﻿
<hansard noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.2">
  <session.header>
    <date>2026-03-25</date>
    <parliament.no>3</parliament.no>
    <session.no>1</session.no>
    <period.no>0</period.no>
    <chamber>House of Reps</chamber>
    <page.no>0</page.no>
    <proof>1</proof>
  </session.header>
  <chamber.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-SODJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SODJobDate">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;" />
            <a href="Chamber" type="">Wednesday, 25 March 2026</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The SPEAKER (</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Hon.</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">
            </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Milton Dick</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">) </span>took the chair at 09:00, made an acknowledgement of country and read prayers.</span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</title>
        <page.no>1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Endometriosis Awareness Month</title>
          <page.no>1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>March is Endometriosis Awareness Month. This is a disease that affects one in seven Australian women, yet for too long the health system didn't take it seriously or treat it properly. As part of the biggest ever investment in women's health, our government is changing that. At the last election we promised to open 11 new endo and pelvic pain clinics, to create a network of 33 clinics right around Australia. Eight of those clinics are already open, and the remaining three will be open next month.</para>
<para>I visited the Werribee endo and pelvic pain clinic in February with the member for Lalor, and there I met with Alana. She was 22 years old and she told me that for years her pain was dismissed. She was told, 'Just take a Panadol'—not anymore. She told me of the difference it had made to her life. Now Australian women are able to visit one of these clinics and get the treatment they need. What's more, we've listed new medicines for endo on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, saving thousands of dollars a year. New endo clinics, cheaper medicines, stronger Medicare—that is what you get from a government that takes women's health seriously, and that is what our Labor government is delivering.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELL</name>
    <name.id>282981</name.id>
    <electorate>Moncrieff</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I would like to associate the coalition with the Prime Minister's comments on endometriosis month. There are so many women in our country who suffer great pain in silence, and I would like to highlight to those opposite and to the nation the great work that Minister Greg Hunt did in this space while he was the minister for health and the ongoing advocacy that the coalition has delivered for women suffering with endometriosis.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS ON SIGNIFICANT MATTERS</title>
        <page.no>1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS ON SIGNIFICANT MATTERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Roberts, Ms Rhoda Ann, AO</title>
          <page.no>1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>2</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I sincerely thank the shadow minister for those words. I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That further statements on Rhoda Roberts AO be permitted in the Federation Chamber.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>2</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Selection Committee</title>
          <page.no>2</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>2</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present report No. 9 of the Selection Committee relating to consideration of committee and delegation business and private members' business on Monday 30 March 2026. The report will be printed in the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> for today, and the committee's determinations will appear on tomorrow's <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline><inline font-style="italic">.</inline> Copies of the report have been placed on the table.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The report read as follows—</inline></para>
<quote><para class="block">Report relating to the consideration of committee and delegation business and of private Members' business</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1. The Committee met in private session on Tuesday, 24 March 2026.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">2. The Committee deliberated on items of committee and delegation business that had been notified, private Members' business items listed on the Notice Paper and notices lodged on Tuesday, 24 March 2026, and determined the order of precedence and times on Monday, 30 March 2026, as follows:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Items for House of Representatives Chamber (10.10 am to 12 noon)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">COMMITTEE AND DELEGATION BUSINESS</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Presentation and statements</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1 AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Delegation</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">United Kingdom and Poland 9-15 November 2025.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that statements on the report may be made</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">all statements to conclude by 10.15 am.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Neumann</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline>5<inline font-style="italic"> minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 1 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Notices</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1 MS CHANEY: To present a Bill for an Act to amend the <inline font-style="italic">Interactive Gambling Act 2001</inline>, and for related purposes. (<inline font-style="italic">Interactive Gambling Amendment (Stop the Gambling Ads) Bill 2026</inline>)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Presenter may speak to the second reading for a period not exceeding 10 minutes</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">pursuant to standing order 41. Debate must be adjourned pursuant to standing order 142.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">2 MR JOYCE: To present a Bill for an Act to amend the <inline font-style="italic">Australian Citizenship Act 2007</inline>, and for related purposes. (<inline font-style="italic">Australian Citizenship Amendment (Stripping Terrorists of Australian Citizenship) Bill 2026</inline>)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Presenter may speak to the second reading for a period not exceeding 10 minutes</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">pursuant to standing order 41. Debate must be adjourned pursuant to standing order 142.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">3 MR HAMILTON: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) Australia's fuel security remains dangerously exposed, with the nation holding among the lowest levels of sovereign fuel reserves in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) Australia imports over 90 per cent of its refined fuel, leaving critical supply chains vulnerable to geopolitical shocks, regional instability, and global market disruptions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) regional, rural and transport-dependent communities are disproportionately exposed to fuel supply disruptions, particularly in the heavy vehicle and agricultural sectors;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) recent volatility in global fuel markets and the Government's failure to respond has massively increased costs for households and businesses, exacerbating cost of living pressures; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(e) the Minister for Climate Change and Energy has:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) failed to deliver a comprehensive, whole-of-government fuel security strategy;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) prioritised the net-zero energy transition without adequately safeguarding short-term liquid fuel resilience;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iii) provided no clear contingency plan for maintaining diesel supply in the event of major import disruption; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iv) failed to provide certainty or support to transport operators exposed to volatile spot market fuel pricing;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) acknowledges that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) fuel security is a matter of national security, economic stability, and community resilience; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) reliable access to diesel is essential for freight, agriculture, mining, emergency services, and regional supply chains;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) calls on the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) urgently develop and implement a national fuel security plan, including increased onshore storage and refining capability;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) provide targeted support to transport operators, particularly small and owner-driver businesses, impacted by fuel price volatility;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) establish clear minimum stockholding obligations to meet or exceed international benchmarks; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) deliver transparent reporting to Parliament on Australia's fuel security position and preparedness; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) condemns the Minister for Climate Change and Energy for:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) failing to ensure Australia's fuel security at a time of increasing global uncertainty;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) neglecting the needs of regional Australia and the transport sector;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) placing ideological energy priorities ahead of practical national resilience; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) being absent in a time of crisis, choosing to attend Conference of the Parties (COP) meetings instead of managing the crisis facing Australia.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">40 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Hamilton</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 8 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">4 MR REPACHOLI: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) recognises:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the conclusion of negotiations between Australia and the European Union (EU) to secure a free trade agreement, which will:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) deliver significant economic benefits to Australian consumers, workers, producers and exporters by opening the doors of the EU's $30 trillion economy and 450 million consumers;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) eliminate tariffs on almost all Australian exports to the EU;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iii) guarantee new and significant market access for Australian farmers and producers, creating more well paid jobs here at home; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(iv) reduce costs for Australian consumers and businesses by making imports from the EU cheaper by cutting tariffs; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) that the Australia-EU Free Trade Agreement will make EU investment in Australia easier, creating more jobs and supporting economic growth; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that in times of turbulence in global trade, Australia is strengthening our partnerships across the world.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">remaining private Members' business time prior to 12 noon.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Repacholi</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 9 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"><inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Items for Federation Chamber (11 am to 1.30 pm)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Notices</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1 MS BOELE: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) under the Fuel Tax Credits (FTC) scheme introduced in 2006, Australian consumers can claim a tax credit for certain fossil fuels used in machinery, and for certain heavy and off-road vehicles;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the FTC scheme cost the Australian taxpayer $10.8 billion in 2025-26;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) by 2028-29, the cost of the FTC scheme is forecast to reach $13.1 billion federally, at a rate of growth higher than growth in spending on a range of social services, including disability assistance, childcare subsidies and aged care;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) the Government has a legislated target of achieving net zero emissions by 2050;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(e) the Department of the Treasury's 2025 modelling shows that current government emissions reductions policies are insufficient for achieving that target;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(f) Australia's economy continues to be subject to geopolitical shocks which impact the availability and cost of fuel; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(g) the FTC scheme is one of the largest headwinds for the Australian economy to electrify, a critical aim for meeting both our net zero emissions targets and supporting Australia's energy independence and therefore national security; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) calls on the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) undertake an orderly phase out of the FTC scheme; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) consider, for that purpose, the introduction of a transition tax incentive with the following elements:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(i) a cap of $50 million annually, per consolidated corporate entity, to the FTC scheme (so that it will not apply to small users of the FTC scheme, such as farmers and small businesses); and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(ii) permit receipts by consolidated corporate entities above $50 million to be retained for capital expenditure in eligible electrification infrastructure and technology investments and to enable an orderly phase-out of fuels eligible for the FTC scheme.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">25 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ms Boele</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 5 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">2 MS BRISKEY: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that the Government is delivering on its commitments to ensure that more Australians have a safe and secure place to call home by:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) working with the states and territories to make renting easier, fairer, and more affordable;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) backing first home buyers with the expanded five per cent deposit scheme for first home buyers and the Help to Buy scheme; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) building more homes, including more social and affordable homes around the country; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) acknowledges that this housing delivery is already changing the lives of Australians who otherwise may not have had an opportunity to access home ownership or put a roof over their head.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">30 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ms Briskey</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 6 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Orders of the day</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1 HOUSING : Resumption of debate (<inline font-style="italic">from 23 March 2026</inline>) on the motion of Mr Caldwell—That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges that the Government has made Australia's housing crisis worse than ever by:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) expanding the 5 per cent deposit scheme from a sensible and targeted approach, to an uncapped and non-means tested free-for-all which has supercharged house prices by 3.6 per cent in just one quarter, and exposed first home buyers including young Australians to larger mortgages;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) creating the failing Housing Australia Future Fund which has $11.4 billion within it but has built only 895 houses in two and a half years of operation; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) proposing to fiddle with the capital gains tax and negative gearing, which is dressed up as an equity measure but will not actually result in the construction of new dwellings;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that the Government is overseeing a historic collapse of housing construction, with dwelling completions now running at around 170,000 each year, whereas 200,000 dwellings were completed annually under the previous Government, while the population has grown by more than 1.6 million since the Government came to power; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) further notes that the Government is already running more than 80,000 dwellings short of the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million homes by mid-2029, and modelling by the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council says the Government will not reach its own target, falling more than 60,000 dwellings short.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">30 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">All Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline>5<inline font-style="italic"> minutes each.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 6 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"><inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">2 EDUCATION SYSTEM: Resumption of debate (<inline font-style="italic">from 9 February 2026</inline>) on the motion of Ms J Ryan—That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges the start of the 2026 school year and the Government's record investment in Australian public schools through the Better and Fairer Schools Agreement;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that this agreement represents the largest Commonwealth investment in public schools by any Australian Government ever and is tied to important reforms to lift student outcomes;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises the importance of teachers and the steps the Government is taking to tackle the teacher shortage;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) further notes that new data shows more Australians are choosing to study teaching, supported by important measures to help more people start and finish teaching degrees including through:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) Commonwealth Paid Prac for teaching students;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) Commonwealth Teaching Scholarships; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) reforms to strengthen teacher training;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) further acknowledges the national effort being undertaken with states and territories to prevent and respond to bullying in schools; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(6) affirms that the Government continues to invest in schools, support teachers, and is committed to building a better and fairer education system.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">40 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">All Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline>5<inline font-style="italic"> minutes each.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 8 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"><inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">3 MS PENFOLD: To move—That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) recognises:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the vital role of neighbourhood and community centres in providing essential social services to individuals and communities in need, particularly in the regions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) neighbourhood and community centres provide critical relief and emergency support where other services do not exist; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the hard work and dedication of the staff and volunteers who work tirelessly and selflessly for others;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) expresses concern that many centres are underfunded and heavily reliant on ad hoc competitive grant funding from state and Commonwealth governments; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) calls on the Government to provide long-term operational funding and dedicated infrastructure funding to secure the future of neighbourhood and community centres and the services each provide to people in desperate need of help.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">remaining private Members' business time prior to 1.30 pm.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ms Penfold</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 5 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Items for Federation Chamber (4.45 pm to 7.30 pm)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Notices — continued</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">4 MR PIKE: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges increasing reports from participants, families and service providers that the Government's mismanagement of the National Disability Insurance Scheme is resulting in reduced support packages, particularly for those with complex and high needs;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes evidence provided through National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) answers to Questions on Notice from Supplementary Budget Estimates showing that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) eligibility reassessments increased from 12,366 in the fourth quarter of 2024-25 to 21,189 in the first quarter of 2025-26;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) reassessments resulting in revoked eligibility surged from 389 to 10,202 over the same period; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) plan reviews led to a reduction of $436 million from participant plans in the first quarter of 2025-26;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises the reports that these changes are often occurring behind the scenes, with limited explanation or transparency provided to participants and their families;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) condemns any approach to scheme sustainability that prioritises cutting participant supports over addressing systemic issues such as waste, red tape and fraud; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) calls on the Government to restore transparency, consistency and accountability in decision making, including clear communication of reasons for funding changes and a renewed focus on fixing inefficiency and safeguarding the integrity of the scheme.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">25 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Pike</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 5 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">5 MS AMBIHAIPAHAR: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the rare convergence of Lunar New Year, Ramadan and Lent, which all commenced within 24 hours of the 17th of February 2026;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) this alignment has not been seen since the 19th century; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) that other significant celebrations, including Holi and Passover, are also being observed by communities at this time;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) acknowledges and thanks the volunteers, faith leaders and community organisations who work tirelessly to mark these occasions and bring our communities together;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises that these celebrations, across cultures and faith traditions, share common themes of reflection, generosity, renewal and hope; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) affirms that Australia's diversity is one of our great national strengths, and that moments like this remind us that our many traditions together form part of the shared Australian story.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 23 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">40 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Ms Ambihaipahar</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 8 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">6 MR VENNING: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes reports of fuel wholesalers rationing petrol and diesel across Australia, raising serious concerns about fuel supply;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) condemns the Government's failure to reassure Australians that a plan is in place to protect the nation's fuel security;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises Australia is a diesel-reliant economy, with fuel critical to transporting food, pharmaceuticals and essential goods;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) further notes the former Government introduced the Petroleum and Other Fuels Reporting Act to strengthen monitoring of Australia's fuel supplies; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) calls on the Government to urgently outline its fuel security strategy and use its powers to identify and protect industries at risk of fuel shortages, including farmers, fishers, manufacturers and transport operators.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 10 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">20 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Venning</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 4 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day. </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">7 MR LAXALE: To move:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges the Government's work to make the super system fairer from top to bottom, helping workers earn more, keep more of what they earn, and retire with more;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes the passage of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026, securing more super for around 1.3 million Australians, including around 750,000 women and 550,000 young people under the age of 30, through boosting the low-income superannuation tax offset and better targeting tax concessions for large balances; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) notes that the superannuation system was built by a former Labor Government and this Government has fought to protect and strengthen it, including by:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) lifting the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) paying super on paid parental leave; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) legislating payday super.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">(Notice given 24 March 2026.)</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">30 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Mr Laxale</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Other Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">5 minutes</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 6 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Orders of the day — continued</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">3 COST OF LIVING: Resumption of debate (<inline font-style="italic">from 23 March 2026</inline>) on the motion of Mr Rebello—That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that the cash rate has risen to 3.85 per cent, marking the 13th interest rate increase under the Government;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) recognises new data showing a record 760,100 Australians aged 65 and over are now in the workforce, the highest level since records began in 1995;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) expresses concern that nearly 100,000 more older Australians feel it necessary to work or delay retirement or are returning to work due to cost of living pressures;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) condemns the Government's economic mismanagement and unchecked debt fuelled spending, which has contributed to rising inflation and increasing household costs for power, rent, groceries and mortgages; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) calls on the Government to take urgent action to address the cost of living crisis, curb spending pressures driving inflation, and ensure older Australians are not forced to delay retirement due to financial hardship.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">30 minutes.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">All Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline>5<inline font-style="italic"> minutes each.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 6 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"><inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">4 APPRENTICESHIPS IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR: Resumption of debate (<inline font-style="italic">from 2 March 2026</inline>) on the motion of Mr Laxale—That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges the Government's Key Apprenticeship Program (KAP) is delivering real outcomes, with over 11,400 housing apprentice commencements in the first six months;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) commends the Government for prioritising apprentices to build more houses through providing $10,000 incentive payments for apprentices in housing construction trades in instalments across the apprenticeship to support commencements and completions;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises the Government's other measures to support apprentices, including increasing the allowance for apprentices living away from home for the first time in more than 20 years, while also doubling support for employers hiring apprentices with a disability;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) supports these measures as vital steps towards building a skilled workforce and addressing the worst skills shortage in 50 years which was left unaddressed by the previous Government; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) further recognises that National Centre for Vocational Education Research data shows there were 22 per cent more apprentices in training within the construction sector at 30 June 2025 compared to 30 June 2019.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Time allotted</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline> <inline font-style="italic">remaining private Members' business time prior to 7.30 pm.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Speech time limits</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">All Members</inline> <inline font-style="italic">—</inline>5<inline font-style="italic"> minutes each.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">[Minimum number of proposed Members speaking = 4 x 5 mins]</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">THE HON D. M. DICK MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Speaker of the House of Representatives</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">25 March 2026</para></quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>9</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026, Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <p>
              <a href="r7446" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026</span>
                </p>
              </a>
            </p>
            <a href="r7449" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>9</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I declare that, unless otherwise ordered, the Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026 and the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026 stand referred to the Federation Chamber for further consideration at the adjournment of the debate on the motion for the second reading of each bill.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>9</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7456" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>9</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>9</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Today, we introduce the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026.</para>
<para>This bill amends the Competition and Consumer Act 2010to double maximum penalties for misconduct under competition law and the Australian Consumer Law from $50 million to $100 million.</para>
<para>These laws help tackle price gouging at its source, outlawing:</para>
<list>False or misleading representations, including lying about the reason for price increases;</list>
<list>Price fixing, colluding on prices, and other cartel behaviour;</list>
<list>Misuse of market power to lessen competition, including by refusing to supply to third parties like independent fuel retailers;</list>
<list>Unfair contract terms, especially in relation to business-to-business conduct, to stop big business pushing around small and family businesses;</list>
<list>Exclusive dealings that reduce competition; and</list>
<list>Unconscionable conduct, like taking advantage of vulnerable people.</list>
<para>The even stronger penalties that we are introducing will empower the ACCC to throw the book at any companies who illegally and unfairly increase their prices.</para>
<para>Since the start of the war, we have seen much higher prices for petrol and diesel across the country.</para>
<para>It has put more pressure on motorists and families who are already doing it tough.</para>
<para>Our message to petrol retailers has been very clear: you are on notice; do not use the conflict to take advantage of Australians.</para>
<para>Now they'll face penalties of up to $100 million per offence if they do.</para>
<para>These penalties apply across the economy.</para>
<para>This will help ensure that all retailers and suppliers, from fuel companies to supermarkets and the entire supply chain in between, do not use the war in the Middle East as an excuse for illegal and unfair pricing.</para>
<para>The states and territories share the Albanese government's sense of urgency here. Reforms to the Australian Consumer Law require the agreement of the states and territories, and I want to thank every single one of them for very swiftly confirming their agreement to support these reforms.</para>
<para>The ACCC has been clear that they won't hesitate to take action to protect consumers and markets, and they'll seek the highest penalties appropriate in any case that they take to court.</para>
<para>This bill is an important way that we are protecting consumers and securing Australia's fuel security, but it's not the only way.</para>
<para>We have already:</para>
<list>Established a Fuel Supply Taskforce led by Anthea Harris to ensure fuel is getting to where it's needed;</list>
<list>Added hundreds of millions of litres of diesel and petrol by releasing some of our minimum stock obligations;</list>
<list>Temporarily reduced the sulphur content standards to ensure more fuel can be sold here in Australia, and we're amending the fuel security services payment to ensure that our domestic refineries can keep making fuels here;</list>
<list>Temporarily adjusted diesel standards to give Australian refineries more flexibility in how they make diesel and widen the markets that we source our diesel from;</list>
<list>Increased surveillance and the reporting of petrol pricing by the ACCC, with a focus on price spikes;</list>
<list>Worked with industry to help increase supply to service stations in regional areas;</list>
<list>Ensured the ACCC has the ability to issue on-the-spot fines, without having to go to court;</list>
<list>Invested $1.1 billion in low carbon liquid fuels, so our refiners can modernise and make more fuels here;</list>
<list>Coordinated and engaged with our international partners. The Prime Minister has met with the head of the IEA and, with the Prime Minister of Singapore, affirmed our two nations' shared commitment to working together and strengthening energy security;</list>
<list>Engaged with my New Zealand counterpart, Nicola Willis, on our response; and</list>
<list>Convened a special meeting of the Council of Financial Regulators to work through the impacts the conflict could have on our economy and on our financial markets.</list>
<para>This bill also brings Australia's competition law penalties into closer alignment with comparable economies.</para>
<para>It's the latest step in our strong record of competition and consumer reforms since coming to government in 2022. Here, I want to pay tribute to the assistant minister, who does an absolute mountain of work when it comes to our competition policy settings in this country.</para>
<para>We've already legislated the single biggest reform to Australia's merger laws in 50 years, for example.</para>
<para>We're introducing unfair trading practice arrangements to protect consumers and small businesses, including farmers and producers.</para>
<para>We've increased ACCC funding by over $30 million to go after supermarkets using misleading pricing tactics.</para>
<para>We're strengthening the Unit Pricing Code to tackle shrinkflation. We've made the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct mandatory, with tough penalties to stop supermarkets from unfairly squeezing suppliers.</para>
<para>We're reforming non-compete clauses and other employment restraints.</para>
<para>We're extending the right to repair to agricultural machinery.</para>
<para>We're making it easier for new businesses to enter the market by incentivising the states and territories to cut commercial and industrial planning and zoning red tape under the revitalised National Competition Policy.</para>
<para>Backed by our $900 million National Productivity Fund, we're working with the states and territories on:</para>
<list>removing barriers to the uptake of modern methods of construction,</list>
<list>creating a single national market for goods, starting with standards reform,</list>
<list>creating a single national market for workers by incentivising occupational licensing reforms,</list>
<list>delivering heavy-vehicle productivity reforms, working with colleagues like the minister here at the table, and</list>
<list>reforms allowing health practitioners to work to their full scope of practice.</list>
<para>This is all about making sure that Australian families get a fair go and easing the pressure where we can.</para>
<para>Again, our message to fuel companies is very clear.</para>
<para>If you do the right thing by your customers, our government is here to support you and work with you.</para>
<para>But if you take advantage of foreign conflicts and take Australians for mugs, the ACCC will throw the book at you.</para>
<para>That's what these laws are all about.</para>
<para>Full details of the measure are contained in the explanatory memorandum.</para>
<para>I commend this bill to the House.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>11</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7453" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>11</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>11</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>In beginning this speech, I wish to acknowledge the survivors and advocates, and their families, who have joined us in the gallery for the introduction of this bill. I recognise:</para>
<list>Andrew Carpenter;</list>
<list>Madeleine West and her children, Xascha and Xayn;</list>
<list>Adam Washbourne and his wife, Troon;</list>
<list>Nicholas Cavanagh and his father David Kneyle; and</list>
<list>Edan van Haren and his family members Carolyn, Richard, Kirsten and Trent.</list>
<para>Their presence here today is deeply significant. It reflects not only courage, but their enduring commitment to justice, advocacy, and hope.</para>
<para>I acknowledge the bravery of the victim-survivors who spoke at a media conference that we held before the commencement of proceedings today. Their words were incredibly powerful and eloquent, and I thank all those who were there.</para>
<para>I also acknowledge the many organisations that have advocated for the introduction of this bill over a long period of time, including, but certainly not limited to, Super for Survivors, Bravehearts, the Grace Tame Foundation, Fighters Against Child Abuse Australia, and the Carly Ryan Foundation.</para>
<para>I won't be able to give an exhaustive list, but can I acknowledge a few people who are in the chamber. The member for Boothby and the member for Eden-Monaro have advocated for this measure for a very long period of time. I also see that the member for Lyne is here, and there are others in the chamber for this speech today.</para>
<para>These reforms have not emerged in isolation. They are the result of sustained advocacy, lived experience, and the determination of survivors and their supporters to improve a system that has too often failed them.</para>
<para>This bill will enable victims and survivors of child sexual abuse offences to seek access to a perpetrator's superannuation to satisfy unpaid compensation orders, where a criminal conviction has been made.</para>
<para>At its core, this bill is guided by a simple but fundamental principle: perpetrators of child sexual abuse should not be able to hide behind financial structures to avoid accountability.</para>
<para>For too long, a deeply unjust loophole has allowed convicted offenders to shield assets in superannuation while victims and survivors are left without the compensation they are owed. This bill closes that loophole and affirms that financial systems must not operate in a way that undermines justice.</para>
<para>This bill aims to prevent superannuation being used to shield a perpetrator's assets from compensation, improve transparency and reduce uncertainty in pursuing compensation. Child sexual abuse causes profound and often lifelong harm. Its impacts extend far beyond the period of abuse itself, in many cases affecting mental health, physical wellbeing, relationships, education, and a person's ability to participate fully in work and community life.</para>
<para>For many survivors, the trauma does not end when the abuse ends. It is something they carry into adulthood, often navigating its effects daily, and too often without adequate support.</para>
<para>The harm is not only emotional and psychological but also deeply material. Too many survivors face barriers to stable employment and financial security, meaning the consequences of abuse can shape every aspect of their lives.</para>
<para>This bill also amends the Bankruptcy Act, allowing compensation debts to survive perpetrators' bankruptcies, improving the ability of victims and survivors to enforce such debt.</para>
<para>There is a growing recognition that justice is not only about securing a conviction but about ensuring meaningful redress.</para>
<para>For too many survivors, a conviction has not translated into real-world outcomes. They have endured the trauma of legal proceedings, often reliving deeply painful experiences, only to face further distress when compensation orders go unpaid. That compounds the harm and undermines confidence in the justice system.</para>
<para>Under this bill, victim-survivors will be able to apply to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), with appropriate safeguards, to identify any potential eligible superannuation to inform their decision as to whether to seek a court order.</para>
<para>These reforms are a practical and targeted step to address that injustice. They introduce a mechanism to ensure that perpetrators cannot simply wait out their obligations while their financial position remains protected.</para>
<para>Importantly, by allowing compensation debts to survive bankruptcy, this bill sends a clear and necessary message: financial manoeuvring must not override moral and legal responsibility. Bankruptcy should not be a refuge from accountability for such serious harm.</para>
<para>Unfulfilled historical compensation orders brought into existence before the schedule's commencement will be eligible if they remain legally enforceable.</para>
<para>These changes recognise that there are survivors right now who are being denied justice under the existing framework. By applying to both future and current bankruptcies, this bill seeks to address not only future harm but present inequity.</para>
<para>These reforms are intended to strengthen victim-survivors' ability to enforce court ordered compensation and prevent superannuation being used by perpetrators to shield their assets. When offenders retain substantial retirement savings while victims struggle financially, often as a direct result of the abuse they suffered, it undermines confidence in the justice system.</para>
<para>It risks perpetuating a system where the burden continues to fall on those who were harmed, rather than those who caused the harm. These reforms help restore balance and fairness.</para>
<para>The regime established by the bill will be subject to a review after it commences full operation, to ensure that it is operating effectively for victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.</para>
<para>This bill should be understood as a significant and necessary foundation. It closes a clear loophole, sends a strong signal about the direction of reform and establishes a framework that can be built upon in the future.</para>
<para>Reviewing these measures after implementation will be critical. It ensures that this parliament remains engaged with how the law operates in practice and whether it is truly delivering for victims and survivors.</para>
<para>Our approach must continue to be informed by the voices of survivors, advocates, legal experts and practitioners. When survivors tell us where the system still falls short, it is our responsibility to listen and act.</para>
<para>Ultimately, this measure is about restoring fairness and dignity. It is about ensuring that the law does not inadvertently protect those who have caused profound harm, while leaving victims and survivors without recourse. It aligns our financial and legal systems with our values that perpetrators must be held accountable and that victims and survivors deserve meaningful support and redress.</para>
<para>I thank members from across the chamber, across all political parties and the crossbench, who have offered their support for this bill and who, this morning, stood alongside me and alongside survivors when we announced this bill's introduction. Today's show of unity has been a demonstration of the parliament at its best.</para>
<para>Full details of the measure are contained in the explanatory memorandum.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>12</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7457" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>12</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>12</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>This bill amends the Treasury legislation to support philanthropic giving and strengthen the integrity of tax administration systems.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 to the bill removes the requirement that a donation to a deductible gift recipient be valued at $2 or more before the donor may claim an income tax deduction. Removing this threshold updates the tax treatment of gifts to reflect modern fundraising practices and supports philanthropic giving.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 to the bill amends the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936to require trustees of closely held trusts to report in the trust's income tax return the quoted tax file numbers of beneficiaries when they have an entitlement, from 1 July 2026.</para>
<para>These changes are part of modernising tax administration systems to reduce compliance costs for trustees, beneficiaries and their agents. They streamline how trustees report tax file numbers, removing reporting on a separate form.</para>
<para>The amendment will strengthen the integrity of the tax system, helping to ensure the right amount of tax is being paid by trustees and beneficiaries on trust income.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 to the bill makes minor and technical amendments to legislation within the Treasury portfolio. These amendments reflect the government's ongoing commitment to the care and maintenance of Treasury laws.</para>
<para>The amendments ensure that Treasury portfolio legislation remains current, fit for purpose and continues to work for relevant stakeholders and the broader public.</para>
<para>The Legislative and Governance Forum on Corporations was notified in relation to amendments in schedule 3 of the bill in accordance with clauses 506 and 507 of the Corporations Agreement 2002.</para>
<para>Schedule 4 to this bill amends the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to exclude activities related to gambling and tobacco from research and development tax incentive eligibility.</para>
<para>This will ensure the community is not subsidising this kind of research and development, which can exacerbate serious health risks, addiction and associated harms.</para>
<para>The exclusions will apply broadly, capturing research and development related to all types of gambling and any tobacco, from 1 July 2025.</para>
<para>The government recognises the importance of minimising the harms from gambling and tobacco. That's why a carve-out applies for research and development activities that are conducted for the sole purpose of harm minimisation, such as stopping addiction. The carve-out is designed to ensure that only truly harm-minimising research and development related to gambling and tobacco remains eligible to receive support.</para>
<para>Full details of the measure are contained in the explanatory memorandum.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>13</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7454" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>13</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>13</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HILL</name>
    <name.id>86256</name.id>
    <electorate>Bruce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Serious and organised crime threatens the safety and wellbeing of our communities and has a significant financial impact—estimated by the Australian Institute of Criminology to be $82.3 billion in 2023-24, a figure that rose more than $13 billion in a single year.</para>
<para>The threat environment is complex and constantly evolving. Threats that were historically treated as separate are now converging and overlapping. Characteristics that were previously associated with terrorism, or foreign interference or child exploitation, are now converging with serious and organised crime.</para>
<para>Serious and organised crime groups are opportunistic, highly adaptive, resilient and increasingly operate with the agility and sophistication of multinational businesses. Networks often span across a diverse range of crime types and illicit markets such as money laundering and drug trafficking. They are borderless, decentralised, digitally enabled and increasingly embedded in legitimate systems. Criminal actors operate to target Australia from offshore and online and use innovative methods and technologies to both advance and obscure their illicit business ventures.</para>
<para>Law enforcement cannot combat the threat alone. Where we have a convergence of threats in this way we need to have a convergence of protection. To do this, Australia requires a national criminal intelligence agency equipped with the appropriate powers and capabilities to obtain and provide actionable intelligence on the complex and evolving criminal networks impacting Australia today and into the future. It is essential that law enforcement agencies are supported by unique and insightful intelligence to more effectively direct their disruption efforts.</para>
<para>The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Bill 2026 will ensure the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission is repositioned as an intelligence-focused agency aimed at countering the national security threat that serious and organised crime poses. The bill will ensure that the ACIC has the necessary functions and powers to deliver this role, replacing theAustralian Crime Commission Act 2002.</para>
<para>The bill is informed by, and gives effect to, the government response to legislative recommendations of the Independent Review of the ACIC and associated Commonwealth law enforcement arrangements.The independent review recognised that the functions and powers vested in the ACIC are no longer fit-for-purpose and inhibit the ACIC from effectively fulfilling its intelligence mandate.</para>
<para>Parts 1 and 2 of the bill comprehensively reform the ACIC by setting out its core functions. This includes the collection, use and communication of intelligence relevant to serious and organised crime, the provision of national policing information systems and services, the provision of criminal intelligence assessments, and cooperation with a range of entities. Part 2 also provides for the making of guidelines relating to the use of personal information and other matters.</para>
<para>Part 3 of the bill will establish a framework for the ACIC's exercise of coercive powers. This will include powers to conduct examinations, and to compel the provision of evidence, information, documents or things that would assist the agency to obtain intelligence relevant to serious and organised crime. Coercive powers remain a core capability for the agency and represent a significant value-add to help build a transnational picture of the serious and organised crime landscape to assist partners in targeting their efforts to disrupt and dismantle criminal networks.</para>
<para>Part 4 of the bill will also establish a framework for the ACIC to conduct controlled intelligence operations. This framework will enable the ACIC to obtain intelligence relevant to serious and organised crime, by ensuring its capacity to gain close access to sensitive information via covert means. It will achieve this by enabling authorised persons to engage in unlawful conduct as outlined in a controlled intelligence operation authority. These operations are of critical importance as criminal actors and their enablers are becoming increasingly sophisticated and using complex methodologies to facilitate and commit crimes.</para>
<para>Part 5 of the bill will also enable the ACIC to execute search warrants in relation to particular premises or persons, and related assistance orders, to obtain intelligence relevant to serious and organised crime. Search warrants are an important tool in intelligence gathering as they enable access to otherwise inaccessible information that is stored privately and securely.</para>
<para>Part 6 of the bill will provide for the continuance of the ACIC's provision of national policing information systems and services. These systems are essential enablers that provide agencies with cross-jurisdictional information that supports frontline officers and enhances community safety. This will also include the provision of nationally coordinated criminal history checks, which support governments, businesses and other organisations to make informed decisions regarding a person's criminal history.</para>
<para>Part 7 of the bill will continue to enable the ACIC to make and give criminal intelligence assessments to inform certain background checks, including to determine the eligibility of individuals to access certain secure environments and to possess a firearms licence. This function is in line with amendments recently made to the Australian Crime Commission Act by the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Firearms and Customs Laws) Act 2026.</para>
<para>Part 8 of the bill will provide a framework for timely intelligence sharing, enhancing the ACIC's ability to communicate intelligence to relevant agencies and bodies to support operational outcomes and other actions. This is in recognition that sharing intelligence with other agencies and bodies will support broader efforts to mitigate risks, address vulnerabilities and harden the environment against serious and organised crime. This part will also establish secrecy offences to ensure there are adequate protections over the sensitive information that the ACIC holds.</para>
<para>Part 9 of the bill contains administrative provisions to support staffing and appointments. The bill will provide for the appointment of the director-general of the ACIC and appointment of independent examiners. The director-general will have powers in relation to staffing and the general administration and operation of the agency.</para>
<para>Part 10 of the bill contains record-keeping and reporting requirements to facilitate effective and appropriate oversight of the ACIC and its use of powers by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, and the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. This will complement other legislation facilitating oversight of the ACIC as amended by the Strengthening Oversight of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025. This part of the bill will include a requirement for periodic independent reviews to ensure the legislation remains fit for purpose.</para>
<para>This bill will be accompanied by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (National Policing Information Charges) Bill 2026 and a consequential and transitional package of amendments, to be introduced later this year.</para>
<para>Closing remarks</para>
<para>The measures I've outlined in this bill deliver fundamental reforms to recast the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission as Australia's national criminal intelligence agency focused on countering serious and organised crime. This bill reflects this government's commitment to protecting the Australian community, by ensuring that our agencies can adapt and respond to the rapidly evolving landscape of serious and organised crime.</para>
<para>I commend the bill.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (National Policing Information Charges) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7455" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (National Policing Information Charges) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>15</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>15</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HILL</name>
    <name.id>86256</name.id>
    <electorate>Bruce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>This bill forms a package with the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Bill 2026, which implements recommendations of the <inline font-style="italic">Independent review of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and associated Commonwealth law enforcement arrangements </inline>(Independent Review), in particular the replacement of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002.</para>
<para>In line with recommendations from the independent review, this bill will allow the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission to continue to impose charges for nationally coordinated criminal history check services. Nationally coordinated criminal history check services provide a complete national view of a person's convictions for criminal offences. They are used for a variety of purposes, including employment screening, working with children and vulnerable persons, and various licensing and registration schemes.</para>
<para>Amounts received through these charges will continue to be used to support the delivery of effective national policing information systems and services.</para>
<para>The bill will create a mechanism to allow the minister to specify in a legislative instrument the kinds of nationally coordinated criminal history check services that the ACIC will charge for. This will ensure there is flexibility in the legislation to support charging models for different services. For example, while nationally coordinated criminal history checks are currently provided point-in-time, in future this may be extended to continuous checking services.</para>
<para>The minister will also be required to specify in a legislative instrument who has to pay the charges, and the amount of each charge. This provides flexibility to impose different charges for different classes of persons, such as reduced charges for volunteers. The National Policing Information Committee, to be established under the ACIC Bill 2026, will be required to make recommendations to the minister about the charge amounts.</para>
<para>Closing remarks</para>
<para>This bill is key to the implementation of recommendations of the independent review.</para>
<para>The ACIC's provision of nationally coordinated criminal history check services is critical to provide a national view of a person's previous convictions for criminal offences. These services help protect the Australian community.</para>
<para>The revenue received supports other critical national policing information systems and services, including the National Criminal Intelligence System. These systems and services enable police and other partner agencies to perform their core functions to keep the community safe.</para>
<para>This bill will allow the ACIC to continue to provide these national policing information services in an adaptable and fiscally sustainable way.</para>
<para>I commend the bill.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>15</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7452" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>15</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>16</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HILL</name>
    <name.id>86256</name.id>
    <electorate>Bruce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>The Australian government is committed to protecting Australians from dangerous fake goods and protecting the rights of genuine businesses from fraud and intellectual property theft.</para>
<para>This change toughens existing regulatory measures that exist to deter and penalise those who bring counterfeit items into our country. In the 2024-25 financial year, over 700,000 individual counterfeit items were seized at the border. Had the items been genuine, their estimated value is over $35 million.</para>
<para>The Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026 will create a new strict liability offence for importing goods with false trademarks—that is, counterfeit goods. This will bring the importation of counterfeit goods within scope of the Infringement Notice Scheme under the Customs Act 1901 as administered by the Australian Border Force.</para>
<para>The bill also includes amendments to the Customs Regulation 2015 that enable Australian Border Force officers to issue infringement notices as an alternative to prosecution for the new offence.</para>
<para>As a strict liability offence, only the physical element of the offence must be proven. This aligns this reform with existing laws in the Copyright Act 1968, which already contains a strict liability offence for breaches of copyright.</para>
<para>This reform is necessary, as counterfeit products pose a significant consumer safety risk. Any goods can be counterfeited, and the potential for harm from consumer goods, such as phone chargers, beauty products, pharmaceuticals or vehicle parts, is severe. Those who import commercial quantities of high-risk consumer products will be targeted by the new laws.</para>
<para>Consumers buying counterfeit and pirated goods are not only receiving a flawed and potentially dangerous product but are also supporting the black market. The sale of counterfeit and pirated goods is often linked with the funding of criminal enterprises.</para>
<para>Making the importation of counterfeit goods an infringeable offence would allow the Australian government to directly impact the profits of counterfeiters. This would provide an additional deterrent alongside the current process of civil litigation.</para>
<para>Any infringement action would only occur after the importers of counterfeit goods have been identified through the existing compliance processes. When products are seized, the Australian Border Force officer has discretion to levy an infringement notice, taking into consideration factors such as first-time offences, genuine mistakes of fact, the quantity of goods and the type of goods.</para>
<para>Alongside the proposed changes, the Australian Border Force has already put in place complementary measures to request evidence of legitimacy if individuals want to claim their seized goods back. There will be no new regulatory impacts on lawful importers or border industries as part of the bill.</para>
<para>This reform will support Australian businesses by protecting their legitimate intellectual property rights. This reform will support a more prosperous and reputable retail sector and retain consumer confidence in Australian retailers and products.</para>
<para>This is a change that Australian trademark owners have been calling for. They've called for more deterrents for counterfeiters importing fraudulent goods, to reduce the financial burden that small and medium businesses must bear to bring expensive civil litigation. The Australian government is listening to the needs of legitimate businesses and ensuring their interests are protected, not undercut by importers who bring fake products that fail Australian safety standards.</para>
<para>This change will support the government's priorities of growing the Australian economy and supporting Australian businesses by implementing a means to further combat the economic, community safety and criminal risks of the trade in counterfeit goods.</para>
<para>I commend the bill to the House.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (2026 Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>16</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7444" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (2026 Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>16</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LEESER</name>
    <name.id>109556</name.id>
    <electorate>Berowra</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026. The coalition will not be opposing this bill in the House. However, I want to put on the record some important concerns about what this bill represents and, more tellingly, what it does not. This is an omnibus bill comprising five schedules that make a range of amendments to Commonwealth criminal justice, law enforcement and prosecution legislation. On the face of it, much of the bill is technical or procedural in nature. The coalition accepts that a modern parliament must maintain workable, up-to-date frameworks for policing and prosecution, and where these amendments do that we support them.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 clarifies AFP policing powers at Western Sydney International (Nancy Bird Walton) Airport; modernises how warrant applications are made, allowing electronic and telephone applications in place of cumbersome paper based processes; and makes sensible technical changes for ACT Policing. These are sensible, practical changes that the coalition supports. Schedule 2 moves certain serious drug offences to a mixed-weight approach for calculating drug thresholds, broadly aligning Commonwealth law and most state and territory frameworks. Schedule 3 creates a mechanism for managing conflicts of interest involving the Director of Public Prosecutions. Schedule 4 clarifies arrest powers and streamlines extradition procedures. Schedule 5 makes a minor consequential amendment to the telecommunications interception legislation following changes to the Integrity Oversight Victoria arrangements.</para>
<para>I want to turn to the element of the bill that deserves the most careful scrutiny. That is the extension of the cybercrime disruption powers under schedule 1. In 2021, the coalition government introduced the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act, the SLAID Act. It contained landmark reforms that gave law enforcement the tools to actively disrupt criminal networks operating online. It provided for data disruption warrants, network activity warrants and account takeover warrants. The powers were designed not merely to watch criminals operate but to stop them. Those powers are subject to a sunset clause set to expire on 4 September this year. This bill extends them for a further three years to 4 September 2029. The coalition supports extending these powers—of course we do; we created the powers—but here's the problem: we shouldn't be in a position where the parliament is scrambling to extend a sunset clause at the eleventh hour because this government has spent nearly four years failing to progress the broader electronic surveillance reform agenda.</para>
<para>The Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, or the INSLM, conducted a comprehensive review of these powers, and he made several recommendations in his report. The Comprehensive Review of the Legal Framework of the National Intelligence Community was clear: reform of electronic surveillance laws is becoming more urgent. The Albanese government received that review. It accepted the principle of reform and it did almost nothing. Nearly four years—that's how long this government has had to progress a comprehensive overhaul of our electronic surveillance framework. Instead, here we are today, extending a sunset clause because there's no broader reform legislation to replace it. This extension is not a policy achievement; it's an admission of failure.</para>
<para>We believe that this bill should be referred to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry and report. While much of this bill appears technical, several elements—including the change to mixed-weight drug thresholds, the DPP conflict-of-interest mechanism and the timing provisions for extradition warrants—warrant proper parliamentary scrutiny. The coalition believes in thorough oversight, and the Senate committee process provides just that. We don't oppose this bill—the law enforcement and prosecution powers contained in it are necessary, and our agencies deserve certainty—but we will not allow this government to quietly extend critical powers without accountability for its broader failure to deliver the comprehensive reform that Australia's national security community has been calling for. I thank the House.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>17</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7446" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>17</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BIRRELL</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
    <electorate>Nicholls</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the federal coalition, I'm pleased to inform the House that we will be supporting the passage of the Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026. We are supporting this legislation because it will deliver sensible and minor amendments to the framework of export operations in Australia. The Export Control Act 2020 sets out the overarching legislative framework for the regulation of exported goods, including food and agricultural products, from Australia. It is important to acknowledge that this is a legislative framework which is regularly reviewed to ensure that it remains streamlined and fit for purpose.</para>
<para>This bill will reduce the regulatory burden on industry and facilitate regulatory reform of certain goods, 'general products', that are not currently prescribed for the purposes of the act, which are 'non-prescribed goods'. On this front, this bill before the House today would amend the Export Control Act 2020 to deliver several outcomes. First, it will allow export operations, including production and preparation, 'to be carried out at registered establishments without needing to be included in the registration if it is not a prescribed export condition to so be included'. This can present an excessive regulatory burden for some export operations, and this particular amendment in the bill will remove it. Ultimately, the federal coalition will always support measures that are aimed at cutting red tape, boosting productivity and maximising efficiency for Australia's export system and our key agricultural industries, who depend upon it.</para>
<para>The second set of amendments in this bill includes minor changes to expand the scope of export documentation that can be issued by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry when it comes to trade. This part of the legislation would allow the department to provide additional documentation required by Australia's trading partners to cover 'a range of goods' for export to a maximum period of 18 months, rather than 'a specific kind of goods'. This is also a measure that we welcome, given that it could help meet changing requirements from overseas countries.</para>
<para>Right now, we know that the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is conducting an export assurance reform project that is examining the regulatory oversight of certain non-prescribed goods, including commodities such as wool and wool grease, skins and hides, animal food, honey and bee products, food and beverages, pharmaceuticals and technical and blood products. Collectively, these categories of products are intended to be prescribed for purposes of the Export Control Act 2020 and be referred to as 'general products' once prescribed. The amendments in this bill will be of particular benefit to these 'general products' because registered establishments are not proposed to be used as a regulatory mechanism for those commodities.</para>
<para>To add a further note on the government's legislation, the explanatory memorandum indicates that the amendments in this bill are supported by industry. Overall, it is crucial that Australia maintains an efficient, robust and evidence based export system, because we know how vitally important exports are to the health, profitability, sustainability and resilience of our agriculture sector and all of our hardworking primary producers. This is underpinned by the reality that Australia exports 70 per cent of its total production, and, in 2025-26, this is forecast to reach $80.5 billion, which is truly a remarkable achievement.</para>
<para>When this legislation was introduced a couple of weeks ago, the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry said that this bill was about 'increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of our export regulatory system'. However, when it comes to export regulation, there are some significant challenges which currently confront the sector, and they need to be recognised. Among these are the excessively rising costs of Australia's agricultural exports. It is extraordinary that, over the last five years, between 2020 and 2025, the export regulatory costs of the department for our agricultural industries such as meat, seafood, grain, dairy and fruit and vegetables have increased by 47 per cent—an increase of 47 per cent in five years! These export regulation services cover responsibilities like documentation, assessments, inspections and audits. Unfortunately, we know that our nation's key export industries are already confronted with tariffs and rising fuel, fertiliser and input costs, so a 47 per cent rise in regulatory costs by the department to provide export services is enormously concerning, as it will be passed on to our agricultural industries. This increase needs to be heavily scrutinised, and, in the interests of our agricultural exporters, the ruler needs to be run over this.</para>
<para>That's why the federal coalition is taking action. In the Senate, we have successfully moved an order for the production of documents that demands that this government release its modelling and evidence behind these massive cost blowouts, because, in order to secure full transparency and accountability and maintain a fit-for-purpose export regulatory system, we need to know how the Albanese Labor government allowed the department's costs of providing export services to explode by such a large magnitude and now expects the agricultural industry to pay for it. We will take time to go through this data.</para>
<para>In conclusion, as I affirmed in my earlier remarks, the federal coalition strongly backs our agricultural exporters. We will always support having a productive, streamlined and effective export regulatory framework in Australia, and, when it comes to the Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026, the federal coalition believes that the measures outlined in this legislation are sensible and reasonable. It's for those reasons that I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COLLINS</name>
    <name.id>HWM</name.id>
    <electorate>Franklin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I do want to thank the member opposite for contributing to the debate. I'm not sure that I can say I agree with everything he said, because I don't. But I say that this important bill, the Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026, will reduce regulatory burden for Australian export businesses by ensuring that export operations can be carried out at registered establishments without needing to be included in the registration unless it's a prescribed export condition.</para>
<para>The act currently requires that all operations for prescribed goods at a registered establishment must be included in its registration. This includes operations that do not otherwise require registration, creating excessive regulatory burden for Australian exporters. The bill will remove this requirement, allowing industry to produce and prepare multiple types of products at a registered establishment if those products meet all of the requirements for exports.</para>
<para>This bill also broadens the scope of what documents the government can issue under the act to support trade. This ensures that the government can better support Australia's market access by providing the assurances required by our trading partners. These amendments support the Australian government's export assurance reform project. These reforms will strengthen the regulatory oversight of certain goods that are not currently prescribed for the purposes of the export control legislation, including wool, honey, pet food, skins and hides, rendered goods, pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, stock feed and feed additives.</para>
<para>The bill underpins the government's commitment to support the growth of Australia's agriculture sector. It increases the efficiency and the effectiveness of our export regulatory system, and it paves the way for broader reform across a range of non-prescribed goods. I commend the bill to the chamber.</para>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a second time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Third Reading</title>
            <page.no>19</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COLLINS</name>
    <name.id>HWM</name.id>
    <electorate>Franklin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a third time.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a third time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DELEGATION REPORTS</title>
        <page.no>19</page.no>
        <type>DELEGATION REPORTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Parliamentary Delegation to the 5th Pacific Islands Parliamentary Group Conference in Fiji</title>
          <page.no>19</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr GARLAND</name>
    <name.id>295588</name.id>
    <electorate>Chisholm</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the report of the Australian Parliamentary Delegation to the 5th Pacific Islands Parliamentary Group Conference in Fiji, 25 August to 28 August 2025, and seek leave to make a short statement in connection with this report.</para>
<para>Leave granted.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr GARLAND</name>
    <name.id>295588</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It was an absolute privilege to be part of Australian Parliamentary Delegation to the 5th Pacific Islands Parliamentary Group Conference with Senator Richard Colbeck from the other place. Since its establishment in 2019, the Pacific Islands Parliamentary Group has created a uniquely Pacific led space for dialogue, cooperation and shared learning between our legislatures. It reflects something fundamental—that the strength of our region lies in working together as neighbours. Throughout the conference, what stood out most was that sense of partnership, whether that be in mitigating the ramifications of climate change or in unlocking economic opportunities in the region. The relationships between our parliaments are grounded in shared challenges and shared responsibility, and that connection was evident in every discussion. That's what the Pacific partnership is all about—sharing our responsibilities and sharing our challenges.</para>
<para>A particular highlight was meeting with recipients of Australian aid programs, especially those focused on empowering women. These initiatives are making a real difference—supporting leadership, economic participation and stronger communities across our region. I'm really proud that the Australian government is supporting those initiatives every day of the week.</para>
<para>We also had the opportunity to engage directly with parliamentarians from across the region through the course of this conference, and I want to thank those parliamentarians for their engagement, their kindness and their friendship. The many conversations we had reinforced the importance of strong democratic institutions, transparency and ensuring our parliaments remain inclusive and responsive to the people we serve whilst responding to the very unique challenges and opportunities our region faces. This conference also marked an important moment for the future of regional cooperation.</para>
<para>I returned with this delegation with a deep appreciation for the collaboration across our region and with confidence in what we can achieve together. I'm very proud to table this report in parliament today. Our Pacific neighbours know they have a very good mate in Australia indeed.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>20</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treaties Joint Committee</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>20</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:10</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHESTERS</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
    <electorate>Bendigo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, I present the committee's report 231, <inline font-style="italic">Pacific resilience and sport manipulation treaties</inline>.</para>
<para>Report made a parliamentary paper in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHESTERS</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I rise today to make a short statement on the report of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties regarding two major treaty actions: the agreement to establish the Pacific Resilience Facility; and the Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sport Competitions. The report also contains one minor treaty action—an amendment to annex 1 of the International Convention against Doping in Sport.</para>
<para>The Pacific Resilience Facility agreement is a significant treaty aimed at building climate resilience in the Pacific through regional cooperation. The Pacific Resilience Facility, a concept birthed and developed through the Pacific Islands Forum, will be an international organisation that manages and distributes funding. The facility's capital will come through pledges from donations from both member parties and non-Pacific nations, with Australia already having pledged $100 million.</para>
<para>During the process of the inquiry, the committee investigated the facility's funding mechanisms, interactions with non-Pacific nations, operations and governance structure. The committee found that the agreement provided sound and comprehensive basis for the effective operation of the facility. Importantly, the committee identified a consistent and central theme throughout the deliberations—that is, that the Pacific Resilience Facility is a mechanism designed, implemented and led by the Pacific itself. Australia, as a founding member of the Pacific Islands Forum, has long demonstrated its commitment to supporting a prosperous and resilient region. By ratifying this agreement, Australia will continue to uphold its commitment to strengthen its support initiatives for the projects that are driven and directed through Pacific partners.</para>
<para>The Convention on the Manipulation of Sport Competitions establishes a framework for nations to collaborate with sports organisations and betting providers to detect, prevent and prosecute manipulation of sports matches. The convention is currently the only legally binding treaty designed for stopping the manipulation of sports competition. Across the inquiry, the committee held two public hearings and heard from various stakeholders—39, in fact. But I was disappointed that the Alliance for Gambling Reform chose not to participate.</para>
<para>The committee heard from Sports Integrity Australia about Australia's efforts to strengthen existing legislation and regulation since signing the convention in 2019. This included the establishment of the national sports integrity offences, which aim to work alongside existing state and territory laws to create a harmonised national approach to criminalising and prosecuting match-fixing and the manipulation of local sports competitions. The committee also heard how Sports Integrity Australia is collaborating with other nations, as part of the convention, to further strengthen global sports integrity efforts.</para>
<para>Throughout the inquiry, the committee heard about the key role Australia plays as a leader in sports integrity globally. Ratifying the convention will enable Australia to continue to lead the fight against sports manipulation and will encourage other countries to follow suit. Along with entering into force, the committee has also recommended that Australia seek to encourage the development and early adoption of similar treaties beyond Europe aimed at combating sports manipulation and illegal offshore gambling at a global level.</para>
<para>The report also includes one minor treaty action, which amends annex I of the UNESCO International Convention Against Doping in Sport. This agreement aims to prevent and eliminate doping in sport through international cooperation and standardising legislation, guidelines, regulations and rules. The amendment to annex I will reflect the 2026 update to the World Anti-Doping Agency's prohibited list, which specifies substances and methods banned in sport. This list is updated annually, and the amendments are made regularly to reflect this.</para>
<para>The committee recommends ratification of both major treaties and the minor treaty action examined in this report. On behalf of the committee, I commend the report to the House.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>20</page.no>
        <type>BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Consideration of Legislation</title>
          <page.no>20</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GEE</name>
    <name.id>261393</name.id>
    <electorate>Calare</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the following from occurring immediately:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) the Member for Calare presenting a bill for an Act to amend the <inline font-style="italic">Competition and Consumer Act 2010</inline>, and for related purposes;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) debate on the second reading of the bill proceeding immediately for a period of no longer than one hour; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) any questions required to complete passage of the bill then being put without delay.</para></quote>
<para>Today I introduce to this House the Fair Fuel Price Bill 2026. It is a bill which would allow the Commonwealth government to temporarily regulate fuel prices during periods of extraordinary global disruption, such as war or similar crises. It would allow the minister, in particular the Treasurer, to make fuel price determinations that impose price controls on unleaded petrol and/or diesel. It needs to be considered urgently, because our country is in the midst of a devastating fuel crisis. Both country and city communities are being pummelled by these skyrocketing prices. It's smashing our local businesses, and it's stinging everyone from families to pensioners.</para>
<para>Urgent action is required. Leadership is required, and it is required now. The Fair Fuel Price Bill would reintroduce fuel price controls of the type ushered in during the Second World War to Australia. In 1939 this parliament passed the National Security Act, which gave the Australian government the power to set fuel prices for the duration of that conflict. It was aimed at preventing price gouging, and it was effective. This Fair Fuel Price Bill also gives the government the power to set fuel prices for the duration of the current conflict in the Middle East. Our communities are crying out for action, and they expect their leaders to be leading with tangible solutions, not just cheap talk.</para>
<para>Sky-high prices are throttling our community members and businesses. Our farmers can't get the diesel they need to get their crops in the ground. When they can get diesel, they are paying through the nose for it. Without action, this fuel crisis could very quickly spiral into a food security price crisis. As of yesterday, 51 service stations across New South Wales had completely run out of fuel, while a further 164 sites had no diesel available. Today apparently there are about 630 stations across the nation running out of fuel. People living in the bush have been putting up with the price gouging of country motorists for years, with enormous disparities between city and country fuel prices. The difference can be as high as 40c a litre. Mudgee has been a hot spot for years for price gouging. In Yeoval today, they're paying just over $3.30 for diesel. That's well above the city price. In Bathurst today, it's $3.20.</para>
<para>This latest war in the Middle East has again brought the issue of price gouging into stark relief. The government needs a taskforce to tell it if there is price gouging occurring, but our communities do not. They're tired of all the talk and no action. We need decisive leadership. The ABC's Alan Kohler recently pointed out that Australian retail petrol prices have risen to levels higher than in 2022, even though global crude oil prices have not returned to those peaks. He points out that this discrepancy indicates that retail margins have expanded significantly. In other words, it points to price gouging.</para>
<para>This bill amends the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to introduce section 51 AG relating to fuel price determinations. Section 1 empowers the minister, being the Treasurer, to make a legislative instrument establishing price controls for unleaded petrol and/or diesel supplied in constitutional trade and commerce. Subsection (2) defines such an instrument as a fuel price determination. Subsection (3) provides a safeguard by requiring that the minister must be satisfied that fuel prices have increased due to a war or similar crisis before making a determination. This ensures that the power is only exercised in exceptional circumstances. Subsection (4) requires the minister—that is, the Treasurer—to consult with the Prime Minister prior to making a determination ensuring high level oversight. Subsection (5) requires that the minister must revoke a fuel price determination once satisfied that the relevant war or crisis has ended, ensuring that price controls are temporary.</para>
<para>This fuel crisis is hitting our businesses, it's hitting our families, it's hitting our pensioners, it's hitting our country workforce, and, because country residents have further distances to travel, sky-high fuel prices have a disproportionately harsh and damaging effect on country communities. Here is just one example: Christie, a nurse who lives in the Canowindra area and works at Orange, says, 'The financial strain has become overwhelming. As an assistant in nursing earning $26.61 an hour, I commute an hour each way to work. With current fuel prices, it is no longer financially viable for me to continue in my role. Despite working full-time, I have been forced to take on a second job just to survive. Even then, I was left with only $2.30 in my account this week after paying my mortgage. I am currently limiting myself to one meal a day so that my children can have three.' She's also completing her bachelor of nursing and says, 'The cost of fuel now threatens my ability to complete mandatory placements.' She says, 'The situation is unsustainable. Nurses are being pushed to the brink, and the consequences are being felt by the communities we serve.' You couldn't get a more pertinent testimony about how this price gouging is affecting country communities.</para>
<para>I have received an email by a parent in our electorate who reports that, with respect to schooling, this week they have been told that certain excursions will need to be curtailed because fuel is too expensive or hard to come by for the buses, and families are unable to cover the increasing cost of transport to excursion and sporting events, with household bills and interest rates continuing to rise. The correspondence goes on and on. The pain is real and it is being compounded because, in our part of the world, the Great Western Highway is closed. On the weekend I spoke to Ken Muldoon from Little Hartley. He runs a family haulage company and told me about the massive impacts that the skyrocketing fuel prices and the closure of the Great Western Highway are having on his business. It's twice the cost because of fuel, twice the time because of the highway closure and half the profit, and he makes it very clear that it's just not sustainable.</para>
<para>As I've said, if farmers can't get the diesel they need, the crops cannot be planted and, if the crops can't be planted, this nation does not eat; it's as simple as that. Many farmers have contacted me with examples of them placing orders for diesel for on-farm fuel, and their suppliers have just failed to turn up. It just doesn't arrive when they need it. We need to control these prices and the fuel supply for country Australia. The government's recent initiatives don't go far enough. The ACCC does not have sufficient power. The government wants to increase penalties for price gouging, but I don't think that is going to do very much at all, with all due respect to the government, because there have only been a handful of successful prosecutions for petrol price gouging over the last 20 years. We have been fighting price gouging in the Mudgee area for a long time, and, when we raise it with the government, they say, 'Go and see the ACCC.' We have a meeting with the ACCC. They meet with us with good faith and with the best will in the world but nothing happens. We're sick of it. Our country communities are sick of it. They are being strangled by these sky-high prices, and we want some positive action, not just window-dressing. Increasing penalties for price gouging is going to do nothing if you can't actually prosecute them properly. And we've hardly seen any successful prosecutions. That's the problem with the government's approach.</para>
<para>We don't need a taskforce out there to tell us that price gouging is occurring. Ask anyone out there. You've heard the emails; you've heard from our constituents. Many members have come into this place and told stories of the pain and suffering that is being inflicted on families and pensioners and businesses because of these skyrocketing fuel prices. Well, we need some leadership, and this is the moment to take it. This bill should be used as part of a suite of measures to control these skyrocketing prices. Look, during COVID, the fuel excise was halved for six months. Why is the government not doing this again?</para>
<para>Communities around our nation are at breaking point. Decisive action is needed to stop the gouging and deliver fair fuel prices to the Australian public. I urge all members of this House to come in now, support this bill and deliver urgent and badly needed price relief to the Australian public.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LE</name>
    <name.id>295676</name.id>
    <electorate>Fowler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to second the motion moved by the member for Calare. This proposal goes to the heart of what millions of Australians are feeling right now. Across Western Sydney, diesel and petrol are surging towards $3 a litre, and, as the member for Calare just mentioned, in Bathurst, it's at $3.20. Rocketing fuel prices are hitting families and small businesses first, and they are being hurt the most.</para>
<para>Yesterday I asked the Treasurer a very simple question: why won't this government halve the fuel excise at least for six months to help Australians through this crisis? I did not get an answer that would reassure any parent at the bowser this morning. I did not get an answer that would reassure any small business owner trying to keep their vans and trucks on the road. What I heard was a government that is prepared to sit on its hands while Australians are pummelled by prices they simply cannot escape.</para>
<para>Families and small business in Fowler in south-west Sydney and right across Western Sydney—and, of course, in regional areas—are being crushed by the cost-of-living crisis. They are not trimming luxuries or excess; they're actually being hit by non-negotiable bills. They have to fill their tank to drive to work. They have to pay their high energy bill costs. They have to pay for increased food. These are all the things that they have to do. In my electorate of Fowler, driving is not a luxury. It's not a lifestyle choice. It is a necessity. Public transport is terrible. We don't have proper public transport. Many workers start before dawn and finish late at night. They are frontline workers. They are aged-care workers, warehouse workers, truckies, cleaners, delivery drivers, tradies. They keep the country running and simply cannot work from home. They cannot drive less. Every time fuel jumps by 10c to 20c, it is a direct pay cut for them.</para>
<para>While this is happening, the Commonwealth government is doing very well, thank you. On every litre of petrol and diesel, more than 50c goes straight to Canberra, plus the GST as well. Last year alone, the government raked in around $27 million in fuel excise. Surely a six-month halving of the fuel excise—which cost the Morrison government approximately $5.6 billion when they did it in 2022—is not an impossible ask off the back of such a profit.</para>
<para>That is why I have been calling consistently for a temporary halving of the fuel excise. It is one of the simplest, fastest levers the Commonwealth can pull. It is deflationary while it is in place, because it brings down one of the key prices feeding into everything else. It does not require an application form. It does not require a means test. It does not carve Australians into winners and losers. It helps everyone who has to fill a tank—workers, families, small businesses, regional communities. This is not a boutique program for one sector; this is relief for the majority of working Australians.</para>
<para>With petrol and diesel rocketing towards $3 a litre—and, as we heard, $3.20 in Bathurst—the Albanese government refuses to budge. It is as if they think that the crisis at the bowser is somehow less real than the crisis at the supermarket checkout or in the mortgage statement. But talk to any family in Fowler—in Liverpool, Cabramatta, Fairfield or Canley Heights—and they will tell you fuel is the bill that makes every other bill worse. This is why the member for Calare's bill to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is so important. It is about ensuring that, in times of genuine crisis—and we are having a genuine crisis at the moment, with global conflicts, supply shocks and market failures sending prices spiralling—the Australian government can step in to take control of fuel prices and protect the public. We already accept that in a natural disaster or pandemic, government must act quickly in the national interest. A fuel price shock that is pushing families to the brink is no different.</para>
<para>Taking control in a crisis does not mean micromanaging every servo every day. It means having clear powers and clear triggers so that when prices are exploding, like they are now, when they're barrelling towards $3 a litre and beyond, governments can intervene to cap the damage, prevent gouging and back temporary tax relief like a fuel excise cut. It means recognising that fuel is not a luxury; it is the backbone of how our economy moves, how our people get to work and how our supply chains function. For this reason, I strongly support the member for Calare's motion to suspend the standing orders so that this bill to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 can be debated and voted on today. Australians cannot wait. Families in Fowler and across Western Sydney cannot wait. The time for reviews and excuses is over; the time for real, immediate action is now. I second the motion.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
    <electorate>Wills</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the debate be adjourned.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the debate be adjourned.</para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [10:35]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Milton Dick)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>65</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Abdo, B. J.</name>
                <name>Ambihaipahar, A.</name>
                <name>Belyea, J. A.</name>
                <name>Berry, C. G.</name>
                <name>Briskey, J. L.</name>
                <name>Burnell, M. P.</name>
                <name>Byrnes, A. J.</name>
                <name>Campbell, J. P.</name>
                <name>Charlton, A. H. G.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Clutterham, C. L.</name>
                <name>Coffey, R. K.</name>
                <name>Coker, E. A.</name>
                <name>Comer, E. L.</name>
                <name>Cook, K. M. G.</name>
                <name>Cook, P. A.</name>
                <name>Doyle, M. J. J.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fernando, C. J.</name>
                <name>France, A. A.</name>
                <name>French, T. A.</name>
                <name>Garland, C. M. L.</name>
                <name>Georganas, S.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P. P.</name>
                <name>Gregg, M. J.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Holzberger, R. A. V.</name>
                <name>Jarrett, M. L.</name>
                <name>Jordan-Baird, M. A. M.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>Lawrence, T. N.</name>
                <name>Laxale, J. A. A.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>Lim, S. B. C.</name>
                <name>Mascarenhas, Z. F. A.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Miller-Frost, L. J.</name>
                <name>Moncrieff, D. S.</name>
                <name>Neumann, S. K.</name>
                <name>Ng, G. J.</name>
                <name>O'Neil, C. E.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Reid, G. J.</name>
                <name>Repacholi, D. P.</name>
                <name>Roberts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C.</name>
                <name>Sitou, S.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Smith, M. J. H.</name>
                <name>Soon, X.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Swanson, M. J.</name>
                <name>Teesdale, J. A.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Urquhart, A. E.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>White, R. P.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
                <name>Witty, S. J.</name>
                <name>Zappia, A.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>11</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Boele, N.</name>
                <name>Chaney, K. E.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Katter, R. C.</name>
                <name>Le, D. T. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Ryan, M. M.</name>
                <name>Scamps, S. A.</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Watson-Brown, E.</name>
                <name>Wilkie, A. D.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.<br />Debate adjourned. </p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>24</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025</title>
          <page.no>24</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7409" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>24</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BYRNES</name>
    <name.id>299145</name.id>
    <electorate>Cunningham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. At its heart, this bill is about fairness. It is about ensuring Australians are not penalised for taking steps to look after their health. It is about removing a barrier that has for too long forced people into an impossible choice—a choice between finding out potentially life-saving information about their future health and protecting their ability to access affordable life insurance. This is not a choice that anyone should have to make, and it is a choice that this bill will end. Genetic testing is one of the most powerful tools we have in modern medicine. It allows doctors to identify risks early, it allows patients to take preventive action and it allows families to understand inherited conditions and make informed decisions. In many cases, it quite literally saves lives.</para>
<para>We are moving into an era where genomics is not just about treating disease but preventing it all together, but the law has not kept pace with that science. For too long Australians have held back from genetic testing because of the fear that it could be used against them by life insurers, and that fear is not hypothetical. Treasury analysis and stakeholder evidence make it clear that people are delaying or even avoiding genetic testing and participation in medical research because of concerns about life insurance. That means worse health outcomes and missed opportunities for early intervention, and it means a system that is working against people, not for them. This bill fixes that.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 delivers a clear and decisive reform. It bans life insurers from using adverse genetic test results when making decisions about life insurance cover, including whether to offer a policy and on what terms. That means Australians can undergo genetic testing without worrying that the result will be used to deny them cover or increase their premiums. It restores certainty and confidence and it puts people's health ahead of insurer profit margins. Importantly, this reform is carefully designed. It does not undermine the fundamentals of the insurance system. Insurers will still be able to use relevant information to assess risk. They can still consider symptoms, diagnosis and family medical history. They can still ensure policies are properly underwritten, and individuals can still choose to disclose genetic test results where it benefits them, with appropriate consent. This is not about creating loopholes; it is about delivering fairness and drawing a clear line where discrimination should not occur. This bill also strengthens enforcement. It introduces civil penalties and criminal offences for noncompliance, and it gives the Australian Securities and Investments Commission the responsibility to oversee and enforce these protections. These are not symbolic changes. They are real protections, backed by real consequences.</para>
<para>We know this reform is needed because we have heard directly from Australians. We have heard from researchers and clinicians, and we have heard from participants in studies like the DNA Screen project at Monash University. That study tested 10,000 young Australians for genetic risk of preventable cancers and heart disease. What it found was striking. Around one in 50 participants had a high genetic risk of serious disease. That is not a small number; that is a significant portion of the population. For those individuals, that information gained through genetic testing opened the door to preventive care: surveillance, medication and, in some cases, life-saving interventions. In my electorate of Cunningham, at least 50 young people participated in the DNA Screen study. They were proactive. They wanted to understand their health risks and they wanted to take preventive action. But the main reason that people who signed up for DNA Screen decided not to participate was genetic discrimination in life insurance. This barrier to testing is not abstract; it is happening in communities, including in places like the Illawarra, and this legislation will remove that barrier.</para>
<para>The benefits of this reform go far beyond the individual. Greater uptake of genetic testing means better public health outcomes. It means earlier detection. It means more effective prevention. It means advances in scientific knowledge that benefit all Australians. It also makes economic sense. Published modelling shows that preventive genomic screening is cost effective, with productivity gains in the billions. This is not just good health policy; it is good economic policy.</para>
<para>This reform has been a long time coming. The use of genetic information in life insurance has been a policy concern for decades. There have been reviews, moratoriums and industry led approaches, but the evidence has been clear: those measures have not been enough. They have not provided certainty, they have not removed fear and they have not delivered the protections that Australians deserve. That is why legislative action is necessary, and that is why the Albanese Labor government is acting.</para>
<para>This bill also ensures that our laws are consistent. It aligns the Insurance Contracts Act and the Disability Discrimination Act so that genetic discrimination is clearly addressed. It clarifies that individuals are not required to disclose protected genetic information when applying for life insurance, and it ensures that antidiscrimination protections keep pace with advances in science. As technology evolves, our legal framework must evolve with it.</para>
<para>I also want to acknowledge the people who have worked tirelessly to bring this reform to this point. In particular, I want to recognise Dr Jane Tiller from Monash University for her leadership and advocacy over many years. Her work has been absolutely instrumental in highlighting the real-world impacts of genetic discrimination and in building the case for change. I also want to acknowledge the Assistant Treasurer for progressing this legislation and delivering on the government's commitment. I also want to recognise the former assistant treasurer and my good friend Stephen Jones for his work in advancing these reforms and laying the groundwork for what we are debating today. That was really important work that Stephen and his office did. This has been a sustained effort, and it deserves recognition.</para>
<para>The bill also includes a number of additional measures. Schedule 2 provides licensing exemptions for foreign financial service providers, giving Australian businesses and investors access to a greater diversity of investments, new sources of financing and lower costs through increased competition. This will support diversification and strengthen our financial system. Schedule 3 modernises Australia's legislative framework for multilateral development banks and the International Monetary Fund. It reduces administrative burden and ensures that Australia can continue to participate effectively in international financial arrangements. Schedule 4 removes unnecessary regulatory burden on financial advisers by repealing a requirement for annual individual registration that is no longer needed.</para>
<para>These are important measures, but it is schedule 1 that goes to the heart of this bill because it speaks to a fundamental principle: Australians should never be punished for looking after their health. This reform is about dignity, fairness and trust—trust that, when Australians engage with the healthcare system, they can do so without fear; trust that the system will support them, not penalise them; and trust that the law will protect them. It is also about the kind of future that we want to build—a future where preventive healthcare is embraced, a future where medical research thrives and a future where advances in science translate into better outcomes for everyone. We cannot achieve that future if people are afraid to participate. We cannot achieve that future if outdated rules stand in the way, and this bill removes those barriers.</para>
<para>There will always be questions about how we balance fairness and risk in insurance markets, and it is important to acknowledge that. That's why this legislation includes safeguards. It's why insurers retain access to other relevant information. It's why the operation of these provisions will be subject to regular review. We are taking a careful and a considered approach, but we are also taking a necessary step because doing nothing is not an option. Australians deserve a system that supports their health decisions. They deserve a system that reflects modern science and they deserve a system that treats them fairly. This bill delivers that. It delivers on a clear commitment, it ends a longstanding inequity, and it ensures that Australians no longer have to choose between their health and their financial security. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Genetics has come a long way since Mendel and his peas in the 1860s, and it has been absolutely remarkable, in my medical lifetime, to see the advances in genetics. There was slow progress for over a hundred years until we got to the Human Genome Project, which really opened up the field of medical genetics to all of us in the 1990s and 2000s. The Human Genome Project was started in October 1990, and it was projected to take 15 to 20 years. In fact, it was done after 13 years, so it was finished early. This then opened up the field of human genomics to medical researchers and scientific researchers, which led to a tsunami of new treatments and new medical interventions in the last few years.</para>
<para>Just as an example, when I started my training as a paediatrician, about 90 per cent of people who had intellectual handicaps were described as being 'idiopathic'—in other words, no cause found. That is now totally the opposite, where 10 to 15 per cent were described as having an idiopathic intellectual handicap and over 90 per cent now have a cause, mostly genetic. We've done some remarkable things. We now have treatments for some of the previously fatal genetic disorders of childhood, for example, spinal muscular atrophy, which, in its most severe form, usually caused death by age 3. It now has a curative treatment available because of genetic intervention. We are doing remarkable things.</para>
<para>We know there are many inherited disorders that can cause disability in children that can be picked up by newborn screening. Now, over 40 are routinely tested for, and that is a remarkable change since my beginnings as a paediatrician, when only three or four conditions were tested for. There are remarkable differences, remarkable changes and medical advances that are leading to better health care and leading to good quality of life for many people who previously would have been quite disabled.</para>
<para>However, with that, there have come concerns about the availability of genetic information and how that is used by different organisations, including insurance companies, financial institutions et cetera. This is expanding very rapidly. We know that there are risk genes for a whole range of common disorders—diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cardiovascular disease.</para>
<para>Recently I heard from a group led by a paediatric colleague of mine, Srinivasan, who's an endocrinologist at the children's hospital, about a condition called familial hypercholesterolaemia. This is a condition where cholesterol is so high that it causes very early onset cardiovascular disease and heart attacks and sometimes death in the 20s and 30s. This can be prevented by treatment and can be picked up in very early childhood. There are lots of at-risk genes for a whole range of disorders. Many people have these tests done or have relatives who have these tests done. Through family history, that can affect people even though they may never have had a test done and may until that time be unaware that they are at risk of certain diseases.</para>
<para>We recently had a situation in Sydney at the Royal North Shore Hospital fertility IVF clinic, which, some years ago, made a mistake and inadvertently transferred two embryos to a mother who was not the genetic mother. Only recently, because of genetic screening through commercial program, were these twins found to be not the biological children of the person they thought was their mother for over 30 years. Genetics is remarkable in its advances, and it's a cascading situation where you're seeing more and more advances, but it also comes with some dangers if that information is not in the right hands.</para>
<para>This legislation delivers on the government's commitment to ban the use of adverse genetic test results in life insurance. We know already that some people are avoiding getting testing done because of concerns about that information falling into hands that could use it to financially affect them. I think there are other possibilities as well that we need to be thinking about. If this information gets into the hands of a prospective employer, it may sometimes affect their willingness to employ people, so we need to be very careful about how genetic information is allowed to be given to other people. Sometimes it may well be because of careful family histories that people are implicated as being at risk despite the fact that they may never have had a test done.</para>
<para>There are also concerns about access to genetic counselling and access to the correct information for many people who may have at-risk genetic profiles. I know that the government is working very strongly on that issue to make sure that people, if they do have at risk genes identified, are able to access genetic information. Before I go any further, I'd like to congratulate Professor Jane Tiller from Monash University for the work that she has done. She's here now and it's great to have her here. This project has taken so much time over such a long period of time, and Jane has been the one person who has never failed in her commitment to the cause. I congratulate her and thank her from the bottom of my heart for making sure that we were all focused on getting this bill through the House.</para>
<para>I would like to also thank my friend and colleague Stephen Jones for the efforts that he put in. It did take a long period of time to make sure that we were using the right information and that everyone was aware of the necessity for this bill and I thank Stephen for that. It's also fantastic to have in the House today Daniel Mulino, the Assistant Treasurer. I don't want to push him to think that I'm ingratiating myself with him, but he has been like a dog with a bone and has been the one person that has pushed this through the parliament, and he deserves the highest congratulations and thanks for what he has done.</para>
<para>There is clearly a long list of other people in the genetics community—genetics Australia et cetera have done an incredible job. My friend and colleague Mimi Berman, the previous head of genetics Australia, has been fantastic and really tireless in making sure that this legislation was to the fore. Kathy North from Genomics Australia has been a really fantastic advocate as well. And many of my paediatric colleagues have done a lot of work in this space and are really grateful that the government has brought this legislation forward.</para>
<para>Genetic risk is, of course, risk; it's not a certainty. But it is important that people can have certainty, when they do get genetic testing, that the information will only be in the hands of people who want their good, not other organisations who may use it for financial gain et cetera. The Treasury's analysis is clear that some people are holding back from essential testing and even from participating in research projects because of concerns about their genetic information being used against them. That is not good enough. This government has been really focused on making sure that there is certainty, and this legislation will give that in letting Australians know that their genetic information will be used for their good and no-one else's in the first instance. Their decision to undertake genetic testing must be made on a medical basis. People must be sure that it won't jeopardise their access to life insurance or force them into more expensive or restrictive policies, and it should not affect other insurance.</para>
<para>These reforms will support greater uptake of genetic testing and, in particular, participating in medical research. We have a government and a health minister that are focused on supporting our medical research community. That means better prevention, earlier treatment and, really, stronger and more focused research that will improve public health across the country and allow us to participate in international programs and take advantage of advances in scientific knowledge that will benefit every Australian.</para>
<para>This legislation has been carefully designed, and it has taken some time. Once again, Minister Mulino needs to be congratulated for making sure that that's the case. Individuals can volunteer their test results if they've given their consent to other organisations, and insurance providers can still use family histories and diagnoses to make sure that policies are properly risk rated. We're delivering fairness, we're delivering certainty, and we're delivering knowledge to the people who can best use it in a healthcare setting. We're acting because vulnerable Australians deserve a system that supports their health decisions, and we are acting because this government is focused on 21st-century health care that not only provides protections for people but also provides incredibly strong public health policy. It will make sure that people won't feel disadvantaged if they do undertake genetic testing or if their other family members undertake genetic testing. Genetic testing, we know, can save lives and improve quality of life, and, certainly, in the paediatric space, it can help in a whole range of things, including family planning.</para>
<para>The bill makes amendments to the Insurance Contracts Act to implement the ban and related amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act to make sure Australia is aligned with antidiscrimination laws. It makes sure that genetic testing can still be used to improve quality of life, save lives and support medical researchers to prevent, treat and monitor a whole range of disorders, including inherited metabolic disorders, genetic disorders and, in some cases, genetically based cancers and cancer predispositions. And, of course, in families of Ashkenazi Jewish origin, like mine, they have a higher risk of certain cancers if they carry the so-called BRCA genes, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Many of us, without even knowing that we carry at-risk genes, can be reassured that, if we do get tested, the information will be used in the right way.</para>
<para>Across the parliament there's pretty uniform agreement on this legislation, and this is something the whole parliament can be congratulated on. It's one of the most important pieces of legislation to pass through this parliament in the 10 years I've been here; I really do feel that. This will open the way for further advances in health care based on genomics that we know will be coming towards us as a tsunami in the next few years. The people that have promoted this bill—I'll mention Jane Tiller again, from Monash University, and Stephen Jones, Daniel Mulino and many other members of parliament that we've heard speak—need to be proud of the fact that this parliament is looking to the future in health care by introducing this legislation. I congratulate my paediatric colleague Monique Ryan, who's here today, who I know has also been a very strong supporter of this legislation, as have many other members of parliament—too many to mention.</para>
<para>We should all be proud that this is something we are doing that will advance health care for many years in the future in Australia. It's great to be a member of a parliament that can make this happen to benefit all Australians, and to be involved in 21st century health care around the world. I'm proud to be here on the day that this legislation is being debated. I'm wearing the badge of Genetics Australia, and I'm proud to do that. I thank all my colleagues who have supported this legislation.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Let the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard </inline>note that the honourable member for Macarthur referred to the member for Kooyong.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ZAPPIA</name>
    <name.id>HWB</name.id>
    <electorate>Makin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's always a pleasure to follow and listen to the remarks of the member for Macarthur, who brings so much valuable insight into the health issues that our nation faces. That was a wonderful example in his contribution to this bill, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. This legislation, in fact, has four schedules. Schedule 1 limits the use of genetic information by life insurers—that is the matter the member for Macarthur focused on a moment ago, and which I will come back to in my own remarks; Schedule 2 provides licensing exemptions for foreign financial service providers; Schedule 3 modernises and streamlines Australia's participation with multilateral development banks; and schedule 4 repeals stage 2 financial adviser registrations with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.</para>
<para>This is good legislation because it bans life insurance companies from taking into account the results of or information about a person's genetic testing when deciding whether or not they will offer life insurance cover and, if they do, determining the terms and conditions. The ban brings Australia into line with similar approaches in other countries, including the UK and Canada, who banned the practice some time ago. As the member for Macarthur pointed out a moment ago, this is a matter that's had a long history. Indeed, back in 2023 I wrote to the minister for health about this very issue, and it is good to see this legislation now before the parliament.</para>
<para>Once this legislation is enacted, any breaches of the ban will be subject to a criminal offence and civil penalties, with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission being the regulating body. I understand that health insurance providers in Australia are already prevented from using genetic testing to deny cover or increase the cost of premiums. If that is the case—and it is—life insurance should be no different.</para>
<para>This legislation is not simply about stopping discrimination; it is also about saving lives and better managing the health of individuals and the health system of the country. Genetic testing is an effective health management advancement—the member for Macarthur spoke eloquently about that—and it should be encouraged. However, the current use of genetic testing by life insurance companies is a disincentive for people to have genetic health tests. If people make use of genetic testing, they are likely to have a much earlier diagnosis of serious illness and therefore begin earlier, and possibly life-saving, treatment. The ban, however, does not prevent individuals from volunteering genetic test results and the use of these volunteered results in underwriting where this would not adversely impact the life insurance cost and terms.</para>
<para>I also note that this legislation has been the subject of extensive public consultation and public discourse for probably the last decade, if not longer. In 2018, the life insurance industry inquiry of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services recommended a ban on the use of predictive genetic test results in life insurance underwriting be urgently implemented. That was some eight years ago. Today, after so much time, we are finally in a position where legislation has come to this House. Again, as the member for Macarthur did, I acknowledge the work of so many other people, including the members of that committee that I referred to, for their work in bringing this issue before the parliament eight years ago.</para>
<para>But along the way there have been many others. The member for Macarthur mentioned Jane Tiller, whom I have also met with and whom I also congratulate on her commitment to and focus on this work over several years. Jane is from Monash University, and I met with her in my office on a couple of occasions. She, along with her with some of her other colleagues, including Associate Professor Paul Lacaze from Monash University and Professor Margaret Otlowski from the University of Tasmania, have carried out considerable research over the years into genetic testing and life insurance. I want to quote only one section of a paper that they provided to me at the time. It was a briefing paper related to this issue, which talks about Australia's obligations under certain human rights provisions that we are now signatory to. It says:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Australia's international human rights obligations require prohibition of genetic discrimination</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Australia's international human rights obligations, including Article 6 of the United Nations Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (UDHGHR) and Article 25 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) … require a prohibition on discrimination based on genetic characteristics, and …specifically refers to discrimination in the offer of life insurance.</para></quote>
<para>It is very clear and very pointed that genetic testing should not discriminate when it comes to life insurance. That was the basis on which I suspect much of Jane Tiller's work was focused. I've got no doubt that the work she and her colleagues have carried out has been influential in this legislation finally coming to the House.</para>
<para>Other speakers have covered this issue very well, and I don't want to go over everything in detail, but in summary —and this is my view of this legislation—not everyone in Australia has life assurance, and many of those people don't have life assurance because genetic testing puts a barrier in front of them. That is, if they have a genetic test and it shows up certain health issues, then it is likely that they will either pay higher premiums or won't even get life assurance at all. That practice has to stop.</para>
<para>But genetic testing is also good for the nation as a whole. If more people undertake genetic testing, it means that we as a nation have a better understanding of the health issues that that the nation is facing. And if we have a better understanding of the health issues that the nation is facing, our health strategy is much more targeted and much more focused. That, in turn, means that, in the long term, we will have a much more effective health strategy for the nation.</para>
<para>We know that health costs are one of the major costs facing governments of all persuasions, both federal and state. If we're ever going to get on top of managing the health costs of this nation, we need to better understand what the issues are, and we're not going to do that if people are discouraged from doing what now has become a fundamental test—that is, genetic testing—that provides so much insight into a person's health issues. So, when we have a snapshot of that across the nation, it will actually save the nation costs, as well as, as I said earlier, individual costs, not to mention possibly life-saving treatment that would otherwise have been missed because the genetic testing was never carried out.</para>
<para>I thank the minister who's at the table for his role in bringing this to the parliament. I also thank the previous minister, who did a lot of the groundwork on it as well, because, as the member for Macarthur said, this has been an effort of so many people to bring it to the parliament. As the member for Macarthur quite rightly points out, this is important legislation, and I commend it to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Firstly, I would like to thank those members who have contributed to this debate, and I briefly acknowledge a few people who are in the chamber and also in the gallery for their contribution. I echo the words of previous speakers and acknowledge the work of Dr Jane Tiller, who has been working on this measure for many, many years. I remember first encountering this issue when I was on the Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, and Dr Tiller, along with her colleague Paul Lacaze, gave a very detailed and compelling briefing. She had been working on this for a long time before that and has continued her advocacy along with other colleagues. Jane Tiller is an example of advocacy that is very impactful.</para>
<para>I also say that, through acknowledging Dr Tiller, there are many other experts and organisations who have contributed experts in medicine, in the law and in public policy, and I'm not in a position to acknowledge all of them. But, through her work, I want to acknowledge all of the others, and there are probably some of them in the gallery and in the building today. I acknowledge my predecessor Stephen Jones and his work on this. He made a lot of groundwork, as the previous speaker indicated, but also made key decisions, and that is extremely important. I acknowledge the member for Macarthur, who spoke very eloquently on this. I acknowledge his advocacy on this particular measure but also the great expertise and depth of knowledge and passion that he brings to issues right across the spectrum in this area. His views carry a great deal of weight in this area.</para>
<para>I also acknowledge that we have, in the chamber, members from across a range of parties. We have the member for Makin, who has just given a very thoughtful contribution; the member for Kooyong, who I know has an interest in this; and the member for Cowper, who I've worked with on this issue and others. Indeed, when we gave a major press conference to announce the imminent release of exposure draft legislation, we had members from across all the parties, and that to me reflected the fact that, on issues like this, this place operates well and best when we work together and draw on the expertise from right across this place. I want to acknowledge that we have a range of members in this place and acknowledge the thoughtful contribution from the member for Makin but also that the other members who are here have also contributed to this issue.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 of the bill implements the government's decision to ban life insurers from using information about an individual's genetic test results to inform the offer of life insurance cover or the terms and conditions of the cover that is offered. This provides certainty to individuals that undertaking genetic testing, either for personal medical reasons or as a participant in medical research, will not impact their ability to obtain life insurance cover or the terms and conditions of that cover. It is intended that the ban will lead to the uptake of genetic testing and therefore maximise the opportunity to realise the extensive individual public health and scientific benefits of genetic testing. As a number of speakers have indicated in the debate, the benefits of this testing for the individual and for society more broadly are expanding all the time.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 to the bill delivers on the government's commitment to ensuring that Australian professional and wholesale investors have access to the cross-border financial advice services they need by providing licensing exemptions to foreign financial service providers. The exemptions are designed to encourage the offering of foreign financial products and services in Australia to diversify investment opportunities for Australian professional and wholesale investors. ASIC will also be empowered with civil penalty provisions and other oversight and enforcement tools. With the schedule allowing ASIC to gain enhanced regulatory powers, ASIC can engage in stronger oversight of foreign financial service providers. The government is taking action to provide investors with access to global investment opportunities and increased competition in the Australian market.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 to the bill streamlines and modernises Australia's legislative framework for multilateral development banks and the IMF. The schedule reduces administrative and legislative burden and ensures that Australia does not fall behind in its ability to participate in future financing arrangements within these important institutions. These changes will also allow Australia to formalise agreements with the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank announced as part of the 2024-25 MYEFO.</para>
<para>Schedule 4 of the bill repeals schedule 2 of the Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response—Better Advice) Act 2021 and implements the government's decision to no longer proceed with stage 2 of the registration process for financial advisers. This would have otherwise required individual financial advisers to register themselves annually with ASIC from 1 July 2026. This maintains the current system, which requires Australian Financial Services licensees to apply to ASIC to register their authorised financial advisers, and is consistent with the objective of removing unnecessary regulatory burden for individual advisers. Further, the operation of stage 1 registration has proven sufficient to meet the policy objectives of a functioning and effective disciplinary system. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The immediate question now before the House is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Kooyong be agreed to.</para>
<para>Question negatived.</para>
<para>Original question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a second time.</para>
<para>Message from the Governor-General recommending appropriation announced.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Consideration in Detail</title>
            <page.no>30</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move the amendment circulated in my name:</para>
<quote><para class="block">(1) Schedule 1, item 3, page 10 (line 18), omit "each fifth anniversary", substitute "each third anniversary".</para></quote>
<para>I have moved this amendment to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. This important bill recognises that we have to remove disincentives for people who want to access life-saving genetic testing. The amendment that I am moving strengthens that intention by requiring the minister to commence and complete the statutory review of this legislation sooner than the government currently proposes—in fact, as soon as is practicable after three years, rather than five.</para>
<para>The government's bill specifies that statutory reviews must consider whether the legislation is effective in providing reasonable certainty to individuals about the use of protected genetic information in relation to contracts of life insurance and whether these provisions have any unintended consequences. There is, in fact, good reason to suspect that future reviews will identify disadvantage arising from the failure of this bill to offer retrospective application. As it stands, people who have already had penalties, loadings, exclusions or discriminatory terms imposed upon them by life insurers will continue to face discrimination unless they seek to negotiate new coverage. The implications of this inequity are going to have to be closely monitored.</para>
<para>The bill provides that regulations may prescribe what information is protected by genetic testing. This ensures that the legislation will remain effective, even in the face of rapidly evolving genetic testing technologies. But it's absolutely vital that insurance companies do not bypass the protections created by this legislation by inferring genetic test results based on other data points—for example, information about other aspects of their medical care such as risk surveillance activities, prescribed medications, participation in preventative health care, involvement in clinical trials and other indirect methods. An earlier review would help pick up whether or not this unintended consequence materialises. It's also to be hoped that timely and evidence based reviews will identify a significant uplift in the number of Australians who are accessing genetic testing, free of concerns about their insurability.</para>
<para>Even with the enactment of this legislation, a discriminatory barrier to accessing genetic testing remains. Many Australians will continue to struggle with the out-of-pocket cost of many forms of genetic testing. For example, non-invasive prenatal testing is the most accurate screening test for most genetic conditions, but it currently attracts no Medicare rebate. Families are still being expected and asked to pay $400 to $500 out of pocket, which is an unaffordable sum for many households. It's not simply a cost issue; it is an equity issue. A study from Monash University found that these out-of-pocket expenses are the No. 1 barrier preventing Australians from accessing non-invasive prenatal testing.</para>
<para>In 2023, new Medicare items were introduced to cover carrier testing during pregnancy for cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy and fragile X syndrome. This was a very welcome and very overdue step, but it underscores how inconsistent and how incomplete Medicare coverage for genetic testing remains in this country. Australians should not face financial barriers when it comes to vital information about their health or about the health of their unborn children.</para>
<para>As medical science advances very quickly, the gap between our clinical capacity and policy settings continues to grow wider. This bill attempts to bridge part of that divide by curtailing discriminatory insurance practices in relation to genetic testing. My amendment furthers that aim. But we have to continue to consider broader gaps in our policy settings which continue to lead to healthcare discrimination, and that includes price discrimination.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The government supports the need for reviews and the benefit of reviews, but does not support this particular amendment. Three-yearly reviews may not be sufficient to adequately assess the impact of the ban. Once the ban is implemented, it will take time for its impact to fully develop, and three years may not provide enough time for this to occur. Additionally, undertaking a statutory review every three years is likely to give rise to a significant administrative burden with potentially less than commensurate benefits. Three years is likely not enough time to effectively implement and monitor the impacts of any legislative changes arising from recommendations in prior reviews.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>201906</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the amendment be agreed to.</para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
            <division.header>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [11:32]<br />(The Deputy Speaker—Hon. Terry Young) </p>
              </body>
            </division.header>
            <division.data>
              <ayes>
                <num.votes>10</num.votes>
                <title>AYES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Boele, N.</name>
                  <name>Chaney, K. E.</name>
                  <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                  <name>Le, D. T.</name>
                  <name>Ryan, M. M. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Scamps, S. A.</name>
                  <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                  <name>Spender, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Watson-Brown, E.</name>
                  <name>Wilkie, A. D.</name>
                </names>
              </ayes>
              <noes>
                <num.votes>66</num.votes>
                <title>NOES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Abdo, B. J.</name>
                  <name>Ambihaipahar, A.</name>
                  <name>Belyea, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Berry, C. G.</name>
                  <name>Briskey, J. L.</name>
                  <name>Burnell, M. P.</name>
                  <name>Byrnes, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Campbell, J. P.</name>
                  <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                  <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                  <name>Clutterham, C. L.</name>
                  <name>Coffey, R. K.</name>
                  <name>Coker, E. A.</name>
                  <name>Comer, E. L.</name>
                  <name>Cook, K. M. G.</name>
                  <name>Cook, P. A.</name>
                  <name>Doyle, M. J. J.</name>
                  <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                  <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Fernando, C. J.</name>
                  <name>France, A. A.</name>
                  <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                  <name>French, T. A.</name>
                  <name>Garland, C. M. L.</name>
                  <name>Georganas, S.</name>
                  <name>Gorman, P. P.</name>
                  <name>Gosling, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Gregg, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Holzberger, R. A. V.</name>
                  <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                  <name>Jarrett, M. L.</name>
                  <name>Jordan-Baird, M. A. M.</name>
                  <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                  <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                  <name>Lawrence, T. N.</name>
                  <name>Laxale, J. A. A.</name>
                  <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                  <name>Lim, S. B. C.</name>
                  <name>Mascarenhas, Z. F. A.</name>
                  <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                  <name>Miller-Frost, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                  <name>Moncrieff, D. S.</name>
                  <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                  <name>Neumann, S. K.</name>
                  <name>Ng, G. J.</name>
                  <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Reid, G. J.</name>
                  <name>Repacholi, D. P.</name>
                  <name>Ryan, J. C.</name>
                  <name>Sitou, S.</name>
                  <name>Smith, D. P. B. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Smith, M. J. H.</name>
                  <name>Soon, X.</name>
                  <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Swanson, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Teesdale, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                  <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                  <name>Urquhart, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Violi, A. A.</name>
                  <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                  <name>White, R. P.</name>
                  <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
                  <name>Witty, S. J.</name>
                  <name>Zappia, A.</name>
                </names>
              </noes>
              <pairs>
                <num.votes>0</num.votes>
                <title>PAIRS</title>
                <names />
              </pairs>
            </division.data>
            <division.result>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question negatived. </p>
              </body>
            </division.result>
          </division><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr SCAMPS</name>
    <name.id>299623</name.id>
    <electorate>Mackellar</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move amendments (1) and (2) as circulated in my name together:</para>
<quote><para class="block">(1) Schedule 1, item 3, page 5 (lines 22 and 23), omit "Regulations made for the purposes of this subsection have effect despite anything else in this section.".</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) Schedule 1, item 3, page 6 (lines 26 to 28), omit "Regulations made for the purposes of this subsection have effect despite anything else in this section.".</para></quote>
<para>I rise to speak in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025. This legislation establishes a statutory ban on insurers using the results of genetic tests when offering or pricing life insurance.</para>
<para>While I strongly support this bill, I will be moving two amendments to strengthen it. These amendments respond to concerns raised by the Australian Human Rights Commission regarding sections 33E(2) and 33F(5) of the bill. As currently drafted, these sections allow regulations to override the definitions of key terms, such as 'genetic testing' and 'protected genetic information'. Specifically, the provisions state that the regulations 'have effect despite anything else in this section'. This means that regulations could, in effect, redefine what constitutes protected genetic information, even if that contradicts the definitions set out in the legislation itself. This creates a risk that the scope of protections could be narrowed in the future. In doing so, it dilutes the strength and certainty of the ban. It is not appropriate for regulations to have the power to limit or expand the meaning of terms that are so central to the operation of the legislation.</para>
<para>While the explanatory memorandum suggests that this flexibility is needed to keep pace with advances in medicine, the Australian Human Rights Commission asserts that this is not sufficient justification for such an extensive delegation of power. They argue that substantial changes to the meaning of prescribed terms should only be done through legislative processes and appropriate scrutiny. My proposed amendments remove from sections 33E(2) and 33F(5) the words:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Regulations made for the purposes of this subsection have effect despite anything else in this section.</para></quote>
<para>This will safeguard against any future narrowing of the protections in this bill, whilst still allowing the legislation to evolve appropriately through proper legislative processes.</para>
<para>This bill is the culmination of years of advocacy from medical professionals, researchers and consumer advocates who have consistently called for change. For too long, Australians have faced what has rightly been described as genetic discrimination in life insurance, where the results of a genetic test, often undertaken to better understand or prevent disease, could be used against them. The Australian Medical Association and Monash University's Public Health Genomics unit have cited research that shows that fear of insurance discrimination has deterred many at-risk people from having potentially life-saving genetic testing. The Human Genetics Society of Australasia has highlighted that patients have delayed or declined testing even when there is a strong family history of serious disease. The Public Health Association of Australia has pointed to broader public health implications, noting that reduced uptake of testing limits opportunities for early intervention and prevention. Consumer groups, including the Cancer Council Australia, have emphasised the very real human cost of missing the chance for early detection because they fear being penalised financially. This bill responds directly to those concerns and has been welcomed by the Council of Australian Life Insurers as giving Australians more certainty and empowering them towards better health outcomes. I'd like to acknowledge and thank the Assistant Treasurer for his very constructive engagement with the sector in developing this legislation.</para>
<para>In closing, this bill represents an important step forward for fairness, for public health and for the future of personalised medicine in Australia, and I commend these amendments and the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I begin by acknowledging the contribution of the member for Mackellar on this subject matter over a period of time. I make clear that the government will not be supporting this particular amendment.</para>
<para>The government recognises the importance of this legislation in futureproofing the ban and ensuring it continues to operate effectively, particularly as health and medical technology continue to advance. The purpose of the regulations is to enable the legislation to promptly respond to health and medical advancements which might necessitate modifications to the operation of the ban. The legislation establishing the ban is complex and it is important that it is futureproofed, particularly in the early stages of its implementation. The inclusion of the wording is important to putting it beyond doubt that the regulations can override the primary law, particularly where there is overlap. Without the wording, there could be confusion as to whether the primary law or the regulation takes priority, and it may ultimately limit the ability of the legislation to keep pace with ongoing advances in health and medical technology.</para>
<para>Importantly, any regulations made under the proposed bill would be subject to disallowance, ensuring parliamentary oversight and control over delegated legislation is maintained and in this case, including any impacts on the operation of the primary law. Justification for the inclusion of the wording is in the explanatory memorandum at paragraphs 1.71 to 1.73 for subsection 33E(2) and paragraphs 163 to 165 for subsection 33F(5).</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>201906</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the amendments be agreed to.</para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
            <division.header>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [11:47]<br />(The Deputy Speaker—Hon. Terry Young) </p>
              </body>
            </division.header>
            <division.data>
              <ayes>
                <num.votes>9</num.votes>
                <title>AYES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Boele, N.</name>
                  <name>Chaney, K. E.</name>
                  <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                  <name>Le, D. T. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Ryan, M. M.</name>
                  <name>Scamps, S. A. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Spender, A. M.</name>
                  <name>Watson-Brown, E.</name>
                  <name>Wilkie, A. D.</name>
                </names>
              </ayes>
              <noes>
                <num.votes>64</num.votes>
                <title>NOES</title>
                <names>
                  <name>Abdo, B. J.</name>
                  <name>Ambihaipahar, A.</name>
                  <name>Belyea, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Berry, C. G.</name>
                  <name>Briskey, J. L.</name>
                  <name>Burnell, M. P.</name>
                  <name>Byrnes, A. J.</name>
                  <name>Campbell, J. P.</name>
                  <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                  <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                  <name>Clutterham, C. L.</name>
                  <name>Coffey, R. K.</name>
                  <name>Coker, E. A.</name>
                  <name>Comer, E. L.</name>
                  <name>Cook, K. M. G.</name>
                  <name>Cook, P. A.</name>
                  <name>Doyle, M. J. J.</name>
                  <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                  <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Fernando, C. J.</name>
                  <name>France, A. A.</name>
                  <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                  <name>French, T. A.</name>
                  <name>Garland, C. M. L.</name>
                  <name>Georganas, S.</name>
                  <name>Gorman, P. P.</name>
                  <name>Gosling, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Gregg, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Holzberger, R. A. V.</name>
                  <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                  <name>Jarrett, M. L.</name>
                  <name>Jordan-Baird, M. A. M.</name>
                  <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                  <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                  <name>Lawrence, T. N.</name>
                  <name>Laxale, J. A. A.</name>
                  <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                  <name>Lim, S. B. C.</name>
                  <name>Mascarenhas, Z. F. A.</name>
                  <name>Miller-Frost, L. J.</name>
                  <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                  <name>Moncrieff, D. S.</name>
                  <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                  <name>Neumann, S. K.</name>
                  <name>Ng, G. J.</name>
                  <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Reid, G. J.</name>
                  <name>Repacholi, D. P.</name>
                  <name>Ryan, J. C.</name>
                  <name>Sitou, S.</name>
                  <name>Smith, D. P. B. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Smith, M. J. H.</name>
                  <name>Soon, X.</name>
                  <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                  <name>Swanson, M. J.</name>
                  <name>Teesdale, J. A.</name>
                  <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                  <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                  <name>Urquhart, A. E.</name>
                  <name>Violi, A. A.</name>
                  <name>White, R. P.</name>
                  <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
                  <name>Witty, S. J.</name>
                  <name>Zappia, A.</name>
                </names>
              </noes>
              <pairs>
                <num.votes>0</num.votes>
                <title>PAIRS</title>
                <names />
              </pairs>
            </division.data>
            <division.result>
              <body>
                <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question negatived. <br />Bill agreed to.</p>
              </body>
            </division.result>
          </division></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Third Reading</title>
            <page.no>33</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a third time.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a third time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>34</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7434" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>34</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
    <electorate>Lindsay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. At the outset, I want to make the coalition's position clear. The coalition will not stand in the way of this bill passing the House. However, given the potential implications of these changes for our private health system, the coalition believes the legislation requires careful scrutiny through a Senate inquiry.</para>
<para>This bill makes two key changes to Australia's private health system. First, it introduces transparency by default, with amendments to allow the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish information on the Medical Costs Finder about the medical fees charged by medical practitioners, including specialists and general practitioners, and the likely out-of-pocket costs patients will face through their private healthcare experience.</para>
<para>The second change contained in this bill focuses on regulating private health insurance premiums. It requires insurers to seek ministerial premium approval for new products and existing products where certain changes are proposed. The change broadly aligns with the current process for premium changes for existing products, whilst expanding ministerial oversight of premium setting for new private health insurance products. This change seeks to address the risk of product phoenixing, where an existing insurance product can be closed and then an identical or similar new product opened at a higher premium, skirting the requirement for premium change approval.</para>
<para>The coalition supports the concept of ensuring greater transparency in healthcare pricing and the need to help consumers make informed decisions about their health care. We also support sensible measures to ensure that Australians obtain better value from private health insurance. However, reforms in this area must be considered carefully. Australia's private health system plays a critical role in supporting our public hospitals. The two systems work hand in hand to ensure that all Australians have access to the health care they need. Importantly, the private health system relieves pressure on our public hospitals, something that could not be more critical right now, when we are seeing record levels of ambulance ramping and increasing waiting times at hospitals right across the country. That is why reforms in this area must be approached carefully, to avoid unintended consequences.</para>
<para>This debate is also occurring at a time when Australians are facing rising healthcare costs under Labor. The coalition recognises that high out-of-pocket costs for specialists are a major concern for many Australians, particularly as families struggle with the rising unaffordability of health care under this government. Labor's reckless spending and economic mismanagement are pushing up costs across the board, and health care is another victim of that. Not only has the out-of-pocket cost to see a GP skyrocketed to more than $50 under this government—the highest level on record—but out-of-pocket costs for specialist appointments are also spiralling out of control.</para>
<para>According to the government's own most recent Medicare data, for specialist attendances the bulk-billing rate is 28.2 per cent, with an average out-of-pocket cost of $123.48. For anaesthetists the bulk-billing rate is just 8.7 per cent, with an average out-of-pocket cost of $244.99. This is forcing Australians to make the difficult decision to avoid seeing a doctor, because they simply cannot afford it. Research conducted last year by Redbridge found that around 30 per cent of people who were referred to a medical specialist over the past three years did not attend because of concerns about cost. Australian families are now having to choose between seeing a doctor and paying the bills. This is a choice that no family should ever be forced to make.</para>
<para>On top of these pressures, the Albanese Labor government has now quietly imposed another cost increase on the 15 million Australians who rely on private health insurance, with premiums set to rise by 4.41 per cent during this cost-of-living crisis. This is the largest private health insurance premium rise in eight years and above the rate of inflation. At a time when household budgets are already under enormous pressure, this premium increase is another hit families simply cannot afford. At the worst possible time, Labor is slugging Australians with higher private health insurance premiums while families are already struggling to pay their bills. Once again, we see the real impact of Labor's broken promises on Australian families.</para>
<para>The Prime Minister waved around his Medicare card and told Australians it would be free to see a doctor. In reality, Australians are now facing the highest out-of-pocket costs to see a doctor on record, and those costs are only predicted to keep rising. Australians are seeing their cost-of-living, out-of-pocket healthcare costs and private health insurance premiums all rising under Labor. They are being forced to avoid accessing critical health care because of it, and this is a serious issue that the coalition is concerned will not be addressed by this bill.</para>
<para>The proposed amendments will allow the government to publish fee information on the Medical Costs Finder by using Medicare, hospital, and insurer billing data already held by government. While this seems reasonable, and improving transparency is a worthwhile objective, several issues require careful examination through a committee process. These include: the concerns raised by specialists, colleges and peak medical bodies about unintended consequences; concerns raised by private health insurers about the government overreach and prevention of innovative new products from being launched; the lack of information about what data will be captured by the bill, how it will be displayed and the timeliness of that information; and the broader drivers of rising out-of-pocket costs.</para>
<para>Most importantly, the government must recognise that, while increased transparency is a good thing, transparency alone will not address the spiralling out-of-pocket costs Australians are facing under Labor when they see a doctor. These issues should be carefully examined through a Senate inquiry, because this doesn't just impact Australians' hip pockets. If Australians are forced to drop or downgrade their private health insurance or if they delay accessing health care, it will inevitably worsen already-rising hospital wait times. It will add further pressure to elective surgery waitlists, and it will place additional strain on hospitals already dealing with serious bed-block issues caused by the Albanese government.</para>
<para>The coalition is proud of its record in ensuring we have a strong private health system working alongside our public hospitals. The former coalition government was successful in bringing private health insurance premium increases under control. We delivered the lowest annual premium change in two decades and the increases were progressively getting smaller. Under Labor, that trend has reversed. Premiums are now rising at the fastest rate in almost a decade. This is incredibly disappointing but unsurprising when you look at Labor's record on private health.</para>
<para>Australians remember that Labor cut the private health insurance rebate—a move that continues to hurt the affordability of private health insurance for millions of families. Who can forget former Labor health minister Tanya Plibersek proudly saying at a press conference: 'Every promise I made, I paid for. How did I pay for it? I paid for it by targeting private health insurance.' Whether it is stranding older Australians in hospital, allowing out-of-pocket costs to soar or standing by as private health insurance premiums surge, Labor has proven time and again it is determined to erode the choice, quality and affordability Australians deserve from their healthcare system.</para>
<para>Australians deserve choice, quality and timely access to health care. The coalition support greater transparency and a strong private health system because we know that leads to better outcomes for our public hospitals and all Australian patients. However, changes to the regulation of private health insurance and specialists must be carefully examined to avoid unintended consequences for consumers, patients and the broader health system. For that reason, while the coalition will support this bill in the House we believe it must be subject to further scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. This inquiry must investigate the spiralling out-of-pocket healthcare costs being overseen by this government, which this bill will not address. It is time for the Prime Minister to stop waving around his Medicare card and start addressing the rising affordability issues facing Australian patients because of his government's economic mismanagement.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS</title>
        <page.no>35</page.no>
        <type>MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Better and Fairer Schools Agreement</title>
          <page.no>35</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>43</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CLARE</name>
    <name.id>HWL</name.id>
    <electorate>Blaxland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the resumption of the debate on the motion to take note of the minister's statement on the <inline font-style="italic">B</inline><inline font-style="italic">etter and fairer schools agreements progress report</inline> be referred to the Federation Chamber.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>43</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>43</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7449" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report from Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>43</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Third Reading</title>
            <page.no>43</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ROWLAND</name>
    <name.id>159771</name.id>
    <electorate>Greenway</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a third time.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a third time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>44</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7434" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>44</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBRIDE</name>
    <name.id>248353</name.id>
    <electorate>Dobell</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to speak in support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. This bill is fundamentally about fairness. It is about making sure Australians can make informed decisions about their health care—decisions grounded in transparency, clarity and genuine choice. For too long, too many Australians have been left in the dark about the true costs of private medical treatment. This legislation changes that.</para>
<para>Every year, thousands of Australians receive referrals to specialists but never take them up because of cost. In 2024-25 alone, 8.6 per cent of people, more than 800,000 Australians, delayed or missed specialist care due to cost, and these costs are overwhelmingly driven by medical specialist fees. No family should be blindsided by an exorbitant bill. No Australian should have to choose between getting the care they need and paying their bills. Importantly, this legislation delivers on our election commitment to improve transparency in healthcare pricing, helping consumers make informed decisions about their health care and private health insurance.</para>
<para>Since 2022, specialists and insurers have been able to publish their fees on the Medical Costs Finder, but uptake has been low. Only one to two per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers have provided their data. Schedule 1 of the bill fixes this by allowing government to publish fee and out-of-pocket information using existing Medicare hospital and insurer billing data. It will also include information about individual practitioners—their locations and fees and whether they participate in gap-cover arrangements, as well as information about hospitals and insurers and typical out-of-pocket costs under different arrangements. Importantly, patient privacy remains fully protected, with no patient information published.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 of the bill addresses another serious consumer issue: phoenixing in private health insurance. Some insurers have exploited existing rules by closing a product and reopening a nearly identical product at a higher price, avoiding ministerial scrutiny. This bill closes that loophole by requiring ministerial approval for all private health insurance products, including changes to cover key terms. It also strengthens the annual premium round with formalised timelines and a structured process for additional information.</para>
<para>These reforms modernise health transparency and ensure practitioners have a fair internal review process. They're practical, reasonable and necessary. They reflect the government's commitment to ensuring the private health system delivers genuine value for money and places consumers at the centre of decision-making. We don't want Australians to continue to face uncertainty about treatment costs, often during some of the most difficult times for them and their families. I want to thank constituents who have written to me or met with me, like Peter, who said on specialist fees:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The only option to see a specialist is to ring around and see how much they charge.</para></quote>
<para>Peter, this bill is for you and others who, like you, have been forced to do the heavy lifting themselves. This bill strengthens consumer protection, transparency and trust. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This bill, the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026, addresses two key concerns: phoenixing products in private health care and transparency on medical fees by medical practitioners.</para>
<para>I am the shadow minister for regional health and, as I said in my maiden speech in 2019, your postcode should not determine your health status. Sadly and, at times, tragically, it still does today. I regularly survey my constituents and my latest survey revealed only 40 per cent of Mallee residents feel they have adequate private health insurance. Of those that actually hold private health insurance, about a quarter believe it is inadequate for their needs. It may well be worse now. The medical fee changes in this bill follow on from the former coalition government's Medical Costs Finder, which was implemented after the Ministerial Advisory Committee on Out-of-Pocket Costs investigation, to help patients make informed decisions before seeing a specialist. We, the coalition, created the Medical Costs Finder to prevent bill shock when seeing a medical specialist. The former coalition government implemented the Medical Costs Finder in 2019 for stakeholders to use on a voluntary basis. This bill makes that program compulsory.</para>
<para>Regrettably, by December 2022, 85 per cent of participants in an Australia's Health Panel survey had not heard of Medical Costs Finder. I note that we are now being asked to make it mandatory, four years into this government's term. You have to wonder how hard this government has promoted the tool to prevent bill shock. The public record that Labor or the department have done much to promote the Medical Costs Finder is very scant. When the Medical Costs Finder was launched, the then chief medical officer, Brendan Murphy, said the website was an important step in improving the transparency of medical costs. I quote him:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We know the vast majority of doctors charge reasonable and proportionate fees and disclose the costs of treatment and charges to their patients. However, some doctors do charge high fees. This website is an important step in improving understanding and transparency of medical costs.</para></quote>
<para>Importantly, the coalition government said we would add more detail and functionality, as recommended by the ministerial advisory committee. As I say, unfortunately, since we lost office, Labor appear to have done very little to promote the Medical Costs Finder project, which explains its low level of uptake.</para>
<para>Let's look at the real figures on private health cover, because Mallee constituents tell me their cover isn't providing them with everything they expected. The ABC reported that due to the cost-of-living crisis, between December 2020 and December 2023, 400,000 Australians downgraded their gold health insurance coverage. Private Healthcare Australia added that, in the first half of 2024, a further 216,000 private health policies were downgraded. PHA said at the time that almost 15 million Australians—55 per cent of the population—had some kind of private health insurance and that it was critical to keep pressure off the public system. In December 2025, a media release in relation to the AMA <inline font-style="italic">Private </inline><inline font-style="italic">health insurance report card</inline> stated:</para>
<quote><para class="block">In further warning signs for the sector, gold-tier policies are in decline as consumers face rising premiums and cost-of-living pressures. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the number of gold-tier policies have dropped by 360,000, despite the overall number of policies growing.</para></quote>
<para>The AMA noted that the number of Australians with gold-tier cover has now fallen to just 743,000 across Australia. That five-year slump represents almost one-third of Australians with gold-tier cover abandoning that cover. I mention this because, as the AMA said in December, gold-tier policies are particularly susceptible to 'phoenixing'. It is understandable that the government wants to take steps to prevent 'phoenixing' to maintain confidence and affordability in gold-tier private health insurance. I note the AMA states it supports Medical Costs Finder and supports transparency, as we all do—or should—though the government likes to claim transparency but is often lacking in that area.</para>
<para>Informed choices are the best choices when it comes to medical care, and, in a cost-of-living crisis, being financially informed before making choices to access private health care is actually essential. The AMA also noted that 68 per cent of private health hospital policies now contain exclusions such as pregnancy, joint replacements or cataracts. The latest quarterly private health insurance membership and benefits data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, or APRA, shows that now only 45.6 per cent of the population have hospital-level private health cover, with the number of policies over that reporting comparison year falling by 150,000 and the number of insured persons falling by 287,000. That's despite the number of hospital treatment episodes rising by about 90,000 cases. Critically, in this cost-of-living crisis, the out-of-pocket costs per hospital treatment episode have risen more significantly than the cost of general treatment, like extras. Hospital treatment out-of-pocket costs on private health rose from $437 to $471, up 7.7 per cent year on year to December 2025, whereas general treatment only rose from $59 to almost $63, still a 5.6 per cent increase but not as dramatic.</para>
<para>Notably, in the last report reporting data, the demographic dropping hospital treatment insurance, if you exclude those over 80 years old, is people aged 20 to 24 years. Why would that be? Over 5,000 Australians dropped their hospital cover in just one quarter. You can picture it, can't you? mum and/or dad say, 'Keep your hospital covered,' but, as a younger person leaves home and tries to pay the rent and make ends meet, they dump the cover—because of course they're invincible, as we all know!—and don't think they need it. Consequently, the Ahpra data shows the biggest dip in cover is for those aged in their 20s. But then, as the 31st birthday looms for lifetime health cover, LHC, the rates pick up again.</para>
<para>I note that, during this cost-of-living crisis, in February the Albanese government approved an average premium increase of 4.41 per cent, effective in a week's time on 1 April, the largest rise in seven years. Of course, at the time it was announced, it was above the rate of inflation, not so anymore. For context, Canstar says that a 4.41 per cent increase equates to annual costs rising by $167, but, for families on an average priced gold hospital policy, premiums will rise by $330. Even families on bronze cover will cop a $120 increase this year under Labor. However, importantly, Canstar noted that the cost of individual gold policies rose by an average of 11.6 per cent between March and April, despite the previous year's approved average being just 3.73 per cent. Canstar predicted last month that it's highly likely more Australians will downgrade their hospital cover on the back of Labor's private health premium increase. Naturally, Canstar recommended Australians shop around for the best deal.</para>
<para>Before the pandemic, the former coalition government approved an average industry premium change of just 2.92 per cent in 2020, which was down about 50 per cent on Labor's last year in office. In government, the coalition supported more than 15 million Australians taking out private health cover at the lowest cost in more than 20 years. By contrast, primary health care is becoming unaffordable under Labor—a bit like fuel—with bulk-billing collapsing 11 per cent, and there have been 40 million fewer bulk-billed GP visits in the past financial year alone.</para>
<para>Let's remember too that 14 private maternity wards have closed under the Albanese Labor government. That is shameful. You have to wonder whether the combined effect of premium increases, policy downgrades and private hospital service closures and the reduction in private health cover is, as the Minister for Home Affairs likes to often say, 'by design' to undermine confidence in private health cover. Remember former minister Plibersek once bragged at a press conference: 'Every promise I made, I paid for. How did I pay for it? I paid for it by targeting private health insurance.' I'll bet she's proud of that.</para>
<para>There's an interdependence between private hospitals and the private health insurance sector. Private hospitals in Australia are under acute financial strain, with operating profits plummeting and 82 closures in the last five years. While utilisation of private hospitals is now above pre-COVID levels, insurer benefits pay-out ratios are stuck at around 84 to 86.3 per cent, which is well below the pre-COVID 90 per cent benchmark and federal Minister for Health and Ageing's target. Rising operational costs, driven by wage increases, the cost of agency staff—of which there are many and a plethora in regional centres, I might point out—medical devices and inflation have not being matched by revenue growth. Private health insurance funds about 50 per cent of private hospital revenue, yet large insurers have significant market power in contract negotiations with hospitals, despite record profits. Private health insurers' failure to pass through adequate premium payouts to cover real costs is the core driver of private hospital distress, threatening the entire private-public balance. When the private system has less capacity, the public system bears the brunt. This circumstance and the failure of the health minister to act on it must be called out as part of the debate on this bill.</para>
<para>The coalition supports ensuring greater transparency in healthcare pricing and the need to help consumers make informed decisions about their health care and obtain better value from private health insurance. To ensure we preserve Australia's private health system, the coalition believes the legislation requires careful scrutiny through a Senate inquiry. Labor's reckless spending and economic mismanagement is pushing up costs across the board, and health care is another victim of that.</para>
<para>The out-of-pocket cost to see a GP skyrocketed to more than $50 under this government—the highest level on record. Out-of-pocket costs for specialist appointments are also spiralling out of control. According to the government's own most recent Medicare data for specialist attendances, the bulk-billing rate was 28.2 per cent, with an average out-of-pocket cost of $123.48. For anaesthetics, the bulk-billing rate was 8.7 per cent, with an average out-of-pocket cost of $244.99.</para>
<para>Australians are making the difficult decision to avoid seeing a doctor because they simply cannot afford it or wait two or three years. In rural, regional and remote Australia, delaying or avoiding treatment is particularly dangerous because we already have higher morbidity and mortality rates than metropolitan people. I have Mallee constituents who tell me they are avoiding treatment for lethal conditions because they cannot afford or bear the long, regular trips to a specialist–and forget paying for the petrol to get there.</para>
<para>One lady, a constituent from Kaniva, told me that under Labor's fuel supply crisis her local petrol station didn't have fuel, so she couldn't make it to her health appointment in Horsham. That's where the rubber hits the road under this government—or doesn't hit the road, you could say—on women's health in regional Australia: inaccessible health care and poorer health outcomes because of Labor's cost-of-living crisis.</para>
<para>Research conducted last year by Redbridge showed around 30 per cent of people referred to a medical specialist over the past three years did not attend, due to concerns about the cost. At the worst possible time, Labor is slugging Australians with higher private health insurance premiums while families are already struggling to pay their bills. Once again, we see the real impact of Labor's lies on Australian families. The Prime Minister waved around his Medicare card many, many times and told Australians it would be free to see a doctor. The truth is that Australians are now facing the highest out-of-pocket costs on record to see a doctor, which are only predicted to keep rising—if you can find a doctor in the regions. The coalition is focused on ensuring that all Australians have timely and affordable access to essential health care. In stark contrast, Labor is only focused on using Medicare as their political plaything.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I understand that the member for Pearce would like to present a copy of their speech to be incorporated into <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline>, in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 6 November 2025.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ROBERTS</name>
    <name.id>157125</name.id>
    <electorate>Pearce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para><inline font-style="italic">The incorporated speech read as follows—</inline></para>
<para>I would like to speak in strong support of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026.</para>
<para>This bill goes to the heart of what I hear in my electorate of Pearce. People are worried about the cost of seeing a specialist. They are confused about what their private health insurance actually covers. They are unsure who to trust when making big decisions about surgery or treatment, especially when they are already anxious or unwell.</para>
<para>Every week, constituents tell me similar stories. Their premiums keep rising, but the exclusions and gaps quietly expand. They receive referrals from their GP but do not act on them, because they fear a big, unknown bill at the end. Some tell me they sit at the kitchen table and call their insurer, only to be left without a clear answer. When a parent decides not to take a child to a specialist because no-one can give them a straight price, something in our health system is not working as it should.</para>
<para>This bill is about restoring confidence and fairness to that system. It aims to give patients clearer information and a fairer deal when they use private health care. It does that in two main ways: by fixing how specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs are published, and by tightening oversight of private health insurance premiums so insurers cannot dodge scrutiny through 'product phoenixing'.</para>
<para>We know that cost is already a major barrier to care. In 2024-25, 8.6 per cent of people—more than 800,000 Australians—delayed or missed specialist care because of cost. The biggest cause of those out-of-pocket costs is specialist fees, not hospital charges. It is wrong to expect patients to commit to a treatment plan without knowing what it will cost them and their family. People should not have to choose between their health and their household budget.</para>
<para>Under the previous government, about $24 million was spent on the Medical Costs Finder website. It was meant to give people clarity about specialist fees and help them compare costs, but it relied on voluntary disclosure from specialists. The result was embarrassing. Out of around 6,300 eligible specialists, at the end of 2022 only six had displayed their fees—six! Three years later, only about 88 specialists had done so—to clarify: that is 88 doctors, not 88 per cent. That is not transparency; that is failure. It did not deliver for patients or for taxpayers.</para>
<para>Meanwhile, private health insurance premiums are adding to cost-of-living pressures. Insurers must get ministerial approval to raise premiums on existing products, usually through the annual premium round. They can, however, launch new products at any time, at any price, without approval. Some insurers close an existing product and reopen a very similar one at a higher price or with reduced benefits. This practice, known as product phoenixing, leaves new customers paying more, undermines trust and defeats the purpose of ministerial premium scrutiny.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 of this bill fixes the failed Medical Costs Finder model and turns it into a tool patients can actually use. Instead of relying on a handful of specialists to upload their fees, the bill allows government to publish information on typical fees and out-of-pocket costs using Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data that is already collected. The initial focus will be on non-GP specialists, with the capacity to add GPs later. Patients will be able to see what different specialists usually charge for particular services and what that has meant, on average, for the gaps they might face.</para>
<para>This is a commonsense change. We already collect this data, and it is patients who pay the bills. They should be able to see clear ranges of what doctors actually charge, in one place, and compare those charges with other practitioners in their area. That will take some of the guesswork out of healthcare decisions and allow people to weigh cost alongside other factors, such as quality, location and waiting times.</para>
<para>Clinicians and professional bodies see the value of these reforms. The Australian Society of Anaesthetists has welcomed the bill as an important step to improve clarity in a confusing system. They point out that private health insurance premiums are a major cost-of-living pressure and that patients deserve clear, accurate information about what their insurance covers and how to get value from it. Their survey work shows that informed financial consent is already routine in anaesthetic practice, especially for planned admissions.</para>
<para>Many anaesthetists already give patients detailed information about likely fees and potential out-of-pocket costs, yet many patients still do not fully understand what their policy covers. This legislation supports that ethical practice by making consistent fee and coverage information easier to find and understand.</para>
<para>Stakeholders in aged care and hospital administration have also recognised the significance of this reform. Older Australians and their families can be blindsided by unexpected specialist or procedural fees as they move between residential care and hospital. By requiring health cost transparency, this bill helps ensure older people and their carers are not surprised by large out-of-pocket costs at a stressful time.</para>
<para>In the hospital sector, commentators note that publishing billing data on Medical Costs Finder will help patients 'find the best value' when they need specialist advice and treatment, rather than leaving them to navigate an opaque market.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 deals with the other piece of the puzzle—how private health insurance premiums are set and how consumers are protected when insurers change or launch products. At present, insurers must apply to the minister if they wish to change the premium on an existing product, but they do not need approval for premiums on new products. Some have used this loophole to close an old product and relaunch a similar one with higher premiums or fewer benefits, avoiding proper scrutiny.</para>
<para>Product phoenixing does real harm. It hurts new customers, who pay more for less. It hurts existing members, who see the value of their cover erode and lose confidence that ministerial approval means anything. It undermines the 15.3 million Australians with private health insurance, who deserve to know that products on the market are subject to consistent scrutiny and that premiums reflect fair value, not creative rebadging.</para>
<para>The bill amends the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 so that insurers must seek the Minister for Health and Ageing's approval not only when they change premiums on existing products but also when they set premiums for new products. They will also have to seek approval before making certain changes that reduce cover, benefits or other key terms and conditions. In short, if an insurer wants to charge more or deliver less, it must go through a transparent process and justify that decision to government. This gives effect to the wider scrutiny of premiums that the Minister for Health and Ageing has signalled and gives consumers greater confidence in the value of private health insurance.</para>
<para>The Office of Impact Analysis estimates a modest regulatory burden—around $480,000 a year in compliance costs across all 28 insurers—and notes there is no impact on individuals or community organisations. For consumers, the benefit is confidence that premium changes and new products are properly scrutinised and that commitments to address phoenixing are being honoured. For the system, it restores coherence and fairness—similar products, whether new or existing, will face the same oversight and consumer-protection expectations.</para>
<para>Underlying both schedules is a simple principle—patients and consumers must be at the centre of the private health system. For too long, opaque pricing, complex policy wording and practices that make sense on a balance sheet but not at the kitchen table have dominated. This bill shifts the balance back towards transparency, accountability and informed choice. It supports doctors who already practise informed financial consent, insurers who compete on value rather than confusion, and patients who simply want to know what they are signing up for.</para>
<para>The Albanese Labor government made an election commitment to tackle product phoenixing and to fix the broken approach to price transparency, and this bill delivers on that promise. It does so while working with the medical profession and good-faith insurers, including bodies like the Australian Society of Anaesthetists and peak hospital groups, that are ready to partner with government to make the system accurate, meaningful and fair. It also sends a clear message to those who have not done the right thing: the era of gaming the system through nondisclosure or phoenixing is over.</para>
<para>For my constituents—families, older Australians, and young people taking out private health insurance for the first time—these changes mean more than a line in a statute book. They mean being able to go online before a procedure, see what different specialists typically charge, compare those costs and have an honest conversation about fees and gaps. They mean greater confidence that the premium increase letter has been properly scrutinised and that similar products are subject to the same rules. Most importantly, they mean fewer unpleasant financial surprises when people are at their most vulnerable, and more Australians getting the care they need when they need it.</para>
<para>I commend the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This legislation is about health, and, certainly, I want to acknowledge the member for Pearce and her contributions to the parliament. What she does and how she does it—she's somebody who shows a lot of pluck, and I do absolutely applaud you, Member for Pearce. You are an inspiration; you truly are.</para>
<para>I want to also acknowledge the member for Lyons, the Assistant Minister for Health and Aged Care, for attending a 5 March professionalism framework launch of the Council of Presidents of Medical Colleges. That particular meeting, a very important one, was addressed by Associate Professor Kerin Fielding from Wagga Wagga, who is president of the Council of Presidents of Medical Colleges. She's also an orthopaedic surgeon. She laid bare the difficulties with regional health as opposed to metropolitan services.</para>
<para>The member for Mallee, the shadow minister for regional health, has also just given a fine speech to the House of Representatives about the issues for people in country areas accessing health. The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 is a bill which makes two key changes to Australia's private health system. First, it brings in transparency by default, with amendments to allow the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish information on the Medical Costs Finder about the medical fees charged by medical practitioners, including specialists and GPs, and the likely out-of-pocket costs patients will incur through their private healthcare experience. That is a good and wise step.</para>
<para>The second change contained in this bill is focused on regulating private health insurance premiums. It requires insurers to seek ministerial approval for premiums for new products and for existing products where certain changes are suggested. I'm not against ministers having more powers. In fact, I've spoken a number of times in recent months about government ministers—Labor ministers—abrogating their responsibilities when it comes to actually doing their jobs. The jobs of ministers should not be fulfilled by the bureaucrats in the Public Service. Whilst we have some outstanding public servants—I acknowledge that—they are not the ones who have the final say and the imprimatur on a piece of legislation coming before the House or the Senate. They are not the ones who make the calls and the decisions. All too often, I believe, this government is outsourcing more and more of the work that should be done by ministers, who have the final say. The buck has to stop with them.</para>
<para>The second change to which I referred broadly aligns with the current process for premium changes for existing products while enlarging ministerial oversight of premium setting of new private health insurance products. The change is attempting to address the risk of product phoenixing, where an existing insurance product can be closed and an identical or similar new product then opened at a higher premium, skirting and getting around the requirement for premium change approval. The coalition is not going to stand in the way of this, because what we want to see is people being able to access help, certainly in regional areas. Particularly at the moment, as the member for Mallee outlined, there are so many people who cannot access their health diagnosis. They cannot get to their doctors' appointments at the practice or the surgery simply because they can't afford to pay for the fuel—that's if they could even fill up their tank, because, at the moment, we've got a crisis.</para>
<para>We've got a national crisis with the availability of fuel. There are more than 600 petrol stations which are out of fuel, and that is causing problems, particularly in regional Australia, and particularly for chronically ill people—and even for those who just need to see their doctor because they may have got an overnight sniffle, or worse—and that's not good. That is not good.</para>
<para>I refer to that 5 March gathering where Associate Professor Fielding talked about the issues and the vast difference between accessing health services in country areas and elsewhere. She said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Across Australia, too many people are doing the same, travelling long distances or unable to travel, worried about accessing the care they need.</para></quote>
<para>She was referring to questions her 90-year-old mother had raised:</para>
<quote><para class="block">How much will this cost me?</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">What if I can't afford it?</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">How long will I have to wait and how far will I have to travel?</para></quote>
<para>Associate Professor Fielding went on to say:</para>
<quote><para class="block">They're getting bills they didn't expect, or they're avoiding a referral altogether because they don't know what it will cost.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The Minister recently told Parliament that over 800,000 Australians delayed specialist care last year because of affordability. That is a serious problem. Australia has one of the best health systems in the world and every Australian should be able to access affordable, high-quality specialist care without risking financial hardship.</para></quote>
<para>I don't think there's anybody in the parliament who would disagree with Associate Professor Fielding's remarks. She said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">But many patients face a different barrier. They can't see a specialist at any price, because there isn't one locally. Rural Australia has 2.7 doctors per thousand people compared to Cities which have 4.3. Potentially preventable hospitalisations are 30 per cent higher in outer regional areas and 70 per cent higher in remote communities.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Thirty per cent of the country's population are too often overlooked, and for too long, our health system has been built around metropolitan centres. The consequences of that are felt every day in regional communities. The communities that grow and provide our food and much more!</para></quote>
<para>And she's right.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Aldred</name>
    <name.id>11788</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Hear, hear!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I hear the member for Monash saying, 'Hear, hear!' This was a very good speech. It was a shame that more people weren't there to listen to it. The member for Lyons, the Assistant Minister for Health and Aged Care, was there, and I hope she took on board—I'm sure she would have; she's a person of good intent—the wise words of Associate Professor Fielding, who then added:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Patients need two things from us: high-quality care they can afford and high-quality care they can actually access.</para></quote>
<para>Her husband, Dr Joe McGirr, is well known to many people in Wagga Wagga as the state member but also through his deep and longstanding involvement in local health. Between them, they are a formidable pair; I acknowledge that. They, like me, want the very best for Wagga Wagga and the wider Riverina for health care, for health services.</para>
<para>That's why, as Deputy Prime Minister, I established the Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network—and I know Bendigo is in that, as is Mildura, Shepparton, Dubbo, Orange and Wagga Wagga. That is going to not fill every gap but certainly go a long way towards providing, in most if not all of those campuses, 30 new doctors every year once they start to graduate. Some of those campuses are at different rates in the course than others. The one at Wagga Wagga is three years in; we've recently opened it. Dr Mike Freelander, the member for Macarthur, was there, in his role here, to help me open that; he is well respected in the medical field both here and outside this building.</para>
<para>Getting back to Associate Professor Fielding, she said on 5 March:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I'm pleased to announce that today we are publicly releasing the CPMC Professional Framework on Ethical Billing and Fee Transparency.</para></quote>
<para>It's all to do with this piece of legislation before us; it's about transparency. It's about making sure that carers, parents, patients, doctors and everyone across the board and across the system know what is going to be charged and what they are getting for the fees they are paying.</para>
<para>All 16 medical colleges have endorsed the framework, and that's to be commended because it was very regional focused. I have to say, many of the colleges are very much metropolitan based. As Associate Professor Fielding said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That unity sends an important message—that Professionalism includes how we communicate and are transparent about cost.</para></quote>
<para>It was an outstanding speech; it truly was. I've heard a lot of good speeches in this place, both here in the House of Representatives and elsewhere, in the committee rooms in this building, but this was one of the best because it got to the nub of what's really important, and that is cost, transparency, accessibility and availability. It's all of the things that we talk about as regional members when we get up to address the difference between health services in regional and peri-urban centres and what is available smack bang in our inner-city electorates. I truly don't think that city based MPs understand the hardships our people, our constituents, have to endure to get proper affordability and accessibility, moreover, to health services. In 2026, it's just not good enough.</para>
<para>Professor Fielding said that she welcomed the government's efforts to strengthen transparency through the Medical Costs Finder, which is part of this legislation, 'as transparency supports trust', but—and this is really interesting—she said: 'But transparency alone will not solve affordability. We need multi-lever reform. We need investment in public outpatient services and Medicare rebates that reflect modern care as well as expanded specialist training.' That's what she said, and I would say that it's simply not good enough for the Prime Minister to keep waving around that green and gold Medicare card of his and say, 'This is all you'll need,' because it's not right. It's just not entirely truthful. Unless that Medicare card comes with his credit card or debit card or some other card, it's going to actually dig into the person's hard-earned—their own money—so the message he is sending is just not correct.</para>
<para>It's all well and good for the Minister for Health and Ageing to talk about all of the Medicare urgent care after-hours clinics and surgeries and what they're doing in that space, but, if you actually look at where those clinics are being established, I'll tell you what, they're not in non-Labor seats, or, if they are, they're seats that Labor wants to add to their big majority. This isn't right because medical help shouldn't discriminate. It shouldn't discriminate against those people in regional seats that just don't happen to have a member with an electorate office adorned with red. It just shouldn't be the case. It's the same with mobile telephone towers. They should be going on a fair and equitable basis to where there is a need. When it comes to medical help, everywhere there is a need. There is a need for better services, more GPs and more specialists. Professor Fielding is certainly working towards that end, as is her husband, as is the shadow minister for regional health—the member for Mallee—who gave an outstanding speech and spelled out the issues at hand here.</para>
<para>I know that everyone on this side is concerned about regional health affordability and accessibility. I know, in my heart of hearts, that those sitting opposite would be too, but they're the government and they have the ability to do something about it. They have the ability to find the solutions and to be fairer when it comes to accessibility to health services, certainly in remote and regional Australia and those outer-city suburban areas, which are not necessarily places where you see crops growing and stock grazing. Regional Australia feeds the country and it's time that we were given our fair share when it comes to health services, health accessibility and the sort of medical support that cities tend to take for granted.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In 2026, you can compare the prices of flights to London in seconds. You can research the price of second-hand cars within a 50-kilometre radius. You can check what your neighbour sold their house for last week. It is seamless, it is easy and it's at your fingertips. But when you need to see a medical specialist, when the stakes could not be higher, you are expected to make an appointment without knowing what it will cost you, without knowing the impact on your hip pocket and without knowing the price tag for your family. As families in my local community of Moreton face cost-of-living pressures, that information gap is not a minor inconvenience; it's a real financial risk.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I apologise. The debate is interrupted in accordance with standing order 43, and the debate will be resumed at a later hour. The member will have leave to continue speaking when the debate is resumed.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</title>
        <page.no>51</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Ramadan</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LE</name>
    <name.id>295676</name.id>
    <electorate>Fowler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last week marked the end of the holy month of Ramadan, a time of reflection, generosity and compassion for Australians of the Muslim faith. In my electorate of Fowler, we are home to a large and vibrant Muslim community whose faith and contributions enrich our local area every day. As a Catholic, I've had the honour of attending many religious celebrations across our community, and it's always a privilege to be welcomed into these moments of faith. In recent weeks, I had the privilege of sharing Ramadan and Eid, joining families at the Grand Omar Mosque in Auburn and the Turkish mosque in Bonnyrigg and spending time with the Australian Uyghur community—I hope I pronounced that correctly! These were meaningful moments of prayer, reflection and gratitude after a month of fasting and service to others.</para>
<para>For many in our community, this has also been a time of deep concern, with loved ones in the Middle East and elsewhere facing uncertainty and conflict. I know many have continued to pray for peace while holding close a deep sense of gratitude for the safety and freedom we have here in Australia. I would also like to thank the mayor, Ned Mannoun, and Liverpool City Council for putting on an amazing Most Blessed Nights, where families come together to join in the spirits of Ramadan.</para>
<para>To everyone who observed Ramadan this year: I wish you and your families Eid Mubarak. May the spirit of peace and compassion guide us here at home and remind us of our shared responsibility to stand for dignity, understanding and hope for all communities everywhere.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cost of Living</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks 12 months since the Albanese Labor government announced our cost-of-living top-up tax cuts for 14 million Australians. We want Australians to earn more and to keep more of what they earn. Tomorrow marks 12 months since the coalition voted against these tax cuts in this House, a decision made by the Leader of the Opposition as shadow Treasurer. 'Great job, well done Angus.' Our government's tax policy is cutting income taxes for every working Australian this year and next year. Helping Australians with the cost of living is our No. 1 priority while building a better future for all Australians.</para>
<para>That's why we have also cut student debt, cut the cost of PBS medicines, delivered the largest investment in bulk-billing in Medicare's history, cut 30 per cent off home batteries to lower power bills, supported apprentices with a $10,000 bonus and introduced paid prac for nursing, teaching, social work and midwifery students. While we're focused on delivering cost-of-living relief, the Liberals and Nationals—those opposite—are still focused on themselves. They have not changed. Labor is delivering; the Albanese Labor government is delivering. The Liberals—those on that side—are completely divided, and Australians deserve better.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I remind the member for Solomon and all members following to use correct titles when referring to people in this chamber.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union</title>
          <page.no>51</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McKENZIE</name>
    <name.id>124514</name.id>
    <electorate>Flinders</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>There are serious allegations that organised crime has infiltrated Victoria's construction industry through the CFMEU. With each day, the full details are revealed—deals of a scandal that goes right to the heart of whether governments are in control or whether organised crime is in control on major infrastructure projects funded by the public purse.</para>
<para>Last week, on the front pages of the Melbourne <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline>, it was reported that federal police believe that whistleblowers against CFMEU corruption are being threatened, businesses are too scared to speak up and investigations are being undermined. All of it is happening on projects paid for by taxpayers. That means your money—the money of people right across the Mornington Peninsula, families right across the state of Victoria.</para>
<para>While billions are being poured into these projects with little to no accountability, costs are blowing out, delays are mounting and a suggested $15 billion has been diverted to bikies and organised crime. What is the Mornington Peninsula getting? Three hundred and fifty kilometres of state managed roads falling apart, a hospital in Rosebud crying for rebuild—yet somehow the money keeps flowing into projects crowded by allegations of serious corruption.</para>
<para>Where is the state Labor government? They are failing to act. They are failing to address corruption. They have lost control. It's not just about unions; it's about construction, where the hardworking communities like mine are being short-changed while the system is being gamed by Labor's mates. Right now, people on the peninsula are asking a simple question: if the political arm of the CFMEU has got money to throw around on waste and corruption, why hasn't Jacinta Allan—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Time! The member for Brisbane has the call.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Labor Government</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:35</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JARRETT</name>
    <name.id>298574</name.id>
    <electorate>Brisbane</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Liberals confirming that they'd vote against Labor's tax cuts for all working Australians. What a day that was! If anyone still needs proof that the Liberals are not on their side, there it is. When those opposite come into this House and they scream from the rafters about cost-of-living pressures, just remember that it's just a show. While households were under pressure, the Liberals chose to abandon you and give their corporate mates a big tax cut instead. But we know that getting more money in your pocket really does make a big difference. It makes it easier for students, carers, mums, dads and others to put food on the table and pay their bills.</para>
<para>We know Australians are doing it tough at the moment, and that's why our No. 1 priority is the cost of living and helping Australians with the cost of living. Last year, while those opposite were divided amongst themselves, this government got on and ensured 14 million Australian taxpayers received a tax cut. This came on top of other cost-of-living measures. We've delivered cheaper medicines, GP for free, student debt cuts, energy bill relief and more.</para>
<para>This is responsible and meaningful hip-pocket help for households across the country. While those opposite remain in an identity crisis, this government's getting on with the job and looking after Australians. While the LNP get behind their rich mates, the Labor government gets behind everyday working Australians.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Time! The member for Kooyong has the call.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Electric Vehicles</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last week, with the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, I had the pleasure of launching Australia's largest EV-enabled apartment building, the Sierra apartments in Hawthorn. NOX Energy is delivering scalable charging in high-density residential buildings. It's absolutely vital that we support EV adoption by strata communities.</para>
<para>But Australia's transition to electric vehicles is far from assured. Only 13 per cent of new car registrations in Australia, and only two per cent of the 21 million vehicles on our roads, are EVs. The Productivity Commission recently recommended scrapping the fringe benefits tax exemption for novated lease EVs. That FBT exemption should not be punished for its own success. It has already driven more than 105,000 additional EV purchases since 2022. It has tripled the second-hand EV market, and it is delivering, every day, $2.25 in economic, environmental and health benefits for every dollar spent.</para>
<para>The events of recent weeks—surging fuel prices, global supply chain shocks—show that Australia remains dangerously vulnerable to disruptions in our petrol and diesel supplies. In this budget, the government has to continue to invest in sovereign energy capability, maintain EV incentives and stop subsidising diesel under the fuel tax credit scheme.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>52</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COFFEY</name>
    <name.id>312323</name.id>
    <electorate>Griffith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Sir Robert Menzies once spoke of the forgotten people—Australians who worked hard, raised families, kept their communities going and asked only for a fair go. That was the tradition the Liberal Party once called its own. But when it came time to support tax cuts for working Australians, today's Liberal Party, which once said it stood for the forgotten people, has, in too many ways, simply forgotten people.</para>
<para>Labor's tax cuts have been delivering relief for all Australians, particularly low- and middle-income earners. Those opposite not only opposed the next round of cuts; they committed to repealing them. In Griffith every day I meet working people—renters, young families, shift workers, small-business owners, teachers, and healthcare and aged-care workers—who are doing their best to keep up. They deserve a government that delivers for them, not one that turns its back when relief is on the table. Labor's tax cuts are letting people keep more of what they earn and providing relief that shows up in their bank accounts every single pay day, ensuring we have a tax system that is fairer for the people who keep this country moving.</para>
<para>This week marks one year since those opposite chose to vote against Labor's tax cuts. But there is absolutely nothing to celebrate in that. This isn't a moment for celebration, but it is a powerful reminder of the priorities of those opposite.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Patriotism</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LLEW O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
    <electorate>Wide Bay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It became obvious during the South Australian election that Premier Peter Malinauskas's focus group stumbled across the word 'patriotism', and now federal Labor is scrambling to use it. Patriotism isn't a slogan; it's what you do. If patriotism is love of country, why is this Prime Minister radically reshaping Australia in ways that are unrecognisable to everyday Australians?</para>
<para>Patriotism isn't dividing Australia by race. It isn't failing to tackle the rising cost of living. It isn't signing up to international climate agendas that hurt our economy. It isn't mismanaging the economy and driving up interest rates. It isn't presiding over the longest per capita recession in our history. It isn't allowing business insolvencies to surge past 41,000. It isn't being slow to respond to terrorist threats on Australian soil. It isn't running a migration system that strains housing services and cohesion. And it isn't expanding the political class to suit a big Australia agenda. Patriotism isn't quietly diluting our national day—shifting citizenship ceremonies away from 26 January and pretending nothing has changed. Patriotism isn't a fad. It's measured by sincerity and outcomes, and, by that test, this Prime Minister and his government are neither competent nor patriotic.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cost of Living</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GREGG</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
    <electorate>Deakin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Helping Australians with the cost of living is the No. 1 priority of the Albanese Labor government. We're about helping Australians earn more and keep more of what they earn. In these uncertain times, many Australians are doing it tough. A year ago today, Labor announced top-up tax cuts, and the reflex action of those opposite was to oppose them. While we're about cutting taxes, they're more interested in cutting the wages and conditions of working Australians. Under their plan, Australians would be $50 a week worse off. Importantly, we would also see 1.5 million small businesses and sole traders lose out under their plan. Don't forget that these tax cuts also applied to 1½ million small businesses. Many of the 3½ thousand construction businesses in my electorate would have been affected—money out of their pocket. Those opposite pretend to be the party of small business, but when that was put to the test they failed small business once again.</para>
<para>We see those opposite continue on their journey inward, asking themselves: What are we about? Why do we exist? Well, Labor knows what we're about. We are about protecting the interests of working people, we're about making sure small businesses get to keep more of what they earn, and we're about making sure Australians can be optimistic about the future. The cost of living remains the laser focus of this government. We've got the credentials on the board and we are always looking at what more we can do, while the reflex of those opposite is just to be negative. They have no great ideas and no big plans; they just oppose, oppose, oppose. We are going to focus on the job at hand and deliver cost-of-living relief for Australians.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government: Economy</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REBELLO</name>
    <name.id>316547</name.id>
    <electorate>McPherson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I have an announcement to make: this government has lost control. After four years in office, Labor now owns this economy, and Australians are paying the price. Last week Australians copped the 14th interest rate rise under this government. That's 14 blows to family budgets, 14 blows to small business and 14 reminders that Labor has no answer to inflation. Inflation in Australia is now the highest in the developed world. While households are cutting back, this government keeps spending. This government pretends that Australians are not hurting, but we on this side of the House know that they absolutely are. They feel it at the checkout, they feel it in their mortgage and they feel it when they fill up their car.</para>
<para>In my electorate, John and Sharon, who run a family crane business, told me exactly what this looks like in the real world. For them, fuel climbed from around $1.63 a litre to $2.73 a litre between 28 February and 18 March, and they are bracing for it to go even higher. For a family business, that's not an inconvenience; it's a threat to viability. This is what happens when a government loses control of the economy, loses control of fuel security and loses touch with the people it is meant to serve. Australians are hurting, and this government has no plan.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cost of Living</title>
          <page.no>53</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I just note to the House: this is not an acting speaker; this is the Deputy Speaker. I rise today as a proud member of this Labor government—a Labor government that's already delivered a tax cut to every taxpaying Australian. Today marks 12 months since the last budget, when we declared two more tax cuts for Australians across this country.</para>
<para>Speaking of anniversaries, tomorrow is the anniversary of when the current leader of the opposition was the shadow Treasurer who made the decision that they would vote against said tax cuts. Can you believe it? Can you believe that the party that now sits in opposition voted against tax cuts in this place?</para>
<para>They're happy to come in here every day and carp about the cost of living. We know people are doing it tough. That's why it's what we are focused on. It's why we're working every day. It's why we've cut student debt by 20 per cent. It's why we've cut the cost of PBS medicines down to $25 per script and $7.70 for pensioners. It's why we've delivered the largest investment in bulk-billing in Medicare's history—because it's good for health and it's good for family budgets. Thirty per cent off home batteries—we are delivering; they are divided.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Labor Government</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PRICE</name>
    <name.id>249308</name.id>
    <electorate>Durack</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Across my electorate of Durack, many families and businesses are hurting. So just how bad is this reckless Albanese government? Labor is responsible for the largest drop in living standards globally. This is shameful. Regardless of events taking place in the Middle East at the moment, Australia's inflation is already higher than in any advanced economy. This has been caused by the Albanese government's addiction to spending. Australians have experienced 14 interest rate rises under this Labor government, with more, sadly, on the way. Debt is headed towards $1 trillion, and productivity has collapsed, falling nearly five per cent.</para>
<para>And, on top of all of these concerns, farmers and small miners throughout Durack and regional Western Australia are also dealing with this fuel shortage, and our farmers are facing the prospect of being stranded without fertiliser to put the crop in. Last week, I met with farmers in Northampton. They told me that prices of fertiliser have already increased by 50 per cent to 60 per cent—and that's if you can get the fertiliser.</para>
<para>This is serious. This is something that the whole of this House should be focused on. If farmers cannot finish the cropping season, then Australia's food security is at serious risk. This is not a political issue. This is a real live issue that's happening right here and right now. So my plea to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is this: be transparent with our primary producers so that they know that they can put the crop in— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JORDAN-BAIRD</name>
    <name.id>316021</name.id>
    <electorate>Gorton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australia is the country of the Bunnings sausage sizzle, meat pies and having a fair go. But, most of all, we're home to the world's best game: Aussie Rules footy. I've been the ruck of a local AFL team in the western suburbs—shout-out to the West Footscray Roosters—so prepare yourselves for some footy lingo. We are patriotic to the game. We call out 'Ball!' at the MCG with a Carlton Draught in hand. We are the country of having a fair go—and what's more Australian than tax cuts for every single Australian?</para>
<para>Today marks a year since the Leader of the Opposition first flagged that the coalition would vote against Labor's tax cuts. Now, that doesn't sound very Australian to me. Today is a reminder to every Australian that the Leader of the Opposition wants you to pay higher taxes. They can change their frontbench as much as the AFL changes their rules, but it makes no difference. The coalition still have no game plan.</para>
<para>The Leader of the Opposition reckons Labor's tax cuts are a cruel hoax. But I'll tell you about a real cruel hoax: watching Collingwood and St Kilda replay the 2010 grand final. Our tax cuts are real cost-of-living relief for every single Australian around the country, and this makes a real difference to my community in the western suburbs of Melbourne, where these tax cuts have meant 83,000 taxpayers are saving over $2,000 each. Now that's real cost-of-living relief for Aussies around the country, and what's more Australian than that?</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PENFOLD</name>
    <name.id>248895</name.id>
    <electorate>Lyne</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I've never seen Australians hurting like they are right now. Across my electorate, families, farmers and businesses are being smashed by skyrocketing fuel prices and fuel shortages—and they know something isn't adding up, because this cannot simply be blamed on the conflict in the Middle East.</para>
<para>What is truly alarming is this: the government and the ACCC do not appear to have a grip on the fuel supply chain at all. Instead of going after the real problem, they've been targeting mum-and-dad service stations, many of whom are selling fuel at a loss. That is not where the problem lies. The real issue is the diesel spot market. There are credible concerns about hedging and hoarding, and yet we are seeing no meaningful enforcement action. Normally the spot price sits within 2c or 3c of contract prices, but over the past three weeks we've seen blowouts of up to 90c per litre. That is not normal. Yes, there was a demand spike, but demand has already eased. That does not explain what is happening now. How do we explain reports of diesel supply to regional areas being cut by as much as 90 per cent, while the minister continues to claim there is no supply issue? Where is the fuel?</para>
<para>On 19 March, the ACCC finally announced an investigation into major suppliers. But why stop there? Why exclude other key players in the spot market like Park Fuels and United Petroleum?</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government</title>
          <page.no>54</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MATT SMITH</name>
    <name.id>312393</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks 12 months since the Albanese Labor government announced cost-of-living top-up tax cuts for 14 million Australians, because we want Australians to keep more of what they earn. Australians up in my part of the world work hard in a variety of jobs, often in the heat, but they go at it. Often, it creates a hard-earned thirst—just a quick reminder that the beer excise has also been frozen! But it was on this day tomorrow, where the opposition got together and said, 'Should Australians keep more of what they earn? Do Australians deserve a tax cut?' And at this strategy meeting they looked around and said, 'Nah, I think they're alright.'</para>
<para>In the middle of an election campaign those opposite couldn't listen to the people. They didn't understand what was going on out in the street. We have listened. We understand that cost of living is front and foremost of every single Australian's mind, and we are delivering. Do you need a cut in your HECS debt—delivered.</para>
<para>We've made the largest investment in medicine. PBS medicines are back down to the price they were in 2004, when I was playing for the New Zealand Breakers. I was terrible in New Zealand, but the medicines were cheap and people enjoyed it. Medicare Urgent Care Clinics are opening right across the country—great for spider bites and now great for the northern beaches of Cairns.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bowman Electorate</title>
          <page.no>55</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PIKE</name>
    <name.id>300120</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I have 12,000 residents in my electorate who live on islands in Moreton Bay that are only connected to the mainland via ferry and barge services. They face many of the same challenges that we see in regional communities across Australia. They're already struggling with the highest level of inflation that we're seeing of any advanced economy. They have already experienced the largest decline in living standards of any OECD nation. And of course, they've been refused regional status for infrastructure funding from this government, something they enjoyed under a previous coalition government. But the fuel crisis is hitting them particularly hard.</para>
<para>This morning at Russell Island, unleaded 91 was selling at $3 a litre. It's been that over the course of the last week. A ferry operator told me that the diesel bulk price has nearly doubled since the crisis began, and this operation is purchasing 6,000 litres of diesel every few days. I've mapped these vulnerabilities and I've met with the minister for energy. I've talked to the minister for energy about them and I thank him for that engagement. But this government has been on the back foot of this crisis since day one. This government had weakened the economy before we even got in here. They have been slow to respond to this crisis. They have absolutely lost control, and my island and mainland communities are paying the price for that. They have no plan to respond to this crisis and Australians are paying the price for their incompetence.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government</title>
          <page.no>55</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr REPACHOLI</name>
    <name.id>298840</name.id>
    <electorate>Hunter</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks 12 months since our government delivered tax cuts for 14 million Aussies. That's real help with the cost of living. You see, we have a simple view: if you work hard, you should earn more and keep more of what you earn. But here's the thing: this time last year, those opposite voted against it. The Leader of the Opposition, who was then shadow treasurer, led the charge. They voted no to tax relief. They voted no to helping Australians doing it tough. It gets worse. On Friday, it will be one year since those opposite said that if they won the last election they would put tax up for every one of those Australians. Higher taxes, less help—that's their plan. While they talk, we deliver. We're cutting into income tax this year and again next year. We've cut student debt. We've made medicines cheaper and we've put more into Medicare than ever before, delivering 137 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics.</para>
<para>We're helping bring down power bills with Cheaper Home Batteries, and we're backing apprentices and students with real support. We're focused on easing the pressure for Australians, but those opposite, well, they just keep focusing on themselves. Still divided, still out of touch, they're more interested in political games and headlines than actually helping Aussies pay their bills. We're getting on with the job and delivering for every single Australian in this country.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>55</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
    <electorate>Barker</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to speak about the growing and undeniable truth that Australia is weaker today than it was three years ago, and every single Australian can feel it. We have a weak economy propped up by spin and sustained by denial. Growth is an illusion, productivity is collapsing, confidence is gone and the Australian people are hurting. They're hurting at the supermarket. They're hurting at the fuel bowser. They're hurting at the kitchen table. Labor's reckless spending is pouring fuel on the inflation fire. It's driving up prices, driving up interest rates and driving down living standards.</para>
<para>Australians have suffered 14 interest rate hikes under this government. That's 14 hits to every mortgage holder, every small business, and that's 14 reminders that this government has lost control. And, while Australians tighten their belts, this government expands the bureaucracy, regulators multiply, red and green tape suffocates enterprise, and businesses are grinding to a halt under the weight of compliance and uncertainty. Labor has driven up costs, driven down productivity and driven confidence into the ground.</para>
<para>This is what a weak economy looks like. This is what failed leadership looks like. They have driven up inflation, weakened our energy system, exposed our fuel fragility and forced Australian families to carry the burden of their failures. Make no mistake: Australians are waking up to this mob and what they've done to them.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fiscal Policy</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'll give the opposition this: they're pretty consistent when it comes to cuts. Those across the chamber love a cut. They love a cut to health, love a cut to education and love a cut to manufacturing support. They have never seen a cut that they didn't like, with one glaring exception. That exception is tax cuts. The Leader of the Opposition who now sits across from us in this chamber voted against a tax cut for every single Australian.</para>
<para>I think it's worth imagining a world where the coalition's dreams had come true and they were in government right now. It's a world where 14 million Australians would be paying higher tax. In my electorate, it's a world where we would have 11 fewer bulk-billing clinics, a world where 27,000 people would have 20 per cent higher debt and a world where local apprentices would be $10,000 poorer.</para>
<para>We know that tomorrow marks 12 months since the opposition decided to vote against a tax cut for every Australian. What is scary for the Australian people and what is scary for the Australian economy is that the architect of those decisions is sitting in the opposition leadership chair right now.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Energy</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TED O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>138932</name.id>
    <electorate>Fairfax</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The conflict in Iran is certainly bringing the most acute consequences of Australia's energy crisis to the fore. But let us make no mistake: the energy crisis now facing Australia did not happen overnight and it is not due to the crisis in Iran alone. This has been building for four long years under this Labor government—four years of failure of energy policy.</para>
<para>We have had the energy minister, with the blessing of the Prime Minister, calling on the end to all fossil fuels. Now they're hitting the phones wanting more fossil fuels. In true form, though, this government has taken no responsibility. They have pointed the finger to blame someone else. And who are they blaming? The Australian people. If the Prime Minister wants to blame the Australian people, I suggest he goes and eyeballs the farmers who don't know if they can sow this year's crop and tell them that it's their fault. Tell the tradies who can't fill up their ute that it's their fault. Tell the mums and dads who are struggling to pay for the fuel to get the kids to school that it's their fault. Alternatively, Prime Minister, start taking responsibility.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHESTERS</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
    <electorate>Bendigo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today marks a significant milestone. It is 12 months since Liberal Party and National Party members came into this place and voted for higher taxes. They voted against tax cuts. I think that moment was the moment that Australians woke up to who the Liberal Party and the National Party are today. I look at who is now on the government benches and what has happened in those 12 months. I think about the people who were here who are no longer here and the awesome contribution that the member for Moore is making, the member for Deakin is making, the member for Petrie is making, the member for Menzies is making, the member for Banks is making, the member for Bass—and the list goes on. It will be 12 months tomorrow since the Liberal Party and the National Party exposed to the Australian people just who they are. We cannot go past the former member for Dickson and how blessed we are to now have the current member for Dickson representing the Australian people in this place and, like every Labor Party member, standing up for lower taxes for all Australian workers.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! In accordance with standing order 43, the time for members' statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MINISTRY</title>
        <page.no>56</page.no>
        <type>MINISTRY</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Temporary Arrangements</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I inform the House that the Minister for Defence Industry and Minister for Pacific Island Affairs will be absent from question time today. The Deputy Prime Minister will answer questions on his behalf.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>56</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>56</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TAYLOR</name>
    <name.id>231027</name.id>
    <electorate>Hume</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. How many service stations in Australia are currently out of fuel?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I might do it state by state, territory by territory. In New South Wales, there are 187 with no diesel and 32 without any stock at all. That's down 19 on yesterday. That's out of a total of 2,417 service stations in New South Wales. Queensland figures remain 55 with no diesel and 35 with no regular unleaded. In Victoria, there are 134 with a lack of one or more grades. That's down 28 on the last report. South Australia has 49 out of 700. Western Australia remains at six with a total stock-out and four with no diesel, out of 771 service stations. Tasmania—it remains my advice—has one with no diesel and six with no unleaded. In the Northern Territory, the advice remains the same—that there are no shortages as a result of fuel shortage. As I said yesterday, the Northern Territory is in the grip of a natural disaster, and, of course, there are impacts on service stations, with access and roads. In the ACT, there is currently one service station with no diesel, but my advice is that the service stations with no diesel in the ACT are normally having that rectified in a matter of hours.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel Security</title>
          <page.no>57</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms THWAITES</name>
    <name.id>282212</name.id>
    <electorate>Jagajaga</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. With the ongoing war in the Middle East impacting supply chains and fuel security around the world, how is the Albanese Labor government taking action to support Australia's fuel security and supply?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Jagajaga for her question and for the leading role that she's playing in policy development for the government going forward as well. What we are dealing with, of course, is global in nature and global in scale, as we heard from the President of the European Commission just yesterday. The war in the Middle East is seriously impacting supply chains and pushing up the cost of fuel right around the world.</para>
<para>Here at home, those higher prices are putting Australians under pressure. We recognise that, and that's why we're taking action, setting up the Fuel Supply Taskforce, releasing 20 per cent of our national fuel reserves and changing petrol and diesel standards to get more fuel flowing. We've backed our oil refineries to keep making fuel onshore. We've made sure that all of the fuel that we make in Australia is used in Australia. We've empowered the ACCC to crack down on price gouging and, just today, have introduced even stronger legislation. We've changed the Fair Work Act so truckies are paid fairly when prices spike. Through the National Cabinet, we're delivering a national response so that the states and territories can distribute fuel to where it's needed most and so the Commonwealth can focus on supply. Working with our trading partners in Asia, we're working to get more fuel to Australia, which is part of our reciprocal relationships. We're backing industry to deliver a Future Made in Australia as well, with more energy and manufacturing sovereignty preparing us for the future.</para>
<para>When the war began, we were better prepared for a shock like this. We had the highest reserves in 15 years, and we'll continue to act in the national interest because our priority is delivering for all Australians, whether it be on fuel supply and security, whether it be on the cost of living or whether it be on securing Australian industry and a stronger economy. We'll continue to work each and every day to engage constructively with states and territories but also with industry, including peak organisations, to make sure that we come through what is a very difficult period right around the world.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>57</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:05</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TEHAN</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
    <electorate>Wannon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. This morning the minister said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We have as much fuel in Australia today as we had on the day Iran was attacked.</para></quote>
<para>How many service stations have to be out of fuel before the minister will use his powers to require mandated reporting of disruption and the immediate domestic redistribution of stock to where it is needed?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I did make that comment because it's accurate, and that is the position the government has been communicating consistently to the Australian people because the responsible thing to do is to provide the facts to the Australian people—that the ships continue to arrive and that the refineries continue to work full pelt for Australians. As we have said from the very beginning, that does not mean there aren't real shortages in rural Australia in particular and that the supply chain has not struggled when demand doubles. And that has always been the case.</para>
<para>Now, the honourable member asked me why I won't use more information-gathering powers. It does strike me that, to use those powers, we would need to use the legislation that the Treasurer put through the parliament and the member for Wannon and everyone else over there opposed. It reminds me of the demand that the House return to pass hate legislation, then voting against it and then voting against other legislation and demanding we use it.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Maranoa has interjected too many times, so I'll be keeping an eye on him.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>57</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr REID</name>
    <name.id>300126</name.id>
    <electorate>Robertson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. How is the Albanese government acting to get more fuel flowing to where it's needed, and why is now a time for our representatives to act within the national interest?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank my honourable friend for the question. I think this is his first question since returning from paternity leave, so welcome back and congratulations. I'm very pleased to update the honourable member and the House, and I'll update the House primarily, firstly, on two things. As the House knows, we released 20 per cent of our minimum stock obligation on the condition that it flows to rural and regional Australia. We have struck agreements with each company that's impacted. We have been in discussions with those companies and required them to provide real and quantifiable undertakings that it flow to regional Australia. I'm pleased to inform the House that, overnight, two more agreements were struck, and now 757 million litres is flowing to regional Australia as a result of the release of the minimum-stock obligation. With real obligations to supply regional states and territories across the country, that's what real action looks like.</para>
<para>I'm also happy to inform the House—the Prime Minister's informed the house of his interactions, of the Foreign minister's interactions and of my interactions with our foreign counterparts to ensure ongoing supply. We know that, because we have only two refineries operating in Australia, we do rely on imports when it comes to liquid fuels. That is the case because we did see the de-industrialization of refining over previous years. I previously have informed the House that we were aware that, out of the 81 expected ship arrivals over April, there were six cancellations. I do have an important update. I can tell the House that—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Pike</name>
    <name.id>300120</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Stop the boats!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>They obviously think this is very funny. The Liberals and the Nationals appear uninterested in the fact that all six of those cancellations have now been filled with new alternative orders. All of them have now been replaced with alternative spot market orders from different locations. I'm also pleased to tell the House that industry has informed me this morning that, in addition to replacing those six cancelled boats, they have been able to secure at least three more cargo deliveries for April and May for Australia over and above the normal contracted deliveries to ensure that we are dealing with this demand. This is good progress.</para>
<para>Now, what these actions have in common is practical action by government and industry working together, none of them suggested by the opposition, who haven't made a constructive suggestion all through. The only contribution of the Leader of the Opposition has been the mislead about exports. The only contribution of the member for Lindsay has been to mislead the House about a statement by the Premier of New South Wales yesterday, and the only contribution of the member for Wannon is to insult Pacific leaders.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The minister will pause. The member for Canning on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Hastie</name>
    <name.id>260805</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There was nothing in the question about the opposition or risks or alternative approaches, so I just ask that you bring the minister back to the question, unless he's done. It sounds like he's done. Are you done?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Resume your seat. The Minister for Social Services will cease interjecting.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The Leader of the Nationals in the House of Representatives will also cease interjecting. The Leader of the House.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Burke</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>To the point of order, the final part of the question went specifically to representatives needing to act in the national interest, which is precisely the point regarding the opposition that the minister is now making.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister is going to be asked about why is it required in the national interest? He's going to explain to the House why that is. That is almost an abuse of the point of order—to the member for Canning. So if this continues, I'll start what I did last week. If this continues—people jumping up because you don't like what's being said and it's not part of the standing orders—I won't take the point of order. So, if this continues, I'm just giving fair warning to the House, like I did last time, if there are frivolous points of order, they won't be taken. I like to be crystal clear with everyone how things roll here, and that will be the decision. The minister has 12 seconds remaining.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para> The only contribution of the member for Wannon has been to insult Pacific leaders by saying I should tell them I'm too important to meet with them. And the only contribution of the member for Canning has been to mislead about net zero. Serious times call for serious people. These are not serious people. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>58</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>58</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Before I call the member for Bradfield, I have a number of guests I would like to welcome to the House of Representatives today. Firstly, I'd like to welcome Her Worship Ms Vraie Cally Balthazaa, the Mayor of Colombo.</para>
<para>I'm also pleased to inform the House that we have a delegation of young music leaders who are here taking part in a launch hosted by The Push of the National Plan for Young Australians in Music—the realisation of a 10-year vision shaped by extensive consultation with young people—as guests of the Minister for the Arts.</para>
<para>We also have a group of young Greek Australian leaders from across the country who are here in Canberra as part of the Greek Australian Society's inaugural young leaders. On behalf of the House, welcome to question time, as today is also Greek Independence Day—chronia polla!</para>
<para>I'm pleased to inform in the House today we have a delegation from the Sydney Swans, including coaches, management and current players Braeden Campbell and Chloe Molloy, in a sea of red in the gallery. Welcome to question time.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear hear!</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>59</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gambling Advertising</title>
          <page.no>59</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BOELE</name>
    <name.id>26417</name.id>
    <electorate>Bradfield</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is for the Prime Minister. Australia led the world with cigarette plain packaging laws. We also led the world with the social media ban. But Australia is also the world leader in gambling harm, with the highest per capita gambling losses in the world. Plain packaging, the social media ban—Labor governments have shown us that they can get these hard but important things done. Prime Minister, gambling harm is killing people. When will you finally take real action and keep Australians safe?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Bradfield for her question. I acknowledge, as part of that question, her welcome acknowledgement that it is always Labor governments that do the big things, that do the big reforms that change the country for the better. That is what we do. I thank the member for Bradfield for acknowledging that. Now, when it comes to gambling, we've done more than any other government to tackle online gambling harms.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Can I move a point of order, Mr Speaker?</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! I'd like the House to return to order. Prime Minister.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We're continuing to consult with stakeholders on this important issue because we know that more needs to be done. We're focused on addressing three key priorities when it comes to gambling. The first is minimising children's exposure to wagering advertising, the second is breaking the connection between wagering and sport, and the third is reducing the saturation and targeting of wagering advertising.</para>
<para>Further reforms will build on the work that we've done up to this point. We have launched BetStop, the National Self-Exclusion Register. Just as one example, there have now been 58,000 total registrations, and 36,000 of those are currently active. Thirty-eight per cent of those people have chosen a lifetime ban. Eighty-one per cent of the registrants said that they have completely stopped betting on sports or racing events, and 15 per cent said they had reduced it. Four in five people who've registered for self-exclusion have since experienced a better overall quality of life, and 79 per cent say that their mental health has got better as a direct result of that. We know that BetStop is working, and we know as well that more needs to be done.</para>
<para>We need to also acknowledge something that hasn't been a part of a lot of the public discourse here. Overwhelmingly, problem gambling's greatest issue is poker machines—overwhelmingly—and second in terms of the list, and a growing area, is the issue of lotteries or keno in their various forms, including on devices, which give people far greater access to them.</para>
<para>We also need to acknowledge, because this is an economic issue as well when it comes to our tax issues and offshore sites, the major issue of the drain of money being suctioned overseas by these companies. One of the things that the government are examining is what we can do to deal with those overseas sites that are causing harm and are completely unregulated because of the nature of them being overseas. These issues aren't simple, but the government are working each and every day to make sure that we continue to make a difference, and I'll continue to report on further reforms.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Manufacturing Industry</title>
          <page.no>59</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:17</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOLZBERGER</name>
    <name.id>88411</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. How is the Albanese Labor government delivering on its agenda to secure a future made in Australia and boosting our sovereign capability? What are the risks to these important priorities?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:17</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Forde, a great Queenslander, for his question. Today, together with the Queensland government of Premier David Crisafulli, we've secured the future of the Boyne aluminium smelter in Gladstone, Central Queensland. This is a great example of—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr Webster</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Who's paying?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The member for Mallee, the Prime Minister is 20 seconds in. The member was heard in silence. The same respect's going to be shown to the Prime Minister. There are far too many interjections.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This is an example of the Commonwealth working with a state government to deliver more manufacturing sovereignty for Australia and more energy for Australia as well. This is a joint investment that will transform the Queensland energy grid and deliver on our commitment to a future made in Australia. It will secure 1,000 jobs at the smelter, but, importantly for Gladstone, over 2,000 jobs when you look at indirect jobs as well. This is about mobilising Australia's sovereign industrial capability and investing in energy resilience with new renewable energy generation and transmission across Queensland.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm talking about a joint announcement that's been worked out with me, Premier Crisafulli and the respective ministers, and what we get is people over there showing their contempt for jobs and these issues and sovereignty—</para>
<para>Honourable members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>through their interjections and through their response there. We'll work with people of good will regardless of the state, what the electorate is or what political party is represented in that seat. This is about jobs for Gladstone. I would have thought that would be a good thing that would be welcomed. I hope it's welcomed by the member for Gladstone because it is indeed a great announcement.</para>
<para>The impact of the war in the Middle East shows us how important sovereignty is and how important it is that we make more things here. It follows up from the work that we've done in Mount Isa, in the electorate of the member for Kennedy, and in Whyalla, in the electorate of the member for Grey. We're making a difference, protecting jobs and making sure that we can make more things here. That is so important. We're delivering a future made in Australia and securing sovereign capability.</para>
<para>Those opposite who object to this reform and this investment jointly, fifty-fifty, with the Queensland LNP and the federal Labor government show they only have two settings—talking Australia down and tearing each other down. Not satisfied with attacking us, now they're attacking the Crisafulli government as well.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>60</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELL</name>
    <name.id>282981</name.id>
    <electorate>Moncrieff</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, and I note his previous answer about the almost 500 service stations that have run dry. This morning Queensland Premier David Crisafulli said: 'All we're after is a national plan to make sure that there's visibility of where fuel is flowing because it's a crisis and it does need action.' When will the minister take action to ensure fuel gets to where it's needed?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This government has been taking action, and we've released, as I just outlined, 757 million litres from the minimum stock obligation on the condition that it flows. Some of the undertakings given to us under that will see flow to Toowoomba and the Darling Downs, to those areas affected by flooding; more fuel for local councils in the Atherton Tablelands and Mareeba; more allocations to support Indigenous communities and get fuel up to Cape York—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The member for Groom and the member for Fisher will not interject any more during this answer; otherwise, they won't be here.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Forrest can join them as well. Do not interject. There is just too much noise. This is information that the member for Moncrieff, I assume, wants to be read into the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> and has the opportunity to do, and the minister is responding directly. Everyone just calm down and just listen to the minister without this incessant interjecting for no reason at all.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We've arranged for more allocations to support Indigenous communities and to get fuel up to Cape York and the farming communities around Cairns and Townsville. We've prioritised key refuelling sites for long-distance transport and extra bulk-volume deliveries for families in Queensland.</para>
<para>Interestingly, one of the towns that's been specifically identified for extra deliveries in Queensland is the town of Texas in Queensland. We're sending fuel to Texas; others had a plan to get fuel from Texas in a crisis. If we still had our fuel stocks still in Texas, we couldn't have done this. We couldn't have made this delivery because the fuel would still be on its way from America.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FERNANDO</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
    <electorate>Holt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Treasurer. Can the Treasurer update the House on today's inflation data and the government's cost-of-living help? How does this compare to other approaches?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:24</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Holt is a wonderful local member and a really key part of our team. She understands the cost-of-living pressures being felt in her community and around Australia.</para>
<para>Today we got the new inflation numbers for February. What those numbers showed is that inflation eased a little bit in February. It's still higher than we would like, but we also know and understand that the conflict in the Middle East will push that inflation higher and for longer. It is pleasing to see that inflation came off a little bit in February, but we know that there are a lot of challenges in the global economy and in our own economy, and that's the government's focus. Headline inflation was flat in the month. It was down to 3.7 through the year. Underlying inflation was 3.3 per cent through the year. This reflects a mix of temporary factors, like the end of the energy rebates, and some more persistent factors as well. Treasury estimates that around three-quarters of the increase in inflation since the middle of last year reflects temporary factors.</para>
<para>With Australians still under pressure despite this welcome easing of inflation in our economy in February, it's really more important than ever that we do the work that we're doing to get more fuel supply and to make sure the ACCC has the powers to police their suppliers and the retailers, we engage with industry to get fuel where it's needed and we engage with our international partners—in ways described by the Minister for Climate Change and Energy a moment ago—to make sure that we're doing whatever we can to ensure that Australians who are under pressure at the petrol pump are getting supported by this government.</para>
<para>It's also why it's so important we're managing the budget responsibly—a couple of surpluses, getting the Liberal debt down, banking upward revisions to revenue—a budget which is $233 billion stronger since we came to office. These numbers are also a reminder of why our cost-of-living help is so important—cheaper medicines, more bulk billing, student debt relief and the like—but especially when it comes to the tax cuts that will be rolling out in our economy in July and then the July after. Our three tax cuts together mean an average worker gets about an extra $50 a week to help with the cost of living.</para>
<para>This is especially important today, because today is the one year anniversary of the 2025 budget. That means it's the one year anniversary of the member for Hume standing up after the budget and saying he opposes our tax cuts. Tomorrow's the anniversary of him voting against those tax cuts, and Friday's the anniversary of him saying that they would repeal these tax cuts. If you're looking for evidence that they haven't learned and they haven't changed, they took the member for Hume, who opposes our tax cuts, and made him the Leader of the Opposition.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. I refer to his statement earlier that there were almost 500 service stations which have run dry. This morning, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said: 'My very strong view that I took to National Cabinet last week is that any consideration of supply management should be coordinated at a national level.' When will the minister take action to ensure fuel gets to where it is needed?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Mallee for the question. The contradiction in it, I think, is obvious from the nature of it, which is that the Victorian Premier said that at the meeting that was convened to nationally coordinate activity, to have a national fuel supply coordinator in Anthea Harris and to have all of the state and territory governments to appoint someone as well so we could deal with the bureaucracy. Then energy ministers were convened the day after, on Friday, to coordinate that approach with the energy ministers. I intend convening again the National Cabinet meeting. We'll meet next week to further coordinate the activity that we are taking and, indeed, in coordinating that activity, it is important that we have national consistency.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! Members on my left. I can't hear a word that anyone saying because of the constant chatter. There are not even interjections any more, it's just noise.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>61</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>61</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Before we move to the member for Moreton, we have some very special visitors who've just arrived onto the floor of the parliament. I'm pleased to inform the House that joining us today on the floor is a parliamentary delegation from the Parliament of Singapore, led by my friend, the Speaker, Mr Seah Kian Peng. A very warm welcome to you, Speaker, and to your delegation.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear, hear!</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>62</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Transport Industry</title>
          <page.no>62</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations. How is the Albanese Labor government backing truck drivers and what has been the response?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RISHWORTH</name>
    <name.id>HWA</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingston</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to thank the member for Moreton for her question and for standing up for workers and for standing up for Australian truck drivers in Queensland and right across Australia. Now, this Labor government is backing the trucking industry and truck drivers who are delivering essential goods across Australia. They deserve to make a decent living. In recognition of this, the government has given the Fair Work Commission the ability to issue contract chain orders and set fair minimum standards across the road transport supply chain, ensuring that truckies in our country get a fair go.</para>
<para>Under the current legislation, the Fair Work Commission must consult when setting contract chain orders for a minimum of six months. This government recognises, with the ongoing war in the Middle East resulting in volatile fuel prices, the commission needs the power to respond more quickly to contract chain order applications to ensure that trucking companies and owner-operators are not left to absorb the costs on their own. In good news for the industry, this government has taken swift and decisive action to do exactly this. Yesterday, we announced that we'll be introducing an amendment to the Fair Work Act to establish an urgent pathway for truckies to argue for their fair share at the commission.</para>
<para>I'm asked about the response to our announcement and what our action has been. Well, there has been broad support right across the transport industry for our action. The president of the National Road Freighters Association, Glyn Castanelli, said the government's announcement couldn't come soon enough and noted, 'We've got to protect truckies and that is what this will do.' The Australian Trucking Association also strongly supported our actions, saying:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The ATA stands today with the Government, with the union, with our employers and with our small operators in … support of this announcement.</para></quote>
<para>Further, the ATA committed, 'We will do anything to speed this amendment through the parliament,' and we thank them for their assistance. The Transport Workers' Union said of the importance of this legislation that the 'government is taking decisive action'. And I'm pleased to say that we even had positive comments in the <inline font-style="italic">Courier Mail</inline> editorial today which said that these changes are 'good news' for truckies. This Labor government is standing up for our truckies and our road transport industry, ensuring it's reliable and viable resilient into the future.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>62</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ALDRED</name>
    <name.id>11788</name.id>
    <electorate>Monash</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. I refer to the fact that around 500 service stations have now run dry. This morning, Premier Chris Minns said, 'There was a willingness from the states to say to the Commonwealth, look, we need to make sure that, if there's going to be demand management measures that are put in place, they need to be done on a national level.' When will the minister take action to ensure fuel gets to where it's needed?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the honourable member for the question, and I thank her for accurately quoting the Premier of New South Wales, which is a big step forward on yesterday—a big step forwards—after the member for Lindsay completely misquoted and misrepresented the Premier of New South Wales. She just dropped the word 'if', which does rather a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The minister will pause. The member for Lindsay?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McIntosh</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>On relevance, this isn't the first time that the minister has done this personally towards me, and it is not about the opposition.</para>
<para>Honourable members interjecting—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>No, I'll take action on this. I warned everyone before. Minister, resume your seat. I was crystal clear, and I said to everyone, 'This is how things will go.' You simply can't attend the dispatch box to say you don't like what the minister is saying. We would be here all day if that happened.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Well, that would be the case if everyone could say they objected to whatever someone's saying. So you will leave the chamber under standing order 94(a) for abuse of standing orders. You didn't state the point of order. To simply say that the minister has done this numerous times is an abuse of the standing orders. Simply state the point of order on relevance, as the Manager of Opposition Business does, and then we will deal with it—do not say anything else. We're simply not going to have people taking points of order because they don't like what the minister is saying. We cannot have that. No Speaker has tolerated that, and I won't either.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The member for Lindsay then left the chamber.</inline></para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The honourable member referred to the statements of the Premier about the willingness to act in coordination, which is exactly what this Prime Minister is doing by convening a National Cabinet with said premiers and what I am doing by convening meetings with said energy ministers. That's what coordination means—coordinating the action we have taken and coordinating further action together. That is exactly what we are doing. It is exactly what we have done. I'll say it again: if those opposite want to engage in a little bit of patriotism for a change, instead of partisanship, they can make just one constructive suggestion—for the first time.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Trade with European Union</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Yesterday, the Albanese Labor government concluded a range of important agreements with the European Union. At a time of global uncertainty, why do these agreements matter, and what has been the response?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the fantastic member for Dunkley for her question and thank her as well for her ongoing advocacy on behalf of the people of Frankston and the region that she's so proud to represent. International trade can make a difference in local communities. That's the point here, because it's about strengthening our economy and strengthening jobs.</para>
<para>Yesterday, we finalised three agreements with the European Union. One boosts Australian research and development through connecting us up with Horizon in Europe. One boosts our defence and security cooperation with Europe—that's so important. And, after eight long years of negotiation, this government secured an Australia-EU free trade agreement. This opens up access to 27 European markets for our Australian products and makes European goods cheaper for Australians here at home. It's a win as well for 450 million Europeans, who get more access to Australian products—the best in the world—and it's a win for our nation, for business, for primary producers and for consumers. It's a win for everyone who backs Australia and who wants to see more trade and more Australian industry.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I take the interjections from those opposite. The Nats claim to speak for the bush, but they say that massive increases in exports of red meat is somehow a bad thing. This agreement provides for eight times the access for our beef—eight times. Is that better or worse? Instead of 4,000 tonnes, it is 35,000 tonnes—making an enormous difference—plus five times the increase in access for sheepmeat.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order, the members on my left. The member for Groom is now warned.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Those opposite used to say that they supported free trade. They used to do that, but they've just gone backwards. They're so spooked by the one guy—who hasn't even bothered to turn up today—up in the corner that they're adopting policies and just trying to be 'One Nation lite' when it comes to trade and trade issues.</para>
<para>Honourable members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There he is! He doesn't even have to be in the room for the tail to wag the dog. He doesn't even have to be in the room. Well, we back Australian trade, we back Australian producers and we back Australian consumers. The coalition will just continue to talk Australia down.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</title>
        <page.no>63</page.no>
        <type>DISTINGUISHED VISITORS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Acknowledgement</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Before I call the member for Kennedy, I'm pleased to advise that the council from Doomadgee and their CEO, Troy Fraser, are here from the member's electorate.</para>
<para>Honourable members: Hear, hear!</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>63</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>63</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KATTER</name>
    <name.id>HX4</name.id>
    <electorate>Kennedy</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Treasurer, 30 per cent of Australia's fuel can be supplied from existing indigenous reserves, even without tapping oil shales. Why does government refuse to ban exports, which earn a measly $8 thousand million, whilst importing fuel, costing us $62 thousand million? Australia is one of the big four in grain and sugar production. Both are feedstock of ethanol. Why no action? Ethanol can, right now, supply three per cent of Australia's demand. Additionally, four of the recently closed refineries can easily be recommissioned. Why, on these three obvious initiatives, has the government done nothing?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Thanks to the member for Kennedy for his question. The government is working very hard to make sure that there is enough fuel reaching regional and other communities in our country, and a big part of that is making sure that we have the refining capacity that we need. I pay tribute to the work of the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, who, just on Friday in my neck of the woods, was making it easier for our local refineries to access the support that they need—the two remaining refineries, after the Leader of the Opposition waved another four of them goodbye when he was the energy minister. Locally produced fuel is a big part of the government's efforts to deal with the consequences of what we're seeing out of the Middle East.</para>
<para>We also recognise how important ethanol is to our domestic fuel supply. More than recognising that, we're investing in it. Once again, at the Lytton refinery, the energy minister and I announced $1.1 billion for our Cleaner Fuels Program, which is to invest in low-carbon liquid fuel production in Australia, consistent with the kinds of goals that the member for Kennedy has. That's on top of the $250 million in innovation funding under the Future Made in Australia Innovation Fund. He's right that we don't have a mandate, but the relevant departments and authorities have been working to see whether we could implement one in the future, making sure that we factor in things like safety and quality. Again, that's all about supporting our local fuels industry.</para>
<para>At times like this, when there's an extraordinary amount of global economic uncertainty—we know that the main driver of that is this oil shock coming out of the war in the Middle East—we're working on a whole range of fronts to address those challenges, and a big part of that are the efforts that we're all putting into our domestic industry.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medicare</title>
          <page.no>64</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURNELL</name>
    <name.id>300129</name.id>
    <electorate>Spence</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is for the Minister for Health and Ageing. How is the Albanese Labor government making it easier for Australians to see a GP for free? Why is this important after a decade of cuts and neglect?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BUTLER</name>
    <name.id>HWK</name.id>
    <electorate>Hindmarsh</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My friend and colleague the member for Spence is a terrific representative of Adelaide's northern suburbs. A lot of people do it tough in Adelaide's north, but it is an amazing community. It gave us Holden cars and Jimmy Barnes and so much else. Those opposite managed to shut down Holden, but not even that terrible government could shut down Barnesy, for which we're all very thankful.</para>
<para>He's also been a relentless advocate for a stronger Medicare in Adelaide's north. The urgent care clinic in Elizabeth has seen almost 30,000 people already—all bulk-billed—taking pressure off the terrific Lyell McEwin Hospital. `Last month we opened a new headspace service in Gawler, as well as a new Gidget perinatal mental health centre in Elizabeth. Both opened just last month. Soon that longstanding headspace in Edinburgh's north, which has been supporting young people in the member's community for almost two decades, is going to be upgraded to a headspace plus, with more staff and more free services for young people. For a community like Adelaide's north, bulk-billing is especially important—the idea that people there can go to the doctor whenever they feel they need to, rather than just when they feel they can afford to.</para>
<para>When we came to government four years ago, bulk-billing was in freefall because of a decade of cuts to Medicare, particularly the Medicare rebate freeze. After we tripled the bulk-billing incentive, since 2023 bulk-billing for pensioners and concession card holders started to turn around. But our decision to extend bulk-billing payments for the first time ever to every single Australian last year is the thing that's really making a big difference. Since 1 November—just five months ago—the number of general practices in Spence bulk-billing all of their patients all of the time has tripled. Today, two out of every three general practices are 100 per cent bulk-billing practices in the electorate of Spence.</para>
<para>Indeed, before 1 November, only around 2,000 general practices in Australia out of more than 7,000 were 100 per cent bulk-billing. We expected to get that number up from 2,000 to 3,600 by 2028, on our way to a 90 per cent bulk-billing figure in 2030 that the Prime Minister committed to. I'm pleased to report that we have already achieved our 2028 target in March 2026. Today there are 3,621 general practices bulk-billing all of their patients, and that number is increasing every single week.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>64</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TAYLOR</name>
    <name.id>231027</name.id>
    <electorate>Hume</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. When will the Prime Minister take action to ensure that fuel gets to the almost 500 service stations that have run dry?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for his question. We have established the Fuel Supply Taskforce. We've convened the National Cabinet. We're engaging with state and territory governments, who are responsible, of course, for distribution issues, but we're making sure that it's coordinated, and I note the media release from, for example, the New South Wales Premier today, as well as the actions that the New South Wales government are taking. Right across the country, we're engaging. I've been having constructive discussions with Premier Crisafulli as well.</para>
<para>Honourable members interjecting—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The Prime Minister has completed his answer. We'll move to the next question. We're not having commentary and we're not having people just approach the dispatch box. When the House comes to order, we'll hear from the honourable member for Reid.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Education</title>
          <page.no>65</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SITOU</name>
    <name.id>298121</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Education. How is the Albanese Labor government delivering better outcomes for students through the Better and Fairer Schools Agreement after a decade of decline in outcomes?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CLARE</name>
    <name.id>HWL</name.id>
    <electorate>Blaxland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank my friend, the ridiculously talented member for Reid. I told the House a couple of weeks ago that the number of kids finishing high school is going back up, and that's good news because for the last decade it's been going down—from about 85 per cent to 79 per cent—and now that's turning around. It's not the only example of where things are turning around; school attendance is another example. Since 2014, the number of kids turning up to school has been going down every year—year after year after year—and now that's going back up as well.</para>
<para>It's the same story with the number of people starting a degree at university to become a schoolteacher. Over the last decade the number of people signing up to become schoolteachers has plummeted, and that's now turning around as well. Over the course of the last three years, that's jumped by 20 per cent, and numbers this year indicate it's jumped by about another 6.3 per cent. None of this happens by accident; it happens because of the action that this government is taking and because of the action that state and territory governments are taking.</para>
<para>We've got some more good news, this time on the reading of our littlest Australians. I've told MPs before that the reading wars are over. We know what works. It's phonics that works, and the results that we got out of New South Wales last week are proof of that. For the last few years, they've been teaching kids to read with phonics, and they've been doing something called a phonics check. Three years ago, one in two children in New South Wales, according to the phonics check, were on track with their reading. By last year, that had jumped to two-thirds. It had jumped from one in two to two-thirds in three years. At Five Dock Public School, in the member for Reid's electorate, it's even more incredible. Three years ago, it was one in two—50 per cent of kids were on track with their reading. Last year it was 90 per cent. That's about the most incredible news that I have heard in my time as education minister. The impact of that is potentially massive. If you get the basics right when you're little, then you can build on it. And we need to build on that too.</para>
<para>That's why this year, for the first time ever, every state and every territory will roll out the phonics check in year 1. We're going to do the same thing with maths; this year, most states will roll out or pilot a maths check, a numeracy check, as well. This is all part of the agreements we signed with every state and territory a year ago this week to fix the funding of our public schools—the biggest investment ever in our public schools by an Australian government. It's not a blank cheque; it's tied to important reforms just like this. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Research, Development and Innovation</title>
          <page.no>65</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Industry and Innovation. Minister, the strategic examination of research and development report, released last week, is called <inline font-style="italic">Ambitious Australia</inline>. Much of that report, including its key recommendation to establish a national innovation council, is spookily similar to the Rudd government's <inline font-style="italic">Venturous Australia</inline> report from 2008. Given that this recommendation for a national innovation council is almost two decades old, will the government commit to actually acting on it?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr CHALMERS</name>
    <name.id>37998</name.id>
    <electorate>Rankin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm answering the question in the absence of Minister Conroy. As I indicated the other day, the government takes the recommendations of the strategic review very seriously. In fact, I met with Robyn Denholm and other members of the panel—Ian Chubb and others—this morning, as it turns out, to talk about the recommendations—and the PM, similarly. That's because we understand the central role of research, development and innovation in the productivity challenge we have. Productivity came up last year—it grew a bit faster than the 20-year average—but isn't growing fast enough to lift living standards into the future. We're working through the 20 recommendations.</para>
<para>When it comes to the council that the honourable member refers to, Minister Ayres, in the other place, working with a number of colleagues, is working out the best way forward. We know the honourable member has a particular interest in medical research—as does the member for Melbourne, who has been engaging with us in her characteristically diligent and dedicated way, representing the wonderful researchers in the community of Melbourne. We'll continue to work with the member for Melbourne and any members in this place with an interest in making sure we make the most out of research, development and innovation. We understand the fundamental and central role it will continue to play in our economy as we try and meet these economic objectives of a much more productive economy with higher living standards in the future.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans</title>
          <page.no>66</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms URQUHART</name>
    <name.id>231199</name.id>
    <electorate>Braddon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister for Defence Personnel. How is the Albanese government delivering support for veterans to access free advocacy services, and why is this so important?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KEOGH</name>
    <name.id>249147</name.id>
    <electorate>Burt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Braddon for her question. I've had the great opportunity of visiting many veteran services in her electorate with her—including the Burnie hub, which we were able to open during the last term of the Albanese government. The Albanese government, from day one, has been focused on delivery for our veteran community. Our significant investments in the Department of Veterans' Affairs have improved claim processing. We are now determining more claims than ever, and we're improving support reaching our veterans and the families of veterans.</para>
<para>But we've seen an increase in unscrupulous commercial veteran advocates taking advantage of our veterans. We heard in a recent Senate inquiry the urgent need to increase the capacity and the capability of 'free' to the veteran advocacy services. In some cases, we saw commercial advocates had been charging commissions as high as 29 per cent of a veteran's statutory compensation payment or charging contract break fees in excess of $27,000.</para>
<para>Of course, that means we, as a government, are taking action. We are investing more than $203 million to improve DVA's integrity measures and to expand the support for free-to-use advocacy services for veterans and the families of veterans. This will ensure that veterans and their families receive safe, high-quality services and that taxpayer dollars are going towards the support of veteran wellbeing, rather than looking after those that are trying to take advantage of our veterans. We've doubled the funding for the Building Excellence in Support and Training Grants Program, the BEST grants. These support ex-service organisations in providing free-to-use advocacy services for our veterans. We're also providing greater funding security for those ex-service organisations so that they can employ and provide training to their advocates, who are free to use for a veteran, and to support them by making these grants, instead of just for one year, for three years.</para>
<para>These changes address recommendation 99 of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. This will mean that veterans can better access free-to-use advocates to assist them with making their claims with DVA. This is all part of how the Albanese government is committed to delivering the care, services and supports that our veterans community not only needs but deserves. It stands in stark contrast to the division that we see from the Liberals and the Nationals opposite.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>66</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOGAN</name>
    <name.id>218019</name.id>
    <electorate>Page</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors. In my electorate of Page, community transport providers are warning that, without urgent fuel cost support, they will have to reduce services to more than 2,000 vulnerable people. What is the minister's plan to ensure recent rising fuel costs do not result in the loss of these essential services?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAE</name>
    <name.id>300122</name.id>
    <electorate>Hawke</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for his question. I acknowledge that there are providers all across Australia in all of our communities who are providing these very important services to older people. Transport is obviously a critical part of the public service that's provided under the Commonwealth Home Support Program—I assume it's that program that the services the member is referring to pertain to.</para>
<para>As the Minister for Climate Change and Energy has confirmed, Australia is fuel secure. Petrol companies have advised us that fuel stocks continue to arrive on time and in the quantities expected. We continue to closely monitor the impact of prices on aged-care providers. Of course, providers can seek support through existing aged-care business and viability supports offered by my department, and we stand ready to provide those supports through the Market Adjustment Program, through dedicated First Nations support programs or through our business and workforce advisory services. We're not experiencing a fuel shortage. What we're seeing is localised disruption, caused by significant spikes in demand.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Tehan</name>
    <name.id>210911</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It goes to relevance. It's regarding the cost of fuel, and 2,000 services will be cancelled unless you can deal with the cost—if you could come to the cost, please.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question was, 'What is the plan to ensure that services won't be reduced?'</para>
<para>Government members interjecting—</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! I'm dealing with the point of order, which the manager was entitled to raise. The question asked was, as I understand, specifically, 'What is the minister's plan to ensure that services won't be reduced?' in relation to the issue. The minister is being directly relevant to the point that he was asked about, and he's referring to the services. I'm making sure that he is being directly relevant. The minister may continue.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAE</name>
    <name.id>300122</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm not sure if the member couldn't hear; I'll repeat myself. We stand ready to support aged-care businesses through our viability supports offered by the department. We've got a market adjustment program. We've got dedicated First Nations support programs. We've got our business and workforce advisory services. We'll continue to support these wonderful providers who look after older people across our communities every single day. We've had no interruption to services but will continue to monitor and support them as needed.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing</title>
          <page.no>67</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KARA COOK</name>
    <name.id>316537</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Housing, Minister for Homelessness and Minister for Cities. How is the Albanese Labor government tackling the housing challenges facing the country? What other approaches are there?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
    <electorate>Hotham</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>What a pleasure to get this question from the wonderful member for Bonner. She is so passionate about housing and, particularly, about making sure that we have proper supports in place for women and children fleeing family violence. It's been an absolute pleasure to work with her in the time that she's been in the parliament.</para>
<para>Our national housing challenge is affecting the lives of many people around our country. Australians are doing everything right. They're saving up, they're planning for the future and they're thinking in advance. Yet they still reach a point—often much later in their lives than we would like—where they're not able to get that foothold in the housing market that they deserve. It is for those families that our government has built the boldest and most ambitious agenda a Commonwealth government has had on housing since the postwar period. We have got a long way to go on this, but, by God, we are making progress: 570,000 homes built since we came to office, 6,000 social and affordable homes completed and 24,000 in planning or construction today. Every single renter in our country has improved rental standards because of the leadership of our prime minister. We've got hundreds of thousands of Australians out of renting and into their first home.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>And we're seeing approvals turn a corner, up seven per cent year on year. I'm asked about alternative approaches. Opposite us sit three right-wing parties: the Liberals, the Nationals and One Nation. They say that they have differences. But—I can tell you—when it comes to housing, they look all the same to me. They say that they care. They say they care about supplies—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We're not just having a free for all, no matter what type of question it is. The member for Page is warned. He won't say one more word for the remainder of this answer, or he won't be here to hear the remainder of the answer. The minister deserves the courtesy of being heard in silence.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>These three parties say that they care. They say they care about supply and they say they care about supporting first home buyers. But when it actually comes time to act, what do they do? They say no. They say no to 30,000 social and affordable homes under the Housing Australia Future Fund. They say no to unlocking 80,000 homes through our build-to-rent changes. They say no to helping more Australians get pathways into homeownership.</para>
<para>Let's be clear about what the approach of the right-wing parties would do for housing in this country: build fewer homes, make housing more expensive and make homeownership further away for the people of our great country.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms O'NEIL</name>
    <name.id>140590</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>They love to give us all a bit of lip in the chamber, but I want to remind them that politics is not about all the politicking that you come in here to do. It's not about all the leadership ructions that you get up to. It's not about One Nation laying landmines. It's about doing the gritty, hard work of making a difference. And there's only one political party in this parliament that's doing that on housing, and that is the Australian Labor Party.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Indigenous Health: Diabetes</title>
          <page.no>67</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KATTER</name>
    <name.id>HX4</name.id>
    <electorate>Kennedy</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Health and Ageing. Recent data shows 72 deaths in the cape straits and gulf in four years attributable to diabetes. Diabetes, inter alia, results from poor nutrition. Post Country Party, subsequent Labor and Liberal governments abolished the missionary market gardens, banned the islanders' ubiquitous backyard fruit and vegetable gardens and, in an initiative the Nazis would be proud of, took away the islanders' staple diet: seafood. Will you act immediately to stop what some people describe as tantamount to genocide?</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I just remind the member for Kennedy to be careful with his language and how he describes things and situations.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BUTLER</name>
    <name.id>HWK</name.id>
    <electorate>Hindmarsh</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>While I strongly reject the characterisation that the member just made of a number of decisions, I do also recognise, and have for some years, his deep interest in this area and his involvement going back to his time as the minister for Aboriginal affairs in the Bjelke-Petersen government and the role that the mission market gardens program played back then. I've heard the member speak passionately about this question many, many times. I understand representatives of the community are here in parliament this week and will be meeting with Minister McCarthy tomorrow to talk more about issues of food security.</para>
<para>The member raises what is probably the most pressing public health challenge the whole country has, which is the rise of type 2 diabetes. But we know that it is a particular challenge for First Nations communities. We know that prevalence is high. Morbidity and mortality are higher for First Nations Australians. We know that treatment of advanced diabetes takes too many First Nations Australians off country for dialysis treatment, which is why we're seeking to build renal services in remote communities, so people can receive that dialysis on country.</para>
<para>But, really, the member raises the more important questions about how we prevent people going into diabetes in the first place. We have been working very hard through Minister McCarthy in particular to improve food security in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and that program—the Low-Cost Essentials Subsidy Scheme—is already subsidising the cost of dozens of essential items in grocery stores in remote communities so that First Nations Australians in those communities are paying the same price that Australians in metropolitan Australia pay, saving up to 50 per cent, with prices now comparable to city supermarkets in about 113 stores to date, and we're working to improve that.</para>
<para>I know that's not a full answer to the member's question. I say this: the Minister for Indigenous Australians, the Minister for Social Services, I and other members of the government are committed to working together to address what is a very serious public health challenge and a deep, deep shame and a stain on First Nations communities. The lack of access to high-quality, affordable food is something we should always strive to improve. I look forward to the meeting the Minister for Indigenous Australians is having with community members and probably the member himself over the coming day or two, and I'll certainly be happy to do anything I can to contribute to this effort.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>68</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LAWRENCE</name>
    <name.id>299150</name.id>
    <electorate>Hasluck</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>():  My question is to the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government. What is the Albanese government doing to secure our fuel supply and support Australians during this fuel spike? What other approaches are there?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CATHERINE KING</name>
    <name.id>00AMR</name.id>
    <electorate>Ballarat</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Can I thank the member for Hasluck for her question and her interest in the transport industry in particular. Since the commencement of the Middle East conflict, we have been working to ensure that Australians have access to the fuel that they need. I'm in regular contact with transport representatives working on practical measures to address the consequences of rising international fuel prices. Tomorrow I will convene a third such meeting of transport and the fuel industry together.</para>
<para>Across government and industry, we are working on a coordinated approach, and already we have released 20 per cent of the minimum stockholding obligation for petrol and diesel, particularly directed to regional communities, and amended fuel standards for petrol and now, announced yesterday, diesel to allow more supply into the market. We've announced legislation to amend the Fair Work Act so transport operators can renegotiate the cost of fuel in their contracts now, not in six months time. We've introduced legislation to strengthen the ACCC's hand, doubling penalties for companies found guilty of unfairly raising their fuel prices. And we continue to monitor airlines and airfares closely. We're working with our regional partners, like Singapore and Korea, to shore up supplies, strengthening energy security, and support the flow of essential goods. In the longer term, we are of course building a sustainable fuels industry here in Australia through our $1.1 billion Cleaner Fuels Program.</para>
<para>Our government is continuing to work around the clock to respond to these fuel price spikes and the issues around supply. But, when we look at those opposite, what do we see? We see absolute chaos and no ideas at all. In the Senate yesterday, the shadow minister for infrastructure announced that the coalition would be supporting a motion for the Commonwealth to pay states and territories for their public transport fares. It's up to them to say they're going to do that. But, when it actually came down to the vote itself, all of the Liberal members fled the chamber. It was, frankly, like watching a game of follow the leader. The only problem was they couldn't decide which leader. There are now more people with 'leader 'in their title in the coalition than there are women sitting on the frontbench in the House. Imagine them each morning: 'leader', 'leader', 'leader', 'leader', 'leader'—hello! While we're getting on with the job of dealing with an international global crisis, those opposite simply are an absolute joke.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Albanese</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>On that note, I ask that further questions be placed on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline>.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE</title>
        <page.no>69</page.no>
        <type>MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Albanese Government</title>
          <page.no>69</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:10</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I have received a letter from the honourable member for Gippsland proposing that a definite matter of public importance be submitted to the House for discussion, namely:</para>
<quote><para class="block">In the middle of a national fuel crisis, the Prime Minister's broken promise to govern for all Australians.</para></quote>
<para>I call upon those honourable members who approve of the proposed discussion to rise in their places.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">More than the number of members required by the standing orders having risen in their places—</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
    <electorate>Gippsland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australians are hurting, Australians are angry, Australians are frustrated and, after four years of this incompetent Albanese government, Australians are worse off. This last fortnight tells you everything you need to know about a government that simply doesn't care about regional people.</para>
<para>We've had the energy minister with his head up his own—battery. First, he denied there was a fuel supply problem then he said we were scaremongering and then, a few days later, he said it was a national crisis. The biggest crisis right now is the crisis of incompetence in the cabinet room, because we then had the agriculture minister telling every peak body that she knows more about farming than they do.</para>
<para>The deal with the European Union is a free trade agreement for the rich and famous—cheaper EVs and fancy cheese at the expensive local dairy industry workers. I'll come back to that later, but we also have this Prime Minister, who promised to govern for all Australians, happily sinking the boots into one of our most important export sectors—the agriculture industry—just so he could get another photo opportunity with a world leader.</para>
<para>The Prime Minister said no-one would be held back and no-one would be left behind. If I could just capture that bulldust coming out of their mouths, I could fertilise the entire country and solve the other crises our regions are facing now.</para>
<para>The Prime Minister has fundamentally broken his promise to govern for all Australians. The European Union free trade agreement is just the latest example. It was all about that photo opportunity with the world leader rather than a good deal for our farmers. Yesterday I asked the minister for agriculture whether she actually really believed it was a good deal for Australian farmers. Amongst all the waffle, all the spin, all the Labor talking points, she said: 'What I would say to the member opposite is that we're strong advocates on this side of the House for farmers and producers, and that's what you've seen from us since we've been in government.' The minister herself couldn't even say it was a good deal. I give credit to the minister. She's not stupid. She wasn't going to say it was a good deal, because she's been reading the same feedback that I've received. Here's what the peak agricultural bodies have been saying. Let's start with the VFF president, Brett Hosking, who said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">At a time when farmers are getting smashed by devastating water buybacks, skyrocketing fuel and fertiliser costs, we've been hung out to dry for the sake of getting the deal done.</para></quote>
<para>It's pretty embarrassing. For farmers, no deal would have been better than what we've been dealt.' NFF president Hamish McIntyre said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Australian farmers are extremely disappointed. They will now pay the price for this subpar EU deal for decades to come.</para></quote>
<para>Then we have the Cattle Australia chair, Garry Edwards. He said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… we have been misled by an apparently disingenuous trade negotiation, with amateurs playing a game against professionals.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The deal that has been struck is simply appalling for agriculture and regional Australia …</para></quote>
<para>It goes on; it just keeps on coming. The chair of the Australia-EU Red Meat Market Access Taskforce, Andrew MacDonald, said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">To land a deal so far below what other suppliers have secured is genuinely bewildering.</para></quote>
<para><inline font-style="italic">A government member interjecting</inline>—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Speak up! You didn't speak up yesterday about the European Union free trade agreement. Speak up now—any time you like. You can go straight after me. You can come straight after me and tell me why all these farming groups are wrong and you're right. From the suburbs of Perth, you tell me why you were right and all these farming groups are wrong!</para>
<para>Now, the Australian Dairy Industry Council chair—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Excuse me, Deputy Leader, just direct your comments through the chair, unless that—</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>But the member—sorry, Deputy Speaker—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I don't want interjections, and I do not want you referring directly to members.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I understand, Deputy Speaker. The member for Hasluck was offering some free advice for our farming people, and I just took up the opportunity to point out that every peak body that has written to us has raised their concerns about the EU free trade agreement.</para>
<para>Now, the Australian dairy industry council chair Ben Bennett said that it's unfair on many fronts and that they're being asked to give up established commercial freedoms without securing meaningful market access. Sheep Producers Australia CEO Bonnie Skinner said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Australia's sheep producers have been sold out.</para></quote>
<para>CANEGROWERS's CEO Dan Galligan said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">This is a horrendous outcome for Australia's cane growers …</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">It's a capitulation to protectionist European sugar interests, plain and simple.</para></quote>
<para>These aren't our words. These are the peak bodies'. We've been 'sold out'. It's a 'horrendous outcome'. It's 'unfair on many fronts'. It's 'bewildering'. They're not happy.</para>
<para>And there's more. Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan said that the outcome was a kick in the guts to the Australian red meat industry. AgForce's general president, Shane McCarthy, said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">This is shaping up as a perfect storm for producers.</para></quote>
<para>Australian Lot Feeders' Association president Grant Garey said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">By any measure, the Government's report card on this deal is a failing grade, delivering one of the weakest free trade agreement outcomes for our sector to date …</para></quote>
<para>Dairy Farmers Victoria board member Ben Vagg said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">It's not free trade, it's just more market access for the EU …</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">They dump their produce into Australia, at a cost, because of the protectionism of their domestic market.</para></quote>
<para>Why on Earth would the minister or the Prime Minister pretend it's a good deal when all of the major agricultural organisations in our country have come out and slammed this arrangement? Why do these members of parliament, from their city based seats, think they can tell our farmers how to run their businesses? Why do they think that? It's because they simply don't understand and don't respect the regional people in this nation.</para>
<para>This dates right back to this Prime Minister's promise to govern for all Australians. It's 30 years this month since the Prime Minister was first elected. He is the most institutionalised member of parliament in this place. He is the ultimate Canberra insider bubble boy because he's defined himself with one quote in 2012—his most famous quote. It says:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I like fighting Tories. That's what I do.</para></quote>
<para>This guy likes fighting Tories. He's never been interested in building a consensus in this country. He is the great divider of Australian politics. After the last election, what was the first thing he did—this prime minister, who says he believes in the parliament, believes in democratic processes? The first thing he did was cut the staff of the coalition—because you wouldn't want to have any transparency. You wouldn't have any accountability! That was his first decision. He divides Australians at every opportunity into two camps—Labor voters and non-Labor voters—because he's made a career out of it for 30 years. The Prime Minister is the great divider of Australian politics. He has no interest in a consensus. That's why he divided Australians with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. That's why he divided Australians with his decision to recognise Palestine. He is dividing Australians with his 100 per cent renewables plan. It is tearing apart families in regional areas, and the regional communities are paying the price of this prime minister's approach to energy.</para>
<para>Everything this prime minister has done since he came into office has widened the divide between city and country people. We've seen it most obviously with grant programs that used to provide opportunities for regional communities to do the hard work, develop projects and then seek funding from state and federal governments to improve their own communities. Regional Australians have been punished every day since this Prime Minister came to office in 2022. Is it any wonder that last year he was chased out of Ballarat by farmers on tractors?</para>
<para>Let's not forget that he has cut the Building Better Regions Fund. He has cut the Roads of Strategic Importance program. Who would cut a program that's designed to improve productivity and save lives? He has cut the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program. He has cut the Stronger Communities Program. The program that was going to replace them all was the Growing Regions Program. They cut that as well! They cut their own program! Once they finished cutting our programs, they cut their own program. The only regional grant program available right now on the department's website is closed to anyone who isn't invited to apply, and you're invited to apply if you got a grant during the last federal election campaign. It's a fund to pay for election promises.</para>
<para>Dividing Australians into those who voted for Labor and those who support the coalition is just the way this Prime Minister does business, because he is the bubble boy. He is so institutionalised after 30 years in this place. It's all he knows to do when it comes to Australian politics. It is shameless. It's disgraceful for our regional communities, and it explains why Labor is absolutely loathed in our regional communities. It also explains why he hasn't got the guts to run a candidate in the seat of Farrer. If he were going so well as a prime minister, maybe he'd turn up and test his vote. But, no. After four years of the Albanese government, Australians are worse off and the nation is heading in the wrong direction. Only the coalition is working to protect our way of life and to restore the standard of living for all Australians.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
    <electorate>Wills</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I was really hopeful that maybe I would hear some facts or some perspective from the member for Gippsland in this MPI rather than personal pot shots or partisan political points, but maybe I was being too hopeful. I'm going to try to address some of the facts in relation to this MPI that they've raised. It is a fact that Australians are following the events in the Middle East, and they're seeing and feeling the consequences of this. Australians have been feeling the pressure at the pump over the last few weeks, and that's going to continue because, the longer this conflict in the Middle East goes on, the more significant the impact will be on the global economy and on the Australian economy. This is being felt around the world. That's just a fact.</para>
<para>The fact is that 20 per cent of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz. That's significant. That's a fact, and it has an ongoing impact on people's lives. However, I can say that it's a fact as well that Australia's oil imports have been fairly robust in this context—very robust, in fact.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'll take the interjection because it's just a fact that, even though those on that side made a big song and dance about six out of 81 shipments of oil being cancelled in the past month—as was stated in question time by the minister, and I'll repeat it and point it out—all six of those have been replaced. In fact, as the minister informed the House today, in addition to replacing those six cancelled shipments, three cargo ships over and above the normal contracted deliveries for April and May are going to be added to the fuel supply.</para>
<para>It's a fact that we're dealing with an issue around demand. Why is that? For context, it takes about a month for oil to leave the Middle East and make its way through the Strait of Hormuz to Asian countries like Singapore that refine the crude into petrol. Then it's shipped to Australia, it gets trucked to your local petrol stations and it makes its way to the bowser and into your car. It takes more than a month for all of that to occur. Given this context only started four weeks ago, what we're dealing with, factually, is an increase in demand. The bulk of the issues we're dealing with have been caused by spikes in demand.</para>
<para>Demand for petrol has doubled due to—well, the best way I can describe it is this. My mum called me the other day, and she was upset. She said she went to the petrol station to fill up her car, and the bloke in front of her filled up his car and then filled up five jerry cans. She said, 'Why is he doing that?' I wanted to make a partisan point and say, 'Because some of those in our parliament are encouraging people to panic buy in this way. It's not necessary, mum. You just fill up with what you need.' Most Australians just need to fill up with what they need. It's not necessary, Mum. You just fill up with what you need. Most Australians just need to fill up with what they need. There is plenty of fuel supply. This is an issue around demand. It's an issue around getting the message across to the bloke at the petrol station who, selfishly, in front of a pensioner, is filling up five jerry cans and not thinking about the community around them. It's important that the messaging to Australians, the responsibility that you have as members of parliament, is not encouraging people to panic buy in your commentary like the Leader of the Opposition has in some of the statements he's made. It's actually to take the responsible position and say to Australians: 'This is what's happening; these are the facts. The fuel supply is intact; it's coming through. We've increased the number of cargo ships, and all you need to do is buy the fuel that you need for you and your family and not fill up jerry cans.'</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Penfold</name>
    <name.id>248895</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>A constituent of mine had to sell his assets to buy fuel!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>But, unfortunately, as we can hear now with the interjections, they can't even bring themselves to conduct that kind of responsible statement on behalf of their constituents. That's not what we're doing. As a government, we are taking that very seriously and making sure that we get the right messages across to people about buying the fuel they need.</para>
<para>More than that, as a government, we are also very responsibly making sure that we increase supply to meet that increase in demand and that there is no profiteering during this period. We've boosted the fuel supply by releasing up to 20 per cent of the baseline minimum stockholding obligation for petrol and diesel. In addition to that, we've had two more agreements that have been struck, with 757 million litres now flowing—released—to regional Australia. We've appointed Anthea Harris as the Fuel Supply Taskforce Coordinator to support coordination across governments and sectors across the country. Ms Harris will lead a new fuel supply taskforce that will be established by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.</para>
<para>We've also convened roundtables with the fuel industry, the transport industry and the agricultural sector, doing substantive work to coordinate our efforts during this period. We're not making pot shots, not doing personal pot shots like the previous member was, not making interjections and not carrying on, but we are doing the responsible work that the government needs. We've convened the National Oil Supplies Emergency Committee. We've held six meetings since 1 March, and we've activated the National Coordination Mechanism, which has now met twice.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Member for Lyne, if you intend to participate in this debate, you will be thrown out at any moment.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That might be a bit boring for those opposite, but it's the work of a responsible government. You probably don't know what that is. We're driving the coordination between the Commonwealth and the states and territories on fuel security and supply chain resilience.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Stop it. Honestly, you'll be gone if you do it again.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We're hosting a national cabinet and special energy ministers meetings as well. That's how we're ensuring that there's no profiteering and that there's fair competition. That's how we're ensuring that we get more supply into the system, given the spikes in demand that I just touched on. We need to ensure that petrol is being priced fairly. That is really important for people in Australia. It would be very disappointing if we were to discover that these companies are trying to make a quick buck off the back of this situation. They should know that the government is watching what they're doing very, very closely. That's why new information-gathering powers have been given to the secretary of the department as well as additional information about supply and demand and fuel distribution terminals around Australia being given to the relevant agencies, and that includes empowering the ACCC to protect motorists from unfair price rises as well. We'll hold those suppliers accountable for any anticompetitive conduct and allow conditional coordination across the supply chain to address shortages.</para>
<para>As the Assistant Minister for Defence, I think it's important to let the public know, too, that, within Defence, I've been in contact with our department and the ADF around our plans during this period. It is important to also state clearly that Defence's fuel supply is secure. In fact, Defence, since 2022, has doubled the amount of fuel that it holds in strategic reserves. We've done the real work of government, the responsible work of government, to actually make sure of those contingencies. We've committed billions of dollars into the Defence fuel resilience program—$3 billion, actually—and that stands in comparison to the previous government, which had committed just $1 billion over a 30-year timeframe. Our first phase of the strategic fuel reserve has now been delivered, making our Defence Force more agile and secure. That includes investment in infrastructure, additional fuel stores and transport mechanisms. That is important for our men and women in uniform.</para>
<para>But, yes, there is pressure on everyday Australians around the fuel crisis, and we've got, obviously, this period with cost-of-living pressures and so on. That is why the Treasurer has quite rightly pointed out that, even though the new inflation numbers for February are somewhat lower—there's been a little bit of an easing—they're still higher than we would like, and he continues to do the work to bring inflation down. The government understands that many Australians are feeling that cost-of-living pressure, and that's why we're rolling out cost-of-living relief on a continual basis. Again, it might not be as exciting as the pot shots that those opposite are throwing around, but we are doing the real work.</para>
<para>This side actually cares about our communities and our constituents. We're making sure that we've got the tax cuts for every taxpayer. The pay rise for minimum and award wage workers is happening under Labor. There's paid parental leave; the bonuses for housing apprentices; the percentages off home batteries to cut power bills; the paid prac for teachers, nurses and social workers; the boost to Medicare; and the Medicare urgent care clinics that we are building right across the country. All of this makes a real, substantive difference to the people that we represent, and that's why we are doing it.</para>
<para>We're taking responsibility as a government to make sure that Australians are looked after. In difficult periods the Albanese Labor government is putting practical, substantive policies in place that make a real difference to people's lives. I understand the need in this place for some theatrics and all the rest of it, but there are facts and realities that go over and above the partisan points that are being made, and I have set them out clearly in this MPI. There is more fuel supply in our reserves today than there has been for a long time, and we are doing what is necessary to look after Australians every single day.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I just cannot start this speech without responding to the member for Wills and his extraordinary narrative there, particularly his point that the coalition are basically whipping up the panic buying. I take absolute exception to that. It is complete rubbish. What we have is farmers who need 20,000 litres of fuel in order to spray their hectares and 30,000 litres of fuel to seed their crops. They need fuel and they need urea. These are facts that the minister did not refer to. This is not about the coalition whipping up panic buying. People need fuel to live their lives.</para>
<para>'Nobody held back, nobody left behind'—that's what the Prime Minister has said over and over again. Do you know what? If it was true and that was actually happening, we would be very supportive, but the fact of the matter is that that is not what is happening. People in regional centres in particular are being left behind every day, and because I have the Minister for Health and Ageing sitting right here I have to begin with health. We still have workforce shortages in regional areas. We have urgent care clinics—the member for Lyne is constantly talking about Taree. What about Taree? We still don't have an answer from the minister about that. We have people who cannot get the care they need and people who cannot get the aged care they need. Now we're in a fuel crisis, and we heard today in question time from the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors: 'Look, we've kind of got a plan to get workers out to see people who need home-care packages. We just haven't really got any boots on the ground yet. We haven't got any actual solutions.' People are being left behind every day. We've got childcare deserts, we've got terrible roads and we've got shire councils struggling to stay afloat—in fact, they're not staying afloat. It is a cost-of-living crisis that is worse out in the regions. There are mobile black spots and grey spots. Honestly, I could go through almost every portfolio represented by the government. In every one of them, we are being let down in the regions, but I particularly want to focus on the EU trade deal.</para>
<para>Yesterday the government was spruiking the EU trade deal as being the best thing since sliced bread. Newsflash: it's not. It's absolutely not, and, as the shadow minister for agriculture mentioned earlier, people out in the regions know it. The primary producers know it. The sector is standing up—every member of the ag sector, whether it's the NFF, whether it's the VFF, whether it's the cattle people. I have a farmer in Mallee, Andrew Weidemann, who has said this:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… exactly what I thought might happen. It's trading away—</para></quote>
<para>that's the government—</para>
<quote><para class="block">our right to farm and we, as grain growers, livestock producers will just be taxed more to meet the green economy.</para></quote>
<para>Now, why would that be so? It's because this EU trade agreement is actually connected to the Paris Agreement, and it's connected to the EU standards, which, frankly, don't work in Australia, and to the renewable rollout in Australia, which is harming our farmers already. In regional Australia, we cop the brunt of these great ideological dreams that Labor have thought up and the EU are part of, and now they're going to be trading away farmers' opportunity to farm. Brett Hosking, Mallee farmer and VFF president, said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">At a time when farmers are getting smashed by devastating water buybacks and skyrocketing fuel and fertiliser costs, we've been hung out to dry for the sake of getting the deal done.</para></quote>
<para>That says everything about this EU trade deal. Garry Edwards from Cattle Australia said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The deal that has been struck is simply appalling for agriculture and regional Australia and delivers nothing to address the trade imbalance to the EU.</para></quote>
<para>When have you heard a peak body call a deal 'appalling'? It's that bad.</para>
<para>Farmers are smart. Farmers are very smart. They have got a handle on trade. They have got a handle on their own businesses. They know what this fuel crisis and this trade deal—and every other idea that comes out of Labor—is actually doing to their industries.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I welcome the opportunity to speak about the Albanese Labor government governing and delivering for all Australians. We are continuing to build on delivering cost-of-living relief for Australians as our No. 1 priority, while working to set Australia up for the long term. It is powerful, I think, to list just some of the measures the Albanese Labor government is delivering for cost-of-living relief for Territorians and Australians.</para>
<para>There are tax cuts for every taxpayer, including another tax cut in July this year, and pay rises for all minimum and award wage workers—there are those words 'every' and 'all'. Paid parental leave has been expanded to 24 weeks, on the way to 26 weeks, with super now paid on all government paid parental leave. There are $10,000 bonuses for housing apprentices; 30 per cent off home batteries to permanently cut power bills; and paid pracs for all nursing, teaching, social work and midwifery students—helping with the cost of living.</para>
<para>There's record hospital funding for Territory hospitals. We've expanded five per cent deposits to all first home buyers, there are pay rises for child-care and aged-care workers and we've expanded bulk-billing. For Territorians, people in my electorate of Darwin and Palmerston, 70 per cent of GP practices are now registered as Medicare bulk- billing practices. We're cutting student debt by 20 per cent. There's free urgent care in the Medicare clinics. For Territorians, that means that no appointment is necessary at Palmerston and the soon-to-be-open urgent care clinic in Darwin, as well as the other urgent care clinics in the Northern Territory. There's been the biggest cut to the cost of medicines in the history of the PBS. All PBS medicines will be $25 or less and, for concession card holders, just $7.70. And that helps with the cost of living.</para>
<para>We understand that all Australians are following the events in the Middle East closely and are feeling the consequences here at home. Our government is looking at every practical measure required to shield our nation and the household budgets of Australians from the worst of this global uncertainty, ensuring our regional communities and the services that all Australians rely on can continue to access the fuel that they need.</para>
<para>Across the board, the Albanese government has been working through and planning for the impacts of this crisis and protecting Australians from the worst of this global challenge. Some key measures include that we have empowered the ACCC to protect motorists from unfair price rises as well as to watch airlines and airfares and to watch grocery prices. We've launched an enforcement investigation into allegations of anticompetitive conduct by each of the major fuel suppliers—Ampol, BP, Mobil and Viva—and are investigating reports around independent wholesalers and distributors that service regional and rural Australia. We've boosted fuel supply by releasing 20 per cent of the baseline minimum stockholding obligation for petrol and diesel, and that is helping with supply. We're getting more fuels into the Australian market by temporarily amending some of the fuel standards. We're working closely with industry and the states, as well as the territories, to ensure this fuel gets to where it's needed most, particularly regional communities.</para>
<para>This is a global challenge, and Australia's international relationships have never been more important. We have reaffirmed our commitment with Singapore to strengthen energy security, to support the flow of essential goods, including petroleum oils, such as diesel, and liquefied natural gas, between our two countries and to notify and consult each other on any disruptions with ramifications on the trade of energy.</para>
<para>Our government, the Albanese government, will continue to work with our partners to ensure we're doing everything we can to shield Australians from the worst of the challenges coming from the Middle East and ensure that truckies and transport operators are better protected from fuel price rises. Government amendments to the Fair Work Act will allow truckies and road transport businesses to make an emergency application for a contract chain order to deal with the current spike in fuel prices caused by the war in the Middle East. Our government is looking at every practical option to shield Australians and businesses from the worst effects of this current crisis.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm very pleased to speak on the member for Gippsland's motion about 'in the middle of a national fuel crisis, the Prime Minister's broken promise to govern for all Australians'. At the outset, let's look at the Prime Minister's form. He's got a lot of form for breaking promises. Does everyone remember the $275, where the Prime Minister got up and said, 'If you vote for us, we will take $275 off your power bill'? How many times did he say that? Does anyone know that? Anyone? How many times?</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Penfold</name>
    <name.id>248895</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Ninety-seven, was it?</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Ninety-seven—thank you very much, Member for Lyne. He said it 97 times and then just totally broke the promise. What about the holding up of the green Medicare card? Remember that one? It was just before this election. He held it up. The Prime Minister looked the Australian people in the eye and said, 'If you vote for us, the only card you will need at a doctor's is this green Medicare card.' But I can tell you something right here, right now: the people in Dawson aren't buying it. They know that, unless you've got your Medicare card and your credit card, you are not seeing a doctor and you are not getting served. That's the reality. This Prime Minister has the credibility of a vegetarian shark.</para>
<para>Let's look at the latest stunt—the mismanagement of fuel. The Minister for Climate Change and Energy has said: 'There's nothing to see here. The supply is right.' But the people in rural and regional Australia know that either the supply is not right or the distribution is not right, because the simple fact of the matter is that fuel is not getting where it's needed most. We did hear today in question time, to his credit, the Minister for Climate Change and Energy say there are 500 servos without fuel. It would be very interesting to see the breakdown of that. How many of those would be in rural and regional areas? I reckon it would be the lot.</para>
<para>Here's a newsflash for those opposite: you're supposed to be running the country. You're not standing in the tuckshop line, looking down and wondering if your gym boots are going to do the miles. You've actually got to do the work to provide the fuel where it's needed most.</para>
<para>In my part of the world, we're about to start the horticulture crop in the Bowen-Gumlu area, and that's a three-quarters of a billion dollars crop. So there's going to be a lot of diesel being burnt for discing, ripping and making sure that the plastic's laid and the trellises are done. This area has crops like tomatoes, capsicums, beans and corn. It's the salad bowl of Australia for the winter. If these farmers don't get the diesel that they require, then Australia's going to go hungry. It will go hungry under the Albanese Labor government's watch. It is simply not good enough.</para>
<para>The cane farmers are coming into the time when they plant their cane. Again, they're going to need diesel for their planters and their tractors. Then, in June, not very far down the track, there'll be the harvest times. Fuel is going to be needed for the harvesters and the hauling operators to get it done.</para>
<para>What about our truckies? Our truckies need the diesel. When this government lets the fuel supply run short for trucks, it affects all of rural and regional Australia, because that's how we get our supplies up from the city, and it's how farmers get our produce to market. It's simply not good enough.</para>
<para>What about our tourism operators—in particular, our marine tourism operators? In the Whitsunday, we've got 74 beautiful islands and we are the heart of the Great Barrier Reef. I note that the member for Leichhardt enjoyed that. I know that you have made visitation to the Great Barrier Reef as well, but you're welcome to come to the Whitsundays and have a look. With 74 beautiful islands, we are the heart of the Great Barrier Reef, but marine tourism needs diesel to take people out to the reef, out to the islands, to enjoy themselves.</para>
<para>There are also the grey nomads. We have very good grey nomad years, when they come up and travel through our area. We are very concerned that this fuel shortage and lack of distribution is going to upset the grey nomad season.</para>
<para>Folks, only a coalition government will protect Australians' way of life and restore their standard of living. We need to stop the rot from Labor. The coalition has the answer.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ELLIOT</name>
    <name.id>DZW</name.id>
    <electorate>Richmond</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm very pleased to be speaking on this matter of public importance, particularly to highlight how this government, the Albanese Labor government, governs for all Australians. That's been our commitment since we were elected to government—from day one—particularly when you look at our long list of cost-of-living relief measures, and I will outline them soon. All of those measures were voted against by the Liberals and Nationals. They have consistently voted against every measure we have had for cost-of-living relief for Australians who desperately need it. We have seen that time and time again from them.</para>
<para>Now what's really disappointing is that the Deputy Leader of the Nationals puts forward this matter of public importance and plays cheap politics, as we've consistently seen with the issue of fuel security, misleading people all the time. This is a time for bipartisanship. It is a time for everyone to work together, given the global uncertainty that we all face. Instead, we see cheap political games from the Liberals and Nationals yet again. They should be on Team Australia with all of us—all of us on the same page. But I think Australians have come to learn that all we get from the Liberals and Nationals is constant chaos, all the time. But Australians know they can rely on the Albanese Labor government when it comes to cost-of-living relief and when it comes to governing this country in the best interests of all Australians.</para>
<para>Today, we were all reminded that it was only a year ago that the Liberals and Nationals voted against tax cuts. No wonder Australians rejected them. They have no interest in the benefits for Australians, particularly those in regional and rural Australia. Those tax cuts have made a huge difference for those people in regional Australia. Time and time again, we see them voting against the best interests of all Australians.</para>
<para>Now, of course, we are all very closely following the events in the Middle East and seeing and feeling the consequences here at home. The longer that conflict goes on, the more significant the impact will be on the global economy and the Australian economy. It is front of mind for the entire government. We are looking to have in place every practical measure required. We're focused on shielding Australians from the worst of the Middle East energy crisis and building our energy resilience.</para>
<para>We have taken very positive action to shore up fuel supply and ensure consumers get a fair go at the petrol pump. We've already boosted fuel supply by releasing 20 per cent of the baseline minimum stockholding obligation for petrol and diesel and we've unlocked new sources of supply by amending the fuel standards. We've worked with the ACCC to authorise major fuel suppliers to get fuel to where it is needed in the regions and to ramp up fuel price monitoring. We've set up the forums that are really needed for a coordinated response, including convening National Cabinet, tasking the National Coordination Mechanism and establishing the Fuel Security Taskforce. We have immediately done these actions because we know we need to have an absolute focus on this issue.</para>
<para>This week, we'll be empowering the ACCC by doubling penalties for false and misleading conduct and cartel behaviour—up to $100 million per offence. This government is acting swiftly because of the concerns. There is massive global uncertainty, but this government is acting swiftly because we need to have this in place. We have been indeed working around the clock—looking at all practical options that are available—ever since this conflict began.</para>
<para>The opposition is very well aware of this, and, as I said, they've chosen to play politics rather than be productive and get on board team Australia. That's what they should be doing, not playing politics. It's irresponsible and against the Australian interest for both the Liberals and Nationals—and One Nation, in fact; they're all one and the same now, aren't they?—to be spreading falsehoods about fuel security. It is irresponsible to be constantly doing that—for those Australians who are concerned. It's against the interest, particularly of regional Australians too, to be pushing damaging falsehoods just to get some cheap political gain. But I think people are seeing through it and seeing through the fact that it's just cheap political agendas that they have.</para>
<para>We're working to ensure that fuel flows at affordable prices as a supply chain comes under pressure and there's a massive increase in demand. We're closely monitoring that situation and working with the states, the territories and industry as well, every single day. We've heard here in question time from the Prime Minister and from the relevant minister exactly what is going on about this.</para>
<para>What I found appalling is that the previous speaker made reference to health. We all remember their previous government when it came to health. They wanted a GP tax. They cut millions from the health budget. They walk in here and have the audacity to lecture us about cost-of-living measures when they made every single cut that hurt Australians. In particular, regional and rural Australians hurt the most under the Liberal and National government. Since we've been in government, we've had a massive range of programs to provide cost-of-living relief when Australians desperately need it. We are working day and night when it comes to the very important issue of fuel security.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is somebody from the opposition rising? No. Okay! The member for Leichhardt.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MATT SMITH</name>
    <name.id>312393</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm honoured and surprised to be going this early! In 10 minutes, you can listen to 'Welcome to the Jungle' and 'Sweet Child o' Mine', or you can drive from Craiglie to Port Douglas, or, in the member for Gippsland's electorate, you can't quite get from Sale to Maffra. Ten minutes is 600 seconds. It's not a long time, but it is the time allotted for matters of public importance. During this matter of public importance, the member decided to talk about his staff. He doesn't have enough staff. That was a matter of public importance. In 10 short minutes, that was what he chose.</para>
<para>I, and my staff, made hundreds of phone calls across my electorate on Thursday to make sure that people were prepared, that they knew that Severe Tropical Cyclone Narelle was coming, that they were safe and that they had what they needed. On the hundreds of phone calls that we made, not a single person said to me, 'Gee, does the opposition have enough staff?' They were concerned about real life.</para>
<para>Then to have the gall to talk about the bubble—'All Australians' means the people of the cape. 'All Australians' means the 14 million Australians who have received tax cuts. What that means is putting money back into their pocket, rewarding the work that they're doing, getting ahead, feeling like the government is on their side. On the PBS, it's the reduction in price to 2004 levels. I didn't have children in 2004. It was very, very different world. But they will experience cheaper medicines. It's the ability for women to get contraceptives over the counter and the investment in women's health and the endo clinics—half of Australia, not quite all but half, a half that had been ignored for way too long. It's more bulk-billing. There are 49 bulk-billing clinics across Leichhardt now, whereas, before, there were 36.</para>
<para>You see, Leichhardt—and I said this during my first speech—is the embodiment of Australia. It's the most Australian place in Australia because of its diversity, because of what it is. It is a city. It is mining. It's tourism. It's the outback. It's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. It is all of the best parts of Australia in one place. So, when we talk about all of Australia, we'd just as soon be talking about Leichhardt. I know this government delivers for all of Australia and for the people of Leichhardt.</para>
<para>We have some different challenges up there—challenges that many other members on our side have and that some from the opposition have as well—in terms of distance. We are heavily reliant on airports. Currently the cape is cut off. It happens every year. It's going a bit longer this year because the wet arrived late and, of course, because of Cyclone Narelle. We are now heavily reliant on our airports. This government recognised that and invested $25 million into our remote airports, making sure that our communities can get the health care they need and the education they need and that the medicine comes in, the food comes in and the fuel comes in, because it had to be done. These airports didn't suddenly fall apart. They'd been neglected for many, many years, and it is our responsibility to rectify that. It's our responsibility to look after the regions. It's our responsibility to look after all of Australia.</para>
<para>Things are tough at the moment. Fuel prices are hurting people. It's widely acknowledged that supply chains are making things a bit more difficult. That is why 20 per cent of the reserve has been released—on the condition that it goes to rural and regional Australia. Rural and regional Australia is Australia. The cities are Australia. All of it is encompassed here. All of it is represented on this side of the House. We're not worried about the bubble. We're worried about Australians and making this country the best that it can be.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This issue is of great importance to my electorate and rural and regional electorates around the country. Those opposite in government are laughing about the fact that people in my electorate can't get fuel. They are laughing about the fact that businesses, like my fishermen on the wharves of Mooloolaba and my transport companies in Fisher and on the Sunshine Coast, can't get fuel. And, if you can, you're paying north of $3 a litre for diesel. Those opposite might think that's funny, but I can tell them that people are having to be laid off as a result and I can assure them that those people don't think it's funny. The government comes in here and says, 'Nothing to see—there is no shortage of fuel.' Why, then, are there more than 600 petrol stations without fuel in this country? Why is that?</para>
<para>I have had fishermen contact me today and say that they can't get diesel, again, on the wharves. I've had farmers tell me that the price of urea has gone up—how much, do you reckon, in the last three weeks? I'll tell you how much. The price of urea has gone up 50 per cent in just three weeks. That's going to have an impact on farmers and their ability to fertilise their crops. And that's going to have an impact on—you guessed it—food, because it doesn't just come from the supermarket; it comes from the farmers.</para>
<para>An opposition member: It doesn't grow in the aisles.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It doesn't grow in the aisles.</para>
<para>One of the other issues that is a sleeper issue in this fuel security crisis is the fuel security for our Australian Defence Force. In 2021, I led an inquiry in relation to fuel security for our Defence Force. That committee, of both Liberal and Labor members, recommended to the government that they needed to take a very close look at fuel security for the Australian Defence Force. You know what this Labor government's response was? 'Noted'—not 'accept', but 'noted'.</para>
<para>We have got a looming issue here, in a world where the geopolitical environment is the most uncertain since 1945. We have seen a war in Europe that still rages. We now have a war in the Middle East, and God forbid we should see another war in the Indo-Pacific. But if we do, our Australian defence forces are at grave risk of not being able to provide fuel to our Navy, to our Army and to our Air Force.</para>
<para>The committee was told by the ADF, once again, 'Nothing to see here; everything will be alright.' But the committee said: 'We don't think that's right. We are gravely concerned about our fuel security in this country, particularly for the Australian Defence Force.' This Labor government's response was 'noted'—not, 'We're going to get more fuel here, build more fuel bunkers and build more opportunities to store fuel and refine fuel.'</para>
<para>Who could forget the Prime Minister's personal promise, in the lead-up to the 2022 election, of his domestic shipping facility—his domestic ships that he was going to build. Where are they? Where will they be, if we see a conflict? They haven't even been on the marine architect's drawing board. This country is hopelessly prepared from a military defence perspective in relation to fuel. This government needs to get its skates on and fix it.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms TRISH COOK</name>
    <name.id>312871</name.id>
    <electorate>Bullwinkel</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to address this matter of public importance. The opposition loves to use the phrase 'governing for all Australians' as a slogan, but for the Albanese Labor government it is our daily mission. You only have to look at the map of my electorate of Bullwinkel to see why. Minus the beaches, my electorate is a microcosm of this nation. We have the foothills. We have young, diverse families in High Wycombe looking for a fair go. In the hills we have an older generation in Mundaring relying on Medicare. Out in the Wheatbelt we have farmers in Northam, Toodyay, Beverley and York, who are the engine room of our economy. When we govern, we don't just pick and choose; we deliver for everyone.</para>
<para>The opposition's motion mentions a national fuel crisis. But let's be clear what this is: we are seeing a global spike in uncertainty causing excessive demand driven by the conflict in the Middle East. While the opposition continues to exacerbate that fear and uncertainty, this government is playing Team Australia. We have released 20 per cent of our fuel reserves to address regional shortages. We have appointed Anthea Harris as the Fuel Supply Taskforce Coordinator to work with the states to ensure that fuel gets to where it is needed, especially to our regional communities. We are also taking the fight to those seeking to profit from pain; the ACCC is currently investigating major fuel suppliers for anticompetitive conduct.</para>
<para>To our farmers, we understand and we get the uncertainty. But this isn't just about inflated prices at the pump; it's about the viability of their seeding season and the entire season to follow. I know the farmers in the Wheatbelt are looking at their diesel tanks, wondering if they'll have the fuel they need to start their seeding soon. On top of that, we have a cyclone which is bringing rain early, causing some complications. But our government is acting now to ensure they can get fuel.</para>
<para>We are also increasing supply specifically for the Great Southern, the Wheatbelt and the Geraldton and Esperance agricultural regions. We're supporting the seeding and prioritising independent distributors. We're ensuring extra volume above forecasts is supplied into the Goldfields, Busselton and Karratha. And we're not just monitoring the situation; we're redirecting fuel to where it is most needed. To the truckies in Bullwinkel: we have your back. We are amending the Fair Work Act to allow for emergency contract chain orders, ensuring that you aren't forced to shoulder the burden of the global price spikes alone.</para>
<para>It is a bit rich for the coalition to lecture us on fuel security. When they were in power, they oversaw the closure of four fuel refineries and put our strategic reserves of fuel in Texas, United States. Today, under Labor, we are holding over 1.64 billion litres of petrol and 2.8 billion litres of diesel on Australian soil, and we are undoing a decade of infrastructure neglect to ensure that governing for all means actually having the resources to protect everyone.</para>
<para>Governing for all means also looking at the household budget, where we know cost-of-living relief is desperately needed. In Bullwinkel, this means tax cuts for every single taxpayer in the electorate, which were opposed by those opposite. It means cheaper medicines. No Australian is paying more than $25 for a script, and that's $200 million back in the pockets of Australians. It means energy relief, a 30 per cent discount on home batteries to permanently slash power bills in the hills and the regions. And it means cutting student debt by an average of $5,500, giving our young professionals the breathing room they need to save for a home.</para>
<para>The opposition want to focus on broken promises, but the only thing broken is their record on national security and economic resilience. This government is focused on the here and now for everyone. Whether it is freezing draught beer excise for the local pub, boosting Medicare with $1.8 billion in hospital funding or ensuring our Wheatbelt farmers can get the diesel that they need for seeding, we're working hard to ensure supply. We're shielding our nation from global uncertainty and building a future where every Australian, regardless of where they come from, is supported.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VENNING</name>
    <name.id>315434</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today on behalf of the people of regional, rural and remote South Australia, and, indeed, on behalf of every Australian who lives beyond the reach of a Metro bus or a train line. When the Prime Minister stood on the podium on election night, he made a solemn vow to the Australian people to govern for all Australians. It was a tidy phrase designed for a city sound bite. But, nearly four years later, that promise has been exposed. The hard truth is that this prime minister has forgotten the regions. He's governing for the inner city cafes and high-rise boardrooms, while the families and farmers who grow our food and haul our produce are being treated as an afterthought in the midst of a fuel crisis. Look at the chaos at our bowsers. As of Tuesday, nearly 10 per cent of bowsers in SA are out of fuel. Of course, they are all in the regions. National prices have hit record highs. For a family in Sydney, this is a budget strain. For a fisher or a farmer in my electorate or a truckie moving across the Nullarbor, it is a threat to their very livelihood.</para>
<para>We have a full-time COP president and a part-time energy minister in Chris Bowen. He appears to be asleep at the wheel. On one day the government tells us there is no problem. On the next, there's a national crisis. This confusion is shredding public confidence. If stocks are as strong as they claim, then this is a staggering failure of supply chain management. Instead of blaming farmers and businesses, the government need to level with us. Where are the daily updates? What is the plan to get fuel to the regions, where it is desperately needed?</para>
<para>The neglect does not stop at the fuel tank. Our national food security is under a silent mounting threat. Australia relies on the Middle East for roughly 60 per cent of the urea imports, the lifeblood of our crops. Shipments are being delayed or cancelled. Experts warn that the window to avoid impacts on the 2026 season is closing fast.</para>
<para>The coalition saw this coming. We committed $250 million to the NAIF to kickstart domestic urea production via the Perdaman project near Karratha. We acted to ensure we weren't at the mercy of global instability. This government, however, has no plan for domestic production or a serious national food security strategy. If our farmers cannot access fertiliser, the cost of living in the cities will skyrocket. But it is the regional producer who will go bankrupt first.</para>
<para>Finally, we look at the EU free trade agreement—free trade that's not so free. Free trade is central to our prosperity, but it must be done right. The deal Labor is currently shopping around offers no commercially meaningful access for our agricultural exporters. It is a surrender of sovereignty. Since when did we decide that the Europeans should dictate what we call our own products? Labor calls it a reprieve that we can still use names like prosecco. I call it a failure to stand up for Australian interests.</para>
<para>The message from the country is loud and clear—we are tired of being ignored. Reports that the states are begging for direction from Anthony Albanese are deeply concerning. This reveals a vacuum at the top when clear national resolve is needed most. Instead of stepping up, the Prime Minister is passing responsibility back to the states. That is not leadership; that is deflection. Outsourcing this crisis to a taskforce coordinator only reinforces the chilling sense that no-one is firmly in charge of this crisis. Under Labor, inflation is higher, interest rates are tighter and fuel is running out. The Prime Minister cannot claim to govern for all Australians when he has turned his back on the country. It is time to stop deflecting and start showing real leadership because, if the country stops, the city starves.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This discussion has now concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS</title>
        <page.no>79</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Personal Explanation</title>
          <page.no>79</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
    <electorate>Lindsay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I wish to make a personal explanation.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Does the member claim to have been misrepresented?</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I do.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member may proceed.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>At the conclusion of question time yesterday, the Minister for Climate Change and Energy added to his answer which he gave in response to a question I asked him. In his answer, the minister incorrectly—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>You just need to get to the matter of where the misrepresentation lies.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That's what I'm doing.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>It's not a time to introduce new argument. Go straight to the misrepresentation.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>He asserted that I was engaged in political pointscoring and acted dishonestly. Again, in question time today, in response to a question without notice from the Leader of the Opposition—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Where do you claim to be misrepresented?</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This is what I'm getting to. I'm giving an explanation.</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I don't need to speak to you. I'm giving that explanation. The minister said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The only contribution of the member for Lindsay has been to mislead the House about a statement by the Premier of New South Wales yesterday …</para></quote>
<para>The minister made a similar comment on this matter in a further question to him. He has misrepresented what I said three times in 24 hours. And, for the avoidance of doubt and for the minister's information, per page 15 of <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> for Tuesday 24 March, I stated yesterday that the New South Wales Premier said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… demand management procedures are required—that might be rationing …</para></quote>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We've done the misrepresentation now. Unless there's anything further, you've got it on the record—</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, for the edification of the minister, I seek leave to table a copy of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly's <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline>.</para>
<para>Leave not granted.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>79</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026, National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026, Returned from Senate</title>
          <page.no>79</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <p>
              <a href="r7425" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="r7426" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026</span>
                </p>
              </a>
            </p>
            <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
              <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Returned from Senate</span>
            </p>
            <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
              <span class="HPS-Normal">Messages received from the Senate returning the bills without amendments.</span>
            </p>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>79</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7434" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>79</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CAMPBELL</name>
    <name.id>312823</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australians take out private health insurance for one main reason: peace of mind—the reassurance that, if something goes wrong, they are covered. But peace of mind requires information, and right now that is difficult for consumers to come by. You can hold a private health insurance policy, you can pay your premiums faithfully, and you can be referred to a specialist yet still have no reliable way of knowing what an appointment is going to cost you until that bill arrives. That is not peace of mind, and it's not good enough. The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 is about fixing that information gap, because Australians shouldn't have to take a financial leap of faith when it comes to specialist health care.</para>
<para>This bill delivers on the Albanese Labor government's commitment to strengthen Medicare. We created Medicare over 40 years ago, and we do not let it sit idle. Because we care about Medicare, we invest in it. We make it bigger, we make it better, we make it stronger. Whether it's by creating more bulk-billing, whether it's by creating new Urgent Care Clinics, whether it's by investing in Medicare mental health clinics or whether it's by making the biggest investment into women's health in history, this bill goes to those same principles.</para>
<para>This bill helps Australians find the best value when they need specialist medical advice and treatment, and provides more confidence in their private health insurance by outlawing product phoenixing. Specialist fees in Australia can vary enormously, even for the same procedure in the same part of Australia. According to the ABS, the cost of medical and hospital services is a key driver of health inflation for consumers, which feeds into higher out-of-pocket costs and higher private health insurance premiums.</para>
<para>As the Minister for Health and Ageing outlined recently, a growing number of Australians are choosing not to follow through on GP referrals to medical specialists. This is because the cost is a major barrier. During 2024-25, an estimated 8.6 per cent of people—that's more than 800,000 Australians—delayed or entirely skipped specialist appointments because they could not afford them. Right now, if you need to see a specialist, it can be difficult to find out what you'll be charged before you walk in the door. It can also be difficult to compare these costs against the fees charged by other specialists.</para>
<para>The Medical Costs Finder website exists to help with this, but it has been limited in what it can tell you. Participation in the Medical Costs Finder has been extremely low. Only one to two per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers opted to publish their fees and out-of-pocket costs information. The proposed legislative amendments will allow the Medical Costs Finder website to publish individual medical practitioner fees and insurer out-of-pocket data for common medical services.</para>
<para>It's about taking what we know and making sure that it's transparent to people who need that information. Medical practitioners will no longer need to upload their billing information, as it will be drawn from Medicare and hospitals and insurer billing data already collected by government. This is a smart and practical reform; the data already exists, and the government already collects it. We are simply making it visible to the people it affects the most—to patients, to Australians.</para>
<para>This bill will ensure Australian patients have the power to compare costs and make informed choices about their own medical care, while not imposing any administrative burden on doctors. Specifically, the bill will amend the Health Insurance Act and the Private Health Insurance Act to allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners, including their names, their locations, their fees charged by location and their use of gap cover arrangements with insurers. It will also allow for publication of information about hospitals and insurers, including gap cover and contracting arrangements, and the proportion of policyholders experiencing various out-of-pocket costs. Consumer peak bodies and insurer bodies are highly supportive, given the growth in specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs and the rising costs of living.</para>
<para>This is unsurprising, because people deserve to be able to make those informed decisions about their health care, and they need it more than ever. This government understands that cost of living is the No. 1 thing on families' minds and on Australians' minds. To protect all parties, the bill also includes an immunity from civil proceedings for the publication of this information and modernises the secrecy regime to make it consistent with amendments made by the Regulatory Reform Omnibus Act.</para>
<para>The second major component of this bill addresses something that has eroded consumer confidence in private health insurance, and that's product phoenixing. Product phoenixing is where an insurer closes an existing product then opens an identical or similar new product at a higher premium. And why would someone do that? Well, they do it to pull the wool over consumers' eyes.</para>
<para>This is a government that knows that, when times are tough, our job is to protect Australians and to make sure that their money is safe and their health is looked after. Yes—under existing arrangements, your private health insurer can close your product, open a new one that is functionally identical and charge you more for it, all without the Minister for Health and Ageing scrutinising that premium increase.</para>
<para>Phoenixing doesn't just disadvantage people who are signing up to private health insurance for the first time and feel the consequences immediately; it is also detrimental to the wider community of 15.3 million Australians who already hold health cover. These existing members are left vulnerable because changes to products, pricing or fund behaviour often escape proper scrutiny. As a result, longstanding policyholders can face unexpected shifts in what their insurance covers, how much they pay or how secure their policy is over time.</para>
<para>When these kinds of changes are happening—when things are being deliberately done to Australians to pull the wool over their eyes, and all they want to do is focus on their health, their recovery and their treatment—we need someone to step in, and that's what this bill does. In this way, this cynical practice undermines consumer confidence in the entire system, creating uncertainty not only for those newcomers but for everyone who relies on private health insurance to protect their wellbeing. It's been a loophole, and it has been exploited.</para>
<para>Currently, private health insurers are required to apply to the Minister for Health and Ageing if they wish to change the premium for an existing product. This bill amends the Private Health Insurance Act to require an insurer to seek ministerial approval for the premium charged for a proposed new product and for changes that reduce cover, reduce a benefit or change a term or condition of an existing product. This closes that loophole. It means that, if an insurer wants to launch what is essentially the same product at a higher price or quietly reduce the value of a product you hold, they need ministerial sign-off. They need to stump up what they're doing. And that is proper accountability.</para>
<para>The bill also makes important modernisation changes to the premium approvals process more broadly. It introduces an approved application period that gives legislative backing to the existing premium round, which has operated administratively for many years. It applies a public interest test to applications within this period, with a more stringent test for out-of-cycle applications. The minister will be able to delegate the power to approve a premium application, but not the power to refuse one. That is an important safeguard. The bill provides legislative backing for existing processes, including the ability to request further information or ask an insurer to resubmit their application. These are sensible, proportionate reforms that give consumers greater confidence that those premiums that they are being charged reflect genuine value.</para>
<para>The shadow Treasurer thinks he knows what's wrong with our health system. Just before taking on his role, he told the parliament it was 'a system designed to keep people ill' for Labor's political benefit. But, unlike those opposite, this Albanese Labor government came into office with a commitment to strengthen our healthcare system, not talk it down—and not talk Australia down—but strengthen and build our health system, which is one that is the envy of so many the world over.</para>
<para>We have not stopped delivering on that promise, on that commitment. We have made the biggest investment in Medicare since its inception. We've backed bulk-billing in. In my electorate, what that means is that we've got 11 practices that were formerly mixed-billing and are now fully bulk-billing, with nine out of 10 GP visits to be bulk-billed by 2030. We've rolled out urgent care clinics so that Australians can get care without sitting in an emergency department, and 80 per cent of Australians will soon live within a 20-minute drive of one of those fully bulk-billed clinics. I've got two pretty close to me: one at the bottom of Canossa and one at the bottom of the PA.</para>
<para>We've reduced the cost of PBS prescriptions and invested in women's health, aged-care wages and the health workforce of the future. I was at a pharmacy in Corinda the other day. When I spoke to the pharmacist about the impact of $25 PBS medicines, she said that people were taking their medicine, particularly those with chronic disease. People who might not have made that choice previously because of price were now doing that. So these investments in health care impact real people and they help people in our communities.</para>
<para>If the shadow Treasurer would like to join us in strengthening Medicare, we would welcome him to work with us. But his record tells an incredibly different story. In 2011, he told the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> that delivering sustainable health services requires a free-market approach. We know what that means. I'm a Queenslander; I know what that means. It means privatisation, and it means cuts again and again. That is what we see from this opposition. Those are the shadow Treasurer's words. We believe that health care should be for everyone, not be in the hands of a privatised few.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PENFOLD</name>
    <name.id>248895</name.id>
    <electorate>Lyne</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I, too, believe that health care should be universally available. The services of the government should be universally available to all Australians. But I've stood up in this parliament numerous times asking for an urgent care clinic in Taree, a community that was smashed in May last year by a one-in-500-year flood. What response have I got? I've written five times to the minister. Do you think he's responded to me once? I've even written to the minister to request a meeting. I'm trying to work cooperatively on this very important issue—one I agree with the government on—and the minister has said: 'No. I won't meet with you.'</para>
<para>I'm flabbergasted that the member who just spoke said there's going to be an urgent care clinic within 20 minutes of every Australian. I don't think the member for Durack would have an urgent care clinic within 20 minutes of all of her constituents, and I know there's not one federally funded urgent care clinic between Coffs Harbour and Newcastle—not one.</para>
<para>Let me come to this bill, the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. I welcome the opportunity to speak on this bill and support its intentions. The bill will allow for Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data already collected by the government—including what individual specialists charge for particular medical services—to be published on the Commonwealth's publicly accessible Medical Costs Finder website. People will be able to compare those costs against the fees charged by other medical practitioners, ultimately helping people make informed decisions about their health care. Greater transparency in healthcare pricing, which this bill seeks to achieve, is a good thing.</para>
<para>This bill will also amend the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to require insurers to seek the Minister for Health and Ageing's approval of the premiums they intend to charge on new health insurance products. This is important because it will help tackle a shady tactic widely utilised by private health companies, referred to as 'product phoenixing'. As it stands, private health insurers can open a new health insurance product at any time at any premium without the health minister's approval. This is different from the process for changing the premiums of existing products, where insurers must seek the minister's approval first. This difference has led to the practice of insurers closing a health insurance product and opening a similar new product at a much higher price. Product phoenixing tends to result in consumers paying higher prices for health insurance or receiving lower levels of value or coverage. Putting a stop to product phoenixing and formalising ministerial oversight of premium setting for private health insurance products is a necessary move.</para>
<para>However, there is more—much more—that needs to be done when it comes to reforming the private health insurance industry. The record profit take and exorbitant management fees charged by insurers continues unabated. While Australians with private health insurance are forced to foot record premiums in a cost-of-living crisis and are consequently experiencing the largest downturn in living standards in the developed world, the private insurers' profits are reaching new heights. In 2024-25 alone, industry heavyweights Bupa and Medibank saw profits explode. Bupa saw its after-tax profits soar by a staggering $182.1 million to $593.9 million last year. Medibank's after-tax profit grew by $21.7 million to bank $573.7 million. This bill does absolutely nothing to address that. Instead, with the minister's approval, private health insurance premiums will rise at their fastest rate in almost a decade after the federal government approved a 4.41 per cent average increase from April. Even though private health insurance companies must receive ministerial approval to increase their premiums, Minister Butler did not reject their proposed price hike. Instead, he consented to it and has since defended the above-inflation rise, the largest increase since 2017. In doing so, he has forsaken the interests of Australians in favour of the profit of private corporations.</para>
<para>A family from Lorne emailed me to convey their outrage over the minister's approval:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We are appalled at this current situation—</para></quote>
<para>under Labor's administration. They wrote:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We, a retired couple, whom have worked extremely long and hard (beyond retirement age) to secure a self funded retirement, so as not to burden this country or our government by asking for financial assistance, are once more targeted by this Labour Party.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">We recently received an email informing us that on April 1, our private health insurance will increase by $50 a month. This is due to price increases under Labour's policies …</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">We feel this next increase, will drive deserving, frail and ailing older people from private health insurance and will increase a multitude of issues in our public healthcare system and their services.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Shame on you!</para></quote>
<para>On top of this, whilst the private health insurance companies siphon record profits, Australians and my constituents are paying more for their private health insurance and getting less value in return. About 15 million Australians hold some level of private health insurance, and they are all seeing their premiums go up and up whilst their coverage is drastically narrowed.</para>
<para>Over the last five years, the health insurers have dramatically skewed their focus in favour of lesser coverage—namely, silver, bronze and basic-cover policies. A record 70 per cent of people with private hospital cover—some 8.8 million Australians—have major exclusions built into their policies. Often they are unaware of these restrictions until they are sick or injured and at their most vulnerable.</para>
<para>Insurers have been forcing customers away from full and comprehensive gold-level policies. As the Commonwealth Ombudsman found in 2024, health insurers have used a legislative loophole to inflate gold-level cover by 45 per cent over four years, when official average premium increases totalled 11.9 per cent over the same period. The benefit to insurers is that customers are still paying higher premiums each year, and, if they get sick or injured, there are a slew of basic treatments and care provisions they are not covered for and for which they will need to pay substantial out-of-pocket costs. This represents a massive saving for insurers.</para>
<para>The bill also does nothing to confront insurers who are not meeting the expected benefits ratio, or the percentage of premiums people pay each year that flows to healthcare providers. As it stands, Australia's private hospitals, including those in the Lyne electorate, face an existential crisis. Since COVID, the viability of private hospitals has seen a steep decline. This threat has now crossed a line that sees many hospitals simply unsustainable.</para>
<para>Predominantly funded by private health insurance, prior to COVID the benefits ratio was 90 per cent. Over the last four consecutive years, it has languished at or below 85 per cent. This is because there is no mandatory minimum benefits ratio that private health insurers must comply with. There is no mechanism to ensure premium increases are passed on to healthcare providers. Instead, the private health companies are allowed to negotiate with the private hospitals to set the benefits ratio. In reality, the five largest health insurers—Medibank, Bupa, HCF, nib and HBF—all use their market dominance to overpower hospitals and get a favourable agreement for themselves. Private insurance companies are not so much negotiating with private hospitals as coercing them. As a result, over the last several years, insurers have been keeping more of the cash generated through high premiums for themselves and paying less of it to the hospitals. Despite massive windfalls, Medibank barely shifted the dial on the benefits ratio paid to private hospitals—up just 1.3 per cent on 2024 to come in at 87.1 per cent for the year. Bupa actually went backwards, paying out even less than in 2024—down 0.45 per cent for a paltry 83.3 per cent payout ratio.</para>
<para>APRA data shows that, over the last four years, health insurance companies underpaid private hospitals to the tune of more than $4 billion. Over the same period, the health insurance companies recorded unprecedented profits of more than $7 billion. That has to change. Without enforceable, mandated ratios, insurers will continue to underfund the private system. After four years of insurers failing to meet their obligations to private hospitals, the federal health minister's March 2024 warning for them to dramatically improve the benefits ratio has fallen on deaf ears.</para>
<para>Mandating this requirement is now essential and needs to happen quickly to halt the alarming rate of private hospital closures. Some 20 private hospitals have already closed their doors entirely, while 80 services, predominantly mental health and maternity, have been permanently cancelled in the remaining hospitals, including Mayo Private Hospital in Taree. The Australian Private Hospitals Association is aware of at least nine private hospitals at imminent risk of closing, which is on top of the issues being confronted by non-APHA member Healthscope, of whose hospitals 12 are in doubt of continuing. All of this dramatically erodes the access, choice and quality that people rightly expect from the ever-increasing premiums they pay for private health care. Not only does this erode the choice, access and value of private health care; it places more pressure on an already overstretched public hospital system.</para>
<para>Australia's healthcare system relies heavily on Australia's 633 private hospitals and their more than 36,000 beds, so getting the private sector right is critical for our public sector. Private hospitals account for 41 per cent of all hospital admissions—some 5.14 million each year—and 70 per cent of all planned surgeries, with 1.72 million procedures last year. They also perform the majority of many complex operations. The complementary nature of Australia's hospital system—private and public together—has long been a strength, and it's why we have historically been regarded as the world's best. Private hospitals shouldering so much of the workload alleviates massive pressure on the public system, but the financial viability issues confronting all private hospitals are adding and will continue to add to those public pressures.</para>
<para>In Lyne, the Mayo Private Hospital employs 243 people and admits 12,201 patients, or thereabouts, each year. Forster Private Hospital employs 155 people and admits over 11,000 patients each year. If either of these facilities were to close because of private insurance companies refusing to meet prepandemic benefit payout ratios, Manning Base Hospital, the only public hospital in the Lyne electorate, would be forced to pick up the slack. My constituents and I know too well that this is simply not possible. Manning Base Hospital is not receiving its fair share of funding and resources, and the state government's latest attempt to break the back of regional health has gone so far as to downgrade the hospital and remove beds. Without an urgent care clinic for Taree, which, as I said earlier, I've repeatedly requested, and without any real progress taken by the Minns New South Wales government on the delivery of the Forster-Tuncurry urgent care clinic, secured by my colleague Tanya Thompson, and a public hospital in Forster, health in the Lyne electorate—the oldest electorate and one of the poorest—will reach unprecedented and unimaginable lows.</para>
<para>On another issue—in my electorate, countless constituents have contacted me about the Australian government's planned reclassification of MBS items for eye injections, from a type B to a type C procedure, for private health insurance purposes on 1 July 2026. This change will result in over 12,200 people who currently receive eye injection treatment in private hospital and day surgery settings no longer being able to use their private health insurance to pay for their treatment. Countless individuals will have to stop treatment due to the high out-of-pocket cost. As the only treatment they have access to is in a private ophthalmology clinic, patients will be at greater risk of irreversible vision loss and blindness because of this change.</para>
<para>John, who lives in Lakewood, has told me:</para>
<quote><para class="block">without this treatment, I will not be able to see… This is the second time I have had to complain about the way our Labor Government is treating people like myself.</para></quote>
<para>Fiona from Kendall said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I am a carer for my husband. I would not be able to afford injections if the rules change. We live in regional NSW and have no other option. If I lose my sight, I will not be able to drive. Who will look after my husband?</para></quote>
<para>I cannot understand the rationale behind the government's decision to do this. It is extremely concerning, and I've written to the Minister for Health and Ageing, urging him to reconsider. Any loss of eyesight caused by this government's decision is unacceptable and, importantly, avoidable.</para>
<para>While I support this bill, I call on the minister to go further. Implement the necessary mechanisms to ensure health insurers pay their fair share by mandating a return to 90 per cent benefit ratios from annual premiums. I also urge the minister, for the sake of Australians, to seriously consider the need for a mandatory code of conduct in contracting between private health insurers and private hospitals.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise tonight, and I'll share with the member opposite that I, too, communicate regularly with the Minister for Health and Ageing. I send him thankyou notes and I smile at him when I walk past the corridors, because Werribee has an urgent care clinic. We also have an endometriosis and pelvic pain clinic, servicing the city of Wyndham, with a population of 360,000 people. I'll repeat that: 360,000 people. And, yes, most of them live 20 minutes distance from the urgent care clinic. I also want to thank the health minister for making it possible for 80 per cent of the people in my community to see a GP who bulk-bills, because we were a long way from that when we took government four years ago. I was meeting with constituents every day about the cost of health care.</para>
<para>Like the member opposite who just spoke, I've also met with many constituents about the rising costs of private health care, private health insurance and seeing specialists. So I'm really pleased to stand today to support this legislation, because, like the actions that we have taken to strengthen Medicare and to breathe life back into our universal health system in communities like mine, I'm pleased that we are also reaching into this space, which is incredibly important.</para>
<para>This bill is another example of the Albanese government delivering on its election promises. It will help the people in Lalor struggling with the rising cost of living by making health care more accessible and more affordable. At the last election, we promised voters that we would strengthen the healthcare system, helping Australians find the best value when they need a specialist or specialist medical advice and treatment. This bill delivers on that promise.</para>
<para>We also promised to stop private health insurers from price gouging their most vulnerable customers—people who need gold levels of hospital cover—by outlawing product phoenixing. The private healthcare system is subsidised by the government through the private health insurance rebate. This bill makes sure that that investment achieves value for money for consumers and taxpayers. This bill is yet another step towards strengthening and securing our world-class healthcare system.</para>
<para>And what about the local impact? This legislation will benefit people in my electorate in two clear ways. Firstly, it offers transparency by default. Secondly, it fulfils our election commitment to outlaw the practice of product phoenixing. When we talk about transparency by default, what does that mean? It means the bill improves transparency by giving people more information about specialist care providers and preventing dramatic increases in private healthcare premiums by stealth. These proposed changes will mean that individual medical practitioner fees and insurer out-of-pocket data will be published for common medical services. This information will be made available on the Medical Costs Finder website. The information will include names, locations, fees charged by location and the providers' utilisation of gap cover arrangements with insurers—where insurers pay a medical practitioner more if they agree to charge no or fixed out-of-pocket costs. It will include information about hospitals, including medical practitioners who provide services at the facility, and insurers that have gap cover or contracting arrangements with the facility. It will have information about insurers, including the proportion of policy-holders who experience different gap cover arrangements and the out-of-pocket costs under those arrangements. It is transparency by default. Automatically, people will be able to look this up.</para>
<para>Critically, medical practitioners will not need to upload their billing information; it will be taken from data entry already collected by the government, so there will be no extra burden on doctors. People in Lalor will be happy to know that this represents the first significant step towards addressing rising specialist fees and damaging out-of-pocket costs. There is more to be done, and people in Lalor should rest assured that this government is rolling up its sleeves and working hard to drive down their medical bills.</para>
<para>Now, I had an opportunity to speak recently to quite a few GPS as I went to visit GP clinics that had moved to bulk-billing. I've had a few conversations with our local doctors, and they've raised the process of referrals to specialists. I've had some conversations with some of them about what we're planning in this piece of legislation, and they're really pleased. They say it often ends up being a double visit, because they might meet with a patient and say, 'I'm going to refer you to a specialist.' They look up specialists, they do a referral and the patient leaves and goes home. The patient then does their own research, talks to a few neighbours, rings the hospital, goes through a lot of work and ends up back with their GP, saying: 'I actually can't afford this specialist. Do we have a different option?' This will mean that, sitting in the GP's rooms, the patient or the GP could look up the cost finder website and then make an informed judgement about what can be afforded, where this specialist operates and whether they operate in a public hospital as an option, as opposed to simply going automatically to the specialist rooms and then to a private hospital somewhere. So this costs finder website will make a huge difference in communities like mine, where people are making health choices based on cost. This is a government that wants to change that narrative back to a universal health system where people don't have to consider those things, and this is a step in that direction.</para>
<para>Interestingly, what we're doing here is building on what was the former government's commitment to creating this costs finder website. But, unfortunately, with an opt-in system, only 50 doctors registered for the use of this. Every specialist in the country will now be on this list. It will assist GPs to do referrals. It will assist patients to make assessments and judgements about which specialists they want to work with. I think it's incredibly important. That's just one thing that this legislation does.</para>
<para>This legislation also deals with product phoenixing. It's the second thing the bill fixes—the practice of private health insurers protecting their profits by price-gouging their most vulnerable clients. Here's how product phoenixing works. Right now, when health insurers want to change the premiums of an existing product, they must make an application to the minister for health. Private health insurers are creating new products that are identical or very similar to existing products and are dramatically increasing their premiums and bypassing the step to the minister. They can then cancel the original product, leaving the new, more expensive product as the only option for consumers. It's not seen as an adjustment to an existing one, so it doesn't require the minister's approval. It also means that they get around that obligation. They no longer have to seek approval from the minister. It's a simple practice. It's clever, but it has a devastating effect on those who need the most comprehensive cover. Those people, of course, are most likely to have a multiplicity of health issues and be dealing with medicines on a large scale. They are often the people who can least afford it.</para>
<para>According to CHOICE, the price of gold hospital cover has increased by approximately 58 per cent in the past five years. Cost-of-living pressures mean that many people have had to give up their gold health insurance. People forced to make sacrifices have dropped down to lower levels of cover. I know I've had conversations with constituents in my community about the fact that they've been to health insurance; they've gone to do the shop-around. They've got an existing policy. They're looking for something that's more tailored to their needs, and they're looking mostly for something that's cheaper. And the advice they're getting is: 'Don't give up what you've got. I know it's expensive, but the next product won't give you the same service.' Private health insurers have been increasing the cost of the highest levels of cover on a dwindling number of customers—typically, those who need the highest levels of medical cover. That means that the most vulnerable are being price-gouged to prop up the profits of private health insurers.</para>
<para>We promised at the last election that we would end this shameful practice, and that is exactly what this bill delivers. The proposed legislation makes sure that ministerial approval is required for a proposed new product and is required for the reduction of cover offered by an existing product. This legislation strengthens the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's ability to make sure that people are not being ripped off, because this government cares about protecting the most vulnerable. This government is passionate about constantly improving the healthcare system, because good health is the foundation of thriving communities. Good health helps us be better parents, partners, friends, workers and community members.</para>
<para>This bill makes sure that people in my community who require specialist care can find options that provide the best value. It gives my constituents the opportunity to avoid paying high out-of-pocket costs. And, as one GP relayed to me, this bill will actually help GPs find specialists who better suit their needs and those of their patients. The bill also ensures that people who need gold levels of private health insurance cover are not price-gouged to preserve the profits of health insurers.</para>
<para>According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the cost of medical and hospital services is a key driver of health inflation for consumers. Higher out-of-pocket costs for specialist care and higher private health insurance premiums are a serious concern for Australians dealing with cost-of-living pressure. Fees can vary widely across specialists, even for the same procedure in the same part of Australia. This bill helps Australians make more informed decisions by helping consumers understand which providers offer the best value. The bill delivers on the government's promise to deliver transparency by default. On this side of the House, we understand that government plays a central role in making markets work for Australians. Unlike the ideologues who have captured the opposition, Labor understands that commonsense regulation makes markets more efficient and improves outcomes for consumers.</para>
<para>This government respects the expertise and dedication of Australia's healthcare providers. These changes, carefully designed to ensure there's no additional administrative burden on the people providing care, give the minister powers to delegate the approval of new or changed products or premiums; however, only the minister can reject applications. This means that beneficial changes will not be slowed down, and products that hurt Australians will receive the scrutiny they deserve.</para>
<para>As the Minister for Health and Ageing, the member for Hindmarsh, reminded us recently, the shadow Treasurer wants to see the transfer of health financing shifted from government to individuals. We know he doesn't mean ending private health care subsidies. We know he doesn't mean ensuring that private health care subsidies fund services that provide value for money. He means moving towards an American-style healthcare system. And it's not just those on this side of the House who understand that. The people in my community absolutely understand that, when those opposite get their hands on the levers of government, health care is one of the first places that they undo great Australian systems.</para>
<para>In 2021, when the shadow Treasurer was speaking about allowing young people to claim dependent status on their parents health care for longer, he argued that superannuation contributions were the real threat to health care in this country. Australians know the real risk to health care—it's the ideologues in the Liberal Party, and the member for Goldstein is just that. In this place he said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">…when you take money from young Australians and lock it up in super, they can't do other things, like afford private health insurance or homeownership.</para></quote>
<para>We don't see health and housing as diametrically opposed. This is a government that takes action in both spaces. On this side of the House, we know that the only thing Australians need to secure their health care is a Medicare card and a healthy health system. Those opposite don't want a fair healthcare system. They want an American-style system where the only people that can access health care are those who can afford to pay for it.</para>
<para>We're going to hear a lot about Australian values from those opposite before the next election. I want people in Lalor and around the country to know it's a ruse. Now that the ideologues are in charge, they will try to trick you into a more expensive, less fair healthcare system. This bill represents, for all Australians, another delivered election promise by the Albanese government. It will help people in Lalor struggling with the rising cost of living by making health care more accessible and more affordable, and it will drive a healthier Lalor and healthier communities across the country.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The cost of accessing health care in this country is not just a wellbeing issue; it is a cost-of-living issue, it is a labour market productivity issue and it is an economic issue for any treasurer who is serious about Australia's long-term prosperity. When Australians can't afford health care, they delay or forgo it. Improving health outcomes is therefore not just desirable for our wellbeing; it's an important determinant of Australia's productivity and growth.</para>
<para>Healthy people are more likely to participate in the workforce, to contribute to society and to spend into our economy, and they require less expensive care. Over decades, Australia has been drifting away from the universal promise of Medicare and back towards a user-pays healthcare system, which is increasingly pricing Australians out. Gap fees for non-bulk-billing GPs and specialists, bills from private hospitals and the increasing cost of some prescription medications—these kinds of out-of-pocket healthcare costs are now exceeding $33 billion annually for Australia. That is a higher share of total health spending than in the UK, Canada or the United States.</para>
<para>Cost pressure is most acute in specialist care. On average, patients' bills for specialist appointments are $300 a year. Australian patients are now paying out of pocket for two-thirds of all specialist appointments in this country. The average out-of-pocket gap payment for specialist attendances increased from $49 in 2010-11 to more than $115 in 2023-24. That's a 136 per cent increase over a period in which the consumer price index increased by only 40 per cent.</para>
<para>It is increasingly common for Australians to be charged $1,000 for an initial specialist appointment, $650 to see an obstetrician, $600 to see a cardiologist and $1,000 to see a psychiatrist. It's a similar situation in private hospitals. Out-of-pocket payments for private procedures rose 300 per cent in the five years to 2025. As many as 40 per cent of private hospital patients find themselves with bills of $1,000 or more after inpatient treatments. Disadvantaged Australians are rarely bulk-billed when they see a specialist. Three quarters of people who are earning less than $500 a week in this country paid a bill for at least one specialist visit in 2023.</para>
<para>These are extraordinary costs at a time of personal vulnerability for patients. It's not surprising that the 2025 Australian Healthcare Index found that 49 per cent of Australians have delayed seeking medical support due to increasing out-of-pocket costs. A recent cross-country comparison found that Australia ranks second-last amongst wealthy nations on access to care; we're now only ahead of the United States. That is a sobering finding for a country that has rightly prided itself for a long time on the universal promise of Medicare.</para>
<para>It's not just the high gap fees and out-of-pocket costs that worry patients. As an MP, I hear all the time from constituents that I represent about bill shock—unexpected bills that take constituents by surprise. At least one in two Australians receiving specialist care receive unexpected bills. I'm also hearing of hidden booking and administrative fees, some of which are unlawful, which violate the spirit of informed financial consent. Informed consent is enshrined in medical care but it's also a basic consumer right. It's ridiculous, remarkable and unacceptable that we demand it in other parts of our medical practice but not this one.</para>
<para>For many Australians, private specialist care is increasingly the only timely option. In many parts of Australia, public waitlist times for specialists are now stretching from months into years. Fifty specialities across our major cities have public waiting times of longer than a year. For a child in regional Australia who needs to see a paediatrician, waitlist times are between 18 months and four years.</para>
<para>We need a market for specialist medical care that works. Price is part of the story. Patients should be able to compare prices before they arrive at a consultation. GPs should know what specialists charge. Specialist fees in turn need to be fair, transparent, reasonable and proportionate. That's why I'm pleased to see the government legislating reform to the Medical Costs Finder website. Just to remind the House: in 2019 the Morrison government spent $24 million on a tool to give Australians a way of understanding the cost of specialist services before they committed to their care. The website relied on voluntary fee disclosure, and it was a profound failure. Of approximately 11,000 eligible specialists, only seven chose to publish their fees by the end of 2022. The price transparency tool was, in effect, entirely devoid of prices. Three years later, only 88 doctors had voluntarily disclosed their fee information; that represents a participation rate which rounds down to zero.</para>
<para>The website did contain some useful aggregate data about average out-of-pocket costs for consultations across different specialities and about bulk-billing rates by speciality. At least half a million patients have used the site since its launch, but its central purpose—helping patients to understand what their doctor will charge them—has never been realised. Voluntary disclosure will always reflect a self-selected cohort of the most competitively priced practitioners. It will therefore present a skewed picture that further disadvantages consumers.</para>
<para>So, in 2025, this government invested another $7 million to deliver the technological capacity to analyse Medicare, hospital and insurer data. This bill now legislates those changes by amending the Health Insurance Act and the Private Health Insurance Act to allow the department to publish information about doctors and their billings, including the use of gap cover arrangements with insurers.</para>
<para>It will also allow publication of information about healthcare facilities and insurers, including the proportion of policy holders who experience different gap cover arrangements and the out-of-pocket costs associated. That data already exists—it's in Medicare—but this bill allows Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data to be published cumulatively, helping patients make informed decisions and allowing them to compare costs against the fees charged by other doctors.</para>
<para>But I'm still concerned that the bill as drafted is not going to deliver on its stated objective. The EM for the bill proposes that the data presented will be a single figure against the medical practitioner's provision of a service. We've been told that the department is going to develop an analytical approach for the derivation of that figure, but we have no visibility into the derivation of that fee. A price which might be brought down by discounting for some but not all consumers could give an inappropriately low cost point on the website, and the complexity of billing practices could well render the interpretation of fee schedules quite challenging for many individuals.</para>
<para>It doesn't matter what the cost of the service is if you still can't afford it. To be effective, the Medical Costs Finder has to put downward pressure on specialist fees. As it's drafted, the single fee given will be a static snapshot of the previous year's charges. That figure needs to be updated more regularly if we're truly to drive prices down. While I recognise that price is an important metric, high-quality medical services can't be adequately qualified or quantified by a simplistic price comparison tool. There is a common misconception that doctors who charge more provide better quality care. As a medical specialist of 30 years standing, I know this to be untrue. While this bill is an important step in informed decision-making, it doesn't contemplate the publication of quality markers. Publication of complication rates, readmission or patient-reported outcomes could well support patient safety and more informed decision-making, and that's been used with success in other jurisdictions.</para>
<para>But, by addressing the structural drivers of the increasing cost, we're still not driving care. We know that the Medicare Benefits Schedule has not been appropriately indexed for years, nor has it meaningfully kept pace with inflation. During that time, wage and equipment costs—and increasingly restrictive private health insurance policies—have shifted the cost burden from Medicare onto the consumer. Fee transparency will reveal the size of the gap, but it cannot of itself close it. If the underlying cause is a Medicare rebate which is frozen in real terms while operating costs escalate, publishing fees will tell patients how bad the problem is, but will not equip them to solve it.</para>
<para>The government has to consider other policy levers to manage the cost-of-care crisis. I'm proposing two to this House. The first is Medicare rebates. The second is workforce. Medicare rebates have long been underindexed. That has driven higher out-of-pocket costs. The schedule should undergo ongoing review, and it should more accurately reflect the cost of care. At the same time, we should ensure that no specialists are engaging in excessive or exploitative billing.</para>
<para>The bill does not address the ongoing maldistribution of specialist supply. Specialist billing has actually fallen by 10 per cent over the last five years, while the Australian population has grown by more than seven per cent. Doctors charge based on the competition in the areas in which they work. People living in areas with fewer doctors, like those in regional areas, face higher fees. You can't comparison-shop for a specialist if there isn't one in your region. The inadequacy of training positions in multiple specialities has been repeatedly identified by inquiries and studies. Australia needs to ensure that we are producing a pipeline of doctors able to provide the services required.</para>
<para>The existing Health Workforce Taskforce is not designed for or tasked with development of the national workforce strategic directions and priorities. Because health regulation operates at a state and territory level, new initiatives must be legislated in multiple jurisdictions. This deficiency has been identified by a number of inquiries, including the Snowball Review, the 2017 Accreditation Systems Review and most recently the 2022 to 2031 National Medical Workforce Strategy, which called for creation of joint medical workforce planning and advisory structures with sufficient authority and expertise to make recommendations in relation to the size and structure of the national medical workforce. I have long argued for national coordination of specialist training positions.</para>
<para>This bill also addresses a second systemic issue in the healthcare system—the practice known as product phoenixing—wherein private health insurers close the product and then reopen identical one at a higher price or reduce the value of that product. Insurers will be required to seek ministerial approval for premiums on new products and for changes that reduce cover or the value of existing products. The issue with this is that we have seen, as was demonstrated by CHOICE just this week, that the price of many private health insurance packages, particularly of a gold level, has increased well beyond the level of inflation despite the measures that the government believes that it has put in place to keep those costs in line.</para>
<para>This bill doesn't compel any reduction in specialist fees. It doesn't cap gap payments. It doesn't require bulk-billing by specialists. It doesn't mandate that the information displayed on the website is presented in a way that will be genuinely comprehensible to patients with low health literacy. And with only $7 million allocated for its implementation against the $24 million already spent on the failed initial model, questions about platform quality and data integration are legitimate.</para>
<para>The voluntary Medical Costs Finder was an expensive policy fiction. It was a website that looked like transparency but delivered almost none. Moving to mandatory publication of data that the government already holds, it would appear to be a straightforward correction of a structural error. But it would be a mistake to allow this bill to serve as a substitute for the deeper and bigger reform that the specialist market requires—meaningful Medicare rebate indexation, regulation of those extreme fee outliers, expansion of public specialist clinic capacity and genuine workforce planning tied to community need.</para>
<para>Australians deserve a healthcare system that is accessible, affordable and genuinely centred on patients. With those principles in mind and without declining to give this bill a second reading, I commend this bill to the House, and I move amendments (1) to (4) in my name:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) while the government is advancing broader economic and health reforms, out-of-pocket costs of receiving specialist medical care continue to rise in a way that exacerbates cost-of-living pressures;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) consumer price indexation figures show that 'medical and hospital services' increased by 4.2 per cent in the 12 months to January 2026, outpacing headline inflation;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) medical and hospital services should be non-discretionary items, however costs have resulted in approximately one million Australians missing out or delaying specialist care every year; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) while the measures in this Bill will improve price transparency, further reforms are needed to keep specialist healthcare affordable for all Australians, including fixing specialist billing practices, extending Medicare rebates across specialists, indexing Medicare rebates in line with inflation and reviewing gap fee limits".</para></quote>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>201906</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the amendment seconded?</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Chaney</name>
    <name.id>300006</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BRISKEY</name>
    <name.id>263427</name.id>
    <electorate>Maribyrnong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Before I get underway with my contribution to this really important piece of legislation, I'd like to correct the member for Lyne on some of the issues that she raised in her contribution a little earlier this afternoon. The member raised some important issues around the potential of a reclassification of important eye injections and the potential for that to lead to out-of-pocket costs for patients. I'm pleased to correct the member for Lyne and to reassure her constituents that that is not the case. In fact, a couple of weeks ago, the Albanese Labor government announced that it would not be moving ahead with those changes and decided not to reclassify those special eye injections as out-of-hospital services, protecting the out-of-pocket costs for patients. Minister Butler said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">After reviewing and listening to the views of older Australians, we will no longer be proceed with the change so people can continue with their existing arrangements with their existing clinician and won't see an increase in their out-of-pocket costs.</para></quote>
<para>So I hope that the member for Lyne is able to take that really good information and news back to her electorate. It's just another example of how this Albanese Labor government is delivering for every Australian.</para>
<para>Australians are rightly proud of Medicare. It has shaped the public's understanding of health care in this country as a system that is grounded in fairness, transparency and access based on need. Many Australians reasonably expect those same principles to apply under the broader health sector, including when they engage with the private health system. But, in practice, that expectation is not always met. In my community, people tell me the same story in different ways. They do the right thing. They take out private health insurance to protect their family, to shorten waiting times where they can and to have options when life throws a curveball. But too often that promise of security is undermined by opaque pricing, fragmented information and practices that feel like the rules are written for everyone except the consumer.</para>
<para>Australia's health system is one of our great achievements. Medicare is its foundation—a guarantee that essential care is available regardless of income. But most Australians move between public and private services across their lives. When those parts of the system work together well, patients benefit. When they do not, people are left juggling referrals, deciphering bills and making decisions without the basic information any reasonable person would expect. This bill addresses two problems that are widely felt and are long overdue for action. First, it tackles the lack of transparency around fees and out-of-pocket costs. Second, it strengthens oversight of private health insurance premiums and ends the practice known as product phoenixing.</para>
<para>On transparency, let's be frank about the current experience. A person receives a referral to a specialist. They book an appointment, sometimes weeks away. They may not be told the fee until the day of, or they may be given an estimate that is impossible to verify. If the specialist recommends a procedure, the patient then has to piece together separate quotes—surgeon, anaesthetist, assistant, hospital fees—often while they are anxious, in pain or caring for a loved one. Too many only learn the full cost after the decision has effectively been made. That is not informed choice; it is consent under pressure. The consequences are real. Unexpected bills can force families to dip into savings, postpone other essentials or take on debt. Some delay care because they cannot risk the cost. Others go ahead and simply hope that they can cope later. Either way, uncertainty becomes a barrier to health.</para>
<para>This bill takes a clear approach: transparency by default. It enables publication of meaningful, comparable information about fees and typical out-of-pocket costs for common medical services. Crucially, it does this by better using data already collected through Medicare, hospitals and insurers. The point is not to create a new burden for clinicians or drown the sector in paperwork. The point is to unlock the value of information that the government already holds and put it to work for the people it ultimately belongs to—the patients.</para>
<para>With better information in the public domain, Australians will be able to see how fees vary for common services, what gap arrangements are in place and what they are likely to pay. That will help people ask smarter questions: Is there a no gap option? What will my insurer cover? What are the alternatives? It will help people understand whether a quote is within a typical range or whether it is an outlier that warrants further conversation. This is not about naming and shaming practitioners; it's about equipping patients. Most clinicians already communicate well and charge fairly. Transparency will support them by lifting the overall standards and reducing the confusion that too often sits between patient and provider. For those doing the right thing, it's a trust builder.</para>
<para>The bill also recognises that a patient's bill is not determined by one person alone. Out-of-pocket costs are shaped by the broader arrangements that sit behind the scenes between hospitals and insurers and between insurers and providers. Consumers deserve to know what arrangements exist, what they cover and how they affect the final cost. That is why this bill provides for the publication of information about hospitals and insurers as well: who provides services where, what arrangements are in place and how those arrangements influence what the patient pays. It helps Australians see the system as it operates, not as it is marketed.</para>
<para>Of course, transparency must be done properly. Data must be accurate, timely and presented in plain language. It must be contextualised, so it's meaningful and not misleading. It must protect privacy and uphold confidentiality. This bill modernises the relevant legislative frameworks for data sharing and safeguards so those disclosures can occur responsibly. Transparency is the first pillar of consumer confidence. Fairness is the second.</para>
<para>This brings me to premiums and product phoenixing. Australians understand that premiums change. They know costs can rise as demand increases and medical practice evolves. What they expect, quite reasonably, is that premium changes are subject to constant scrutiny and that insurers cannot game the system by changing labels. Product phoenixing has damaged trust because it looks and feels like a workaround. An insurer closes a product and replaces it with one that is substantially similar but more expensive or less valuable. The change can avoid the scrutiny that would normally apply to premium increases. Consumers can be shifted with limited notice and limited clarity. For many, the practical ability to compare or move is constrained by time, health needs or the fear of losing continuity. For the policy holder, the technical distinction between an old product and a new product is beside the point. If they are paying more for the same cover or receiving less for the same premium, the impact is the same.</para>
<para>This bill closes that loophole. It strengthens the premium approval framework by requiring approval not only for the changes of premiums on existing products but also for the premiums associated with new products and for the changes that reduce coverage, benefits or conditions. That is an important shift because it recognises that value can be eroded in ways that are not captured by price alone. This bill does not stop insurers from improving products or responding to changing circumstances. It does not freeze the market, but it does require that significant changes, whether to price or value, are transparent and assessed against public interest.</para>
<para>It also formalises key aspects of the premium approval process that had previously been administrative, and it introduces a legislative application period. It also clarifies how further information can be requested, sets out resubmission processes, applies a public interest test and provides for appropriate delegation of decision-making. Those details are important because they create predictability for industry and accountability for consumers, strengthening the integrity of decisions that affect millions of households.</para>
<para>The bigger issue here is trust. Private health insurance relies on a social contract. People pay now to protect themselves later. They accept that they are joining a pool, sharing risk and funding care that they may never personally use. This only works when consumers believe the system is understandable, honest and regulated in their interest. When people feel blindsided by fees, confused by gaps or trapped by product changes that seem designed to evade scrutiny, that trust frays. People disengage. They downgrade. Some leave altogether. That is not good for families, not good for private hospitals and providers, and not good for the public system that then carries more demand.</para>
<para>This bill strengthens the social contract in a sensible way. It does not set fees. It does not pretend that health care is a simple retail transaction. What it does is make the system easier to navigate for ordinary Australians, giving people the information that they need while ensuring that the rules governing premiums and products operate transparently and fairly.</para>
<para>This bill reflects a fundamental difference in approach. On this side of the House we believe Medicare must remain the foundation of our health system, with private health insurance working alongside it through transparency and fairness, not confusion or hidden costs. Those opposite have often and for too long sought to weaken Medicare while relying on a less regulated private system that shifts costs between patients, risking a drift toward a model where access depends on what you can afford. This government rejects that direction. This bill ensures that private health insurance strengthens Medicare by improving transparency, by closing loopholes like product phoenixing and by putting fairness back at the centre of our health system. It will also help local providers demonstrate the value they deliver and compete on openness and patient experience, not just reputation. That is why stronger premium oversight is so important.</para>
<para>For a young family, it means fewer nasty surprises when a child needs specialist care. For older Australians, it means more certainty when planning for procedures and managing fixed incomes. For people with chronic illness, it means clearer expectations and an ability to budget over time. For small-business owners and the self-employed, it means making decisions with a better handle on what they are likely paying. It will also support the many clinicians and providers who already prioritise clear communication. When transparency is the norm, it reinforces the professionalism that patients rely on.</para>
<para>Implementation will matter, and it absolutely should be done in partnership. We should work with clinicians, hospitals, insurers and consumer advocates to ensure published information is useful and fair. We should monitor impacts carefully to ensure transparency improves decision-making and does not create unintended distortions. We should be honest about what success looks like—fewer unexpected bills, better comparisons, stronger consumer protections and a system that feels more transparent to the people who fund it.</para>
<para>Australians should not need to be experts in item numbers, gap schedules and the fine print to protect their families. They should not discover the true cost of care only after they've had to commit to it. They should not see their insurance product re-emerge under a new name at a higher price without proper scrutiny. This bill responds to those expectations. It complements Medicare's universal foundation by improving transparency and accountability in the private system. It empowers patients with clearer, comparable information. It strengthens consumer protection by ending product phoenixing and applying consistent oversight to meaningful changes in price and value, and it further embeds fairness in our healthcare system. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr SCAMPS</name>
    <name.id>299623</name.id>
    <electorate>Mackellar</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. This bill is about clear, transparent and accurate information for people making decisions about their health. The purpose of this bill is to improve fee transparency for consumers by allowing the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish information on medical fees charged by medical practitioners on the Medical Costs Finder website and to abolish product phoenixing in the private health insurance sector.</para>
<para>Product phoenixing is the practice of closing existing policies and replacing them with almost identical policies at a higher price. This bill would ensure that private health insurers are required to seek ministerial approval for new products and for existing products where certain changes are proposed. The bill has been welcomed by both the Australian Medical Association and Private Healthcare Australia, as it gives the consumer greater visibility of fees and out-of-pocket costs, which will help them to compare options and make informed choices about their health care.</para>
<para>I support these steps that improve choice and transparency for consumers. However, without a single independent steward to oversee and regulate the private health insurance sector, these gains won't stick. Private health insurance is a vital part of our health system. It works to take pressure off our public health system. The government's private hospital financial health check confirms how vital that capacity is. Private hospitals deliver around 70 per cent of elective surgeries and more than 40 per cent of all hospitalisations. Over 12 million Australians are insured for hospital treatment. Keeping these services accessible depends on funding settings that reward care, stabilise contracting and support the workforce that makes care possible.</para>
<para>My electorate of Mackellar has one of the highest rates of private health insurance in the country, with around 77 per cent of people aged 18 or over having private hospital cover and 83 per cent having ancillary cover. To break it down a bit further, this amounts to over 22,000 individuals and around 92,000 families with hospital cover, and over 25,000 individuals and over 98,000 families with ancillary cover.</para>
<para>The average age of people with private health cover on the Northern Beaches is 63. Here lies one part of the problem. More than 50 per cent of patients admitted to hospital on the Northern Beaches for surgeries are aged 65 to 84 years of age. Whilst it is a huge benefit for older members to rightly use their private cover to get elective surgery done sooner, when they make up a larger share of the pool, funds face more hospital claims. This in turn drives higher system-wide costs and cross-subsidy needs, which in turn feed into higher premiums. The consequence is that this hits the price-sensitive younger households first, risking people downgrading their policy cover or dropping out altogether, which puts more demand on the public system.</para>
<para>The Australian Medical Association's annualprivate health insurance report card, which was released in December last year, describes a private health insurance system that is under pressure. It describes the system as 'increasingly failing to deliver value for money for consumers' and 'no longer fit for purpose'. The AMA has called for greater whole-of-system reform to align with our changing health needs. This includes ensuring that private health insurance delivers value for consumers in terms of meeting an individual's health needs, as well as those of an ageing population with increasing chronic disease and multimorbidity.</para>
<para>Around 6.4 million hospitalisations per annum, or 55 per cent of the total, are due to chronic disease, which costs around $82 billion a year. So we need to ensure private health insurance aligns with this increase in chronic disease in Australia, which makes up 85 per cent of our burden of disease. If private health insurance products are designed mainly around episodic acute interventions and not around the growing burden of chronic illness and multimorbidity, then the system will increasingly fail the population it is supposed to serve. We need product settings and payment models that support continuity, rehabilitation, mental health care and multidisciplinary management, not just narrow episodes of care.</para>
<para>When premiums rise year after year, faster than inflation, wages, health inflation and the indexation of the Medicare Benefits Schedule, consumers notice. They notice because their direct debit gets larger, while the benefit they receive feels smaller. The AMA's <inline font-style="italic">Private health insurance report card</inline><inline font-style="italic"> 2025</inline> put it plainly. Every year since 2008, premium growth has outstripped the consumer price index as well as health sector inflation, average weekly earnings and Medicare Benefits Schedule indexation. That is not a sustainable proposition for households already under cost-of-living pressure.</para>
<para>The impact of that pressure is now visible across the system. We are seeing more Australians hold health insurance products that do not give meaningful security when they actually need that care. By June 2025, there were 640,000 more policies than five years earlier, yet the number of gold-tier policies had fallen by 360,000. This shows people are downgrading to cheaper products that exclude important services. This is not consumer choice in its fullest sense; it is consumers being priced into lesser cover, and we know what that means in practice. Gold cover is the tier that guarantees no-wait access to services such as maternity, psychiatric care and many joint replacements. When people are pushed out of gold cover, it means women and families can lose confidence that private cover will deliver maternity care when they need it. It means people needing mental health care can find that the policy that they have paid for does not give timely access. It means older Australians who have paid premiums for years can discover that their cover has narrowed just as their health needs become more complex.</para>
<para>The AMA has warned that product phoenixing has made this especially acute in gold-tier cover, where new customers can end up paying hundreds more for effectively the same product. This is why I welcome the bill's action on product phoenixing. It closes an obvious loophole. It says that, if an insurer wants to bring out a new product or materially alter an existing one, that change should not escape proper public interest scrutiny. This bill is therefore necessary and overdue.</para>
<para>But banning one bad practice does not by itself fix the deeper structural weaknesses in the system. One of those deeper weaknesses is: where is the money going? Over the six years to June 2025, insurers increased benefits paid for in-hospital treatment by only 18.1 per cent. At the same time, sector profits grew by nearly 50 per cent over that period. The latest quarterly figures cited by the Australian Private Hospitals Association show the benefit payout ratio at 86.3 per cent at December 2025. That is still short of the 90 per cent level that the health minister has repeatedly said should be the benchmark the sector works towards.</para>
<para>Another structural problem is that there is no single fit-for-purpose independent steward responsible for the overall functioning of the private health system. We do, of course, have regulation. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, APRA, has an important role around licensing and supervising insurers, setting and enforcing capital solvency, governance and risk management requirements, as well as collecting and publishing industry statistics. The Private Health Insurance Ombudsman has a consumer complaints and information role. The health department administers premium approvals and policy settings. But no one body has the mandate to do a number of other things, including overseeing the interaction between insurers, hospitals and medical practitioners; setting the baseline expectations for contracting; monitoring whether products are delivering real value; or advising government on whole-of-system reform before problems become crises. The AMA has been making this point consistently and has called for an independent private health system authority to fill that gap.</para>
<para>The AMA has warned that selective contracting and no-gap arrangements between private health insurers and doctors may constrain patient pathways. It can affect a patient's choice of doctor and hospital, and can interfere with clinical autonomy. When there is no independent umpire setting fair rules and minimum standards, the bargaining imbalance between insurers and providers can ultimately be felt by patients. That's why an independent private health system authority is needed. It would not replace APRA's prudential role nor duplicate the ombudsman's consumer role. It would be tasked with better regulating and having appropriate oversight of the private health system, including: providing independent, evidence based advice to government; driving reforms that deliver value for customers that meet a person's health needs and the needs of an ageing population with increasing chronic disease and multimorbidity; and also conducting ongoing reviews and continual alignment of all private health system policy levers. Its role would include: overseeing contracting arrangements across insurers, hospitals and medical practitioners; recommending and setting standard terms and conditions for fair dealing and transparency; monitoring value for money and pay-out performance across the sector; and publishing system-wide indicators on affordability, coverage and access. This is the kind of stewardship a public health system that integrates private health insurers into it requires. But the authority should not stand alone. It should sit alongside concrete reforms that deal with the immediate pressures consumers and providers are facing right now.</para>
<para>First, there is a strong case for a legislated minimum benefit payout ratio. The federal minister for health wants to see at least 90 per cent of premiums returned to consumers as benefits. The major private hospital peak bodies, the Australian Private Hospitals Association and Catholic Health Australia, recently publicly backed that principle as part of a package to restore sustainability, arguing that returning to 90 per cent would inject around $1.2 billion a year into hospitals and health services.</para>
<para>Second, we need fair contracting rules. APRA and CHA have called for a mandatory code of conduct for insurer-hospital contracting, overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, to improve transparency, consistency and fair terms. Whether that code is housed directly under the ACCC or developed in concert with the new independent authority, the principle is sound. There must be clearer rules set so that opaque contracting disputes do not keep destabilising hospitals, eroding services and limiting patient choice.</para>
<para>Third, transparency needs to extend beyond fee publication alone. Private Healthcare Australia has backed stronger Medical Costs Finder laws and has also argued for stronger protections against surprise billing, including clearer informed financial consent and consequences where patients are not properly informed of charges in advance. This complements the AMA's position that the public deserves the full picture of what specialists charge, what Medicare pays and what insurers contribute. Consumers need all three pieces of information together.</para>
<para>If health insurance is unaffordable and people leave the system, the pressure does not stay with the private market. It lands in public hospitals, in emergency departments, in elective surgery queues and, ultimately, on taxpayers. Preserving a strong private system is not about privileging one sector over another; it's about protecting the mixed model that allows our entire health system to function.</para>
<para>This bill deserves support. Publishing more accurate fee and rebate information on the Medical Costs Finder and closing down product phoenixing are sensible and necessary reforms. Both have been welcomed by key sector voices and both should pass. But parliament should not mistake this bill for a complete reform agenda. The evidence is clear—if we are serious about protecting patient choice, keeping private care accessible and preventing spillover into the public system, then we need the next step as well: an independent private health system authority, backed by a legislated 90 per cent minimum payout ratio; fair contracting rules; stronger surprise-billing protections; and product reform that reflects the realities of chronic disease and an ageing population.</para>
<para>I commend this bill to the House and I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That all words after "whilst" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) since 2008, average private health insurance premium growth has exceeded inflation, average weekly earnings and Medicare Benefits Schedule indexation;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) over the six years to June 2025, insurers' benefits for in-hospital treatment rose only 18.1 per cent, while sector profits grew by nearly 50 per cent in the same period;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the current benefit payout ratio is still below the Federal Health Minister's 90 per cent benchmark; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) there are no standard terms and conditions for private health insurers' 'no-gap' and 'known-gap' contracts with doctors; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) calls on the Government to establish an independent Private Health System Authority to better regulate, review and oversee the private health system, to ensure value for consumers and that Australians' changing health needs are met".</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>295588</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the amendment seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Boele</name>
    <name.id>26417</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes. I second the amendment and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GEORGANAS</name>
    <name.id>DZY</name.id>
    <electorate>Adelaide</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak today on this very important bill. I support the introduction and passage of the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. It is a very important bill when it comes to the transparency of our private health insurers. Improving transparency assists the consumer. It ensures that transparency is there, and it gives confidence in the system and confidence in the private health legislation area.</para>
<para>A key concern for Australians across the nation is the cost of health insurance. Many of us speak to many constituents. Not a day goes by without people coming to see me about a whole range of issues, and we get on to health care. One of the things raised, especially by elderly Australians, is that they tighten their belts to ensure that they have private health cover. Therefore, when people are doing it tough, as they are at the moment, it's really important that there is real transparency when consumers are purchasing a health insurance product or using health insurance services. As I said, right now Australians are doing it tough, so it's really important for this transparency to be in place. That's why this bill is very important. It's something that provides that transparency and assists the confidence of the consumer.</para>
<para>Health costs have risen recently, along with the costs of many other things. While this government has made the largest investment in strengthening Medicare, opening many after-hours urgent care clinics and ensuring there are more doctors bulk-billing, we know that Australians still have to deal with the different healthcare practices that exist.</para>
<para>Many years ago, when you took out health cover, it was pretty straightforward. You took out cover, and it would cover you for a whole range of things, whether it was a hospital stay, doctors, specialists or operations. For the last 20-odd years, we've seen the development of health insurance products diverge into a whole range of different products, from extras and excesses to certain procedures. If you want to make the choice not to be covered, it can be there, bringing down your costs. Or, if you take all the whistles and all the beaut things that go with them, that will make the cost even higher.</para>
<para>When receiving private health cover, the last thing Australians want is to be slammed by ballooning out-of-pocket charges in an already extremely complicated private health insurance system. Likewise, no family wants to have insurers sneakily substitute their services for more expensive products. In other words, they don't want to see a service morphing into a different product—which is really the same old product—and pay more for it. They don't want to see out-of-pocket fees skyrocket at each new renewal of the policy or at each new visit that they have with a doctor. It's simply more stress that the everyday family, parent or student, or whoever it is, has to bear when we see increasing costs in private health cover.</para>
<para>Australians want and demand transparency on the fees that are charged to consumers and protection against any dodgy practices, and so should we as legislators. The Australian public certainly want an assurance that the cost of their health care won't saddle them with debt that they cannot manage. Australians deserve access to quality medical advice at the best value that they can find. That's also why this Albanese Labor government is committed to improving the quality of transparency in the area of private health insurance, and that's what we're delivering today with this bill.</para>
<para>The bill provides a series of considered measures that allow Australians to access information on healthcare costs and closes what are called product phoenixing loopholes. In other words, you're offering different products, perhaps as a health insurer, and you then write to all your customers and say, 'At the renewal of this policy, this particular product that you have on your insurance policy will cease to exist, but we offer this product, which is similar but much better.' The reality is that sometimes it's just a sneaky way of increasing the premium by keeping the same product, tinkering with the edges of it and saying, 'It's a brand new product and we're charging a different price for it.' This bill is going to stop the phoenixing product loopholes.</para>
<para>The bill will also allow people to compare costs between medical practitioners and the insurers that they deal with, see details on how they utilise their gap over arrangements and see how practitioner fees change between locations. With the passage of the bill, the Australian public will be able to find fees for every single medical practitioner and they'll be able to locate the out-of-pocket costs for common medical procedures on the Medical Costs Finder website. That's important information for health consumers. After all, when we do go in for a procedure, to see a specialist or to go to the hospital, we want to know what it will cost.</para>
<para>There's no other product that we purchase as consumers where we don't know what the upfront cost is. It just doesn't make sense that we shouldn't have the same information available for health products. If you're going to the hospital, you should know what it's going to cost you at the end of the day and be able to make a comparison with other hospitals, doctors, specialists or other places that are offering this procedure so you can make a choice. If it is dearer, you want to know why a particular product is dearer than another product. That is what this bill is all about. It's about being able to find the fees for every medical practitioner and locate those out-of-pocket costs for common medical procedures on the Medical Costs Finder website.</para>
<para>The government will also publish information about which medical practitioners provide services at each hospital's facilities and which insurers have contracting arrangements with these facilities. For example, if you're going in for a procedure at a hospital, you'll find that the surgeon who's performing the procedure usually has an arrangement with particular hospitals for certain costs. If you don't actually get that information upfront, you could be going to a hospital that your surgeon does not have an arrangement with and they decide to charge you more, or the hospital charges you more, than normal. So I think it's really important that that information is made public, that everyone knows. Now, most doctors, or surgeons, are pretty good; when you go and see them, they'll tell you: 'I operate at XYZ hospitals'—make a choice out of two or three—'That's where I've got an arrangement, and that'll be the lowest cost for you.' But it's not up to them to tell you—they don't have to at this point. This will make it possible for the consumer to know exactly what they're up for.</para>
<para>This bill seeks to close the ability for insurers to engage, as I said, in product phoenixing loopholes as well—loopholes that allow the insurer to replace those existing products with similar new products at a higher premium. I explained that a little bit earlier, where you've got a product and you just decline to offer it at the next renewal of the policy and say, 'We now don't offer that product, but we offer this one'—which is exactly the same. It's just a phoenixing method and an increase in the cost, because it's a roundabout way of increasing the cost without having to go through the proper procedures, where nine out of 10 times they may be told that they can't increase it. These loopholes allow the insurer to replace existing products with similar ones at a higher premium. Not only is this behaviour reducing consumer confidence in private health care; it's also raising the cost paid by the average consumer. And, as I said earlier, some people are doing it really tough. They're tightening their belt on other things, like food, holidays et cetera, just to make sure that they keep their private health cover going.</para>
<para>This bill will amend the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to require an insurer to seek ministerial approval for premiums for a proposed new product or for changes that reduce that cover. In addition to this, we're passing the modernisation changes for all premium approvals, making sure that this legislation is comprehensive and fit for purpose. Together, these measures are intended to reduce cost-of-living pressures on Australians and increase the transparency of the private healthcare system. The changes will help Australians find the best-value care, and it will improve coverage from insurance premiums by preventing those insurer loopholes.</para>
<para>The government have not brought this legislation in just on their own. They've consulted far and wide to ensure that they get this right. Services Australia, the Attorney-General's Department, the Office of Parliamentary Counsel—each had no concerns with the execution of this bill. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, the private health insurance ombudsman and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have also helped further refine and assist with the implementation of this legislation. The AMA, Private Healthcare Australia, Members Health Fund Alliance and numerous consumer peak bodies support these measures. So we can be confident Australians will benefit from the clarity, transparency and peace of mind provided by these changes.</para>
<para>These are changes that'll help in seeking the best value medical advice and instil confidence in private health insurers by outlawing that product phoenixing, which is just a sneaky way of increasing the premiums. It has been used, and there was evidence of that. Simply, this government is ensuring that Australians can make informed decisions about their healthcare team and ensure that private insurers act in good faith with their members—yet another way we've delivered on our election promise of a fairer and more transparent health system.</para>
<para>We're helping medical practitioners too by automatically uploading their Medicare, hospital and insurer billing information to the Medical Costs Finder website, which will be a trove of information. This information, which is already collected by the government, will allow us to expand the variety of medical practitioners and out-of-pocket insurance costs accessible on the website—that'll be immediate. We know that the cost of medical and hospital services is a key driver of health inflation for consumers. These costs feed directly into the cost of out-of-pocket treatment and higher private health premiums from insurance companies. By outlawing product phoenixing by insurers, we can be confident that we can provide transparency and predictability to price increases created by private insurance agencies.</para>
<para>This bill intends to give Australians confidence that their coverage will remain the same and ensure that insurers cannot continue to find sneaky ways of increasing their premiums—which, in the end, is no different to ripping off the everyday Australian consumer. For proposed new products and changes, the government will require that the insurance providers seek and receive approval before passing the cost on to consumers—so there will be ministerial approval. Someone will look at the product that is the new product, and the new prices on the product, and it will not be allowed if it's just a phoenixing product—in other words, a similar product tinkering with the edges, getting rid of the old product and saying, 'Now you have only this choice and we have to increase the premium.'</para>
<para>On top of this, the bill requires no additional administrative burden on medical practitioners—none whatsoever. The cost of the specialist care varies widely. As we know, when costs increase Australians lose. With access to pricing information, we'll be able to arm the Australian health consumer with the knowledge that they are finding the best quality health care at the best price they can get. We can also safeguard Australians from insurers' little secret price increases that are adding to the cost of private health cover. The legislation corrects this issue by preventing insurers from making meaningless product substitutions; instead, insurers can make submissions to the minister to request a change that decreases overall cover or even increases overall cover—but at what price? That's what they'll be looking at. This legislation is absolutely crucial, and I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SPENDER</name>
    <name.id>286042</name.id>
    <electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to support the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. One of the things Australians are most proud of is our healthcare system. We value a system that ensures everyone can access the care they need through Medicare, through bulk-billing and through a network of high-quality public hospitals delivering world-class treatment. But Australia has many other aspects to its incredible Medicare system, and this bill deals with two that are of critical importance—the private health insurance part of the healthcare system, and our specialists.</para>
<para>Private health insurance is a crucial part of our system and of our balance. It works alongside Medicare to give people greater choice, to relieve pressure on the public system and to ensure that we can sustain a mixed model of care into the future. When it is working well, it supports timely access to treatment, greater flexibility and choice for patients, and better outcomes across the system as a whole. But, for that to remain true, Australians need to have confidence in it—confidence that it is transparent, that it offers real value and that it is supporting, not undermining, the broader healthcare system.</para>
<para>On specialists, I'm delighted that in Wentworth we have some of the best specialists and healthcare providers in the country. But increasingly I hear from constituents that while care is available from specialists it's not always accessible, because costs are unclear, unpredictable and sometimes unaffordable. In a cost-of-living crisis, this matters to people. It can be the difference between accessing care and choosing not to book an appointment, or it can have a tangible impact on daily decisions about spending and family accounting. This matters. While for some a referral to a specialist may be urgent, for others it may be preventive. If the price is prohibitive, this may discourage patients from accessing the preventive care tests and treatment they may need. This can have significant impacts on their health months, years or decades down the line. This is one of the core problems this bill seeks to address.</para>
<para>Right now, a patient will often go to their GP, receive a referral to a particular specialist and simply assume that it is appropriate or the only option, but what they are not told—and often can't easily find out—is how that specialist's fees compare to others. Right now, a patient will often go to their GP, receive a referral to a particular specialist and simply assume that it is appropriate or the only option, but what they are not told—and often can't easily find out—is how that specialist's fees compare to others. Many patients feel uncomfortable raising costs with their GP, even where there is strong trust. They may hesitate to speak openly about their financial situation or worry that asking about fees could be questioning a referral to a high-quality specialist. Two specialists with similar qualifications, experience and expertise can charge very different fees. There are often valid reasons for that, but it is not fair that patients making decisions about their health care don't have access to that information.</para>
<para>Health care is one of the most important decisions a person will make, yet, unlike almost every other part of our economy, we do not equip consumers with the tools to compare price, understand value and make informed choices. We know the consequences of that. In 2024-25, around 8.6 per cent of Australians, more than 800,000 people, delayed or missed specialist care because of cost. That is not just a statistic; that is people putting off essential care because they do not know how much it will cost them. This bill begins to change that.</para>
<para>Now to what this bill does. Schedule 1 introduces a transparency-by-default model. It amends the Health Insurance Act and Private Health Insurance Act to allow the department to publish clear comparable information on medical fees and expected out-of-pocket costs. Crucially, this information will no longer rely on voluntary participation. It will be drawn from existing databases—Medicare claims, hospital data and insurer billing data—and brought together to give consumers a clearer picture of the cost of their care. This means patients will be able to see in one place what different specialists charge for the same service, the likely out-of-pocket costs after Medicare and insurance, whether a doctor participates in gap-cover arrangements and where services are provided. It also enables publication of information about hospitals and insurers, including what policies cover, how gap arrangements work and how often patients face out-of-pocket costs. Importantly, this is done without publishing any patient information, so privacy is protected.</para>
<para>I'm glad this process will be done without requiring specialists to manually provide this information, instead using existing data. However, it is important that we continue to hear feedback from specialists as this process evolves to ensure that there's a smooth transition and that the data that is collected is actually an accurate representation of what is being offered to the patients. This reform will breathe new life into the Medical Costs Finder. We know that the current model hasn't worked. Despite a $24 million investment, only around one to two per cent of specialists have opted in to share their fees. This bill fixes that by making transparency systemic not optional.</para>
<para>I'm also supportive of the member for Kooyong's amendments, one of which seeks to use future data drawn from Medicare to provide upfront information about quality indicators—such as complication rates, readmission and patient reported outcomes—and information about whether procedures or specialists typically employ upfront or gap-cover arrangements. However, I believe this framework should only be available for the secretary to use when appropriate and alongside publication of relevant case complexity where relevant. This will ensure that it doesn't inadvertently discourage specialists from taking on more complex cases, which may carry higher readmission or complication rates regardless of the quality of care provided. This provides further information to consumers to better understand pricing arrangements and transparency regarding differences in prices, as higher prices do not always indicate higher quality outcomes. I'm also supportive of an amendment from the member for Kooyong which will ensure that the minister must update published information as soon as practicable if they become aware of a greater than 10 per cent reduction in the price of services over a three-month period.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 addresses another critical issue, the cost of private health insurance itself. Private health insurance covers more than 15 million Australians and represents a $30 billion industry but has also become increasingly complex and, in many cases, more expensive. One of the key issues has been product phoenixing, where insurers close an existing product and reopen a near-identical one at a higher price, avoiding the usual premium approval process. This bill closes that loophole. It requires insurers to seek ministerial approval not just for premium increases on existing products but also for new products and for changes that reduce coverage or value. It also formalises a premium approval process in legislation, introduces a clear application period and applies a public interest test to ensure the premium decisions are made with consumers in mind.</para>
<para>I appreciate that this is a good solution to solve a very difficult problem. I appreciate that there will be a public interest test for premium approval for new applications made by insurers within an approved application period and that there will be an allowance for the minister to delegate approval decisions but not refusal decisions. However, as is often the case when new regulatory requirements are introduced, I'll be watching closely to ensure that this does not slow down insurers' ability to bring new products and benefits to the markets.</para>
<para>We do not currently see from the government strong accountability when it comes to decision-making timelines. We do not see it from the government, from departments, from government agencies or from regulators, and that matters here. I do not have faith that we will see it in these instances, despite best intentions. That is why I am moving a second reading amendment in my name to address this. I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That all words after "not" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges that while the bill introduces important measures to improve transparency and accountability in the private health insurance system, these reforms rely on decisions made by the Minister or a delegated authority;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes the Government, regulators and agencies have not consistently demonstrated strong accountability in decision-making timeframes in recent years, including in areas such as environmental approvals and delays within the Administrative Review Tribunal;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises that delays in the approval or refusal of new or amended insurance products risk slowing the intended benefits of new products and may ultimately disadvantage Australians; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) calls on the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) establish and enforce clear timeframes within Schedule 2 of this legislation for decisions on new product applications from insurers, and to adhere to those timeframes in practice; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) establish and enforce clear timeframes across other government departments, regulators, and agencies to ensure that decisions are made in a timely way to allow businesses and Australians greater certainty of timeframe on government decisions".</para></quote>
<para>I really want to make the point that delays in approvals are not just administrative; they have real consequences. They can limit access to new or improved cover, reduce choice and ultimately disadvantage patients. So, while I support stronger oversight, it must be matched with timely, efficient decision-making, because, at the end of the day, when the system slows down, it is consumers who bear the costs.</para>
<para>I want to talk more broadly, particularly about my second reading amendment and about government timeframes for making decisions. This is an issue I see time and time again when I talk to members of my community and when I talk to businesses in my community. I see this when I talk to businesses trying to make large investment decisions. They approach the ATO about making sure that their investment decision is being covered in a particular way, and the ATO just doesn't get back to them, sometimes for 18 months or for two years. You can't run a business like that. I see this where people are applying for visas and where family members or businesses are trying to sponsor people to come to Australia. The timeframes are indicative of what the government would like to see, but, actually, they just aren't borne out by reality. That's not a fair way to deal with people. I see this in waiting times, sometimes for things like Services Australia. I see this in home-care packages where people are promised a home-care package and then don't get it delivered for a long period of time.</para>
<para>I see this in an area of government that drives me crazy, which is drones. I'm going to digress here because it's really important. Drones are a capability for the future, and, when we look at what is going on in the wars overseas right now, we need to recognise that drones are probably one of the most important defence capabilities we have. But we have in this country a system where approvals of innovative drones are really slow. That is not good enough.</para>
<para>The government—agencies and regulators—are not accountable for the timeframes of their decisions. Government is a monopoly. Government agencies and regulators are monopoly providers of services. They do not hold themselves accountable to businesses or consumers who rely on timely decisions and who often are afraid to push for more timely decisions, because they're scared that they're going to get a negative outcome. That is why putting everything back in the hands of the minister makes me nervous. What is the commitment of the minister to make timely decisions? What is the commitment of the government to ensure that this doesn't just slow down new products being offered to Australian consumers who need them?</para>
<para>To return to the key part of the bill, however, I do support the intention of the bill, which is that of practical reforms that will improve transparency, strengthen oversight and help restore confidence in the private health system. I just wish that this bill included something that committed the government to a timeframe in which to do its work. It is important that this oversight remains and that transparency remains. Again, I'm supportive of the member for Kooyong's amendment, which requires the minister to, after each financial year, call a review of applications for new product subgroups and changes made on premiums in order to keep parliamentary oversight of harmful private insurance practices front and centre.</para>
<para>But we should also be clear that this is not the end of the reform task. Transparency is essential, but transparency alone does not guarantee affordability. We still need to address the underlying drivers of rising healthcare costs. We need to ensure that rebates, gap arrangements and incentives are aligned with high-quality, accessible care and investment in prevention, and we need to ensure that private health insurance is delivering real value to Australians.</para>
<para>This bill lays some important foundations. It ensures that patients are no longer navigating the system in the dark and that they are equipped with more of the information they need to make informed decisions about their care. That is a fundamental principle of a fair and effective healthcare system. So, for those reasons, I commend this bill to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>295588</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the amendment seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Chaney</name>
    <name.id>300006</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the amendment and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FRANCE</name>
    <name.id>270198</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026. No-one here is surprised that many Aussies with private health insurance are paying more out-of-pocket costs and rising premiums and that many are considering dumping their private health cover as a result. For public or private patients seeing a private specialist, we know that the gap fees are equally daunting, with many having to pay hundreds in out-of-pocket fees for a single appointment. This translates to pressure on our public health system and longer waiting times to see a specialist for elective surgery and non-urgent procedures.</para>
<para>This bill is a step towards greater transparency of gap fees. It also puts a stop to phoenixing, where insurance companies suddenly shut down a policy and move consumers onto a new but almost identical policy at a higher cost or with less coverage. We know consumers are quite often shocked by the increase in their private health premiums at the start of a new financial year. That shock has eroded confidence in our private healthcare system. This bill is part of the Albanese Labor government's mission to strengthen our healthcare system and protect Medicare.</para>
<para>For the people I represent in Dickson and for families right across Australia, the cost of specialists and private health insurance have been growing issues discussed around kitchen tables around the country. They are line items in the family budget that, under those opposite, became harder and harder to predict and manage. When you need a timely specialist medical appointment or a procedure, it's only fair and reasonable that you also know the out-of-pocket costs of that treatment—how much you're going to pay when you wake up from that surgery. Patients want to be able to access care without experiencing bill shock, and many across the country have experienced that shock. This bill makes changes that will give patients the power to scrutinise the cost of specialist fees and make informed decisions about their health care and private health insurance. It is about ensuring that, when an Australian family chooses a specialist or a private health product, they can do so with their eyes wide open. This bill will do two incredibly important things: make cost transparency the default, not an option, and crack down on sneaky private health insurance product phoenixing.</para>
<para>To understand why this legislation is so vital, we should have a look at the mess we inherited. For nearly a decade, the previous government sat on its hands while out-of-pocket medical costs spiralled, particularly to see a specialist. Their solution was the Medical Costs Finder website, a project that became a textbook example of a taxpayer funded big, fat fail. The Morrison government spent $24 million setting up the Medical Costs Finder website. They said this website would display the cost of common medical services alongside the fees that individual specialists charge, and those specialists would voluntarily share their fees to the website—effectively asking them to dob themselves in. It was, of course, a truly epic fail. Out of 6,300 eligible specialists, how many do you think uploaded their fees in 2022? Six—not six per cent; six individual doctors. Three years later, that number had slowly crawled to 88 out of 6,300. Without mandatory reporting, this tool is effectively a multimillion dollar suggestion box that has failed to gain any real traction.</para>
<para>I'm pleased to see those opposite supporting these much-needed changes tonight, because, for a family in Dickson trying to budget for a knee reconstruction or a hip replacement or to see a psychiatrist to get an ADHD diagnosis, that website was useless. It left them walking into specialists' offices with no idea how much they would be charged. This is not choice; it is being blindsided.</para>
<para>According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, medical and hospital costs are a primary strain on the family budget. We are seeing massive variations in specialist fees, where patients are charged wildly different amounts for exactly the same procedure. Private Healthcare Australia released new data recently that is truly shocking. It showed some specialists are charging between $500 and $1,000 in out-of-pocket upfront fees for a first appointment. It also showed that the median specialist gap fee for in-hospital care has risen 22 per cent since 2022, which has meant thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs for procedures. One in two patients did not know their specialist fee before attending, 38 per cent received an unexpected bill, 55 per cent paid more than expected and nearly one in three reported being charged illegal booking or admin fees.</para>
<para>Patients deserve to know the price tag before they receive the service. This bill transforms the Medical Costs Finder website from a failed experiment into a meaningful platform. By integrating data from Medicare, hospitals and insurers, we are providing individual specialists' fees and out-of-pocket costs without adding any new administrative burden on our hardworking doctors. Consumers will be able to compare the costs of individual medical practitioners, helping them make informed decisions about their own health care. We know that surprise out-of-pocket bills for specialist services have been a household stress for way too long, and we are taking action to fix this.</para>
<para>Another important part to this bill is the outlawing of product phoenixing. To put it simply, some private health insurers have been closing down existing insurance products only to reopen almost identical ones under a different name and at a higher premium or reduced value. This means a consumer, who may have paid fees monthly for decades for health insurance, expecting a certain level of coverage, can suddenly have their insurance cancelled and replaced by a new product that costs them more or has less coverage. They do this to avoid government regulated caps on annual premium increases. For example, the government cap on premium increase in the 2025 financial year was about 3.7 per cent. We know of one insurer that offered a 'premium gold' product in February 2025, only to close it and launch an 'optimum gold' product that was almost identical but priced 35 per cent higher.</para>
<para>CHOICE research found that, while average health insurance premiums rose by 11.9 per cent over a four-year period, health insurers use phoenixing to close older, cheaper policies and replace them with more expensive, near-identical products to increase the average price of gold-level hospital cover by up to 45 per cent. This disgraceful practice forces customers into more expensive, often similar coverage, making it difficult to find, compare and maintain better value policies. By doing this, insurers have been able to sidestep scrutiny and quietly reduce the quality of care while hiking up the cost for families. It is a sneaky practice that destroys consumer confidence. The Australian Private Hospitals Association called them 'insurance cowboys', and the Australian Medical Association president said it well when she said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The widespread practice of phoenixing is a major factor in consumers struggling to access the level of cover that meets their needs …</para></quote>
<para>If you've been paying into a policy for years, you shouldn't wake up to find your benefits have been gutted through a technicality. This bill stops this quite mercenary practice. In my community of Dickson, I talk to families every day, who work hard and choose to pay for private health insurance because they want choice, security, or they want to help take pressure off the public system, but they feel like the system is not working for them. They see their premiums go up while transparency is just not there. This bill is for them. It demonstrates that the government is actually watching insurers and holding them to account. Under these reforms, insurers must seek ministerial approval for all new products, and any reduction in coverage, benefits or terms of existing products will require explicit oversight. This is a big, big change. We are drawing a line in the sand—no more shifting goalposts, no more phoenixing away the value of a family's hard-earned insurance policy.</para>
<para>By closing the loopholes that allowed insurers to avoid oversight, we are restoring accountability to the private health sector. This isn't about being anti insurer; it's about being pro consumer. It's about ensuring that our government-subsidised private health system complements our Medicare system in a way that is fair, sustainable and transparent.</para>
<para>This bill is part of the Albanese government's commitment to strengthen Medicare and build a stronger, fairer healthcare system. We've delivered more bulk-billing GPs by significantly increasing the bulk-billing incentive, supporting more practices to bulk-bill and making it cheaper to see a doctor. We're opening more Medicare Urgent Care Clinics so families can get urgent, non-life threatening care without having to go to the emergency department and without the bill. We've made medicines cheaper by reducing the maximum cost of PBS medicines to just $25. We're investing more than $790 million in women's health, and we're opening endometriosis and pelvic pain clinics right across the country. We are delivering more free mental health services, with walk in Medicare Mental Health Clinics popping up right across the country, including one in my electorate of Dickson in Strathpine—no appointment necessary.</para>
<para>This bill delivers on our promise to strengthen Medicare and to make private health insurance work better for those Australians who can afford to pay for it. It delivers real transparency in specialist fees, real protection against unfair premium hikes and real power for patients to make the best decisions for their families. We are fixing the $24 million—wishy washy, self-reporting, if you can be bothered—website that those opposite set up to track specialist fees. We are creating a system to ensure all healthcare providers and insurers are held accountable and act in the best interests of patients. We want to remove bill shock when it comes to health care. We want the light to shine in; the cost of health care should not be a mystery. We also need to ensure that our private and public health systems work together to continue to deliver the best health care in the world. I love this bill and I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHANEY</name>
    <name.id>300006</name.id>
    <electorate>Curtin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The cost of accessing specialist care is now a deciding factor in whether many Australians get the treatment they need when they need it—if they can get an appointment. Now, that's not a sign of a fair health system; it's a warning light. The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill takes a necessary first step by making fees and out-of-pocket costs visible to patients. But transparency on its own is not a cure. If we're serious about a health system that's genuinely fair, we must pair transparency with reforms that tackle affordability, access, quality and accountability while closely monitoring unintended consequences.</para>
<para>So what does this bill do well? First, it enables government-held data to be used to populate the Medical Costs Finder with GP and specialist fees and out-of-pocket costs. This ends an ineffective voluntary approach that saw only one to two per cent uptake by specialists and insurers. For the patient who's been quoted three different prices for the same procedure, a clear picture of typical charges is empowering. For the more than 800,000 people who in 2024-25 did not proceed from GP referrals to specialist care due to cost, shedding light on fees may reduce some of the fear and confusion that keeps them from treatment.</para>
<para>Second, the bill strengthens ministerial oversight of private health premiums to combat product churn that quietly ratchets up costs for consumers. We've seen examples where premiums rose far faster than the average across products, aided by product phoenixing, where like-for-like products close and then reappear at higher prices. These are almost impossible for consumers to track. Transparent approval processes and scrutiny of new and changed products are essential to stop this shell game.</para>
<para>These are sensible measures, and I'll support them, but they must be seen as the beginning, not the end, of the work that needs to be done. The government's argument for the bill is that informed consumers make better decisions. That's true, but information alone can cut both ways. When price information is published without context, we know that some providers simply increase their fees to match the market rate, and there's a persistent perception among some patients that a higher fee must mean higher quality care. Unless people can access better information about clinical outcomes, complication rates, readmission and wait times, we risk reinforcing this false choice. That's the last thing households facing cost-of-living pressures need. We must monitor, in real time, what happens after this information goes live. Are median fees rising? Are prices clustering at the top of the range? Are patients gravitating to higher priced practitioners without any evidence of better care? If so, the government must be ready to act, whether through enhanced quality reporting or targeted intervention.</para>
<para>There are also technical issues to resolve. The department's plan to publish a single fee figure for each practitioner must be transparent, accurate and fair. An internal review mechanism may not be sufficient when errors can damage a reputation or mislead consumers. We need a clear and timely correction process backed by a methodology that's publicly understood and independently reviewed. But the bigger point is this. Even the best transparency will not by itself make specialist care affordable and accessible. To achieve that, we must address the economic settings that sit underneath specialist pricing and availability.</para>
<para>That's why I've seconded the second reading amendment moved by the member for Kooyong. I agree with the honourable member that Medicare rebates must reflect the real costs of delivering care and must be indexed so they don't erode each year. We need to explore broader rebate coverage across specialities and consider gap-fee settings that rein in excessive out-of-pocket costs. These are structural levers, levers that deal directly with affordability rather than simply shining a light on unaffordable prices.</para>
<para>I've also seconded the second reading amendment proposed by the member for Wentworth, and that amendment relates to Schedule 2 of the bill and calls on the government to establish and enforce clear timeframes for decisions on new product applications by insurers, including automatic approval where those timeframes are not met. I've spoken at length in recent weeks about the government's ongoing failure to respond within timeframes to more than 50 parliamentary committee reports. Like the member for Wentworth, I have concerns, given this record, that decisions under this framework may not be made in a timely manner unless timing requirements are embedded in legislation. It's only fair that if insurers are expected to meet new and expanded obligations, they're also provided certainty about how long they'll wait for a decision.</para>
<para>I urge the government to ensure that three safeguards are baked in as this bill is enacted and implemented. First, active fee monitoring to guard against unintended consequences. The department should publish periodic analyses showing whether median fees are rising post-publication, whether fee dispersion is narrowing around higher price points and whether patients are shifting toward higher priced providers without corresponding quality gains. If we see these patterns emerging, governments should be ready with corrective measures such as enhanced quality disclosure or targeted interventions.</para>
<para>The second safeguard is transparency about the methodology for calculating published fees. This should be public, comprehensible and independently reviewed. There should be a time-bound process to correct errors, with clear thresholds for when changes are made and how practitioners can seek review.</para>
<para>The third action that needs to be taken is a parallel affordability reform agenda. We should progress work on Medicare rebate adequacy and indexation and consider gap-fee settings that protect patients from extreme outliers. Price transparency must be a beginning, not an endpoint. Australians accept that health care is complex, but they, rightly, expect it to be fair. Publishing fees and out-of-pocket costs are a necessary start, and one I support, but we cannot mistake transparency for structural reform.</para>
<para>Access to specialists is an issue which is raised a lot with me by Curtin constituents. For example, I heard from a parent of a four-year-old child who waited 12 months for an autism diagnosis from a child psychologist, which then needed to be verified by a paediatrician in order to access an NDIS plan. This parent contacted more than 20 paediatricians, only to be told that their books were closed for 12 months. And this is in the private system. In the public system there was a two-year wait for services, which is a long time in a child's life, when early intervention is critical. Sadly, stories like these are too common.</para>
<para>A truly fair health system ensures that people can afford to make informed decisions to act on the medical information they're given and get access to the specialists they need when they need them. This bill should be the first chapter of a reform story that restores confidence in specialist care so patients can get the treatments they need and aren't choosing between their health and their household budget. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FERNANDO</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
    <electorate>Holt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Access to health care lies at the very foundation of the Australian Labor Party. It is not an optional extra. It's not a privilege reserved for those who can afford it. It is a right and it has been a defining mission of Labor governments for generations. It was the great Ben Chifley government that, in 1946, put forward a referendum to give the federal parliament the power to legislate for sickness and hospital benefits. That referendum led to what we now know as section 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution, empowering the Commonwealth on 'the provision of maternity allowances; widows pensions; child endowment; unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits; medical and dental services, but not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription; benefits to students; and family allowances'. It was another Labor government, under Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, that established Medicare in 1974. It was the first truly universal health insurance scheme in this country. And it was a Labor government, under Prime Minister Bob Hawke, that delivered Medicare in 1984. The system remains one of the proudest achievements of modern Australia.</para>
<para>Medicare is more than a program; it is an expression of our national character. It says that, in Australia, your access to a doctor depends on your Medicare card, not on your credit card. Access to health care was a central pillar of Labor's re-election campaign because we know that cost-of-living pressures are real and that healthcare affordability is at the centre of those pressures. That's why, when we were re-elected, Labor committed to restoring bulk-billing for GP visits, investing over $8.5 billion so that all Australians can see a GP for free. That is the largest investment in Medicare in its history. But we know that restoring bulk-billing is only part of the solution.</para>
<para>Throughout my first term in this parliament, I heard from countless families across my electorate about the very real difficulties they face accessing health care. I have sat with young parents who are working two or three jobs and still struggling to cover medical fees. I have spoken with older residents who delay scans or follow-up appointments because they simply cannot afford the out-of-pocket cost. I have met with families who told me about the heartbreaking decisions they are forced to make each week—whether to put food on the table, pay the mortgage or see a medical specialist. This is not an Australian promise. Many residents have raised concerns about exorbitant specialist fees even after being referred by their GP. These fees are often in the hundreds or even thousands of dollars per visit. They are rising year after year. For many families in rapidly growing outer suburbs and communities like mine, this is simply unsustainable.</para>
<para>Our government is committed to fixing this, and this is why we are now turning our attention to specialist fees. This bill represents the first step in that process. This bill will increase transparency by allowing the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing to publish medical practitioner fees and out-of-pocket expenses on the government's Medical Cost Finder website. The department already holds significant amounts of this information through Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data. Once passed, this legislation will enable the department to publish that information without requiring provider consent, ensuring that patients have access to clear, accurate and up-to-date data, because transparency matters.</para>
<para>In a report by Private Healthcare Australia, titled <inline font-style="italic">Restoring affordable access to specialist care in Australia</inline>, it was found that one in two patients did not know their fee before attending an appointment. Nearly 30 per cent of Australians have delayed or cancelled specialist care because of cost. This is a situation that cannot stand. Health care delayed is often health care denied. When people put off appointments, conditions get worse. What might have been a manageable issue can turn into something far more serious and far more expensive for both families and the healthcare system.</para>
<para>This issue is worse in outer suburbs where people are making those difficult decisions between paying the mortgage or going to a specialist appointment. Specialist fees can vary significantly between suburbs, between providers and between hospitals, sometimes with no clear explanation for patients. By uploading specialist fees online for all providers, we are allowing consumers to check fees before they attend a specialist appointment, empowering them to make informed choices. Patients will be able to compare costs for their health care and shop around for the best prices, just as they would for groceries, household services or any other everyday expenses.</para>
<para>The report by Private Healthcare Australia further showed that patients are now paying a median of $270 for specialist in-hospital care. Outside of hospitals, some patients are being asked to pay up to a thousand dollars for an appointment with a specialist doctor. Rachel David, from Private Healthcare Australia, stated, regarding the reforms:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Private Healthcare Australia has welcomed the Federal Government's legislation to upgrade the Medical Costs Finder website, saying it is a critical step toward tackling Australia's growing specialist fee crisis.</para></quote>
<para>Catholic Health Australia director of health policy, Katharine Bassett, said making the data publicly available 'is critical, as out-of-pocket costs for specialist care are rising and becoming increasingly unpredictable for patients'.</para>
<para>We know that greater transparency increases competition, and competition, in turn, places downward pressure on excessive pricing. This reform is about restoring balance in a system where patients often feel powerless. Let me be clear. This is not the end of the conversation. The Minister for Health and Disability, Mark Butler, has indicated that the Albanese government is considering how far it can go, and it will test constitutional boundaries that have long constrained government regulation of specialist fees because, to every Australian out there, this is a government that has heard your struggle, and this is a government that has your back.</para>
<para>There is a second and equally important element of this bill, one that goes directly to fairness for the nearly half of Australians who hold private health insurance. Around half of all Australians choose to take out private health insurance, often at significant expense to their household budgets. In Holt, 68,700 people are covered by private health insurance, meaning 35.4 per cent of all people are covered by private health insurance plans. For many families in communities such as Cranbourne, Clyde and Hampton Park, those premiums are not small change. There are hundreds of dollars a month paid in good faith, with the expectation of certainty and value.</para>
<para>Each year, private health insurers must apply to the Commonwealth government for approval to increase their premiums. Those applications are carefully scrutinised. They are assessed against the financial sustainability of the sector and the impact on policyholders. Often insurers seek increases that are well above the CPI, and the government's process exists for a reason: to protect consumers. But some companies have sought to get around that safeguard. In cases where the government has limited or rejected proposed premium increases, some funds have engaged in a practice known as phoenixing. Product phoenixing occurs when an insurer closes an existing insurance product, often one whose price rise has been restricted, only to launch a nearly identical product days later at a much higher premium—same coverage, same target market, different name, higher price. It is underhanded, it is sneaky and it undermines the very regulatory framework designed to protect Australian families. In a year when private health insurers have collectively made over $2 billion in after-tax profits, and when families are grappling with mortgage stress, grocery bills and rising energy costs, this behaviour is not acceptable. Private health insurance is not a luxury item marketed to the highest bidder. It is a core part of Australia's health system. When companies exploit loopholes to push through excessive price increases, they erode public trust not just in their own brand but in the system as a whole.</para>
<para>This bill will close that loophole. It will outlaw the practice of product phoenixing, ensuring that insurers cannot bypass government oversight by gaming the system with technical restructures and product relaunches. If a premium increase is not approved, insurers will not be able to simply repackage the product and impose it anyway. This reform strengthens consumer protection, and it sends a clear message: transparency and fairness are not optional in Australia's health system. Labor believes that, whether you rely solely on Medicare or choose to take out private cover, you deserve honesty, accountability and respect. This bill delivers exactly that. By increasing transparency in pricing and expanding consumer protections, we are making sure the healthcare system continues to work for all Australians.</para>
<para>I know there is much more work to be done. I know that Labor is the only party that will deliver real reform that delivers for families in communities like mine in the outer suburbs. Labor has always been the party of Medicare. We created it, we have defended it and we will strengthen it—because access to health care is not just a policy; it is about dignity. It is about ensuring that no parent has to choose between their child's health and the weekly grocery bill. It is about ensuring that no pensioner skips a specialist appointment out of fear of the unknown invoice. It is about ensuring that every Australian, regardless of income, background or postcode, can access the care they need. That is the Labor tradition. That is the responsibility we carry. That is exactly what this legislation seeks to advance. I thank the Minister for Health and Ageing, the Hon. Mark Butler, for his work on this bill and for his continued work on ensuring our healthcare system is accessible for every Australian. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms JORDAN-BAIRD</name>
    <name.id>316021</name.id>
    <electorate>Gorton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today I rise to support the Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026, brought forward by the Minister for Health and Ageing, and I commend him for doing so. I'm so proud to be part of the Albanese Labor government as we remain resolute in our commitment to make quality health care accessible for every Australian.</para>
<para>It means making health care more affordable by strengthening Medicare and putting more medicines on the PBS. It means putting an end to life insurance practices that discourage people from getting life-saving genetic testing, as we are doing with the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill. I had the pleasure of contributing to debate on that bill earlier this week. It means making sure that information about healthcare costs is readily accessible to Australians so they can make informed choices about their own health care. It means stamping out insurance provider practices that circumvent regulation and increase costs to Australians without proper oversight. This bill does exactly that. It's another important piece in the Albanese Labor government's work to make sure that, when it comes to health care, everyday Australians come first.</para>
<para>We know that there are Australians who are not taking up referrals to specialists because of the cost. In 2024-25, 8.6 per cent of people delayed or missed specialist care because of cost. That's 800,000 people across our communities who have not received the health care they need because of the high cost of specialist appointments. That's really concerning. It's not right, and it's why we need greater transparency in the medical sector, as well as better regulation.</para>
<para>Since 2022, specialists and insurers have been invited to publish their fees on the Medical Costs Finder. The Medical Costs Finder allows Australians to search and compare out-of-pocket costs for common treatments and procedures. It has the aim of promoting transparency in the sector, giving Australians better visibility of the potential cost of treatments and the ability to compare costs so they can choose the most cost-effective option for them. Unfortunately, the Medical Costs Finder has been limited in its efficacy. That's because there have been low levels of participation from medical specialists, who have to opt in to this service.</para>
<para>In December 2025, only one to two per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers were participating in this website. This means it hasn't been delivering the transparency Australians deserve. That's not good enough. People should be able to access this information so they can find out easily what the potential cost will be for a specialist or treatment they've been referred to and can make their own informed decisions about the next steps of their medical journey. This amendment will allow for the publication of the relevant data on the Medical Costs Finder, without the need for input from medical practitioners. It will be drawn directly from Medicare, hospital and insurer billing data collected by the government, and it will make a real difference.</para>
<para>This bill is about improving the transparency of the costs of specialist services, promoting the efficient access to these services and helping people make informed decisions about their health, because empowering Australians to make informed choices about their health is what accessible health care looks like.</para>
<para>The second part of this bill is about stamping out a problematic practice used by private health insurers to charge more for existing products. At the moment, the PHI Act requires private health insurance providers to apply to the minister for approval to change the premiums they charge. This has meant that the minister can make sure that private health insurers are complying with government-set limits on increases to health insurance premiums, and it has also meant that insurers have not been able to change the cost of these products without a green light from the minister. This protects Australians from excessive annual increases to health premiums and also prevents health insurers from changing the cost of these premiums without government oversight. However—and there is a however—private health insurance providers have instead been circumventing regulation through product phoenixing.</para>
<para>The existing regulation has meant that private health insurers are not allowed to change the cost of existing products, but they are allowed to close products and open new products without government oversight. Private health insurance providers have been using this loophole to close products and open similar or identical ones at a higher premium, avoiding the requirement for premium change approval. Because of this, insurance providers have been able to effectively increase the price of existing products without oversight, leaving customers with few options but to pay the new expensive premium or move to a lower level of care. The Commonwealth Ombudsman reported that, in 2024, private health insurers' newly released products were about 14 per cent more expensive than the policy that was replaced. This practice cannot be tolerated. For consumers, it reduces visibility into the value for money they're getting with their insurance and obscures the real reason for price increases. This makes it difficult for them to make informed choices and often results in them being charged more for the same product.</para>
<para>The bottom line is that this practice does not put Australians first, and it has to stop. With this bill, we're requiring private health insurers to apply to the minister for approval of premiums charged for new products. When it comes to stamping out this practice, we're leaving no stone unturned, making sure we can continue regulating premiums effectively and giving Australians the transparency they need to make informed choices about their private health cover.</para>
<para>This bill is about making sure we're regulating the medical sector effectively, but also it's fundamentally about the value of specialist medical treatment. There's no doubt that medical specialists are incredibly important in our community. Receiving care from a medical specialist saves and changes lives every day. The importance of this kind of care being readily available can't be understated. We're lucky to have some of these specialists now serving their communities in this very chamber. I acknowledge the work of the incredible member for Macarthur, Dr Mike Freelander, and his long-term career as a paediatrician and now as a federal parliamentarian and chair of the Standing Committee on Health, Aged Care and Disability, of which I am a proud member. I know the member for Macarthur, like me, is very passionate about the availability of specialists across Australia.</para>
<para>I was holding a mobile office in Deer Park a few weeks ago and had a long chat to one of my constituents, Brett. We chatted about the problem he's been facing—accessing specialist medical treatment. For Brett, seeing a specialist would improve his quality of life immensely. But, due to a lack of available specialists in the electorate, he's only been able to get into a clinic in Sunshine—and, even then, there's a long waitlist, so it'll still be at least another nine months before he can see the specialist. Brett's story demonstrates an important issue my community is facing around the availability of specialists. It demonstrates the importance of specialists and the consequences of those services not being available.</para>
<para>We know there's more to do in this space, and this bill is an important first step towards making specialists more accessible. It's about empowering Australians with the knowledge of what they can expect to pay to see a specialist or for treatment in the private health sector. Ultimately it's about giving them power to make informed choices about their own care. This is all part of our government's push to ensure health care remains affordable and accessible to all Australians. Our government has a laser-sharp focus on this because we know that, to communities across Australia, accessible health care matters. It matters to communities like mine in Melbourne's western suburbs, where young families are moving in and building their homes and their futures—young families who are facing mounting pressure on mortgages, at the supermarket and, yes, when taking care of their health. An electorate like mine—young, diverse and aspirational—has many needs that have yet to be met.</para>
<para>One area that has struggled to keep up is access to health services. Gorton residents experience significant disadvantage in accessing health services. Even within Melbourne's north-west, the burden of disease disproportionately impacts my constituents. In the city of Brimbank, a staggering 28 per cent of residents between 18 and older have been diagnosed with two or more chronic diseases—conditions that need to be managed throughout their lives. For locals who are navigating chronic conditions, for those who need to see specialists regularly and throughout their lives, these changes are making this easier.</para>
<para>Ensuring cost transparency when seeing a specialist or receiving treatment in the private sector is one piece of the puzzle of improving access to health care for Australians, including those in Melbourne's north-west. But it is by no means all the Albanese Labor government is doing for affordable and accessible health care. With record investments in bulk-billing, we are strengthening Medicare by increasing bulk-billing incentives. Thanks to these record investments in Medicare, there are now 23 Medicare bulk-billing clinics in my electorate of Gorton in Melbourne's western suburbs; that's 72 per cent of the GP clinics in our local area that you can get an appointment at for free. The national bulk-billing rate is now sitting at over 80 per cent, and 96 per cent of Aussies live within a 20-minute drive of a fully bulk-billed practice. We're also growing Australia's health workforce with the largest GP training program in Australian history.</para>
<para>This is real cost-of-living relief, and it makes a difference to those families whose credit cards are taking the hit when at the supermarket checkout, buying petrol or paying the bills. Hardworking Aussies like those in my community deserve free health care, and that's what we're doing for Australians. With this bill here, we're also ensuring costs to see specialists are transparent so that Australians can be empowered to make informed choices about their care. We've also introduced Medicare urgent care clinics around the country so that Australians can access free walk-in care to take the pressure off our hospital systems.</para>
<para>Last year I was lucky enough to open the 90th urgent care clinic, in Melbourne's west, with the Prime Minister and my friend the member for Fraser. That urgent care clinic was one of two urgent care clinics near my community, both recently opened, in Sunshine and Melton. This is great. We know that it's making real change, and it's working.</para>
<para>I recently had a conversation with a local pharmacist, Chris Luu from Deer Park Compounding Pharmacy. Chris grew up in Deer Park, and he's been working at the Deer Park Compounding Pharmacy for 30 years. Chris is so incredibly passionate about his community. He wants his customers—some of whom he's seen grow up and have kids themselves—to thrive. He showed us a mural of Deer Park's history made with students at a local school, which he moved and reassembled outside his building, making sure it was preserved for future generations. We are very lucky to have him in our community. Chris and I chatted about the cost of medicines on the PBS. Chris told me that he wished more people knew the original prices of medicines so they could see how much they were saving every time they got a script filled on the PBS. He knows the changes that our government is making because he sees them every day, like capping the cost of medicines listed on the PBS to just $25. Last year the maximum cost for a PBS medicine was $31.60, and, from January this year, it was reduced to just $25. This is more than a 20 per cent cut in the maximum cost of PBS medicines, and it's saving Australians over $200 million a year. That's giving my community and Chris's customers real access to the medicines they need and tangible relief on the cost of health care.</para>
<para>Someone who has a lot to say about the cost of health care is the current shadow treasurer. Over the years, the shadow Treasurer has told us, many times, that he'd like to privatise Medicare. He told us in 2011 when he said that he'd like to see the health burden shifted from government to individuals. He told us again in 2021 when he said, 'When you push the cost of health care away, the obligations and the sense of responsibility people have to it diminishes.' When someone shows you who they are, believe them. Just like they were in 2011, the opposition is still more interested in making sure Australians know how much they cost to look after, rather than making sure they are actually looked after. On this side of the House, we're about real change that looks after Australians, puts food on the table, reduces household bills and makes a doctor's visit affordable—no Australian held back and no Australian left behind.</para>
<para>And that's why we brought this bill here—a bill that gives back to Australians by providing transparency and strengthening the regulation of our healthcare system. And, on that note, I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>First of all, I thank the member for Gorton for her very kind remarks, which were probably undeserved, but I'm very grateful. I'll start by saying, if I can be allowed a short preamble, it's often said in my profession that, if you put 100 doctors in a room and ask them how to fix the health system, you'll get 110 answers. I admit my biases, and I have a very personal view of how we can improve our health system.</para>
<para>I've worked in health care in the public hospital system now for over half a century, and I'm in this House as a Labor member because the Labor Party is the party of health care. This was identified very well by my great hero, Gough Whitlam. It's important to understand that he's the one that introduced the original Medibank, the first national health insurance program, designed by Scotton and Deeble, two health economists, in late 1960s. It was done for a reason. It was done because we had an inequitable healthcare system where people who could afford it were getting very good health care, and many people were missing out on health care because they couldn't afford it. It's a little-known fact—but it is a fact—that the most common cause of bankruptcy in Australia prior to the introduction of Medibank was health costs. People were sent to the wall because of the costs they were incurring in providing health care. For me, Labor is the party of health care. I started my private practice, which I ran for 40 years, on the same day that Medicare became operational in Australia, introduced by the Hawke Labor government. I saw patients whose families couldn't afford to see a paediatrician in the past; they'd never seen a paediatrician in spite of the fact they often had significant disability. This was really a sign to me that Labor is the party of health care, and it's continued along those lines.</para>
<para>It's really important to note that, since the start of the first Albanese government, I can hardly remember a question being asked by the opposition about health care in this House at question time. I can't remember one. We have the now shadow Treasurer making comments like our healthcare system being 'a system designed to keep people ill to feed the benefits of the unions and the people that they are paid to represent and to maintain the political control by the Australian Labor Party'. What absolute tripe! This is coming from the shadow Treasurer. Can you believe it? It's just crazy. That is a quote from <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline>. So, too often, I hear those opposite talk about Medicare as if it's a burden, as if it's a thorn in the side of their attempts to privatise and make Americanised our healthcare system. When I hear contributions from the member for Goldstein, I don't hear a defence of Medicare. I don't hear support for one of the best health systems in the world. I don't hear a commitment to strengthening universal access to health care. Instead, what I hear is an ideological position that leans away from collective responsibility and towards an individual burden of health care. The member for Goldstein is always talking about how Medicare is broken and how people should pay their own way. He really has some crazy ideas about health, and I think that's replicated in many other members of the opposition.</para>
<para>This legislation is really important legislation that improves the transparency of our health system. As I've said, I ran a private practice for 40 years. I did have a position where I would bulk-bill people who I felt should be bulk-billed—including all those with healthcare cards, but also many with chronic illness—and privately bill others. The introduction of Medicare meant that the scheduled fee was 100 per cent of the recommended fee, and the Medicare rebate was 85 per cent of that scheduled fee. The 15 per cent gap was not paid by the government for bulk-billed patients, but the rebate was. That was because, by bulk-billing, you remove the cost of privately billing people and sometimes having to chase them for fees afterwards. That used to happen occasionally; we had to make sure that we could follow people for the fees because we didn't charge people upfront. They were allowed to pay the full fee once they received their Medicare cheque, usually in the mail. That 15 per cent gap was supposed to be the cost of having to get the fees from privately billed people.</para>
<para>What has happened over time, of course, is that the gaps got bigger as the rebate didn't increase in line with inflation. But we now have a point where many of the gaps are bigger than the actual scheduled fee, particularly for things like cataract surgery and some subspecialty consultations. They are often opaque; the patients aren't aware of them when they have their first consultation. The gaps can vary from specialist to specialist. Often these are not advertised, can be difficult for patients to find and can be quite a shock when they first see a doctor in consultation—especially with some of the procedural specialists, who charge quite large gap fees.</para>
<para>I'm not going to get into arguments about whether they're too much or too little. The reasons for specialist fees can vary. The costs of specialist practice are quite expensive. The training is now very prolonged. Many people go into medicine after a first degree. Their medical degree is their second degree and their specialist qualifications are often their third degree. The costs of running a practice, including insurance, have increased a lot. Rents have increased a lot. Equipment fees, which some specialists, such as ophthalmologists, require have become more and more expensive. The Medicare rebates haven't kept pace with the actual costs of doing medical business, if I can put it that way.</para>
<para>This bill does increase transparency and it does mean costs will be findable by patients prior to their consultation or hospitalisation. It is really important that people do get that transparency so they can find out how much doctors will charge them and how much they will have to pay out of pocket. It is very important to understand that there are some procedures that we do now that weren't available in the time of the advent of Medicare. Because the rebates don't exactly fit the procedure, sometimes the costs are much higher than for the previous treatments. It is reasonable, though, that specialists make their fees available for patients.</para>
<para>The bill delivers on yet another commitment by the Albanese government—to make health care more accessible for all. When you look at the things that we have already done in a relatively short period of time, they have made health care much more accessible and much more equitable—things like the bulk-billing incentives. In my electorate of Macarthur, over 90 per cent of GP consultations are now bulk-billed, which is a huge turnaround. The 60-day prescribing for common pharmaceuticals has been of tremendous benefit to patients. The maximum fees for pharmaceuticals, including making the maximum fee $25 for non-healthcare cardholders and just over $7 for healthcare cardholders, have made medicines much more accessible. Our increased training positions for nurses and doctors have made health care much more accessible. Our increasing scope of practice for pharmacists, nurses and allied health professionals has made accessibility much better.</para>
<para>There is much more to do; we know that. In rural and regional areas there are huge difficulties in attracting specialists and in getting people access to specialists. In my own field of paediatrics, in some areas of western New South Wales, for example, the waiting times to see a paediatrician are measured in years, not in months or weeks. This is delaying health care for some of the most vulnerable. There is much more for us to do and we are certainly working on it.</para>
<para>We also need to look at more innovative ways of getting specialist opinions for people who live in rural, regional and remote areas. Improvements in telehealth, which have been a real focus of the Minister for Health and Ageing, Mark Butler, have been a really important change in improving access to specialist opinions.</para>
<para>Our women's health packages have been dramatic in improving access to pelvic pain clinics and endometriosis treatments. The scheduling of new treatments for pregnancy control and for endometriosis et cetera has really made a dramatic difference for many women around the country.</para>
<para>This is part of the government's commitment to ongoing improvements in our very equitable health system. We do not want an Americanised system, in spite of what many in the opposition would want. We will deliver on our election commitments but we will also do more. This is a gradual process. We can't fix every issue immediately, but we are gradually working towards improvements in our health system that will make sure it is the best in the world. The introduction and passage of the genetic information bill has been really important, and it's something that the government committed to over a long period of time. It's yet another improvement in our health services.</para>
<para>This bill also looks at how we can make private health insurance more transparent and reduce the ability of private health insurers to change insurance programs and products willy-nilly, to phoenix some products and to continue to make large profits at the expense of people who are paying significant amounts for health insurance. My own personal view is that having three tiers of private health insurance is counterproductive to making sure our hybrid health system continues to work well. I would like to see private health insurance be one product—you either have it or you don't—and to have a community rating of risk through that private health insurance, rather than different levels of insurance, but that is something for another day.</para>
<para>There are many more things we need to do, but this is continuing the progress towards a better and better health system, which Mark Butler and the Albanese government are committed to, and I'm very proud to be part of it. I know that we can—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>299498</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Would the honourable member please resume his seat. Member for Moncrieff?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Bell</name>
    <name.id>282981</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Members should be called by their correct title. I'm just highlighting that for the member.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>299498</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I would ask the member for Macarthur to address people by their correct title.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm sorry. I inadvertently made that mistake. I think that the opposition really need to improve their attitude towards health care. That would hold us to account and make us more likely to improve our discussion with them about having a universal healthcare system. I think they need to adopt the universal health insurance program that Labor has been committed to for the last half a century and stop their attacks on Medicare, but I'm not here to give a lecture to the opposition. I'm here to talk to our process of continuing to improve our wonderful health system.</para>
<para>I believe in our health system, and I think that this bill continues with those improvements. It will improve transparency with health costs, but I would stress that it's not just about greedy doctors charging large amounts of money; it's about how we can improve transparency and access to health care. We need to support our highly trained specialists to provide the best care they can in an equitable manner across the country. I would also like to see a huge investment, by federal and state governments, in our public hospital outpatient system, as another way of improving equitable access to health care. We do need to continue to examine our private health insurance system so that it works in the most efficient manner.</para>
<para>I congratulate the health minister on this bill, and I look forward to further improvements in our health system by the Albanese Labor government.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MILLER-FROST</name>
    <name.id>296272</name.id>
    <electorate>Boothby</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Prior to Medicare, medical bills were the major cause of bankruptcies in Australia. That ended overnight. It's worth noting that medical bills are still a major cause of bankruptcies in the US, and consequently Americans choose to avoid seeking health care or seeking a diagnosis. They fear the costs pushing them into bankruptcy and homelessness. That's why the US health system is the most expensive in the modern world and has the worst results at a population level. This is not what we want for Australia and for Australians. Despite its challenges, Australia's health system is the best in the world. If you are sick or injured, you wouldn't want to be anywhere else.</para>
<para>We know that those opposite oppose Medicare. The shadow Treasurer has said that we should get rid of Medicare and instead have individual accounts that we can draw down on when we need care, which of course would be a disaster for those who are particularly unwell. If you had a lifelong condition, a chronic disease, a cancer diagnosis, a catastrophic injury or a progressive disease, your account would run dry.</para>
<para>Despite the benefits of Medicare in making Australian health care affordable as a blended public-private system, gap fees do accrue to patients, and constituents contact me about having to pay an unexpected gap fee or even the entirety of the cost of a GP referred specialist appointment. Health care should not be a financial risk in this country. It shouldn't require hedging your bets when your health is at stake.</para>
<para>More than half of Australians are on some form of private health insurance. Private health is crucial to the sustainability of Australia's broader health system, helping in particular to alleviate an already overburdened public health sector. Yet we all know that private health premiums are rising year on year. Patients deserve peace of mind, knowing that the cost of the care they're receiving is being paid with the full knowledge of their options—peace of mind that they don't need to worry about money in the midst of a serious health crisis, peace of mind that they can seek screening tests or diagnosis without having to worry about unexpected bills. We want Australians to seek diagnosis and early intervention for their own best health outcomes and also to manage costs in the health system by keeping them out of hospital where possible. In this country, equitable health access is a right, not a privilege, no matter whether you're paying for it via private health or Medicare, and that is why the Albanese Labor government is committed to delivering a private health insurance framework that is fair, efficient and accessible.</para>
<para>The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 seeks to course-correct longstanding deficits in the private health system. It seeks to enshrine private health consumers' rights and their ability to be the masters of their own health destiny. It does so in two ways. Firstly, it ensures that Australians are able to make an informed choice about the cost of specialist medical advice and treatment through improvements to the Medical Costs Finder tool. Secondly, it ensures that price gouging by private health insurers by way of product phoenixing is curbed. As a result, private health consumers can be confident that the cost of their medical service is market standard. The bill ensures that Australians are able to access detailed information about the costs and associated costs of their medical specialist appointment and treatments.</para>
<para>The Australian Bureau of Statistics reports that the cost of medical and hospital services has contributed to health inflation more generally, with flow-on effects for the out-of-pocket costs and higher insurance premiums. The most common cause of out-of-pocket costs are medical specialist fees. The typical out-of-pocket cost for a specialist procedure in Australia is $1,000. Unsurprisingly, this has seen patients refuse to take up a specialist referral from their GP owing to their fears of the potential costs, which are often unknown and unpredictable. In the financial year 2024-25, 8.6 per cent of patients delayed or missed specialist care, citing cost factors—that is, over 800,000 people. One in two patients don't know what their bill is going to be before an appointment; 38 per cent received an unexpected bill.</para>
<para>The proposed legislative arrangement follows Labor's 2025 election commitment and the 2025-26 budget measure to improve transparency in medical pricing information in order that Australians are able to make informed and knowledgeable decisions about their healthcare needs. Because patients shouldn't be slapped with a bill without the full knowledge of what they're paying for, how much they should be paying, and having the opportunity to compare other medical providers. Additionally, knowing what private health insurers are prepared to cover will help consumers determine their out-of-pocket costs.</para>
<para>The former coalition government previously invested $22 million in the Medical Costs Finder website, which is informed by data from Medicare and from the information volunteered by Medicare medical practitioners. By the end of 2022, of the 6,300 medical practitioners registered to practice in the 11 specialities included in Medical Costs Finder, only six decided to voluntarily offer up their pricing information. Three years later, only 88 doctors have signed up. As at December 2025, that's maybe one to two per cent of specialists and 10 per cent of insurers who decided to participate in the Medical Costs Finder.</para>
<para>The problem with the former government's voluntary model, as the president of the AMA, Dr Danielle McMullen describes it, is that private health insurers were extremely reluctant to upload their information, which also created a significant disincentive for doctors to upload their own billing data. Indeed, she continues:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The AMA has pushed hard for Medicare rebates and insurer benefits to be included on the Medical Costs Finder, so that patients get the full picture of why they may face an out-of-pocket cost …</para></quote>
<para>Access to insurer data is crucial for patients, alongside clear information on Medicare rebates, which have failed to keep pace with inflation for decades and remain a major driver of out-of-pocket costs. The amendment will allow the Medical Costs Finder website to publish individual medical practitioner and insurer out-of-pocket costs for common medical services, but medical practitioners, including specialists and GPs, will no longer be required to volunteer their own billing information. Instead, it will be taken from Medicare, hospitals and insurer billing data already collected by the government</para>
<para>Specifically, the bill will amend the Health Insurance Act 1973 and the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 to allow for the publication of information about medical practitioners and their billing, including names; qualifications; speciality; any languages spoken; fees charged by location; and their utilisation of gap cover arrangements with insurers, where insurers pay a medical practitioner more if they agree to charge no or fixed out-of-pocket costs. The bill will allow for the publication of information about health facilities such as hospitals, including information about medical practitioners who provide services at the facility and insurers that have gap cover or contracting arrangements with the facility, and will allow for the publication of information about insurers, including policy holders who experience different gap cover arrangements and the out-of-pocket costs under those gap cover arrangements.</para>
<para>We all know that specialist fees vary drastically across the country and even within individual communities. These changes to the Medical Costs Finder will provide patients and consumers with efficient and at-hand access to detailed pricing information in order that they can compare costs and make the right decision for themselves. The ability—the right—to shop around is crucial to the private health marketplace. In fact, the visibility and transparency of medical pricing will reinforce a standard among medical practitioners and insurers that is in keeping not only with market expectations but also with community expectations.</para>
<para>The bill also outlaws a widespread practice among private health insurers called product phoenixing. Health insurers are required to limit price rises to a percentage approved by the Minister for Health and Ageing on an annual basis. Some health insurers have been employing what the Commonwealth Ombudsman has dubbed a 'loophole tactic', a deliberate and cynical strategy to get around this price increase limitation. Product phoenixing is when a private health insurer closes an existing product and then reopens an identical product at a higher premium, skirting regulatory oversight and ministerial scrutiny.</para>
<para>Despite being warned by the minister for health, private health insurers have continued this deceptive practice. Indeed, an investigation by consumer group CHOICE found that the price of gold-tier policies increased on average by more than 30 per cent over a three-year period. This kind of price gouging is not only amoral and unethical; it should be illegal. As the president of the AMA has stated:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Private health insurance premiums have outpaced wages and inflation in recent years, all while insurers' management expenses and profits continue to soar … The widespread practice of phoenixing is a major factor in consumers struggling to access the level of cover that meets their needs, and it is eroding public confidence in the private health system.</para></quote>
<para>So the minister for health has acted to eliminate this specific practice. This amendment will restore consumer confidence in the private health system. Current arrangements oblige private health insurers to seek the minister for health's approval for change to the premium of an existing product, which is managed administratively during the annual premium round process. The proposed amendment would require that approval would additionally need to be sought from the Minister for Health and Ageing where a new product is being proposed or where mooted changes will reduce cover, a benefit, or a term or conditions of an existing product.</para>
<para>The amendment will also improve and enhance current arrangements for premium approvals, including creating in legislation specific premium round submission dates and an instrument that will allow the minister to vary those dates; creating a stronger public interest test for submissions outside the premium round to compel more applications within the approved period; creating a power for the minister to delegate approval authority, which is likely to be used in the instances of more straightforward applications that are clearly in the public interest; creating a legislative basis on which the minister can request further information about an application and request that the insurer respond, resubmit or further justify their application; and creating a rule-making power to set a fee for insurer applications for premium approval. By banning product phoenixing and streamlining the premium approvals process, consumers can be confident that they will not be shortchanged on their policy because of private health insurers underhanded and unethical getting around of government regulatory oversight.</para>
<para>The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 will ensure that the private health experience of patients is fair, reliable and accessible. The bill is about enforcing a culture of transparency across the private healthcare landscape, prioritising, in the first instance, the individual patient's right to access the full suite of medical information, including costs, not after but prior to their specialist appointment and treatments. It will clamp down on the backroom practices of private health insurers who seek to make a profit off the health anxieties of their consumers. Fundamentally, this bill is about guaranteeing better health outcomes for all patients, it is about modernising and improving private health provision across this country, it's about embedding a culture of fairness and transparency in the private health marketplace, and it's about ensuring that Australians have, as a basic expectation, financial certainty during a time of great uncertainty as they battle with illness and disease.</para>
<para>Having worked in the sector for a couple of decades, I know how important our health system underpinned by Medicare is to the quality of life we enjoy as Australians. This government is acting to ensure that the health system continues to support the health of Australians. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026 goes to the heart of something every Australian cares deeply about—the ability to access timely, affordable and high-quality health care. It is about trust in our health system, confidence in private health insurance and making sure that, when Australians make decisions about their health, they are not doing so in the dark.</para>
<para>At its core, this legislation delivers on the Albanese government's commitment to strengthen Medicare while ensuring Australians who engage with the private health system are better informed, better protected and better supported. This reform is about giving Australians the information they need and closing the loopholes that undermine confidence in the system. Australians should not need to be health experts or to do hours of research to understand what they're being charged. They should not be left guessing about out-of-pocket costs or whether their insurance policy will actually deliver when they need it most. This bill is about fixing that. It is about enabling Australians to make informed decisions about their health care and their private health insurance.</para>
<para>One of the key reforms in this legislation is improving transparency in healthcare pricing. For too long, patients have faced a system where costs can vary dramatically between specialists for the exact same procedure, often within the same city or region. These variations are not always visible upfront. Patients frequently only discover the true cost after they've already committed to treatment. That is not transparency; that is uncertainty. Uncertainty in health care creates stress, financial pressure and, in some cases, people delaying or avoiding health care altogether. This bill addresses that directly through improvements to the Medical Costs Finder.</para>
<para>The reforms will allow the Medical Costs Finder website to publish individual medical practitioner fees alongside insurer out-of-pocket cost data for common medical services. This is a significant step forward. Importantly, this change doesn't impose new administrative burdens on doctors. Medical practitioners will no longer be required to manually upload billing data. Instead, the system will draw on existing data already collected through Medicare, hospitals and private health insurers, and that is what reform should look like—reducing red tape while increasing—</para>
<para>Debate interrupted.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>ADJOURNMENT</title>
        <page.no>110</page.no>
        <type>ADJOURNMENT</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bradfield Electorate: Community Organisations</title>
          <page.no>110</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BOELE</name>
    <name.id>26417</name.id>
    <electorate>Bradfield</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Over the coming months or so, the beautiful trees of our nation's bush capital will turn from yellow to orange to red, and we all know what that means. The budget is in the air. This will be my first budget as a member in this place, so my focus has been, and will be, on the things that matter most to my community in Bradfield.</para>
<para>My prebudget submission to the Treasurer asked for many things. The process of laying out in black and white the funding that so many organisations and community groups in Bradfield need made me realise—with pride and no small amount of humility—just how many good people we have doing such important work for others. Here's who they are, what they do and what they need.</para>
<para>Let's start with mental health—an area of so much need, with so many grassroots organisations stepping up to help with the crisis. The organisation Empowering Parents in Crisis, or EPIC, is a peer led organisation that has provided over 1,700 connections with parents caring for young people aged 12 to 25 experiencing mental health issues, school disengagement and high-risk behaviours. The 2023 Senate inquiry into school refusal recognised the urgent need for a fully funded peer-parent support network, highlighting the value of lived experience in helping families navigate complex challenges. EPIC's work directly responds to this recommendation, offering scalable, community based support that strengthens families and improves outcomes for young people. EPIC is seeking $600,000 over two years to enable it to expand this vital work.</para>
<para>Next is the Ku-ring-gai youth development service, or KYDS—with a y—a community organisation delivering structured, evidence based interventions for young people experiencing mental illness. Seventy-five per cent of mental health difficulties emerge before the age of 25, and young people have some of the highest rates of psychological distress and suicide risk. KYDS acts as a clinical bridge, addressing gaps in access for that missing middle—those not eligible for headspace and those who are less critical than those needing acute care. KYDS needs only $500,000 per annum to deliver 2,325 sessions, benefiting over 230 young people and over 2,300 community members.</para>
<para>Then there's the sporting community. Ku-ring-gai Council, the Lindfield rugby and junior rugby clubs and Lindfield District Cricket Club have a joint proposal for upgrades to their existing clubhouse at Lindfield Soldiers Memorial Park, including the provision of changing rooms for girls and women and access for people living with disability. This is to support the rapid increase in female participation in both cricket and rugby and to provide compliant ambulant and disabled access points for the elderly and the less able-bodied members of our local community—$1.5 million from the federal budget will see this project completed. Still on sport, the Willoughby squash and racquet club needs just $250,000 to part-fund the installation and maintenance of a temporary indoor racquet-sports court while the new, purpose built centre is developed.</para>
<para>Moving from sport to social services, Transitional Community Housing is a registered charity which supports high-risk, high-need groups—women over 55, and women with dependent children, who are experiencing, or are at risk of, homelessness; exiting women's shelters or specialist homelessness services; or referred from housing services. The need is great, and the service that TCH provides is incredible. They're asking for just $500,000 over two years to support 50 women and 75 children to access affordable and secure transitional housing for up to two years.</para>
<para>Now, to the arts—the beloved Zenith theatre plays a critical role in supporting the local community performing arts sector in Chatswood. The Zenith offers opportunities for multicultural and amateur organisations that don't have the funds or the patronage to access larger venues or to showcase to the broader community. The theatre is seeking $2.5 million to undertake a major upgrade to revitalise the venue with new facilities and enhance the audience experience, attracting varied productions and increasing visitors to Chatsworth's cultural precinct.</para>
<para>It is an honour to have these organisations in Bradfield—to know them, to work with them and to be able to represent them in the federal budget process. I urge the government to grant these funding requests.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Trade with the European Union</title>
          <page.no>111</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:35</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms TRISH COOK</name>
    <name.id>312871</name.id>
    <electorate>Bullwinkel</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to celebrate a defining moment for our nation's economy and our place in the global community. Yesterday, Australia and the European Union concluded negotiations for a comprehensive, balanced and commercially meaningful free trade agreement. This is not just another trade deal; it is a once-in-a-generation landmark. For decades, many of our agricultural products have been effectively locked out of one of the world's most lucrative markets. Yesterday, the doors were swung wide open.</para>
<para>Beyond the balance sheets, yesterday was a moment of profound historical significance for this parliament. We were honoured to listen to the address by Her Excellency Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission. As the first female leader of a foreign power to address this chamber, her presence underscored the deep values we share with Europe. Her words reminded us that, while we are separated by geography, we are united by a commitment to democracy, the rule of law and a transparent rules based trading system.</para>
<para>The EU is currently our largest trading partner without a FTA—until yesterday—and it is the world's second-largest economy. It is a high-income market of 450 million people, with a GDP of approximately $30 trillion. By securing this deal, we are transforming our economic landscape. Once this agreement enters into force, 88 per cent of Australia's trade will be covered by fair trade agreements; that's up from 79 per cent. In an increasingly uncertain global environment, this is how we build economic resilience. We are diversifying our relationships and levelling the playing field for Australian businesses.</para>
<para>This is the breakthrough we have worked for for decades. This agreement will eliminate the vast majority of EU tariffs on agricultural products. From our world-class wine and dairy to tree nuts, honey, olive oil and cereals like wheat and barley, which are grown in my electorate of Bullwinkel, the barriers are coming down. For products like beef, sheepmeat, rice and sugar, where duty-free access wasn't fully possible, we have locked in new and vastly improved volumes under tariff rate quotas. We are making our farmers more competitive, and, in many cases, opening the European market to them for the very first time.</para>
<para>This is also the most progressive trade agreement Australia has ever signed. It positions us to become a renewable energy superpower. The EU FTA removes all tariffs on Australian energy and resources exports. This includes critical minerals, lithium hydroxide and hydrogen—products that previously faced tariffs of up to 5.5 per cent. By removing these costs, we make our exports the first choice for European battery manufacturers and green energy innovators.</para>
<para>Furthermore, by raising foreign investment screening thresholds for private EU investors, we are making Australia an even more attractive destination for the capital needed to drive our energy transition. Our services sector, worth nearly $10 billion in exports last year, also stands to gain immensely. We are making it easier for the Australian professionals in finance, education and tourism to travel and work within the EU. We have streamlined the recognition of professional qualifications, ensuring that an Australian expert's skills are valued and accessible across the continent.</para>
<para>Crucially, this agreement reflects who we are as people. It protects the interests of First Nations people, specifically regarding art and intellectual property. It sets a new gold standard for labour rights and environmental protections, enshrining our shared commitment to the Paris Agreement. This agreement is testament to what can be achieved when two partners who share common values sit down with a commonsense purpose. It delivers low costs for Australian businesses, more choice for consumers and more jobs for workers.</para>
<para>It is a proud day for Australia, a proud day for our exporters and a historic step forward in our partnership with Europe. I commend the agreement to the House.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Disaster and Emergency Management, Mental Health, Cost of Living, Fuel</title>
          <page.no>111</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VIOLI</name>
    <name.id>300147</name.id>
    <electorate>Casey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In my community of Casey, it is vital we are prepared for emergencies. This is something I've been advocating since becoming a candidate in 2021. Solutions don't just come from parliament; they come from our community. It was fantastic to be in Lilydale on Sunday for the handover of the new power trailer from Buffalo Stand-alone Power Solutions to the Monbulk & District Community Opportunities Working Group, fondly known as MADCOW. This power trailer is a deployable back-up system that will be used to strengthen our local emergency preparedness during outages and severe weather events. It will ensure that local groups and community members have access to energy when they need it most in a crisis. Everyone that lives in Monbulk knows that, as when they lived through the June storms of 2021, they can be cut off from any other community for days and weeks. So this is such a significant investment in the Monbulk community.</para>
<para>It was wonderful to attend the Lilydale Football Club's men's mental health awareness games recently to honour club champions in the Steve Featherstone Shield and the John Crennan Trophy. Mental health support is so important, and sport is one of the best ways to provide positive mental wellbeing. In our community, accessing mental health supports can be a challenge, especially for our young people and those that are geographically diverse. According to headspace, nearly half of all young Australians aged 12 to 25 report high or very high levels of psychological distress. Two in five young people aged 16 to 24 experienced mental ill health within the previous 12 months. We're very fortunate to have headspace in Lilydale and in Knox doing great work to support our young people, but their services are often at capacity. It's time for the Lilydale hub to go from a part-time service to a full-time service five days a week. This June, I'm supporting local young people and our headspace centres by completing the headspace Push-Up Challenge. Registrations open on 14 April, and I encourage you to get involved or donate to a worthy cause.</para>
<para>We all know that so many people in our community are struggling. They are struggling today as petrol hits $3 a litre, but they have been struggling for so much more than just the recent crisis. This is what makes this price shock so painful—that it has been so hard for people for so long. John from Lilydale recently filled out my household budget survey. He said that, in the last six months, he has taken on extra work. He's had to dip into savings to cover everyday bills and delayed medical and dental appointments due to the cost. He wrote:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We have delayed multiple maintenance callouts due to the cost. We are living with no lights in one room, no working aircon and plumbing issues. We have tried to grow some of our own food due to the crazy increases at the supermarket.</para></quote>
<para>This is the lived experience of John. It could be so many in my community. That's why it's so galling that, day after day, in question time we have to listen, and our communities have to listen, to a prime minister that continues to tell them that they've never had it better, that the economy is going great and that this government has got it under control. We have seen the same story from this government. The Treasurer talked about how the economy was going so strong for so long. Well, it wasn't and it's not for John and so many in my community.</para>
<para>The story is being played again with fuel. For weeks, the Prime Minister and Minister Bowen told members of my community: 'There is no issue. There is no crisis. They have fuel.' At the very same time, farmers in my community were getting messages from their distributors saying, 'We are not delivering fuel to farmers today.' At the exact same time, the Minister for Climate Change and Energy is in this House telling those people there is no problem in this country. Time and time again, this minister and this prime minister are late, and it's the Australian people that pay the price.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bonner Electorate</title>
          <page.no>112</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KARA COOK</name>
    <name.id>316537</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last week, I had the pleasure of hosting the Wynnum First Nations Allies for a roundtable at my office. They are a local community group committed to supporting First Nations peoples through truth telling, relationship building and advocacy for structural change. The allies meet monthly, host guided cultural and art tours, and host elder-led sessions about lived experiences. We discussed Closing the Gap—the progress made and the work we must do—and the parliamentary inquiry into hate, racism and violence directed at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Conversations like this matter, and I want to thank the Wynnum First Nations Allies for their very important work.</para>
<para>As a member of the Joint Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs, I'm encouraging everyone in my community and certainly right across our country to have their say on how we can create a safer and more respectful Australia through the parliamentary inquiry into hate, racism and violence directed at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The committee will examine systemic racism, the influence of online platforms and the initiatives that aim to combat racism. The inquiry will also look at the threat posed by ideologically motivated extremism towards First Nations people, and the role of intelligence and law enforcement agencies in protecting the community from that threat. Submissions to the inquiry are now open and will close on 1 May. There will also be opportunities for the community to contribute at hearings right across the country in the coming months.</para>
<para>I recently had the privilege of opening the Specialist Dementia Care Program Unit at EM Tooth's Residential Aged Care Home in Manly in my electorate of Bonner. Dementia touches many lives in this country. There are over 411,000 Australians who live with dementia. For those with dementia, about one per cent have very severe behavioural or psychological symptoms and cannot be cared for in mainstream aged-care services. That is why I'm so proud to be part of the Albanese Labor government that is providing a $197 million investment for the Specialist Dementia Care Program right across the country, including a $4 million investment for the unit in my community in Bonner. The program funds specialist units to provide the care for people with severe behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, and aims to reduce and stabilise symptoms so that those living with dementia can transition into less-intensive care settings.</para>
<para>I want to acknowledge those who play a crucial role in caring for someone with dementia at home or in aged care. There are 1.6 million Australians who are doing this each and every day, often unseen. This includes families and aged-care workers. The EM Tooth Residential Aged Care Home is one of a network of 35 units delivering this program right across the country. It is also the first service operating in Brisbane's southside, providing vital care for those with severe dementia, and guidance and support for their families. At the opening of the service, I was so delighted to meet with many families whose family members who were being cared for in that unit, and to meet with some of those in the unit. When I toured the unit, it was an absolutely beautiful space. It has a real cottage-like feel and it is right on the doorstep of Moreton Bay, with an incredible outlook and a real sense of community. We are so lucky to have this in our community in Bonner and it was an absolute privilege to be at the opening.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>113</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILLCOX</name>
    <name.id>286535</name.id>
    <electorate>Dawson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Well, Australia is in the grips of a fuel crisis and, for regional Australians, fuel is not a luxury; it is an absolute necessity. Unlike those that live in the city, regional Australians do not have the luxury of just being able to jump on a train or on a bus to get to work. Fuel is how we have the means to make a living. It's how we get our kids to school; it's how our businesses and farms keep running. But, when the pumps are empty, our regional communities simply grind to a halt.</para>
<para>That's why the coalition yesterday launched a real-time reporting tool, 'No Fuel Here'. If you open www.nofuelhere.com.au, we need to give our community a direct way to report shortages as they happen in real time. This website was created because the official reports from Canberra simply do not match the reality of what is happening on the ground. We needed a way to bypass the bureaucracy and get the truth directly from people at the pump. This platform turns local frustration into hard evidence. We need to demand action from this Albanese Labor government. It will ensure the voices of regional Australians are not drowned out by city-centric statistics. Regional Australia depends on fuel like nowhere else, and, when the pump runs dry, our communities stop moving. This tool gives every Australian the power to report a shortage and put pressure on this government to act.</para>
<para>We've been assured by the Minister for Climate Change and Energy that there is no supply crisis. Take his word for that; let's see what happens. But there is definitely a distribution crisis. There is definitely a distribution issue. If the supply is right, it's simply not getting where fuel is needed the most. As I've said before, it takes nearly two weeks for global wholesale prices to change at our local bowsers, yet we've seen prices jump 40 cents in an afternoon. These aren't market forces. This is war profiteering, and the ACCC needs to be instructed by the Treasurer to show some teeth and prosecute those who are doing the wrong thing. Australians are already experiencing a Labor created cost-of-living crisis. Adding fuel crisis to the already difficult decisions they have to make each and every day is something that the people of Dawson and the people of Australia should not have to do.</para>
<para>So why should the residents of Dawson, who've had nothing to do with the tensions in the Middle East, have to pay extortionate prices for fuel? We're calling on this government to make the ACCC do their job and stop fuel price gouging.</para>
<para>Dawson is the biggest cane-growing area in the country, and I'd like to highlight some things from the freshly inked EU deal. There's a press release from CANEGROWERS titled:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Raw Deal—Sugar Shortchanged in EU Deal</para></quote>
<para>It's as follows:</para>
<quote><para class="block">CANEGROWERS has slammed the outcome for sugar in the long-awaited Australia-EU Free Trade Agreement as a complete failure, saying it fails cane farming families and Australian sugar manufacturers and falls well short of what producers had been seeking.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"This is a horrendous outcome for Australia's cane growers," CANEGROWERS CEO Dan Galligan said.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"For the past decade we have made our needs abundantly clear to the Australian Government … There is no meaningful commercial access for sugar in this deal.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"The market access Australia has achieved is extremely small—less than 2% of Europe's import requirement and well below what Brazil and its Mercosur partners secured last year, which was around four times larger than Australia's outcome."</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"Compounding this, the deal delivers no growth, no pathway to expand access and effectively locks growers into a bad deal for the next generation.</para></quote>
<para>I also speak to all the other collectives, CANEGROWERS, QCAR, Kalamia and AgForce. I have not found one cane farmer happy with the EU deal. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petrie Electorate</title>
          <page.no>113</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms COMER</name>
    <name.id>316551</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In May last year, the people of Petrie placed their trust in me to represent them in this building. It is a responsibility I carry with great pride and one that I have worked hard to honour every single day since. Now, it's been just over 10 months since I was elected. In that time, I've made it a priority to get straight to work. Because for me, being a good representative isn't just about titles; it's about outcomes. It's about listening, showing up and delivering for our community, and that's exactly what I've been doing from day one.</para>
<para>I've been out in the community meeting with residents, schools, small businesses and community groups. I've made sure that the voices of my community are heard not just locally but here in Canberra as well. The issues my community raised with me are clear: cost of living, housing, health care, education, the environment and local jobs. I'm proud to say that I'm part of a government that is delivering real support in each of these areas. We have delivered tax cuts for every taxpayer, helping Australians keep more of what they earn. We've cut student debt by 20 per cent, easing the burden on 22,813 current and former students in Petrie. We've made medicines more affordable, with PBS scripts now capped at $25 for the general public and $7.07 for concession card holders for the rest of the decade. We have fully funded all Queensland schools. We've created a new Environmental Protection Agency. We've made TAFE free. We're delivering on energy bill relief, more tax cuts for every taxpayer and more affordable child care.</para>
<para>But beyond national policies, I've been focused on delivering local outcomes because that's what matters most to the people I represent. In health care, I've been able to secure an Urgent Care Clinic in Deception Bay, a Medicare Mental Health Centre in Redcliffe, a speciality Indigenous mental health clinic in Deception Bay, and additional funding for headspace Redcliffe. Because of Labor's policies, we have now doubled the number of fully bulk-billed GPs in the Petrie electorate, because access to health care should not depend on your postcode. In education, I'm meeting with school principals in my electorate, hearing about their priorities and what support they need, and I've raised these matters directly to the education minister.</para>
<para>I've also been able to support and sponsor the Petrie shield for 41 schools, recognising the achievements of students right across the electorate. For housing, more than a thousand people in Petrie have been able to buy their own home using the five per cent home deposit scheme, paying off their own mortgage rather than someone else's. While it is great to see so many first homebuyers using this, my focus is also on supply of social and affordable housing, getting 82 new social and affordable homes built in Redcliffe, with 248 more on their way in Margate, Carseldine and Deception Bay. It is a great start, and I'll continue to advocate directly to the housing minister for more.</para>
<para>For infrastructure, the federal government is backing the Bruce with an investment of $7.2 billion, with over $1.7 billion worth of work happening right within the Petrie electorate. On top of that, we've put in $56.24 million on the Beams Road overpass and $125.5 million to finally upgrade the Linkfield Road overpass, which is one of the worst overpasses in Queensland, if I'm frank.</para>
<para>Working with ministers, I've been advocating directly to them to get the best outcomes for my community. Looking at everything that has been delivered for Petrie, it is clear that the Albanese Labor government has a keen focus on the electorate. Personally, I am so excited that Minister Wells and I have been able to secure the 2027 Women's Softball World Cup in Redcliffe, which is expected to bring about $2.5 million into the local economy.</para>
<para>But just as important as the big announcements are the everyday moments hosting community events like the Fitzgibbon Family Fun Day, working with volunteers such as the great people at Deception Bay Scouts, the Redcliffe Wood Crafters, the amazing crew at Bridge FM and so many more. Because strong communities aren't built in parliament; they're built by the hard work of every single member of the amazing community that I am a part of.</para>
<para>But even with all of this, my job is far from over. There is so much more that needs doing including: getting more healthcare services into the area; hosting more community events that bring our neighbours together; fighting for more infrastructure funding, especially roads, as our community continues to grow so that people can get where they need to go faster and safer; and building more houses all throughout the community to help people realise the Australian dream. A great deal has been achieved in just 10 months, but there's still so much more to do because representing Petrie isn't something I take for granted. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Endometriosis Awareness Month</title>
          <page.no>114</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELL</name>
    <name.id>282981</name.id>
    <electorate>Moncrieff</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I just want to add to the record in Endometriosis Awareness Month that the Australian coalition, when in government, has historically driven significant policy initiatives regarding endometriosis, setting the foundation for national action, which the current Labor government has indeed expanded. I commend them for moving forward on a coalition government policies, including our policies—the National Action Plan for Endometriosis, the endometriosis and pelvic pain clinics, research and clinical funding for endo, and education and advocacy support for endometriosis.</para>
<para>House adjourned at 20:00</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>NOTICES</title>
        <page.no>115</page.no>
        <type>NOTICES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Presentation</title>
          <page.no>115</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
  </chamber.xscript>
  <fedchamb.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-MCJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-MCJobDate">
            <a href="Federation Chamber" type="">Wednesday, 25 March 2026</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">DEPUTY SPEAKER </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">(</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Ms Lawrence</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">)</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">
            </span>took the chair at 09:30.</span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS</title>
        <page.no>116</page.no>
        <type>CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Calare Electorate: Fuel Security</title>
          <page.no>116</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GEE</name>
    <name.id>261393</name.id>
    <electorate>Calare</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The closure of the Great Western Highway and the crippling fuel supply emergency mean that the people of the Central West are being systematically strangled by twin crises and treated as second-class citizens. Right now the national food bowl is running on empty, and we are about to see a total collapse of the basics. There's an old saying that you reap what you sow, but what can you say to farmers who can't sow because they have empty diesel tanks? If this government can't guarantee the fuel required to put seeds in the ground, it forfeits its right to talk about the cost of living. Let's be clear. Farmers with empty fuel tanks will equal empty supermarket shelves. It's that simple. It's regional and remote areas that have been hit hardest with this national fuel crisis.</para>
<para>But for our region the pain isn't just from the bowser. It's in the failure of a bridge built by a convict chain gang in 1832 that serves as the main highway in and out of our region. The devastating indefinite closure of the Great Western Highway at Victoria Pass has turned our local communities into a high-stakes traffic experiment. In Lithgow the safety of our schoolchildren is being gambled with every single day that passes. We have thousands of huge heavy haulage vehicles diverted off the highway and funnelled directly through the heart of Lithgow. Parents and teachers are terrified, and rightly so. We are one tired driver or one mechanical failure away from tragedy. One primary school principal from Lithgow wrote to me and said they are witnessing increasingly impatient and unsafe driver behaviour around the school, and their community feels they are being left exposed to unnecessary risk. And what about the kids from the Hartley Valley? Their commute, just to get to a classroom, has tripled. They are spending hours trapped in transit because a bridge built by a convict chain gang in the 1830s is apparently the best option that a 21st century government can muster.</para>
<para>I've stood with Shannon in Erin's Outdoor Quality Power Centre and in the gardens of Margaret and Allan's Maple Springs Nursery. I've spoken with Ken Muldoon from Mully's Transport in Hartley. These aren't just impacted stakeholders. They are families watching their bank accounts bleed out. Whether it's Margaret and Allan seeing business vanish by 90 per cent, Shannon struggling to pay his staff or Ken seeing his fuel costs double while his productivity halves, the message is the same: enough is enough.</para>
<para>The Great Western Highway is not fit for purpose, and we are done with the broken promises and funding heists. Our community's demand of this government today: (1) an immediate fuel guarantee for farmers and transport operators in country communities; (2) an immediate slashing of the fuel excise tax until this crisis is over; and (3) a support package for businesses across the region hit by the closure of the Great Western Highway. We are sick of the empty words and broken promises. We want action, and we want it now.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Aston Electorate: Community Events</title>
          <page.no>116</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms DOYLE</name>
    <name.id>299962</name.id>
    <electorate>Aston</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last weekend I had the pleasure of attending two fantastic local events in my electorate of Aston, each of them such a wonderful reminder of what makes our community so special. The first one I attended on Saturday was the St Joseph's & St Bernadette's Community Fete. It was an excellent celebration of community, connection and local pride. Events like this bring together people of all ages and backgrounds. They create a vibrant space where local families feel welcome. It was truly heartening to see so many members of the community come out in the bright autumn sunshine and participate and contribute to such a positive atmosphere.</para>
<para>What stood out most were the conversations, the laughter, the sense of belonging and the strong community spirit that flowed throughout the day. I had such a wonderful conversation with 90-year-old Maureen. She told me how she sews beautiful aprons, and she's got such an eye for detail—footy aprons; I bought a St Kilda one, because, you know: go Saints! She was a delight to speak to. I was also pleased to be joined by our new state Labor candidate for the seat of Bayswater, Julie Buxton, for this year's upcoming Victorian state election. It was clear to me and Julie that locals deeply value opportunities to connect and engage with representatives like us and with one another.</para>
<para>I also had the opportunity to attend the Rowville Men's Shed open day, an equally fantastic event that highlighted the vital role men's sheds play in fostering wellbeing, connection, lifeline learning and also lifelong friendships. During my visit, I met up with Stephen and Michael, who were kind enough to assist me with fitting anti-theft numberplate screws, a simple yet practical service that reflects the hands-on, community focused nature of the men's shed. The men's shed also do a bit of beekeeping, so I made sure I bought myself a jar of delicious shed honey.</para>
<para>The day itself was full of activity, from guided shed tours and tool sales to impressive displays, exhibitions, and even a showcase of nostalgic classic cars. Importantly, the day also offered meaningful opportunities for connection. Initiatives like the Talking Cafe created a welcoming space for conversation, helping to reduce isolation and build friendships—something that is more important than ever in today's fast paced world.</para>
<para>While these events may seem modest in scale, their impact is anything but small. They strengthen social bonds, support mental wellbeing and provide inclusive spaces where people can share skills, experience and support. This past week has been a powerful reminder that, when we invest in our community, we are investing in people. Our government remains committed to backing communities like Boronia and Rowville, ensuring they have the resources, opportunities and support they need to thrive—because strong communities don't just happen; they are built through partnership, through investment and through a shared belief in a better future for all.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Aged Care</title>
          <page.no>117</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WATSON-BROWN</name>
    <name.id>300127</name.id>
    <electorate>Ryan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>We'd all like to imagine that we'll be cared for when we get older and that we'll be able to access the support that we really need when we need it. In a wealthy country like Australia, surely that is not too much to ask. But, last year, the Labor government did a dirty deal with the coalition that protects for-profit care providers and makes life harder for older people and their families. Many older people must pay more for the care they receive or simply make do with less care. With long delays for receiving funding, shamefully—tragically—people will die while they wait.</para>
<para>The Greens opposed this scheme at the time, and, sadly, since these changes have come into effect, I have heard truly heartbreaking stories from Ryan residents about the deep suffering that these changes have caused. One constituent told me that her elderly father has recently suffered a stroke and has been classified as needing the highest level of Support at Home funding, level 8. However, under the new laws, he still has an eight- to nine-month wait for the funding to arrive. This constituent says, 'There is a high likelihood my father will die before his funding comes through.' These are the harsh, tragic realities that the government has imposed on people at the stage of life when they should be being looked after.</para>
<para>Not only is the policy itself terrible, but the rollout has been absolutely atrocious. One constituent wrote to me regarding her 82-year-old stepmother, whose funding for vital care services has been consistently delayed. They said, and I quote: 'It seems to us that the government is trying to manage costs by agreeing people need and are entitled to a package but then withholding the money in a sneaky and non-transparent way.' One in three big corporations in Australia are getting away with paying no tax, but instead of going after them, Labor and the coalition are going after older people who've worked hard and paid their taxes all their lives—older people just trying to get the care that they need to survive.</para>
<para>The Greens forced the government to release 20,000 home-care packages early, but that is not enough. We've won two Senate inquiries into the changes, one of which is still accepting submissions until July. So, if you've been affected by these changes, consider making a submission so that your story can actually be heard. The Greens and I will continue to hold the government to account for the damage they have caused to so many people and their families.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Chisholm Electorate: Community Events and Organisations</title>
          <page.no>117</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr GARLAND</name>
    <name.id>295588</name.id>
    <electorate>Chisholm</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I love being able to speak about my electorate of Chisholm in this place. I cherish being able to attend cultural events and community activities. I cherish the work I get to do every single day locally, because I get to see how special the people in my community are. In my role, I get to see the excellent commitment people have to their neighbours and the care that they show to others. I'm very grateful to be invited to so many events right across my electorate.</para>
<para>I was really pleased that, last week, I was able to join the Chinese Association of Monash for their Spring Festival Gala—this was a magnificent event—celebrating the Lunar New Year with traditional dance song, food and stories. It's in these traditions passed down through generations that we can see how wonderful the diversity in our community is. It is so generous for people to share their cultural heritage with people from non-Chinese backgrounds, and I am really grateful for that. I wish everyone a wonderful Year of the Horse in this new year.</para>
<para>Last week, I was pleased to visit the WISE Employment site in Glen Waverley with Minister Rishworth. There, we saw firsthand the work of amazing employment consultants who help give real jobs to people who need them through government programs. They help people to understand what their passions are and what pathways they want to pursue. It's a really important model that we have. I thank the minister for joining us that day. She's always welcome back in the electorate of Chisholm. Indeed, all ministers are. I really do want to thank everyone who shared their stories so generously with me and the minister on that day. Some of their stories and experiences were hard to share, and I'm very grateful that they were able to do so with us so that we can do our jobs even better. Thank you so much.</para>
<para>I love our democracy. On Thursday last week, I was so privileged to join students at Wattle Park Primary School for a mock parliament. Our future leaders participated so well, asking excellent questions, and we had a terrific mock debate. I'm very certain that our future is in very safe hands with these young leaders, and I thank them so much for their enthusiasm and passion. Last week, it was great to visit the Inspire Early Learning Journey in Mount Waverley, seeing our early childhood educators hard at work. It was terrific and absolutely the highlight of my Friday to read stories to the children.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nicholls Electorate: Community Events</title>
          <page.no>118</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BIRRELL</name>
    <name.id>288713</name.id>
    <electorate>Nicholls</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Over the weekend, I attended a great event, which was the 150th anniversary of the town of Katamatite. Katamatite is a small country town that sits on the Boosey creek near its junction with Broken Creek, about 46 kilometres north-east of Shepparton. Many iconic people have come from Katamatite, including identical twin brothers Rod and Don Kilgour, local media personalities who became sports announcers on GMV-6 television. Don later entered the Victorian parliament as the member for Shepparton in 1991.</para>
<para>As you enter the town, a sign greets you, saying 'Home of the 1995 Stawell Gift Winner'. That was Glenn Crawford, who won with a time of 11.79 seconds. Katamatite's got a great reputation as a sporting town. I've attended football training there, and I've attended junior cricket training, where I was clean bowled by a young guy and then thought, 'Instead of batting, I'll go and try bowling.' A young lady sent the ball back over my head a considerable distance. It's also the reigning premier of the Picola and District Football Netball League. Above all, Katamatite is a great little town. It produces high-quality agricultural produce that goes all around the world. It's weathered drought, changing economics and fluctuations in population. But, throughout this, Katamatite has maintained a strong sense of identity and community. When they had some fire dramas earlier this year, they all banded together to help each other out and get through that crisis.</para>
<para>Last year, Shepparton Theatre Arts Group celebrated 50 years in existence. Shepparton Theatre Arts Group is an absolute gem of the Greater Shepparton and Goulburn Valley area. It has musical productions. It has plays. It has all sorts of events that bring the community together to participate but also be the audience. They've done some really big things like <inline font-style="italic">G</inline><inline font-style="italic">rease</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">My Fair Lady</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">Jesus Christ Superstar</inline>. Local playwrights have also written about issues that affect us. One local playwright—who's a podiatrist as his day job but writes plays when he's not looking at feet—wrote some great plays, one called <inline font-style="italic">Dookie</inline> and one called <inline font-style="italic">Watershed</inline>. I was actually in <inline font-style="italic">Watershed</inline>, playing a dairy farmer with a pair of binoculars who was trying to look at a bunch of ladies doing a naked rain dance. I performed that rather well! But it was a wonderful play. It brought the community together, and it explored an issue that we were facing: our drought and our irrigation system.</para>
<para>Congratulations to Shepparton Theatre Arts Group. Here's to another 50 years of wonderful performances.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Greek Independence Day, International Women's Day</title>
          <page.no>118</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GILES</name>
    <name.id>243609</name.id>
    <electorate>Scullin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today is of course 25 March, and that means it is Greek Independence Day. In my electorate, the local Greek community are gathering to celebrate a day that should be remembered not only by the Greek community but by us all for it's important significance historically and as we look forward. Because I'm here, I cannot be there, but I do want to recognise the extraordinary influence the Greek Australian community has had in shaping modern Australia. I think it's fair to say that it is an indelible influence, and it's particularly found in that corner of Melbourne's northern suburbs that I'm so proud to represent here.</para>
<para>Much of the Greek Australian community arrived following a period of postwar instability in Europe with little to their names other than hope, hard work and aspiration for a better future. When we fast forward from that time to today, we see an extraordinary immigration success story—deep roots across local communities, businesses thriving, strong families and vibrant cultural institutions and connections to culture that enrich us all. I say, to Secretary George Sachinidis and the entire Greek Orthodox community of Whittlesea, zito I Ellada</para>
<para>We've just celebrated International Women's Day, a critical opportunity for all of us to recognise and to celebrate the contributions of women in our own communities, our own lives and a broader sense. It's also vital that we recommit ourselves at this time to the work that must be done to address ongoing gender inequality. With that in mind, I hosted an International Women's Day event in my electorate of Scullin, a gathering of strong, inspiring women from diverse backgrounds who are, all in their own way, making contributions to Melbourne's northern suburbs and the special community that it is. We were incredibly lucky to be graced with the presence of my great friend and colleague Assistant Minister Ged Kearney, who came and shared her story alongside some local trailblazers like Peta Fualau, Tracy Perry and Jude Armanazi. It was also fantastic to have Whittlesea Community Connections and the Epping Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Clinic—another important women's health initiative to recognise today—on hand to provide tailored assistance.</para>
<para>It was reminder too about the tangible impact the Albanese government's policies are having on the lives of Australian women and on addressing gender based inequities. We are, of course, Australia's first women-majority government and together have delivered real progress: a record low gender pay gap, record investments into women's health and safety and the extension of paid parental leave with super paid on it, too, so women aren't left behind in retirement. In my own portfolio of skills and training, women are around 60 per cent of free-TAFE enrolments. We're breaking down barriers that have held back so many women from getting into previously male dominated trades. I want to thank the fantastic speakers and everyone who came along to this IWD event and recommit myself to working towards an equal Australia.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fadden Electorate: Aged Care</title>
          <page.no>119</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CALDWELL</name>
    <name.id>306489</name.id>
    <electorate>Fadden</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today on behalf of the seniors on the northern Gold Coast who have done the right thing all their lives but now cannot get the aged-care support that they've been assessed as needing. Labor talks a big game about dignity for older Australians, but, when it comes to delivery, too many seniors are left waiting, left confused and left without help.</para>
<para>Just last week I met with David, a community liaison manager for an aged-care provider based at the northern end of the Gold Coast. David told me that My Aged Care is still giving out codes to people needing help but that there is nobody available to deliver those services. In his words, people get the codes and feel happy that help is on its way, but that hope is short lived because they are then left without real support. He said he spends a fair bit of his time in people's homes, advocating for them and calling My Aged Care to seek reassessment for a Support at Home package, but the process is long and painful.</para>
<para>David raised the case of one woman he met in July 2025 who was approved for a level 4 care package, the highest level of care. Yet, by January 2026, she still had not received the funding and, sadly, is now on end-of-life care. That is not a system that's working as it should. That is a system that's failing vulnerable Australians at the moment they need it the most. He also told me the system is taking nine to 12 months to process applicants, with no guarantee that funding will actually be there at the end. The official data shows that, as at 31 October 2025, estimated wait times for medium-priority approvals were nine to 12 months for level 2 and level 3 packages and six to nine months for level 4, with 107,281 people still waiting at their approved level.</para>
<para>In the same week, I met with Lorraine from Biggera Waters. Lorraine wants to stay in her own home. That is not an unreasonable ask. That's exactly what this aged-care system should do. But, because of the changes that have been made, she cannot access the funds she needs to modify the steps in her home in order to stay there safely. That makes no sense at all. The home modifications should be able to help older Australians stay safe and independent at home. I was also contacted by Wendy of Steiglitz on behalf of her mother, Merle. This family's ordeal has now stretched to over six years, beginning back in 2018. They have faced assessment delays, administrative errors, funding delays and, after funding was finally released, separate equipment application processes.</para>
<para>Unfortunately, these are not the hallmarks of a successful aged-care system, and I would call on the minister to review where this is all going so wrong.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Women in Rescue</title>
          <page.no>119</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FERNANDO</name>
    <name.id>299964</name.id>
    <electorate>Holt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to acknowledge that last Saturday marked the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. In my electorate of Holt, multiculturalism is a part of everyday life. I see it in our schools, our small businesses and our community organisations, where people from diverse backgrounds come together and contribute to a shared Australian story. Families from all over the world have made Holt their home, bringing with them their cultures, languages and traditions. Diversity is one of our greatest strengths. It enriches our community, strengthens our economy and reflects the best of modern Australia.</para>
<para>Last week, I stood with the Prime Minister and colleagues from across our parliamentary team. It was a powerful reminder of what modern Australia looks like at its best—people from different cultures, faiths and backgrounds coming together, united by a shared commitment to our country. It reflected a simple truth that our diversity makes us stronger and that every Australian deserves to feel safe, respected and included.</para>
<para>I also want to make it clear that racial discrimination has no place in our country. It undermines fairness, damages social cohesion and stands in direct opposition to the values we uphold in this parliament. Labor believes in dignity, respect and a fair go for all Australians. For everyone who lives here and commits to our nation and to our democracy, I will always stand to ensure you have a place to belong and an opportunity to thrive.</para>
<para>The SES recently hosted their Women in Rescue initiative. Over 291 women in Victoria attended this training across seven sites, including at the Cranbourne SES unit, in my electorate. It was a privilege to attend and witness firsthand the skill, professionalism and dedication of these incredible volunteers. The day showcased the crucial role the Cranbourne SES plays in our community to keep us safe, whether responding to storms, floods or emergencies.</para>
<para>What stood out the most was the strong focus on encouraging more women to step forward into operational roles. Programs like Women in Rescue are breaking down barriers, including confidence, and ensuring our emergency services better reflect the communities they serve. I want to thank Deputy Controller Julie for inviting me for the day and all the SES volunteers for their service and commitment. Whether it's responding to floods, storms, earthquakes or landslides, your work embodies the very best of our community spirit and dedication.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Critical and Strategic Minerals Industry</title>
          <page.no>120</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHAFFEY</name>
    <name.id>316312</name.id>
    <electorate>Parkes</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This week, as the shadow assistant minister for resources, I've been able to meet with a number of organisations during Minerals Week and attend the Minerals Week parliamentary dinner in the grand hall. This is an important week in Australia's calendar, with events organised by the Minerals Council of Australia, because mining remains—despite the effort of those opposite—a key driver in our nation's economy. Mining contributed $213 billion to Australia's gross domestic product last year. That's over eight per cent of our entire economy. Mining directly employs 290,000 Australians and provides almost 11,000 apprenticeships and traineeships each and every year. And, for every job in mining, there are another six jobs created in manufacturing, in construction, in engineering, in local services and in transport. In my own electorate of Parkes, mining has coexisted with agriculture as a mainstay of our economy for more than a hundred years.</para>
<para>It's hard to tell the Australian mining story without recalling the history of the 'Silver City', Broken Hill, where one of the world's largest silver, lead and zinc deposits was discovered back in the 1880s and BHP was born. In communities like Parkes, Gunnedah, West Wyalong, Nyngan, Forbes, Narrabri, Condobolin and Cobar, mining has been the absolute foundation of the community, providing employment, driving growth and funding infrastructure. In 2025-26, in the Parkes electorate, there were 3,838 full-time mining jobs, $545 million was paid in wages, there was $1.1 billion in annual direct spending and the industry supported 874 local suppliers.</para>
<para>Agriculture and mining have, together, built towns and cities across our great nation. In 2023-24, mining related companies invested more than $660 million in regional programs, including sporting clubs, environmental projects, emergency health services, child care and community organisations. The Minerals Council of Australia have advised that, in the 2022-23 financial year, the mining industry paid $74 billion in tax and royalties, making it the biggest taxpayer in our nation. Of all company tax collected in that financial year, 30 per cent came from mining. That is money for hospitals, for schools, for aged care, for roads, for child care, for police and for much, much more.</para>
<para>Critical minerals are becoming more and more sought after for their role in modern technology, and Australia has strong reserves. The Standing Committee on Primary Industries is inquiring into factors shaping social licence and economic development outcomes in critical minerals projects across the country. This inquiry is now open for submissions, and I encourage individuals and organisations to share their views.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Campbelltown Theatre Group: 70th Anniversary</title>
          <page.no>120</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>09:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to acknowledge and celebrate a remarkable milestone in our local community: the 70th anniversary of the Campbelltown Theatre Group. For seven decades, this not-for-profit organisation has been at the heart of the performing arts in Macarthur—and I've been to several fantastic productions put on by them—bringing together people from all walks of life united by a shared passion for theatre and the performing arts.</para>
<para>The Campbelltown Theatre Group was formed following a public meeting on 21 June 1956, and less than a year later it staged its very first production, Gilbert and Sullivan's <inline font-style="italic">The Pirates of Penzance</inline> at the Town Hall Theatre, then known as the old town hall. That inaugural performance marked the beginning of what has become a rich legacy for Macarthur's creative arts community. Over the past 70 years, the group has presented more than 240 musical and dramatic productions, performing across venues throughout the Macarthur region.</para>
<para>Since 1980, it has proudly called the Town Hall Theatre in Queen Street its home. This historic venue stands today not only as a heritage listed building but as a symbol of what can be achieved when community and government work hand in hand. Through the leadership of Gordon Fetterplace at the beginning and the dedication of countless members, the group partnered with council and secured government support to transform the former town hall into a dedicated theatre. It looks fantastic. That effort, supported by funding, volunteer labour and sheer determination, ensured that the arts would have a permanent home in Campbelltown.</para>
<para>The Campbelltown Theatre Group is far more than a performance company. It's a training ground, a creative hub and a welcoming space for aspiring artists of all ages. Through youth programs, workshops and work placement opportunities, it continues to nurture the next generation of performers, technicians and creatives, many of whom have gone on to professional careers in the arts.</para>
<para>Today, with more than 130 active members, this group continues to thrive. Just the other week, I attended the opening night of their latest production, <inline font-style="italic">Come From Away</inline>, which was a terrific performance, and I congratulate all involved in putting it together. It was so professional. The performing, the singing and the music were absolutely wonderful. I would encourage everyone and anyone to go and see this—as well as their other works, including <inline font-style="italic">Billy </inline><inline font-style="italic">Elliot</inline>.</para>
<para>Like so many community theatre organisations across Australia, the Campbelltown Theatre Group operates entirely on the dedication of volunteers. Its longevity is a testament to the passion, talent and generosity of those who give their time both on and off the stage. I extend my sincere congratulations to every member, past and present, who's contributed to this extraordinary journey, and I look forward to seeing the Campbelltown Theatre Group continue to flourish for many years to come. I congratulate the council for its ongoing support and I look forward to seeing some great productions in the future.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Feral Animal Management</title>
          <page.no>121</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
    <electorate>Gippsland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Feral animals and invasive species are a menace to Australia's biodiversity and agricultural production. They are costing us $1 billion per year in lost agricultural production, and this is an issue where we're simply not doing enough at state and federal government level. We need more boots and fewer suits. That's more boots on the ground doing active environmental management and pest-animal control, and fewer suits in the cities, making excuses.</para>
<para>Just this week, I was contacted by a fifth-generation farmer from the area of Benambra in my electorate, a fellow by the name of Stuart. He sent me photos of the wild-dog carnage on his property from just one night. It's confronting—but it is the reality of a lack of wild dog control measures—to see the impact on his sheep flock. People who may not be familiar with farming and don't like the idea of wild dogs being shot or wild dogs being trapped or the use of aerial baits should go out and join my constituent Stuart when he walks out into the paddock in the morning and deals with the stock losses.</para>
<para>Stuart told me the state government rolled back the highly successful wild dog aerial baiting program in the last fortnight, and he says now is the perfect time to bait, as all the young dogs are out on their own and they're the ones doing the damage. Given all the regular issues that we deal with in this industry, we certainly can't afford the time and the cost of this dog issue getting out of hand again.</para>
<para>The social and economic cost of wild dogs to our sheep flock is enormous—and to our farmers themselves. In terms of mental health and stress, just imagine working all day to care for your stock, going home at night and grabbing a bite to eat and then grabbing your rifle and your thermal scope and heading out again to try and control wild dogs. That is the lived reality for farmers in my electorate.</para>
<para>The last time the dogs were this bad was around 2010 when, from a flock of, say, 1,000 sheep, you could lose 20 to 30 ewes in one night. That was at a time when sheep were valuable—but nothing like the prices they're getting today. In today's market, a lamb can be worth up to $300, and ewes can be around $250 to $350 per head. So, in a bad night, if it gets back to the way it was in 2010, you could see a loss of $7,500—or even up to $15,000 if the ewes are pregnant—just in one night. This is the lived reality of farmers in my electorate right now, when it comes to controlling the wild dog problem.</para>
<para>I acknowledge this is primarily a matter for the state government, but the federal government does have a role to play here in the way we provide funding for natural resource management and the control of invasive and feral species. Wild dogs are an enormous social and economic cost to our community, and both levels of government need to be working together to use every available lever to control the problem before it gets completely out of hand once again.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Down Syndrome, National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>121</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms FRANCE</name>
    <name.id>270198</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Saturday was World Down Syndrome Day, a day to recognise the incredible contributions of people with Down syndrome. I would like to take this opportunity to tell you the story of Eoin Gibson, who I recently had the pleasure of meeting at my office in Strathpine. Eoin's story is one of determination, possibility and a love of work. Eoin is an employment ambassador for Down's Syndrome Australia and he's an advocate for their Employment Connections program. Eoin talked to me about how much he values his job, working at Coles. He's not just an employee. He is a valued and integral member of the team, having been trained across all departments within the store.</para>
<para>Eoin's on full wages, as he should be, and is supported in his professional development in exactly the same way as any other employee. He has the ability to try different roles, receive ongoing training and discover what works best for him and his team. That kind of opportunity to grow, to contribute, to prosper and to be truly seen in the workplace matters enormously. Eoin believes, and I agree wholeheartedly, that everyone should have the right to work and prosper, including people with Down syndrome, and that, if we support each other, anything is possible.</para>
<para>For people with a disability, employment is about so much more than just a job. It is financial freedom. It is independence. It is dignity and worth. Sadly, over decades, we have not done enough to encourage and support people with a disability to get into the workforce. While in the past few years the statistics have come up a bit, we still have a lot more work to do to ensure that people who want a job can get into the workforce and can support their families and become financially independent.</para>
<para>A new report released today by e61 Institute reinforces just how transformative the right support can be. It found that people who have access to the NDIS and the right supports perform significantly better in the workforce than they did before receiving government funded support. NDIS participants work nearly two hours more per week within four years of entering the scheme, and earn an extra $76 per fortnight. As a result, they are less likely to rely on unemployment payments, and, importantly, they report feeling better and having higher energy levels.</para>
<para>Stories like Eoin's and data like this remind us why Labor's investment in the NDIS is so important and why we will always continue to protect it.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Port Macquarie</title>
          <page.no>122</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONAGHAN</name>
    <name.id>279991</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to take this opportunity to talk up beautiful Port Macquarie, a rapidly expanding regional city that deserves acknowledgement of its recent accelerated growth and future potential. Port Macquarie has always been a tourism hotspot. If you haven't been there, you should go. But, in recent years, more and more of its once seasonal visitors have opted to stay permanently, with a growth rate of 17.3 per cent in Port Macquarie west since the start of 2021. It's not hard to see why. Not only is it a coastal city filled with natural beauty but it continues to enhance and expand its employment opportunities and services, evolving to cater to both young and old.</para>
<para>Once upon a time, it was heralded as a retirement capital, but now it's attracting more and more families than it ever has before, and it's easy to see why. It's because we have some of the best public schools and impressive independent schools like the Nature School, the Steiner school and St Columba. The range and choice on offer certainly puts it at the top of the list in New South Wales. That's coupled with the state-of-the-art Charles Sturt University campus that is well on its way to doubling its intake by 2030, and the University of New South Wales clinical campus at the base hospital as well.</para>
<para>Yet, despite these obvious indicators of accelerated, sustained growth, the congestion chaos at this burgeoning regional city's most critical entry points continues to grow worse with every passing month, due to a lack of care and investment by this Labor government and the state Labor government. The Wrights Road and the Lake Road roundabouts leading to the health and education precincts—in fact, those that I've just referred to—have long been flagged as the worst areas and the most dangerous bottlenecks, impacting not only commuters but, more importantly, ambulances attempting to get to the hospital. That's why under the coalition, prior to 2022, we allocated $5 million to settle a feasibility study for those areas. But, with the change of government, that funding decision was reversed, and, despite continued, unified calls by local, state and federal representatives, nothing has happened.</para>
<para>So, on behalf of my communities, I'm asking the state and federal governments: why are you ignoring the needs of a rapidly expanding regional city with so much to offer? We deserve so much more.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Dunkley Emerging Leaders Program</title>
          <page.no>122</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to speak about a matter deeply close to my heart: empowering the next generation of leaders in Dunkley. Before entering parliament, I spent more than 20 years as a youth worker across local, state and national government. I worked alongside young people and dedicated professionals to build programs that created real opportunities for young people to grow, connect and reach their potential. My passion for this work is personal. As a young person, I experienced family violence and sexual abuse. It led to disconnection from school and shattered my confidence. Through family support, education, counselling and ballet, I was able to rebuild my life.</para>
<para>My lived experience drives my determination to ensure young people from every background receive the support they need to build resilience, develop skills and rise above adversity. In my first speech, I committed to advocating for young people. Over the past two years that commitment has only grown stronger because now—in a time of social, economic and political uncertainty—many young people feel powerless and overwhelmed by the scale of the challenges before them.</para>
<para>That is why I am proud to report to the House that I have taken a meaningful step forward through the Dunkley Emerging Leaders Program. Last week I held the first session of this pilot program for young adults aged 18 and over who are passionate about advocacy, change making and leadership. The program is grounded in experiential learning, helping participants build confidence, self-understanding and a strong sense of purpose. In the months ahead, participants will develop practical leadership skills, learn to think critically, engage with civic and political systems and gain confidence in public speaking. We will hear from Professor Rod Glover, Senator Lisa Darmanin and Speaker of the House Milton Dick. They will also deepen their resilience, emotional literacy and capacity for self-care—qualities essential for any leadership journey.</para>
<para>This program is about empowering young adults to contribute meaningfully to their communities and to drive positive change. When we invest in young people, we invest in the future of our nation. You cannot be what you cannot see, and we hope this program helps young people see what is possible and turn belief into action.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Energy</title>
          <page.no>123</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAMILTON</name>
    <name.id>291387</name.id>
    <electorate>Groom</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Australians are right to be angry about the cost of living. They feel it every single day at the checkout and through their power bills, their rent and the cost of getting to work. When you strip it back, one truth sits underneath it all: energy is the economy. When energy gets more expensive, everything gets more expensive.</para>
<para>Over the past few years, we've made a political decision to rebuild our entire energy system around emissions targets—not around cost, not around reliability and not around what works for Australian families. And that decision has consequences. We're forcing early coal-fired power plant closures before firming replacement is ready. That reduces supply. And when supply goes down, price goes up.</para>
<para>We've built an energy system that's dependent on the weather, which means we now need to duplicate the entire grid with back-up generation, transmission lines and storage. That's not cheap. It's one system becoming two, and we're paying for them both. We've seen billions of dollars in subsidies flow into projects that cannot stand on their own, and those costs don't disappear. They're paid for, one way or another, by Australian households. We've created a system where industries—the businesses that make things, employ people and anchor our communities—are now paying some of the highest energy prices in the developed world. And that flows straight through to household budgets—higher fertiliser costs, higher freight costs, higher grocery prices and higher rents as a result of construction costs rising. This is not abstract. This is the weekly shop. And that's why, back in 2021, when Australia signed up to net zero, I took a different path—not because I don't care about the environment but because the engineer in me could see that this was heading towards a system built on higher costs, a system that weakens our industrial base and a system that makes Australia more dependent, not less.</para>
<para>There is no strong country without a strong economy. There's no strong economy without low-cost, reliable energy. From steel to fertiliser and transport to manufacturing, energy sits underneath it all. If we want to ease the cost of living, rebuild our economy and be a country that makes things again, then we have to be honest about what's gone wrong. We cannot keep pretending that higher-cost energy will somehow magically deliver a lower cost of living. It will not. The path forward is simple, but it requires courage. We must rebuild our energy system around the core principles of affordability and security. That means using the resources we have: coal, gas and, where it stacks up, new technologies to deliver the lowest possible cost to households and businesses. The best cost-of-living policy you will ever see is cheap energy. Until we get that right, everything else will keep getting harder.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Queensland: Floods</title>
          <page.no>123</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MATT SMITH</name>
    <name.id>312393</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On Thursday last week we were informed that Tropical Cyclone Narelle had reached category 5 levels. This is an incredibly dangerous system with winds up to 250 kilometres an hour and the potential to impact right across Cape York Peninsula. On Thursday we hit the phones, calling into the communities of Lockhart, Coen, Cooktown, Hope Vale, Wujal Wujal, Aurukun, Weipa, Pormpuraaw, Napranum and Mapoon to ensure that they were prepared and ready for what was coming.</para>
<para>It went from bad to worse. A small but powerful system was bearing down, looking to hit Coen directly and then move across the cape. We were spared the worst of it. Princess Charlotte Bay is shallow. It sucked some of the power out of Narelle, which arrived as a category 4 and rapidly diminished once it hit the land. It also took a hard right and spared Coen, taking out some of the stations. There was a lot of damage to shed infrastructure, and a couple was stranded on the Moreton Telegraph Station for a day or so while the floodwaters from the Wenlock rose.</para>
<para>On Saturday I flew up to Coen to meet with Premier David Crisafulli, with the member for Cook and with Mayor Robyn Holmes. All three levels of government were available for the people of Coen to have a chat to. What we found in Coen was a community that was resilient and happy. They were grateful that they were spared the worst of the cyclone, but they were prepared. This is not our first rodeo. We do cyclones fairly regularly. The thing about the Far North—and the thing that I'm most proud of—is how our community bands together in times like these.</para>
<para>There are new community members in Coen. It was their first cyclone. Sara, who runs a bush pantry there, and her husband broke down one day, actually, and they decided to stay in Coen. There wasn't a mechanic in town. Mike was a mechanic, so he bought the place. It was their first cyclone, and they were so impressed at how the entire community got together and made sure that everyone was going to be safe for the upcoming storm. On Sunday I went to Weipa to inspect the damage there—same thing. The North is resilient, and the North survives.</para>
<para>I do want to illustrate a story which I think shows who we are as the Far North. On Thursday night I got a text from Coen: 'Preparations are good. We're in the pub.' Okay! Couldn't fault the logic! On Friday during my phone calls to all the communities to make sure everyone was okay—the mayor of Lockhart River was on the plant—my favourite text was again from Coen on Friday night. 'We're all good. The power's back on. We're back in the pub.' Fantastic! A full circle moment! I love the Far North, the resilience we show and the way we look after each other, and it just shone through again.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fuel</title>
          <page.no>124</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAWKE</name>
    <name.id>HWO</name.id>
    <electorate>Mitchell</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise with great concern over the recent fuel and oil shocks that are causing an increase in inflation and cost-of-living crises for Australians. What is most important for Australia to remember is that we can only control what is inside our control as a country, not be blown about by things that are happening overseas. Yes, we have a war in Iran. Yes, we have a war in Ukraine. Yes, we now have an oil shock and a fuel crisis. But the consequences of the government abandoning the productivity challenge—from the day they got re-elected, they said productivity was their first concern—and giving it up so easily has ongoing effects for our economy.</para>
<para>Have a think about Trevor in West Pennant Hills in my electorate, who emailed me and said his year-on-year electricity bill that he just got just went up 33 per cent. Have a think about all the small businesses in my electorate who tell me now that to get something off the docks—off the waterfront—for import exposed businesses is now a three-month wait. Now, I've contacted the minister, and his staff are very helpful. My former agencies in Home Affairs have very helpful people. But our lack of productivity on the waterfront means that these businesses have faced three-month waits, and that's still not the resolution. They don't know if they will have their goods off the docks after three months.</para>
<para>Declining productivity in Australia means directly that, for each of those small businesses and services affected in my electorate—three of them have contacted me just this month, desperate to get those supplies off the waterfront—their viability is under severe threat. And nobody treats that like a crisis. When we have the world's highest wages and we have people on the waterfront increasing wages constantly, we have no link to productivity. Why can't we demand more productivity from our waterfront? Why can't we get those things out of the cargo containers and to the businesses so they can keep their businesses going? No-one answers that. That's not a crisis. We're dealing with other crises. Well, I can tell you that freefall declining productivity over time is the biggest economic crisis we face, because the cost of everything is going up.</para>
<para>For God's sake, rents are unaffordable for ordinary people. Beer is unaffordable. Let's have a look at that. Historically speaking, beer is one of the cheapest staples in world history. It is now almost unaffordable for Australians. We talk about it here in pubs and we've heard members here talking about pubs. Well, beer is virtually unaffordable for the average Australian right now. This is freefall declining productivity. The Treasurer said it was his No. 1 challenge and then he dropped it like a lead balloon within five minutes. We haven't heard this government speak about productivity since. I give this example of my constituents struggling directly. They're genuine, great, import-exposed small businesses. They cannot get their products off the docks. Everyone's trying to help, but no-one's doing anything about the problems with productivity. We must be able to do better as a country, or our prices and our inflation will continue to increase the cost of all basic goods and services, which is a disaster for our economy.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Richmond Electorate: Community Organisations</title>
          <page.no>124</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ELLIOT</name>
    <name.id>DZW</name.id>
    <electorate>Richmond</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last week, I invited the Minister for Social Services back to the North Coast to visit Krurungal Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporation for Welfare, Resource and Housing and talk with their amazing team about how the Albanese Labor government's increased funding for their organisation will support our local community. Our government has increased emergency relief grant funding for Krurungal by 41 per cent to support them in delivering a range of culturally appropriate community based services. The services include emergency relief and community pathway connector programs as well as supporting individuals with mental health concerns and transitioning to the NDIS and other services. Krurungal has a strong track record of working closely with family, friends, support people, carers and other services on behalf of community members to ensure that locals receive culturally appropriate support and their health and wellbeing are addressed in a holistic manner. I'd like to say a very, very big thank you to the chairperson of Krurungal, Aunty Joyce Summers, and the whole team for the vitally important work that they continue to do to help support our local community in accessing services. Thank you so much for welcoming the minister and me last week.</para>
<para>Also earlier this month, I had the great pleasure of greeting <inline font-style="italic">Matilda</inline>, our very own 'local mobile wildlife hospital', as she and her team arrived at Parliament House in Canberra. What a treat that was for everyone. I also invited the Minister for the Environment and Water to meet the whole team and see the incredible work they do utilising Australia's only mobile wildlife hospital which operates inside a fantastic custom-built semitrailer. I know many members and senators were able to visit <inline font-style="italic">Matilda</inline> during that week. It was a wonderful visit, I can report that the Minister for the Environment and Water, who visited, is very fond of Digby, a nine-month-old wombat, and that he was also very impressed also by the terrific volunteers and workers who were nursing Digby back to health after an accident. It is a great example of the incredible work that Byron Bay Wildlife Hospital do.</para>
<para><inline font-style="italic">Matilda</inline> and the team are on a tour throughout the entire country. They're visiting New South Wales, Victoria, the ACT as I said, Tasmania, South Australia and Western Australia. They're on tour to demonstrate and showcase the mobile capacity to assist wildlife impacted by natural disasters, disease outbreaks and accidents as well. Now, while <inline font-style="italic">Matilda</inline> is on tour, the Byron Bay Wildlife Hospital continues to do their work tirelessly from their permanent base in Lennox Head, which is in my electorate of Richmond, and I'm very pleased to have worked with the Byron Bay Wildlife Hospital over many years and also very proud to have delivered on my 2025 election commitment of $2 million for the expansion of operations of the Byron Bay Wildlife Hospital. By providing funding for Australia's only mobile wildlife hospital, our government is helping to ensure they continue to provide that very important care to injured wildlife through surgery, intensive care, X-rays, ultrasound and other facilities so they can continue their amazing work. So I want to say a really big thanks to all the team at Byron Bay Wildlife Hospital and a happy travels, Tilly, as you continue around the country. You're doing a great job.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Casino Greyhound Racing Club, Casino Branch of the Country Women's Association of NSW, Crispin, Mr Darren</title>
          <page.no>125</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:24</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOGAN</name>
    <name.id>218019</name.id>
    <electorate>Page</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to acknowledge and celebrate the 90th birthday of the Casino Greyhound Racing Club. The first race meeting was held at the now Queen Elizabeth Park in 1936. The Northfield family are notorious in our local greyhound community. Pop Northfield was a key driver behind greyhound racing in the northern rivers. His son Billy trained champions like Pretty Short, which won 58 races in its career. His grandsons, Mitch, Charlie, Brad and Glen, along with the wider family, have carried on this legacy. I'd particularly like to acknowledge Mitch, who is currently the president, Secretary Donna Pezet and past employees with significant contributions such as Don Waldron, Bruce Knight and Ronnie Herd for their leadership and service to the club. Because of this dedication and support of local trainers and the community, the Casino greyhound club continues to thrive as a hub for racing. Congratulations to the committee, the staff and the volunteers over a remarkable 90 years.</para>
<para>I'd like to acknowledge and congratulate the Country Women's Association Casino branch for their 100th birthday. For a century, the women of Casino CWA have been at the heart of our community. From establishing vital health and welfare services to their participation in Primex, the Casino Show, community fundraising stalls and the Casino Golf Club markets, the group have provided ongoing support for community organisations in Casino. I'd also like to acknowledge the dedicated branch executive and president, Jane Flick; secretary, Janet Henderson; treasurer, Jennifer Baker; and cultural officer, Denise Crouch, along with all the Casino branch members. I'd also like to recognise two life members: Rita Nicholls, for 40 years, and Anne Bailey, a CWA Far North Coast Group patron and life member of 69½ years, celebrating her 100th birthday in September. Thank you to all the members, past and present, for your leadership and dedication to the Casino CWA.</para>
<para>I'd like to acknowledge Darren Crispin from Grafton, who this weekend will take on a 24-hour tennis challenge in support of the Love Your Sister charity. Darren is a generous coach at the Junction Hill Tennis Club and a driving force behind the club, always giving his time to students and backing those doing it tough. Cancer is something he holds close, having lost loved ones, and that's what is driving his fundraising. Last year he completed a 12-hour marathon, raising over $25,000. This year, after 12 months of training, he is taking up the 24-hour challenge. Through initiatives like Aces for the Community and Bridges of Hope walks, Darren continues to bring people together to support others in need. I'd like to acknowledge his wife, Karen; his children, Natasha, Nick, Josh and BJ; and their partners for their support. Darren, this is a remarkable effort, and the community is right behind you.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination</title>
          <page.no>125</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WATTS</name>
    <name.id>193430</name.id>
    <electorate>Gellibrand</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Saturday 21 March was the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. This is a day that all Australians can be proud of. It's a day to be proud to be Australian.</para>
<para>Australia's a country that has made terrible mistakes in its history with respect to race. Indeed, the first substantive bill passed by this parliament after Federation was the Immigration Restriction Act, better known today as the White Australia policy. But Australia's greatest strength as a country is our ability to change as a democracy, to recognise mistakes and to set a new course, and this is what Australia has done as a nation. We have recognised the mistakes and the dead end that race based politics can lead a country down, and we've corrected it. We've gone from a country that passed a White Australia policy at the moment of Federation to become a modern Australia, the most successful multicultural nation on earth.</para>
<para>Today, the parliament that first passed that Immigration Restriction Act now includes 17 members of parliament with Asian heritage, 10 from the government's side. I was so proud to see them all come together for a celebratory photo last week. Today's parliament includes eight members of parliament with Indigenous heritage, something that would have been unimaginable at the moment of Federation. We can be so proud as Australians of the journey we have taken as a nation and of the country that we have built together—a country drawing on 60,000 years of Indigenous heritage, a country leveraging the Westminster institutions of our democracy and our rule of law to change and recognise mistakes, a country where now half of us are either born overseas or have a parent born overseas, enriched by that multicultural migration. We're a country that can cheer on Sam Kerr at the Asian Cup as the captain of the Matildas with Indian heritage, a country that can cheer on Jason Day, a magnificent world-class golfer with Filipino heritage, at the Masters, a country that can cheer on Saya Sakakibara and Arisa Trew, gold-medal-winning Asian Australians, at the Olympics, a country that can celebrate Rose as part of Blackpink, a country where Terry Tao can become a maths prodigy and our first Fields Medal winner, a country where Jack Zhang can found Airwallex, a company worth $12 billion and a country where Melanie Perkins can co-found Canva, a company worth $60 billion.</para>
<para>Some things never change, though. In 1996, Pauline Hanson said, 'All Asian immigration should stop.' She said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate.</para></quote>
<para>Just imagine what Australia would have missed out on if we had followed her advice 30 years ago. My family, my electorate and my country are in a better place for rejecting divisive, race based politics. Modern Australia is a country we've all built together and we can all be proud of.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In accordance with standing order 193, the time for member's constituency statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>126</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</title>
          <page.no>126</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="r7449" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>126</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GREGG</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
    <electorate>Deakin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The bill before us today, the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026, is about keeping Australians safe, which has to be the primary concern of every member of this parliament. This bill updates and improves pieces of crime related legislation, including amendments to the Crimes Act, the Criminal Code Act, the Director of Public Prosecutions Act and the Extradition Act. A lot of these changes are quite technical in nature, but if you read through the bill you'll see there are a number of very significant and important changes too, which I'd like to go through in turn. The common thread is that they are all about keeping Australians safe.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 is about making amendments to modernise the law around enforcement and the procedures that allow our agencies to operate more efficiently.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">A division having been called in the House of Representatives—</inline></para>
<para>Sitting suspended from 10:31 to 10:42</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GREGG</name>
    <name.id>315154</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Part 1 of the bill lists Sydney West Airport as a major airport to empower the Australian Federal Police to exercise the necessary powers at the airport. These powers already apply to every other major airport in the country. This amendment does not create new powers; it simply extends them to the new airport in Sydney's west, which is a completely commonsense change.</para>
<para>Part 2 of schedule 1 of the bill clarifies that specific warrants and orders contained in the Crimes Act can also be made electronically. This is so officers do not have to waste time going to court to fill out hard copy forms. It also makes it easier to obtain these important warrants and orders outside of ordinary court hours. It improves the efficiency of law enforcement and makes sure that we're keeping pace with modern lodgement practices—again, a commonsense change. It addresses major issues with in-person lodgement, which is eminently sensible.</para>
<para>Part 3 of the bill extends the sunset date for three sets of warrants—network activity warrants, data disruption warrants and account takeover warrants—as well as emergency authorisations. These warrants were originally set to expire in September this year. They will be extended to 2029. That will enable the government to complete its more exhaustive package of reforms to these areas, but will ensure the preservation of the status quo up until that time. Again, another very important change. Another aspect of those warrants is that the data disruption warrants will fall outside of the powers of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. This is to reflect the fact that they are now focused on being an intelligence gathering organisation. Disruption is really outside of their purview, and that also reflects the independent review of the relevant legislation.</para>
<para>Other parts of the bill look at our drug laws. These are aligning practices at a Commonwealth level with those of the states. So, instead of measuring criminal culpability based on the purity of a substance, we're simply allowing the inclusion of the total weight of any mixed substance. For example, if cocaine is mixed with pseudoephedrine, you can count the whole lot as cocaine. This is commonsense. It reflects the culpability of those involved in it and prevents unnecessary time and money being spent assessing the purity of a substance when that is not a relevant fact when it comes to these criminal offences.</para>
<para>There are also changes to evidence provisions, enabling the issuing of a certificate which confirms the chain of custody after drugs have been taken away and prior to prosecutions. Currently, individual officers all have to write reports. They also have to be available to give oral evidence in court. This is exhaustive and, frankly, fundamentally unnecessary. This doesn't undermine the right to a fair trial. If someone wants to contest the processing of a particular drug in court, they're still entitled to do so. But this enables a simplified approach, which means, again, that trials can focus on relevant facts at issue and not get sidetracked by these unnecessary administrative burdens.</para>
<para>Another small reform that I neglected to mention in relation to schedule 1 is the continuation of the Australian Capital Territory police's powers around precharge detention and investigation. When these provisions were originally drafted, the ACT had envisioned that it would be introducing its own regime. But, as time has gone on, it's become evident that the Commonwealth regime will do. So this just continues the status quo for them.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 is, again, a fairly uncontroversial change. Under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act currently, if there's a perception of or a real conflict of interest, the only option is for the Director of Public Prosecutions to step down so someone else can step up. This change effectively empowers the Attorney-General, if such a conflict is raised, to appoint someone temporarily to address that conflict without the current hoo-ha, which is again a very commonsense piece of reform. It also changes the title of Associate Director of Public Prosecutions to Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions. It's using language similar to that seen in other departments.</para>
<para>Extradition legislation will also be changed. That is the powers of police to arrest people who are the subject of orders from foreign countries seeking either to prosecute them or to ensure that they serve their sentence of imprisonment. Often we're talking about serious offenders. This will enable police to effectively exercise powers of arrest similar to those already seen in crimes legislation in Australia. This reflects the fact that we're often talking about individuals who have committed very serious offences. It allows fair and proportionate use of police powers of entry and arrest. In circumstances where, for example, there is a need to capture someone between 9 pm and 6 am, the police have to exercise proper discretion and make sure that's eminently necessary. So it's ensuring a proportionate framework but nevertheless a rigorous application of those powers.</para>
<para>There are also rule changes around those who have waived their extradition rights. This is ordinarily an administrative process that people go through. When a country requests that someone be sent back to that country, there is a formal review process. A person can waive that administrative process. This enables that in a more direct way, at the same time allowing those individuals to be kept in detention until such time as they're handed over to the other country, where they'll face either prosecution or imprisonment.</para>
<para>Schedule 5 amends the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act. This is a very technical amendment. In Victoria, what was formerly known as the Victorian Inspectorate is now known as Integrity Oversight Victoria, and this amendment simply reflects that change.</para>
<para>These are fairly commonsense changes to the law, as we've seen so far, so it's a bill that I absolutely commend. In particular, the changes around drug legislation are incredibly important for efficiency's sake, ensuring that the trial process is rigorous and focused on the criminal culpability of the individuals involved and not allowing a discount in culpability simply because of impurities in a substance. But it's also proportionate because it prevents double charging. So, if there are two substances that are governed by these legal regimes, you're not going to be charged for each substance separately. They're treated as one. For example, pseudoephedrine and cocaine mixed together in a powder would be treated as a packet of cocaine. You wouldn't have one charge for pseudoephedrine and one charge for cocaine. It simplifies the process. It reflects the way the states have worked for a very long time. It is commonsense enforcement that reflects the culpability of the offenders involved. This enables a more rigorous and robust enforcement. It's not awarding impurity. It's not awarding dodgy drug-dealing practices. This is just ensuring that the criminality is properly reflected in the way things are prosecuted. It is really facilitating a better and more efficient criminal justice process by enabling prosecutions to be focusing on evidence of probative value as to whether someone is guilty and culpable of an offence and not on technical administrative issues. The same is true in relation to the warrants and orders. This is about making a better, more efficient justice system , improving the way criminal justice works in Australia. It's something that ought to be commended.</para>
<para>I want to pay tribute to the Attorney-General, who is doing a lot of work dealing with crime. This is something that I know is incredibly important to my community and communities around Australia. The Albanese government is working incredibly hard. We have a no-nonsense approach to this kind of criminality. This is one of many reforms that the government is going through to ensure that we have a rigorous criminal justice process and that our law enforcement agencies have the powers, tools, clarity and certainty they need to do their jobs effectively. So I commend the Attorney-General, and I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CLUTTERHAM</name>
    <name.id>316101</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak in support of the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No.1) Bill 2026. At its heart, this bill is about supporting law enforcement agencies to provide efficient and effective services to Australians to keep them safe. Law enforcement agencies play a critical role in the functioning of our communities and of our country and they need to be appropriately equipped to carry out their functions, with appropriate, reasonable and proportionate safeguards as well.</para>
<para>When out and about in my community, I've received some feedback of a general nature that crime, particularly opportunistic crime, is on the rise and that people feel just that little bit less safe generally. Car theft, petty robbery, low-level property damage and general antisocial and threatening behaviour are on the rise. Opportunistic crimes committed randomly and without preplanning cause fear within communities, reducing connection, increasing scepticism and undermining cohesion. Deliberate, targeted crime does this too, just on a much more significant scale.</para>
<para>Cost-of-living pressures, social issues that are still lingering from the pandemic and the development of technology that facilitates, for example, car theft or the duplication of garage remote codes means that opportunistic and deliberate crime is happening and police resources are stretched. Australians do not want police resources to be so stretched that difficult decisions about which call-outs to attend, which offences to investigate and which offences to prosecute need to be made any more than is absolutely necessary. No-one wants that, and this bill contains measures to assist with this.</para>
<para>Firstly, however, I'll go to criminal law. There are many different purposes to criminal law. First and foremost is the maintenance of social order. Criminal law plays a critical role in keeping things in order within a society. As society changes, which it does regularly, clear definitions surrounding what behaviours are harmful and disruptive—and thus off limits—are important. This helps to set boundaries and acts as a deterrent against committing crimes or aiding in the commission of crimes. This makes communities safer and more predictable. It also helps to hold people to account for their actions by ensuring that people who commit crimes face consequences. This also facilitates trust and confidence in the criminal law system because it demonstrates fairness to the wider population. It demonstrates that everyone is subject to the same rules and also limits people taking justice into their own hands, which is a very dangerous approach on many levels.</para>
<para>Ensuring victims receive justice is the second key purpose of criminal law. I recently met someone in my electorate of Sturt who had been the victim of a very serious crime. She had two main drivers going forward. The first was justice for herself—to be heard and to have the effect that the serious crime had on her to be soundly understood. The second driver was to share her story so that lessons could be learned and strategies put in place to minimise the prospects of what had happened to her happening to anyone else. When victims do not feel heard or feel that nothing was done in response to what happened to them, there is a loss of trust and confidence in the police, the courts and all operators in the justice system, and issues and offences are less likely to be reported, potentially leading to escalation and this sense amongst perpetrators that it is possible to get away with offending.</para>
<para>In this respect, the third key purpose of the criminal law is the rehabilitation of offenders. This is important because it offers opportunities for offenders to reintegrate into society and once again become productive members of the community. If the underlying causes of criminal behaviour can be addressed through rehabilitation then the prospects of reoffending are lowered, which is a good thing for the entire community. Through rehabilitation, the criminal justice system is motivated to break the cycle of crime and promote meaningful and sustainable positive change for individuals and for communities.</para>
<para>Fourth is deterrence and punishment. The goal of deterrence is to discourage members of society from committing criminal offences, and the fear of punishment is the general deterrence and discouragement mechanism. However, deterrence is effective only if a person has the capacity to reflect. Because many people commit crimes in the heat of the moment, this is one of the major obstacles for deterrence in criminal justice. That is why implementing punishments and making them publicly known as a form of education is an equally important part of deterrence, because it sends the message that all criminal acts will be punished, that authorities are motivated to catch offenders and punish them and also that Australians, quite rightly, expect this and deserve this.</para>
<para>Finally, the criminal law, particularly the way it operates in this country, is complete with safeguards, thresholds, clear processes, and an emphasis on procedural fairness and the protection of the rights of individuals. Innocent until proven guilty, or the presumption of innocence, is a fundamental principle of the criminal justice system in Australia, and it must remain forever so, no matter what the alleged offence is. The minute we start picking and choosing who is entitled to the benefit of this principle is the minute we turn our backs on core legal principles and core human rights and invite false accusations and invite the state, as the prosecuting authority, to punish individuals without justification.</para>
<para>Our criminal law system, including the measures in this bill, guards against this. Equally, the appellate process, where decisions of courts of first instance are appealable on certain grounds, operate in order to correct mistakes or injustices where they have occurred. The standard of proof in criminal offences beyond reasonable doubt is the right standard when punishment may involve the deprivation of liberty. No other standard is appropriate. As difficult as this sometimes is to accept, it is better to let a guilty person go free than to convict an innocent individual. It is this notion that underpins the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. With such a high threshold, the likelihood of a potentially guilty individual walking free increases, but it also makes it that much more difficult for an innocent individual to be wrongly convicted of a crime.</para>
<para>This bill, containing all the safeguards and thresholds as it does, with its five schedules, speaks to the purposes of criminal law and also speaks to the idea that it's important to continually examine whether the criminal law in this country remains true to those purposes, whether it is contemporary in its approach to societal changes, and whether it provides adequate powers and resources to ensure that the criminal justice system operates effectively.</para>
<para>Going to the five schedules, schedule 1 deals with police powers and warrants. The bill will amend the Crimes Act to enable the Australian Federal Police to exercise critical powers at the new Western Sydney International Airport, ensuring a consistent policing and security framework at major airports nationwide. And it will modernise the way law enforcement agencies can apply search warrants and assistance orders to better align with today's digital operating environment, but without affecting the substantial thresholds and safeguards that are already in existence around these processes.</para>
<para>Secondly, in schedule 2 to the bill there are critical amendments to the Criminal Code directed at ensuring that the prosecution of serious drug offences is efficient and effective. This includes the implementation of an evidentiary certificate which allows prima facie evidence of specific facts, normally technical or formal in nature, to be provided and approved without calling a witness. The amendments also change the way drug threshold quantities are measured. The current purity approach, which does not reflect how drugs are typically trafficked, will be replaced with mixed quantity requirements.</para>
<para>Schedule 3, another safeguard, contains amendments that streamline the process for managing an actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest identified by the Director of Public Prosecutions, meaning that a sufficiently senior person can exercise powers and functions in lieu of the director where it is not appropriate for the director to do so because of a conflict of interest.</para>
<para>The Extradition Act will be modernised by schedule 4 to the bill to improve not only the efficiency of the extradition process but also its safety. The amendments provide that, once a person waives extradition, they are to remain in custody until they are physically surrendered to the requesting country or released under an appropriate order, saving time and money. The Extradition Act will also be amended to provide police officers with the power to enter premises and use reasonable force when executing an extradition arrest warrant, reducing operational risks to the police and to the community.</para>
<para>The final schedule is schedule 5, which is a technical amendment to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act. This is required in order to update terminology to reflect changes in Victorian legislation in relation to Integrity Oversight Victoria.</para>
<para>Criminal law is complex. It must be constantly examined to ensure that these complexities are being appropriately managed. But we in the community all play a role, too. For the average Australian individual or business, there are things we can all do to deter both opportunistic and deliberate crime. Some may say it's a shame that things are not as they were 40 years ago, when you could leave the keys in the ignition as you popped into the shop. But things aren't the same. The South Australian police commissioner made this very salient point last week when he asked fuel retailers to implement easily available and effective prepay systems to avoid people driving off without paying for fuel, an offence that has spiked given current market conditions. Prepay eliminates this. So retailers: please implement it. Commissioner Stevens quite rightly warned that police would stop responding to call-outs about this issue, because resources are so stretched.</para>
<para>To the community: lock your doors; use the alarm; don't leave the engine running as you go into the shop; don't leave your phone, wallet and other valuables lying around; take sensible precautions; take simple actions of deterrence. This helps police, and these deterrence actions that you can take make it harder for an opportunistic or deliberately motivated perpetrator to commit an offence, which means police resources can be directed elsewhere, to where the need is greater—and we know the need is great.</para>
<para>This underscores the need for constant examination and measurement of the effectiveness of the criminal law system, which underscores the importance of this bill. I thank the Attorney-General for her work and commend the bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms ROWLAND</name>
    <name.id>159771</name.id>
    <electorate>Greenway</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank members for their contribution to the debate on the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026, which supports the effective administration of government by updating and improving key pieces of crimes related legislation. This is critical to supporting law enforcement and related agencies to keep the community safe.</para>
<para>The bill will ensure that police have the necessary powers to keep passengers safe at Australia's newest airport, in Western Sydney. It will modernise the way law enforcement agencies can apply for search warrants and assistance orders. And it will ensure that the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission continue to have appropriate access to critical powers to identify and disrupt serious technology enabled criminal activity. The bill will improve the operation and efficiency of prosecution of serious drug offences, aligning Commonwealth procedures with state, territory and international approaches while retaining procedural fairness.</para>
<para>The bill will enhance the efficient running of Australia's federal prosecution agency by clarifying and modernising the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, including by streamlining the process of managing an actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest identified by the Director of Public Prosecutions. Frameworks in the Extradition Act will be clarified and modernised to streamline processes and ensure law enforcement officers are equipped with appropriate powers to effectively perform their functions.</para>
<para>Finally, the bill will update terminology to modernise language and provide clarity and consistency across jurisdictions. The amendments in the Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026 modernise, streamline and clarify important provisions, ensuring law enforcement and related agencies can efficiently and effectively perform their critical functions. This bill is vital to ensuring our crimes legislation remains up to date and adequately supports our agencies to keep Australians safe. I commend the bill to the chamber.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is the bill now be read a second time.</para>
<para>Question unresolved.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>As it is necessary to resolve this question to enable further questions to be considered in relation to this bill, in accordance with standing order 105, the bill will be returned to the House for further consideration.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</title>
        <page.no>130</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>International Women's Day</title>
          <page.no>130</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to celebrate and make some comments about International Women's Day, and I'm pleased to follow our Attorney-General, a female in this government's cabinet. Women belong in the House and the Senate, they belong in the cabinet, they belong in the Attorney-General's chair, they belong on the court and on the bench, they belong in the C-suites, and they belong on the boards. In this country, women belong in every facet of our political, social and civic life.</para>
<para>Last week in my electorate, I was really pleased to host my annual Lalor International Women's Day High Tea. The event was an opportunity for some of our incredible local women to come together and celebrate our achievements as a community. I was joined by the federal member for Gorton, who shared her experience as a newly elected MP in the government. From community and sports organisations to teachers and students, from the arts and local schools to scout groups and the local CFA, women from all walks of life filled the room. I shared with them some of the achievements of our second-term, female-majority government, and, most importantly, I shared with them how we are delivering for women locally.</para>
<para>I talked about the new contraceptive and endometriosis medications that have been listed on the PBS, with scripts now just at $25, and I was pleased today to sit behind the Prime Minister as he called out a celebration around this government's actions to support women with endometriosis and terrible, terrible pelvic pain. The $800 million investment in women's health includes $49 million in new Medicare items, for longer specialist consultation to support additional services for women with complex gynaecological conditions, and new endometriosis and pelvic pain clinics like the one in Werribee.</para>
<para>As I do every year, I asked the community to nominate local women to be recognised for the work they do locally. This year's categories included community, business, arts, sports and our woman of the year. This year's recipients were extraordinary. They've created safe and inclusive spaces for women. They've created opportunity for growth. They've shared their love for the arts with others. They've dedicated countless hours to community sport and been tireless advocates for women's health. Their efforts have been pivotal and will continue to be for generations.</para>
<para>I want to celebrate Kritika Sharma, nominated for community; Deborah Dickinson, for business; Ngun Bor Chin, for arts, Angie Robinson, for sport; and    Chandrakantaben Patel, our woman of the year, who was involved in working with women in the Gujarati community to educate them about breast screening and whose work actually resulted in real, improved health outcomes for local women. It was a wonderful event, and I want to thank everybody for their attendance and for joining in in celebrating women.</para>
<para>Of course, this year the theme for International Women's Day was Balance the Scales. I'm proud to be a member of a party that has for 30 years acted directly to balance those scales in this place. I am proud to follow the previous member for Lalor, who was one of the first women elected in this place under our affirmative action and was joined by the first female attorney-general in this country, Nicola Roxon, who was elected the member for Gellibrand under that same program. It is amazing to see what that 30-year commitment to affirmative action has attained.</para>
<para>We are taking real action in women's health. On my social media pages, there's a bit of an attack happening: 'They're spending money on women's health.' Well, of course we are. For those who want to understand why, let me tell you this. Historically, women were excluded deliberately from the data that determined our health policies, from the data that determined treatments. Why? Because women were perceived to be aberrant—that is, not consistent enough. Unlike men, our temperature varies. Unlike men, our hormonal patterns vary. The wisdom of the day suggested that therefore, because of those inconsistencies, women should not be in the data. This led to some outrageous things. Women were not used in the data that determined the height of seatbelts in our cars, which has meant that small women are actually still vulnerable in a car accident because of the height of that seatbelt.</para>
<para>Since coming to government, by acting in good faith with 51 per cent of the community and ensuring that they are now included in the data going forward, through breast-screening processes and all sorts of ways, we've made sure that we're fixing that data to have women included, to inform the decisions we make in health.</para>
<para>I want to spend a little bit of time, too, celebrating as chair of Parliamentary Friends of Women in Sport and as chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Netball. I just want to share with people and with people in my community, particularly with mums and dads with daughters, what sport meant to me growing up as a girl. On the netball court, on the volleyball court, on the basketball court and in picking up a tennis racquet, sport gave me permission to be completely and utterly 100 per cent competitive. It gave me permission to be fearless. It gave me permission to be aggressive. It gave me permission to compete. This is something that all our girls deserve. Wherever you can find it, for your daughters, to give them the capacity to go after being their true selves in every facet of their personality, you should do so. If that's debating, then that's fantastic. If it's on the sporting field then, from my perspective, that's even better.</para>
<para>I want to give a shout-out to the local sporting community who are living Balance the Scales, including my football clubs who are actively recruiting young girls to play football so that we're going to be using our community assets like our football grounds—forever the domain of male athletes. We're going to have girls running around on those footy fields, making sure that 51 per cent of our community get to use the community assets that we've so heavily invested in across decades and decades. To my football clubs, to my soccer clubs, to my basketball clubs, to my netball clubs, to my hockey club, to everyone who is actively supporting the recruitment of girls into their teams and onto their pitches and their courts, I want to thank you for your efforts. I want to thank the volunteers who run our local sporting groups. I want to thank the women who are involved in those sporting groups for doing the work to balance those scales.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination</title>
          <page.no>131</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SITOU</name>
    <name.id>298121</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>When I was a teenager growing up, the first time I questioned my place in this country was when the newly elected member for Oxley said in her first speech:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished. I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians.</para></quote>
<para>She went on to say:</para>
<quote><para class="block">They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate.</para></quote>
<para>It was a message that made me feel deeply unwelcomed here, but it was also a reminder that our multicultural society can be attacked and threatened. It was a reminder that we all have a role to play to nurture and defend multicultural Australia, because a multicultural and multifaith country does not come easily. It takes work from all of us, and that hard work is worth it.</para>
<para>The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination reminds us of a simple truth: a fair society does not happen by accident. Political leaders need to step up. Community leaders need to step up. All of us need to step up. Racial discrimination is not something confined to the past. It is something people still experience in their daily lives, in workplaces, in schools, in the media and online, and sometimes even at their places of worship. That is why this day must be more than symbolic. It must be a call to action. In Australia, we are rightly proud of our multicultural success story. We are a country shaped by migration and by the belief that people from every background should be able to build a good life here. That belief has made us stronger. It has enriched us as a nation. It has helped make modern Australia the way it is.</para>
<para>I know it personally. In 1978, my parents were welcomed in this country. My family is of Chinese heritage, but my parents were born and raised in Laos, and they fled their homeland and were incredibly lucky that Australia gave them refuge. When my parents came here, they had limited formal education and spoke very little English, but they worked hard in factories and they were able to find secure work with good conditions. They gave my brother and I the education opportunities that they never had, and our family was able to thrive here. It is a story shared by so many in my electorate of Reid and across the country—families who came here seeking peace, safety and possibility; families who worked hard so their children could have more opportunities than they did; families who believed in Australia even before Australia fully believed in them. That is why racial discrimination cuts so deeply. It tells people that, no matter how much they contribute, no matter how hard they work, no matter how much they love this country, they will still be seen as seen by some as less than fully belonging. And that is unacceptable.</para>
<para>We have seen in recent years how quickly prejudice can harden into abuse, intimidation and hatred. We have seen racism directed at many communities. We have seen an unacceptable rise in antisemitism. The attack at Bondi last year was not only a shocking act of violence; it was a devastating blow to the Jewish community and to every Australian who believes in safety, dignity and respect. Jewish Australians are reporting that they feel less safe, and no-one should have to think twice before walking into a synagogue or expressing their identity.</para>
<para>We have also seen a deeply troubling rise in Islamophobia, with increasing threats made to the Muslim community and attacks on their mosques. The International Day to Combat Islamophobia is recognised internationally on 15 March. The date commemorates the Christchurch mosque attacks, the deadliest act of terrorism against Muslims in our region. This year, that anniversary fell during the holy month of Ramadan, a time of deep spiritual reflection and heightened communal activity for Muslims. That coincidence makes the moment even more solemn and even more important, because no-one should feel threatened for going to prayer, and no-one should fear abuse because they wear a hijab. We must be unequivocal. Antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism have no place in Australia—not in our streets, not on our campuses, not online and not in our politics. The safety of every community is a shared responsibility. In the face of grief and fear, we choose unity and compassion. Protecting Australians from hate motivated violence and intimidation is essential to safeguarding our democratic freedoms, our social cohesion and our national identity. When any community feels unsafe, the strength of our national fabric is weakened.</para>
<para>Recently, Senator Hanson said in a TV interview that there are no good Muslims. She is wrong. She was wrong in 1996 when she stood up to say multiculturalism in Australia should be abolished, and she continues to be wrong today with her bigotry towards Muslims. I feel sad for that young Muslim Australian whose political awakening may be made by those comments by Senator Hanson. It might make them question their place in this country, just as it made me question my place here decades ago. This is my message to that young Muslim Australian and to all young Australians: you are not defined by your background, your faith, the postcode you grew up in or the school that you went to. In this country you are defined by the content of your character and what you want to do for others. It's a country where the daughter of migrants fleeing conflict in Indochina can become a member of the Australian parliament representing one of the most diverse electorates in the country.</para>
<para>What drives me every day is to build a more inclusive and welcoming country where every child, regardless of their race or religion, grows up knowing they belong and where our diversity is seen for what it is: one of our greatest national strengths. The Australia I believe in is one where good governments change lives by expanding opportunity, by defending dignity, by making sure every person can participate fully, by rejecting division and by making it clear that hatred has no place in our democracy. That is the promise of Australia. It is the promise that people from every background can build a life here in safety and with dignity. It is the promise that your name, your face, your faith or your family history should never be a barrier to your future. So let us say it plainly—no to antisemitism, no to Islamophobia and no to racism.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WITTY</name>
    <name.id>316660</name.id>
    <electorate>Melbourne</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In a place like Melbourne, it can be easy to point to diversity and feel the job is done. We see diversity in our streets, in our schools and in the community that I represent and am proud of. But, when we listen closely, we hear something else. We hear that for many people the experience of this country is not the same and that, even in places that look inclusive, people still carry moments where they are treated differently, where they are questioned and where they are made to feel they are outside something they should belong to. If we are serious about eliminating racial discrimination, we have to start by listening to the people who have experienced it—not explaining it away, not comparing it, but hearing it for what it is.</para>
<para>The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination exists for a reason. It comes from a moment in 1960, in Sharpeville, South Africa, where people gathered to peacefully protest apartheid laws and were met with violence. Lives were lost and the world was forced to confront what happens when racial injustice is allowed to go unchecked. That moment does not belong to one country, but to all, because while Australia's story is different, it is not separate from the same question of fairness, of equality and of who is made to feel like they belong.</para>
<para>The story of this country begins with the oldest, continuous civilisation on earth. For tens of thousands of years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have cared for this land, built cultures of extraordinary depth and passed knowledge from generation to generation. That history is not just in the distance; it is part of the present. It reminds us that questions of fairness and Justice in this country did not begin recently. They have been part of our story for a long time, and they are still part of our responsibility today.</para>
<para>If we want to understand what facing these questions look like in practice, we can look to my electorate of Melbourne, because this is where it is tested every day—not in theory, not in policy, but in real life. I see it when I walk through Chinatown, the largest, continuous Chinese settlement in the Western world where generations have built community, businesses and a sense of belonging in the heart of our city. I see it in Richmond and in Abbotsford, where the Vietnamese community has built an enduring place, shaping the streets, the culture and the identity of the suburb. I see it in the Somali communities across inner Melbourne, where families are building lives, raising children and starting to shape what our city will become next.</para>
<para>As I spend time with these communities, I also hear something deeper: discrimination has not disappeared. It's not always loud. It's not always called out. But it is still there, in comments that are brushed off, in assumptions that go unchallenged, in moments that people carry, even when they do not speak about them. That silence does not mean it is not there; it means that people have learnt to carry it. If we do not hear these stories or do not listen to the people living them every day, we risk building a picture of Australia that is only true for some people. But across Melbourne, people are not waiting for things to be perfect. We are building community anyway.</para>
<para>The strength of this amazing city is in the places where people come together, in places like Youlden Parkville Cricket Club, where people from different backgrounds play side by side and build something shared over time; in places like Queen Victoria Market, where culture, food, language and tradition are where diversity is part of everyday life; and, in schools like Abbotsford Primary School, where bilingual education is not treated as something different but as something core to who we can be.</para>
<para class="italic"><inline font-style="italic">A division having been called in the House of Representatives—</inline></para>
<para>Sitting suspended from 11:28 to 11:40</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WITTY</name>
    <name.id>316660</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This is what cohesion looks like: not something declared but something built. It only holds if we keep choosing it.</para>
<para>Even in a city like Melbourne, it can slip. It slips in the moment someone laughs off a comment that should have been called out, when a name gets shortened because it feels easier than correcting it and when someone walks into a room and quietly works out how much of themselves is safe to show. It shows up in small decisions: a pause before speaking, a choice to stay quiet, a decision to not put your hand up this time—not because people lack ability but because they are reading the space around them. These moments build. They follow people into classrooms, into workplaces and into the choices they make about what they go for and what they step back from. Over time, they shape who participates, who leads and who feels like they belong.</para>
<para>If we are serious about the kind of community we say we are, we cannot just point to diversity and assume that is enough. There is a difference between celebrating diversity and defending it. Celebration is easy; defending it is much harder. It means acting when something is not right, it means listening when people tell us that something is not working and it means being prepared to change what we are doing when the evidence is there. This is not about getting it right once; it's about continuing to learn and continuing to respond. This is where government matters, because government has a responsibility to not just to reflect the country but respond to it.</para>
<para>This government looks more like modern Australia than ever before. It reflects the diversity of the people it represents, and that matters. When people are in the room, their experiences are in the room too, and that shapes what gets heard. This government is taking action. Through the National Anti-Racism Framework, we are setting a clear direction for how institutions respond to racism. Through investment in multicultural community organisations, we are backing the people who are already doing the work on the ground. Through stronger protections in the workplace and public life, we are making it clear that discrimination is not acceptable. Through education and community programs, we are helping build understanding earlier so that the next generation expects something better.</para>
<para>But we also know this: policy alone does not solve this. It only works if we stay connected to the people who are experiencing it. I have had conversations with people in my life that have stayed with me. One was with my sister and her husband. Her husband is Maori and has darker skin. They were both asked a simple question: do you think Australia is racist? They answered the question at the same time—</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">A division having been called in the House of Representatives—</inline></para>
<para>Sitting suspended from 11:43 to 11:55</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WITTY</name>
    <name.id>316660</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>My sister and her husband were asked: do you think Australia is a racist country? They answered at the same time. My sister, who looks like me, said no. Her husband said yes. They both meant it, because they were speaking from lived experience. That moment has stayed with me because it shows something we have to be willing to face—that people can live in the same place, build the same life and still experience this country in very different ways. If we are serious about eliminating racial discrimination, we have to be willing to hold the truth—not one version of the story but all of them.</para>
<para>Melbourne shows us what is possible. It's a city where people do not just live side by side; they live together. It's a city built on contribution, on community and on people showing up for each other. But it also reminds us of something else—that this work is never finished. In the end, this comes down to something simple. When the moment comes, when something is said, when something is done, when something is not right, we all face the same choice: to stand up or to stand by. I know what my choice is. For the people I represent, for the community that raised me and for an Australia where no-one should be made to feel like they do not belong, I will stand up so they do not stand alone.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr RYAN</name>
    <name.id>297660</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Saturday 21 March was the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Here in Australia, the commitment to eliminating racism has never been more important. The following is the picture of racial hatred in this country.</para>
<para>During the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw a mainstreaming of racism and violence towards people of Chinese and Asian origin. I heard from constituents in Kooyong that they experienced racism against themselves and their family members for the first time ever during COVID. During the Voice referendum, we witnessed visible and widespread racism against First Nations people, adding to the systemic injustice that they endure every day. After 7 October 2023, both antisemitism and anti-Palestinian racism surged and have been an ongoing scourge in our communities since that time. Between 2023 and 2024, in-person Islamophobia more than doubled. Antisemitism, sadly, has also massively increased in the communities that I and many other members of this chamber represent.</para>
<para>In recent years, antimigration rallies and racially charged demonstrations have tested the strength of our multicultural identity. During the federal election campaign last year, a number of events in the electorate that I represent of Kooyong were disrupted by Neo-Nazis, an unthinkable thing five or 10 years ago. In 2025, Indian migrants in our communities were subjected to targeted abuse and propaganda, worsened in some cases by some colleagues from this place. During last year's Hanukkah festivities, the unthinkable tragedy of the Bondi massacre affected all Australians but most particularly those who are Jewish. Just last month, a prominent politician—from this place again—brazenly claimed during the sacred month of Ramadan that there are no good Muslims.</para>
<para>This is a brief and, sadly, incomplete picture of racism in Australia over just the last five years. Australia's Race Discrimination Commissioner, Giri Sivaraman, says that there has never been a more urgent time to address racism in this country. I think he's right. Many Australians are scared. They're scared for their safety. They're scared of racial intolerance. They're scared, with good reason, of unprovoked violence. It's not a problem that we can ignore—that we can put off to the next electoral cycle. It's a problem that demands urgent action now.</para>
<para>In November 2024, the Australian Race Discrimination Commissioner delivered <inline font-style="italic">The n</inline><inline font-style="italic">ational </inline><inline font-style="italic">a</inline><inline font-style="italic">nti-</inline><inline font-style="italic">r</inline><inline font-style="italic">acism </inline><inline font-style="italic">f</inline><inline font-style="italic">ramework</inline><inline font-style="italic">:</inline><inline font-style="italic">a</inline><inline font-style="italic"> roadmap to eliminating racism in Australia</inline>. It's the most comprehensive plan in Australia's history. It's our first whole-of-government, whole-of-society framework designed to address racism at a national level. It was developed through extensive consultation with hundreds of communities and hundreds of organisations across the country. More than 50 civil society organisations have joined together and have asked for national leadership from the Albanese government to fully fund and fully implement that national antiracism framework. But, 16 months later, we're still waiting for the Albanese government to respond—16 months.</para>
<para>So are we really surprised when the Prime Minister and the home affairs minister are booed at a mosque in Lakemba during Eid prayers? What happened last week in Lakemba was just a visible expression of a deep anger from many Australian communities: anger at what they see as seeming indifference; anger at a government which, many people feel, has allowed division to be sown and to fester.</para>
<para>For 16 months now, the government has chosen to neglect a report which makes it clear that racism in Australia is not just an interpersonal issue; it is deeply systemic. It exists within our employment structures. It exists and, sadly, it manifests in our provision of health care. It exists in our justice system, in our education system and in the media. And, when our institutions fail to address these inequalities, they do more than just ignore or overlook racism. They enable it.</para>
<para>The <inline font-style="italic">N</inline><inline font-style="italic">ational anti-racism framework</inline> confronts this reality. It's honest about the systems that sustain racism in this country. Its primary recommendation calls for a modest but important first step: the establishment of a national taskforce to begin implementation. We haven't taken even that first step. The Attorney-General has indicated that the framework is being considered and that a holistic approach must be taken to ensure the rights and freedoms of all Australians. But what's holistic about doing nothing? Racism is not going to disappear on its own while the government hesitates and obfuscates.</para>
<para>In December 2025, I, with crossbench colleagues, wrote to the Prime Minister requesting a royal commission into the horrible events at Bondi, and I was really pleased to see the Prime Minister act to initiate the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. It's a really important step to addressing the scourge that is antisemitism in this country.</para>
<para>But there are two important takeaways about that royal commission that I would like the government to heed. The first is that Dennis Richardson's resignation in recent weeks sends a clear message that intelligence findings simply cannot wait until December and that we have urgency in ensuring that all Australians are safe. The second is that selective action is not enough. We have to take decisive steps as a country to address all forms of racism. That includes taking the next step: bringing the framework to life by formally endorsing it, acting on its primary recommendation to establish the national antiracism taskforce and then funding and implementing the recommendations in that framework in partnership with our communities.</para>
<para>At a time when racism and division are deepening, there has never been a more pressing and urgent time for the government, the Prime Minister, all members of his cabinet and all representatives of our community to demonstrate real national leadership on racism.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELYEA</name>
    <name.id>309484</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to mark the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, held on 21 March—a day that calls on all of us to reflect and to act. My values have been shaped by faith, by community and by a deep belief in the inherent dignity of every human being. I was raised with a simple but enduring principle: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It is a principle shared across cultures, faiths and philosophies, and one that speaks directly to respect, responsibility and inclusion. Yet, today, many Australians feel a deep unease.</para>
<para>Around the world and here at home we are witnessing a troubling rise in division fuelled by fear, misinformation and the deliberate misuse of race, religion and identity—often for political gain. I hear this directly from my community of Dunkley, particularly from young people who observe political debates. They ask whether this is the future we want to create, because that is what we appear to be choosing. They see conflict abroad. They see rising antisemitism and Islamophobia. They see the ongoing impact of racism on First Nations people, and they wonder whether social cohesion is slipping from our grasp—whether it is an aspiration, a dream, or an unrealistic goal.</para>
<para>The people that speak to me about their fears and apprehension feel despair. Others begin to mimic the behaviour they see, believing division to be the norm. That should concern every one of us in this place. History teaches us that social cohesion is not automatic. It must be protected, nurtured and operationalised deliberately and consistently. Australia's strength has always been found in our diversity—not despite of it but because of it. We are a nation built by people from every corner of the globe, united not by conformity but by shared democratic values of fairness, respect and equality.</para>
<para>My own life reflects this diversity. I've close family connections within the Jewish community. I have worked with and learned from Jewish leaders and businesspeople, whose commitment to community responsibility and social justice has shaped my career. My mother introduced me to Buddhism and its teachings—including compassion, service and universal acceptance. These experiences reinforced a simple truth. While beliefs and traditions may differ, the core values of humanity are shared.</para>
<para>This understanding further deepened through my work with First Nations communities. From my early adulthood I committed myself to learning, listening and working alongside Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders. Leading a national indigenous youth leadership program and learning from respected leaders across the country challenged my perspectives and strengthened my resolve to stand against racism and discrimination in all its forms. As the member for Dunkley, I took an oath to serve all Australians without fear or favour. That responsibility demands more than words.</para>
<para>Australia is a signatory to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, a commitment that requires us not only to reject racism but to actively prevent it. Eliminating racial discrimination is not symbolic. It is a legal and moral responsibility that safeguards social cohesion, human dignity and democratic stability. It requires all of us, when we see it, to call it out, to protect communities from discrimination and to model the respect we expect of others.</para>
<para>In recent weeks I have seen the best of this spirit in my community at the Holi celebrations at the Shri Shiva Vishnu temple, with people of all backgrounds coming together in joy—colour replacing division and celebration replacing fear. At citizenship ceremonies I'm regularly reminded that Australia is home to more than 3,000 cultures, each representing our shared national history. I am proud to represent a community that is home to the largest Hindu temple in the Southern Hemisphere; to Sikh Volunteers Australia, whose service embodies generosity and compassion; and to the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, whose guiding principle—love for all, hatred for none—offers a powerful lesson for our times.</para>
<para>These local experiences are reflected on the global stage. In recent months Australia has welcomed overseas leaders including Mark Carney, the prime minister of Canada; the King and Queen of Denmark; and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. This past week, we have also hosted Exercise Kakadu, bringing together naval forces from 18 nations, including Canada, New Zealand, Japan, India, Indonesia, Singapore, the Philippines and the United States. These moments matter. They remind us that the elimination of racial discrimination is critical to ensuring social cohesion. Our national security and our contribution to global peace depend on our ability to live together with trust, respect and solidarity. Cohesion at home strengthens credibility abroad.</para>
<para>Social cohesion begins with leadership. Those of us honoured to hold positions of influence must understand that our words and our actions carry weight far beyond this chamber. Leadership is not just about what we say; it is about what we demonstrate. If we want a cohesive, respectful and resilient nation, then those in positions of power must walk the talk every day with integrity. We cannot let leaders say that there are no good Muslims. Cohesion is not weakened by difference; it is weakened by political pointscoring not grounded in the values of respect. The elimination of racial discrimination requires leadership from all of us in this place that rejects division, policy that promotes inclusion and everyday actions that reinforce belonging, including the implementation of the National Anti-Racism Framework.</para>
<para>If we are to remain true to the values that define Australia—fairness, respect and equality—then we must actively choose unity over fear, inclusion over exclusion and hope over despair. Let us recommit to the simple yet powerful truth that our shared humanity is greater than any difference. In doing so, we strengthen not only our communities but the very fabric of the nation we are proud to call home.</para>
<para>Federation Chamber adjourned at 12 : 12</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
  </fedchamb.xscript>
</hansard>