the Labor Party continues to subsidise renewable energy. And, despite all of this investment by the Albanese Labor government, energy prices continue to rise, and Australians pay the price.</para>
<para>We of course support investment in renewable energy—of course we do—but we must also recognise the importance of gas, coal and nuclear in providing reliable and affordable energy. The coalition will lift the ban on nuclear and supports it as part of Australia's long-term future. Nuclear energy provides reliable 24-hour zero-emissions power and is already used successfully in many of the world's most advanced economies.</para>
<para>We will end Labor's carbon taxes, including the safeguard mechanism and Labor's car and ute tax as well. Labor are focused on their net zero obsession; we will not be focused on that. The coalition is committed to making Australia the energy superpower it once was, using our natural resources, investing in technology and scrapping net zero.</para>
<para>Western Australians understand the value of practical energy policy. They're a practical mob, especially in regional Western Australia. For decades, our domestic gas reservation policy has helped support energy security, local industry and affordable power. It shows how valuable our natural resources are to our energy systems.</para>
<para>We are one of the most energy-rich nations in the world. You have to ask yourself why, then, do Australian families feel poorer under the Albanese government? Under Labor, energy prices have skyrocketed, while emissions have gone up. This is a failure of government. A coalition government will deliver lower energy prices, support industry, strengthen regional communities and ensure our energy system remains reliable for future generations. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CLUTTERHAM</name>
    <name.id>316101</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Energy security is a critical part of every economy. It's an issue of national security and of food security. Without energy security, health services are compromised, our defence forces cannot perform optimally—putting the safety of personnel at risk—and everyday Australians cannot do the work and leisure activities they take for granted. Energy security is about availability. It's about having enough energy sources like solar, wind, gas and hydro to meet everyday and peak demand. Energy security is about reliability—or the grid's capability to recover quickly from unexpected faults, extreme weather or equipment failure. And, balanced with reliability and availability, energy security is about affordability. It's about keeping prices fair and as stable as possible so that households and businesses can access reliable energy at a price that does not cause hardship. The Albanese Labor government understands this, and, although it has acted to address energy costs, we know that there is more to do.</para>
<para>Power bill relief and gas price caps have played a role in this, as have the solar sharer scheme and the Cheaper Home Batteries Program. Over 500,000 Australians have taken advantage of this program in the past 12 months, and, in my electorate of Sturt, people write to me telling me that, thanks to this program, they no longer receive a bill. This is a good thing and we need more of it.</para>
<para>The Cheaper Home Battery Scheme is part of the industrial-scale transition from ageing coal-fired power plants to clean, renewable energy, firmed up, for now, by gas. We know that substantial investment is needed, and we know that this investment will create new social and economic opportunities in all sectors and regions, but it will need to be sustained over the long-term because the transition to renewable energy will not happen overnight. We need to be patient. We can't just say, 'Prices are too high, so the transition has failed.' We need to take risks, and we need to recognise that these risks are not only about what could go wrong, but about what could go right. We need to continue investing, researching, exploring and walking together when risks don't always crystallise immediately, especially when Treasury modelling shows that wholesale electricity costs will be lower than the long-term average under the transition to renewable energy.</para>
<para>Although patience is required, that doesn't necessarily help households now seeking to meet cost-of-living challenges, including energy costs. So, as well as providing energy bill relief and opportunities like community and home batteries, this government has implemented structural changes to the energy market to make the market fairer for consumers.</para>
<para>The Australian Energy Market Commission has implemented new rules that will prohibit energy retailers from increasing prices more than once a year. The rules will also prevent customers from being charged more than the standing offer price if their initial low-cost entry offer changes or expires. In addition, excessive retailer charges like late payment fees for retail contracts will be banned, and more opportunities will be provided to help people shop around, so that low-income families and other vulnerable Australians are receiving the best possible deal, together with proper, meaningful assistance in times of hardship.</para>
<para>This government also commissioned the Nelson review, which reported in December 2025, to examine a number of matters relevant to the National Electricity Market, including what the best future market settings are to promote investment in firmed renewable generation and storage capacity within the National Electricity Market, and how best to support the development and staged implementation of reforms to the National Electricity Market wholesale market that support the achievement of the National Electricity Objectives. These are to promote efficient investment in—and efficient operation and use of—electricity services for the long-term interests of consumers of electricity with respect to many issues, including price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply.</para>
<para>So we are acting, with short-term relief for Australians and Australian businesses when it is needed; medium-term structural change with respect to the wholesale markets, retail markets and the national electricity market; and a long-term achievable transition to clean, renewable energy—which, in my electorate of Sturt, is what many people in the community are asking for. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
    <electorate>Barker</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Albanese Labor government came to power promising cheaper power. I'd argue it was an election-defining promise. The Prime Minister uttered it no less than 96 times—you'll recall a $275 reduction, that Australians ended up never seeing, and a $378 reduction that, by 2030, they will absolutely never see. Now, the Prime Minister saying one thing before an election and doing another thing after an election is a practice he's obviously maintained in the subsequent election, telling Australians he wouldn't seek to change property taxes—on this occasion, 50 times—but he did all the same. Instead, in terms of power prices, Australians didn't get cheaper electricity; they got higher bills, greater uncertainty and a fragile grid underpinned by ideology and not economics.</para>
<para>It's time for those opposite to come clean, stop the spin and deliver real, affordable, reliable energy, not more broken promises. That's what our plan does, by backing in abundant, affordable, sustainable energy generation that spans the gamut from nuclear power, coal and gas to renewables, rather than this renewables-only madness that has created an experiment that's failing in South Australia, my home state.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. In accordance with the resolution of 12 August, it being 1.30 pm the debate is interrupted and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
<para>Federation Chamber adjourned at 13:30</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
  </fedchamb.xscript>
</hansard>