Presentation

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned about the rising cost of living, energy poverty, and economic inequality that disproportionately affect disadvantaged Australians. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to deliver clean, safe, and virtually limitless power at lower costs, supporting vulnerable households and communities. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and carries minimal safety risks, making it a safer, more community-friendly option. Major economies are investing heavily in fusion research to power homes, industries, and critical infrastructure. Without action, Australia risks falling behind and leaving disadvantaged communities dependent on expensive, polluting energy sources. Investing in fusion now can create thousands of high-skilled jobs, support affordable housing, and provide low-cost electricity that eases financial pressures on the most vulnerable Australians. We believe every Australian deserves access to affordable, sustainable energy that improves quality of life and supports economic opportunity.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on supporting disadvantaged Australians. This program should include funding for research and development, community energy partnerships, pilot projects in low-income areas, and regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable access to fusion-powered electricity. Early action will ensure that no Australian is left behind in the clean energy transition, delivering a fairer, more prosperous future for all.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7592)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's economic prosperity depends on developing future-focused industries that can drive sustainable GDP growth. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to power Australia's economy with clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and carries minimal safety risks, making it a more community-friendly technology. Leading economies—including the US, UK, and China—are investing heavily in fusion research and development, recognising its potential to support advanced manufacturing, clean technology exports, and new high-skilled jobs. By investing in fusion now, Australia can position itself as a global leader in this emerging sector, driving innovation, attracting private investment, and growing GDP. Fusion energy will also support lower energy costs, increased productivity, and new export markets, enhancing Australia's economic competitiveness in the Asia-Pacific region. If Australia does not act now, we risk missing out on billions of dollars in economic benefits.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on boosting Australia's GDP. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry, regulatory frameworks for pilot projects, and initiatives to attract private investment and export opportunities. Early action will ensure Australia's economy remains strong, competitive, and sustainable for generations to come.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7593)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's future energy system should be built by Australians, for Australians, using homegrown expertise and resources. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to provide clean, safe, and virtually limitless power while creating high-skilled jobs and supporting local industries. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and has minimal safety risks, making it an ideal solution for communities and the environment. Australia has the talent, resources, and infrastructure needed to lead in fusion energy, but without a coordinated national program, we risk losing opportunities to foreign competitors. Investing in fusion energy here in Australia can foster sovereign capabilities, support regional economies, and ensure that every Australian benefits from this clean energy revolution. We want to see an Australian-built fusion industry that empowers local communities and grows our economy, rather than relying on foreign technology.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on developing fusion energy in Australia, for Australians, by Australians. This program should include funding for Australian research and development, partnerships with local industries, training programs for our workforce, and regulatory frameworks that prioritise local content and benefits. Early action will ensure that fusion energy strengthens Australia's economy, supports local communities, and is truly built by Australians for Australians.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN7594)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's prosperity and regional influence depend on maintaining strong trade relationships with our Indo-Pacific neighbours. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to power Australia's industries sustainably and export clean energy expertise, advanced manufacturing, and fusion-related technologies. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and carries minimal safety risks, making it a preferred choice for regional partnerships and trade. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, and Singapore are investing heavily in fusion research and development, recognising its potential to transform energy systems and drive regional cooperation. By developing fusion energy in Australia, we can position ourselves as a key supplier of fusion technology, expertise, and services to regional markets. This will create high-skilled jobs, boost advanced manufacturing, and strengthen our economic resilience while supporting regional trade integration and security.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on strengthening regional trade. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry and international allies, regulatory frameworks for demonstration projects, and trade initiatives that showcase Australia's leadership in fusion energy. Early action will ensure Australia remains competitive, secure, and influential in the regional clean energy market.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7595)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about the severe impacts of climate change and energy insecurity on our Pacific neighbours. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and dependence on expensive fossil fuels are placing enormous stress on the Pacific region, threatening communities, economies, and ecosystems. Fusion energy offers a transformative solution by providing clean, safe, and virtually limitless power without high-level radioactive waste or the risk of weapons proliferation. Unlike fission, fusion is community-friendly and environmentally sustainable, making it an ideal technology for Australia to share with our Pacific partners. By investing in fusion energy now, Australia can develop expertise, technology, and capacity that can be exported to the Pacific, supporting regional resilience, clean energy transitions, and climate adaptation. Fusion can also create opportunities for joint research, training, and partnerships that strengthen regional ties and economic growth. Australia has a moral and strategic responsibility to help our Pacific neighbours.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on supporting Australia's role in helping Pacific nations. This program should include funding for research and development, industry partnerships, training initiatives, regulatory frameworks, and regional collaboration. Early action will ensure that Australia can lead in delivering sustainable, secure energy solutions to the Pacific, helping to save the region from climate and energy challenges.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7596)

Discrimination

The petitioners, residents of Australia, draw the attention of the House to growing concerns about discrimination, exclusion, and disrespect experienced by Christians in public discourse, institutions, and community settings.

Australia is a secular, multicultural nation that protects freedom of religion and belief for all. However, many Christians report increasing instances where their beliefs, traditions, and cultural practices are dismissed, marginalised, or altered in the name of neutrality, leading to feelings of exclusion and inequality.

Examples of concern include the removal or renaming of longstanding Christian cultural symbols and celebrations, such as Christmas references, and public commentary that dismisses or denigrates core Christian beliefs. These practices can undermine mutual respect and contribute to social division rather than cohesion.

The petitioners believe that religious equality must apply consistently to all faiths, and that no group's beliefs or traditions should be diminished or excluded from public life.

We therefore ask the House to :

Appoint a dedicated envoy or commissioner to monitor, report on, and address anti-Christian discrimination (Christianophobia) in Australia;

Ensure that public institutions uphold equal respect for all religious beliefs and cultural traditions;

Promote social cohesion through policies that protect freedom of religion while fostering mutual respect across all faiths and beliefs.

The petitioners submit that these measures are necessary to ensure fairness, inclusion, and equal treatment for all Australians.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9068)

Migration

The petitioners, residents of Australia, draw the attention of the House to concerns about national security, public safety, and social cohesion in relation to Australia's migration and visa system.

Australia welcomes migrants, students, and visitors who respect our laws, values, and peaceful way of life. However, there is growing concern that individuals from countries or environments where extremism, terrorism, or hatred are promoted may enter Australia and engage in activities that intimidate communities, glorify violence, or undermine public safety.

The petitioners believe that visa pathways must be firm, transparent, and protective of the Australian public.

We therefore ask the House to

-Strengthen screening of visa applicants from regions associated with terrorism or extremist activity

- Require all visa applicants to formally declare they will not promote hatred, fear, violence, or terrorism

- Introduce clear cancellation and deportation provisions for any visa holder who engages in extremist, criminal, or terror-supporting activities

- Ensure that Australia's migration system prioritizes safety, lawful behavior, and social harmony

These measures are necessary to protect Australians, maintain public confidence in the migration system, and uphold Australia's democratic values.

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN9069)

Parliamentarians' Entitlements

This petition of residents of Australia draws the attention of the House to growing public concern regarding ministerial travel expenses and parliamentary entitlements, particularly the scale, frequency, and perceived discretionary nature of some claims made using taxpayer funds.

Recent media reporting in December 2025 highlighted significant expenditure on ministerial travel, including international flights, accommodation, hospitality, and family travel allowances. While these claims may fall within existing entitlement rules, they have raised serious questions about proportionality, necessity, and value for money at a time when many Australians are experiencing cost-of-living pressures, housing stress, and reduced access to essential services.

The current entitlement framework permits extensive travel benefits, including business-class flights, family travel allowances, and associated hospitality costs. The lack of clear caps or stronger public-interest tests risks undermining public confidence in political leadership and the integrity of parliamentary expense systems.

Australians expect ministers to act as careful stewards of public funds. Transparency alone is insufficient if spending rules remain overly permissive and disconnected from community expectations. Strengthening limits and oversight would improve accountability, restore trust, and ensure that public money is spent only where genuinely necessary for official duties.

We therefore ask the House to the House to:

Conduct an independent review of ministerial travel and entitlement arrangements

Introduce clear caps on travel, accommodation, hospitality, and family-related entitlements

Require stronger public-interest justifications for high-cost domestic and international travel

Ensure entitlement rules reflect fairness, restraint, and community expectations

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN9071)

Public Sector Governance

This petition of residents of Australia draws the attention of the House to concerns about integrity, accountability, and public confidence in government and public administration.

Public office holders—including elected officials, senior public servants, defence personnel, and those in sensitive decision-making roles—exercise significant authority on behalf of the Australian people. Dual citizenship may give rise to perceived or actual conflicts of interest, divided loyalties, or security risks, particularly in roles involving national security, law enforcement, foreign policy, or access to classified information.

While Australia is a multicultural nation that values migration and diversity, public trust depends on ensuring that those entrusted with governing and protecting the nation owe their sole legal allegiance to Australia. Clear and consistent standards would strengthen confidence in institutions and reinforce the principle that public office is exercised exclusively in the national interest.

We therefore ask the House to :

Review current laws and policies governing eligibility for government and public office;

Introduce a requirement that holders of designated government and public positions hold Australian citizenship only;

Ensure any reforms are applied fairly, transparently, and prospectively, with appropriate transitional arrangements; and

Strengthen safeguards to protect national interest, security, and public confidence in Australia's democratic institutions.

from 15 citizens (Petition No. EN9072)

Transport Industry

Australia's national supply chain is increasingly vulnerable due to its heavy reliance on long-haul trucking and ageing, single-track interstate rail corridors. Extreme weather events in recent years have repeatedly severed key freight routes, exposing the fragility of a system built on nineteenth-century alignments with limited redundancy. This creates significant economic disruption and highlights the need for a modern, climate-resilient national freight network.

Rail freight is substantially more energy-efficient and lower in emissions than road transport. As transport is projected to become Australia's largest source of emissions by 2030, shifting just 10% of freight from road to rail would reduce national emissions by millions of tonnes annually. Despite this, rail operators pay full cost-recovery access charges while competing against heavy vehicles that do not pay for the full infrastructure damage they cause. Modernising interstate freight rail would strengthen national resilience, reduce emissions, improve safety, and ensure Australia's supply chain can withstand future shocks.

We therefore ask the House to :

- Modernise interstate freight rail corridors through realignments, passing loops, dual-tracking, and climate-resilient engineering;

- Prioritise federal investment in high-capacity freight rail to reduce reliance on long-haul trucking;

- Ensure heavy vehicle road charges reflect their real infrastructure and environmental costs to create fair competition between road and rail;

- Develop a national freight resilience strategy that recognises rail as a critical backbone of Australia's supply chain.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN9140)

Defence

Australia's defence force increasingly relies on single-platform fleets sourced from a limited number of international suppliers. While these partnerships are valuable, relying on only one type of submarine, one type of tank, or one type of combat aircraft creates strategic and operational vulnerabilities. Supply-chain disruptions, export controls, production delays, or changes in foreign policy can restrict access to essential parts, munitions, and upgrades.

Many allied and partner nations operate complementary capability pairs—such as nuclear and conventional submarines, heavy and medium armoured vehicles, or stealth and non-stealth fighter aircraft—to ensure flexibility, resilience, and sovereign control. These mixed fleets allow nations to match the right platform to the right mission, reduce single-point-of-failure risks, and maintain operational independence under all global circumstances, including supply-chain disruptions or changes in foreign export policy.

A more balanced and diversified force structure would strengthen Australia's defence resilience, broaden industrial partnerships, and ensure the nation can sustain operations even if one supplier or platform becomes unavailable.

We therefore ask the House to :

- Develop a defence capability framework that supports complementary platform pairs across land, sea, air, cyber, and autonomous systems;

- Evaluate both nuclear and conventional submarine options to ensure Australia maintains regional and long-range capability;

- Assess complementary armoured vehicle types, including heavy and medium platforms, to improve operational flexibility;

- Consider mixed-fleet fighter options to enhance resilience, sovereign sustainment, and mission adaptability;

- Reduce single-supplier dependence by diversifying procurement sources and strengthening sovereign sustainment pathways.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9141)

Sovereign Capability

Australia possesses some of the world's largest reserves of lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth elements essential for the global energy transition. Currently, the majority of these minerals are exported as raw concentrates, with processing and value-adding occurring offshore. This model leaves Australia vulnerable to geopolitical supply-chain disruptions and prevents the nation from capturing the high-value economic returns associated with battery and advanced component manufacturing. By failing to develop domestic downstream capabilities, Australia misses the opportunity to create thousands of highly skilled jobs and secure its sovereign industrial base.

We therefore ask the House to :

Develop and fund a comprehensive national strategy to expand onshore refining and processing of critical minerals.

Implement policy mechanisms to support the establishment of domestic battery-cell and component manufacturing.

Foster downstream industries, including electric vehicle components and grid-scale energy storage systems, through targeted investment and infrastructure.

Strengthen sovereign supply-chain resilience by ensuring a greater proportion of Australia's natural resources are transformed into high-value final products domestically.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9145)

Sovereign Capability

Australia is one of the world's largest exporters of iron ore, bauxite, alumina, copper, and other industrial metals essential for construction, transport, energy systems, and defence manufacturing. However, most of these resources are exported in raw or semi-processed form, with the high-value refining, smelting, and manufacturing stages occurring overseas. As a result, Australia captures only a small portion of the economic value generated from its own natural resources. Relying on foreign processing and overseas manufacturing exposes Australia to supply-chain disruptions, price volatility, and geopolitical risks. It also limits domestic job creation, reduces sovereign capability, and prevents Australia from developing advanced industries such as steel fabrication, aluminium component manufacturing, electric-motor production, and rare-earth magnet manufacturing. Expanding onshore processing and manufacturing would strengthen national resilience, support regional economies, and ensure Australia benefits fully from the resources it produces

We therefore ask the House to :—Develop a national strategy to expand onshore refining, smelting, and processing of iron, bauxite, alumina, copper, and other industrial metals;—Support domestic manufacturing of high-value products such as steel components, aluminium parts, electric-motor assemblies, and rare-earth permanent magnets;—Encourage downstream industries including transport manufacturing, renewable-energy infrastructure, and defence-grade materials production;—Strengthen sovereign supply-chain resilience by reducing reliance on overseas processing and ensuring more of Australia's raw materials are transformed into final products domestically.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9146)

Political Advertising

Political advertising plays a significant role in shaping public understanding during election periods and throughout the policy-making process. Unlike commercial advertising, which is subject to truth-in-advertising laws, political advertising at the federal level is not required to be factually accurate. This allows objectively false or misleading factual claims to be published without consequence, reducing public trust and undermining informed democratic participation. Some Australian jurisdictions, such as South Australia and the ACT, already prohibit misleading or deceptive political advertising based on objectively false factual claims. Similar standards at the federal level would help ensure that political debate remains robust while preventing the spread of demonstrably false information. A national framework would improve transparency, strengthen democratic integrity, and support voters in making informed decisions.

We therefore ask the House to—Introduce federal truth-in-political-advertising standards prohibiting objectively false or misleading factual claims;—Establish an independent body to assess complaints and issue timely rulings during election periods;—Require political advertisements making factual claims to be substantiated with verifiable evidence upon request;—Ensure that these standards protect freedom of political communication by applying only to factual assertions, not opinions, values, or policy arguments.

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN9148)

Disaster and Emergency Management

Across Australia, emergency service volunteers, including members of the Country Fire Service, Rural Fire Service, State Emergency Service, and related organisations, are increasingly relied upon to respond to severe bushfires, floods, storms, and other natural disasters.

During officially declared emergencies, these volunteers routinely work long and dangerous shifts to protect lives, communities, infrastructure, and the environment. Many are required to take unpaid leave from employment, lose income if self-employed, or experience financial stress as a direct result of their service. This places an unfair burden on individuals who are responding to national emergencies in the public interest.

Australia already recognises the principle of paid national service through the Australian Defence Force Reserves, whose members are remunerated when called upon during emergencies. A comparable approach for civilian emergency service volunteers would improve fairness, workforce sustainability, and national resilience, while respecting the volunteer ethos that underpins these organisations.

As climate change drives more frequent and severe disasters, reliance on unpaid emergency labour is becoming increasingly unsustainable. Establishing a nationally funded payment framework for emergency service volunteers during declared disasters would acknowledge their contribution, reduce financial hardship, and ensure Australia remains prepared to respond to future emergencies.

We therefore ask the House to establish a nationally funded scheme to pay emergency service volunteers when deployed during officially declared disasters, aligned with Australian Defence Force Reserve pay arrangements, to ensure consistent support across all states and territories while strengthening Australia's national emergency response capacity.

from 94 citizens (Petition No. EN9368)

Albanese Government

A vote of no confidence should be passed on the current Australian federal government due to its failure to maintain public trust and demonstrate effective leadership. Ongoing concerns about unmet policy commitments, cost-of-living pressures, lack of transparency in decision-making, and an inability to deliver clear, decisive outcomes on key national issues have undermined confidence in its capacity to govern in the interests of all Australians.

We therefore ask the House to move, debate and vote on a motion of no confidence.

from 37 citizens (Petition No. EN9369)

Iran

Since late 2025, the Iranian people have faced widespread and systematic repression by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including mass killings, arbitrary detention, torture, enforced disappearances, and death sentences against peaceful protesters. These actions follow decades of authoritarian rule exercised without the consent of the Iranian people. Protesters across Iran have explicitly rejected reform within the existing system and are demanding fundamental change through an Iranian-led democratic transition. Across the country, protesters have called for Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi to act as a unifying figure for the democratic opposition during a transitional period toward free, fair, and internationally supervised elections. The Islamic Republic's conduct also extends beyond Iran's borders, including intimidation, surveillance, and foreign interference targeting Iranian communities abroad, including in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to acknowledge that the Islamic Republic of Iran no longer governs with the consent of the Iranian people and that an Iranian-led democratic transition is necessary; engage with Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi as a leading representative of the Iranian democratic opposition and support an Iranian-led transition to free, fair, and internationally supervised elections; advocate for the immediate release of all political prisoners and pursue accountability for officials responsible for serious human rights violations; maintain, expand, and strictly enforce Magnitsky-style sanctions against responsible officials and affiliated entities; investigate and act against regime-linked intimidation, surveillance, and foreign interference in Australia, including expelling Iranian diplomatic personnel in accordance with Australian law; and maintain firm opposition to the Islamic Republic of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons.

from 828 citizens (Petition No. EN9374)

Iran

The Iranian people have long endured the absence of fundamental freedoms, political repression, and the lack of meaningful democratic mechanisms.

The undersigned affirm that the political future of Iran, regardless of its form or structure, can only be considered legitimate if it emerges from the free and direct will of the Iranian people themselves.

In accordance with international law and the right to self-determination, no individual or entity, domestic or foreign, holds political authority or legitimacy prior to a transparent and democratic vote conducted by the people of Iran.

We recognize that diverse perspectives regarding Iran's future system of governance, whether monarchy, republic, or other models, are natural and legitimate. However, the only peaceful means of resolving these differences is through a fair, independent, and inclusive democratic process, free from both internal coercion and external interference.

We therefore ask the House to We therefore ask the House to call upon the Government to:

Formally affirm its support for the right to self-determination of the Iranian people as a guiding principle in its engagement with Iran and the international community;

Exercise caution in adopting political positions or actions that could be interpreted as pre-determining Iran's political future or conferring premature legitimacy upon specific individuals or governing structures not yet chosen through a democratic process by the Iranian people;

Express support for democratic principles consistent with international law and in line with Australia's longstanding commitment to human rights, while respecting the Iranian people's right to decide their own future independently and without external direction or pre-arranged outcomes.

from 81 citizens (Petition No. EN9375)

Personal Information and Privacy

There have been reports that the Australian Government will share biometric and other sensitive data of Australian citizens with the United States government. This includes the data of citizens who do not plan to travel to the USA. Given the current state of US politics, this seems unwise, and more consultation and transparency is needed around the negotiation of requirements for the visa waiver program with the USA.

We therefore ask the House to ensure the Government is following rigorous consultation procedures and is transparent about requirements for Australia's ongoing participation in the visa waiver program specifically, and is required to transparently communicate proposed changes to data sharing with foreign countries generally.

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN9376)

Taxation

Farmers/Agricultural groups that use off-roads (private) and maintain these roads themselves have received this tax credit. Abolishing this credit will increase their costs, which then are passed onto the end consumers. Cost of living is already high. What assistance will then these businesses get for maintaining their own roads in place of this credit? These industries and regional businesses are the backbone of our country and are already doing it tough.

We therefore ask the House to stop any proposed action to remove or reduce the Fuel Tax Credit Scheme.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9378)

Defence Properties

Australian Military bases have heritage significance to the people of Australia and our history. .

We therefore ask the House to to stop and reject the sale of our military historic sites.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN9379)

Australian National Flag

In protests and "cultural expressions" large groups of people have been known to burn the Australian flag. Sadly, it is still legal to burn the flag. If you don't like Australia, leave, get out, go away don't burn the flag or say we are the problem. It may be legal to burn the flag now, but if this petition gets enough signatures, maybe new legislations will come in that make it illegal to burn the flag. It should be punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine maximum. Think about what would happen if we burned the aboriginal flag.

We therefore ask the House to introduce a bill that makes it a crime to burn the flag of Australia.

from 22 citizens (Petition No. EN9380)

Defence

I do not think it is acceptable to tarnish our SAS in the media. These matters should be conducted by the military, not trial by media. The Government should stand by our soldiers and not leave them to the wolves.

We therefore ask the House to stand fully behind our soldiers and not allow the media to get involved in military matters. Also the Government to stand by their soldiers and give them the respect they have earned.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9381)

National Capital Plan

We, the undersigned, draw the attention of the House to Commonwealth planning powers that allow the rezoning of established residential areas without adequate safeguards for existing residents.

When National Capital Plan controls expand over established residential land, residents may face constructive displacement through acquisitions, loss of amenity, higher ongoing holding costs, and reduced security of tenure, without compulsory acquisition. Impacts include transaction and relocation costs, increased statutory and strata charges, and loss of long-term value without equivalent protections.

This petition is informed by a case tabled on 5 February 2026 in the ACT Legislative Assembly: Draft Amendment 102 would include established residential areas within the National Capital Plan as Designated Areas under the National Capital Authority. This petition does not seek to determine that amendment; it identifies a wider policy gap in Commonwealth planning decisions.

A home is more than a financial asset; shifts in planning control can have material effects on residents' security, wellbeing, and community that fall outside existing regulatory protections, even where market value is considered.

Long-term leases in the ACT do not shield residents from these effects.

We therefore ask the House to

1. recognise constructive displacement arising from Commonwealth planning control changes as a material policy issue

2. examine whether existing Commonwealth frameworks adequately protect affected residents

3. establish minimum safeguards to ensure residents are not left financially or materially worse off as a result of Commonwealth-led inclusion of established residential areas within the National Capital Plan

from 279 citizens (Petition No. EN9382)

Mining Industry: Taxation

Everyday Australians should not be paying more tax than multi million/billion dollar companies, ease the cost of living by taxing big companies

We therefore ask the House to tax mining companies

from 39 citizens (Petition No. EN9384)

President of Ukraine

The Honourable Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, millions of Ukrainians have endured immense hardship. Throughout this, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has shown remarkable courage and leadership, inspiring people globally, including Australians, as a symbol of democracy, freedom, and human dignity.

Australia has stood in strong support of Ukraine through humanitarian and military assistance, affirming our values of sovereignty and peace. Erecting a statue of President Zelenskyy would serve as a permanent tribute to these shared values, and to the Ukrainian community in Australia

We therefore ask the House to We respectfully request the House of Representatives support the creation of a permanent public statue of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Commonwealth land in Canberra, honouring his leadership and Australia's solidarity with Ukraine. This monument would serve as a symbol of freedom, peace, and friendship between our nations.

from 25 citizens (Petition No. EN9386)

Competition Policy

The petitioner draws to the attention of the House that Commonwealth legislation and regulatory settings can unintentionally increase operating costs for certain industries, reducing their competitiveness in domestic and international markets. When this occurs, governments may respond by providing subsidies, compensation, or other financial assistance funded by taxpayers.

The petitioner is concerned that such subsidies may conceal the underlying cause of the problem—namely, legislation that imposes disproportionate or unintended burdens on specific sectors. Using public funds to offset these impacts can create long-term fiscal costs, distort market signals, and reduce transparency about the true effects of government policy.

The petitioner believes that before taxpayer-funded assistance is provided, there should be a clear, independent assessment of whether the relevant legislation is responsible for the loss of competitiveness and whether amending that legislation would be a more effective and fiscally responsible solution.

We therefore ask the House to legislate that:

1. Any proposed subsidy or financial assistance to an industry must be preceded by an independent assessment of whether Commonwealth legislation caused the competitiveness issue.

2. If legislation is identified as the primary cause, the Government must first consider amending or repealing it before approving public funding.

3. All assessments must be publicly released.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9387)

Parliamentary Standards

We request the following reforms:

1. Equal Legal Accountability: Misuse of public funds by elected officials must result in loss of office and criminal prosecution under the same laws that apply to all Australians, ensuring that public office does not shield anyone from the law.

2. Independent Oversight: All expenses, allowances, gifts, and donations must be independently audited and publicly disclosed in real time, so citizens can clearly see how public funds are spent.

3. Strict Limits and Transparency: All claims for travel, meals, or other allowances must be capped by an independent body. Allowances stop automatically when Parliament is not sitting. Politicians cannot claim what an ordinary worker could not, and all claims must be publicly documented and audited.

4. Donation Reform: Donations must be capped, fully disclosed immediately, and banned from industries politicians regulate, preventing conflicts of interest or influence over decisions.

5. No Special Pensions or Perks: Politicians retire under the same superannuation rules as other Australians, removing lifetime privileges and ensuring fairness.

We therefore ask the House to act now to restore trust, fairness, and integrity in government, that all elected officials are held to the same legal standards as ordinary Australians

from 39 citizens (Petition No. EN9392)

Iran

Supporting and solidarity with Iranian people with their fight against the terrorist and occupying IR regime.

We therefore ask the House to expel Iranian regime diplomats and pursue legal action against those responsible for crimes against humanity and support a democratic transitional government under Prince Reza Pahlavi leadership.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN9394)

Australian Constitution

It's time Australia had a new state

We therefore ask the House to call referendum. In conjunction with Victoria to establish a new state called Riverina state communities west of great deviding range. Down to Victoria and rural areas of Victoria

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9396)

COVID-19 Vaccines

I am covid injured and thousands more

We therefore ask the House to call for a Royal Commission inquiry to covid vaccines

from 130 citizens (Petition No. EN9397)

Child Abuse

We Need Law Reform. It's TIME To have NEW LAWS Implemented via PARLIAMENT For the toughest laws for ANY and ALL crimes against ANY Children And to have it AUSTRALIA WIDE With Easier Access to the Community

We therefore ask the House to Issue FRESH New Law Reforms and New Approach to all online predators and paedophiles and all crimes against children of Australia with the toughest penalties Australia wide.

from 30 citizens (Petition No. EN9398)

Migration

We respectfully request the Australian Parliament to review and amend the current residency requirement for children born in Australia to temporary resident parents. Under existing policy, such children become eligible for permanent residency only after ten (10) years of continuous residence in Australia. We propose reducing this requirement to five (5) years, provided that the child and parents have remained lawfully in Australia throughout this period. By the age of five, children typically commence preschool and begin forming strong educational, social, and cultural ties within Australian communities. Prolonged uncertainty regarding residency status during these formative years can cause emotional stress, disrupt education pathways, and negatively impact a child's sense of belonging. Families who live legally in Australia for five years, contribute to the workforce, pay taxes, and participate in community life demonstrate long-term commitment and integration. Providing an earlier pathway to permanent residency would support the best interests of the child, promote social cohesion, and reflect Australia's values of fairness and inclusion.

We therefore ask the House to We urge Parliament to consider this change to ensure stability and opportunity for children born and raised in Australia. And your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9400)

Renewable Energy

Correspondence from the Minister for the Environment (Ref: MC25-012099) confirms the Government relies on the "avoid, mitigate and offset" hierarchy to approve wind farms in native forests. We are witnessing the reckless industrialisation of regional Australia. We submit that this policy is flawed. You cannot "offset" the irreversible loss of unique State Forest ecosystems or critical water catchments. The Government's intent to "streamline" assessments prioritises approval speed over the rigorous scrutiny required to protect fire-prone regions. Furthermore, allowing the Department to oversee its own environmental research lacks independent oversight. We contend that without a National Inquiry into cumulative impacts, the current rush of approvals constitutes an unacceptable risk to regional biodiversity, water security, and public recreational access.

We therefore ask the House to DECLARE A NATIONAL MORATORIUM: Immediately suspend all wind farm assessments in State Forests (including both native forest and plantation) until a Senate Inquiry reports on cumulative impacts. BAN OFFSETS IN STATE FORESTS: Amend the EPBC Act to prohibit "biodiversity offsets" for renewable energy projects on public land; State Forests must be protected in-situ. MANDATE INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT: Transfer all environmental research authority to the CSIRO and Office of the Chief Scientist to ensure independent integrity. EXPAND THE "WATER TRIGGER": Amend the EPBC Act to apply the "Water Trigger" to all large-scale renewable infrastructure in public water catchments. PROTECT RECREATIONAL ACCESS: Legislatively prohibit any renewable energy project in a State Forest that results in the permanent alienation or restriction of public recreational access.

from 15 citizens (Petition No. EN9403)

RAAF Base Point Cook

RAAF Base Point Cook, established in 1913, is the birthplace of the Royal Australian Air Force and a site of exceptional national and international significance. It contains rare historic hangars, parade grounds, workshops, and the RAAF Museum, which preserves over a century of Australia's aviation and military history. The base has deep cultural and community value, with veterans, cadets, and locals maintaining strong ties. Current proposals for sale, redevelopment, or demolition risk losing irreplaceable heritage, historic buildings, and public access. Preserving Point Cook ensures Australia's aviation legacy is safeguarded, educates future generations, and honours the contributions of past generations who trained, served, and built the nation's defence history.

We therefore ask the House to ensure RAAF Base Point Cook remains permanently protected as a heritage site. All heritage-listed buildings should be preserved, maintained, and restored according to conservation standards. Public access to the RAAF Museum and historic precincts must be guaranteed. We also request the creation of a Heritage Management Plan, developed with heritage experts and community input, including funding for ongoing preservation. Protecting Point Cook safeguards Australia's aviation legacy, honours veterans and past generations, and ensures future generations can experience and learn from this historic and culturally significant site.

from 75 citizens (Petition No. EN9405)

Israel

This petition acknowledges the implications of foreign interference and political subversion, espionage, and the influence of foreign powers and particularly orchestrated by the State of Israel within the Australian political and industrial landscape.

We therefore ask the House to initiate a Royal Commission to investigate foreign interference and the implications that the state of Israel has had with dictating Australia's domestic and foreign policy decisions, including involvement in conflicts such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

The petition highlights concerns about covert espionage activities conducted within Australia by agents or affiliates loyal to Israel, including the use of "sayanim" networks and connections with the Mossad. It seeks an inquiry into the use of intelligence software, including PROMIS and Pegasus, for surveillance, data theft, blackmail, and the collection of compromising material on Australian parliamentarians, officials, and law enforcement personnel. These actions, if proven, represent a serious threat to our nations sovereignty, independence, and democratic integrity of the Commonwealth of Australia. The petition further requests the examination of historical allegations involving Israeli intelligence and the dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam. The aim of this Royal Commission is to expose any foreign manipulation undermining Australia's self-governance, to ensure transparency, and to safeguard national interests from undue foreign influence and covert interference.

The House is urged to treat this matter as one of national security and importance and to act decisively to uphold the principles of Australian democracy, sovereignty, and independence through a transparent and accountable process of a Royal Commission.

from 3,177 citizens (Petition No. EN9406)

International Relations: Australia and the United States of America

America has long been an ally to Australia, however they have begun a downward spiral into fascism. We should not allow a country that murders its citizens to have military bases on our soil, especially when those bases are being used to illegally surveil the Australian population. Further, America should have no access to sensitive data (in particular biometric data of citizens) in the interest of national security. We are yet to be a truly sovereign nation due to American influence, and for Australia to develop a national identity we must remove this foreign power. Any nation that has a history of illegal violence against its citizens should not continue to interfere in our national politics, and should not be sanctioned by our government.

We therefore ask the House to place substantial tariffs on American goods, remove all American military from our soil, hold a government inquiry into the data collected at Pine Gap and revoke visa-free travel for American citizens. We also request that the government acknowledges illegal CIA intervention in the 1975 Whitlam 'dismissal'.

from 64 citizens (Petition No. EN9407)

Victoria Barracks Sydney

The Federal Government has identified 67 Defence sites for divestment, including Victoria Barracks Sydney. Established in 1840, it is one of Australia's most historically significant, operational military precincts. Its well-preserved history and heritage are a direct result of the care provided by its custodians, the Australian Army. Victoria Barracks still holds strategic importance as home of Headquarters Forces Command and Headquarters 2nd Health Brigade. Its versatility and location enables a broad range of uses, from the conduct of sensitive operations, through to hosting visits of foreign state and military leaders. All of this whilst still having deep connections with the local and greater Sydney communities. The site's divestment would forgo a strategic location, weaken long-standing community relationships, diminish its significance and lose its shared history. It is incorrect to suggest that its history and grounds are hidden away from the public. Victoria Barracks Sydney is open to the public weekly, offering free guided tours, as well as access to the Army Museum. Victoria Barracks Sydney welcomes the public and local communities for events, such as Anzac Day, Christmas Carols, Indigenous youth initiatives and charity events. It regularly hosts national, state and local sporting teams, who train and hold exhibition matches on its grounds. It is feared that all of this will be lost if the site is sold—its history, its heritage, its identity—our history, our heritage and our identity.

We therefore ask the House to remove Victoria Barracks Sydney from the list of ADF Divestment sites.

from 1,099 citizens (Petition No. EN9408)

Education

Australia is experiencing a significant and ongoing decline in arts education across both schools and universities (see data from the National Advocates for Arts Education). Enrolments in senior secondary Arts subjects have fallen nationally, and many tertiary creative arts courses have been reduced or discontinued. These trends are narrowing educational opportunities for young Australians and weakening the nation's cultural, creative, and educational future.

Arts education plays a vital role in student engagement, wellbeing, creativity, cultural understanding, and academic success. It contributes to a balanced, humanising education and supports the development of skills essential for the future, including communication, collaboration, and creative thinking. Despite this, Arts education continues to receive unequal recognition and investment compared with other learning areas.

We therefore call on the Australian Government to take urgent action to address the decline of Arts education by initiating a national parliamentary inquiry into arts education and training in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to initiate a national parliamentary inquiry into arts education and training in Australia, examining the causes and impacts of declining participation across schools, tertiary education, and teacher education, and to recommend coordinated national action.

We further ask the House to consider policy and funding measures to restore and strengthen arts education, including addressing declining school and university participation, ensuring equitable recognition and investment for Arts education alongside other national priorities, and supporting the development of a coordinated national plan to secure the future of arts education in Australia.

from 7,472 citizens (Petition No. EN9412)

Schools

Private schools currently receive millions of taxpaxer dollars while only benefiting 1% of the population. We, the petitioners, believe this is unfair as many of these schools teach religious doctrine as being true and in our opinion this violates the secular order our society is founded upon. These schools are also often owned by the church and are therefore tax exempt. The tax exemption is already big enough of a handout so why add more?

We therefore ask the House to halt funding for schools which charge a fee to attend (better known as private schools) and reallocate the funding towards public schools and other instuitions in need for funding. This is to be done in the next federal budget at the time of government response.

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN9413)

Capital Gains Tax

This petition of certain citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the House the reported deliberations regarding a reduction of the 50% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) discount in the upcoming May 2026 Federal Budget. Many individual investors have made long-term financial commitments based on the government's explicit pre-election promises to maintain existing tax settings. Scaling back this discount severely undermines the retirement plans of middle-income Australians who have invested in assets to be self-sufficient in their later years. By eroding the expected capital required for retirement, these changes will force many who intended to be self-funded retirees to instead rely on the Age Pension. This shift creates a long-term fiscal burden on the taxpayer that far outweighs any short-term revenue gain from increased CGT. Such policy changes penalise aspiration and long-term planning while failing to protect those who have already made life-altering investment decisions based on current law.

We therefore ask the House to 1. Reject any proposal to reduce the current 50% Capital Gains Tax discount for individuals. 2. Uphold previous election commitments to maintain stability in the tax treatment of long-term investments. 3. Ensure that, should any changes proceed, all existing assets are fully grandfathered to protect the retirement security of current investors.

from 68 citizens (Petition No. EN9414)

Early Childhood Education and Care

We, the undersigned, petition Government to reform Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) policy and funding to ensure equitable access for disabled children with complex health and support needs (Children with Complex Needs/CwCN). Due to barriers in childcare policy, funding, and workforce models: CwCN are denied critical early learning opportunities; Parents, predominantly mothers, are forced out of employment and education; and Carer wellbeing declines, increasing long-term social costs. RippleAbility's Pilot evidenced that appropriate CwCN early learning environments, provide benefits beyond the child to support family stability, parental workforce re-entry, and improved wellbeing. These outcomes are difficult to scale post-pilot due to current inadequate ECEC policy and funding.

We therefore ask the House to 1. Reform: Child Care Subsidy loadings for CwCN, recognising non-standard attendance; The Inclusion Support Program to ensure funding for higher staff-to-child ratios and an appropriately skilled workforce, to enable inclusion of CwCN; Capacity building to enable ECEC services to safely and confidently include CwCN. 2. Recognise: Inclusive ECEC is essential to carer workforce participation; Realign ECEC reform with national priorities/commitments in productivity, gender equity, disability, and early intervention; That including CwCN requires coordinated reform across early learning, disability, and health systems. 3. Partner with people with lived experience to: Co-design inclusive policy and program reforms; and Invest in scalable models bridging disability/health/education.   Children with complex needs have the same right to early learning, and their parents have the same right to participate in work, as their peers. Inclusive ECEC is a national policy gap with profound social/economic consequences.

from 205 citizens (Petition No. EN9415)

Migration

We respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the current eligibility timeline for permanent residency (subclass 191) for holders of the Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) visa (subclass 491).

Under the current framework, applicants must hold the subclass 491 visa for a minimum of three years before becoming eligible to apply for permanent residency. However, processing times for the subclass 491 visa often exceed 24 months, resulting in a total waiting period of approximately five to six years before applicants can transition to permanent residency.

Many applicants already spend several years in Australia on student and temporary visas and experience extended delays after state nomination approval before visa grant. These administrative delays, which are beyond the control of applicants, create prolonged uncertainty despite applicants having demonstrated commitment to regional Australia and compliance with all eligibility requirements.

We therefore ask the House to recognise that applicants who receive state or territory nomination approval have already met all substantive eligibility criteria and demonstrated their commitment to regional Australia.

We respectfully propose that the three-year regional residence requirement for eligibility for the permanent residency visa (subclass 191) should commence from the date of state or territory nomination approval, rather than the date of subclass 491 visa grant.

This change would ensure fairness by preventing applicants from being penalised for administrative processing delays and would create a more just and reasonable migration pathway for skilled migrants contributing to regional Australia.

from 482 citizens (Petition No. EN9416)

Building and Construction Industry

Recent public allegations and reporting about corruption, coercion and improper influence in the construction sector—particularly involving CFMEU and major publicly funded projects in Victoria—have seriously undermined public confidence. These matters affect billions of dollars, cost blowouts, competition, safety, and value for money. Existing processes have not provided the independence, scope or transparency needed to restore trust. Where Commonwealth funding, federal industrial laws, federally registered organisations, corporations or interstate conduct are involved, the Commonwealth has a clear public-interest role in ensuring integrity and accountability.

We therefore ask the House to establish or support an independent Commonwealth inquiry (including, if appropriate, a Royal Commission) with full powers to compel evidence into corruption and improper conduct risks in the construction sector where Commonwealth funding, federal laws or federally regulated entities are involved, and to refer any evidence of wrongdoing to relevant Commonwealth integrity and law-enforcement agencies, and to strengthen transparency and integrity conditions on future Commonwealth infrastructure funding.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN9417)

Consumer Protection

A common dilemma when visiting pubs in Australia : the mysterious beer prices. Beer prices are not displayed in Australian pubs, causing confusion, shock, and problems about purchasing beers on tap. There are wide variations of beer prices in Australian pubs. A schooner of beer in Sydney, sometimes cost in excess of $17 AUD.

In UK, and many countries, they list their beer prices clearly. Why are "beer prices in pubs" not available in Australia?

We therefore ask the House to require pubs to display beer prices .

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9429)

Health Care

Many Australians choose to live in the Philippines and Thailand for retirement, work, or lifestyle reasons. However, without reciprocal healthcare agreements, they face high out of pocket costs for essential life-saving medical care, unlike in countries where such agreements exist. This creates financial hardship and the discourages long-term residency aboard. Expanding Australia's reciprocal healthcare agreements to include the Philippines and Thailand, wood provide Australians living there with access to subsidized emergency and necessary treatment similar to Medicare. This would support expat communities and align with Australia's interests in southeast Asia

We therefore ask the House to initiate negotiations for reciprocal healthcare arrangements with the Philippines and Thailand. Prioritising coverage for resident Australians.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9430)

Young Australians

The internet & computing technology revolutionised the world of communication forever. The social media ban for under 18yos restricts their access to this platform & is a loss of creative freedom, which could impact their motivation & social skills, as well as their tech skills development & enthusiasm for computing. The government could, in theory, compensate the young people of Australia, by providing : Youth Activity Cafes, in every city. At the Youth Activity Cafes, our young people could enjoy hands on games, art, craft, books & activities, on their own, or with their peers, to ensure healthy enthusiasm for creativity, & healthy social skills development occurs, while they are cut off from internet & social media. These Youth Activity Cafes would create jobs & reduce emotional damage & loss to our young people as well as being a positive focus of alternatives to the internet & social media, in communities.

We therefore ask the House to immediately create a Youth taskforce committee, to develop a business plan, financial plan & cost estimate of, a nation-wide rapid roll out of Youth Activity Cafes in every city for the benefit of the young people of Australia.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9432)

Migration

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the Federal Government address the unacceptable processing times for the Subclass 191 visa.

The current requirements stipulate that individuals must hold the 491 visa for three years. While this may initially appear reasonable, it is, in practice, unmanageable.

Onshore applicants are required to live in the sponsoring states for 12 months and, in many cases, to study there for two years. Presently, the processing time for the 491 visa takes approximately two years, before the three-year holding period even begins. When combined with the current 16-month processing time for the 191 visa, this results on average 7 to 8 years spent as temporary residents in regional areas of Australia.

This situation is both inhumane and unjust.

The original intention of the provisional visa program was never to create such an absurd outcome.

We therefore ask the House to urge the government to consider the following actions:

Credit Time on Bridging Visas:

Credit the time spent by onshore applicants on bridging visas while residing in their sponsoring states toward fulfilling the three-year requirement for the 191 visa.

Review Processing Times:

Implement measures to expedite the processing times for both the 491 and 191 visas to ensure that applicants are not unjustly delayed in their path to permanent residency.

Change the Tax Laws

To ensure 491 visa holders are not disadvantaged in their ability to buy their own homes in Australia compared to permanent residents.

We believe these changes are essential for ensuring fairness and equity in the immigration process

from 1,236 citizens (Petition No. EN9433)

Road Vehicle Standards

We note that:

The current requirement for 100 points of identification to register a trailer is excessive and creates an unnecessary barrier for many Australians, particularly older citizens and those with limited digital access.

The national online registration website is difficult to use, often fails to recognise uploaded identity documentation, and poses significant challenges for users without advanced digital literacy.

These issues have resulted in frustration, delays, and exclusion, especially among older Australians who are legally entitled to register their trailers but are prevented from doing so due to system complexity.

We therefore ask the House to call upon the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to review the 100-point identification requirement applied to individuals seeking to obtain a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) for a small, home-built trailer under the Commonwealth vehicle standards framework.

We further request a review of the associated federal online application system to ensure it is accessible, user-friendly, and suitable for older Australians and those with limited digital literacy.

We ask that a public response outlining any proposed improvements and timeframes be provided.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9436)

Narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological sleep disorder that significantly impairs a person's capacity to safely participate in everyday life. Despite its serious impact, Australia does not have a national registry to accurately record prevalence, diagnosis patterns, treatment access or long-term outcomes. Diagnosis is often delayed for many years, and access to specialist care and appropriate treatment varies across states and territories. The absence of coordinated national data limits research, service planning, funding allocation and the development of consistent clinical guidelines. A national registry would strengthen evidence-based policy, improve early diagnosis and treatment pathways, support research, and promote equitable healthcare access for Australians living with narcolepsy.

We therefore ask the House to establish and fund a national registry for diagnosed narcolepsy to collect anonymised data on prevalence, diagnosis, treatment access and outcomes; develop consistent national standards in consultation with medical experts and patient advocacy groups; and align Australia's approach with registry and clinical frameworks implemented in comparable jurisdictions, including the United States and parts of Europe.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9437)

Building and Construction Industry

We are concerned about the allocation of approximately $15 billion in Australian taxpayer funds in circumstances involving cooperation between the government and the CFMEU.

Australian taxpayers expect transparency, accountability, and responsible management of public money. Any arrangement involving significant public expenditure must be subject to proper oversight, clear reporting, and independent scrutiny to ensure funds are used lawfully, efficiently, and in the public interest. Where large sums of public money are involved, there must be full disclosure of how decisions were made, what safeguards were in place, and what outcomes were achieved. Public confidence in government institutions depends on accountability and transparency.

We therefore request that Parliament ensure a thorough and independent review of the allocation of these funds, with findings made publicly available. If any misconduct, mismanagement, or improper influence is identified, appropriate action should be taken in accordance with the law.

Australians deserve assurance that public funds are protected and used responsibly.

We therefore ask the House to Establish an independent parliamentary inquiry into the allocation and management of the $15 billion in taxpayer funds referenced in this petition.

Require full public disclosure of the decision-making process, contractual arrangements, and oversight mechanisms associated with these funds. Ensure that any findings of misconduct, mismanagement, or improper influence are referred to the appropriate authorities for further investigation and action.

Strengthen transparency and accountability measures to safeguard future public expenditure. We respectfully request that the House take all necessary steps within its powers to ensure public confidence in the responsible and lawful use of Commonwealth funds.

from 37 citizens (Petition No. EN9517)

Pensions and Benefits

The Australian Institute of Family Studies has determined that one child costs $397 per week in 2025. Yet, child support is only based on a percentage, with non-primary parents on Centrelink, not working, or ABN paying well below the average cost in raising a child. The Child Support system has not had a comprehensive review since 2006, despite housing and living costs raising by 40%. This petition therefore calls for Child Support to have a minimum payment of $150 per week to the primary care parent, regardless of income.

We therefore ask the House to introduce a Minimum $150 per week child support payment to the primary care parent, regardless of the income amount declared by the secondary parent to effectively cover the determined average cost of one child per week, to minimise financial abuse of parents not declaring income accurately etc under an ABN and to reduce the financial burden pushed onto primary caregivers so that they can effectively take care of the child.

from 85 citizens (Petition No. EN9518)

Aged Care

Elderly people in Australia cant always pay or clean for services, this petition allows free services with no payments from their pensions to make life easier and more comfortable for them.

We therefore ask the House to change the laws and make aged care free for all no matter when they apply and get accepted for the age care.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN9519)

Qualification of Members and Senators

Politicians who break constitution and are dual citizens need to resign

We therefore ask the House to investigate elected representatives who are or could be dual citizens ship holders who are break constitution and should be forced to step down. Break the constitution is break the law

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN9521)

Capital Punishment

The crime of child sexual abuse and pedophilia , particularly those of a penetrative nature, destroy the lives and potentials of young innocent human beings. There is very little evidence or success in rehabilitation of pedophiles particularly those convicted of penetrative sex with children. Having these individuals in our justice system or in society is nothing but a burden.

We therefore ask the House to please consider reinstating the death penalty for individuals convicted of acts of pedophilia or at least penetration of a minor.

from 97 citizens (Petition No. EN9522)

Grocery Prices

Shops prices need to be investigated

We therefore ask the House to investigate the pricing system of shops maybe shops should be capped on prices.

Example if a farmer is forced to sell a lamb at $200. Then it goes to abattoir.where it's killed and sent on to wholesalers / butcher. Where it's cut up. Some where in all this price goes through roof. 6 lamb cutlets becomes $36 . Is it big chains like Woolworths Cole's that cause the price hike . This needs investigation.on everything shops sell.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9523)

Kurdish People

The Kurds have been historically persecuted by Muslims, so they would be unanimously against Arab Nationalism, so it is a strategic location for Middle East Peace efforts. It is not currently recognised by any states.

We therefore ask the House to recognise all regions of Kurdistan and give Kurdish Immigrants status.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9524)

Services Australia

To the Honourable Speaker, Members of the House

This petition draws attention to systemic failures in Services Australia's administration of child support, enabling financial abuse, coercive control and psychological harm.

Misuse of Non-Agency Payment credits and provisional income allows parents to avoid legal obligations across tax and income disclosure, including misuse of employment and trust structures.

Suspension of child support during review and excessive delays leave vulnerable parents without support; Services Australia awards non-compliant parents credits, further entrenching financial control.

In domestic violence cases, objections expose survivors to foreseeable harm when evidence is shared with the other parent, undermining safety and agency.

The petitioners note Commonwealth Ombudsman reports mirror these deficiencies, including failures to follow the law, weak income verification, inadequate lived experience training and absence of enforceable safeguards. Women, men and children are affected; children experience secondary harm when support is withheld, misapplied or used as control.

We therefore ask the House to ensure:

Enforcement of Ombudsman recommendations through an independent risk management and assurance framework with deadlines and penalties for CEO and delegate inaction.

Mandated trauma informed family violence training and risk controls for all Services Australia staff, including executives.

Establishment of a specialist Domestic Violence unit with lived experience oversight for cases involving domestic violence, actively mitigating ongoing abuse.

Application and enforcement of statutory NAP credit, provisional income and income estimate safeguards.

A mandated multi department taskforce including ATO and Family Court to strengthen controls and governance addressing coercive control, financial and domestic abuse.

from 105 citizens (Petition No. EN9527)

Parliamentarians' Entitlements

The life pensions given to retiring politicians is out of step with the rest of industries and inappropriate considering the cost of living issues.

We therefore ask the House to review the proposal to remove life pensions moving forward.

from 32 citizens (Petition No. EN9528)

Fitness Industry

This petition of certain citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the House the significant health and economic benefits of regular physical activity. Exercise improves mental health, reducing depression and anxiety by 4-7%, and mitigates stress, which drives 90% of primary care visits and raises risks of heart disease, stroke, and immune dysfunction; lowers the risk of chronic diseases including arthritis, high blood pressure, diabetes, and heart disease. Physically active individuals incur 9-27% lower healthcare costs, with 10-22% savings in later-life expenses. Modelling indicates that incentivising participation could deliver $24-73 billion in long-term healthcare savings and $1.3 billion per year in ongoing health system and productivity benefits.

Government employees already enjoy subsidised fitness access through Fitness Passport; extending equivalent incentives to all Australians would recognise that their health is equally important. Amid the cost-of-living crisis, many are cutting exercise expenses, contributing to a 7% annual revenue decline in the fitness industry. Currently, gym memberships and sports-related expenses are not generally tax deductible, limiting participation.

We therefore ask the House to make gym memberships, sports fees, classes, and training costs tax deductible for all Australians. This would encourage physical activity—potentially adding 1.8 million participants—promote health, reduce stress-related impacts, and deliver economic benefits. While the estimated initial reduction in tax revenue is $400-900 million per year, this would be significantly offset by over $1.3 billion in annual healthcare and productivity savings, yielding a strong net positive outcome for Australia's economy and public health.

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN9529)

Personal Information and Privacy

The Australian Government is negotiating an agreement to share Australian citizens' biometric data—including facial images, fingerprints, DNA, and passport information—with United States agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), without public consultation or parliamentary debate.

Biometric data is permanent and irreversible. Unlike passwords or financial data it cannot be changed once compromised. The sharing of this data with foreign government agencies creates an irreversible and unaccountable surveillance risk for all Australians.

This negotiation has occurred alongside the granting of Australian government security clearance to Palantir Technologies—the primary technology contractor powering ICE's surveillance and enforcement infrastructure in the United States.

We therefore ask the House to immediately suspend negotiations on any biometric data sharing agreement with the United States government pending full parliamentary scrutiny, independent human rights assessment, and transparent public consultation.

from 107 citizens (Petition No. EN9530)

National Security

The 11 Australians commonly known as the ISIS brides and their 23 children are an unacceptable risk to Australia. The Australian government can cancel an Australian passport on security grounds. Under the Australian Passports Act 2005, the Minister for Foreign Affairs may cancel a passport if a "competent authority" (such as ASIO or the Australian Federal Police) advises it is necessary to prevent risks to national security, terrorism, or serious criminal conduct. Such advice has been received.

We therefore ask the House to instruct the Minister for Foreign Affairs to cancel 44 Australian Passports issued to the 11 Australians commonly known as the ISIS brides and their 23 children.

from 80 citizens (Petition No. EN9534)

Telecommunications

That residents, businesses and road users in Crafers, South Australia, experience significant mobile phone black spots and unreliable coverage throughout the township. Poor reception occurs in key community locations including the town centre, local businesses such as the petrol station and restaurants, the local primary school, and along Piccadilly Road which is a major through road in the Adelaide Hills. Unreliable mobile coverage affects public safety, emergency communication, local commerce, school operations and the daily lives of residents and commuters. In an area prone to bushfire risk and high tourist traffic, dependable mobile service is essential infrastructure, not a luxury.

We therefore ask the House to work with telecommunications providers to investigate and address mobile coverage deficiencies in Crafers, South Australia, including consideration of additional infrastructure, tower upgrades, or other measures necessary to ensure reliable and consistent mobile phone service for the community.

from 122 citizens (Petition No. EN9535)

Automotive Industry

Australia once took immense pride in building our own cars—Holden and Ford vehicles that embodied our craftsmanship, innovation, and national spirit. Since the closure of Australian car manufacturing, thousands of owners and enthusiasts have struggled to find genuine replacement parts for these vehicles.

Without access to authentic components, many Australian-built cars such as the Holden Commodore, HSV models, Ford Falcon, FPV models, and Ford Territory are becoming harder to maintain, threatening to erase a significant part of our national heritage. These cars are more than transport—they represent decades of local skill, family memories, and community identity.

When Saab production ended in Sweden, the Swedish Government supported companies that continued manufacturing genuine parts to preserve the brand's legacy and sustain local jobs. Australia should follow this example by securing the rights and facilities needed to produce parts for our iconic vehicles.

This petition seeks to protect Australia's automotive legacy, support skilled local manufacturing, and ensure our proud motoring history is never forgotten.

We therefore ask the House to Acquire or secure the manufacturing rights, tooling, and intellectual property necessary to produce genuine replacement parts for Australian-built Holden, HSV, Ford, and FPV vehicles;

Partner with local engineering and manufacturing firms to establish a sustainable, Australian-made parts program, similar to the approach taken in Sweden after Saab's closure; and

Recognise the cultural and economic importance of Australia's automotive heritage by supporting initiatives that preserve and celebrate our local motoring history.

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN9536)

Pakistan: Human Rights

This petition of certain citizens and residents of Australia draws to the attention of the House that concerns have been publicly reported regarding the detention conditions and health of Imran Khan, former Prime Minister of Pakistan. Reports refer to alleged inadequate medical care, deterioration in health including reported vision impairment, prolonged solitary confinement, and restricted access to family members and legal counsel. If accurate, such circumstances may be inconsistent with internationally recognised human rights standards, including humane treatment in detention and access to medical care and legal representation.

We therefore ask the House to seek clarification from the Government of Pakistan regarding Mr Khan's health and detention conditions; Raise, through appropriate diplomatic channels, matters relating to international human rights obligations; and Advocate for access to appropriate medical assessment and regular access to legal counsel and family members.

from 271 citizens (Petition No. EN9537)

Iran: Human Rights

Recent nationwide protests in Iran have reportedly resulted in widespread human rights concerns, including deaths, injuries, arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, denial of medical care, and protest-related executions. There are serious concerns regarding detainees' safety, lack of transparency, and restrictions on independent monitoring. These issues raise urgent humanitarian concerns consistent with Australia's longstanding commitment to human rights and the rule of law.

We therefore ask the House to : • Condemn the reported use of lethal force, arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence in detention, and protest-related executions; • Call for the immediate and unconditional release of individuals detained solely for peacefully exercising their fundamental rights; • Urge full disclosure of the fate and whereabouts of all disappeared persons; • Advocate for immediate, unimpeded access to all detention facilities by relevant United Nations mechanisms, independent observers, and qualified medical professionals; • Demand safe and unrestricted access to medical care for injured civilians, and protection for medical personnel performing their professional duties without harassment or retaliation; • Encourage coordinated international engagement, consistent with Australia's existing legal and diplomatic frameworks, to safeguard affected individuals and families.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN9538)

Taxation: Artificial Intelligence

We, the undersigned, express our deep concern about the rapid replacement of human workers by automated technologies such as self-checkout machines and AI-powered robots. Across many industries—retail, administration, customer service, and even healthcare—machines are increasingly performing jobs once done by people. This trend is leading to fewer employment opportunities, reduced job security, and growing economic inequality. While large corporations benefit from increased profits through automation, displaced workers and their families face financial hardship and uncertainty. We believe that technological progress should benefit society as a whole, not just corporations. Automation must not come at the cost of human dignity and livelihood. A balanced approach is needed to ensure innovation continues while protecting workers and maintaining a fair society.

We therefore ask the House to Introduce a fair tax on self-checkout systems and AI-powered robotic workers that replace human jobs. Use the revenue from this tax to support unemployed and displaced workers through retraining programs, income support, and job creation initiatives. Ensure that employees who use AI and advanced machines to increase productivity receive fair wage increases reflecting their higher output.

from 34 citizens (Petition No. EN9539)

Telecommunications

For five years I have been without a home landline and internet connection. On 15 January 2021 my ADSL landline and internet service with Telstra was disconnected due to the NBN roll out.

Although, the NBN HFC is available for my home, after having the cable installed, I had it removed, due to severe headaches.

I do not have a mobile telephone due to my sensitivity to wireless radiation.

Without a landline I am not able to call my dad who is 95 years old and living in New Zealand.

Regarding, my ADSL disconnection, Telstra (email 16 September 2024), advise, "Once the NBNCo already rolled-out their service in the area as per government mandate the copper services such as phone and ADSL internets will be restricted meaning there is no option for the customer to get those kind of service. I would like to apologise but this is a government mandate."

We therefore ask the House to allow new ADSL landline and internet connections, with the choice for a non-wireless compatible connection.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9544)

E-Cigarettes and Vaping Products

The Federal Government needs to do something about our restrictive vaping laws. People who have smoked their entire lives and switched to vapes are now being discriminated against and this has got to change. I am a disabled person, who got addicted to cigarettes after having to survive in offices and public transport full of heavy smokers. I now vape just to keep my nicotine levels manageable. Other Nicotine replacement therapies have all failed. Now the Government have banned 5ml vape pods and coloured vape devices. Because of my disabilities, I constantly lose the black vape devices. Because of my disabilities, I am forced to carry 2 vape devices with me as the 2ml pods run out too quick. I could last half a day with a 5ml vape pod. Now I am forced to buy more vape devices to replace the lost ones and I have no idea what happens to the lost vapes—children could be finding them for all I know. So, the Australian Government now discriminates against disabled people, and are making access to vapes easier for children. You won't let disabled people claim vapes on NDIS so we must pay for vape devices out of our pension.

We therefore ask the House to make changes to vape laws to allow disabled adults access to brightly coloured vape devices with at least 5ml pods or tanks.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9545)

National Security

Recent national security incidents, including terrorist linked returns from Syria and cyber threats, raise questions about current policies. An inquiry would help identify any gaps and strengthen protections.

We therefore ask the House to investigate the effectiveness of Home Affairs policies on visa processing, intelligence sharing, and counter-terrorism to ensure public safety and border integrity are protected. We also ask to investigate individuals handling and use of policies, information, and potential bias being used for gain in these matters.

from 44 citizens (Petition No. EN9547)

Child Abuse

The growing concern regarding child sexual abuse offences, including those of facilitated through online plateforms, live streaming technologies, and international exploitation networks has led to this petition. Advances in technology have enabled offenders to exploit children through live streaming platforms and encrypted networks. These crimes cause profound and lifelong harm to victims and families

and require a strong and coordinated national response. The Australian people need to feel that their children are safe, and the law is adequate for the severity of these heinous crimes.

We therefore ask the House to

We respectfully request that the Australian Government:

1. Review and strengthen federal laws relating to online child sexual exploitation and live streamed abuse.

2. Introduce stronger penalties for individuals who organise, pay for, facilitate, or distribute live streamed child sexual abuse.

3. Work with states and territories to examine sentencing frameworks and consider stronger and more consistent penalties across Australia.

4. Increase funding and resources for specialist law enforcement units investigating online child exploitation, including international cooperation.

5. Expand prevention, victim support, and early-intervention programs to protect children and assist survivors.

We ask the Parliament to recognise the seriousness of these crimes and treat this issue as a national priority to better protect children and hold offenders accountable.

from 300 citizens (Petition No. EN9548)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's industries and workers deserve fair competition and protection from the underpayment of overseas workers that undermines local jobs and wages. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to power advanced automation and high-tech industries here at home, creating well-paid jobs and sustainable industries. Unlike fission, fusion energy is safe, clean, and virtually limitless, providing a competitive edge without high-level radioactive waste or proliferation risks. By investing in fusion-powered automation, Australia can remain globally competitive without resorting to outsourcing or underpaid labour. Major economies—including the US, UK, and Japan—are investing heavily in fusion research to future-proof their economies. Without action, Australia risks falling behind and losing jobs to countries with lower labour standards. Investing in fusion and automation will allow Australia to innovate responsibly, maintain fair wages, and secure our manufacturing, technology, and export sectors against unfair competition.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on advanced automation and fair competition. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry, regulatory frameworks, and training pathways for Australian workers. Early action will protect local jobs, secure fair wages, and ensure Australia competes on innovation and quality, not on undercutting wages.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7597)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned that Australia's energy policy advisers and agencies have consistently overlooked fusion energy, a technology that promises clean, safe, and virtually limitless power without high-level radioactive waste or weapons proliferation risks. Fusion energy is rapidly advancing globally, with major economies—including the US, UK, EU, and China—investing billions into research and development. Australia risks falling behind in this critical technology due to the advice given by current energy advisers who focus narrowly on existing renewables and fission technologies. We believe that this oversight is detrimental to Australia's energy security, economic competitiveness, and climate commitments. A review of energy advisers and the reasons behind their neglect of fusion energy is urgently needed to ensure that Australians benefit from all available clean energy options, not just those that suit established industries.

We therefore ask the House to conduct an immediate review of Australia's energy policy advisers and their approach to fusion energy. This review should examine why fusion has been overlooked, the qualifications and biases of those responsible, and make recommendations to ensure that fusion energy is properly considered in national energy planning. Early action is needed to ensure Australia remains competitive, innovative, and open to the full range of clean energy solutions.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7598)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia must invest in cutting-edge research to ensure a sustainable, competitive, and secure energy future. Fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless power source that can transform Australia's economy and help meet our climate goals. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and has minimal safety risks, making it a more community-friendly technology. Major economies—including the US, UK, and China—are investing heavily in fusion research, recognising its potential to revolutionise energy systems, manufacturing, and advanced technologies. Australia risks falling behind if we do not prioritise fusion research now. Investing in fusion energy research will create high-skilled jobs, boost innovation, and position Australia as a leader in clean energy technologies. This is essential to secure our energy independence, support advanced industries, and remain competitive in the global economy.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy research program during this parliamentary term. This program should include significant funding for research and development, support for universities and research institutions, partnerships with industry, and clear regulatory frameworks to facilitate pilot projects. Early action will ensure that Australia leads the way in fusion energy research and benefits from the opportunities this transformative technology offers.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN7599)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's energy future should be guided by informed public opinion and an inclusive national dialogue. Fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless source of power that could transform Australia's energy landscape. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and poses minimal safety risks, making it an attractive option for communities. However, there has been little effort by the government to engage Australians on this emerging technology. A national survey would give Australians the opportunity to express their views on fusion energy, its potential benefits, and their expectations for government action. This would ensure that future energy policies reflect the views and aspirations of all Australians. We believe that an informed and engaged public is essential for building a successful and sustainable energy future.

We therefore ask the House to commission a national survey on Australians' views about fusion energy during this parliamentary term. This survey should be designed by independent experts, include diverse voices from all regions, and be publicly available to ensure transparency. The results should guide future government decisions on research, investment, and policy related to fusion energy, ensuring that Australia's energy future is built on a foundation of community support and understanding.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7600)

Nuclear Energy

Australia is at a crossroads when it comes to energy independence, affordability, and national security. Current bans on nuclear energy restrict our ability to diversify energy sources and create unnecessary confusion between fission and fusion. Fusion energy is a separate and safer technology that does not carry the same risks as fission. It produces no long-lived radioactive waste, has no meltdown risk, and uses widely available fuels such as deuterium from water and boron from common minerals.

By embracing fusion energy, Australia can secure a stable and sovereign energy future that delivers low-emission, affordable electricity without reliance on imported fossil fuels or uranium. Fusion will also enable new industries in defence, space, mining, advanced manufacturing, and water security, ensuring Australia is not left behind in the global energy race. With world-leading universities, skilled engineers, and an innovative workforce, Australia is well placed to participate in the growing international fusion industry.

We therefore ask the House to update Australia's energy laws to explicitly permit the research, development, and deployment of fusion energy, to invest in sovereign fusion infrastructure and workforce training, and to ensure that fusion is recognised as a safe, clean, and strategic option for Australia's energy and national security future.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7935)

Public Sector Governance

This petition of residents of Australia draws the attention of the House to the importance of maintaining strict political and religious neutrality within government institutions and parliamentary workplaces.

Australia is a secular democracy where the state does not endorse, promote, or oppose any religion or belief system. Public confidence in government depends on the clear separation between personal belief and official authority, particularly in decision-making roles that affect all Australians equally.

The visible display of personal religious, ideological, or political symbols by public officials while performing official duties can create perceptions of bias, unequal treatment, or influence—whether intended or not. This can undermine trust, heighten community anxiety, and weaken confidence in the impartial administration of laws and public services.

Many democratic nations maintain neutral dress and conduct standards for public officials to reinforce fairness, professionalism, and equality before the law. Such standards do not restrict private belief or worship, but ensure that official government spaces remain neutral, inclusive, and focused solely on public duty.

The petitioners submit that clear, consistent, and secular standards are necessary to protect institutional neutrality, public trust, and social cohesion in an increasingly diverse society.

We therefore ask the House to the House to:

Establish clear, neutral dress and conduct standards for government officials and parliamentary workplaces while performing official duties

Ensure that public institutions remain free from religious, political, or ideological symbolism that may imply state endorsement or bias

Protect freedom of belief while reinforcing the principle that government authority must remain impartial and secular

Apply any standards fairly, consistently, and without discrimination

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9073)

Racism

This petition of residents of Australia draws the attention of the House to concerns about the growing misuse of the term "racism" in public discourse, workplaces, education, and media, in ways that are inconsistent with Australian law and that cause serious personal, social, and psychological harm.

Under Australian law, racism is addressed through race-neutral legislation, including the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and corresponding state laws. These laws define racism as unfair treatment, discrimination, or vilification based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin, and apply equally to all people, regardless of background. Australian law does not limit racism to any single race, nor does it require historical power or privilege.

However, the term "racism" is increasingly used loosely, politically, or inaccurately, including as a personal accusation without lawful basis. Such misuse can cause reputational damage, emotional distress, mental anxiety, and social exclusion, and undermines the seriousness of genuine racism claims. False or reckless accusations also weaken public trust in anti-discrimination laws and harm social cohesion.

The petitioners believe that clarity, fairness, and consistency are essential to maintaining respect for Australia's equality-based legal framework and protecting individuals from unjust harm.

We therefore ask the House to the House to:

Reaffirm the legal, race-neutral definition of racism as set out in Australian law;

Promote public education to ensure the term "racism" is used accurately and responsibly;

Consider safeguards or consequences for the reckless or malicious misuse of the term where it causes demonstrable harm;

Ensure anti-racism protections remain strong while also protecting individuals from unfounded accusations.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9076)

Law Enforcement: Protests

We draw the attention of the House to the increasing use of face coverings, masks, balaclavas and other identity-concealing apparel during public protests in Australia. While peaceful protest is a fundamental democratic right, the concealment of identity during demonstrations undermines accountability, public safety, and community confidence.

Masked protests make it more difficult for law enforcement to identify individuals who engage in intimidation, harassment, property damage, or violence, and they can create fear and anxiety among the public and other participants. The use of face coverings to conceal identity is inconsistent with the principles of transparency and responsibility that underpin lawful and peaceful assembly.

Australia already accepts reasonable limits on protest activities in the interests of safety, order and the rights of others. Prohibiting identity-concealing face coverings at protests, with limited and clearly defined exceptions such as legitimate medical or safety reasons, would be a proportionate and reasonable measure.

Further, placing responsibility on protest organisers to ensure compliance would promote lawful conduct and deter misuse of protests for unlawful or intimidating purposes.

We therefore ask the House to introduce or amend legislation to prohibit the wearing of face coverings intended to conceal identity during public protests and demonstrations, except where genuinely required for medical or safety reasons, and to impose significant penalties on organizing bodies that permit or fail to prevent such breaches, in order to uphold public safety, accountability, and the integrity of peaceful protest in Australia.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN9077)

Sex Discrimination Commissioner

The petitioners, citizens and residents of Australia, draw the attention of the House to the importance of ensuring that senior statutory roles responsible for discrimination law, public guidance, and social cohesion are informed by appropriate professional expertise.

The office of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner plays a critical role in advising government, interpreting discrimination frameworks, and shaping public understanding of issues involving biological sex, gender identity, and equality before the law. These matters often involve complex biological, medical, and scientific considerations that require evidence-based understanding.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Review appointment criteria for the role of Sex Discrimination Commissioner to ensure formal access to qualified medical or biological expertise, either through appointment or mandated advisory mechanisms.

2. Support the development of a clear, evidence-based definition of biological sex for use in public policy and discrimination law, consistent with medical and scientific standards.

3. Ensure that public guidance and policy advice issued by this office is grounded in independent scientific evidence, while remaining respectful of all individuals and consistent with Australia's anti-discrimination framework.

These measures would strengthen public confidence, improve clarity in public discourse, and ensure that discrimination policy is informed by sound evidence, transparency, and fairness for all Australians.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9078)

Australian National Flag

The petitioners draw the attention of the House to concerns about acts that desecrate the Australian National Flag, including burning or deliberate destruction, which undermine social cohesion, public order, and respect for Australia's laws, institutions, and shared civic values.

The Australian flag is a national symbol representing the country's sovereignty, democratic freedoms, and the sacrifices made by past and present Australians. While peaceful protest is a protected right, acts that intentionally destroy or desecrate national symbols are widely viewed as disrespectful and contribute to community division, intimidation, and social tension.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Prohibit the deliberate burning or destruction of the Australian National Flag in Australia, with appropriate penalties, including fines and imprisonment of up to two years;

2. Impose fines on organisations or event organisers that knowingly permit or facilitate the burning or desecration of the Australian flag at public events;

3. Introduce civic education initiatives promoting respect for Australian symbols, laws, democratic values, and cultural unity;

4. Ensure that non-citizens who engage in serious acts of flag desecration are subject to appropriate visa consequences under existing migration and character provisions, consistent with due process and Australian law.

The petitioners submit that these measures would strengthen respect for national symbols, uphold public confidence in the rule of law, and reinforce shared civic responsibility in a diverse and democratic society.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9084)

Donations to Political Parties and Candidates

Transparent political donation rules are essential for maintaining public trust in Australia's democratic processes. Under current federal laws, donations below the disclosure threshold do not need to be publicly reported, and disclosures are often delayed for many months. This makes it difficult for the public to understand who is financially supporting political parties, candidates, and associated entities during election periods and throughout the year.

Improving transparency would help ensure that voters have timely and accurate information about significant financial contributions to political actors. Clearer and more consistent disclosure requirements would strengthen accountability, reduce opportunities for donation-splitting, and support confidence in the integrity of Australia's electoral system.

We therefore ask the House to :

- Require public disclosure of any political donation above $2,500 made to federal political parties, candidates, associated entities, or significant third-party campaigners;

- Introduce timely disclosure requirements to ensure that donation information is made publicly available as close as practicable to the time the donation is received;

- Strengthen rules to prevent donation-splitting across multiple entities for the purpose of avoiding disclosure;

- Ensure that improved transparency measures apply consistently across all relevant political actors to support fairness and public confidence in the electoral process

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9149)

Economy

Australia's national debt, projected to exceed $1 trillion, impacts long-term economic stability and essential services. A one-off, progressive debt reduction levy offers a responsible path to fiscal repair. Using an S-curve model, this levy would exempt low-income earners (under $18,201) while requiring modest contributions from most citizens and higher contributions from those with greater capacity. This approach ensures fairness while providing the Commonwealth with a sovereign fund to buffer against future shocks. To ensure public trust, all revenue must be ring-fenced exclusively for debt reduction and social resilience projects—specifically excluding defence procurement—to directly improve the quality of life for all Australians.

We therefore ask the House to :

1 Introduce a one-off national debt reduction levy using a progressive S-curve model with low-income exemptions;

2 Allow contributions to be paid over ten years, indexed to CPI, with tax-reduction incentives for early completion;

3 Legislate that all funds raised be used exclusively for national debt reduction and social resilience;

4 Explicitly prohibit the use of these funds for defence procurement;

5 Ensure transparent reporting to the public on the levy's impact on national fiscal strength.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9150)

Railways

Australia's interstate rail network remains hampered by single-track sections and inconsistent track gauges, creating bottlenecks that hinder progress towards Net Zero. Road freight produces more than an order of magnitude higher emissions per tonne-kilometre than rail, yet our national system still relies on outdated sequencing and 'breaks of gauge', where freight must be transferred between incompatible rail systems, adding delay and cost. To meet climate targets and secure our sovereign supply chain, the national network must be modernised to support interoperable standard-gauge and continuous dual-track operation. This proposal forms a critical extension to the Inland Rail project, ensuring its benefits reach the Adelaide-Tarcoola, Adelaide-Melbourne, Melbourne-Sydney and East Coast corridors. While High-Speed Rail (HSR) focuses on new passenger routes, standardising and duplicating existing lines across every State and territory delivers immediate freight efficiency and enables high-performance regional passenger services nationwide.

We therefore ask the House to prioritise and fund a phased standardisation and track duplication of the National Land Transport Network, including both mainland and Tasmanian systems. We request that infrastructure standards be set at 200 km/h for passenger services and 140 km/h for freight, ensuring rail can realistically compete with road and air transport. This work should commence immediately, independent of long-term HSR timelines, to strengthen Australia's supply-chain resilience and support achievement of our 2050 Net Zero obligations through rapid rail decarbonisation.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9163)

Workplace Relations

Australia's standard 38-hour workweek was designed for an industrial era that no longer reflects modern productivity, technology, or workforce wellbeing. Advances in automation, digital tools, and artificial intelligence have significantly increased output per worker, yet working hours have remained largely unchanged. Ensuring reasonable working hours is a long-standing principle of Australia's workplace system, grounded in fairness, dignity, and the right of all people to participate fully in society. A universal 32-hour workweek would extend this principle to reflect modern productivity levels, improve work-life balance, support gender equity, reduce burnout, and give Australians more time to engage in family life, community, and the broader economy.

We therefore ask the House to legislate a national 32-hour standard workweek with no loss of pay; support a phased national transition with flexibility for sector-specific implementation where appropriate; strengthen protections against unpaid overtime; and ensure that productivity gains from automation and successful international trials are shared with all workers through reduced working hours, recognising a universal 32-hour week as a modern workplace right that promotes work-life balance, gender equity, and fuller economic participation rather than increased workload.

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN9168)

Consumer Protection: Housing

Real-estate agents are doing shifty stuff

We therefore ask the House to investigate laws on which real-estate agent operate under and consider harsher penalties for doing wrong

Example. Agents altering pictures to make house better than it is . Putting house plans on pics to show what could be .they should be advertising the value generals estimated price on signs. / if the value is $300.000 it should be on a sign . Not just put up real-estate value $600.000. Example values ……

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9525)

Functional Neurological Disorder

FND is:

• The second most common reason, after headache, that people present to neurologists (Stone et al., 2009).

• Responsible for 15-30% of acute neurological presentations to hospital (Mishra & Pandey, 2022).

• Estimated to affect 80-140 people per 100,000, equating to up to 39,000 Australians living with FND (Finkelstein et al., 2025).

Despite this prevalence, structured treatment pathways remain largely unavailable across Australia.

Early diagnosis and access to FND-specific multidisciplinary therapy significantly improve prognosis (Gelauff et al., 2019; Gelauff & Stone, 2016). However:

• Awareness across health professions remains low (Stone, Reuber, & Carson, 2013).

• Many clinicians report limited training and negative attitudes towards FND (Lehn et al., 2019).

• Patients frequently experience fragmented care and fall between neurology, mental health, rehabilitation and disability systems (Perez et al., 2018).

• An Australian study has identified "surplus suffering" created by healthcare systems themselves (Sinclair et al., 2025).

Without targeted early intervention, individuals risk long-term disability, workforce exit, financial hardship and increased reliance on hospital services and the NDIS.

We therefore ask the House to support the implementation of a Medicare funded Dedicated FND Care Plan.

Australians living with FND require a Medicare-funded, structured multidisciplinary treatment plan, specifically tailored to FND, to avoid long term disability.

A Medicare FND Care Plan should include access to at least 60 annual Medicare funded allied health outpatient sessions including at least two of the following disciplines:

• Neuro-physiotherapy

• Occupational therapy

• Speech pathology

• Psychology

• Care coordination.

Evidence consistently demonstrates that intense multidisciplinary early intervention model is the most effective treatment pathway for FND.

Without this structured support, patients risk preventable chronic disability.

from 4,415 citizens (Petition No. EN9549)

Australian National Flag

The current national symbols lack visual cohesion. While the Australia Act 1986 established full legal independence, and the 1984/1986 proclamations established green and gold as our national colours and the kangaroo as our mascot, the national flag remains non-compliant with this modern visual identity. There is currently no official flag that exclusively represents these established Australian symbols.

We therefore ask the House to Request the Governor-General, under Section 5 of the Flags Act 1953, to proclaim a new "Australian National Colours Flag." This flag should incorporate green, gold, and the kangaroo. Consistent with the 1995 precedent for the Aboriginal Flag, this design should be appointed as a "flag of significance to the Australian nation generally," to be flown alongside the National Flag.

from 110 citizens (Petition No. EN9551)

National Security

Australia has consistently expressed concern for the protection of vulnerable women and children in conflict settings. We ask that this principle be applied to Australian women and children currently detained in camps in northeast Syria.

Australian citizens remain in these camps following the collapse of Islamic State territory. Prolonged detention in unstable conditions places them outside Australian legal jurisdiction and oversight. Some of those detained are Australian-born children who have not been charged with any offence.

Repatriation under strict security controls would allow Australian authorities to investigate and prosecute where evidence exists, and to apply appropriate counter-terrorism measures including monitoring and control orders. Managing these matters within Australia enables accountability under Australian law and structured risk management.

We believe the Australian Government should establish a clear, security-led framework to prioritise the return of women and children, ensuring national safety while upholding Australia's legal and humanitarian responsibilities.

We therefore ask the House to call upon the Australian Government to establish and implement a clear, security-led process for the controlled repatriation of Australian women and children detained in northeast Syria, prioritising the return of children and ensuring that any adult returnees are subject to investigation and appropriate legal processes under Australian law.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN9552)

Glyphosate

RoundUp is a herbicide, its main ingredient is the glyphosate which is a proven carcinogen. Bayer and/or subsidiary Monsanto were several times obliged to pay compensations to victims who contacted various cancers from the use of RoundUp, when gardening. At last count 7.25 billions of dollars will be paid out in compensation, still the sale of RoundUp continues all around in Australia, poisoning the soil and water.

Glyphosate is even used drying certain produces (oats) which is horrendous. The drying of produce is banned in Europe, in Germany France Netherlands Hungary Austria Luxembourg Belgium. In addition, glyphosate is a strong chelator, siphoning out of the soil its beneficial minerals as magnesium, copper, manganese, zinc, calcium and iron; reducing the soil's nutrients to practically zero, leading to mineral deficient people.

We therefore ask the House to consider the raising costs of HealthCare, the health of the people of Australia and ban the sale of the glyphosate containing RoundUp.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN9553)

Labor Government

Since December 14 2025

The Australian public have been gaslit at every opportunity by the Albanese Government.

They can not call out Islamic extremism and in fact have introduced potential draconian laws that target every day Australians who speak out for their free speech as well as creating further divisions in Australia's social cohesion.

These laws also target firearms owners who have absolutely no relationship with the atrocities committed on Bondi Beach.

We therefore respectfully ask that there is a vote of no confidence in the Labor Government

We therefore ask the House to vote of no confidence in the Labor government

from 35 citizens (Petition No. EN9556)

Capital Punishment

For the death penalty to come back for sex offenders as they continue to reoffend

We therefore ask the House to bring back the death penalty for child sex offenders as they continue to reoffend

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN9558)

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

Australia maintains a robust legal framework, including the Autonomous Sanctions (Magnitsky-style) Regulations 2021 and a comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing stance (AML/CTF), to uphold the integrity of our financial markets. It is essential that these mechanisms are applied with rigor to ensure Australia remains a global leader in transparency and human rights.

Effective and consistent application of these measures is essential to maintaining the integrity of Australia's legal, financial and migration systems and ensuring alignment with the objectives of the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011.

This petition draws to the attention of the House the documented role of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and associated officials in systemic human rights violations and financial irregularities. Operating independently of civilian oversight, these entities have reportedly diverted significant resources from the Iranian people. We are concerned that Australia's stable economy may inadvertently attract associates of the regime seeking to protect assets or circumvent international sanctions.

We therefore ask the House to

1.⁠ ⁠Utilise existing powers under the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 to designate IRGC officials and associates involved in human rights abuses or systemic corruption.

2.⁠ ⁠Authorise the investigation and, where appropriate, the freezing of Australian-based assets held by regime officials and their families when linked to corruption or sanctions evasion.

3.⁠ ⁠Implement targeted financial sanctions and travel restrictions to ensure Australia does not provide a haven for those responsible for serious violations of international laws.

4.⁠ ⁠Demonstrate international leadership by closing regulatory gaps that allow the exploitation of the Australian financial system by corrupt individuals.

from 33 citizens (Petition No. EN9559)

Foreign Donations

Public confidence in democracy requires transparency. Existing safeguards may not adequately disclose or regulate foreign influence, lobbying, donations, and policy coordination affecting Australian government decisions.

We therefore ask the House to establish an independent inquiry to review foreign influence on government decision-making and the adequacy of current transparency and accountability laws.

from 53 citizens (Petition No. EN9562)

Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency

Many Australians have raised concerns regarding the timeliness, transparency and consistency of complaint handling processes within the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and associated National Boards.

Members of the public have reported significant delays in complaint assessments, dismissal of concerns without clear explanation, and limited transparency surrounding investigative and decision-making processes.

Recent public scrutiny of regulatory oversight in high-profile cases has further increased community concern regarding whether existing governance, accountability and oversight mechanisms are sufficient to protect patients and maintain public confidence in the national health practitioner regulatory system.

These concerns highlight the importance of ensuring regulatory bodies operate with independence, procedural fairness, transparency and accountability.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Establish an independent inquiry into AHPRA governance and complaint handling processes.

   2. Examine the transparency, timeliness and consistency of investigations and regulatory decision-making.

   3. Assess potential structural conflicts of interest within National Boards.

   4. Recommend reforms to strengthen public protection, accountability and trust in the regulatory system.

from 543 citizens (Petition No. EN9563)

Cybersafety

The petitioner draws to the attention of the House that children in Australia can currently access online services containing P0rnograpgic (to be referred to as adults only material)material with minimal or no barriers. This is inconsistent with emerging national efforts to limit children's access to social media platforms, where age limits and safety measures are increasingly required to protect young people from harmful or developmentally inappropriate digital environments. If social media platforms, designed primarily for communication, require age-based protections, then online services hosting adults-only material should be subject to at least equivalent safeguards.

Research in developmental neuroscience and psychology indicates that early access to highly stimulating adults-only digital material can affect the developing brain. Studies have shown that repeated exposure to such content may influence reward pathways, shape unrealistic expectations about relationships and consent, and interfere with emotional regulation during adolescence. The petitioner is concerned that without effective age-verification requirements, children remain vulnerable to material that is not appropriate for their stage of cognitive, emotional, and social development.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation requiring all online providers of restricted-age material accessible in Australia to implement robust, privacy-preserving age-verification systems; ensure such systems comply with Australian privacy standards and independent oversight; align access controls with child-protection principles already applied to social media; commission updated research into developmental impacts; and establish a compliance framework with meaningful penalties

from one citizen (Petition No. EN9564)

Parliamentary Standards

In any work place across Australia, employees are typically subjected to drug and alcohol testing, regardless of the importance of their role. Being subjected to drug and alcohol testing can also occur when your colleague or work mate suspects you of being under the influence.

So why is it that elected officials, who are typically at the pinnacle of decision making are exempt from randomised drug and alcohol testing, or when they are under the suspicion of being intoxicated? Politicians are expected to maintain a high order of professionalism, as the choices they make have serious consequences for millions of Australians.

There is no excuse for any politician who engages in parliamentary decisions while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs.

We therefore ask the House to implement on the spot randomised drug testing. Furthermore, a process needs to be established where sitting members can refer the administration of a drug and alcohol test to their peers who they collectively believe to be under the influence.

Members who fail a drug and alcohol test are to be removed from parliament immediately, preventing them from voting on matters while intoxicated. They also are to be immediately referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission for investigation into misconduct.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9565)

Cleft and Craniofacial Conditions

While Medicare will subsidise reconstructive surgeries to help correct clefts and craniofacial abnormalities, there are no rebates for modern, non-surgical interventions like facial fillers, Botox and scar reduction treatments.

These treatments can correct abnormalities and treat scarring where surgical interventions are not effective.

Some of these treatments are also already subsidised to treat other conditions, but cleft and craniofacial patients can be left thousands out of pocket at each appointment.

We call for these interventions to be subsidised for patients diagnosed with a cleft or craniofacial condition by a health professional, and when administered by sufficiently qualified medical professionals.

We therefore ask the House to subsidise non-surgical interventions for cleft and craniofacial patients through the Medicare Benefits Schedule.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9566)

Australian Constitution

The British monarchy are a distant and uninvolved institution. That have degenerated into a tawdry soap opera of poor moral judgement. They do not represent Australian ideals and are not suitable to be held up as an example of aspirational leadership.

We therefore ask the House to present a national referendum to citizens of Australia containing the question: Do you believe that Australia should reject the British monarch as Australian head of state? Yes/No

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9568)

Bill of Rights

Australia is one of the few liberal democracies without a comprehensive bill of rights, and there are compelling reasons to introduce one.

First, it would provide explicit, enforceable protections for fundamental freedoms—speech, religion, assembly, and privacy—that currently rely on common law or implied constitutional rights, both of which are fragile and inconsistent.

Second, it would offer a check on government overreach, ensuring that legislation cannot easily strip citizens of basic rights without scrutiny.

Third, it would protect minorities and vulnerable groups from the tyranny of the majority, something parliamentary majorities alone cannot guarantee.

Fourth, it would bring Australia into fuller alignment with its international human rights obligations, including the ICCPR, which it has ratified but not fully incorporated into domestic law.

Fifth, it would empower individuals to seek redress through the courts rather than relying solely on political goodwill.

Finally, countries with similar legal traditions—the UK, Canada, and New Zealand—have adopted human rights frameworks without sacrificing parliamentary sovereignty, demonstrating it is practically achievable.

A well-designed bill of rights need not hamstring parliament; it can simply require that rights be taken seriously before they are overridden.

We therefore ask the House to draft and pass legislation to achieve this petitioned goal of a Bill of Rights for all Australians.

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN9569)

Veterans Heart Health Program

The Department of Veterans' Affairs currently funds the Veterans Heart Health Program, however, eligibility is restricted to veterans with qualifying operational service.

Many veterans who served only in Australia—including those exposed to chronic stress, long-term physical strain, irregular hours, and training environments—are unable to access the program despite experiencing elevated cardiovascular risk factors comparable to operational veterans.

The restriction therefore creates a health disparity where prevention is based on service classification rather than medical risk.

Preventive care is significantly more cost-effective than late-stage cardiac treatment and reduces long-term healthcare burden on both veterans and the commonwealth.

We therefore ask the House to undertake such necessary action that results in eligibility being extended to the Veterans Heart Health Program to all Australian Defence Force veterans, regardless of operational service

from 72 citizens (Petition No. EN9570)

Food Labelling: Allergens

Approximately 1.8 million Australians have food allergies, and the country has one of the highest reported rates of childhood food allergy in the world, affecting around 1 in 10 infants. In addition, coeliac disease affects an estimated 1 in 70 Australians. Both conditions require clear and accurate food information to prevent serious health consequences, including hospitalisation or death.

While packaged foods are subject to mandatory allergen labelling requirements, there is no nationally consistent standard requiring restaurants, cafés, and other food service venues to clearly disclose priority allergens on menus or ensure structured staff training. Allergen information in these settings is often inconsistent, unclear, or dependent on individual staff knowledge.

There is also no requirement for venues to maintain accessible written ingredient information, leaving people with medically necessary food restrictions vulnerable to mistakes and miscommunication.

Comparable jurisdictions, including countries in the European Union, have formalised rules for displaying major allergens in food service settings. Similar nationally consistent measures could be implemented in Australia to improve public health, safety, and consumer confidence.

We therefore ask the House to introduce nationally consistent, mandatory standards for allergen management in restaurants, cafés and other food service venues, including:

Clear disclosure of priority allergens on menus under a standardised key.

A requirement for food service venues to maintain and be able to provide, upon request, accurate written ingredient information for menu items.

Mandatory food allergy training requirements for hospitality staff.

A review of the use of precautionary allergen statements in food service settings.

from 4,122 citizens (Petition No. EN9575)

New Zealand Citizen Family Relationship Visa

We have to wait for our Nz Citizen partners to become Australian citizens,Every year we pay taxes,Medicare Levy,Health insurance,Character Checks wherever the 5 year visa ends.

We therefore ask the House to give a straight to permanent resident Visa for 461 visa holders.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9581)

New Zealand Citizen Family Relationship Visa

Subclass 461 (New Zealand Citizen Family Relationship) visa holders are lawful residents of Australia who live and work alongside Australian citizens and permanent residents.

Many Subclass 461 visa holders have resided in Australia for several years, maintaining continuous employment, paying taxes, raising children, and contributing to local communities and businesses.

Despite their long-term residence and economic contribution, Subclass 461 visa holders do not currently have a direct or structured pathway to permanent residency. This creates ongoing uncertainty for families who have established genuine and lasting ties to Australia.

Many affected families have Australian-born children, long-term employment, and deep community connections. The absence of a clear pathway limits long-term stability and planning for families who are already contributing members of Australian society.

We therefore ask the House to introduce a clear and accessible pathway to permanent residency for eligible Subclass 461 (New Zealand Citizen Family Relationship) visa holders who have demonstrated long-term lawful residence, consistent employment, tax contributions, good character, and genuine ties to Australia.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN9582)

Biosecurity

Certain countries continue continue dangerous biological research for little reward. An example is a sars cov virus GX_P2V which mutated in lab into GX_P2V(short_3UTR) which has a 100% fatality rate in human ace 2 transgenic mice.

If we have a lab leak what next?

We therefore ask the House to mandate that 100% of funds for infectious disease or genetic research must be spent within Australian territory and only in facilities certified by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR).

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9583)

Daylight Saving

In summer, Australia goes from having 3 time zones to 5 time zones, which can be quite confusing, not just from a business perspective, but also from a tourist perspective. The state of Queensland is a prime example, especially in the southeast corner with its close proximity to the border. Because of the Earth's tilt, the southeast corner sees the sun rise at around 4:30am compared to the north and western parts of the state. Meanwhile over the border in Tweed Heads, the sun rises at 5:30am.

If the southeastern corner of Queensland had daylight savings, this would allow those who work over the border less hassle and confusion of dealing with the 1 hour time difference and allow residents/tourists to enjoy more time in daylight after work, especially in a tourist centric centre like the Gold Coast.

The last referendum was held in 1992, where the majority of Queenslanders (Those in rural and western areas) were strongly opposed, yet no dedicated referendum was held since.

Things have changed in 35 years and we, the citizens of SE Queensland deserve to be brought in line with the rest of the east coast.

We therefore ask the House to over-rule the Queensland Government's decision not to implement daylight savings and bring the southeast corner of Queensland (Gold Coast to Sunshine Coast) in line with the rest of the east coast of Australia in the summer months.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9584)

International Students

On 1 March 2026, the Visa Application Charge (VAC) for the Temporary Graduate visa (Subclass 485) increased from AUD $2,300 to AUD $4,600, a 100% rise implemented without prior notice or transitional arrangements.

This sudden increase has placed a significant and unexpected financial burden on international students who completed or were completing their studies in early 2026. Many graduates traditionally lodge their Subclass 485 applications in March after finishing their courses in late February. These students made financial and career plans in good faith based on the previously published fee.

While the Government may adjust visa charges, an immediate doubling of the fee raises concerns about proportionality, fairness, and policy predictability. A phased increase or reasonable notice period would have reduced financial shock and allowed affected students time to adjust.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Introduce transitional arrangements allowing students who completed or were completing their studies before or shortly after 1 March 2026 to apply at the previous fee of AUD $2,300; or

2. Implement the increase in phased stages rather than as an immediate 100% rise; and

3. Provide adequate advance notice for significant visa fee changes in the future.

These measures would promote fairness, transparency, and confidence in Australia's migration system while protecting students who acted in good faith.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9585)

Mental Health

Australia is experiencing unprecedented demand for mental health services. At the same time, digital tools, artificial intelligence and online therapeutic supports are rapidly entering clinical practice. Innovation is welcome but ungoverned digital mental health care is not.

Clients deserve safety, practitioners deserve clarity, and the public deserves regulatory leadership.

Currently in Australia:

• Digital mental health tools operate under inconsistent oversight


• Some AI-enabled services provide interactions without clear practitioner visibility


• Regulatory boundaries between wellness tools and regulated health services are blurred


• Funding mechanisms do not distinguish between governed clinical infrastructure and consumer AI products

This creates risk.

Without clear governance, digital mental health systems may:

• Operate outside professional competency standards


• Avoid therapeutic goods classification while delivering therapeutic advice


• Store sensitive data offshore without transparency


• Provide AI-generated mental health guidance without clinician visibility


• Create unmanaged duty-of-care exposure

This is not sustainable.

Mental health care is not a tech experiment. When therapeutic advice is delivered, risk is real.

The Australian public should not have to determine which digital platforms are safe. That is the role of policy, regulation and governance. Digital mental health can strengthen the system but only if it is built on accountability.

We therefore ask the House to

• Establish enforceable governance standards


• Clarify regulatory boundaries


• Prioritise compliant infrastructure in funding models


• Protect practitioners from unclear digital risk exposure


• Protect the public from unregulated therapeutic AI

Digital innovation must not outpace safety.

from 123 citizens (Petition No. EN9586)

Freedom of Speech

I believe that everyone should have the right to say/express what they want to even though the terrosist attack on Bondi says otherwise but the fact is that people feel like they cannot express anything in Australia and theirfore should be allowed freedom of speech as a right not as implied freedom of speech

We therefore ask the House to make freedom of speech a right not an implied freedom of speech law

from 29 citizens (Petition No. EN9588)

Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction

1. Protect Ocean Biodiversity

The High Seas Treaty ensures the conservation and sustainable use of marine life in areas beyond national jurisdiction, safeguarding fragile ecosystems and species from overfishing and habitat loss.

2. Fulfil International Commitments

Australia has signed the treaty and joining fully requires domestic legislation. Implementing it demonstrates Australia's commitment to global environmental leadership and international law.

3. Promote Sustainable Use

The treaty establishes rules for responsible scientific research, marine protected areas, and sharing benefits from marine genetic resources, ensuring high seas activities are sustainable.

4. Address Climate & Environmental Challenges

Healthy oceans regulate climate, support fisheries, and maintain biodiversity. Domestic implementation will help Australia contribute to global efforts to combat climate change and ocean degradation.

5. Public Support & Accountability

Australians expect the government to act on international environmental agreements. Passing legislation ensures transparency, accountability, and enforcement of the treaty domestically.

We therefore ask the House to pass legislation to implement the High Seas Treaty (BBNJ Agreement) into Australian law.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9589)

Taxation

Documents released by the US Department of Justice in early 2026 include a June 2010 email from former UK politician Peter Mandelson to Jeffrey Epstein. In it, Mandelson shared mining industry strategy materials from Xstrata and urged building a broad coalition to apply sustained pressure on the Australian government to abandon its proposed 40% Resource Super Profits Tax (RSPT). This occurred weeks before Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was removed as Labor leader amid opposition to the tax. The involvement of a foreign figure linked to a convicted sex offender in influencing Australian policy raises serious questions about external interference in domestic decisions.

We therefore ask the House to

establish or refer to an appropriate committee an inquiry into foreign involvement in the 2010 opposition to the Resource Super Profits Tax, with particular reference to the communications in the Jeffrey Epstein documents released in 2026, to assess any implications for national sovereignty and policy integrity, and to make recommendations to strengthen safeguards.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN9590)

Mujahedin-e Khalq

The Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) also known as People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI) and its affiliate, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), have a well-documented history of terrorism, violence, and coercive internal practices.

Credible reporting and government records confirm the group's involvement in targeted killings of U.S. personnel in the 1970s, cooperation with Saddam Hussein's regime, and other acts of politically motivated violence.

In 1992, MEK operatives carried out coordinated attacks on Iranian diplomatic missions worldwide, including the Iranian Embassy, demonstrating both operational capacity and intent to conduct international violent actions. The organisation was formally designated as a terrorist organisation by the United States and other jurisdictions due to its violent activities

Extensive testimony from former members and investigative reporting further detail coercive and cult-like practices within the organisation, including forced family separations and other serious abuses. These patterns of conduct are incompatible with democratic principles and pose reputational and security risks.

Allowing such organisations to operate, fundraise, or lobby in Australia without scrutiny risks undermining public safety and the integrity of our democratic institutions.

We therefore ask the House to esentatives to urge the Federal Government to formally assess and immediately list the MEK and its affiliated entities as terrorist organisations under the Criminal Code to protect Australia's national security and democratic values.

from 2,324 citizens (Petition No. EN9592)

Australian Parliament

The Australian Parliament has a long-standing tradition of opening proceedings with the Lord's Prayer, reflecting the nation's historical and cultural foundations. In recent times, religious texts from other faiths have been read during parliamentary sessions. Many Australians believe that introducing diverse religious readings into official parliamentary proceedings goes beyond representation and risks blurring the boundary between the state and religion. Australia is a secular democracy, and parliamentary proceedings should reflect that principle by maintaining a consistent, neutral approach to religious expression that does not favour or elevate any particular faith.

We therefore ask the House to Representatives to:

Review the current guidelines governing religious observance and readings in parliamentary proceedings.

Establish a clear, formal policy that limits religious expression in Parliament to the existing agreed ceremonial practices, ensuring no additional religious texts or prayers from any faith are introduced into official proceedings without broad parliamentary consensus.

Ensure that any changes to religious protocols in Parliament are subject to a transparent public consultation process before adoption.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9594)

Fuel

Recent geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, specifically the bombing and retaliatory attacks involving Iran, has contributed to volatility in global oil markets and rising fuel costs. While genuine global supply risks can affect wholesale prices, many Australian motorists and consumer advocates have raised concerns that some fuel companies are using the situation as a pretext to inflate retail prices unfairly.

Fuel is not a luxury, it is a necessity. Millions of Australians rely on affordable fuel to commute to work, transport children to school, run small businesses, deliver goods, access healthcare, and maintain essential services. Rising fuel prices are placing significant financial strain on families, workers, farmers, and regional communities who often have no viable public transport alternatives.

We therefore ask the House to take necessary and appropriate measures to reduce the cost of fuel through some if not all the following means:

Review and reduce the fuel excise where possible.

Increase transparency around fuel pricing and market practices.

Strengthen oversight of fuel retailers to prevent price gouging.

Provide targeted relief for regional and rural Australians.

Explore long-term strategies to stabilise fuel prices and reduce cost-of-living pressures.

These measures should be considered to prevent fuel from inflating to prices as high as $3/litre and help get it back below $2/litre to ease the cost of living strain on households across the nation.

from 231 citizens (Petition No. EN9595)

Iran

For nearly 48 years, many people in Iran have lived under a system widely criticised for restricting fundamental human rights and freedoms.

Reports describe men, women and even children being arrested, beaten or imprisoned for peacefully protesting or speaking out for basic rights such as freedom of expression and equality. Many Iranians also face serious economic hardship despite the country's natural resources.

Families struggle with rising living costs, unemployment and poverty, while many believe the nation's wealth has not benefited its people. Iran is one of the world's oldest civilisations, historically known as Persia. It was the birthplace of Zoroastrianism, one of the world's oldest religions, founded on principles of truth and justice. Persia is also associated with early ideas of human rights and respect for human dignity.

We therefore ask the House to lly call for greater international attention to human rights conditions in Iran and support for the Iranian people's right to peacefully pursue freedom, dignity and democratic reform. We support the establishment of a secular and democratic system of governance that respects human rights, equality and freedom of belief.

We also recognise the right of the Iranian people to determine their future leadership, with many Iranians viewing Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi as a trusted figure who could help guide a peaceful transition toward a democratic future.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN9597)

Proof of Identity

When applying for essential services online, such as bank accounts or telecommunications plans, Australians are frequently required to provide a Driver's Licence or Passport for digital identity verification. Businesses relying on the federal Document Verification Service (DVS) often choose not to accept valid State and Territory Photo Cards, as they program their onboarding systems for majority convenience rather than universal accessibility.

This creates a systemic barrier and indirect discrimination against individuals who cannot obtain a driver's licence or travel overseas due to disability, medical conditions, age, or income constraints. These individuals are unfairly forced to visit physical branches to prove their identity, locking vulnerable Australians out of the digital economy.

While State Governments issue Photo Cards, the financial and telecommunications sectors, alongside the national digital identity frameworks, are regulated by the Federal Government. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure equitable access to essential digital services for all Australians, regardless of their ability to drive.

We therefore ask the House to legislate a mandate requiring all federally regulated businesses that use the Document Verification Service (DVS) or national digital identity frameworks for customer onboarding to accept valid State and Territory Photo Cards as primary identification, in all instances where a Driver's Licence and passport is currently accepted.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9598)

Veterans

Statements of Principles determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority establish the medical-scientific framework used to determine whether injuries, diseases, or deaths of veterans may be related to military service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986...

These instruments have significant consequences for Australian veterans and their families because they determine the causal pathways by which liability for service-related conditions may be established...

Under the current legislative framework, a request for review of a Statement of Principles by the Specialist Medical Review Council must be lodged within three months...

However, the Act allows the Repatriation Medical Authority to decline to undertake a further investigation into a condition where the Authority has conducted an investigation into that condition within the previous twelve months...

This creates an imbalance in the statutory framework. While veterans must act within a short three-month period to seek review, the Authority may decline to consider new medical-scientific evidence for up to twelve months following an investigation...

Medical research evolves continuously and credible new evidence concerning the causes of injury or disease may emerge shortly after an investigation has concluded...

We therefore ask the House to to amend the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 so that the period in which the Repatriation Medical Authority may decline to undertake a further investigation is reduced from twelve months to three months, aligning the Authority's discretion with the review timeframe applying to veterans.

from 73 citizens (Petition No. EN9600)

Middle East

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives

This petition of the undersigned draws to the attention of the House the killing of school girls under the age of 12 at Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school in southern Iran, which killed more than 160 children following a US/Isreali strike.

The deaths of children in places of education represent a grave tragedy and raise serious concerns under international humanitarian law regarding the protection of civilians and educational institutions during armed conflict.

We therefore ask the House to Publicly condemn the killing of schoolchildren in Iran.

Call for an independent international investigation into the incident.

• Urge Israel and the United States to respect international humanitarian law and ensure the protection of civilians and children.

from 125 citizens (Petition No. EN9601)

Family Law

Child support should be calculated using income that is stable, predictable, and sustainable. Overtime earnings are often inconsistent and depend on workplace demand, economic conditions, and personal availability. Many parents work additional hours to manage rising living costs, debts, or other responsibilities, and these hours are not guaranteed year to year. Including overtime in income assessments can create unrealistic financial obligations and discourage parents from taking on extra work when opportunities arise. A fair system should reflect a parent's regular base income from contracted hours, ensuring child support obligations remain balanced, transparent, and sustainable while continuing to prioritise the financial wellbeing and support of children.

We therefore ask the House to take the following actions to improve fairness and transparency in the child support system:

Initiate a formal review of child support income assessment policies to ensure calculations reflect stable and reliable earnings.

Legislate or amend guidelines so that overtime and irregular income are excluded from standard annual income calculations used to determine child support obligations.

Define base income clearly as contracted or regular salary, ensuring assessments are predictable and sustainable.

Consult with working parents, family law professionals, and community stakeholders to ensure policies reflect modern employment conditions.

Implement fair and consistent reforms that continue to support children while recognising the realities of variable work hours.

These changes would strengthen confidence in the child support system, encourage workforce participation, and ensure obligations are based on realistic and dependable income, creating a fairer outcome for families and children across the country.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9603)

Public Sector Governance

On 20th October 2015, Senator Heffernan brought to Parliament and Australias attention, official documents presented during the Wood Royal Commission and again during Royal Commission into Ritual and Sexual Abuse within Institutions. These documents include police documents, naming 28 high profile paedophiles, including one former Prime Minister. Investigation into these documents were stopped. The government and Judiciary have been noted suppressing these documents with orders for 90 years, choosing not to investigate as the public would 'lose faith in the judiciary'. The public have already lost faith in the Government and Judiciary. This is compounded by these suppression orders. We the Australians with integrity and honour stand against these suppression orders and wish to protect our children. We insist these people and institutions be fully investigated, and held to account, including those whom have chosen to cover and suppress any investigations.

We therefore ask the House to therefore ask the House to 1: Lift the 90 year Suppression Orders on these documents. 2: Create and support permanently, Independent Corruption and Integrity Commission to investigate ANY and ALL corruption exposed within Government, Judiciary and other formal Institutions. 3: Investigate these particular documents suppressed, and bring those guilty to account. 4: Bring justice to the victims and survivors, by exposing those people and systems in place that are corrupt and currently hidden. 5: Clean the institutions of all corruption

from 51 citizens (Petition No. EN9604)

Middle East

We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned by the ongoing humanitarian crises in the Middle East. We draw the attention of the House to the significant loss of civilian life and the destruction of essential infrastructure in Gaza and surrounding regions. We are concerned that Australia's current diplomatic and strategic alignment may contribute to violations of international humanitarian law and the continued displacement of populations.

Recent reports from international human rights organizations and findings from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have raised grave concerns regarding the legality of military occupations, the use of starvation as a weapon of war, and the systematic oppression of civilian populations. We believe that Australia's military exports, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic support for parties involved in these conflicts must be scrutinized to ensure they do not breach our obligations under the Genocide Convention and the Arms Trade Treaty.

We therefore ask the House to We therefore ask the House to:

1. Call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in the Middle East and the full withdrawal of military forces from occupied territories.

2. Suspend all military exports and defense cooperation with parties currently under investigation for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

3. Initiate an independent inquiry into Australia's role in regional conflicts, ensuring our foreign policy prioritises human rights and adheres to the rulings of the International Court of Justice.

4. Increase humanitarian aid to the region and advocate for the unhindered delivery of food, water, and medical supplies to civilian populations.

from 30 citizens (Petition No. EN9606)

Middle East

On March 4, 2026, the Iranian vessel IRIS Dena was destroyed by a U.S. torpedo in international waters off Sri Lanka. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed on March 6 that three Royal Australian Navy personnel were embedded on the attacking vessel. Reports indicate the IRIS Dena was unarmed and returning from the MILAN 2026 multinational exercise. Furthermore, the failure of the attacking vessel to render aid to over 80 shipwrecked sailors constitutes a serious allegation of a breach of the Second Geneva Convention. Under Division 268 of the Criminal Code Act 1995, Australia has a legal obligation to investigate potential war crimes involving its personnel, including acts of complicity or aiding and abetting.

We therefore ask the House to ask the House to direct the Minister for Defence to:

​Refer the conduct of the three Australian personnel to the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) for a formal war crimes investigation.

​Disclose the specific Rules of Engagement under which Australian personnel are embedded with foreign militaries in the Indian Ocean.

​Provide a transparent report to the House on whether Australian technical or tactical support contributed to the strike on a non-military target and the subsequent failure to render assistance to survivors.he House to

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN9607)

Parliamentarians' Entitlements

Federal MPs receive a $322 nightly travel allowance in Canberra, which many use to pay off private mortgages. This single night's allowance equals a weekly grocery budget for a family of three. Furthermore, while the national debt hits $1 trillion, taxpayers fund private cars and unlimited fuel for 227 MPs, many of whom refuse to switch to electric vehicles despite pushing "Net Zero" targets. This creates a massive disconnect between the government and struggling Australian families.

We therefore ask the House to

Abolish the 'own-home' mortgage allowance in Canberra.

Mandate that MPs lease their own vehicles and claim work kilometres via the ATO at tax time like regular workers.

Implement individual means-testing for the $116,000 resettlement 'golden handshake' for outgoing politicians.

Stop taxpayer-funded lifelong office and staff allowances for former Prime Ministers.

from 56 citizens (Petition No. EN9608)

Personal Information and Privacy

Digital ID usage is invasive and detrimental to our privacy as citizens of Australia. Ceasing requirements for them, including on mature sites, is the best way to go. Continuing to require IDs will lead down a pathway of censorship and the web will no longer be open as it used to be. Parents should be required to protect their children from adult sites, not the government. Stop the censorship.

We therefore ask the House to cease requiring Digital IDs, on both typical websites and adult ones.

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN9609)

Capital Punishment

We must implement much harsher sentences for crimes against children ,the only way we can help protect any child from being abused is to impose much harsher outcomes for the person / persons who have committed a crime inflicted on innocent children ,unless the laws change and better outcomes to protect our children this will always continue.Its our duty to protect the children if the judiciary won't

We therefore ask the House to pass much harsher outcomes to those crimes inflicted onto innocent children this will,reinstate the death penalty for those who sexually abuse children

from 69 citizens (Petition No. EN9611)

Cybersafety

The new age verification laws arent thought out at all. Too many ways around them with too little care for how it affects the everyday person. In just 10 minutes of searching i alone have found over 40 different way to bypass these laws legally.

We therefore ask the House to completely reverse the new age verification laws and NEVER try to reintroduce them or anything similar again

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9612)

Australia Day

This petition of the undersigned citizens and residents of Australia draws to the attention of the House that:

Australia Day has not always been observed on 26 January and the date has evolved over time.

The first nationally recognised "Australia Day" was held on 30 July 1915 as a fundraising effort to support Australians wounded during the First World War.

The date of 26 January was not consistently observed as a national public holiday across Australia until 1994.

Many Australians believe the national day should be a unifying occasion that allows all Australians to celebrate our country together.

Holding Australia Day on a Monday would provide a consistent national long weekend, encouraging community events, participation, and celebration.

We therefore ask the House to consider legislation or national agreement to move the celebration of Australia Day from 26 January to the third Monday in January each year, creating a national long weekend for all Australians to celebrate our country.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN9613)

Cybersafety

Official Petition to Stop the Rollout of Mandatory Age Verification on All Websites and to Cease the Proposed Social Media Ban

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives

This petition of concerned citizens, and residents of Australia draws to the attention of the House that:

Proposals to implement mandatory age-verification systems across websites and online platforms may require Australians to provide sensitive personal information, including identification documents or biometric data, in order to access lawful online content.

Such requirements raise serious concerns about privacy, data security, and the potential creation of large databases containing personal identification information that may be vulnerable to misuse, cybercrime, or data breaches.

Mandatory identification to access lawful information online may undermine the ability of Australians to access information anonymously and participate freely in public discussion and democratic debate.

In addition, proposals to broadly ban or restrict access to social media platforms risk limiting freedom of expression, community participation, and access to important online services used for education, communication, and small business.

These measures may also impose significant compliance costs on small businesses, independent media, community organisations, and website operators who may lack the resources to implement complex age-verification systems.

We therefore ask the House to

Halt the rollout of mandatory age-verification requirements across websites and online platforms.

Cease proposals for broad social media bans.

Ensure that future online safety policies protect the privacy, freedoms, and digital rights of Australians.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN9614)

Cybersafety

The government has failed to understand modern Internet and technology and is such the current online safety act laws that have been put into place are doing more harm to the privacy and safety of Australian citizens including children, multiple studies have indicated that these laws have no effect on young people who simply have the knowledge to circumvent restrictions, Australian citizens over the age of 18 should have the freedom within the law to consume online content

We therefore ask the House to repeal the online safety act, the social media restrictions on under 16s and putting the power back in the hands of parents to dictate what their children can then cannot do

The Australian government should also broadcast a public apology for the failure of the system outlining why it didn't work

The Australian government needs to better understand and research how the Internet works and to stop putting the blame on social media companies and the Australian people

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN9615)

Falun Gong

Falun Gong, also known as Falun Dafa, is a spiritual practice rooted in the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance. Since 1999, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has carried out a systematic campaign of persecution against millions of Falun Gong practitioners, including wrongful imprisonment, torture, sexual abuses, forced organ harvesting and extrajudicial killings. The independent China Tribunal in UK concluded in 2019, that "Forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale and that Falun Gong practitioners have been one—and probably the main—source of organ supply." In 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed 'The Falun Gong Protection Act" and "Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act" to combat the persecution of Falun Gong and state-sanctioned forced organ harvesting in China. As a signatory to many international conventions on human rights, and as a nation that values freedom of belief and thought, Australia has a moral obligation to stand up and take actions to stop such atrocities.

We therefore ask the House to: 1. Call for an immediate end to the decades-long persecution of Falun Gong and the unconditional release of all detained Falun Gong practitioners in China, especially the families of Australian citizens and residents; 2. Condemn the CCP's transnational repression of Falun Gong in Australia; 3. Pass legislation and adopt other measures to combat forced organ harvesting in China; 4. Urge the Australian government to sanction the perpetrators of human rights abuses of Falun Gong.

from 7,891 citizens (Petition No. PN0655)

Nuclear Energy

Fusion energy is not the same as fission. It has no risk of meltdown, produces no long-lived waste, and relies on fuels such as deuterium and boron. Yet Australia's laws often conflate "nuclear" with "fission," creating uncertainty for investors and researchers. This confusion risks driving Australian innovation offshore.

We therefore ask the House to amend federal legislation to provide clear legal recognition of fusion energy as a distinct and permitted technology, separate from fission, ensuring Australia can develop this industry without delay.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7936)

Nuclear Energy

Australia remains heavily dependent on imported fuels and vulnerable to international supply shocks. Fusion energy provides a pathway to self-reliance by using abundant domestic resources, including deuterium from seawater. A sovereign fusion industry would protect Australia from volatile energy markets and enhance national resilience.

We therefore ask the House to support sovereign fusion development and create policies that prioritise Australian-owned projects, ensuring long-term energy independence.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7937)

Nuclear Energy

Australia's defence capabilities require reliable and secure energy. Fusion energy offers compact, safe, and high-density power that can be applied to defence bases, maritime propulsion, and advanced radar systems. Investing in fusion strengthens AUKUS commitments and secures Australia's regional standing.

We therefore ask the House to invest in defence-aligned fusion energy programs and embed fusion research into the nation's strategic security planning.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7938)

Nuclear Energy

Fusion produces clean, near-limitless energy with no long-lived radioactive waste. It complements renewables while replacing coal and gas, helping Australia meet emissions reduction targets. Global climate leadership will be determined by nations that master fusion. Australia risks missing this opportunity without urgent investment.

We therefore ask the House to include fusion energy in national climate and emissions policy, ensuring Australia leads rather than lags in the global clean energy transition.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7939)

Nuclear Energy

A strong fusion industry requires skilled engineers, scientists, and tradespeople. Australia already trains talent that is leaving for overseas fusion projects. Without urgent action, we will suffer a brain drain. By creating local pathways, Australia can build sovereign expertise and long-term jobs.

We therefore ask the House to fund fusion education and workforce development programs across universities, TAFEs, and industry training schemes.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7940)

Migration

The petitioners draw the attention of the House to growing concerns about the sustainability of Australia's current migration intake in light of housing shortages, infrastructure pressure, cost-of-living stress, and employment competition.

While migration has long contributed positively to Australia's economy and cultural life, the petitioners submit that migration settings must be carefully aligned with housing supply, employment availability, infrastructure capacity, and social integration outcomes to maintain public confidence and social cohesion.

The petitioners are concerned that high intake levels, without sufficient matching investment and selection criteria, are contributing to rental stress, reduced housing affordability, and pressure on essential services in many regions.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Review and moderate overall migration intake levels until housing supply and infrastructure capacity improve;

2 .Strengthen skills-based selection criteria across all permanent and temporary migration streams, ensuring migrants meet genuine labour market needs;

3 Require functional English proficiency as a core requirement to support workplace safety, economic participation, and community integration;

4. Align migration planning with housing construction targets, employment demand, and regional capacity;

Ensure migration policy remains non-discriminatory, merit-based, and consistent with Australia's democratic values and long-term national interest.

The petitioners submit that these measures would support sustainable growth, protect living standards, and maintain public confidence while continuing to welcome migrants who can contribute effectively to Australia's economy and society.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN9086)

Social Cohesion

The petitioners draw the attention of the House to growing public concern about social cohesion, public safety, and the misuse of ideological or religious material to justify hatred or violence, particularly following recent violent incidents that have deeply unsettled the Australian community.

Australia is a secular, multicultural democracy founded on the rule of law, mutual respect, and the equal dignity of all people. While freedom of religion and belief is protected, no belief system or ideology should be misused to promote violence, intimidation, or hatred toward any individual or community.

The petitioners note that extremist actors—both religious and non-religious—have historically exploited selective interpretations of texts, slogans, or doctrines to radicalise individuals and undermine social harmony. Ensuring that such material is not misused to incite harm is essential to maintaining public trust and community safety.

We therefore ask the House to :

Establish an independent, expert-led review mechanism to assess how religious, ideological, or political materials may be misused to promote hatred or violence, without targeting any faith or community

Strengthen counter-extremism safeguards that focus on misuse and incitement, rather than belief

Ensure that freedom of religion remains protected while affirming that violence, intimidation, and hate speech are not protected under Australian law

Promote education, dialogue, and prevention strategies that reinforce peaceful coexistence, social cohesion, and respect for Australian civic values

These measures are intended to protect all Australians, uphold constitutional freedoms, and ensure that public safety and unity are preserved in an evolving security environment.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9088)

Social Cohesion

The petitioners draw the attention of the House to the importance of maintaining one uniform system of Australian law that applies equally to all people, regardless of religion, ideology, or cultural background.

Recent violent incidents and rising community tensions have highlighted public concern about hate speech, incitement to violence, and extremist messaging, whether expressed through speeches, publications, protests, or other materials. These concerns underscore the need to ensure that freedom of belief and expression does not extend to the promotion of violence, intimidation, or harm against others.

The petitioners affirm that Australia is a secular democracy, where laws are made by Parliament and must apply equally to everyone. No religious, ideological, or informal legal system should override, replace, or operate parallel to Australian law.

We therefore ask the House to :

Reaffirm that Australian law is the sole governing legal framework in all public and civic matters

Strengthen laws against incitement to violence, threats, and hate-based intimidation, regardless of ideology or belief

Ensure that all materials, speeches, or actions that promote violence or harm are addressed consistently under existing criminal and civil law

Support education and enforcement measures that promote social cohesion, public safety, and respect for the rule of law

These measures are intended to protect all Australians, uphold equality before the law, and maintain confidence in Australia's legal and democratic institutions.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9089)

Social Cohesion

The petitioners draw the attention of the House to concerns about public safety, social cohesion, and the prevention of extremist radicalisation in Australia.

Australia is a democratic, multicultural nation that protects freedom of belief and expression. However, these freedoms do not extend to conduct that incites violence, promotes terrorism, or encourages hatred or intimidation against others. Individuals who exploit religious, political, or ideological platforms to advocate violence undermine community safety and the rule of law.

The petitioners note that existing laws prohibit incitement to violence and support for terrorism. Where non-citizens are found, through lawful investigation and due process, to have engaged in hate-based incitement or extremist advocacy, the consequences should reflect the seriousness of the risk posed to the Australian community.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Ensure robust enforcement of laws against incitement to violence, terrorism advocacy, and hate-based intimidation, regardless of ideology or belief.

2. Provide clear grounds, consistent with due process, for visa cancellation and deportation of non-citizens found to have engaged in such conduct.

3. Establish transparent oversight and safeguards to ensure decisions are evidence-based, proportionate, and non-discriminatory.

4. Support preventative measures, including monitoring of extremist preaching and education on lawful expression and civic responsibility.

These measures are necessary to protect public safety, uphold Australia's values, and maintain confidence in the integrity of our laws.

from 36 citizens (Petition No. EN9091)

Pensions and Benefits

Economic security is essential for full participation in society. Australia's existing income-support system was designed for a different era and no longer reflects the realities of modern work, automation, artificial intelligence, insecure employment, and rising living costs. Many Australians experience financial stress even while working, and gaps in the current system leave people without adequate support during transitions between jobs, caring responsibilities, study, illness, or training.

A Universal Basic Income (UBI), or guaranteed minimum income floor, would provide every adult with a stable, unconditional foundation that ensures dignity, reduces poverty, supports mental and physical wellbeing, and strengthens economic participation. International trials have shown that guaranteed income improves financial stability, increases workforce engagement, and supports local economies. Ensuring universal economic security aligns with Australia's principles of fairness, dignity, and equal opportunity.

We therefore ask the House to establish a Universal Basic Income for all adult residents of Australia as a guaranteed, unconditional income floor; ensure that this payment is sufficient to meet essential living needs and indexed to the cost of living; maintain and protect specialised supplementary payments for people with disabilities, carers, the elderly, children, and single-parent families so that those with additional needs are not disadvantaged; support a staged national implementation and integrate the payment with the tax system so higher-income earners contribute proportionately, supported by strong tax-integrity measures; and require ongoing evaluation of economic, social, and labour-market impacts while modernising the social security system to reduce punitive compliance measures and unnecessary administrative complexity.

from 18 citizens (Petition No. EN9169)

Cooperatives

Cooperatives and member-owned enterprises play a vital role in Australia's economy by keeping wealth local, supporting regional communities, improving job security, and ensuring that workers and consumers have a direct stake in the organisations that serve them. Despite their proven benefits, co-ops face structural barriers including limited access to finance, regulatory complexity, and a lack of federal programs designed to support democratic business models. As Australia adapts to technological change, rising living costs, and increasing economic concentration, expanding cooperative ownership offers a practical way to strengthen local economies, improve resilience, and give Australians greater control over their workplaces and essential services. Supporting co-ops aligns with Australia's principles of fairness, shared prosperity, and community self-determination.

We therefore ask the House to strengthen Commonwealth support for cooperatives by establishing a national co-operative development fund; improving access to low-interest finance for worker, consumer, and community co-ops; modernising federal regulations and working with state jurisdictions to streamline the Co-operatives National Law to reduce unnecessary barriers to cooperative formation and growth; establishing a dedicated Commonwealth procurement pathway that recognises cooperatives and mutual enterprises as eligible community-benefit organisations for government contracts; and expanding education and advisory services to ensure co-ops are included in national industry, regional development, and innovation strategies.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9170)

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence and automation are transforming Australia's economy, increasing productivity and generating significant new wealth. However, without deliberate policy, these gains risk flowing disproportionately to large corporations rather than to the broader community. As AI systems replace or reshape work, Australians face growing uncertainty about job security, income stability, and the distribution of economic benefits. A National AI Dividend would ensure that a portion of the economic value created by AI is returned to the public, recognising that technological progress is built on publicly funded research, national data resources, and decades of collective innovation. Sharing AI-generated wealth aligns with Australia's principles of fairness, opportunity, and social cohesion.

We therefore ask the House to establish a National AI Dividend by creating a sovereign public fund capitalised through appropriate levies on large-scale AI-driven profits, digital services, or automation-related productivity gains; ensure that revenue from this fund is directed toward public benefit, including universal income supports, skills development, and community services; require transparency from companies deploying high-impact AI systems; and develop a national framework to ensure that the economic benefits of artificial intelligence are shared fairly among all Australians.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9171)

Railways

ARTC's interstate rail pricing does not reflect track wear or service quality. Current access charges rely on "flagfall" rates rather than physical impact, capacity use, or infrastructure standards. Passenger trains, which are lighter and cause minimal wear, face disproportionately high fees compared to heavy freight.

Furthermore, passenger services are often constrained to freight speeds due to track conditions, yet are charged as premium services. This creates a structural disadvantage for sustainable regional rail. In contrast, road transport is funded as a public good; interstate coaches operate without equivalent per-kilometre access fees. Consequently, regional passengers "pay twice"—through general taxation and higher fares. International best practice dictates that rail pricing should reflect cost-causation and service quality. The Australian model's divergence from these principles limits transport choice and unfairly penalises rail users.

We therefore ask the House to review the interstate rail access pricing framework, specifically the 2024 Interstate Access Undertaking, to ensure charges:

Replace flat flagfall rates with wear-based models using axle load and tonnage;

Align with service quality, implementing "Service-Level Adjusted Pricing" where fees are discounted if track conditions restrict speeds;

Ensure competitive neutrality by auditing rail access fees against the marginal infrastructure costs paid by long-distance road transport.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9266)

Sovereign Capability

Australia is facing growing domestic threats that directly affect the safety and wellbeing of its people. Recent years have brought severe floods, bushfires, heatwaves, coastal erosion, and damage to critical ecosystems. These events have displaced families, destroyed homes, disrupted supply chains, and placed increasing pressure on emergency services and essential systems.

At the same time, Australians are experiencing rising housing stress, stagnant wages, underfunded services, and declining infrastructure resilience. These issues weaken national stability and reduce our ability to respond to future crises.

Despite this, national security spending continues to prioritise long-range military capabilities designed for operations far from Australia, rather than strengthening our capacity to defend the continent and protect communities from the threats they face now. Australia is not an expansionist nation. Our defence force should exist to safeguard our territory, people, and critical systems.

A secure Australia depends on strong domestic resilience. Investing in climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, essential services, and sovereign defensive capability is vital to protecting the nation in the decades ahead.

We therefore ask the House to

- Reaffirm that the primary purpose of Australia's defence force is the defence of the Australian continent, its people, and its critical infrastructure;

- Commission a National Human Security and Resilience Strategy to assess Australia's domestic vulnerabilities;

- Rebalance national security spending to prioritise domestic resilience, climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and essential services; and

- Ensure that defence procurement prioritises sovereign capabilities that support territorial defence and disaster response.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9294)

Iran Women's National Football Team

Members of the Iranian women's national football team are currently in Australia for the Women's Asian Cup. Serious concerns have been raised about their safety should they return to Iran.

During the tournament, some of the players refrained from singing the Iranian national anthem. Following this, Iranian state media accused the players of committing an act of treason.

In Iran, accusations of treason or betrayal against the state can carry extremely serious consequences. Individuals who have expressed dissent or opposition to the Iranian authorities have historically faced detention, prosecution, imprisonment or worse.

Women and dissidents in Iran have frequently been subjected to torture for acts of protest or perceived opposition to the government. Human rights advocates have warned that these players could face serious consequences if they are forced to return, including the risk of detention and torture.

There are also reports that the players have used a recognised distress signal while leaving the Gold Coast, indicating fear for their safety.

Australia has international legal obligations under refugee and human rights law not to return individuals to a country where they face a real risk of persecution or serious harm.

We therefore ask the House to call on the Australian Government to ensure that no member of the Iranian women's national football team currently in Australia is returned to Iran as they face a real risk of persecution or serious harm. We ask that these players be provided access to legal advice and the opportunity to apply for asylum or other protection under Australian law.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9616)

Economy

This petition of certain citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the house that in march 2026, Australia's national debt officially reached $1 trillion, Costing taxpayers approximately $3 billion in monthly interest. While everyday Australians face a severe cost-of-living crisis, Rising insurance premiums, And a housing shortfall, Members of parliament continue to receive guaranteed salary increases. There is currently no legislative mechanism to link the pay of decision-makers to the economic outcomes of the nation or the living standards of its citizens. Furthermore, Discretionary spending on non-essential foreign aid and subsidies continues while critical local infrastructure projects remain delayed.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Amend the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 to legally freeze all members and senator salary increases until the national inflation rate remains within the 2-3% target band for four consecutive quarters.

2. Implement a "Preference Link" whereby future pay rises are capped at the rate of the national minimum wage increase.

3. Legislate a "Local First" spending requirement that suspends new Discretionary foreign aid increases until a parliamentary-approved debt-reduction pathway is met

from 33 citizens (Petition No. EN9618)

Fuel Security

many towns in Australia are currently out of fuel due to limited reserves and extreme limited capacity for Australia to manufacture more fuel. The government should move to increase our reserves immediately by 500% to correct the shortfall and also subsidize additional oil refineries to manufacture more fuel in Australia to make us more self sufficient.

We therefore ask the House to immediately purchase and increase the supply of fuel reserves to the country, upgrade existing refineries and review to build additional refineries to support our country becoming more self sufficient in fuel supply due to global instability. The government should immediately access the oil reserves that were purchased in 2020 and are held by the USA.

from 20 citizens (Petition No. EN9619)

Iran Women's National Football Team

The House of Representatives requests that the Australian Government and the Minister for Home Affairs:

• Provide immediate protection and support to the Iranian women's national football team currently in Gold Coast.

• Grant them temporary asylum, visa extension, or humanitarian protection.

• Prevent their forced return to Iran, where they face serious risks to their safety and freedom.

• Allow them to remain safely in Australia until the Islamic Republic regime collapses and conditions in Iran become secure for their return.

This is to safeguard their lives and rights amid grave human rights concerns.

We therefore ask the House to

Grant them temporary asylum, a visa extension, or other appropriate protection measures.

Allow them to remain safely in Australia until conditions in Iran improve significantly following the collapse of the current regime.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN9620)

Workplace Relations: Aviation Industry

The Flight Attendants' Association of Australia (FAAA) and its members support the intent of the Government's recent "Closing the Loopholes" workplace reforms, which were designed to improve the lives of the workforce. Many Australians believe that aircraft operating under the Australian flag should support Australian jobs and uphold Australian workplace standards.

However, there is growing concern that a new loophole may be emerging in the aviation sector through the use of offshore cabin crew working on aircraft registered in Australia and operating under an Australian Air Operator's Certificate (AOC).

These crew perform safety-critical duties on aircraft regulated under Australia's aviation framework. Yet, they may be employed under overseas contracts with wages and employment conditions significantly lower than those applied to Australian-based crew.

Many Australians believe that when aircraft operate under the Australian regulatory system, the work performed onboard should reflect Australian workplace standards. There is concern that offshore crew arrangements may reduce opportunities for Australian-based aviation workers and create inconsistency between aviation oversight and Australian labour protections.

We therefore ask the House to Representatives to establish a parliamentary inquiry into the use of offshore employment arrangements for crew operating on aircraft under an Australian Air Operator's Certificate, including whether current laws allow these arrangements to circumvent the intent of the Closing the Loopholes workplace reforms, and whether legislative or regulatory changes are required to protect Australian aviation jobs and ensure fair employment standards on Australian-registered aircraft

from 14,209 citizens (Petition No. EN9621)

Wages and Salaries

It's time that meat workers were paid a decent wage. The current wage in certain areas for floor workers isn't enough to buy a house and raise a family.

We therefore ask the House to increase the minimum wage for this group to $40 an hour, increase afternoonshift loading from the minimum 15% to 20% and nightshift from 30% to 40%.

With a minimum hour for lunch.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9622)

Superannuation

Allow anyone with sufficient Australian super funds to access upto $20k, so they can withdraw that money to help them with the cost of living crisis.

Obviously people with less than $20k super balance will only be able to withdraw what funds they have.

This withdrawal process should be done via the ATO website, (ie: on line), & the approval should be automatic & payment made to a person's Australian bank account within 30 days.

We therefore ask the House to put real pressure on the Labor Govt to allow anyone to access upto $20k of their superannuation & without any conditions. The Labor Govt & Canberra bureaucrats are really out of touch with reality in my opinion.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9625)

Fuel

We call on the House of Representatives to introduce a government-set fuel benchmark price and a 100% levy on all retail margin above that benchmark. This single change would make it impossible for fuel retailers to profit from price gouging, protecting every Australian at the bowser.

Australian households and small businesses are being severely harmed by fuel prices that rise sharply during global disruptions but fall slowly or not at all when wholesale costs ease. Under current law, fuel retailers are legally free to charge as much as the market will bear. There is no mechanism to prevent opportunistic gouging during times of war or supply shock.

Retailers treat fines imposed after the fact as a cost of doing business. But fines do not protect consumers if the retailers do it anyway. South Korea introduced a fuel price cap for the first time in 30 years in response to the same global disruption. Australia should do the same.

A 100% levy on margin above a published benchmark makes gouging economically pointless. Retailers who price fairly keep their margin. Retailers who gouge keep nothing. Every Australian who fills a tank is protected.

We therefore ask the House to We ask the House of Representatives to:

We ask the House of Representatives to:

1. Legislate a government-set fuel benchmark price based on wholesale import costs plus a fair regulated margin, administered by the ACCC;

2. Impose a 100% levy on all retail margin above that benchmark price on every litre sold, collected by the ATO.

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN9630)

Local Government: Development Applications

Development application processes administered by local councils across Australia have become increasingly complex, slow and costly for residents, property owners and small developers.

Applicants are often required to prepare extensive documentation, specialist reports and technical assessments before an application can be considered. Requirements can vary significantly between councils and are frequently unclear at the outset, leading to repeated requests for further information and costly revisions.

These processes can take many months, and sometimes years, before a decision is made. Long and uncertain approval timeframes create financial risk, increase project costs and discourage individuals from pursuing housing or building projects.

Delays in development approvals also contribute to broader housing supply challenges by slowing the construction of new homes and small residential developments.

Petitioners are concerned that current development application processes lack transparency, consistency and reasonable timeframes, and that the administrative burden placed on applicants is excessive for many projects.

We therefore ask the House to initiate a national parliamentary inquiry into the complexity, timeframes and administrative burden associated with local council development application processes across Australia, and to consider reforms that simplify requirements, improve transparency and reduce unnecessary approval delays while maintaining appropriate planning and environmental protections.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9631)

National Security

To the Honourable Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives,

We, the undersigned, draw to the attention of the House that many Australians do not want Australia drawn into overseas wars that do not directly involve the defence of Australia's own sovereignty.

Recent statements referring to "defensive" military assistance create serious public concern that Australia may become entangled, directly or indirectly, in conflicts that are not necessary for the protection of Australia itself.

Many Australians are concerned that military involvement can be expanded through logistics, intelligence-sharing, facilities, or other forms of support without clear democratic consent or full parliamentary transparency.

We therefore ask the House to

1. does not participate militarily in overseas conflicts unless Australia's sovereignty is under direct threat;


2. does not provide intelligence, logistical, operational, or other support that contributes to such conflicts;


3. commits to full parliamentary transparency regarding any proposed military involvement; and


4. uses Australia's diplomatic position proactively to promote peace, de-escalation, ceasefires, and negotiated solutions.

This petition reflects the principle that Australia should be a force for peace, international law, and genuine national defence, not a participant in wars beyond the strict defence of its own people and territory.

from 33 citizens (Petition No. EN9632)

Lancer Barracks

The Federal Government has identified 67 Defence sites for divestment, including Lancer Barracks Parramatta. It is mainland Australia's oldest military barracks, and oldest and most decorated surviving Regiment, both on the battlefield and in its ceremonial duties. The Lancers and cadets train at Lancer Barracks. The buildings were erected on the orders of Governor Macquarie, in 1820 and stand in an area of 3.25ha. The Lancer Barracks and Museum are open almost every Sunday and has live Tank running days once a month. The museum is listed as a Commonwealth Heritage. With a retired Lancer as your personal guide, the Museum walks you through the Regiment's history on the battlefields of the Boer War, at Gallipoli, Beersheba and Jerusalem in WW1 and El Alamein and the jungles and beaches of New Guinea and Borneo in WW2. The museum shows the development of uniforms, weapons, military communications and equipment from 1885 to the present day, from horses and lances to main battle tanks and armour piercing shells; hear the stories and live the lives of Lancers, through photographs, scrapbooks and diaries and see the world from the inside of an armoured fighting vehicle. It is feared that all of this will be lost if the site is sold—its history, its heritage, its identity—our history, our heritage and our identity.

We therefore ask the House to to remove Lancer Barracks Parramatta from the list of ADF Divestment sites.

from 532 citizens (Petition No. EN9633)

Copper and Gold Mining: Dittmer Project

To the House of Representatives

The reason for our request concerns Ballymore Resources' application MLA100351 in Dittmer, Queensland—a proposed 272-hectare copper and gold mining lease forming part of the much larger Dittmer Project (513 sq km) across the Clarke Ranges.

Despite the scale and environmental values at Dittmer, MLA100351 has no EPBC referral, no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), no Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), no Social Impact Assessment (SIA), no baseline water data, and no publicly available hydrogeological assessment. The current rehabilitation bond for MLA100351 is $18,000.This large scale mine is being regulated under small scale EA approvals.

Dittmer and Kelsey Creek falls across the drinking water catchment for the Whitsundays and the Great Barrier Reef catchment just 48 km downstream. Dittmer contains core habitat for multiple endangered threatened species listed as Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES), downstream wetlands support migratory MNES species.

Copper and gold mining have a documented history of water contamination, including acid mine drainage and heavy-metal pollution. Allowing this project to proceed without federal intervention poses significant risk of creating a legacy mine in a WHA.

We believe it is unacceptable for a project of this scale and potential impact to proceed without an EPBC referral and without all claimed environmental and water studies being made publicly available.

We therefore ask the House to under Section 74A of the EPBC Act, call in MLA100351 as part of the larger Dittmer Project and determine it to be a Controlled Action requiring full and rigorous EIS assessment.

from 229 citizens (Petition No. EN9634)

Live Animal Exports

We draw the attention of the House to the ongoing risk of heat stress and cumulative fatigue experienced by farmed animals in the live export supply chain prior to sea transport.

Animals are exposed to extreme heat, prolonged transport, queuing and delayed loading, all increasing risk of injury and death.

In theory, trucks leave before the heat of the day. In practice, animals spend hours and hours in hot trucks. There's no law regulating how long they remain travelling without water. No law requiring shade in holding yards. No enforceable temperature ceiling.

There's law protecting the workers loading them—at 35°C, construction workers across Australia can stop work and leave site. That threshold recognises sustained heat isn't a single dangerous moment—it compounds.

Enforceable national regulations are required to protect animal welfare and ensure public confidence.

We therefore ask the House to

- Prohibit loading of farmed animals for live export when ambient temperatures reach/exceed 35°C.

- Continuous access to clean drinking water until loading.

- Shade provided for animals waiting at the port before loading.

- Ensure trucks depart the registered-establishment immediately on completion of loading animals and unload immediately on arrival at port.

- Each animal must undergo final inspection by a licensed veterinarian at Port prior to loading. Rejected animals must be euthanised at Port and not transported back to saleyard/farm.

from 1,675 citizens (Petition No. EN9635)

Migration

We are Australian citizens and permanent residents, and we respectfully express our strong opposition to the Migration Amendment, which prevents certain nationalities from entering Australia.

We believe that this legislation:

• Discriminates against families of Australian citizens and permanent residents—Many affected individuals are from Iran or other conflict-affected Middle Eastern countries. Preventing their entry separates families and contradicts Australia's values of compassion, fairness, and family unity.

• Undermines transparency and accountability—Allows regulations imposing entry bans to be immune from Senate disallowance, raising serious concerns about oversight and accountability.

• Perpetuates systemic discrimination—Hidden restrictions on visas create barriers for certain nationalities, inconsistent with Australia's values of equality, inclusiveness, and the rule of law.

• Contradicts Australia's foreign policy and humanitarian principles—while promoting freedom abroad, the Government restricts access to safety for people fleeing conflict, including those who have invested time, money, and effort to be qualified for study or work visas, seeking the same freedom.

We therefore ask the House to

• Reject the Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No.1) Bill 2026. If temporarily imposed, it should be amended to exempt close family members, such as brothers and sisters, of Australian citizens and permanent residents.

• Ensure migration policy aligns with Australia's humanitarian obligations and commitment to family unity.

• Guarantee transparency, accountability, and non-discrimination in all migration regulations and decisions, regardless of nationality.

We urge the Government to uphold the principles of fairness, compassion, and equality central to Australian society, and to reject legislation that discriminates against people seeking safety and family unity in Australia.

Yours faithfully,

The Petitioners

from 276 citizens (Petition No. EN9639)

Consumer Protection: Advertising

Recent investigations suggest that up to 30% of jobs advertised on major platforms may be fake or 'ghost' jobs and that around half of HR professionals admit to routinely engaging in this practice. This is particularly prevalent in fields like tech, marketing and finance. First hand experience reveals that major platforms are subject to perverse incentives and fail or refuse to address this problem. Regardless of the motivations driving this practice it is completely unethical and contrary to the Australian ethos of honesty and fairness in all areas of life.

The negative impacts of this phenomenon are being internationally recognised and have profound implications. These include not only the deceiving and demoralising of job seekers in difficult circumstances, but the distorting of labour statistics which are relied on to monitor economic health and guide policy. Such distortions may obviously lead to bad policy decisions.

We therefore ask the House to fast track legislative action to prevent this pernicious practice. This is particularly given that other governments are already in the process of taking such action or have already taken it, putting Australians at a disadvantage. We refer parliament to the US federal 'Truth in Job Advertising Act' under review, California's enacted 'AB 1251' bill and Ontario's enacted 'Working for Workers Five Act'. These are all aimed at stamping out the practice of ghost job posting and more broadly of improving integrity in the practice of job advertising.

from 147 citizens (Petition No. EN9642)

Labor Government

Labor continues to fail on delivering on their promises for the every day Australian and financially making it harder for younger people

We therefore ask the House to lower GST and to lower income tax and stop spending idiotically instead rebuild Australia's refineries and future

Ps: liberal and labour same same but but different but still same

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9656)

Cybersafety

Mandatory age verification laws require adults to hand over government ID or biometric data to private companies—just to access legal online content.

It creates data breach honeypots. Centralising sensitive identity documents across commercial platforms increases the risk of breaches and misuse. Australians have already seen what happens when companies mishandle our data.

It burdens small platforms unfairly. Compliance costs push smaller services to either exit the market or cut corners on security.

It doesn't actually protect children. Parental controls, network filtering, and device-level tools already do that—without collecting a single piece of adult identity data.

It sets a troubling precedent. Normalising ID checks to access lawful content undermines the open internet.

We therefore ask the House to entatives to repeal mandatory age verification legislation and invest in privacy-preserving alternatives that already exist:

Router parental controls (free, built-in, no data collection), ISP-level DNS filtering (Telstra and Optus offer opt-in filtering at the network level), Device controls (iOS Screen Time, Android Family Link, Windows Family Safety), Browser filtering (built into Chrome, Safari, and Edge)

These tools work. They don't require Australians to hand their identity to private companies.

Mandatory age verification is not a child safety policy. It is a data collection regime that solves the wrong problem.

from 36 citizens (Petition No. EN9658)

Taxation

Currently the ATO treats every individual as a separate economic unit and imposes income tax accordingly and doesn't take into account their background and circumstances.

This will mean families with the same gross household income get taxed different amounts, while having similar expenses and liabilities.

For example, consider two couples with a combined household income of $100,000.

Couple A: $50,000 each

Couple B: $80,000 and $20,000

Taxation amounts (based on 2024-2025 income year):

Couple A Tax: $5,788 each. Total: $11,576.

Couple B Tax: $14,788 and 288. Total: $15,076. (One individual pays more tax that Couple A)

Even though both households earn a combined income of $100,000, Couple B pays about $3,500 more in tax simply because of their unevenly distributed income.

At the same time, almost all of government benefits—particularly in health, family assistance, and social services—are assessed using combined household income, showing inconsistencies in governance delivery.

This creates an unfair inconsistency where households with the same total income and with similar cost of living face different tax outcomes.

We therefore ask the House to review and amend the current taxation framework so families and couples are treated as a single economic unit and they are taxed based on their average household income and not on aggregate individual income. This will promote greater fairness and ensure households are treated consistently.

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN9660)

COVID-19 Vaccines

Reason:

Petitioners raise concerns regarding the continued registration and supply of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in Australia, including Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (Moderna).

These vaccines were authorised during the COVID-19 pandemic through expedited regulatory pathways intended to allow rapid access during a public health emergency. Petitioners believe that medicines approved under accelerated processes should be reassessed once emergency conditions have passed to ensure they continue to meet the requirements of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.

Petitioners are concerned that questions remain regarding whether the clinical trial evidence, manufacturing processes and supporting regulatory assessments fully reflect the products currently supplied to the public. Medicines listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods should demonstrate clear and ongoing compliance with requirements relating to safety, quality, efficacy and manufacturing standards.

Petitioners also believe that transparency regarding clinical data, safety monitoring and regulatory decision-making is important to maintaining public confidence in Australia's medicines regulatory system.

We therefore ask the House to Action:

We therefore ask the House to request that the Australian Government direct the Therapeutic Goods Administration to conduct an independent review of the continued registration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including Comirnaty and Spikevax, on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. If this review determines that these products do not clearly meet the requirements established under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, petitioners request that the Government consider suspending or removing these vaccines from the Australian market.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN9661)

Australian Society: Religious Discrimination

The religious landscape of Australia has shifted significantly over the last decade. According to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data, Australians identifying with "No Religion" rose from 22.3% in 2011 to 38.9% in 2021, while those identifying as Christian fell below 50% for the first time.

Despite this trend toward a more secular society, certain institutions continue to hold broad statutory exemptions that can lead to discriminatory outcomes. Furthermore, there is a growing need for federal oversight to protect citizens from faith-based vilification and coercive indoctrination, ensuring that all Australians—regardless of their beliefs—can participate in society with dignity and freedom from harassment.

We therefore ask the House to review the negative impacts religious institutions may have had on Australian society over the past 10 years, specifically evaluating their relevance to our modern secular progression. Based on these findings, we request that the House:

1) Draft legislation to strengthen protections against faith-based crimes and vilification.

2) Review and minimise statutory exemptions that allow for discrimination.

3) Ensure all citizens are protected from coercive indoctrination, upholding the right to live free from religious harassment.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN9663)

Banking and Financial Services

Every time I pay with my debit card, I am forced to pay a surcharge. It's my money, not borrowed from the bank, so why am I charged extra just to access what is rightfully mine? It's not only unfair, it's an outright theft disguised as a convenience fee. This hits everyday Australians like me who are just trying to manage their finances responsibly without accruing extra charges. It's a cruel practice that needs to be put to an end.

We therefore ask the House to consider this practice of charging surcharge on debit cards illegal. Creating a legislation to outlaw charging on debt cards surcharges within Australia will create relief to the affected citizens.

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN9665)

Israel Defense Forces

Petition Reason:

This petition of certain citizens and residents of Australia draws to the attention of the House the grave concern and disgust regarding the entry of personnel from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) into Australia.

As of March 2026, military operations have expanded across Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran, resulting in the daily killing of civilians and the families of Australian citizens. We draw the House's attention to the harrowing fact that Australian citizens of Palestinian, Lebanese, and Iranian heritage are currently mourning families being murdered by these military operations.

Furthermore, these forces are subject to constant international investigations for war crimes, many of which remain unpunished, creating a climate of perceived impunity. Australians are outraged that 49 IDF members have been permitted to enter Melbourne for "rest and recovery" and to visit schools while the families of Australian taxpayers are being killed. Allowing individuals implicated in such actions to vacation in our cities is a profound insult to Australian values and a direct threat to the safety and social cohesion of our multicultural community.

Since when is a foreign national more important than our own Australian Citizens

We therefore ask the House to

Implement a total ban on the entry of all IDF personnel into Australia under any visa category,

Immediately rescind the visas of the 49 IDF members currently in Melbourne and any others identified as active or recently active combatants.

Prohibit any foreign military "rest and recovery" programs from operating on Australian soil, especially those involving forces under investigation for international crimes.

from 6,163 citizens (Petition No. EN9667)

Schools: Attendance

We, the undersigned, call for an urgent review and reform of the current allowable absence policy for children aged 0-5 years in early childhood education settings.

The current limit of 42 allowable absence days does not adequately reflect the realities faced by young children and their families. We believe places unnecessary pressure on families and does not align with comparable provisions in the primary education system.

We therefore ask the House to Exclusion of Public Holidays

Public holidays should not count toward the 42 allowable absence days, as these are nationally recognised non-attendance days and should not disadvantage families.

Medical Exemptions for Illness

Absences due to illness, supported by a valid medical certificate, should be excluded from the allowable absence count—regardless of when they occur. Young children are especially vulnerable to illness in group care, and families should not be penalised for prioritising their child's health.

Alignment with School Holiday Structures

Primary school children receive around 10 weeks of holidays annually, far exceeding the 42-day absence limit. This creates inconsistency and added pressure for families with children across both systems.

Increase in Allowable Absence Days

If holidays and public holidays remain included, the allowable absence limit should be increased to better reflect real family needs, work-life balance, and child wellbeing.

Conclusion

These changes are essential to create a fairer and more practical system. Current limitations can pressure families to send unwell children into care, increasing illness transmission and placing strain on educators. Reform would support responsible health decisions, reduce illness spread, and promote healthier environments for children and educators alike.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN9668)

Defence Properties

This petition is authorised by the Toowoomba RSL Sub-Branch and created by Nicholas Dudley in his capacity as Vice President. It concerns the uncertain future of Toowoomba's historic Drill Hall and the broader Milne Bay Training Depot. This is about far more than a property decision. The site has significant military, historical and community value. The Drill Hall is an important part of Toowoomba's military history, while the broader depot continues to matter to veterans, cadets, families and the wider community. There is growing concern that decisions may be made without proper consultation or full recognition of the site's heritage significance, cadet role and connection to Toowoomba's military tradition.

We therefore ask the House to Call on the Australian Government and the Department of Defence to ensure no final decision is made about the future of Toowoomba's historic Drill Hall and Milne Bay Training Depot without proper community consultation and full consideration of the site's military, historical and community significance, and of options to preserve its heritage and ongoing value to veterans, cadets, families and the wider public.

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN9669)

Indigenous Languages

It would help make Indigenous language more visible and part of normal life.

This change is simple, low-cost, and easy to include in emails, phone calls, and greetings.

For these reasons, we are asking for local Indigenous language to be used in basic public service communication in Canberra, such as saying hello and thank you.

We therefore ask the House to promote this initiative as a practical step toward strengthening cultural recognition, respect, and everyday inclusion of First Nations languages within government practice.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN9670)

Migration

Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Act 2026, introduced powers enabling the Minister to suspend/cease temporary visas held by specified classes of offshore non-citizens. These powers may prevent 'unsustainable strains on the functioning of the migration system' by suspending entry for visa holders who may seek to lodge a protection visa after entering Australia.

Migration Amendment (Temporary Sponsored Parent Visas) Regulations 2021 (F2021L01029) provided automatic extensions of Subclass 870 visas where COVID-19 prevented travel. This measure ensured visa holders were not disadvantaged by circumstances outside their control and maintained the integrity of the migration system. The related Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights refers to mitigating negative impact of travel restrictions upon family in Australia including children.

An extension of the visa period, for those affected by the new travel restriction powers, would permit travel after a s84E (Migration Act 1958) suspension is revoked or ceases, where the visa period extends beyond a suspension period. This approach would be consistent with the temporary nature of arrival control powers and would avoid disproportionately adverse outcomes for compliant visa holders including those who provided legal undertakings not to apply for protection visas.

Mitigating impact of restrictions upon family in Australia has been a key policy consideration. Adverse impact should also be avoided for Business Visitor visa holders, given their contribution to Australian commercial interests.

We therefore ask the House to urgently consider automatic visa extensions to temporary visa holders affected by s84E as a proportionate addition to broader travel restrictions.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9671)

Pensions and Benefits

To be eligible and

obtain Carers allowance, Carers payment, Child disabilty assistance and potentially more disability support payments by Services Australia the family income needs to be below the threshold of $250k.

This is discrimination against 2 working person/parent families, hard working families and a person or family who has worked hard to secure a higher paying jobs [no doubt with detriment to their family].

Assuming because a person or family earn over $250k means these payments are not required is not true.

The ndis doesnt cover all disability costs most families spend their own money on: private health cover [including urgent and non urgent ambulace for complex disabilities and high level hospital cover], off shelf items, medicine, plus many out of pocket costs for disabled children and adults.

.

Service Australia should remove the threshold of [$250k income ]and not discriminate based on a higher income means less government support for carers of children and family members with a disability.

We therefore ask the House to ask Service Australia to remove the threshold of [$250k income] and allow all carers the same payments regardless of income to obtain Carers allowance, Carers payment, Child disabilty assistance and any other payments.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN9672)

Labor Government

Cost of Living/Economy: Failure to manage the economy, leading to a cost-of-living crisis, uncontrollable inflation, and soaring housing/rental costs.

Specific Policy Failures: Energy policies (e.g., diesel) and immigration levels.

Neglect of Duty: The Prime Minister has failed to act decisively to safeguard the community, thereby undermining the responsibility of his office.

Leadership: A loss of confidence in the Prime Minister's ability to lead, citing failure to represent the interests of everyday Australians.

Australians are suffering. Enough is enough.

We therefore ask the House to consider a motion of no confidence.

from 97 citizens (Petition No. EN9673)

Fuel Security

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives,

This petition of the undersigned draws to the attention of the House that:

Australia is a resource-rich nation, producing significant volumes of gas and other natural resources essential to energy security and economic stability.

Recent global events, including international conflicts and supply disruptions, have contributed to increased fuel and energy costs and highlighted Australia's exposure to global market conditions.

A substantial proportion of Australia's natural resources is exported, while domestic households and businesses may experience rising costs and uncertainty in supply.

The petitioners are concerned that current policy settings may not sufficiently prioritise domestic access to these resources during periods of market instability.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Consider policy or legislative measures to prioritise domestic access to Australia's natural resources before export;

2. Ensure a reliable and sufficient supply of essential resources for Australian households and businesses;

3. Review existing export and regulatory frameworks to ensure they support Australia's long-term energy security and national interest.

from 98 citizens (Petition No. EN9677)

Women's Reproductive Health

In a world where women's health remains underfunded and under-research, it is not okay that women are forced to use their annual or sick leave to manage chronic conditions that have no cure.

Across Australia, women diagnosed with Endometriosis and Adenomyosis live with severe, ongoing health complications that impact every aspect of their daily lives. These women show up and push through but there are sometimes days within each cycle that are truly debilitating and life-altering.

These women are not only fighting their conditions, but they are also fighting to be seen and supported. With action from the Australian Government, they can feel acknowledged through realistic, compassionate support, for living with chronic pain.

An estimate 1 in 7 Australian Women live with Endometriosis, and 1 in 5 with Adenomyosis. Both conditions causing emotional distress, serve pain, fatigue, inflammation and impacts in participation within society.

Current flexible workplace arrangements and existing workplace adjustments are not enough. They place a burden on these individuals rather than addressing the systemic gap in support.

Countries such as Spain, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea have already implemented variations of Menstrual Leave policies to support those affected. Australian women also deserve this understanding and person-centred care.

Let's make this change happen.

We therefore ask the House to provide individuals with diagnoses of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis with Menstrual Leave per month with a doctor's approval to help give them the support they deserve.

from 28,434 citizens (Petition No. EN9679)

National Disability Insurance Scheme

This petition of concerned citizens draws to the attention of the House that some NDIS participants with serious mobility or disability-related safety risks may be left in unsafe living circumstances while disputes about home modifications, Specialist Disability Accommodation, Medium Term Accommodation or related supports are under internal review or before the Administrative Review Tribunal.

Petitioners are concerned that there is no clear, transparent and urgent interim safety pathway requiring the National Disability Insurance Agency to assess immediate risk and provide temporary protective supports where credible evidence shows a participant is at risk of injury, unsafe access, falls, deterioration, or avoidable hospitalisation and deaths.

We therefore ask the House to Petitioners to call on the Australian Government to require the NDIA to establish a national urgent participant safety framework that permits urgent interim decisions, temporary accommodation or other protective supports where necessary to prevent harm, clear response timeframes for urgent safety matters while reviews (internal or external) are underway, and public reporting on urgent safety complaints, delays and outcomes.

from 251 citizens (Petition No. EN9682)

Fuel

This petition of residents of Australia draws attention to significant and rapid increases in petrol and diesel prices across local communities.

Fuel prices are often rising by substantial amounts within short periods, without clear explanation or alignment with expected wholesale pricing cycles.

For example, within a short period in March 2026, fuel prices in one Queensland community increased from approximately 160.9 cents per litre to over 219.9 cents per litre, with diesel observed close to 291.9 cents per litre in nearby areas.

These movements raise concerns regarding transparency, fairness, and the impact on households, businesses, transport sectors, and supply chains.

Concerns also exist regarding fuel supply stability, public messaging that may contribute to market volatility, and the potential impact of fuel quality changes on modern vehicles.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Improve transparency in fuel pricing and wholesale cost linkage

   2. Strengthen ACCC oversight and response capability

   3. Introduce protections against excessive or unexplained price increases

   4. Improve public reporting and monitoring of fuel prices

   5. Introduce penalties where pricing practices are misleading or anti-competitive

   6. Ensure clear communication on fuel supply and maintain fuel quality standards

from 45 citizens (Petition No. EN9683)

Australian Constitution

Australians do not know their Constitution of Federation 1901

We therefore ask the House to do all in its power to ensure free copies of the Commonwealth Constitution 1901 and the availability of free online educational courses on the constitution 1901 to the people of Australia.

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN9684)

Skilled Migration Program

We draw the House's attention to the unexplained stagnation in processing Hong Kong Stream (Subclass 189/191) visas. Since September 2025, visa grants have virtually ceased, leaving many applicants in indefinite limbo.

This delay contradicts the humanitarian intent of the "Safe Haven" policy, established to protect Hong Kong and BNO passport holders from deteriorating human rights and political instability. These applicants, who have lived and worked in Australia for years, share our core values of democracy and the rule of law. Prolonged uncertainty inflicts severe psychological and financial hardship on these families.

Critically, the lack of transparency regarding processing times and quota usage has created an information vacuum. This is being exploited by unethical migration agencies to spread misinformation, claiming the stream has permanently closed to coerce vulnerable applicants into unnecessary, costly alternatives. This has sparked widespread panic and destabilised long-term settlement plans for the Hong Kong community.

We therefore ask the House to

Immediate Resumption: Direct the Department of Home Affairs to immediately resume the granting of Subclass 189 and 191 visas for the Hong Kong Stream to clear the existing backlog.

Transparency: Provide a clear and transparent timeline for the processing of current applications to counteract misinformation and restore certainty for the Hong Kong community in Australia.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN9688)

Taxation

Grievous disparity in foreign resource entities not paying any tax on sovereign resources. Introduction of a single entity responsible for all natural resources earmarked for export and identifying loopholes in the current taxations framework that are exploited by these foreign companies.

We therefore ask the House to consider identifying all foreign resource companies who are negligent in their tax and PRRT responsibilities and holding them accountable and in-default of their financial responsibilities to the Australian public.

from 26 citizens (Petition No. EN9693)

Syria

Certain Australian Christian citizens of Syrian descent have close family members applying for humanitarian visas to Australia, residing in high-risk conflict zones such as Erbil, Iraq, and Lebanon. Their applications have been pending for over four years, and other applicants have reached 8 years, during which the circumstances pose an immediate threat to their safety, including the risk of death or serious harm. Moreover, there is no possibility of return to Syria due to extremism, lack of security and an increase in the rate of murder and kidnapping specifically for minorities. The number of these Christian families is limited, and their Australian relatives are suffering due to this separation and the precarious conditions affecting their lives.

All proposing Australian families are prepared to assist in facilitating their integration into the Australian community and do not wish to be a burden, considering the current economic and political context.

We therefore ask the House to discuss this matter with the utmost urgency and to refer it to the Department of Immigration, represented by Minister Tony Burke, requesting that a ministerial directive be issued prioritising these Christian family visa applications on compassionate and compelling grounds, given their imminent danger.

from 332 citizens (Petition No. EN9710)

Migration

Currently, some visa applicants provide police clearances that exclude 'spent' or 'expunged' convictions, in accordance with the laws of their home country. This enables individuals with a history of child-related sexual offences to enter Australia without their complete criminal history being disclosed. This loophole poses a direct threat to the safety of Australian children. In order to maintain the integrity of our borders and protect our most vulnerable citizens, it is crucial that the Australian government requires access to complete and unfiltered criminal histories for all applicants. No serious prior offence should be able to remain hidden simply because it was legally 'cleared' or 'removed' in another jurisdiction.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Migration Act to mandate "Full Disclosure" criminal record checks for all visa applicants. This requirement must specifically include all child-related offenses, including those considered spent or expunged under the laws of the applicant's home country, ensuring no prior child sex offense is hidden during the visa assessment process.

from 87 citizens (Petition No. EN9711)

National Disability Insurance Scheme

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is funded by public money and is intended solely to provide supports to participants.

There is growing concern that current regulatory frameworks do not provide sufficient transparency in how NDIS funds are used by providers. While providers are required to deliver services, there is limited visibility over how funds are spent within their businesses.

This creates a risk that NDIS funds may be diverted to non-service-related expenses, including excessive profits, executive remuneration, related party arrangements, or personal benefit.

The absence of detailed financial transparency allows inappropriate expenditure to be concealed within general business costs, making it difficult to detect misuse and undermining public trust in the scheme.

Stronger financial accountability is necessary to ensure that NDIS funds are used for their intended purpose and that providers handling public money are subject to appropriate oversight.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation to strengthen financial transparency and accountability of NDIS providers, including:

   1. Recognising NDIS funds as public money requiring enhanced accountability;

   2. Requiring providers to account for the use of NDIS funds, including detailed expenditure reporting across all business expenses;

   3. Requiring providers to maintain transaction-level financial records accessible to regulators;

   4. Strengthening audit, monitoring, and enforcement powers, including retrospective investigations where appropriate; and

   5. Introducing appropriate public reporting to ensure transparency while protecting privacy and commercial considerations.

from 77 citizens (Petition No. EN9712)

Mining Industry: Taxation

Australia forecast $383 billion in resource and energy export earnings for 2025-26, yet the national rental vacancy rate has fallen to 1.1%—well below the 3% required for a functioning market. In Perth, the vacancy rate is 0.6%.Australia's Petroleum Resource Rent Tax raised approximately $1.5 billion in 2025-26—less than beer excise—while the government provided $16.3 billion in fossil fuel tax concessions the same year. Norway, with comparable resource production, collects approximately $60 billion annually in petroleum tax and holds a $3.1 trillion sovereign wealth fund. Australia has no equivalent national savings vehicle.

We therefore ask the House to tives to:

Enact a 10% non-deductible flat royalty on all mineral and gas export earnings, ring-fenced by legislation into a National Housing Trust, to fund the construction of social and affordable housing until the national rental vacancy rate reaches 3%.

Commission a Treasury-led feasibility study into establishing a Digital Sovereign Wealth Fund, modelled on Norway's Government Pension Fund Global, with a legislated beneficial interest for Australian citizens.

Conduct an independent review of all fossil fuel tax concessions, including the Federal Fuel Tax Credit Scheme, with a view to redirecting savings to cost-of-living relief for low and middle-income households.

from 34 citizens (Petition No. EN9713)

Road Safety

White LED vehicle lights are extremely bright and create dangerous glare for drivers. They can temporarily blind oncoming traffic, and during rain, the light reflects off the road, making lane markings hard to see. Drivers who wear glasses often experience double glare, but all drivers are affected. This is a serious road safety issue that increases the risk of accidents. We are asking the government to ban non-standard white LED lights and reinstate yellow headlights as the standard to improve visibility and protect everyone on the road.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation banning non-standard white LED vehicle lights on all Australian roads and to reinstate yellow headlights as the standard. This will protect all citizens from harm by reducing glare-related accidents and improving visibility for drivers, cyclists, scooter riders, and pedestrians.

from 93 citizens (Petition No. EN9715)

Food Industry: Taxation

Highly processed foods that are high in sugar, salt, fat, and preservatives are cheap and widely available, making them easy choices for many Australians. Regular consumption of these foods contributes to serious public health issues, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, dental decay, and mental health problems.

Conversely, organic, minimally processed, low-sugar, and low-preservative foods are often more expensive, discouraging healthy eating despite their long-term benefits. This imbalance leads to higher healthcare costs, reduced workforce productivity, increased strain on hospitals, and intergenerational health consequences.

Rewarding healthy eating through tax incentives on wholesome foods and discouraging unhealthy options through targeted taxes can:

Reduce obesity rates and chronic disease prevalence.

Encourage local and sustainable agriculture, reducing environmental impact from intensive processed food production.

Support families and communities in making healthier food choices without financial penalty.

Decrease healthcare costs and improve population productivity.

Promote healthier children, reducing risks of lifelong diseases.

Improve mental well-being through better nutrition.

By making healthy eating financially rewarding, we create a society that values nutrition, longevity, and well-being.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation that:

Imposes a tax on highly processed, high-sugar, high-preservative foods.

Provides higher tax breaks for organic foods.

Provides moderate tax breaks for foods that are minimally processed, low in sugar, and low in preservatives.

This policy will reward healthy choices, encourage better lifestyles, reduce chronic disease, and benefit communities, citizens, and the environment.

from 41 citizens (Petition No. EN9719)

Visa Cancellation or Refusal

Yik Kwan Chan and his family have been ordered to leave Australia. Chan and his family are valued members of the Bright Alpine Uniting Church and the wider Bright community. It would be a sad loss for all that know him to lose this hard working contributor to Bright.

We therefore ask the House to grant Yik Kwan Chan and his family permission to remain in Australia

from 109 citizens (Petition No. PN0657)

Petitions received.

Responses

Skilled Migration

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7373—Right of skill assessment on the basis of Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and Australian experience. My response to Petition EN7373 is below.

Distinction between mutual recognition and skilled migration requirements

Applying for registration under the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (TTMR Act) and applying for a migration skills assessment required for an Australian skilled visa application are distinct processes with different purposes and eligibility criteria.

The TTMR Act gives effect to a bilateral agreement between Australia and New Zealand that facilitates the mutual recognition of occupational registration. It allows individuals registered in a regulated profession in New Zealand to apply for registration in the equivalent profession in Australia with the Ahpra. Its purpose is to support professional mobility, but it is not for migration purposes.

A migration skills assessment is a separate process governed by Australia's migration laws. It is administered by the Department of Home Affairs to determine whether an applicant's qualifications and experience meet the standards required for skilled migration or visa.

While registration under the TTMR Act may demonstrate professional competence for the purposes of practising in an occupation, it does not automatically satisfy the criteria for a positive migration skills assessment.

The Australian Physiotherapy Council's (APC) role in skills assessments

APC is specified as the assessing authority for the occupation of physiotherapists for the purpose of sub regulation 2.26B(l) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Migration Regulations).

As the assessing authority for the occupation of physiotherapists, the APC is required to set standards against which the skills of a physiotherapist are assessed for migration law purposes under sub regulation 2.26B(2) of the Migration Regulations. The Migration Regulations do not prescribe matters that assessing authorities must have regard to, or must include, when setting their own occupational assessment standards and eligibility criteria to apply for migration skills assessments. As such, the APC cannot be required by the Australian Government under the Migration Regulations to change or remove the requirement to demonstrate prior clinical experience to qualify for one of their migration skills assessment pathways.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

from the Deputy Leader of the House, Mr Butler

Myanmar

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence enclosing Petition EN8072 on the crisis in Myanmar.

The Australian Government has grave concerns about the political and humanitarian crisis in Myanmar. On 1 February 2026, I issued a statement marking five years since the military coup in Myanmar. I noted that recent regime elections were held amid ongoing violence and repression, and without meaningful participation from opposition parties, and they did not meet the conditions for free, fair and inclusive elections.

Australia has consistently condemned the regime's brutal and ongoing atrocities against the people of Myanmar, and we will continue to judge the Myanmar military by its actions. We continue to urge a peaceful transition of power to a democratic civilian government that reflects the will of the people.

Prior to the elections on 10 December 2025, Human Rights Day, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade released a statement calling for an end to violence, release of all those unjustly detained and inclusive dialogue among all stakeholders. The statement noted that elections held without these conditions would lead to greater instability and prevent a peaceful resolution to the ongoing crisis.

Australia's sanctions have been used judiciously to target regime leaders and limit the regime's access to funds for arms and jet fuel. We continue to keep our sanctions under review, in close consultation with like-minded partners. Australia also maintains an arms embargo on Myanmar and supports calls for a global arms embargo.

Australia stands with the people of Myanmar, including through our humanitarian assistance and support for education, health, livelihoods and civil society. Since 2017, Australia has committed over AUDl.26 billion in humanitarian assistance to the people of Myanmar, including the displaced Rohingya and their host communities in Bangladesh. This includes a new three-year program of AUD370 million starting in 2026. This is Australia's largest humanitarian response package. We take proactive steps to ensure that our assistance is not diverted to the regime and does not legitimise nor give credibility to the regime.

We will continue to work with regional and international partners to support a better future for the people of Myanmar.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 9 February 2026 regarding Petition EN8494 concerning the social media minimum age law.

I acknowledge the points raised in the petition regarding the benefits social media can provide, including connection, community and education for young Australians. However, the evidence is also clear that social media is causing harm to young Australians, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

The social media minimum age legislation reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to these harms.

The new law does not seek to rule out digital participation for young people, and it does not 'cut off the internet' for under 16s. Young people will still be able to explore, learn and express themselves on platforms that are not age-restricted. This includes on messaging services, online games, professional networking and professional development services, and services that primarily function to support the health and education of users.

Since becoming the Minister for Communications, I've sat down with many young people to hear their views on the social media minimum age. I've been heartened to hear that many are supportive of the measure. At the same time, many also told me that they didn't know life without social media, and that the adjustment was going to be hard.

That is why in October 2025, I hosted a roundtable with close to 20 frontline mental health organisations to ensure they are prepared to help young people manage the changes. My department and the eSafety Commissioner have also developed a suite of resources to support mental health experts, educators, and parents and carers to have conversations with young people about the new law and how it will impact them.

These resources are available at esafety.gov.au. I would encourage the signatories of the petition to explore the materials and share them with the young people in their lives.

While the social media minimum age will go a long way in addressing online harm, it is one part in the Government's broader online safety agenda which includes an established online safety regulatory framework under the eSafety Commissioner, investment in digital literacy through the Alannah and Madeline Foundation and a commitment to legislate a Digital Duty of Care. Collectively, these measures are uplifting online safety and contributing to healthier digital experiences for both Australian children and adults.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Early Childhood Education and Care

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 9 February 2026 about petition EN8543 being presented to the Standing Committee on Petitions to lower the child to educator ratios in early childhood education and care (ECEC) services.

Education Ministers asked the Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) to undertake a rapid assessment of the operational application of educator to child ratio requirements and of practices that improve safeguarding and supervision in services, and how these could be strengthened to uphold child safety. In February 2026, Education Ministers agreed to a series of supervision-related reforms, with consultation to commence immediately and outcomes to be provided to Ministers in mid-2026.

ACECQA's published report on the Rapid Assessment of Child Safe Practices can be found at www.acecga.gov.au/resources/research/research-ngf-and-acecqa-research-reports.

All governments are taking action to ensure the safety of our children in ECEC settings. Education Ministers most recently met in February 2026 to consider progress on agreed actions to strengthen safety, improve quality and protect children.

The Australian Government, in coordinated action with states and territories, has agreed to invest $226 million to strengthen safety and quality in ECEC settings including:

A stronger workforce with mandatory child safe training, a national educator register, and a review of staffing practices.

Stronger rules in centres to ban personal devices that take images, a CCTV assessment, and more information for parents.

Stronger regulation, with increased penalties, more regulator visits, and withdrawing funding from poor providers.

Work on each of the measures outlined above commenced immediately after the August meeting of Education Ministers and was made a priority for action. This represents the biggest reform to the sector since the national early learning system was introduced 15 years ago.

Ministers were briefed on progress of these measures at the Education Ministers Meeting on 17 October 2025. Amendments to the Education and Care Services National Law Act 2010 passed the Victorian Parliament in December 2025. This means these updated laws have been adopted in all states and territories as happens under the National Law arrangements. This will embed stronger safety and quality standards for all Australian ECEC services, with a focus on the rights and best interests of children.

The Government has also passed legislation to cut funding to ECEC centres that are failing to meet the quality and safety standards. Already compliance actions have been initiated against more than 60 services under these new powers.

Please be assured the Government is committed to strengthening protections for children and working with closely Regulatory Authorities in all states and territories to make sure these protections are implemented in full.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to my attention and your continued advocacy and engagement on behalf of families and children in your electorate.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Early Childhood Education, Senator Walsh

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 9 February 2026 regarding Petition EN8548 concerning the social media minimum age.

I acknowledge the points raised in the petition regarding the benefits social media can provide, including connection, community and education for young Australians. However, the evidence is also clear that social media is causing harm to Australian kids, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

The social media minimum age legislation reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to these harms.

The new law does not seek to rule out digital participation for young people, and it does not 'cut off the internet' for under 16s. Young people will still be able to explore, learn and express themselves on platforms that are not age-restricted. This includes on messaging services, online games, professional networking and professional development services, and services that primarily function to support the health and education of users.

Since becoming the Minister for Communications, I've sat down with many young people to hear their views on the social media minimum age. I've been heartened to hear that many are supportive of the measure. At the same time, many also told me that they didn't know life without social media, and that the adjustment was going to be hard.

That is why in October 2025, I hosted a roundtable with close to 20 frontline mental health organisations to ensure they are prepared to help young people manage the changes. My department and the eSafety Commissioner have also developed a suite of resources to support mental health experts, educators, and parents and carers to have conversations with young people about the new law and how it will impact them.

These resources are available at esafety.gov.au. I would encourage the signatories of the petition to explore the materials and share them with the young people in their lives.

While the social media minimum age will go a long way in addressing online harm, it is one part in the Government's broader online safety agenda which includes an established online safety regulatory framework under the eSafety Commissioner, investment in digital literacy through the Alannah and Madeline Foundation and a commitment to legislate a Digital Duty of Care. Collectively, these measures are uplifting online safety and contributing to healthier digital experiences for both Australian children and adults.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Pregnancy Loss, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence dated 9 February 2026 to the Hon Michelle Rowland MP, Attorney-General, concerning petition number EN8549, regarding leave entitlements in the Fair Work Act 2009. As the matter raised falls within my portfolio responsibilities, your correspondence has been forwarded to me for reply.

The loss of a pregnancy is a difficult event for parents, both physically and emotionally. The National Employment Standards (NES), which provide a safety net of minimum entitlements for all Australian national system employees, acknowledge this by providing 2 days of compassionate leave if an employee, their spouse or de facto partner has a miscarriage and the child was not a stillborn child. The NES also provides a minimum entitlement to paid personal/carer's leave for certain employees which lets employees take time off to help them deal with personal illness, caring responsibilities or family emergencies.

Employees may also be entitled to take unpaid special parental leave if their pregnancy ends after 12 weeks, the child was not stillborn and they are not fit for work. This entitlement provides another option for time off for those recovering from the loss of a pregnancy.

Central to Australia's workplace relations system is the ability for employees and employers to bargain for entitlements above the minimum safety net. Employees can negotiate entitlements through enterprise bargaining and many agreements provide leave entitlements, beyond the NES, for those experiencing pregnancy loss prior to 20 weeks. This government has introduced supported bargaining to help workers in lower-paid and feminised sectors negotiate better pay and conditions. This supports workers and their unions to bargain for entitlements which support workers and the workplace.

The government recognises the importance of ensuring workplace laws remain responsive to the needs of workers and employers. The ongoing Inquiry into the operation and adequacy of the NES may examine the adequacy of current compassionate leave and other miscarriage related entitlements. Submissions for the Inquiry closed on 27 February 2026. I have forwarded your correspondence to the Chair of the Inquiry. More information on the Inquiry can be found at www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/employment_workplace_relations_skills_and_training.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, Ms Rishworth

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 9 February 2026 regarding the petition to add approved weight-loss medicines to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) (petition EN8800).

The Australian Government thanks the petitioners for raising concerns about access to weight-loss medicines, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) therapies, and recognises obesity as a significant and growing public health issue that contributes to serious long-term health risks and pressure on the health system.

The Government acknowledges concerns about the high out-of-pocket costs of some newer medicines and the impact this can have on equity of access. While affordability is a core objective of the PBS, decisions about subsidy must ensure medicines are safe, clinically effective and represent value for money for taxpayers.

Before a medicine can be listed on the PBS for a particular condition, it must be assessed by the independent Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). The PBAC considers evidence on safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and provides recommendations to Government, which the Government relies on when making PBS listing decisions. Only pharmaceutical companies can apply for PBS listing of their medicines.

In March 2025, the Government sought PBAC advice on equitable access to obesity medicines. At its November 2025 meeting, the PBAC identified priority populations likely to benefit most from subsidised access to GLP-1 medicines and advised that any expansion should be managed and staged, noting uncertainties regarding long-term use, safety and cost impacts. This advice is available at www.pbs.gov.au/info/reviews/PBAC-advice-equitable-access-to-GLP-1-obesity-treatments.

At the same meeting, the PBAC recommended PBS subsidy of semaglutide (Wegovy) for adults with obesity and established cardiovascular disease, subject to specific eligibility criteria. Following a positive PBAC recommendation, further steps are required before a medicine can be listed on the PBS, including agreement on pricing and subsidy arrangements between the sponsor and the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. Information on the status of PBS listings is available at www.pbs.gov.au/medicinestatus.

The Government remains committed to working with the PBAC, clinicians, consumers and industry to support safe, effective and sustainable access to medicines through the PBS.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Suicide and Self-Harm

Dear Chair

Thank you for yourcorrespondence of 9 February 2026 regarding petition EN8812 which requests a national review of the contributing factors for all suicides in Australia over the past decade.

The Australian Government understands the devastating impact mental health challenges and suicide has on individuals, families and communities and acknowledges the need for high quality data collection to inform policy responses and monitor progress.

The Government is investing $11.9 million from 2025-26 to 2027-28 to further improve suicide and self-harm information and data through the National Suicide and Self Harm Monitoring System project. The Monitoring System project supports the safe use of suicide-related data by governments, Primary Health Networks, service providers, researchers and other suicide prevention sector organisations, to identify population trends and emerging risks and inform policy and program responses. The Monitoring System project includes enhancements to the National Mortality Database that enables reporting of risk factors associated with suicide deaths from 2017 onwards. This data is available on the Australian Bureau of Statistics website.

The coding system used in the National Mortality Database to ensure comparability of deaths data and the associated risk factors, the International Classification of Diseases·1oth edition (ICD-10), does not currently allow for domestic family and sexual violence (DFSV) to be reported as a unique risk factor. Experience of DFSV is currently reflected under broader categories such as 'Problems in spousal relationships', which can include separation and divorce as well as arguments and domestic violence situations.

In 2025, analysis of the National Mortality Database found that the most common psychosocial risk factor of suicide was problems in spousal relationships circumstances, present in 25.7% of suicides overall and most commonly mentioned as a risk factor for those aged between 25-44 years (31.1%). Problems in spousal relationships was the third most common risk factor for suicide mentioned for males who died by suicide. This compares to the fifth most common for females.

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare is currently leading the implementation of an updated coding system, the ICD-11. The ICD-11 is expected to have more granular coding in areas such as self-harm and suicide, and domestic, family and sexual violence, which will help fill known gaps in routinely collected data on the risk factors for suicide in Australia.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Australian National Flag

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email dated 23 March 2026 to the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister, regarding petition EN9333 which requests that the Australian Government considers criminalisation of any destruction or defacing of the Australian National Flag, ensigns and all State and Territory flags. The Prime Minister has asked me to reply on his behalf as the Minister with responsibility for Australian symbols policy.

The Australian National Flag is Australia's foremost national symbol and is an expression of Australian identity and pride. The flag is paraded by our defence forces and is displayed by national sporting groups, community groups and private citizens. The Government also respects the Australian Aboriginal Flag and the Torres Strait Islander Flag and encourages their display together with the Australian National Flag.

The Government believes that the overwhelming majority of Australians deplore the actions of those who desecrate the Australian National Flag or other official flags of Australia.

The Government acknowledges the importance of freedom of expression as a fundamental part of our free and democratic society. However, there are more appropriate and respectful ways for Australians to express their political views.

While there are no penalties regarding the desecration of the Australian National Flag or other flags under the Flags Act 1953, individuals still have to comply with other Australian laws. In certain circumstances, conduct associated with desecration of the flag may constitute an offence under state and territory criminal law, for example, public order or property damage offences.

The Government is satisfied that the community will make its own judgement, in a respectful manner, against those who dishonour the flag in this way.

The Government encourages all Australians to follow flag protocol when displaying the Australian National Flag or other flags. More information regarding flag protocol is available in the Australian Flags booklet, which is available on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet's website at www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/government/australian-flags-booklet-0.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to the Government's attention and I trust this information will be of assistance. I have provided a copy of this correspondence to the Prime Minister.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister, Mr Gorman

Statements

Cost of Living

Budget

Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026

Mackellar Electorate: National Volunteer Week

Budget

Budget

Menzies Electorate: Community Organisations

Defence Properties: Woodside Barracks

Every One Cafe

Budget

Volunteering

Albanese Government

Albanese Government

Budget

Volunteering

Budget

International Wine Day

Budget

Health Care

Budget

Environment

Budget

Budget

Budget

Budget

Housing

Acknowledgement

Budget

Fuel Security