Presentation

EN10010

Australia has the potential to be a film industry powerhouse given the chance

We have screen Australia and other screens but they don't help independent film makers . The screens are full of actors and producers and directors and there friends. So they control who gets funds .

We therefore ask the House to consider investing in a film industry or help it.

We have everything in Australia to make films. Many good writers film makers but no one helps them . Independent film makers get no help. Foreign companies get help better than Australia citizens.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN10010)

EN10375

We are concerned about reported human rights violations affecting Pashtun and Baloch communities in Pakistan, including enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, unlawful detention, civilian casualties, displacement, and restrictions on peaceful expression and assembly.

We recognise concerns raised by Pashtun and Baloch communities, human rights defenders, civil society organisations, and peaceful movements, including the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM). The Pashtun National Jirga held in October 2024 also highlighted serious concerns regarding insecurity, enforced disappearances, displacement and the rights of Pashtun communities.

We believe Australia should promote universal human rights and encourage peaceful, democratic and lawful resolution of grievances.

We therefore ask the House to call upon the Australian Government to raise these concerns with the Government of Pakistan through appropriate diplomatic channels; encourage transparent and independent investigations into reported enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and unlawful detention; advocate for the protection of peaceful activists, journalists and human rights defenders; support freedom of expression and peaceful assembly; and encourage appropriate international monitoring and humanitarian assistance for affected Pashtun and Baloch communities.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN10375)

EN10376

The country needs an immediate change in government as the one in power now are failing to meet the peoples needs abs are failing this country as a whole

We therefore ask the House to pass the above mentioned vote of no confidence as a matter of urgency

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN10376)

EN10380

I believe that it's in Australia"s and the United States best interest to have a trade agreement with Iraq and Afghanistan for steel and petroleum which is paramount for prospering peace and stability and minimising wars in the middle east

We therefore ask the House to put in place a trade agreement with Iraq and Afghanistan for cheaper steel and petroleum which is paramount for prospering peace and stability in Iraq and Afghanistan which is needed in order to minimise the wars in the middle east

from one citizen (Petition No. EN10380)

EN10381

The current government funded employment agencies request their clients attend 30minutes appointments even if the client has medical certificates for up to 3months on a fortnightly basis. There's not much to achieve accept the resume is updated and ready when competent.

We therefore ask the House to not supply employment agencies with funding if not following current legislation.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN10381)

EN10382

The Australian Government's new emergency warning system forces mobile devices to broadcast alerts at 100% maximum volume, completely bypassing silent, mute, and Do Not Disturb settings.

While designed for public safety, this mandatory audio override poses a direct health hazard and causes severe physical pain to citizens suffering from severe sound-tolerance disabilities, including noxacusis, hyperacusis, misophonia, acoustic shock injuries, and severe PTSD. Forcing sudden, piercing, high-pitched frequencies into the homes and ears of these individuals causes physical injury, long-term ear damage, and psychological distress.

We therefore ask the House to direct the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts to mandate a "Medical Opt-Out" or "Vibrate/Flash Only" accessibility toggle within the mobile operating systems.

This toggle would allow citizens with certified medical or auditory conditions to disable or downgrade the audio siren of the emergency warning system without having to completely power off their communication devices.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN10382)

EN10385

We draw the attention of the House to concerns regarding the AusAlert emergency warning system. Emergency communication should not unnecessarily compromise Australians' privacy, autonomy, or control over their personal devices.

The ability of AusAlert to override user settings and activate a mandatory audible alarm raises concerns about compliance with the Privacy Act 1988, transparency, and the appropriate limits of government use of personal technology. Australians deserve clear information about how the system operates, what information is used, and what safeguards exist to prevent future expansion beyond genuine emergency purposes.

The mandatory audible alarm is also unnecessarily intrusive and may create avoidable safety risks by startling drivers, cyclists, heavy machinery operators, and others engaged in activities requiring concentration. Emergency warnings should inform the public without introducing new hazards.

Australia has successfully relied on emergency broadcasts through radio, television, SMS, websites, and emergency services for many years. Any new national warning system should be developed with public consultation, independent oversight, and respect for privacy and individual choice.

We therefore ask the House to suspend the AusAlert system in its current form, undertake an independent review of its privacy implications and compliance with the Privacy Act 1988, and publish the findings. We further ask that a nationwide public consultation be conducted to determine how Australians wish to receive emergency warnings before any permanent system is implemented. Any future warning system should use the least intrusive means necessary, preserve individual choice wherever possible, and prioritise both public safety and the privacy rights of all Australians.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN10385)

EN10388

Every child has the right to grow up safe and free from violence. Despite ongoing reforms, too many children continue to be exposed to harm where there is evidence of domestic and family violence. Children who experience or witness violence can suffer lifelong physical, emotional, and psychological harm. We believe that where there is evidence of domestic and family violence, including coercive control, threats, or repeated breaches of protection orders, every parenting decision should prioritise the safety and wellbeing of the child.

We therefore ask the House to We therefore ask the House to Therefore, we ask the House to: Review and strengthen the Family Law Act 1975 to ensure children's safety remains the paramount consideration in parenting decisions where there is evidence of domestic and family violence. This review should strengthen protections for children, improve information sharing between family courts, police and child protection agencies, and ensure evidence of family violence is given appropriate weight in parenting proceedings. We are their voice. Protect our children from family violence.

Principal Petitioner Information

from six citizens (Petition No. EN10388)

EN10389

Australians have the right to make informed decisions about medical treatment. Many people believe that this right should also include the ability to choose the source of blood they receive during a blood transfusion.

Under the current system, patients generally receive blood supplied through the national blood service and have very limited ability to nominate a donor of their own choosing. This removes an important element of personal autonomy and informed consent.

Where a spouse, family member or friend is willing and eligible to donate blood, and that blood meets the same testing and safety standards required of all donated blood, patients should have the right to receive blood from that donor if they choose.

This petition seeks to ensure that Australians are given greater choice over their own medical treatment by recognising the right of patients to nominate an eligible blood donor of their choosing.i

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation that guarantees every Australian the right to choose the source of blood they receive during a blood transfusion, including the right to receive blood from an eligible donor of their own choosing who has met all applicable blood safety screening requirements.

from 1,064 citizens (Petition No. EN10389)

EN10390

We, the undersigned, draw to the attention of the House that fuel excise is automatically indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), resulting in periodic increases without parliamentary approval.

Fuel excise provides important Commonwealth revenue. However, increases in fuel costs contribute to higher transport costs, which are reflected in the price of freight, food, goods and essential services throughout Australia. During periods of significant inflationary and cost-of-living pressure, automatic increases occur without Parliament considering their economic impact.

Taxes that increase automatically without a vote of Parliament reduce parliamentary oversight and accountability.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Excise Tariff Act so that any future increase in fuel excise requires the approval of the Australian Parliament following consideration of its impact on Australian households, businesses and the economy.

from 24 citizens (Petition No. EN10390)

EN10391

Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, was banned from Australia just over a year ago for his antisemitic remarks online.

He has since formally apologised for these remarks, met with official Rabbi Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto to apologise to the international Jewish community and took out a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal to again apologise and explain how medical oversight following his 2002 car accident contributed to his undiagnosed bipolar disorder.

I, along with many other Australians, believe that maintaining Ye's ban serves no constructive purpose. Lifting the ban would also have the potential to bring millions of dollars into the Australian economy through concerts, tour dates, and related tourism and spending.

We therefore ask the House to lift the travel restrictions on Ye and allow him into our country.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN10391)

EN10396

Unlike any medical condition, mental health touches the lives of everyone yet it is the least understood, the most poorly managed, and receives the least amount of government funding.

We therefore ask the House to implement changes that support an improvement in communication and collaboration across all services and settings to reduce the divide between medical and mental health treatment in support of holistic care, and furthermore reduce the divide between mental health service providers to support continuity of care.

We would like to ask the house to:

fund free psychology that is accessible by all patients/clients across all public health services and settings; expand community mental health services to support chronic mental health care needs; further establish mental health prevention and public health support services to encourage early engagement, encompassing more than suicide prevention; review current barriers that prevent psychiatric inpatients the ability to access their routine mental health support services and providers.

from 44 citizens (Petition No. EN10396)

EN10397

We get all sorts of gambling rammed down our throats everywhere but you banned part of a video game I feel like there bigger fish to worry about instead of a game. GTA online casino shouldn't be banned it makes no sense to do so

We therefore ask the House to unbanned GTA online casino

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN10397)

EN10398

Australians already spend billions of dollars each year on online gambling, yet licensed online casino games such as pokies, roulette, blackjack and baccarat remain unavailable through Australian operators. This has encouraged many Australians to use offshore gambling websites that operate outside Australian laws, reducing consumer protection and limiting the Government's ability to regulate the industry effectively. A regulated Australian online casino market would provide stronger safeguards through identity verification, mandatory responsible gambling tools, deposit limits, self-exclusion programs and regulatory oversight. Legalisation would also generate tax revenue that could be directed towards gambling harm prevention, mental health services and public infrastructure while creating Australian jobs in technology, compliance and customer support. Rather than driving demand to unregulated overseas operators, Australia should provide a safe, transparent and accountable domestic alternative that protects consumers and keeps economic benefits within Australia.

We therefore ask the House to review the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 and introduce legislation allowing licensed Australian operators to offer regulated online casino games, including online pokies and live table games, under strict consumer protection requirements, responsible gambling measures, and strong federal oversight.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN10398)

EN10399

This petition of certain citizens and residents of Australia draws to the attention of the House that under current Australian Consumer Law (ACL), online transactions and digital bookings are categorised under "change of mind" provisions if made erroneously or accidentally.

Consequently, businesses—including publicly funded statutory bodies and cultural institutions- are under no legal obligation to provide a refund, transaction reversal, or credit option, even if the consumer identifies the error and contacts the merchant within minutes of execution. This lack of regulatory protection exposes Australian families and consumers to immediate, non-recoverable financial loss for simple digital input errors, offering no reasonable grace window to correct genuine mistakes in an increasingly digitised economy.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 and the Australian Consumer Law to introduce a mandatory, minimum one-hour "cooling-off" or grace period for all point-of-sale digital bookings and electronic transactions, allowing consumers to cancel accidental transactions without financial penalty.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN10399)

EN10401

Tipping might not be as ingrained in Australian culture as it is in the United States, but it's here to stay and it's becoming more common every year. Whether it's at your local café, a restaurant or through a food delivery app, more Australians are leaving tips for good service.

In fact, despite the cost-of-living crunch, the average tip in Australia increased by 25% between 2024 and 2025.

However, did you know that employers have zero legal obligations to pass tips on to employees?

That's right. The 10% tip you gave to that excellent waiter last week; there is zero legal guarantee they ever saw a cent of it.

Most hospitality businesses do the right thing and pass tips on to their staff. But without any legal protections, there are still businesses that don't do the right thing.

Over my 12 years working in hospitality, I've seen tips:

• Used to cover breakages.

• Paid out based on written knowledge tests.

• Given only to long-term staff, while newer employees got nothing.

As tipping becomes more common, our laws haven't kept up.

No matter where you stand on tipping, I think most Australians would agree on one thing: if you leave a tip for a worker, that money should go to the worker.

We therefore ask the House to make legilastion that

• Require employers to pass tips on to employees.

• Require hospitality businesses to have a clear, written tipping policy that's available to both staff and customers.

from 46 citizens (Petition No. EN10401)

EN10402

Any R18+ games in Australia should be able to use casinos, gamble or play luck games to win in game consumables.

We therefore ask the House to remove ban on video game gambling for R18+ games.

from 13 citizens (Petition No. EN10402)

EN10404

Historically, the queue release dates for Subclass 143 and Subclass 864 visas have been broadly aligned, creating a legitimate expectation that applicants would receive comparable treatment within the Contributory Parent visa program.

Many families lodged Subclass 143 applications in good faith, paid substantial fees, and made significant decisions based on the migration policies and processing arrangements in place at the time. Many 143 applicants who became eligible for Subclass 864 during waiting chose not to switch because both subclasses had historically progressed at a similar rate.

Ministerial Direction 117 departs from this longstanding practice by prioritising Subclass 864 applications over Subclass 143 applications, disadvantaging applicants who relied on previous government policy and undermining procedural fairness and legitimate expectations.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Establish a fair and transparent allocation approach between Subclass 143 and Subclass 864 applications

The Government should ensure that changes to processing priorities do not result in different queue release dates Subclass 143 and Subclass 864 applications.

2. Create a transitional pathway allowing eligible long-waiting Subclass 143 applicants to transfer to Subclass 864 while retaining their original queue date

Where a Subclass 143 applicant has waited for a substantial period and subsequently meets the age eligibility requirements for Subclass 864, the applicant should be permitted to transfer their application without losing their original queue position.

from 3,369 citizens (Petition No. EN10404)

EN10406

Thousands of Australians provide full-time unpaid care for a loved one who is elderly, living with disability, or has a serious medical condition. Many carers are unable to work because of their caring responsibilities.

The current Carer Payment partner income and assets test assumes carers have access to their partner's financial resources. However, this is not always the case. Some carers have little or no financial independence, and in many households a single income is not enough to meet the cost of living.

Unpaid carers save the Australian Government billions of dollars each year by helping loved ones remain at home and reducing pressure on the health, disability and aged care systems. We believe the current eligibility rules do not reflect the financial realities faced by many carers and should be reviewed.

We therefore ask the House to review the partner income and assets test for the Carer Payment and consult with carers and relevant organisations to ensure the eligibility rules better reflect the financial realities faced by Australia's unpaid carers, including households where one income is insufficient or where carers have limited access to household finances

from 290 citizens (Petition No. EN10406)

EN10408

Ban Hassan Piker from Australia.

Aimed at stopping him from spreading hate speech, antisemitism, and extremist views in the country.

We therefore ask the House to Ban Hassan entry to Australia.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN10408)

EN10409

The Petition of residents of the State of Queensland draws to the attention of the House that to assist with the cost of living to have the mandated vaccinations to receive the Childcare Subsidy be removed.

Give parents the right to choose what's best for their family by vaccinating or not without financial punishment. This will give those parents who choose not to vaccinate the chance to give their children an education and social life while they stay home with younger siblings or for the parent/s the ability to return to work to support their family's, without paying the full costs of daycare.

We therefore ask the House to do everything in its power to cause a change in the requirements for Childcare Subsidy to exclude mandatory Childhood vaccinations.

from 19 citizens (Petition No. EN10409)

EN10411

Australia is a nation of pioneers, yet when it comes to human spaceflight we are sitting on the sidelines while other nations play the game. We have trained astronauts ready to go, but no consistent, sovereign pathway for them to fly. Every dollar spent on space stays right here, building local jobs and technology that flow through to farming, healthcare and disaster response. Without a program of our own, we will keep sending our best space talent overseas to work under other flags. That is not who we are. We back our own, and it is time we backed our astronauts too.

We therefore ask the House to establish and permanently fund a sovereign Australian human spaceflight program, giving Australian-trained astronauts guaranteed and ongoing opportunities to fly to the International Space Station, the Moon and beyond, in partnership with international space agencies. They have done the hard yards and are ready to reach the try line. All they need now is their country to run onto the field beside them.

from 23 citizens (Petition No. EN10411)

EN10414

Stop letting America build military, satellite and weapons facilities on our soil! The construction of a new base in victoria has already been approved without Australia agreeing, The base would be Victoria on aboriginal land, and used for weapons storage to use in forgein wars and drag us into a war we did not agree to! Say no to war and no to the construction of this facility or any more American buildings on our land!

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Raise this matter in parliament, calling for a full public audit of all US-linked facilities, contracts, and projects across Australia.

2. Demand clarity on what Australia gains from these arrangements, and what risks we are accepting without our consent.

3. Support First Nations rights—ensuring Traditional Owners are properly consulted, compensated, and given a genuine say over land use.

4. Advocate for our laws first—requiring all works on Australian soil be subject to Australian law, parliamentary oversight, and full public disclosure.

5. Push for an independent review of Pine Gap's role, its legal status, and whether it truly serves Australian national interests.

6. Cancel the plans for the Bandiana, Victoria project and not allow for weapons of mass destruction to be stored in Australia.

from 41 citizens (Petition No. EN10414)

EN10416

The TGA and Australian government banning the use of less harmful smokeless options to consume nicotine!

We therefore ask the House to immediately overturn the ban on Swedish snus and allow its regulated sale to Australian adults.

We believe the current prohibition is not based on genuine public health concerns but is instead driven by the Government's desire to protect tobacco tax revenue. While cigarettes remain legally available despite causing enormous harm, Australians are denied access to a smokeless alternative that we believe is significantly less harmful than smoking.

Sweden has demonstrated that widespread access to snus can coincide with dramatic reductions in cigarette smoking. Rather than supporting harm reduction, Australia's current policy leaves smokers with fewer lower-risk alternatives while continuing to permit the sale of combustible cigarettes.

We call on the Australian Government to:

   • Remove the ban on Swedish snus.

   • Establish a regulated legal market with strict quality standards and age restrictions.

   • Recognise harm reduction as a key component of tobacco policy.

   • Put the health and freedom of Australian adults ahead of taxation and bureaucracy.

Australians deserve the right to choose less harmful alternatives to smoking. We believe the current policy is inconsistent, unfair, and does not serve the best interests of public health. It is time for Australia to follow the evidence and allow adult Australians access to regulated Swedish snus.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN10416)

EN10417

We believe that certain decisions of the Australian Government have reduced public confidence in governance and affected the well-being of Australians. We are concerned these matters require further consideration and review through appropriate parliamentary processes.

We support a united, democratic Australia where people of all backgrounds live together in harmony. We value multiculturalism and welcome migrants who respect Australia's laws, democratic institutions, culture, and values; whilst maintaining traditions consistent with Australian law.

Australians have 17 concerns requiring urgent attention. Three key issues are: (1) the level of international and domestic organisations' and interest groups' taxpayer funding; (2) current immigration settings, including the scale of legal and unlawful immigration, causing immense pressures on housing, infrastructures and essential services, and consistent enforcement of immigration and criminal laws; (3) the volume and impact of recent legislation, particularly tax measures on Australians and businesses.

Information on ALL issues is contained in a separate document we wished could accompany this petition.

We therefore ask the House to tatives consider these concerns and take appropriate lawful parliamentary action, including reviewing relevant policies, processes and measures available to restore public confidence.

We further urge comprehensive reviews of recent and proposed legislation and policies; stronger support for Australians and businesses; and full enforcement of immigration and citizenship laws—including enactment of legislation for deportation and/or revocation of citizenship to deal with criminal offences. We also want legislation be enacted for the same legal measures applying to returning ISIS-affiliated individuals.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN10417)

EN7971

Low-income households struggle with energy bills. Fusion can provide affordable, stable power to reduce inequality.

We therefore ask the House to commit fusion energy to addressing energy poverty.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7971)

EN7972

Data centres consume vast electricity. Fusion offers clean power to support AI and digital industries.

We therefore ask the House to integrate fusion into digital and AI infrastructure policy.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7972)

EN7973

New housing requires stable, affordable power. Fusion can underpin expansion while keeping household costs down.

We therefore ask the House to include fusion in housing and infrastructure planning.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7973)

EN7974

Ports and shipping rely on fossil fuels. Fusion energy can support clean port infrastructure and future propulsion.

We therefore ask the House to fund fusion pilots for ports and maritime industry.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7974)

EN7975

Major projects require abundant energy. Fusion provides secure supply for rail, roads, and airports.

We therefore ask the House to link fusion energy to national infrastructure investment.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7975)

EN9216

To the Honourable the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives,

We draw the attention of the House to growing public concern about antisemitism and extremist ideological influence within Australia's political discourse, including allegations raised in relation to elected representatives and party organisations.

Following recent terrorist violence, rising antisemitic incidents, and increased community tension, many Australians are seeking reassurance that all political parties and representatives unequivocally reject antisemitism, violent extremism, and ideologies that seek to undermine Australia's democratic and constitutional order, including any support for Islamic State-inspired statehood concepts.

Public confidence has been affected by:

Reports of antisemitic rhetoric or conduct linked to political activism;

Concerns about whether extremist ideologies are being legitimised through political platforms or associations;

The absence of an independent, authoritative inquiry to assess these matters objectively; and

The need for clear standards ensuring that elected officials uphold democratic values, social cohesion, and national security.

Australians expect that all political parties—without exception—are held to the same standards of accountability, transparency, and rejection of hate-based or violent ideologies.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Establish a Royal Commission or independent judicial inquiry to examine allegations of antisemitism and extremist ideological influence across political parties, including party leadership, members, and affiliated organisations;

2. Assess whether any conduct, associations, or advocacy may undermine Australia's laws, democratic institutions, or community safety;

3. Make public findings and recommendations to strengthen safeguards against hate-based extremism in political life; and

4. Ensure accountability measures are applied consistently across all parties and representatives.

This petition seeks truth, transparency, and public confidence, not predetermined conclusions.

from one citizen (Petition No. EN9216)

EN9218

We draw the attention of the House to growing public concern about antisemitism, political extremism, and radicalisation in Australia, particularly following recent terrorist violence, rising community tensions, and widespread debate about political accountability.

Many Australians believe that any proposed National Royal Commission into antisemitism and extremism must be comprehensive, impartial, and apply equally to all political parties and representatives, without exemption.

Public confidence in democratic institutions depends on transparent examination of serious allegations wherever they arise. Concerns have been raised in public discourse about whether some political parties, leaders, or members may have engaged in, tolerated, or failed to adequately address:

Antisemitic conduct, rhetoric, or incitement;

Associations with or legitimisation of extremist ideologies hostile to Jewish Australians or democratic values;

Inadequate internal accountability mechanisms when serious allegations are made.

Australians are not seeking predetermined conclusions, but rather independent fact-finding, due process, and clear standards of accountability to ensure political discourse remains lawful, respectful, and consistent with Australia's democratic values.

Without equal scrutiny across all parties, there is a risk that public trust will continue to erode and that social cohesion will be undermined.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Ensure that any National Royal Commission into antisemitism and extremism has authority to examine allegations across all political parties and representatives equally;

2. Empower the Commission to investigate conduct, governance, and accountability mechanisms where credible concerns arise;

3. Require public reporting of findings, consistent with due process; and

4. Consider recommendations for enforceable standards, transparency, and accountability to protect democratic integrity, social cohesion, and public safety.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9218)

EN9228

Establish an independent Royal Commission to investigate Australia's LNG taxation and royalty framework;

Examine PRRT design, deductions, uplift rates, and transfer pricing practices;

Investigate the role of intermediaries, foreign ownership, and marketing arrangements;

Assess ministerial, regulatory, and policy decisions contributing to revenue outcomes; and

Recommend enforceable reforms to en

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Establish an independent Royal Commission into Australia's LNG taxation and royalty framework;

2. Examine PRRT design, deductions, uplift rates, and transfer pricing practices;

3. Investigate intermediary arrangements, foreign ownership, and gas marketing structures;

4. Assess ministerial, regulatory, and policy decisions affecting public revenue outcomes; and

5. Recommend enforceable reforms to ensure transparency, accountability, and a fair public return on Australia's gas resources.

from four citizens (Petition No. EN9228)

EN10014

Australia has great resources we could sell to world Minerals. Livestock.crop.

We therefore ask the House to consider selling Australian livestock and crop and minerals to world. Advertising campaigns. Opals and kangaroo meat skins. . Sheep cattle. Camels . 1000s of wild camels could be caught sold to Arabic countries.

Billion dollar industry. With everything we could sell overseas

from two citizens (Petition No. EN10014)

EN10034

Cancer is bad and needs for research funding. For potential cures

We therefore ask the House to consider funding research into. Fendbendazole and ivermectin if this combination is a cure for cancer as people have stated

from three citizens (Petition No. EN10034)

EN10419

We, the undersigned, draw the attention of the House to the growing impact of frailty on older Australians. Around one in five Australians aged 65 years and over are living with frailty, and almost one in two more are pre-frail, placing them at increased risk of falls, disability, hospitalisation and loss of independence.

Frailty is associated with reduced quality of life, increased need for health and aged-care services, and loss of independence. Much of this decline is preventable through maintaining muscle strength across the lifespan.

Muscle strength is a fundamental determinant of health, physical function and healthy ageing. Strong evidence shows that regular muscle-strengthening activities reduce the risk of falls, frailty, disability and many chronic health conditions, while helping older Australians remain independent.

Australia's Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines recommend muscle-strengthening activities on at least two days each week. However, only 27% of Australian adults report meeting this recommendation, and many Australians continue to view strength training as an activity primarily for athletes or younger people rather than an essential part of lifelong health.

We therefore ask the House to call on the Australian Government to develop, fund and implement a sustained, evidence-based national public health education campaign that raises awareness of the importance of muscle strength, addresses misconceptions about strength training, promotes safe muscle-strengthening activities for Australians of all ages and abilities, and integrates consistent messaging into existing health promotion, healthy ageing and chronic disease prevention initiatives.

from 53 citizens (Petition No. EN10419)

EN10420

The recent ABC Four Corners investigation ("Duped: Food Exposed") revealed profound systemic failures in Australia's food supply chain, exposing widespread food fraud, including toxic chemical contamination in spices, illegal meat substitutions, and deceptive country-of-origin labeling. Currently, Australia lacks a unified, proactive federal authority to investigate food crime. Responsibility is fragmented across inadequate local council inspectors and under-resourced state food authorities that rely primarily on reactive consumer complaints rather than routine, rigorous testing. This regulatory vacuum allows illicit imported food products to easily bypass detection, putting public health at severe risk and forcing honest Australian farmers into an unfair, unsustainable price war against unverified, counterfeit competitors. Peer nations, including the United Kingdom, have successfully mitigated these threats by establishing centralized, dedicated enforcement bodies like the National Food Crime Unit (NFCU) to actively hunt, intercept, and prosecute food criminals. Australia urgently requires an equivalent independent federal regulator to protect its citizens, secure national biosecurity, and restore trust in our food system.

We therefore ask the House to introduce legislation to establish a dedicated, independent National Food Fraud Regulator with the federal authority and funding to:

- Conduct mandatory, proactive random testing on imported and domestic food supplies.

- Investigate and criminally prosecute companies, syndicated and individuals involved in food adulteration and labeling deception, including the sale of such items.

- Coordinate a centralized national intelligence network to trace and eliminate food fraud across all states and territories.

from five citizens (Petition No. EN10420)

EN10421

Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza. Just this week most of Gaza's medical supplies were destroyed by the zionists running Israel.

Maxx Plank Institute says up to 186,000 people in Gaza have been killed by Israel.

A simple pennies and dollars problem most Australians are suffering at the moment is fuel prices are going up because the zionists running Israel attacked Iran.

The Ambassador for Israel is an ambassador for a genocidal state committing war crimes throughout the Middle East.

We therefore ask the House to close the Israeli embassy in Canberra and send the Ambassador home.

from 7,372 citizens (Petition No. EN10421)

EN10422

University education is a public good that benefits all Australians through a more skilled workforce, stronger economy, and better health and social outcomes. Since 1989, Australian students have been required to take on HECS/HELP debt, unlike citizens of many comparable nations such as Scotland, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Germany, where domestic students pay little or no tuition. Indexation of HELP debts has recently caused large jumps in balances, creating a sense of unfair "lifetime tax" on graduates and deterring people from low-income, regional and first-in-family backgrounds from studying, especially in long or expensive degrees. This undermines equity, workforce planning in critical areas like nursing, teaching and allied health, and intergenerational fairness.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Abolish all student contribution fees for Australian citizens in Commonwealth Supported Places at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, effectively making university free at the point of study.

2. Cancel all existing HECS/HELP debts owed by Australian citizens.

3. Fully fund universities through the Commonwealth budget, maintaining or increasing per-student funding to protect quality and access, with priority investment in nursing, teaching, allied health, psychology and regional healthcare courses.

4. Commission a review of higher education funding to ensure long-term sustainability, equity of access for regional and disadvantaged students, and alignment with national workforce needs.

This reform would bring Australia into line with countries that treat tertiary education as a right, not a source of lifelong debt, and would reduce financial barriers that currently limit opportunity for everyday Australians.

from 95 citizens (Petition No. EN10422)

EN10424

Small businesses across Australia are often required to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars fitting out leased commercial premises before they can commence trading. This includes walls, plumbing, electrical works, cabinetry, flooring, consulting rooms, accessibility upgrades and other structural improvements that are essential to operating their business.

Under the current tax system, much of this expenditure is deducted over 40 years, despite many small businesses occupying premises for only five to ten years. This creates a significant mismatch between the commercial life of the investment and the tax treatment, placing unnecessary pressure on cash flow and discouraging investment, expansion and employment.

Australia also has some of the highest commercial fit-out costs in the Asia-Pacific region, further increasing the financial burden on small businesses.

We therefore ask the House to amend Commonwealth taxation legislation so that eligible commercial fit-out expenditure incurred by businesses with aggregated annual turnover of $10 million or less may be deducted over the shorter of:

• 10 years; or

• the initial qualifying lease term.

We further ask that any remaining undeducted balance be immediately deductible when an eligible business permanently vacates the premises and the fit-out is abandoned, demolished or removed without compensation.

This reform would better align the tax treatment of commercial fit-outs with their practical economic life, improve small business cash flow, encourage investment, support employment and reduce barriers to establishing and growing Australian businesses.

from 163 citizens (Petition No. EN10424)

EN10425

The destructive Varroa Destructor Mite arrived on Australian shores in 2022 and has since made its way through NSW, QLD, Victoria and South Australia. It has taken a devastating toll on Honey Bees during since, destroying Bee Hives, in some cases up to 90% in many areas. Beekeepers have worn the cost of fighting this mite and its associated devastation by themselves. Australia's diverse climate also significant challenges in managing this mite, as local conditions and temperature variations determine what treatments should be undertaken and when—with some overseas treatment methods and processes not even practical in many parts of Australia due to Winter conditions essentially being non-existent.

Apis mellifera are responsible for the pollination of the food we consume AND export to the rest of the world. Even a 50% reduction in the number of bee hives available for commercial pollination activities could result in a 50% reduction in successful fruit/vegetable set—directly and immediately affecting our food supply here in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to

Firstly—Provide regulatory action through the APVMA by providing "Own Use" permits for Oxalic Acid and Formic Acid the most effective chemicals in the fight against Varroa Destructor.

Secondly—the APVMA issue an emergency permit for the use of Norroa.

Thirdly—financial support to beekeepers for the replacement of equipment, Queen Bees and Colonies which are no longer viable due to the swift and brutal action of Varroa and associated pest, causing sudden and terminal colony collapse.

from 14,597 citizens (Petition No. EN10425)

EN10426

Prolonged processing delays and prolonged periods of administrative inactivity for offshore Partner Visas (Subclasses 300 and 309) are causing severe emotional, mental, and financial hardship for Australian citizens, permanent residents, and their families. Many applicants experience extended timelines well beyond published global median benchmarks without updates, clear communication, or progress on their files. While rigorous security, health, and identity checks remain essential, the current backlogs leave families separated indefinitely.

We therefore ask the House to Home Affairs allocate adequate administrative resources to offshore processing posts, clear long-standing application backlogs, and improve processing transparency and communication for offshore Partner Visa applicants.

from 1,682 citizens (Petition No. EN10426)

EN10430

The current Child Support Assessment Scheme does not always fairly reflect the realities of modern Australian families, shared parenting arrangements, and the true financial circumstances of both parents.

The Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 was developed at a time when family structures and parenting arrangements were different from those experienced by many families today. The current system can create unfair outcomes where:

- Parents providing significant direct care and financial support for their children may still face substantial child support liabilities.

- The assessment formula does not always adequately consider the actual costs each parent incurs while caring for their children.

- Shared-care arrangements are not always reflected fairly in financial assessments.

- Additional expenses such as medical, educational, therapy, and activity costs may not be adequately recognised.

- The use of gross income rather than a more accurate reflection of disposable financial capacity may create inequitable outcomes.

We therefore ask the House to

1. Establish an independent review of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989.

2. Examine whether the current formula fairly reflects modern shared parenting arrangements.

3. Review whether assessments should better account for each parent's actual financial capacity, living costs, and direct expenditure on children.

4. Consider reforms that improve transparency, fairness, and consistency in child support decisions.

5. Ensure that the best interests of children remain the primary consideration while also recognising the financial realities faced by both parents.

from 105 citizens (Petition No. EN10430)

EN10431

The petition of the undersigned shows that, from 24 July 2026, adult Australians no longer have any lawful pathway to buy or import oral nicotine pouches, and medical practitioners can no longer prescribe them. This removed the previous prescription-based pathway, including through the Special Access Scheme, the Authorised Prescriber Scheme and the Personal Importation Scheme. Petitioners support strong protections for young people and appropriate regulation of nicotine products, but are concerned that Australia has removed regulated adult access altogether.

Overseas, access is preserved subject to safeguards, including in Sweden and Canada, where oral nicotine products are subject to age limits, health warnings, sales controls or pharmacy restriction. Petitoners further note that nicotine pouches may assist some adult nicotine consumers to manage nicotine dependence while avoiding cigarettes and other higher-risk nicotine products, and that the United States Food and Drug Administration has determined that permitting the marketing of certain oral nicotine pouch products is appropriate for the protection of public health.

We therefore ask the House to call on the Minister for Health and Aged Care to reinstate the lawful prescription pathway for adult access to oral nicotine pouches pending development, under Commonwealth law, of a clear, evidence-based pathway for assessment and approval, consistent with overseas models including the US Food and Drug Administration's PMTA pathway, Canada's Natural Health Product licensing framework for nicotine buccal pouches, the Philippines' Standard licensing scheme for nicotine pouches, and the United Arab Emirates' ECAS-based technical regulation for tobacco-free nicotine pouches.

from 4,101 citizens (Petition No. EN10431)

EN10433

The climate crisis is a real and imposing danger to Australia, with data centre projects being placed in already drought prone areas across Australia, with Europe on fire, with Canada on fire, with the UK experiencing drought and record breaking heat recorded across the globe, it is only a matter of time before things get even worse in Australia, with a record breaking El Nino predicted to land soon. Australians deserve to be protected by their government from corporations that take the resources of our beautiful land and destroy our wildlife and ruin our economy in the process. Instead, our government cozies up with these people with promises of jobs and donations. Enough is enough. We need our government to take proper, meaningful climate action, not in 2030, not in 2050, we need it now. Today. Yesterday was the time but it's already passed, so we demand the government start making meaningful progress towards the climate crisis and preparing Australia for the increased bushfires, droughts and famine today!

We therefore ask the House to take the climate crisis seriously. Start dismantling and moving away from fossil fuels and CO2 heavy energy and exercises TODAY. No more NetZero sometime in the future, start making actual meaningful action right now. We ask the House to say NO to Data Centers, to mining billionaires and to start actually caring about the planet we live on and the beautiful country that is Australia being needlessly killed by the 'Drill baby Drill' mindset.

from 50 citizens (Petition No. EN10433)

EN10434

Thousands of skilled Australians are struggling to find employment while an increasing number of professional and technical jobs are being outsourced overseas primarily to reduce labour costs. This trend reduces opportunities for Australian graduates and experienced workers, weakens the nation's skills base, and limits long-term economic growth.

We believe Australian workers should be given a fair opportunity to compete for jobs created by Australian businesses and supported by the Australian economy. While international business and global collaboration remain important, greater emphasis should be placed on retaining skilled employment within Australia wherever practical.

We call on the Australian Government to review the impact of offshore outsourcing, encourage businesses to create and retain jobs locally, and implement policies that support employment for skilled Australians while maintaining Australia's economic competitiveness.

We therefore ask the House to protect skilled Australian workers and strengthen Australia's workforce by introducing legislation to limit the offshoring of Australian jobs where suitably qualified Australians are available. Reviewing the feasibility of applying taxes, levies, or penalties to companies that offshore roles primarily to reduce costs. Restricting outsourcing of critical and publicly funded roles where maintaining Australian capability is essential.

Requiring large companies to disclose the number of Australian jobs moved offshore and the reasons for those decisions. Investing in programs that strengthen Australia's skilled workforce and improve employment opportunities. Providing incentives for businesses that create, retain, and invest in skilled Australian jobs.

These actions would help maintain Australia's skills base, support local employment, and ensure economic growth benefits Australian workers and communities.

from 76 citizens (Petition No. EN10434)

EN10435

Photographs taken for driver licences are provided solely for identity verification when driving. Increasingly, these images are being accessed by government agencies and private companies for facial recognition purposes—including through schemes like the National Facial Biometric Matching Capability—without the explicit, informed consent of licence holders. This is often justified as necessary for "public safety" or "security," yet many Australians have never agreed to have their licence photo used to train or run facial recognition systems. This technology carries real risks: misidentification, discriminatory error rates across demographic groups, irreversible biometric data breaches (unlike a password, a face can't be changed), and the potential for mass surveillance of people who have done nothing wrong. Citizens should control how their biometric data is used, and should not be deemed to have consented to invasive surveillance merely by holding a driver's licence. Expanding facial recognition use of licence photos without clear legislative safeguards sets a dangerous precedent for biometric surveillance in Australia.

We therefore ask the House to legislate to require that the Australian government, or any company or organisation obtain a person's explicit, informed and opt-in consent before using AI-based facial recognition technology to identify or track them in public places, including recognition drawn from driver licence photographs; and to give Australians an enforceable right to refuse such use without penalty or loss of access to services.

from 48 citizens (Petition No. EN10435)

EN10436

Ministerial Direction 117 downgrades Subclass 143 Contributory Parent visas, making offshore applications secondary to onshore family streams. Traditionally, Australia's migration system processed family visas with a balanced approach, regardless of where the applicant applied. By delaying applications purely based on geographical location, the new policy leaves many Australian families separated for years, causing severe emotional distress.

Since 143 visa applicants commit to substantial financial contributions the same as onshore stream, they deserve equal treatment. These parents do not just pay high fees; they also bring pensions, savings, and overseas assets that directly boost local consumption. More importantly, they provide essential childcare and emotional support, stabilizing households and giving skilled migrants the confidence to stay and build long-term careers in Australia.

Restoring the previous processing priority is essential to maintain consistent policy and support timely family reunification.

We therefore ask the House to request the Minister for Home Affairs to amend Ministerial Direction 117, so that Subclass 143 Contributory Parent visas are processed with the same priority as onshore family visas.

from 74 citizens (Petition No. EN10436)

EN10437

We draw to the attention of the House the increasing practice of large corporations operating in Australia transferring Australian-based jobs and business functions overseas, particularly to reduce labour costs.

Large-scale offshoring can reduce employment and career opportunities for Australians, weaken graduate and entry-level pathways, increase financial insecurity for families, and erode Australia's long-term domestic skills base.

Corporations may receive substantial financial benefits from lower overseas labour costs, while Australian workers, communities and governments bear many of the economic and social consequences.

This petition is not directed at overseas workers. It seeks greater accountability from large corporations whose offshoring decisions significantly affect Australian employment.

We therefore ask the House to investigate measures to protect Australian employment, including:

1. an offshore employment levy, tax adjustment or similar measure for large corporations that substantially replace Australian jobs with overseas labour or outsourced overseas services;

mandatory public reporting of significant Australian job offshoring;

stronger consultation and redeployment requirements before jobs are transferred overseas; and

2. incentives for corporations that retain, train and develop Australian workers, including graduates.

3. We also ask the Government to examine the long-term economic and workforce impacts of large-scale offshoring.

from 29 citizens (Petition No. EN10437)

EN10438

This petition draws the House's attention to the systemic lack of accountability within the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA). Current remedies for participants experiencing negligence or bullying are ineffective. Internal complaints are routinely referred back to the departments responsible, resulting in dismissal or further intimidation. The statutory immunity currently afforded to the NDIA under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) shields the Agency from civil liability, leaving participants without genuine recourse for physical, financial, or psychological harm caused by administrative misconduct.

We therefore ask the House to ​Amend the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) to waive statutory immunity for the NDIA in cases of proven negligence, bullying, or systemic misconduct.

​Establish an independent external body empowered to investigate, adjudicate, and award compensation for such claims, bypassing internal NDIA processes.

​Create clear, enforceable legal pathways for participants to hold the Agency accountable for actions falling outside the scope of fair and reasonable administration.

from 526 citizens (Petition No. EN10438)

EN10439

The severe and growing threat to personal privacy caused by residential security cameras across Australia. Currently, the federal Privacy Act 1988 explicitly exempts private individuals using surveillance for personal or domestic purposes. This regulatory gap leaves citizens completely unprotected when neighbours position security cameras that capture portions of adjoining private land, such as yards, fences, and driveways. The lack of a uniform national standard causes widespread psychological distress and endless neighborhood disputes, as state laws vary wildly and often permit "incidental" surveillance of private propertiesTherefore, we ask the House to:

Amend the Privacy Act 1988 to remove the domestic exemption for surveillance devices, thereby creating a uniform nationwide law that strictly prohibits any individual from capturing, recording, or monitoring any portion of a neighbour's private land without their express written consent, irrespective of whether the capture is intentional or incidental.

We therefore ask the House to herefore,

Amend the Privacy Act 1988 to remove the domestic exemption for surveillance devices, thereby creating a uniform nationwide law that strictly prohibits any individual from capturing, recording, or monitoring ANY portion of a neighbour's private land without their express written consent, irrespective of whether the capture is intentional or incidental. This would include the privately owned land in front of a private dwelling including driveways, garages, front yards and porches.

from 25 citizens (Petition No. EN10439)

EN10442

Australian democracy was founded on the principle that every citizen should have an equal political voice. However, political donations from corporations, organizations and wealthy individuals creates unequal access to political decision making and actual/perceived influence over public policy.

While disclosure requirements provide important transparency, it does not prevent financial contributions from undermining public confidence or creating conflicts of interest in political decision making. This concern applies regardless of donor political affiliation, ideology or industry.

Donation and expenditure caps alone will not prevent preferential treatment toward connected individuals and businesses. Thus, to protect the integrity of Australian democracy and ensure political influence is not determined by financial capacity, private donations and funding from organizations and individuals should be prohibited.

We therefore ask the House to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 to prohibit political parties and associated political entities from accepting private donations and other forms of private financial support.

from 59 citizens (Petition No. EN10442)

EN10443

We are concerned about the use of Australian publicly backed finance in transactions involving foreign-controlled investment in Australian agricultural land. Recent concerns surrounding the Rushy Lagoon transaction in Tasmania have highlighted questions about approximately $69 million in Clean Energy Finance Corporation financing, foreign investment in Australian farmland, and the conversion of productive agricultural land to forestry. Australians deserve transparency about how public money is invested, who ultimately benefits, what safeguards protect Australian land and food production, and how these decisions serve Australia's national interest. Public institutions should be accountable to the Australian people when significant public finance and strategically important Australian assets are involved.

We therefore ask the House to

review the circumstances surrounding the Rushy Lagoon transaction and associated publicly backed financing; ensure full transparency regarding the approval process and public benefit; and strengthen safeguards governing the use of Australian public finance in foreign-controlled acquisitions of agricultural land. We further ask the House to consider measures ensuring that Australia's long-term food security, national interest, local communities and Australian ownership opportunities are properly considered before public funds support such transactions.

from 16 citizens (Petition No. EN10443)

EN10444

Employment Agencies don't offer good & services. The Jobseeker is best to promote themselves & work on their own confidence & presentation. The agent is motivated by their own income. The money is best funded back into Centrelink and course funding for Jobseekers. There is no incentives, for example if you get casual employment they demand fortnightly 30miinute appointments.

We therefore ask the House to cancel government funding. To Employment Agencies. Provide the lesser amount of funding to Centrelink to govern Jobseeker & course funding.

from 14 citizens (Petition No. EN10444)

EN10445

To the Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives

We, the undersigned, support effective measures to reduce gambling harm, particularly protections for children, self-excluded people and those at risk of harm.

However, we are concerned by proposals to prohibit wagering inducements for all adults, regardless of their gambling behaviour or chosen limits.

Research indicates that inducements can influence betting behaviour and may pose greater risks for vulnerable gamblers. This does not establish that a blanket prohibition is the only proportionate response. Responsible adults should retain reasonable freedom to make their own choices about lawful recreational activities where effective protections against harm can be maintained.

Targeted measures, including self-exclusion, customer-set limits and intervention when gambling behaviour indicates elevated risk, provide alternative approaches to harm reduction.

We therefore ask the House to reject a blanket prohibition on wagering inducements for adults and instead pursue targeted, evidence-based regulation that protects vulnerable customers while preserving reasonable choice for low-risk recreational gamblers.

This should prevent inducements being offered to self-excluded or appropriately identified high-risk customers, while allowing adults within appropriate safeguards to choose whether to receive lawful wagering promotions.

We therefore ask the House to reject a blanket prohibition on wagering inducements for adults and instead consider targeted, evidence-based regulation that strongly protects vulnerable customers while preserving reasonable choice for low-risk adult recreational gamblers.

Such regulation should prevent inducements being offered to self-excluded or appropriately identified high-risk customers, while considering whether adults who remain within appropriate safeguards should retain the choice to receive lawful wagering promotions.

from nine citizens (Petition No. EN10445)

EN10446

Under the Migration Act 1958, a non-citizen convicted of a serious sexual offence against a child fails the character test. However, mandatory visa cancellation under section 501(3A) only occurs if the person is serving that sentence full-time in custody. Where a sentence for this kind of offending is wholly or partly suspended, or where a court finds the person guilty but discharges them without recording a conviction, this automatic cancellation trigger never activates. Cancellation is then left to depend on a separate, discretionary decision by a departmental delegate, which may never be made. This means how a court structures its finding or sentence can determine whether removal from Australia is even considered, regardless of how serious the offending was. We believe that for offences of this nature, cancellation should not depend on these sentencing or procedural outcomes.

We therefore ask the House to amend section 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 so that mandatory visa cancellation for a serious sexual offence against a child applies on any finding of guilt or conviction, including where a person is discharged without conviction recorded, regardless of whether any part of the sentence involves custody or suspension.

from six citizens (Petition No. EN10446)

EN10447

Under the Migration Act 1958, a non-citizen whose visa is mandatorily cancelled following conviction for a serious sexual offence against a child may apply to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) to have that cancellation revoked. Ministerial Direction 110 requires the ART to treat protection of the community as the primary consideration in these cases. However, the Direction does not prevent the ART from weighing this against factors such as length of residence in Australia, family ties, age, health, and hardship to the offender or their family if removed. In recent decisions, the ART has revoked mandatory cancellations for people convicted of serious sexual offences against children after finding these personal factors outweighed the risk to the community. These circumstances existed before the offending took place and did not prevent it. We believe personal or family hardship should not be capable of outweighing community protection for this category of offending.

We therefore ask the House to amend section 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 so that a mandatory visa cancellation relating to a serious sexual offence against a child cannot be revoked on the basis of personal or family hardship.

from 10 citizens (Petition No. EN10447)

EN10448

Under section 36(3) of the Migration Act 1958, Australia is taken not to owe protection obligations to a person who has not taken all possible steps to access a right to enter and reside in another country where they would not face persecution or significant harm. Courts have read this narrowly, requiring an actual legal right of residence, not merely safe passage through a country. As a result, this provision rarely applies to people who transit multiple safe countries without holding formal residency rights in any of them before reaching Australia. International law does not require refugees to claim protection in the first safe country they reach, but nothing prevents Australia from adopting a stronger domestic standard, provided it does not put a person at real risk where they are ultimately sent.

We therefore ask the House to amend section 36(3) of the Migration Act 1958 so that a person's presence, before reaching Australia, in a country that is party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or in which the UNHCR conducts refugee status determination is sufficient to exclude Australia's protection obligations, unless the person shows that country would not have protected them.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN10448)

EN7976

Pacific nations face climate and energy crises. Fusion technology can be shared as part of Australia's regional leadership.

We therefore ask the House to include fusion in Pacific partnerships and aid.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7976)

EN7977

Fusion can power spacecraft and off-world colonies. Australia can be a leader in fusion-driven space technology.

We therefore ask the House to support space-aligned fusion research.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7977)

EN7978

Australia's science sector can lead global discovery, but risks irrelevance without fusion investment.

We therefore ask the House to commit long-term research funding to fusion science.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN7978)

EN7979

Australians deserve to see their nation lead in solving global challenges. Fusion can be a source of pride and innovation.

We therefore ask the House to declare fusion a national strategic priority.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7979)

EN7980

Billions are invested in energy transition. Without fusion, funds risk being locked into short-term fixes.

We therefore ask the House to direct climate finance toward fusion projects.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN7980)

EN9232

We draw the attention of the House to growing public concern regarding the extent of foreign ownership of Australian agricultural land and farms, and the adequacy of existing safeguards to protect Australia's long-term national interest.

Official reporting indicates that approximately 13 per cent of Australia's agricultural land is subject to foreign ownership interests. While foreign investment can deliver economic benefits, many Australians are increasingly concerned about impacts on food security, water resources, rural communities, land prices, and national sovereignty.

Current regulatory arrangements under the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) rely heavily on monetary thresholds and case-by-case assessments. There is concern that these mechanisms may not sufficiently address cumulative ownership, beneficial ownership transparency, or strategic risks associated with large-scale land aggregation.

Australians also seek greater clarity regarding:

- Which foreign entities and countries hold agricultural land interests;

- The long-term strategic implications for food and water security;

- Whether existing "national interest" tests adequately reflect contemporary risks; and

- The transparency and enforcement of foreign land ownership conditions.

These concerns are about land governance and national interest, not opposition to lawful investment or migration.

We therefore ask the House to

- Review and strengthen FIRB rules governing foreign ownership of agricultural land;

- Introduce clearer limits or caps on foreign ownership where appropriate;

- Enhance public reporting and transparency of beneficial ownership; and

- Ensure food security, rural resilience, and national sovereignty are explicit considerations in all future approvals.

from 12 citizens (Petition No. EN9232)

EN9233

We draw the attention of the House to public concern regarding compliance with Australian visa conditions by temporary residents, including international students, in the context of recent protests and rising antisemitic incidents.

Student visas are granted on the basis that the primary purpose of stay in Australia is education. Australians are concerned that some temporary visa holders may have misrepresented their intentions, engaging in organised political activism unrelated to their studies, and in some cases participating in antisemitic conduct, hate speech, or intimidation, which is unlawful under Australian law.

Australia rightly protects freedom of expression; however, visa holders do not possess the same rights as citizens, and all temporary residents are required to comply strictly with visa conditions, character requirements, and public order laws. Where criminal conduct, hate speech, or visa breaches occur, enforcement should be lawful, individualised, and evidence-based.

There is also concern that existing oversight mechanisms may be insufficient to identify whether visa conditions have been breached, or whether temporary visas have been used to facilitate activities inconsistent with Australia's national interest and social cohesion.

We therefore ask the House to :

1.Ensure strict enforcement of student visa conditions, including action where misrepresentation or breaches are proven;

2.Require that political activism beyond lawful expression be assessed against visa eligibility on a case-by-case basis;

3.Strengthen consequences for temporary visa holders found guilty of antisemitism or hate crimes; and

4.Include examination of visa compliance and radicalisation risks within the scope of the Bondi Massacre Royal Commission.

from three citizens (Petition No. EN9233)

EN9238

We draw the attention of the House to growing public concern about the threat posed by violent extremist ideologies, including those aligned with Islamic State, and the need for stronger, lawful counter-terrorism measures to protect Australians.

Australians expect national security laws to address extremist ideology when it manifests through conduct, such as incitement to violence, recruitment, financing, propaganda, or material support. Effective prevention requires early intervention, disruption of networks, and accountability, while respecting the Constitution, judicial oversight, and human rights.

There is concern that current frameworks may not sufficiently deter or disrupt:

Advocacy or promotion of terrorist ideology that legitimises violence or seeks to undermine Australia's constitutional order;

Online and offline propaganda, recruitment, and facilitation activities;

Financial flows, including foreign funding, that support extremist causes;

Gaps in visa, citizenship, and employment screening for sensitive roles; and

Coordination across agencies to prevent radicalisation before violence occurs.

Public confidence depends on clear laws that are ideology-neutral, evidence-based, and applied equally to all forms of extremism, including Islamist, far-right, neo-Nazi, or violent left-wing movements.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Review and strengthen counter-terrorism laws to criminalise advocacy, financing, and facilitation of violent extremist ideology;

2. Enhance preventive powers (with judicial oversight) to disrupt high-risk individuals and networks;

3 Increase financial transparency and enforcement to stop extremist funding;

4. Strengthen immigration and security screening for high-risk activities and roles; and

5. Ensure robust parliamentary oversight, due process, and equal application of the law.

These measures would improve public safety while upholding democratic principles.

from seven citizens (Petition No. EN9238)

EN9241

We draw the attention of the House to public concern regarding the appointment process for Australia's Ambassador for First Nations People.

The Ambassador for First Nations People represents Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples internationally and contributes to Australia's foreign engagement on matters affecting First Nations communities. Given the significance of this role, many Australians question why the appointment is made solely through ministerial decision, without a formal process of direct consultation, nomination, or endorsement by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities themselves.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are the custodians of the world's oldest continuing cultures. Many believe that representation at national and international levels should reflect principles of self-determination, cultural legitimacy, and community trust.

Concerns include:

The lack of a formal mechanism for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities to participate in the selection process;

Whether ministerial appointments alone can adequately represent the diversity of First Nations nations, cultures, and perspectives;

The importance of transparency, accountability, and community confidence in representative roles.

These concerns are not directed at any individual officeholder, but rather at the process by which the role is filled.

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Establishing a formal framework for meaningful consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in appointing the Ambassador for First Nations People; and

2. Exploring community-led or advisory selection mechanisms consistent with principles of self-determination, transparency, and accountability.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9241)

EN9243

We, the undersigned, call on the Parliament to critically review the 54 recommendations delivered by the Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia, Mr Aftab Malik, which include inquiries into Islamophobia and so-called "anti-Palestinian racism."

While discrimination of any kind must be addressed, the recommendations fail to acknowledge the documented rise in antisemitic violence and terrorism in Australia. Since the Hamas attacks of 7 October 2023, the Jewish community has been targeted by arson attacks, intimidation, and credible extremist plots. In January 2025, police uncovered a trailer filled with explosives in New South Wales linked to an antisemitic plot, highlighting ongoing threats to Jewish Australians.

Tragically, on 14 December 2025, the Bondi Beach massacre underscored the urgent need to identify and address all forms of extremist threats, regardless of ideology or community.

We believe that national security policies and social cohesion require an honest assessment of the sources of extremist violence, including ideologies that inspire attacks, rather than selective focus on certain communities. Ignoring credible threats undermines the safety and confidence of Australian

We therefore ask the House to :

1. Scrutinise Mr Malik's recommendations in light of documented antisemitic threats and recent attacks;

2. Conduct a national, evidence-based debate on the primary threats to Australian security;

3. Ensure that policies protecting communities from hate and violence are proportional, balanced, and grounded in facts, not ideology.

from two citizens (Petition No. EN9243)

Petitions received.

Responses

Middle East

Dear Chair

Thank you for your petition regarding the situation in Gaza.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

For more than two years, Australia has been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We continue to press for the full implementation of the Gaza peace plan, which has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. We are clear that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

It is Australia's longstanding position to respect the independence of international courts and tribunals and their role in upholding international law, including on questions relating to genocide. Israel will be judged on its compliance with the Genocide Convention by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ is currently considering South Africa's case against Israel under the Genocide Convention.

The Australian Government has been clear that the Netanyahu Government must comply with the binding provisional orders made in 2024 by the Court in that case. This includes ensuring the unhindered provision of basic services and humanitarian assistance at scale, in full cooperation with the UN.

Australia continues to work with partners, including the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross, to respond to the devastating humanitarian situation in Gaza and to push for the sustained and unimpeded flow of aid to those in urgent need. Australia's funding has gone to organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Middle East

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN7675 concerning the situation in Gaza.

For more than two years, Australia has been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders of the International Court of Justice.

We continue to press for the full implementation of the Gaza peace plan, which has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. We are clear that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

Australia continues to work with partners, including the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross, to respond to the devastating humanitarian situation in Gaza and to push for the unimpeded flow of aid to those in urgent need.

Australia's funding has gone to organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly to deliver food, medical supplies for field hospitals and other lifesaving support.

Australia has worked with partners to contribute momentum to peace. Australia formally recognised the independent and sovereign State of Palestine on Sunday the 21st of September 2025, alongside Canada and the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australia recognised the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest.

These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country. There are 160 countries which have diplomatic relations with Israel. We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

Australia has a universal, non-discriminatory immigration program and visa system that seeks to support a prosperous, united and secure Australia. All non-citizens who wish to travel to, enter or remain in Australia must satisfy the visa requirements of the Migration Act 1958 (the Migration Act) and the Migration Regulations 1994.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the

Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter regarding EN7750 on the conflict in the Middle East.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

For more than two years, Australia has been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders of the International Court of Justice.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest to do so. These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country.

We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

EN7551

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter regarding EN7751 on the conflict on the Middle East.

For more than two years, Australia has been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders of the International Court of Justice.

We continue to press for the full implementation of the Gaza peace plan, which has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. We are clear that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

Australia continues to work with partners, including the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross, to respond to the devastating humanitarian situation in Gaza and to push for the unimpeded flow of aid to those in urgent need.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Palestine

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN7881, concerning Australia's recognition of the State of Palestine.

Australia formally recognised the State of Palestine on 21 September 2025, alongside Canada and the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australia recognised the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own.

Recognising Palestine reflects Australia's longstanding commitment to a two-state solution, which has always been the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and the

Palestinian peoples.

Recognition promotes moderate voices such as the Palestinian Authority, who recognise Israel's right to exist and support a two-state solution—the State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel. We will continue to work with partners to hold the Palestinian Authority to the reform commitments it has made to Australia and the international community.

Hamas continues to damage the prospects of a two-state solution and reject Israel's right to exist. Australia remains unequivocal in its condemnation of Hamas, including for its atrocities on 7 October 2023 and its ongoing acts of terror. The Australian Government reaffirms that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Australia will continue to work with our international partners to bring the Middle East closer to the lasting peace and security that is the hope, and the right, of all humanity.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN7913 concerning Australia's relationship with Israel.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

For more than two years, Australia has been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders of the International Court of Justice.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest to do so. These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country.

We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Palestine

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN8046, concerning Australia's recognition of the State of Palestine.

Australia formally recognised the State of Palestine on 21 September 2025, alongside Canada and the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australia recognised the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own.

Recognising Palestine reflects Australia's longstanding commitment to a two-state solution, which has always been the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples.

Recognition promotes moderate voices such as the Palestinian Authority, who recognise Israel's right to exist and support a two-state solution—the State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel. We will continue to work with partners to hold the Palestinian Authority to the reform commitments it has made to Australia and the international community.

Hamas continues to damage the prospects of a two-state solution and reject Israel's right to exist. Australia remains unequivocal in its condemnation of Hamas, including for its atrocities on 7 October 2023 and its ongoing acts of terror. The Australian Government reaffirms that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Australia will continue to work with our international partners to bring the Middle East closer to the lasting peace and security that is the hope, and the right, of all humanity.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Honours and Awards

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence dated 9 February 2026 to the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister, regarding petition EN8505, which requests that the Australian Government considers an amendment to the National Medal Regulations 2011. The Prime Minister has asked me to reply on his behalf as the Minister with responsibility for Australian honours.

I acknowledge the significant and dedicated contribution of service members, emergency first responders and volunteers who undertake service on behalf of the community, in particular through hazardous events. Their service is an example of the Australian ethos of pitching in and helping fellow Australians at times of national and local distress.

The National Medal was established by Letters Patent in 1975 to recognise long and diligent service by members of recognised government and voluntary organisations that risk their lives or safety to protect or assist the community in enforcement of the law, or in times of emergency or natural disaster.

In consultation with the chief officers of various eligible organisations, including the Australian

Defence Force, and state and territory Police Services, a new provision to the National Medal 2011 Regulations (the Regulations) was introduced on 5 February 2020, to extend eligibility for the award of the National Medal to members of eligible organisations that:

have died in the line of duty, applied retrospectively to the date the Australian honours system (and the National Medal) commenced on 14 February 1975, and

but for injury or disability sustained while performing their duty, would have served a minimum of 15 years' service. This change applied prospectively from the commencement date of the amended regulations, being 5 February 2020. There is no retrospectivity.

The responses to the consultation were in support of extending the eligibility criteria for death, injury or disability in the line of duty. However, several considerations were raised in relation to retrospective application of the provisions around injury or disability.

These considerations included the resource implications involved in determining the details of historical records that may no longer exist or be able to be sourced, and the difficulty of assessing probable length of service for former members who may not be known to current personnel, including chief officers who must be satisfied that a person has met, or would have met, the applicable time requirements.

Proposals for new awards, or significant changes to existing awards, are generally developed by peak bodies and supported by the chief officers of relevant organisations and relevant state and territory ministers. In the case of multi-jurisdictions being affected, as the case would be for this proposal, it is common for these proposals to be sponsored by one jurisdictional minister, who submits it to the Australian Government (the Government) on behalf of all interested parties.

In the case of occupational-based awards, the support of employing bodies is essential.

Such proposals from peak bodies or ministers should provide detailed eligibility criteria for the proposed changes, associated costs of implementation and administration, along with the supporting rationale on why such a change is appropriate, and setting out the level of support from all interested parties and jurisdictions.

It is open to interested parties to seek support from a peak body, sponsored by a jurisdictional minister, to bring forward a fully considered proposal, for the Government's consideration.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to the Government's attention. I have provided a copy of this correspondence to the Prime Minister.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the Public Service, Mr Gorman

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN8510 concerning the situation in Gaza.

Australians have been understandably distressed by the violence, including the deaths of so many innocent civilians. As the Prime Minister has said, we have seen the situation in Gaza go far beyond the world's worst fears.

For more than two years, we have been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders of the International Court of Justice.

Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians and sanctioned two senior Israeli ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

We continue to press forthe full implementation of the Gaza peace plan, which has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. We are clear that Hamas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

Australia continues to work with partners, including the United Nations and the

International Committee of the Red Cross, to respond to the devastating humanitarian situation in Gaza and to push for the unimpeded flow of aid to those in urgent need.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest.

These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country. There are 160 countries which have diplomatic relations with Israel. We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave

Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

There is a very long road to recovery in Gaza, securing long term peace and building the Palestinian state. Together with our partners, Australia will continue to be a constructive partner in support of the full implementation of the peace plan and to do what we can to contribute to a just and enduring two-state solution.

I appreciate you taking the time to write to me on this difficult issue.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Qualification of Members and Senators

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for referring petition EN8608 about the eligibility of Australian Politicians, I write to respond in my capacity as Special Minister of State responsible for electoral matters.

Section 34 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (the Constitution) outlines the baseline qualifications for members of the House of Representatives (as does section 16, tying these baseline qualifications to Senators as well) as:

i. "He must be of the full age of twenty-one years, and must be an elector entitled to vote at the election of members of the House of Representatives, or a person qualified to become such elector, and must have been for three years

at the least a resident within the limits of the Commonwealth as existing at

the time when he is chosen:

ii. He must be a subject of the Queen, either natural-born or for at least five years naturalized under a Jaw of the United Kingdom, or of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, or of the Commonwealth, or of a State.,,

Importantly, Section 34 of the Constitution also provides for the parliament's ability to otherwise provide for the qualifications of members of the House of Representatives and Senators.

Under section 34 of the Constitution, the Parliament has since otherwise provided for the qualifications necessary for members of the House of Representatives through section 163 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

Section 163 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 adjusts the baseline qualifications to:

"A person who:

has reached the age of 18 years;

is an Australian citizen; and

is either:

an elector entitled to vote at a House of Representatives election; or

ii. a person qualified to become such an elector; is qualified to be elected as a Senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

A person is not entitled to be nominated for election as a Senator or a member of the House of Representatives unless the person is qualified under subsection (1)."

This works in tandem with section 44 of the Constitution, which sets out five grounds for disqualification from a person being chosen or sitting as a member of the federal Parliament. Pertinently, section 44(i) disqualifies any person who "is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power".

After each federal election, the Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) holds an inquiry into all aspects of the conduct of the election.

The JSCEM is currently undertaking an inquiry into the 2025 federal election and other matters. I encourage interested petitioners to follow the work of the JSCEM as it explores important issues impacting our democracy. The JSCEM's webpage can be accessed here: www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral Matters/.

Thank you for bringing this petition to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Special Minister of State, Senator Farrell

Middle East

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for the letter regarding Petition EN8794 in relation to the situation in Lebanon.

The Australian Government remains focused on the situation in Lebanon. On 6 June 2026, I joined international counterparts, including from France, the European Union and Canada, in calling on all parties to exercise maximum restraint, adhere fully to the ceasefire, refrain from actions that could lead to further escalation and ensure the protection of civilians. We reaffirmed that Israel must respect Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity and to stop its military escalation.

Australia welcomes ongoing diplomatic efforts, including those led by the United States and international partners, aimed at securing a durable peace and security for the peoples of

Israel and Lebanon. We support the Lebanese government in its efforts to extend its authority throughout the country in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, including through the strengthening of Lebanese state institutions and security forces and the disarmament of Hezbollah. We have been clear that Hezbollah must cease its attacks on Israel.

The Australian Government recognises Lebanon's humanitarian need is high right now. That is why we continue to support the people of Lebanon through our trusted partners. On 4

June, we announced a further $10 million in humanitarian assistance for Lebanon. This was in addition to the $5 million in humanitarian assistance announced on 21 March. Australia also joined international partners on 24 April to deliver much-needed food, tents, and relief supplies to the people of Lebanon through the Jordanian-led humanitarian bridge.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Israel

Dear Chair

Thank you for the letter regarding Petition EN9339 in response to the conflict in Gaza.

Australia wants to see an end to the suffering and a sustainable peace in Gaza. For more than two years, we have been part of the international pressure for a ceasefire and the flow of humanitarian assistance to Gaza.

We have called on Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including the binding orders ofthe International Court of Justice. Alongside our partners, including the UK and Canada, we have condemned Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians.

Australia continues to press for the full implementation of the Gaza peace plan, which has been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. We are clear that Ha mas must disarm and play no role in the State of Palestine.

The Australian Government is deeply concerned by the situation in the West Bank. Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, threaten the viability of a two-state solution, and are a major obstacle to peace. On 2 June 2026, I announced further human rights sanctions in response to escalating settler violence against Palestinians. They build on sanctions Australia previously imposed with partners on two senior Israeli ministers—ltamar

Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—along with other Israeli extremist individuals and organisations.

Australia maintains diplomatic relations with countries because it is in our national interest.

These channels enable us to put forward Australia's views, they are not an endorsement of the policies or decisions of another country. We have used our diplomatic ties to press Israel to remove restrictions on aid, to coordinate consular assistance for Australians and their families wanting to leave Israel or Palestine, and to advocate for a ceasefire.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Repatriation Medical Authority

Dear Chair

PETITION EN9367—REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY GUIDELINES

FOR RESEARCHERS

Thank you for your correspondence of 26 March 2026 regarding Parliamentary Petition EN9367, which concerns the Repatriation Medical Authority's (the Authority) Guidelines for Researchers (the Guidelines) and the use of sound medical scientific evidence (SMSE) in the development of Statements of Principles.

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) determines Statements of Principles based on SMSE as defined in the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. RMA researchers are appropriately qualified to undertake literature reviews that assist the Authority in their deliberations, the Guidelines sets out the processes and procedures used by the researchers in their role.

Legislative amendments that commenced on 1 July 2026 transition the Authority to the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The equivalent provisions under the MRCA have the same provisions referred to above.

The Authority acknowledges that some of the literature considered in the development of Statements of Principles was not originally generated for social or compensatory purposes. Noting the matters raised in the petition and to promote clarity and transparency, the Authority will incorporate an explanatory note in the Guides as part of a broader review of the document that is currently been undertaken.

The inclusion of this note is intended to provide further guidance and transparency. It does not imply that SMSE has been used incorrectly or improperly in the development of Statement of Principles.

Thank you for taking the time to write. I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours faithfully

from the Minister for Veterans Affairs, Mr Keogh

Disaster and Emergency Management

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 24 May 2026 enclosing Petition EN9368, with 94 signatures, concerning Pay For Australia's Emergency Service Volunteers During Declared Disasters.

The Australian Government acknowledges the extraordinary contribution of emergency service volunteers and recognises the concerns raised that some volunteers may face financial hardship, particularly during major disasters requiring extended deployments.

The Australian Government recognises that volunteers should not face unreasonable hardship because of their service. Previous reviews and inquiries, including the Royal Commission intoNational Natural Disaster Arrangements, Boots on the Ground: Raising Resilience and theNational Volunteer Incentive Scheme have considered how volunteers can be better supported during long deployments while preserving the volunteer ethos that underpins Australia's emergency management system.

Emergency services are primarily managed by state and territory governments. Nationally consistent approaches to financial support for emergency service volunteers require careful consideration with jurisdictions, emergency service organisations and the volunteer sector. Financial support is one element of a broader range of considerations for supporting emergency service volunteers. It sits alongside other matters such as employment protections, leave arrangements, reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, targeted hardship assistance, recognition and practical measures that reduce barriers to participation.

The National Employment Standards (NES) contained in the Fair Work Act 2009 provide national system employees with an entitlement to unpaid community service leave to undertake a voluntary emergency management activity. Employees and employers may agree to entitlements above this safety net, including paid emergency service leave, through enterprise bargaining, variations to modern awards or individual employment contracts.

I note that the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Workplace Relations, Skills and Training is undertaking an inquiry into the operation and adequacy of the NES. The issue of paid community service leave for employees engaged in voluntary emergency management activities has been raised during the Inquiry. The Australian Government will consider any recommendations made by the Committee, including those relating to community service leave. Further information about the inquiry is available at:

www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Employment_Workplace_Relations_Skills_and_ Training/NESlnquiry.

Current arrangements, including unpaid community service leave under the Fair Work Act and paid emergency services leave offered by some employers do not cover all volunteers, particularly those outside standard employment arrangements. Governments have provided targeted support in exceptional circumstances, such as temporary income support during the 2019-20 Black Summer bushfires. However, that experience highlighted the complexity of any payment framework, including eligibility, consistency across jurisdictions, interaction with leave entitlements, and the trigger for support.

The Government continues to strengthen and support emergency volunteering through broader, ongoing work with partners across the sector. This includes the development of a draft National Emergency Volunteering Strategy, which is being led by the NSW Government and progressed collaboratively through the National Emergency Management Ministers' Meeting and the Australia-New Zealand Emergency Management Committee. The draft Strategy considers matters such as volunteer wellbeing, employer support, incentives, insurance and protection, surge capability, and workforce sustainability.

The Government values the contribution of emergency service volunteers and will continue working with states and territories, emergency service organisations and the volunteering sector to support a sustainable, fair and effective emergency volunteering system.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN9368 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Emergency Management, Ms McBain

Iran

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence conveying Petition EN9374, concerning the actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The Australian Government condemns the Iranian regime's violent repression of protests, including the horrific scale of its brutality. We have called for an immediate end to the regime's killing of protesters, use of force, arbitrary arrests, and telecommunications blackouts, and conveyed these concerns directly to Iranian authorities. The Prime Minister and I have been clear that a regime that relies on the repression and murder of its own people to retain power is a regime without legitimacy—and that the Iranian people must be allowed to determine their country's future.

The Albanese Government has taken stronger action to hold Iran to account for its human rights violations than any previous Australian Government. In 2023, the Albanese

Government expanded Australia's autonomous sanctions framework for Iran to enable individuals and entities to be sanctioned for their involvement in the general oppression of people in Iran, the oppression of women and girls in particular, and assisting Iran to threaten or undermine the sovereignty or territorial integrity of another country. We have drawn on these powers to sanction over 230 Iranian individuals and entities across multiple sanctions frameworks since the murder of Mahsa Amini in 2022. Our most recent sanctions, imposed in May 2026, targeted individuals and entities involved in the Iranian regime's ongoing repression of its people and destabilisation of the region.

We are also working with partners in multilateral forums to hold Iran to account for its human rights record. In January 2026, Australia co-sponsored United Nations resolution HRC/RES/S-39/1, which renewed the mandates of the Fact-Finding Mission in Iran and the Special Rapporteur on Iran to investigate the regime's recent and ongoing human rights violations and crimes.

The Australian Government has made clear that we will not allow Iran, or any nation, to undermine the safety of Australians or sow division in our community. In August 2025, we expelled Iran's Ambassador, and three other Iranian officials, in response to attacks directed by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against Australia's Jewish community.

The Government also created new laws in November 2025 to enable state entities to be listed as state sponsors of terrorism under the Criminal Code Act 1995, and listed the IRGC as a state sponsor of terrorism under this new framework.

The Government has long recognised that Iran's nuclear program poses a threat to international peace and security. We have been clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.

Australia will continue to stand with the brave people of Iran in their ongoing struggle against oppression.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

National Capital Plan

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email of 25 May 2026 regarding Petition EN9382 which requests the House to:

recognise constructive displacement arising from Commonwealth planning control changes as a material policy issue;

examine whether existing Commonwealth frameworks adequately protect affected residents;

establish minimum safeguards to ensure residents are not left financially or materially worse off as a result of Commonwealth-led inclusion of established residential areas within the National Capital Plan .

The issues raised in this petition are consistent with matters which have been raised through the public consultation process for a draft amendment to the National Capital Plan.

Draft Amendment 102 (DA102)—Hume Circle Precinct was released for public consultation in January 2026 and has continued through the due process for making of an amendment to the National Capital Plan {NCP) for a period of 6 months. In that time there has been significant input from, meetings with and feedback to the group of existing residents who are the initiators of petition EN9382.

DA102 establishes a planning framework to apply to an area of land at the eastern entry to the National Central Area referred to as the Hume Circle precinct. The objective of DA102 is to facilitate a long-term, precinct-based approach to the urban renewal of the precinct in a manner that is consistent with the recognised significance of this area in the Griffin Plan for

Canberra. The amendment is also intended to support broader national objectives relating to housing supply by establishing a framework for high-quality urban development in a location that is close to transport and employment.

While DA102 changes the statutory planning authority of the precinct from the ACT

Government to the National Capital Authority (NCA), the ACT Government would remain the manager of the lands as Territory lands and retain all existing rights and responsibilities associated with that role. The ACT Government would continue to levy taxes on the lands.

Existing ACT Government legislation (other than planning legislation) would continue to apply, including laws and regulatory protections that support residents and community members, such as those relating to strata arrangements and other residential matters.

Importantly DA 102 does not alter the ownership/lessee arrangements of any property in the precinct and so can have no impact on the circumstances of existing owners or lessees.

The NCA has no authority to initiate development in the precinct, but rather its authority is limited to considering and assessing development proposals, if and when they are brought forward by property owners or lessees.

As noted above, the amendment establishes a planning framework under the NCP for the

Hume Circle Precinct. It establishes the principles and expectations for any development proposals within the precinct and requires public consultation as part of the consideration of any development proposals, prior to NCA approval and prior to any application for works approval being submitted.

Please be assured that the concerns and issues raised through this petition by this group of existing residents, have been heard and responded to in the amendment, along with the feedback from other stakeholders.

DA102 has been approved and will be tabled in both Houses. Notification will also be provided to all those who made submissions or commented as part of the public consultation process for DA102.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Regional Development, Local Government and Territories, Ms McBain

New Zealand Citizen and Family Relationship Visa

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 in relation to petition EN9518 regarding the child support system.

I am committed to ensuring the child support system is safe, fair and effective for parents, and improves the wellbeing of children.

A key principle of the system is that parents support their children according to their financial capacity. For this reason, the child support formula calculates how much child support is payable based on each parent's income, the number and age of the children, and the care arrangement.

The Minimum Annual Rate of child support is currently $551 per case. If the Minimum Annual Rate were increased to a higher amount, such as $150 per week, this would result in some parents owing a child support amount that is beyond their financial capacity to pay.

Clearly, if one parent is assessed as owing the Minimum Annual Rate, the other parent will be left with significant costs in raising their child. Such a circumstance should be reserved for cases where the non-custodial parent's earning capacity is genuinely severely limited.

Like the petitioners, I have been deeply concerned that our child support system has allowed some parents to hide income and assets that would enable them to support their children and to avoid their child support responsibilities.

The Government has recently announced the most significant reforms to the child support system in many years. These reforms will protect more parents and children from weaponisation, financial abuse and non-compliance.

In particular, our reforms crack down on the under-reporting of income by strengthening data sharing between Services Australia and the Australian Taxation Office to catch people who under-state their income, and expand prosecutions of people with a child support arrangement who do not lodge their tax returns.

As part of our reforms, I have also committed to explore further options where paying parents use structures that are legal, like businesses, trusts and joint accounts, for the unacceptable purpose of avoiding their child support responsibilities.

To make the system safer, our reforms also remove the current legal requirement for sensitive personal information provided by one parent to be shared with the other in change of assessment processes, and increase powers for Services Australia to reject vexatious applications and objections used by one parent to harass or harm the other.

To improve compliance, our reforms will expand employer withholding to all suitable cases so that child support is collected directly from a payer's wage, like tax and superannuation, ensuring more child support is transferred on time and in full to the receiving parent to help them manage the costs of raising a child.

Finally, our reforms will automatically prohibit anyone with a child support debt of $10,000 or more and a history of recent travel from departing the country until arrangements are made to pay that debt.

More information on these child support reforms can be found at: www.dss.gov.au/budget-and-additional-estimates-statements/resource/safer-and-more-effective-child-supportsystem.

The Government is committed to helping families manage their responsibilities for their children following separation and is continuing to look for measures to strengthen the system.

I have asked that the feedback provided in the petition be considered by my Department as part of the implementation of our reforms and in ongoing policy reviews.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Social Services, Ms Plibersek

Capital Punishment

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter of 25 May 2026 regarding petition EN9522 on reinstating the death penalty for convicted child sexual offenders involving penetrative acts.

The Australian Government is committed to protecting children from sexual abuse in all settings and to ensuring Australia's criminal justice response adequately reflects the profound harm caused to victims, survivors, their supporters, and the broader community. Australia's National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030 (National Strategy) provides a 10-year, whole-of-nation framework to deliver a coordinated and consistent approach to preventing and better responding to child sexual abuse. Information on the National Strategy is available at: www.childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-prevent-and-respond-childsexual- abuse-2021-2030. A community survey is open to the public from 21 May 2026 to 17 July 2026 to inform the next action plan under the National Strategy. This survey is available at: www.consultations.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/nocs-community-survey/.

States and territories have primary responsibility to legislate on matters related to child sexual abuse within their jurisdiction. However, the Commonwealth's Criminal Code Act 1995 (Criminal Code) criminalises child sexual abuse and dealings with child abuse material committed via a carriage service (such as a mobile phone or the Internet), via a postal service, and by Australian citizens or permanent residents while overseas. Under the Criminal Code and the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), mandatory minimum penalties apply to the most serious child sex offences and repeat offenders. These provisions ensure that sentences recognise the significant harm suffered by victims of child sex offences. Sentencing remains a matter for the judiciary, which determines appropriate penalties based on the nature and circumstances of the offending, within the framework of maximum penalties and any applicable mandatory minimums. The mandatory minimum provisions do not prevent a court from handing down longer sentences.

The Australian Government is committed to ensuring that serious crimes, including child sexual abuse, are met with appropriate penalties. However, it maintains a long-standing policy of opposition to capital punishment.

As a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Second Optional Protocol, Australia has an obligation not only to abolish the death penalty within its jurisdiction but also to ensure that its laws and policies remain consistent with this obligation. The Commonwealth abolished the death penalty through the Death Penalty Abolition Act 1973 (Cth). In March 2010, legislative amendments extended this prohibition to state and territory laws, ensuring that the death penalty cannot be reintroduced anywhere in Australia in the future.

Support for victims and survivors remains a key priority. The National Office for Child Safety within the Attorney-General's Department has a consolidated online hub of support services and resources for those impacted by child sexual abuse, such as the 1800RESPECT phone counselling service (1800 737 732). These resources can be accessed online at: www.childsafety.gov.au/getsupport. The Commonwealth has also instituted Minimum Practice Standards for specialist and community support services responding to child sexual abuse, to help victims, survivors and their support systems overcome barriers they can face when seeking help. These standards make sure that support services are victim and survivor centred, trauma-informed and culturally safe. You can learn more about Minimum Practice Standards at: www.childsafety.gov.au/minimumpractice- standards.

Thank you for taking the time to write to me on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Attorney-General, Ms Rowland

Services Australia

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 in relation to petition EN9527 regarding the child support system.

All forms of violence in our community are unacceptable, and everyone has the right to live free from harm and without fear of abuse of any kind.

I am deeply committed to ensuring the child support scheme is safe and effective for parents and improves the wellbeing of children.

The Government has recently announced the most significant reforms to the child support system in many years. The 2026-27 Budget invests an additional $182.6 million to improve parts of the system most in need of reform, including:

Closing loopholes that enable weaponisation and abuse,

Making the child support assessment process fairer and more accurate, and

Improving compliance so more child support flows in full and on time.

To make the system safer, our reforms will remove the current legal requirement for sensitive personal information provided by one parent to be shared with the other in change of assessment processes, and increase powers for Services Australia to reject vexatious applications and objections used by one parent to harass or harm the other.

To improve the accuracy of child support assessments, our reforms will strengthen data sharing between Services Australia and the Australian Taxation Office to catch people who under-state their income, and expand prosecutions of people who do not lodge their tax returns to avoid their child support responsibilities.

To improve compliance, our reforms will expand employer withholding to all suitable cases so that child support is collected directly from a payer's wage, like tax and superannuation, and automatically issue Departure Prohibition Orders to anyone with a child support debt of $10,000 or more and a history of recent travel.

These reforms respond to recommendations made by the Ombudsman and to issues raised with me by advocates and people with direct experience of the system.

More information on the 2026-27 Budget child support reforms can be found at www.dss.gov.au/child-support/making-child-support-system-safer-and-more-effective.

In addition to the measures announced in the Budget, Services Australia has recently introduced its Preventing Financial Abuse through Child Support strategy and action plan.

The action plan outlines recent and upcoming steps, including:

New guidance and training for staff in identifying and responding to financial abuse,

Funding for staff and system that will enable better use of existing compliance powers, such as garnishee notices, tax refund intercepts and litigation, and

Transitioning experienced child support service officers to focus on complex and high-value debt collection.

Both the strategy and action plan can be found at www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/preventingfinancial- abuse-through-child-support-strategy and will be reported on and updated annually.

I am continuing to look for further ways to strengthen the child support system, including responses when paying parents use mechanisms that are legal, like trusts and joint accounts, for the unacceptable purpose of avoiding their child support responsibilities.

The petition that you have forwarded has raised additional issues, including around credits, provisional income and income estimate safeguards, which I have asked my Department to consider further.

Thank you for providing a copy of this petition. Hearing people's direct experiences with the child support system provides us with valuable insight and helps us to monitor and improve the system for all those who depend upon it.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Social Services, Ms Plibersek

National Security

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence regarding petition EN9534, presented on 25 May 2026, requesting the cancellation of the Australian passports held by certain Australians. I am not able to comment on individual cases.

All Australian citizens have a right to be issued with an Australian passport. This is a legal entitlement, enshrined in the Australian Passports Act 2005. The primary object of the

Australian Passports Act 2005 is to provide for passports to be issued as evidence of identity and citizenship to Australian citizens travelling internationally.

In rare circumstances, a passport can be refused or cancelled due to law enforcement or security concerns. These circumstances are narrowly and strictly defined in the Australian

Passports Act 2005. In national security matters, a competent authority must request that a passport be refused or cancelled if it has reasonable grounds that the person would be likely to engage in specific types of harmful conduct.

Any such request from a competent authority and ensuing decision to cancel or refuse a passport must be made on a case-by-case basis, specific to each relevant individual, and taking into account all relevant circumstances. As I have said publicly, ASIO and other competent authorities have not made such a request.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Senator Wong

Telecommunications

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 to the Hon Catherine King, Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional development and Local Government, regarding Petition EN9535 which expresses concern about mobile black spots and unreliable coverage in in Crafers, South Australia, and asks the House of Representatives to work with the telecommunications industry to address these issues. As this matter falls within my portfolio, the petition has been referred to me for response.

The Australian Government recognises that all Australians deserve access to reliable, high-quality and affordable telecommunications, regardless of where they live and work. Given the concerns raised in the petition, I asked the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts (the department) to seek advice from the relevant mobile network operators (Optus, Telstra and TPG Telecom/Vodafone) about both coverage and investment plans.

Optus, Telstra and TPG Telecom have advised that local terrain presents challenges in delivering mobile coverage to the area, and that further investment would be required to deliver improvements. Optus is planning SG in 2027, which will uplift capacity at some sites and may improve customer experience in the area. Advice from TPG is that it is considering in-building options to improve coverage at Crafers Primary School. Telstra advised that it is planning network upgrades in the broader area, including enhancements to existing sites and potential targeted infrastructure, to improve coverage and capacity over time.

The government is also delivering the Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation (UOMO), which will require mobile carriers to provide reasonable and equitable access to outdoor mobile coverage across Australia, including access to outdoor mobile SMS and voice calling. Carriers are expected to leverage their existing networks and, in areas currently without mobile coverage, direct-to-device (D2D) technology enabled through Low Earth Orbit (LEOSats) satellites. It is expected that this will help add up to 5 million square kilometres of baseline outdoor mobile SMS and voice coverage across Australia.

The UOMO will be a vital safety net, expanding areas where the community will be able to make free calls to Triple Zero and where people can call for help if they are lost, injured, or are facing natural disasters in areas without mobile coverage.

The government introduced framework legislation to Parliament on 27 November 2025, with the UOMO to commence from late 2027, subject to market developments.

There are a number of other options to help improve connectivity in areas where mobile coverage is affected by the local terrain. For residents and businesses in Crafers, this may include Wi-Fi calling, which is available on mobile carriers' networks with a compatible device and allows customers to make calls and send texts over a Wi-Fi broadband connection. A

National Broadband Network (NBN} service is generally available in areas with limited or no mobile coverage, with fixed line, fixed wireless or satellite-based solutions offering another form of connectivity. According to NBN's rollout map, fixed line is available in Crafers.

Thank you for bringing the petitioners' concerns to my attention and I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Communications and Minister for Sport, Ms Wells

Veterans

Dear Chair

RESPONSE TO PETITION NUMBER EN9600

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 regarding Parliamentary Petition EN9600, which seeks to change the period in which the Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) may decide not to conduct a further investigation under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA).

Subsection 196C( 4) does not prevent a further investigation for 12 months in every case. Instead, it allows the RMA to decline a request if it has recently completed a thorough investigation and there is not enough reason to investigate the matter again.

The law also allows the RMA to conduct a further investigation within 12 months if credible new medical-scientific evidence becomes available. The RMA may also start an investigation on its own if significant new evidence is identified.

The changes to veterans' legislation that came into effect on 1 July 2026 will transition the RMA to the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The equivalent provisions under the MRCA will have the same effect as the provisions cited above.

This helps the scheme operate efficiently by avoiding repeat requests soon after a full investigation has finished unless important new evidence has emerged. Each request is considered on its merits, including whether relevant new medical-scientific evidence has been provided.

For these reasons, the Government considers the current law already provides enough flexibility to respond quickly when significant new medical-scientific evidence emerges.

Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to my attention. I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours faithfully

from the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, Mr Keogh

Public Sector Governance

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email of 25 May 2026 regarding Petition EN9604. I welcome the opportunity to respond to this petition.

The petition raises concerns about '90 year suppression orders' that were purportedly made over documents provided to the Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police

Service (Wood Royal Commission) and the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (Child Abuse Royal Commission).

The Australian Government has not issued a 90-year suppression order as alleged in Petition EN9604. I do note that the Royal Commissions Act 1902 excludes certain information from public access for 99 years, including information that was obtained at a private session of the Child Abuse Royal Commission, and information provided in confidence to the Child

Abuse Royal Commission about lived experiences of child sexual abuse in institutional context. The personal and sensitive nature of people's accounts of how they have been affected by child sexual abuse justifies these exclusions.

The petition also raises concerns about alleged corruption in public institutions.

The National Anti-Corruption Commission, established in 2023, is an independent

Commonwealth agency able to detect, investigate and rep01t on serious or systemic corrupt conduct in the Commonwealth public sector. Further info1mation about the Commission, including how to make a referral, is available on the Commission's website at: www.nacc.gov.au.

Thank you for bringing this petition to my attention. I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Attorney-General, Ms Rowland

Parliamentarians' Entitlements

Dear Ms Belyea

I write in response to Petition EN9608 regarding parliamentarians' allowances.

The Albanese Government believes a strong democracy depends on all citizens being able to participate equally, not just the rich. It is important that people from all corners of our community are enfranchised through an electoral system that promotes equality in political participation and reduces societal inequities.

Aligned to these values, our Nation's founding document, the Australian Constitution, makes provision for allowances for Federal parliamentarians. This supports a cornerstone of our way of life, a democracy open and accessible to all Australians, by ensuring the opportunity to stand for election is not reserved for the independently wealthy.

The Constitution empowers Federal Parliament to determine members' allowances. In the 1970s, Parliament established the independent statutory Remuneration Tribunal, who responsible for the remuneration of key Commonwealth offices, including parliamentarians.

Today, by legislation, this independent Tribunal must inquire into parliamentarians salary each year. The Tribunal reports inquiry outcomes and provides reasons for its decisions.

In its 2026 Review of Remuneration for Holders of Public Office Statement, the Tribunal decided to determine no adjustment to remuneration for public offices in its jurisdiction from 1 July 2026.

This Statement is available on the Tribunal's website, www.remtribunal.gov.au .

Thank you again for sharing this petition and to the petitioners for raising these matters.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister of State, Senator Farrell

Capital Punishment

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter of 25 May 2026 regarding petition EN9611 on sentencing and maximum penalties for crimes against children.

The Australian Government is committed to protecting children from sexual abuse in all settings and to ensuring Australia's criminal justice response adequately reflects the profound harm caused to victims, survivors, their supporters, and the broader community. Australia's National

Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030 (National Strategy) provides

a 10-year, whole-of-nation framework to deliver a coordinated and consistent approach to preventing and better responding to child sexual abuse. Information on the National Strategy is available at: www.childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-prevent-and-respond-childsexual- abuse-2021-2030. A community survey is open to the public from 21 May 2026 to 17 July 2026 to inform the next action plan under the National Strategy. This survey is available at: www.consultations.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/nocs-community-survey/.

States and territories have primary responsibility to legislate on matters related to child sexual abuse within their jurisdiction. However, the Commonwealth's Criminal Code Act 1995

(Criminal Code) criminalises child sexual abuse and dealings with child abuse material committed via a carriage service (such as a mobile phone or the Internet), via a postal service, and by Australian citizens or permanent residents while overseas. Under the Criminal Code and the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), mandatory minimum penalties apply to the most serious child sex offences and repeat offenders. These provisions ensure that sentences recognise the significant harm suffered by victims of child sex offences. Sentencing remains a matter for the judiciary, which determines appropriate penalties based on the nature and circumstances of the offending, within the framework of maximum penalties and any applicable mandatory minimums.

The mandatory minimum provisions do not prevent a court from handing down longer sentences.

The Australian Government is committed to ensuring that serious crimes, including child sexual abuse, are met with appropriate penalties. However, it maintains a long-standing policy of opposition to capital punishment.

As a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Second Optional

Protocol, Australia has an obligation not only to abolish the death penalty within its jurisdiction but also to ensure that its laws and policies remain consistent with this obligation. The Commonwealth abolished the death penalty through the Death Penalty Abolition Act 1973 (Cth). In March 2010, legislative amendments extended this prohibition to state and territory laws, ensuring that the death penalty cannot be reintroduced anywhere in Australia in the future.

Support for victims and survivors remains a key priority. The National Office for Child Safety within the Attorney-General's Department has a consolidated online hub of support services and resources for those impacted by child sexual abuse, such as the 1800RESPECT phone counselling service (1800 737 732). These resources are available at: www.childsafety.gov.au/get-support.

The Commonwealth has also instituted Minimum Practice Standards for specialist and community support services responding to child sexual abuse, to help victims, survivors and their support systems overcome barriers they can face when seeking help. These standards make sure that support services are victim and survivor centred, trauma-informed and culturally safe. You can learn more about Minimum Practice Standards at: www.childsafety.gov.au/minimum-practice-standards.

Thank you for taking the time to write to me on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Attorney-General, Ms Rowland

Fuel Security

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email of 25 May 2026 presenting petition number EN9677 asking the

Government to consider measures to prioritise domestic access to gas and other natural resources before export. I appreciate you bringing this matter to my attention.

The Australian Government recognises the importance of securing a reliable and sufficient supply of essential resources for Australian households and businesses. This is why we have committed to reserving 20 per cent of LNG exports for Australians. This landmark reform puts

Australian customers first, placing downward pressure on prices and guarantees domestic supply over the long-term. It protects households and industry from global price shocks while fixing gas supply shortages created over the last decade.

The Government has also strengthened domestic gas security through measures including the mandatory Gas Market Code, which has secured more than 600 PJ of enforceable domestic supply commitments. Together with other market interventions, these measures have improved the east coast gas outlook and reduced risk of seasonal and peak-day shortfalls. We have also committed to focus future Commonwealth offshore gas exploration acreage releases on optimising existing discoveries and infrastructure in producing basins, to prioritise energy security and align with our net zero emissions targets.

Thank you for raising this matter with me. I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Resources, Ms Madeleine King

National Disability Insurance Scheme

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 concerning a petition regarding National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) participant safety and safeguarding.

Safeguarding participants is the National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) highest priority. The NDIA is committed to supporting participants to be safe, while respecting their autonomy and rights to make decisions about risk in their lives.

I would like to share information on the NDIA's current policies and how the NDIA embeds risk identification across the participant journey-during check-ins, plan reassessments, internal reviews and matters before the Administrative Reviews Tribunal (ART).

The NDIA's Participant Safeguarding Policy, published in 2023, sets out how the NDIA works with participants to identify, assess, and manage risk, and to strengthen safeguards that protect them from violence, abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

This policy is guided by 6 principles that were co-designed with the disability community. To ensure this policy remains fit-for-purpose, the NDIA continues to work actively with the community on improvements to the participant safeguarding experience in the new way of planning.

The policy also recognises that safeguarding is a shared responsibility across the NDIA and the broader disability service and support system. This includes the NOIS Quality and

Safeguards Commission, NDIS-funded providers, mainstream services such as health, housing, education and families, and other informal supports. Further information around the policy can be found at www.ndis.gov.au/policies-rules-and-legal/policy/participantsafeguarding- policy

At all stages in the NDIS journey, NDIA staff work to understand if there are areas of risk in the participant's life and identify safeguards. Safeguards could include:

scheduling more frequent check-in conversations

setting shorter periods between plan reassessments

including a support as a stated support to make sure the funds are used for a specific service or service provider.

NDIA staff may also decide to include specific supports in the participant's plan to help resolve or mitigate risks. These can include support coordination, specialist behaviour supports, capacity building supports to help address a specific risk and operate as a safeguard, and funding for rental of assistive technology if there's a supply delay or if assistive technology requirements are still being decided.

NDIAstaff assess participant risk through a structured, evidence-based safeguarding approach that draws on functional information, environmental indicators, and formal risk tools. This process supports consistent, trauma-informed decision making and early identification of participant safety issues.

Participant safeguarding capability is built through a suite of frontline learning packages for NDIA and Partner staff. Together, this learning builds practical capability to identify risk and vulnerability, have sensitive, trauma-informed conversations about risks or safety concerns, and respond appropriately. The frontline induction learning program develops skills in recognising risk, applying appropriate safeguards, and supporting participants to make their own safeguarding decisions.

When considering plan reassessments, NOIA staff are required to consider whether any risks are present. This includes assessing whether there is any risk of harm to the health or wellbeing of a participant or prospective participant; instability in accommodation or care arrangements; risks associated with the nature of the person's disability; or risks relating to the availability or continuity of supports.

Where a clear safeguarding or emergency concern is identified, staff can use established escalation pathways to refer matters to dedicated escalation teams for timely consideration and appropriate management.

This approach to participant safety remains paramount during internal and external reviews processes.

The NDIA triages urgent internal reviews based on the immediacy of risk, with additional clinical and technical advice provided where required. Where appropriate, the Agency may work across business areas to address funding or support issues during the review, and participants may be supported to access alternative pathways, such as an unscheduled reassessment, if their circumstances change.

For matters before the ART, the NOIA works closely with participants to understand their support needs and gather appropriate evidence, noting that funded supports cannot be increased without sufficient information. The NOIA triages ART matters on receipt to identify risk, issue complexity, and opportunities for earlier resolution. The aim is to undertake early assessment by working with participants to understand their circumstances and discuss resolution options before an ART hearing.

This highlights a strong emphasis on early resolution, with majority of matters resolved prior to a substantive ART hearing, often through agreement or the provision of new information during the review process.

Participants may request an unscheduled reassessment if their circumstances change during a review, and the existence of an ART application does not affect their rights. Where participant risk is identified, the NOIA works with the ART to expedite decision making.

The NDIA continues to invest in improving the improved dispute resolution approaches, including early triage and assessment of matters to identify risk and complexity, and to support earlier, fairer resolution wherever possible.

The NDIA also has a Participant Service Guarantee (PSG) which sets clear timeframes for key NDIS processes. The NDIA must make decisions about access, plan approvals, plan reviews and nominee changes within these timeframes. This gives participants, families and carers greater certainty about how long processes will take.

Each quarter, the NDIAreports against PSG timeframes in the Quarterly Report.

I trust that the information provided in this letter is of assistance.

Thank you for raising these matters.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Senator McAllister

Road Safety

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 25 May 2026 to the Hon Catherine King MP, Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, regarding

Petition EN9715—Banning non-standard LED headlights. As the Minister responsible for the national road vehicle standards, Minister King has asked me to reply on her behalf.

The Australian Government supports the introduction of new technologies that improve the safety of new vehicles. The Government's long-standing policy is to harmonise the national road vehicle standards, the Australian Design Rules (ADRs), with the international United

Nations (UN) regulations as set by the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle

Regulations. This allows the Government to set AD Rs that provide Australians access to safer and reasonably priced vehicles produced for a global market.

Vehicles first entering the Australian market must meet the ADRs for lighting. I have recently signed new AD Rs for lighting to align with the international regulations to prevent barriers that may have restricted the latest vehicle lighting technology coming to Australia.

The Australian Government regulates the first supply of vehicles to the Australian market, while the states and territories regulate the use of vehicles in-service. Modification of vehicles, including the fitment of aftermarket lighting or globes, is a matter for each state and territory. In general, the states and territories require that vehicles continue to meet the ADRs that were in effect at time of first supply.

I am pleased to advise that my department is participating in a UN Task Force to examine concerns regarding lights that cause glare to other road users. My department participates in this task force to better understand the issue, support ongoing global research, and contribute to the development of standards that appropriately consider the Australian context. Any updates to these international regulations could then be considered for adoption in Australia.

While changes at the international level may take some time, my department will consider any updated lighting requirements at the earliest appropriate opportunity.

Thank you for taking the time to write to me on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister Regional Development, Senator Chisholm

Environment

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence of 22 June 2026 regarding the Petition Ministerial Referral EN9729. I appreciate the time you have taken to bring this matter to my attention.

The Australian Government has delivered on its commitment to strengthen and streamline Australia's national environmental laws with the passage of Environment Protection Reform Bills through Parliament in November 2025. The reforms will deliver greater accountability and transparency in environmental decision making, stronger environmental protection and restoration and support the delivery of accountable, efficient, outcomes-focused and transparent environmental regulatory decision making.

The new, independent National Environmental Protection Agency (National EPA) commenced on 1 July 2026 and is the first independent national environmental regulator. The National EPA will have a clear focus on compliance and enforcement to ensure that our precious natural environment is protected and restored for future generations to enjoy.

The Government has also committed to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. This means addressing the causes of environmental decline like land and sea use change, invasive species, climate change, pollution and unsustainable use of resources.

The Government is taking action to mitigate threats and improve resilience for our biodiversity and ecosystems by:

Taking a leadership role, both domestically and internationally and setting ambitious national targets to protect and restore our environment.

Tackling biodiversity decline through Australia's Strategy for Nature, delivering on the 30 by 30 target and the commitment to no new extinctions.

Providing over one billion dollars in support for environmental protection, natural resource management and sustainable agriculture programs and initiatives through the Natural Heritage Trust.

Investing in environmental science, data and information to help make better decisions that result in positive outcomes for nature.

Delivering water commitments under the Basin plan, investing in water infrastructure, delivering First Nations water and future-proofing water resources.

Increasing investment in nature protection, repair and management, through practical on ground projects.

These activities all address the causes of environmental decline at different scales and involve partnerships with states and territories, where we share responsibilities for environment and water management.

State and territory governments have primary responsibility for water management and its associated regulation. The Australian Government works collaboratively with jurisdictions through the Water Ministerial Council on national reform processes, including the new

National Water Agreement, to support sustainable and efficient water use.

In the Murray-Darling Basin, the Water Act 2007 and the Murray- Darling Basin Plan provide additional frameworks for water allocation, environmental water management and compliance.

Independent oversight is provided by the Productivity Commission who conducts two reviews: one into national water reform and the other into Basin Plan implementation. The Inspector-General of Water Compliance regulates compliance, enforcement and water market integrity in the Murray- Darling Basin. The Water Act is subject to a statutory 10-year review which is due by the end of 2027 to ensure our legislative framework remains fit for purpose.

State of the Environment Reporting (SOE) is also required under Australia's national environmental laws, and the next report is due to be provided to me in December 2026. Australia's SOE is a national assessment that brings together the best available science, data and First Nations knowledge to provide a comprehensive picture of the condition of our environment. It helps track how our natural systems are changing and what that means for communities, ecosystems and the economy. Following the national environmental law reforms, future reports will transition to a two-year reporting cycle from 2028 onward.

Thank you again for raising these matters with me.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the Environment and Water, Senator Watt

Electoral System

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for referring petition EN9735 about holding a referendum on the preferential voting system to the Prime Minister, the Hon Anthony Albanese MP. The Prime Minister has referred this petition to me, as the Special Minister of State responsible for electoral matters.

A strong democracy depends on all citizens being able to participate equally. The Australian Government believes everyone should have an equal say at the ballot box.

Referendums are held to change Australia's Constitution. The Constitution provides for the Australian Parliament to legislate a method for electing Senators and Members of the House of Representatives. These methods are set out in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act).

The Electoral Act has provided for full preferential voting in the Australian House of Representatives since 1918. Full preferential voting, as applied in Australian federal elections, requires a candidate to build an absolute majority of support in an electorate. In jurisdictions using a first-past-the-post method, a candidate may be elected with less than a majority of support from voters.

Additionally, since 2016, the Electoral Act has provided for partial optional preferential voting in

Senate elections. Under this system, a voter must sequentially number at least 12 candidates below the line on the Senate ballot paper or at least six parties or groups above the line on the Senate ballot paper. Vote-saving provisions mean a vote is not informal if the voter sequentially numbers just six preferences below the line or just one preference above the line.

The 2016 changes also abolished Senate group voting tickets. This means the flow of a voter's preferences now goes only to the parties, groups, or candidates for which the voter explicitly expressed a preference on the ballot paper.

The High Court of Australia has presided over cases related to the method of voting under the Electoral Act, upholding the use of preferential voting for election for the House of Representatives and partial optional preferential voting in Senate elections.

After each federal election, the Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) holds an inquiry into all aspects of the conduct of the election. The preferential voting system was considered by JSCEM following the 2013 and 2019 federal elections.

The JSCEM is currently undertaking an inquiry into the 2025 federal election and other matters. I encourage interested petitioners to follow the work of the JSCEM as it explores important issues impacting our democracy. The JSCEM's webpage can be accessed here: www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral Matters/.

Thank you for bringing the concerns referred to in the petition to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister of State, Senator Farrell

Albanese Government

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your email dated 22 June 2026 to the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister, regarding presentation of Petition EN9756. The Prime Minister has asked me to reply on his behalf.

This Petition calls on the House of Representatives to move and support a vote of no confidence in the government. The Petitioners consider a vote of no confidence should be supported because of "concerns regarding maladministration, lack of accountability, and failure to protect key national interests". The petition references several policy matters including cost of living, fuel security, national votes and defence.

Whether a vote of no confidence in the government is to be moved is a matter for Members of

Parliament. However, I note the following regarding the concerns raised in the petition.

Cost of Living

The government is delivering reforms across a range of sectors to improve cost of living pressures. These include:

tax cuts,

making free Urgent Care Clinics a permanent part of Medicare,

record investment in public hospitals,

making life-changing medicines cheaper by putting them on the Pharmaceutical

Benefits Scheme,

making free TAFE permanent,

three days' subsidised childcare for families who need it,

expanding paid parental leave to six months, with superannuation accrued in that leave,

making supermarket price gouging illegal, and

banning card surcharges.

Fuel Affordability

The Australian Government is continuing to closely monitor fuel supplies to ensure Australians continue to get the fuel when and where they need it. The government has put in place a range of measures to increase fuel supply and reduce the risk of future shortages. These include:

a $14.8 billion Australian Fuel Security and Resilience package that establishes a permanent government-owned Australian Fuel Security Reserve of around one billion litres, and lifts Australia's critical diesel and jet fuel reserves to around 50 days,

new legislation to support fuel imports through financial arrangements such as guarantees, loans and insurance,

engaging with critical regional partners to ensure Australia's energy supply remains secure and supporting energy security across the region,

fuel quality standards have been temporarily adjusted to allow for 100 million litres of additional fuel to enter our market each month,

changes to the Fuel Security Services Payment have helped our domestic refineries continue operating and adapt to new technologies, and

the government is working with First Nations organisations and community partners to support access to fuel, energy and essential goods for regional and remote areas.

The government has also taken the following actions to ensure that savings are passed on to consumers, reducing fuel prices:

new laws against petrol price gouging, giving the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission new powers to track how savings are being passed on,

increasing fines for retailers caught ripping Australians off,

halved the fuel excise for petrol and diesel from 1 April to 30 June, tapering this support to16 cents per litre from 1 July to 2 August 2026, and

extending relief for transport and freight operators by reducing the heavy vehicle road user charge by 16 cents per litre from 1 July to 2 August 2026.

National Votes

In October 2023, the government delivered on its election commitment to hold a referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution by establishing a

Voice to Parliament. The referendum did not pass and the Government respects Australia's decision.

Defence

The government has allocated $425 billion over the decade to 2035-36 to deliver accelerated capability for the Australian Defence Force. The government's 2026 National Defence Strategy builds on the inaugural National Defence Strategy published in 2024. Defence spending as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will rise to three per cent by 2033.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to the Prime Minister's attention. I have copied this letter to the Prime Minister.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister, Mr Gorman

Fuel Security

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your email of 22 June 2026 presenting petition number EN9772 which asks the Australian Government to consider measures to strengthen Australia's sovereign oil and gas capabilities. I appreciate you bringing this matter to my attention.

Australia's oil and gas sector makes a substantial economic contribution, with around $75 billion in gross value added in 2025 and employing nearly 18,000 people as of the February 2026 quarter. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports are near record levels and Australia is completely self-sufficient when it comes to meeting its domestic gas needs. Current indicators show continued strength in the sector's investment, exploration and export activity. Future Commonwealth offshore petroleum exploration acreage releases will focus on optimising existing discoveries and infrastructure in producing basins to prioritise energy security.

To ensure Australian industries and people can access their gas at affordable prices, the Albanese Government is reserving the equivalent of 20 per cent of LNG exports for the domestic gas market. The 20 per cent domestic reservation will put strong downward pressure on domestic gas prices, shield our industry and households from global price volatility, and ensure Australia's energy security by avoiding potential gas supply shortfalls. It is a key plank of our plan to build Australia's energy sovereignty, alongside growing our fuel reserves and supporting our domestic liquid fuel refining capabilities.

Secure and affordable gas is key for our Future Made in Australia agenda, particularly for nationally significant, trade exposed industrial users who can't currently electrify.

The Albanese Government is committed to ensuring Australians continue to benefit from our oil and gas industry and have access to the fuels we need. In 2023-24, oil and gas companies in Australia paid almost $12 billion in tax. We also agree with many in the community that gas companies should pay more tax. So in 2024 we reformed the Commonwealth Petroleum Resources Rent Tax to increase how much gas companies will pay between now and 2030 by $2.4 billion.

We do not support, however, taxpayer-funded or owned oil and gas exploration and production projects. The private sector built Australia's oil and gas sector, investing billions of dollars over decades and creating thousands of highly paid, secure jobs. For the Australian Government to take an equity stake in mature oil and gas projects now would not be fiscally responsible. Owning an oil and gas project means assuming responsibility for it—any accidents, any problems. It also means decommissioning it when it's reached end of life. As set out in our Australia's Offshore Decommissioning Roadmap, decommissioning is expected to cost $60 billion over the next 30 to 50 years.

The Australian Government is delivering a range of measures to support our domestic fuel security, improve fuel quality and protect consumers and our economy from supply disruptions.

The Australian Fuel Security and Resilience package announced in the Budget includes:

$3.2 billion to establish a Government-owned Australian Fuel Security Reserve of around 1 billion litres of fuel, focused on diesel and jet fuel

Lifting the Minimum Stockholding Obligation (MSO) by around 10 days for diesel, petrol and jet fuel, increasing stocks to around 50 days of supply

Strengthening the Fuel Security Services Payment to ensure the future of the two domestic oil refineries, and

$10 million for feasibility studies into new or expanded fuel refining capabilities, co-funded with state and territory governments.

Thank you again for providing me with the opportunity to respond to petition number EN9772.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Resources, Ms Madeleine King

Agricultural Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority

Dear Chair

Thank you for your letter of 22 June 2026 to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, the Hon Julie Collins MP, regarding petition ministerial referral (EN9792). Your letter was referred to me, as this matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) Adverse Experience Reporting Program (AERP) plays an important role in supporting the ongoing monitoring of registered chemical products after they enter the market. Reports received through the program help the APVMA identify potential safety signals, monitor product performance and determine whether further regulatory assessment is required.

Information about adverse experience reports is included in the APVMA's Annual Report in accordance with the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Regulations 1995. Information received through the AERP is assessed alongside other scientific and regulatory information to support evidence-based decision-making.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) publishes information relating to adverse events through the Eudra Vigilance Veterinary database. The EMA notes that reports of suspected adverse events should not be interpreted in isolation, as the existence of a report does not establish that a product caused the reported outcome. Regulatory conclusions can only be reached following a detailed scientific assessment of all available evidence.

The APVMA does not provide adverse experience reports to the EMA. Information appearing in the Eudra Vigilance Veterinary database is reported directly to the EMA by marketing authorisation holders under separate reporting arrangements. The APVMA is not involved in that reporting process.

Where adverse experience reports indicate a potential safety signal or emerging trend, the APVMA undertakes further analysis and assessment. This includes consideration of reporting trends, available scientific evidence and information from domestic and international regulatory authorities. Where warranted, matters are referred to the relevant technical specialists for further consideration and advice. A report submitted to the AERP represents information provided by a reporter and does not, on its own, establish that a product caused the reported outcome. Regulatory decisions are based on an assessment of all available evidence.

This process supports timely and proportionate regulatory action where required. Depending on the circumstances, actions may include updates to product labels and safety information, changes to conditions of use, targeted compliance activity, formal reconsideration of a product, or, where necessary, cancellation of a registration. The APVMA continues to monitor adverse experience information and other relevant evidence relating to registered veterinary chemical products and will take regulatory action where the available evidence supports intervention.

The APVMA acknowledges the interest of pet owners, veterinarians and other stakeholders in understanding how adverse experience reports are used and how regulatory decisions are made. This includes interest in access to information held by the APVMA through both public reporting and Freedom of lnformation (FOI) processes.

In relation to FOI request 2025/021, the APVMA continued to process the request following a deemed refusal due to statutory timeframes. During assessment, the request was identified as large and complex, involving extensive documentation and datasets. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), the APVMA undertook a practical refusal consultation process on the basis that processing the request would substantially and unreasonably divert resources from the APVMA' s core functions. The applicant did not agree to narrow the scope of the request, and a final practical refusal decision was subsequently issued.

The Australian Government acknowledges the petitioners' request for a parliamentary inquiry into these matters. The APVMA operates within a comprehensive legislative and accountability framework and remains subject to a range of oversight mechanisms, including parliamentary scrutiny, annual reporting obligations and independent review processes.

The APVMA remains committed to a transparent, science-based and proportionate regulatory system that supports confidence in the safety, quality and effectiveness of agricultural and veterinary chemical products used in Australia.

Thank you for bringing your concerns to the Australian Government's attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry,Mr Chisholm

Electric Vehicles

Dear Chair

Thank you for your correspondence originally directed to the Treasurer, the Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP, concerning Petition EN9796 on Hyundai and Kia electric vehicles. Your correspondence has been referred to me for response.

I note the concern raised by the petition regarding the alleged failure of Integrated Charging Control Units on certain Hyundai and Kia electric vehicles, and the adequacy of remedies available to affected consumers. I appreciate the petition highlights that this issue may have affected thousands of vehicles and that some owners have experienced significant repair costs where warranty claims were denied.

The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) requires goods and services supplied to consumers to meet a range of consumer guarantees. These guarantees include that goods are of acceptable quality, meaning they are safe, durable and free from defects, and fit for any disclosed purpose. Businesses must also comply with any warranties they have provided, though such warranties cannot change or take away a consumer's rights under the consumer guarantees.

Noting the petition's claim that warranty claims have been denied, there are no set rules for deciding how long a product should last under the consumer guarantees. However, products are expected to be durable enough to perform their intended functions for a reasonable time, having regard to factors such as the type of product, how it was used, and how it compares to similar products. If goods do not meet a consumer guarantee, consumers are entitled to a remedy. This may be a repair, replacement or refund depending on the circumstances. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) expects motor vehicle dealers and manufacturers, including electric vehicle manufacturers, to meet their obligations under the ACL when responding to consumer issues involving motor vehicles.

I have brought the concerns you have raised to the attention of relevant officials within the ACCC. The ACCC monitors information it receives regarding potential consumer law issues, including reports that may indicate broader or systemic concerns affecting multiple consumers.

However, the ACCC is an economy-wide regulator and cannot pursue all matters that come to its attention. The ACCC exercises discretion to direct resources to matters that provide the greatest overall benefit, focusing on circumstances that will, or have the potential to, impact consumers experiencing vulnerability, harm the competitive process or result in widespread consumer or small business detriment. The factors the ACCC considers when deciding whether to pursue a matter, and if so, the appropriate course of action, are outlined in the ACCC's Compliance and Enforcement Policy: https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/acccstrategy- and-priorities/compliance-and-enforcement-priorities.

Responsibility for enforcing the ACL is shared between the ACCC and state and territory consumer protection agencies under a 'one law, multiple regulator' model. At a high level, state and territory consumer protection regulators generally address more localised conduct and, in some jurisdictions, provide conciliation or dispute resolution services for individual consumers. This complements the ACCC's focus on addressing more systemic or national matters.

The Government is taking action to ensure the ACCC and state and territory consumer regulators can better protect Australians' consumer rights. The ACCC is a strong watchdog, and the Government has taken steps to strengthen its enforcement capacity. We have boosted the ACCC's funding by more than $100 million and increased penalties for breaches of competition and consumer law to a maximum of $100 million.

We acknowledge that under the current ACL, consumers can face barriers such as high costs, lengthy delays and power imbalances when trying to enforce their rights. The Government is strengthening the consumer guarantees and supplier indemnification framework so that, when products or services fail, Australians receive the refunds, repairs or replacements to which they are entitled. These reforms will give the ACCC and state and territory regulators expanded enforcement powers, including the ability to issue infringement notices for non-compliance.

The Government will also introduce tough civil penalties for businesses that fail to provide required remedies, including refunds, repairs or replacements, and for manufacturers that fail to indemnify suppliers. This will help ensure breaches of consumer law cannot be dismissed as a mere cost of doing business.

Together, these reforms will strengthen protections for Australian consumers and provide regulators with an expanded toolkit to act when businesses breach their obligations.

While the ACCC and state and territory consumer protection regulators have a role in relation to consumer protection issues involving motor vehicles, other government agencies have primary responsibility for motor vehicle safety outcomes. The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts (DITRDCSA) is responsible for administering legislation that sets national standards for road vehicles and establishes Australia's road vehicle recall framework, including considering potential recall action for unsafe road vehicles and road vehicle components. Given the concerns raised relate to a vehicle component I have also referred the petition to DITRDCSA for its consideration.

The Australian Government expects manufacturers to comply with their obligations under consumer and safety laws and for regulators to respond appropriately where evidence emerges of systemic defects or consumer harm. The concerns raised in the petition have been brought to the attention of the relevant agencies responsible for consumer protection and vehicle safety matters.

I trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister for Productivity, Competition, Charities and Treasury, Mr Leigh

Albanese Government

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your email dated 22 June 2026 to the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister, regarding presentation of Petition EN9839. The Prime Minister has asked me to reply on his behalf.

This Petition calls on Members of the House of Representatives to initiate a parliamentary inquiry into government performance, decision-making, and expenditure. The Petitioners consider an inquiry is necessary because of "growing concerns regarding the handling of key issues, including cost of living pressures, fuel affordability [and] food security".

Whether Members of Parliament initiate such an inquiry is a matter for the House of

Representatives, rather than the government. However, I note the following regarding the concerns raised in the petition.

Cost of Living

The government is delivering reforms across a range of sectors to improve cost of living pressures. These include:

tax cuts,

making free Urgent Care Clinics a permanent part of Medicare,

record investment in public hospitals,

making life-changing medicines cheaper by putting them on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme,

making free TAFE permanent,

three days' subsidised childcare for families who need it,

expanding paid parental leave to six months, with superannuation accrued in that leave,

making supermarket price gouging illegal, and

banning card surcharges.

Fuel Affordability

The Australian Government is continuing to closely monitor fuel supplies to ensure Australians continue to get the fuel when and where they need it. The government has put in place a range of measures to increase fuel supply and reduce the risk of future shortages. These include:

a $14.8 billion Australian Fuel Security and Resilience package that establishes a permanent government-owned Australian Fuel Security Reserve of around one billion litres, and lifts Australia's critical diesel and jet fuel reserves to around 50 days,

new legislation to support fuel imports through financial arrangements such as guarantees, loans and insurance,

engaging with critical regional partners to ensure Australia's energy supply remains secure and supporting energy security across the region,

fuel quality standards have been temporarily adjusted to allow for 100 million litres of additional fuel to enter our market each month,

changes to the Fuel Security Services Payment have helped our domestic refineries continue operating and adapt to new technologies, and

the government is working with First Nations organisations and community partners to support access to fuel, energy and essential goods for regional and remote areas.

The government has also taken the following actions to ensure that savings are passed on to consumers, reducing fuel prices:

new laws against petrol price gouging, giving the Australian Competition and

Consumer Commission new powers to track how savings are being passed on,

increasing fines for retailers caught ripping Australians off,

halved the fuel excise for petrol and diesel from 1 April to 30 June, tapering this support to16 cents per litre from 1 July to 2 August 2026, and

extending relief for transport and freight operators by reducing the heavy vehicle road user charge by 16 cents per litre from 1 July to 2 August 2026.

Food Security

The Australian Government has committed $3.5 million to the development of a National Food

Security Strategy ("Feeding Australia: A National Food Security Strategy"). This includes the commissioning of a National Food Supply Chain Assessment to provide advice to Government on practical steps to strengthen preparedness for disruptions to food production and supply chains.

Thank you again for bringing this petition to the Prime Minister's attention. I have copied this letter to the Prime Minister.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister, Mr Gorman

Public Sector Governance

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence dated 22 June 2026 about Petition EN9859 on 'Truth in Communication' and use of the term 'free' by the government and media in relation to health and social services.

The Australian Government has strong frameworks and guardrails in place to ensure all communication presented on government websites and communications materials is factually accurate.

The Australian Government Guidelines on Advertising and Information Campaigns by noncorporateCommonwealth entities provide clear guidance requiring communications to be objective, fair, and accessible, and for information presented as fact to be accurate and verifiable.

Campaigns must demonstrate value for money, comply with legal requirements, and avoid party-political content. Advertising campaigns are subject to review and oversight by an Independent Communications Committee to support transparency and accountability in the use of public funds.

Additionally, all public servants are required to comply with the APS Values and APS Code of Conduct prescribed in the Public Service Act 1999, which require them to behave, at all times, in a way that is impartial, committed to service, accountable, respectful, ethical, and demonstrating stewardship. This extends to their actions and communication with the public.

I thank you for your interest in this area and note the petition.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for the Public Service, Ms Gallagher

Veterans

Dear Chair

Thank you for the referral of petition EN9860 to the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, the Hon Matt Keogh MP. As the Minister responsible for the Administrative Review Tribunal (Tribunal) and Commonwealth legal financial assistance, this petition was referred to my office. The petition to the House of Representatives requests amendment to section 294 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (ART Act) to provide a mandatory entitlement to legal or financial assistance for holders of a DVA Gold Card involved in proceedings before the Administrative Review Tribunal (Tribunal), without requiring proof of hardship.

The Tribunal provides an independent mechanism of review that is accessible and responsive to the diverse needs of parties and ensures that applications are resolved quickly and fairly without requiring f01mal legal advocacy. The Tribunal can adapt its procedures and offers supports to ensure that all parties to proceedings can meaningfully participate, recognising that most Tribunal users are self-represented.

Section 294 of the ART Act provides that a person can apply to the Attorney-General for legal or financial assistance in relation to a Tribunal proceeding. As Attorney-General, I, or my delegate, can grant a person legal or financial assistance if I consider that refusing the application would cause hardship and that the person's application should be granted in all the circumstances.

Assistance provided under section 294 of the ART Act is one of a number of schemes for legal financial assistance administered by the Attorney-General's Department (the Department). The discretionary granting of assistance is consistent with other forms of statutory and non-statutory legal financial assistance schemes administered by the Department—see: www.ag.gov. au/legal-system/legal-assistance-services/ commonwealth-le gal-financialassistance.

Under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and the

Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024, the Department is required to administer this funding for proper purposes and ensure that Commonwealth resources are used efficiently, effectively, economically, and ethically. The discretionary nature of legal financial assistance schemes is appropriate, given the limited funding available.

A mandatory entitlement to legal or financial assistance would mean that the funds available under the sub-program could be exhausted more quickly, limiting the Department's ability to share limited grant funds equitably and to those cases that will assist the community to the greatest extent.

Applications for legal financial assistance are considered in accordance with the Commonwealth Guidelines for Legal Financial Assistance 2012, which confer discretion on me, or my delegate, when determining whether to approve an application, the conditions that may apply to any grant, and the amount of assistance that may be provided. This broad discretion enables decision-makers to consider the individual circumstances of each case, including a range of applicant, financial and legal action considerations.

Thank you for bringing your concerns to the Australian Government's attention. I trust this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Attorney-General, Ms Rowland

Administrative Review Tribunal

Dear Chair

Thank you for the refe1rnl of petition EN9863 to the Attorney-General, Reference. MC26-022879 the Hon Michelle Rowland MP. The petition to the House of Representatives requests amendment to the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (ART Act) to provide a mandatory entitlement to legal or financial assistance for members of the public who are respondents in proceedings before the Administrative Review Tribunal (Tribunal), where a Commonwealth agency is a party, without requiring proof of hardship.

The Tribunal provides an independent mechanism of review that is accessible and responsive to the diverse needs of parties and ensures that applications are resolved as quickly, and with as little formality and expense, as a proper consideration of matters pe1mits. The Tribunal can adapt its procedures and offers supports to ensure that all parties to proceedings can meaningfully participate, recognising that most Tribunal users are self-represented.

Section 294 of the ART Act provides that a person can apply to the Attorney-General for legal or financial assistance in relation to a Tribunal proceeding. As Attorney-General, I, or my delegate, can grant a person legal or financial assistance if I consider that refusing the application would cause hardship and that the person's application should be granted in all the circumstances.

Assistance provided under section 294 of the ART Act is one of a number of schemes for legal financial assistance administered by the Attorney-General's Department (the Department).

The discretionary granting of assistance is consistent with other forms of statutory and non-statut01y legal financial assistance schemes administered by the Department—see: www.ag.gov. au/legal-system/legal-assistance-services/ commonwealth-legal-financial-assistance.

Under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and the Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024, the Department is required to administer this funding for proper purposes and ensure that Commonwealth resources are used efficiently, effectively, economically, and ethically. The discretionary nature of legal financial assistance schemes is appropriate, given the limited funding available.

A mandatory entitlement to legal or financial assistance would mean that the funds available under the sub-program could be exhausted more quickly, limiting the Department's ability to share limited grant funds equitably and to those cases that will assist the community to the greatest extent.

Applications for legal financial assistance are considered in accordance with the CommonwealthGuidelines for Legal Financial Assistance 2012, which confer discretion on me, or my delegate, when determining whether to approve an application, the conditions that may apply to any grant, and the amount of assistance that may be provided. This broad discretion enables decisionmakers to consider the individual circumstances of each case, including a range of applicant, financial and legal action considerations.

Thank you for bringing your concerns to the Australian Government's attention. I trnst this information is of assistance.

Yours sincerely

from the Attorney-General, Ms Rowland

Family and Domestic Violence

Dear Chair

Thank you for your email of 22 June 2026 to the Attorney-General, the Hon Michelle Rowland MP, sent on behalf of the Standing Committee of Petitions (the Committee) I am responding as petition EN9868's focus on family violence information sharing falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

I thank the petitioners for raising this matter to the House of Representatives. The Australian Government understands how important inter-jurisdictional information sharing is to ensuring that victim-survivors of family, domestic and sexual violence are kept safe and to ensure that people using violence are held accountable for their actions. No one should be able to move interstate to avoid accountability.

The importance of strong mechanisms for information sharing was emphasised in Unlocking the Prevention Potential, the August 2024 report of the Rapid Review of PreventionApproaches (Rapid Review). The report is available on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet website.

In response to the Rapid Review, National Cabinet agreed to accelerate action to deliver on Australia 's National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022-2032. This package included projects to pursue information sharing across systems and state boundaries.

In addition, and at the request of the Women and Women's Safety Ministerial Council (WWSMC), the Data and Digital Ministers Meeting (DDMM) agreed to develop national guidance to enable best-practice FDV information sharing, under its National Data Sharing Work Program. This project was co-led by my Department and the Victorian Government, in consultation with the Western Australian Government, and was endorsed by the DDMM in January 2026.

Progress is being made on these complex but important projects.

Thank you again for writing. I hope this information is useful to the Committee and to the petitioners to understand the work we are doing to improve information sharing.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Social Services, Ms Plibersek

Migration

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 17 August 2026 enclosing Petition EN10015, with 2083 signatures, concerning Parent Visa places for the 2026-27 program year. Your correspondence has been referred to me as the matter falls within my portfolio responsibilities.

The Australian Government acknowledges the important role family migration plays in allowing

Australian citizens and permanent residents to reunite with their family members and contributing to social cohesion by strengthening family and community bonds in Australia.

The number of places allocated to the permanent Parent program is decided annually as part of the permanent Migration Program planning process. For the program year 2026-27

(commencing on 1 July 2026), 7,060 places have been allocated to the permanent Parent visa program. This number has been reduced from a planning level of 8,500 in 2025-26 and represents a 16.9% reduction to the program.

This decision by the Government recognises the need to strike a balance between sustainable family reunion and maximising Australia's longer term economic growth and prosperity. Parent reunification brings social, economic and cultural benefit to the Australian community, but this benefit must be balanced against the significant costs of the Parent program on the taxpayer.

Thank you for bringing Petition EN10015 to my attention.

Yours sincerely

from the Assistant Minister for Immigration, Mr Thistlethwaite

Victoria:Roads

Dear Ms Belyea

Thank you for your correspondence of 17 August 2026 regarding Petition PN0658 on the proposed Traralgon bypass on the Princes Highway.

The Australian Government is proud to be delivering modern transport infrastructure for Victorians through the Infrastructure Investment Program (IIP). Under the IIP, the Australian Government is investing $322.9 million along the Princes Highway corridor in Victoria to improve safety and productivity, accessibility and road connectivity for all road users.

Projects within this corridor include deliver of bridge strengthening works for High Productivity Freight Vehicle movements, new overtaking lanes, intersection and safety upgrades and installation of traffic signals.

While the Australian Government provides significant funding for land transport infrastructure projects, the responsibility for identifying, prioritising and delivering projects lies with state, territory and local governments.

Should the Victorian Government seek Commonwealth funding for the plam1ing and delivery of a Traralgon bypass, the Australian Government would consider the request in the context of future Budget processes.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, Ms Catherine King

Heart Health

Veterans

Health Care

Federal Court of Australia: Subpoena

Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026

Trade and Investment Growth Joint Committee

Orders of the Day

Raise Our Voice in Parliament

Raise Our Voice in Parliament

New South Wales: Local Government

Veterans

Roads

Raise Our Voice in Parliament

Banking and Financial Services

Raise Our Voice in Parliament

Small Business

Middle East: Iran

Lawes, Mr Wayne

Raise Our Voice in Parliament

Banking and Financial Services

Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence

Small Business

Cybersafety

Banking and Financial Services

Ukraine

Banking and Financial Services

Paterson Electorate: Roads

Afghanistan War: 25th Anniversary

Israel Attacks: Third Anniversary

Baird, Hon. Bruce George, AM

Small Business

Artificial Intelligence

Acknowledgement

Banking and Financial Services

Economy

Acknowledgement

Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal

Superannuation

Small Business

Wages and Salaries

Banking and Financial Services

Avian Influenza

Reserve Bank of Australia

Cybersafety

North Queensland

Cybersafety

Banking and Financial Services

Critical Minerals Industry

Speaker

Questions in Writing

Australian National Audit Office

Report Nos 5 and 6 of 2026-27

Presentation