Presentation

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about Australia's long-term energy security, climate commitments, and global competitiveness. Fusion energy offers a transformative solution: it is clean, safe, and practically limitless. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste, significantly reducing long-term storage and disposal challenges. Moreover, fusion does not carry the same proliferation risks associated with fission technologies. Other nations—including the US, UK, and China—are investing heavily in fusion research and development. Australia risks being left behind in this critical field, missing opportunities to create high-skill jobs, boost advanced manufacturing, and position itself as a leader in the Asia-Pacific region. Our nation's wealth of scientific talent, natural resources, and technological infrastructure uniquely position us to take advantage of this opportunity. We believe that investment in fusion aligns with Australia's net-zero commitments, national security interests, and long-term prosperity.

We therefore ask the House to establish a dedicated national program to accelerate the research, development, and deployment of fusion energy technologies in Australia. This should include significant funding for research institutions, industry partnerships, and pilot projects; a strategic roadmap; and coordination with international efforts to ensure Australia remains competitive and sovereign in this critical emerging industry.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN7567)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned about Australia's energy security and its commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Fusion energy offers a long-term, sustainable solution that is clean, safe, and virtually limitless. Unlike traditional fission reactors, fusion produces no high-level nuclear waste and has minimal risk of accidents or weaponisation. Other leading nations are investing billions into fusion research and development, aiming to commercialise this technology in the next decades. Australia, however, lacks a coordinated national fusion program and risks falling behind in this crucial field. By investing in fusion research, Australia can create thousands of highly skilled jobs, boost advanced manufacturing, and strengthen national resilience against climate change and geopolitical instability. Our scientific talent and natural resources give us a unique advantage to lead the Asia-Pacific region in fusion innovation.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national strategy for fusion energy development. This should include targeted funding for research institutions, support for industry partnerships, regulatory frameworks for pilot plants, and incentives for private sector investment. A coordinated approach will ensure Australia can harness fusion's potential and become a leader in the clean energy revolution, ensuring secure, reliable, and sustainable energy for generations to come.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN7568)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, recognise the critical need for Australia to strengthen its national security and defence capabilities while meeting its climate commitments. Fusion energy offers a transformative solution to these challenges by providing a safe, virtually limitless, and low-emissions energy source. Unlike fission, fusion has no high-level radioactive waste and no risk of weaponisation, making it ideal for powering future defence platforms and strategic infrastructure. As nations including the US, UK, and France accelerate their fusion programs, Australia risks falling behind in this critical technology, undermining our defence sovereignty and industrial base. Developing domestic fusion capacity can support next-generation propulsion systems for naval and aerospace platforms, enhance energy security for bases and critical infrastructure, and position Australia as a leader in advanced defence technologies in the Indo-Pacific region. This is essential to strengthen our national resilience and maintain technological parity with allies.

We therefore ask the House to establish a dedicated national program to develop fusion energy for Australia's defence and national security. This should include investment in fusion research, partnerships with defence industries, support for pilot projects, and collaboration with international allies to accelerate deployment of fusion technologies. Such a program will protect Australia's strategic interests and ensure our defence forces remain modern, sustainable, and sovereign in a rapidly changing global security environment.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN7569)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's long-term economic prosperity depends on diversifying its energy mix and investing in cutting-edge technologies that create high-value jobs and secure our national future. Fusion energy promises abundant, safe, and low-emissions electricity that can revolutionise Australia's economy. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce high-level radioactive waste or pose significant proliferation risks, making it a safer, more sustainable choice. Major economies—including the US, UK, China, and South Korea—are investing billions in fusion research and development, aiming to capture the vast economic potential of this transformative technology. If Australia fails to act now, we risk losing out on a global market expected to reach trillions of dollars in the coming decades. By investing in fusion, we can create thousands of highly skilled jobs, attract private capital, and secure our position as a technology leader in the Asia-Pacific region. Fusion energy can also boost advanced manufacturing, export opportunities, and sovereign supply chains, strengthening Australia's resilience in a rapidly changing world.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy program that includes funding for research and development, support for industry partnerships, regulatory frameworks for demonstration plants, and incentives for private investment. This program will ensure that Australia benefits from the economic, technological, and strategic opportunities that fusion energy offers, driving sustainable growth and innovation across the nation.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN7570)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about the continued reliance on fission-based nuclear power, which produces long-lived radioactive waste, carries risks of catastrophic accidents, and creates proliferation challenges. These issues impose significant costs on taxpayers and future generations. In contrast, fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy source without high-level radioactive waste or the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. The global community is investing heavily in fusion research and development, with many countries aiming for commercial deployment within the next two decades. Australia risks being left behind if we continue to invest in outdated and potentially hazardous fission technologies. By prioritising fusion energy, Australia can lead in clean technology, create thousands of high-skilled jobs, and secure energy independence while avoiding the long-term liabilities associated with fission. We believe that the shift towards fusion is not only scientifically sound but also economically and environmentally responsible.

We therefore ask the House to commit to phasing out investments in fission-based nuclear technologies and instead prioritise the development of fusion energy. This includes funding for fusion research, partnerships with industry, and a clear regulatory framework to support the safe and rapid deployment of fusion power. Such an approach will ensure Australia's energy future is clean, safe, and economically sustainable, free from the long-term burdens of fission waste and risk.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN7571)

Migration

My dear friend Shaaban and his family could die if they are not saved and evacuated from Gaza. As an Australian citizen living in Melbourne, I would support Shaaban, Fatima, and Rajaa, the Mortaga family. I would sponsor them and help get them over here. They have already lost their father Ibrahim to the hell-like conditions. Shaaban has dreams, he is kind, and he is a hard worker with a degree from Gaza City University in Economics. He misses working and making his family proud, he can speak English and Arabic. The Mortaga family would be an asset to this country. We have so much space to share in Australia, we do not need these offshore island centres, barely any of this land is used. None of the Mortaga family has any criminal history or association with criminals; they are peaceful people who just don't want to die.

We therefore ask the House to With the hopes of Gaza's borders opening up to the world again with this new US deal, I want to call on Senator Penny Wong, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Premier of Victoria Jacinta Allan. Please let the Mortaga family come and live in Australia.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN8483)

Fraud

Individuals and business providers who commit Fraud under NDIS should be held accountable for taking advantage of some of the most vulnerable community members.

We're asking that their assets get frozen or removed from their and/or their family's possession under the Confiscation & Proceeds of Crime Act if they're caught misusing funding for their own personal or business benefits.

Navigating an NDIS plan can be incredibly difficult for people with disabilities. Often, this is done right under their nose without any understanding of what's actually happening. It's wrong, and we believe these people who take advantage of people should be treated and held accountable for the criminals they are. It is time to set the example and stand up!

We therefore ask the House to hold individuals who commit these crimes properly accountable as criminal convictions

from 59 citizens (Petition No. EN8485)

Cybersafety

The undersigned citizens of Australia draw the attention of the House to the significant risks posed to children by the online gaming platform, Roblox. Its structure, which relies on user-generated content and social features, creates an environment where children are exposed to harm.

We are concerned about predatory adults using the platform's chat features for grooming and unsolicited contact. Children are also frequently exposed to inappropriate user-created content, including themes of violence, horror, and sexual material. Furthermore, the platform's "Robux" currency and integrated gambling-like mechanics encourage addictive spending and normalise harmful gambling behaviours in minors. Current moderation and safety measures are proving insufficient to protect young Australians from these serious and escalating risks.

We therefore ask the House to request the House to launch an urgent parliamentary inquiry into the safety of the Roblox platform and its impact on Australian children. This inquiry should scrutinise the platform's content moderation effectiveness, safety features, and compliance with the Online Safety Act 2021.

(Note to Clerk: Principal Petitioner does not have a phone number. Contact is via email only.)

Following this inquiry, we urge the House to develop stronger, specific regulations for digital platforms targeted at children. These new regulations should mandate robust age verification, enforce safety-by-design principles, and prohibit exploitative monetisation and gambling-like mechanics to ensure the digital environment is safe for Australia's youngest citizens.

from 26 citizens (Petition No. EN8486)

Corporate Governance

Repeatedly we have seen corporations get away with a "slap on the wrist" fine for illegal actions. An example of this are the fines Qantas was forced to pay in August of this year for illegally outsourcing 1,800 ground crew jobs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. While the fines Qantas paid seem substantial, the fact is that including the penalties they paid, Qantas still saved money from this illegal act, sending the message that fines for corporate wrongdoings in Australia are simply just the cost of doing business and not a genuine deterrence, and another example of the Government treating corporations better than they treat their own citizens.

We therefore ask the House to introduce a bill that allows the Government to seize a percentage (above 5%) of the operations (indefinitely) of large companies that attempt to hurt Australian's in the pursuit of profit. Any wealth gained from the seizure will then be redistributed amongst Federal, State and Local governments to provide essential services to it's citizens, in the same way taxes are.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN8488)

National Disability Insurance Scheme

We, the undersigned, call on the House of Representatives to:

   1. Guarantee Lifelong Access

Once a person is accepted into the NDIS, they must never be involuntarily removed at plan review while their permanent disability remains.

   2. Protect Current Participants

Any tightening of eligibility rules must only apply to NEW applicants. Existing participants must not be disadvantaged.

   3. Stop the Fear of Reviews

Participants must not live in fear that at each plan review they will lose their supports. Reviews should focus on supports, not eligibility.

   4. Maintain Minimum Supports

No participant should ever drop below the level of support needed to manage their permanent disability and live safely.

   5. Guarantee Equivalent State Services if Removed

If the NDIA ever seeks to withdraw participants or services, then equivalent supports (Allied Health, Assistive Technology, Home Modifications, Community Supports) must be provided by the States/Territories free of charge, with no reduction in benefit.

We therefore ask the House to

   1. Legislate that once accepted into the NDIS, participants cannot be involuntarily removed, except in cases of fraud or misrepresentation, recognising that permanent disability is lifelong.

   2. Amend the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) so that any future tightening of access criteria applies only to new applicants, not existing participants.

   3. Ensure plan reviews focus on supports, not re-testing eligibility, and that no participant's supports fall below the minimum needed for safe, dignified living.

   4. Guarantee that if the Commonwealth reduces or withdraws NDIS supports, equivalent services of equal quality must be provided by the States and Territories free of charge, including allied health, assistive technology, home modifications, and community access.

from 49 citizens (Petition No. EN8490)

Qualification of Members and Senators

We, the undersigned, call on the House of Representatives to:

   1. Require Australian Birth

Only people born in Australia should be eligible to run for Parliament.

   2. Require Australian Parentage

Both parents of a candidate must also have been born in Australia.

   3. Hold a Referendum

Change the Constitution to enshrine these rules and protect our democracy.

   4. Update Electoral Law

Amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act so that every candidate must hold an Australian Birth Certificate.

   5. Protect Australia's Democracy

Safeguard Parliament so that those who make laws for Australians have an undivided, lifelong allegiance to Australia.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Initiate a referendum to amend the Australian Constitution so that eligibility for election to the House of Representatives and the Senate is restricted to persons born in Australia, holding an Australian Birth Certificate, with both parents likewise born in Australia.

   2. Amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) and related laws to reflect and enforce these constitutional requirements.

   3. Affirm that the preservation of Australia's democratic system requires Members of Parliament to hold undivided and lifelong allegiance to the Australian nation, free from competing heritage or divided loyalties.

from 29 citizens (Petition No. EN8491)

Personal Information and Privacy

We urge the Australian House of Representatives to stop the Digital ID system due to significant concerns. It risks centralizing sensitive personal data, increasing vulnerability to cyberattacks and data breaches, as seen in past government system failures. Digital ID threatens individual privacy by enabling extensive tracking and profiling without adequate consent. It could exclude those without digital access, exacerbating inequality. The system's mandatory aspects undermine personal autonomy, forcing participation in a potentially insecure framework. Global examples show digital IDs often lead to surveillance overreach and misuse by authorities. Australia's existing identity systems, like myGov, already function effectively, making Digital ID redundant. Public consultation has been insufficient, with many Australians unaware of the implications. The rushed legislative process ignores widespread opposition, as evidenced by thousands of petition signatures and public campaigns. Stopping Digital ID will protect citizens from privacy erosion, ensure equitable access to services, and maintain trust in governance. We demand the repeal of the Digital ID Bill 2024 to safeguard our rights and freedoms.

We therefore ask the House to take action on the following matters. We, the undersigned, call on the Australian House of Representatives to take immediate action to halt the implementation of the Digital ID system, including repealing the Digital ID Bill 2024 and any associated legislation, to protect the privacy, security, and autonomy of all Australians.

from 97 citizens (Petition No. EN8492)

Australian Society: Population

Nearly every major challenge facing our nation—housing, healthcare, education, infrastructure, environmental pressures, welfare systems, and social cohesion—can be traced back to one factor: population growth. Current immigration policy only addresses border entry, not the wider consequences of population increase.

Each new household requires not only a home but also secure access to water, food production, transport networks, energy, storage, and environmental resources. Without coordinated planning, these demands will continue to outpace supply.

Australia needs a holistic, whole-of-nation approach to population management—covering both immigration and natural growth—that places sustainability at its core and ensures the well being of all Australians now and into the future.

We therefore ask the House to implement a comprehensive national population plan to ensure Australia's long-term sustainability.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8493)

Cybersafety

We are calling on the Australian Government to reconsider the proposed nationwide ban that will prevent individuals under the age of 16 from holding social media accounts. Instead, we urge the government to set the minimum age at 13, as that is the current age for many social media platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and Snapchat.

Preventing under 16 year olds access to social media will exclude an entire generation from participating in local and global societies. For many teenagers social media gives a sense of community and belonging, as well as helps teenagers struggling mentally by giving us resources, the confidence to ask for help, and a space to feel safe.

Social media is also an educational tool that teaches teens skills like cooking, sewing and even helping us to understand schoolwork. It also provides an important creative outlet, one that many people need.

Social media is the only place we can speak freely and have our voices be heard in a way that is not filtered by adults.

While we understand the intent to protect us online you are making it more dangerous as it compromises our ability to practice safe behaviours we will need throughout life. Instead you should focus on making social media safer for all.

We urge the Australian government to act now, lower the age before it's too late.

Be the reason we get to keep our voice, sign the petition.

We therefore ask the House to lower the age of the social media ban to 13

from 44,054 citizens (Petition No. EN8494)

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

1. Definitions:

The ABC is Australia's publicly funded Broadcaster and NEWS source.

ACON is the Aids Council of NSW, started to assist with AIDS awareness during the 1980's AIDS crisis. It has since added gender diversity interests to its portfolio.

2. The problem

a. The ABC are 'Principal Partners' and Platinum Employers with ACON. They have won awards from ACON for diversity recruitment and production / presentation of content in support of ACON initiatives eg 'First Day or ABC Queer.

c. The ABC provide celebrities free of charge for ACON events.

d. A 2025 study of ABC Online NEWS articles related to gender identity found a heavy bias in favor of transgender and non-binary perspectives. 'Bias by omission' and 'opinion presented as fact' were common descriptors.

The ABC, via its Charter and the The Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, must follow the standards of objective NEWS reporting. These standards are:

a: To collect & present NEWS in an accurate and impartial way. This means presenting facts from all sides of a news story if they exist.

b. To not be influenced by any outside organisation in it's selection or presentation of NEWS.

It is not only vital that the ABC follow these standards, but they are SEEN to follow them.

Therefore, the ABC must sever its relationship with ACON.

We therefore ask the House to honour Appendix 1, Sections 8c and 8d of the ABC Code of Practice, by instructing the relevant Minister to meet with the ABC Board to discuss ABC's links with ACON.

from 1,262 citizens (Petition No. EN8495)

Housing

The Help to Buy Scheme (40% Share Equity) and the Australian Government 5% Deposit Scheme have, or will, worsen housing affordability.

These schemes do not effectively assist individuals in purchasing homes; rather, they increase profits for landlords, developers, and financial institutions.

As house prices rise, rental costs also increase, making it increasingly difficult for people to afford rental housing.

Moreover, tax benefits granted to property investors exacerbate the problem by encouraging further investment in housing.

Some investors exploit these schemes by using their children or relatives as applicants, bypassing eligibility rules. This loophole undermines the programs' purpose and drives up housing prices, making it harder for genuine first-home buyers.

We therefore ask the House to Cancel the Help to Buy federal Scheme (40% Share Equity) and the Australian Government 5% Deposit Scheme.

Abolish tax incentives that benefit the property market, including those available to both business and residential investors.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN8497)

Electoral System

We, the undersigned, call on the Parliament of Australia to address the structural dominance of the two major political parties: the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal National Coalition. While these parties have historically contributed to Australia's development, their long standing control has created a political duopoly that limits meaningful democratic choice, suppresses innovation, and undermines public trust.

In practice, the current system disadvantages independent and minor party candidates through unequal access to media, funding, and visibility. This restricts political diversity and leads to reactive, short term policymaking, rather than bold and visionary solutions to major issues such as climate change, housing, tax reform, and Indigenous reconciliation.

Adversarial politics between the two major parties fosters division rather than cooperation. Parliamentary debate is often reduced to partisan attacks instead of constructive problem solving. As a result, many Australians feel unheard and disillusioned with the political process.

We urge Parliament to consider reforms such as improving proportional representation, strengthening bipartisan parliamentary committees, and increasing transparency around political donations. These steps would promote a more inclusive, representative, and forward thinking democracy.

A vibrant political system should reflect the full diversity of Australian society. It is time to review and reform the structures that entrench two party dominance in our nation.

We therefore ask the House to We respectfully urge Parliament to investigate the impact of two party dominance and implement electoral reforms that enhance political diversity, fairness, and transparency. These changes will help restore public trust and ensure a more inclusive and representative democracy for all Australians.

from 22 citizens (Petition No. EN8500)

Electoral System

The selling and trading of preferences is now having a detrimental effect on the outcome of elections. The result means a person's vote can often be diluted by the skewing of preferences.

We therefore ask the House to reform the electoral voting count system to reflect a "first past the post" count. The candidate with the majority of votes wins the count.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8501)

Honours and Awards

The National Medal, established in 1975, recognises 15 years of diligent service by Police, Fire, Ambulance, Defence Force, corrective services, search & rescue, and other emergency personnel. Over time, eligibility has evolved, with the most significant change occurring on 5 February 2020 when the Line-of-Duty Amendment allowed the Medal to be awarded to those killed, injured, or disabled in the line of duty—even if they had not completed 15 years of service.

However, this amendment applies only from 2020 onward, leaving behind countless individuals who suffered, sacrificed, or even died in service prior to this date. Their contributions remain excluded, despite their equal bravery and dedication.

Other national awards, such as the National Police Service Medal, apply retrospectively to their inception, setting a fair precedent for backdating eligibility. Recognition is not merely ceremonial—it validates sacrifice and restores dignity to those who gave so much for their communities.

On a personal note, watching my father in tears after being told he was not eligible for the National Medal despite his line-of-duty injury, was devastating. Recognition can mean the difference between 6ft under or feeling 6ft taller.

Families across Australia share this same injustice.

We therefore ask the House to amend the National Medal eligibility rules to allow recognition of all personnel killed, injured, or disabled in the line of duty prior to 5 February 2020, ensuring fairness, consistency, and due honour for their service and sacrifice.

from 181 citizens (Petition No. EN8505)

Foreign Investment

Our country is being sold off to overseas investors piece by piece. Australian land, building and water right need to be owned by Australian citizens ONLY

We therefore ask the House to reject all property, land, farms and buildings to be purchased by companies or individuals who are not Australian citizens. All property and buildings that are currently owned by overseas investors must only be transferred to Australian citizens.

from 52 citizens (Petition No. EN8506)

Biosecurity

The Purpose of the petition is to not repeat the pandemic that occurred in 2020 and to make sure that Our Nation Laboratories are safe, and I do understand that all medical research is very important but there is other research that has a low risk, and it is very effective but this research that needs to be banned it has a high risk and the Australian government cannot be able handle another pandemic because of the challenges that we are facing at this moment.

If a lab leak occurs in Australia, the situation will be very serious because there are viruses that we are dealing with in Australia and that's included COVID 19 and other flu virus that are become very dangerous, and we do not need another one to surfaced.

We therefore ask the House to issue a national banned on the medical research known as gain of function research.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8508)

Charities and Not-for-Profit Organisations

Currently many not-for-profit organisations including non-for profit sporting clubs, especially small incorporated associations, are only required to submit financial summaries to state regulators and do not make their full financial statements public. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for members, donors, and the public to ensure funds are used appropriately.

We therefore ask the House to the House to legislate so that all not-for-profit organisations in Australia which receive tax concessions or government grants must lodge their annual financial statements on a publicly accessible website, regardless of their size or registration status, including non for profit sporting clubs

from 20 citizens (Petition No. EN8509)

Israel

The UN Commission has, echoing the opinion of genocide scholars and organisations, found that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip. This live-streamed and brazen barbarity inflicted upon Palestinians has been ongoing for 2 years. We have seen Israel engage in ruthless attacks against civilians, including journalists, activists, human-rights organisations and medical personnel, including Australian citizens, and of course, the nearly 100,000 Palestinians who have been murdered by Israeli military actions intended to exterminate them.

General Assembly resolution 260 A (III) states clearly that states have an obligation to prevent and punish genocide whenever it occurs. Australia has demonstrated that has the capability to levy sanctions against countries and organisations it believes are breaking international law, including for false pretences such as the reversed sanctions against the UNRWA. Australia has sanctioned countries such as Russia, Iran, North Korea and Syria. But when faced with the ongoing genocide committed by Israel, Australia has so far only sanctioned certain select individuals. These individual sanctions do not put pressure on the root cause, the UN Commission did not decree only a few individuals were committing genocide, but rather that the State of Israel was committing genocide. Australia has an obligation under international law to prevent this genocide, and must exercise this obligation with a full embargo and sanctions against the State of Israel. Genocide cannot be ignored or excused under any circumstances, sanction Israel!

We therefore ask the House to sever all economic ties, impose country-level sanctions and embargo the State of Israel.

from 194 citizens (Petition No. EN8510)

Personal Information and Privacy

To the Honourable Speaker & Members of the House of Representatives

The petition of the undersigned draws to the attention of the House our concerns about the Digital ID Bill. While Section 74 states that use of a Digital ID cannot be required as a condition of service, such protections are fragile & can be amended. Once established, a centralised Digital ID system risks misuse of personal data, increased surveillance, and erosion of privacy and freedom.

We therefore ask the House to reject the Bill and protect the rights and freedoms of all Australians.

We therefore ask the House to reject the Digital ID Bill and ensure Australians are never compelled to use a centralised Digital ID.

from 1,833 citizens (Petition No. EN8511)

Diabetes

Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) are life-changing devices for people who use insulin. They provide real-time blood glucose readings, eliminating the need for constant, painful finger-prick tests. This technology is vital for preventing dangerously high or low blood sugar levels, which can lead to serious health complications or even death.

Currently, subsidised access to CGMs is limited, leaving many insulin users—including people with Type 2 diabetes—to pay thousands of dollars a year out of pocket. This financial barrier is unfair and puts the health and safety of many Australians at risk.

We are petitioning for equitable access to subsidised CGMs for everyone who requires insulin. This change would not only improve the daily lives and mental well-being of thousands of people but would also reduce the long-term burden on our healthcare system by preventing costly hospital visits and severe health issues. Access to this technology should be based on medical need, not a person's ability to pay.

We therefore ask the House to expand the eligibility criteria for the subsidised Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) program to include all Australians who are dependent on insulin for the management of their diabetes.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8514)

International Relations: Australia and Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea is Australia's closest neighbour, with deep cultural, social and economic ties between our people. Despite this close relationship, Papua New Guinean citizens must currently apply for a visa to enter Australia.

This requirement creates unnecessary financial and administrative barriers for families, students, businesses and communities who wish to travel between our two nations. It discourages cultural exchange, limits trade and educational opportunities, and prevents many Papua New Guineans from visiting relatives and friends in Australia.

Removing visa requirements, or introducing a special visa-waiver arrangement, would strengthen people-to-people links, support regional cooperation, and reflect the unique bond shared between Australia and Papua New Guinea.

We therefore ask the House to remove visa requirements for Papua New Guinea citizens visiting Australia by:

1. Introducing a visa-waiver scheme or equivalent arrangement for short visits (including tourism, family visits, education and business);

2. Ensuring appropriate safeguards, including health and security screening, are maintained;

3. Providing the necessary support and infrastructure to enable the arrangement to operate efficiently; and

4. Monitoring and reviewing the outcomes of the program, with periodic reporting to Parliament.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN8515)

Housing

Median house prices have increased by more than 400% since 2000, while wage growth has stagnated.

Home ownership among Australians under 35 has fallen below 50%, the lowest rate on record.

Over one million dwellings sit vacant, while homelessness continues to rise.

A combination of negative gearing, capital gains tax discounts, and underinvestment in public housing has fuelled speculation and restricted access for first-home buyers.

Australia stands at a crossroads. Either we act decisively to rebalance housing policy—or we condemn future generations to permanent rental dependency.

We therefore ask the House to abolish the 50% Capital Gains Tax Discount on investment properties and apply standard income tax rates to property profits.

2. Phase out Negative Gearing on new investments while maintaining existing arrangements for current investors ("grandfathering").

3. Introduce a National Vacancy Levy on residential properties left unoccupied for extended periods.

4. Restrict Foreign Ownership to new developments only, with surcharges for vacant or underutilised properties.

5. Establish the Australian Housing Construction Authority (AHCA) to lead large-scale affordable housing projects.

6. Implement Rent Stabilisation Frameworks capping annual increases to CPI + 2%.

7. Expand First-Home Buyer Support through shared equity and mortgage interest deduction schemes. the House to

from 27 citizens (Petition No. EN8518)

Wages and Salaries

Minor's minimum wage is lower than adults

Some minor's want save up for a car or university with out debt but the minimum wage being lower for minor's can make that a lot harder

We therefore ask the House to make the minimum wage for minor's the same as adults

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN8522)

Palestine Action Group

We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned about the extremist activities of Josh Lee and Palestine Action Group (PAG), an international organisation founded in the UK and recognised as terrorist organisation there. PAG has organised disruptive blockades across Europe, including Italy, where Lee is currently exchanging tactics. They plan to replicate these blockade tactics in Australia on 12 October, targeting Sydney Opera House, Commonwealth landmark. Since 7 October 2023, they have held frequent nationwide protests disrupting infrastructure, intimidating citizens, radicalising youth on campuses, spreading hate, misleading people, calling for the dismantling of Israel, advocating revolution worldwide including in Australia. Their true aim is civil unrest and political upheaval, not genuine advocacy for Palestine. Despite Australia's recognition of the State of Palestine, their intensified actions undermine public safety, social cohesion, and democracy.

We therefore ask the House to urgently investigate activities, foreign funding, and international links of Josh Lee and PAG under federal laws including Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act 2018, the Criminal Code Act 1995, and the Public Order (Protection of Persons and Property) Act 1971. We seek federal proscription of PAG as terrorist or extremist organisation consistent with the UK designation and federal restrictions preventing their organisation or participation in protests or public events nationwide, including on Commonwealth lands such as the Sydney Opera House. We also call for measures to restrict their activities within educational institutions to protect youth from extremist radicalisation. Strict enforcement of federal laws preserving public order, national security, and democratic values is essential.

from 227 citizens (Petition No. EN8523)

Israel

We, the Australian people, call upon our Parliament, and our Government, to reaffirm Australia's commitment to the rule of law and the protection of civilians in the Palestine crisis.

This petition calls for the prosecution of Australians that have served in the Israeli Occupation Force and for the Australian Government to implement economic sanctions and to cease all trade and commerce with the state of Israel.

This petition emphasises an adherence to international and humanitarian law and domestic statutes, including the Criminal Code Act 1995, which prohibits Australians from serving in foreign militaries without the explicit approval of the Attorney-General. This petition further acknowledges the Modern Slavery Act 2018 and further, Sections 52 and 53 of the Trade Practices Act and the obligations of corporations and business that are engaged in trade or commerce with the state of Israel.

We therefore ask the House to cease all trade and commerce with the state of Israel and implement economic sanctions. We further ask that Australians that have served with the Israeli Occupation Force to be investigated and prosecuted for war crimes and genocide, and further that businesses and corporations engaged in trade or commerce with the state of Israel to also be investigated and prosecuted for breaches of Sections 52 & 53 of the Trade Practices Act and for violations of the Modern Slavery Act and international law.

from 806 citizens (Petition No. EN8524)

Personal Information and Privacy

Australians value freedom, privacy, and equality before the law. Yet Digital Identity frameworks risk enabling surveillance, data profiling, and allowing companies or agencies to restrict essential services or penalise non-consenting individuals. No Australian should lose access, opportunity, or dignity for choosing privacy. Parliament must ensure Digital ID remains voluntary, with no coercion, no discrimination, and full protection of citizens' rights and data security.

We therefore ask the House to We, the undersigned citizens and residents of Australia, firmly reject the implementation or expansion of Digital Identity systems that threaten individual freedom, privacy, and equality before the law.

Australians were not asked to consent to such systems. Under the guise of convenience, Digital Identity frameworks risk enabling surveillance, data profiling, and indirect coercion. They empower private or public entities to control access to essential services, penalise non-consenting individuals, and normalise compliance as a condition of participation in society.

Such developments are incompatible with the values of a free democracy and risk creating a two-tier system that discriminates against Australians who choose to protect their privacy.

We therefore call on the House of Representatives to:

-Reject the implementation or expansion of Digital Identity systems without explicit public consent and legislative safeguards;

-Guarantee no penalties, service restrictions, or discrimination against individuals who decline participation;

-Prohibit private or contractual enforcement of Digital Identity requirements; and

-Enact strong statutory protections for privacy, data security, and individual autonomy.

Technology must serve citizens—not monitor them. Parliament must act decisively to prevent a surveillance infrastructure from taking root in Australia.

from 89 citizens (Petition No. EN8525)

Mental Health

We urge the Government to halt the planned removal of MBS Item 2713 (GP Mental Health Consultation) because it will severely compromise mental health care access for our community.

1. Defunding Dedicated Care Time:

The item guarantees funding for the 20+ minutes required for complex mental health assessment, risk management, and care coordination. Removing it pressures GPs to use shorter, less-appropriate standard appointments, degrading the quality of treatment.

2. Increased Patient Costs:

Reliance on general time-based items will increase the financial gap, making affordable mental health care inaccessible to the most vulnerable, including concession card holders. This is a direct defunding of essential care.

3. Shifting the Crisis Burden:

Closing this vital front-line pathway will force more patients into crisis, unnecessarily increasing reliance on overwhelmed hospital emergency departments, which are ill-equipped for routine mental health management.

We demand the Government support General Practitioners and protect patient access to dedicated, affordable mental health treatment.

We therefore ask the House to o take immediate action to protect essential frontline mental health services.

We urge you to retain MBS Item 2713 within the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Removing this item is a direct defunding of the time required for comprehensive mental health assessment and ongoing care.

This change will drastically increase out-of-pocket costs and push vulnerable patients toward overwhelmed emergency departments.

Stand up for your community and support the GPs providing vital, affordable mental health treatment.

from 27 citizens (Petition No. EN8526)

AUKUS

High Financial Cost and Economic Burden

The estimated cost of building nuclear-powered submarines runs into tens of billions of dollars, potentially diverting funds from other essential areas like health, education, and infrastructure.

Ongoing maintenance and operational costs will be very high and extend over decades, impacting Australia's defense budget and fiscal priorities.

Sovereignty and Dependence Concerns

AUKUS increases Australia's military dependence on the U.S. and the UK, potentially limiting Australia's strategic autonomy and independent decision-making in defense matters.

Sharing nuclear submarine technology binds Australia closely into allied strategic frameworks, which could limit its flexibility to pursue independent foreign policies.

Risk of Regional Arms Race and Destabilization

The deal risks escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific, provoking responses from China and other regional powers, which could undermine Australia's regional security environment.

AUKUS may contribute to an arms race, making Australia a potential target in geopolitical conflicts.

Technological and Operational Challenges

Building and maintaining nuclear-powered submarines is complex and may take longer than expected, delaying Australia's naval capabilities.

Australia currently lacks the industrial base and workforce skilled in nuclear technology, making the project riskier and more reliant on external support.

Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Environmental Concerns

Although submarines use nuclear propulsion and not weapons, nuclear technology still raises proliferation concerns and environmental risks that could impact Australia's international standing.

Waste disposal, safety, and regulatory frameworks need to be established from scratch, which is costly and controversial.

Just to name a few of many more reasons

We therefore ask the House to end the AUKUS agreement immediately and give the public another chance to have a democratic say, by petition.

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN8527)

Housing

To be able to withdraw $50,000 of your own superannuation no age limit or wage cap no putting extra money back into just what you normally earn from your super and only to purchase first home buyer

We therefore ask the House to allow anyone to withdraw $50,000 if it is in our superannuation to purchase a first home. The 5% deposit is not going to help alot of people we still have big debts and rent is ridiculous nothing the government has done will help anyone does not matter what wage or age you are if you have $50,000 in super we should be able to use it to purchase a home for our families

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN8529)

Australian Constitution

In a representative democracy like Australia, it is essential that major government decisions reflect the will of the people. Increasingly, however, significant policies are being implemented without direct public input. The current Labor government is pursuing policies that are exhausting available housing and expanding the size of government in a way that appears strategically political. Rather than ensuring balanced representation, Labor's proposal to add more parliamentary seats disproportionately favours regions already aligned with their voter base. This risks creating an uneven playing field and undermines the democratic principle of fair representation.

Such moves have long term consequences for all Australians and should not be decided unilaterally. Policies that reshape the structure of government or drastically impact citizens such as housing supply, electoral boundaries, and public spending should be subject to national referendums. Giving Australians a direct vote ensures transparency, accountability, and prevents any one party from monopolising power.

Democracy thrives on participation. If the government truly acts in the interest of the people, it should trust them to have a say in the direction of the country. Major policies must be put to a national vote to preserve democratic integrity and ensure all Australians are equally heard.

We therefore ask the House to require national referendums on major policy changes that significantly affect Australians. Decisions on housing, government expansion, and electoral boundaries must reflect the people's will. True democracy demands direct public input on the future direction of our nation.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8530)

Veterans

The Ex-Service Organisations Round Table (ESORT), established by the Department of Veterans' Affairs to provide policy and service advice, has not consistently delivered broad or representative outcomes for the veteran community. Its structure concentrates influence within a small number of large ex-service organisations, allowing them to advance institutional interests while marginalising smaller or emerging groups. This lack of balance reduces transparency, fosters perceptions of preferential access, and undermines confidence in the policy process.

Many participating organisations do not systematically consult their grassroots members on matters discussed at ESORT. Although this is beyond departmental control, it exposes a fundamental weakness of the model and reinforces the case for disbandment.

ESORT is widely perceived as a one-way forum where the Department presents information rather than engaging in genuine two-way consultation. It is seen as a mechanism that validates departmental policy, enabling the Department to claim endorsement where no meaningful consultation has occurred. Its opposition to the establishment of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide—despite overwhelming community support—demonstrates that it does not reliably reflect veterans' interests.

ESORT's continuation duplicates other mechanisms for consultation, including parliamentary committees, public submissions, and modern online engagement. It has outlived its usefulness and lacks the transparency and accountability expected today.

We therefore ask the House to disband the Ex-Service Organisations Round Table (ESORT).

from 37 citizens (Petition No. EN8532)

Banking and Financial Services

Regulation is needed to protect brokers and their clients as banks promise an application timeline of 2 weeks and when they don't deliver, ask for finance extensions to be sought before they can work on it (and in hot property market this will not happen), don't pay loan penalties when overdue settlements caused by bank errors, customers miss out on properties and no apologies or care factor by banks and customers are missing out on financially.

We therefore ask the House to work with brokers and create a bank framework to protect clients and brokers where the banks have to be kept accountable and time stamped applications as their turnaround times do not reflect the current experience for home and business loan transactions similar to those experienced by the banks during covid (broker applications were not prioritized and this was raised by Mike Felton from MFAA).

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8533)

Electoral System

Australians deserve transparency in how their votes are used. Under the current preferential voting system, minor parties and independents are not required by law to declare where their preferences will flow before polling day.

This lack of disclosure means voters may unknowingly direct their support to a major party or candidate they did not intend to help. It undermines trust in the electoral process and weakens informed choice.

In the 2022 federal election, the Labor Party formed government with around 32% of the primary vote, relying heavily on preference flows from minor parties and independents. Most voters were unaware of how those preferences had been arranged.

Transparency should be a fundamental principle of democracy. Every Australian voter has the right to know where their vote may end up before casting it.

We therefore ask the House to ask the House to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 to require that:

1. All registered political parties and independents publicly declare their intended preference allocations at least 30 days prior to election day;

2. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) publish this information prominently on its official website in a voter-friendly format; and

3. Any changes to preference arrangements need to be made public immediately

from 36 citizens (Petition No. EN8537)

Skilled Migration

491 State nomination invite: Respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of current eligibility timeline for permanent residency (191 subclass).

Under the existing framework, applicants must hold the subclass 491 visa for a minimum of three years before becoming eligible to apply for permanent residency (subclass 191). How ever, the processing time for 491 visa itself often exceeds 24 months, resulting in a total wait time of approximately five to six years before applicants can transition to permanent residency. 90% of applicant spend 3 to 4 years to complete their studies, 1-2 year on temporary visa,then 24 month wait after nomination approval to get visa grant and after visa grant hold 491 for three years to apply 191 which will take another 1 year.

We therefore ask the House to that applicant who receive state nomination invitation from territory Govt. OR state have already demonstrated their commitment to regional Australia and fulfilled the eligibility criteria at the time of nomination that's why we got invitation from state govt. The delay between nomination approval and visa grant is purely administrative and should not penalize applicants who have met all substantive requirements.

we therefore propose that the 3 year residency requirement commence from the date of nomination approval by Govt Authorities, rather than the date of visa grant.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8538)

National Security

antifa's "campaign of violence and terrorism nationwide" includes burning of the Australian Flag, assaults against members of the public, organized riots targetting patriotic Australian, and supporting known overseas Terrorists i.e Hamas

We therefore ask the House to declare ANTIFA in Australia as Domestic Terrorists following the declaration that the United States Of American has imposed upon Antifa in the usa

from 82 citizens (Petition No. EN8540)

Early Childhood Education and Care

The early childhood sector in Australia is suffering. Children deserve better care and educators deserve better working conditions. The child to educator ratios should be far lower than they are currently. This will reflect best practice within the industry and prevent more awful things happening to children

We therefore ask the House to lower the educator to child ratio across all states in Australia to better reflect the level of care children require

from 144 citizens (Petition No. EN8543)

Superannuation

This petition of certain citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the House that current provisions under the Superannuation Act 1976 (governing the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme) and the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (governing the Military Superannuation and Benefits Scheme) prohibit or restrict current and former Commonwealth public servants, as well as serving and ex-military members, from rolling over the entirety of their superannuation benefits into retail or self-managed superannuation funds. These restrictions limit individuals' ability to manage their retirement savings with greater flexibility, potentially denying access to diversified investment options, lower fees, or personalized strategies that align with their financial goals. In an evolving superannuation landscape, such limitations may disadvantage affected individuals compared to other Australians who enjoy unrestricted rollover rights.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Superannuation Act 1976 and the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 to remove these restrictions and permit full rollovers into any superannuation fund chosen by the affected individuals, thereby promoting equity and choice in retirement planning.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN8544)

Australian Society

Sharia law is outdated and dangerous to western culture.

We therefore ask the House to ban Sharia law from ever being imposed in western society.

from 1,244 citizens (Petition No. EN8545)

Cybersafety

The social media ban is aimed to protect young Australians from harmful design features and content that negatively impacts their mental health, and to hold platforms more accountable for online safety. How ever the social media ban can disconnect the young Australians from friends and family. Most young people use apps like snapchat, instagram, tiktok ect to stay in contact with each other but if the social media ban goes through that will ruin that connection between the young people. The ban is also aimed to stop online bullying but as you know it is for under 16s but those at the age of 16 or over can still get online bullied very easily. So why aren't those 16 and over being protected as well? It is also being forgotten that apps like tiktok can be very educational especially towards young people. You see there is lot's of important information about things that are happening right now all over the world, important events from the past and so much more on social media. As well because it is on social media it catches attention from the young people. There are so many more reasons to why this stupid ban should stop, the list goes on. Therefore you, yes you should make a change, help the young people of Australia and stop the social media ban.

We therefore ask the House to get rid of the social media ban or at least lower the age limit.

from 193 citizens (Petition No. EN8548)

Pregnancy Loss, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death

Currently, under Fair Work Act 2009, employees in Australia who experience a pregnancy loss prior to 20 weeks' gestation are only entitled to two days of bereavement leave. This fails to recognise not only the emotional impact of pregnancy loss, but the unique physical impact of loss closer to the 20-week mark. As a result, many Australians are forced to return to work too soon, without the time or space to grieve, heal, or seek medical or psychological care.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Fair Work Act 2009 to introduce a specific category of leave for pregnancy loss occurring before 20 weeks' gestation, introducing leave entitlements that allow at least one to two weeks of paid leave; where grief, physical recovery and medical care can then be safely accessed.

from 694 citizens (Petition No. EN8549)

Artificial Intelligence

As an artist and supporter of Australian creativity, I am deeply concerned about the growing use of artificial intelligence in our creative industries. I believe the Australian Government must take immediate action to ban the use of AI in all creative fields, including music, visual arts, writing, design, and film production.

I've watched as AI systems have begun to replace genuine human creativity with automated imitations. These tools scrape and replicate the hard work of real artists, writers, and musicians often without consent or credit. What was once a space for human emotion, imagination, and expression is now being flooded with content generated by algorithms that know nothing about experience, struggle, or inspiration.

We therefore ask the House to Criminalize the us of A.I in all creative industries, to criminalize the use of protecting A.I Art behind copywrite and to criminalize making money and royalties of all A.I Creative works

from 30 citizens (Petition No. EN8550)

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

Australia is becoming a very unsafe to live and our country is slowly been destroyed by the crime and low punishment recieved. We need tougher laws, and to start taking a stand before our county is ruined for good.

We therefore ask the House to listen to the people of Australia. If citizens can see the problem clearly why cannot the government. I would like to change the law on crime for internationals. Our jails and resources are full and it is costing Australia billions to keep criminals in jail, I say we cancel their visa throw out their passports and remove the criminal and family from Australia this way it is a huge deterant to do crime. Rules need to change Australia is so unsafe.

from 25 citizens (Petition No. EN8552)

International Relations: Australia and the United States of America

The Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap was originally established under a 10-year renewable treaty signed in 1966. In 1988, the treaty was changed to an open-ended arrangement with only periodic reviews, reducing parliamentary oversight and public accountability.

The presence and recent expansion of Pine Gap raise significant issues of:

Sovereignty: ensuring that Australian territory is not used for foreign military purposes without democratic approval.

Transparency: giving the Australian public confidence that intelligence facilities operate with proper scrutiny.

Security: requiring Parliament to regularly consider the strategic and defence implications of Pine Gap's role.

Reinstating the 10-year renewable framework would not require disclosure of sensitive operational details but would restore a vital democratic safeguard: that Parliament has a recurring opportunity to assess whether Pine Gap continues to serve Australia's national interest.

We therefore ask the House to request that the Australian Government re-engage with the United States to amend the current treaty governing the Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap, restoring the original 10-year renewable framework. This would ensure that Parliament and the Australian people have the opportunity for regular review and debate on the operation of foreign military and intelligence facilities on Australian soil.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8554)

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

he proposed amendments to the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 and Migration Act 1958 strip away basic fairness from our migration review system by denying oral hearings to international students and other temporary visa holders. Under these changes, people facing visa refusals will be forced into a "papers only" process where they cannot speak directly to decision-makers, ask questions, or clarify misunderstandings. This is particularly harsh for international students who may struggle with complex legal documents, face language barriers, or lack proper legal representation. These amendments create an inferior justice system for migrants while maintaining full hearing rights for others—a discriminatory approach that undermines Australia's commitment to fair treatment under the law.

We therefore ask the House to entatives to vote against these amendments to the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 and Migration Act 1958 when they come before the House for consideration. As our elected representatives, you have the power to reject this legislation that would deny fundamental hearing rights to visa applicants. We urge the House to either defeat the bill entirely or refer it to a parliamentary committee for proper inquiry into its impact on natural justice and procedural fairness. The House should demand the Government withdraw these amendments and develop alternative reforms that improve efficiency without sacrificing the basic right of people to present their case in person before administrative decision-makers.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN8556)

Tobacco Control

The petitioners believe that current tobacco excise taxes have reached excessive and unsustainable levels that disproportionately impact low- and middle-income Australians. While the original intent of tobacco taxation was to reduce smoking rates and recover health-related costs, the repeated and steep increases have made cigarettes among the most heavily taxed consumer products in the world.

These high prices have unintentionally driven many Australians to seek cheaper, unregulated, and illegal tobacco products, undermining public health goals and funding organised criminal activity. The petitioners believe that a fair and balanced approach to tobacco taxation is necessary—one that maintains public health objectives without fuelling black markets or imposing undue financial strain on disadvantaged groups.

We therefore ask the House to initiate a comprehensive review of the current tobacco excise system and consider evidence-based reforms to ensure it is fair, effective, and sustainable.

from 60 citizens (Petition No. EN8557)

Cybersafety

Discord is a messaging platform that is part of the Social Media Ban for under 16s that is coming into full effect on the 10th of December, 2025. Currently, due to the Online Safety Act in the UK, Discord users are required to upload their IDs or take selfies to verify their age to access the platform normally without any restrictions. However, right after this age verification system was implemented, data of over 70,000 users who used their ID to verify their age were stolen by hackers. This is a massive breach in privacy, putting users who complied at risk as the data used to verify the users' age was meant to be promptly deleted, not stored. With Discord failing to delete or secure such private and personal data, how can any social media users in Australia feel safe with proving their age to access what they have the right to? While it is understandable why children should have limited access to social media to keep them safe from harm, the Social Media Ban is now putting everyone who is over 16 at risk instead.

We therefore ask the House to reconsider the Social Media Ban and the approach to limit access for users under the age of 16 without the need to verify the users age that invades their privacy. We recommend alternative methods such as educating parents to supervise their children's access to the internet in general instead of imposing every Australian to verify their age.

from 46 citizens (Petition No. EN8559)

Migration

there's to many people in the country

We therefore ask the House to stop imagration

from 34 citizens (Petition No. EN8561)

National Socialist Network

The Nation Socialist Network (neo-nazis) fit the definition of terrorists, so they should be treated as such. Especially after their attack on Camp Sovereignty on August 31st, other acts of violence they committed that day, and other recent incidents. They are openly violent, practice hate speech, persecute members who try to leave their cult-like organisation and they have very extreme, dangerous beliefs and plans for the future. They also prey on young boys and groom them into joining their network. They are terrorists.

We therefore ask the House to recognise them as the terrorists they are and take legal action to arrest and charge them when they organise, display violent or hateful messages or pose threats to the public. We want this dangerous organisation to be criminalised before they have the chance to attack anyone again.

from 33 citizens (Petition No. EN8562)

Cybersafety

We call for the removal of Julie Inman Grant as eSafety Commissioner and the shutdown of the eSafety Commission due to ongoing concerns over accountability, transparency, and effectiveness. Under her leadership, the Commission has faced criticism for inconsistent enforcement, overreach in online regulation, and lack of measurable outcomes in protecting Australians online. Many Australians feel that current operations limit free expression while failing to adequately address cyberbullying, online scams, and privacy breaches. We urge the government to review the Commission's mandate and consider alternative frameworks that prioritize safety, transparency, and individual rights.

We therefore ask the House to abolish the Enhancing Online Safety Act 2015, the Online Safety Act 2021, and the Online Safety (Social Media Minimum Age) Amendment Act 2024, which will remove the eSafety Commission and its Commissioner, and end the social media age restrictions for under-16s. The current framework has raised serious concerns regarding overreach, lack of transparency, and infringement on individual freedoms. Australians deserve a safer, balanced online environment without disproportionate restrictions. We urge the House to consider alternative approaches that protect users while respecting freedom of expression and parental choice.

from 47 citizens (Petition No. EN8565)

National Disability Insurance Agency

From 2026 the NDIA plans to replace Functional Capacity Assessments with internal Support Needs Assessments. These will be completed by NDIA-trained assessors who are not required to hold allied-health qualifications or have specialist disability experience.

This change removes the need for the NDIA to consider professional evidence from participants' OTs, psychologists, or medical professionals when making funding decisions. It means the people who know participants best (their treating professionals and families) will no longer have their voices heard.

These reforms risk inaccurate assessments, unsafe funding outcomes, and greater appeals to the AAT. Australians with disability deserve fair, transparent, and clinically informed decisions that reflect their real-life needs, not rushed internal judgments.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Amend the NDIS Act to require the NDIA to consider all professional reports and evidence submitted by participants.

2. Mandate that Support Needs Assessors hold relevant allied-health or disability-specific qualifications.

3. Establish independent oversight to ensure participant and clinician evidence is fairly considered in every NDIS plan.

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN8567)

Business Innovation and Investment Program

We urgently petition the Australian Parliament to address the prolonged processing delays within the Business Innovation and Investment Program (BIIP), particularly at the Provisional stage. Under Ministerial Direction No.105, subclass 188 visas are placed in the lowest processing priority, behind all other skilled visa categories. Those who lodged their applications around May 2021 have now been waiting for more than four years with no end in sight. At the time of lodgement (May 2021), the indicative processing time was approximately 12 to 18 months, yet it has now extended beyond 56 months with many cases still unfinalised. These ongoing delays not only erode the confidence of genuine investors but also weaken Australia's global competitiveness. Many applicants have already committed significant financial and personal resources in anticipation of their move. Timely processing of BIIP applications is therefore essential to honour Australia's commitment to fairness and transparency.

We therefore ask the House to urge the Government to review the current priority settings and processing timeframes for the BIIP Provisional Visa to expedite the resolution of the long-standing backlog of Subclass 188 applications. Many genuine investors have been waiting for years, ready to bring their capital, innovation, and expertise to Australia. Enabling their timely arrival will not only restore fairness and confidence in the program but also inject much-needed momentum into Australia's economy: creating jobs, strengthening businesses, and reinforcing the nation's global competitiveness.

from 28 citizens (Petition No. EN8569)

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Participants, their families, and supporters have very real concerns about the format and process of the proposed NDIS Supports Needs Assessment and how the plan budget will be generated. Many are anxious that the potential harms found with the previously proposed Independent Assessments, will be similarly experienced with the proposed Support Needs Assessment. Participants and their families need certainty of support. An assessment that is inaccurate is unfair and risks neglect. Harm cost more long-term. As this new planning is such a major change in over 12 years, the Support Needs Assessment and support budget generation must be properly investigated to be fit for purpose.

An NDIS Joint Standing Committee Inquiry needs to hear from all stakeholders with regard to: the validity and reliability for the Support Needs Assessment purpose of the chosen tool I-CAN; the procurement process of the tool or tools; the NDIS modification of the tool(s); the cohort of intended participants; the additional information to be used (or excluded) for the Support Needs Assessment; the assessor qualifications; assessor as bureaucrat or independent; multiple impairments application; the process of generating the support budget; the risk assessment for participants; psychological support for the process; pilots and evaluation of all cohorts; ethics approval obtained; appeal rights; the cost modelling including cost shifting and potential loss of capacity; any other concerns raised.

We therefore ask the House to establish the NDIS joint Standing Committee Inquiry into the proposed NDIS Supports Needs Assessment and how the participant plan will be generated.

from 5,589 citizens (Petition No. EN8570)

Australia

When originally established, the majority of these organisations had noble causes; however, in the past 25 years or so, these organisations have been infiltrated and funded by those that we would normally consider our enemies, i.e. they don't have the world's best interests at heart, and some might say, they deliberately want to change the world to Socialism and Communism. We saw how corrupt the World Health Organisation was during Covid-19, how the UN is now beholding to China for its donation of nearly half a billion dollars in 2023. By signing up to deals with these organisations, such as (but not limited to) the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, the UNHCR, the Paris Climate Agreement, UNSSC Agenda 2030 etc., our politicians feel they can divest themselves of responsibility and possibly accountability when it suits them. We are now seeing Western governments, including Australia, push for an increasing digital economy and a digital ID will be upon us this December. These moves are primarily about control of the average person. Therefore, we must start standing up for our rights; otherwise, given that COVID-19 was merely a test run for erasing those rights, everything else that follows will be much worse. By signing this petition, you are doing the minimum to voice your concerns and request the government completely change direction and put Australia and Australian's first!!

We therefore ask the House to motion to remove Australia from unelected orgs such as the UN, etc.

from 66 citizens (Petition No. EN8571)

Child Abuse

The tragic loss of my sister, Jordan, to suicide has illuminated the profound and often overlooked impact of coercive control on children. While Australian law criminalises coercive control in adult relationships, children remain unprotected. Coercive control involves manipulation, intimidation, and isolation that can harm a child's emotional and psychological development. Children exposed to such behaviours are more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and long-term mental health challenges. It is urgent to enact Jordan's Law, criminalising coercive control against children nationwide. This law would close the legal gap, provide essential protection, and ensure children can grow up in safe, nurturing environments free from fear and psychological abuse. Enacting this law would honour all children who have endured coercive control and take a crucial step toward protecting future generations from its lasting and harmful effects.

We therefore ask the House to call on Cabinet, through National Cabinet, to establish a national framework to criminalise coercive control against children, known as Jordan's Law. The framework should involve people with lived experience and experts in child welfare, law enforcement, and mental health to ensure it is effective and practical. Cabinet should allocate resources to support states and territories in implementing the law, including training for professionals to identify and respond to cases. Consistent nationwide application and awareness campaigns are needed so children, families, and communities understand and can access these protections, ensuring children are safeguarded from psychological harm and abuse.

from 245 citizens (Petition No. EN8573)

Veterans

This petition draws attention to what appears to be a serious drafting oversight in the most recent amendment to section 341(3) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA)… That subsection affirms that "no right, privilege, obligation or liability is acquired, accrued or incurred that would permit the Commission, the Board or the Tribunal … to apply any Statement of Principles (SoP) that is no longer in force."…This wording lawfully extinguishes a person's procedural right to have a claim decided or reviewed under the SoP that applied when the claim was made…In practice, a veteran may rely on a specific factor contained in an SoP, only to find that factor has been removed before the decision or review decision is made. Because section 341(3) removes the right to have the earlier SoP applied, any delay in decision-making may cause irreversible prejudice. This justifies immediate and routine recourse to section 7 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act, as a court may order a decision to prevent unfairness from the loss of a relevant SoP factor…Section 341(3) represents a rare extinguishing a right of procedural continuity otherwise preserved under the ordinary rule of law.

We therefore ask the House to Refer MRCA s341(3) to the responsible Minister or Committee for urgent amendment and return the accrued right intent that existed within the original Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 framework, where a veteran's claim could be decided and reviewed under the same Statement of Principles that existed when the claim was made.

from 105 citizens (Petition No. EN8575)

Veterans

This petition draws to the attention of the House that the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) requires the Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) to base its Statements of Principles only on existing "sound medical-scientific evidence."... Where plausible service-related mechanisms have not yet been studied, the RMA must decline to recognise probable, even evident causation, even when they are biomechanically or clinically credible. The VEA provides no statutory provision for the RMA to commission such research, and no process exists to fill these gaps... This is an historic oversight in the veterans' legislative framework. It allows the absence of evidence to operate as a barrier to recognition, which is contrary to the beneficial nature of veterans' legislation which requires that doubt be resolved in the veteran's favour. The omission leaves Defence-specific conditions permanently unexamined and inconsistent with Parliament's original intent under the VEA.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 to require that, whenever there is insufficient sound medical-scientific evidence on a plausible service-related question, the Act compels the Authority to commission appropriate sound medical-scientific research.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8576)

Cybersafety

The social media ban is a major problem scrambling our young Australian society, it will only make more problems. Not only is it extremely easy to evade by simply using a VPN something easily accessible for the Australian Youth, the ban needs to be stopped it is straight up immature we are extremely close to the ban and the government is still scrambling together their documents and ban list.

We therefore ask the House to repeal and review the terms of the proposed legislative changes and remove the ban for under 16 Aussies.

from 1,348 citizens (Petition No. EN8577)

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

We, the undersigned, petition the Australian Government to reverse its decision to deny commentator Candace Owens entry into Australia. This decision represents a concerning precedent that undermines freedom of speech and ideological diversity—values that Australians have long cherished.

Candace Owens is an internationally recognised political commentator, author, and advocate for conservative and Christian values. She has no criminal record, has not incited violence, and poses no threat to national security. Her exclusion appears based solely on her opinions, which may not align with those of the current government—yet they reflect the beliefs and convictions of many Australians who value faith, family, and personal responsibility.

It is deeply inconsistent and unjust that our government allows individuals with documented associations to extremist organisations, including ISIS brides, to return to Australian soil under the banner of human rights, while silencing a lawful, peaceful voice for conservative thought.

Australia should be a country where ideas—not ideology—determine who may visit and speak. Denying entry to Candace Owens sends a dangerous message: that dissenting views are no longer welcome in a nation once proud of its democracy, open debate, and fair-mindedness.

We call on the Minister for Home Affairs to reconsider and overturn this ruling, reaffirming Australia's commitment to freedom of expression, fairness, and religious liberty.

Let Australians decide who they listen to.

We therefore ask the House to call on Minister for Home Affairs to reconsider and overturn this ruling, reaffirming Australia's commitment to freedom of expression, fairness, and religious liberty.

from 37 citizens (Petition No. EN8579)

Labor Government

A large proportion of the Australian public, on all sides of politics, are unhappy with the current government's handling of a range of issues, and have lost all confidence in the government's representation of the will of the people. We acknowledge there are multiple other petitions calling for a vote of no confidence, however they all cite specific reasons for the vote. This deters numerous individuals from signing said petitions, as they may not support the reasons outlined. Therefore, this petition aims to unite the masses who are unhappy with the government, and call for a vote of no confidence in Anthony Albanese and his government, regardless of our exact reasoning behind this desire.

We therefore ask the House to call for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

from 186 citizens (Petition No. EN8580)

Health Care: Preventable Blindness

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO RECONSIDER THEIR STANCE AND REINSTATE HEALTH FUND BENEFITS AND MEDICARE REBATES FROM (JULY 2026) FOR INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS. BY DOING SO, WE CAN ENSURE CONTINUED ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE IN NEED, PREVENT AVOIDABLE BLINDNESS, AND SUPPORT HEALTHIER, MORE PRODUCTIVE SOCIETY.

PLEASE STAND WITH US IN ADVOCATING FOR THIS CRITICAL CHANGE. SIGN THIS PETITION TO DEMONSTRATE YOUR SUPPORT FOR REINSTATING FUNDING INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS AND PROTECTING THE VISION AND LIVES OF COUNTLESS AUSTRALIAN

We therefore ask the House to reinstate health funds benefits and Medicare rebates from July 2026.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN8581)

Defence

We believe that conscription should only be used to defend Australia from direct invasion or attack. No Australian citizen should be compelled by law to serve in overseas conflicts. The Defence Act 1903 currently allows Parliament to authorize conscription in times of war, including for overseas deployment. This undermines the right of Australians to choose whether to risk their lives in foreign conflicts. Our national defense should be focused solely on protecting Australian territory and people.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Defence Act 1903 to prohibit the conscription of Australian citizens for overseas military service. We further request that conscription be constitutionally limited to circumstances of direct homeland defense, ensuring that no Australian blood is spilled on foreign soil without voluntary consent. We believe that no government or authority should have the power to compel Australians to fight abroad against their will.

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN8582)

Temporary Humanitarian Visas

Now that the war in Palestine is over, and Israel has stopped their bomings, it's time we send the people we've took in for the duration of the war back to Palestine or surrounding areas. If we are to tackle immigration we need to start here, it's not being harsh on the people of Palestine, it's putting them back to their own and original life's and their original cultures. While some may seek to live here permanently we need to send those with temporary visas back.

We therefore ask the House to send those who were taken from the war in Palestine back to their own country for the benifit of all Australians and all people of Palestine.

from 97 citizens (Petition No. EN8583)

Cybersafety

The proposed social media ban for people under sixteen in Australia is unfair and harmful. While the goal of protecting young people is important, a full ban takes away their rights and opportunities instead of solving the real problems.

Social media helps young people learn, connect, and express themselves. Many teens use it to find support, especially those who feel isolated or belong to minority groups. It also allows young creators and small business owners to share their work and earn money. Taking that away limits creativity, education, and future opportunities.

The ban could also worsen mental health. Without online support networks, some teens may feel alone and helpless, leading to higher risks of depression and suicide. Losing safe spaces to talk or seek help online removes an important lifeline for many.

It may also cause more youth crime. Without ways to connect or express themselves, some young people may turn to risky or illegal activities out of boredom or frustration.

The ban creates privacy risks too. Enforcing it would require collecting ID or facial scans, which could expose personal data. Many would also try to lie about their age, making it harder to control.

Instead of banning social media, the government should teach digital safety, promote healthy online habits, and make platforms more responsible. Young people deserve to be part of the digital world safely and with their voices heard.

We therefore ask the House to remove the social media ban bill or amend the bill to a younger age

from 21,901 citizens (Petition No. EN8584)

Public Sector Governance

All government department employees including ministers & prime ministers should fall in line with the rest of the workforce & be subject to random drug & alcohol testing to ensure the safety of not only themselves but those of us that they represent. We are wanting the laws changed to include all government employees & ministers right through to the prime minister. These employees do attend engagements where alcohol is accessible & deals get made. We need to ensure these deals & forthcoming agreements etc are done with accountability & in the peoples best interest.

We therefore ask the House to implement this change to give the people more confidence in the law being equal for every working Australian & not to be bias towards certain government specific groups or staff also the decisions being made are with a clear & concise mind & in a safe manner.

from 72 citizens (Petition No. EN8587)

Housing

Negative gearing is pushing up the price of property, preventing many Australians from buying their own home. Therefore Negative Gearing on Property should be abolished. Housing is a human right and should not be treated as an investment vehicle for the rich. Poverty and homelessness are increasing in Australia. The Capital Gains tax discount is also contributing to the housing crisis and should also be abolished in 2026. Tax incentives should only be applied to new housing and the government should apply a cap on all rents in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to discuss and vote on this proposal. Introduce a new bill into parliament Abolishing Negative Gearing on Property Assets and the Capital Gains Tax discount in 2026.

from 690 citizens (Petition No. EN8590)

Postnatal Mental Health

Provide free and immediate access to mental health support for all mothers during the first year after giving birth. Instead of handing out a baby bonus.

We therefore ask the House to Cover the full cost of therapy sessions under Medicare without requiring upfront payment or gap fees.

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN8592)

Employment

Removes 'internships' from job market. Provides clarity in what graduates are applying to. No more unpaid or unclear terms of no role at all being on offer. Encourages employers to begin offering 'entry level' positions. The positions offered are encouraged to be paid the rest to a full wage by the employers. Work expierence begins to be offered to students in lower level years. Graduates leave with skills and work expierence to match their qualification and can show on their cv.

We therefore ask the House to review the larger issues mentioned in clarity around the language of 'internships'. Identify unpaid internships and graduate unemployment as a problem. Find way to make this work that makes sense for everybody. Spending on centrelink and wages unearned combined is over $150 000 for a person out of work for 2 years. Is it worth spending 10k per student?

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8595)

Cybersafety

The social media ban for under 16's is taking away parents rights to decide what is okay for their children. Government has no place in parenting. It's also an underhanded push for the Digital ID which should not be forced on anyone.

We therefore ask the House to stop this bill and allow parents to decide what technology their kids can use. Government has no place in parenting.

from 2,355 citizens (Petition No. EN8597)

Veterans

The undersigned respectfully submit that the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) routinely requires veterans to participate in independent medical examinations conducted by private contractors retained by the DVA. These assessments are not intended as treatment; rather, they serve to provide expert medical opinions that inform compensation and rehabilitation decisions made under legislation designed to benefit veterans where uncertainty exists… Although there is no Commonwealth legislation prohibiting participants from recording their own examinations, it is common practice for veterans to be asked to sign "no-recording" agreements or to be informed that recording is not permitted. This lack of transparency has the potential to compromise the objectives of veterans' legislation, as even minor discrepancies in reports—such as words being misheard, omitted, or re-phrased—can significantly affect both interpretation and outcome… Permitting veterans to record their examinations would promote transparency, fairness, and accountability, safeguarding the interests of the veteran while maintaining the evidentiary integrity of the process. Additionally, this practice would reinforce Parliament's long-standing intent that veterans' entitlements be administered justly, compassionately, and favourably—setting a standard distinct from other accident or injury medical reporting procedures in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to legislate that all private contractors engaged by DVA to conduct independent medical examinations must permit veterans to make and retain their own audio recordings without restriction or penalty, and that no contractor or delegate may ask a veteran to waive this right.

from 80 citizens (Petition No. EN8598)

Parliamentary Standards

We observe a decline in public trust in the goverment and an urgent need for reforms that strengthen integrity, accountability, and the rights of all Australians.

We therefore ask the House to act decisively and build a fairer, more accountable government for everyone. First, we must clean up politics. This starts with a powerful Federal Integrity Commission to investigate corruption. We need real-time donation disclosure and spending caps, so our leaders listen to voters, not just wealthy donors. And we must strengthen lobbyist regulations to ensure complete transparency. Second, we must protect our freedoms. We need a Federal Charter of Human Rights to safeguard our liberties. We need truth in political advertising laws to stop disinformation, and we must offer iron-clad protection for whistleblowers who speak out. Finally, we demand an accountable government. This means a binding code of conduct for politicians, an end to secrecy with stronger Freedom of Information laws, and caps on electoral spending to ensure a level playing field. We also need to fix our federal-state relations to end the blame game and get better results in health and education. These reforms are not radical; they are the bedrock of a healthy democracy. They are a blueprint for a government that serves the people.

from 29 citizens (Petition No. EN8600)

Pensions and Benefits

Eligibility for a Health Care Card for young people with chronic health conditions stops at 16 years of age, but their chronic health condition does not.

Imagine being 16, you can't vote, transitioning from paediatric to adult care, striving for a university-entry ATAR or undertaking an apprenticeship, and yet considered adult enough to be responsible for annual administrative tasks and healthcare costs.

Or a newly diagnosed 18 year old, just left home to work or study on a minimum wage, without local support and navigating complex health systems and costs for the first time.

People with type 1 diabetes, for example, already make an extra 180 decisions a day to manage their condition. Many adults get burnt out with the endless paperwork, appointments, costs and time to manage this condition—so why do we expect 16-25 year olds to be able to.

Removal of the administrative and health cost barriers for 16-25 year olds with chronic health conditions so they can focus on building credentials and early career experience is Australia's best chance of reducing long-term health budgets and maximising productivity.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Health Care Card criteria for 16-25 year olds as follows:

1. Extend eligibility of Ex-Carer Allowance (Child) Health Care Card to include ALL 16-25 year-olds who received a Health Care Card associated with a Carer Allowance, WITHOUT the extra burden of annual renewals or proof of student status.

2. Extend Youth Allowance to include 16-25 year-olds with an existing or newly diagnosed chronic health condition.

from 426 citizens (Petition No. EN8602)

Nigeria

In Nigeria, 7000 Christians have been killed in the first seven months of this year ( 2025 )

We therefore ask the House to consider taking diplomatic action to stop the killing of Christians in Nigeria.

from 28 citizens (Petition No. EN8603)

Taxation

Patriarchy has persecuted, underpaid, not paid, abused, locked up homosexuals and they should not have to pay for women's orgasms to go to school. It was legal to underpay ALL women due to their gender. Men do not work for free. They don't work for altruism. They don't compensate women for pain and suffering due to pregnancy. They don't pay child support.

We therefore ask the House to not allow homosexuals and women to pay taxes.

from 38 citizens (Petition No. EN8604)

Personal Information and Privacy

Currently social media companies are gathering unprecedented personal details on its users, which is then used to see user wants, needs, desires to advertisers. By their own admission, via Facebooks "Common Ground" initiative, it was found that current operating practices in their business model, is causing users to be exposed to alarming content, based on their algorithms.

We therefore ask the House to bring into law the banning of surveillance capitalism, particularly in the context of social media and their current business model.

from 53 citizens (Petition No. EN8605)

Qualification of Members and Senators

Born Here, Lead Here: Why Australian Politicians Should Be Australian-Born

Australia's leaders should share not just the citizenship but the roots of the people they represent. Requiring politicians to be born in Australia ensures that those making the laws and shaping the nation have a deep, lived understanding of its culture, values, and history. It helps guarantee that decision-makers have grown up within the same social, educational, and civic systems as the citizens they serve—not simply adopted them later in life.

This standard would strengthen national identity, reduce foreign influence, and build public trust by ensuring that loyalty to Australia is undivided and instinctive, not learned or strategic. Just as many countries require their heads of state or senior officials to be native-born, Australia too should safeguard the integrity of its democracy by ensuring that those in power have been Australian from the very beginning.

We therefore ask the House to change the requirements to become a politician to require you to be born in Australia, and if passed, remove all sitting foreign born politicians.

from 108 citizens (Petition No. EN8608)

Freedom of Speech

Australians are deeply concerned about recent government initiatives that risk restricting freedom of speech and personal privacy—including the Digital ID system, the Social Cohesion Taskforce, and proposed Islamophobia laws.

These measures lack clear definitions, safeguards, and transparency. They may be used to censor legitimate public discussion, suppress criticism of extremist ideologies, and centralise citizens' data without sufficient privacy protections.

Freedom of speech and open debate are core Australian values that must be preserved, not weakened under the guise of cohesion or security.

We therefore ask the House to :-

Halt the implementation of the national Digital ID system until comprehensive public consultation, privacy protections, and independent oversight mechanisms are established.

Ensure the Social Cohesion Taskforce cannot restrict lawful free speech or penalise citizens for discussing social, religious, or political issues.

Reject any proposed "Islamophobia" laws that would criminalise or discourage Australians from speaking out against extremist or violent ideologies.

We urge Parliament to reaffirm its commitment to the Australian Constitution and protect the democratic freedoms that define our nation.

from 3,113 citizens (Petition No. EN8610)

Freedom of Speech

Australia's values of fairness, community, and standing up for those in need are under threat. Coordinated campaigns, often aligned with authoritarian ideologies, are spreading false information, fuelling division, and undermining democratic institutions.

These efforts include propaganda, hate speech, and destabilising rhetoric, amplified through media and political networks. Such influence threatens our social cohesion, public safety, and international reputation.

Misleading political messaging and distorted media narratives are also eroding public trust. Australians deserve truth in political advertising and public communication, especially when designed to influence voters or shape opinion.

We must act decisively to protect Australia from organised disinformation and extremist influence, while upholding legal protections that safeguard democracy, including freedom of expression, political diversity, and the rule of law. These measures should complement existing protections under Australian law, including the implied freedom of political communication and principles of judicial oversight.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Investigate and publicly disclose coordinated disinformation campaigns targeting Australians.

2. Strengthen legislation against political interference, hate speech, and incitement linked to extremist movements, ensuring enforcement is transparent, proportionate, and legally accountable.

3. Refuse entry to individuals who promote division or pose a verified threat to national security, based on lawful criteria and subject to review.

4. Introduce stronger standards for truth in political advertising and public messaging, with penalties for deliberate misinformation, while safeguarding lawful dissent and media freedom.

5. Support public education to help Australians identify misinformation and understand their rights.

Enforcement should target deliberate, coordinated deception, not lawful dissent or genuine debate.

from 232 citizens (Petition No. EN8613)

Endometriosis

We, the undersigned, draw attention to the ongoing crisis in Endometriosis care across Australia. Endometriosis affects one in nine Australians assigned female at birth, causing chronic pain, infertility, and severe impacts on physical, mental, and financial wellbeing. Despite recent government funding for the "free" Pelvic Pain Clinics, these services are not entirely free and have not reduced public wait times, forcing many patients to seek costly private treatment. Current wait periods for diagnosis, imaging, surgery, and specialist appointments often extend months or years—leaving thousands in debilitating pain and unable to work or study. The intent of national funding has not been fully realised: equitable, timely, and affordable care remains out of reach for many.

We therefore ask the House to We therefore ask the House to 1. Increase and properly target funding to reduce public wait times and surgical backlogs; 2. Ensure pelvic pain and endometriosis clinics are genuinely free and accessible, particularly in regional areas; 3. Expand multidisciplinary clinics nationwide, including surgical capacity; and 4. Improve GP, Sonographer, radiologist and specialist training for earlier detection and treatment.

from 162 citizens (Petition No. EN8614)

Economy

Australia's resources (A$5T+ reserves, A$385B annual exports) are looted by companies paying ZERO tax: Santos exported $47B gas (10th zero-tax year); Ichthys LNG $43B sales (6th zero-tax year). This deprives the nation of revenue needed for long-term prosperity.

Norway: saves oil wealth in Government Pension Fund Global US$1.8T fund = US$320K per citizen (5.5M pop) → net debt-free.

Australia: A$1T gross debt, A$541B net debt, 27.7M citizens. A$10B deficit.

The current Future Fund (A$252B) has untapped potential: taxed resources could yield A$180K per citizen like Norway.

Australia is in a Crisis: Worst OECD living standards fall (3 years), cost-of-living hell. Net zero policies already deliver: 653K job losses, fragile grids, skyrocketing power prices, China's renewables → national security collapse. Combined untaxed resource extraction, this path represents national destruction through economic suicide and potential corruption. This path is unsustainable.

We therefore ask the House to legislate a Sovereign Wealth Fund modelled on Norway's, funded by taxed resources. Enforce 40% PRRT, 30% tax on all exporters. Redirect to eliminate A$1 trillion debt and maintain surplus for 27.5 million citizens. Halt net zero policies driving costs, decline. Review taxation, corruption within 12 months.

Urge House to LEGISLATE:

1. Australian Sovereign Wealth Fund (Norway model) funded by taxed resource exports (minerals/gas/coal).

2. End ZERO-TAX exports—Santos/Chevron pay FULL 40% PRRT + 30% company tax immediately.

3. Eliminate A$1T debt, deliver surplus to 27.7M citizens.

4. HALT net zero policies causing job losses, power price gouging, China energy dominance = national security vulnerability.

5. Independent review/royal commission (resource taxation + policy risks) within 12 months.

from 48 citizens (Petition No. EN8618)

Veterans

This petition draws to the attention of the House that the Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) currently applies submission requirements not found in the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) through its 2016 "Submission Guidelines."... Under sections 196C and 196F of the VEA, an eligible person or organisation may make a request or submission to the RMA simply by providing it in writing... The Act does not prescribe a form, structure, or evidentiary threshold. By contrast, section 15(3)(a) of the VEA expressly authorises the Repatriation Commission to determine the form of a claim, demonstrating that Parliament chose to confer such power where it was intended... No equivalent power is conferred on the RMA.. Despite this, the RMA's administrative guidelines require submissions to include peer-reviewed, epidemiological evidence and scientific referencing—expectations well beyond the capacity of ordinary veterans and dependants... These additional requirements have no basis in the Act and effectively deter or exclude lay person participation, contrary to Parliament's intent that veterans' legislation be beneficial, remedial, and accessible.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 to confirm that requests and submissions to the RMA need only comply with the Act itself—being made in writing by an eligible person—and to prohibit the Authority from imposing any additional procedural or evidentiary requirements beyond those expressly provided by law... This amendment would restore the beneficial intent of the veterans' legislative framework and ensure that all veterans can freely raise matters of concern for investigation without technical or professional barriers.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN8619)

Pensions and Benefits

Regional students tend to face more financial disadvantage compared to those based in the city. Higher education shouldn't just be for those that live in the right places—everyone should be offered the same opportunity to contribute to a better Australia. Educating the youth is a national issue. Future doctors, engineers, nurses, teachers, and other essential workers that need tertiary education come from regional areas. Parliamentarians have an inherent responsibility to make policies that encourage the youth of today to be the work force of tomorrow.

We therefore ask the House to raise the combined parental income threshold used to calculate the Youth Allowance payment for regional dependents, and to increase the payment allocated by the Tertiary Access payment.

from 53 citizens (Petition No. EN8620)

eSafety Commissioner

The current Esafety commissioner should be fired because the Eastside commissioner is not saving anything. She has attempted to censor multiple freedom of speech websites such as WikiLeaks and X

She's using her power to actively censor things that fit her agenda.

We therefore ask the House to at an immediate stage fire the current E-Safety commissioner

from 193 citizens (Petition No. EN8621)

Artificial Intelligence

Generative AI is energy inefficient, environmentally unsustainable, and is being used to take away jobs and create misleading photos and videos.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation to restrict or ban the use of generative ai, LLMs and LIMs in order to protect Australian jobs, and prevent large scale misinformation campaigns.

from 258 citizens (Petition No. EN8622)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's future economic prosperity depends on creating secure, high-skilled jobs that support our workers and communities. Fusion energy offers an opportunity to establish a new, world-leading industry that will generate thousands of jobs across research, engineering, manufacturing, construction, and operations. Unlike fission, fusion has no high-level radioactive waste and minimal safety risks, making it more acceptable to communities and more aligned with our climate goals. Major economies are already investing billions into fusion, and Australia risks being left behind without a comprehensive national strategy. Our country has the scientific talent, natural resources, and advanced manufacturing potential to lead in this transformative technology. By investing in fusion, we can create enduring employment opportunities, foster regional development, and build sovereign capability in clean energy technologies. Fusion can power Australia's industries, drive exports, and ensure that our workforce is equipped for the clean energy revolution.

We therefore ask the House to support the creation of a national fusion energy development program with dedicated funding for research, industry partnerships, and pilot projects. This program should prioritise Australian job creation, regional opportunities, and training pathways to ensure our workforce is ready to benefit from the fusion economy. We also ask the House to coordinate with states and territories to maximise regional job growth and attract investment into Australia's fusion industry.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN7572)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's ability to lead in the emerging global fusion energy sector depends on a highly educated and skilled workforce. Fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless source of power that can transform Australia's energy landscape and contribute to net-zero goals. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce high-level radioactive waste or pose significant proliferation risks, making it safer and more acceptable to communities. To compete globally, Australia needs to invest now in educating the next generation of scientists, engineers, technicians, and skilled workers who will design, build, and operate fusion systems. Currently, Australia lacks dedicated programs and resources for fusion education and training, putting us at risk of missing out on billions of dollars in global investment and high-skilled jobs. Early investment in fusion education can also stimulate STEM engagement and regional development, supporting national resilience and economic growth.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion education and training initiative. This should include funding for university programs, TAFE courses, research fellowships, apprenticeships, and school outreach focused on fusion technologies. We also ask the House to coordinate with states and territories to support local education providers and ensure Australia's workforce is prepared to lead in the clean energy future powered by fusion.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN7573)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about rising living costs, energy affordability, and economic pressures on Australian families. Fusion energy offers a transformative solution by providing a safe, clean, and abundant source of power that can lower energy prices, reduce emissions, and support national welfare. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and carries no risk of catastrophic accidents, making it a safer and more community-friendly option. A national fusion energy program would create thousands of high-skilled jobs, stimulate regional economies, and reduce Australia's dependence on imported fuels. Importantly, cheaper and more reliable energy would ease household energy bills, freeing up family budgets for other essentials and improving overall welfare. By investing in fusion, Australia can ensure that all citizens benefit from secure, affordable, and sustainable energy, reducing energy poverty and strengthening social cohesion.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program that prioritises affordability and community benefits. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry, regulatory frameworks for safe deployment, and support for regional economic development. We also ask the House to ensure that the welfare of Australians is a key priority in any fusion energy rollout, with policies that protect consumers, lower energy costs, and improve the quality of life for all Australians.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN7574)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia urgently needs to act on fusion energy development within this parliamentary term to secure our energy future and economic prosperity. Fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless power source that can transform Australia's energy landscape, reduce emissions, and lower costs for households and businesses. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce high-level radioactive waste or pose proliferation risks, making it safer and more community-friendly. Australia risks falling behind global competitors who are investing billions in fusion research and pilot projects. Immediate action will position Australia to attract investment, create thousands of high-skilled jobs, and build a sovereign supply chain in advanced manufacturing and clean technology. Delay risks missing out on strategic advantages, including energy security and regional leadership. We believe Australia must not wait any longer to seize the economic, social, and environmental benefits of fusion energy.

We therefore ask the House to begin implementing a national fusion energy program during this parliamentary term. This should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry, regulatory frameworks for pilot plants, and initiatives to create skilled jobs and training pathways. Early action is essential to ensure Australia leads the way in clean energy innovation and delivers lasting benefits to all Australians.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN7575)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about Australia's long-term national security and our ability to remain technologically competitive in the Indo-Pacific region. Fusion energy offers a clean, safe, and virtually limitless power source with significant potential for defence applications, including energy security for bases, advanced naval propulsion, and support for high-tech industries. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and poses no proliferation risk, making it a safer and more acceptable technology. Other nations, including the US, UK, and China, are investing heavily in fusion research, recognising its strategic importance for defence and security. Australia risks falling behind if we do not act now. By investing in fusion energy development this parliamentary term, Australia can build sovereign capabilities, support defence innovation, and enhance our strategic resilience. Acting now will ensure Australia is not left vulnerable in a rapidly changing security landscape.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, focused on defence and national security applications. This should include funding for research and development, support for industry partnerships, pilot projects for defence integration, and collaboration with allies. Immediate action is essential to ensure Australia's defence forces have access to the world's safest, most advanced energy technologies and to secure our nation's strategic interests.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN7576)

Medical Research Future Fund

We are asking the Australian Federal Government to release the full $1 billion annual disbursement from the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) in the 2026-27 Federal Budget.

Right now, only about $650 million from the Medical Research Future Fund is being released each year—leaving lifesaving research underfunded and vital discoveries at risk.

The MRFF must cover the real cost of research, including infrastructure, compliance, cybersecurity, and patient engagement. Without this support, institutes will be forced to cut jobs and stop research projects mid-stream.

Please ensure the MRFF delivers what Australians were promised—sustainable funding for medical research that saves lives.

We therefore ask the House to release the full disbursement of the Medical Research Future Fund every year, for it to be set out in the budget, as $1 billion dollars as promised in 2015.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN8623)

Australian Parliament

Recently, there have been discussions around the expansion of Parliament. The last time that the Australian Parliament has expanded was 41 years ago. In 1984, both the House of Representatives and Senate expanded before the year's election of a new prime minister due to a double dissolution in 1983. While there were many short-term issues (practical size of parliament, changes to sizes of preexisting electorates), the double-edged sword of the matter, which may or may not already be accounted for, is representation. While this effect did improve the scrutiny of parliament, it also increased the wait times, debates and hearings of those directly involved or willing to engage with Parliament and Government. We would like Parliament to be an efficient and democratic body, and myself as well as those who sign this petition, would like Parliament to be as transparent and supportive of the Australian public through this process.

We therefore ask the House to establish (in speech or writing) why—beyond the demographics of a growing population and more diversified voting base—the Parliament is expanding the Parliament. It is and will be a complicated issue for many Australians. Some of the questions we would like to be answered are: Does the time between Parliament expansions increase due to population growth and, if so, does that mandate more serious legislation? Does the Parliament aim to add more backbenchers or does an increase the likelihood of new ministers being added to the front bench? Further clarity is appreciated.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8628)

Electoral System

Voting should be made non compulsory as some people may not want to vote due to religious and moral standpoints . We should be given the right to abstain from voting if that's our viewpoint without getting fined .

We therefore ask the House to consider making voting non compulsory as its a free country ,where we should have freedom to choose if we want to vote or not .

from 18 citizens (Petition No. EN8630)

Veterans

This petition draws to the attention of the House that the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) requires the Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) to investigate matters when a valid request is made under section 196C(4). However, the Act provides no timeframe for when such requests must be considered...

As a result, veterans' submissions can remain unattended for many months before being placed on the RMA's meeting agenda. In one recent example, a submission lodged in October 2025 was not scheduled for consideration until June 2026—a delay of more than seven months...

Such delay frustrates the beneficial purpose of the VEA, which was enacted to ensure that veterans' matters are dealt with promptly, fairly and with compassion. In an era of electronic communication and virtual meetings, it is unreasonable that procedural decisions of this nature are deferred for extended periods solely because of internal scheduling practices. The absence of any statutory timeframe enables unnecessary delay and undermines public confidence in the veterans' medical assessment process..

We therefore ask the House to amend the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 to require the Repatriation Medical Authority to, determine any valid request made under section 196C(4) within 30 days of receipt.

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN8633)

Defence Personnel

We, the undersigned, believe that when an institution repeatedly abuses its exclusive jurisdiction over criminal matters, it forfeits the right to remain separate. We are deeply concerned by the lack of independent civilian oversight in the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences committed by members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF). Internal handling has undermined transparency, eroded victim protection, and damaged public trust. ADF personnel must be held to the same legal standards as civilians, with justice delivered impartially. Recent reports reveal systemic sexual violence and harassment, and decades of failure to protect victims or deliver justice. It is clear that the current framework is not—and has not been—reliable. Civilian oversight is now urgently required to restore accountability and uphold the rule of law within the ADF.

We therefore ask the House to legislate a National Defence Integrity Bill and amend all relevant legislation to:

• Transfer criminal jurisdiction over ADF personnel to the Australian Federal Police (AFP).

• Integrate Military Police (MPs) into the AFP as a specialist division under civilian command.

• Classify all criminal conduct and offences committed by ADF members as federal crimes, to be investigated by MPs and Australian federal police.

• Mandate that war crimes be prosecuted only in the High Court of Australia.

• Require all other offences to be heard in either the Supreme Court of the relevant State or Territory, or the Federal Magistrates Court.

• Establish independent reporting pathways and oversight mechanisms to protect victims and uphold democratic accountability.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8636)

National Security

Australians deserve confidence that decisions affecting our national security, immigration system, and public funding allocation being free from any misuse of ministerial power, and in the national interest. Recent actions by DHA, have raised significant public concern, including:

• The repatriation of individuals with links to foreign terrorist organisations without adequate community consultation or clear security reassurances

• Issuing of visas to asylum seekers without appropriate vetting, as well as the ongoing presence of individuals who entered on tourist visas but remain in Australia

• Fast-tracking citizenship ceremonies for constituents across the state of NSW in the lead-up to the May 2025 Federal Election, raising concerns of political advantage

• The allocation of more than $20 million in taxpayer funding to certain community associations and charities, some of which have reported or alleged links to extremist networks or individuals previously identified as religious radicals.

These matters raise legitimate questions about national security, transparency of funding allocations, and the impartial use of ministerial powers.

We therefore ask the House to investigate whether the DHA has been compromised and also:

1. Refer the matter to the NACC or establish an appropriate parliamentary inquiry.

2. Review the policy and vetting processes around repatriation of foreign fighters' families

3. Audit taxpayer funding to community and religious associations

4. Strengthen safeguards to ensure citizenship ceremonies and related processes cannot be misused for political or electoral gain.

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN8637)

Cybersafety

We are calling on the Australian Government to lower the current social media age restriction so that individuals under 12 can have access to platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X. At 12, most of us are finishing primary school and becoming more mature, responsible, and aware of online safety. Preventing younger people from using social media limits our ability to learn how to navigate the digital world safely and responsibly.

Social media is a major part of how young people connect, express themselves, and learn new things. It helps us find communities where we feel accepted and supported, especially for those who struggle to make friends in person or face mental health challenges. It also provides educational content, creative opportunities, and inspiration that help us grow and learn beyond the classroom.

Instead of keeping kids under 12 off social media completely, we should focus on creating safer, supervised spaces with stronger parental controls and better online education.

We urge the Australian Government to lower the social media age limit and give us a chance to learn, connect, and have our voices heard safely and responsibly.

We therefore ask the House to Lowered the social media ban to The Age of under 12

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8638)

Cybersafety

i request that the age

social media ban is lowered to the age of 13 so no one under the age of thirteen can have a social media account

We therefore ask the House to lower the age of social media ban in Australia

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8640)

Cybersafety

because kids will find dangerous loopholes to access social media and will be in serious trouble when something goes wrong

We therefore ask the House to stop the ban for social media

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8643)

Cybersafety

I think the social media ban is a good idea to restrict certain content from being accessed but I think taking it away all together will make kids sneaky and use vpns, parents Id and more, instead I think you should restrict certain content such as the spotlight feature on Snapchat or the 18+ feature on TikTok

We therefore ask the House to consider our request to modify the ban and restrict certain parts of the app for under 16s instead of taking it away completely

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8648)

Cybersafety

The reduction of the age restriction for social media in Australia from 16 to at least 13 is quite reasonable in many aspects. To begin with, 13 is actually a common age restriction for social media usage worldwide because of regulations in different legal frameworks and legislation in many nations. Children are still in a developmental level where they can comprehend social media usage but still need some oversight.

Having younger teens on social media allows parents to teach them how to use it properly. Rather than not allowing them to be on social media at all, there could be an open dialogue in a family about issues such as how to handle online privacy and how to act as an online citizen. In addition to that, many kids age 13 and above are still somehow finding a way to have a social media presence without parental oversight.

In conclusion, a change to this social media ban age can encourage young Australians to acquire important skills for a digital age and ensure that their online life is a more positive experience.

We therefore ask the House to lower the age limit of the social media ban to at least 13

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN8650)

Ambulance Services

Hospitals are free throughout the country. Medicare covers a huge amount of GP appointments etc. Yet the one thing that ends up getting the many that need emergency help is ambulances, costing possibly thousands of dollars in Victoria among other states. We can't really say we have free healthcare in our country until the WHOLE country has EVERY part of healthcare free. Not everybody can afford such an expense.

We therefore ask the House to put ambulance costs under Medicare completely and federally, so that ambulance costs are less state-specific.

from 74 citizens (Petition No. EN8658)

Animal Welfare

Australia's current animal welfare laws are fragmented, outdated, and inconsistent across jurisdictions. Scientific evidence confirms that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain, fear, and joy. Yet many practices such as intensive confinement, live export, and unregulated breeding continue to cause widespread suffering. The lapse of the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy has left a national policy vacuum. A renewed, coordinated approach is urgently needed to reflect public expectations, improve enforcement, and ensure ethical treatment of animals across all sectors.

We therefore ask the House to

• Legislate the formal recognition of animal sentience in Commonwealth law.

• Establish a National Animal Welfare Commission preferably by federalising the RSPCA to coordinate policy, enforcement, and national strategy.

• Phase out inhumane practices including battery cages, sow stalls, and live animal export, replacing them with ethical and sustainable alternatives.

• Mandate transparent labelling of animal products to reflect welfare standards and empower consumer choice.

• Reinstate and strengthen the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy with measurable goals, stakeholder engagement, and public accountability.

from 260 citizens (Petition No. EN8660)

Migration

Call for an end to discriminatory practices in immigration policies that unfairly target Middle Eastern applicants. Current immigration and visa processes impose excessive security measures and disproportionately long waiting timeson individuals from Middle Eastern countries.

While every applicant deserves fair and thorough screening, these procedures often go far beyond what is required for applicants from other regions, resulting in systemic bias, prolonged separation from families, and lost opportunities for work, study, and safety.

This unequal treatment sends a harmful message that applicants from certain backgrounds are less trusted or less deserving, which undermines the principles of fairness, equality, and justice that immigration systems should uphold.

We therefore ask the House to

* Review and reform discriminatory security protocols.

* Ensure that all applicants are processed under equal and transparent standards.

* Commit to timely and fair processing times for applicants of all nationalities.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8662)

Income Tax

Australians are working harder than ever just to keep up with the rising cost of living. Yet when they put in for overtime hours to earn more a large portion of that is swallowed by tax. Overtime is a choice made by hard-working Australians who sacrifice personal time family time and rest. They should be rewarded for their extra work. Not penalised. It's time to make overtimectax free. There are of course pros and cons to this argument of course. Pros are rewarding hard-work, easing the cost of living, boosting productivity and filling labour gaps. Currently overtime can push workers into higher tax brackets meaning they lose most of the extra earnings to tax. And yes, I understand that by not taxing overtime the Federal Government will have less money but that may encourage them to spend our money wisely. Australia currently already offers tax offsets and exemptions and by extending a similar concept to overtime pay would be straightforward to implement. As an example, the first 10 hours of overtime could be tax free. Australians need a break to earn and keep more of their money. Let's make overtime tax free.

We therefore ask the House to exempt overtime from being taxed

from 22 citizens (Petition No. EN8666)

Sudan

We, the undersigned, urge the Government to act urgently in response to the war and genocide unfolding across Sudan. Massacres continue in El Fasher, Bara, North Kordofan, and across Darfur—each week brings new violence, displacement, and loss.

Had Sudanese Australians been able to bring their families to safety when the war began, many would not be mourning today. Australia created humanitarian pathways for Ukrainians and Palestinians—we ask for the same fairness and compassion for Sudanese Australians.

Every day of inaction costs lives. The people of Sudan, and their families here in Australia, are asking for protection, justice, and urgent action. We call on Parliament to debate and respond now.

We therefore ask the House to We call on the Australian Parliament to urgently respond to the humanitarian crisis in Sudan. Families are being torn apart by war, famine, and atrocities in El Fasher, Bara, and North Kordofan.

We ask the House to:

1. Create immediate humanitarian visa pathways and an additional quota for Sudanese nationals, allowing Sudanese Australians to reunite with their parents, siblings, and children.

2. Unsuspend the Community Support Program (CSP) so families can safely sponsor loved ones and support their integration.

We also urge the Government to support humanitarian relief, condemn the ongoing genocide, and sanction those arming or funding the perpetrators.

Australia has shown compassion before. We ask for the same solidarity toward Sudanese Australians seeking safety for their families.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8669)

Sudan

We, the undersigned, draw the attention of the House to the grave and deteriorating humanitarian crisis in the Republic of Sudan.

Since 2023, widespread armed conflict has resulted in mass killings, targeted violence against civilians, ethnic cleansing, forced displacement, sexual violence, deliberate destruction of public infrastructure, and the collapse of essential services. Millions have been forced to flee their homes, and countless lives have been lost. Reports from international humanitarian organisations indicate a rapidly worsening situation, including famine conditions, indiscriminate attacks, and atrocities potentially amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Despite the scale of this tragedy, the response of the international community has been insufficient to prevent continued atrocities. The people of Sudan urgently need global support and decisive action to protect civilians, facilitate humanitarian access, and work toward a lasting ceasefire and peaceful political resolution.

We therefore ask the House to the ongoing massacres, ethnic violence, and human rights abuses in Sudan;

-Call upon all parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire and commit to a peaceful process under international supervision;

-Advocate through diplomatic channels for stronger international action, including sanctions against those responsible for mass atrocities;

-Increase humanitarian support to affected Sudanese civilians, including refugees and displaced persons;

-Support international investigations—including through the UN and ICC—into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity;

-Assist Sudanese communities in Australia, including by facilitating family reunification and protection pathways for those at risk.

We, the petitioners, urge the Australian Parliament to act promptly to help prevent further loss of life and protect innocent civilians in Sudan.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN8671)

Sudan

Sudan is bleeding. In October 2025, the city of El-Fasher in Darfur became the site of one of the most horrific massacres in recent history. Over 2,000 civilians were executed. Inside a maternity hospital, 460 people including women, children, and medical staff were slaughtered. Children were killed in front of their parents. These are not battlefield casualties. These are deliberate, targeted war crimes.

The violence continues. Civilians are being hunted. Aid workers are being attacked. Communities are being erased. The United Nations and human rights organizations have warned that these atrocities may constitute crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. Over 30 million people now need urgent humanitarian assistance, and 15 million of them are children.

This is not a distant tragedy. It is happening now. And it demands a response.

We therefore ask the House to

• Publicly condemn the ongoing war crimes in Sudan and demand accountability for those responsible.

• Support international investigations into crimes against humanity through the International Criminal Court and other legal bodies.

• Increase humanitarian aid to Sudan and neighboring countries hosting displaced people.

• Provide safe pathways for Sudanese refugees and asylum seekers to seek protection in Australia.

• Engage diplomatically to push for a ceasefire, humanitarian access, and justice for victims.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN8672)

Northern Territory

The Northern Territory was split off from South Australia in 1911, and was since then largely used as a dumping ground for Indigenous Australians, so that the then-Government would be able to have more control over the Indigenous community and give them special laws, thus bypassing the constitutional protections of state equality. This was an extremely racist move, and while we have made major strides in Indigenous rights, we still have more to go. One of the biggest steps that we can take in genuine progress is to give them their own statehood, including having their own state-level government which can be voted for themselves.

Back in 1998, the NT had a referendum to become independent, which was voted "no". However, (1) this was lost by a rather thin margin; and (2) it was lost not because people did not want independent statehood, but rather because of the less than ideal execution, including a lack of information provided on how it would work, as well as being offered only 3 senators unlike the 12 that every other states get.

We therefore ask the House to either (1) create a new state in the place of the Northern Territory with 12 senators, clear information for citizens, and up to 5 years of financial help to get the new state off the ground should it struggle (given each original states recieved 10 years after Federation); or (2) re-join the NT back into South Australia as had been prior to 1911.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8673)

Waste Management and Recycling

Single-use plastic water bottles contribute too much to plastic pollution.

We therefore ask the House to ban single-use plastic water bottles

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8674)

Banking and Financial Services

I recently faced a situation where I was denied access to my own money by bank staff simply because I chose not to disclose what I intended to use it for. They are not law enforcement, and in my opinion, bank institutions are not always a paragon of trustworthiness. These staff members are essentially strangers to me, and they should not dictate how I access my own funds.

Australians have the right to access and use their money without having to explain themselves to bank representatives, who may not have the necessary qualifications beyond being retail workers. It's not just about inconvenience but about the fundamental right to financial privacy and autonomy. Unfortunately, many Australians are subjected to similar experiences, and this practice needs to be reevaluated.

We therefore ask the House to

According to the Australian Banking Association, customers can be required to inform banks about the purpose of large cash withdrawals as a measure to combat financial crimes. However, the balance seems off when these inquiries infringe on individuals' privacy and control over their finances.

We propose that banking policies be revised to restore customers' rights to access their money without unnecessary scrutiny. This could include setting up clear guidelines ensuring that any requirement to disclose information is minimal, transparent, and only when absolutely necessary to prevent criminal activities.

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN8675)

Migration

We request the Australian Parliament to reform the entry requirements for becoming a Registered Migration Agent (RMA).

Currently, applicants must complete a Graduate Diploma in Australian Migration Law and Practice, pass the Capstone Assessment, and meet strict English language criteria—even if they have completed higher education in Australia.

The Capstone exam is costly (over $2,100), infrequent, and duplicates the assessment already completed during the Graduate Diploma. Many capable graduates are unfairly blocked from registration due to this extra hurdle.

Additionally, the English language requirement is redundant for applicants who have completed a Bachelor's, Master's, or PhD in Australia and have lived and worked here for years. Requiring further English testing (e.g., IELTS or TOEFL) adds unnecessary cost and stress.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Abolish the Capstone Assessment or reduce its fee to $1,000 and increase its availability.

2. Remove the English test requirement for applicants who have completed higher education in Australia.

These reforms will make the registration process fairer and more accessible, allowing qualified individuals to contribute to the migration industry and the Australian economy through professional practice and tax contributions.

from 58 citizens (Petition No. EN8676)

Cybersafety

We know the Australian social media ban is coming up on december 10th

and its unfair for under 16 year olds we know that

but thr goverment should make it under 10

because social media is damaging their brains and unhealthy for them

Its rotting their brains

You see my point?

We therefore ask the House to see that kids are having their creativity and minds wreaked because of social media and to makesure that 10 and under ten year olds shouldn't have acess to social media.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8677)

Family Law

The child support system needs reform to ensure fairness and accountability. Parents receiving support should have to prove that funds are being used for their children's needs—not for personal expenses. Payments should also reflect current income, not outdated financial records, so both parents are treated fairly and children truly benefit.

—

Why this is important

The child support system is meant to protect children and ensure they have the financial support they deserve. Unfortunately, the current system allows for a lack of accountability and transparency in how child support payments are used—and often unfair financial pressure is placed on paying parents.

We believe it's time to modernise and reform the system so that it truly works for the children it was created to support.

We therefore ask the House to reform the child support system to ensure fairness, accountability, and focus on children's wellbeing.

Parents receiving support should provide proof, like receipts or statements, showing funds are spent on essentials such as food, clothing, housing, and education. Payments must reflect current income, with quick adjustments for changes in financial circumstances. Child support should be reasonable and sustainable for paying parents while meeting children's needs. Introduce transparent reporting and oversight to reduce disputes and ensure funds are used appropriately.

We call on the government to act now to create a child-focused, fair, and accountable system.

from 50 citizens (Petition No. EN8679)

Cybersafety

I strongly believe the social media ban is restricting many opportunities for older kids who have clearly matured. Social media is a place for teens and above to interact, socialise, meet new people, learn, and build character. For many people, social media has an algorithm so they can view videos they are interested in. They can build their personality and extend their thinking. We don't want to limit their character, we need to let them grow. Holding teenagers back is not going to help them, in fact, social media has influenced many to be more confident from affirmations to positive influencers. There's even a growing trend on TikTok the ditch the iPhone and go out, indicating self-control and maturity. After 16, many teens might want to explore outside and get jobs/go partying. There's a wide range of people discovering new music and old music, increasing favourite artists such as Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Kings of Leon, Lynyrd Skynyrd, and much more. Teens have become more mature, relaxed, and free ever since the growing social media. How can you take that away? I do believe younger children such as 12 and under can live a long, healthy childhood, but soon after, they'll want to explore and develop. Lets not limit that.

We therefore ask the House to change the social media ban from 16 and under to 13 and under.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8683)

Dingoes

Properly constituted bodies, charities, notfor profit organisations, law makers and others are advocating for dingoes to be viewed and governed as invasive pests, which perpetuates a false narrative about dingoes. An example of this is misinformation about dingoes' status as native wildlife recognised under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, and their ecological importance to biodiversity. Another example involves individuals, constituted bodies, charities and not for profit organisations and groups which discredit the reputation of highly esteemed environmental scientists through dissemination of blatant disinformation, which seems to have been AI generated.

We therefore ask the House to establish law to impose penalties upon constituted bodies, charities, not for profit organisations, local councils, and law makers that knowingly, negligently and recklessly, create and/or spread disinformation about native wildlife, including dingoes, which may impede informed government decision making, and public understanding of environmental and biodiversity management.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8686)

Cybersafety

The Social media ban will not do much at all besides from shutting down the little social interaction we already have. The government should be caring more about bigger problems than this. The ban enacting on December 10th 2025, There are many loopholes around this and teenagers will find a way, furthermore social media is a big part of our life in the 21st century and your taking all that away. it is the governments way of shutting down all our connections, what if you have a friend on snapchat that lives on the other side of the world and you lose your only contact with them, this ban age should be lowered to at least 13 coming into your teenage years.

We therefore ask the House to lower the age of the ban to 13.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8688)

Cybersafety

1. Infringement on Digital Literacy and Expression:

Social media is essential in learning and communication between parties, removing it burdens our right of freedom and speech and self expression.Teenage content creators will no longer be able to express their feelings to the rest of the world.

2. Privacy Concerns:

The implementation of age verification measures may lead to the collection of sensitive personal data from minors.By entering personal details onto an online platform is bound for trouble, this raises privacy concerns, putting millions of Australians autonomy and personal information at risk.

3. Unintended Consequences:

Evidence suggests that such bans may drive young users to less regulated and more harmful online spaces. Instead of protecting children, the ban could inadvertently expose them to harm on less common, unmonitored even illegal platforms.

4. Parental Rights and Choice:

The decision to allow children access to social media should be their parents/guardians decisions, not the parliament or Australian governments decision . The current legislation undermines parental authority and individual freedoms, violating the human right of free will.

We therefore ask the House to :

• Repeal the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024.

• Engage with stakeholders, including educators, parents, digital rights organizations, and young people, to develop policies that are capable of ensuring the online safety of Australian children without infringing on their rights.

• Implement comprehensive digital literacy programs that empower and teach young people proper online etiquette for young Australians to navigate the online world safely and responsibly.

from 29 citizens (Petition No. EN8689)

Australian Centre for Disease Control

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives assembled in Parliament:

This petition of the undersigned citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the House the need for accountability and public oversight in the implementation of the Australian Centre for Disease Control Act 2025, which was passed by Parliament on 6 November 2025 and is scheduled to commence on 1 January 2026.

We note that the Act establishes a new national health authority with broad powers to collect and share health data, coordinate national disease responses, and enter into arrangements with international bodies. These functions carry significant authority for the Director-General, yet the Act provides no independent or parliamentary oversight mechanism to ensure accountability and safeguard Australians' privacy rights.

We therefore ask the House to call upon the Minister for Health and Aged Care, the Hon Mark Butler MP, to:

1. Establish a Standing Parliamentary Oversight Committee to ensure ongoing accountability of the Australian Centre for Disease Control;

2. Table and review all data-sharing declarations, memoranda, and international agreements entered into by the CDC before the Act commences; and

3. Guarantee Australians' right to privacy and consent under the Privacy Act 1988 and all applicable health-record legislation.

from 1,863 citizens (Petition No. EN8691)

Cybersafety

Social media can have powerful effects on self-esteem and mood. Teenagers and children are still developing emotionally, so:

• Constant comparison to influencers and peers can lead to anxiety, depression, and poor body image.

• Likes and followers can make self-worth feel dependent on online approval.

• Exposure to cyberbullying or negative comments can be extremely damaging to a young person's mental health.

Social media platforms contain adult content, harmful trends, and misinformation that aren't suitable for children. Even with filters:

• Kids can easily encounter violence, sexual content, or hate speech.

• Algorithms often push addictive or extreme content that can distort a child's view of the world.

Children under 16 often don't fully understand how to protect their personal information online.

• They might overshare private details like location or school, making them targets for scammers or predators.

• Once something is posted online, it's almost impossible to remove permanently, which can affect future education or job opportunities.

Social media is designed to be addictive. Young users may:

• Spend hours scrolling instead of sleeping, studying, or socializing in real life.

• Struggle to focus or develop healthy habits because of constant notifications and dopamine hits.

Before 16, young people are still learning important social, emotional, and critical thinking skills. Too much time online can:

• Limit face-to-face communication and real-world friendships.

• Reduce creativity and attention span because of fast, shallow content.

• Prevent them from developing resilience to handle criticism or failure offline.

We therefore ask the House to remove under 16s as it can harm their mental health, expose them to danger, and interfere with their growth both emotionally and socially. Real-life experiences

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8692)

Cybersafety

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives in Parliament assembled:

The petitioners draw to the attention of the House that:

The Federal Government's proposal to ban Australians under the age of 16 from using social media platforms would unfairly restrict young people's rights to communicate, learn, and participate in modern digital society.

While protecting children online is important, an outright ban is not a balanced or effective solution. Such a ban would limit access to educational and community resources, disrupt social connections, and reduce opportunities for safe online learning. It would also be extremely difficult to enforce and could create new privacy and identity risks through mandatory age-verification systems.

Young Australians need support to use the internet safely and responsibly, not exclusion from the digital world altogether. Education, parental involvement, and platform accountability offer far more effective approaches than blanket prohibition.

We therefore ask the House to:

Reject any proposal to impose a nationwide social media ban on Australians under the age of 16;

Develop alternative policies that strengthen online safety through education, awareness, and digital literacy programs; and

Consult meaningfully with young people, parents, educators, and online safety experts to design practical and inclusive solutions.

We therefore ask the House to lower the limit to 13-14+ as of all teenagers should be allowed to have social media and it wouldn't be fair on the 14 year olds and it is most people's safe place on social media

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8693)

Fraud

Social media companies allow deepfake ads spruiking fake investment schemes to be published on their platform.

This needs to stop. The government needs to introduce a penalty for platforms that knowingly take money from scammers.

Too many Australians, particularly older Australians are losing their savings to these schemes and social media platforms are getting off scott-free at the moment.

We therefore ask the House to penalise social media platforms that knowingly take money from scammers.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8696)

Medicare

Allowing prisons to access Medicare will benefit society for several reasons

- Improving physical health outcomes

- Improving mental health outcomes (aiding in the decrease of reoffending rates)

- Continuity of care

- Supports rehabilitation

We therefore ask the House to consider excluding Medicare ineligibility for prisoners under the Health Insurance Act 1973

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN8698)

Cybersafety

The December 10th social media ban will restrict access to certain social media platforms for people under 16 years of age.

While we acknowledge the intent to protect young Australians from online harms, we are concerned that the policy as designed will:

Require age-verification systems that may collect, store, or analyse sensitive personal information, creating serious privacy and data-breach risks.

Apply inconsistently across platforms, meaning some services remain unregulated while others are banned, which may push children towards less-safe or unmoderated online spaces.

Lack sufficient consultation with privacy experts, youth advocates, educators, and industry representatives on how to implement safeguards effectively.

Focus primarily on restricting access rather than building digital literacy and resilience, which are key to long-term online safety.

We believe the legislation, in its current form, risks undermining the very safety outcomes it seeks to achieve.

We therefore ask the House to Delay full implementation of the December 10 restrictions to allow further consultation with experts and affected stakeholders.

Commission an independent privacy impact assessment on all proposed age-verification technologies before enforcement begins.

Ensure that no biometric data, identity documents, or other sensitive personal information are required or stored as part of any age-verification system.

Address inconsistencies by developing clear, platform-neutral safety standards applying to all online services used by young people, not just selected social media sites.

Provide transparent public reporting on the impacts of the new restrictions, including whether children migrate to less-regulated online spaces.

Invest in national programs promoting digital literacy, online safety education, and parental guidance instead of relying solely on access bans.

from 23 citizens (Petition No. EN8699)

Cybersafety

The social media ban for under-16s was made to keep us young people safe. But is it really? Or is it just a way for the government to gain more control over its citizens? Whether young people can use social media is a parent's decision, not one to be handed over to the government. There are so many bigger problems to worry about, such as wars that are literally killing millions of people, and our government is fussing over some Instagram? We are allowed to drive at the age of 16, yes, operate a moving machine, but only then are we allowed to use an app legally? It's not fair and unjust. Additionally, doesn't the Labour Party have its own TikTok account that's inspired by Gen Z? Oh, and let's not forget. They full-on plagiarized the format and content of the American creator, RayWilliamJohnson. The government relies on us to use social media to watch their videos that are way too obviously targeted towards us, so why are we the ones getting banned? Recently, 12-year-old Flossie came in the hope of changing Albanese's mind about the ban, only for him to say that the ban will get children to be "offline and into life", completely dismissing the purpose for which she came. Again, that's not right. Taking a teen's social media away is taking their word away and all connections with friends.

We therefore ask the House to remove the under-16 social media ban.

from 30 citizens (Petition No. EN8700)

Defence

To make sure that everyone in Australia is safe by having a stronger millitary and defense force

We therefore ask the House to increase the spending on the Australian millitary and defense force

from five citizens (Petition No. EN8702)

Defence

To boost the spending on millitary defense to make Australia safer and the money spend it to help with defending the millitary equiptment

We therefore ask the House to raise the amount of money spent on millitary defense to defend the millitary equiptment and spend more on millitary equiptment as well

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN8703)

Indigenous Australians: Cultural Heritage

Unban the import/export of Aboriginial and Torres Strait Islander items as we should be able to celebrate the Australian culture/history around the world

We therefore ask the House to unban the import and export of Aboriginial and Torres Strait Islander items

from four citizens (Petition No. EN8704)

Energy

Excessive and unjustified increases to supply charges and negating the benefits to Australians of solar and battery, impacting cost of living, ROI for the investment and allows electricity companies to unfairly profiteer.

Removing the supply charge would make the shift to self-sustaining, more viable for every Australian and is fairer.

It is not in the interest of electricity companies to reduce supply charges, so they will not, unless forced.

We therefore ask the House to mandate removal of supply charges and make electricity consumption based billing. This would mean Australians pay for the amount of electricity they use from the grid.

This would be mean a higher consumption charge, which in turn will lead to a greater benefit of solar and battery for Australians.

As a fall back, we ask that supply charges be limited for a % of the total bill. eg. supply charge of 20% of usage charge.

from 25 citizens (Petition No. EN8706)

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

The federal government to stop funding the ABC and make it a subscriber funded streaming service

We therefore ask the House to stop public funding of the Australian Broadcasting Commission

from 15 citizens (Petition No. EN8713)

Artificial Intelligence

This petition is raised to the house to update the media code of practice and update the requirements of government reporting, documenting and media releases and ban the use of AI generative imagery and captions due to the inconsistent and misleading imagery AI produces.

Currently media outlets and governments both state and territory are allowed to use AI generative images in reporting, documentation and media releases, this is leading to misunderstandings with the general public and could be used disingenuously creating a risk for people and staff.

We therefore ask the House to move a motion to have the media and broadcasting standards updated to ban generative AI being used in any news sources or articles where it is not needed and not relevant to the article at hand and that all government documentation, media releases including social media posts by sitting MP's and senators also be banned from using generative AI to avoid confusion, misunderstandings or misleading the general public.

from 30 citizens (Petition No. EN8715)

Cybersafety

Because kids in Australia won't be able to speak and text there friends and there loved ones

We therefore ask the House to not ban social media for kids under 16s

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN8716)

Cybersafety

1. A ban won't solve the problem—

Experts warn that banning social media will not address the root causes of online harm and could create new risks.

2. It undermines kids' rights—

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child guarantees freedom of expression, association, and access to information. A blanket ban threatens these rights.

3. It reduces digital literacy—

Research shows that restricting access will limit kids' ability to develop critical thinking, online safety skills, and responsible technology use.

4. It pushes social media underground—

Teens will find unregulated alternatives, increasing exposure to harmful and illicit content.

5. Better solutions exist—

Experts and organisations like Amnesty International recommend education, parental support, stronger platform accountability, and safer algorithms, not isolation.

We therefore ask the House to reject the proposed social media ban for under-16s and instead adopt expert-recommended strategies that protect children's rights and improve online safety, including digital literacy education, parental support, stronger platform accountability, and age-appropriate content regulation.

from 23 citizens (Petition No. EN8717)

National Security

We, the undersigned Australian citizens and residents, petition Parliament to urgently list Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT) as a terrorist organisation under Division 102 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). This would ban its recruitment, support, and extremist ideology, safeguarding national security and social cohesion.

- HT's Threat in Australia:

Founded in 1953, HT seeks a global caliphate via sharia law, glorifying terrorism and anti-Semitism despite denying violence. It praises Hamas attacks and radicalises individuals. In Australia, HT hosts rallies and plans a 2025 Sydney conference, amplifying extremist propaganda, as warned by ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess. Members chant anti-Jewish slogans, aligning with proscribed groups like Hamas. ASIO links it to Islamist radicalisation.

- International Precedent:

HT is banned in the UK (2024), Germany, Russia, China, Bangladesh, Egypt, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, and UAE for inciting terrorism. Australia must align with allies.

- Urgent Action Required:

Listing HT would criminalise its operations, disrupt radicalisation, and affirm zero tolerance for divisive ideologies—protecting all communities.

We therefore ask the House to -

1. List HT immediately.

2. Strengthen counter-extremism laws.

3. Reaffirm commitment to combating extremism.

from 35 citizens (Petition No. EN8718)

Aged Care

Given that the Age Pension and the Disability Support Pension (DSP) are set at the same income rates, we demand the immediate abolition of all co-payments for essential in-home care services.

​This disparity is unjust: Age Pension recipients are currently burdened with contributing between 5% and 80% of the hourly rate for essential supports such as showering, meal preparation, and cleaning. In stark contrast, participants in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) who receive the identical services are required to make zero financial contribution.

​This gross inequity in funding models must end to ensure fair and affordable access to essential care for all citizens receiving government support.

We therefore ask the House to abolish co-payments for essential daily care in aged care packages including showering, meal preparation, cleaning, and wound care. This is vital to elevate care quality for elderly Australians and ensure equity with the NDIS.

from 880 citizens (Petition No. EN8720)

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

We, the undersigned residents and supporters of the Paralowie community, respectfully request PBS approval for Paralowie Village Discount Pharmacy to provide access to Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicines within the Paralowie Village Shopping Complex.

Currently, there is only one PBS-approved pharmacy in Paralowie, located in a different complex, which limits convenient and equitable access for residents and visitors. The Paralowie Village Shopping Complex is strategically located within proximity of 60,000 passing vehicles per day, near the intersection of four major roads: Kings Road, Bolivar Road, Port Wakefield Road, and the Northern Expressway. Despite this high level of traffic and community activity, PBS medicines are not available at this location.

The population of Paralowie (SA 5108) is approximately 18,000 according to the 2021 Census and continues to grow due to several housing developments, including a 150-home development near the caravan park on Highway 1 for residents aged 50 and over. This growth will further increase demand for accessible PBS-subsidised medicines locally.

The absence of PBS access at this central hub creates challenges for residents, particularly the elderly, people with disabilities, families with young children, and those without reliable transport, who must travel further to obtain essential medicines.

We therefore ask the House to direct the Department of Health to grant PBS approval for Paralowie Village Discount Pharmacy, ensuring residents of Paralowie have convenient and equitable access to essential, subsidised medicines locally, while strengthening the local health network and supporting the wellbeing of a growing community.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8721)

Cybersafety

The terms of the Act will cause irreparable harm to the private lives of all Australians both under and over the age of 16.

All Australians over the age of 16 will be made to provide proof of age to access large parts of the internet, removing the essential element of anonymity from use of the internet. These same Australians will still be subject to the same kinds of internet filtering in search engines, to an extent only seen under repressive totalitarian regimes.

This will place younger Australians at a severe disadvantage educationally, as it severely limits access to the vast ocean of educational resources present on the internet.

Australians below the age of 16; those who are not permitted to vote; who lack any and all forms of representation in government are having their rights stripped away from them, without any ability to fight back.

It is not the government's responsibility to be placing blanket bans on all content on social media for children. It should be the role of the parent to decide what is and is not appropriate for their own child individually.

It is for these reasons that we, the children—the next generation of Australians—implore the House and Senate to repeal the act.

We therefore ask the House to repeal the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, and instead provide parents with the necessary tools to monitor their own child's social media presence and habits rather than the federal government.

from 115 citizens (Petition No. EN8722)

Bradfield Scheme

The Australian interior is a dry and rugged land with most of the interior not suitable for livestock or crops. The implementation and construction of the Bradfield irrigation scheme would enable the ability for the Australian interior to be developed for livestock and the farming of crops. The Bradfield Scheme would also incorporate a hydro-electric capability thus enabling the generation of power to assist with the further development of the Australian interior and provide additional energy for domestic households and industry.

The implementation and construction of the Bradfield Irrigation Scheme would also provide numerous jobs for the Australian people and at a time when workers are being made redundant due to the implementation of automation and artificial intelligence.

We therefore ask the House to implement the Bradfield Irrigation Scheme.

The implementation and construction of the Bradfield irrigation scheme would enable the ability for the Australian interior to be developed for livestock and the farming of crops. The Bradfield Irrigation Scheme would also alleviate our nations problems by catching and storing water.

The Bradfield Scheme would incorporate a hydro-electric capability thus enabling the generation of power to assist with the further development of the Australian interior and provide additional energy for domestic households and industry.

The implementation and construction of the Bradfield Irrigation Scheme would also provide numerous jobs for the Australian people and at a time when workers are being made redundant due to the implementation of automation and artificial intelligence.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN8723)

Cybersafety

We, the undersigned, call on the Australian Government to strengthen the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 by increasing the minimum age for social-media account ownership from 16 to 18 years.

Research and practical experience show that exposure to unfiltered social-media environments before adulthood has damaging effects on mental health, attention, and emotional development. Online platforms profit from addictive algorithms that target users long before they possess the full capacity to regulate screen time, manage digital privacy, or critically assess misinformation.

At 16, most teenagers remain in compulsory schooling and are still developing the cognitive maturity needed to navigate complex online environments safely. Raising the minimum age to 18 aligns with other age-based safeguards, such as gambling, adult content, and legal contracts, where full decision-making responsibility begins at adulthood.

Social media is not an essential right for minors, it is a commercial service designed for profit. Protecting children and adolescents from its harms until they are legally adults ensures safer, healthier digital habits and supports real-world social development.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 to raise the minimum age for account ownership on age-restricted social-media platforms from 16 to 18 years, ensuring stronger protections for young Australians.

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8724)

Insurance Industry

Insurance companies should not be allowed to approach in any form. People involved in accidents if the value of the car or property has not been settled on

We therefore ask the House to set up an inquiry on law for insurance companies that in an accident or anything involving insurance companies.they cant approach or contact or email any person involved in an incident before the value is established.

In other words. No calling email letters nothing or asking how you're going to pay when you have no idea of value. Of damage and insurance agents have not established value. Example a car accident an insurance company can't call or email or contact asking how you intend to pay when value isn't established . This is a form of harassment to ask to pay how will you pay and other questions when damage value is not established

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN8725)

Cybersafety

Denmark has recently followed Australia's footsteps in banning social media for those under 15. However, they have also brought along parental consent for those under 15 to access social media. This move has given Denmark's new policy more popularity and approval unlike the Australian policy, which is extremely harmful to those who live in remote communities and restricts those who rely on online communities to find a safe space.

We therefore ask the House to let parents consent for their under 16 children to be allowed on social medias that are banned by the new policy.

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN8729)

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

Tucker Carlson, an american conservative, has been capable of visiting Australia, in clear double standards to the revoking of Ye's visa for antisemitic remarks(which Ye has apologised for). Whilst this could raise an issue of double standards or even racism, we would prefer that if you care about the polarised state of Australian we live in, you will help revoke the visa of a man who called Jewish people 'the occult' and who gives Christians all across the Western World a bad name.

We therefore ask the House to revoke the visa of Tucker Carlson from visiting Australia.

from 15 citizens (Petition No. EN8731)

National Disability Insurance Agency

NDIA staff, including planners, often call from private or unknown numbers and do not leave voicemails. As a result, participants and their representatives have no way of knowing whether an important call from the NDIA has been missed, or if the call was from the NDIA at all.

These call attempts with no voicemail/SMS or email follow up, are often used to support the statement "we attempted to contact you".

This practice creates unnecessary anxiety, stress, and confusion for individuals who rely on timely communication about their essential supports.

We therefore ask the House to put policy in place to stop the use of private or unknown numbers calling out from the NDIA.

from 362 citizens (Petition No. EN8735)

Disability Services

I recently experienced the sudden loss of a highly valuable and professional disability support worker from my team. This individual was not only integral to my care and support but also brought peace of mind as I trust and depend on quality support services. Losing such a dedicated worker was not just a personal blow; it highlighted the critical systemic issues facing disability support workers in Australia. For disabled people with memory issues, training new support workers is very difficult. We become reliant on support workers to remember things to do and how to do them they way we need and like them done. For example, on laundry day. If clothes are put away in a different drawer, a client can spend an hour just looking for an item.

Disability support workers are the backbone of our communities, providing essential care to those who need it the most. Despite the profound importance of their work, many of these professionals are employed under contracts that do not reflect their dedication, training, and the profound impact of their roles. These workers face instability in Casual contracts which contribute to high turnover rates and inadequate support for people living with disabilities.

Without fair contracts for Casual Support Workers, the sector risks a decline in morale and the quality of care provided. Many workers are driven to leave for more stable and financially rewarding employment opportunities elsewhere.

We therefore ask the House to create fair and stable employment contracts for disability support workers.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN8737)

Functional Neurological Disorder

it seem that people who have fnd heath fund say that its not a permant disability that people will rcover so the tell the hosiptal to send patient home, health fund should be educate, that it could take months, years, to recover , no doctor or spealist have the answer because they donit under stand fnd, functional neurological disorder, sending patient home who is going to help then and the hospital that can help theres 8 mounths waiting list, there are between 50 thousand to 100thouand people in australia with fnd . please help.that

We therefore ask the House to talk to the heath fund not to send patient, home saying that they will recover, they should help them stay in hospital to be recover. my nephew 26 years old heathy and a builder, when into hospital for back surgery , the next minute, the doctor and specialist said he has fnd, he is and rehab hospital , cant walk or talk, but his health find says to hospital send him home, at home who can help we are not health workers

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN8738)

Cybersafety

Ages above 13 need social media to contact their parents if they are in need for help or for watching videos online on a professional person explains certain stuff or to see if any changes are occurring in Australia that we need to know especially if our parents have language barriers and can't understand what changes have been applied

We therefore ask the House to lower the age ban to 13 and under because 14 and over is a crucial age to have social media as you want to apply for a hop application or try to see businesses that are trying to hire people on social media which would help them out. Also people at the age of 14 and over need to research on social media for their exams and maybe they need to watch a qualified person that teaches them how to do these certain stuff that you need help with especially if they have no contact with other people that can help them. At this age parents would want to give their children a phone to contact their parents if anything goes wrong for example they get lost or something worse which would be your fault for not letting them have access to contact their parents for help in a certain situation so please limit the age restriction. Thank You for reading.

from 25 citizens (Petition No. EN8739)

Economy

The financial burden of hosting a global summit—covering logistics, security, infrastructure, and hospitality—diverts critical resources away from pressing domestic priorities. Instead of investing in high-profile international events, our government should focus on Australia-first initiatives, including:

• Reducing energy costs for households and businesses through practical, scalable solutions.

• Improving housing affordability and increasing pathways to home ownership for Australians.

• Strengthening infrastructure and services to support communities impacted by rapid population growth.

• Investing in local climate resilience projects that directly benefit Australian citizens and ecosystems.

Climate action must continue, but it should be pursued in a balanced and fiscally responsible manner that prioritizes the well-being of Australians.

We therefore ask the House to directly challenge our current stance and position and oppose on behalf of the Australian people as hosting such a large-scale international event at this time is a misallocation of taxpayer funds. Australia is currently grappling with a cost-of-living crisis, driven by rising energy prices, housing affordability issues, and the economic pressures of increased immigration. These challenges are placing immense strain on everyday Australians, many of whom are struggling to make ends meet.

from 21 citizens (Petition No. EN8740)

Allied Health: Social Work

The core problem is that anyone in Australia can call themselves a social worker, even without an accredited qualification, professional supervision, or adherence to a code of conduct. Unlike other professions with similar responsibility and risk, social work has no national regulation. As a result, the public—particularly people experiencing vulnerability—has no guaranteed protection from untrained or unsafe practitioners.

Social workers operate daily in high-risk environments such as child protection, mental health, disability, aged care, hospitals, domestic violence, homelessness, justice, education, and emergency response. They make decisions that directly influence safety, wellbeing, family preservation, liberty, and long-term outcomes. Despite this, there is no consistent national mechanism to ensure competence, ethical practice, or accountability.

National registration is the solution. It would establish one protected title, one national qualification standard, one code of conduct, and one framework for managing unsafe practice. It ensures that anyone using the title "social worker" is properly trained, accountable, and practising safely—regardless of location or service system.

We therefore ask the House to to create a single, consistent regulatory framework for social work in Australia. This requires introducing and passing federal legislation to establish a national Social Work Registration Act or, alternatively, integrating social work into the existing AHPRA scheme. Either pathway would deliver the essential elements of public protection: a protected title, minimum qualification standards, national supervision and professional development requirements, and an enforceable code of conduct.

from 200 citizens (Petition No. EN8742)

Cybersafety

Technology-facilitated abuse refers to using digital platforms and devices to perpetrate harm, harassment, and exploitation. This includes actions like non-consensual sharing of intimate images, creating fake sexual content, and using spyware or tracking applications that invades personal privacy.

As technology evolves, the methods of abuse also change, making it challenging for victims to seek justice.

Women, children, and vulnerable groups are increasingly harmed by non-consensual sharing of intimate images, fake sexual content, spyware like secret tracking apps, and online threats. Laws are inconsistent, technology lacks safety requirements, and tech companies often evade accountability.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Establish uniform laws across Australia to ensure that it is illegal to share sexual images or videos without consent, or to create fake sexual content (including AI-generated images). Survivors should not face different protections depending on their postcode.

2. Enhance safety in technology design. Implement a ban on spyware and secret tracking software that monitor individuals without their consent (including apps that track location or device activity covertly). Introduce mandatory minimum safety standards for devices and applications, requiring companies to integrate user protections, such as straightforward blocking and reporting features.

3.Hold technology companies accountable. Require that companies publicly disclose statistics related to abuse reports, remove harmful content quickly, and impose strong penalties for failure to comply.

from 110 citizens (Petition No. EN8743)

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

Kanye has apologized publicly and privately for his words and hasn't done anything physically to any person or group of people. we feel the ban is unwarranted and should be lifted

We therefore ask the House to lift the ban from Ye / Kanye West from visiting and preforming in Australia

from 33 citizens (Petition No. EN8744)

Family Law

The family court system holds tremendous power over the lives of children, parents, and extended families. It is therefore essential that its processes remain transparent, evidence-based, and free from procedural abuse. Concerns have been raised regarding the misuse of legal professional privilege, the admission of unsubstantiated allegations, and the lack of evidentiary standards governing affidavits and court submissions. These issues risk undermining public trust and compromising fair outcomes

We therefore ask the House to We respectfully urge policymakers and judicial leadership to implement the following reforms:

1. Safeguards Against the Misuse of Legal Professional Privilege

Legal privilege is essential to a fair justice system, but it must not be used to conceal conduct that undermines due process. We call for mechanisms ensuring that privilege cannot be exploited to influence proceedings unfairly or avoid accountability.

2. Mandatory Evidentiary Requirements for Allegations

Unverified allegations should not form the basis of court decisions. We petition for a rule that:

All allegations submitted in affidavits or court documents must be supported by factual evidence at the time of submission.

Unsupported claims must be deemed inadmissible until substantiated.

3. Commitment to Procedural Fairness and Impartiality

The family court must remain neutral and must not permit assumptions or systemic biases to influence decisions. All parties—regardless of gender—should be treated with equal respect and judged solely on evidence and the best interests of the child.

4. Strengthened Oversight and Accountability

We request the establishment or enhancement of oversight mechanisms to monitor legal practitioners in family matters.Where misconduct, unethical strategies, or misuse of privilege are identified, disiciplinary actionapplied.

from 20 citizens (Petition No. EN8746)

Skilled Migration

Ministerial Direction unfairly classifies the 191 visa as a low priority. This contradicts the original promise of a priority pathway. Applicants were pre-selected based on skills for regional occupations, and their permanent residency should be processed swiftly.

It is unfortunate that the published processing times are misleading, as they can be artificially reduced by prioritizing a small number of newer applications. This creates a faster average that does not reflect the reality for the majority of applicants stuck in the queue.

Skilled applicants of Points based stream receive Permanent Residency immediately if granted a subclass 189 or 190 visa. In stark contrast, those who chose the regional 491/494-191 pathway are forced to wait a total of 6-7 years (including processing times of 491 &191). This creates a fundamentally inequitable two-tiered system that actively penalizes the very people who accepted the government's call to live and work in regional Australia.

The significantly lower application fee for the 191 visa acknowledges the reduced processing burden, as applicants are pre-approved and have already undergone extensive checks. The current prolonged processing is illogical and Unfair.

We therefore ask the House to amend Ministerial Direction to reclassify the Subclass 191 visa as the highest processing priority. Implement systems to automate the grant of 191 visas for applicants who meet the clear, objective criteria. Expedite all pending applications and provide transparent, accurate processing times.

from 198 citizens (Petition No. EN8747)

Skilled Migration

The current manual processing model for the Subclass 191 visa is inefficient and unsustainable. Eligibility is based on objective, pre-verified criteria: three years' lawful compliance with regional visa conditions, 3 Notice of assessments and Character checks. These are clear facts, not subjective assessments.

However, the process faces challenges with efficiency. Manual steps, such as assigning HAP IDs for children, introduce delays of several months. Additionally, requesting documents like ATO debt statements, which are not routinely required for other permanent visa streams, creates an unnecessary burden on departmental case officers, wasting valuable resources on a low-risk, pre-vetted cohort.

With approximately 25,000 Subclass 491&494 visas granted annually, a similar volume of 191 applications will soon enter the system each year. Manually processing this predictable, low-risk cohort will create a permanent backlog. Automation is the logical and necessary solution to prevent a future system-wide overload and deliver the efficient pathway that was intended.

We therefore ask the House to direct the Minister for Immigration to implement an automated/Priority grant system for the Subclass 191 visa to finalize applications within one weeks (similar to 191 Hongkong Stream) for all applicants who provide evidence of meeting the legislated criteria. This is a reasonable expectation for low-risk applicants who have already been living and working in our communities for over three years. We also request the automation of procedural steps like HAP ID generation, ATO Debt statement etc at the time of application.

from 115 citizens (Petition No. EN8748)

Cybersafety

The proposed age restriction of 16 unfairly cuts young people off from the communities, friendships, and support networks that are now a normal and essential part of teenage life. Social media is not just for entertainment—it is where young people connect with friends, build confidence, express themselves, and feel included. Setting the age at 13 aligns with global standards and recognises that teenagers should be taught to use technology responsibly, not pushed into secrecy or isolation. When teens cannot join regulated platforms, many turn to hidden or unsafe accounts without parental guidance, which actually increases risk. A 13+ limit allows families to guide safe online habits, supports young people's social and emotional development, and protects their right to stay connected in a digital world that they are already part of. Lowering the age to 13 creates a safer, more realistic, and more supportive environment for Aussie teens and their wellbeing.

We therefore ask the House to change the age of the social media ban so if your 13 and above you can have a social account.

from 285 citizens (Petition No. EN8749)

Taxation

Division 293 tax was introduced in 2012 as an additional tax to be charged on an individual's combined income and superannuation contributions above a threshold of $250 000. Politicians and judges are exempt from this tax. The threshold has never been indexed, so it captures more and more Australians every year. $250 000 in 2012 is the equivalent of $366 000 in 2025 according to the RBA inflation calculator. This gives an idea of what incomes the tax was originally aimed at. Further to the unfairness of this un-indexed threshold is the problem that thresholds cannot be combined within a legal domestic partnership. In such cases, individuals superannuations are considered shared; therefore, the tax-free allowances should also be shared. As an example, a person who is unable to work but has a partner with a higher income is also unable to claim disability payments. In this case, the superannuation of the high-income earner becomes the retirement savings for both. It is therefore unfair to tax those savings based on only one individual's tax-free threshold and appears as double-dipping on behalf of the government.

We therefore ask the House to raise the Division 293 tax threshold to $365 000 and make allowances for its continued yearly increase to align with CPI. We also request an amendment to the rules of Division 293 thresholds to allow them to be combined within legal spousal partnerships.

from 35 citizens (Petition No. EN8750)

Family Law

The petitioners draw to the attention of the Parliament that:

- The current child support system enforces payments even when lawful contact with children is denied.

- This practice punishes parents financially while rewarding parental alienation, undermining justice and the best interests of the child.

- Parents are forced to pay without transparency or proof of actual child-related expenses.

- Services Australia lacks independent oversight, leaving families vulnerable to systemic misuse.

- There is no mechanism for retroactive justice—parents denied contact for years are never compensated for payments made during that time.

- Repayment obligations should survive beyond the child's 18th birthday, ensuring past injustices are corrected.

- Reform is urgently needed to introduce accountability, transparency, independent review, and retroactive compensation.

We therefore ask the House to 1. Suspend child support payments when lawful contact is denied.

2. Establish an independent tribunal for fast-track reviews and binding decisions.

3. Require transparency and proof of actual child-related expenses.

4. Introduce automatic annual reviews of all child support cases.

5. Impose penalties on parents who obstruct contact while receiving child support.

6. Link child support obligations directly to lawful contact rights.

7. Mandate repayment of all child support paid during periods of denied contact, enforceable even after the child turns 18.

from 115 citizens (Petition No. EN8752)

Cybersafety

children under 16 may use these platforms to contact friends and parents/ family members. If social media gets banned for these kids, they may not be able to contact their parents because they may not have a phone number.

We therefore ask the House to lower the age of the social media ban to "13" years old instead of 16.

from 3,353 citizens (Petition No. EN8754)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's economic future depends on developing competitive, high-value export industries that can thrive in the global clean energy transition. Fusion energy offers a unique opportunity to position Australia as a leader in advanced energy technologies, manufacturing, and critical mineral supply chains. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and has minimal safety risks, making it more acceptable to communities and trade partners alike. Major economies—including the US, UK, EU, and China—are investing heavily in fusion, and Australia risks falling behind without a coordinated national strategy. Investing in fusion energy development can open new export markets for advanced technologies, scientific expertise, and clean energy solutions. This will drive economic growth, create thousands of high-skilled jobs, and strengthen Australia's trade position in the Asia-Pacific region. By acting now, we can ensure that Australia's industries remain competitive and secure our place in the global clean energy market.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry and academia, regulatory frameworks to support demonstration plants, and trade initiatives to promote Australian fusion technologies and services abroad. Early action will enable Australia to capture new trade opportunities and secure our position as a global leader in fusion energy.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7577)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's shipbuilding industry is a cornerstone of national defence, economic growth, and technological innovation. Fusion energy represents a transformative opportunity to power the next generation of advanced ship propulsion systems, offering safe, clean, and virtually limitless energy. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce high-level radioactive waste or pose significant safety risks, making it ideal for naval and commercial ship applications. Major economies are investing heavily in fusion research and development, and Australia risks being left behind in maritime technology if we do not act now. Investing in fusion energy will revitalise Australia's shipyards, create thousands of high-skilled jobs, and ensure sovereign capabilities in a critical industry. It will also position Australia as a leader in advanced maritime technology exports, strengthening our trade partnerships and regional security. Acting this parliamentary term is essential to seize the benefits of fusion and secure Australia's position in global shipbuilding.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, focused on supporting Australia's shipbuilding industry. This program should include funding for research and development of fusion propulsion, partnerships with industry, regulatory frameworks for pilot projects, and support for advanced manufacturing and shipyard innovation. Early action will ensure Australia's shipbuilding industry is future-ready and able to compete on the world stage with clean, safe, and advanced fusion-powered vessels.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7578)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's maritime sector is vital for national defence, trade, and economic prosperity. Fusion energy offers a revolutionary opportunity to power the next generation of ships with clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce high-level radioactive waste and poses minimal safety and proliferation risks, making it ideal for maritime propulsion systems. As global competition in advanced maritime technology intensifies, nations such as the US, UK, and China are investing heavily in fusion research for naval and commercial applications. Australia risks falling behind without a coordinated national strategy. By investing in fusion propulsion research, we can future-proof our maritime fleet, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and establish Australia as a leader in sustainable shipping technologies. Fusion-powered ships can reduce emissions, lower operating costs, and enhance Australia's strategic resilience, while also creating high-skilled jobs and advanced manufacturing opportunities.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on maritime propulsion. This program should include funding for research and development of fusion systems, partnerships with shipbuilders and maritime industries, regulatory frameworks for pilot projects, and collaboration with international allies. Early action will ensure Australia's maritime industry remains competitive, sustainable, and secure in the 21st century.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7579)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, believe that Australia's future economic prosperity depends on attracting skilled migrants who can contribute to our clean energy, science, and technology sectors. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to develop a new high-tech industry that will require a large, highly educated workforce. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and has minimal safety risks, making it a safe, sustainable, and community-friendly energy option. As leading economies invest in fusion research and development, Australia must act now to remain competitive and attract international talent. By investing in fusion energy, Australia can position itself as a global hub for cutting-edge technology and innovation, encouraging skilled professionals, researchers, and engineers from around the world to settle here and contribute to our economy. This will help address skills shortages, support regional growth, and build a more diverse, future-ready workforce.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a strong focus on attracting skilled migrants to build our workforce. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with industry and academia, regulatory frameworks for pilot projects, and targeted immigration initiatives to attract global talent. Early action will ensure Australia's economy remains competitive, diverse, and sustainable in the 21st century.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7580)

Nuclear Energy

We, the undersigned, are concerned about the increasing cost of living and housing affordability challenges facing Australian families and communities. Fusion energy offers a transformative opportunity to support sustainable, affordable housing by providing clean, safe, and virtually limitless electricity that can reduce energy bills and lower construction costs. Unlike fission, fusion produces no high-level radioactive waste and poses minimal safety risks, making it a more community-friendly option. By investing in fusion energy development, Australia can power new housing developments, reduce infrastructure costs, and support regional growth. Fusion's stable and predictable energy supply can also encourage investment in advanced construction technologies and net-zero housing solutions, driving innovation in the housing sector. We believe that integrating fusion energy into Australia's housing strategy will improve living standards, reduce household expenses, and build stronger, more resilient communities.

We therefore ask the House to establish a national fusion energy development program during this parliamentary term, with a focus on supporting housing and community development. This program should include funding for research and development, partnerships with construction and housing industries, regulatory frameworks for pilot projects, and policies that integrate fusion energy into sustainable housing solutions. Early action will ensure that all Australians can benefit from affordable, secure, and sustainable homes powered by clean fusion energy.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN7581)

Skilled Migration

We respectfully request the Minister for Home Affairs to support the urgent processing of the Labour Agreement application for the Australian Buddhist Vihara, Katoomba, to enable Head Monk Rev. Udurawana Mudithadewa Kiththi Thero (Rev. Muditha) to apply for a permanent visa.

Rev. Muditha has served the community since 2018 and is the only resident monk responsible for the Vihara's religious services, cultural programs, counselling, meditation sessions, and community outreach across NSW. His current visa expires in December 2025, and without approval of the Labour Agreement, he will be unable to continue his service.

His departure would severely impact the spiritual and cultural wellbeing of the community and disrupt the functioning of Australia's historically significant Buddhist Vihara.

We respectfully request ministerial support to ensure Rev. Muditha can remain in Australia and continue his invaluable service.

We therefore ask the House to request ministerial support to the urgent processing of the Labour Agreement application for the Australian Buddhist Vihara, Katoomba, to enable Head Monk Rev. Udurawana Mudithadewa Kiththi Thero (Rev. Muditha) to apply for a permanent visa.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN8761)

Veterans

This petition draws the attention of the House to the need for a Non-Reduction Provision (NRP) to be built into the veterans' compensation legislation…

From 1 July 2026, all new claims will transition to a single Act. This reform risks disadvantaging veterans whose conditions have already been assessed and compensated if they make new claims…

A clear example is hearing loss. Decades ago, a veteran may have had their hearing loss assessed and compensated accordingly…

The same veteran may now be reassessed under MRCA tables that apply age-related adjustments…

Even if the service-related hearing loss has not improved, these adjustments can reduce the impairment rating and leave the veteran worse off solely because they have aged…

This outcome is unfair and inconsistent with the beneficial intent of veterans' legislation…

No matter the injury or disease, age-related adjustment should not result in a veteran being worse off if the condition has previously been assessed and compensated…

Where a condition has already attracted compensation, whether by way of incapacity points, impairment points, lifestyle rating, or payment no subsequent application of MRCA age-adjusted criteria should reduce that compensation.

We therefore ask the House to We therefore request the House to include a Non-Reduction Provision (NRP) in the harmonised Act…

This safeguard is essential to protect veterans through the legislative transition.

from 161 citizens (Petition No. EN8762)

Veterans

This petition draws to the attention of the House a serious and ongoing misapplication of the treatment provisions relating to Gold Card veterans with accepted dental conditions by the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA)…

Gold Card holders are entitled to clinically necessary treatment for all conditions, including accepted dental conditions, under long-standing repatriation principles. However, the DVA has been treating some Gold Card veterans as though their access to dental care is restricted by the "Annual Monetary Limit" (AML)...

The AML is a budgeting tool designed for general treatment eligibility of gold card holders without relevant accepted dental conditions, not for veterans whose dental conditions have been accepted as service-related…

This practice has resulted in some gold card veterans being denied entitled dental treatment, delayed in receiving treatment, or forced to pay out-of-pocket for procedures directly connected to their accepted dental conditions…

Dental conditions, once accepted as service-related, are injuries or diseases for which the Commonwealth is liable. Subjecting these conditions to AML caps is not supported by law, frustrates clinicians, creates inequity between veterans, and undermines the very purpose of the Gold Card, that being to provide comprehensive care for those with significant service-related impairment…

We therefore ask the House to instruct DVA to cease applying AML restrictions to accepted dental conditions in Gold Card cases.

from 151 citizens (Petition No. EN8763)

Government Services

We, the undersigned, call for the creation of a Government Website Refinement Authority (GWRA) to address the persistent failures of key online services. Citizens deserve clear, reliable, and accessible platforms. Instead, too many government websites remain outdated, confusing, and inefficient.

The worst offenders are MyGov, Centrelink Online Services, and the ATO portal. MyGov, intended as a central hub, forces users through endless logins and redirects. Centrelink's site frequently crashes at peak times, leaving vulnerable people stranded. The ATO portal buries simple tasks beneath jargon and cluttered menus. These flaws waste time, erode trust, and disproportionately harm those with limited digital literacy.

A dedicated authority would enforce modern standards of usability, accessibility, and reliability. Government websites should be as functional as physical offices; citizens should not need IT expertise to access essential services.

We therefore ask the House to compose legislation that establishes an authority of government website refinement: The Government Website Refinement Authority (GWRA).

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8764)

Food Labelling: Cacao

Cacao the main ingredient in chocolate a food that not many people can live without is often sourced from farms using child Labor and slave labor, not only is this extremely unethical it is illegal in our country, yet we allow these chocolate companies to provide chocolate with cacao sourced from slave and child labor.

We therefore ask the House to make it mandatory for all cacao sourced be not sourced by slave/child labor and inform all Australians on packaging where it is from and what working conditions occur.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8769)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

Funding cuts to the CSIRO in 2024 and 2025 have resulted in a reduction of 800 workers of the CSIRO, and new funding cuts will result in the further removal of 350 jobs in the CSIRO. This is a total of 1,150 jobs of roughly 6,000 CSIRO jobs that will be erased. This fails to recognise the significant and ongoing tangible value of the CSIRO to all Australian industries and global challenges, and equally fails to recognise the corresponding long-term tangible financial losses to the Australian economy that will result from these cuts.

We therefore ask the House to immediately halt all funding cuts to CSIRO, and to reverse funding cuts implemented or proposed in 2024 and 2025. Further, we ask that this funding shortfall is resolved through the identification of new revenue generating opportunities, rather than transferring these funding cuts to a different portfolio.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8773)

Video Game Regulation

Cheating in video games through hacks, cheats, or third-party software is widespread and harms the gaming community. It undermines fair competition, negatively affects honest players, and can cause financial losses for developers. Many cheaters bypass existing restrictions using VPNs or anonymization tools. Currently, Australia has no specific criminal penalties for creating, distributing, or using cheating software.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation making the creation, distribution, and use of cheating software in video games a criminal offense, including attempts to evade detection via VPNs or other methods. The law should penalize developers, distributors, and players who knowingly use cheats, and ensure enforcement can address attempts to bypass detection. This action will protect Australians who play responsibly, preserve fair competition, and uphold integrity in online gaming.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8781)

Cybersafety

YouTube shall be recognised as an educational and informational platform rather than a standard social media service.

The platform provides essential access to learning resources, tutorials, academic support, and skill-development materials required by students, teachers, and workers.

Restricting YouTube limits digital literacy, disrupts education, and reduces access to factual and instructional content relied on by the public.

YouTube supports Australian creators, businesses, and cultural expression by providing a global space for local content, economic growth, and professional opportunities.

The ban negatively impacts small businesses and creators who depend on YouTube for outreach, promotion, and community engagement.

YouTube includes extensive safety tools such as age restrictions, parental controls, reporting systems, and moderation guidelines that allow safe use without the need for full prohibition.

Safer use can be managed through regulation and education rather than continued banning.

Removing YouTube from the ban list ensures continued access to vital information, public announcements, and emergency communication.

The platform functions as a digital library and multimedia resource essential to modern learning and participation in the digital world.

For these reasons, YouTube should be formally removed from the social media ban list in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to remove Youtube off the list of banned websites and apps for under 16s

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN8782)

Cybersafety

A major problem with platforms such as YouTube Kids is that they are designed to capture a child's attention, often being very addictive, often resulting in a trance-like state and tantrums when they aren't allowed to access the platform.

We therefore ask the House to restrict the access of addictive and algorithmically powered kids content, especially those with zero or little educational value.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8786)

Aviation Industry

Long-term exposure to aircraft noise is associated with increased hospitalization and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Large epidemiological studies have documented measurable rises in heart disease among populations living near airports. In children, chronic noise exposure at schools and homes impairs reading comprehension, attention, and learning—effects that are difficult to reverse and that exacerbate educational inequalities.

Night-time noise is particularly harmful. Repeated nocturnal sleep disruption elevates stress hormones and increases the risk of hypertension and other cardiometabolic outcomes. The World Health Organization recognizes night-time noise as a specific public-health risk and recommends protective policy measures to limit exposure. Enforceable airport curfews are a clear, evidence-informed intervention that would reduce population-level health burdens associated with nocturnal aircraft noise.

Currently, only Sydney and Adelaide have federal legislation supporting airport curfews. Aligning other major cities, including Melbourne and Brisbane, with these protections would extend vital health safeguards to populations now experiencing significant noise-related harms. Federal legislation to establish nationwide airport curfews would directly address sleep disruption, cardiovascular risk, and cognitive impacts on children, while reducing broader inequalities caused by chronic noise exposure.

Implementing such curfews is consistent with peer-reviewed evidence, aligns with WHO recommendations, and represents a practical, effective policy to protect public health from the documented harms of aircraft noise, particularly during night-time hours.

We therefore ask the House to create Federal Legislation for airport curfews in all major Australian cities

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN8787)

Bureau of Meteorology

We, the undersigned, call upon the Australian Government to commission a formal and transparent inquiry into the reported cost—estimated in public reporting to be in the vicinity of $90-100 million—of the Bureau of Meteorology's new website redevelopment project. While investment in essential public digital infrastructure is both necessary and expected, the scale of expenditure indicated for this project appears unusually high when compared with typical industry standards for websites of similar scope and functionality.

As taxpayers and stakeholders in the effective functioning of public institutions, Australians have a right to understand how public funds are allocated and whether value for money has been achieved. A cost approaching $100 million for a website raises reasonable questions regarding procurement processes, project management, scope definition, contractor selection, oversight mechanisms, and whether alternative approaches could have delivered the required outcomes more efficiently.

A formal inquiry would not presume wrongdoing; rather, it would provide clarity, accountability, and evidence-based findings. Such an examination would help determine whether the expenditure was proportionate, whether the procurement process met best-practice standards, and whether the project delivered measurable benefits commensurate with its cost. Importantly, an inquiry would also identify lessons to guide future digital transformation projects, ensuring that public sector investments are fiscally responsible, transparent, and aligned with community expectations.

We therefore ask the House to initiate a full and formal inquiry into the Bureau of Meteorology's website rebuild project.

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN8789)

Discrimination

Far-right political movements including white supremacists and fascists have long used an ever changing list of hateful symbols to put down others and promote violence. As a nation we should collectively condemn the use of these symbols through a nationwide ban on their public display. This ban will make it an offence to display symbols which can be interpreted in a violent or hateful manner. The current Victorian ban along these lines is a good framework for a federal ban, but it cannot adapt to the ever increasing number of symbols being used by far-right groups such as the NSN in place of their traditional symbols. It is for this reason that an organisation must be established, or an existing organisation expanded, to identify and flag symbols used by modern extremist groups, and their display would become an offence. This is the only way to truly tackle new previously unseen symbols being used by far-right extremist organisations to promote violence and hate.

We therefore ask the House to implement a federal ban on the public display of symbols used by far-right movements and regimes. We also ask that a body is set up which is focused on identifying the ever changing nature of these harmful symbols and ask that they have the power to determine if a symbol is being used in a hateful manner.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN8790)

Tobacco Control

The official "Denormalisation" strategy for tobacco control has evolved into state-sanctioned bullying. While health risks are acknowledged, this approach actively encourages social hostility, exclusion, and harassment of smokers. It creates a hostile environment that severely impacts the mental health and dignity of citizens. Public health initiatives should rely on education and support, not on strategies that incite shame, stigma, and psychological distress.

We therefore ask the House to

1. formally acknowledge the psychological harm caused by denormalisation policies that promote social stigma; and

2. review national anti-smoking campaigns to ensure they do not incite public harassment or dehumanize citizens suffering from nicotine addiction.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN8791)

Artificial Intelligence

There has been an increase in the use of artificial intelligence which ultimately has taken away jobs through automation. It is distressing to know the government hasn't done anything. Regulation needs to be implemented to keep jobs and ensure security! As ultimately this will cost the government massive amounts in welfare benefits which they don't like paying. I understand that AI will not go away, so regulations must be made and legislated in accordance with the fair work act! WHATEVER NEEDS TO BE DONE! This will help in the long run providing equal and fair job market for Australian citizens who are already struggling with the cost of living on top of job market instability. Its time, this needs to be done effectively as it's killing the job market. Unemployment benefits are unliveable in this cost of living crisis and with less jobs being published how is everyone going to be able to provide for themselves. So as the elected Government, I CALL ON YOU TO REGULATE THE USE OF AI to work alongside humans not replace us!!!

We therefore ask the House to regulate the use of AI to ensure job market growth and stability to ensure that Australian's are able to actively and successfully find work! So as the elected Government, I CALL ON YOU TO REGULATE THE USE OF AI to work alongside humans not replace us!!!

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN8792)

Schools

This petition will allow many families to be able to afford to send their children to private schools so their children can receive a better education. Cost of living pressures have made many families unable to afford such fees and high marginal tax rates are not helping alleviate this either. Especially for regional families, this can be very hard, because many families cannot afford the high boarding fees just so there children can have an education.

We therefore ask the House to make non-government primary and secondary school tuition and boarding fees to be tax deductible.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8793)

Middle East

We, the undersigned, urgently petition the Australian Government to confront the death and destruction unfolding in Lebanon by Israel's flagrant violations of the ceasefire terms of UN resolution 1701, undermining Lebanon's sovereignty and stability. Repeated strikes on villages have killed many and displaced thousands.

Despite the November 2024 ceasefire, Israel's near-daily violations continue to cause civilian deaths, with recent lethal drone strikes on Ein al-Hilweh and Beirut. Southern Lebanon faces catastrophic destruction: in Maroun al-Ras alone, over 700 structures were demolished, alongside ecocide of farmland and ecosystems. Evidence reveals the use of white phosphorus, cluster munitions, destruction of reconstruction equipment, and the construction of a concrete wall inside Lebanese territory in breach of Resolution 1701.

Emerging reports allege that Israeli authorities or actors are facilitating the sale of land inside Lebanon to Israeli settlers. Current military actions appear aimed at broader territorial entrenchment.

We ask that Australia uphold its obligations under international and humanitarian law to defend Lebanese sovereignty, protect civilians, and speak against ongoing injustice.

We therefore ask the House to : Based on the concerns raised above, we respectfully urge the Australian Government to:

1.Unequivocally condemn Israel's attacks and ceasefire violations.

2.Call for the withdrawal of Israeli forces and dismantling of the illegal wall.

3.Suspend all arms trade and military cooperation with Israel until compliance with international law is verified.

4.Support an independent investigation into ecocide, the use of booby-trap devices and outlawed munitions.

5.Advocate through the UN for reparations, environmental rehabilitation and the safe return of displaced Lebanese civilians.

from 1,025 citizens (Petition No. EN8794)

Cybersafety

The outside world is way more dangerous for kids than social media

We therefore ask the House to put the social media ban down to 14s and under

from one citizen (Petition No. EN8796)

Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence

This petition of concerned citizens highlights the urgent need for stronger integrity, safety, and accountability standards for all elected officials, particularly regarding domestic violence (DV), sexual violence, and child sexual abuse (CSA).

Under current laws, elected officials who are investigated, charged, or convicted of these offences can legally stand for election once a sentence is served or their term completed, if the sentence is less than twelve months. This loophole undermines public trust, discourages reporting, and allows individuals who have caused serious harm to return to office.

We request that governments enact legislative and constitutional reforms to ensure that any elected official under investigation, charged, or found guilty of those offences is immediately suspended from all duties and be permanently disqualified from office. Victims and complainants must have safe, independent channels for disclosure, protected from retaliation.

We therefore ask the House to take the following actions:

1. Amend the constitution and laws to enforce these measures across all levels of government.

2. Immediately suspend and permanently disqualify any official under investigation, charged, or convicted of domestic violence (DV), sexual violence, or child sexual abuse (CSA) from holding office or standing for election.

3. Establish independent oversight and protections for victims and complainants.

from 71 citizens (Petition No. EN8797)

National Security

All face coverings including non-religious and religious, should be banned in public places and businesses for the following reasons:

(1) To eliminate National security risks especially at protests

(2) To keep in line with other countries that are banning face coverings including those for religions reasons

(3) Community safety

(4) Social cohesion

(5) To re-examine and amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 to include the Criminal Code Amendment (Prohibition of Full Face Coverings in Public Places) Bill 2017 to include all face coverings including religious coverings which are currently exempt to ensure the purpose of the bill to increase security in public places and businesses and to promote peace and assimilation within the community.

We therefore ask the House to to re-examine and amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 to include the Criminal Code Amendment (Prohibition of Full Face Coverings in Public Places) Bill 2017 to include all face coverings including religious coverings which are currently exempt to ensure the purpose of the bill is meet and therefore to increase security in public places and businesses and to promote peace and assimilation within the community.

from 68 citizens (Petition No. EN8798)

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

Many Australians rely on approved weight-loss medications, such as GLP-1 treatments, to manage obesity, insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, PCOS, metabolic disorders, and other chronic health conditions. These medications are medically recognised as effective tools for improving long-term health outcomes, reducing the risk of diabetes, heart disease, and other preventable illnesses.

Despite their proven benefits, the cost of these medications remains extremely high for individuals and families. Many people who medically qualify for treatment cannot afford it, creating serious inequality in access to essential healthcare. For some, these medications are not simply for cosmetic weight loss—they are a necessary part of managing chronic conditions and preventing serious health complications.

Making these medications more affordable would support better public health, reduce long-term pressure on the healthcare system, and improve the wellbeing of thousands of Australians.

We therefore ask the House to Add approved weight-loss medications to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for people who meet medical eligibility criteria; ensure that patients with chronic conditions—such as obesity, insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, and PCOS—are prioritised for access; and support a national approach to reducing preventable chronic disease by making effective weight-loss treatment affordable and accessible to all Australians who medically need it.

from 73 citizens (Petition No. EN8800)

Cybersafety

Banning the media for teens in Australia is stupid as teens have had this access for years, instead of protecting teens protect the younger generations from the harm of the media. By now teens are mentally mature enough to face these dangers but not mentally preparing the younger children is setting them up for a dark world. Please sign this to make the voices of teens heard.

We therefore ask the House to lower the social media age to under 13s

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8803)

Food Labelling

Plastic fruit stickers are tiny, but billions are used every year. They don't break down, contaminate compost, and contribute to microplastic pollution. Sustainable alternatives already exist. We call on government regulators and supermarkets to eliminate plastic fruit stickers and transition to eco-friendly labelling methods.

We therefore ask the House to 1) prohibit the use of all plastic-based fruit stickers, including those made from recycled or partially recycled plastics, (2) mandate the use of only certified home-compostable, industrial-compostable, or laser-etched labelling methods, and (3) ensure that all labelling used on fresh produce in Australia is made exclusively from non-plastic, genuinely compostable, or otherwise fully biodegradable materials.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN8807)

Cybersafety

The social media ban is not going to end well, it's ruining teens mental health and 16 is too high. The depression and crime rates will go up once the ban commences. Please sign this petition to stop the ban

We therefore ask the House to cancel the social media ban or lower it to age 13 and postpone it to December 2026

from five citizens (Petition No. EN8809)

Cybersafety

ocial media platforms are not designed for young children, and allowing kids 11 and under to use them can seriously affect their safety, mental health, and development. Children this young are more likely to experience cyberbullying, online predators, and exposure to inappropriate content because they don't yet have the maturity to understand online risks or protect themselves properly.

Social media also increases anxiety, comparison, and pressure at a time when kids should be focusing on school, real friendships, and healthy activities. Many studies show that early exposure to social media can harm self-esteem, sleep, and emotional development.

By setting the age requirement to 11 and under banned, we help protect children from dangers they aren't ready for, give them time to grow without online pressure, and make the internet a safer place for everyone.

We therefore ask the House to Block all under-11 accounts and add stronger age checks to protect young kids online."

"Make social media safer by banning under-11 users and removing accounts made by kids."

"Create strict age limits so children 11 and younger can't access unsafe social media spaces."

"Stop under-11s from joining social apps by adding better verification and safety systems."

"Protect kids by enforcing an 11-and-under social media ban across all platforms."

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8810)

Cybersafety

Social media affects a lot of our lives and it's not just entertainment. It makes up as a relief during tough situations and helps many teenagers get through severe mental health problems as social media is a place where you can find people that are similar to you.

We therefore ask the House to lower the social media ban to under 13s.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8811)

Suicide and Self-Harm

Suicide remains a major cause of death in Australia, yet there is no national reporting system that identifies the specific circumstances or contributing factors that lead to these deaths. As a result, policymakers, frontline workers, and families lack critical information needed to prevent further loss of life.

Across the country, there are consistent reports of suicides linked to domestic and family violence, coercive control, malicious child-withholding, prolonged family court proceedings, and failures across policing, child protection, and support services. However, without a unified national analysis, these patterns remain unverified and invisible within official datasets.

Coroners collect detailed information about circumstances surrounding each death, but Australia has no standardised national process to review, code, or publicly report how many suicides involve domestic violence behaviours or other identifiable system-related stressors. This gap prevents accurate understanding of risk factors and limits the effectiveness of prevention strategies.

A national review of suicides over the past decade is needed to determine how many deaths involved domestic or family violence, family court proceedings, identify systemic contributors, support evidence-based policy reform, and provide transparency for families and communities. This information is essential for improving prevention, protecting vulnerable Australians, and reducing preventable deaths.

We therefore ask the House to direct the Government to conduct a national review of all suicides in Australia over the past decade, and to publicly report verified contributing factors, including domestic and family violence behaviours, coercive control, family court involvement, and other systemic stressors, to improve prevention and policy outcomes.

from 79 citizens (Petition No. EN8812)

Trade with China

Everywhere one go's, they see a product made in China. Of course there are many benefits to be reaped in the name of free trade, but there are also disadvantages. One, the influx of Chinese products lowers our resilience as an economy, making us more vulnerable to shocks. Two, it gives China a advantage to sue Australian companies and turn back imports if they exceed a certain limit. Three, it weakens our national sovereignty, which makes us, in the eyes of the Pacific, China's Western 'plaything' and makes the idea of military conquest more and more likely to be subtle with only our encampment of saints to show for maddening conditions.

Of course, I am not proposing blanket bans on Chinese imports. I am merely making sure that our sovereignty and safety as a country is respected in the name of free trade.'

We therefore ask the House to support baseline tariffs on Chinese products to reclaim sovereignty and borders.

from eight citizens (Petition No. EN8813)

Cybersafety

We are asking for the social media ban for kids 12 and above to be changed because it's affecting the way young people communicate, learn, and stay connected. As teenagers, we use social media to talk to friends, work on school projects, and stay updated on the world around us. A full ban doesn't keep us safe—it just shuts us out of the online spaces where everyone else is learning to navigate the digital world.

Instead of banning social media, we should focus on teaching younger users how to be safe and responsible online. With parental controls, privacy settings, and education about online risks, kids 12 and up can learn to use social media in a healthy and balanced way. Blocking it completely only makes us unprepared for the real world. We're asking for a smarter solution that protects kids without taking away important tools for connection and growth.

We therefore ask the House to We ask lawmakers to reconsider the social media ban for kids 12 and above. Instead of blocking access, create safer, age-appropriate guidelines that teach responsible use. Please update the policy so we can learn digital skills, stay connected, and be protected at the same time. We urge you to act now

from one citizen (Petition No. EN8814)

Tobacco Control

1. Rapid Growth of the Illicit Tobacco Market

The extremely high retail price of legal tobacco has fueled the expansion of an illegal black market. Illicit tobacco products are now widely available, significantly cheaper, and increasingly controlled by organized crime. This undermines public safety and harms legitimate retailers.

2. Loss of Government Revenue

As more consumers turn to untaxed, illegal products, government revenue from tobacco excise continues to leak to criminal operations instead of supporting health services and national programs.

3. Increased Risks to Consumers

Illegal tobacco products are unregulated, may contain unknown contaminants, and provide no health warnings or quality controls, exposing consumers to additional risks beyond those already associated with smoking.

4. Criminal Activity and Community Harm

The illicit trade has contributed to an increase in violent crime, including arson attacks on retailers, extortion, and smuggling operations. High taxes have indirectly incentivised criminal enterprises that threaten local communities and small businesses.

We therefore ask the House to

1—Conduct a formal review of current tobacco excise rates and their impacts.

2—Reduce excise levels to a more reasonable and sustainable rate that discourages illicit trade while still supporting public health goals.

3—Strengthen enforcement measures targeting organized crime, while reducing the financial incentives that make smuggling and illegal sales so profitable.

I believe a balanced approach—one that protects public health while addressing the unintended consequences of excessively high taxation—will lead to better outcomes for consumers, retailers, communities, and the Australian economy.

from 17 citizens (Petition No. EN8815)

Family Law

Malicious child-withholding and interstate parental abduction frequently occur during family separation. These behaviours include intentionally denying a child access to a safe parent, refusing communication, hiding the child, or relocating interstate to defeat Federal Circuit and Family Court parenting orders. This causes severe psychological harm to children and parents, increases conflict, prolongs litigation, and contributes to mental health decline and suicide among affected parents.

Because parenting orders, interstate arrangements, and federal judicial processes fall under Commonwealth responsibility, state police often lack jurisdiction or powers to enforce compliance. Australia currently has no federal offence addressing malicious child-withholding or domestic interstate abduction. Existing laws only cover international abduction and do not protect children within Australia who are removed or concealed to obstruct contact.

Families need national protection so that parental rights under federal law cannot be undermined by interstate movement or deliberate obstruction.

We therefore ask the House to create federal legislation establishing penalties for malicious child-withholding and interstate parental abduction, or to amend the Family Law Act 1975 to include enforceable national offences and sanctions for intentional breaches of lawful parenting arrangements.

from 57 citizens (Petition No. EN8816)

Family Law

Knowingly false allegations cause severe psychological, financial, and reputational harm. These allegations frequently occur during federal family law disputes, through digital communication, and across state borders. They can result in traumatic police intervention, restrictions on parental time, legal costs, and long-term mental injury.

Existing offences such as perjury do not cover most false allegations because they only apply to sworn in-court statements and are rarely prosecuted. False allegations made to police, child protection, schools, workplaces, or online can still heavily influence family law outcomes, while victims have no federal remedy.

Because family law, cross-border disputes, and telecommunications fall under Commonwealth jurisdiction, federal protection is required to prevent system misuse and protect the integrity of federal judicial processes.

We therefore ask the House to introduce federal legislation criminalising knowingly false allegations that cause serious psychological harm or interfere with federal judicial processes, or to amend the Family Law Act 1975 to establish civil penalties and sanctions for malicious false reporting

from 68 citizens (Petition No. EN8817)

Family Law

Parental alienation occurs when one parent manipulates a child to reject, fear, or disengage from a safe and loving parent. These behaviours include denigration, emotional coercion, manufactured fear, interference with contact, and manipulating agencies against the other parent. These acts cause long-term developmental harm, anxiety, depression, behavioural issues, and breakdown of family relationships.

Parental alienation commonly arises in federal family law matters, interstate arrangements, and digital communication. Federal law currently provides no clear definition, protections, or penalties for alienation despite its recognised psychological impact on children.

Because parenting arrangements, cross-border disputes, and child-parent relationship rights are governed federally, national reform is required to protect children from psychological manipulation.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Family Law Act 1975 to define parental alienation as psychological child abuse and to create national penalties, enforcement powers, or civil sanctions for intentional or reckless alienating behaviour.

from 82 citizens (Petition No. EN8818)

Family Law

Many individuals experience deliberate misuse of federal systems, federal court processes, and digital communication channels as a form of harassment, coercion, or control. This includes repeated malicious complaints, fabricated evidence, false digital reports, and Manipulation of federal family law mechanisms to harm another person.

These actions occur across state borders and often rely on telecommunications and federal jurisdiction. Current laws do not adequately address system abuse, interstate harassment, or digital coercion that causes psychological harm.

Federal intervention is necessary to protect vulnerable individuals, preserve public resources, and prevent federal systems from being used as weapons in personal disputes.

We therefore ask the House to introduce federal legislation creating penalties for intentional misuse of federal systems or digital platforms to harass or cause psychological harm, or to amend the Family Law Act 1975 to address system weaponisation within federal family law processes.

from 57 citizens (Petition No. EN8819)

Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence

Many suicides and suicide attempts occur after prolonged psychological abuse, digital harassment, false allegations, coercive control, or system misuse. Much of this conduct occurs across state borders or through telecommunications systems, placing it under federal jurisdiction.

Current federal law only prohibits direct incitement, requiring explicit encouragement of suicide. This does not cover sustained patterns of digital harassment, coercive behaviour, or interstate intimidation that foreseeably leads to suicidal collapse.

A federal response is needed to address modern forms of psychological violence that cross borders and exploit digital communication, affecting the mental health and safety of Australians.

We therefore ask the House to create federal legislation addressing conduct that intentionally or recklessly causes or contributes to suicide or self-harm, including digital or cross-border behaviour, or to amend the Criminal Code (Cth) and Family Law Act 1975 to establish national protections.

from 76 citizens (Petition No. EN8820)

Artificial Intelligence

With the explosion of AI tools in marketing and media, it's become harder than ever to trust what you see.

Australians deserve to be notified when advertising uses AI, in the interest of honesty and transparency.

The marketing industry already has issues with expectations not matching reality, in the effort to encourage consumers to purchase their products or services vs their opposition.

With this new technology, the line between reality and the imagined truth becomes that much harder to distinguish, disadvantaging many people both online, and on television etc.

If companies believe their advertising presents an accurate portrayal of their products or services, then advising Australian customers and consumers should not present them any problems.

This disclaimer notice would allow Australians to make informed choices about their options, and would lead to better consumer relations with companies they choose to engage with.

We therefore ask the House to require advertising in Australia to notify consumers of AI usage, under the banner of the ACCC.

from 42 citizens (Petition No. EN8822)

Cybersafety

The proposed social media ban for people under sixteen in Australia is unfair and harmful. While the goal of protecting young people is important, a full ban takes away their rights and opportunities instead of solving the real problems. Social media helps young people learn, connect, and express themselves. Many teens use it to find support, especially those who feel isolated or belong to minority groups. It also allows young creators and small business owners to share their work and earn money. Taking that away limits creativity, education, and future opportunities. The ban could also worsen mental health. Without online support networks, some teens may feel alone and helpless, leading to higher risks of depression and suicide. Losing safe spaces to talk or seek help online removes an important lifeline for many. It may also cause more youth crime. Without ways to connect or express themselves, some young people may turn to risky or illegal activities out of boredom or frustration. The ban creates privacy risks too. Enforcing it would require collecting ID or facial scans, which could expose personal data. Many would also try to lie about their age, making it harder to control. Instead of banning social media, the government should teach digital safety, promote healthy online habits, and make platforms more responsible. Young people deserve to be part of the digital world safely and with their voices heard.

We therefore ask the House to remove the ban fully or make it to 12s and under.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8823)

Minister for Climate Change and Energy

The Minister for Climate Change and Energy has failed to deliver the Government's election commitment to reduce household electricity bills by $275. Instead, under his administration, electricity costs have surged, with the Australian Energy Regulator's final determination for 2025-26 confirming further price increases of up to 9.7% for families in New South Wales. The Minister's policies have prioritized an ideological transition over affordability and reliability, driving up network costs and placing financial strain on households and small businesses. Furthermore, the Minister has disregarded genuine community concerns regarding the environmental and economic impacts of offshore wind zones in the Illawarra and Hunter regions. The Minister has lost the confidence of the community to deliver cost-effective electricity.

We therefore ask the House to move a motion of no confidence in the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, the Hon Chris Bowen MP, and to call upon the Prime Minister to advise the Governor-General to revoke the Minister's commission immediately to allow for the restoration of cost-effective electricity policy.

from 52 citizens (Petition No. EN8827)

Health Care

autonomous pharmacist prescribing models increase risks, are not supported by evidence, and that the traditional model of medical practitioners as the primary prescribers is safer for patients. the expansion of prescribing scope could fragment care and lead to patient harm from potentially dangerous medical events or contribute to antimicrobial resistance.

We therefore ask the House to urge the minister for health and the Pharmacy Board to reconsider its consultation process by enabling a more meaningful and substantive dialogue that addresses legitimate concerns about the proposed model

There are risks to public safety, conflict of interest concerns and fragmentation of primary care will lead to adverse outcomes

from four citizens (Petition No. EN8830)

Cybersafety

We would like you to change the social media ban for u/16s to u/12s. While the goal of protecting young people is important, a full ban takes away their rights and opportunities instead of solving the real problems. Social media helps young people learn, connect, and express themselves. Many teens use it to find support, especially those who feel isolated or belong to minority groups. It also allows young creators and small business owners to share their work and earn money. Taking that away limits creativity, education, and future opportunities. The ban could also worsen mental health. Without online support networks, some teens may feel alone and helpless, leading to higher risks of depression and suicide. Losing safe spaces to talk or seek help online removes an important lifeline for many. It may also cause more youth crime. Without ways to connect or express themselves, some young people may turn to risky or illegal activities out of boredom or frustration. The ban creates privacy risks too. Enforcing it would require collecting ID or facial scans, which could expose personal data. Many would also try to lie about their age, making it harder to control. Instead of banning social media, the government should teach digital safety, promote healthy online habits, and make platforms more responsible. Young people deserve to be part of the digital world safely and with their voices heard.

We therefore ask the House to change the ban to u/12s or remove it fully.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8831)

Queensland Ballet

Queensland Ballet is one of Queensland and Australia's premier ballet companies that have been producing workers for more than 60 years all over Queensland. Not only do they produce works of high caliber and classes that feed back into the community but also inspire homegrown talent through the efforts of the Queensland Ballet Academy.

Recently, due to rising costs and the demands of high performance output, Queensland Ballet has faced an $8 million deficit which have resulted in redundancies and low wages where only two dancers will earn above the national average wage while the twelve youngest dancers will be on the minimum wage. This is not sustainable long term for both the company and for the Queensland artistic community.

We are asking the House of Representatives to support a company that has contributed so much to the Queensland landscape, and increase Queensland Ballet federal funding through the National Performing Arts Partnership Framework in order to have parity with other organisations.

By increasing the funding, we can ensure that Queensland Ballet and the Queensland Ballet Academy can become a sustainable company for Australia and continue to lead nationally and internationally as a premier ballet company and academy.

We therefore ask the House to increase federal funding through the National Performing Arts Partnership Framework for Queensland Ballet.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8837)

Personal Information and Privacy

People deserve better, the shouldn't have their personal data stored by the government as it is their confidential information and does not be stored for any reason. Every individual deserves the right to communicate, and share personal information without fear of being watched or monitored without proper oversight or legal justification. Excessive surveillance infringes on fundamental human rights, free expression, and undermines trust in government institutions.

We therefore ask the House to protect citizens' privacy from government surveillance.

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN8838)

Cybersafety

The problem is the social media ban I get it is for safety but think about all the influencers that will lose the followers and then that will stop them from doing what they love I'm sure you have gotten a lot of these petitions but that is because it's not fair for under 16s to lose there accounts

We therefore ask the House to lower the age of the social media ban to 13

from one citizen (Petition No. EN8839)

Environmental Conservation

Australia does not have a nationally recognised day that focuses specifically on environmental protection, marine health or coastal stewardship. As a coastal nation, Australia's oceans and waterways are central to biodiversity, community wellbeing, First Nations cultural identity, tourism, fisheries and national economic activity. Pollution, marine debris, spills and coastal degradation continue to affect these environments and communities.

A national day of environmental significance would support community education, environmental literacy and public participation in sustainability activities. Many important national observances, such as Mother's Day, Harmony Day, International Women's Day and Clean Up Australia Day, are recognised nationally without being legislated as public holidays. These examples show that the House can acknowledge and support national observances where there is strong community interest.

Petitioners believe that recognising 7 March as a national day of environmental significance, referred to as Maritime Environmental Protection (MEP) Day, would help build national awareness and engagement with environmental protection and stewardship.

We therefore ask the House to The petitioners request the House to:

Note the public interest in recognising 7 March as a national day of environmental significance (Maritime Environmental Protection Day).

Acknowledge the importance of environmental protection, marine health and coastal stewardship to the Australian community.

Support national awareness and education efforts relating to environmental protection and sustainable practices.

Encourage community participation in environmental activities consistent with other nationally recognised days.

These requests fall fully within the House's power to act and do not seek the creation of a public holiday.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8841)

Environmental Conservation

Australia does not have a nationally recognised day that focuses specifically on environmental protection, marine health or coastal stewardship. As a coastal nation, Australia's oceans and waterways are central to biodiversity, community wellbeing, First Nations cultural identity, tourism, fisheries and national economic activity. Pollution, marine debris, spills and coastal degradation continue to affect these environments and communities. A national day of environmental significance would support community education, environmental literacy and public participation in sustainability activities. Many important national observances, such as Mother's Day, Harmony Day, International Women's Day and Clean Up Australia Day, are recognised nationally without being legislated as public holidays. These examples show that the House can acknowledge and support national observances where there is strong community interest. Petitioners believe that recognising 7 March as a national day of environmental significance, referred to as Maritime Environmental Protection (MEP) Day, would help build national awareness and engagement with environmental protection and stewardship.

We therefore ask the House to ask the House to The petitioners request the House to: Note the public interest in recognising 7 March as a national day of environmental significance (Maritime Environmental Protection Day). Acknowledge the importance of environmental protection, marine health and coastal stewardship to the Australian community. Support national awareness and education efforts relating to environmental protection and sustainable practices. Encourage community participation in environmental activities consistent with other nationally recognised days. These requests fall fully within the House's power to act and do not seek the creation of a public holiday.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8842)

Cybersafety

Right now, the Government is planning to ban under 16's from using social media. If this takes effect, it's going to change this and later generations. Social media is used around the world, and without it, kids can't communicate with one another. Kids will also have less freedom around the world, giving them a poor understanding of the world. We understand that there is cyberbullying or over 18 content, but we can simply ask the companies to reinforce more and stricter rules. Another reason why we should appeal the under 16 social media ban is that kids would have to learn safe online behaviours UNTIL 16 or above. Finally, if this takes place, it will raise privacy concerns as apps will ask for ID or age checks.

We therefore ask the House to take back the under 16 social media ban

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN8843)

Australian Society: Families

We, the undersigned citizens and residents of Australia, call on the Australian Government to champion stronger, future-focused frameworks that protect, empower, and uplift families across the nation. Families are the core operating system of our society, and effective policy design must centre on stability, wellbeing, and equitable access to essential resources.

Families United seeks to deliver improved national outcomes by driving targeted actions that support family resilience, reduce systemic barriers, and enhance community cohesion. We request federal government alignment and backing for these initiatives.

We therefore ask the House to assist with structure of Families United UNITE FAMILIES Lseeks practical solutions that reduce hardship, improve access to essential services, and create safer environments for children and young people.

We request that the Australian Government act on the following priorities:

• Review and integrate Families United's policy recommendations into relevant federal programs and frameworks.

• Allocate targeted funding for evidence-based services that improve family stability, mental health support, housing security, and youth outcomes.

• Establish a coordinated working group involving government agencies and Families United to co-design effective solutions and ensure clear accountability.

• Increase transparency through public reporting on national progress in family wellbeing, safety, and community resilience.

• Strengthen support for community organisations, enabling them to deliver high-impact programs that meet the needs of vulnerable households.

This Request for Action represents a unified call from citizens seeking a future where Australian families are supported, protected, and empowered. We expect timely and meaningful steps from Parliament to advance these priorities and drive positive national outcomes

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8847)

Family Law

To the Honourable Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives. This petition calls for urgent legal reform to create an immediate divorce pathway for survivors of domestic and family violence, mirroring the model adopted in New Zealand.

Australia currently requires 12 months of separation before a person can apply for divorce even when they are escaping violence.

This delay prolongs exposure to coercive control, financial dependence, legal entanglement, and unsafe contact initiated by the perpetrator. New Zealand has introduced a streamlined process allowing survivors with a valid protection order to end their legal relationship without a mandatory waiting period, recognising that abusers often use marriage or partnership status as a tool of ongoing control.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation to:

1. Allow survivors who hold a current domestic violence, family violence, or intervention order to apply for immediate divorce, with no 12-month separation requirement.

2. Enable survivors to retain safe occupancy of the family home during the dissolution process, similar to NZ provisions that prioritise safety and stability.

3. Create a simplified, trauma-informed application pathway that does not require joint signatures, mutual consent, or ongoing contact with the perpetrator.

4. Ensure that any related parenting or property matters can be handled separately or under safety-focused procedures, so survivors are not forced into unsafe negotiations.

from 37 citizens (Petition No. EN8848)

Income Tax

The cost of living keeps going up, and many Australians are struggling to keep up with household expenses. To make ends meet, people are taking on extra work like rideshare driving, food delivery, or other casual jobs on top of their full-time employment.

The problem is that this extra income is taxed at the same rate as their main job, or even more if it pushes them into the next tax bracket. For instance, in rideshare and food delivery jobs, after paying for fuel, car maintenance, GST, and income tax, workers often keep only about 30% of what they earn. This is frustrating and unfair for those who are working hard just to support their families.

We therefore ask the House to 1) A reduced tax rate or tax-free threshold for income earned from a second job or gig work when someone already has a full-time job.

2) A review of GST and tax obligations for gig economy workers to make the system fairer.

This change would ease financial pressure and help Australians cope with rising living costs.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN8849)

Cybersafety

The issue is that people under the age of 16 should still have access to social media if they are 13 or above because they are people too and the issue is not the app it's the people on the app that should be regulated.

We therefore ask the House to lower the social media ban to 13 years of age in Australia

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8850)

Bill of Rights

We, the undersigned citizens, petition the House to secure fundamental liberties and protect individuals from government overreach by enacting a clear Bill of Rights.

We demand the following Core Human Rights be legally secured for all Australians:

We therefore ask the House to inact these bare minimum bill of rights.

Freedom of Expression & Assembly: The right to speak, write, and peacefully gather without fear, guaranteed for all ages, Protection of Property: Government cannot seize private property without clear public need and fair market compensation, Right to Privacy: Protection against arbitrary interference with private life and personal communications, Right to Health & Education: Secure access to necessary medical care and basic schooling, Protection Against Excessive Taxation: Government must not use high taxes to arbitrarily restrict or prohibit lawful commercial goods (Anti-Extortion), Transparency in Tax Use: Targeted tax revenue must be clearly accounted for and fund related public costs, Abolition of Death/Inheritance Tax: The government shall never impose a tax on the transfer of a deceased loved one's possessions or money to their beneficiaries, Inherent Right to Body Autonomy: Every adult has the fundamental right to govern their own body and make personal consumption choices, Protection Against Coercion: Government must not use excessive taxation or shaming to coerce individuals away from lawful personal choices, Protection of Bodily Privacy: No person shall be compelled to share multi-user changing rooms or facilities with an individual of the opposite biological sex.

from 73 citizens (Petition No. EN8853)

Disability Services

Australians with terminal, degenerative, or high-complexity disabilities are being put at risk by long delays, inconsistent decisions and limited clinical oversight in current disability systems. Essential equipment and urgent supports often take months to be approved, even when allied health evidence is clear.

These risks have increased with the introduction of automated and algorithmic decision-making tools in the NDIS. These systems can flag people for reductions, override clinical recommendations or assign "capacity" without human review. This creates safety concerns, discrimination risks and repeats the failures seen in Robodebt, where automation without transparency was ruled unlawful.

There are no enforceable timelines, no protections against unsafe automation and no independent body to intervene when delays or errors put lives at risk.

We therefore ask the House to establish Harley's Law, legislating:

• mandatory deadlines for essential equipment and urgent funding

• clinical oversight and mandatory human review for all decisions affecting terminal, degenerative or high-complexity disabilities

• a ban on automated tools reducing supports without human sign-off

• transparency for any automated tools used in disability assessments

• enforceable rights for people and families to choose home, community or residential care

• creation of an independent Dignity in Care Commission.

Harley's Law is needed to protect vulnerable Australians from harmful delays, unsafe automation and inconsistent decision-making and to ensure the Commonwealth meets its obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

We therefore ask the House to to pass Harley's Law to guarantee timely supports, human oversight of automation, care choice protections, and independent oversight.

from 2,147 citizens (Petition No. EN8854)

Parliamentary Petitions

Due to the vague and ultimately meaningless guidelines and failure of assigned responses (Ministers) to address petitions it is proposed that the office handling these be abolished and resources better allocated.

There are far too many examples of petitions being closed without answering the issue raised and/or incorrect responses being provided—see EN 7139 for a recent example.

We therefore ask the House to amend the abolished the Petition Office or, as I expect will be the case, amend the SSOs to give the office authority to vet and reject insufficient/erroneous Minsterial responses.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8855)

Parliamentarians' Entitlements

Australians are facing rising living costs, strict accountability at work, and limited public trust in government. Yet our elected representatives continue to receive salaries, allowances, and lifelong pensions far above the reality of ordinary Australians.

In an age where most parliamentary duties can be carried out online, extensive travel allowances and meal claims are unnecessary and wasteful. More importantly, there is no legal or professional consequence when a politician knowingly lies, misleads, or deceives the public. Ordinary Australians can face dismissal or criminal penalties for deception in their jobs—politicians should meet at least the same standard.

The current system rewards excess and tolerates dishonesty, eroding faith in democracy and wasting taxpayer money. Reform is needed to restore fairness, transparency, and integrity in public office.

We therefore ask the House to re ask the House to:

1. Introduce legislation making it an offence for any elected representative to knowingly lie, mislead, or deceive the public in an official capacity.

2. Reform political salaries to reflect median Australian wages.

3. Cut non-essential travel and lifestyle allowances, requiring digital attendance where practical.

4. End taxpayer-funded food and personal expense claims.

5. Replace lifelong parliamentary pensions with normal superannuation.

These reforms would align politicians with the people they serve and rebuild public trust in Australian democracy.

from 41 citizens (Petition No. EN8856)

Cybersafety

Reason for Adjusting the Social Media Age Limit

We believe the social media age limit should be reduced to 13-15 with parental consent and completely banned for children under 13.

Young teens aged 13-15 are already active online for school, communication, and everyday life. Allowing them to use social media with verified parental consent gives families control and ensures that teens are guided, monitored, and protected while still being able to participate in the digital world responsibly. This approach encourages safer online behavior and lets parents decide when their child is ready.

However, children under 13 are far more vulnerable to online risks such as harmful content, data collection, cyberbullying, and exploitation. At this age, most children are not developmentally prepared to navigate these dangers. A clear age ban below 13 helps protect their mental health, privacy, and overall safety.

This balanced change prioritizes child protection, strengthens parental involvement, and reflects the realities of how young people use technology today.

We therefore ask the House to implement stricter age requirements for social media platforms by allowing access for 13-15-year-olds only with parental oversight, while legally prohibiting access for children under 13 to safeguard their wellbeing.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN8857)

Carers

The petition of certain citizens of Australia draws to the attention of the House the essential contributions of informal carers (both unpaid and those receiving income support), parents, and citizens receiving the Disability Support Pension (DSP). These contributions provide immense economic and social value to the Australian community. However, the current rates of income support fall drastically short of the National Minimum Wage, forcing many into financial hardship. Furthermore, these citizens face a double disadvantage: they are denied superannuation (leading to poverty in retirement), and their years of complex, practical caregiving experience are currently ignored by the formal labour market. This lack of recognition creates a barrier for carers wishing to transition into the paid workforce.

We therefore ask the House to

Raise the Rate: Increase the base rates of the Carer Payment, Disability Support Pension (DSP), and Parenting Payment to align with the National Minimum Wage ($915.90 per week), recognizing this contribution as essential labour.

Guarantee Superannuation: Legislate mandatory Superannuation Guarantee contributions on these payments to ensure financial dignity in retirement.

Formal Recognition of Skills: Implement a government-funded "Carer Skills Recognition" framework. This would allow long-term carers to have their practical experience assessed as Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) towards formal qualifications (such as a Certificate III in Individual Support), facilitating a seamless transition into the professional care workforce.

from 43 citizens (Petition No. EN8861)

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Letting assessors into peoples homes without giving them a choice is an invasion of privacy and will only make an already traumatic process even more traumatic for those who have to undergo this process.

Give people a choice, because forcing this on vulnerable people is unacceptable and honestly a massive failure on the governments part. Pushing this will only do more harm than good.

Make telehealth an option for the needs assessments for the majority of participants, unless it is not possible due to the individual circumstances of the participant.

We therefore ask the House to Make telehealth an option for NDIS Participants undergoing the new needs assessments as opposed to coming into their home, unless it is really necessary and a last resort.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN8862)

Tobacco Control

We, the undersigned, call on the House of Representatives to review and reduce current tobacco excise levels, which we believe have had unintended consequences including growth of the illicit tobacco market, increased involvement of organised crime, and increased public health risks through unregulated products.

We ask the House to consider reforms to ensure tobacco taxation achieves public health objectives while reducing criminal activity and restoring consumer safety through regulated legal supply.

We therefore ask the House to review and reconsider the current tobacco excise framework, with a view to reducing rates to sustainable levels that discourage illicit trade, protect consumer safety, and support legitimate businesses.

from 74 citizens (Petition No. EN8863)

Children in Sport

Australia is taking an important step by strengthening protections for young people, including restricting social media use for those under 16. But this change places even more pressure on parents—because when we ask kids to step back from screens, we must give them somewhere better to go. Children need connection, belonging, purpose, and joy. Sport and extra-curricular activities provide exactly that.

Why this matters

Sport isn't just exercise—it's confidence, friendships, resilience, and hope. Children who participate in structured activities experience better mental health, lower anxiety, and a stronger sense of identity. They attend school more often, try harder, and believe in themselves. They learn teamwork, leadership, and how to solve problems. Communities with active kids see less anti-social behaviour, stronger social bonds, and healthier families. These benefits last a lifetime, reducing future healthcare and social costs. When kids thrive, society thrives.

The challenge for families

Right now, many parents simply cannot afford to give their children these opportunities. Rising costs mean that fees, uniforms, and equipment often push sport out of reach. And with reduced social media access, kids have fewer ways to connect—yet many communities lack safe, structured, after-school options. Families want to do the right thing. They just need support.

We therefore ask the House to 1. Cover most of the cost of children's sports and extra-curricular activities.

2. Provide a national "Active Kids Allowance."

3. Invest in community sports infrastructure where it's needed most.

4. Partner with schools and clubs to create safe, affordable after-school programs.

Every child deserves a chance

from 11 citizens (Petition No. EN8864)

Skilled Migration

To the Department of Home Affairs,

​We, the affected family members of Subclass 491 Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) visa holders, urgently petition the Department of Home Affairs to significantly expedite the processing time for Subclass 491 Subsequent Entrant visa applications.

​The current official processing time for 75% of these visas is quoted as up to 15 months, with some sources showing up to 23 months for 90% of applications. This is in stark contrast to other Subsequent Entrant visas, such as Subclass 485, 482, 407, and Student visas, which are frequently processed within a few months (typically 1-6 months).

​This discrepancy creates severe hardship, forcing families into prolonged separation. The 491 visa is a pathway to permanent residency, and timely family reunification is vital for the primary visa holder's settlement, well-being, and ability to contribute effectively to regional Australia, thereby undermining the visa's core purpose.

​We urge the Department to re-evaluate the allocation of resources and align the processing times for 491 Subsequent Entrant visas with those of other, more swiftly processed dependent visas. We request that the Department reduce the processing time to a maximum of 6 months to support family cohesion and regional workforce stability.

​We seek your prompt action on this critical issue.

We therefore ask the House to expedit Processing of Subclass 491 Subsequent Entrant Visas by allocating more resources.

from 210 citizens (Petition No. EN8866)

Drug Addiction and Abuse

Australia continues to face a growing crisis of opioid, methamphetamine, alcohol, and prescription-drug dependence. Current treatment options help many people, but relapse rates remain high and thousands of families are still affected. Ibogaine, a psychoactive alkaloid derived from the Tabernanthe iboga plant, has shown promising effects in interrupting withdrawal, reducing cravings, and helping people recover from long-term addiction. However, due to regulatory barriers and limited clinical trials, Australians currently have little to no safe, legal access to this therapy.

We therefore ask the House to support evidence-based pathways for Ibogaine-assisted addiction treatment.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN8868)

Minister for Communications and Minister for Sport

The Member for Lilley, Anika Wells, has unreasonably charged taxpayers thousands of dollars t fly around the globe, pay for exorbitant lunches, attend friends birthdays parties, take her family on skiing holidays and fly her husband to the AFL Grand Final.

We therefore ask the House to pass a motion of no confidence in the Minister for Communications

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN8869)

Ministerial Standards

The current rules are being abused. They need to be reviewed in line with community expectations.

We therefore ask the House to review and change the travel entitlement rules.

from 32 citizens (Petition No. EN8870)

Cybersafety

We all know that social media can be harmful, but the government doesn't have to ban certain apps especially ones we migrate to. please vote for this

We therefore ask the House to Lower or Remove the ban

from three citizens (Petition No. EN8871)

Minister for Communications and Minister for Sport

Ministers must be held accountable when spending taxpayer dollars. There needs to be clear justification for how these funds are used, and ignorance is not an excuse. It is unacceptable to misuse public money while so many individuals and families are struggling. Transparency and accountability are not optional—they are essential.

We therefore ask the House to is for Anika Wells to resign and pay back some of the taxpayers money.

from 39 citizens (Petition No. EN8872)

Ministerial Standards

Recent reports in national media have revealed that Minister for Aged Care and Sport, the Hon Anika Wells MP (Member for Lilley), has incurred significant taxpayer-funded travel expenses, including overseas and domestic trips involving her family and staff, costing tens of thousands of dollars.

While some of these expenses may fall within the current entitlement rules, Australians have a right to expect that public funds are used responsibly and transparently. Excessive or discretionary spending on travel—especially during a cost-of-living crisis—undermines public trust and confidence in government accountability.

Public outrage over these expenses has not been addressed through adequate oversight or independent review. The Prime Minister's defence of these expenditures further demonstrates the need for a transparent, impartial investigation to uphold integrity standards across all ministers.

We therefore ask the House to : Refer Minister Anika Wells' travel and family-related expenses to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission (IPSC) for a full investigation.

Publish the findings of that investigation and table them in Parliament.

Establish a permanent public register of all ministerial travel and family-accompanied travel expenses, updated quarterly.

Strengthen ministerial accountability provisions to ensure that breaches of community expectations—even when technically within entitlement rules—attract disciplinary action or censure.

from 70 citizens (Petition No. EN8873)

Ministerial Standards

Government spending is out of control. It is not appropriate that Ministers and their staff and families are spending large amounts of Tax payer money on expensive dinners, flights, accommodation and events, when tax paying Australians cannot claim travel for their families as a tax deduction and expense, Then why should government officials?

Ministers and their staff are paid very well for their time in office.

We therefore ask the House to bring in new rules for what can be claimed for travel and meals for ministers and staff.

- flights to be economy only, can upgrade at own cost.

- meals to be capped at $100 per day anything more to be paid at own cost.

- accomodation to be capped at $500 a night, anything over to be paid at own cost.

- family meals and accomodation and event tickets are to be paid at own cost.

from 90 citizens (Petition No. EN8874)

Cybersafety

Roblox allows children to be exposed to violent and harmful explicit sexual content. For example a guardian newspaper female journalist joined roblox to see what it was like was immediately confronted with agressive sexualised content and images that were misoginistic and harmful to both young boys and girls. According to the journalist,here doesn't seem to be any policing of content by roblox administration and content is freely generated by irresponsible anonymous content creators. What initially may have been designed to allowyoungsters to create online content has now evolved into a toxix environment for all Australian children under the age of 18

We therefore ask the House to take action to add Roblox to the current social media ban &ban Roblox for under 18year olds and issue Roblox admin with financial penalties if agreement is breeched

from 31 citizens (Petition No. EN8876)

Public Sector Governance

Australia is in the grip of financial hardship. Not only has the general cost of living increased to record highs but so has electricity, gas, groceries and even taxes.

The Australian public can no longer bare this burden alone.

Government perks such a free air travel and insane spending such as BOM website needs to be stopped. Not changed or adjusted but ceased.

We therefore ask the House to

Revoke all personal government funded travel

Revoke all government perks funded by Australian tax payers

Require those involved in the bureau of meteorology website cost blow out to be held accountable and possibly stood down.

Require minister Anika wells to be removed from office due to excessive spending of tax payer money.

from 84 citizens (Petition No. EN8877)

Veterans' Review Board

This petition of concerned veterans and citizens draws to the attention of the House that decisions of the Veterans' Review Board (VRB) are presently not published, unlike decisions of the Administrative Review Tribunal and other merits review bodies across the Commonwealth. Because VRB hearings are conducted in private and reasons are not publicly accessible, systemic issues cannot be understood, community learning is limited, and applicants are deprived of guidance about how similar cases have been assessed.

The House is further advised that lack of visibility of VRB decisions inhibits transparency, consistency, accountability, and the development of public confidence in administrative justice concerning veterans' entitlements.

We therefore ask the House to Your petitioners therefore request the House to require that:

VRB written decisions be published, with identifying information removed unless the veteran expressly consents to being named.

Where consent is given, the veteran's real name may appear.

Where consent is not given, the decision should be published under a pseudonym or appropriate anonymisation consistent with existing federal merits review practice.

Publication occur via a publicly searchable database, with safeguards for privacy, national security information, and vulnerable applicants.

Your petitioners submit that the publication of VRB reasoning will strengthen trust in the system, encourage consistent decision-making, and advance the beneficial nature of veterans' legislation.

from 157 citizens (Petition No. EN8879)

Sex Discrimination Commissioner

The Sex Discrimination Commissioner Dr Anna Cody's position is untenable. She claims not to understand the biological differences between males & females so therefore doesn't grasp the binary nature of sex in humans. How can she protect men/women from discrimination based upon their sex if she doesn't understand this basic premise? Dr Cody disregards issues such as women's sex-based rights as outlined under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) which is the basis upon which the Sex Discrimination Act and Commission were formed.

The Commissioner is supposed to monitor Australia's progress on implementing CEDAW.

We therefore ask the House to call for the immediate resignation of Dr Anna Cody.

The Attorney General Michelle Rowland oversees the role of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner & so must act without delay to remove this dangerous ideologue from this post and also move to amend the Sex Discrimination Act to reinstate the definitions of man and woman as well as remove "gender identity" as a protected characteristic.

from 141 citizens (Petition No. EN8881)

Cybersafety

Lowering the social media age restriction to 14 is a more reasonable age as most 14 year olds are already active on social media and this could provide younger teens with valuable opportunities for social connection and self-expression. This will also allow them to connect with peers, friends who share similar interests, fostering a sense of community and belonging. This early exposure can also help them develop digital literacy skills, preparing them to navigate the online world more effectively as they grow older . Lastly its unreasonable to restrict a 15 year old from social media but they are old enough to get a criminal record as well as a Job there for this ban is completely ridiculous and unnecessary.

We therefore ask the House to reduce the age restriction policy from ages 16+ to 14+ as it's more affective and more reasonable

from five citizens (Petition No. EN8884)

Cybersafety

Please, do not overlook this petition and reconsider the proposed social media age restrictions and allow access for Australians aged 13 and above. While we are aware the ban is to protect us, we request for a chance to speak up. Social media is important for young people to communicate with friends, organise meet-ups, collaborate on school projects, and participate in community or extracurricular activities. It also provides opportunities to learn new skills, share hobbies, explore cooking recipes, access educational content, and engage with creative or cultural communities. While online safety is vital, a strict age restriction may limit these benefits and push young people toward unsafe alternatives. We respectfully submit that parents and guardians are best placed to guide and monitor their children's social media use according to their own circumstances and comfort. Providing parental controls, digital literacy education, and improved platform safety tools can protect young users without removing access. Moreover, we respectfully ask the House to introduce measures requiring social media companies to remove harmful content promptly, with appropriate enforcement or penalties, rather than restricting access for young Australians, to the reason that us teenagers are being digitally disconnected due to this ban taking place, leading us to miss out on ideas such as tourist attractions in different cities. Please reconsider the impacts that could be caused on our social lives.

We therefore ask the House to et the national minimum social media age at 13+, while strengthening safety measures and supporting parental guidance.

from 22 citizens (Petition No. EN8885)

Renewable Energy

We, the undersigned, call on the Australian Government and ARENA to provide urgent commercialisation support to ClearVue PV, an Australian developed Building Integrated Photovoltaics technology with world leading patented innovation and strong global demand.

Despite being funded by Australian shareholders for almost a decade and progressing to commercial readiness, ClearVue has received no meaningful Federal support. This is occurring while billions of dollars in programs such as the Solar Sunshot initiative and the Future Made in Australia Fund remain largely inaccessible to commercial ready technologies.

ClearVue has been forced to establish an offshore bid desk in Manila simply to manage project enquiries. Without targeted support, capability, jobs and future economic value risk shifting offshore to markets like Hong Kong, Korea and Shanghai, where funding, capital markets and industry backing are far stronger.

Large grants continue to be allocated to manufacturing projects with uncertain commercial outcomes, while ClearVue requires only around $10 million of working capital to operate at full capacity, execute its pipeline and retain capability onshore.

We therefore ask the House to

Provide a $10 million commercialisation support package for ClearVue PV.

Engage through a publicised site visit and strategic discussion.

Prioritise keeping Australian developed renewable technology onshore.

ClearVue represents a rare national opportunity. We ask the Government and ARENA to act now.

from 77 citizens (Petition No. EN8886)

Cybersafety

Snapchat is for the social life: texting and calling. It is crucial and if wanting to take away reels just take that away not the messaging parts.

We therefore ask the House to unban Snapchat or just unban the texting part and keep the reels banned

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN8887)

Bill of Rights

We petition the House to secure fundamental liberties and protect individuals from government overreach by enacting a clear Bill of Rights. We request the following Core Human Rights be legally secured for all Australians.

We therefore ask the House to enact these bare minimum bill of rights. Freedom of Expression & Assembly: The right to speak, write, express, and gather without fear or restriction, guaranteed for all ages, Protection of Property: Government cannot seize private property without consent from the land owner and must provide fair market compensation, Right to Privacy: Protection against arbitrary interference with private life and personal communications, Right to Health & Education: Secure access to necessary medical care and basic schooling, Protection Against Excessive Taxation: Government must not use high taxes to arbitrarily restrict or prohibit lawful commercial goods (Anti-Extortion), Transparency in Tax Use: Targeted tax revenue must be clearly accounted for and fund related public costs, Abolition of Death/Inheritance Tax: The government shall never impose a tax on the transfer of a deceased loved one's possessions or money to their beneficiaries, Inherent Right to Body Autonomy: Every adult has the fundamental right to govern their own body and make personal consumption choices, Protection Against Coercion: Government must not use excessive taxation or shaming to coerce individuals away from lawful personal choices, Protection of Bodily Privacy: No person shall be compelled to share multi-user changing rooms or facilities with an individual of the opposite biological sex.

from 186 citizens (Petition No. EN8888)

Wages and Salaries

Children who work in industries like fast food or retail should be paid the same amount as adults who perform the exact same job as they do. Children's wages are significantly less than adult's wages although they perform the same, sell the same, make the same, do the same.

We therefore ask the House to abolish Junior Pay Rates or Child Wages and pay them the same amount as adults who work and perform equal to them.

from 38 citizens (Petition No. EN8889)

Petitions received.

Responses

Banking and Financial Services

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Petition EN6484. Broker commissions are ultimately a commercial matter for negotiation between brokers and lenders and, subject to the existing regulatory framework, the Government does not prescribe situations in which such arrangements should be entered into.

The clawback arrangements entered with each credit provider may vary and have adapted over time, driven by market competitive pressures and a desire by lenders to attract referrals from brokers. The National Consumer Credit Protection Regulations 2010 prohibits clawbacks after two years.

The Government notes the petition's request to remove clawbacks and refund those charged since the introduction of the best interests duty. While we understand that some brokers feel these arrangements no longer reflect the reality of their obligations, implementing a prohibition on clawbacks or retroactive refunds on clawbacks raises complexities.

Removing clawbacks could lead to adjustments in overall commission structures, potentially reducing the upfront or trailing commissions brokers receive or increasing costs for consumers. Similarly, retrospective refunds would require altering commercial agreements and introduce uncertainty for lenders and brokers.

The cost of commissions form part of the cost base for providing mortgages and the interplay between refinancing activity, a potential prohibition on clawbacks, the overall remuneration of brokers, and the cost to the consumer is complex. As such, a prohibition on clawbacks requires careful consideration as to the impact it may have on the market.

The Government continues to listen to brokers, lenders and borrowers on these issues, supports a strong and growing mortgage broker industry and acknowledges the benefits the industry brings to Australian households and the Australian economy more broadly. We recognise that mortgage brokers play a crucial role in ensuring competition between lenders and driving better outcomes for consumers in the market.

The Australian Government acknowledges the positive and constructive approach the mortgage broking sector has taken in implementing recent reforms and contributing to improved outcomes for consumers.

We remain open to ongoing dialogue and monitoring of broker remuneration practices, including clawback arrangements, to ensure that the market continues to operate efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of consumers. Should evidence emerge that current practices are negatively impacting consumer outcomes or market competition, the Government will consider whether further steps are warranted.

I trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

from the Treasurer, Dr Chalmers

Climate Change

Dear Secretariat

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 March 2025 regarding a request of the reconsideration of commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement—Petition Ministerial Referral (EN7093). I appreciate the time you have taken to bring this matter to my attention.

Climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing our generation. It threatens global economic prosperity, security and livelihoods. Australia is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Our climate has warmed significantly since 1910, contributing to: record-breaking hot days; larger, more frequent bushfires; and more intense, heavy rainfall leading to damaging floods.

The Paris Agreement has played a central role in catalysing cooperative global action to address the climate crisis—193 countries are Parties to the Agreement. Through their actions we have avoided a potential 4°C increase in global temperatures, with 2.l-2.8°C now expected if all current climate action plans are implemented. All countries need to play their part.

The Australian Government recognises that strong climate action is in our national interest. The Government is committed to the Paris Agreement and its goals, recognising their achievement would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change.

Globally, action on climate change is driving major economic opportunities, including over two trillion dollars in clean energy investments in 2024 alone. Australia has strong natural endowments of clean energy, key minerals important for low emissions technologies such as batteries, and a skilled workforce. We want to play a key role in supporting the global transition to net zero. The Government has committed $22.7 billion over the next decade to build a Future Made in Australia to maximise the economic and industrial benefits of the global transition.

Our engagement in the Paris Agreement is important for attracting investment in our global industries, and ensuring Australia's place in global supply chains.

Thank you again for bringing your concerns to the Government's attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Mr Bowen

Consumer Protection

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence on Petition EN7142 concerning matters in relation to the liquidation of Qartaba Homes Pty Ltd (Qartaba Homes).

I am sorry to hear about the difficult circumstances that affected individuals and their families have faced in their dealings with Qartaba Homes. I appreciate that the events outlined in the petition are likely causing a great deal of distress.

These circumstances raise issues across a number of areas regulated by Commonwealth and State and Territory governments. The Commonwealth regulates consumer credit, consumer law and insolvency law as it applies broadly across the market. Real estate laws are State and Territory-based and come under the authority of state and territory governments, regulators and consumer protection agencies.

At the Commonwealth level, the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to credit contracts, including making false or misleading representations. This includes giving information or documents that are false or materially misleading when engaging in credit activities. Likewise, the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), which forms part of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, prohibits businesses from engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct, and from including unfair contract terms in their standard form contracts with consumers. The ACL also prohibits businesses from engaging in false or misleading representations about the sale of land.

At the Consumer Minister's Network meeting in December 2024, Commonwealth, State, Territory and New Zealand Consumer Affairs Ministers discussed consumer issues relating to practices in the real estate sector and noted recent steps to uplift consumer protections in this area. Ministers agreed to report on progress throughout 2025 as they continue to identify opportunities for harmonisation and meaningful uplift in standards to protect consumers in this area. A copy of the communique associated with this meeting is available at: www.ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/stephen-jones-2022/media-releases/consumer-affairs-ministers-renew-commitment-protecting.

In relation to insolvency laws, the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act) sets out the rules and process for corporate insolvency, including the priority of claims when a company is wound up. Secured creditors (including mortgage holders) are generally entitled to be repaid from the proceeds of the sale of secured assets in a liquidation before any other unsecured creditors. This principle is supported by longstanding legal and commercial practices.

In relation to the capabilities of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), ASIC has a range of powers that enable it to respond flexibly and proportionately to a broad range of individual and corporate misconduct. ASIC can take enforcement action to punish wrongdoers, protect investors, preserve assets, prevent or disrupt misconduct, correct disclosures, ensure affected investors and consumers are remediated, and improve compliance with the laws it administers. You can find further information about ASIC's approach to regulatory action and enforcement at: www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/asic-investigations-and-enforcement/asic-s-approach-to-enforcement/.

I also note the concerns raised regarding possible misconduct of the directors of Qartaba Homes, including their engagement in fraudulent practices. I encourage the affected individuals to lodge a report of misconduct regarding this with ASIC at Qartaba@asic.gov.au. This email will reach the ASIC investigation team directly.

ASIC is an independent statutory authority established under the ASIC Act. Under the ASIC Act, the Minister is specifically precluded from giving ASIC a direction about its policies or priorities in relation to a particular case to ensure that its decisions and actions are independent of the political process.

I have copied this letter to the Hon Dr Andrew Leigh MP, Assistant Minister for Competition, Charities and Treasury.

I trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

from the Treasurer, Dr Chalmers

Gippsland Lakes

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter of 28 August 2025 regarding Petition EN7256, requesting the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) conduct an updated audit to ensure the future of the Gippsland Lakes System.

I note primary responsibility for management of the Gippsland Lakes System sits with Victorian state and local government agencies. As Australia's administrative authority for the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, the Albanese Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water plays a leadership and coordination role. Should the responsible management agencies identify the need for an environmental audit, it would be open to them to engage CSIRO or another expert adviser to complete this work.

I can advise CSIRO published a report in 2022 on the Vulnerability of the Gippsland Lakes Ramsar Site and its catchment to bushfire and climate change. This is available at www.dcceew.gov.au/water/wetlands/publications/vulnerability-gippsland-lakes-ramsar-site-catchment-bushfire-and-climate-change.

Thank you for writing on this matter. I have copied this correspondence to

Senator the Hon Murray Watt, Minister for the Environment and Water, as his portfolio is responsible for Ramsar oversight.

Yours sincerely

From the Minister for Science, Senator Ayres

Political Advertising

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7448—Revise the Spam Act to disallow political advertising via SMS.

The Spam Act 2003 regulates the sending of unsolicited commercial electronic messages that seek to offer, advertise, supply or promote goods, services, land or business or investment opportunities.

I understand the petitioners are concerned about the volume of political messages she received during the federal election campaign, especially via SMS. I can advise the current law allows members of the public to receive political messages, such as emails, text messages, and calls. This reflects the fact that freedom of political communication is protected under Australia's constitution.

I understand that the Trumpet of Patriots sent a great volume of text messages in the last election. I trust that their failure to secure the election of any candidate serves a lesson to all political parties and candidates.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Hospitals

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding petition EN7454 which requests support for the development of a new, purpose-built Greensite Hospital in Albury-Wodonga.

I acknowledge the concerns raised by the petitioners and the broader Albury-Wodonga community, who are seeking improved access to modern, high-quality health care services that can meet the growing needs of this growing cross-border region. The Australian Government is committed to improving access to health and hospital services so that all Australians receive appropriate health care when and where they need it, including in regional, rural and remote areas.

The National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA) sets out the agreed financial and governance arrangements for the funding of public hospital services in Australia. Under the NHRA, state and territory governments are recognised as the system managers of their public hospital systems, responsible for the day-to-day administration of their public hospitals. As such, the petitioners may wish to contact the New South Wales Minister for Health, the Hon Ryan Park MP, or the Victorian Minister for Health, the Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP regarding the issues raised in this petition.

The contact details for the respective Ministers are as follows:

The Hon Ryan Park MP

Minister for Health

Minister for Regional Health

Minister for the lllawarra and the South Coast GPO Box 5341

SYDNEY NSW 2001

Email: office@park.minister.nsw.gov.au

The Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP Minister for Health

Minister for Health Infrastructure Minister for Ambulance Services Level 22, 50 Lonsdale Street

MELBOURNE VIC 3000

Email: minister.health@health.vic.gov.au

As part of the NHRA, states have agreed that where cross-border activity occurs, such as patients travelling between Albury and Wodonga to receive treatment, the state where the patient would normally reside should meet the cost of the services. In administering these cross-border arrangements, states must recognise their commitment to provide eligible patients with the choice to receive public hospital services free-of-charge, on the basis of clinical need and within a clinically appropriate period.

Through the NHRA, the Government provides significant funding to assist states and territories with the costs of delivering public hospital services. In 2025-26, the Government is delivering an additional $1.8 billion to states and territories to fund public hospital and health services. Including its extra one-off funding boost, the Government's total funding contribution for public health and hospital services is now estimated to be $9.88 billion in 2025-26 to New South Wales, an increase of 11% from 2024-25; and $8.18 billion in 2025-26 to Victoria, an increase of 12% from 2024-25. Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding petition EN7619, presented to the Parliament of Australia in the House of Representatives requesting the Australian Government review current pricing and data surrounding the delivery of Support Coordination.

The Government recognises the important role that organisations providing Support Coordination play in supporting people with disability. The Government is aware the decision to maintain the hourly rate for Level 2 and Level 3 Support Coordination in the 2024-2025 Annual Price Review has raised concerns across the sector. The Government is committed to working collaboratively with the sector to strengthen disability services and ensure providers can continue delivering high-quality support to Australians with disability.

The National Disability Insurance Agency (NOIA) has established a Quality Supports Program that includes a pilot for Support Coordination. The program is focused on working with large scale support coordinator providers that meet certain criteria relating to quality.

The purpose of the pilot is to identify features of quality service provision and cost models associated with providing quality services to ensure every NDIS participant has access to quality supports. The findings from the program will be used to inform future market approaches and pricing as part of the NDIA's commitment to a revised pricing approach.

Further information can.be found at www.ndis.gov.au/grants/quality-supports-program.

I am advised the Support Coordination market continues to grow steadily over time, and analysis shows that supply continues to meet growing participant demand. The NDIA's latest Quarterly Report outlines total payments for Support Coordination in the year ending 30 June 2025 were $1.146 billion. This compares to the previous financial year which totalled $1.072 billion. You can find more information on the National Disability Insurance Scheme website at www.ndis.gov.au/publications/guarterly-reports.

The NDIA is continuing to monitor markets to ensure participants have access to quality supports and the market remains sustainable. The skills and experience of Support Coordinators continue to play a role in helping participants understand and implement supports in their plan.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

from the Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Mr Butler

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding House of Representatives petition EN7711 to address National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) pricing approaches.

The National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) is responsible for setting price limits for services provided to NDIS participants. Price limits are set with the aim of striking a balance between maintaining a market of quality services and ensuring participants get value for money in using their plans.

A strong market of a diverse range of high-quality providers delivering supports to participants is integral to the success of the NDIS. Markets need to function well so participants can exercise choice and control over the supports they access, to enable them to pursue their goals and participate fully in community life.

The Annual Pricing Review (APR) 2024-25 is the evidence-based process for setting price limits. Price limits are set based on a range of factors� including supply and demand in the market, prices in other markets and broader economic factors.

The APR 2024-25 was informed by the largest and most comprehensive collection of data to support therapy pricing recommendations, covering more than 10 million additional transactions. Benchmarking now includes Medicare data, private health insurance claims and data from 13 comparable government schemes.

Feedback from those with direct experience of the NDIS is a key part of the APR process. The 2024-25 APR leveraged previous consultation processes including the consultation process undertaken to inform the 2023-24 APR, which included over 350 responses from providers and 550 from participants. It was also informed by advice and peer review from the NDIA's Pricing Arrangement Reference Group, the Independent Pricing Committee, and targeted consultation with 16 Commonwealth and State Schemes. As part of the 2025-26 APR, the NDIA will consult with participants, their carers and families, providers and the wider disability community. This consultation process is due to commence in the coming weeks.

The NOIA has announced it will soon release a 3 Year Pricing Workplan, a multi-year pathway to ensure NDIS pricing supports sustainable, high-quality services and value for participants. Consultation with people with disability will be at the centre of the NDIA's work.

The workplan is being developed in collaboration with the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission and the Department of Health, Disability, and Aged Care to ensure alignment with good market stewardship principles and broader registration reforms underway across the support economy. Targeted consultation on the workplan will commence in the coming weeks.

The NOIA is conducting a therapy pricing review. This will support the NOIA moving to a more differentiated pricing approach that reflects the benefits that participants value from quality providers. To support this work, the NOIA announced a new pilot as part of their Quality Supports Program. The Quality Supports Program is part of the NDIA's commitment to ensuring every participant can access high-quality, value-for-money services. Through a series of targeted pilots-including therapy, supported independent living, and support coordination-the program is working with selected providers across Australia to better understand the features and costs of delivering quality supports. The pilots include a diverse mix of providers, covering regional and remote delivery, complex and standard supports and different service models, and the NOIA is working with providers involved in the pilot to ensure they hear from participants receiving those supports.

These pilots will generate evidence to inform future pricing approaches and strengthen the sustainability and effectiveness of services across the NDIS.

The NOIA continues to monitor markets to ensure participants have access to quality supports and the market remains sustainable.

I trust this information is of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Mr Butler

Skilled Migration

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 1 August 2023 from previous Chair to the Hon Andrew Giles MP, former Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, enclosing Petition EN5136, with 13 signatures, concerning the exclusion of Masters of Project Management and Business from the list of eligible qualifications for the extended post-study work rights under the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

On 1 July 2023, international graduates with degrees in select areas of verified skill shortage were provided an extended two-year post-study work rights in the former TGV Post-Study Work stream to address skills shortages facing the labour market at that time. The method for selecting eligible courses was determined by the Post-Study Work Rights Working Group recommendations. The extension ceased on 1 July 2024, as part of implementing the 2023 Migration Strategy, which found that the extended post-study work rights did not assist applicants secure skilled employment longer term. The TGV's Second Post-Higher Education Work stream continues to offer graduates the opportunity to extend their stay in Australia subject to regional requirements being met.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN5136 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Deputy Leader of the House, Mr Butler

Skilled Migration

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 1 August 2023 from previous Chair to the Hon Andrew Giles MP, former Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, enclosing Petition EN5147, with 10 signatures, concerning the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV) study requirement. Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matters falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The TGV provides international students who recently graduated with qualifications from an Australian institution the opportunity to live and work in Australia temporarily. To meet the TGV study requirement, eligible applicants must have qualifications resulting from a course or courses that required at least two academic years study, completed in no less than 16 months in Australia. These requirements support retaining students trained in, and familiar with Australia, who can make a greater contribution to the economy and community. Further detail on the TGV Post-Higher Education Work stream is available on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/temporary-graduate-485/post-higher-education-work.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department's website at: https://immi.homeaffairs. gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

Housing

Dear Chair

Thank you to the Standing Committee on Petitions for correspondence concerning Petition EN5247. Petition EN5247 raises concerns regarding foreign ownership of Australian residential property. The petition requests that ownership of Australian residential property be restricted to Australian citizens and permanent residents.

Foreign investment in Australian residential property is managed through Australia's foreign investment framework. The Government's policy regarding foreign investment in residential property is to channel foreign investment into new residential dwellings, as opposed to established dwellings, as this contributes to Australia's housing stock and helps support economic growth. Foreign persons generally require foreign investment approval before acquiring an interest in residential property.

On 16 February 2025, the Government announced that from 1 April 2025, foreign persons (including temporary residents and foreign-owned companies) will be temporarily banned for two years from purchasing established dwellings in Australia, unless a limited exception applies. These changes will ensure that foreign investment in housing is in Australia's national interest, support the Government's broader agenda to boost housing supply, and enable Australians to buy homes that would have otherwise been bought by foreign investors.

This builds on earlier changes implemented by the Government to ensure foreign investment in residential property is in Australia's national interest. This includes higher applications fees for the purchase of established homes by foreign investors, increased fees for those that leave properties vacant, strengthened compliance activity to ensure foreign investors comply with the rules, and lower application fees for foreign investment in Build to Rent projects to support the delivery of more new homes across Australia.

These measures strengthen Australia's already robust foreign investment framework to help ensure foreign investment in residential property is in our national interest.

Yours sincerely

from the Treasurer, Dr Chalmers

Middle East

Dear Chair

Thank you for referring petition EN5954 about the conflict in Israel and Palestine.

Australia formally recognised the independent and sovereign State of Palestine on Sunday the 21st of September 2025, alongside Canada and the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australia recognised the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own.

Recognising Palestine reflects Australia's longstanding commitment to a two-state solution, which has always been the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples. It also reflects Australia's work with partners over many months to contribute momentum to peace and breaking the cycle of violence the Middle East has known for generations.

The Albanese Government has been firm and consistent that Israeli settlements are illegal under international law and a significant obstacle to peace. We are deeply concerned that the Netanyahu Government is extinguishing the prospect of a two-state solution by its rapid expansion of settlements. Australia strongly opposes any steps towards territorial or demographic change in Palestine.

Australia condemns ongoing Israeli settler violence against Palestinians and is taking action against perpetrators. Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with sanctions on Israeli settlers. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

Australia has a robust legal framework in place to ensure perpetrators of offences against Division 268 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 {Cth) are investigated properly by the Australian Federal Police and prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

Australia will continue to work with our international partners to help build on our decision to recognise Palestine, and to bring the Middle East closer to the lasting peace and security that is the hope, and the right, of all humanity.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

International Students

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 1 July 2024 from previous Chair to the Hon Andrew Giles MP, former Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, enclosing Petition EN6181, with 1697 signatures, concerning the age requirements for the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The Migration Strategy, released on 11 December 2023, outlined the Australian Government's vision for building a migration system that delivers for all Australians. Lowering the age eligibility from under 50 to 35 years or under for the TGV supports the objective of reducing 'permanent temporariness' and repositions the visa for early career professionals. These changes took effect on 1 July 2024 and apply to all applicants with the exception of Hong Kong and British National (Overseas) passport holders and applicants holding qualifications in the postgraduate research sector.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN6181 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

International Students

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 1 July 2024 from previous Chair to the Hon Andrew Giles MP, former Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, enclosing Petition EN6215, with 125 signatures, concerning the age requirements for the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The Migration Strategy, released on 11 December 2023, outlined the Australian Government's vision for building a migration system that delivers for all Australians. Lowering the age eligibility from under 50 to 35 years or under for the TGV supports the objective of reducing 'permanent temporariness' and repositions the visa for early career professionals. These changes took effect on 1 July 2024 and apply to all applicants with the exception of Hong Kong and British National (Overseas) passport holders and applicants holding qualifications in the postgraduate research sector.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN6215 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

International Students

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 1 July 2024 from the previous Chair to the Hon Andrew Giles MP, former Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, enclosing Petition EN6255, with 119 signatures, concerning stay periods for the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The 2023 Migration Strategy outlined the Government's vision for building a migration system that delivers for all Australians and included recommendations to strengthen the TGV program. As part of implementing these recommendations, TGV stay periods were adjusted to give graduates sufficient time to demonstrate their ability to succeed in the skilled labour market, while setting boundaries for those with low prospects of becoming permanent residents. This included removing the additional two years of post-study work rights for select degree holders in the former TGV Post-Study Work stream for applications.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN6255 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

International Students

Dear Chair

I refer to correspondence of 4 November 2024 from the previous Chair enclosing Petition EN6610, with 51 signatures, concerning the age requirements for the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). I appreciate the time you have taken to bring this matter to my attention.

The Migration Strategy, released on 11 December 2023, outlined the Australian Government's vision for building a migration system that delivers for all Australians. Lowering the age eligibility from under 50 to 35 years or under for the TGV supports the objective of reducing 'permanent temporariness' and repositions the visa for early career professionals. These changes took effect on 1 July 2024 and apply to all applicants with the exception of Hong Kong and British National (Overseas) passport holders and applicants holding qualifications in the postgraduate research sector.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN6610 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

International Students

Dear Chair

1 refer to correspondence of 10 February 2025 from the previous Chair enclosing Petition EN6778, with 287 signatures, concerning the age requirements for the Temporary Graduate visa (TGV). I appreciate the time you have taken to bring this matter to my attention.

The Migration Strategy, released on 11 December 2023, outlined the Australian Government's vision for building a migration system that delivers for all Australians. Lowering the age eligibility from under 50 to 35 years or under for the TGV supports the objective of reducing 'permanent temporariness' and repositions the visa for early career professionals. These changes took effect on 1 July 2024 and apply to all applicants with the exception of Hong Kong and British National (Overseas) passport holders and applicants holding qualifications in the postgraduate research sector.

The TGV is not the only visa available to highly qualified graduates, who continue to have access to other migration pathways. Visa options can be found on the Department of Home Affairs' website at: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/vi$a-finder.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN6778 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding Petition EN6808 concerning Israel's membership of the UN General Assembly.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire and the release of the hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

Australia has consistently been part of international calls for a ceasefire, return of the hostages, and the unimpeded flow of aid to Gaza. We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Alongside our international partners, including the UK, Canada, and Japan, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food. The Prime Minister has made clear this is indefensible, and a breach of international law.

With the ceasefire now in place, we are seeing some signs that much-needed aid is starting to flow to civilians in Gaza who have endured unacceptable hardship. Together with our partners, we will work to support the sustained and unimpeded delivery of aid.

Australia has committed more than $130 million in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 2023. Our most recent commitment of $20 million was to support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza. We are delivering our aid with key partners, including in close coordination with the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

After a year-long diplomatic effort to drive global action to protect humanitarian workers in conflict zones, Australia was proud to lead the Declaration for the Protection of Humanitarian Personnel joined by more than 100 countries. The Declaration sets out practicable and actionable measures including: access to communications and equipment to stay safe in conflict zones; improved technology and planning tools; enhanced physical and mental health support for aid workers; new joint training for military personnel and aid workers; funding legal advice for aid workers who are victims of violence; and access to justice for aid workers killed or harmed in the line of duty. Humanitarian workers save lives. This work should never cost them their own.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalei Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions. Applying them without warning—and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

Australia has been clear that that settlement activity is illegal under international law and a major obstacle to peace and a two-state solution. We have called on Israel to respond substantively to the International Court of Justice advisory opinion, cease settlement activity and hold perpetrators of settler violence to account.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest to do so. These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country. 160 countries have diplomatic relations with Israel.

We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Taxation

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Petition EN6825 on implement a dental expenses tax offset.

As you can appreciate, tax policy can involve challenging trade-offs between the efficiency, simplicity and fairness of the tax system, while also ensuring that enough revenue is raised to enable the provision of services the community values.

The Government continues to support Australian children through the Child Dental Benefits Schedule, which helps to cover the cost of some dental services for eligible patients under 18 years of age. Additionally, the Government has committed $107.8 million to extend the Public Dental Services for Adults funding agreement to 30 June 2026 to support the states and territories in delivering public dental services. This agreement helps individuals with Commonwealth concession cards—such as the Centrelink Pensioner Concession Card, or Health Care Card—access dental care nationwide. The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing is also progressing the next National Oral Health Plan 2025-2034 to continue to improve health and wellbeing across the Australian population by improving oral health status and reducing the burden of poor oral health.

I recognise affordability is a key pillar of Australia's health care system. This is why the Government committed $7.9 billion to boost the rate of bulk billing, and support patients receiving medical services with no out-of-pocket cost in the 2025-26 Budget. This includes expanding eligibility for the bulk billing incentive to cover all Australians. The Government is also establishing an additional 50 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics on top of the existing 87 clinics now open across the country. These clinics bulk bill and remain open for longer hours to improve affordability and accessibility.

I trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

The Hon Jim Chalmers MP

from the Treasurer, Dr Chalmers

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding Petition EN6831 concerning the situation in Palestine.

On our own, Australia has few ways to move the dial in the Middle East. That is why we have been focused on partnering with other countries that also wanted the fighting to stop and to deliver lifesaving aid, secure the release of hostages and work towards a two-state solution.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

Australia has consistently been part of international calls for a ceasefire, return of the hostages, and the unimpeded flow of aid to Gaza. We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza. Alongside our international partners, including the UK, Canada, and Japan, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food. The Prime Minister has made clear this is indefensible, and a breach of international law.

Australia has committed more than $130 million in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 2023. Our most recent commitment of $20 million was to support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza. We are delivering our aid with key partners, including in close coordination with the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and BezaIel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions.

Applying them without warning—and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

It is Australia's longstanding position to respect the independence of international courts and tribunals and their role in upholding international law, including on questions relating to genocide.

Israel will be judged on its compliance with the Genocide Convention by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ is currently considering South Africa's case against Israel under the Genocide Convention. As demonstrated above, the Australian Government is not waiting for the final ICJ decision to take action in response to the situation in Palestine. We have also been clear that the Netanyahu Government must comply with the binding provisional orders made in 2024 by the Court in that case. This includes ensuring the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale, in full cooperation with the UN.

In line with longstanding bipartisan practice, the Australian Government does not publish the details of legal advice. Nevertheless, I can assure you that as Foreign Minister I will continue to keep the public informed of Australia's approach to the situation in the Middle East.

Australia is part of the international effort to stop this war. Australia is not making weapons or ammunition in this country and supplying them to Israel. The Government has confirmed that Australia has not supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel in the five years prior to the conflict.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Australian Financial Complaints Authority

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Petition EN7196.

I understand that the petition is seeking to strengthen legal protections for borrowers with the request to amend the ASIC Act 2001 and the Corporations Act 2001 to align with the Federal Court's declarations in ASIC v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited [2020] FCA 716.

The Government is committed to the protection of all consumers. It has provided ASIC with appropriate investigative and enforcement powers to enable it to regulate financial services and corporate conduct. As an independent statutory authority, ASIC's powers include, but are not limited to, investigating banks and lenders for breaches of credit laws, including negligence, misleading conduct or failure to meet responsible lending obligations. ASIC has discretion to use its powers and considers a range of factors in doing so.

With regard to the request for a Parliamentary inquiry into AFCA and its determinations, AFCA is already subject to a comprehensive accountability regime, including strengthened oversight by ASIC, an Independent Assessor who reviews complaints about the standard of AFCA's service, and a requirement to be subject to regular independent reviews. The 2021 independent review of AFCA found that AFCA is performing well in a difficult operating environment and a changing regulatory landscape. The next independent review of AFCA is due to commence next year.

While AFCA is independent and responsible for its own internal processes and management of complaints, it has been established to always remain impartial. AFCA's board of directors must have an independent Chair and equal numbers of directors with consumer and industry experience. This means that AFCA is in no way controlled or influenced by the banks and financial institutions that are members. Financial institutions are required by law to have a membership with AFCA, as this ensures that consumers can bring complaints against member institutions.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Financial Services, Dr Mulino

Universities

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 28 August 2025 regarding Petition EN7274.

I acknowledge the cost-of-living concerns facing students today. On 31 July 2025, the Government passed legislation to cut the Higher Education Student Contributions (HECS) debt of Australians by 20 per cent. This wipes more than $16 billion in HECS and other student debt for more than 3 million Australians, who will see their debt cut over the next two weeks. It's the biggest cut in student debt in Australian history. The legislation also raises the minimum repayment threshold so people only start repaying their HECS debt when they start getting the benefit of going to university.

This builds on the significant reforms our Government is already implementing. Last year we wiped $3 billion of student debts and fixed the system so that the indexation on student debts can never increase faster than wages. From 1 July 2025, we established new Commonwealth Prac Payments to support about 68,000 eligible teaching, nursing, midwifery and social work students while they are completing their compulsory practical training at university. We have also massively expanded Fee Free Uni Ready courses to help more students from disadvantaged backgrounds to get a chance at going to university.

While a temporary loan fee exemption was in place between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the exemption was not funded beyond this period.

The Australian Universities Accord considered FEE-HELP loan fee arrangements in 2023 and found that a continued 20 per cent FEE-HELP loan fee is justified due to the higher costs associated with those loans.

Our changes provide relief for students and young people while continuing to protect the integrity and value of the HECS system, which has massively expanded higher education access for millions of Australians. When HECS was first introduced, only about five per cent of the workforce had a university degree. Now it is more than 26 per cent. Today almost one in two young people in their 20s and 30s have a university degree.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Education, Mr Clare

Taxation

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Petition EN7300 on mining taxation. Your correspondence has been referred to me for response.

Australians deserve a fair return from the natural resources they own.

That's why in 2023, the Government announced changes to the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax (PRRT) to ensure offshore gas companies pay more tax, sooner.

These changes were forecast to increase tax receipts by $2.4 billion in the 2023-24 Budget, helping to fund things like a stronger Medicare and cost of living relief for Australians.

The changes are about delivering a fairer return to the Australian people from the resources they own, while also providing certainty to industry and ensuring Australia remains a reliable trade and investment partner.

The latest Budget update forecasts we will collect $6.9 billion in PRRT over the four years to 2028-29. This is on top of the corporate tax these companies will have to pay.

ATO data show oil and gas companies paid almost $12 billion in PRRT and company tax in 2023-24. The introduction of the Government's reforms increased the number of companies paying PRRT from 11 to 16 in 2023-24.

The Government is also working to ensure multinationals, including gas companies, pay their fair share of tax in Australia.

As part of this work, the Government has legislated new integrity rules to stop multinationals claiming excessive debt deductions to wipe out or reduce their tax in Australia. We've also legislated a new global minimum tax and domestic minimum tax and increased tax transparency requirements to hold multinationals to account.

Ensuring companies are paying their fair share of tax helps support the Budget so we can deliver the services Australians need, provide cost of living relief, and deliver tax cuts for every taxpayer—one last year, one next year, and another the year after.

I trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

from the Treasurer, Dr Chalmers

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 28 August 2025 regarding Petition EN7327, Keep Our Disabled Community Safe, Happy and Healthy.

I want to reaffirm the Albanese Government's commitment to ensuring that every person with disability has access to safe, appropriate, and inclusive housing. Having a place to call home is fundamental to living a good life.

We know that housing is more than just bricks and mortar. It's about dignity, independence, and the ability to participate fully in work, community, and culture, just like every other Australian. That's why we are focused on ensuring people with disability have genuine choice and control over their housing and supports.

Earlier this year, all levels of Government reaffirmed their commitment to deliver better outcomes for people with disability through the release of an updated Australia's Disability Strategy 2021-2031 (ADS). As the cornerstone for guiding Australia's disability policy reform, the ADS is the Government's national plan to improve the lives of people with disability. ADS sets out a vision for an inclusive Australia, where people with disability can fulfil their potential as equal members of the community.

An outcome area under the ADS is Inclusive Homes and Communities. It includes a policy priority that promotes housing accessibility and people with disability's right to have choice and control over where they live, who they live With, and who comes into their home. A key action is the Inclusive Homes and Communities Targeted Action Plan. It seeks for state and territory governments to increase the availability and supply of accessible and adaptive housing for people with disability through the National Construction Code.

On 30 January 2024, the Government announced funding of $49.7 million .over two years to support better housing and living options for people with disability. This is supporting design and consultation on reforms to housing and living supports, including a number of issues raised in the NDIS Review. The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, the National Disability Insurance Agency (NOIA) and the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (NDIS Commission) are working together to deliver these reforms to housing and living supports.

The Disability Royal Commission recommended a roadmap to phase out group homes within 15 years. This recommendation is subject to further consideration by the Government. The NOIA and states and territories have implemented a number of initiatives to support the phasing out of group homes enrolled as SDA. For example, the NOIA no longer provides SDA payments for enrolled SDA properties with 11 or more residents and is progressively ceasing SDA payments for properties with 6 to 10 residents.

The NDIS offers participants funding that seeks to centre participant choice, safety and independence. This includes Individualised Living Options (ILO) which is funding provided to help. participants explore different ways to live and design the supports required to live the way they choose. The Government will continue to work with and listen to participants, providers and the broader disability community to progress continuous improvements to the ILO model. The market for ILOs is continuing to grow, however, the Government recognises there is still more to be done to support uptake of ILOs, in particular by building awareness of the benefits offered by this model of home and living supports.

While the Commonwealth is responsible for housing for NDIS participants eligible for SDA, we recognise that accessible and affordable housing is a shared responsibility. We are committed to working hand-in-hand with state and territory governments to expand housing options and ensure every person with disability has the opportunity to live in a home that supports their independence, safety, and wellbeing.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Senator McAllister

Light Pollution

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 24 November 2025 concerning the petition for legislation to be introduced to limit light pollution and artificial light at night, including public and private exterior illumination (EN7346).

The Australian Government recognises that excessive or poorly designed lighting can affect human health, disrupt ecosystems, and contribute to energy waste and emissions. These are issues we take seriously, particularly as we work to improve environmental outcomes while supporting safe, liveable communities.

At the national level, the Australian Government has already taken several steps to help reduce the effects of light pollution on wildlife. This includes releasing National Light Pollution Guidelines for Wildlife (www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/publications/national-light-pollution-guidelines-wildlife), which provide practical, science-based guidance on managing artificial light in environmentally sensitive areas. The guidelines promote using light only when and where it is needed, reducing glare and skyglow, and selecting lighting that minimises impacts on wildlife.

The Australian Government also works closely with Standards Australia to support improved lighting management. One important outcome of this collaboration is the development of AS/NZS 4282:2023—Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting. This standard sets out clear requirements to limit unnecessary light spill, reduce glare, and improve directional control of outdoor lighting in both public and private settings. The standard plays a key role in helping planners, designers, local governments and industry reduce obtrusive lighting and improve energy efficiency.

These national efforts sit alongside a range of state, territory and local government measures, including planning controls, environmental impact assessment processes and upgrades to public lighting using more efficient, well-designed technologies.

The suggestion for further national legislation is noted. The Australian Government continues to monitor emerging evidence, international approaches—including work undertaken in France, Germany and Croatia—and the progress already underway across Australia. We remain committed to improving environmental protection while ensuring any future measures are practical, effective and aligned with community needs, including safety, amenity and opportunities such as astrotourism.

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this petition.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the Environment and Water, Senator Watt

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding petition number EN7379—Medicare-subsidised Eating Disorder Plans to include eligibility for individuals clinically diagnosed with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) by a general practitioner, psychiatrist or paediatrician.

The Australian Government recognises the growing impact of eating disorders and the need to improve the availability of appropriate treatment and support across the care continuum, and for the range of conditions individuals experience, including ARFID. I am aware of the gaps and barriers within the Medicare system that have created additional burdens on families and those suffering from eating disorders to navigate and access affordable and appropriate eating disorder treatment and supports.

I acknowledge that ARFID does not currently meet the eligibility criteria for the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Eating Disorder and Treatment Plan. You may be interested to know that an independent evaluation has been completed of the MBS eating disorder items and is available on the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing's website at www.health.gov.au using the search term 'Evaluation of the Eating Disorders'. The evaluation was undertaken to determine whether the eating disorder MBS items are working as intended for patients, clinicians, and the Government.

The evaluation report proposed 46 recommendations, and the department is working in collaboration with the broader eating disorder sector to consider the recommendations.

I note that the report recommends regular revie"'! and updating of the approved acceptable treatments within existing review mechanisms to enable expansion of the approved treatments as the evidence base changes, and consideration of inclusion of other eating disorders such as ARFID when sufficient evidence for the effectiveness and safety of treatments is available.

To amend and review existing services funded on the MBS or other programs the

Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is an independent, non-statutory committee comprised of experts in medicine, science, health economics and consumer health which advises me on whether a new medical service or technology should be publicly funded.

Information on the MSAC process, including applicantguidelines and MSAC application form, are available on the MSAC website at www.msac.gov.au. Applications to MSAC can be lodged by the medical profession, medical industry and others seeking Government funding for a medical service or technology to be listed on MBS.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Cybersafety

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7404 which requests the House of Representatives introduce 'Fifi's Law 2025' to strengthen the Online Safety Act 2021 (the 'Act') and other legislation to prevent online bullying and harassment.

The Albanese Government is committed to keeping Australians safe online. I am sorry to hear about the online harassment campaign that Fifi was targeted by, also known as a "volumetric attack" or "pile-on attack." We are currently considering a recommendation made through an independent review into the Online Safety Act, which recommended defining volumetric attacks under the law. It also recommended empowering the eSafety Commission to issue a notice to public platforms based on a single complaint to address volumetric attacks.

This recommendation to define and act against volumetric attacks builds on several systems already in place to combat online abuse and harassment.

Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995, it is a crime to use the internet or phone in a threatening, harassing or offensive way. It is also an offence to use the internet or phone to threaten to kill or cause serious harm to another person. Maximum penalties for these offences range from three to ten years imprisonment.

The Online Safety Act supports Australians online by providing the eSafety Commissioner with powers to regulate online abuse, image-based abuse and cyberbullying. It does this through:

a cyberbullying scheme for children that allows the removal of material from the full range of online services where children are now spending time—including games;

a cyber abuse scheme for adults that assists victims of seriously harmful online abuse to have the material removed;

removal of intimate images within 24 hours;

enabling the eSafety Commissioner to remove content that would be refused classification no matter where it is hosted; and,

equipping the eSafety Commissioner with a rapid website blocking power for material that depicts abhorrent violent conduct, which may be used during an online crisis event.

My colleagues, the Hon Mark Butler MP, Minister for Health and Aged Care, and the Hon Emma McBride MP, Assistant Minister for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, lead mental health support for Australians. They are leading the Government's commitment to provide $2.4 billion over 4 years to support the mental health and wellbeing of children, young people and their families and carers. This is including Australians who may be experiencing mental distress from experiencing harms online.

Additionally, the eSafety website has information and resources to help Australians to stay safer and have more positive experiences online, including dedicated resources for parents and young people on how to look after mental wellbeing on social media, at https://www.esafety.gov.au/.

Going forward, the Australia is taking world-leading action to delay access to social media until the age of 16. Passed in response to a petition signed by 120,000 Australian parents, this law will give young people extra time to develop their community and identity offline, and build their resilience and digital literacy skills before they join social media. The Government acknowledges that harms do not just stop existing when a person turns 16 years old. It is crucial that young people can safely navigate online spaces. This is why we have also delivered $6 million to the Alannah and Madeleine Foundation to ensure access to free digital and media literacy products in every Australian school.

We have also committed to legislating a Digital Duty of Care for online services operating in Australia. A duty of care will require the online industry to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harms. This shifts industry's focus from reacting to harms and towards systems-based approach, to stop the harms occurring in the first place. Consultation is now open: https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-vour-sav/digital-dutv-care

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Lyme Disease

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 on behalf of the Standing Committee on Petitions regarding Lyme disease (refer petition number EN7414).

I have responded to the petitioner's specific requests, in detail, below.

1) House to recognise Lyme disease as a chronic, life-altering condition

2) Improve diagnostic tools and treatment protocols

3) Fund research into chronic Lyme and co-infections

4) Launch public awareness campaigns about prevention and symptoms

5) Support patients through disability accommodations and care access

Lyme disease

The Australian Government acknowledges the concerns and the significant impact on individuals, families, and communities with tick-borne illnesses. To address these concerns, the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing continues to engage with patients, researchers and individuals affected by tick-borne diseases and allergic conditions to improve our understanding of these complex health issues.

Lyme disease is typically an acute infection that can affect the skin, joints, nervous system, and the heart. It is most commonly found in regions such as the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Asia. Australians can be bitten by an infected tick while overseas and return to Australia carrying the infection. While it is acknowledged that some non-specific symptoms can linger after treatment and impair quality of life, the concept of chronic Lyme disease is widely disputed. Persistent symptoms do not reflect ongoing infection.

Lyme disease is caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi (B. burgdorferi). Despite extensive surveys and research, this bacterium has not been detected in Australian ticks. In the absence of compelling evidence showing either the presence of B. burgdorferi in Australia or that local Borrelia species cause Lyme disease, the Government is not in a position to support the diagnosis of locally acquired Lyme disease. This position is consistent with the views of conventional medical practitioners and the scientific community.

Consequently, Lyme disease is only considered clinically relevant in Australia when a patient has a history of travel to a Lyme disease-endemic region and presents with compatible symptoms, and/or a verified tick bite, and/or laboratory test results performed by an accredited laboratory. This approach is endorsed by both the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

The best outcome for patients and health practitioners is to not draw conclusions based on poor levels of evidence, but to consider each patient thoroughly in a multidisciplinary medical approach that makes the best use of clinical expertise and available diagnostic skills and technology.

Improve diagnostic tools and treatment protocols

Australian health care providers have the necessary expertise to diagnose and treat Lyme disease patients who have been bitten by ticks while visiting Lyme disease-endemic regions. Although travellers may be exposed to infected ticks overseas, not all ticks carry B. burgdorferi, and even bites from infected ticks do not always result in illness.

Diagnosing tick-borne illnesses can be challenging as symptoms often overlap with those of many other conditions. In Australia, routine testing for Lyme disease is not generally recommended unless there is epidemiological evidence, such as travel to a region where Lyme disease is known to occur, that increases the pre-test probability. A confirmed case requires aligned clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological evidence. When needed, health care providers are encouraged to consult experts in vector-borne diseases, including specialist microbiologists with diagnostic experience and infectious disease physicians.

Australian infectious diseases physicians are trained in the management of classical overseas-acquired Lyme disease, and clinicians can diagnose and treat tick-borne illnesses known to occur in Australia or refer patients with more complex presentations.

There are well-established and reliable in vitro diagnostic devices and treatments available for managing tick-borne infections involving pathogens that have been thoroughly characterised. This includes infections like overseas-acquired Lyme disease, Q fever, spotted fevers, and rickettsial infections.

To support clinicians in diagnosing and managing patients who present with new or ongoing debilitating symptoms that cannot be explained by another condition-and who may or may not have a history of tick bites-the Debilitating Symptom Complexes Attributed to Ticks (DSCATT) Clinical Pathway has been developed. This clinical pathway guides health care providers in making differential diagnoses and determining appropriate referral pathways for patients with unresolved symptoms that do not have a readily diagnosable cause. Currently, due to the lack of definitive evidence, a clinical management guideline is not available for patients with medically unexplained symptoms attributed to ticks.

The department has published a range of educational resources on Lyme disease and tick-borne illnesses for both health care professionals and the public. These materials are available at www.health.gov.au by searching for 'Lyme disease' or 'ticks'.

Fund research into chronic Lyme and co-infections

The department has funded a number of projects investigating novel causes of, and potential new treatments for, tick-borne illnesses acquired in Australia. This includes recently published research by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Exploring Borrelia in Australia: Isolation, genomic characterisation, and host and vector associations that found no Lyme disease-causing Borrelia species in Australia.

Other current research includes grants by the National Health and Medical Research Council through a Targeted Call for Research to:

the University of Melbourne to explore new research for treating unexplained syndromes linked to tick-bites in a randomised trial

Murdoch University for research on causes of DSCATT.

Further information on these projects can be found on the department's website using the search term 'Lyme disease research'.

Any future investment and potential research will build on the evidence available, rather than further exploring Borrelia as a vector for DSCATT in Australia. This reduces the risk of duplication and ensures investment in targeted research to identify gaps, including through projects funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Launch public awareness campaigns about prevention and symptoms

The department has produced a suite of tick educational materials. This includes fact sheets for the general public and guidance notes for clinicians on Lyme disease available on the department's website. The tick-borne disease resources describe best practice principles for tick prevention and tick bite management. Further information on educational materials can be found on the department's website using the search term 'Lyme disease fact sheets'.

Support patients through disability accommodations and care access

While the Government supports patients through established disability accommodations and car� access pathways, Lyme disease is not recognised as a disability or a nationally notifiable condition in Australia. As such, individuals will be assessed under existing disability frameworks based on their functional impairment and clinical need, rather than on a specific diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Miscarriage and Stillbirth

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 providing petition on EN7449 regarding dedicated funding for a national stillbirth awareness campaign.

The Australian Government is committed to strengthening the health of mothers and babies. From 2020-21 to 2025-26, the Government has invested $229.6 million in perinatal services and supports. This includes investing in:

national perinatal mental health centres

perinatal mental health screening

education and awareness programs

preterm birth prevention

perinatal loss support programs

national maternal and perinatal data collections

implementing the National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan (Stillbirth Action Plan).

The Stillbirth Action Plan aims to reduce preventable stillbirths after 28 weeks by 20% or more over five years. It also aims to ensure families experiencing stillbirth receive respectful and supportive bereavement care. The Stillbirth Action Plan recognises that some groups, including First Nations communities and some migrant and refugee communities, experience higher rates of stillbirth and includes actions to address these inequities.

Since the release of the Stillbirth Action Plan in December 2020, a range of activities have been funded including:

developing a new Clinical Care Standard for Stillbirth

updating the Care around Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Guidelines

delivering stillbirth education and awareness programs

developing and implementing health professional training programs and resources

national implementation of the Safer Baby Bundle, an initiative providing

evidence-based information to maternity health care providers to reduce the risk of stillbirth

adaptation of the Safer Baby Bundle for First Nations women and migrant and refugee women, who are at increased risk of stillbirth

activities to increase stillbirth autopsy rates

miscarriage and stillbirth bereavement support programs and resources

programs to support families experiencing stillbirth, including the Red Nose Hospital to Home Program.

The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing publishes an annual report of progress for the Stillbirth Action Plan. The reports are available on the department's website at www.health.gov.au by searching 'National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan'.

In addition, $5.9 million is being provided to Monash University to update the Australian Pregnancy Care Guidelines and develop new national Australian Postnatal Care Guidelines. These guidelines provide health professionals with evidence-based, best practice guidance to support them to provide optimal care to women during pregnancy and the postnatal period. New content relating to risk of stillbirth has been incorporated into the Australian Pregnancy Care Guidelines. Draft recommendations relating to bereavement support associated with perinatal loss have been published in the Australian Postnatal Care Guidelines. These recommendations will be considered by the National Health and Medical Research Council on 27 November 2025 and published as final recommendations following approval.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Middle East

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN7497 concerning the situation in Gaza.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

On our own, Australia has few ways to move the dial in the Middle East. That is why we have been so focused on partnering with other countries that also wanted the fighting to stop, deliver lifesaving aid, secure the release of hostages and work towards a two-state solution.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire and the release of the hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

Australia has consistently been part of international calls for a ceasefire, return of the hostages, and the unimpeded flow of aid to Gaza. We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We continue to urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza. Alongside our international partners, including the UK, Canada, and Japan, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food. The Prime Minister has made clear this is indefensible, and a breach of international law. We will continue to push for the sustained and unimpeded delivery of aid.

Australia has committed more than $130 million in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 2023. Our most recent commitment of $20 million was to support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza.

We are delivering our aid with key partners, including in close coordination with the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Australia has been clear that Israel must comply with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice, including to ensure the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale in Gaza. This includes multiple statements, alongside dozens of other countries, pressing for aid to flow and aid workers to be protected, and calling for the protection of civilians, release of hostages and urging a ceasefire.

After a year-long diplomatic effort to drive global action to protect humanitarian workers in conflict zones, Australia was proud to lead the Declaration for the Protection of Humanitarian Personnel joined by more than 100 countries. The Declaration sets out practicable and actionable measures including: access to communications and equipment to stay safe in conflict zones; improved technology and planning tools; enhanced physical and mental health support for aid workers; new joint training for military personnel and aid workers; funding legal advice for aid workers who are victims of violence; and access to justice for aid workers killed or harmed in the line of duty. Humanitarian workers save lives. This work should never cost them their own.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions. Applying them without warning- and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I trust that the information provided is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Child Care

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025, about Petition EN7560 which calls for additional financial support for parents who remain at home and care for their children.

The Australian Government assists families with out of pocket costs of approved ECEC services, to support workforce participation and to meet the early learning needs of children. The Government provides financial assistance to help families cover the cost of ECEC and encourage workforce participation through the CCS. CCS is a family entitlement paid directly to approved providers to pass on to families as an ECEC fee reduction. This support recognises the lifelong educational and social development benefits of early learning.

Critically, it recognises the formal qualifications of early learning educators and the importance of this learning to child development.

I note the suggestion to expand subsidies to include families who choose to care for their children at home. While the Government is not considering a payment like this, there are established programs and payments provided by the Government to support families with the costs of raising children. These include Family Tax Benefit Part A and Part B, as well as the Parenting Payment. Further information about Government payments is available at www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/guide-to-australian-government-payments.

I acknowledge the important role stay at home parents play in their children's lives and that parents are best placed to make decisions about whether to care for their children at home or in an ECEC service. The Government supports access to ECEC in a range of settings to ensure parents have choices about the type of education and care their children receive.

As you know, the early years are a critical time that shapes the rest of a child's life, across health, education, and wellbeing outcomes. Recognising this, last year the Albanese Government launched the Early Years Strategy 2024-2034. The Early Years Strategy outlines the Government's long-term vision for Australian children and their families in the early years and contains specific outcomes focused on supporting the holistic wellbeing of young children. Further information is available on the Department of Social Services website at www.dss.gov.au/early-years-strategy.

I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Early Childhood Education, Senator Walsh

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding petition EN7604 which asks for mobility-impaired participants to be given access to dog guides and for consultation to occur with dog guide providers to develop new guidelines.

The National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) recognises the vital role dog guides play in supporting people with blindness or vision impairment. To address the concerns raised in the petition, it may be helpful to provide information about how the NDIA makes decisions when funding assistance animals, including dog guides, in a participant's plan.

The NDIA can fund an assistance animal if the request meets the NDIS funding criteria set out in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (NDIS Act). This means the support needs to be related to the participant's disability support needs, value for money, and effective and beneficial for the participant. The support also needs to be an National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) support, meaning it is a service, item, or equipment that the NDIS is allowed to fund under the NDIS Act and Rules.

The assistance animal must also meet the NDIA's definition of an assistance animal and be trained by an accredited assistance animal provider. The NDIA uses the internationally recognised definition developed by La Trobe University, which outlines what is and isn't considered an assistance animal.

Before funding an assistance animal, the NDIA must consider whether it is a reasonable and necessary support that will meet the participant's disability support needs and help them pursue their goals.

NDIA staff use Our Guidelines when they make decisions under the NDIS. Our Guidelines are based on the NDIS Legislation and Rules and help NDIA staff make consistent, evidence-based decisions under the NDIS Act. All NDIS guidelines are available at www.ndis.gov.au/our-guidelines

Our Guideline—Assistance animals including dog guides explains how funding decisions are made and what evidence the NDIA requires.

To help the NDIA decide if an assistance animal meets the funding criteria, participants must provide evidence that shows:

the dog guide meets the NDIA definition of an assistance animal

allied health professionals confirm the participant needs an assistance animal

the participant has passed a suitability assessment

the assistance animal has passed the public access test, or the participant has an agreement with their service provider on when the animal must pass this test

if the participant has had a dog guide before, this can be provided as lived experience.

In 2022, the NDIA established the Dog Guide advisory group which included representatives from Vision Australia, the Royal Society for the Blind and Guide Dog Australia. This group developed a streamlined assessment process for dog guides, including an assessment temp!ate for use when providing evidence to the NDIA.

The template, which is completed by an International Guide Dog Federation qualified instructor, can include information about the specific tasks the dog guide is expected to perform, an assessment of the participant's suitability to be a dog guide user, and any other relevant information that may impact their ongoing ability to use a dog guide.

NDIA staff will review the evidence provided along with other information, including the participant's lived experience and individual circumstances. Funding for dog guides is considered alongside other supports in the participant's plan, and how these supports might work together to help the participant pursue their goals.

The NDIA can't fund support for an assistance animal if there's a risk to its wellbeing and safety. To ensure the animal can perform its tasks and be an effective and beneficial support, the NDIA needs to be satisfied that it will be properly cared for and get enough exercise, rest and play time. The NOIA also needs to be sure there are no risks to the animal when it performs tasks such as lifting or pulling heavy items or leading an electric wheelchair.

The NOIA recognises people with disability as experts in their own lives. They understand their disability better than anyone and are experts in how the NOIS works for them.

To provide a platform for people with disability to share their lived experience, the NOIA established Participant First. Members of this group can contribute their insights and lived experience through engagement activities such as focus groups, interviews or co-design workshops.

I encourage participants with blindness or vision impairment to join Participant First. Working with the group, they can continue to improve the way the NDIS is delivered. More information about how to get involved is available at engage.ndis.gov.au/page/participant-first

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Mr Butler

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email regarding petition EN7668 concerning the situation in Gaza.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

On our own, Australia has few ways to move the dial in the Middle East. That is why we have been so focused on partnering with other countries that also wanted the fighting to stop, deliver lifesaving aid, secure the release of hostages and work towards a two-state solution.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

Australia has consistently been part of international calls for a ceasefire, return of the hostages, and the unimpeded flow of aid to Gaza. We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza. Alongside our international partners, including the UK, Canada, and Japan, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food. The Prime Minister has made clear this is indefensible, and a breach of international law.

Australia has committed more than $130 million in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 2023. Our most recent commitment of $20 million was to support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza. We are delivering our aid with key partners, including in close coordination with the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and BezaIel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions.

Applying them without warning- and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

It is Australia's longstanding position to respect the independence of international courts and tribunals and their role in upholding international law, including on questions relating to genocide.

Israel will be judged on its compliance with the Genocide Convention by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ is currently considering South Africa's case against Israel under the Genocide Convention. The Australian Government has been clear that the Netanyahu Government must comply with the binding provisional orders made in 2024 by the Court in that case. This includes ensuring the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale, in full cooperation with the UN.

Australia is part of the international effort to stop this war. Australia is not making weapons or ammunition in this country and supplying them to Israel. The Government has confirmed that Australia has not supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel in the five years prior to the conflict.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Childers Backpacker Tragedy

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence dated 27 October 2025 to the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister, regarding petition EN7672, which seeks bravery recognition for the

Childers Auxiliary Firefighters actions during the Palace Backpacker Hostel fire in Childers, Queensland on 23 June 2000. The Prime Minister has asked me to reply on his behalf.

I apologies for the delay in providing you a return, the matter was under active consideration.

While the years have not diminished the memories of this tragic event, time also does not dim the outstanding work of the members of the Queensland Fire Department and

Rural Fire Service, the Queensland Police Service, the Queensland Ambulance Service, and the State Emergency Service, who performed their duties in response to this event with skill and dedication.

The Australian Bravery Decorations are designed to recognise acts of bravery where people selflessly put themselves in jeopardy to protect the lives or property of others. The Australian Honours and Awards Secretariat (the Secretariat) at the Office of the Official Secretary to the Governor-General is responsible for administering the Australian Bravery Decorations, as well as maintaining a register of all honours since the commencement of the Australian Honours and Awards system in 1975.

Anyone can nominate someone for these honours, via the online portal on the Governor-General's website at:

www.gg.gov.au/australian-honours-and-awards/nominate-someone-award

To make a nomination, a nominator will need to provide details of both the person they are nominating, and of the incident for which they are being nominated, including:

The contact details of the person they are nominating (if known)

A description of the incident where the brave act occurred

Details of what the person they are nominating did; which could be supported by:

Photographs of the incident or the place it occurred

Links to media articles or other information about the incident

If available, the contact details of any other witnesses to the incident

The nominator's own contact details.

Where nominations are received, they are presented to the Australian Bravery Decorations Council (Council) for its consideration. The Council is an independent advisory body that considers nominations for awards and makes recommendations to the Governor-General. All nominations are strictly confidential, and to maintain the integrity of the process, the Secretariat is unable to confirm if a nomination has been received, and only provides an update to the nominator listed on the nomination form.

Where an award is approved by the Governor-General, and where an individual has consented to their details being publicly released, these awards are announced in Australian Bravery Decorations Honours Lists. Copies of these lists can be found on the Governor-General's website at: www.gg.gov.au/australian-honours-and-awards/australian-honours-lists

Further information about the Australian Bravery Decorations can be found at: www.gg.gov.au/australian-honours-and-awards/australian-bravery-decorations

The Secretariat are able to provide further information or assistance in completing a nomination form, and can be contacted via email at honours@gg.gov.au, or by calling 02 6283 3604.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to the Australian Government's attention. I have copied this response to the Prime Minister.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister, Mr Gorman

Visa Refusal or Cancellation

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 enclosing Petition EN7684, with 130 signatures, concerning the petition supporting Tana's Rocky Wood Fire Neapolitan Pizza. I appreciate the time you have taken to bring this matter to my attention.

Visa applicants are required to meet objective criteria specified in the Migration Regulations and are assessed on the information provided in their application. When a criterion is not satisfied the Migration Act requires that the application is refused.

Eligible applicants may seek to have that decision reviewed by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART). Further information about the review process can be found on the ART website at: https://www.art.gov.au/applying-review/immigration-and-citizenship.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN7684 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Burke

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding petition EN7685 on registration of independent support workers, companies and therapists for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS).

The Australian Government is committed to ensuring the NDIS market delivers high quality and safe supports to people with disability.

In December 2023, the Independent Review into the NDIS (NDIS Review) recommended the Australian Government design and implement a graduated risk-proportionate regulatory model for the whole provider market. In response, the government established the NDIS Provider and Worker Registration Taskforce (Taskforce) to provide expert advice on key design elements and implementation of a new regulatory model for the NDIS.

The Taskforce's Advice was released on 2 August 2024 and includes 11 recommendations and 10 implementation actions. The Taskforce recommended four new registration categories based on risk-three for providers and one for self-directed NDIS participants. The government is carefully considering the Taskforce's advice in consultation with the disability community and the disability sector.

I note the feedback provided in the petition regarding potential impacts of regulatory changes on the availability of supports, particularly for those with high support needs and people living in rural areas.

The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing intends to consult with the disability community, NDIS providers and states and territories on the definition of a 'NDIS Provider' as proposed by the Taskforce. This will determine which supports would require registration under a new model of regulation.

This will require careful consideration to ensure the definition upholds the rights of NDIS participants while enabling appropriate visibility of the NDIS provider market delivering supports and services.

The Government will continue to progress reform that ensures appropriate oversight of providers, while preserving flexibility, choice and control for participants to ensure safe, high-quality services continue without placing unnecessary burdens on NDIS participants or those providing NDIS supports.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Mr Butler

National Security

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter regarding petition EN7784 to launch formal consultations with New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom to explore a mobility and security pact.

The Australian Government deeply values its close bilateral relations with Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. These ties are underpinned by our shared history, common values and interests, and people-to-people links.

The Government is working collaboratively with these partners, bilaterally and through plurilateral and multilateral groupings, to advance our shared foreign policy, defence and economic interests and to promote people to people connections. That includes the Government's work to maximise the benefits of our bilateral Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement and Australia-United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement, as well as regionally through the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for

Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

These efforts position our countries well to meet the challenges we face. By speaking together, or with distinct voices when it makes sense to do so, we can maximise our effectiveness internationally. The Government does not propose to take forward consultations on a standalone mobility and security pact.

I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7824 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

Keeping young Australians connected and better protected

Keeping Australians safe online is a top priority for the Australian Government. The Government is focused on positive solutions to issues of national concern, and the risk of harm to children and young people from social media is at the top of that list.

The social media minimum age requires age restricted social media platforms to prevent Australians under 16 years from having accounts. The legislation reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to harms experienced by children and young people on social media platforms, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

The framework incorporates feedback received through consultation with key stakeholders including young Australians, parents and carers, and broader community organisations, including mental health groups.

The new laws do not seek to rule out digital participation for young people. Young Australians can continue to use the internet, messaging services and online games, among other online services.

I also recognise that the harms do not switch off when a person turns 16. That's why it is critical all Australians, and in particular young people, are equipped with the tools necessary to safely navigate the world.

The government recently committed funding for the Safe Kids are eSmart Kids initiative, delivered by the Alannah and Madeline Foundation (AMF). AMF is free and available for every Australian school, teaching young people aged 4 to 16 years old, how to be safe, smart and responsible in the digital world.

The Government is also actively working on further measures to uplift online safety, including through a Digital Duty of Care and restricting access to nudification apps and websites.

YouTube's inclusion in the social media minimum age obligation

I acknowledge the concerns raised in the petition about young Australians being unable to access educational content on platforms like YouTube. My decision not to name YouTube in the legislative rules—meaning YouTube is subject to the minimum age obligation—is based on stakeholder feedback, research and advice provided by the eSafety Commissioner.

In her advice, the eSafety Commissioner noted that 76% of children and young people aged between 10 to 15 were on YouTube. Concerningly, 37% of these users reported that they were exposed to harmful content on YouTube and a further 21% encountered online hate.

YouTube is comparable in form, function and use to other social media platforms captured under the social media minimum age. YouTube Shorts, a key component of the platform, employs persuasive design features associate with harm that are widely used on social media platforms such as lnstagram and TikTok.

While I acknowledge that YouTube has many educational benefits, given the similarity in its functionality to other social media platforms, providing a specific carve out for YouTube would be inconsistent with the purpose of the social media minimum age, which is to protect children and young people from online harms.

It is important to make clear that the minimum age obligation will only apply to children and young people 'holding an account' with age-restricted platforms. Applying the obligation to YouTube will not prevent children and young people from accessing content on the platform in a 'logged-out' state. This ensures that educational resources will remain accessible while harms associated with holding an account are reduced.

Further, the legislation does not prevent a parent or carer from allowing a young person to use an account held by that parent or carer, or prevent an educator from showing educational content on YouTube to students under 16 years.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7828 concerning the privacy implications of the social media minimum age legislation.

The social media minimum age requires age restricted social media platforms to prevent Australians under 16 years from having accounts. The onus is clearly on platforms—not parents.

The Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. It's for this reason the legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is also clear that no Australian can be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

The eSafety Commissioner has released guidance for industry, which provides detailed information on the measures social media platforms are expected to have in place to comply with the minimum age legislation. Importantly, the guidance outlines that platforms are not required to age-assure every user—blanket age assurance may be considered unreasonable, especially if existing user data can reliably infer age.

The guidance also includes the expectation that platforms actively prevent, detect and respond to attempts by underage users to circumvent age assurance systems, including by use of VPNs. We know platforms have tools at their disposal to combat the use of VPNs. For example, many video streaming services (such as Netflix) employ these tools to meet local content and classification requirements.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7830 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

Keeping Australians safe online is a top priority for the Australian Government. The Government is focused on positive solutions to issues of national concern, and the risk of harm to children and young people from social media is at the top of that list.

The social media minimum age requires age restricted social media platforms to prevent Australians under 16 years from having accounts. The legislation reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to harms experienced by children and young people on social media platforms, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

Compatibility with human rights

As part of developing the Bill that introduced the social media minimum age, the Government undertook an assessment of the impacts on human rights. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is published with the Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill, and affirms that to the extent the laws impact human rights, those impacts are reasonable, necessary and proportionate to achieve the legitimate aims of the social media minimum age.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

I also note the concerns raised in the petition about privacy risks and wish to reassure the signatories that the Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. The legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Importantly, platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Functional Neurological Disorder

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7833 to the House of Representatives to allow Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) to be included in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS}.

Access to the NDIS is based on functional impact or impairment, not diagnosis or how an impairment was acquired. People who experience significant and permanent disability, including those with FND, can become NDIS participants if they meet the requirements set out in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 including age, residency and disability or early intervention requirements.

Generally, a person will be eligible for the NDIS if their impairment is, or is likely to be, permanent and causes a substantial reduction in their capacity to do one or more daily life activities, including moving around, communicating, socialising, learning, undertaking self-care, or self-management tasks.

I encourage anyone wishing to test their eligibility for the NDIS to contact the

National Disability Insurance Agency on 1800 800 110 or visit their local offices which can be found at www.ndis.gov.au/contact/locations.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7845 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

Keeping Australians safe online is a top priority for the Australian Government. The social media minimum age reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to harms experienced by children and young people on social media platforms, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

Compatibility with human rights

I can confirm that, as part of developing the Bill that introduced the social media minimum age, the Government undertook an assessment of the impacts on human rights. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is published with the Explanatory Memorandum to the bill, which affirms that to the extent the laws impact human rights, those impacts are reasonable, necessary and proportionate to achieve the legitimate aims of the social media minimum age.

The legislation does not seek to rule out digital participation for young people. Young Australians can continue to use the internet, messaging services and online games, among other online services.

Importantly, the social media minimum age framework isn't 'set and forget'. The Government will closely monitor the outcomes and impacts of the social media minimum age, including as part of a formal review of the legislation, which must commence before December 2027.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

The Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. The legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024}, unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7847 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

The social media minimum age legislation requires platforms to prevent Australians under 16 from holding social media accounts. The onus is clearly on platforms—not parents.

I acknowledge the concerns raised in the petition regarding the potential privacy impacts of the measure. For this very reason, the legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Importantly, platforms must destroy data collected and used to assure age online, with serious penalties applicable for a breach of this requirement. Where a platform wishes to retain that data for other purposes (such as curated contentL they must seek the explicit consent of the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is also clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Israel

Dear Chair

I am writing in response to petition EN7850. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain what the Australian Government is doing to respond to the conflict in Gaza.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire and the release of hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

On our own, Australia has few ways to move the dial in the Middle East. That is why we have been so focused on partnering with other countries that also wanted the fighting to stop, deliver lifesaving aid, secure the release of hostages, and work towards a two-state solution.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice. With the ceasefire now in place, we are seeing some signs that much-needed aid is starting to flow to civilians in Gaza who have endured unacceptable hardship.

Australia has a long history of supporting efforts to promote the Genocide Convention, including by playing an active role in its negotiation and by being one of the first countries to ratify the Convention in 1949. Australia takes its obligations under the Genocide Convention very seriously.

In regard to the question of genocide, it is Australia's longstanding position to respect the independence of international courts and tribunals and their role in upholding international law. South Africa's case against Israel under the Genocide Convention is currently before the International Court of Justice.

On sanctions, Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich -for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions.

Applying them without warning—and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

Australia is part of the international effort to stop this war. Australia has not supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel for at least five years before this conflict started.

We maintain a robust and thorough export control regime, under which Defence undertakes a rigorous assessment of each application against a range of legislated criteria, including with respect to human rights and Australia's international obligations.

In relation to the International Criminal Court {ICC) issuing arrest warrants for

Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, Australia respects the independence of the ICC and its important role in upholding international law. Adherence to international law is a matter of principle and is in Australia's interests. Australia will act consistently with our obligations under international law.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan. On 21 September, we recognised a Palestinian state alongside the United Kingdom, Canada, and France, and will continue to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7857 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

Keeping Australians safe online is a top priority for the Australian Government. The Government is focused on positive solutions to issues of national concern, and the risk of harm to children and young people from social media is at the top of that list.

The social media minimum age requires age restricted social media platforms to prevent Australians under 16 years from having accounts. The legislation reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to harms experienced by children and young people on social media platforms, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

Preventing circumvention

I fully expect that some children will try to get around the new laws and to create or retain their social media accounts. That is why the Government has sought to proactively address this issue.

The eSafety Commissioner has released guidance for industry, which provides detailed information on the measures social media platforms are expected to have in place to comply with the minimum age legislation, come 10 December 2025. The guidance includes the expectation that platforms actively prevent, detect and respond to attempts by underage users to circumvent age assurance systems.

The independent Age Assurance Technology Trial, conducted by the Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS) found that age assurance providers are actively addressing known 'attack' methods—such as Al-generated spoofing, document forgeries and the use of VPNs to bypass age assurance systems. For example, geolocation software can be used to combat VPNs.

Given the availability of tools to address circumvention by underage users, the onus remains firmly on platforms to implement such systems. Ongoing monitoring and improvement will be important to maintain effectiveness against increasingly sophisticated 'attacks' over time.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

The Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. The legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Importantly, platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024}, unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email of 27 October 2025 regarding Petition EN7872, about the eSafety Commissioner.

The Online Safety Act 2021 (the Act) supports Australians online by establishing the office of the eSafety Commissioner (the CommissionerL Australia's independent regulator, who is responsible to promoting and improving online safety.

The Commissioner provides an important safety net for individuals, including children, who are facing online abuse, including child cyberbullying, image-based abuse, adult cyber abuse and illegal and restricted online content. eSafety's ability to respond quickly, uplift industry's systems and processes, and require industry transparency and accountability is critical to keeping Australians safer online.

The Act also enables industry associations to develop enforceable industry codes to regulate illegal and restricted content online. The Commissioner is responsible for determining whether these codes meet community standards.

The Commissioner has recently registered nine industry codes to protect children from age inappropriate content like pornography, self-harm material and high-impact violence material across a range of online services. These codes were registered following a public consultation process from 22 October—22 November 2024. This is a critical step in implementing the Act to keep Australians, particularly young people, safer online, and ensures that industry steps up to the plate to protect their users from harm.

Education and awareness raising are a key component of the Commissioner's functions. These functions provide Australians with practical skills and confidence to have safer and more positive experiences online, and to know where to go to seek help. eSafety's resources can be accessed online at www.esafety.gov.au, and cover a wide range of online safety matters, including mental health and social media, online gaming, addressing inappropriate online content, and responding to child cyberbullying.

The eSafety Commissioner follows a process clearly prescribed in the Online Safety Act 2021. If individuals have concerns about decisions made by the Commissioner, there are a number of ways they can raise their concerns. The Commissioner's powers, such as the ability to issue removal notices, are subject to important oversight mechanisms. Individuals and service providers affected by a reviewable decision of the Commissioner can request internal review of the decision, free of charge, if they believe the decision is unreasonable, unfair or otherwise wrong.

Individuals and service providers can also seek external review of the Commissioner's decision through the Administrative Review Tribunal and courts. Independent oversight is an important part of Australia's legal system and provides valuable guidance for the Commissioner about the interpretation of the Act and the scope of their powers.

eSafety has also published regulatory guidance about how it applies the Act to ensure there is transparency for the public and service providers about how it operates, and to ensure consistency of decision-making. This guidance is available at: www.esafety.gov.au/industry/regulatory-guidance.

Parliamentary processes such as Senate Estimates also provide an important mechanism through which to ensure eSafety is transparent and accountable in how it conducts its work. Furthermore, like other regulators, the Commissioner is subject to corporate accountability and governance oversight mechanisms. Annual reports and accountability reporting documents are published on the Commissioner's website.

The Government recognises the importance of ensuring that the Act remains fit-for-purpose and meets community expectations. To this end, the Government brought forward the independent statutory review of the Act by one year. The final report of this comprehensive review was informed by public consultation and stakeholder engagement. The Government is carefully considering the 67 recommendations arising from the review, which was tabled in Parliament on 4 February 2025.

In addition to the online safety regulatory framework, the Government has also recently announced $450,000 for SmackTalk to raise awareness of sexual extortion, and $6 million for online safety learning in schools enabling the continuation of the Alannah and Madeline Foundation's eSmart program and expanded digital literacy tools within schools.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 3 November 2025 concerning Petition EN7889 regarding the social media minimum age legislation.

Supporting parents, not platforms

The social media minimum age legislation requires platforms to prevent Australians under 16 from holding social media accounts. The legislation is clear that the onus is clearly on platforms—not parents—to prevent Australians under 16 from holding social media accounts

From 10 December, young Australians will have 3 more years to build the relationships and experiences that will better equip them to safely navigate the online world. To support this, the Government is continuing to invest in free digital literacy for Australian children, having recently committed funding for the Safe Kids are eSmart Kids initiative, delivered by the Alannah and Madeline Foundation (AMF). AMF is free and available for every Australian school, teaching young people aged 4 to 16 years old, how to be safe, smart and responsible in the digital world.

While the social media minimum age will go a long way in addressing online harm, it is one part in the Government's broader online safety agenda which includes an established online safety regulatory framework under the eSafety Commissioner and a commitment to legislate a Digital Duty of Care.

Impacts on vulnerable youth

I acknowledge the points raised in the petition regarding the benefits social media can provide, including learning, connection, and for Australians to find their communities. However, the evidence is also very clear that social media is causing us immense harm, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

The social media minimum age reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to those harms. We know these harms are heightened for vulnerable groups, including LGBTIQ+ youth, who are known to be on the receiving end of higher levels of hateful comments and content online.

Combatting circumvention

I fully accept that some children will attempt to get around age checks and create accounts on social media. The onus is on platforms to ensure compliance with the new obligation—and that includes avoiding circumvention.

We know platforms have tools at their disposal to combat circumvention, such as by detecting the use of VPNs. For example, many video streaming services (such as Netflix) employ these tools to meet local content and classification requirements.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

The legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Importantly, platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024}, unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Israel

Dear Chair

I am writing in response to petition EN8047. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain what the Australian Government is doing to respond to the conflict in Gaza.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire and the release of hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

On our own, Australia has few ways to move the dial in the Middle East. That is why we have been so focused on partnering with other countries that also wanted the fighting to stop, deliver lifesaving aid, secure the release of hostages, and work towards a two-state solution.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice. With the ceasefire now in place, we are seeing some signs that much-needed aid is starting to flow to civilians in Gaza who have endured unacceptable hardship.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest to do so. These channels enable us to advocate for Australia's interests and put forward Australia's views. 160 countries have diplomatic relations with Israel.

We use our diplomatic ties to press Israel to let humanitarian assistance into Gaza, to adhere to international law, and to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—ltamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan. On 21 September, we recognised a Palestinian state alongside the United Kingdom, Canada, and France, and will continue to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs,Senator Wong

Internet Content

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 3 November 2025 regarding Petition EN8155 about the eSafety Commissioner.

The Online Safety Act 2021 (the Act) supports Australians online by providing the eSafety Commissioner (the Commissioner), Australia's independent regulator for online safety, with powers to regulate seriously harmful online abuse, including child cyberbullying, image-based abuse, adult cyber abuse and illegal and restricted online content.

The Commissioner provides an important safety net for individuals, including children, who are facing online abuse. In the 2024-25 financial year alone, the Commissioner received over 3,400 child cyberbullying complaints, over 3,600 adult cyber-abuse complaints, over 6,500 image-based abuse complaints, and almost 20,000 complaints regarding illegal and restricted content. eSafety's ability to respond quickly, uplift industry's systems and processes, and require industry transparency and accountability, are critical to keeping Australians safer online.

The eSafety Commissioner follows a process clearly prescribed in the Online Safety Act 2021. If people have concerns about decisions made by the Commissioner there are a number of ways they can raise their concerns. The Commissioner's powers, such as the ability to issue removal notices, are subject to important oversight mechanisms. Individuals and service providers affected by a reviewable decision of the Commissioner can request internal review of the decision, free of charge, if they believe the decision is unreasonable, unfair or otherwise wrong.

Individuals and service providers can also seek external review of the Commissioner's decision through the Administrative Review Tribunal and courts. Independent oversight is an important part of Australia's legal system and provides valuable guidance for the Commissioner about the interpretation of the Act and the scope of their powers.

eSafety has also published regulatory guidance about how it applies the Act to ensure there is transparency for the public and service providers about how it operates, and to ensure consistency of decision-making. This guidance is available at: www.esafety.gov.au/industry/regulatory-guidance.

Parliamentary processes such as Senate Estimates also provide an important mechanism through which to ensure eSafety is transparent and accountable in how it conducts its work. Furthermore, like other regulators, the Commissioner is subject to corporate accountability and governance oversight mechanisms. Annual reports and accountability reporting documents are published on the Commissioner's website. eSafety's annual reports contain a range of useful information, including the number of complaints it has received, an overview of the types of complaints received, and enforcement actions it has taken.

To ensure the Act remains fit-for-purpose, the Government brought forward the independent statutory review of the Act by one year. The final report was informed by public consultation and stakeholder engagement. The Government is carefully considering the 67 recommendations arising from the review, which was tabled in Parliament on 4 February 2025.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybercrime

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 3 November 2025 regarding Petition EN8157 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

The Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. It is for that very reason that the legislation incorporates strong privacy protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes (including government identification), with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Importantly, as is suggested in the petition, the legislation requires that platforms destroy any information collected for age assurance purposes, after the process is complete. Where the platform wishes to retain that information for other purposes (such as curated content), it must seek the explicit agreement of the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is also clear that no Australian can be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 3 November 2025 regarding Petition EN8159 concerning the use of children's data on sites such as YouTube.

Uplifting privacy protections for children

I acknowledge the concerns raised in the petition about the collection, use and security of children's data by YouTube, and by digital services more broadly. In November last year, the Australian Government passed the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 to introduce specific, targeted privacy protections for children online. Those amendments provide for the development of a Children's Online Privacy Code (the Code) by December 2026, overseen by the Australian Information Commissioner.

The Code will set out how the Australian Privacy Principles are to be complied with by digital services when handling children's personal information. The Code would apply to social media (including YouTube) and other internet services likely to be accessed by children.

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) is currently developing the Code in consultation with a range of stakeholders including children, parents, child development experts, child welfare advocates, industry and the eSafety Commissioner. More information about the Code is on the OAIC's website: https://www.oaic.gov.au/

The social media minimum age

The importance of protecting Australians' data and privacy is also embedded in legislation introducing a social media minimum age. The legislation requires age restricted social media platforms to prevent Australians under 16 years from having accounts.

Those laws incorporate a requirement that platforms destroy data collected and used to assure age online, with serious penalties applicable for a breach of this requirement. Where a platform wishes to retain that data for other purposes (such as targeted content), they must seek the explicit consent of the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited services, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Cybersafety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your letter of 3 November 2025 regarding Petition EN8179 concerning the social media minimum age legislation.

I acknowledge the points raised in the petition regarding the benefits social media can provide, including self-expression, connection, and for Australians to find their communities. However, the evidence is also very clear that social media is causing harm to Australian kids, including problematic use, social isolation, poor mental health, and exposure to harmful content.

The social media minimum age reflects Australians' expectations for a strong regulatory response to those harms. We also know the harms are heightened for children and young people, and vulnerable groups, including LGBTIQ+ youth, who are known to be on the receiving end of higher levels of hateful comments and content online.

Balancing protection with connection

The social media minimum age legislation requires platforms to prevent Australians under 16 from holding social media accounts. This is about protecting young people-not punishing or isolating them-and letting parents know the Government is in their corner when it comes to supporting their children's health and wellbeing. The new laws do not seek to rule out digital participation for young people. Young Australians can continue to use the internet, messaging services and online games, amongst a range of other online services.

Over the past few months, I've sat down with many young people to hear their views on the social media minimum age. I've been heartened to hear that many are supportive of the measure. At the same time, many also told me that they didn't know life without social media, and that the adjustment was going to be hard.

That is why in October 2025, I hosted a roundtable with close to 20 youth mental health organisations to ensure they are prepared to help young people manage the changes. My department and the eSafety Commissioner have also worked hard to develop a suite of resources to support mental health experts, educators, and parents and carers to have conversations with young people about the new laws and how it will impact them.

These resources are available at esafety.gov.au. I would encourage the signatories of the petition to explore the materials and share them with the young people in their lives.

Privacy protections under the social media minimum age

The Government takes the privacy of Australians seriously. The legislation incorporates strong protections for information collected by platforms for age assurance purposes, with serious penalties applicable for breach of these requirements.

Platforms must not use information collected through age assurance methods for any other purpose, unless explicitly agreed by the user. This agreement must be voluntary, informed, current, specific and unambiguous—this is an elevated requirement, beyond what is required by the Privacy Act 1988, that precludes platforms from seeking consent through preselected settings or opt-outs.

The legislation is clear that no Australian will be forced to use government identification (including Digital ID) for age assurance on social media. The legislation specifies that platforms must not collect government-issued identification or require the use of Digital ID (provided by an accredited service, within the meaning of the Digital ID Act 2024), unless a reasonable alternate means is also offered.

While the social media minimum age will go a long way in addressing online harm, it is one part in the Government's broader online safety agenda which includes an established online safety regulatory framework under the eSafety Commissioner, investment in digital literacy through the Alannah and Madeline Foundation and a commitment to legislate a Digital Duty of Care. Collectively, these measures are uplifting online safety and contributing to healthier digital experiences for both Australian children and adults.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells

Albury-Wodonga: Mental Health

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 3 November 2025 regarding petition EN8181 which requests improved access to adolescent inpatient mental health beds in the Albury-Wodonga and Hume region.

I acknowledge the concerns raised by the petitioners and the broader Albury-Wodonga. community, who are seeking enhanced inpatient mental health services to meet the needs of young people in this cross-border region. The Australian Government is committed to improving access to health and hospital services so that all Australians receive appropriate health care when and where they need it, including in regional, rural and remote areas.

The National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA) sets out the agreed financial and governance arrangements for the funding of public hospital services in Australia. Under the NHRA, state and territory governments are recognised as the system managers of their public hospital systems, responsible for the day-to-day administration of their public hospitals. As such, the petitioners may wish to contact the New South Wales Minister for Health, the Hon Ryan Park MP, or the Victorian Minister for Health, the Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP regarding the issues raised in this petition.

The contact details for the respective ministers are as follows:

The Hon Ryan Park MP

Minister for Health

Minister for Regional Health

Minister for the lllawarra and the South Coast GPO Box 5341

SYDNEY NSW 2001

Email: office@park.minister.nsw.gov.au

The Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP Minister for Health

Minister for Health Infrastructure Minister for Ambulance Services Leader of the House

Level 22, 50 Lonsdale Street

MELBOURNE VIC 3000

Email: minister.health@health.vic.gov.au

As part of the NHRA, the state and territory governments have committed to providing eligible patients with the choice to receive public hospital services free-of-charge, on the basis of clinical need and within a clinically appropriate period. The NHRA also includes a strengthened commitment to improving the mental health outcomes of Australians and preventing suicides by reforming the provision of mental health care across the key areas of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.

Through the NHRA, the Government provides significant funding to assist states and territories with the costs of delivering public hospital services. In 2025-26, the Government is delivering an additional $1.8 billion to states and territories to fund public hospital and health services. Including its extra one-off funding boost, the Government's total funding contribution for public health and hospital services is now estimated to be $9.88 billion in 2025-26 to New South Wales, an increase of 11 per cent from 2024-25; and $8.18 billion in 2025-26 to Victoria, an increase of 12 per cent from 2024-25.

You may be interested to know that, under the Community Health and Hospitals Program for Victoria, the Government committed $14.5 million towards the development of a Mental Health Rehabilitation Unit and delivery of an expanded range of consulting clinical suites at Wodonga Hospital. The Federation Funding Agreement Schedule is published on the Federal Financial Relations website.

The Government has also allocated $38.5 million to New South Wales under the Albury-Wodonga Regional Deal to support a range of health infrastructure projects, which are being managed by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Middle East

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence referring petition number PN0637, regarding Palestinian self-determination and the situation in Gaza.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

Australia welcomes with immense relief the securing of a ceasefire and the release of the hostages. After more than two years of conflict and a devastating loss of civilian life, this is a much-needed step towards peace.

We want to see the ceasefire maintained and aid to flow unimpeded to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.

Australia has consistently been part of international calls for a ceasefire, return of the hostages, and the unimpeded flow of aid to Gaza. We urge all parties to respect the terms of the agreement and work towards implementing it in full.

Throughout this conflict, Australia has been a part of the international call on Israel to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid to Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Alongside our international partners, including the UK, Canada, and Japan, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food. The Prime Minister has made clear this is indefensible, and a breach of international law.

With the ceasefire now in place, we are seeing some signs that much-needed aid is starting to flow to civilians in Gaza who have endured unacceptable hardship. Together with our partners, we will work to support the sustained and unimpeded delivery of aid.

Australia has committed more than $130 million in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 2023. Our most recent commitment of $20 million was to support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza. We are delivering our aid with key partners, including in close coordination with the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

After a year-long diplomatic effort to drive global action to protect humanitarian workers in conflict zones, Australia was proud to lead the Declaration for the Protection of Humanitarian Personnel joined by more than 100 countries. The Declaration sets out practicable and actionable measures including: access to communications and equipment to stay safe in conflict zones; improved technology and planning tools; enhanced physical and mental health support for aid workers; new joint training for military personnel and aid workers; funding legal advice for aid workers who are victims of violence; and access to justice for aid workers killed or harmed in the line of duty. Humanitarian workers save lives. This work should never cost them their own.

Australia formally recognised the independent and sovereign State of Palestine on Sunday the 21st of September 2025, alongside Canada and the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australia recognised the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own.

Recognising Palestine reflects Australia's longstanding commitment to a two-state solution, which has always been the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples. It also reflects Australia's work with partners over many months to contribute momentum to peace and breaking the cycle of violence the Middle East has known for generations.

Australia will continue to work with our international partners to help build on our decision to recognise Palestine, and to bring the Middle East closer to the lasting peace and security that is the hope, and the right, of all humanity.

Australia has sanctioned two senior ministers in the Israeli Government—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—for their role in human rights abuses against Palestinians, along with other sanctions on Israeli extremist individuals and organisations. We imposed those sanctions in partnership with the UK, Canada, New Zealand and others.

We have worked with the international community to increase pressure on Israel, and we have seen Israel react to that pressure from Australia and others. Consistent with longstanding Australian Government policy, we do not speculate on future sanctions. Applying them without warning—and with partners—is what makes them more effective.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest to do so. These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country. 160 countries have diplomatic relations with Israel.

We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

Australia is part of the international effort to stop this war. Australia is not making weapons or ammunition in this country and supplying them to Israel. The Government has confirmed that Australia has not supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel in the five years prior to the conflict.

The Government continues to calibrate its approach to export permits as the circumstances of the conflict evolve. At the Deputy Prime Minister's direction, Defence is now publishing a greater level of detail about Australia's defence exports more frequently to ensure greater transparency. Since 7 October 2023, the Government has only approved new export permits to Israel for items that support Australian Defence or law enforcement capability, and that will return to Australia.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Albury-Wodonga: Hospitals

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 3 November 2025 regarding petition PN0645 which requests support for healthcare improvements in the Albury-Wodonga region and neighbouring towns, including Corowa, Rutherglen, Wahgunyah, and surrounding communities.

I acknowledge the concerns raised by the petitioners and the broader Albury-Wodonga community, who are seeking improved access to modern, high-quality health care services that can meet the growing needs of this growing cross-border region. The Australian Government is committed to improving access to health and hospital services so that all Australians receive appropriate health care when and where they need it, including in regional, rural and remote areas.

The National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA) sets out the agreed financial and governance arrangements for the funding of public hospital services in Australia. Under the NHRA state and territory governments are recognised as the system managers of their public hospital systems, responsible for the day-to-day administration of their public hospitals. As such, the petitioners may wish to contact the New South Wales Minister for Health, the Hon Ryan Park MP, or the Victorian Minister for Health, the Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP regarding the issues raised in this petition. The contact details for the respective Ministers are as follows:

The Hon Ryan Park MP Minister for Health

Minister for Regional Health

Minister for the lllawarra and the South Coast

GPO Box 5341

SYDNEY NSW 2001

Email: office@park.minister.nsw.gov.au

The Hon Mary-Anne Thomas MP

Minister for Health

Minister for Health Infrastructure

Minister for Ambulance Services

Level 22, 50 Lonsdale Street

MELBOURNE VIC 3000

Email: minister.health@health.vic.gov.au

As part of the NHRA, states have agreed that where cross-border activity occurs, such as patients travelling between Albury and Wodonga to receive treatment, the state where the patient would normally reside should meet the cost of the services. In administering these cross-border arrangements, states must recognise their commitment to provide eligible patients with the choice to receive public hospital services free-of-charge, on the basis of clinical need and within a clinically appropriate period.

Through the NHRA, the Government provides significant funding to assist states and territories with the costs of delivering public hospital services. In 2025-26, the Government is delivering an additional $1.8 billion to states and territories to fund public hospital and health services. Including its extra one-off funding boost, the Government's total funding contribution for public health and hospital services is now estimated to be $9.88 billion in 2025-26 to New South Wales, an increase of 11% from 2024-25 and $8.18 billion in 2025-26 to Victoria, an increase of 12% from 2024-25.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mr Butler

Taxation

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Petition EN4458 regarding cost-of-living relief and the former Stage 3 tax cuts.

When it comes to tax, the Government's priority is delivering three tax cuts for every single Australian taxpayer—one last year, one next year, and another the year after.

Starting from 1 July 2024, the Government has:

Reduced the 19 per cent tax rate to 16 per cent (for taxable income between $18,200 and $45,000).

Reduced the 32.5 per cent tax rate to 30 per cent (for taxable income between $45,000 and the new $135,000 threshold).

Increased the threshold above which the 37 per cent tax rate applies from $120,000 to $135,000.

Increased the threshold above which the 45 per cent tax rate applies from $180,000 to $190,000.

As a result of the Government's changes, tax cuts are already flowing to Australian taxpayers, with more than 14 million taxpayers estimated to have benefitted from the tax cuts since July 2024.