﻿
<hansard noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.2">
  <session.header>
    <date>2021-10-18</date>
    <parliament.no>1</parliament.no>
    <session.no>1</session.no>
    <period.no>0</period.no>
    <chamber>House of Reps</chamber>
    <page.no>0</page.no>
    <proof>1</proof>
  </session.header>
  <chamber.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-SODJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SODJobDate">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;" />
            <a href="Chamber" type="">Monday, 18 October 2021</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The SPEAKER (</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Hon.</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">
            </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Tony Smith</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">) </span>took the chair at 10:00, made an acknowledgement of country and read prayers.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Line" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Line"> </span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DOCUMENTS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>DOCUMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Agreement for Members to Contribute Remotely to Parliamentary Proceedings</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Presentation</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HOWARTH</name>
    <name.id>247742</name.id>
    <electorate>Petrie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>For the information of honourable members, I present an agreement for members to contribute remotely to parliamentary proceedings made pursuant to the resolution adopted by the House on 23 March 2020.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PRIVILEGE</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PRIVILEGE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Member for Pearce</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I wish to raise a matter of privilege under standing order 51. The matter concerns the member for Pearce and whether his failure to comply with the resolution of the House regarding the registration of members' interests constitutes a contempt of the parliament.</para>
<para>If this matter is allowed to stand we might as well not have a Register of Members' Interests at all. Today is the first sitting day since the matter was made public, and today is the earliest opportunity I've had to present this matter to the House in the comprehensive manner required. The shadow Attorney-General has also written to the Standing Committee of Privileges and Members' Interests on this matter.</para>
<para>The facts are these. On 1 June it was announced that the member for Pearce would withdraw a defamation case against the ABC. His costs are undisclosed. The member for Pearce has stated, 'My lawyers, whilst they are very good, are very, very expensive,' and I will table that transcript. On 13 September, the member for Pearce updated his register, addressing payments related to his defamation case, and I will table that document. The member for Pearce lists:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Part contribution to the payment of my fees by a blind trust known as the Legal Services Trust. As a potential beneficiary I have no access to information about the conduct and funding of the trust.</para></quote>
<para>But what the member for Pearce describes as a blind trust is in fact nothing like the blind trusts which have previously been registered. In every other blind trust which has appeared on the register it has been clear whose money was being managed. On this occasion we have no idea.</para>
<para>The central purpose of the register is to manage and disclose interests and potential conflicts. It beggars belief that the member for Pearce has no idea who donated to this trust. It is incomprehensible that this strange new breed of philanthropist, who could donate to any cause or charity in the world, would choose this otherwise secret trust to pay the legal bills in a private defamation case and then have no interest in the member for Pearce knowing that they'd helped out. The House needs to consider what this means. If what the member for Pearce has done is allowed to stand, it means that any member of parliament can set up a trust, instruct the trustee to accept donations on a confidential basis only and then receive the cash from any source, all the while saying, 'Well, I couldn't tell you where my donations are coming from, because they were given on the basis of confidentiality.'</para>
<para>What the member of Pearce has done renders the Register of Members' Interests completely worthless. If permitted, this behaviour empowers other MPs to create such a trust as a means of escaping their disclosure obligations as an elected member of this House. At its worst, it provides a means for MPs to get around laws that prohibit foreign donations. Indeed, the only assurance we have that the member for Pearce has not done such a thing is that he simply says he has not. In a statement by the member for Pearce on September 19, which I will table, we learned two things. The first is that, despite the member for Pearce's statement on his register, he actually was able to uncover information regarding the donors to this trust. His statement says:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… on my request the Trustee provided me an assurance that none of the contributors were lobbyists or prohibited foreign entities.</para></quote>
<para>The second thing revealed is that the member for Pearce has made a choice not to uncover further information about the identities of the donors. He states:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Ultimately, I decided that if I have to make a choice between seeking to pressure the Trust to break individuals' confidentiality in order to remain in Cabinet, or alternatively forego my Cabinet position, there is only one choice I could, in all conscience, make.</para></quote>
<para>He also states:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I could not assist any process that would ultimately allow people who have done nothing wrong to become targets of the social media mob and I would continue to respect their position.</para></quote>
<para>So either the member for Pearce does know who the donors to his legal trust are but is refusing to disclose them publicly or he has chosen to not take steps which are available to him to determine their identities. Either conclusion raises doubt as to whether the member has committed a serious contempt under part (c) of the additional resolution adopted on 13 February 1986 regarding members' interests, which I will table. That resolution provides:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That any Member of the House of Representatives who—</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">…   …   …</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) knowingly provides false or misleading information to the Registrar of Members' Interests,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">shall be guilty of a serious contempt of the House of Representatives and shall be dealt with by the House accordingly.</para></quote>
<para>This is a serious allegation that must be investigated by the Standing Committee of Privileges and Members' Interests. This is not a case of an MP making an honest mistake. This is not a case of carelessness. This is a deliberate and calculated attempt to evade the entire purpose of the register.</para>
<para>Mr Speaker, with that in mind, I ask you to consider granting precedence to a motion to refer this matter to the Standing Committee on Privileges and Members' Interests regarding whether the precedent the member for Pearce has set threatens the integrity of the Register of Members' Interests, whether the member for Pearce has wilfully refused to take reasonable steps available to him to identify donors to a trust which has part-paid his legal fees, whether this constitutes a breach of part (c) of the additional resolution on the registration of members' interests, and whether members receiving anonymous gifts beyond the threshold set out in (2)(k) of the House resolution on the registration of members' interests constitutes a contempt of the House.</para>
<para>I thank you for your consideration and I table the documents referred to.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the Manager of Opposition Business and I accept that he's raised the matter at the earliest opportunity, at the beginning of the first sitting day. I will consider the matter in the normal way and report back to the House during the course of the week.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petitions Committee</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr O'DOWD</name>
    <name.id>139441</name.id>
    <electorate>Flynn</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the 31st report of the Petitions Committee for the 46th Parliament.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The report read as follows—</inline></para>
<quote><para class="block">HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PETITIONS COMMITTEE</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">REPORT No. 31</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Petitions and Ministerial Responses</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">18 October 2021</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Chair Mr Ken O'Dowd MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Deputy Chair Hon Justine Elliot MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mrs Bridget Archer MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Lisa Chesters MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Gladys Liu MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Julian Simmonds MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr James Stevens MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Ms Susan Templeman MP</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Report summarising the petitions and Ministerial responses being presented.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The committee met in private session on 4 August, 11 August, 25 August, 1 September and 29 September 2021.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">1. The committee resolved to present the following petitions in accordance with standing order 207:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified by the Committee on 4 August </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5329 petitioners - requesting changes to the <inline font-style="italic">Sex Discrimination Act 1984</inline> (EN2874)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 444 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for aged care workers (EN2919)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 19 petitioners - requesting to grant refugee status for family members in South Africa (EN2921)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 69 petitioners - requesting for Australians to be allowed to undertake international travel (EN2924)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 432 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations without informed consent (EN2925)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3 petitioners - requesting the introduction of a COVID-19 health pass (EN2926)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 267 petitioners - requesting the introduction of a COVID-19 health pass (EN2927)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners - requesting the introduction of a COVID-19 health pass (EN2928)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 39 petitioners - requesting to stop foreign national companies and dual citizens buying freehold land (EN2929)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1144 petitioners - requesting to fund research into topical steroid withdrawal in Australia (EN2934)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners - requesting to intervene diplomatically in the civil unrest in South Africa and to deliver humanitarian aid (EN2935)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners - requesting to make COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory for all Australians (EN2936)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 24608 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations (EN2939)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 17 petitioners - requesting to let Australian citizens impacted by lockdowns access their superannuation (EN2941)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 13 petitioners - requesting that joint custody of children be granted in the absence of a court order, apprehended violence order or abuse claim (EN2942)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners - requesting to make access to firearms harder for known criminals (EN2946)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners - regarding the Declaration on Children, Youth and Climate Action (EN2947)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 91 petitioners - requesting to enforce taxation for all churches (EN2948)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 575 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations (EN2951)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners - requesting that COVID-19 support payments be reintroduced nationally (EN2954)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 29 petitioners - requesting COVID-19 vaccinations be provided to Australian businesses and expatriates in Vietnam (EN2956)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 23 petitioners - requesting to allow international travel for vaccinated residents (EN2957)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 430 petitioners - requesting to bring home stranded Australians in Bangladesh (EN2960)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 62 petitioners - requesting amendments be made to the <inline font-style="italic">Veterans Entitlement Act 1986</inline> (EN2961)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 144 petitioners - requesting to cap the income earned by politicians in line with government COVID-19 disaster payments (EN2964)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 330 petitioners - requesting true reporting from government and media for COVID-19 and vaccine related deaths (EN2966)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners - requesting to provide access to euthanasia and/or assisted suicide for climate change related disasters and impacts (EN2970)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 247 petitioners - requesting to stop the Cashless Debit Card's usage in the Wide Bay region (EN2971)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners - regarding foreign ownership laws for new and existing real estate (EN2972)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 41 petitioners - requesting more vaccination choices (EN2973)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners - requesting to permanently reverse the distribution priority area status of the Hunter region (EN2977)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 7 petitioners - requesting unrestricted domestic travel during lockdowns for fully vaccinated citizens (EN2979)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2455 petitioners - requesting better management for the noise pollution from Brisbane Airport's flight paths (EN2983)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3798 petitioners - requesting to end the COVID-19 emergency measures (EN2988)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 35 petitioners - requesting reliable ADSL internet in the Moore Creek area (EN2989)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 913 petitioners - requesting that PCR testing cycle rates are fully disclosed (EN2991)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6 petitioners - requesting to immediately withdraw Australia's navy from the South China Sea (EN2992)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners - requesting to mix the usage of AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccinations (EN2994)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 15 petitioners - requesting an online referendum to determine if COVID-19 vaccinations should be mandatory (EN2995)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners - requesting to increase the concessional contributions cap (EN2997)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 91 petitioners - requesting to increase the mobile phone coverage in Moore Creek (EN2998)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 72 petitioners - requesting to establish a program that provides masks for those living in poverty (EN3001)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 388 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for nurses or doctors (EN3002)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 252 petitioners - requesting no mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for aged care workers. (EN3006)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 328 petitioners - requesting a referendum to amend the Constitution (EN3011)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 76 petitioners - requesting an amendment to the 1983 nuclear power ban (EN3012)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners - requesting reforms for Crohn's disease injections (EN3013)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 38 petitioners - requesting to bring vulnerable Australian citizens home from Indonesia (EN3014)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 22 petitioners - requesting to immediately reinstate JobKeeper and other COVID-19 financial support services (EN3015)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 24 petitioners - requesting to legalise nicotine vape solutions (EN3016)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 90 petitioners - requesting to stop CSIRO conducting gain of function research (EN3017)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10 petitioners - requesting the deployment of the Australian Defence Force and all additional resources and assistance to the Moree Community (EN3018)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1620 petitioners - requesting to stop the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine passports (EN3019)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners - requesting to remove prayers from the standing orders (EN3021)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners - requesting reforms for Crohn's disease injections (EN3022)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2905 petitioners - requesting to stop mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(EN3023)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 13 petitioners - requesting to supply AstraZeneca vaccines to Australians and permanent residents stuck overseas (EN3025)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 495 petitioners - requesting assurance that no national emergency vaccinations or martial law will be imposed upon Australians (EN3026)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 679 petitioners - requesting no mandatory vaccinations for disability workers or community service professionals (EN3029)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 13 petitioners - regarding attendees and organisers of 'freedom marches' (EN3031)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 568 petitioners - requesting to stop using the term 'cases' when reporting positive COVID-19 tests (EN3035)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 613 petitioners - requesting an immediate enactment of Magnitsky-style legislation (EN3036)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 43 petitioners - requesting a repeal of s138(2)(a) of the <inline font-style="italic">Veterans Entitlement Act 1986</inline>(EN3037)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 71 petitioners - requesting to amend preferential ballot voting (EN3038)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 148 petitioners - requesting reforms to the Australian Constitution with a greater gender equality focus (EN3040)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5 petitioners - requesting for Iran to be urged to obey and uphold international agreements and domestic laws (EN3041)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 116 petitioners - requesting to reject the Uluru Statement and Indigenous voice to Parliament (EN3042)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 87 petitioners - requesting to disband the ATSI advisory group on the Australian school curriculum (EN3043)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10918 petitioners - requesting to decriminalise cannabis (EN3044)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 47 petitioners - requesting premature baby leave (EN3045)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 108891 petitioners - requesting to immediately stop COVID-19 vaccinations for children aged 12-16 (EN3046)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 28 petitioners - requesting a Royal Commission to examine adult content platforms (EN3048)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 50 petitioners - requesting for over 60s to have a choice in vaccinations (EN3049)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 707 petitioners - requesting to repeal Section 50A of the <inline font-style="italic">Northern Territory (Self Government) Act 1978</inline> (EN3052)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 514 petitioners - requesting immigration pathways for minors born in New Zealand (EN3053)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified by the Committee on 11 August </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 14 petitioners - requesting a change to the name of some Australian currency (EN3055)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 97 petitioners - requesting to increase the age pension to align with the minimum wage (EN3058)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 28 petitioners - requesting to vaccinate all Australians before relaxing COVID-19 restrictions (EN3062)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1840 petitioners - requesting to stop the use of COVID-19 vaccines in young people and students (EN3070)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 863 petitioners - requesting to reopen the Home Builder Grant to all eligible homebuilders and renovators (EN3071)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1335 petitioners - requesting that pathology labs report the accuracy of their COVID-19 tests (EN3072)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4054 petitioners - requesting to stop the discrimination of Australians not taking COVID-19 vaccines (EN3073)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4 petitioners - requesting to add the hospitality industry to the priority Pfizer vaccination program (EN3078)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 153 petitioners - requesting to allow vaccinated Australians to travel overseas without quarantining on return (EN3079)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1460 petitioners - requesting to allow compassionate travel exemptions for a support person to be present during the perinatal period for pregnant women (EN3080)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11 petitioners - requesting to stop cigarette smoking within Melbourne Immigration Transit Accommodation (EN3082)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 128492 petitioners - requesting that all COVID-19 vaccinations be halted immediately (EN3083)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 42760 petitioners - requesting to stop the COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children and young people (EN3084)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 170 petitioners - requesting daily alcohol testing of Members of Parliament (EN3085)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 536 petitioners - requesting the protection of physical currency as a means of payment (EN3086)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1942 petitioners - requesting to ban gain of function research and its promotion (EN3088)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 240 petitioners - requesting to make the Pfizer vaccine available for people under 40 years of age (EN3089)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 192 petitioners - requesting an immediate end to hotel quarantine in Australia (EN3090)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 128 petitioners - requesting to ban coral damaging sunscreens in all marine parks (EN3093)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 485 petitioners - requesting an international travel exemption for parents of Australians and permanent residents (EN3094)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified by the Committee on 25 August </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 85 petitioners - requesting to ban alcohol in Parliament House and government buildings (EN3099)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 105 petitioners - requesting to allow Australians who reside overseas to leave Australia without requiring an exemption (EN3102)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 147 petitioners - requesting to make Novavax available to Australian citizens (EN3104)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners - requesting an automatic exemption for Australian expats to leave Australia (EN3107)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 14787 petitioners - requesting that international or domestic vaccine passports not be introduced (EN3108)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5693 petitioners - requesting to keep medical information private (EN3112)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 16 petitioners - requesting to reinstate reparation payments for survivors of Australian Defence Force abuse (EN3114)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 389 petitioners - requesting to stop mass vaccination and to lower viral infectivity rates by other means (EN3115)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 315 petitioners - requesting an exemption for certain visa holders to enter Australia (EN3116)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 6532 petitioners - requesting that domestic vaccine passports not be introduced (EN3119)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners - requesting an inquiry into funding for niche sports broadcasting (EN3122)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 128 petitioners - requesting to remove preference voting (EN3126)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 856 petitioners - requesting emergency authorisation for the use of Ivermectin (EN3127)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 4712 petitioners - requesting public advice on whether COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide (EN3128)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 52 petitioners - requesting Australian residency for non-black South Africans (EN3129)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 64 petitioners - requesting to rescind the law demanding expatriate Australians to have to ask permission to leave Australia (EN3132)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 68 petitioners - requesting the Australian Government make a greater climate change action commitment at the 2021 Glasgow Climate Change Conference (EN3134)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners - requesting to accelerate climate change prevention measures (EN3135)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 22 petitioners - requesting a ban on tobacco products (EN3137)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 20 petitioners - requesting a mandate for businesses to use more renewable energy (EN3139)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 11072 petitioners - requesting to use Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 (EN3141)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 165 petitioners - requesting to put medicinal cannabis on a cannabis access scheme (EN3145)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 21 petitioners - requesting to commit to a net zero emissions target by 2050 (EN3146)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 269 petitioners - requesting a day of prayer in the House of Representatives (EN3152)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 59 petitioners - requesting the nuclear power ban remains in place (EN3153)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8553 petitioners - requesting the approval of Chinese made COVID-19 vaccines for use in Australia (EN3158)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 525 petitioners - requesting to bring families of Australian residents and vulnerable Afghanistan residents to Australia from Afghanistan (EN3159)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 34 petitioners - requesting the provision of urgent humanitarian support to Afghanistan (EN3161)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8 petitioners - requesting support for residents of Afghanistan (EN3164)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 974 petitioners - concerning nursing registrations (EN3168)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 5852 petitioners - requesting the provision of evidence that COVID-19 exists (EN3169)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 423 petitioners - requesting refuge be provided for citizens of Afghanistan (EN3174)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 14 petitioners - concerning the Australian Curriculum (EN3175)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 38 petitioners - requesting a one-off humanitarian intake of the most vulnerable residents Afghanistan (EN3176)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 19 petitioners - requesting an urgent increase to grant protection visas for at-risk citizens of Afghanistan (EN3177)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1487 petitioners - requesting urgent and ongoing funding for the Northern Territory's Working Women's Centre (EN3178)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 102614 petitioners - requesting to immediately release all Therapeutic Goods Administration submission documents for publicly funded vaccines (EN3179)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 41 petitioners - requesting action to end marine pollution (EN3180)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 676 petitioners - requesting the immediate approval and rollout of the Novavax vaccine (EN3182)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 172 petitioners - requesting an increase to the allowance of humanitarian visas for refugees from Afghanistan (EN3183)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 232 petitioners - requesting changes to the House petitioning process (EN3188)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 216 petitioners - requesting for access to personal superannuation as a COVID-19 relief measure (EN3190)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Petitions certified by the Committee on 1 September </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 3025 petitioners - requesting an investigation into vaccinations and clinic vaccination trials (EN3193)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 35 petitioners - requesting for the acceptance of more refugees from Afghanistan (EN3194)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1536 petitioners - requesting for alternate COVID-19 treatment options (EN3196)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 9 petitioners - requesting assistance for the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (EN3199)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 10565 petitioners - requesting that COVID-19 vaccines not be made mandatory for government employees (EN3203)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 2353 petitioners - requesting an Australian Bill of Rights be drafted (EN3205)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 159 petitioners - requesting an increase in the amount provided for COVID-19 support payments (EN3206)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 87 petitioners - requesting the recovery of unnecessary JobKeeper payments (EN3207)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 65 petitioners - requesting a ban on the mass distribution of fridge magnets (EN3208)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 179 petitioners - requesting additional privacy protections for Census data (EN3211)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 123 petitioners - requesting an extension on the validity of expressions of interest for certain visas (EN3212)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 12525 petitioners - requesting the disclosure of white papers describing the isolation of COVID-19 (EN3213)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 8465 petitioners - requesting alternate treatment options for COVID-19 (EN3214)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 1216 petitioners - requesting for certain disorders to be included in the NDIS (EN3215)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 316 petitioners - requesting the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2035 (EN3222)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From 108 petitioners - requesting the development of national minimum accommodation standards for farm workers (EN3223)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">The following ministerial responses to petitions were received:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Responses received by the Committee on 1 September</inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs - to a petition concerning international students and pathways to permanent residency (EN2540)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs - to a petition concerning Australia's character requirements under section 501 of the <inline font-style="italic">Migration Act 1958</inline> and removal of New Zealand citizens (EN2545)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting an expanded and more effective quarantine system for returned Australians (EN2650)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition requesting laws be introduced to protect the construction industry from fraud (EN2718)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition concerning false allegations made in court proceedings (EN2749)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for the Environment - to a petition requesting that the Museum of Underwater Art structures not go ahead within the Great Palm Island group or surrounding waters (PN0515)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block"> <inline font-style="italic">Responses received by the Committee on 29 September </inline></para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Treasurer - to a petitionrequesting that the Government conduct a petition on compulsory donations to bushfire and drought relief (EN1265)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Treasurer - to a petitionrequesting proof of identity to purchase baby formula (EN1483)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and the Digital Economy - to a petition concerning compulsory retirement (EN1825)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Treasurer - to a petition regarding a progressive procreation tax (EN1995)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts - to a petition requesting a ban on all forms of gambling advertisements on television and radio (EN2593)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts - to a petition requesting a ban on all forms of gambling advertisements on all platforms (EN2595)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Treasurer - to a petitionconcerning how the Consumer Price Index is measured and what level the cash rate is set at (EN2600)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition concerning Australia becoming a party to the third Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (EN2603)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts - to a petition concerning proof of age for online pornography (EN2614)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs - to a petition requesting the provision of medical supplies to India in response to the recent COVID-19 surge in infections (EN2636)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition concerning religious freedom, the Religious Discrimination Bill and the associated legislative package (EN2638)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts - to a petition concerning grant processes in the Australian screen industry (EN2656)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention - to a petitionrequesting a three digit suicide prevention hotline (EN2684)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs - to a petition concerning Israeli aggression towards Palestinians (EN2692, EN2715, EN2710)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to allow people to pay for vaccinations if they wish to do so (EN2695)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition concerning the removal of the Avastin brand of the medicine bevacizumab, from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (EN2697)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition concerning the introduction of health labels on alcohol products and to protect children exposed to alcohol advertisements from the sponsorships in sports broadcasts (EN2704)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition concerning the establishment of mass vaccination centres and launching a national media campaign to positively promote COVID-19 vaccines (EN2716)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Sport - to a petition regarding the promotion of yoga in Australia (EN2724)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition concerning workers engaged in the gig economy (EN2730)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition concerning the imposition of quarantine for returning travellers to Australia (EN2735)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs - to a petition requesting the Australian Government place sanctions on Palestine (EN2741)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Education and Youth - to a petition concerning the Australian Curriculum (EN2747)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting COVID-19 vaccinations not be made mandatory (EN2753)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Assistant Treasurer - to a petition concerning foreign investment in Australia (EN2757)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Attorney-General - to a petition concerning an Australian Bill of Rights (EN2762)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Foreign Affairs - to a petition concerning the welfare of Indian farmers (EN2784)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to provide all Australians with access to COVID-19 vaccines, regardless of age (EN2785)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to provide all Australians with a choice of COVID-19 vaccine (EN2787)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Education and Youth - to a petition requesting that Cantonese and Traditional Chinese be provided as elective language courses to Australian secondary students (EN2792)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Families and Social Services - to a petition concerning the cashless debit card (EN2799)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting multiple dedicated federal quarantine facilities to manage incoming travellers (EN2802)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition concerning a national COVID-19 roadmap towards zero lockdowns and international travel (EN2807)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting that all citizens over the age of 18 be automatically registered as organ donors (EN2811)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting that vaccinated Australians be allowed to travel overseas and quarantine at home upon their return (EN2812)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to relax quarantine arrangements for fully vaccinated Australians returning from overseas (EN2824)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting the opening of Australia's borders (EN2839)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to donate doses of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to Sri Lanka (EN2841)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Education and Youth - to a petition concerning the cost of higher education in Australia (EN2847)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting that the Therapeutic Goods Administration assess the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 (EN2855)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to allow fully vaccinated Australian citizens and permanent residents to leave the country in case of an emergency or for compassionate reasons (EN2859)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to provide doses of AstraZeneca to Bangladesh (EN2869)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting a hard deadline for a date by which fully vaccinated Australians can travel internationally (EN2875)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for the Environment - to a petition requesting to ban all woodfires and open fireplaces (EN2878)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Speaker of the House of Representatives - to a petition concerning the webpage of the House Standing Committee on Petitions (EN2881)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to allow aged care workers to have a choice to not have the COVID-19 vaccine and instead use full protective personal protective equipment (EN2886)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting the establishment of a COVID-19 vaccination passport to facilitate exemption from public health order arrangements such as lockdowns and mandatory mask wearing (EN2887)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Agriculture and Northern Australia - to a petition concerning the labelling of meat (EN2888)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Speaker of the House of Representatives - to a petition concerning the replacement of religious observances at the start of parliamentary proceedings (EN2895)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Health and Aged Care - to a petition requesting to extend access to subsidised FreeStyle Libre to all Australians living with diabetes using insulin through the Continuous Glucose Monitoring Initiative (EN2914)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">From the Minister for Home Affairs - to a petition concerning regional processing arrangements for illegal maritime arrivals (PN0513)</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Mr Ken O'Dowd</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Chair - Petitions Committee</para></quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Women's Sport</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Asylum Seekers</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Foreign Investment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Eczema</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>South Africa</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Family Law</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gun Control</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Declaration on Children, Youth and Climate Action</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Charitable Organisations</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Income Support Payments</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans' Entitlements Act</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Parliamentarians' Entitlements</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Statistics</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Welfare</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Foreign Investment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medical Workforce</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Domestic Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Brisbane Airport</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Biosecurity</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Broadband</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Statistics</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>South China Sea</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Telecommunications</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Homelessness</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gun Control</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crohn's Disease</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Income Support Payments</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>E-Cigarettes</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Missing Persons</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentary Procedure</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Crohn's Disease</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Law Enforcement</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Statistics</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Human Rights</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Veterans' Entitlements Act</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Commonwealth Electoral Act</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Constitution</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Iran</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Constitution</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Education Standards</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medicinal Cannabis</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Paid Parental Leave</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Internet Content</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Euthanasia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Currency</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Age Pension</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>HomeBuilder Program</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Statistics</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Maternal Health</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Immigration Detention</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Economy</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Research and Development</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Quarantine</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Environmental Conservation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentarians</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Defence Force</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sport</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Commonwealth Electoral Act</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>South Africa</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Tobacco</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Renewable Energy</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Health Care</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Medicinal Cannabis</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Day of Prayer</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nuclear Energy</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Nurses</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Education Standards</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>NT Working Women's Centre</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Environment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petitions</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Income Support Payments</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Afghanistan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bill of Rights</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Income Support Payments</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>JobKeeper Payment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Fridge Magnets</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Census</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Migration</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Health Care</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Disability Insurance Scheme</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pacific Australia Labour Mobility Scheme</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Responses</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr O'DOWD</name>
    <name.id>139441</name.id>
    <electorate>Flynn</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present the following ministerial responses to petitions previously presented:</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Taxation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Baby Formula</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Employment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gambling</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gambling</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Housing Affordability</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Convention on the Rights of the Child</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Internet Content</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: India</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Freedom of Speech</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Film Industry</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Suicide Prevention</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Middle East</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Alcohol</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Yoga</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gig Industry</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Middle East</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Education Standards</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Foreign Investment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Human Rights</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>India</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Census</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Cashless Debit Card Program</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Organ and Tissue Donation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Education</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Air Quality</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petitions</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Food Labelling</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliament</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Diabetes Services Scheme</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Asylum Seekers</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PETITIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PETITIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Statements</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp> (Flynn—Deputy Nationals Whip) (10:08):</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr O'DOWD</name>
    <name.id>139441</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This report includes a large number of petitions, so I echo my previous comments on just how great it is that democracy can continue to flourish, even though many of us around the country have experienced, or are experiencing, social distancing in various forms. While visitors are currently unable to enter parliament, the public can be assured that the regular work of the parliament continues, including the Petitions Committee, who continue to work remotely to receive and consider petitions and to assist petitioners with their queries.</para>
<para>Likewise, ministers continue to be busy providing responses to petitions. This report includes 57 responses to petitions previously presented, which is a great outcome for the petitioners. The Petitions Committee refers the majority of petitions to ministers, and most are responded to, providing a clear avenue of communication between the petitioner and the highest government offices. This communication is then published on the committee's website as part of a transparent process. The committee would like to thank ministers for their continued work in supporting this very important activity and petitioners for continuing to engage with their parliament online during uncertain and difficult times.</para>
<para>I look forward to further updating the House on the work of the Petitions Committee.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>NOTICES</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>NOTICES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Postponement</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I inform the House that, pursuant to standing order 110, the honourable member for Clark has postponed notice No. 1 standing in his name. The order of precedence of remaining private members' business notices, as determined by the Selection Committee's report adopted by the House on 1 September 2021, remains unchanged.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Amendment Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="00AMR" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Amendment Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KELLY</name>
    <name.id>99931</name.id>
    <electorate>Hughes</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Firstly, I'd like to thank the member for Kennedy, who originally seconded this bill but who, unfortunately, cannot be here today. I'd also like to thank the Manager of Opposition Business for organising an alternative seconder, and I'd especially like to thank the member for Oxley, who has indicated to me that he will second this bill. We may disagree on many things, but when it comes to workers' safety I believe that we are on the same page.</para>
<para>Several months ago the coalition moved a bill and passed it through this House and also the Senate which made major changes to the superannuation industry, its structure and the regulations regarding it. What they did was, I thought, contrary to the principles of the Liberal Party, because the policies that went through this House, endorsed by a coalition government, will only lead to further concentration in the superannuation industry. It will lead to more power—a concentration of power, both economic and political—in the hands of a smaller number of players controlling a smaller number of very large superannuation funds. It also reduced the freedom of choice for Australians as to where they could invest their superannuation money. However, the worst of the changes that that legislation brought in was what is known as the 'stapling provision', which is where, when you change from one job to the next job, your original superannuation fund stays with you. Previously, when you changed work, you would often go into the default fund of your new employer. Under the changes that have been passed through the two houses of parliament, you are 'stapled' to the original fund that you were in. You no longer go into the new fund by default. That may be fine, perfectly fine, when it comes to investments, but a very important part of anyone's superannuation fund is their insurance policy, and insurance policies between different areas of work need to be completely different to recognise and acknowledge the different risks of work from workplace injuries.</para>
<para>When it comes to workplace fatalities in this country, between 2015 and 2019, 916 Australians lost their lives at work, and 62 per cent of those deaths were in just three industries: transport; agriculture, forestry and fishing; and construction. A worker from a retail sector or an office job who goes to work in those dangerous occupations needs a different type of insurance policy, yet what this parliament has done is stapled their old insurance policy to them. We have created the real risk in this parliament that a young Australian will go from their normal job as a retail worker into one of these dangerous industries, and on their first week, before they've had a chance to think about changing their superannuation policy, they may suffer a catastrophic injury. But they will find themselves not being adequately insured. They will find themselves being unable, often, to claim—or their families to claim—on that insurance policy, because of the changes that this parliament made. I hope everyone can see the danger and the risks that we have put everyone into.</para>
<para>During that previous debate and when that legislation passed, I proposed that we should have a threshold where the stapling provisions do not apply to industries where there is one death per 100,000 workers. With this amendment I have raised that threshold to 2.5 deaths, hoping that we can get support across both houses and across both sides of this parliament so we can make sure that Australian workers—young Australian workers especially—who are going into dangerous occupations are adequately covered.</para>
<para>That threshold of 2.5 per 100,000 will cover forestry, agriculture and fishing workers, who currently have a three-year average of 13.9. It will cover workers in the mining industry. It will cover workers in electricity, gas and waste services and workers in the construction industry. All of those industries have a death rate higher than 2.5. And it is wrong—it is completely wrong—to staple someone's insurance policy and staple their life insurance policy from an office job when they go into these industries.</para>
<para>That is the intention of this bill, and there is also great, great urgency for this bill. We face an unprecedented situation in our nation regarding the right to work. The opportunity to work, the opportunity to earn a living, is probably the most fundamental right that anyone has in this country: the right to go to work, earn a living, come home and put food on your family's table, to be able to pay your mortgage. That is the most fundamental right in this nation, yet that right is being stripped away from hundreds of thousands of workers today. The occupation in which many have worked for decades—people find, especially in Victoria, where medical fascism has been employed by that state government, that, if you have not submitted yourself to taking an experimental injection, to engaging in what is still a medical experiment, you are denied your human rights to work in your industry of choice. You are being denied employment. This is more than coercion. This is blackmail and this is extortion. And that is what hundreds of thousands of workers are facing in the nation today. They are being blackmailed and they are being extorted under a policy of medical fascism at the risk that they can no longer work in their industry of choice.</para>
<para>This should outrage every single member of this House—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I say to the member for Hughes, if he could just pause for a second: he has lots of opportunities to voice his views in this House throughout the parliamentary day. I just need to bring him back to the substance of his bill, which was about superannuation, not about any state government or any other policies.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KELLY</name>
    <name.id>99931</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you. I respect your ruling. I was making the point of the urgency of this bill, because we are facing a situation in this nation where many workers will be changing jobs because of policies that are happening in this nation. And, because they are changing jobs, they are at risk of having their superannuation policy and, most importantly, their life insurance policy stapled. So the reason and the urgency for this particular bill that I have introduced today is because of that very situation, and I think it is important that I detail that as an explanation in part of the introduction to this bill.</para>
<para>We have an obligation to the workers of this nation. We have an obligation to ensure that they can actually go and do their job. But we are facing a situation where many hundreds of thousands of workers are forced out of their job, and they'll be forced into other industries. And, when that happens, under the current legislation, they will have their life insurance policies tied to their superannuation policies stapled. There is a very real risk, with what this House has done and what the other place has done, that there will be young workers who will suffer a catastrophic injury when they change jobs and find that the life insurance policy under their superannuation is inadequate. That has to change. I plead with the other members of this House to see the danger of this policy and what it has done and to see the risks that it poses to young Australians.</para>
<para>There may very well be an argument to staple your investments, but there is no argument to staple your life insurance policy, and that is the mistake that this House has made. This bill seeks to remedy that. It puts in a threshold so that, for workers transferring into certain industries—those four most important industries of construction, mining, agriculture and transport—their life insurance policy is not stapled. It is economically sensible, it is socially responsible and it should be supported by everyone in this House and, I hope, the other house.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Dick</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Stopping PEP11) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="83C" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Stopping PEP11) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STEGGALL</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
    <electorate>Warringah</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Petroleum Exploration Permit 11, known as PEP 11, covers 4,575 square kilometres of ocean, from Newcastle through the Central Coast to Manly. The area adjacent to PEP 11 is home to millions of people. It is a whale migration path and an area of significant biodiversity. The local economy, as well as the community's wellbeing, is intertwined with the health of this area and of the ocean. PEP 11 is the culmination of the coalition's gas folly. Advent Energy Ltd and Bounty Oil and Gas NL, the titleholders of PEP 11, are seeking a renewal and extension of PEP 11 to allow for exploratory oil and gas off our coast. Offshore oil and gas exploration and production through PEP 11 could have dire consequences for our ecosystems, tourism businesses, coastal communities and climate. It must be stopped. Communities have been patient. I presented a petition in February 2020, with over 60,000 names, calling for PEP11 to be cancelled. We have had paddle-outs. We have written letters. We have had platitudes from coalition MPs along the coast, even from the Prime Minister, and assurances that it won't happen. Yet the permit is still here. Advent Energy are still proceeding with their plans, and Minister Pitt, a Nationals MP from Queensland, is declining to cancel the licence.</para>
<para>Oil and gas and fossil fuels contribute to man-made climate change. Climate change has already devastated communities on the east coast, with drought and bushfires. Gas is not a transitional fuel or cleaner; gas is as polluting as coal when lifecycle emissions are taken into consideration. Methane from oil and gas extraction, flaring and transport is driving emission growth in Australia. Emissions from export LNG have grown from 13 million tonnes per annum in 2014 to almost 60 million tonnes today. That is equivalent to four Hazelwood power stations, formerly the most polluting power station in the developed world.</para>
<para>The International Energy Agency, one of the most conservative energy institutions in the world, has stated, 'No further oil and gas developments can proceed if we are to reach net zero by 2050.' The International Energy Agency has put Australia on notice. PEP11 cannot go ahead. To be clear: we do not need more gas. Gas will not lower prices. We have tripled supply and yet gas prices have increased by 130 per cent. Gas is not a transition fuel. Batteries now outperform gas peakers on cost by as much as 30 per cent. We do not need more gas supply for the domestic market, as 70 per cent of supply goes offshore anyway. There will not be a market for gas in 30 years, as most of our major trading partners have net zero targets by 2050 or 2060. Japan, for example, the biggest importer of liquefied natural gas in the world and Australia's major customer, will halve their LNG imports by 2030.</para>
<para>Oil and gas exploration risks pollution of our oceans. Our ocean is fragile and is already under threat from climate change and plastics pollution. We cannot risk an oil spill from a drilling rig wrecking our ocean in areas that are some of the most unique in the world. Just recently, in October, 100,000 litres of crude oil spilled in the Pacific Ocean when an oil pipeline broke six kilometres off California. The spill created a 21-kilometre-wide slick off Huntington Beach. Last week crews began cleaning at least 3,000 barrels of oil washed onto shore. There is now a state of emergency in Orange County. That is the second spill in six years—the last hit Santa Barbara in 2015. Do we really want to risk this happening off the east coast between Newcastle and Manly and off Palm Beach? It is ridiculous. So much can go wrong. Make no mistake, undertaking oil and gas exploration risks disaster for our pristine coast.</para>
<para>The community in the vicinity of PEP11 strongly and adamantly opposes any exploring or drilling for oil and gas. It's not just us. The New South Wales state government has also opposed this project. Former Deputy Premier John Barilaro recommended the project should not proceed. Despite all this PEP11 remains active, pending a decision of federal water and resources minister, the member for Hinkler.</para>
<para>The delay on this decision is causing significant concern and distress to the community. The project proponents are gearing up to drill. They've put out tenders for equipment and other services. So that's why today I am introducing the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Stopping PEP11) Bill 2021 to parliament. The bill will ensure that PEP11 does not proceed. It also ensures that no further applications for any reason can be granted by the joint authority or titles administrator in this current PEP11 block, as well as the area covered by the original PEP11. PEP11 itself will cease to be enforced two months after this bill receives royal assent if people in this place actually stand up for their convictions. The bill is for the millions of people living near PEP11. It's for their wellbeing and economic prosperity. PEP11 must be cancelled. I commend the bill to the House and cede the remainder of my time to the member for Mayo.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SHARKIE</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
    <electorate>Mayo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It is my pleasure to second the motion. I commend the member for Warringah on this bill. It reminds me of my first term in parliament, when we spent much of that time fighting big oil in the Great Australian Bight. Our community in Mayo, in fact many of the communities across the coastal areas of South Australia, were deeply concerned about that. What we knew was that it was in an area of incredibly high risk and remoteness. Drilling at a depth of 2½ kilometres in pristine wilderness—at what point are we going to say no? At what point do we put the environment and people ahead of big oil?</para>
<para>I am going to use my last couple of minutes to share that story. I hope it provides some relief to the people who are fighting PEP11. It can be done.</para>
<para>Initially BP and Chevron wanted to drill in the Great Australian Bight. There was huge community pressure. Our community did not let up. We had paddle-outs and constant hands across the sand. Environmental charities came together, whether they were the Wilderness Society or Greenpeace. We had people from all political persuasions—Senator Hanson-Young, a senator in the other place, and Leon Bignell, the state member for Mawson in South Australia. He's a Labor member of parliament. Despite the Labor Party in South Australia and here not coming out on it, Leon stuck to his guns and fought hard. Leon actually went to Norway to petition the Norwegian government. I wrote to every member of the Norwegian government, because, once we got rid of BP, Equinor came in.</para>
<para>The problem is that the exploration licences continue to sit there. That's where the great risk is. That is what Zali's bill is fighting for. We actually need to cancel these licences. It was a good day in February 2020 when, after huge public pressure, Equinor decided to step out of oil exploration drilling in the bight. But those licences should never have been there, just like they shouldn't be there for off the coast of New South Wales, which is a pristine part of our coastline. We market Australia as the great beach and a huge island, yet we're prepared to risk that just for big oil.</para>
<para>What do we need to happen in the Great Australian Bight? We still need World Heritage protection. We have a remote area of enormous marine biodiversity. Like PEP11, it's an area where whales come to calve. I commend this bill to the House. Good on you, Member for Warringah. We need more conviction in this place and fewer donations.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I give a friendly reminder to the member for Mayo to refer to members by their proper title during debate. The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next day of sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="XH4" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STEGGALL</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
    <electorate>Warringah</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>Introduction</para>
<para>We are at a turning point in history.</para>
<para>We are on the eve of the olympics of international relations and the world is coming together at COP26 to set out the plan to safeguard our way of life.</para>
<para>The Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) Bill 2021 is the proven plan that will put Australia in the driving seat of the new alliance of nations committed to a net zero world.</para>
<para>We are on the eve of the biggest disruption that can solve the climate crisis. We are at a turning point. There is cause for optimism but we cannot afford to delay as was made clear in the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.</para>
<para>We risk hitting 1.5 degrees of warming in the 2030s which will be devastating to our global economy, ecosystems and our way of life.</para>
<para>There are moments in history when leaders have the opportunity to show what they are made of, and this is one of them.</para>
<para>The major sectors of our economy: energy, transport, industry, and agriculture, are being transformed by new technologies.</para>
<para>Market forces are a tailwind behind us and as a result, we are decarbonising—but, make no mistake, not fast enough. Technology needs clear targets to drive investment and uptake. We have the tools. We need to roll out mature technologies at scale and fast. Let's be clear: this is a race.</para>
<para>Countries like the United States, Japan and Korea understand this urgency and have committed to double their action and roll out technology solutions by 2030.</para>
<para>This is a critical decade, and they are accelerating, determined to grasp the economic opportunities of the net-zero economy.</para>
<para>The Morrison government has spent so long denying the need to act that it has failed to deliver a clear plan and framework.</para>
<para>The work has been done for them. It's the climate change bill.</para>
<para>The government have focused on technologies that have failed to deliver, like carbon capture and storage. They are focusing on putting out greenwashing websites whilst approving coalmines. They claim credit where credit is not due, because the work is being done by others.</para>
<para>Emissions are down only because of the drought and COVID-19 restrictions. A pandemic and a drought are not climate policies.</para>
<para>The Prime Minister is desperate to do a deal with the Nationals on net zero by 2050, but that is meaningless without a strong interim target. Decarbonising 30 years into the future is not enough anymore.</para>
<para>We need to lock in ambitious targets and a framework to get to net zero into law. We can accelerate the transformation of the economy, and we can all benefit from the new opportunities these technologies will bring.</para>
<para>The climate change bill has been endorsed by the business, industry and investment communities. They are forging ahead but require policy certainty to make serious decisions.</para>
<para>There is a global capital pool of more than $1.7 trillion per annum and growing that Australia may miss out on due to a lack of policy certainty.</para>
<para>The Business Council has said that the policy framework in the legislation of these bills provides:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… an architecture which will be critical to mapping out a planned and predictable approach to emissions reduction across the economy as we work towards the net-zero target in 2050 …</para></quote>
<para>So, rather than smooth the way for business, the government is throwing obstacles in their path by not adopting this bill, and now Australia risks being skipped as a destination for investment.</para>
<para>We need to adopt the bill before COP26 and restore confidence for the business community.</para>
<para>We know that two out of three coal jobs will disappear in the next two decades, whether the Nationals like it or not.</para>
<para>We have been warned. Change is coming, and we must plan and prepare for that change. That disruption is underway—make no mistake—and these communities are being left unprotected and unprepared. There is no point in selling them fantasies that industries will be around forever when they simply will not be.</para>
<para>We must not protect old industries. We must protect people and communities. There is a very important distinction to be made.</para>
<para>I've consulted broadly with community, business, unions, academics and not-for-profits. The bill we have today has important new provisions.</para>
<para>To ensure the bill is relevant in a decade's time and working effectively, the bills will now be reviewed every 10 years after commencement. They are based on the experience of the United Kingdom's Climate Change Act. Witnesses suggest that statutory duties on the minister should extend to meeting the target and adaptation plans.</para>
<para>The minister must now take all reasonable steps to ensure that the target is met and that objectives set out in adaptation plans are achieved.</para>
<para>On targets, I've heard the concerns of many in relation to interim targets and introduced an aspirational, ambitious target of 60 per cent emissions reduction on 2005 levels by 2030. The US are at 52 per cent. The UK are at 68 per cent. We must have a plan that at least puts us in the leading group.</para>
<para>We have to be ambitious. It's the key to being competitive on the international stage and being a destination for investment. It's in line with our trading partners.</para>
<para>Our adaptation plans will now be disallowable instruments, alongside emissions budgets, to ensure the parliament—this place—has oversight over such important instruments and can chart our course to action on climate change.</para>
<para>I call on the government to allow debate and an open vote on the climate change bill. Take the climate change act to COP26.</para>
<para>Show leadership and restore our international standing.</para>
<para>Set up policy certainty for communities and industries and unleash a wave of investment in the technologies that we need to get to net zero.</para>
<para>To every member in this place: you have a responsibility to your communities and future generations.</para>
<para>It's time to pass the bill, not the buck.</para>
<para>I cede the remainder of my time to the member for Mayo.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SHARKIE</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
    <electorate>Mayo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, I second the motion. Again, I would like to commend the member for Warringah on her good work on the Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) Bill 2021. I wonder, when we get to 2050—a time when many of us will have grey hair and perhaps many of us won't still be here—what the young people of 2050 will say about us and today's debate. I wonder if they will say, 'What a wasted opportunity.' The member for Warringah has done the work. She's basically done all of the homework for the government with respect to COP26. We didn't even know if a member of the government was going to attend. It wasn't announced until just recently that the Prime Minister would attend. We had Prince Charles come out and speak on this. We should be leading the world because we have the space, we have the sun, we have the wind. We see other nations that don't have those natural resources at hand leading, and we are being left behind. Much has been said on this subject and many have suggested that this is not what people in regional Australia want. Well, let me say that I represent a regional electorate, as does the member for Indi. In fact, members of my electorate are so interested in this space that they attended a workshop where the member for Indi presented and talked about the renewable energy projects in her community.</para>
<para>We should be leading the world on solar. We should be leading the world on battery uptake, particularly in the home. We should be building those batteries. We should be leading the world on electric vehicle uptake, instead of reading reports that we are having some of the dirtiest vehicles dumped in Australia because of our lack of emissions control. We should be building those electric vehicles. Just recently, we had totally renewable Yackandandah follow up on the member for Indi's work, because we want to lead. We want to do this despite the actions of the government. There are employment opportunities here—huge employment opportunities. As the member for Warringah said, coal jobs will not be around, because there won't be any buyers. We have to support those communities to transition now rather than sell them falsehoods by saying that those jobs will be around. We need to help them and we need to stop treating Australia like a big sandpit. That is what we do. It is the laziest thing we could do; we dig up our minerals and we send them overseas. The rest of the world sees us as a pariah. We need to fix this. It is not too late. We all need to support the member for Warringah's bill. We need to take action, we need to have courage and we need to lead from the front.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="123674" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STEGGALL</name>
    <name.id>175696</name.id>
    <electorate>Warringah</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a second time.</para></quote>
<para>This bill, the Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2021, will make consequential and transitional amendments to existing acts for the purposes of the substantive bill, the Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) Bill 2021. This bill also introduces climate risk disclosure for Commonwealth entities. Commonwealth entities like government agencies and departments are exposed to the risks of climate change impacts. The Reserve Bank of Australia has observed that climate change is exposing financial institutions and the financial system more broadly to risks that will rise over time if not addressed.</para>
<para>Since 2017, the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, TCFD, led by Michael Bloomberg, has been leading voluntary climate reporting standardisation for private companies. Companies around the world have recognised the value of climate disclosure. Benefits include more effective risk assessment, capital allocation and strategic planning. Banks, insurers, developers, miners and big business around the world have been rapidly incorporating climate disclosure in their annual reporting. After a landmark opinion by Noel Hutley SC and Sebastian Hartford Davies, legal cases like McVeigh v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd and guidance on climate risk from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Australian companies must start disclosing material climate risks or be exposed to legal and regulatory actions. According to APRA:</para>
<quote><para class="block">A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks.</para></quote>
<para>Fifty-eight per cent of ASX 100 companies now report using TCFD—up from 16 per cent in 2017. More work needs to be done, but progress is being made very rapidly in the private sector. Unfortunately, the public sector is lagging far behind.</para>
<para>How can we ask companies to report on climate risk but not Commonwealth entities? A legal action last year claiming that the government is not disclosing climate risks on Treasury bonds demonstrates this. National governments have been successfully prosecuted in Ireland and the Netherlands for failing to adequately respond to climate related risks. Moreover, countries are dumping Australian Treasury bonds over a perceived lack of action and transparency. This is a looming credit risk. The Treasurer himself stood up in front of the Australian Industry Group and detailed the consequences of our inaction. These are: higher lending costs, a burden on Australian households and investment skipping Australia as a destination.</para>
<para>Other governments are now leading the charge. On 20 May of this year, the United States' President Biden signed an executive order on climate related financial risk. President Biden mandated that the US federal government would advance consistent, clear, intelligible, comparable and accurate disclosure of climate related financial risk, including both physical and transitional risks. The Australian federal government is exposed and should do the same.</para>
<para>This bill will ensure that accountable authorities for Commonwealth entities must consider, in the exercising of their duties or powers, the potential risks of climate change, the potential contribution to Australia's emissions of greenhouse gases, and the broader impacts of these actions. This bill will also establish the reporting of material risks to those entities and the disclosure of actions taken to mitigate those risks. Stakeholders, including the community, will have confidence that the government is managing its own climate risk. The minister for climate change can publish guidelines for accountable authorities to follow in their response to climate risks. These guidelines will be made by legislative instrument to ensure accountability.</para>
<para>The bill enables the creation of a climate change commission and the repeal of the Climate Change Authority. We know that a climate change commission is needed to provide expert, fact based, independent advice to policymakers. Only then can we really make sure that climate policy is made in the national interest for the benefit of all Australians, instead of what we are currently seeing, which is policy on the run being dictated by a minority of Nationals, their hands out, looking to negotiate something that is not in the best interests of Australia. We will get a confused mess of policies that do not efficiently and cost-effectively address climate impacts, adaptation, mitigation and our transition across all sectors of society. We've heard all about a deal around things like inland rail that does nothing to stop climate change, that will further facilitate transportation of thermal coal. We've heard of carve outs from agriculture, which stands to be the area most affected by climate change yet stands to gain the most. We cannot have political deals dictating our long-term safety and our long-term prosperity. We need independent advice to ensure accountability.</para>
<para>We know that the UK Climate Change Committee, on which this commission is based, has been effective at breaking political deadlock—the kind of deadlock that the government is in at the moment with its lack of climate policy. It cuts through debate with sound and practical advice and puts forward exemplar policy that is usually accepted by the government of the day and the opposition. We must emulate that in Australia. Introducing the Climate Change Commission is desperately needed in Australian politics. It will introduce duties and reporting requirements on accountable authorities and Commonwealth entities. We need to pass both the climate change bills and this bill. It is very clear that the government has not done the work. But the work is done. The community is behind this—industry, business—all are behind it. It's time to put a winning plan to Australia and to the world. I cede the rest of my time to the member for Indi.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I second this bill, the Climate Change (National Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2021, and I do so secure in the knowledge that I'm standing up for the economic future of regional Australia. Over the past few weeks and months, members of the National Party have made all sorts of outrageous, fear-mongering claims about the future of our regions. They've called for $250 billion of government money to pay big fossil fuel companies to continue to pollute. That's $30,000 for every regional Australian that we could be putting towards hospital beds, more doctors in the bush, the NBN or the elimination of blackspot mobile phone problems. But the Nationals' big vision for regional Australia is subsidised coalmining. They've said that there are no jobs in renewables. But there are thousands of good jobs in renewable energy right now, across Australia.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The assistant minister on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Howarth</name>
    <name.id>247742</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, on relevance. We're not here to talk about the Nationals; we're here to talk about this bill.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I encourage the member for Indi to focus on the matters relating to the bill.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Absolutely—I would be delighted to. There are thousands of good jobs in renewable energy right now across Australia, and we could grow hundreds of thousands more jobs in export oriented manufacturing if we were smart enough to capture the endless low-cost renewable energy that shines down upon our continent every single day. We are on the precipice of another gold rush but, instead, the government is looking to keep us in the Bronze Age. Setting the goal of net zero emissions by 2050 and putting in place smart policies that cut emissions quickly is the single-best thing we could do to drive the economy in the regions. To meet our domestic electricity needs whilst also growing new clean export industries, Australia will need to quadruple our supply of electricity and switch it all to renewable sources. That will mean hundreds of billions of dollars invested into regional Australia. We know the world is moving to things like green hydrogen, green steel and green aluminium. I believe that instead of importing them all from other countries we should be exporting these products from regional Australia to the world.</para>
<para>The bill before us sets out a framework through which we can pursue this bright economic agenda. It sets out in law a commitment that the vast majority of Australians support: that we will decarbonise our economy by the middle of the century. And it requires the government of the day to set out detailed plans to meet those legislated emission reductions targets. I've worked closely with the member for Warringah to make this bill robust and to make sure the bill will deliver for the regions. I've inserted a 'regional economic safeguard' mechanism that requires the new climate commission to make sure that regional Australia secures an equitable share of the economic benefits of zero net emissions. I've inserted a 'regions first' clause that requires the climate commission to implement a strategy to maximise economic benefits for rural and regional Australia, and I've inserted a 'regions at the table' rule that says the board of the new climate commission must have expertise in regional development.</para>
<para>As a regional Australian who wants to see my region thrive long into the future, in my short time in this place I've put in the work, inside this place and with my community, to develop sensible, considered policies like this one. While the member for Petrie would rather I not mention the National Party, I have to ask: in eight years—eight years—what have they actually done to tackle the climate problem in regional Australia? What have they done for the farmers? What have they done for the regional jobs in our towns? I'm proud to second this bill.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MOTIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>MOTIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Spinal Muscular Atrophy</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VASTA</name>
    <name.id>E0D</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) acknowledges that the month of August is Spinal Muscular Atrophy Awareness Month;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the number one genetic killer of infants under the age of two in Australia and one in thirty-five people are carriers of SMA; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the Health Chief Executives Forum has encouraged all states and territories to include SMA in their Newborn Screening Programs following the success of the pilot program in NSW/ACT;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) recognises that the Commonwealth Government has invested significantly in the space of genetic testing and SMA treatment due to our strong economic management; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) calls on the remaining state and territory governments to implement SMA testing into their Newborn Bloodspot Program, following the advice from the Health Chief Executives Forum.</para></quote>
<para>Today I rise to speak on a matter that is very close to my heart. I rise to be the voice of every newborn and family currently on their own journey with spinal muscular atrophy and for those who seek to embark on this journey in the future. Spinal muscular atrophy, also known as SMA, sadly affects one in 10,000 births in Australia, and, with no cure, this disease is the No. 1 genetic cause of death for babies under two in Australia.</para>
<para>I first became aware of SMA through the story of baby Mackenzie in 2018. Since then I have taken every opportunity to raise awareness around SMA and speak on this matter in the House, because fighting for the lives of newborns and the lives of Australians is a matter of urgency, especially when there are treatments available. Little Mackenzie was diagnosed with SMA at just 10 weeks old and, sadly, passed away at just seven months old. Mackenzie's parents, Rachael and Jonathan Casella, have made it their mission to shine a light on this disease. On learning of their story, I had the privilege of working with Rachael and Jonathan to bring SMA to the attention of Minister Hunt and Minister Coleman. Their hard work resulted in the delivery of a $20 million study into reproductive genetic carrier screening, called Mackenzie's Mission, in the 2018 budget, and it was a core project as part of the $500 million Australian Genomics Health Futures Mission. Next Friday, 22 October, marks the anniversary of little Makenzie's life. Her story and legacy will forever leave a mark on the fight for more life-saving SMA treatments. My heartfelt condolences go out to the Casella family for the little girl that they miss so dearly.</para>
<para>Our government has remained committed to supporting babies with this horrible disease by introducing life-saving measures. During SMA Awareness Month, which fell during August, our government listed Evrysdi on the PBS. This medication has meant that families living with SMA now have access to less invasive treatment options. It has also meant these families may experience a reduction in visits to specialist hospitals. As a parent, all you want to do is protect your child from pain and suffering. Treatment options like Evrysdi are making sure that new families can enjoy one of the happiest times of their lives as they welcome their little one into the world. It means that they can make precious family moments that aren't tarnished by days, weeks or even months of sleepless nights at the hospital. It is giving and will give so many families hope at a time when it is needed most. I thank our government for this listing.</para>
<para>I'm a strong advocate for bringing awareness to SMA. There are families in my electorate of Bonner currently battling this disease, like locals Kate and Grant Gough and their beautiful baby Oakley. Just last week, Oakley celebrated her first birthday. I first met with the Gough family last year and have been working with them to bring awareness to SMA in Queensland. It has been a long and challenging journey for Oakley after being diagnosed at just eight weeks old, but to see how Oakley has grown and remained resilient during her first 12 months of life has truly been a privilege. She is one of the most precious and inspiring little fighters that I've ever met. Kate and Grant have shown Oakley the strongest and purest form of love. Oakley has recently been able to access Zolgensma, a life-changing gene therapy drug to treat babies with SMA. After just two weeks of accessing this drug, Oakley rolled over for the first time, lifted her head and scored 100 per cent in her physio assessment. She is now even able to enjoy sitting upright. I'm happy to report she is improving every day, but that doesn't mean life will be easy.</para>
<para>Had Oakley been screened for SMA as part of the newborn blood spot screening program, her quality of life might have been completely different today. It is incomprehensible that, had Oakley been born in a different state, that too might have meant a quality of life that would be completely different today. It is a disadvantage which should not exist in this country. Today, I also rise to bring attention to the lack of action from the Queensland state government on including as part of the NBS program a screening for SMA, which newborns in New South Wales and the ACT already receive. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAYES</name>
    <name.id>ECV</name.id>
    <electorate>Fowler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion. I thank the member for Bonner not only for bringing this motion before us but also for his ongoing advocacy in respect of spinal muscular atrophy. Looking back to August, that is the month when we recognise SMA. Not just is this a debilitating disease; it is a killer disease. It is the leading genetic killer of infants under the age of two in this country. To put the matter in greater perspective, one in 6,000 babies are born with SMA.</para>
<para>SMA is a rare motor neurone disease that causes progressive deterioration of the motor neurons, the spinal cord and the muscles surrounding the area, like those affecting the neck, the trunk, the arms and the legs. They are the muscles that control posture and movement and the respiratory muscles which control the breathing. Over time, coughing becomes very difficult. As a matter of fact, the inability to cough is one of the significant aspects of SMA that causes the death of children suffering from the disease.</para>
<para>Alarmingly, SMA occurs not only in children but also in adults. Many experience the late onset of this disease, particularly types 2, 3 and 4, and it has absolutely life-changing aspects. For many individuals impacted by SMA, the symptoms may develop as early as at three months of age, yet for others who are mildly affected by types 2, 3 and 4 the disease may not be visible until they are in late childhood or even, as I said, early adulthood. Sadly, children with type 1 SMA usually do not live beyond their second birthday.</para>
<para>Another statistic that it is worth acknowledging, given the importance of ongoing engagement with and awareness of the condition, is that one in 35 Australian adults carry the regressive gene that causes SMA, and most people are simply unaware of it. What that means is that, if one person is a carrier of this defective gene and has a child with another who is similarly a carrier of the gene, they have a one-in-four chance of having a child born with SMA. This is a statistic that should be a concern to all Australians, and that is why the Health Chief Executives Forum has encouraged all states and territories to include SMA in newborn screening programs, particularly following the success shown by the programs operating in New South Wales and the ACT. In fact, I'd go further and say that, given the success of the newborn screening programs, we should establish a national screening program that operates uniformly across all states and territories. This is where we require the Commonwealth to work cooperatively with all our states to at least establish a consistent outcome.</para>
<para>SMA is a matter close to home for my family, having witnessed the impacts of the dreadful disease. In 2010, my cousin, Tamara Hayes, lost her daughter, Summer, to SMA. You can imagine the absolutely tragic and devastating time that the family has had after losing a precious little girl. To Tamara's credit, she used her experience to become an advocate on this very important issue. Tamara advocates for others to ensure that they are aware of, and better equipped to deal with, SMA as a real issue with respect to their children.</para>
<para>I can't imagine the grief that families go through when they lose a child—it's simply beyond reckoning. But what it does mean is that we must do better. Clearly, we must work to ensure that better support is provided to families, including the availability of genetic screening, and to those families that are found to be carriers of the regressive gene. While there is currently no cure for SMA, there is certainly a lot of research being invested into this condition with respect to both genetic testing and SMA treatments, with some promising treatments now being tested in clinical trials. This is why we must continue to support the investment of further research into SMA and its treatments.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VAN MANEN</name>
    <name.id>188315</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's a pleasure to rise on this motion moved by the member for Bonner, who has brought this important issue to the House to make our communities more aware of this life-changing and life-ending disease. Spinal muscular atrophy is the No. 1 genetic killer of infants under the age of two in Australia, as has been mentioned by the member for Fowler and also the member for Bonner. One in 35 people in Australia are carriers of the SMA gene.</para>
<para>The Australian government has invested significantly in the space of genetic testing and SMA treatment as part of its ongoing development to broaden the range of health services across this country. As the member for Bonner was remarking in his closing comments, we're now calling on the remaining state and territory governments to implement SMA testing into their newborn bloodspot screening programs, following the advice from the Health Chief Executives Forum. The newborn bloodspot screening programs in Australia are managed by the state and territory governments, and operate independently of each other. You would think that in the 21st century issues such as this would, from a health perspective, have some level of uniformity across our country. It's disappointing to note that there are still state governments who haven't introduced this additional screening to their NBS programs, and I'm sad to say that Queensland is one of those.</para>
<para>All of the states have committed to ensure quality and consistency across their programs through the NBS National Policy Framework, so I join the member for Bonner in calling for the Queensland government in particular to step up to the plate in this regard. Through the National Health Reform Agreement, the Australian government has made a funding contribution to the state and territory governments of 45 per cent of the growth of costs in all public hospital services, including population screening and NBS programs. The Commonwealth government has made the commitment to provide the funding to assist the state governments to roll these programs out, so I say there is no reason the state governments shouldn't be including these tests in their screening programs.</para>
<para>It was encouraging to see the recent trial project in New South Wales that demonstrated the effectiveness of screening for SMA in the newborn bloodspot screening program. I also recognise Western Australia's announcement of a test program for SMA testing, which will commence following assessment of the benefits and harms and the required resources in WA. Early detection through the NBS screening programs is vital in providing this life-changing information to families. Unlike a number of others that have already contributed to this debate, I have not had the experience of family, friends or people I know who have suffered the loss of a child as a result of spinal muscular atrophy, but I have seen the devastation in families who have lost young children for other reasons. I know the effect that has on families, and I would envisage it would be no different for a family who has lost a young child as a result of SMA. I think, as we've all reflected at various points in this place, no parent should have to bury their child. We can assist in making the lives of our children better by having these treatments and these processes in place to identify these issues early on in the piece, before the child is even born; it gives us the opportunity to provide the treatments that are necessary.</para>
<para>I'm pleased to say that this government continues to expand the PBS to include drugs like Evrysdi to ensure that these are now available to people who require treatment for SMA types who are aged 18 years or under. It's an oral form of treatment and therefore a less invasive treatment option for patients compared with spinal injections.</para>
<para>As I have said already, the government is seeking to ensure it provides the support for a range of health services across the country. I commend the government's work. I commend the work the member for Bonner has done in this space.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I would like to thank the member for Bonner for moving this motion and also the members for Fowler and Forde for their comments, which I won't repeat, because there is so much more to say. I've sat in a room and told parents that their child has SMA and there was very little we could do for them. There was a little girl called Molly who died of pneumonia just after her second birthday. It's a common way that children with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy die. It used to be called Werdnig-Hoffmann disease, named after the neurologists who first described it over a century ago, and we gave it that name because we didn't know what caused it. Then, with medical advances, it became known that this disease was caused by the death of the nerve cells in the spinal cord and brain stem that supply skeletal muscle, and it led therefore to the loss of that muscle and eventual death, usually from respiratory failure. Then we found the genetic cause: the vast majority are due to a defect in chromosome 5 in a gene that produces a protective protein for those neurones. So those neurones die, the muscle dies and the child dies.</para>
<para>We found the cause, but in the 21st century we now have treatments. We have treatments that will allow these children, who all would have died with type 1, to survive and live, we hope, a normal life. Australia is a wealthy country, and we can provide those treatments, but it's very important that those treatments start very early, before damage is done—and damage starts from day one of life. We have newborn screening tests that can now pick this genetic defect up, and treatment can begin very early. The first treatment was a treatment called Spinraza. Another one is a genetic treatment called Zolgensma, and there's a third one, called Evrysdi, that has come on the market. It is an oral treatment, which makes treatment even better. This, we hope, will allow these children to live a normal life.</para>
<para>Paradoxically, not every child in Australia with this disorder will be picked up in the neonatal period and be offered treatment in the neonatal period. And this diagnosis often is missed. It used to be missed because of a lack of diagnosis. So it's very important that we start early treatment, yet, shamefully, in Australia we have no national newborn screening program. In New South Wales these children can get picked up virtually at birth with a newborn screening test, but in Queensland they don't get picked up until the diagnosis is made, usually when much damage has occurred. It really is disgraceful that in a country like Australia we have such a terrible screening program that differs from state to state. This should not happen, and it is a shame on both Labor and Liberal parties that we don't have a national newborn screening program that is the same in every state.</para>
<para>I want to pay tribute to Felicity McNeill, the CEO of Better Access Australia, who has been trying her very best to make sure that Australia gets a national, uniform newborn-screening program. It is ridiculous that we don't have one, and it's vitally important that it happens as soon as possible so that these treatments can be offered before damage occurs. It's a shame on all of us that we don't have this, and it needs to be approached on an urgent basis. I find it continually frustrating in this place that we can't get urgent action that will save lives in such a simple manner.</para>
<para>The other issue that is important is that we should be offering these treatments to people over the age of 18 so that they can prolong their lives with these now readily available treatments. I think it's highly discriminatory that people over 18 cannot be offered these treatments. It's an urgent matter, and this government should immediately provide treatment for all people with spinal muscular atrophy who would benefit from the newer genetic treatments available.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALEXANDER</name>
    <name.id>M3M</name.id>
    <electorate>Bennelong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>One of the great things about representing Bennelong is representing Pill Hill at Macquarie Park. Modern medicines are incredible. Many of the conditions which were traumatic, debilitating or deadly for my parents' generation are now cured. No-one fears polio or smallpox anymore. We haven't heard of these in years. We can thank revolutions in medicine for this. Similarly, many of the diseases and conditions we have now will not plague future generations, and if we look closely we can see cures coming over the horizon right now. Many treatments that were death sentences within the last 10 years are now curable or at least manageable. We will die with these conditions, not of them.</para>
<para>Spinal muscular atrophy was a terrifying condition. It is a genetic condition that causes the degradation of muscles, leading to their atrophy over time. It was, as the motion said, the No. 1 genetic killer of infants under the age of two in Australia. But, with all due respect to my friend and colleague the member for Bonner, this motion has its tenses muddled. SMA was the biggest killer of infants, but it is now one of those conditions which we have the ability to consign to medical textbook history. We have done this in Australia through two things: testing and treatment. When one in 35 people carries the gene for SMA, testing is obviously imperative. The newborn blood-spot screening program has been a huge success in screening over 25 conditions in newborns. The ACT and New South Wales have recently run a pilot that added SMA testing to this program. This screened over 250,000 babies, and 21 had a genetic condition of SMA. Through the screening, those 21 babies are either on the PBS-listed treatment or accessing treatment through clinical trials, which we know has been life saving and has allowed them normal development. Since we know that the earlier you treat this condition to prevent the loss of function the better the health outcomes, this intervention will have massive implications for their futures. While adding things to the newborn blood-spot program is arranged at a state level, following these great results Western Australia has added SMA screening to its program, which is fantastic to see. I understand that the Minister for Health and Aged Care, the Hon. Greg Hunt MP, has written to all state and territory health ministers, urging them to consider the inclusion of SMA screening in their newborn blood-spot screening programs, and I hope this call will be answered across the nation.</para>
<para>Even recently, testing provided somewhat useless knowledge, as treatment remained elusive, but in June 2018 this changed, with the first-ever treatment for this devastating condition being listed on the PBS. This was Spinraza, and it is made by one of the companies on Pill Hill. The government invested in Biogen's drug, with $241 million to list Spinraza on the PBS for the treatment of patients under the age of 18 with types 1, 2, and 3A SMA, from 1 June 2018. The listing of Spinraza was expanded from 1 December 2020 to include treatment of children and infants under 36 months with presymptomatic SMA. Without PBS subsidy families would pay more than $367,000 a year for this treatment. Meanwhile, Roche's Evrysdi was listed on the PBS in 1 August 2021 for the treatment of patients with SMA types 1, 2 and 3A who are aged 18 or under at treatment initiation. Without PBS subsidy around 100 patients a year would be paying more than $123,000 for their treatments.</para>
<para>Behind these figures are real families with loved ones who now have a bright future. One such family lives locally to me in Willoughby, New South Wales. Matilda MacDonald was born with type 1 SMA and would probably have died had she not accessed Spinraza. She is now a boisterous five-year-old who is keen to start school. While she needs a little help with things, she is growing into an independent young person. At a time when we are fixed on a vaccine helping us to open up, it is clear and obvious to all that medicines can change lives. But in some cases medicines can do more than change lives, they can give life. These two treatments represent the opportunity to live for children who otherwise would not have that opportunity. I can encourage testing across Australia. We have the opportunity to take the terror out of SMA.</para>
<para>Debate adjourned.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>10:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STANLEY</name>
    <name.id>265990</name.id>
    <electorate>Werriwa</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) 15 October 2021 is International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) on that day, parents, families, friends and healthcare workers will memorialise babies they have lost through miscarriage, stillbirth and infant death;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) infant loss is a tragic and terrible event to go through for families, healthcare workers and friends, and International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day provides an opportunity to mark their shared loss; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) direct support for persons affected by pregnancy and infant loss is difficult at the current time considering the local health environment;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) acknowledges that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) each year approximately 150,000 women in Australia experience some form of pregnancy or infant loss;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) further issues are commonly faced by those close to these tragic events such as depression, anxiety, changes in relationships, development of unhealthy coping mechanisms and post-traumatic stress disorder;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) these effects, amongst others, are often underestimated and overlooked by healthcare professionals, friends, and even family members, especially concerning pregnancy loss related bereavement and subsequent grief;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) greater research and understanding is required to aide in the creation and establishment of programs, resources and services that support and provide assistance to survivors of baby loss and their families, and enable them to overcome their trauma and integrate their bereavement into their life in a healthy, helpful, healing manner;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(e) services for people affected by pregnancy or infant loss have been continuing, as best as possible, their necessary and significant work during this recent and difficult period; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(f) further support is required including providing parents who aren't covered by leave entitlements with the same amount of paid leave they would be entitled to if their baby was born alive;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) expresses sympathy to all families who have suffered a miscarriage, a stillbirth or infant death; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) commends every person who has supported parents and families through their journey from the loss of a baby.</para></quote>
<para>October marks International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month. As with all awareness campaigns, there is an encouragement to talk and recognise the loss of a baby by miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death. By talking we're raising awareness and we're raising money, instigating research to reduce the incidence of this loss and find ways to prevent families distress in the future.</para>
<para>Every year in Australia 110,000 mothers experience miscarriage. More than 2,200 endure a stillbirth and 600 more families lose their babies in the first 28 days of life. If you come from a culturally or linguistically diverse background the statistics are higher for you. If you are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander the statistics show you are 50 per cent more likely to see your baby die. COVID-19 has presented more challenges for families who have been affected by the loss of a baby over the last two years, given the necessary isolation from families and friends who could provide support and comfort. Getting COVID in pregnancy is also extremely dangerous for the health of the mother and baby. Medical experts recommend getting vaccinated if you're thinking of having a baby or are currently pregnant so, please, talk to your doctor or medical professional and consider booking in for a vaccination.</para>
<para>Last Friday 15 October social media was full of images of candles lit for beloved babies. This event every year gives families an important opportunity to publicly remember and reduce stigma that often follows the loss of a baby. Red Nose and Sands Australia are also supporting parents by their Say Their Name campaign, which encourages parents to remember their babies by posting their names on social media in their birth month. Often the feedback from bereaved families in isolation is that they don't think there's a space to talk about their babies that have died. And well-meaning comments, like, 'You're young, you can have another one,' or, 'At least you already have children' don't provide mothers, fathers, siblings or grandparents a place to talk and remember their baby. All parents love talking about their children and it's no different for families who have lost a baby. Having people remember their birthdays, even after many years, makes the loss easier to bear.</para>
<para>The hardest question I'm often asked is how many children I have. My answer is rarely 'five' for so many complicated reasons, but mostly because society has no real words to comfort grief of any sort, and especially that of a baby. I have three wonderful boys I've watched grow and succeed in life, and two babies who, although are thought of every day, are not with us to share our celebrations. Raising awareness not only supports families dealing with those losses but also ensures research to improve outcomes in the future. Government initiatives and funding for research are vitally important. The National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan is one of the things we need to fund and support.</para>
<para>Overall, Australia is one of the safest places in the world to have a baby, but even here over 100,000 pregnancies a year will end without a healthy baby to take home. That is why groups such as Red Nose, Sands, Miracle Babies and the Stillbirth Foundation are so crucially important to support families grieving the loss of their babies. These groups support and help mothers, fathers and the rest of the family negotiate not just those first few weeks and months but the subsequent pregnancies, which are often difficult, as they bring back so many negative memories.</para>
<para>I encourage and acknowledge all of the researchers, doctors, nurses and families who are contributing every day to finding the answers that will help reduce these rates. I especially recognise all the families who share their stories to make sure that their special children are not forgotten and other families do not suffer in the future. I acknowledge the medical professionals and my friends and family who supported us on our journey of loss. I remember Michael and Meaghan.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Werriwa for her contribution. Is the motion seconded?</para>
<para>An honourable member: I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms HAMMOND</name>
    <name.id>80072</name.id>
    <electorate>Curtin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Werriwa for moving this motion and I acknowledge her grief. Losing a child is the ultimate tragedy. It is the worst possible grief—beyond reckoning—and it doesn't end. Pregnancy and infant loss touch so many Australians. Each year one in four pregnancies end in a miscarriage and one in six pregnancies end in a stillbirth. This means that nearly every Australian has been touched by the loss of a baby, either indirectly or directly.</para>
<para>On 17 February this year a motion was passed in this place for 15 October to be officially and eternally recognised as International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day. Official recognition of International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day in Australia acknowledges the loss and ongoing grief that those impacted by pregnancy and infant loss endure. It was an honour to attend the memorial service at the King Edward Memorial Hospital's rose garden last Friday to take time to remember the babies that have died due to miscarriage or stillbirth. The day provided these families with the knowledge that they are not alone and that there is support for them in the Australian community. It was a day on which parents, families and friends memorialised babies lost through infant death, stillbirth or miscarriage. There are more than 40,000 babies memorialised in the rose garden.</para>
<para>To acknowledge the tragedy of losing a baby, the government is investing $152 million in perinatal services and support measures to improve health outcomes for mothers and babies. This forms part of Australia's broader commitment to the National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan, which the federal government released last year. The plan aims to reduce stillbirth rates in Australia by 20 per cent or more in the next five years. This government also recognises that preterm birth is a cause of infant loss and has committed $13 million to implement the Australian Preterm Birth Prevention Alliance nationally to reduce the rate of preterm birth in Australia. I note and commend Professor John Newnham and his team, who lead this national program out of my electorate.</para>
<para>There has also been $21 million committed for specific actions to target women at increased risk of stillbirth, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. The government is working closely with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds to design stillbirth prevention messages that resonate with these population groups.</para>
<para>Bereaved parents often suffer in silence, which is why the government is investing in ongoing support for the wellbeing of parents, including $43 million towards the Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing Program, which includes support for families experiencing grief following the death of a child.</para>
<para>To provide intensive support to families experiencing stillbirth, the government is working with Red Nose to fund the Hospital to Home program. The government is dedicated to working closely with other non-government organisations like the Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth and the Australian Preterm Birth Prevention Alliance to help reach as many families as we can. The government is proud to be working with a wide range of organisations and is committed to improving the health of mothers and babies to reduce the devastation of pregnancy and infant loss.</para>
<para>The formal recognition of 15 October as International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day gives us all the opportunity to acknowledge the loss and ongoing grief that those impacted by pregnancy and infant loss endure. In closing, I want to recognise and thank a dedicated and inspiring WA couple, John and Kate De'Laney, for their work in relation to pregnancy and infant loss and on having this day officially recognised. Mr and Mrs De'Laney lost seven babies by miscarriage. After losing their first baby, the De'Laneys didn't know where to turn, who to talk to or where to get support. Over time, and by supporting each other, they discovered that the loss of a baby is not something that you get over; you just have to find a way of integrating it into your life. Since that time, John and Kate have dedicated themselves to raising awareness of the issue of pregnancy and infant loss to ensure that no-one ever feels as alone and unsupported as they did on the day they lost their first child. They do this with one of their eight children, beautiful Mary-Jane, who has now, deservedly, had her name noted and recognised in <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> numerous times, both here in Canberra and back home in Western Australia.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This is a very important motion, and I thank the member for Werriwa for moving it. Miscarriage, pregnancy loss and neonatal death are very important parts of the work of a perinatologist's life. In Australia, whilst we have very good medical care, these are areas that have been sorely neglected for a long period of time. I wish to acknowledge Dr Peter Barr, who was a mentor of mine, a perinatologist and neonatologist at Royal North Shore Hospital, who started the first awareness campaign for pregnancy loss and neonatal death in Australia and who has subsequently provided ongoing care for parents who have lost a child during pregnancy or shortly afterwards.</para>
<para>There are several things that I want to make mention of in talking to this motion. Firstly, in Australia we have no uniform newborn screening test program. As mentioned in the previous motion, it's very important that Australia, on an urgent basis, does have a uniform, national program for neonatal screening tests for common disorders and less common disorders for which treatment is now available. This needs to be Australia wide, and it requires some urgency to develop. That's the first ask. I want to pay tribute to Felicity McNeill from Better Access Australia, who has been campaigning long and hard to have a national newborn screening program developed in Australia. This would certainly save lives. It would be very cost-effective. In the 21st century, when treatments are available for some of the rare genetic and metabolic disorders, it is very important that we bring our services up to date and have a national program.</para>
<para>We also need to provide support on an ongoing basis to those who have lost a pregnancy or had a neonatal death. As has been said, the pain does not go away. People do learn to deal with it, but the pain itself continues. I feel for every one of the patients that I've cared for, for every one of those families who have lost a child in pregnancy or in the neonatal period. Much more needs to be done in terms of research. It's estimated that up to 50 per cent of miscarriages are preventable. Diseases such as undiagnosed diabetes and medical conditions caused by poor control of high blood pressure or drug and alcohol intake and other factors that can cause miscarriage are diagnosable and treatable if they're picked up early enough. Not everyone in Australia has access to a highly detailed ultrasound that can pick up congenital abnormalities. Treatment is available for many of these abnormalities before birth if they're picked up early enough. It's very important that they are picked up and managed and that treatment is available throughout Australia.</para>
<para>For a long time I've been asking my party, the Labor Party, to adopt as our child health program a program called First 1000 Days. It provides assessment and support for all children from pre conception to the age of two. It looks at illness, it looks at preventable causes and it looks at management of pregnancy and afterwards. Simple measures can make huge differences. For example, we know that, in relation to sudden infant death syndrome, the simple thing of getting a child to sleep on its back instead of its stomach can reduce our sudden infant death rates by over 50 per cent. It's unbelievable that a simple treatment like that can and does have such a huge effect. Simple measures like encouraging breastfeeding and proper infant nutrition can make huge differences throughout life, so it's about time we adopted policies like the First 1000 Days to make sure that preventable causes of pregnancy loss and neonatal and infant death can be prevented.</para>
<para>I would like to pay tribute to the work of Red Nose and Sands who have constantly campaigned on these measures. I would like to pay tribute to all of the families who have suffered a neonatal death or infant loss through a miscarriage because I know the pain of that goes on for a long time, and it's up to us, as politicians, to make sure that measures are put in place to support you as best we can.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PRICE</name>
    <name.id>249308</name.id>
    <electorate>Durack</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's great to have an opportunity to speak briefly on this motion, and I thank the member for Werriwa for bringing forward this motion and acknowledge her loss. Her contribution was really very heart-warming, but we could all hear the pain in her voice. I know that there are many people who sit in this House but don't talk about these issues, and it's very brave of her to talk about her experience. I would like to acknowledge that it is International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day. I want to thank all of those who have contributed to this discussion today. I particularly want to acknowledge the member for Macarthur for his contributions this morning, not just on this motion but also with respect to spinal muscular atrophy. The theme running through this morning in the House seems to be around research that's needed to identify issues relating to childbirth and testing regimes. Pregnancy and infant loss is a really difficult issue for all of us, including myself, so I'm glad that I've at least had an opportunity to acknowledge and thank everyone for their contributions today.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RISHWORTH</name>
    <name.id>HWA</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingston</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I would like to thank the member for Werriwa for putting together this motion to mark International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day. This is a very important day because, as members have said in previous contributions to this discussion, losing an infant or losing a pregnancy is not spoken about in the same way as losing someone else in your family is spoken about. For a lot of people, miscarriage is not spoken about at all, despite over 110,000 Australians a year experiencing a miscarriage. It's not spoken about much, but that doesn't mean, as many members have said, that the grief is not real and present and is only made harder by the fact that, in many cases, people aren't able to speak about it. I have to say that comments such as, 'Oh, well, you'll be able to get pregnant again,' are not helpful. Certainly, that has been my personal experience, having lost two pregnancies to miscarriag Hearing those sorts of comments from well-meaning people is very difficult, because the loss is real. The loss is there, and it can carry on for some time. I think that many people, after they've experienced a miscarriage, feel that they have to soldier on and just get on with it—to just continue to get on with their daily lives. That was certainly my experience after a miscarriage. I came back to parliament within two days, feeling I had to get on with life and not really speaking about it much at all. It is an important message, as we think about this day and think about Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month; it is important to talk about it.</para>
<para>Previous speakers have spoken about prevention, and that is really important. When we talk about prevention, we need to do everything we can to make sure that everything is put in place, from a public health perspective, to reduce the instances of infant loss and stillbirth, in particular. I'd like to acknowledge the huge amount of work done by Kristina Keneally, Catryna Bilyk and the other members of the Senate committee, who have worked very hard to look at what needs to be done to prevent stillbirth. Sadly, Indigenous women are 50 per cent more likely to have a stillborn baby, so there is more work that can be done.</para>
<para>An important message on this day of remembrance is that, sometimes, it's just a really sad, unfortunate issue about which nothing can be done. That was certainly my experience, when I had what was called a 'missed miscarriage', which is not very common. That is where you think everything is okay. You turn up to the doctor and have a scan, and no heartbeat can be found. That is particularly traumatic. It's not something that you think is going to happen; you rock up for your scan expecting to hear good news. For me, it was a very difficult situation when no heartbeat could be found. Nothing could have been done to prevent that—it was one of those difficult situations—but it doesn't mean the loss is not felt equally as hard.</para>
<para>So, on Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day, it's important that we remember. It's important that we commit to take all the steps we can to prevent these sorts of occurrences, but it's also important to accept that there are circumstances where nothing can change the course of this loss. It's important to remember, to acknowledge, to grieve and to make sure that our society and community are able to talk about these things. It's not good enough that people don't feel that they can talk about these losses. It's important for it to be properly acknowledged by others. We need to commit ourselves to that understanding and commit ourselves to grieve with others who have lost. Most importantly, on this motion, I would like to say to all of those who have lost an infant or miscarried a baby: I'm sorry for your loss.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALLEN</name>
    <name.id>282986</name.id>
    <electorate>Higgins</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to thank the member for Werriwa for this motion today. It's incredibly important to acknowledge International Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day, which was last Friday 15 October. It's a day to recognise bereaved parents, families and friends—because, let's be clear, it does actually affect a whole community—and to remember the babies they have lost through miscarriage, stillbirth and infant death. It's also a day to acknowledge those wonderful healthcare workers who provide support and wrap services around parents in their time of need.</para>
<para>It is likely we all know someone who has been affected by pregnancy and infant loss, but we may not even know that they were affected. It is all too often a private grief. Even though Australia is one of the safest countries in the world for a baby to be born, still more than 2,000 babies are stillborn each year. Thousands of families suffer with the terrible experience of miscarriage every year. I myself had a miscarriage between my third and fourth child, so I also know of the grief that people suffer.</para>
<para>Sadly, three out of every 1,000 babies born in Australia every year die within the first month of their lives. For those families and parents who have suffered infant loss either in pregnancy or around birth the physical and psychological damage is traumatic and incredibly painful. As a doctor, I heard stories from women who have remained traumatised for decades following the callous way in which these issues were handled a generation ago. I'm pleased to say that this is no longer the case to the same extent, and a significant improvement in the way these issues are handled has really helped to prevent the deep and ongoing emotional effects brought on by the tragedies. Still, too often they can be overlooked and underestimated, and that's partly because of the privacy of the grief around these issues. The trauma of these events can trigger depression, anxiety, relationship breakdowns and even post-traumatic stress disorder.</para>
<para>The Morrison government understands the significant impact that pregnancy and infant loss has on families, and that's why it is working in partnership with states and territories and a whole range of important organisations. It has also made a significant commitment of funding to this important area. Last year the Morrison government announced the National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan. This plan invests $152 million in perinatal services and support measures to improve health outcomes for babies and mothers. It includes $21 million in measures to reduce stillbirth and support families affected by stillbirth. Measures include education and awareness programs, the development of a new clinical care standard and the support of research so that we can always do better. This investment aims to reduce stillbirth rates in Australia by more than 20 per cent by the end of 2025.</para>
<para>The government recognises that preterm birth is a major cause of stillbirth and infant loss, and it is providing $13 million to implement the Australian Preterm Birth Prevention Alliance to reduce the rate of preterm birth nationally. The government is also investing $43.9 million in the Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing Program, providing support for families experiencing grief following the death of a child, including as a result of stillbirth. To ensure intensive support is available to families experiencing stillbirth, the government is also investing in Red Nose to deliver the Hospital to Home program and has announced an additional $400,000 to ensure the program continues for an additional six months. We all know that sometimes it's hard to leave home when you're dealing with grief and bereavement, so it's wonderful to hear that these outreach services are going into the home to support families in their time of need.</para>
<para>I was proud to be part of this government and to speak in support of the Fair Work Amendment (Improving Unpaid Parental Leave for Parents of Stillborn Babies and Other Measures) Bill last year. This bill amended the unpaid parental leave provisions and complemented the government funded paid parental leave pay changes. It provided parents with the same unpaid parental leave entitlements they would have had if their baby had survived, and this has really helped parents who are grieving, because this grief can be so private. It's a time that enables people to be with their family, their friends and their support system. It's a time not only to grieve but also to arrange funerals, to be together with those who love you and whom you love. In my first speech I said the words 'widow' and 'orphan' describe loss in our language but no words exists for a parent who has lost a child. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could eliminate the devastation of infant loss? I commend this motion to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HWN</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Members of Parliament: Staff</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms PRICE</name>
    <name.id>249308</name.id>
    <electorate>Durack</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">(1) The House note:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the duties and responsibilities of members and their staff employed under the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) that all members and their staff have obligations to comply with all applicable Australian laws, including understanding workplace health and safety duties and the steps to take to satisfy those duties, under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 and other workplace laws; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the establishment of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service, which provides for an Independent Parliamentary Workplace Complaints Mechanism for serious incidents in a parliamentary workplace.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) Where the Parliamentary Services Commissioner makes a report in writing to the Speaker:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) finding that a member has not cooperated with a review under the Independent Parliamentary Workplace Complaints Mechanism or has not acted on the recommendations in a review conducted under the Independent Parliamentary Workplace Complaints Mechanism; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) requesting that the Speaker refer the report to the Committee of Privileges and Members' Interests; the Speaker must confidentially refer the report to that committee and the report may not be considered by any other committee.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) In considering a report under this resolution, the committee must meet in private session.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) The committee must confer with the Parliamentary Services Commissioner in seeking additional information for its report.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(5) The committee must make one of the following recommendations, and report to the House accordingly:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) that a member cooperate with a review conducted under the Independent Parliamentary Workplace Complaints Mechanism;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) that a member act on the recommendations in a review conducted under the Independent Parliamentary Workplace Complaints Mechanism; or</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) that no further action be taken by the House;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">and must not make any other recommendations.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(6) The committee must provide a statement of reasons for the recommendation made in the report.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(7) The committee must make its report referred to in paragraph (5) within 30 days of receiving a referral under this resolution, unless an explanation is provided in writing to the Speaker with the nomination of a new reporting date. The Speaker must inform the Parliamentary Services Commissioner of the new reporting date. The Parliamentary Services Commissioner must inform parties to the report of the revised date set by the committee.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(8) Any member who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with a recommendation of a report referred to in paragraph (5), and which has been adopted by the House, shall be guilty of a serious contempt of the House and shall be dealt with by the House accordingly. The question of whether any contempt has been committed must first be referred to the Committee of Privileges and Members' Interests for inquiry and report to the House and may not be considered by any other committee.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(9) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), in the event that the Speaker is the subject of or directly and personally involved in a report by the Parliamentary Services Commissioner, the Parliamentary Services Commissioner must make a report in writing under paragraph (2) to the Deputy Speaker. In this event, references to the Speaker in this resolution shall be read as the Deputy Speaker.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021, Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority Amendment (Governance and Other Measures) Bill 2021, Customs Amendment (2022 Harmonized System Changes) Bill 2021, Customs Tariff Amendment (2022 Harmonized System Changes) Bill 2021, Electoral Legislation Amendment (Counting, Scrutiny and Operational Efficiencies) Bill 2021, Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Offences and Preventing Multiple Voting) Bill 2021, Electoral Legislation Amendment (Party Registration Integrity) Bill 2021, Foreign Intelligence Legislation Amendment Bill 2021, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Titles Administration and Other Measures) Bill 2021, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Regulatory Levies) Amendment Bill 2021, Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021, Paid Parental Leave Amendment (COVID-19 Work Test) Bill 2021, Designs Amendment (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property Response) Bill 2020, Industry Research and Development Amendment (Industry Innovation and Science Australia) Bill 2021, National Health Amendment (Decisions under the Continence Aids Payment Scheme) Bill 2021, Royal Commissions Amendment (Protection of Information) Bill 2021, Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021, Work Health and Safety Amendment (Norfolk Island) Bill 2021, Charter of the United Nations Amendment Bill 2021, Customs Tariff Amendment (Incorporation of Proposals) Bill 2021, National Health Amendment (COVID-19) Bill 2021, National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment Bill 2021, Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021, Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 6) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <p>
              <a href="K26" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="HYM" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority Amendment (Governance and Other Measures) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="FK6" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Customs Amendment (2022 Harmonized System Changes) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="HX4" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Customs Tariff Amendment (2022 Harmonized System Changes) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="00AMN" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Electoral Legislation Amendment (Counting, Scrutiny and Operational Efficiencies) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="HK6" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Offences and Preventing Multiple Voting) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="112096" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Electoral Legislation Amendment (Party Registration Integrity) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="265975" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Foreign Intelligence Legislation Amendment Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="218019" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Titles Administration and Other Measures) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="DH4" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Regulatory Levies) Amendment Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="53369" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="M38" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Paid Parental Leave Amendment (COVID-19 Work Test) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="0L6" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Designs Amendment (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property Response) Bill 2020</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="DYH" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Industry Research and Development Amendment (Industry Innovation and Science Australia) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="A9B" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">National Health Amendment (Decisions under the Continence Aids Payment Scheme) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="243609" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Royal Commissions Amendment (Protection of Information) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="RH4" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="30379" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Work Health and Safety Amendment (Norfolk Island) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="247512" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Charter of the United Nations Amendment Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="83Z" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Customs Tariff Amendment (Incorporation of Proposals) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="WN6" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">National Health Amendment (COVID-19) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="83B" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">National Redress Scheme for Institutional Child Sexual Abuse Amendment Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
              <a href="74046" type="Bill">
                <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                  <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021</span>
                </p>
              </a>
            </p>
            <a href="XS4" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 6) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Assent</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Courts and Tribunals Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="249147" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Courts and Tribunals Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>First Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo></subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Intelligence and Security Joint Committee</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DREYFUS</name>
    <name.id>HWG</name.id>
    <electorate>Isaacs</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, I present the following reports: <inline font-style="italic">Annual report of committee activities 2020-2021</inline>; <inline font-style="italic">Advisory report on the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2020</inline>, incorporating a dissenting report; <inline font-style="italic">Advisory report on the Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure) Bill 2020 and Statutory Review of the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018</inline>, incorporating a dissenting report; <inline font-style="italic">Review of the relisting of five organisations as terrorist organisations under the Criminal Code</inline>; and <inline font-style="italic">Review of police powers in relation to </inline><inline font-style="italic">terrorism, the control order regime, the preventative detention order regime and the continuing detention order </inline><inline font-style="italic">regime</inline>.</para>
<para>Reports made parliamentary papers in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DREYFUS</name>
    <name.id>HWG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—These reports by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security were all presented out of session and published on the committee's website. First, I want to make a brief comment on the <inline font-style="italic">Review of the relisting of five organisations as terrorist organisations under the Criminal Code</inline>. I think this report largely speaks for itself, but I would like to make a few brief comments about recommendation 1, which is that the government give consideration to extending the listing of Hamas' Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades as a terrorist organisation to the entirety of Hamas.</para>
<para>The evidence to the committee overwhelmingly confirmed that the Hamas Brigades do not operate as some kind of independent entity, separate and distinct from the rest of Hamas. As Dr Matthew Levitt has noted, the founder of Hamas has been quoted as saying:</para>
<para>We cannot separate the wing from the body. If we do so, the body will not be able to fly. Hamas is one body .</para>
<para>And as the Director-General of ASIO told the committee during its inquiry, while it may be that the Brigades carry out the violence, Hamas as whole advocates violence and advocates and supports terrorist activity. Certainly I have no doubt that Hamas as a whole meets the requirements of being listed as a terrorist organisation under the Criminal Code. That is also the position that the committee has reached in this report. It is a position that has been reached unanimously and it is a position that the government ought to give serious and urgent consideration to.</para>
<para>The next report on which I would comment is the <inline font-style="italic">Review of police powers in relation to terrorism, the control order regime, the preventative detention order regime and the continuing detention order regime</inline>. While the committee has supported the extension of the sunset dates for the control order regime, the preventative detention order regime and the continuing detention order regime, the committee has made 19 recommendations in this report, including: legislative amendments to improve the Commonwealth Ombudsman's oversight of the Australian Federal Police; the introduction of stricter issuing criteria in relation to declarations of 'prescribed security zones' by the government; an amendment to the definition of 'issuing court' in the Criminal Code, so that that only superior judges may issue control orders; and an amendment to division 105 of the Criminal Code, so that only Federal Court judges may issue preventative detention orders, not AAT Members or Federal Circuit Court judges, as is currently the case.</para>
<para>The committee has also made a number of recommendations that do not require legislation and which, frankly, it should not have been necessary for the committee to make. For example, it should not be necessary for the committee to recommend that the Department of Home Affairs coordinate with relevant state and territory departments to source appropriate accommodations to facilitate interim and confirmed continuing detention orders. And yet that recommendation is necessary because, despite the continuing detention order regime having been introduced over five years ago, the government does not have agreements in place with all relevant state and territory departments in relation to appropriate accommodation for the subjects of interim and confirmed continuing detention orders. In fact, it appears that the only relevant agreement that currently exists is an agreement between the Commonwealth government and the Victorian government that was signed in September 2020, just days—in the nick of time—before the first continuing detention order was made by the Supreme Court of Victoria. That is not good enough.</para>
<para>The third report I will comment on is the advisory report on the Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure) Bill 2020 and the Statutory Review of the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018. Significantly, the committee has recommended, unanimously, that the critical infrastructure bill be split into two, with many of the more contentious issues to be reconsidered and redrafted in light of the committee's comments and feedback from key industry and other stakeholders.</para>
<para>This report is a sensible and measured response by the committee to, on the one hand, an identified need by security agencies and, on the other hand, serious and understandable concerns about the bill from a range of stakeholders, including the Electrical Trades Union, the ACTU, industry groups and legal experts. I note that the critical infrastructure bill has been listed for debate in the House this week, and I look forward to speaking in more detail about the bill and the concerns expressed by witnesses to the committee.</para>
<para>The fourth report on which I will briefly comment is the advisory report on the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2020. I will also have the opportunity to talk about this bill in detail when it is brought on for debate in the coming weeks, so I'll be brief. If this bill becomes law, it would be possible for federal authorities to seek an extended supervision order as an alternative to a continuing detention order for high-risk terrorist offenders. Under a supervision order, an offender would be released into the community at the end of his or her sentence but would be required to comply with prohibitions, restrictions or obligations that are, in the court's view, reasonably necessary and appropriate and adapted to protecting the community.</para>
<para>The committee has unanimously endorsed the bill, subject to the government accepting a number of important recommendations. The former Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, Dr James Renwick SC, recommended the introduction of an extended supervision order in 2017. It took the current government three years to respond to that recommendation by introducing legislation into the parliament, despite the fact that the former Attorney-General, the member for Pearce, told the<inline font-style="italic"> Australian</inline> in October 2018—three years ago—that:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The government intends to introduce legislation to create an ESO scheme as soon as possible.</para></quote>
<para>Against that background, it was disappointing to read in <inline font-style="italic">The Australian</inline> a report on 13 September this year that the current Minister for Home Affairs 'will seek to increase powers for security agencies and courts to keep high-risk terrorists in prison or monitor them'—as if this bill were some new idea of the minister's that was being urgently acted on.</para>
<para>Other media organisations also reported that the home affairs minister was seeking 'new powers' to prevent terrorists from committing an attack, no doubt having been provided with carefully prepared material by the minister which neglected to mention that the idea had been around for four years and that the Intelligence and Security Committee was actually completing a review of the legislation. Much of this media commentary was very familiar, because we'd heard it all before, including when this bill was introduced by the member for Pearce approximately one year ago when he was Attorney-General and two years before that when he first announced that the government was committed to introducing such a bill as a matter of urgency.</para>
<para>The truth is that if the current government had spent more time on actually developing the measures contained in this bill and less time trying to eke out as many breathless headlines as possible then we would already have a federal extended supervision order regime. Counterterrorism legislation is too important to be used by ministers as a means of generating self-aggrandising and misleading headlines. The Australian people deserve better, and I urge the Minister for Home Affairs to do better in the future.</para>
<para>The final report I have presented is the committee's annual report for 2020-21. As outlined in the report, the committee has faced, and is continuing to face, the heaviest workload in its history. It is therefore important for the government and the committee itself to consider how the committee's work can be done more efficiently, how the committee can conduct its inquiries most effectively and whether the committee is adequately resourced.</para>
<para>The committee's annual report for 2020-21 makes a few practical and modest suggestions to improve the efficiency and quality of the committee's many inquiries. For example, the committee has recommended that any bill referrals are accompanied by a submission from the department responsible for the bill; more often than not, that will be the Department of Home Affairs. From my own perspective, the main virtue of this recommendation is to enable non-government submitters to review and respond to the relevant department's submission at the outset of the committee's inquiry into a particular piece of legislation. Among other things, this would assist the committee in identifying deficiencies in the relevant department submissions sooner and, where necessary or helpful, ask the relevant department to provide supplementary submissions.</para>
<para>Regrettably, the Department of Home Affairs has a track record of providing poorly reasoned and unenlightening submissions to the committee, heavy on platitudes and jargon, light on detail and evidence. That has not invariably been the case; the department has demonstrated that it is at least capable of producing helpful submissions, especially when it is pressed by the committee. If this recommendation by the committee is adopted, I hope we will see higher-quality submissions from the department, because they will have an opportunity to review the department's submission prior to preparing their own, even better and more informed submissions from non-government submitters too.</para>
<para>Perhaps most significantly, the committee has recommended that the government refer section 29 and schedule 1 of the Intelligence Services Act to the committee for review and report at the commencement of the 47th Parliament. As set out in the annual report, that review would provide the committee with an opportunity to give further consideration to whether its oversight functions should be expanded and how much oversight ought to be conducted. It would also provide the committee with an opportunity to consider the perennial issue of resourcing and potential improvements to how the committee goes about its work, including when it comes to quorum requirements and meeting procedures and the availability of suitable, classified meeting facilities.</para>
<para>I would like to thank all committee members, Labor and Liberal, for the work that they have done over the 2020-21 period, which was a very challenging and disrupted period for all Australians. I'd also like to thank the committee secretariat for their professionalism and hard work. It has not been easy, with many hearings and meetings conducted remotely, but the committee has achieved a lot, in large part thanks to your efforts. That's a comment directed to the secretariat.</para>
<para>There were a number of changes to the composition of the committee over the course of 2020-21. I acknowledge the contribution of Senator Stoker, who left the committee in December 2020 when she became assistant minister to the Attorney-General. And of course I must acknowledge the contribution of the member for Canning, who was until December 2020 the chair of the committee, a position that he held for four years. While the member for Canning and I had our fair share of disagreements, I never doubted his integrity or his commitment to the national interest, including in circumstances where his own view of the national interest diverged from that of the government.</para>
<para>I'd also like to recognise the impressive members of parliament who have joined the committee during the 2020-21 financial year. First is my Labor colleague the member for Cowan, a counterterrorism expert, who joined the committee in September 2020. Second is the member for Curtin, a former professor of law and university vice-chancellor, who joined the committee in February 2021. Finally there is Senator James Paterson, who took over as chair of the committee in February 2021. Like the member for Canning and, as the five reports I have tabled today attest, Senator Paterson is proving to be a constructive and effective chair of this valuable committee.</para>
<para>Finally, I would like to recognise the contribution of the former deputy chair of the committee, the member for Holt. The member for Holt has been a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee since 2005. He is a former chair of the committee and has served as deputy chair of the committee since 2013. A lot has been said recently about the member for Holt, and a lot more will be said in the light of last week's IBAC hearings. I do not propose to say anything about those matters today. What I will say is that there can be no doubt that the member for Holt has made a significant contribution to the Intelligence and Security Committee and national security policy more generally over the course of his 22 years in the federal parliament. That contribution has been widely acknowledged, including by those opposite. Last week was the member for Holt's last as the deputy chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee, and I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge that and thank him for his years of invaluable service to the committee. I commend the five reports to the House.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Human Rights Committee</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:05</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, I present the committee's report, entitled <inline font-style="italic">Human rights scrutiny report 11 of 2021</inline>.</para>
<para>Report made a parliamentary paper in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I am pleased to speak to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights 11th scrutiny report of 2021, which was tabled out of session on 16 September 2021. As usual, this report contains a technical examination of legislation with regard to Australia's obligations under international human rights law. In this report, the committee considered 26 new bills and 162 new legislative instruments and commented on five bills and one legislative instrument. During this difficult time of lockdowns and restrictions, I would like to note that this committee has continued its important scrutiny work, including by regularly meeting remotely, via teleconference; tabling scrutiny reports out of session, as was done with this report; and continuing to scrutinise the many legislative measures which have been introduced to address this unprecedented health crisis.</para>
<para>In this report, for example, the committee considered the Biosecurity Amendment (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill 2021, which seeks to introduce a new power for the making of a human biosecurity group direction. The committee notes that, as this measure is intended to prevent the spread of serious communicable disease like COVID-19, it likely promotes the rights to health and life. The bill also necessarily limits other human rights, and in this report the committee is seeking further information as to the proportionality of these limitations.</para>
<para>Also in this report, the committee has commented on the Social Security Legislation Amendment (Remote Engagement Program) Bill 2021. This bill would establish a new supplementary payment for people in remote areas receiving certain social security payments. The committee considered that, while the measure may promote the rights to work, social security and an adequate standard of living, depending on how it operates in practice, it may also limit these rights as well as the right to equality and nondiscrimination. The committee considered that, while the measure likely pursues a legitimate objective, it is difficult to assess whether it is proportionate and rationally connected to these objectives. This is because key aspects of the measure are to be set out in legislative instruments, including the circumstances in which the payment may be suspended or withdrawn. Without knowing the detail that would be contained in such instruments, it is not possible to conclude that the measure would permissibly limit these rights.</para>
<para>Additionally, the committee commented on the Foreign Intelligence Legislation Amendment Bill 2021. The committee noted with some concern from a scrutiny perspective that this bill passed both houses of parliament one sitting day after its introduction, before the committee had an opportunity to scrutinise this legislation. This bill expands the application of Australia's foreign intelligence warrant framework and information-sharing arrangements. While these measures may promote the rights to life and security of a person, they also engage and limit a number of other rights, including the right to privacy. The committee considered that, while the measures pursue legitimate objectives, there is a risk that they may constitute an arbitrary limitation on the right to privacy, and affected individuals may not have access to an effective remedy. The committee has suggested some amendments to the act that may assist with the proportionality of this measure. I encourage all parliamentarians to carefully consider the committee's analysis. With these comments, I commend this report to the chamber.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Northern Australia Joint Committee</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Report</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ENTSCH</name>
    <name.id>7K6</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia, I present the committee's report, incorporating dissenting reports, entitled <inline font-style="italic">A way forward: </inline><inline font-style="italic">f</inline><inline font-style="italic">inal report into the destruction of Indigenous heritage sites at Juukan Gorge</inline>.</para>
<para>Report made a parliamentary paper in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ENTSCH</name>
    <name.id>7K6</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—On behalf of the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia, I wish to make a few remarks on the committee's final report into the destruction of Indigenous heritage sites at Juukan Gorge which has just been presented. Firstly, I'd like to acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in this nation and the traditional custodians of country throughout Australia, and I pay my respects to ancestors and elders past, present and emerging.</para>
<para>This report follows on from <inline font-style="italic">Never again</inline>, the interim report of the inquiry, which was tabled on 9 December 2020. Despite the impact of COVID-19, we have been successful in producing a complete examination of the issues brought to light throughout the inquiry. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage—both tangible and intangible—is a key part of Australia's history. Loss of cultural heritage diminishes the heritage of our nation and deeply wounds the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples for whom this heritage is sacred. The destruction of the 46,000-plus years old Juukan Gorge rock shelters in May 2020 caused immeasurable cultural and spiritual loss as well as profound grief for the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura, or PKKP, people. Rio Tinto's actions were inexcusable and an affront not only to the PKKP peoples but to all Australians. The company's actions demonstrated the profound lack of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage in this country, but perhaps the tragedy may at least be a catalyst for change.</para>
<para>The destruction of the Juukan Gorge was a result of Rio's failures, but the events also highlighted the inadequacies of protection afforded by the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. Throughout the course of the inquiry, it became apparent that there were serious deficiencies across Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage legislative framework. The destruction of the Juukan rock shelters also awakened national and international awareness to the loss of the ancient presence of human beings on the continent. This has implications for governments, lawmakers and corporations who must take seriously the public awareness of international developments like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, or UNDRIP, shareholders nationally and internationally who have become attuned to the behavioural standards of corporations and their relationships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.</para>
<para>Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across the nation reported to the committee their perspectives on the inadequacy of cultural heritage legislation. It became apparent to the committee that the legislation designed to protect cultural heritage has, in many, many cases, contributed to the damage and destruction. The committee was heartened by those in the resources industry who have responded to the destruction of the heritage sites at the Juukan Gorge by proactively reassessing their agreements with traditional owners and proposing processes to address inadequacies and inequalities in these agreements. The committee also calls on those working within the industry to improve the respect shown to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and to also demand change across their industry as a whole. It is time for the legislative frameworks in all Australian jurisdictions to be modernised to bring meaningful protection to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage to ensure that nothing like Juukan Gorge ever happens again. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are not opposed to mining and acknowledge the economic benefits mining brings to the nation. They do, however, want the rights afforded to them by the UNDRIP to be a reality. Legislative change must be based on the UNDRIP principles of free, prior and informed consent. Such changes will bring deserved protections to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's cultural heritage and ensure that the world's oldest living culture continues to thrive.</para>
<para>I'd like to conclude with some words of thanks. Many people have contributed to this inquiry, including traditional owners, Indigenous organisations, companies, governments, lawyers, academics and members of the public. I would like to particularly thank the PKKP peoples, who, despite their grief, have embraced the inquiry and assisted its works. Thanks also to Rio Tinto, which, perhaps in contrition for its errors, has been forthcoming with evidence, not always to its advantage. I'd like to think that Juukan Gorge marks a turning point for that company and for the mining industry as a whole. I'd also like to thank all of my committee colleagues—including the member for Lingiari, sitting over there—for their attentive and very constructive contributions in what has proved to be quite a difficult inquiry, undertaken under very challenging circumstances. Last, but not least, I have to say a great thankyou to the staff of the secretariat—to Jenny Adams and her team—for their sterling work. They have been absolutely outstanding. I'm a little disappointed and saddened that, given the circumstances, we haven't been able to have them sitting here in the chamber today to personally thank them for their work, but I know that they will be listening to this contribution. I say thank you to each and every one of them: it's you guys who've made this report as good as it is. It's my earnest hope that this report leads to some very positive changes, and I commend it to the House.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SNOWDON</name>
    <name.id>IJ4</name.id>
    <electorate>Lingiari</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I firstly acknowledge the traditional owners of this country and the country of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people right around this country, their elders past and present and those who are emerging. I want to thank and acknowledge the member for Leichhardt for his contribution, which was well thought through, and for his role in leading this committee inquiry. I'll make further comments about that towards the end of my contribution. I want to speak to this report, <inline font-style="italic">A</inline><inline font-style="italic"> w</inline><inline font-style="italic">ay </inline><inline font-style="italic">f</inline><inline font-style="italic">orward</inline>, the final report on the destruction of the Juukan caves by Rio Tinto. As the member for Leichhardt said, the committee also published an interim report, <inline font-style="italic">Never </inline><inline font-style="italic">a</inline><inline font-style="italic">gain</inline>, which made a number of significant recommendations and addressed the immediate anger and concern about the destruction of the caves and the processes leading up to it.</para>
<para>The destruction of these 46,000-plus-year-old caves underlines the ongoing impact of dispossession and alienation of Aboriginal people across this country, legitimised and enacted by legislatures across state, territory and Commonwealth jurisdictions since Federation. As a result, Aboriginal land was seen as fair game by miners, pastoralists and the like, whose actions in exploiting the traditional lands of the First Australians, including the destruction of sites, were legitimised and encouraged. It wasn't until the seventies, with the Woodward royal commission and the passage of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976, that the rights and interests of Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory—but nowhere else—were given part-recognition and limited protection. At a national level, it wasn't until the passage of the Native Title Act in 1993, following the victory of Eddie Mabo in the High Court—which consigned the notion of terra nullius to the dustbin of history, where it should have been in the first place—that the nation was compelled to at last deal with and address the rights and interests of people who claim native title over land and waters. The destruction of the Juukan Gorge epitomised the arrogance of developers to operate with impunity and ignore the legitimate rights and interests of native title holders, the traditional owners of the lands whose sacred sites were being destroyed.</para>
<para>The final report of the committee charts a way forward that acknowledges the pre-eminent rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the original owners of the lands and seas. The report underscores the need for legislative reform, as the member for Leichhardt said, to give real voice and meaning to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, most especially the concepts of free, prior and informed consent and, in particular, the right to withhold consent—to say no—to the destruction of their heritage and, most particularly, places of significance. This report addresses the need to recognise both tangible and intangible heritage.</para>
<para>But, of course, the report, as you would expect, pays particular attention to the failures by Rio Tinto in its wanton destruction of Juukan Gorge as well as the failures and inadequacies of the Western Australian heritage laws to protect Aboriginal heritage in that state. What the committee uncovered was the historical abuse of power by the mining industry in Western Australia, enabled by Western Australian law, to effectively corral, ignore and override the rights and interests of traditional owners, to use every legal trick to do this and to do so without recrimination or penalties or the need to properly compensate Aboriginal people in Western Australia for the exploitation of their traditional lands and the destruction of their heritage.</para>
<para>It's startling that, despite the destruction of Juukan Gorge, Rio Tinto had no penalties applied and that those with ultimate responsibility left the company with golden handshakes. Despite this, though—and as the member for Leichhardt commented—the committee saw evidence and took evidence from Rio Tinto to the effect that that company has embarked on a very important process of real reform in the way it deals with, recognises, prioritises and addresses the rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Other companies, notably BHP, have also introduced new policies and procedures and taken significant action in reforming the way they treat and contract with Aboriginal peoples. Of particular note is the express recognition of the rights of traditional owners and native title holders in the negotiation process over developments on their land. However, there is still a long way to go for the mining industry.</para>
<para>The committee also saw the gross inadequacy of legislative protection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage across jurisdictions and at a national level. In the case of Juukan Gorge, Commonwealth legislation and ministerial and administrative inaction failed to protect this heritage site from destruction. The committee's report goes into some detail and explores this failure and its implications. There is now clear and unequivocal evidence that the way forward requires the responsibility of heritage protection in the case of First Nations people to be the responsibility of the minister responsible for First Nations. It most certainly should not remain the responsibility of the Minister for the Environment. In addition, there is a need for new overarching Commonwealth legislation to protect our First Peoples' cultural heritage, with minimum standards that state and territory jurisdictions will be required to meet. Of course, this legislation will need to be developed in concert with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.</para>
<para>This committee's report explores and reports on the deficiencies of relevant state and territory legislation. Most particularly, of course, it exposes the flaws in the existing Western Australian legislation, which provided the framework and capacity for the destruction of heritage sites in Western Australia through the use of section 18 determinations and ministerial discretion. It is noteworthy, however, that Western Australia is currently in the process of drafting new legislation that we hope will address the deficiencies identified by this committee in its deliberations. The committee's report exposes the use of gag clauses which have denied Aboriginal people from access to legislation such as, at a federal level, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage protection legislation and the EPBC Act that could otherwise protect heritage sites.</para>
<para>Another piece of Commonwealth legislation that the committee has found is in clear need of revision, as a result of evidence to the committee, is the Native Title Act, in particular the future act regime and the right and capacity of native title holders to withhold consent for development on their land, as well as the need to remedy the inequality and negotiating positions with future act proponents and native title holders. In this context, the role of the representative bodies and prescribed body corporates needs to be considered, including for them to be adequately resourced so that they can properly participate in negotiations and protect the interests of native title holders, including, of course, the protection of their very important heritage.</para>
<para>The outrage over the destruction of Juukan Gorge has ignited investor interests nationally and internationally. The protection of cultural heritage has now become not only a moral and ethical issue but an issue of economic risk. The time for reform is long past.</para>
<para>I, along with the member for Leichhardt and I'm sure other members of the committee, want to acknowledge the massive contributions of the PKKP and other traditional owners of the Pilbara for giving evidence to this committee under very difficult circumstances. I want to thank them for their forbearance and their open-mindedness to the prospect for change.</para>
<para>It's noteworthy that the committee's report is illustrated by some paintings from Mr Jack Green, a traditional owner from Borroloola, which are very important in telling a story. I, along with, I'm sure, my colleagues, want to acknowledge the work of the committee and its membership. I want to thank Mr Entsch, the member for Leichhardt, for his leadership. It was a particularly difficult inquiry. I also want to acknowledge the contribution of my colleague and friend Senator Dodson, who was a very important cog in the wheel of this inquiry and, as I'm sure as the member for Leichhardt would attest, was integral to making sure we had a successful outcome. I also acknowledge someone who's no longer on the committee and no longer in the parliament, former senator Rachel Siewert, who, with a very open mind, made a very positive contribution to the deliberations of the committee.</para>
<para>The committee secretariat did an outstanding job, as the member for Leichhardt said, under very difficult circumstances. I want to acknowledge—and I will name them all—Jenny Adams, as Committee Secretary; Bill Pender, as Inquiry Secretary; Siobhan Leyne, as Inquiry Secretary; Kate Harkins as Senior Researcher; Stephen Sherlock, as Senior Researcher; Adam Walker, as Researcher; Ben Russell as Researcher and Sarah Brasser as Office Manager.</para>
<para>Deputy Speaker, in the length of time that I've been in this parliament I've been involved in many inquiries, I can say to you that I've not seen an inquiry as important as this. In my terms, it was absolutely vital that the committee undertook this work and exposed the thuggery—really—of some people in the mining industry in this country. But I am very, very pleased to say that change is afoot and that the mining industry is, at last, addressing the need to recognise the proper rights and interests of the First Nations people of this country.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ENTSCH</name>
    <name.id>7K6</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd quickly and briefly like to acknowledge Senator Dodson, who was outstanding. I'd also like to acknowledge former senator Rachel Siewert, who instigated this in the first instance. She's no longer in the Senate. Both of those senators had an absolutely critical contribution to this inquiry. I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the House take note of the report.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HWN</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In accordance with standing order 39, the debate is adjourned. The resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ENTSCH</name>
    <name.id>7K6</name.id>
    <electorate>Leichhardt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the order of the day be referred to the Federation Chamber for debate.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="HWP" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LIU</name>
    <name.id>282918</name.id>
    <electorate>Chisholm</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021. The bill aims to empower Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory by activating the economic potential of their land. As the Minister for Indigenous Australians, the Hon. Ken Wyatt, has noted, this is the most far-reaching set of reforms to the Aboriginal Land Rights Act since it was enacted in 1976. The first significant step taken by the bill is the establishment of the Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation. The corporation will be funded from the Aboriginals Benefit Account, which was set up under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act to receive and distribute funds equivalent to the royalties generated from mining on Aboriginal land in the Northern Territory. With the Aboriginals Benefit Account reaching a value of over $1.3 billion due to the mining boom, the Morrison government is unlocking its potential, with this bill proposing to use its funds for strategic investment in Aboriginal businesses and commercial projects to grow wealth, create jobs and support sustainable Aboriginal economies in the Northern Territory for the benefit of future generations. Once established, the Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation will carry out this investment and payment function. It will receive an initial $500 million endowment and $60 million per year for the first three years of its operation, and subsequent yearly funding from the ABA. The new corporation will use this funding to invest in Aboriginal businesses and commercial projects like aquaculture, agriculture and tourism enterprises, and to support community projects like art centres and youth centres.</para>
<para>The bill also streamlines exploration and mining provisions in the land rights act. Current processes can be unnecessarily time-consuming and costly for all stakeholders, so these proposed changes are directed towards fixing problems identified in an independent review published in 2013. They create much needed clarity and will build confidence for industry and investors. But, critically, they also ensure that the rights of traditional owners are maintained. Finally, the bill proposes a package of land administration amendments which strengthen Aboriginal control over decision-making and address operational gaps. Among other things, these changes will result in a prescribed process by which a body may be nominated and approved to hold a township lease, improve the permit system for access to Aboriginal land and increase the penalty for unauthorised access. The bill rectifies issues that were brought to light in the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory worked successfully to protect their communities through remote travel restrictions. But it's not just what's in the bill that matters; it's how it was put together. These reforms have been extensively co-designed with traditional owners in the Northern Territory and the land councils over the last 3½ years. The co-design process and the intent of the reforms themselves put the government's Closing the Gap commitments into practice, through working in partnership with Aboriginal people and supporting strong economic participation and Indigenous people's relationship with their land and waters.</para>
<para>Furthermore, decisions about Aboriginals Benefit Account funding, which had previously been taken by the Australian government, will be taken by the Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation. The corporation will be led by a board of eight Aboriginal representatives from the Northern Territory, two government appointed directors and two independent directors appointed by the board. As a result, for the very first time an Aboriginal controlled body will be able to use funds derived from the ABA to strategically and proactively seize and generate economic and social investment opportunities. This emphasis on shared decision-making, just as much as the technical content of the bill, should be recognised and celebrated. I commend this bill to the chamber.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SNOWDON</name>
    <name.id>IJ4</name.id>
    <electorate>Lingiari</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It gives me great pleasure to be able to make a contribution to this debate on the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021. I should not so much express a conflict but make a declaration. Prior to entering this federal parliament my job was as a policy adviser to the Central Land Council. I just want to make that declaration. I will also dob in my colleague the shadow Attorney-General, because he was a lawyer—and I'm not sure if he has improved—with the Northern Land Council in Darwin. He's acquired additional information over that time.</para>
<para>I think it's worth at the outset reflecting on some comments in the <inline font-style="italic">Bills Digest</inline>. It refers to page 2 of the explanatory memorandum, which states:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Amendments to the Land Rights Act are not common. Aboriginal stakeholders in the NT have strong voices through their Land Councils (the NLC, CLC, ALC and TLC)—</para></quote>
<para>the Northern Land Council, the Central Land Council, the Anindilyakwa Land Council and the Tiwi Land Council—</para>
<quote><para class="block">and the Commonwealth has committed to only amend the Land Rights Act with their support.</para></quote>
<para>That's only a reasonably new development, because this act, as the <inline font-style="italic">Bills Digest</inline> reminds us, has been amended many times—often just to add land claims, which may require parliamentary action—with the widespread support of the land councils and traditional owners and frequently it has been amended—for more fundamental amendments—against the wishes of Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory. The <inline font-style="italic">Bills Digest</inline> says that on many occasions it has been amended in ways in which the land councils have not supported t indicates, in an accurate depiction of these amendments, that key features of the bill are best understood as rollbacks of or compromises over past amendments, to which the land councils objected over time.</para>
<para>The previous speaker outlined the detail of the act in relation to the development of the Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation, an Aboriginal controlled corporate-Commonwealth entity funded from the existing Aboriginals Benefit Account, which, as we heard, has $1.3 billion at its disposal. Since the establishment of the Land Rights Act, monies out of the act, under section 54.4, were paid to the Aboriginals Benefit Account for distribution. An Aboriginals Benefit Account advisory committee was set up under the act, under section 65. Its job was to set priorities for and make recommendations on how the monies should be expended. The final decision was in the hands of the minister, who could choose to accept or otherwise the recommendations from that advisory committee.</para>
<para>Sadly, over a period of time, ministers got to use this fund as a discretionary fund, where they determined its use without necessarily seeking the advice or getting the approval of the Aboriginals Benefit Account Advisory Committee. We had the outstanding example of Minister Brough, when he was the minister responsible, taking money out of the Aboriginals Benefit Account, which is for the benefit of Aboriginal people whose lands have been exploited in the Northern Territory and who are affected by it as well as for the benefit of the broader Aboriginal community of the Northern Territory. He made a grant to a festival in Queensland, which was totally discretionary and outside the bounds of what the legislation would have otherwise provided. Successive ministers since have made allocations of monies out of this account without a recommendation from the Aboriginals Benefit Account Advisory Committee—purely at the discretion and the decision-making of the respective minister.</para>
<para>So this reform is an important one. It will set up a corporation, which will have a board that is largely independent of government, with representatives of the Aboriginal land councils in the Northern Territory. There will be two from each, which, I might say, is very kind on behalf of the CLC and the NLC, which have large areas and large population bases and which could argue—I would have thought—for additional members. Nevertheless, they've—graciously, in my view—come to a decision to provide a board which has two members from each of the land councils, two government appointed directors and two independent directors appointed by the board.</para>
<para>This corporation will also, as the previous speaker said, take over the responsibility for making beneficial payments to Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, which are currently made out of the Aboriginals Benefit Account. The importance of this change cannot be underestimated. There can be criticism, absolutely, of some of the detail, but it is very clear that this is a major step forward. To give direct control of these substantial funds—$680 million over the next three years—to an entity which is controlled by traditional owners, through their representatives on the board of this corporation, in the Northern Territory is a remarkable change.</para>
<para>I think it's important to acknowledge that this change hasn't been taken lightly or without the necessary level of consultation. The Land Rights Act is a very prescriptive piece of legislation, as I'm sure the shadow Attorney-General will attest. Section 23 of the act prescribes the functions of the land councils and their roles and responsibilities to consult extensively with and to reflect the wishes of traditional owners and, indeed, other Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory. It's within that context that, when you contemplate the roles of the land councils under section 23, you need to look at how they're constructed, how their consultation processes proceed and how they work through their delegates at a local community level to provide information and to get feedback. They regularly hold meetings in remote places so they can bring together traditional owners to discuss things like these proposed changes. I'm confident, because of my knowledge over many years of how the land councils operate, that they would have taken great care in making sure that job was done properly.</para>
<para>Now, the bill will also make other changes to processes around negotiation of the mining provisions in part 4 of the act. These amendments flow from recommendations by Justice Muirhead in the review of part 4 of the act in 2013, as pointed out by the previous speaker. It will, as the previous speaker said, make changes to section 28(a) of the act, about access to Aboriginal land. It will repeal unused powers of the delegation of land council functions to corporations. We opposed this when it was introduced by the Howard government and we're pleased to see it go.</para>
<para>The bill will also repeal section 74AA of the Land Rights Act, which was part of the Howard government's Northern Territory intervention and which has the effect of preventing land councils from overturning permits for accessing Aboriginal land that had been granted by a minority in the community but against the wishes of the traditional owners. That's gone. That goes to the comments made in the bills digest about this remedying and winding back decisions which were taken against the interests, desires and wishes of Aboriginal people of the Northern Territory.</para>
<para>This legislation is very important. Whilst it makes a great change in terms of this new corporate entity, it doesn't release the land councils from their obligations, and they are extremely conscious of and wise to this. Now, there will be people who will argue that these amendments are not appropriate, but to them I just say I've watched the Land Rights Act in operation, I've seen the way in which various governments have introduced amendments to override the rights and interests of traditional owners in the Northern Territory. This bill does the opposite. For that, I want to commend—not that I'd normally do this—the minister for undertaking, through his agency, NIAA, an extensive process of consultation and negotiation with the land councils, providing them with the capacity to go back to their membership to seek the instructions that are properly required for them to agree to this proposal.</para>
<para>But changes are important. I can well recall—and I'm sure the shadow minister will recall—the ill-fated Reeves review, a review of the land rights act by John Reeves, a former member of this parliament and now a judge in the Federal Court. He undertook a review of the land rights act and made a series of recommendations which would have radically changed the act. The Howard government put forward proposals which never saw the light of day because of the opposition of Aboriginal people across the Northern Territory. That was a significant victory, and it was done against the backdrop of a government wanting to overturn and limit the rights and interests of Aboriginal people under the act.</para>
<para>We're now in a situation where it could be argued that the opposite has occurred—that the rights and interests of Aboriginal people are being enhanced by these amendments. Whilst they are not perfect, and they may need reviewing over time, they do provide an opportunity for Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory to make a dramatic change in the way moneys are allocated out of the ABA. That, to me, is a very significant change. I applaud the land councils for their work. I was involved in a couple of joint meetings of the land council executives where they discussed these recommendations over a period of months this year. I was delighted about the way in which they'd come together in unity around these proposals and had undertaken very clearly, with their eyes wide open, a negotiation with the federal government which has achieved a successful outcome and that is reflected in this legislation.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I'm very happy to speak about Aboriginal land lights and also to recognise the previous speaker, the member for Lingiari, for his long engagement in the area. Of course, the Wave Hill Walk-Off in 1966, Mr Deputy Speaker Vasta, was just a couple of weeks before both you and I were born, so in that respect there are a couple of us in this chamber who are very much a benchmark of progress in this area, based on the simple fact of how old we are. It was 55 years ago, and halfway into that time—the 27 years that followed 1966—was probably my first visit to Indigenous Australia, with the intention of doing research based in the semi-desert community of Lajamanu. On the way through, one stops at Kalkarindji for a triple-decker toasted sandwich before heading off to Lajamanu, where there were considerably less pickings in the local store at the time. They were celebrating the walk-off in 1993. It's important because, another 27 years into the future, we can make general assessments about what we're achieving generationally. I think very little was achieved in the generation between 1966 and 1993, and sadly I see no evidence of any more achievement in this area in the 27 years that have followed.</para>
<para>There have been apologies many times for the mainstream work in Indigenous affairs. My greatest concern is that I won't be forced to apologise to my children, to my grandchildren and to Indigenous Australians for what we did while we were here in this chamber, what we are voting for today, and in this case, we consider Aboriginal investment and economic empowerment. The previous speaker has connections to the Central Land Council dating back to 1993. Exactly the same period that he was there, I was studying medicine, and within two or three years I found myself in a remote community evaluating a newly devised azithromycin treatment for trachoma—Australia being the only developed country in the world that was afflicted. The result of that work is that azithromycin is now the mainstream treatment for this disease, and that blindness is almost unknown in Australia as a result of that drug that was first trialled in 1993 in Lajamanu.</para>
<para>So, personally, I go back to the people of Lajamanu and my very limited Warlpiri from being involved in that community for 15 months. It was bookended, on my first trip to the community, by the spearing of a young man, and when I left it was petrol sniffing and a community gathering under a tree to discuss these incredibly difficult issues. The phrase 'petrol sniffing' was inserted into Warlpiri. There was no way that the senior men and women could express such a scourge in their own language, so they had to appropriate English to do it. There were tragic elements at Lajamanu. And, while things may well have improved in certain areas, I have to admit that I am getting tired of listening to the respective leader every year talking about a couple of gaps closing and a couple of them opening.</para>
<para>This presumption that we need to close the gap with mainstream Australia forgets that we actually can dream of Indigenous Australia being better than us. It's not about closing the gap; in many cases, this community, by walking in two worlds with, as Noel Pearson says, a foot in both worlds, can be better than us. I don't want to close a gap; I want them to be better in many areas. And what are those areas that this Indigenous Investment Corporation should be focusing on? Let's be honest: what we've done so far hasn't achieved a great deal.</para>
<para>You're best to get out of Indigenous and remote Australia to see the solutions by looking globally. In my time in parliament, I have fought against this Aboriginal exceptionalism; this notion that there is something utterly unique about Indigenous Australia that necessitates particular and specific structures to help them realise their dreams. We are all part of humanity, and the general economic rules, wherever you travel, will be pretty much the same: four out of five families live independently of government; four out of five families raise their kids without them being vulnerable or at risk; four out of five families get their children to school to complete their education and go on to tertiary education or work; four out of five families are independent of publicly provided housing and they contribute to their aged care; and four out of five work for most of their career and fund their retirement. These are basic rules that apply no matter where you go—give or take.</para>
<para>What we have created in Indigenous Australia is utterly different, and I don't like it being explained away as being 'traditional' or 'connected to country', which are the excuses used for appalling outcomes. What are those outcomes? Every community relies on the provision and consumption of goods and services. But what we've created in much of regional and remote Australia is basically a single stream of welfare or royalties flowing in and a consumption mostly of imported goods and rubbish at the local store. There's virtually no production of local goods for Indigenous people. I use 'painting' as a terrible generalisation. Dot painting is a good, but they are not dot painting for themselves; they are dot painting to exchange for cash. And, then, what services are delivered between Indigenous people? That is a very important question, because half of mainstream employment is the provision of services to each other. With cultural elements aside, in the absence of a services sector, it's almost impossible to dream of full employment. So the Aboriginal Investment Corporation has a massive challenge here. There are these antecedent conversations that haven't been had in one or two generations.</para>
<para>My problem with the previous speaker is that he is perhaps inured by having been in those situations for so long that he simply can no longer visualise a way out. I'm saying today that there must be a way out of the paternalism and the patronising nature of mainstream structures being overlaid to ensure that Aboriginal people can manage their money. This is my concern with Aboriginal benefit accounts. With the greatest of respect to the good people in land councils, where else in the world do ordinary families appropriate the management of their personal finances to a barely elected body? I can understand the role of a local government, where we vote them in and pay a contribution, but this is very different. This is money that belongs to individual families.</para>
<para>With the Western overlay of these administrative structures that are in no way Indigenous, where we are, at the same time, eroding kinship and family groups with welfare payments to individuals, where does that leave traditional family and kinship structures? That is the pre-eminent structure to which I think every Indigenous person I've ever met would turn to for advice, guidance, counsel and leadership. But there is no role for these kinship groups in what we're doing at the moment—and I fear not in this investment corporation either.</para>
<para>We're all unified here in this chamber for economic, social and cultural prosperity, but my great concern is that there's so much symbolism and there are so many administrative overlays that we've lost all practical progress. We've got a blizzard of 16 gaps to close—so many that no-one I have ever met can list them all. There are three gaps that we don't have in there that would close the other 13. Fundamentally, this is about learning, living and working. We need four out of five families learning and showing up to school and transitioning into some form of employment which is their choice. Four out of five families need to be independent of government payments because they're earning their way through life. Lastly, we need four out of five families, because this is the way the rest of the world works, to be independent of government payments for the majority of their household income and independent of publicly provided housing. Learn, earn and work: if these things are taken care of, we don't need the other 13 gaps, because they will close on the way through to closing those three. We've got so many gaps that we can't focus on any of them. It's like a rotisserie arrangement, where one or two haphazardly close for the year, and we congratulate ourselves, and then we sadly mourn the fact that none of the others did.</para>
<para>I'm very disappointed about where we are at the moment, because I don't think we'll come any closer to a solution. I recently visited Indigenous businesses from the top of the NT to the centre, and the common theme for me was the fact that none of these individuals have been given an opportunity to run their own personal business. The notion is that if you go out alone you're competing against your kinship groups, so everyone either works within the cooperative or not at all. I'm all for setting up new Indigenous enterprise, but my concern is if it's nothing more than dot painting, which is about the only 'good' that might be produced, or rangering on traditional country, which is the only service being provided, then we're going to have to just wait until someone wants to pay for those services or those goods. Aboriginal Australians have moved past those dreadful, simplistic generalisations and can be so much more than that, and the Indigenous corporation needs to be attuned to that. We can't simply lift one or two individuals out of the red zone and show that they can run a business and then cross our fingers and hope that they'll employ one or two more. We need a fundamental rethink of economic activity on land.</para>
<para>Connection to country doesn't mean you're trapped on it, that you are mandated to earn your money from it. A lot of people aren't totally clear that capitalising and optimising Indigenous land, which by 2030 will be around 50 per cent of all of Australia, is not primitive rent-seeking. Ten per cent of mainstream Australians are rent-seekers. The point is that everyone else isn't. There's a substantial proportion of people carving their way through other forms of enterprise. This must be the focus of this corporation. It's not about liberating the land. It's not about exploiting the land. It's about doing whatever you're really passionate about. It doesn't have to be those generalisations that I am trying to break in this speech.</para>
<para>What we need is the recognition that family and kinship groups make these decisions for themselves. I've got on Stradbroke Island a pernicious system where individuals driven out of the prescribed body corporate are alienated from all of the current structures under the Native Title Act. They haven't forfeited their native title right—they still hold it—but they're excluded from the PBC. 'What is a PBC?' and 'Why do we need a land council?' are super-important questions. I know that no-one's thought of a different way of doing things. But, if you're talking about a way of extinguishing the rights of individual families and kinship groups, it's having a larger global entity making decisions on your behalf or your being voted down by majority, where the enterprise that you wanted to have invested in can't get any money from the land council because the others voted you out. We need a threshold under which individual families can maximise utility and engage the economy without interference or molestation by a land council majority decision. I'm not saying this is an endemic problem, but it's never worked anywhere else in the world, has it? Let's be honest. It's only in place in Central Australia. We've got to be brutally honest that we are failing in Central Australia.</para>
<para>A remote Indigenous community and a family within it will always be my barometer of success in Indigenous Australia. I love to death Indigenous people who are succeeding in the city. That's fantastic. But, ultimately, when it comes to closing the gap, the gap I'm most mindful of is the gap that we see in a household that still speaks an Indigenous language in remote Australia, where the delivery of services and opportunities are bleakest and most challenging. That is where we must be tested. That is where the focus must always be.</para>
<para>In conclusion, I'm all for something that's, hopefully, going to increase business opportunity, but the current language must change. We must be refocusing on individual family and kinship groups and identifying senior men and women to make decisions and control resources for their family group. I don't believe necessarily in an Indigenous voice to parliament. I want Indigenous voices to parliament, because there is no one voice that paternalistically and patronisingly speaks for Indigenous Australians. They won't cop it. They won't cop someone from some other family group, let alone another community, speaking on behalf of them. Let the voices come forward from local areas. There is no need for bureaucracy to make this happen. It should have happened yesterday. It's been two decades since ATSIS. Again, why do Indigenous Australians need to come to me, to you, Deputy Speaker, and to the parliament, for permission to have a voice? I want to be completely disintermediated from this and just see the voice happen organically. It will prove its value and its worth, and the facts on the ground will see legislation driven and, ultimately, constitutional change by virtue of it proving itself to its own people.</para>
<para>This is not a decision for white politicians. The voices to parliament already have a democratic path, but I absolutely support—as I would for any minority group—an alternative route to express opinions and give advice. There is nothing wrong and there's nothing to be frightened of. This business and investment corporation could play a role there. But, for those that are appointed—by Indigenous Australians, by government and independently—I will be personally challenging this corporation, whether this first conversation is had about what family groups individually want to do, and how much of everything that we're doing today in the last generation is actually adding to the patronisation of Indigenous families. We have to unlock the potential that you see in the rest of the world, and it starts with a new conversation—not a fixation on closing gaps or setting up new bureaucracies.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] This is my first time contributing virtually, so I hope that you can hear me okay. One thing that doesn't change, when you're coming in virtually, is the member for Bowman and that curious speech that he just gave, but I'll leave it to the member for Lingiari and other people with more in-depth knowledge to school him at a later time. Having spent some time recently with First Nations artists in the Northern Territory, I can say that painting and expressing culture is about so much more than selling artwork. It's about describing, communicating, lore, culture, families and dreaming. It's an important part of their culture. It's not simply something to be traded. I think the member for Bowman's ignorance on some of these issues belies the problem we have with realising the deep, deep potential of Indigenous exceptionalism.</para>
<para>Recently, here in the Northern Territory, the Children's Commissioner has reported that one in three NT kids are living in poverty, so we've got a great deal of work to be done. This legislation—the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021—might be part of the solution, but I think it'll only be part. It is important. It's not perfect, as the member for Lingiari mentioned earlier. There's so much that needs to be done to lift the standards. To think it's all going to happen from enterprise and not from concerted government action, at the federal level, the NT government level, the local council or local government level, is naive at best but at worst a deliberate attempt to defund organisations and programs that are slowly but surely leading to better outcomes.</para>
<para>Having said that, let me reflect on land rights for a little while. Here in the Northern Territory we live on the front line when it comes to the matter of Aboriginal land rights. It was a battle hard-fought by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders to begin that process of achieving some form of compensation for their significant losses during the period of European colonial settlement. There was a way for them to regain their connection and rights to the land that was taken from them—nearly always without their consent—and to strengthen that connection to their traditional lands with a connection in law. That movement had a massive impact here in the Northern Territory. These days, about half of the Northern Territory is now recognised as Aboriginal land. Given that Aboriginal Territorians represent about a third of our population, consulting with this population has always been paramount here in the Northern Territory.</para>
<para>I'm happy that these amendments have come about in part through some extensive consultation with the Northern Territory's four Aboriginal land councils. Like the member for Lingiari, I commend the minister for that. The Northern Land Council, the Central Land Council and the Tiwi and Anindilyakwa land councils have all played a part in helping shape this bill. They have called for these changes, which are 'the most significant set of reforms since the land rights act came into effect, in 1976'. I'm really pleased that this has occurred. Labor is very supportive of any measures that support the economic empowerment of Indigenous Australians.</para>
<para>As has already been mentioned in this debate, there are four major sets of changes being made to the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act. I won't go into them all here today, and I stress that they're not all perfect. Firstly, the bill seeks to establish a new Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation as an Aboriginal-controlled corporate Commonwealth entity, funded from the existing ABA, or Aboriginals Benefit Account. As others have said, the ABA was established almost 70 years ago, and it extracts those royalties from mining on Aboriginal land. The federal government currently makes decisions about investment and other payments from the ABA and takes advice from the ABA advisory committee. Under this bill, the new Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation will be established and will make investment decisions mostly independently of government. The idea is that it will promote self-management and economic self-sufficiency as well as the social and cultural wellbeing of Aboriginal people in the NT, which is hugely important. It will be led by a board of eight Aboriginal representatives from the NT—two from each of the four land councils—two government-appointed directors and two independent directors appointed by the board. The new body will also take over responsibility for making beneficial payments to Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory that are currently made by the ABA. This is a big deal.</para>
<para>The ABA holds considerable funds—currently about $1.3 billion—which is accumulated from mining royalties. The government has said that the Aboriginal Investment Corporation will initially receive half a billion dollars from the ABA with an additional $60 million per year during the first three years of its operation. That represents a lot of money to be spent for the betterment of Aboriginal Australians here in the Territory. One thing that needs further thought is the range of investments that the NTAIC can make to build revenue. There needs to be a wide variety of investments to enable the revenue to keep growing and for the ongoing investments to benefit Aboriginal communities. Again, in the make-up of the board there is now a disproportionate weighting in favour of the two smaller land councils, and also there's no board representation from non-traditional owners. As the member for Lingiari said, I think that shows a significant level of grace from the northern and central land councils, representing, as they do, a much bigger percentage of Aboriginal Territorians. But we need to ensure that representation is fair and that investment and spending is done fairly across the Northern Territory.</para>
<para>I'd also like to note that currently the ABA's funds can only be invested in cash accounts, term deposits or investment-grade securities, like government bonds. Over the more than 40 years since the land rights act came into effect, the return on such investments has declined a lot. It's dropped to about a third of what it once was. Although the establishment of the AIC addresses this in part, more than $620 million will remain with the ABA. The ABA's mining royalty income is likely to drop off in the near future, as the Groote Eylandt manganese mine, which currently provides about two-thirds of mining revenue to the account, is scheduled to stop operating in the coming years. Perhaps it's time to look at a higher-return investment strategy so that the ABA will be able to meet its legislated functions in the future, including covering land councils' operating expenses so that they can do their important work.</para>
<para>Another concern is the change which gives the minister increased control over the remaining ABA balance. As we heard from the member for Lingiari, there were times when former federal ministers for Aboriginal affairs made decisions that were inconsistent with benefiting Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory. Even though the federal Labor team would always take a sensible and legal approach to these issues, we need to make sure that, no matter what government is in power, legislation supports ministers to do the right thing by Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory and keeps them accountable. There's currently no legislated scheme in place that provides for advice to be made to the minister, so the payments from ABA would be made solely at ministerial discretion. That's problematic, as I just said, because, quite frankly, I don't have a lot of faith in those opposite to always do the right thing in these circumstances. That's no reflection on the current minister, but it has been supported by history.</para>
<para>I won't dwell on this too long, but we've also seen how ministerial discretion has been abused by a variety of Commonwealth grant programs in recent times. We've seen the outrageous sports rorts, the car park rorts and last week's heavily imbalanced spending by the BBRF, the Building Better Regions Fund, which was of course skewed towards coalition seats. I don't want to see even more political spending and manipulation of public funds that are meant to support and uplift some of our most vulnerable people. Surely, we need a strong advisory mechanism in place to protect the ABA's funds, to build and maintain trust and to make sure that grants are made fairly and transparently? I'm sure all honourable members would agree. I do hope there's consideration made of this.</para>
<para>On another note, I'd like to acknowledge the ABA's investment and interest in a cultural centre in my electorate of Solomon, here in Darwin. This is going to be a magnificent development that aims to showcase and celebrate Larrakia culture and history and to help maintain it for generations to come. It also aims to help foster economic independence for Larrakia people and to be economically sustainable, and I welcome it. Looking after land and sea, as the Larrakia have been doing for millennia, is important. It's important to all First Nations people. It will help to maintain existing ties and build new relationships with other Indigenous people, not just in Australia and the Pacific but globally.</para>
<para>Labor has welcomed the repeal of section 28A of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act, which we opposed when the Howard government introduced it. It was a brazen attempt to split and undermine the authority of land councils, and I'm very happy to see that it's being removed. We also welcome the repeal of section 74AA, which former Prime Minister Howard brought in as part of the NT Intervention. That section prevented land councils from overturning permits for accessing Aboriginal land that may have been granted by a community minority but against the wishes of traditional owners. There are other changes in this bill regarding processes around negotiation, consent and approval of exploration and mining ventures on Aboriginal land in the Northern Territory that should reduce inefficiencies and delays without—and I stress, without—compromising the rights of traditional owners. I do note that the NT's four land councils are strongly supportive of this bill, as is the Minerals Council of Australia.</para>
<para>I'd like to quickly pay tribute to Drew Wagner, who is the outgoing CEO of the Minerals Council in the NT, for the work that he's done. He's been a powerful advocate for Aboriginal people to be able to create jobs and wealth from the assets on their land, whilst seeking to protect the environment and upholding the concerns of landowners and custodians of that land. I wish him all the best for the future. I'd also like to acknowledge the work of Marion Scrymgour, Labor's very strong candidate for Lingiari. The reason I bring her up in this context is that, over her political career as a minister and the Deputy Chief Minister in the Northern Territory government, she was a powerful voice for Indigenous communities. She was also the first female CEO of any land council in the NT when she was appointed head of the Northern Land Council. She's been a trailblazer and a fighter, and I commend her for that work. I know she'll be an excellent member for Lingiari after the next election and an excellent advocate for Indigenous people across our nation.</para>
<para>Overall, despite some concerns I've mentioned today, there is lot to support in this bill. I believe it represents some very necessary and overdue progress in this space. I encourage all members to consult widely and to think deeply about issues involving First Nations people in our nation. I encourage members to take to their hearts the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the legitimate wants of First Nations people in our nation to have a voice, to have the truth told and to reach agreements about land— <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAMSEY</name>
    <name.id>HWS</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021 and I make the point from the start that, as I'm the member for Grey, this legislation doesn't apply across the border to the south; it is about the Northern Territory. But, while the structures and formulation of land ownership and asset ownership in South Australia are different to those in the Northern Territory, there are many implicit messages in this piece of legislation that should carry through to our state parliaments. Those parliaments should, where they can, act in a way that will empower Indigenous communities and make decisions—hopefully good decisions—on their behalf on the use of the income stream derived from the land rights legislation. The member for Solomon pointed out that 47 per cent, so almost half, of the Northern Territory is now Aboriginal land. In itself, that tells us two things: first, that the policy of accumulation and land transfer has been a spectacular success; and, second, that that is a double-edged sword because the benefits that the Indigenous people have derived from this ownership have been a spectacular failure. Certainly, that is the case south of the border in South Australia, where we've seen large amounts of money and large landholdings now in the possession of Indigenous groups and yet we seem to see very little advance in their economic and social outcomes, at least those outcomes that are directly related to the new-found resources.</para>
<para>It's worth pointing out that it's the 40-year celebration—although we've had to delay the celebration slightly—of the handing back of the APY lands to the Anangu Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara corporation by the Tonkin government, a Liberal government, in 1981. The celebrations have been delayed and will be held next year because of obvious complications around COVID isolation. I can remember talking to an Aboriginal elder who was involved in those original negotiations. He passed away about five years ago, I suppose. He said to me, 'When we negotiated all this, we thought things would be a lot different to what they are now.' It had been a great disappointment to him that they won the fight, if you like, but they didn't win the battle—that they didn't win the battle for economic success, growth and all those things that they had hoped land ownership would deliver. It is worth pointing out that the APY lands is a little more than three times the size of Victoria and supports a population of less than 3,000 people, and there is implied and hidden wealth there; it is just not well-exploited at this time.</para>
<para>This legislation will establish a new Aboriginal controlled body to handle the wealth that has been accumulated in the ABA. That will hopefully unlock a lot of the barriers to investment in a whole host of things that will benefit Aboriginal people—in particular, things like aquaculture, agriculture and tourism enterprises, which speak for themselves. There's been some success in that area in the past, but there have also been many failures. It will also support community projects like art centres and youth centres. But I really hope that one of the things that the new corporation decides to invest in is housing. Wherever I go, particularly in remote Indigenous communities, there is a call for more housing. There's been enormous investment by governments over the years to address the shortfall, but it still falls short. It seems to me that, for the rest of society, if we own our land then we build our own houses. But you can't do that if you don't have an income stream. But in the case of the Northern Territory, they do have an income stream, and they have money in the bank.</para>
<para>So I hope they will look at the projects of investing in Indigenous communities. As part of this legislation, there are adjustments to the land councils that will allow entities to lease township land and derive benefit from it. That is getting closer to a personal ownership model. Noel Pearson has spoken many times about the disempowerment of Aboriginal people because they're not able to use their houses for collateral. They're not able to own their own houses; they're all owned by the government, for all intents and purposes. That can't be a good outcome. We need this housing and these housing projects to be owned, controlled and operated by Aboriginal people who have access to streams of Aboriginal income. So I hope they put that up as a high priority, because I think that could make a real difference in these communities.</para>
<para>Also, a barrier has been lifted to the amount that this new corporation will be able to invest without seeking ministerial approval, from $1 million to $5 million. I think that simply reflects the cost of everything today, quite frankly. We speak about self-determination, and we have to entrust these bodies to make decisions on their behalf that are intelligent. In that, though, it is implicit that these corporations, this new body, should meet the same accounting standards as, say, a local council or a medium-size business. That is not the case at the moment—certainly in my patch, at least—and the accounting standards for the NGOs are also not held to the same standard. I think that in itself is a racist condescension, if you like. I think it is an insult to send this message that Aboriginal people aren't capable of meeting the same standards as local councils. Those types of things should not be tolerated. We need to step up to the plate. There should be one set of rules for all. When you're dealing with other people's money you need to meet the same type of criteria as any other Australian enterprise would. That's what this new organisation will have to be up to.</para>
<para>The bill repeals some delegation provisions, as I said before, which will further simplify land administration and certainly, as I said, allow the entities to engage in the leasing of townships and for them to enable an income stream from that. My comments have probably been abridged a little bit. I realise I have about five seconds left, so I'll leave it at that.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>E0D</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Order! The debate is interrupted in accordance with standing order 43. The debate may be resumed at a later hour.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Airport Noise</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BUTLER</name>
    <name.id>248006</name.id>
    <electorate>Griffith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] This morning the Petitions Committee tabled a petition, circulated in Brisbane, calling on the House to free Airservices Australia from regulatory capture and also to review Malcolm Turnbull's 2007 decision to approve the new Brisbane runway. For the whole of my time as an MP, aircraft noise has been an issue for many locals. Since mid-2020 an additional cohort of locals has been affected with the opening of the new runway at Brisbane Airport. As the local member, I will not be advocating for any changes that leave any locals worse off.</para>
<para>There are a number of things the Morrison-Joyce government should do in the interests of everyone in Brisbane. Firstly, locals have felt blindsided, and they've got a lot of questions. The Morrison-Joyce government should hold a public meeting involving the relevant regulators, the Brisbane Airport Corporation and a representative from the government to answer questions and avoid any buck-passing. The government should also establish a strong, independent, permanent airport community forum for Brisbane residents. We need supervision from a well-informed body that is free from regulatory capture. The government should respond in plain English to the suggestions for noise mitigation advanced by the local community, including suggestions in the petition tabled today. The government should make sure noise monitoring is improved so the community has an accurate measure of noise in all of the affected areas. This is a really important issue for my constituents.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sik, Mr Tristan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LLEW O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
    <electorate>Wide Bay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today I rise to share a message from Tristan Sik, a 17-year-old from Rainbow Beach in Wide Bay. His message is: 'Make your dayz count.' That's something Tristan lives up to every day. The mask I'm wearing in parliament today is part of his clothing line, Sik Ladz, which he launched in April, nearly four years after an accident that nearly killed him. Tristan was hit by a four-wheel drive while riding his pushbike. It left him in a coma with a serious brain injury, broken legs, a broken hip and collarbone, and six fractures in his skull. Doctors told his mum, Carolyn, that he was in a vegetative state and to turn off his life support. However, his mother's intuition told her to give him more time, and this mother's love and determination helped him regain his speech and cognitive function against all odds. Young Tristan has inherited that drive, returning to school at Victory College just one year after his accident. His injuries prevented him from fulfilling his dream of becoming a diesel mechanic, but, with remarkable resilience, he came up with the new dream of his Sik Ladz clothing line. Tristan, your community and your family can be proud of what you have achieved. You are an absolute inspiration.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PERRETT</name>
    <name.id>HVP</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] As part of the Raise Our Voice campaign's Youth Voice in Parliament Week, the future leaders of tomorrow submitted speeches to their local members in the hope that their words would be read in parliament. My speech today was written by 16-year-old Ella Marshall, who lives in Moreton:</para>
<quote><para class="block">In twenty years, I want to see the colours of the Great Barrier Reef. In twenty years, I want to see the biodiversity of the Kakadu National Park. In twenty years, I want to see the penguins on Macquarie Island. With Australia ranking last in climate change action among the UN members, I'm scared. I'm scared that my dreams and many other young peoples' dreams of seeing the wonders of Australia may end up becoming just a story told around the dinner table. That our dreams of a future with these places unaffected by climate change will be as unreachable as a six-year-old wanting to be an astronaut.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Climate change is impacting every Australian's life. From summer school uniforms being modified to combat the unnatural temperatures in heatwaves, to farmers struggling financially, mentally, and physically as they wake up each morning with dying land. It's heartbreaking watching good, hard-working Australian's face the impacts that are a result of profit over people. It needs to stop. The disbelief and the disregard of climate change-induced weather events need to stop. I do not want our country to spend another year with television screens around the world streaming red skies and dying kolas. You can pass the bills to make the change and help me see those wonders in twenty years.</para></quote>
<para>Thanks for those words, Ella, I hope the Deputy Prime Minister has heard Ella's words today. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Moore Electorate: Community Hub</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOODENOUGH</name>
    <name.id>74046</name.id>
    <electorate>Moore</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Northshore estate in Kallaroo was developed 40 years ago. At the heart of the suburb is a small community facility built around a club house, including tennis courts and catering for a thriving local community. The facility has long since outgrown its capacity, and the local residents association has advanced a proposal to extend and redevelop the ageing facilities to create a new not-for-profit community hub. Extensive research has been undertaken to ascertain community needs, culminating in a strategic plan for the next five years, including indicative building plans for the redevelopment of the existing facility.</para>
<para>The Northshore community hub will be run by the community for the community. The hub will be built on the existing community base of more than 600 local residents through a program of community activities and events, including health and wellbeing programs, tennis, pickleball, fitness, tai chi and yoga. With strong support from funding commitments from both the City of Joondalup and the WA state government, a funding contribution from the federal government is necessary to make this landmark project a reality. The Northshore community hub redevelopment has significant merit. I wish to formally place on record my strong support for this project.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Member for Hughes</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WATTS</name>
    <name.id>193430</name.id>
    <electorate>Gellibrand</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Unlike a growing number of people, I don't believe that Facebook is evil, but, like Tom and Daisy in <inline font-style="italic">The</inline><inline font-style="italic">Great Gatsby</inline>, they are a careless company. Facebook smashes things up—democracy and social cohesion—and then retreats back into its money-making business and lets other people clean up the mess it's made. All too often Facebook has refused to act to prevent imminent harms until it's too late, and it's doing so again today.</para>
<para>I recently wrote to Facebook asking how, after the member for Hughes was banned from Facebook for spreading COVID-19 misinformation, he is back on the platform as leader of the United Australia Party. Facebook has previously said that it will take down new pages 'in the voice of the previously banned individual'. Well, of the 19 videos on the UAP Facebook page, 14 are of the member for Hughes. He voices them, he authorises them under Australian electoral law and he is spending tens of thousands of dollars advertising them, including a video citing incomplete extracts from the TGA's adverse event report of COVID-19 vaccinations that the TGA has described as 'seriously misleading'. This video has been viewed 220,000 times.</para>
<para>Facebook's response is that all of this fine because the UAP's Facebook page has 'a different purpose'. This position is a joke. It can't be taken seriously. The member for Hughes can say whatever he likes in here, but he's not entitled to the algorithmic amplification that advantages the divisive and the outrageous. I am sick of long statements from Facebook that say a lot but ultimately do nothing. It's time they enforced their community standards transparently and proactively.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Groom Electorate: Highfields Library</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAMILTON</name>
    <name.id>291387</name.id>
    <electorate>Groom</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Highfields is finally on the way to having a new library, thanks to the Morrison government. After years of planning and deliberation by the Toowoomba Regional Council, I was honoured to turn the first sod on this vibrant community project last week. I am very proud that the government was able to support this project through the Local Road and Community Infrastructure Program, contributing $5 million out of a $7.5 million total project cost. It's exciting to see a new vision for Highfields taking shape. As a unique local identity it's only growing stronger as more people move to the area. It is growing. Highfields is now comparable in size to the town of Warwick—not bad for an outer suburb. Young families, particularly, are making the move to the leafy area for its affordable housing and community amenities, like the wonderful news Highfields Sport and Recreation Park. The new library will only add to this, providing a central meeting place for the community to come together and access crucial services. It will include a customer service centre, community meeting rooms, a dedicated junior meeting area, computer facilities and photocopying services. It was great to see the Toowoomba based company McNab Developments awarded the tender for the design and construction. As our economy recovers from COVID-19 it's important we keep as much of this kind of work as we can local, supporting local jobs and suppliers. I look forward to seeing the finished product early next year. I would particularly like to thank for their hard work Mayor Paul Antonio, Councillor Tim McMahon and previous councillors, Chris Tate and Joe Ramia, who did so much in bringing this project to fruition.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
    <electorate>Wills</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I wonder whether the Prime Minister will be taking his lump of coal to Glasgow. If not, what stunt has he got in store for the Glaswegians and the international community at COP26? Will it be some technological marvel? Could it be a flying car that runs on plutonium like the <inline font-style="italic">Back to the Future</inline>DeLorean or perhaps something more old school? Has the Prime Minister been tinkering in the garage at the Lodge on Menzies' old Bentley to make it a flying car—not Chitty Chitty Bang Bang but 'Scotty Scotty Bang Bang', and it's going to be fuelled—</para>
<para> </para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member will pause for a moment. The member will withdraw the 'Scotty Scotty Bang Bang'.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr KHALIL</name>
    <name.id>101351</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I withdraw. It's going to be fuelled by the hot air and the bile that's spilling out of the Nationals party room. Genius! Emissions free! The Prime Minister has two weeks left for Glasgow. He may as well revert to type. He doesn't have any ideas of his own, so what about stealing some of our ideas? Unlike the Morrison government, we in Labor have not only committed to net-zero emissions by 2050; we've announced $20 billion for renewable energy infrastructure, $200 million for 400 community solar batteries, $100 million for 10,000 energy apprenticeships and a plan for cheaper electric cars. While the Prime Minister does nothing, only Labor and a Labor Party in government will deliver net-zero by 2050, will make Australia a renewable energy superpower and will take real action on climate change.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Sexual Health Education</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms HAMMOND</name>
    <name.id>80072</name.id>
    <electorate>Curtin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>This speech was written by Noah Block, 19 years old, from my electorate, as part of Raise Our Voice Australia. 'Consent: a word which has caused debate, conflict and division in recent times; a word which is so important yet so undervalued and so often misunderstood. As young people, we have had enough: enough debating, enough conflict and enough division. What we want instead are answers, so in that spirit this speech was written not to provoke problems but to invoke answers. These answers may seem hard to find, but, if you listen to the young people of today, they are a lot simpler than what may seem.</para>
<para>'All we ask for is clear, specific and honest education when it comes to consent and sexual health. This education must be inclusive, diverse and reflective of all identities in our country. These issues won't go away unless something is done, unless nationwide consent education programs are introduced to senior schools, universities, workplaces and to all in our country who are responsible for raising the next generation of youth. The impact programs like these could have if done right would be far greater than what may initially seem. Healthy conversations around sex and consent can develop our country into a far more inclusive, accepting and safe place—a place that my generation would be proud to live in in 20 years time.'</para>
<para>Thank you, Noah.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Indi Youth Advisory Panel has asked me to deliver this speech also as part of the Raise Our Voice Australia campaign. 'Young people in Indi face various barriers to education. We need more resources, funding and support. We need more help. This is just one of the ways we fear our future is challenged, and government inaction on climate change is only exacerbating those fears. During the Black Summer bushfires, Riya, at 16 years old, travelled back and forth to school in Mount Beauty, wondering if their home would still be standing at the end of the day.</para>
<para>'As young people, some of our earliest memories surround the impacts of climate change, with extreme temperatures provoking catastrophic weather events. We are facing another summer, scared of a day when the wind is in the wrong direction or the temperature is one degree too high. We need to reach net-zero emissions yesterday. We need ambitious policies that give us hope. We are grieving a future that you are dismantling before our eyes. We are angry. We are sick and tired of empty gestures and reckless policy.</para>
<para>'You say it is too complex for us to understand, but it is simple. We need policy changes and we need them now because we are staring down the barrel of our future.' These are the voices of some young people from my electorate.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Covid-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Of great concern is the slow vaccine rollout in Queensland and WA, the two states most reluctant to join the national plan to reopen. The rhetoric in Queensland, of course, of Pfizer days, Pfizer 2.0 and Bunnings bonanzas belies the fact that only about 0.4 per cent of our population in Queensland is getting vaccinated each day, compared to one per cent in New South Wales, whose double-dose percentage passed Queensland's single-dose percentage 10 days ago. Now they are eight per cent ahead of us, having already lapped us.</para>
<para>This is not due to being in lockdown. Tasmania, which is not locked down, is doing way better than Queensland as well. We don't want low vaccination rates in Queensland becoming a plausible excuse to remain closed. My great concern is that the per capita performance by state hubs around the nation shows Queensland and WA particularly low. In the meantime, the Commonwealth rollout, of course, is speeding ahead. We need to stop blaming the customer. You don't need to keep encouraging them to get jabbed, because they're voting with their feet and seeking out a jab. We need more FTEs performing vaccinations in the hubs. There simply aren't enough at the moment.</para>
<para>We don't want this to be an excuse to remain closed. We don't want community spread coming to any state. In New South Wales's case, my modelling shows that, by the end of this month, October, they'll have new cases under control. We then have a 14- to 28-day period of waiting before we reopen. Hopefully, our data will tell us that 14 days are okay to save tourism, hospitality and major events and get the Christmas break happening in Queensland. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOSH WILSON</name>
    <name.id>265970</name.id>
    <electorate>Fremantle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>What is the point of this Liberal-National government if it can't grasp the environmental and economic importance of acting on climate change? What's the point after eight years and three prime ministers, who've blown the better part of a decade, who've wasted three terms doing three-fifths of nothing, with no idea how to secure Australia's job creation and export destiny as a renewable energy superpower?</para>
<para>We in Australia simply cannot bear another incapacitating dose of this useless and self-serving government. We can't afford to keep drifting backwards into disaster while the coalition fights itself to a deeply nutty standstill. We've already missed opportunities to be at the forefront of new technology and investment. We've already suffered the environmental and community devastation of unprecedented bushfires and bleaching reefs, yet we have a coal-waving Prime Minister who can barely muster the courage to go to Glasgow and can't find the leadership to take a meaningful policy with him. We've got a Deputy PM who says that, after eight long years in government, the Nationals won't be rushed—never mind the fact that rural and regional Australia is bearing the brunt of his climate hopelessness.</para>
<para>The world is moving, and we're being left behind. Our social, economic, public health and environmental wellbeing are at risk, and Australia cannot bear, cannot afford and shouldn't have to put up with another pointless spin on the merry-go-round of the Morrison-Joyce government.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Bull, Mr John W</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LEESER</name>
    <name.id>109556</name.id>
    <electorate>Berowra</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to pay tribute to one of my most admired constituents, John Bull, who died at the age of 70 last month. John was a vital member of the Berowra Lions Club. He served two terms as president, in 2017 and 2019, despite battling an illness at the time. As president, John welcomed me to the club when I joined. He led the club with distinction through some difficult times and was a mentor and inspiration to all. He initiated many projects, including the Warrina Street exercise equipment project in Berowra. He worked tirelessly for years to make it a reality, and it was fitting that he was president at the opening of stage 1 of that development last year despite being gravely ill.</para>
<para>John was a regular at Lions barbecues and other public functions and could often be found at the Berowra Lions op-shop when it was operating. He became affectionately known in the club as 'The man of steel' or simply 'Our Superman'. Last year John was awarded the Melvin Jones Fellowship, the highest honour that a Lions Club can bestow, in recognition of his leadership and his dedicated work for the Berowra community. Completely lost for words, John was surprised and humbled when he was presented with the award. For many years he proved his doctors wrong. They would repeatedly tell him he wouldn't survive until Christmas, and yet year after year he did.</para>
<para>John Bull was a vital part of our community. He inspired all of those around him, particularly those members of the Berowra Lions Club. To his wife, Jen, and his broader family, may John's memory be a blessing and may he rest in peace.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Prime Minister</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CLAYDON</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
    <electorate>Newcastle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In recent weeks we've seen the Prime Minister desperate to rebadge himself as a climate hero, trying his hardest but being held back by his coalition partner, the Nationals. We've all seen this movie before: every problem is someone else's fault; every crisis is someone else's responsibility. But the truth is that this Prime Minister has been at the centre of a furious scare campaign against any action on climate change or investment in new energy jobs for years. The trouble for the Prime Minister now is that the world has moved on. Mr Morrison is leaving Australia and carbon-intensive regions like Newcastle and the Hunter increasingly isolated and vulnerable on the world stage. If the Prime Minister was serious about climate change and not leaving regions like mine hanging out to dry, he wouldn't have spent the last eight years doing nothing.</para>
<para>Here we are on the eve of the Glasgow climate conference with the Morrison-Joyce government as divided as ever on even the most basic science of climate change. We're in a race to seize the new economic opportunities for regions like Newcastle and the Hunter, but this Prime Minister can't even find the starting line. It's time to step up and show some real leadership, Prime Minister; otherwise, seriously, what is the point of being in government? You might as well step aside and let an Anthony Albanese-led Labor government show the way on real action on climate change and real jobs for our regions. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LIU</name>
    <name.id>282918</name.id>
    <electorate>Chisholm</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Today, for Youth Voice in Parliament Week, I will be reading a speech written by a young Chisholm local. Her name is Maahi Verma. When asked, 'What is your vision for Australia in 20 years?' Maahi said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I was born in Australia. I call Australia my home. My mummy and daddy call Australia their home. My Grandma and Grandpa call Australia their home.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">But I am a bit confused. When I watch TV, why don't I see many people that look like me or my mummy and daddy? I know that people who are on TV are really important people. So why don't really important people look like me? My mummy says that people who come on TV make decisions about my life. They decide what my future is going to be like. So, if that's true I want people who look like me to make decisions about me.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">I also want to feel important. I also want to be heard. This is about my future. This is about the future of my country. In 20 years, I want Australia to value all of its people.</para></quote>
<para>I say to Maahi: we hear you and I look forward to seeing you on TV and perhaps here in parliament. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms THWAITES</name>
    <name.id>282212</name.id>
    <electorate>Jagajaga</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Morrison-Joyce government's entire way of operating is to sit back while events unfold around them and pretend they have absolutely no control over them, other than coming up with a political slogan and pulling a stunt. That is why we have a Prime Minister who showed up in this place fondling a piece of coal and who is now flailing around trying to land a credible policy to take to Glasgow. That is why we have a Deputy Prime Minister who pretends he is some kind of radical outsider who has only had four hours to consider what climate action should look like in this country, instead of having eight years as a senior government member. That is why we have so-called modern Liberals who talk about the need for climate action but who are unable or unwilling to overcome the Nationals in their coalition to get action.</para>
<para>This has to be called for what it is: a catastrophic failure of leadership. We are beyond fed up with the climate wars. After eight years in power, three prime ministers and just a week before the Glasgow climate conference, this country does not have a credible climate policy. The consequence of the Morrison-Joyce government's failures is that we will miss out on the jobs and the industries we should be building as part of the transition to a clean energy future. We are missing the window to take action before catastrophic climate change gets baked in. We need a commitment to net zero and we need it legislated. We need a serious medium-term target and we need a change of government.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Mental Health</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MARTIN</name>
    <name.id>282982</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Raise Our Voice Australia helps young diverse voices join the public policymaking process. Their Youth Voice in Parliament initiative invites young students to write a speech and have it read in parliament. This year the theme is 'Where I want Australia to be in 20 Years'. A young woman from Reid has written of her firsthand experience of Australia's mental health system. I will protect her privacy, as she is under 18. She writes:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I am 17 years old and I go to school in the Reid electorate. RUOK? Day has come and gone and it has made me realise something about the country which I live in. Everyone is all for mental health advocacy until it means having to pay for more services. It is easier to ask the question 'RUOK?' than to cough up extra dollars.</para></quote>
<para>My young constituent goes on to state that she is someone who has been in hospital several times due to suicide attempts and that the mental health system has failed so many people. She says that every politician, regardless of party, needs to be doing more. She says that she was discharged from the public mental health system when she was still at risk, because her time to get better had expired. She says that they couldn't afford to treat her anymore and she felt like they had given up. She says:</para>
<quote><para class="block">It's people who are most disadvantaged that need mental health services, yet they are the ones denied it.</para></quote>
<para>I would like to thank my young constituent for sharing her personal experience and powerful message of change. I hope to instil hope in her, as her member, as a psychologist and as the chair of the House Select Committee on Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, that I will be able to create the change that's needed in Australia to improve our mental health system.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:54</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KEARNEY</name>
    <name.id>LTU</name.id>
    <electorate>Cooper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Wonder of wonders: the Prime Minister has decided to grace the UN Conference of the Parties Climate Change Conference with his presence. Lucky them! With the Prime Minister's late RSVP, which Prince Charles and the Queen were left to chase up, the government is now scrambling for a plan. They've got two weeks to come up with something—anything—to take to Glasgow and, boy oh boy, they are struggling with it. They can't bring themselves to pull their heads out of their own party rooms to see what the rest of the world, our young people and the vast majority of Australians, and even our captains of industry can see—the drastic need for climate action.</para>
<para>We know that action on the climate emergency presents Australia with massive opportunities. We on this side know Australia can become a renewables superpower, exporting clean energy to the world and taking advantage of all the jobs and prosperity that would bring. An Albanese Labor government will lead the country to its future—a bright future for the regions, for workers and for all our communities, including those wonderful communities who have kept our country's lights on for centuries. We on this side have a plan, and I guarantee it's a better plan than those opposite have. It seems all the Prime Minister will have is a briefcase with a lump of coal in it that he'll take out and brandish at the world. Sorry, Prime Minister, that ain't going to cut it. It's just plain embarrassing.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Water Safety</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
    <electorate>Lindsay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>We need to stop the drownings before they happen, and right now we're losing the fight. Drownings are up by 108 per cent in the zero to four age group. This is just not good enough. We fought so hard to get indoor pools open during lockdown, when the New South Wales government was going to keep them closed until 1 December. From swim schools to local families across New South Wales, we made our voices heard. This issue is so important. Now, our swim schools are open because of the fight our community took to the government. Local swim schools like Dive In Swimming Academy and Nepean Aquatic Centre have welcomed local kids back through their doors. It was a delight to see them get a head start on their swimming lessons that they desperately needed, having been interrupted over two years.</para>
<para>The fight is not over. As we approach summer, families in Western Sydney are going to be heading to the beaches we've been locked out of and also to the rivers, to the lakes and to the pools. Our kids have missed out on too much time in the water. I'm calling on the Commonwealth and the locked-down states to support an intensive back-to-swim program, because our Aussie kids need it.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In August, I spoke in this House about my friend and constituent Khalil Ibrahim, who had lost both his parents to COVID just a few days apart. The deaths of Kaoukab and Hachem cast a profound sorrow over their entire extended family. Since parliament last met, so many more families have come to know this sorrow. More than 500 Australians have died in that time. Every one of them is now an absence—an empty chair at a table, a favourite jacket unworn in a cupboard, a hug that never comes, or a phone number that stays in the contact list because deleting it would be the final acknowledgement that they are never going to walk through the door again. When a loved one dies, it feels like some of the light of the universe goes out with them. What makes it harder is the sense that they have been lost when we are much closer to the end of the pandemic than the start. Now that they are equipped to do so, Australians are working magnificently to put the pandemic behind us, but for some our emergence is going to be more bittersweet. I say to those who have lost loved ones: no words spoken here can soften the grief—only time can do that—but I do want you to know that you are very much in our hearts as well as those of your family and your local communities.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sheep Meat Exports</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>13:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>One of the largest sheep meat exporters in this country, Roger Fletcher, has this morning again hit out at the bottleneck that is the port stand-off, particularly at Botany in Sydney. He is annoyed by the situation between Patrick Corporation and the Maritime Union of Australia, which is holding up exports with disappointing and unnecessary delays. This needs to be sorted, and soon. Mr Fletcher sends up to 600 20-foot equivalent units of chilled sheep meat overseas a week—at least, that's what he'd like to be able to do. However, as he says, that and so much else is being waylaid by the actions of a tiny group of people. This must end. 'It is just so frustrating,' Mr Fletcher said. He fears industry will not 'be game' to do chilled meat anymore because of the risks associated with the port activities or lack thereof. Here is someone who employs across his network as many as 1,300 people. He's being thwarted in his endeavours to grow his business and hire more people.</para>
<para>He even runs his own trains, such is his commitment to logistics and the supply chain. His Dubbo operations process 8,000 sheep a day, Monday to Friday. He has the capacity to kill 2,000 more per day if there was labour available and the port problems were resolved. Ultimately the biggest losers in all this are the farmers. Sheep producers have endured drought and so much more, and they do not need this. I've taken this up with the member for New England in his capacity as the minister for transport, as well as with the opposition leader. Let's get it resolved.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In accordance with standing order 43, the time for members' statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MINISTRY</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>MINISTRY</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Presentation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present a revised ministry list reflecting changes to the ministry and the changes to representative arrangements.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">The document read as follows—</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Temporary Arrangements</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I inform the House that the Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment will be absent from question time today and for the remainder of the week. He is in quarantine. The Treasurer will answer questions on his behalf in the Trade, Tourism and Investment portfolio and I'll answer questions on his behalf in the Foreign Affairs portfolio. The Minister for Indigenous Australians will also be absent from question time today. The Minister for Health and Aged Care will answer questions on his behalf. The Minister for the Public Service and Special Minister of State will be absent from question time today. The Treasurer will answer questions on his behalf in the Special Minister of State portfolio and I will answer questions on his behalf in the Public Service portfolio.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Prime Minister</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. On bushfires the Prime Minister said he didn't hold a hose. On vaccines the Prime Minister said it wasn't a race. Now the Prime Minister isn't even in the room while the government's climate change policy is being determined by the National Party. Why does the Prime Minister always go missing when leadership is required and never take responsibility for anything?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thought this was question time, not sledge time. If that's how the Leader of the Opposition wants to kick off the week, that's up to him. I know that under this government we have been coming through this pandemic saving lives and saving livelihoods. Australia is reopening now. Australians can see their future. As the days get warmer, their future is getting brighter. And their future is not only getting brighter because we're coming through the pandemic but because they know this government has the economic plans to ensure that they can look forward to the future and can plan for their future with confidence, because they know they will be paying lower taxes under our government, because they know that we're investing in the infrastructure that is needed to boost regions right across this country and because they know that our agricultural sector now is realising some long, hard-fought gains as they've seen an improvement in their crops and they're seeing some prosperity return to the regions and the rural parts of this country.</para>
<para>They know that under this government they can be more secure and they can be more safe—whether it's taking the decisions we need to take in our national defence or working with our partners around the world, particularly the United States, to ensure that in an highly unstable region we can provide stability through the strong leadership we've shown on national security and defence. When it comes to protecting our borders and ensuring that we take the right decisions to ensure Australians are protected from a terrorist threat, we're doing the right thing when it comes to our Home Affairs portfolio as well.</para>
<para>Our government is taking the decisions that are necessary to ensure that Australians can be more prosperous and Australians can be more secure. We're bringing Australia together around the big challenges that this country faces. We're doing it together. We're listening to all across this country, including in our rural and regional areas as they're dealing with the challenges we're facing in the global economy. I can assure you that this government will stand up for rural and regional Australia every single time. This government will understand those concerns about the challenges we face and will respond to those concerns. We will ensure that we have the plans to ensure that they can look forward to a future with confidence. Those opposite have a different set of priorities and plans—plans that aren't for Australia's economic prosperity: plans for higher taxes and plans for leaving rural and regional Australia behind.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Covid-19: Morrison Government</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr STEVENS</name>
    <name.id>176304</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Australians are responding magnificently to the calls to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and, like others nationwide, my community is looking forward to life safely returning to normal. Will the Prime Minister outline to the House how the Morrison government is supporting our safe reopening and economic recovery?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:05</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Sturt for his question. I thank him, because he knows, like the rest of us, that Australia is now emerging from what has been a very long COVID winter, one that's gone past the winter months. This has been a very difficult 18 months to almost two years months for our country, as we've been working our way through this pandemic. Australia, now, is opening up safely so we can remain safely open. This is the time we have been working towards. This has been the goal that we've been pressing towards. Australians have rolled up their sleeves, not just in terms of getting the vaccines. They've rolled up their sleeves, ensuring that they can take themselves, with the decisions they've made and with the resilience that they've demonstrated.</para>
<para>We always believed they would. We never doubted that Australians would roll up their sleeves. We never doubted that they would come forward for what they needed to do in the national interest. They have done that. This week, we will reach 70 per cent double-dose vaccination around the country, meeting one of those critical early marks of the national plan. We are seeing Australians, around the country, starting to reclaim their lives. Eighty-five per cent first-dose vaccinations across the country—that is higher than the United States. It's higher than Germany, it's higher than Israel and it is higher than the OECD average for first-dose vaccination rates. Thank you to all those parents and those kids—60 per cent first dose for 12- to 15-year-olds—responding to that same challenge.</para>
<para>This effort by Australians is now paying the dividends. Businesses are reopening. Families and friends are reconnecting. Children are going back to school. Planes are getting ready for take off again. All of that has been achieved by following the national plan—by Australians getting vaccinated at the record rates that we've seen. As to those states which have not had the same experience of COVID as we've seen in New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT—Victoria and the ACT are soon to follow the road that New South Wales is already on—the rising vaccination rates in Western Australia and Queensland, as we've just learnt from the Queensland government before coming here today, mean that they will soon also be opening up. They also will soon be able to welcome Australians back from overseas, who will be going into home quarantine and, indeed, doing no quarantine as those vax rates rise. It means that those states which have been largely open will be able to remain safely open because of those vaccination rates rising.</para>
<para>The government rolled up our sleeves with record economic support. We've saved lives and livelihoods through the Australian way, and now Australians are reclaiming their Australian way of life. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. The coalition has been in office for nearly a decade. With just two weeks to go until the COP26 conference in Glasgow, why can't the government tell Australians what its climate change policy is? Why is it always too little, too late from this Prime Minister?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm invited, by the member opposite, on these issues. I can refer him to comments by the member for Hunter, where he said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… after 14 years of trying, the Labor Party has made not one contribution to the reduction—</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Prime Minister, if you could just pause for a second. Prime Minister, your microphone is off. The Manager of Opposition Business can resume his seat. I'm making a ruling. The question did not refer to anything other than the government's policy. Just to be very clear: the capacity to speak about opposition policy simply doesn't exist. The Prime Minister has the call.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Thank you, Mr Speaker; I'm well chastised on that matter.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I haven't even started yet!</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm sure! We as a government have set out our goals and our targets very clearly. We've beaten Kyoto I and Kyoto II and we're going to meet and beat the Paris emissions reduction targets that we took to the last election. We went to the last election and we said that we would reduce emissions by 2030 by 26 per cent to 28 per cent. As of right now those emissions are down by more than 20 per cent. Australia has one of the highest—if not the highest—rates of rooftop solar take-up anywhere in the world. We are seeing a flow, a waterfall, of investment into lower-emissions technologies and renewable technologies in this country like we've never seen before. These are the results of the policies that the government has been putting in place to drive down emissions while at the same time taking down electricity prices and investing in the reliability of our grid as we go forward.</para>
<para>We on this side of the House understand that it's about getting the balance right. You've got to get the balance of affordability and reliability while getting your emissions reductions down, as we are achieving. The minister for energy has led the way here with the reforms to the National Energy Market. He's led the way with the lower-emissions technology road map. He's led the way, with me and the Minister for Foreign Affairs, in securing technology partnerships with Germany and many other countries to ensure that we're working together to get the technology that Australia needs so that we can meet our emissions reductions targets and prepare our economy for the global challenges ahead. Our policy's pretty straightforward: technology, not taxes, to reduce emissions.</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Isaacs is warned.</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>With those opposite, when they got the chance, it was tax, tax, tax. Every time you hear the Leader of the Opposition say he wants to reduce emissions, you know he wants to increase your taxes.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Infrastructure: Regional Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr O'BRIEN</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
    <electorate>Wide Bay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Deputy Prime Minister. Will the Deputy Prime Minister outline to the House how the Morrison-Joyce government is ensuring our strong economic recovery by investing in infrastructure projects and creating jobs in regional Australia?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
    <electorate>New England</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to thank the member for Wide Bay for his question. I note the great work the member for Wide Bay has done, especially with regard to road safety, and part of the process of road safety was the upgrade of the Tiaro bypass. I remember that he worked with the member for Riverina to make sure that that was the safest possible outcome, because he was very aware of what was most precious in the work that he has done, especially as a policeman, and that's the saving of lives. Infrastructure has been part and parcel of what this coalition government has done, what the Nationals and the Liberals have done, because we know that, of the 7.7 million square kilometres that make up this nation, over five million square kilometres are held by coalition members and about 1.5 square kilometres are held by Labor members, with the balance being held by Independents. Mind you, 1.35 square kilometres make up one electorate, so we have to be very mindful of the length and breadth of this nation and how Australians do not just reside in capital cities. That's what makes us a coalition government looking after the nation, rather than a Labor government that has forgotten about its regional areas and has retreated predominantly to the inner suburbs.</para>
<para>Part of the process of looking after that huge expanse of our nation is the Building Better Regions Fund. I'd like to thank the Expenditure Review Committee and all those who fought for a further $100 million so that we could look after the disparity in what has happened between those investments in the capitals and those investments in the regions. The state coalition government in New South Wales has now invested close to half a billion dollars in one project in the member for Sydney's electorate, which is an art gallery. We in the coalition have been making sure things get funded in regional areas, such as in the Hunter electorate and the Hunter Sports Centre at Lake Macquarie. It was great to go to Lake Macquarie, in the Hunter electorate, to make sure that they got $10 million so they could build that facility for $25.7 million. It was at this facility that my daughter Odette ran in the state championships. The fund also allowed us to put $5 million into the Swimming and Fitness Centre at Palmerston in the Northern Territory. I know the member for Solomon was a great advocate for that project. I also commend the member for Lingiari, who also wrote a letter of support for that project. Then there's the Birubi Point Aboriginal Place and Tourism and Information Centre in the Labor-held seat of Paterson, and how important that was. This goes to show that we are focusing on regional Australia, making sure we grow this nation, not just in pockets but across the length and breadth of this great country.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Can the Prime Minister confirm that his record on climate change includes claiming electric vehicles will end the weekend, saying the world's biggest battery to store renewable energy is as useful as 'a big banana', and describing renewable energy targets as 'nuts'? Why should Australians trust anything this Prime Minister says on climate change and emissions reduction?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>When I give a commitment to the Australian people about what we're going to do on emissions reduction targets, we keep it. We keep it. We said we would meet our Kyoto targets and we did. We said that we would meet and beat our emissions reduction targets for Paris and that we would stay in the Paris Agreement, and we took that to the last election. Those opposite took to the last election a policy saying that they wanted to reduce emissions by 45 per cent by 2030. We said that was the wrong policy. It is still the wrong policy. It is not something we support. Those opposite, I'm sure, have a myriad of views about this, but our view has not changed. We will meet and beat our targets, and we will do it by ensuring that Australia invests, particularly right across the regional areas of this country, in the changes in energy technology that are needed to ensure that Australia remains prosperous over the next 30 years and over the next 50 years.</para>
<para>To meet the global challenge of climate change, to ensure we understand what is occurring as a result of the world's response to climate change, we have to be honest and understand that that means there will be impacts in this country. There will be economic impacts particularly across the regions of this country, and those challenges need to be confronted and met to ensure that our regions emerge stronger. To deal with climate change, yes, you need an emissions reduction plan and, yes, you need an environmental plan. But, most importantly, to secure the livelihoods of Australians you need an economic plan, and the Australian people know they can trust the Liberals and the Nationals when it comes to managing the economy.</para>
<para>If you're going to rely on the Labor Party for an economic plan to secure your job or save your job in this rapidly changing global climate, you're relying on the wrong party, because Labor do not have the record of managing. Under the leadership of both this opposition leader and those that came before him, they did not have an economic plan to deal with the global challenges of climate change. When asked what it would cost at the last election, they couldn't say. They have a target at the moment with no plan. They have a target which is a blank cheque. The Labor Party want to write a blank cheque, which they want Australians to pay for, when it comes to this issue.</para>
<para>Well, that's not from the Liberals and the Nationals. The Liberals and the Nationals will always have an economic plan to deal with the big challenges facing our country. That's what we're doing. Those opposite have learned nothing.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Deputy Prime Minister. The government is reportedly offering tens of billions of dollars for regional Australia as part of the climate policy deal with the Nationals. A smart regional climate plan would put solar panels of the roof of every country hospital and school to lower their power bills. It would install a community battery in every bushfire-prone town to secure their power next fire season. It would invest in our manufacturing capability to grow new export industries and high-paid jobs in renewables, and it would guarantee that regional people share in the profits of regional renewables. Will the Nationals secure any of this, or will you squander this once-in-a-generation opportunity for us?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
    <electorate>New England</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Indi, and I note her passion for making sure that we look after regional areas. That's the same passion that's shared by my colleagues in the Nationals, as I'm certain it is by many colleagues in the regional Liberals. Of course we are always mindful of making sure that we reach into Nationals seats, Independent seats, regional Liberal seats and, dare I say, regional Labor seats to look after these people, because they're part of our nation. Whether that's in the form of investment in energy projects, investment in medical issues, investment in education and investment in infrastructure that drives those economies forward, you've talked about investments that take the standard of living ahead. That's why the biggest investment project in this nation is the Inland Rail, which is taking the lives of people ahead.</para>
<para>I also note how in your question you talked about a number. There is no number that we have in any pact. I want to dispel this notion that there's some magical number running around. There is not. As you know, Member for Indi—we've both been here for a little while—'just because you read it, doesn't mean they said it'. If you hear them say it, they said it; if you see them say it, they said it. But, by gosh, all of us in this place have had the experience of reading things which later on turn out to be complete and utter tripe.</para>
<para>We will continue to make sure that—mindful of all issues, not just this issue—our process of being in government is to serve the people of regional Australia; to make sure we make the lives of people in regional Australia better; to create opportunities so that not only they but their children and grandchildren can have jobs in regional Australia. Our job is to make sure we stand behind the industries and the wealth of regional Australia. As the member for Indi knows, it is the terms of trade generated by regional Australia, the people who put the product on the boat, that give wealth to our currency and terms to our currency, because so much of our lives is determined by what we take off a boat coming in the other direction. It's the people who put product on the boat—the iron ore miners, the coalminers.</para>
<para>The gas, the cattle, the live cattle, the sheep, the live sheep, the cotton, the grain—all these products come from regional Australia. If we don't protect regional Australia, we don't protect our nation. And if we don't protect the strength of our currency, provide a reason for other people to demand our products so as to give wealth to our currency, we will become a poorer nation.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Covid-19: Morrison Government</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FALINSKI</name>
    <name.id>G86</name.id>
    <electorate>Mackellar</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Treasurer. Can the Treasurer please update the House on what the Morrison government are doing to support Australians during lockdown and how we are ensuring that our economy bounces back stronger as the lockdown restrictions are eased?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FRYDENBERG</name>
    <name.id>FKL</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Mackellar for his question and acknowledge his time as a local councillor, in small business and as chair of the tax and revenue committee in the House.</para>
<para>The good news for the people of the northern beaches is that now, with restrictions having been eased in New South Wales, they can go to the gym or for a swim. They can go for a meal or to a movie, or, indeed, they can now have people over to their own homes. This is the dividend for the work of the people of New South Wales in getting the jab in record numbers—now at 80 per cent double-dose vaccinations. We will see in the great state of Victoria that target reached before too long and restrictions eased in Victoria too.</para>
<para>Every step of the way through this delta variant lockdown we have been, as a government, supporting households and businesses in New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT. Some $17 billion is already out the door—$11½ billion in COVID disaster payments and $5½ billion in our share of the fifty-fifty business support payments. This has helped support households and businesses in their hour of need and ensure that our economy is primed for a strong recovery.</para>
<para>We're already seeing some positive data out of the easing of restrictions in New South Wales. The National Australia Bank credit data for the first week after lockdown has seen $825 million spent. That's a 54 per cent increase on the spending in New South Wales the week prior and a nearly 10 per cent increase on the spending in New South Wales at the same time last year, when they weren't in actual lockdown. We've seen a more than 500 per cent increase in New South Wales in spending at beauty shops; more than a 300 per cent increase in spending at clothing shops; and more than a 50 per cent increase in spending across New South Wales in pubs, clubs and restaurants.</para>
<para>We know that, as the restrictions are eased, our economy will continue to strengthen and the jobs will come back. There is now $330 billion on household and business balance sheets that was not there this time last year. We know that job ads are 21 per cent higher today than they were at the start of the pandemic. We know that business and consumer confidence were both up last week, and we know that, last week, Australia had its outlook upgraded by Fitch that reaffirmed Australia's AAA credit rating. So Australians can look forward to a bright summer. Australians know that their economy is resilient in the face of this big economic shock.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:25</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. I refer to the Prime Minister's comments in the House last November, less than a year ago, that 'a net zero target by 2050 would'—to quote the Prime Minister—'require a 43 per cent emissions reduction target in 2030'. Is that still the case?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>That was in relation to what was being put at the time, if I recall correctly, about some sort of linear trajectory—and there is no such linear trajectory to 2050. That's not what our plan relies on. Those opposite might think that a linear trajectory is how it works, but not those on this side of the House. On this side of the House, we know that you have to invest in the technologies, many of which will have long lead times, that will ensure that the 2030 targets—that we will not only meet but also beat—will set us up well for the future in further reducing emissions. You need to follow the technology path here.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>You can take one of two paths. You can go down the path of ensuring that technologies become more affordable and invest in them, providing more choices to consumers so they can lead the process—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>or you can follow the path that the Labor Party tried to follow the last time they were in government.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Prime Minister will resume his seat. The member for Shortland is now warned. The Leader of the Opposition, on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Albanese</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, Mr Speaker. This was a very precise question. It went to the Prime Minister's own comments, saying that 'a net zero target by 2050 would require a 43 per cent emissions reduction target in 2030', and I asked: is that still the case?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I would just say to the Prime Minister that the question was very tight. It didn't ask for anything about the opposition's approach. The Prime Minister has the call.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I understand that, Mr Speaker. I'm simply drawing a parallel, whether it's the Labor Party's policy or anyone else's. You can go down the path of pursuing a technology investment road map, which is what the government's policy is, which appreciates that, over time, the returns on that investment and the acceleration in the emissions reductions that occur because of that investment, and then you're able to achieve much greater emissions reductions over the longer term. If you're seeking to do that by forcing higher emissions reduction targets by 2030, you will force choices that cost jobs. That is not what the government's policy is. It has never been our policy.</para>
<para>At the last election, we rejected a 45 per cent emissions reduction target put forward by those opposite. And it wasn't just us who rejected it; the Australian people also rejected it. They supported our policy of 26 per cent to 28 per cent—to meet that target and beat that target. That's what we took to the last election. That's what we've honoured in government. That's what we're delivering on, with a more than 20 per cent reduction in emissions on 2005 levels, which is much greater than New Zealand and much greater than Canada—countries that also have a very large proportion of their emissions taken up in their export sector. Here in Australia, at the same time that we have seen one of the largest expansions of our LNG industry, we have as a country been able to reduce our emissions by over 20 per cent on 2005 levels. That's what success looks like.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Covid-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALLEN</name>
    <name.id>282986</name.id>
    <electorate>Higgins</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Health and Aged Care: Will the minister please update the House on the progress of Australia's COVID-19 vaccine rollout?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HUNT</name>
    <name.id>00AMV</name.id>
    <electorate>Flinders</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Higgins for her work and her support as a health leader across this nation. We know that around the world the pandemic continues. It was said at the dispatch box opposite that the pandemic is coming to an end. It's not. We are at 240 million cases around the world. We are at 4.9 million lives lost. The number of cases this year is almost double the number last year. At the same time, however, what is changing is how we live with the virus. One of the fundamental things is that, whilst we relied last year on our borders and on testing, tracing and distancing, the vaccination program is allowing us to change that in Australia. Already we are at 32.6 million doses. In the last week alone, in the last seven days, over 1.9 million vaccinations were delivered in Australia. In the last 14 days there were over 3.8 million vaccinations and in the last 28 days over 7.8 million vaccinations.</para>
<para>These are Australians coming forward to protect themselves, their friends, their families—or just to do the right thing by the community. These Australians are leading to extraordinary outcomes. We see that 93 per cent of our over-50s have come forward for a first dose and an extraordinary 97 per cent of our over-70s, our most vulnerable demographic. Extraordinarily, 99.8 per cent of our aged-care workers have come forward for vaccinations. That is a testament to all involved, and we thank them and honour them. All this is about saving lives and protecting lives. Yes, there has been hardship here, as there has been in all nations of the world. But we know that the actions we've taken over the last two years and have now seen through the vaccination program have meant that Australia has had one of the three lowest rates of lives lost across the OECD, the 38 nations, this year and across the entire pandemic. That means we have saved over 30,000 lives, compared with the OECD average. That is 45,000 lives if we were to compare it with the United Kingdom or the United States. Each one of those is a life to be celebrated, a family that will be whole. Each one of those comes from the actions of Australians over the last two years—in particular, all those Australians who have come forward. And, as the Prime Minister said, we'll pass the 85 per cent first-dose mark and the 70 per cent second-dose mark in the coming days— <inline font-style="italic">(</inline><inline font-style="italic">Time expired</inline><inline font-style="italic">)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ELLIOT</name>
    <name.id>DZW</name.id>
    <electorate>Richmond</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Why has the Prime Minister given the Deputy Prime Minister and the National Party a veto on whether Australia takes action on climate change? And why is the Prime Minister not in the room where Australia's climate change policy is being decided?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The government's decision on the government's commitments for Australia in relation to COP26 will be made by the government in cabinet. That's where it will be made. That's where these decisions are made. All members of the government understand that. All members of the government do the right thing by consulting far and wide, informing their views when they come together to make decisions in the best interests of Australia. And the government, a coalition government—a strong coalition government, working closely together as we have been leading Australia through one of the greatest crises we have seen since the Second World War—is working together constructively to find the right solutions, sensibly, responsibly and cautiously.</para>
<para>This government hasn't gone off and signed a blank-cheque commitment. We haven't gone off and stated a target without a plan. That's what those opposite have done. What we are doing is carefully considering the implications of these very serious issues for Australians right across the country. The Labor Party has signed up to a target without a plan, a blank cheque that they will expect Australians to pay for. That's the Labor Party's policy. On this side of the House the Liberals and the Nationals are working together to ensure that Australia succeeds over the next 30 years in a world economy that is going to be challenged by the world's response to climate change and that is going to have very real impacts in rural and regional communities. We're not oblivious to that like those opposite, who will cavalierly go and commit Australia to all sorts of things without thinking through the consequences. We are thinking through the plans that are necessary not only to protect jobs in this country from the challenges that are coming but also to secure the opportunities. Our policies aren't about shutting anything down but opening up new opportunities. Those opposite would seek to impose choices on Australians. We're going to let Australians make their own choices. We're going to ensure that we keep the lights on and prices down.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:35</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
    <electorate>Barker</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Industry, Energy and Emissions Reduction. Minister, can you outline to the House the importance of a technology led approach to reducing emissions? How does this ensure that we can create jobs and support Australian industry and manufacturing as we reduce those emissions?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TAYLOR</name>
    <name.id>231027</name.id>
    <electorate>Hume</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Barker for his question and for his relentless focus on jobs—in his electorate and across Australia—and on a technology led approach to reducing emissions. That's his focus and that's the focus of all of us on this side of this place—creating jobs and creating opportunity for Australians. In the manufacturing sector, which is strong in his electorate, we've seen in the last three months alone another 91,000 jobs added. That's more than 80,000 jobs more than before the pandemic. We now have over a million people working in manufacturing again, and we haven't seen that since Labor put in place their carbon tax.</para>
<para>Local manufacturers are going from strength to strength, and that includes businesses in the member's electorate like Mondelez, which is one of Australia's largest food manufacturers with more than 100 years of experience in manufacturing behind them and 2,000 local employees. They research, develop, manufacture and sell great products. They're investigating and working on ways now to drive 50 per cent energy efficiency across their operations, and one of the ways they're doing that is by installing solar. We are a world-beater in solar. That's technology, not taxes, at work.</para>
<para>We know from the latest data that Australia's emissions are over 20 per cent down since 2005. We're reducing emissions while we're creating jobs and driving investment, and that's because we're taking a 'technology, not taxes' approach. It's technology, not taxes, that strengthens our regions and our traditional industries, like agriculture, resources and heavy manufacturing. It's that technology led approach that will ensure that we can continue to bring down emissions whilst creating jobs and continuing to drive that investment, including export opportunities for our world-beating export sectors. Technologies that are crucial to achieving that are technologies like hydrogen, soil carbon, carbon capture and storage, stored energy, clean steel, and aluminium. They are all in our technology investment road map, focused in each case on getting those costs down to a point where we see rapid uptake.</para>
<para>Just a few weeks ago we opened our $464 million clean hydrogen hubs program to support the development of up to seven hydrogen hubs across Australia. That makes the total investment in hydrogen $1.2 billion of the total $20 billion we're spending on emerging technologies. We're backing technology. Those opposite will always back taxes.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JONES</name>
    <name.id>A9B</name.id>
    <electorate>Whitlam</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Treasurer. He says that a failure to adopt net zero by 2050 will cost jobs and the economy. Treasurer, what has been the cost to the economy of nearly a decade of climate change inaction?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FRYDENBERG</name>
    <name.id>FKL</name.id>
    <electorate>Kooyong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The first thing to state, for the record, is that our emissions are down by more than 20 per cent on 2005 levels. That's consistent with meeting and beating the 2030 targets that we agreed at Paris. When it comes to the economy and when it comes to jobs, I point out to the honourable member that when we came to government—therefore, under Labor—the unemployment rate was at 5.7 per cent. Before this pandemic, before the first recession in nearly three decades, the unemployment rate was at 5.1 per cent, and today the unemployment rate is at 4.6 per cent. The unemployment rate is under five per cent for the first time in a decade.</para>
<para>I'll tell you what leads to more jobs: lower taxes. On this side of the House we have legislated, through the parliament, more than $300 billion of tax cuts for Australian families. We have introduced, in successive budgets, some of the biggest tax incentives for investment. That has led to, for example, a 20 per cent increase in machinery, capital and equipment purchases over the course of the last year through the incentives and the immediate expensing provisions that we have put in place in the budget. Whether it's our patent box, whether it's cutting taxes for small business down to 25 per cent, whether it's the work that we're—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Whitlam on a point of order?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Jones</name>
    <name.id>A9B</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, on relevance. The question was about the cost of climate change inaction. He hasn't addressed that issue yet. He has gone off on a completely different tangent.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Well, I think it was a fairly broad question, the member for Whitlam would have to admit. He's talking about the economy. The Treasurer has the call.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FRYDENBERG</name>
    <name.id>FKL</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The reality is that under the economic stewardship of those on this side of the House we've seen more jobs created, we've seen the unemployment rate fall to a more-than-decade low and we have the plan in place to see a strong economic recovery from the biggest economic shock since the Great Depression. Those opposite—their only solution—</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Treasurer wasn't asked about those opposite.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr FRYDENBERG</name>
    <name.id>FKL</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The fact is that on this side of the House we are driving the creation of more jobs. We're going to drive stronger economic growth into next year. We've seen our triple-A credit rating reaffirmed by the Fitch rating agency. We're one of only nine countries in the world to have a AAA credit rating from the three leading credit rating agencies. We're getting on with the job of lowering emissions, lowering electricity prices and creating more jobs.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>National Security</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Defence. Will the minister update the House on how the recent Morrison government announcement to strengthen our relationship with the United States and the United Kingdom through AUKUS will keep Australians safe?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to say thank you to the member for Fisher, not just for his leadership on the defence committee and the very valuable role he plays there but also for standing up for veterans on the Sunshine Coast. I've met with veterans with the member for Fisher and he has a deep and abiding passion to make sure that everything that we can do as a country for those veterans is an outcome that we can all be proud of. And he delivers on that, as this government does in terms of national security, providing that safety and security for our country, not just for today but into the coming decades. I want to pay tribute to my counterparts in the United States and the United Kingdom, Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary Ben Wallace, for their support in bringing AUKUS together and their leadership, even today, as we meet as three countries to look at ways in which we can deliver on the agreement we have entered into in the form of AUKUS.</para>
<para>Our Five Eyes compact has absolutely been a very significant underpinning to our national security for many decades. We know now that, as we move into this new phase of great uncertainty in the Indo-Pacific, Australians and people right across the world are worried about what the future holds for the Indo-Pacific. It's important that we not only rebolster the support that we have between the Five Eyes partners in that very important relationship but also that we take our security to the next level as a country and on behalf of our region in the form of AUKUS. AUKUS delivers us a technology which will replace the Collins Class in time, which will be—</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I heard some of the interjections from those opposite. You must be referring to the whole period when you were in government, when you didn't order one vessel, one boat, one submarine or one ship and you cut money from Defence for soldiers and sailors. You were hopeless in government—let's be realistic, Mr Speaker.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Minister for Defence will come back to the question.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>What are we doing in contrast to that? We are putting a record amount into defending this country and keeping Australians safe. We now have a nuclear submarine program which will be, in this region, an absolutely superior boat. It will give us the ability to work with the Americans and to work with the Brits to keep our country safe and secure. Out of AUKUS, there's obviously a lot more that we'll do in terms of cybersecurity, working on artificial intelligence and on quantum technologies, additional undersea capabilities—these are all areas of priority and there will be many, many more. We will work with our best allies in the world and with our dear friends in the region to make sure that we keep our country safe.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CHESTERS</name>
    <name.id>249710</name.id>
    <electorate>Bendigo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Deputy Prime Minister and minister for regional development. The then Deputy Prime Minister said in July:</para>
<quote><para class="block">The likelihood of Joyce getting endorsement from his party room to agree to net zero is zero. That's where the net zero lies.</para></quote>
<para>Is there still a zero chance of the minister for regional development supporting net zero? What is the impact of net zero by 2050 on the regions?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
    <electorate>New England</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the honourable member for her question and concur that the Nationals do concern ourselves with regional Australia. That's what we do and that's why we're here. We as a party are exclusively from regional areas and so of course we're going to be mindful of making sure that we understand the role of this parliament and how lives in regional areas are affected. That is our job. I think people would think a lot less of us if we weren't diligent about the facts, if we didn't take a real sense of prudence to how we have oversight of discussions that could have huge ramifications for regional areas, especially by 2050.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The leader of the Opposition will cease interjecting.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That leads me to where your own party is on this and the sort of diligence, or lack of it, that you have shown in your attention to exactly what happens in regional areas. Might I pose a question to the honourable member?</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>No.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOYCE</name>
    <name.id>e5d</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Might I make a statement? You have got no idea beyond your statement about exactly what the ramifications are for the people of Singleton, what the ramifications are for the people of Gladstone, what the ramifications are in Sale, what the ramifications are in Muswellbrook, what the ramifications are in Busselton, what the ramifications are in Longreach, what the ramifications are in Townsville and in Mount Isa and in the Hunter. We don't just represent or have a heart for the inner suburbs and then drag regional areas along as something that is taken for granted. We take them to heart. We are totally and utterly focused on regional areas, so I concur that we are prudent and diligent if you are asking: are we prudent, are we diligent, are we making sure we go through this? Yes, we are. Of course the member for Grayndler doesn't agree with that.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Covid-19: International Travel</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ZIMMERMAN</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
    <electorate>North Sydney</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to Minister for Home Affairs. Will the minister please update the House on how the Morrison government's national plan will ensure that Australians overseas can come home and those who are here can travel to visit loved ones overseas as part of the reopening of our international borders?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ANDREWS</name>
    <name.id>230886</name.id>
    <electorate>McPherson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for his question and congratulate him and thank him for the great work that he has done, particularly over the last 18 months, as he's been supporting the people in his electorate through what is clearly an incredibly difficult time. It's very clear that the decision that was taken by the Morrison government to close our international borders has saved a significant number of lives. But we've always known that it's not in Australia's interests to keep the international border closed for any longer than is absolutely necessary.</para>
<para>Vaccination is and always has been key to safely reopening Australia to the rest of the world. Australians have absolutely rolled up their sleeves. They have very proactively gotten out there in a remarkable way and chosen to be vaccinated. Across Australia we have some of the highest vaccination rates in the world. Australians deserve the opportunity to be able to freely travel again, for holidays, for business purposes and, most importantly, so that they can be with their loved ones. In November, the outbound travel requirements will be lifted for fully vaccinated Australians, and they will be able to travel in and out of Australia without restriction, subject to the quarantine requirements of the states and territories that they fly back into.</para>
<para>We know that many Australians overseas have struggled to get home, with flight limitations due to the quarantine caps that have been set by states and territories. Of course, New South Wales have facilitated a very large proportion of quarantine for returned travellers throughout this pandemic, and they are leading the way again, announcing no quarantine for fully vaccinated travellers from 1 November. That is very welcome news. There are a number of states and territories that are going through the process of trialling home quarantine, which will mean that vaccinated Australians can come in above the current caps. I know that that is welcomed by many Australians right across Australia.</para>
<para>We have announced that we will be extending travel exemption eligibility to include parents of Australians so that mums and dads living overseas will be able to be reunited here on our shores—so that they can hug their grandkids once again. It's absolutely appropriate that they should be amongst the first welcomed back here to Australia. As soon as it's possible, we want to make sure that we can bring into this country the skilled workers and the international students that we so desperately need. And then, of course, we will be welcoming back international tourists, because they are most welcome here in Australia. We want to show them all that we have to offer here.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBAIN</name>
    <name.id>281988</name.id>
    <electorate>Eden-Monaro</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Does the Prime Minister agree that communities in rural and regional Australia bear the brunt of inaction on climate change, through droughts, bushfires and floods? Does the Prime Minister recognise that communities in rural and regional Australia want action on climate change and will be the biggest beneficiaries of net zero by 2050?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for her question. I do agree that it is true that I believe regions can be the biggest beneficiaries of moving into a new global economy where decisions are being taken outside of this country that impact on our regions. It's important that we take the opportunities that come with those new energy technologies, which can yield great opportunities for our regions. As the world continues to take action together, that will have a positive impact on Australia's climate as well. But I would also say this: it would be foolish to pretend that the economic changes that are occurring as a result of the world's response to climate change will not have negative consequences for rural and regional areas. That would also not be true. We are not blind to that, and that is why the Liberals and Nationals together will ensure that the policies that we have in place seize those opportunities, which come from those technologies, in rural and regional areas, but also enable them to deal with the negative impacts that will inevitably come because of the impacts on more traditional industries.</para>
<para>We want to keep making steel in this country. We want to keep making aluminium in this country. We want to keep making ammonia in this country. We want to continue the manufacturing jobs in this country. I note there are now over one million Australians employed in our manufacturing sector, as at 21 August this year. That is the first time manufacturing employment has been above a million jobs for over a decade.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'll take the interjection. When those opposite came to office, there were over a million manufacturing jobs, and when they left office there were just a bit over 900,000. Manufacturing jobs went down under Labor. They've gone up under the Liberals. Rural and regional areas will benefit from our plans for investing in technology and ensuring we work with the regions, whether it's in infrastructure, water infrastructure, electricity transmission or the big projects that we're pursuing, like the Inland Rail or Snowy Hydro. The member opposite would know that in her own electorate the Snowy Hydro project is a jobs boon written and authorised by the Liberals and Nationals—that's where that project came from and that's the action we're taking. We will deal with these challenges through technology, not taxes. I note that on the weekend Senator Gallagher was asked, 'Is some sort of carbon price an option for Labor?' Her answer was, 'We are looking at everything.' Every time they say they want to reduce emissions—<inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: National Plan</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MARTIN</name>
    <name.id>282982</name.id>
    <electorate>Reid</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Employment, Workforce, Skills, Small and Family Business. Will the minister update the House on how the Morrison government is using world-leading technology to ensure Australians have the tools they need to get their lives back? And will the minister explain why sticking with the national plan is so important to ensure Australian families can be reunited, Australian workers can travel in and out of our country, and we can work towards welcoming tourists back to our shores?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ROBERT</name>
    <name.id>HWT</name.id>
    <electorate>Fadden</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for her question and all the work she's been doing in her electorate to ensure her constituents are safe. Indeed, saving lives and saving livelihoods has been the hallmark of the Morrison government for the last 18 months. But it's Australians who have been doing the heavy lifting—abiding by restrictions, getting vaccinated and practising physical distancing and good hygiene. We should all be so thankful for what our citizens have been doing.</para>
<para>In New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT we've now got road maps out of lockdown, so the Morrison government is now moving to the next phase of the national plan. It's also great to see Premier Palaszczuk coming out before question time to give confidence to small business about sticking to the national plan. The Morrison government is now leading the reopening of Australia and Australians to the world. We have delivered a simple and very secure proof of vaccination that has now been integrated into state and territory contact-tracing applications. It's very easy for an individual, where required under state or territory health orders, to confirm their vaccination status, and it's very easy for businesses to ensure the safety of their staff and customers. These simple and secure proofs of vaccinations are very much underpinning New South Wales and Victoria opening up, and it has been a pleasure for the Commonwealth and all those states and territories to work cooperatively together.</para>
<para>As of 17 October there have been over 19 million downloads of digital proofs of vaccinations in New South Wales, and over 3.8 million of those proofs have been dropped into digital wallets. In the first week of Victoria integrating it, over a million Victorians have linked their vaccination certificates with their new Service Victoria app. Whether you're going to the cafe in Coogee, down to the pub in Penrith or to Toohey's—that great brewery in your electorate—Australians will be using technology built by the Morrison government.</para>
<para>We continue our progress with the national plan, today announcing that from tomorrow Australians will be able to, if vaccinated, download an international proof of vaccination via myGov. With international travel starting again—with New South Wales leading the race—as per the national plan from 1 November, this international proof of vaccination will enable fully vaccinated Australians to depart, return and travel internationally. It's simple, easy and built with the same security as your passport. It can be downloaded digitally—and this is an example of an internationally recognised copy with a standard set by ICAO—or it can be dropped digitally into your mobile phone. The launch of the proof of vaccination is a key step in safely reopening international borders, getting more Australians home and allowing Australians to visit loved ones overseas. The Morrison government is continuing to support Australians through the pandemic and continuing to follow the national plan.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Prime Minister. Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott said climate change is 'absolute crap'. Can the Prime Minister confirm that Australia's current 2030 emissions reduction target is the same 26 to 28 per cent target set by Mr Abbott?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>14:59</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's the target that I, as Prime Minister, took to the last election and that was endorsed by the Australian people. That's what it is. It's a policy that was endorsed by the Australian people at the last election. When I took that policy to the election—when Labor took a policy of 45 per cent, and it was rejected by the Australian people—I said that we wouldn't just meet this target; we would beat this target. What we've seen is that emissions have fallen by more than 20 per cent on 2005 levels. We are making excellent progress towards that goal. Indeed, we will meet that target and we will beat that target, and I'll be in a position to advise the COP26 about our success in meeting and beating that target when I am there in a few weeks time.</para>
<para>We've already heard that on our side of politics—the Liberal and Nationals—our way to address climate change is to ensure we do it with technology, not taxes. But we heard from the Labor senator on the weekend—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>No, Prime Minister, this is not an opportunity to do what you're—</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I'll take the opportunity elsewhere, Mr Speaker, not in here.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>That's right. Just get asked a question about it, and you can.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>We are pursuing that pathway. That pathway has ensured not only that we've been delivering lower emissions but that we've been able to put a brake on those electricity price hikes and ensure we get more gas into the system to provide the reliability that is necessary to keep that stability in the system, ensuring that industry and manufacturing in particular—one in eight jobs were lost in manufacturing under Labor when they were last in power.</para>
<para>Our Modern Manufacturing Initiative is ensuring that we're putting Australians back into manufacturing jobs, with the figures that I've already referred to today in question time. That is being achieved because we're keeping energy prices under control. We're investing in the technology that is needed to reduce emissions. We're investing in reliable energy sources, such as gas as a transition fuel, to keep the lights on and to keep the prices down. Every time you hear Labor talking about cutting emissions, they're putting up your taxes.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Agriculture Industry</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for Agriculture and Northern Australia. Will the minister please update the House on the Morrison-Joyce government's Ag2030 plan and outline how this government's significant investment in agriculture has helped the industry reach record-high levels of production?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LITTLEPROUD</name>
    <name.id>265585</name.id>
    <electorate>Maranoa</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Mallee for her question. She knows better than anyone the important role that agriculture plays for the electorate of Mallee but also for our nation. I'm proud to say that, for the first time in our nation's history, ABARES is predicting that we will exceed over $70 billion worth of agricultural production. That is in the face of fires, droughts and floods. Australian agriculture has continued to get on with the job. We are on our trajectory towards hitting the $100 billion goal. We're doing that by supporting it with our Ag2030 plan, with seven key pillars, and that's being backed with cash.</para>
<para>The first and most important pillar is around trade. We're a nation of 26 million people but we produce enough food for 80 million. So, if we don't engage with the world, if we don't trade with the world, we don't need the farmers or the communities to support them. We've done that through making sure we're digitising our market platforms and our trading platforms to make it easier for farmers to export their goods around the world when we find them the new markets and the market access. Over $300 million has been put aside to achieve that. It's also about putting boots on the ground. Agricultural counsellors in 22 of our high commissions and embassies are getting market access, commodity by commodity. There are also more scientists making sure we get through our risk assessments more quickly so that we can tick off the biosecurity risks that those trading partners want us to remedy before we're able to send that product to them.</para>
<para>We're also protecting our brand through our biosecurity—the second main pillar. Nearly a billion dollars over the last two budgets has been committed to making sure we're protecting our brand with new technologies. The 3D X-ray scanners which will go into our postal services will scan the over 140 million parcels that go through Australia Post every year. We're trialling, with New Zealand, X-rays for baggage so that we will know what's in people's bags before they come to Australia. This is a world-first. In fact, if they don't declare, we will simply fine them. We've lifted the fines from $444 to $2,664 and we have cancelled 14 visas of those that have tried to breach our biosecurity. So it's not just technology; it's also fines.</para>
<para>We're working through a stewardship program and rolling out pilots to reward farmers for the stewardship of their land, which is the third pillar. We're moving into remnant vegetation to reward farmers who, while they have had vegetation management laws placed upon them, can still be rewarded with a payment for that piece of work. We're looking at our supply chains through our modern manufacturing, making sure we go deeper through producing and promoting our products even more. There's also our infrastructure—the $3.5 billion set aside to plumb the nation, to make sure that we have the water infrastructure to grow Australian agriculture. But it's also the innovation, with over $86 million in eight innovation hubs to make sure that our farmers have the tools of the 21st century to adapt. But the most important pillar is the last one, which is our people—our human capital. We are reducing university fees for courses in agriculture by 59 per cent. So we are putting the infrastructure in Australian agriculture— (<inline font-style="italic">Time expired</inline>)</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MOTIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>MOTIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:05</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I seek leave to move the following motion:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the House of Representatives supports a legislative target of net zero emissions by 2050.</para></quote>
<para>Leave not granted.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That so much of standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Leader of the Opposition moving the following motion forthwith:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That the House of Representatives supports a legislative target of net zero emissions by 2050.</para></quote>
<para>This government is frozen in time while the world warms around it. The whole world is gathering in Glasgow, and this lot can't even come up with a policy.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the Member be no longer heard.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the Leader of the Opposition be no further heard.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:10]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>52</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Kelly, C.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>48</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, C. F.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.</p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion. Eight years of denial and delay must end now.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the Member be no longer heard.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the member for McMahon be no further heard.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:15]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>52</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Kelly, C.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>48</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, C. F.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.</p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The question now is that the motion moved by the Leader of the Opposition be disagreed to.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:16] <br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>52</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Kelly, C.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>48</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, C. F.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.</p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Domestic and Family Violence</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs WICKS</name>
    <name.id>241590</name.id>
    <electorate>Robertson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My question is to the Minister for the Environment, representing the Minister for Women. Will the minister update the House on how the Morrison government is supporting victims-survivors of domestic and family violence, including through the new 'escaping violence' payment?</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms LEY</name>
    <name.id>00AMN</name.id>
    <electorate>Farrer</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Robertson for her question and commend her on all the incredible work she does in her electorate, especially during the pandemic. Keeping women and children safe is at the heart of the Morrison government's women's policy agenda—safer in the community, safer online, safer at home. In this year's budget, we announced $1.1 billion to dedicate to women's safety. That's just a down payment on the next national action plan. I say it's a down payment, in spite of the fact that this was the most significant amount, because there's always more work to be done to rise to the challenge of keeping women and families from all walks of life safe and to ensure that every person has the opportunity to live life free of violence, coercion and abuse in all their pernicious forms. Anyone escaping violence, no matter their prior circumstances, faces real anxiety and real challenges—accommodation, schooling, how you're going to pay the bills. There are genuine fears for your personal safety. These are some of the critical areas where help is required, and that's why part of our investment in women's safety is a new $144.8 million escaping violence payment—the first of its kind.</para>
<para>As of tomorrow, 19 October, the escaping violence payment will be available to any person escaping domestic, family and sexual violence. Through our service partners, UnitingCare, the payment, which is worth up to $5,000, will be provided as both cash and direct payments for goods and services, ensuring the financial security of individuals and families as they escape violence and re-establish their lives with appropriate wrap-up support services. The payments are not taxable or reportable, and they help with essential needs, such as bond payments for accommodation, school fees and uniforms, furniture and appliances—the things that people need for safety and stability as they navigate their path away from violence.</para>
<para>While this payment is a critical new initiative, it is only part of this government's response to family and domestic violence, as we work towards the final stages of consultation on the next national action plan to prevent violence against women and their children. Frontline workers, our state and territory partners and non-government organisations are continuing to deliver life-saving circumstances. The safety of women and children in our communities, workplaces and homes is everyone's business, and I know this government and this House are resolute in continuing the work we must do to protect families, women and children in all corners of the country.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Morrison</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Mr Speaker, I ask that further questions be placed on the <inline font-style="italic">Notice Paper</inline>.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS ON INDULGENCE</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Western Australia: Telethon</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr MORRISON</name>
    <name.id>E3L</name.id>
    <electorate>Cook</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I commend the WA telethon, which raised $62 million. That's a record amount raised by the WA telethon. The Commonwealth was obviously pleased to provide $5 million to the WA telethon. More than $400 million has been raised by the WA telethon over its history. Congratulations to all those who participated. I'm sure the Leader of the Opposition would join me in congratulating them.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:21</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I join with the Prime Minister in congratulating all those involved in the WA telethon, including, of course, the <inline font-style="italic">West Australian</inline> newspaper and Kerry Stokes, who always makes a major contribution, and the Mark McGowan government, which donated $10 million. I know that all of the members on this side and, I'm sure, on that side as well were very supportive of the telethon, which has become an institution in WA.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>MOTIONS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>MOTIONS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALBANESE</name>
    <name.id>R36</name.id>
    <electorate>Grayndler</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That so much of standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Leader of the Opposition moving the following motion immediately:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">That the House—</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the government has failed to back a legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) the Prime Minister always does too little, too late, saying he didn't hold a hose during the bushfire crisis, saying it wasn't a race on COVID vaccines, and saying hospital capacity is the responsibility of the states;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) the Prime Minister prefers slogans to leadership, with the Prime Minister claiming electric vehicles will end the weekend, saying the world's biggest battery to store renewable energy is as useful as the Big Banana, and describing renewable energy targets as 'nuts';</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) so great is the dysfunction inside the government, the Prime Minister is allowing climate policy to be set by his Deputy Prime Minister and the National Party; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(e) government members who claim they support a net zero by 2050 target voted against one today, including the Treasurer, the member for Higgins, the member for North Sydney, the member for Mackellar, the member for Wentworth, the member for Reid, the member for Leichhardt, the member for Riverina, and the member for Gippsland; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) therefore condemns the government for voting against the legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050.</para></quote>
<para>This is no longer a government; it's a shambles. It's a shambles whereby we're waiting for the National Party to tell—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The Leader of the Opposition will resume his seat. The Leader of the House has the call.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:24</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the Member be no longer heard.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the Leader of the Opposition be no further heard.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:28] <br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>51</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>48</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, M. M. H.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.</p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BOWEN</name>
    <name.id>DZS</name.id>
    <electorate>McMahon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I second motion. The government has given up even trying to act in the national interest—</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for McMahon will resume his seat. The Leader of the House has the call.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That the Member be no longer heard.</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The question is that the member for McMahon be no further heard.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:30]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>52</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Kelly, C.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>48</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Haines, H. M.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, M. M. H.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Sharkie, R. C. C.</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Steggall, Z.</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to.</p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The question now is that the motion moved by the Leader of the Opposition be disagreed to.</para>
<para> </para>
<para> </para>
</speech>
<division>
          <division.header>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionPreamble">The House divided. [15:33]<br />(The Speaker—Hon. Tony Smith)</p>
            </body>
          </division.header>
          <division.data>
            <ayes>
              <num.votes>53</num.votes>
              <title>AYES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Alexander, J. G.</name>
                <name>Allen, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. J.</name>
                <name>Andrews, K. L.</name>
                <name>Bell, A. M.</name>
                <name>Chester, D. J.</name>
                <name>Conaghan, P. J.</name>
                <name>Connelly, V. G.</name>
                <name>Coulton, M. M.</name>
                <name>Drum, D. K. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Dutton, P. C.</name>
                <name>Entsch, W. G.</name>
                <name>Falinski, J. G.</name>
                <name>Fletcher, P. W.</name>
                <name>Frydenberg, J. A.</name>
                <name>Gee, A. R.</name>
                <name>Gillespie, D. A.</name>
                <name>Goodenough, I. R. </name>
                <name>Hamilton, G. R.</name>
                <name>Hammond, C. M.</name>
                <name>Hawke, A. G.</name>
                <name>Howarth, L. R.</name>
                <name>Hunt, G. A.</name>
                <name>Joyce, B. T. G.</name>
                <name>Kelly, C.</name>
                <name>Leeser, J.</name>
                <name>Ley, S. P.</name>
                <name>Littleproud, D.</name>
                <name>Martin, F. B.</name>
                <name>McCormack, M. F.</name>
                <name>McIntosh, M. I.</name>
                <name>Morrison, S. J.</name>
                <name>Morton, B</name>
                <name>O'Brien, L. S.</name>
                <name>O'Dowd, K. D.</name>
                <name>Pasin, A.</name>
                <name>Pitt, K. J.</name>
                <name>Price, M. L.</name>
                <name>Ramsey, R. E. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Robert, S. R.</name>
                <name>Sharma, D. N.</name>
                <name>Stevens, J.</name>
                <name>Sukkar, M. S.</name>
                <name>Taylor, A. J.</name>
                <name>Tudge, A. E.</name>
                <name>van Manen, A. J.</name>
                <name>Vasta, R. X.</name>
                <name>Wallace, A. B.</name>
                <name>Webster, A. E.</name>
                <name>Wicks, L. E.</name>
                <name>Wilson, R. J.</name>
                <name>Wilson, T. R.</name>
                <name>Zimmerman, T. M.</name>
              </names>
            </ayes>
            <noes>
              <num.votes>45</num.votes>
              <title>NOES</title>
              <names>
                <name>Albanese, A. N.</name>
                <name>Bandt, A. P.</name>
                <name>Bird, S. L.</name>
                <name>Bowen, C. E.</name>
                <name>Burke, A. S.</name>
                <name>Burney, L. J.</name>
                <name>Chesters, L. M.</name>
                <name>Claydon, S. C.</name>
                <name>Conroy, P. M.</name>
                <name>Dick, D. M.</name>
                <name>Dreyfus, M. A.</name>
                <name>Elliot, M. J.</name>
                <name>Fitzgibbon, J. A.</name>
                <name>Freelander, M. R.</name>
                <name>Giles, A. J.</name>
                <name>Gorman, P.</name>
                <name>Hayes, C. P.</name>
                <name>Hill, J. C.</name>
                <name>Husic, E. N.</name>
                <name>Jones, S. P.</name>
                <name>Kearney, G. M.</name>
                <name>Khalil, P.</name>
                <name>King, M. M. H.</name>
                <name>Leigh, A. K.</name>
                <name>McBain, K. L.</name>
                <name>McBride, E. M.</name>
                <name>Mitchell, R. G.</name>
                <name>Mulino, D.</name>
                <name>Murphy, P. J.</name>
                <name>O'Connor, B. P. J.</name>
                <name>Owens, J. A.</name>
                <name>Payne, A. E.</name>
                <name>Plibersek, T. J.</name>
                <name>Rowland, M. A.</name>
                <name>Ryan, J. C. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Shorten, W. R.</name>
                <name>Smith, D. P. B.</name>
                <name>Snowdon, W. E.</name>
                <name>Stanley, A. M. (Teller)</name>
                <name>Templeman, S. R.</name>
                <name>Thistlethwaite, M. J.</name>
                <name>Thwaites, K. L.</name>
                <name>Watts, T. G.</name>
                <name>Wells, A. S.</name>
                <name>Wilson, J. H.</name>
              </names>
            </noes>
            <pairs>
              <num.votes>0</num.votes>
              <title>PAIRS</title>
              <names />
            </pairs>
          </division.data>
          <division.result>
            <body>
              <p class="HPS-DivisionFooter">Question agreed to. </p>
            </body>
          </division.result>
        </division></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Amess, Sir David Anthony Andrew</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Reference to Federation Chamber</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DUTTON</name>
    <name.id>00AKI</name.id>
    <electorate>Dickson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I declare that resumption of debate on the motion relating to the murder of Sir David Amess be referred to the Federation Chamber.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the Leader of the House. I can advise that I spoke with the Speaker of the House of Commons, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, on Saturday afternoon and, on behalf of all members of this House, offered our sincere condolences on the shocking news of the murder of Sir David Amess.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Personal Explanation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
    <electorate>Watson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Mr Speaker, I rise to make a personal explanation.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Does the Manager of Opposition Business claim to have been misrepresented?</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURKE</name>
    <name.id>DYW</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I do. On 24 September, the Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts issued a media release entitled 'Record $10 billion in government support for the creative sector'. In that release the minister claimed that I, along with the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, was 'dead wrong' when I accused him of massively overstating his government support for the arts sector during the early part of the pandemic, in October 2020. Mr Speaker, you will not be surprised to hear that, in his scramble to justify the claim of $10 billion in support for the arts, it is in fact the minister who is dead wrong.</para>
<para>The minister claims analysis published by the Bureau of Communications, Arts and Regional Research backs him up, but, if you look at the research he provided, the $10 billion figure that he says was for the arts includes the following occupations: clothing retailing, footwear retailing, watch and jewellery retailing, architectural services, advertising services, and zoological and botanical gardens operations. These workers would be surprised to learn that they had the attention of the arts minister. It would be good if arts workers received his attention at some point.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Personal Explanation</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Mr Speaker, I seek to make a personal explanation.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Does the member for Bowman claim to have been represented?</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I do, Mr Speaker.</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Please proceed.</para>
</interjection>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Over the last six months, I've been misrepresented by opposition members—and apologies for doing this as a batch. On 11 May, the member for Watson said that I was 'not fit to it be a member of the House' and referred to my vote as being 'tainted' because I was 'trolling and abusing' constituents.</para>
<para>On 12 May, Senator McAllister extensively quoted political opponents, without any substantiation or formal complaint to answer, either then or now.</para>
<para>On 13 May, the member for Dunkley referred to me as 'disgraced and disgraceful', with neither substantiation nor a single complaint to answer.</para>
<para>On 27 May the member for Jagajaga referred to 'inappropriate behaviour', again without any substantiated material.</para>
<para>On 16 June Senator Walsh referred to me as a 'known miscreant' who 'harasses the women in his community' and then the following day stated I have 'a history of trolling and abusing' constituents on Facebook.</para>
<para>On 16 June Senator Green referred to a 'long and proven track record of trolling and abusing' constituents online, but there was no substantiation. She then claimed that a political opponent of mine was forced to 'install CCTV cameras and an electronic security gate' on her home because of me.</para>
<para>On 16 June, Senator Polley referred to 'a long history of trolling and abusing' constituents on Facebook, which has 'undermined the safety and mental health' of an individual.</para>
<para>On 23 June the member for Brand referred to me 'treating women badly, trolling people on Facebook and continuing to behave badly'.</para>
<para>On 23 June, also, the member for Gellibrand said that I had the 'hide' to blame 'appalling trolling, bullying and harassment campaigns online on ADHD'.</para>
<para>On 23 June, the member for Griffith referred to me subjecting locals to 'false claims and social media abuse'.</para>
<para>On 23 June, also, the member for Macquarie said that my conduct 'diminishes the committee, the House and the parliament'.</para>
<para>On 23 June the member for Corangamite said that it establishes 'beyond question a character unfit to represent' and 'the kind of person the member for Bowman was long before he entered the House'. She said I 'viciously attacked female constituents from behind his computer screen'.</para>
<para>On 23 June the member for Lalor said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">He has a record of showing an absolute lack of empathy for the people he represents …</para></quote>
<para>And then she went on to say this:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… good men who respect women … good men with integrity, good men with empathy and good men who would like to see the member for Bowman removed from the committee and removed from this parliament.</para></quote>
<para>On 23 June, again, the member for Cooper said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… the member for Bowman thinks he's entitled to be here in this House …</para></quote>
<para>While there's no mechanism to prevent this hearsay and opinion, I note that not a single element of this communication has amounted to, or is ever likely to amount to, a formal complaint for assessment. I simply ask that these members reflect on this commentary, given evidence, which is now publicly available, that those matters lack any form of independent substantiation.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>COMMITTEES</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>COMMITTEES</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Report</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RICK WILSON</name>
    <name.id>198084</name.id>
    <electorate>O'Connor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works, I present report No. 8 of 2021, <inline font-style="italic">Referrals made June 2021</inline>.</para>
<para>Report made a parliamentary paper in accordance with standing order 39(e).</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RICK WILSON</name>
    <name.id>198084</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—The committee's eighth report of 2021 considers two proposals referred to the committee in June 2021. The total value of the proposed works for the two projects is $87.29 million, with the two projects being undertaken in Townsville and Sydney.</para>
<para>The first is the expansion of the National Sea Simulator at the Australian Institute of Marine Science in Townsville, with an estimated cost of $27.49 million. The National Sea Simulator is a unique, world-class aquarium facility for tropical marine research, which, since its establishment in 2014, has facilitated a significant volume of large-scale, multigenerational studies. The expansion of the National Sea Simulator aims to increase the research capabilities of the Sea Simulator, directly supporting significant research into the long-term sustainability and restoration of the Great Barrier Reef.</para>
<para>The second project is the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation's intermediate-level solid waste storage facility at Lucas Heights in New South Wales. The project has an estimated cost of $59.8 million. ANSTO's existing intermediate-level solid radioactive waste storage facility at Lucas Heights is forecast to reach capacity at 2027. This project will allow ANSTO to expand its storage capacity by at least 10 years, up to 2037, and enable ANSTO to continue its nuclear medicine production without disruption.</para>
<para>The committee would like to extend its thanks to all who gave written and oral evidence to the inquiry. The passion of many Australians who gave evidence was clear. The committee acknowledges their contribution to the ongoing debate surrounding the storage of radioactive waste in Australia.</para>
<para>I would also like to thank both the Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation for their comprehensive presentations. Although the committee was unable to travel to either site to inspect the proposed works, both entities provided sufficient detail in their presentation and briefing to ensure that the committee was able to appreciate the importance and nature of the work. In both cases the committee recommended that it is expedient that the works be carried out.</para>
<para>Since I last spoke in this House on the work of the committee one of our longest-serving members has passed away. Senator Alex Gallacher, as you are aware, passed away on Sunday 29 August after a long battle with lung cancer. The Public Works Committee would like to extend its deep regret at the death of Senator Gallacher, who remained a valuable member of this committee until the very day of his passing. The committee would like to place on the record its appreciation of his service to the work of the committee and to offer its heartfelt sympathy to his family, his wife, Paola, and their four children and grandchildren in their bereavement.</para>
<para>Finally, I'd also like to mention the fantastic work of Ms Pauline Cullen, who has served the Public Works Committee for almost five years. She is not leaving us. She is moving on to a position as a director in the Clerk's office. I wish her all the best for the future and all success going forward.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Privileges and Members' Interests Committee</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Membership</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HK5</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Speaker has received advice from the Chief Opposition Whip that he has nominated Ms Ryan to be a member of the Privileges and Members Interests' Committee in place of Mr Byrne.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BUCHHOLZ</name>
    <name.id>230531</name.id>
    <electorate>Wright</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That Mr Byrne be discharged from the Committee of Privileges and Members' Interests and that, in his place, Ms Ryan be appointed a member of the committee.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>DOCUMENTS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>DOCUMENTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Commonwealth Ombudsman</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Presentation</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HK5</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present a report on the Commonwealth Ombudsman's activities under section 65(6) of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 for the period 1 October to 31 December 2020.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Parliamentary Budget Office</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Presentation</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HK5</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Pursuant to section 65 of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999, I present the annual report of the Parliamentary Budget Office for 2020-21.</para>
<para>Document made a parliamentary paper in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 28 March 2018.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Reports Nos 2 to 6 of 2021-22</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>HK5</name.id>
    <electorate></electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I present Auditor-General Audit reports Nos 2 to 6 for 2021-22. Details of the reports will be recorded in the <inline font-style="italic">Votes and Proceedings</inline>.</para>
<para>Documents made parliamentary papers in accordance with the resolution agreed to on 28 March 2018.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="HWP" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>15:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILKIE</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
    <electorate>Clark</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] After some three years of consultation and achieving the support of key Aboriginal land councils, it would appear that this bill, the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021 is okay, that it's worth supporting. However, what I think about this bill—and in fact what anyone in the House who is not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander heritage thinks—is in some ways quite irrelevant, because the only thing that really matters is what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people think of this bill. It is up to them to decide what good policy is and what their needs are.</para>
<para>To tease that point out a little more: it's been the paternalism of what I might call old white men over 233 years that is at the heart of the problems with public policy and decision-making regarding our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. When you drill down to all the problems and deficiencies and the enduring and chronic disadvantage that has been suffered by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in our country, so much of it goes to that paternalism over hundreds of years. It helps to explain why so many of the indicators remain so bad and remain unaddressed and why year after year in the parliament, when we have the Closing the Gap speeches and lots of hand-wringing, the indicators don't change that much. We're in the practice of, once a year, looking at those indicators—education, employment, health and so on—and then forgetting about them for another year, so many of the problems go unaddressed. I think we should be talking about those stats every day of the year until they get better.</para>
<para>We—people like me and my colleagues—should be ashamed of these indicators every day of the year until they markedly improve, until we can finally stand in the parliament and have a Closing the Gap speech that we can be so proud of and to say, 'We have finally, working together, ensured that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are the equal of the rest of the community of Australians in every other way'; that we won't have to be ashamed of the fact that, for example, the life expectancy of kids aged up to four years in our Indigenous population are twice as likely to die as non-Indigenous children in this country; that we won't have to talk every year about and be ashamed of the fact that Indigenous Australians die on average about 10 years earlier than non-Indigenous Australians in this country; that we won't have to talk every year, it seems, about how when it comes to all chronic diseases, with, I think, the exception only of cancer, Indigenous Australians are so much sicker; that the likelihood of circulatory disease for Indigenous Australians is twice that for non-Indigenous Australians and that among Indigenous Australians the likelihood of kidney disease is 11 times as high as that being experienced by non-Indigenous Australians; and that the suicide rate for Indigenous Australians is double that of the general population.</para>
<para>When it comes to education, only about 60 per cent of Indigenous students in this country finish year 12, compared with almost 90 per cent of non-Indigenous Australians The employment-to-population rate for Indigenous Australians—youth through to retiring age, around mid-60s—is about half the rate for non-Indigenous Australians, which is about three-quarters. The median weekly income for Indigenous Australians is about two-thirds of the median weekly income for non-Indigenous Australians. Indigenous children are about 10 times as likely as non-Indigenous kids to be placed in out-of-home care in this country.</para>
<para>And, of course, so much has been said about justice and incarceration, for as long as anyone can remember, and, frankly, things haven't got any better. Indigenous inmates account for about a quarter of Australia's prison population, even though only about two per cent of Australia's adult population are Indigenous adults. I will say that again: the Indigenous prisoner population throughout all of the jurisdictions in this country is about a quarter of the entire prison population, when about two per cent of Australia's adult population is Indigenous. Equally horrific is the fact that, for children aged 10 to 17 years old, the detention rate in the justice system is 26 times the detention rate for non-Indigenous children.</para>
<para>So who is to blame for this? Who is responsible for this? Well, it is not our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It's not their fault; it's entirely the responsibility of the paternalistic and often old white men—to use that term again—who, for 233 years have been normally thinking they are doing the right thing but just as normally completely missing the mark, not actually sitting down with First Nations people and saying: 'How can we help? What do you need? Please design it for us and we will support you in every possible way to eventually end the enduring and endemic disadvantage that's experienced in this country.'</para>
<para>It's not as though we haven't had the answers at our fingertips over the years. Decades ago the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody did a very thorough examination of the issue and laid out dozens of strong recommendations to start to wind back the shocking prevalence of Aboriginal deaths in custody. But, to this day, none of the significant recommendations have been implemented. We know about justice reinvestment. There are so many clever people out there at the moment researching and coming up with blueprints for effective justice reinvestment to keep people out of the justice system—to improve their lives, to keep them out of prison, to keep them out of being in custody. We know the answers, but we ignore them. We know for a fact that raising the age of criminal responsibility would go quite some way to dealing with the incarceration and detention rate for youth and the way in which that sets those unfortunate young kids on a pathway of bad outcomes.</para>
<para>I lament over 200 years of paternalism from people like me telling our First Nations people what they need instead of asking them, 'What do you need?' and 'How can we support you?' It's in this context that the 2017 First Nations National Constitutional Convention was so important. It was so important that the government, the opposition and all members of the House would get behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart, because there was a wonderful opportunity to listen to first Australians and to finally find out what is needed and how we can help. It is a terrible thing that the government is yet to sign up to a voice to parliament. It's a terrible thing that the Makarrata commission has not been established. These are the sorts of reforms that are needed in this country.</para>
<para>We need a speedy and full implementation of Uluru Statement of the Heart, including—just to be very clear here—a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament. What that looks like should be what First Nations people want it to look like. If they want it to look like what we have in the New Zealand parliament where seats are reserved for the Maori, I will support that. I will support whatever they want that will turn around over 200 years of persecution, disadvantage and shocking policymaking. Regrettably, though, the Uluru Statement from the Heart remains stalled. There is some work and some talk. I note that the minister, who is a good person, is trying to do good things, but the whole thing is stalled. So I again call on the government, in the last days of this parliament: let's lay down some clear markers about what the future looks like. Let's have a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament. Let's have a Makarrata commission. Let's do whatever else we can do. And if we don't have the time to implement the changes in the next couple of months, maybe six months, then at least lay down the markers and have bilateral support for that pathway forward so the next parliament and the next government—whoever it is—knows that they have bilateral support, unanimous support, in the House to bring about the reforms that are necessary.</para>
<para>In closing, I make the point that this is a good bill. It's three years in the making. It does have the support of the big land councils, and that's good. I think it's a credit to everyone who has been involved. Sure, we can always do things better. In fact, I've heard from some constituents that they regret that this matter will be dealt with in such little time today. I assume that there couldn't be more people involved in the debate. But generally it's a good job.</para>
<para>I do take this opportunity to emphasise what I think is a central part of the explanation for the continuing chronic and entrenched disadvantage of First Nations people in this country, and that's the paternalism that has characterised it up until now—too many old, white men making decisions for our First Nations people, instead of sitting down with our wonderful First Nations people and working with them to deliver what they want and what they need. An important step in that direction would be sitting down and saying: 'Right, how do we deliver the Uluru Statement from the Heart? How do we have a constitutionally enshrined, permanent and powerful voice in the parliament? How do we have a commission of some kind to oversee agreement-making and truth-telling?' I call on the government. I know the opposition is onside on this. We just need the government to get on side and then we can go into the next parliament with a unanimous response and maybe start turning these things around. Maybe we won't have to—for the next who knows how many years—put up with more and more of these completely unsatisfactory, shameful reports on closing the gap.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BANDT</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
    <electorate>Melbourne</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In speaking to this, the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021, I want to acknowledge the First Nations traditional owners of this country and pay respects to elders past, present and emerging. I want to make a few brief comments about this bill and the substantial carriage of this bill on behalf of the Greens. It will be taken up in the Senate by Senator Lidia Thorpe, our First Nations spokesperson and a strong and proud Gunnai Gunditjmara and Djab Wurrung woman.</para>
<para>One of the key principles that has to be applied to this bill, and indeed to any piece of legislation in this parliament, which has been reinforced and strengthened as a key pillar of Greens policy, is that everything has to be driven by genuine self-determination of our First Nations people. For too long, as many people in this place have said, there have been decisions made about First Nations people, almost always to their detriment, because this country has a history of oppression and racism that we still have not had the courage to be honest enough to face.</para>
<para>One of the things that we've got to start doing, especially when we're dealing with land rights legislation, like this legislation, is understanding that genuine self-determination must be at the heart of everything we do. We need to begin by telling the truth about the history of violence and dispossession that lies at the heart of this country that we call Australia. It's only when we've begun telling and acknowledging the truth that we can move forward to genuine reconciliation and then strike a treaty, or treaties, with our First Nations people. We need that process. We need that process because otherwise we're never going to be able to move forward as a country. We've got a lot of challenges that we've got to deal with, including dealing with the climate crisis. One of the things that we are hearing very clearly and that we need to understand as a country is that to have true justice in this country, to have true climate justice, we need First Nations justice. In dealing with a land rights bill, which is what this is—especially the most complex set of changes to the land rights act since it first came into force—we need to have self-determination and we need to be driven by a response that listens to First Nations communities and First Nations peoples and the incredible diversity of opinion that exists there, rather than just presuming that there's one single voice. It's a community. It's diverse communities. Of course there are going to be differences of views.</para>
<para>One of the things that is concerning about this bill is that it hasn't been through a committee process and it's not clear why. Consider that this government, during its whole term, has not done that much to progress the cause of treaty, truth and justice for First Nations peoples. In fact, the government has arguably taken it backwards and slowed down progress towards that. When the government introduces a comprehensive bill to amend land rights legislation, First Nations communities have a right to be heard, and one of the ways that that could happen is through a committee process.</para>
<para>This parliament has a good history of using the committee processes to find out if there are unintended problems with bills and if amendments are required. That's something that we should be doing here. Senator Thorpe will make more fully in the Senate the point that there are differences of views, including about some of the provisions in this bill. Maybe they could be dealt with through a proper, comprehensive consultation process, but they need to be addressed if reforms are going to have support, because we can't just mouth 'self-determination' and 'consultation'; we've actually got to put them into practice.</para>
<para>Now, this bill does a number of significant things. There's the establishment of the Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation. There's the streamlining of exploration and mining provisions in the Land Rights Act, something that many First Nations communities feel like they are not heard on and want to be heard on. There's the changing of land administration provisions and there's the aligning of the Aboriginal benefits accounts with the Commonwealth financial framework. One of the things that has become crystal clear to so many people over the last period of this parliament, especially as this week we look at the report that'll be handed down with regard to the Juukan Gorge and we see the systemic and systematic destruction of First Nations heritage and culture by big mining corporations, is that, when it comes to changes to nomination and approval processes but also, in particular, to exploration and mining provisions in the Land Rights Act, we need to make sure everyone gets their say. And so the question here is whether or not this bill should go to a committee process. That's the simple point that is being made: this bill deserves to go through a committee process.</para>
<para>As I said, Senator Thorpe will be making further contributions about this in the Senate, including that we may need to move amendments to this to deal with issues that are raised, but, especially given this government's history, it is not objectionable to ask for the processes of the parliament to be followed. Just because someone raises concerns—they've got the right to do that.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BANDT</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I hear the Labor opposition heckling on this point, but people have the right to raise concerns. It's called democracy and it's called debate. It's called the ability for people to make contributions and for the committee process to do its usual work. That is the point that we're going to be making and making strongly when this bill goes to the Senate.</para>
<para>I thank the House for hearing this contribution, but I hope that it is listened to with a bit more respect, at least from the Labor Party, when the matter goes to the Senate, because we in the Greens are taking a very clear approach. It is time for this country to end the top-down approach to dealing with First Nations people. It is time to genuinely listen and consult. That includes consulting with people whose rights are going to be affected. One of the things that we have seen here in this parliament is Labor and Liberal routinely stitch up deals that hurt First Nations people.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">An honourable member interjecting—</inline></para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BANDT</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I remember sitting here—if the member interjecting wants to interject and defend this, he is more than welcome—when legislation was rushed through this place to ensure that projects like Adani could proceed, even when traditional owners were saying, 'We don't want it.' This place got called together for an urgent hearing because we had to pass legislation, hopefully with no-one complaining until it came in, and the Greens stood up for the First Nations owners and traditional owners as Labor and Liberal tried to take away their land rights.</para>
<para>Whenever you see something come up in here, we have got the right to scrutinise it, because even now—even now—we see it in the Northern Territory with the Beetaloo Basin. We see it with the Adani traditional owners, the W and J clan. We see First Nations communities and traditional owners come to this place to say, 'No, we don't want this mining or this extraction on our land that is going to risk our water and make the climate crisis worse and remove our connection with country.' Time after time after time Labor and Liberal sit in here to do dodgy deals and rush legislation through parliament to take away people's land rights, so excuse me, Labor Party, if, when it comes to having one of the most significant reforms to land rights legislation, we want to ask some questions and apply a bit of scrutiny, rather than just being the Liberal Party's lapdogs.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BANDT</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, they are in government, the Labor Party interjects, which is why we need to scrutinise what they do. They have got an appalling track record on protecting and advancing the rights of First Nations people in this country, so it would be nice if we didn't get heckled for saying we want to scrutinise this bill when this government has such a terrible record, including with the Labor Party's support, on taking away the land rights of First Nations owners and traditional owners of this country. Yes, we will be looking closely at this bill, as every member of this parliament should. Labor and Liberal have a terrible reputation for siding with the big mining corporations over traditional owners and rushing legislation through this place to make the climate crisis worse by taking away First Nations owners' rights, so I will not be lectured about applying scrutiny to government legislation. That is what we are here for. At any time the government comes in here and says, 'We want to streamline provisions of the law to give mining corporations a greater say and amend land rights,' we're entitled to ask questions about it and we will ask questions about it.</para>
<para>Opposition members interjecting—</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BANDT</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I hope that there is a rigorous committee process with respect to this legislation. If you want to heckle about something, Labor Party, and you want to consider your position, consider your position on coming in here and legislating to take away land rights and the rights of traditional owners to stand up to the mining corporations, which you do time after time after time. Enough is enough. There will be no climate justice in this country without First Nations justice, and that includes giving people the right to say no to coal and gas and oil exploration on their land. I know the Labor Party is up to its neck in donations from the gas corporations, just as the Liberal Party is, but that's no excuse. That's no excuse for not applying the scrutiny we need to ensure that self-determination becomes the key principle of everything we do in this country when it comes to our First Nations peoples.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr COLEMAN</name>
    <name.id>241067</name.id>
    <electorate>Banks</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank members for their contributions to the debate on the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Economic Empowerment) Bill 2021. It's a great privilege to provide the summing up of this historic bill to amend the Northern Territory land rights act to empower Aboriginal people to maximise the economic future of their families and communities for generations to come. I remind the House that this bill was introduced just two days after the 55th anniversary of the Gurindji walk-off, an event now woven into the fabric of this nation. I want to take this opportunity to acknowledge the late Mr Wavehill, Mudburra elder, father, educator, artist and activist, who passed away on the same day this bill was introduced to parliament. Mr Wavehill stood with Mr Lingiari and many others during the walk-off to demand the return of his land. Their seven-year struggle paved the way for land rights in the Northern Territory.</para>
<para>The passing of the iconic land rights act in 1976 was a great moment of bipartisanship in our parliament, and I am pleased that this spirit of bipartisanship remains as we look beyond party politics to recognise the intrinsic value of these amendments. The centrepiece of the reforms is the establishment of the new Northern Territory Aboriginal Investment Corporation, an Aboriginal controlled body that will be able to use funds derived from the ABA to strategically and proactively seize and generate economic and social investment opportunities. The new corporation will invest in projects that will grow wealth, create jobs and support sustainable Aboriginal economies in the Northern Territory for the long term. For the first time, decisions about investments and beneficial payments will shift from Canberra to the Northern Territory and from government to Aboriginal leaders.</para>
<para>In addition to these momentous changes, this bill also enables other mechanisms for activating the potential of Aboriginal land. Current processes relating to exploration and mining under the land rights act can be unnecessarily time-consuming and costly for all stakeholders. The amendments have been developed after extensive consultations with peak industry bodies, the land councils and the Northern Territory government. I'm confident they will streamline exploration and mining processes to create clarity and build the confidence of investors. Importantly, the rights of traditional owners, including for protected sacred sites, are maintained.</para>
<para>Finally, there is a package of land administration amendments which strengthen Aboriginal control over decision-making, address operational gaps and remove unused provisions in the act. Of most significance here are the reforms which support and standardise the community controlled township leasing model in the land rights act and provide for greater local decision-making on Aboriginal land to deliver housing, business and government services outcomes that meet the needs of the local community. Aboriginal Territorians have asked for these changes through their land councils, and the reforms have been co-designed in partnership over the last 3½ years.</para>
<para>This is an important day for Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory, as they see their ideas to modernise the land rights act take the next big step to becoming a reality. This is an important day for Aboriginal families, communities and businesses in the Northern Territory, as they see this commitment to grow Aboriginal enterprise and jobs and improve the intergenerational transfer of wealth for Aboriginal families and communities. It is an important day for the parliament, as we seize this opportunity to support the most far-reaching changes to the land rights act since it was enacted in 1976.</para>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a second time.</para>
<para>Message from the Governor-General recommending appropriation announced.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Third Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr COLEMAN</name>
    <name.id>241067</name.id>
    <electorate>Banks</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a third time.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a third time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="7G6" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JONES</name>
    <name.id>A9B</name.id>
    <electorate>Whitlam</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to say at the outset that we'll be moving a second reading amendment at the conclusion of my comments, so my comments today will go to the second reading amendment and to the bill. Labor will be supporting the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021. The three amendments it makes to treasury laws are relatively minor and not controversial as far as they go. That said, the second reading amendment that will be moved, and which has been circulated in my name, highlights some specific failings of this government which I will come to in due course. Before I do that, I want to go through the bill and why Labor will support it.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 relates to the collection of data from companies operating in the gig economy by the Australian tax office. It implements a measure recommended by the Black Economy Taskforce some two years ago and is aimed at ensuring electronic platform operators pay the correct amount of tax. Some of those platform operators argued during this inquiry that the data-gathering requirements were too onerous. We did not agree. We took the same view as the Tax Institute—that the platform providers are well placed to collect such data. I'm pleased that the majority of the committee which inquired into this bill concurred with Labor's view.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 amends the financial complaints authority act to facilitate the closure of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. The tribunal ceased operations in December last year and stopped accepting new cases in November 2018, so this bill relates to the transfer of information that the tribunal had over to the new body, AFCA, which now handles complaints about superannuation. It is nothing more than housekeeping, and we support those provisions.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 removes the $250 non-deductible threshold for taxpayers' work-related self-education expenses from next financial year. This is a welcome but minor change that will make things a touch easier for workers to train themselves up. Unfortunately, it's a paltry effort which represents the sum total of the Morrison government's plan to address the burgeoning skills crisis that is staring them in the face. It's not like this crisis is flying under the radar. Just last week, Infrastructure Australia issued the government its loudest possible warning. It says that, within two years, one in three skilled positions needed to build this nation's infrastructure will go unfilled. Just think about that. Over the course of the next few days, members of the National Party are going to press-gang the Liberal Party to accept billions and billions of dollars in untested infrastructure projects to assist them to grease through some media commitments ahead of the Glasgow climate change summit. Wouldn't it be extraordinary if, but for the want of workers, those projects could not go ahead or, if they do, they'll go ahead at exceptionally inflated prices?</para>
<para>That's 105,000 unfilled job vacancies for a huge variety of skilled jobs—electricians, painters and joiners, engineers and geologists, architects, and the list goes on. These people are quite literally building the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. That's billions of dollars of infrastructure projects we desperately need that either are going to be slowed down or won't be able to proceed at all because of the government's short-sightedness and incompetence on the issue of skills and workforce development. This warning is coming from the government's own independent infrastructure adviser, whose sole purpose is to keep our infrastructure-building pipeline on track to ensure that we don't have a stop and start, and so that we can ensure that the desperately needed economic infrastructure to build the recovery and get the economy whirring again is built and delivered on time. It simply cannot happen unless you have a workforce which is capable of doing it, and yet Infrastructure Australia advises that there are literally thousands of vacancies that will not be able to be filled. This warning has not been heeded by the government. That's just one sector of the economy, and it's coming at us in two to three years time.</para>
<para>As any member of this chamber will know if they've been listening to small businesses in their electorate, particularly in the hospitality sector, the skills crisis is already upon us. Whether it's bars, cafes, food and beverage establishments or fast-food stores, right across the hospitality industry, in accommodation services, there is a desperate shortage of skilled workers. The backpackers aren't filling those jobs as they once did, and it's uncertain when they will be able to. It certainly won't happen anytime this year, and it's unlikely to happen anytime in the near future. This applies to hospitality workers, retail workers and building and construction industry workers. If you cannot get a plumber, an electrician or a carpenter to your house to do a desperately needed repair at a decent price or to do that renovation that you've been thinking about throughout the lockdown, there's a simple reason for it: government failure. Government has failed to invest in skills, in apprentices and trainees, and every Australian household is paying the price, with the cost of renovation and simple repairs going up and up and up.</para>
<para>There is an answer. People used to come from the rest of the world to study it here in Australia. It's called TAFE. But successive coalition governments, with an absolute abject hatred of TAFE, have ripped the guts out of the system such that it will struggle to meet the needs of a growing economy. There's a fashionable view among some who sit opposite that the crisis is something new, brought on by the need to close borders during the pandemic. They no doubt agree with the New South Wales Premier, who is suggesting that we import workers from overseas in numbers roughly equal to the population of Perth to solve the problem. Let me tell you: they're having themselves on.</para>
<para>First of all, there was a crisis before the pandemic. In this government's first eight years, the number of apprenticeships fell by over 100,000 places. Every year, we have seen fewer and fewer apprentices and trainees in training. It's on the heads of those opposite, and Australian households are paying the price of this today. In other words, if those opposite had done nothing, we would have had a fighting chance of filling the skilled vacancies that Infrastructure Australia is now warning about. But they didn't do nothing; they cut places, and now it's this nation's workers and businesses who are paying the price.</para>
<para>Then there's a second issue. You can't simply import 400,000 workers at the drop of a hat. I'm familiar with the accommodation situation for hospitality workers in the Illawarra and the South Coast. They are met with a twin crisis: a workforce shortage and a housing crisis. Even if the government were able to find workers somewhere in the rest of Australia or the rest of the world and bring them to our region, there's nowhere for them to stay. We have an accommodation crisis and we have a skills crisis. It is upon us and it is choking the economic recovery, and all this mob over here can do is play parlour games as if, on those benches opposite, you have the government and the opposition in the one party room. These challenges are far too big to be subject to the hostage games of the National Party and the internal bickering and squabbling and incompetence that is the coalition government.</para>
<para>What we actually need to do is to invest in the long-term industrial future of this country by training local workers. The pandemic is not an excuse to import workers at the expense of reskilling local workers. In a few months time, there will be hundreds of thousands of kids who will be leaving our schools with the hope of finding a job, an apprenticeship or a traineeship. We don't have the training places to meet their needs and aspirations.</para>
<para>My electorate of Whitlam is a perfect example of why, if anything, the need for investment in skills and training is more urgent than ever. Over the pandemic, over 10½ thousand workers in the Illawarra lost their jobs. I hope, as the economy starts to open up again, the overwhelming majority of them will find their way back into full-time employment, some of them, perhaps, going back into part-time employment. We want each and every one of them to find their way back into a job, because we know that there is no economic recovery unless we are bringing all of those people along with us and leaving nobody behind.</para>
<para>We have 10½ thousand workers who are, in many cases, going to need retraining. Who's going to do it? This government has ripped the guts out of TAFE, weakening its capacity to retrain workers to meet the economic needs of recovery. We have had over 800 TAFE teachers lose their jobs over the last eight years on this government's watch. That's more than 100 TAFE teachers each year—each year less than the year before. In my own electorate, they've closed down an entire campus at Dapto, one of the biggest, fastest-growing suburbs in my electorate. It will be called a city within a few years time, and it doesn't have a TAFE. The TAFE has been closed down on this government's watch. We've seen a 20 per cent fall in the number of skilled training places available over the last eight years.</para>
<para>It's a pretty sorry record, when you look at it: 800 fewer TAFE teachers, the closure of TAFE campuses in my electorate and right around the country, and a 20 per cent fall in the number of skilled training places available to young Australians leaving school or Australians seeking to re-enter the workforce. That's what happens when you hollow out the skills and training system—you also hollow out the industrial capacity of this country and you hollow out the future of our workers. You imperil the economic recovery from a once-in-100-years pandemic. It's for this reason that I felt it necessary that we move the second reading amendments. This bill has all the right headings but not enough substance, particularly in the area of reskilling and retraining as we recover from the pandemic.</para>
<para>Imagine how those 10½ thousand workers in my electorate feel today. Do they look at the coalition and think, 'There's a Prime Minister and a government that have got my back'? No, they don't. They're not hearing from this government, 'We'll get more training places so you can get back into the workforce.' They're not hearing from this government, 'We want you to grab those job vacancies that industry needs to fill.' All they're hearing from the Liberals is a plan to import skilled workers from overseas to do jobs that can and should be done by locals.</para>
<para>Don't get me wrong: a level of skilled immigration is an important component in our economic growth, and I welcome it. But it can't be the only answer. It's a pretty lazy answer, isn't it? We don't oppose the removal of the $350 per annum threshold that is contained within the bill, but what we do oppose is this government's abject failure to confront the skills crisis. The answer cannot just be, 'Let's import workers from overseas.' That's laziness and that is incompetence. This government is always making decisions for the short term and only ever making a decision after it's way too late. Nothing can crystallise the approach of this government more than that issue. When confronted with a crisis, they do nothing until it's absolutely too late—always looking for the silver bullet in the form of a marketing catchphrase, never prepared to do the hard yards, and always putting local workers, local industry and skills training last. I predict that, come the next election, Australians are going to hear a lot of the tired old lines of those opposite about cranes in the sky and getting workers back to work. Everybody wants to see that. But what you won't hear from the Liberals and the National Party is what they are going to do to train the workers in those cranes and on those building sites and the generation of workers who are going to be needed to repair or renovate your house. Prices are going to go up and up and up, and the opportunity for young Australians and older Australians who are seeking a second chance is going backwards because of this government's abject failure on skills, apprentices and training.</para>
<para>With those very brief comments, I will formally move the second reading amendment in my name, which has been circulated. I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that the Government has:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) driven growth in insecure work, including through the gig economy, leaving Australians earning less and suffering worse conditions at work;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) failed to adequately combat multinational tax evasion and provide tax transparency;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) mishandled reforms to superannuation, leaving Australians in bad superannuation funds and damaging their retirement prospects; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) done little to improve Australian workers' capacity to improve their skills".</para></quote>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the amendment seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Kearney</name>
    <name.id>LTU</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the amendment.</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>If it suits the House, I will state the question in the form that the amendment be disagreed to.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr STEVENS</name>
    <name.id>176304</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the second reading amendment to the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021. Before I address the substance of the bill I will make a few comments based on the contribution of the member who spoke prior to me, the member for Whitlam, who has turned this into a discussion about investing in skills. I'm very happy to have a debate about that and to talk about what our government is doing when it comes to supporting the skilling of Australians, particularly in my home state of South Australia. About 12 months ago I was lucky enough to have the Treasurer come and visit my electorate, soon after the 2020 budget. I think that was October. We had the opportunity to visit a substantial infrastructure project in the heart of my electorate, the Magill Road and Portrush Road intersection. That was a day when a lot of workers were onsite. The Treasurer, the South Australian Premier, the South Australian Minister for Infrastructure and I visited that site to see the progress. We spoke to some of the people working there—the tradespeople in the roles that of course come with a major infrastructure project like that nearly $100 million intersection redevelopment. The message from those workers was, 'Thank you so much for the investment that the Commonwealth and state governments are making in infrastructure projects and the government stimulus expenditure being undertaken.'</para>
<para>That expenditure was being undertaken to support the economy through a difficult period when, because of the challenges of the coronavirus, we had to put in place some necessary health restrictions that meant that large elements of our economy, particularly the private sector elements, were not able to operate to their usual standards. The government stimulus meant that we were able to step in and fill the breach. Respected economic forecasters—the Reserve Bank and Treasury, no less—believed there was potential in this country for unemployment to increase to double digits, over 10 per cent, soon after we had to put the necessary health restrictions in place. Of course, we've seen that that didn't transpire, thankfully—thanks to us as a government and thanks to the people of Australia. The Labor Party seemed very disappointed in that—that we didn't have an extreme increase in unemployment—and now they're complaining in the reverse, for some reason: that we can't get enough skilled workers. Well, that is a problem, but it's a much better problem to have than the other way around, where there are skilled workers who can't get jobs in our economy. I will just reflect on the situation in South Australia when it comes to skills and training, because the member for Whitlam talked about TAFE and talked about apprenticeships and traineeships.</para>
<para>Firstly, the situation has been very bright in South Australia in recent years. We are seeing record increases in the number of apprenticeships and traineeships in the South Australian economy, thanks to the partnership between the Commonwealth and South Australian Liberal governments. But I remember all too well six years ago, around 2015, when the then state Labor government made some debilitating changes to the way in which vocational education and training was funded in my home state of South Australia. It absolutely decimated the industry led registered training organisations—organisations that are best placed to know what the skills shortages are and to train people appropriately for those opportunities in those sectors. I'm talking about organisations like the Motor Traders Association, providing training for motor mechanics; the Australian Hotels Association, training cooks and chefs; and the Civil Contractors Federation, training people in civil engineering and earthmoving et cetera. These are people from the industry with training needs who are very happy if they can have partnerships with government to provide that training for skills that they know their industry needs.</para>
<para>The Labor government in South Australia basically ended that overnight, deciding that it would divert all funding in that sector back into the TAFE network. There's no problem with the TAFE network whatsoever—I see some excellent outcomes from TAFE education—but to say to someone like the AHA, the Civil Contractors Federation or the Motor Traders Association, 'You're not best placed to train people for your industry, even though you've been doing it for decades and decades, and we're going to end the funding that we've provided to you to do that,' was absolutely appalling. We were seeing the impact of that in the poor training outcomes and shortages of key trades and traineeships that were needed for the roles that the industry groups knew their sector needed. That, thankfully, has been changed substantially since we've had a change of government in South Australia. Equally, as a federal government and a state government we're investing record amounts into training. So the whole premise of this second reading amendment couldn't be further from the truth, certainly not in my home state of South Australia.</para>
<para>Equally importantly, there are a couple of key elements to the substance of this bill—which I note those opposite are still supporting—that I want to make some brief remarks on. The first is in schedule 1, bringing in new obligations on the share economy or the gig economy—those businesses that operate third-party platforms that bring people together in a marketplace. Of course, as Liberals we support that and think it's excellent that new technological solutions are being found to create more efficient markets. All of us in in this chamber probably have experiences with a wide variety of platforms that we can now use on our mobile phones to access services. Some of those involve a marketplace where there's a buyer and a seller, and they are just providing the online marketplace and collaboration between a buyer and a seller. They also have all the information that is relevant for the ATO to be able to understand what transactions are happening on those platforms. I think it is really important that we pass this measure to bring in place that obligation to make sure that the ATO is in receipt of that sort of important information which will place the ATO in a position to make sure that it is adequately capturing and has the full view it needs of what's happening in that part of the economy.</para>
<para>Some of these platforms can be hosted offshore, and it's very important that in these changes we make it clear that whether the platform happens to be hosted overseas or in this country, no matter where that is, if they're undertaking transactions in this country there's an obligation to provide the Australian Taxation Office with the sort of information that it needs to make sure that everyone is paying their fair share of tax. As a Liberal I'd like to see as little tax as possible in our economy, but one of the fundamental principles is fairness and that we have a tax system that is as broadly based as possible. That means that the amount of taxation on everyone can be as low as possible. We don't want to have a situation where in this sector of the economy, which is emerging and growing so rapidly, there is a risk that we won't be capturing the fair share of tax that is obliged to be paid under Australian laws by people operating on those platforms. It may be at times that some aren't fully aware of their tax obligations, and the ATO is very good at working with people to understand what their obligations are. But we want to make sure the ATO gets access to this important information so that they can do their job in this section of the economy like they do in the rest of our economy. This is no different from what happens in the bricks-and-mortar businesses, which have those obligations. We want to make sure the same obligations are in place in the gig economy and the virtual economy. My understanding is that in the EU and the UK very similar measures are being put in place in their tax codes, and I'm sure this is something that we will see replicated by and large across the planet.</para>
<para>These major platforms can be resistant to individual governments putting in place necessary measures for us to properly collect our fair share of tax and also understand what sorts of transactions are happening in our economies. Sometimes they claim that these burdens are high on them, because they aren't the same requirements in other jurisdictions and they've got to change the way they might operate their platform in one jurisdiction or the other. Well, the evidence seems clear that this is going to be happening across the globe. Frankly, these platforms are doing very well—and good luck to them; they're making a lot of money—but in no way, shape or form is it acceptable for them to believe that they don't have the same responsibility, if they're going to operate in our economy, to make sure that they're providing the sort of information that other businesses are required to provide in order to make sure we are adequately taxing transactions out there in the marketplace.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 covers the repeal of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal or the shift of jurisdiction over those complaints from that tribunal to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, AFCA, who I had a little bit to do with via some constituent matters in my first few years in this place. I think it's very sensible to have this sort of efficiency and move this process into AFCA. These changes in schedule 2 effectively fix the tail end of that transition, which has already occurred. My understanding is that there are two elements to this. One is that there are a couple of matters that are still outstanding and did originate in the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. It is clear in the legislation that, for the purposes of those outstanding matters, they now come back to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. Of course, all the work that was done by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal—all the records that they've kept et cetera—should be appropriately transferred across to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. If they're going to be providing this mechanism into the future, it of course makes perfect sense that they hold the records of the agency that previously undertook that.</para>
<para>In schedule 3 we have what I think has been described as some sensible house cleaning around the $250 prescribed education expense deduction. My understanding is that this is a measure that was brought in way back in 1975. It relates to self-education expenses and the threshold before you can claim deductions that equally these days are simply offset by other expenses against that threshold. This just makes it a lot easier for people to do their tax return, because they don't have to provide all this information that is now, in many cases, highly unnecessary given people are not receiving the deductibility for that first amount but equally are claiming other deductions against that amount. It's effectively netting out to nothing. My understanding is that this will come into effect in the 2022-23 tax year, and it's just a sensible way making life easier for people who are undertaking self-education. They won't have this unnecessary complexity in their tax returns when they are lodging them. They won't have to deal with what is a very significant legacy going back all the way to 1975.</para>
<para>Having made at the beginning of my remarks those comments about skills and training, I reiterate that we are a government that is passionate about investing in skilling Australians and making sure that we are training Australians—young Australians in particular—for the job opportunities of the future. There are skills shortages in this country right now. One of those reasons is that, of course, we don't have the skilled migration intake being undertaken, but another one is that this government is investing so comprehensively in infrastructure and in stimulating our economy. That, of course, is doing what it's meant to do, which is creating jobs. It is a problem to have skills shortages, but it is a much better problem to have skills shortages than to have high unemployment—people with skills who can't get a job.</para>
<para>Nonetheless, we will make sure that as a government we continue to invest in training our next generation. We will keep working with the industry sectors to understand from them what the current requirements for training are and what the requirements of the future will be, because there are exciting emerging industries that will need tens of thousands of trained workers into the future. In my home state the defence sector is a very good example of that, where we have made significant decisions to invest in naval shipbuilding, centred in Adelaide. There will be thousands if not 10,000 or more jobs in naval shipbuilding over the years to come across the country—centred in Adelaide but across the country—throughout the supply chains, which will be in every state and territory. Those are going to require existing skills, but there will be skills that are not yet in our economy that we will need to train people in, because they are new roles that are providing an exciting future for the next generation of Australians.</para>
<para>On that note, I commend the bill to the House and I thank the Treasurer and everyone who has done such excellent work more broadly on these budget measures. I'm proud to be a part of a government that is investing in skilling the next generation of young Australians.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:51</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr MULINO</name>
    <name.id>132880</name.id>
    <electorate>Fraser</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak to the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021 and, in particular, to support the second reading amendment moved by the shadow Assistant Treasurer. As speakers on this bill have pointed out in the debate so far, this bill has three schedules. I wish to focus my remarks today on the first of those schedules, which deals with a new requirement for gig economy companies to provide information on transactions made through their platform to the Australian Taxation Office. In particular, I want to draw attention to the first element of the second reading amendment, which is that this government 'has driven growth in insecure work, including through the gig economy, leaving Australians earning less and suffering worse conditions at work'.</para>
<para>I want to focus on schedule 1, which received the most comment of all of the schedules in this bill when this was reviewed by the Senate committee. Most were in general agreement with this schedule, but I think where the opposition stands is with those who made the observation that this schedule doesn't go anywhere near far enough. The Tax Institute of Australia expressed the view—and this was a view shared by the committee—that, as digital native companies, electronic platform operators are well placed to collect the data required to comply with this schedule. They indicated that the sharing economy platforms 'are well equipped to collect, store and report the data required under the TPRS'.</para>
<para>Labor senators and indeed members of the opposition in this place support this measure, but we have made the broader point that it is a missed opportunity to examine the way in which legislation and regulation more broadly deals with the gig economy. Everybody should of course be paying their fair share of tax. And, of course, the ATO requires sufficient information to be provided to it in a timely way and information of a sufficient quality in order for it to do its job. But there is a broader and fast-evolving issue that relates to a burgeoning number of workers in a part of the economy where there are too many people who aren't benefiting from flexibility but rather are experiencing poor wages and poor conditions and all too often are experiencing these poor wages and poor conditions outside of the visibility of regulators and indeed outside of the visibility of this place. If the government is willing to take steps to regulate the gig economy when it comes to taxation and when it comes to providing better information to the ATO, why isn't this government willing to deal with the very substantive issue of worker pay and conditions in the gig economy—an issue which members on this side of the House have raised time and time again over recent years but which the government has not seen fit to look at at all?</para>
<para>I want to quote a couple of the organisations and individuals that provided evidence to the Senate committee, because they provide a very compelling insight into some of the downsides of the gig economy. Later, I will make some observations on its productivity gains, because there are many upsides to the gig economy. But, while accepting those upsides, we have to deal appropriately with the risks that can also come with technological innovation and that can all too often fall on those least well placed to deal with it.</para>
<para>The secretary of the Transport Workers Union made the following observation:</para>
<quote><para class="block">… this bill …is like a kick in the guts to the thousands of workers in the food delivery, rideshare and parcel delivery sectors of the gig economy.</para></quote>
<para>He continued:</para>
<quote><para class="block">This bill does nothing to limit the ability of companies to evade tax responsibilities in our country. What it does do is set a tragic double standard…</para></quote>
<para>Again, what we see here today is a sensible enough measure on its own, but, when looked at in the broader frame of government regulation, it is a failure to address the need for broader regulation of the sector.</para>
<para>The committee heard from the Australian Services Union, who shared this broad perspective, saying that the bill fell short in examining at all the need to deal in a more functional and effective way from a regulatory perspective with wages and conditions in the gig economy. The secretary of that union said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">We are supportive of the taxation law amendments being proposed to create greater regulation and transparency of the gig economy … We just wish that there was similar regulation and transparency about minimum wages and conditions in these platforms.</para></quote>
<para>Workers who work in the sector made some very compelling statements to the Senate inquiry. Indeed, one doesn't need to look too far to find similar observations being made in a range of other forums. One person was Ms Rosalina Pirozzi, a rideshare driver, who described the lack of action on a broader scale as 'heartbreaking'. She said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I don't think it's fair … it's very unfair… Workers' rights are not being addressed at the moment—</para></quote>
<para>and—</para>
<quote><para class="block">I've got no super, no sick pay and no workers comp …</para></quote>
<para>That sums it up. There are too many workers who are taking on a great deal of risk and a great deal of regulatory burden onto their own shoulders, by essentially setting up their own company, but who, in doing so, are having to lose core conditions that so many of the rest of us take for granted.</para>
<para>Again, in very compelling evidence, Mr Ashley Moreland talked about his experience. He said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I actually found myself in an accident—I sustained an injury—only 2½ years ago … because of the … high feelings of pressure that you're under to make these deliveries as quickly as possible, knowing that every single step of the way—from the time you accept the trip on the app to the time when you race into the restaurant, making do with traffic rules if you can—is monitored and noted against your profile and recorded.</para></quote>
<para>So, yes, there are gains from these platforms for us, the users—and I've used Uber Eats extensively over the last months of the lockdown—but we should of course always bear in mind that there is a person on the other end who is adding to our comfort and who is providing all of these goods and services to us. The committee also heard from Mr Jason Ward from the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, who suggested:</para>
<quote><para class="block">While CICTAR supports the concept of this legislation, there are concerns that the reporting requirements will be unfairly passed on to workers. In many cases, so-called 'gig workers' are already struggling to make a decent income. As is already the case in several jurisdictions, the Australian Government needs to take a closer look at regulating platform companies to ensure basic labour standards and increased transparency of multinational transactions.</para></quote>
<para>I want to make some broad observations on the gig economy. I do believe that the gig economy, on balance, is a significant gain in productivity across our society and across our economy. Robert Wright described the gig economy as 'the biggest change in the American workforce in over a century'. It's already a huge part of the economy and it is forecast to grow significantly. Mastercard estimated that the global gig economy generated approximately US$204 billion in gross volume in 2018 and that this would more than double to US $455 billion by 2023. Of course, Australia will be caught up in these broad global trends. In 2015, the World Bank found that, by some measures, 40 per cent of US workers would be in non-standard jobs by the year 2020.</para>
<para>What are some of the productivity gains? Of course, the gig economy, the share economy, can see shared infrastructure and infrastructure utilisation at high rates. This can be a good thing in that it allows scarce resources to be used more efficiently. It can allow for greater individualisation of services, and of course any of us who have used share platforms, gig platforms, knows that the service standards for individuals using those platforms can indeed be significantly higher than was able to be offered by the means with which companies connected with consumers under old platforms. It can provide for more timely services and on some occasions for an effective surge capacity.</para>
<para>But it's important to note that all of these platforms which rely upon incredibly sophisticated IT, which rely upon incredibly sophisticated artificial intelligence, which rely upon incredibly sophisticated telecommunications, in addition to all of this science fiction technology rely upon people. In addition to all of these incredible AI algorithms housed in Silicon Valley, in addition to all of these telecommunications signals being bounced around the world, being bounced out to space and back, we should never forget that, at the end of all of this incredible technology, there is a person who is actually delivering the pizza from a restaurant to our house or there is a person who is actually taking us on a car trip from point A to point B. I feel that all too often we talk about the incredible productivity gains of this sector—and it is true that there are gains—but we forget about the person who is just as important and just as integral to making all of this work as the incredible telecommunications and AI and computing advances. Without that person actually physically delivering the meal or driving us around, this would essentially amount to nought. That's why it's absolutely critical that we as a society and, indeed, as a parliament think harder about how we share the benefits of all of this technology, because at the moment we don't really think about that at all.</para>
<para>What are the downsides of the gig economy? At the moment the downsides can fall under three broad categories. One I would classify as risk transfer, another would be wages and conditions and the third would be a lack of transparency. On the first, risk transfer, I would argue that a large part of the gig economy is transferring risk from these major multinational corporations to individual workers, who essentially have to set up what are small businesses and take on an incredible amount of demand-side risk themselves. That's all well and good if it's done in a fair, balanced and voluntary way. But all too often we find people are doing that work in a way that makes them incredibly stressed. Sometimes they're earning less than the minimum wage and are having to bear incredible regulatory burdens themselves, so one has to seriously question whether the risk transfer is appropriately balanced in the way that it's set up at the moment.</para>
<para>The second, wages and conditions, is clearly another downside. It takes two forms, in my opinion. One is that basically gig workers all too often, in the way that their employment arrangements are structured, are denied sick leave entitlements, automatic payments into pension schemes, appropriate occupational health and safety protections, portable entitlements—many of the things that we take for granted. Again, in some contexts it's appropriate for people maybe to trade off some of these benefits for greater flexibility or for greater hourly remuneration. But one has to ask whether the balance is right in the gig economy. The other component of working conditions is the remuneration, but there's not a lot of transparency of this component. If one looked at a study by the Economic Policy Institute in the US, it estimated that Uber drivers earned an average of US$9.21 per hour after netting off expenses, which was less than the minimum wage in many jurisdictions in the United States. In evidence provided recently by Uber to a parliamentary inquiry, they indicated that, at peak times in Sydney, Uber drivers could expect to earn around $21.55 an hour, and it was pointed out to them at that inquiry that the minimum wage for casuals was $24.80. Uber responded by saying that people who were earning $21.55 could be doing other things at the same time in between jobs. How realistic is that given that somebody would be working at peak time trying to fight traffic conditions to deliver as many meals as they possibly could?</para>
<para>That dovetails into the third problem at the moment, which is that we don't really know what's going on in too much of the gig economy. Whenever we ask ministers in this place questions about minimum wages and conditions in the gig economy or more broadly, they say, 'Oh, it's complicated.' Well, it's complicated and non-transparent because of the way that we've chosen to deal with it. What we find is that it actually takes academic studies even to make a guess of how many workers are earning the minimum wage. What we find at the moment is that regulators, frankly, can't pin down how many workers are earning the minimum wage and, for those who aren't earning the minimum wage specifically, what trade-offs they've made and how voluntary and meaningful those trade-offs were.</para>
<para>I want to reiterate that I do believe the gig economy is a significant gain for our society, for consumers. I do believe that it is a technological marvel. I do believe that it is going to grow and that on balance that's a good thing. But, as I said earlier, this technological marvel that combines incredible advances in computing power, artificial intelligence and telecommunications, and that spans so many fields of technology, ultimately requires a person to provide a service. It requires a person to deliver a meal, to drive us from point A to point B. We need to make sure that we respect their role in the economy and that we have a full understanding of the deal they're getting.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VAN MANEN</name>
    <name.id>188315</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm more than happy to disagree to the amendment put by the members opposite. Listening to the comments made by the member for Fraser just then and by others in this House today around these issues, I note with particular interest the discussion of the lack of skills, training and support to business. I'd like to remind those opposite that over the last little while there have been 50 per cent wage subsidies, there's been funding for 100,000 new apprentices and trainees, and there have been up to 450,000 JobTrainer places for school leavers and jobseekers to upskill.</para>
<para>We regularly hear in this place about the lack of skills and training or the lack of apprentices and opportunities. Well, I can say quite safely, from my experiences in the past seven or eight weeks as I have been out in my electorate talking to businesspeople and engaging with the community, that they are concerned about the lack of skills and training. But what they're more worried about is the fact that, when they talk to the schools, the focus of the schools is still on sending students to university, and that the success of the school is measured by the number of students who go to university. They don't take into account the value and the importance of the number of students who seek to take on a trade or a vocation and a profession in that space. I think that's emblematic of many of the issues that we're discussing.</para>
<para>For the past 20 or 30 years the whole discussion has been about sending kids to university, because if you get a degree you've got your future made. I say to this House and to those outside of here: if you get a trade or get an apprenticeship then your future is made. As I look around my electorate of Forde, manufacturing industries are screaming out for welders and engineers, and infrastructure projects need myriad workers. We're now seeing hold-ups in infrastructure projects because of a lack of those employees. When I look at the building industry I see the plumbers, electricians, carpenters, bricklayers and ceramic tilers who are required. Those discussions are either not or very rarely being had with the students at school today. They may be being had with the students who they think are 'non-academic', but there are plenty of kids who are academically gifted at school but who don't turn out to be so at university. There's not a fulsome and wholesome discussion with our kids at school about the opportunities that are there for them in the future with a vocation or trade.</para>
<para>I'm very proud of the fact that largely my electorate is built on people who have skills and who are working in manufacturing, in construction and in trades of all sorts, because they are the people who build this country. We get to stand in this place because of carpenters, electricians, stonemasons, concreters and bricklayers. If we don't have those people then we don't have buildings like this, we don't have our houses, we don't have our roads and we don't have our bridges. So we need to change that discussion to realise and to educate our children that the option of pursuing a trade or a vocation is as valuable and as important to this country as becoming a doctor, a nurse, a teacher or—heaven forbid!—a lawyer. We need to have that discussion and refocus on what's important for this country.</para>
<para>I've also heard the comment today about employees in various sectors of the economy being employed through labour hire firms and potentially getting less pay than somebody who is paid on a direct basis. Well, it's interesting: when you reflect on what those sectors are—and predominantly those sectors are highly unionised sectors—the question for those opposite is, what are their union representatives doing to ensure that those conditions don't arise? From talking to the businesses in my electorate over the past eight weeks I can say that they want people on full-time pay; they're not interested in employing people through labour hire companies. These are the small-to-medium businesses in my electorate who want to employ people on a direct basis and keep them there for the long term if they're up to scratch. That being said, one business said to me the other week that some of their employees have just enjoyed a very significant pay rise. That was to ensure that the business keeps those very valuable employees, that they don't go off and work somewhere else.</para>
<para>As usual, what we hear from those on the other side is a lot of myth and innuendo that actually, when you get out and engage with the business community in the real world, doesn't hold any validity or any water. As I've said many times in this place, don't listen to what those opposite say but have a look at what they do. This government is very focused on ensuring that we have the necessary workforce for the future. I talked to local businesses that have production lines, and when you talk about electricians today, these are not the ordinary, everyday electricians; these are very, very skilled tradespeople who can do electronics, who can repair electrical circuits that are very intricate and who can service multimillion-dollar machines. These are highly skilled, highly trained employees who bring enormous wealth and opportunity to this country.</para>
<para>More importantly, with regard to schedule 1 of this bill, which is the reporting of the sharing economy regime, this has been something that has been done in the past. The building industry has been required, and still is required, to report annually its range of payments to subcontractors to ensure that taxes are paid, that GST is paid and all those sorts of things. So, this change to the tax administration is a worthwhile and important change. We've seen the value of that in the building industry. I remember talking with the building industry when those changes were introduced about how many of the builders had to work with their subcontractors to make sure they had the systems in place to properly manage their GST requirements and their tax affairs. In fairness to them, a lot of the subbies were somewhat lax in their bookkeeping and other arrangements. I would say that these measures are critically important because what they do is more accurately show what is actually going on in this sector of the economy, as occurred with the building industry when those changes were introduced. They will ensure that everybody in this economy is paying the proper amount of tax, or the tax that they are due to pay, and enable us to lower the tax burden as a whole across our economy.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 of the bill focuses on some transitional provisions relating to the repeal of the Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act. This is as a result of the setting up of AFCA to replace the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, and the transfer of the remaining cases, of which there were six, to AFCA. With this change, which combines all these complaints bodies into a single complaints body, AFCA, we've seen a much smoother transition and administration of complaints. I note that AFCA has been working assiduously in dealing with complaints as they're brought forward. With these systems there are always different views on how things can be improved, and I'm looking forward, down the track when we do a review of AFCA, to see how we can further fine-tune those systems and processes. Overall, I think the combination of these various complaints bodies by this government in 2017-18 has been a great success.</para>
<para>The last bit is schedule 3, which removes the $250 limit for prescribed educational expenses. Whilst a small measure in the context of the overall tax act, it's just another example of finding small opportunities to improve the operation of the tax system and make it more efficient. Equally, it builds on the range of initiatives that this government has made over the years to streamline the tax system and reduce the tax burden on everyday hardworking Australians through the tax plans we've put in until 2025, which will mean approximately 90 per cent of people will pay no more than 30-odd cents in the dollar in tax.</para>
<para>In conjunction with myriad other economic supports that we've put in place over the past 18 months, it just shows how much time and effort this government, we on this side, is putting in to ensure that we support the Australian economy through this COVID crisis. I acknowledge that this bill is not directly related to that, but it's an example of the government continuing to look for opportunities to simplify and streamline systems and processes, no matter how small they are. As the old saying goes, if we look after the pennies, the pounds will follow. It's no different with these things. Where we can find small wins that make the system more efficient and better for everyone involved, everybody benefits.</para>
<para>Likewise, with the stuff we're doing with apprenticeships and traineeships, I encourage people to take the opportunity to engage with their local businesses. I've encouraged my local businesses to engage with their local schools because many of the schools actually don't understand the apprenticeships, traineeships or other job opportunities that are out there. There's also an obligation on the business community to do a better job of engaging with the school community to identify these opportunities. I commend the bill, in its unamended form, to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr LEIGH</name>
    <name.id>BU8</name.id>
    <electorate>Fenner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>A hallmark of the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison government has been to be as soft on multinationals as they are tough on the vulnerable. We've seen, during the time the government have been in office, continued attempts to try and reduce taxes on multinationals, defences of tax havens—particularly under former Prime Minister Turnbull—and an ongoing unwillingness to act on the scourge that is multinational tax avoidance. Those opposite voted against important measures that the previous Labor government put in place to ensure that multinationals pay their fair share, and they continue to mislead this House by falsely claiming Labor has not supported their measures. It's not true. They haven't done enough, but in what little they've done they've had the full backing of the Australian Labor Party.</para>
<para>Now we can see the world moving against the coalition. We can see very clearly the United States, under President Biden, now moving to increase the corporate tax rate. We see in Britain, under a Conservative Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, an attempt to pay for public services by increasing the corporate tax rate. And we can see, with the latest announcement through the OECD-G20 report <inline font-style="italic">Statement on a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy</inline>, 138 countries around the world committing to a two-pillar solution. This solution will, in pillar 1, allocate taxing rights of 25 per cent of the residual profits of the most profitable multinational enterprises to the jurisdictions where the consumers are located, and, in pillar 2, provide a global minimum tax of 15 per cent on all MNEs with annual revenue over 750 million euros.</para>
<para>The argument that the conservatives in this country and in some others have made—that we need to engage in a race to the bottom in company tax—is belied by recent moves from the United States, the United Kingdom and the global community. Yet the Morrison government is nowhere to be seen on this. Australia used to have a key seat on the steering committee in the OECD in charge of these conversations around multinational taxation. We no longer have that role. And, at a time when tax havens are being recognised as a danger to the global tax system, you don't hear a peep out of the Treasurer about them.</para>
<para>It is a fact, according to careful research that's looked at tax havens, that some 40 per cent of multinational profits are now being channelled through tax havens and low-tax jurisdictions. Tax havens aren't simply a means of reducing the tax bill; they're also a hidey-hole for illicit wealth. Tax havens have been used by Mexican drug lords and by al-Qaeda. Tax havens have been used by those involved in extortion and kidnapping. Tax havens have financed terrorism. They should be ruled out of any engagement with the sensible multinational tax community. But we've seen from this government an approach of being soft on tax havens—of being unwilling to recognise the sheer amount of money that is hiding in tax havens. On one estimate, some A$100 billion is in tax havens at the moment. Another study has found that four out of every five dollars in tax havens are there in breach of other countries' tax rules, often because the secrecy surrounding tax havens means that tax authorities, such as the Australian Taxation Office, simply aren't able to get to the bottom of what's happening there.</para>
<para>We've seen leaks from tax havens—such as the Panama Papers; the Pandora Papers; and LuxLeaks, the PwC leaks—which have revealed the abuse of tax havens and highlighted very clearly the way in which tax havens are being misused. The Australian Taxation Office has taken up a range of the cases which have been exposed through these leaks, but we shouldn't be relying on whistleblowers in order to crack down on tax havens. We need a government that is as tough with tax havens as it is with social security recipients—a government that is as tough with multinational tax dodging as it is with people with a disability.</para>
<para>We've seen from this government a failure on multinational taxation and, as a result, Australian small businesses and individuals pay more tax. In order to pay for the public services that we all use, the revenue has to come from somewhere, and too often under this government we've seen an expectation that it will be ordinary Australians that pay those taxes, rather than multinationals and those who are tax dodging through tax havens.</para>
<para>This bill contains some perfectly sensible measures, but the reason that the member for Whitlam, the shadow Assistant Treasurer, has moved this important second reading amendment is to highlight the importance of multinational tax dodging to this side of the House. Under an Albanese government, we will crack down on multinational tax avoidance. The shadow Treasurer, the shadow Assistant Treasurer, the member for Kingsford Smith and many others on the Labor economics team are firmly of the view that we need to do far more to crack down on tax-dodging multinationals, and we will continue that campaign right up to election day.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr THISTLETHWAITE</name>
    <name.id>182468</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingsford Smith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>We support the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill 2021 and its intentions. It has been referred to the Senate committee for a report. That report is now following an inquiry focus on the tax compliance measures in schedule 1 and tax compliance in the gig economy more broadly. Schedule 1 establishes a new requirement for gig economy companies to provide information on transactions made through the platform to the ATO. This measure implements a recommendation of the report on the Black Economy Taskforce. The government committed to implementing this measure back in the 2019-20 MYEFO.</para>
<para>The focus will now be on gig economy participants adhering to a new compulsory reporting regime, which will be implemented by applying the taxable payments reporting system to certain transactions undertaken under these platforms. Ride-sourcing and short-term accommodation platforms will be first up, with the likes of Uber and Airbnb to report information of all transactions to the ATO from 1 July next year. Asset-sharing, food delivery, tasking based services and other services will be included from 1 July 2023. Back in 2019 both Airbnb and Uber said that they supported this change. The government has talked up the new rules as a way of bridging the transparency gap created by the rapid growth of Australia's gig economy and the current inadequacy of the tax reporting system to capture data about transactions that take place there.</para>
<para>We all know that the government has been slow to react in other areas associated with the gig economy. Although they're taking action here, it has to be matched with other areas where there's probably a need for regulation around gig economy workers, most notably around safety at work. We've unfortunately seen several examples of gig economy workers, particularly riders, being killed or injured in their workplace, on the road or on the footpath, in unsafe conditions, with very little guidance from those that they are engaged to work for about health and safety. There has been a lack of access to personal protective equipment, a lack of audits associated with the equipment that's used to perform the role, be it as a contractor or as an employee of these companies. It has taken, unfortunately, the death of several of these workers for governments and the companies to wake up and understand that they have a duty of care to make sure that there's safety about the way that people are engaging with these companies and then going about performing work on their behalf. Let's never forget that they wear the logos of Uber, Deliveroo et cetera when they are performing these duties. There is a responsibility that comes with that from those companies, and that has been sadly lacking in the past. So, although we're taking action on this, it's time for the government to recognise that there are other areas of regulation where gig economy workers need the support of government.</para>
<para>Schedule 1 is also a missed opportunity and highlights the government's failure in priorities. Labor agrees that everyone should be paying their fair share of tax; however, this legislation sees that burden placed on the workers rather than on multinational tech companies. It also shows that the government is happy to pursue these workers for more tax but does little to ensure that they have secure, fair wages and safe conditions. If the Morrison government is willing to take steps to regulate the gig economy when it comes to tax, it needs to do the same, as I mentioned earlier, for workers' pay and conditions. It's not good enough to allow these workers to receive substandard pay and conditions in an unsafe work environment.</para>
<para>During the Senate inquiry, workers who used these platforms were asked about their views on this bill and if they thought it was fair that it appears the government's priority isn't legislating fair pay and safe conditions for gig workers and the share economy. One of those workers, Ms Rosalina Pirozzi, a rideshare driver, described the lack of action as heartbreaking and says she thinks, 'It's very unfair that workers' rights are not being addressed at the moment.' We know that gig workers, including Ms Pirozzi, don't get superannuation, don't get sick pay and aren't covered by workers compensation. The committee also heard from food delivery rider Ashley Moreland, who talked about his experience. He highlighted the high-pressure environment caused by these platforms' monitoring of performance, which led him to being injured on the job. He said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">This facade of flexibility and low levels of control is a bit of a farce.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">I actually found myself in an accident … because of the extraordinarily high feelings of pressure that you're under to make these deliveries as quickly as possible, knowing that every single step of the way—from the time you accept the trip on the app to the time when you race into the restaurant, making do with traffic rules if you can—is monitored and noted against your profile and recorded.</para></quote>
<para>That paints a pretty damning picture of the pressure that many of these workers are under. The constant monitoring and the pressure that they feel to report and make sure that they're meeting delivery guidelines are in some respects unfair, particularly in the context of having to drive through busy traffic in peak hour and the like. If the government can regulate the data that's being captured by these employers for the purposes of fair taxation, which they should, then the government can regulate the wages and working conditions of these workers. Given that these platforms record all of this data, why are they not being given the responsibility for reporting earnings for all the people who work on their platform? That is the question that needs to be answered by the government. It's clear that the rideshare companies, the gig economy companies, accumulate a massive amount of data in respect of not only their taxation reporting requirements but also the health and safety of those that are engaged to perform work for them.</para>
<para>Labor supports this legislation, but it's clear that the government needs to do more to ensure that gig economy workers are provided with fair wages and conditions. If the government is happy to regulate tax, it should be happy to regulate fair pay and conditions for Australian workers.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs WICKS</name>
    <name.id>241590</name.id>
    <electorate>Robertson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak briefly in support of the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 7) Bill. This bill has three schedules, which, among other things, implement changes to enhance compliance with tax obligations, further clarify the role of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority and simplify the tax return experience for hardworking Australians. Schedule 1 of the bill relates to the reporting regime for the sharing economy and extends existing third-party reporting requirements to operators of electronic platforms. The sharing economy includes ridesharing applications, like Uber; food delivery services, such as Menulog, DoorDash, Uber Eats and Deliveroo; and accommodation services, like Airbnb and Stayz. Living in a tourist hotspot, many Central Coast residents take advantage of the ability to rent out their home, a spare room or a secondary dwelling at their place through these providers, which offers greater choice to visitors and generates additional income for the local economy. I know it's certainly become very popular over the last couple of weeks in my region.</para>
<para>Of course, food delivery services have also become extremely popular across the Central Coast, particularly during the pandemic. These services helped many small businesses over the last year and a half. They offered a convenient and COVID-safe way for local residents to have food delivered, and, at the same time, they supported Central Coast residents and helped others to supplement their income. At the same time, the sharing economy offers a range of benefits, by reducing waste and helping to distribute and use resources more efficiently, which of course impacts our economy and the environment in a positive way.</para>
<para>But, with these significant benefits to our local and national economy and the rapid growth that the sector has seen, it's also important to ensure that tax requirements are being met on the income that is earnt. Under this bill, sharing economy operators will be required to report information regarding certain transactions to the ATO, which will help to ensure those earning an income are meeting their tax obligations. These platforms are used in the sharing economy where two parties agree to provide services or loan personal assets for payment. Tax reporting systems haven't been able to keep up with recent developments, and there's some confusion in the community as to whether payments from these platforms are taxable, creating a risk of noncompliance. These amendments are expected to result in increased voluntary compliance and more targeted work by the ATO, and they'll apply to all platforms that do business here in Australia, regardless of whether they're based locally or overseas.</para>
<para>Nations around the world are implementing similar reporting requirements for the sharing economy, and cooperation is really building to ensure that all participants are meeting their tax obligations. Australia must join with other countries to play our part in limiting poor tax compliance, which only disadvantages the businesses and individuals who work hard and report their income correctly. I know there are many residents in my electorate of Robertson who are actively involved in the sharing economy, and I certainly hope that this amendment provides some greater clarity and gives them the confidence to continue to be able to earn income from these platforms.</para>
<para>Schedule 2 of the bill relates to transitional provisions on the repeal of the Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993. In 2017 the government established the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, AFCA, to replace the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. AFCA provides consumers and small businesses with fair, free and independent dispute resolution of financial complaints when they're unable to resolve an issue with a member organisation. These amendments ensure that the transition to AFCA is smooth and that any outstanding cases can be dealt with appropriately. Parties to a dispute will not be adversely affected by these changes and can be assured that AFCA has the resources needed to be able to resolve outstanding issues. The AFCA Act will also be amended to allow for the transfer of records and documents from the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal to ASIC for ongoing records management. These are important administrative changes which ensure financial complaints are handled efficiently and effectively.</para>
<para>Schedule 3 of the bill relates to the of the removal of the self-education expenses threshold. This measure is part of the Morrison government's plan to simplify the tax-return experience for hardworking people right across Australia. Currently, the first $250 of a prescribed course of education expense can't be deducted, but certain expenses that are compulsory but not otherwise deductible—such as childcare costs incurred while attending self-education activities, for example—can be used to offset the $250 reduction. These amendments simply remove this exclusion and the related compliance burden for individuals who are claiming this deduction, and will apply to assessments from the 2022-23 income year. This is just another measure that will benefit taxpayers right across the Central Coast and is in addition to tax relief of up to $2,745 that around 61,600 people in my electorate of Robertson will benefit from this year.</para>
<para>These are some important amendments that will improve tax compliance, clarify the role of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority and simplify tax returns for workers around Australia. This bill forms part of the Morrison government's plan to cut red tape, to simplify taxes and to promote economic growth, which is so important at a time when Australians are beginning to come out of the COVID-19 induced lockdowns. I commend this bill to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TIM WILSON</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
    <electorate>Goldstein</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Firstly, I would like to thank those members who have contributed to this debate. Schedule 1 of this bill extends existing third-party reporting requirements to operators of electronic platforms. Platform operators will be required to report to the Australian Taxation Office information regarding certain transactions that occur on their platforms, such as seller identification and payment details. This information will assist the ATO in its administration of the tax system and ensure that sellers on these platforms are meeting their tax obligations. Schedule 2 to the bill amends the Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First—Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018 to facilitate the closure of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal and any transitional arrangements associated with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority replacing the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. Schedule 3 to the bill reduces compliance costs for individuals claiming self-education deductions by removing the exclusion of the first $250 of deductions for prescribed courses of education. I commend the bill to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Whitlam has moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The immediate question is that the amendment be disagreed to.</para>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Original question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a second time.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.2><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Third Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TIM WILSON</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
    <electorate>Goldstein</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this bill be now read a third time.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
<para>Bill read a third time.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Rearrangement</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr TIM WILSON</name>
    <name.id>IMW</name.id>
    <electorate>Goldstein</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That business intervening before order of the day No. 12, government business, be postponed until a later hour this day.</para></quote>
<para>Question agreed to.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>BILLS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>BILLS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><subdebate.text>
          <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:wx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
            <a href="L6P" type="Bill">
              <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
                <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021</span>
              </p>
            </a>
          </body>
        </subdebate.text><subdebate.2><subdebateinfo>
            <title>Second Reading</title>
            <page.no>-1</page.no>
          </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KEARNEY</name>
    <name.id>LTU</name.id>
    <electorate>Cooper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021, and I foreshadow that I will move a second reading amendment. The purpose of the bill is to amend the Health Insurance Act 1973 to improve the implementation of the bonded medical program and the administration of the medical rural bonded scholarships contracts under section 19 of the act. The program is designed to address the doctor shortage across regional, rural and remote areas, a shortage that has grown worse and worse under the Morrison government. Participants of the programs receive a Commonwealth supported place in a medical course at an Australian university in return for completion of a return-service commitment to work in regional, rural and remote areas and areas of workforce shortage.</para>
<para>The bill allows participants in two legacy schemes, the Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship Scheme and the Bonded Medical Places Scheme, to voluntarily opt in to the program, and if the secretary agrees to their participation they also become bonded participants. The program offers a number of advantages to bonded participants, compared with the two legacy schemes, including a shorter, three-year return-service obligation, rather than up to six years. It assures more flexibility in completing the return-service obligation as well. These changes are welcome, but this bill will not address the difficulties Australians in outer-metro, regional and rural areas are having in accessing health care, including seeing a GP.</para>
<para>The Morrison government's decision to remove areas like Newcastle and the Hunter region from the new distribution priority area classification means doctors in the Bonded Medical Program cannot meet their return-service obligations in these areas, making local GP shortages worse. Tightening access to regional bulk-billing incentives, as the government has done, is another policy from the Morrison government that has made regional GP shortages worse. And, of course, there is also the impact of the government's six-year freeze on Medicare rebates and its decision back in 2014 to abolish Health Workforce Australia. At a time when the government should be investing in Medicare and delivering more services to regional Australia, this government is doing the opposite.</para>
<para>I know the government likes to trumpet its rural health strategy, but this is just another announcement from this government that has failed to deliver an end to the regional GP crisis. A lack of doctors and other medical professionals in regional and rural communities across Australia is not a new problem, but it is an even more pressing problem in the context of the COVID pandemic. That's why Labor has established a Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee inquiry into outer-metro, rural and regional GPs and other healthcare services, which will consider the performance of programs such as the Bonded Medical Program. The inquiry will explore the GP crisis in outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas, including an assessment of government policies such as the rural health strategy, the reforms to the distribution priority areas and the Modified Monash Model geographical classification system. It will also look at GP training reforms and the impact of the coalition's Medicare rebate freeze.</para>
<para>The inquiry has taken off. It has already heard from so many stakeholders confirming there is indeed a regional and rural healthcare crisis and that this crisis also extends to outer-metro areas. So far 43 submissions have been received from stakeholders, including local councils, medical colleges, health organisations and MPs from this place. These stakeholders and outer-metro, regional and rural MPs all acknowledge the challenges to delivering sufficient, high-quality health care to all Australians. These challenges are real, and their impact is only getting worse. Labor wants the inquiry to seek practical, positive solutions to make sure that Australians have access to quality health care regardless of where they live. I encourage all Australians and all MPs to engage with this inquiry.</para>
<para>General practitioners are the backbone of the vaccine rollout across Australia, yet there are regions in which it is near impossible to get a GP appointment. This has obvious implications for vaccination rates, with regional vaccination rates lagging 20 to 30 per cent behind those in cities, and this does nothing but place regional Australians at greater risk from the pandemic. As the member for Macarthur makes clear in his submission to the Senate inquiry, a lack of regional GP access also increases pressure on regional hospitals, as Australians who can't get medical treatment through a local GP are forced to present to regional hospital emergency departments. Of course the same can be said of city hospital emergency departments, which are equally under pressure when people from outer-metro regions simply cannot access a GP. They head into the city based hospital system.</para>
<para>There are other things that regional, rural and outer-metro people are struggling to access when it comes to the healthcare system—for example, obstetrics. Pregnant women can find it very difficult to get the specialist care that they need. They very rarely can access GP shared programs or even midwifery services in outer-metro, regional and rural areas. We were all shocked that the Prime Minister's response to this problem was: the government builds roads, and women use roads. As someone whose daughter had to drive two hours from her regional home to get to the nearest hospital to have her baby, I can tell you that that is no comfort at all.</para>
<para>An area like aged care, where we know that GP access is very short and hard to come by in the cities, is even more desperate in outer-metro, rural and regional areas. Our elderly are not well served by the health system. If there is a shortage of GPs for young people and families, imagine how acute it might be for people in residential aged care or for isolated older people in their homes. They are desperate for good health care from good local GPs, and there just aren't any.</para>
<para>We know that the issue of mental health care is absolutely acute in rural and regional areas, where accessing mental health care is pretty much impossible. Imagine if we had a government that was dedicated and actually put in the time, the energy and the commitment to make sure that people out on farms and living in rural cities and in regional cities could access the mental health care they need: the suicide crisis, particularly amongst our young people, may just be alleviated. We know that some resources are scarce enough, even in the cities, but access is far worse in outer-metro, regional and rural areas.</para>
<para>One policy to support regional and rural access to crucial medical services is to boost the use of telehealth items so that patients can see a doctor regardless of the vast distances that characterise so much of our beautiful country. Everyone, from the medical profession to public health experts and patients themselves, accepts that telehealth is a crucial part of our Medicare system moving forward, but after almost two years of a global pandemic the Morrison government still hasn't made telehealth a permanent feature of Medicare. Some of my constituents who live in the city have told me what a life-changing thing it is to be able to access telehealth, including people with chronic fatigue syndrome, who find it incredibly difficult to leave their home. Trans people, who find it very difficult to access specific health care, have found telehealth to be a saviour. People who, for whatever reason, are finding it hard to get out of their homes and into healthcare services find telehealth to be absolutely revolutionising for their health care. So why is there a delay? Why can't this government simply get on with the job and make telehealth a permanent part of our Medicare system?</para>
<para>Millions of Australians living in outer-metro, regional and rural Australia deserve and are crying out for the same access to medical services as their cousins in the big cities, yet after eight long years of government the Prime Minister has failed to deliver it and has in fact made it worse. Labor will always fight to defend and strengthen Medicare and to make sure that all Australians have access to a GP and to other healthcare professionals. The rural and remote doctors, who I speak with quite a lot in my role as the shadow assistant for health care, have told us that there are many models of healthcare delivery that could be explored and added into the health system to make sure that people in rural and regional areas get good health care. We should be listening to these stakeholders. We should be trialling new models of care that use our entire health force to their full capacity, like midwives, like nurse practitioners, like our allied healthcare practitioners, like physios and like pharmacists who would move to regional areas and who would boost the healthcare workforce. All of this can be looked at, all of this can be added to strengthening Medicare to make sure that all Australians, no matter where they live, can get the health care they deserve. I move the amendment circulated in my name:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House urges the Government to do more to address outer-metro, regional, and rural barriers to medical services including GP access for all Australians."</para></quote>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the amendment seconded?</para>
</continue>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Watts</name>
    <name.id>193430</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the amendment and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:56</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAMSEY</name>
    <name.id>HWS</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak on the Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021. The amendments in this bill will make welcome changes, as the member for Cooper said, to a scheme that is designed to attract more doctors to work in rural and regional areas. Anything that can attract more doctors to rural and regional areas must be welcomed. Although it's unlikely to be the silver bullet that will fix up all the problems of the past, it's certainly designed to make things more flexible. We know that it's a great concern to young people in particular that they're having to tie themselves to a particular area for a long period of time, and that makes them uncertain about signing up to work in a rural or regional area. I thought about when I first went on a hospital board and decided it was in about 1980; it may have been 1982 but it was certainly at least 30 years ago, although that would make it almost 40 years ago. One of the first issues we had in the days when hospital boards existed in each hospital in South Australia was the lack of doctors in regional areas. I watched the whole episode unfold as the numbers of trainee doctors entering universities was curtailed because we had a problem in Australia, and that problem was overservicing in the cities—in fact, chronic overservicing in the cities. At the time a decision was made to cut the universities' intake of trainee doctors with the eventual aim to dry up the surplus of doctors, as it were.</para>
<para>Even at that time we had great difficulties in attracting doctors to rural areas. It certainly was not as difficult as it is now, but it was difficult enough. As a local hospital board we would manage the advertising for medical staff and we would do the interviews. We would chase people from one end of Australia to the other, and at times we would seek to bring trained doctors to Australia. But with the training stream drying up, the foot was kept on the neck of the intake for too long, I would have to say, and eventually we had a shortage of doctors in Australia. Then we began bringing large numbers of overseas trained doctors in to meet that shortfall. As someone who comes from the country and represents a part of remote and regional Australia, I would have to say that those doctors saved our lives. Is it the perfect solution? No, it most certainly is not. But the great advantage of bringing doctors in from overseas is that you can place limitations on where they practise as part of their immigration process. You can ensure that they go to a remote service or a regional service for a certain period of time and so receive the service you need for that population, which is not the case for our local trainees, who maintain that they are private businesses and can go and set up virtually whenever they like.</para>
<para>It takes a long time to become a doctor. There has been a great emphasis over the years on trying to recruit an oversupply or to tilt the scale in favour of regional students because we know that more of them are likely to end up in the regions, but it's far from an ironclad solution. In fact, many regional students, particularly if they've done a couple of years of senior secondary education in a major city, with maybe eight years of training to get their standard doctor's certificate and then GP training after that, might be away from the country for anywhere up to 15 years before they actually qualify to the state where they can come back and serve. By that time, so many things can have happened in their lives—they could have formed partnerships and relationships and may have had children. The whole world can change in that time, and I'm very grateful for those who do decide to return to rural Australia.</para>
<para>In fact, there are a whole host of programs that the government is already running to help bring doctors to rural Australia, including rural bulk-billing incentives. I might point out that under the Monash model it's not uncommon for an extra $10 to be delivered on a bulk-billing incentive package for the needy or for those on pensions, health care cards or whatever. In some places it might be well over a 100 per cent increase in the amount of money per Medicare item for a service in rural Australia. There's the Approved Medical Deputising Service Program, a heath workforce, a scholarship program providing anything up to $10,000 a day, the Medical Outreach Indigenous Chronic Disease Program and the Rural Locum Assistance Program. We have the More Doctors for Rural Australia Program, the Rural Health Outreach Fund, the Rural Health Workforce Support Activity, the Remote Vocational Training Scheme, the Remote Vocational Training Scheme extended targeted recruitment pilot—and there's up to $200,000 a placement available on that one—the Practice Incentives Program and the Workforce Incentive Program. It goes on; there's more there.</para>
<para>The point I make is this. Many doctors don't like to publicly express how much they're earning, but it's not uncommon for them to be earning in excess of $400,000 or $450,000 a year. I don't know how much extra money makes a difference, but I've come to the conclusion that it's about the only tool we've got, quite frankly. We need to recruit more doctors to rural and regional Australia. Statistics will tell us that, on a per capita basis, Medicare item numbers are accessed in regional Australia at roughly half the rate that they are in the city, and this is a really interesting statistic. I live in regional Australia. I live in a small country town that has an irregular doctor service. We have struggled to recruit and retain doctors. We have a hospital, and it's a struggle to keep services up in the hospital unless you have a doctor. It's a struggle to recruit workers in other industries to the town unless you have a doctor. It is absolutely essential that we have a doctor, and yet we don't need twice as many doctors as we've got. This overservicing in the city is already a large problem that is eroding the sustainability of the federal health budget, and I think it's something that requires some deep analysis.</para>
<para>I think we need to understand what a fair shake is in Australia. We don't need more doctors in eastern Adelaide. We need more doctors in northern and southern metropolitan Adelaide and we need a lot more doctors in remote South Australia. We don't have a shortage of doctors in Australia. What we have is a distribution problem. I have argued for some years that we should have a postcode-specific Medicare provider number. I've come to the conclusion in this place—I've been here 14 years now—that I'm not going to get my way. That is not going to happen. I think it probably should, and I know there are some difficulties that surround it, but I take it that we probably won't see progress in that area.</para>
<para>I have reached the conclusion that money is a blunt tool but it's about the only one we've got. I think we need an increased rate, even over all the incentive programs I just read out, for service in remote Australia. It could be worked out based on the Monash model, and that's not a bad idea. I actually prefer postcodes because then we can really drill down and find out which communities are not getting the service they require, and it's very easy to identify those that are getting more service than they require.</para>
<para>Once again, this is not a policy that the coalition government has adopted, but I have suggested that what we should be doing to fund those extra payments in rural and remote Australia is reducing the payments from the places where we've got overservicing. If we don't address the overservicing, eventually it will swamp the budget. If we don't start putting parameters on where extra doctors can provide extra services—it's not hard for doctors to generate extra income: 'Mrs Jones, I've just changed your drugs; I want you to come back next week; I'm not going to issue a repeat.' And when she comes back next week: 'I'm going to send you to my friend the pathologist down the road, and once you've got that report, you come back to me and then we'll analyse it and I'll put you on something else.' It goes on and on and on, and it's very hard, on an individual basis, to call that out. In fact, I don't think anyone would want to call it out. But it's not hard to do on a postcode basis, where you can see that one area is getting so many more services than, say, the little town where I come from, where there's an absolute imbalance in the health budget. Rural and remote Australia deserves a better deal.</para>
<para>So I've come to the conclusion that's the way to do it. I'm not sure I'm going to win that argument, either.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAMSEY</name>
    <name.id>HWS</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I think the learned member on the other side is incorrect, let me say. What we need to do is make a change. This legislation today is a small step in trying to do other things.</para>
<para>I've also been championing a proposal—a rural and remote medical academy, to be based around a number of centres in Australia that will train doctors for the remote areas in combination with the RFDS, with the Aboriginal doctor workforce and with the University of Adelaide. I hope we can find our way, as a government, to funding a number of these positions. One such academy in my electorate would be at a place called Port Augusta. Although Port Augusta has a population of 14,000 people and services a larger area, even areas like that don't have enough doctors. In Port Lincoln—I don't know how many House of Representatives members have been to Port Lincoln, but it's a very attractive community on a beautiful harbour and it's got a lot going for it—even there we struggle to attract doctors to regional areas. It's got a good hospital—a lot going for it.</para>
<para>This legislation today helps. It's another program. As I said, it won't be a silver bullet. As a parliament we need to make an absolute commitment to rural and regional people that this imbalance in health services in Australia is not going to continue, that we're going to do something fair dinkum about fixing it. I don't think we can do something fair dinkum about fixing it unless we tread on a few toes. We've been dangling carrots in front of people for a long, long time. I think we're going to have to take a bit of stick. If that's what it requires then I think that's what's required. But we certainly do owe it to that constituency to provide a better service than they're getting at the moment.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Grey raised several very valid points. One of the points he raised, however, for which there is very little evidence, is that there is, at least in part, an epidemic of overservicing in city areas. That is fundamentally not the case; there is no evidence for that. The problem is, of course, access to proper medical care in outer metropolitan, rural and regional areas. That's why, by whatever measure you care to take, health outcomes in outer metropolitan, rural and regional areas are much worse than in the cities. Whether you take rates of bowel and lung cancer, rates of smoking and cardiovascular disease, death rates or age of death, male or female, they're all much worse in outer metropolitan, rural and regional areas. The further people move from access to medical care the worse those statistics are. So what the member for Grey was saying—that overservicing in the cities is affecting servicing in rural and regional areas—is not true.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Yes, what you said was rubbish. That's quite right.</para>
</continue>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Well, we need the appropriate number of doctors and you need more. I don't particularly want to be distracted with this argument. I'm happy to have it later on. But, if the member for Grey is making these statements, he should be able to produce the evidence, and there is no evidence for that.</para>
<para>I've discussed the Bonded Medical Program many times because I've had to deal with medical students who signed up to this program when they were 17 or 18 and in full flight of getting a good HSC mark and getting into medicine. They signed up for something that may have looked good, but, as the member for Grey and others have pointed out, as their circumstances changed, their priorities changed. I've had to act for a number of people trying to get out of these bonded programs because their lives had changed, because of partners, children et cetera. They haven't worked. They haven't really made much difference to the medical workforce in rural and regional areas. They don't affect the outer metropolitan areas, which also have huge difficulties in attracting general practitioners. I'll just explain to you why that's the case.</para>
<para>If you work in disadvantaged areas—in outer metropolitan areas and in rural, regional and even remote areas—the work is very hard. If you're a doctor working in these situations, you're expected to deal with everything from an obstetric emergency to an acute cardiovascular event, a stroke or a severe seizure disorder. Our standards of medical care have improved a lot over the years and expectations have risen. Providing care in an outer metropolitan hospital, which may not have access to specialist care, may not have access to a range of interventions, like MRI scanning and cardiac catheterisation, and may not have access to the range of specialists that could support you in an inner city hospital, makes the work far more difficult, far more time-consuming—because the work is generally put on the one practitioner only—and much more stressful. If you happen to be on call in these communities, the work is far more difficult than if you were a general practitioner working in an inner city practice with multiple doctors with multiple cover, either not on call at all or only on call one in 10 or one in 14. So the work is much more difficult in these areas and it has proven to be much more difficult to attract people to these areas.</para>
<para>For those reasons and others it's difficult to get ongoing education, even though there are some programs that support rural and regional education. It's more difficult to access specialists and subspecialists in rural and regional areas. As the member for Grey has pointed out, there have been multiple schemes and multiple programs put in place to try to support doctors in rural and regional areas. There has been very little in outer metropolitan areas, like my electorate, but in rural and regional areas there have been lots of schemes put in place. To date they have not been successful in stimulating an influx of medical professionals to the rural and regional areas, and neither have the bonded scholarships, as we've mentioned. I think the financial rewards are not so great as to compensate for the lifestyle and the hours required when working in these practices.</para>
<para>I have approached the health minister on a number of occasions to make sure that they can review these areas of workforce need, the distribution priority area classifications. That has had very little effect, in spite of me approaching the minister on a number of occasions. It's not an issue that's new to the government. I've certainly been doing it since I've been in parliament—for six years. Countless times, I've written to the minister and I've spoken in this chamber about this very thing.</para>
<para>In my own electorate, which is an outer-metropolitan electorate, some of our general practices are having trouble recruiting and retaining quality local medical people. These are the very family practices that we've relied on and that have been on the front line of the pandemic. They play a vital role in our national immunisation program, yet the government has ignored their concerns. Because they've had trouble recruiting general practitioners, it has put far more pressure on our public hospital, which is already overstretched because of the pandemic.</para>
<para>On countless occasions, on behalf of these medical practices from not only my electorate but also the rest of the state, some of whose principals have contacted me, I've urged the government to review its distribution priority area classifications. I have been fobbed off by the government using the bureaucracy as a shield, without any meaningful change. It's not the same trying to access a general practitioner in my electorate as it is in the eastern suburbs or on the North Shore of Sydney. Many of my patients have huge difficulty getting access to a general practitioner. They tend to use the public hospital as their general practitioner, and that puts added pressure on an already-stretched system. I suggest that the junior coalition partner also listen very carefully to what's happening in their electorates, because their constituents have similar problems to mine with access to primary care through a general practitioner.</para>
<para>The partial schemes that have been put in place have been put in place without much evidence and without much forethought about how this is going to work and how we're going to keep general practitioners in these rural, regional and outer-metropolitan areas. The health outcomes demonstrate the difficulties in accessing medical care in outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas. The bonded medical scholarships have not changed it. Neither has setting up rural medical schools, and neither have some of the supports put in place through medical education.</para>
<para>I believe that people are forgoing medical treatment through the pandemic, and this has become much, much worse in outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas. Lack of access to general practitioners is the primary problem. My personal view is that we need to engage better with the departments of health of all the states to make sure our teaching hospitals have more of a role in providing medical workforces to outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas. That will require a total rethink of how health care is managed in previously disadvantaged areas. But it is important that we do that; otherwise health care in outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas will fall further and further behind the inner suburbs of our wealthy capital cities.</para>
<para>We already see different advances in the medical management of, for example, coronary artery disease and heart attacks, with acute intervention which can be life saving and lifestyle saving. Stroke management is changing dramatically, with acute clot retrieval through neuroradiological techniques. There have been huge changes in medical care, and our provision of medical care to these outer-metropolitan, rural and regional areas has not kept pace with those changes in medical care. This bonded medical scholarship scheme will do little to redress those needs. The gap is widening, and the increasing cost of health care is only perpetuating the inequality that is occurring.</para>
<para>Australia's spend on its health budget is much less than many other countries in the developed world, such as the Scandinavian countries, the United States of America, Great Britain et cetera. Where we spend around 10 per cent of our GDP on medical costs, they're spending 12 per cent, 14 per cent or 16 per cent. We need to fund our health care better. We're now approaching a time similar to the time of the advent of the Whitlam government, when healthcare costs were out of the reach of average Australians. We need to rethink our access to medical care for those disadvantaged areas. We need to rethink Medicare on that basis, we need to fund Medicare properly and we need to make sure that our major teaching hospitals that provide the highest level of care can provide that level of care throughout the country. We need to rethink how we engage with them.</para>
<para>I think it's very unfair that someone who lives in, for example, North Sydney, should get far better care than someone who lives in Campbelltown, Minto, or Airds; someone who lives in Temora; someone who lives in Armidale; or someone who lives in Broken Hill. I think we need to look at a more equitable approach to health care.</para>
<para>I think that the government needs not just to pay lip service to these complaints; there needs to be a real review of how we provide health care in Australia. I welcome the recent announcement that a new appeals process will be installed to existing DPA classifications—I think that's very important—but there's a lot of work from making that possible to getting it right and allowing our practices to recruit medical practitioners on a DPA basis. It's not a new issue, as I've said.</para>
<para>I want to thank my friend and colleague the member for Dobell, who has worked very hard on similar issues on the Central Coast. The member for Chifley also has worked hard to get GP recruitment in his outer metropolitan electorate. I know the member for Macquarie has worked very hard in her electorate to see what can be done to get better GP recruitment in her electorate. Labor has consistently been trying to get the government to address the GP shortages. These shortages have made the pandemic problems even worse in disadvantaged electorates, and it's time the government actually took notice and did something about it. This small change to the bonded medical scholarships will not make much difference at all, I'm afraid, and we really do need to see meaningful action from a government that's been prepared to sit on its hands for far too long.</para>
<para>I am constantly being contacted by general practitioners in my electorate and others around the country to see what can be done to improve recruitment of general practitioners, because primary care is the basis of all good medical care. If you can't get your primary care right, you will not have good health care. This is across a whole range of issues, be it paediatrics, obstetrics, immunisation programs, public health campaigns and even dental health and other preventative health measures. Unless we can get our primary care right, we will not get decent primary health care across the country.</para>
<para>What's happening is very inequitable. This is a government that for eight years has sat on its hands, and it's time we had a consistent program from the government to improve the whole system.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LAMING</name>
    <name.id>E0H</name.id>
    <electorate>Bowman</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's such an important topic and close to my heart as well, having been a bonded medical practitioner myself. There is a long history of financial incentives to address workplace maldistribution, and Australia leads the world in some of those mechanisms. These tinkerings with the legislation from a couple of years ago address some really important points and, from what I've heard in the debate, there seems to be reasonable agreement on both sides for these changes to occur.</para>
<para>As you know, there are a couple of legacy programs such as the Bonded Medical Program itself and the Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship Scheme. Thankfully, now those categories are also eligible to access the slightly more favourable return-of-service-obligation arrangements that the new system offers. But let's go back a step here and remember this is a mechanism that's been in place for decades now to encourage medical graduates, many of them in their mid-20s already. Many have settled down and have a home in cities. We identified about 10 years ago the importance of rural medical schools to ensure one can grow up in the bush, become a doctor in the bush and stay in the bush. It's certainly a much better way of approaching this challenge than having to increasingly raise the bid until sufficient urban medical practitioners are prepared to relocate, often involving partners and family.</para>
<para>There are no easy answers here. Medicine is complex because of the nature of and the amount of support required for a medical practice, the propensity to seek out further training and promotional opportunities, often in tertiary hospitals, which are not available as you go regional and have a lack of specialist medical training placements. This means that, once you go out of sight of the major hospitals, you lose the ability to be on the crest of the training wave and you lose the opportunity to be close to supervisors and those who are going to select you for medical speciality positions that are highly sought after. So we are working against the economic currents in many ways to find ways to convince medical graduates to go bush.</para>
<para>One option was to increase the number of medical graduates until there was a flow-out effect. That's not a terribly efficient way of doing it, because we are simply creating more and more providers in the Medicare system with potentially urban overservicing as a result. It's very interesting to have a look at Medicare spend by postcode. In theory, it should be based on health rather than remoteness, and to see that Medicare is not equitably utilised in regions and ultimately in remote Australia is a cause for concern. This is particularly the case in the Northern Territory, where there are very few general practitioners working outside of the two or three major centres in the Territory.</para>
<para>So today we recognise the importance of health planning in balancing the GDP spend on health as a proportion of GDP. Just to correct the previous speaker, who I think impugned northern European and Scandinavian health systems for spending between, I think he mentioned, 12 per cent and 14 per cent, that is obviously not the case. He might have been getting confused with the US at 16.9 per cent. Those Scandinavian nations are much closer to Australia and are still firmly in single figures, with the exception of a couple of them—Australia at 9.3 per cent, nowhere near that, and the OECD average of 8.8 per cent. Australia and New Zealand are very similar in their per capita spend.</para>
<para>It is an important question because obviously it's more expensive to deliver services in remote and regional areas. Australia has a high proportion of the population living more than 100 kilometres from a major metropolis and a tertiary hospital and, most importantly, it is extremely expensive to deliver those services. Having worked in Gundagai with Dr Paul Mara AM and also in Goondiwindi, St George, Mungindi and Dirranbandi, I saw firsthand how a small change in an obstetric process, delivering a baby, that might become complicated can lead to massive expense that starts with a phone call for advice and ends with an air retrieval of that mum with her baby back to a tertiary hospital hours away, even when we consider flight times. This is an extraordinary expense that isn't incurred when we have a mostly urban population.</para>
<para>I want to note also that these GPs, many of whom are city people deciding to relocate, become the community glue. It is so important in regional towns of 5,000 to 20,000 to have a general practitioner in the community, not just because they carry the oranges at half-time for the local football team and volunteer at providing first aid health but also because the town is proud of having a thriving general practice. They love having a general practitioner that they confide in and they like not having to travel for services if they can avoid it. Finally, off a strong general practitioner service in community, off a medical practice, there are of course a whole lot of allied health and pharmacy services that hang. To lose that can be catastrophic for communities and for community health. Gundagai was a good example of that. There was a need for a general practitioner, even in that smaller community, because it was located on the Hume Highway, where there was a number of medical emergencies and motor vehicle accidents requiring evacuation sometimes an hour away to Wagga, and that simply wasn't possible relying on paramedics alone.</para>
<para>The other point to make is that there are always going to be unique and exceptional circumstances with the bonding placements. So I'm really glad to see that they're a little bit more flexible now than they were in the 1990s when I was an applicant. There are arrangements here for special circumstances where there might need to be an extension of time to meet a service obligation, return of service can also be done over a longer period and there can be up to a six-year extension, which is also very promising.</para>
<para>We know that having adequate general practitioners in the bush is critical—that goes without saying—but we also know that, by having GPs in the bush, we can actually support a whole lot of other health services provision. I want to make the obvious statement in this debate: what is the point of having private health care if you live in a remote area where there is no GP?</para>
<para>We don't think about that very often but, in many cases, we rely on having a GP to support private health insurance levels so that people can get value for money for their insurance, because with the general practitioner come the optical and pharmaceutical benefits as well as the allied health services that they need. If those allied health workers drive out from a central location only once a week, it's very hard to get value for money from your private health insurance, and we know that it falls away in regional areas for that reason.</para>
<para>The bonded medical placements that are offered here play multiple roles, as I've pointed out. It's not just community cohesion. It's not just being able to turn up at a school and give a public health talk that otherwise wouldn't happen. It's that you no longer rely on rotating services—seeing different practitioners every time and different providers and people not keeping notes up to date. You can always count on a local GP to do that. These bonded placements are important because they offer this tantalising opportunity to work in the bush where it would otherwise never happen. I can tell you that there is no shortage of GPs who were dragged screaming to paradise, as one would say, to work in regional areas, and who fell in love and stayed. I'd obviously dispute the previous speaker saying that there are lifestyle issues with working in the bush. In most cases, the lifestyle is utterly brilliant; it's the isolation that's the problem. It's not just social and professional isolation; obviously there were times when there were almost no online services and continuing medical education available. That's now a thing of the past. Internet connection is far better, so the support from colleges and from the AMA for further education is there in a way that it wasn't before.</para>
<para>I continue to push the medical speciality colleges to start to accredit more of their fellows who work in regional Australia—for that work to be an accredited part of a training scheme. What I mean by that is, if an eye surgery trainee were to go and spend a few months in a smaller community where there is an ophthalmologist—say, Rockhampton, Bundaberg or Gladstone—then there really is no reason why that shouldn't be accredited training for their speciality, up to a cap of, say, six to 12 months. If you do that, you're not only rewarding the fellow and giving the fellow a chance to educate but also attracting to the town GPs who can learn more about eye surgery. And, if the trainees come and visit as well, then we increase the odds that, when they graduate, they're more likely to serve regional Australia.</para>
<para>I'm obviously very proud of having been a former participant of a scheme that offers a carrot and not a stick. It's sad that many will forget that, in the early nineties, there was a push to geographically allocate provider numbers in a way that, effectively, recruited, rather than having GPs move to regional areas as willing volunteers. That was stopped in the early nineties. It was one of the great debates at a time when the easy solution was to mandate and basically have the government putting GPs where they felt they should be put. There's no doubt that having GPs that move somewhere because the incentives are right—and when they get there they love it and they stay as a result—is an enormous and rewarding success for the system. Very few other countries can say they have a similar challenge. Australia's unique solutions to this challenge are something we can all be very proud of. I know, as I'm speaking tonight, that there may not be many people in the gallery nor even in the chamber, but there will be hundreds of remote and regional Australians listening to this debate and knowing that tonight, for a change, both sides of this parliament are fighting to support these modest amendments that continue a very, very important strategic attempt by a rural commissioner—the additional investment of a $550 million, 10-year Stronger Rural Health Strategy. That is all a legacy of the Morrison government from 2018-19, and it continues to roll out successfully.</para>
<para>These incentives are vitally important for the reasons that I have given. They have spin-off benefits to the community and spin-off benefits to allied health, who are supported by the presence of a general practitioner in these communities. And it's fair to say that, if you're in a community of 5,000 or more people, there's a reasonable expectation that there should be an Australian GP there to look after you and your family, to be the care navigator and to provide the services you need that range from allied health through to access to specialist referrals at your doorstep or nearby in your local community. It's a challenge that Australia, with its sparse population density and large distances, faces quite uniquely, and I'm proud to say that, as a result of legislation like this, it's one that we have not only negotiated but also achieved.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms TEMPLEMAN</name>
    <name.id>181810</name.id>
    <electorate>Macquarie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Well, there is some agreement and recognition that there is a GP shortage—for electorates like mine it's a very serious shortage—and the Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021 will have our support. But it doesn't go nearly far enough to address the issue. The complex problem of the provision and retention of GPs has been a challenging issue since I first sought office in 2010, and I've advocated for changes at various times over those 11 years. We were able to secure special support to attract GPs to our area through some of that time, but in the past eight years there have been big changes. The Nepean Blue Mountains Primary Health Network and its predecessor have been active on this matter throughout that whole time as well. GPs have spoken to me about the strain of the shortages that they and their teams experience. Residents of my electorate, particularly new residents, have told me of their challenges in being accepted as a patient at a local practice. It plays out for a lot of people.</para>
<para>The Macquarie electorate covers all of the Blue Mountains and all of the Hawkesbury local government areas on the western edge of Sydney. So, some people think of us as Western Sydney, but in fact we have some very remote areas, and a lot of rural. We have a lot of distance between us and the major teaching hospitals. So these changes are welcome, but the bill will simply not address the difficulties that peri-urban areas like my electorate experience. The Morrison government's decision to exclude most of the Blue Mountains and the Hawkesbury from the new Distribution Priority Area classification means that doctors in the Bonded Medical Program can't meet their return-of-service obligations in my area, and that makes the local GP shortage worse. Often it's not just an issue of attracting the GPs; it's also an issue of attracting the bulk-bill incentives. That's another policy that the Morrison government took action on that makes the regional GP shortage worse. And of course there's also just the general impact of the Morrison government's six-year freeze of the Medicare rebates and the government's decision back in 2014 to abolish Health Workforce Australia—all these things at a time when we should be investing in Medicare and delivering more services to peri-urban, regional and rural areas. This government has been doing the opposite.</para>
<para>The COVID experience has obviously made things harder. That's why Labor established a Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee inquiry into outer-metro, rural and regional GP and other healthcare services. The inquiry will consider the performance of programs such as the Bonded Medical Program, and I was very pleased to make a submission to that inquiry. We want this inquiry to seek practical, positive solutions so that Australians have access to quality health care, regardless of where they live. You shouldn't have to live in Double Bay to get the best health services; you should be able to get those if you in Bullaburra. I encourage others who have views around this and have experienced the impact of shortages and difficulties accessing primary health care to make a submission to the inquiry. It can be as simple as an email and a letter. I want to acknowledge the efforts of the Nepean Blue Mountains Primary Health Network. They and their predecessor have worked hard on this and I'm very grateful for their ongoing interest in the issue.</para>
<para>I want to talk about the things we experience in the electorate. Residents in the upper Blue Mountains and parts of the Hawkesbury find that it can be difficult to get an appointment with a local GP in a timely way. Many new residents to the area are advised by multiple local general practices that their books are closed to new patients; they simply cannot become a patient. And a lot of our GP practices are relatively small. We don't have massive centres, so we have smaller practices scattered across a lot of towns and villages. The real challenge is in attracting GPs to live and work in the area. There are no financial incentives to attract GPs from inner metropolitan areas to the Blue Mountains, unlike designated rural areas. And GPs will not choose to commute on a daily basis from Sydney to Katoomba when there's local work available closer to home. Early-career GPs are increasingly reluctant to venture beyond inner-metropolitan areas, I'm told, or to relocate to regional and rural areas.</para>
<para>Let's put this in perspective. Katoomba is 55 kilometres from the nearest tertiary hospital and metropolitan centre, which is Penrith, and it's more than 100 kilometres from the CBD—probably closer to 150. Yet this peri-urban status is not reflected in GP workforce schemes and initiatives. It's still considered part of metropolitan Sydney. This is a place people go to for a long weekend to escape Sydney, yet we're classified as Sydney for the purposes of GPs. It makes no sense and is completely inequitable. This has to change. You have to travel to Black Heath, a bit further up the mountain, before you get to an area that is considered to be slightly outside Sydney.</para>
<para>The two major general practices in Katoomba have been under significant stress for several years. GP positions have remained vacant and demand for GP appointments has increased. Local residents report absolute distress at the impossibility of getting a timely appointment, and that means that they can end up having to go to an emergency department to get the medical assistance they need. All of this has been an issue for a long time but has been heightened ever since the Blue Mountains LGA was not deemed a distribution priority area in 2019. The primary health network informs me that, for example, in November 2020 one of these practices reported turning away more than 100 patient appointment requests a week. That's a lot of people who are reaching out to get medical assistance and advice, or to have their usual check-ups, but are not able to get it.</para>
<para>Coupled with the difficulty for residents in accessing appointments is the fact that there is no 100 per cent bulk-billing general practice in the mid- to upper-Blue Mountains. There's no general practice open on evenings, Saturday afternoons, Sundays or public holidays. This is a contrast to other areas closer to Sydney, where bulk-bill services are available until 10 o'clock every night of the year. That has led to a strain on the emergency department at the local Blue Mountains District Anzac Memorial Hospital. The cost factor is an issue as well as the difficulty in securing a doctor's appointment. It means that residents in the area who have chronic and complex health issues frequently present at the hospital with what are probably inappropriate presentations that could be seen by a GP rather than taking up time in an emergency department. But they're thinking about the out-of-pocket, the cost of the appointments that they would have to pay.</para>
<para>I received similar feedback to this from GPs in the Hawkesbury. Remember that the Blue Mountains is an area of about 1,000 square kilometres and the Hawkesbury is an area of about 3,000 square kilometres, with people living up little country roads, stretching halfway up to the Hunter. Their medical services are delivered in small towns and cities like Richmond and Windsor. I raised this issue recently in a Zoom with GPs, in which I was getting an update from them around how the vaccination rollout was going in the Hawkesbury. I asked them, 'How are you feeling about GP shortages?' And there was just a complete, unanimous response of, 'Oh my goodness, it is a massive issue!' They had a totally unanimous view about it, particularly when they talked about the area across the river—not the Sydney side of the Hawkesbury River but the north and western parts of this very large LGA.</para>
<para>Historically, we have had a proportion of the district covered by workforce shortage provisions. In the past this has enabled GPs to recruit from a wider pool of doctors, because it allowed for overseas-trained doctors and those on the Bonded Medical Places Scheme to work in the region. Under the Commonwealth's Stronger Rural Health Strategy, and in an effort to shift inequity in the distribution of GPs, the distribution workforce system was replaced in 2019 with this new Distribution Priority Area scheme. It might have benefited some very rural and remote areas—I don't argue that—but peri-urban areas like mine are worse off as a result. The suburbs of Blackheath and Mount Victoria—and anyone who knows the Blue Mountains knows they are small areas right at the top of the mountains—are the only areas now classified as being distribution priority areas. That's in contrast to the entire Blue Mountains and most of the Hawkesbury local government area previously being considered a DWS.</para>
<para>A high and growing proportion of GPs who work in the broader Nepean Blue Mountains PHN are overseas trained doctors. In 2017, about half of GPs in the region had gained their qualifications overseas. The loss of the DWS-DPA status has had a detrimental effect on general practices' ability to get those GPs to work there. I will give you one example of that, Mr Deputy Speaker. When the area was ruled a DWS, under the old scheme, we were able to help at least 25 doctors, in a 4½-year period, secure work in a general practice in the region. Afterwards, that changed. The only place you can do it is Blackheath, so we're down to pretty much zero. There are a few exceptions. The establishment of the medical practice in Glossodia, in the Hawkesbury, was helped only due to the fact that it was in a DWS-DPA area and the owner of the practice was the first doctor they recruited. That has not been possible since the changes were made. These are two things that were possible before but are not possible now, and the consequences of that are really profound.</para>
<para>One of the really serious consequences I'm seeing is GP burnout. I think we've probably all seen GP burnout during COVID. They have been asked to administer vaccines to thousands and thousands of people. In my electorate there is no hub. The only place you can go is to a GP practice or, now, to a pharmacy. The hubs are outside the electorate, so people have leaned really heavily on their GPs. They have stepped up amazingly, but they are burning out. They are carrying a large and complex case load. I'm advised that several GPs from the upper Blue Mountains have resigned in the last 12 months because the patient complexity and workload volume were simply unsustainable.</para>
<para>In peri-urban areas like mine there are fewer opportunities for GPs to link patients with the types of health services and support that residents in metropolitan areas have, so they carry a big load on their own. They're coordinating far more of the care of patients with chronic conditions than are their urban counterparts, who can simply refer on. My rural and regional colleagues will know this.</para>
<para>My GPs also report that they feel less connected to a collegiate professional network. They draw a lot on each other, as GPs, but there's not necessarily the wider ecosystem. Interestingly, I've had a number of conversations with overseas trained GPs who aren't able to work in my electorate. They live in Sydney's west, so they live close. We're not asking them to drive long distances to get to us. They would love the opportunity to finish their Australian training and be supervised, and we have such experienced GPs within our practices that the supervision would be of a very high standard. With the right incentives it would actually be a perfect match. These are the sorts of things that should be considered to provide long-term, sustainable services to my community.</para>
<para>At a systemic, policy level we need to see the methodology for determining distribution priority areas reviewed; we need to see more incentives for GPs to work in lower socioeconomic, peri-urban areas; we need stronger measures to support collegiate professional networks; and we need to consider new models for funding primary health care that might support our GPs and their work. We really do need to draw on the experience of long-serving GPs to train the next generation.</para>
<para>There's one other thing that I think this parliament needs to push. We all accept that telehealth will be an absolutely crucial part of our Medicare system going forward. It has saved lives during COVID. The medical profession, public health experts and patients themselves all agree that it should be made permanent, but after two years of a global pandemic it still isn't a permanent thing. I cannot understand the delay. That is something that needs to be done and it's something Labor will be fighting for, to defend Medicare and improve health services.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr COULTON</name>
    <name.id>HWN</name.id>
    <electorate>Parkes</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I take great pleasure tonight in speaking about the Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021. The bonded placement scheme is very important in distributing doctors across this country to where they are needed. I understand the need for this bill to iron out some problems, but we also don't want to take it away. If someone has an obligation to work in a regional or rural area, they should, unless there are exceptional circumstances, fulfil the obligation they have agreed to.</para>
<para>I've been listening to the debate here and I've heard a lot of talk about the problems, but there haven't been too many solutions coming forward. The member for Macarthur, who's obviously highly regarded in his field, could have gone into some of the programs that are now in place but for some reason chose not to. I'd like to touch on the complexity of the shortage of doctors in regional areas. In listening to the member for Macquarie, I have a degree of sympathy for her issues in being 100 kilometres from a tertiary hospital, but I've got constituents who are 300 or 400 kilometres from their obstetrician and have to relocate a long way from their homes for several weeks before their baby is due and then for some time afterwards for antenatal care, so it's all relative.</para>
<para>In my time as regional health minister I found that everyone believes they live in a disadvantaged area and has special circumstances, but it's important that we put the resources and the support where they are really needed. Over a period of time various schemes have come about. One of them, which paid locums higher rates to fill those workforce gaps, did in one way fill some of those shortages in the workforce, but in another way it actually exacerbated the problem, because why would someone commit to working full time in a regional centre when they could go and work part time in several regional centres and earn double the income of someone who had committed to the area? So the locum scheme actually created part of the problem.</para>
<para>When I was minister, up until quite recently, we put in five trial sites to encourage a different model of workforce. One of the partners in that was Western NSW Local Health District, because they are paying millions of dollars a year in locum fees to fill short-term gaps. They agreed to put some of those funds into creating a work environment that is more conducive for people to work there. They are paying a salary to a doctor to go and work in an area, because they're competing with the larger hospitals in the city, where you can work on a salary, have regular shifts and get holiday pay and maternity leave. With the feminisation of the medical workforce, it's a difficult decision for a younger doctor to go into a regional area, knowing that if they want to have a family they are not actually paid for that particular time.</para>
<para>There are five trial sites. One of them, known as the '4Ts', is four small towns in the Central West of NSW: Trangie, Tottenham, Tullamore and Trundle. Those four towns are working as a network so that there's a collegiate atmosphere and so that they're supporting each other. They know that they are not going to be swamped, given the 80- or 100-hour weeks. They know that there's other backup if they need it. But they also know that, if they're part of a generalist pathway, they will be able to work shifts in, say, Dubbo hospital as an anaesthetist, as an obstetrician or as one of the other specialists that goes with the generalist pathway. In the early stages this seems to be having some effect. They've been quite popular. People are being recruited to these models, because one of the disincentives—and it's been raised here by others on both sides—is that feeling of isolation and lack of support. To overcome that, the generalist pathway that's been funded by this government will give those doctors who are going into those regional areas a broader skill set—knowing that you might be doing primary health care, general medicine, all day, and then a carload of teenagers hits a tree that night and you need to have that extra skill set to be able to manage an emergency of that scale. That can be a daunting process for young doctors. Doctors in my home town of Warialda were the rural doctors of the year in Australia some years back because in 2007, on the last day of the school holidays, a ute with eight 13-year-olds flipped over. All except one were critically injured. Sadly, three passed away, but the others' lives were saved because of the skill set of those doctors. So we are training another cohort of doctors to come through with the skill set to handle that.</para>
<para>Probably at the core of the issue is the fact that general practice as a discipline is falling from favour among our graduates. Part of the reason is that during their training time in the metropolitan hospitals they are actively discouraged from going down a pathway in general practice because working in a specialty can be more financially rewarding, it can have a better work-life balance and people can work closer to the city. So one of the big shifts was the establishment of the Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network, where we are training country people in country areas to be doctors. Earlier this year I was at the first intake in Orange. Every one of those students comes from a regional area. I was speaking to some of them from my electorate. One ultimately wants to be a dermatologist because of the high rate of skin cancer in country people. Every one of those young people was committed to practising in the region.</para>
<para>Next year will be the first intake into Dubbo. Sydney university's campus for Murray-Darling is very, very popular. Sydney university have been recruiting locally from, probably, a more mature group—people who are already established in the community and want to advance their career into becoming doctors. They can do it in their local area. With the establishment of the Western Cancer Centre, which has recently opened, you can do your specialty in oncology or surgery or obstetrics in a regional area, rather than having to be drawn into the city. Because it's such a long process to be fully qualified as a doctor, quite often other life issues come into play. By the time you're fully qualified, you have generally found a life partner. In some cases you want to start a family. So it's important that those decisions are made where people might ultimately be established, rather than having to move a family. One of my daughters is a GP. She practises in a regional area. When she moved from Sydney to that regional area she could find work, but it took some time for her husband to find a position that was suitable for his skill set.</para>
<para>One of the changes in the last budget, a change that comes into effect on 1 January, is that for the first time there is a graduated rebate payment for general practice under the MBS for bulk-billing. On the Modified Monash Model, the further remote you are the higher the rebate you will receive. Understanding a lot of the smaller and more remote communities do have a higher bulk-billing regime, it's important that we reward them. It's the first time that the MBS has been altered in that way. It comes into effect on 1 January. Dr John Hall, the President of the Rural Doctors Association, said this was 'a game changer' for rural medicine.</para>
<para>When I was minister, we also doubled the training places in regional areas for junior doctors. Quite often, for doctors that spend part of their training program as doctors, the more time they are exposed to rural and regional medicine the more likely they are to be established in the areas they've come from.</para>
<para>This is a very complex issue. It is a big issue; there's no doubt about it. It's probably the biggest issue in my electorate. It's not universally the same right across it. At the moment, it's a big issue in Gunnedah, a community of 15,000 people with two practices and two or three doctors servicing that community. Others towns are doing better. It's a bit cyclical. Quite often the problem comes when a senior practitioner wants to retire. That transition to someone else coming through is quite often the difficult part.</para>
<para>These innovative models, I think, will very much help with that. It's the idea that people can come into a system where they'll work with and have the support of a cohort of medical professionals—allied health workers and Indigenous health workers as well—but where there's also the understanding that they're going to have some work-life balance. The days of a doctor coming to town, buying the practice and staying there for 40 years are of an era past. That's just not happening now. The cohort of junior medical professionals who are coming through at the moment want to have that work-life balance. They want to be able to have other skills or go into a more generalist pathway, and we need to recognise that. We need to know that, when that older doctor or those couple of doctors retire, it's probably going to take three or four junior doctors to replace them.</para>
<para>The number of medical graduates coming through is encouraging. There were over 700 applicants for 40-odd places at the Orange campus of the Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network. There is a desire. It is a slow process to go from a first-year medical student to a fully qualified practitioner. I met three third-year medical students on Friday in a little village called North Star, in my electorate. They were out helping the Royal Flying Doctor Service with the vaccination program in regional areas, and they were quite enthusiastic about the experience they were having—flying around in an aeroplane and going into smaller, remote areas. Hopefully, the positivity of that experience might get them to think about maybe enhancing their career.</para>
<para>We just need to be wary of short-term fixes, because quite often the short-term fix actually exacerbates the problem and doesn't solve it. I acknowledge some of the comments made by earlier speakers on both sides. We owe a great debt of gratitude to our doctors and medical practitioners for their work over the last 18 months. They've got Australia through a very difficult time. In my electorate there were over 1,000 cases of COVID but there was a very low death rate, largely because of the dedicated staff of the Aboriginal medical services, the Royal Flying Doctor Service, the health districts and the local GPs doing a fantastic job.</para>
<para>I support the changes in this bill and I look forward to seeing some of the other policies that this government has in place coming to fruition over the years to come as we tackle—in a methodical, professional and thoughtful way—the issue of workforce shortages in medicine across regional Australia.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MURPHY</name>
    <name.id>133646</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I start by joining others in this place in thanking all of the medical staff and people who have supported medical staff through the pandemic, from nurses doing COVID testing to the administrators helping the nurses as we go through the mass testing sites to have everyone registered for their testing; to the pathology service who have processed the tests; to the doctors, the nurses and the administrators in our hospital systems who have been under such pressure dealing with COVID; to the GP clinics and the people that work in those clinics, be they the GPs, the practice managers or the people at the front desk. You have been the front line of our fight against COVID and will continue to be as we open up. All of those people deserve the support of their government—not just words of thanks, which I'm sure are welcome, but the funding that's needed to make sure our public hospital systems can continue to operate not just for the sake of people who have COVID but for everyone else who needs to access a public hospital, which is often overwhelmed at the best of times and certainly has the extra burden of COVID. For the Medicare system, for the GPs who are now seeing people for their health check-ups, for their ongoing treatment, for getting the vaccine, sometimes then for treatment of COVID—their workload has increased. Sadly, we haven't seen enough funding guaranteed going forward to help these people.</para>
<para>The Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021 brings forward some changes that are welcomed, but it doesn't address some of the specific issues that Australians have in outer metro seats like my seat and my community of Dunkley and in regional and rural areas in accessing health care and, in particular, in seeing a GP.</para>
<para>Tightening access to regional bulk-billing incentives that the government has brought in is a policy from a Morrison government that's made regional GP shortages worse, and we feel those shortages in outer metro seats like mine; it's not just in the regions. There's also the impact of the government's six-year freeze in Medicare rebates and the decision back in 2014 to abolish Healthcare Workforce Australia, the consequences of which we are still feeling today.</para>
<para>This is the time that the government should be investing in Medicare and delivering more services to people, not fewer. October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and the Breast Cancer Network of Australia and other organisations dedicated to helping women and the smaller number of men who have breast cancer have been ringing the bell loudly and clearly for at least 18 months now about drop-off rates of women getting checked—having mammograms—and the consequences of later detection of cancers for survival rates and for the sort of treatment that you have to go through.</para>
<para>There is so much to be done in the healthcare system on top of COVID, and we can't afford a government that is not just asleep at the wheel but failing to look after people in their time of need. If we can't properly train up enough people to be GPs in Australia, if we can't devise a system that incentivises GPs to get to outer metro seats like mine, we're going to continue to be reliant on GPs coming to Australia from other countries. We've seen that something like this pandemic really impacts the ability for GPs to come from other countries. We welcome medical practitioners from around the world, and they bring so much to the profession and also to our community. We of course should continue to actively recruit people—the best and the brightest—from all different parts of the world to come and work in Australia, but we have to skill up Australians. We have to give Australians the opportunity to be the best medical practitioners that they can be.</para>
<para>We have to have a system that doesn't make it almost impossible for GP clinics in outer-metropolitan seats to recruit GPs. That's why Labor established a Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee inquiry into outer-metro, rural and regional GP and healthcare services. That inquiry is also going to consider the performance of programs such as the Bonded Medical Program. There is a crisis in outer-metro seats. There is no doubt about it; there is a crisis in being able to recruit and retain appropriately trained GPs. It is unfortunate that we have to have a Senate inquiry to push for reforms in this area. It should be something that is done as a matter of course by a good government, but it hasn't been done.</para>
<para>The inquiry happening in the Senate, I understand, has heard from numerous stakeholders. If you look at the committee's website, it says that some 40-odd submissions have been received so far. I thought that was a bit strange, because I made a submission on behalf of my community in Dunkley and it's not on the website. So my office contacted the committee today. Apparently there are so many submissions to this inquiry that they're overwhelmed trying to get them all up onto the website. So those 43 or so submissions that are on the website don't reflect the huge number of stakeholders, MPs, local councils, medical colleges, individuals and GP clinics who have made submissions. The point of this inquiry is not simply to hold an inquiry; it's to get practical, positive solutions to make sure Australians have access to quality health care regardless of where they live. I've made a submission on behalf of Dunkley, and I encourage everyone who lives this issue or is concerned about this issue to get engaged in the inquiry.</para>
<para>This issue was first brought to my attention shortly after I was elected in August 2019. Dr Chung and Lucina Wilk from the Total Care Medical Group in Frankston came to me. Dr Chung, 72 years young, wants to retire. He wanted to retire in August 2019 but he couldn't—and still can't—recruit enough replacement doctors to be able to do so. I've raised this issue with the minister and I've raised this issue in the parliament, but the barriers to employing doctors at Dr Chung's clinic remains and he continues to work. In November 2019 I met with Rachael Hatzopoulos, from the St Mary Medical Centre in Carrum Downs, because of the serious barriers to employing new doctors that that clinic and other clinics associated with it have been experiencing. Ms Hatzopoulos said to me at the time that it is a common problem across bulk-billing, outer-suburban clinics. It was then and it is now. Ms Hatzopoulos has put in a submission to the committee, which I helped her to submit.</para>
<para>Recently, I had a roundtable discussion with local clinics and Labor's shadow minister for health. Here is a summary of what was clear from that roundtable. As an MM1 location, the Dunkley electorate is not listed as a distribution priority area. From 2022, all doctors require a 3GA program placement; however, there are no programs available in the local area. The only program is the AGPT, which has been closed for several years in metropolitan locations. Health workforce certificates are not granted in MM1 locations, resulting in local clinics being unable to recruit an international medical graduate. Clinics with GP shortages have used locum doctors to fill the gaps, but these placements are only available after they've passed their FRACGP exam and for a maximum of six months. So patients and clinics are consequently subject to frequent GP changes, which is not good for people who need ongoing care. Multiple GP clinics with active patient lists of over 6,500 have reported having only one full-time doctor, with some part-time assistants to manage their patient load. Additional pressure is being put on hospital emergency departments. Patients who can't be seen by a doctor in a timely manner are being referred to hospital for primary care matters.</para>
<para>It's just not good enough. It's not good enough for my community of Dunkley and it's not good enough for people across Australia. We are constantly putting out a positive message to people to look after their health: engage actively in preventative health, go and see their doctor if they have concerns about anything, get tested and carry out courses of treatment in the way that they are prescribed to them. It's really, really hard for people in outer suburbs who rely on bulk-billing GP clinics if they cannot engage a GP to help them to do all of those things. It shouldn't matter what your socioeconomic status is. It shouldn't matter where in Australia you live. You should have access to superb, top-quality care and you should be able to get that care at a bulk-billing GP clinic. When the clinics in my electorate can't recruit doctors and can't get them to stay at their clinics, that undermines the care that is given to often the most vulnerable people, and it's not good enough. I call on the government to actively participate in the Senate inquiry, to look for positive solutions and to implement those solutions. It's actually urgent and it really needs to be done.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>In my maiden speech I made the statement that your health status should not depend on your postcode. I adhere to that statement. I committed then to fighting for my regional communities to improve access to health care and an increased professional workforce, and I continue to do so. I moved to the country 44 years ago, as an 18-year-old bride married to a young intern who began his internship and junior residency at the Mildura Base Hospital, undertaking training in anaesthetics. He then became a GP and completed additional training in obstetrics. Phillip was a very busy GP, with over 1,000 births in just a few years. He spent 44 years in a country practice where doctors shared after-hour calls and obstetric calls and had alternate weekends on duty—it was a heavy workload. Today, things are different, though I will say that rural GPs, such as rural generalists, can work just as hard. In places such as Mildura, GPs choose to take on registrars, resulting in some staying and therefore increasing the workforce in those areas. Not all towns and practices have that option.</para>
<para>This government recognises the need to invest in our regional communities to ensure we get the health care we need when we need it. Many of the challenges relating to healthcare service delivery, particularly in my electorate of Mallee, relate to workforce. We simply do not have the people to deliver the services we need in our communities. The workforce we do have is stretched to the limit, especially now, during the pandemic. The commitment and sacrifice shown by frontline workers in my electorate through this difficult period are a demonstration of why our regional areas are such a wonderful place to live. But we cannot dodge the key issue: we need more people. We need highly trained doctors, nurses, radiologists, physios and other allied health professionals. The problems facing healthcare delivery in regional areas are not going to go away until we get the right people. That's where the government's initiatives to train, attract and retain medical professionals in rural communities become so important.</para>
<para>For example, from 1 January 2022 the Morrison-Joyce government is investing more than $65 million in boosting bulk-billing rebates and providing more affordable health care for patients in regional areas. We are introducing a new progressive incentives schedule that increases the value of the rural bulk-billing incentive based on remoteness. This will enhance the financial viability of practices in rural and remote areas as well as reduce the gap paid by patients. The more remote the area, the greater the incentive payment. This will be done to recognise the greater challenges and cost pressures of providing health care in regional areas. The new rural bulk-billing incentive will support those GPs providing services to people in greatest need and those who have the lowest capacity to pay for health care. The new rural incentive rates are a key reform we have delivered to attract more doctors to the bush.</para>
<para>The legislation currently before the House builds on the coalition government's workforce training and primary care reforms. The Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021 provides additional flexibility to enhance the implementation of the bonded medical program. The bonded medical program is a key policy which aims to provide more Australian doctors to areas of need, particularly in regional and remote Australia. The proposed amendments will address unintended consequences in the interests of participants and will also support achievement of the program's objectives. The proposed amendments will provide the necessary flexibility to administer the program and to address issues that are having a direct impact on participants. If the bill is not passed in the 2021 spring sittings, the issues directly affecting participants—most of whom are medical professionals providing crucial health services in regional, rural and remote Australia at this critical time—will remain unresolved. This is unacceptable. The additional flexibility provided for by this legislation will enhance participation in the program and will therefore improve health outcomes for regional Australians. Increasing the availability of appropriately trained doctors is a key factor in improving our health outcomes.</para>
<para>While we are delivering these key amendments, we also need to look to the future. Retaining skilled people is a key challenge in the bush. We know that training people in the regions significantly increases the likelihood that a student will live and remain in the regional area. Train local; stay local. That's what I'm focused on, particularly for my electorate of Mallee. Training home-grown talent to meet our health needs is the most sustainable solution to the problems we face. One of my key aims is to assist in the establishment of an undergraduate biomedical degree at our local La Trobe University campus in Mildura. The idea is then to link the undergraduate biomed degree to a postgraduate medical degree at Melbourne university's Shepparton campus or, alternatively, Mildura. This would create a pathway for rural students to complete end-to-end medical training in regional Victoria. I'm fully behind this proposal and have taken it directly to the Minister for Regional Health, whom I know is on board. I've also spent many, many Zoom meetings with the Vice-Chancellor of La Trobe University, Professor John Dewar.</para>
<para>Within the first six months of taking up the role as the member for Mallee, I held stakeholder meetings with health service providers across Mallee to seek to understand where they saw the gaps and the issues. It became very clear that an innovative model would be necessary to meet the health needs of our rural, regional and remote communities. I put together a healthcare policy document which addressed the gaps and provided solutions. As such, an integrated model, which reaches out to rural towns, appears to be the ultimate solution—a heart and artery model or a hub and spoke model of primary and allied healthcare. Mallee Track in Ouyen provides such a service and reaches out to small, rural towns in that region. Lois O'Callaghan is the CEO of Mallee Track, and I've spent many sessions talking with her about how it could be improved. At the moment, they struggle to get a GP—to simply get a doctor to work at that practice. It puts a tremendous load on the service delivery.</para>
<para>The team approach is working very well in other states, and I have spoken with the Minister for Health and the Minister for Regional Health about this concept for Mallee. I've discussed with them the need for a mix of block funding and Medicare funding to provide services by allied and primary health professionals who work together as a team. The benefit of a team approach is that it shares the load of health delivery. A team that communicates and plans and that manages patient needs, whether that happens under one roof or over several locations, would bring an enhanced healthcare model and, undoubtedly, increase our workforce at the same time.</para>
<para>The health space in my electorate is continually expanding, and this government is backing us to deliver more of the services we need locally. The coalition government invested $6.5 million to purchase new equipment for a radiation oncology service in Mildura. The service will be established at the Mildura Health Private Hospital and will be open to both public and private patients. A radiation oncology centre in Mildura is another step towards improved health outcomes for regional Victorians. Thankfully, cancer patients in Mildura and surrounds will no longer have to travel long hours away from home in order to receive life-saving radiation cancer treatment. Of course, the pandemic has exacerbated this issue, and there have been many patients who have had treatments delayed or have had an inability to get the treatment that they need. This would be solved with the implementation of this radiation bunker.</para>
<para>It comes down, however, to workforce. In Mallee we are ambitious and we see a bright future for Mallee as a tri-state health hub. Discussion and planning for a new hospital in Mildura has begun at the state government level, which is greatly appreciated. A new hospital is undoubtedly necessary to keep pace with our population growth and greater demand for services. We need the new hospital to be a tertiary training hospital, with capacity for specialist referrals. We can't keep shipping our most sick patients off to Bendigo, Adelaide and Melbourne. People in the region deserve the best quality healthcare close to home.</para>
<para>This is an ambitious goal but a critical one. This is why we need to implement measures now to secure the workforce for the future. We need to have new local training opportunities. We need to continue incentivising doctors to work in the bush and to create innovative models of healthcare delivery to address workforce shortages. This government is getting on with the job. Measures contained in this bill will work towards a brighter future for healthcare delivery in the regions.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBRIDE</name>
    <name.id>248353</name.id>
    <electorate>Dobell</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Firstly, I'd like to join others in this House who have recognised and acknowledged the critical work of healthcare workers across Australia during the pandemic. I'd like to especially acknowledge those on the Central Coast in the electorate I represent. As we faced COVID-19 it was a privilege as a volunteer pharmacist immuniser to help boost vaccination rates in our community.</para>
<para>I rise to speak on the Health Insurance Amendment (Enhancing the Bonded Medical Program and Other Measures) Bill 2021 and to support the amendment moved by the member for Cooper. The purpose of the bill is to amend the Health Insurance Act 1973 to enhance implementation of the Bonded Medical Program and the administration of medical rural bonded scholarship contracts under section 19 of the act. The program is designed to address a doctor shortage across rural, regional and remote Australia, but this shortage has only gotten worse under the Morrison government.</para>
<para>I have spoken countless times about the acute GP shortage that we're facing in Australia, particularly in the outer suburbs and the regions—as soon as you live anywhere outside a big city. But, despite the growing crisis, this government has been slow to act. That's why we have been forced to establish a Senate inquiry into the provision of GPs and related primary health services in outer metro, regional and rural Australia. The inquiry will consider the performance of programs such as this one. Many submissions have been made from my electorate so far—from the Central Coast Community Women's Health Centre; local GPs, like Dr Brad Cranney; and local surgeries. They know that the problem is real and that it is only getting worse.</para>
<para>In my community the GP shortage is now a crisis. On the coast getting in to see a GP has never been tougher. The government's distribution priority area classification—and I've spoken to the minister about this myself—excluding most of the Central Coast, particularly the northern part of the Central Coast that I represent, is making it harder to get an appointment. Unfortunately, this is true for many communities in outer metropolitan, rural and regional Australia. We're now seeing a two-tiered health system in Australia, where care is increasingly determined by where you live and how much you can pay. This means that people living outside big cities are finding it much more difficult to access care and access critical care close to home, leading to poorer health outcomes in rural and regional communities, which is made worse by longer wait times, higher out-of-pocket costs and a shortage of healthcare workers.</para>
<para>The Morrison government's DPA classification has had a significant and detrimental impact on my community. It means doctors in the Bonded Medical Program can't meet their return-of-service obligation in our community, making the local GP shortage even worse. It has made it extremely difficult for local practices to recruit and retain GPs. I've spoken to so many GPs who are struggling to get through the COVID-19 pandemic and be able to meet the needs of people who want to get a jab, who need critical health information and who need routine care. Regular health screening has been delayed.</para>
<para>This is a crisis in our community. In a community like mine—where one in five people are aged over 65 and, at the other end, there are lots of young families—people can't get a GP. They can't find a GP. The books are being closed. To get an appointment they're being forced to travel back to where they were before. It's just not good enough. I have heard from countless GPs working in local practices. They have reported increased waiting times since we lost our DPA status. Not only is it frustrating that people in my community must wait weeks to see a GP but also it is risky.</para>
<para>Debate interrupted.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.2></subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>ADJOURNMENT</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>ADJOURNMENT</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Frontier Lighting</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALY</name>
    <name.id>13050</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] If you've attended a Pink concert, a Jimmy Barnes concert—and I know you have, Deputy Speaker Goodenough—the AFL grand final or indeed any large event in Perth, chances are that the event lighting was provided by Perth's own Frontier Lighting. They are WA's biggest event lighting company, established 21 years ago, and they are doing it tough. They have been hit by COVID. In order to recover from the COVID pandemic and its impact on them, they applied for an SME recovery loan. Remember that when these loans were announced, Mr Speaker, they were announced with much fanfare. In fact, at the time, the Treasurer said the government expected that these loans would support around $40 billion worth of business. To date, the loans have in fact only supported around $6 billion.</para>
<para>Jared Hawke from Frontier Lighting tells me that he was rejected for the loan because, with no international acts coming in, he would have no income coming in. I would have thought that that was the purpose of the scheme—to enable companies that aren't getting an income stream during COVID to survive the pandemic until they can become profitable again post the pandemic. For Jared Hawke and Frontier Lighting, the SME recovery loan would have provided the light at the end of the tunnel which they so desperately needed. Jared has now lost his car, is looking at the prospect of losing his home and is waiting to learn if he'll have to be declared bankrupt. I know the Premier of Western Australia, Mark McGowan, has written to the Treasurer about Frontier Lighting and is seeking the Treasurer's assistance in ensuring that Frontier Lighting gets access to these loans. I would add my voice to that of Premier McGowan's to urge the government to step in and ensure that Frontier Lighting doesn't go down.</para>
<para>It's been reported in the <inline font-style="italic">West Australian</inline> that the company's assets will be flogged off by liquidators at bargain rates, with lights from Germany that cost Jared $7½ thousand attracting offers from eastern states companies of just $500. If the company is sold off to eastern states, this means that lighting for big events here will have to be shipped from the eastern states, at an estimated cost of $80,000. Who's going to bear the brunt of that cost? It will be WA event goers. It will be the WA public who will bear that cost.</para>
<para>Before the pandemic, Frontier Lighting had about 30 staff and engaged another 30 subcontractors, so they have been hit really hard by the pandemic, as have many in the arts industry. Many of their subcontractors included tradies. The arts industry—and the entire sector, no doubt—is one that has been given less attention by this government during the pandemic. When it has been given support by the Morrison government, that support has been slow, it has been limited and it has been without a comprehensive understanding of what exactly the entire arts sector needs or what it includes. We know that the arts sector includes companies like Frontier Lighting—event lighting companies.</para>
<para>Frontier Lighting are not the only ones doing it tough here in WA who have already had issues with accessing the poorly designed SME Recovery Loan Scheme. Here in WA there are many businesses that were successful before the pandemic who will be profitable again post the pandemic if they are able to access these loans. I urge the government—I urge the Treasurer—to look into these loans and to ensure that they fulfil the purpose for which they were set up. If people like Frontier Lighting—a company that's been around for 21 years, WA's largest event lighting company—are unable to access these loans, and other companies can't do it, then the loans are an abject failure in their purpose. I speak on behalf of Frontier Lighting. Let's get this right. Give them access to the loan.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Moncrieff Electorate: Gold Coast Jobs, Skills and Industry Forum</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:35</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms BELL</name>
    <name.id>282981</name.id>
    <electorate>Moncrieff</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to inform the House about the Reimagine 2.0 Gold Coast Jobs, Skills and Industry Forum that I hosted on 24 September at the Island Gold Coast, in the heart of Moncrieff in Surfers Paradise. This forum is now in its second year as the Gold Coast's only cross-industry think tank. It is an initiative of the City Heart Taskforce, which I chair, and was convened in May 2020 as my local response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides an important platform for city industry leaders to connect, create and collaborate by sharing knowledge about innovation, implementation and service delivery, with a key emphasis on jobs, skills, talent, economic diversification and investment attraction.</para>
<para>The forum component featured keynote plenary presentations and a themed industry breakout session for key industry leaders and business representatives to initiate the discussion of issues and provocative ideas, with a focus on targeted outcomes. Over 120 city leaders came together for the breakfast, which featured speakers from emerging Gold Coast industry sectors of biomedical technologies, industry 4.0 and space. Ms Estella Rodighiero, Director of Regional Development Australia Gold Coast and City Heart Taskforce executive member, outlined her work for the industry 4.0 project, which plays an important role in highlighting new technologies and new ways to do business, including robotics, artificial intelligence, the internet of things and 3D printing. I also acknowledge the great work that RDA Gold Coast does under its regional chairman, Nick Scott.</para>
<para>Dr Hal Rice is a neurovascular surgeon and a diagnostic and interventional neuroradiologist who has developed robotic brain aneurysm procedures and 3D models of patient aneurysms that can be used as training tools for medical students or in practice runs for difficult and complex surgeries. Dr Rice and his partner, Dr Laetitia de Villiers, work from Griffith University's ADaPT—the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute. I'm advocating in this place for a larger building as a new home for this type of technology and innovative therapies, which save lives across Queensland and, potentially, the world.</para>
<para>Mr Adam Gilmour's business Gilmour Space is blasting off, launching rockets and satellites into space. There's an incredibly fast-growing space industry on the Gold Coast, which is exciting not only for Gilmour Space, Ryan Aerospace and Aero Defence but also for the next generation of schoolkids whose dreams of becoming rocket scientists can now become reality without leaving the Gold Coast.</para>
<para>At the breakfast we heard a message from the Prime Minister to Gold Coast industry leaders, and from my Gold Coast colleague the member for Fadden, the Minister for Employment, Workforce, Skills, Small and Family Business, who outlined the challenges we face as a nation with regard to skills shortages in the workforce. He outlined how important it is that the Queensland Premier stick to the national plan to provide Gold Coast businesses with a road map to Christmas. And today, finally, we heard the Premier talking about sticking to the national plan, which is great news for local business, particularly tourism and hospitality operators. The member for McPherson and Minister for Home Affairs then spoke about the challenges of opening our international borders and her very important work protecting Australians.</para>
<para>After the Reignite Breakfast, the City Heart Taskforce executive members went into breakout power sessions where they discussed the three key themes, and accompanying questions, that formed their closing remarks at the end of the forum. The key themes that we explored were opportunity, innovation and talent. The 2032 Olympics is now a tremendous opportunity for transport, infrastructure and growth in sport, which will produce development from the community to the elite level. It will see a decade of opportunity before and after the games. We've seen 100,000 people move to the Gold Coast over the last 12 months, and that population growth has brought talent with it that needs to be harnessed and funnelled into our emerging sectors, such as arts and culture. Some sectors have innovated, diversified and activated to survive and prosper during the COVID-19 pandemic. Already contributing $7 billion to the Gold Coast economy is manufacturing, which certainly has further potential and opportunities, with 24 per cent growth and 14,500 jobs in the last five years. Talent is a key factor in our long-term recovery and indeed future growth, and this was discussed at length by industry key pillars. I congratulate City Heart Taskforce executive members, who worked together on Reimagine 2.0 to steward the way forward for jobs, skills and industry on the Gold Coast. The Reimagine 2.0 <inline font-style="italic">I</inline><inline font-style="italic">nsights</inline> report will be published shortly.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: Vaccination</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:40</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms RYAN</name>
    <name.id>249224</name.id>
    <electorate>Lalor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Mr Speaker, as you know, I'm the proud member for Lalor, in the west of Melbourne. I'm proud to represent a growing community, a community in a place where I was born and where I raised my family. I see my role in the federal parliament as to carry their stories into this place, to influence people who make decisions in this place and to be a part of that decision-making with the full knowledge of how my community works.</para>
<para>I stand here tonight the incredibly proud member for Lalor, as we have learnt today that the city of Wyndham—a city which Lalor exists inside—has reached a percentage rate of more than 95 per cent of over-16s having had their first dose of vaccination. This is an extraordinary response from my community. We are also celebrating that we are 68.8 per cent in terms of double dosed or fully vaccinated. That's 138,000 people from my community who are now fully vaccinated in the over-16 bracket. That's 22,000 people in the last week. That's an 11.1 per cent increase this week. I have watched these numbers carefully and have seen the rate rise—eight per cent, nine per cent—week on week for first vaccinations and for second vaccinations. But to reach 11 per cent today is an extraordinary achievement.</para>
<para>It is about the community and their willingness to get on board to protect themselves, to protect their families and to protect their neighbours. It's truly an extraordinary movement that has occurred in my community. But I'm not surprised, because I have seen my community called to action before. I've seen them respond before when we have been struck by things or when we have needed to fight for things. It's a community that I very proudly led to beat back a toxic dump when Jeff Kennett was Premier of Victoria and thought that we were a likely locality. They beat that and we are going to beat the pandemic, because the people in my community care about one another and they care about their community.</para>
<para>They have the highest first vaccination rate of local government areas in the western suburbs of Melbourne, as I stand here this evening, and the highest fully vaccinated LGA in the west. We moved ahead of Hobsons Bay this week. This week we had the highest increase in second doses in the state, and we are the second metro-Melbourne LGA to hit greater than 95 per cent first dose, with Nillumbik getting there before us. We did all this with a population that defied what everyone expected. We had op-eds telling us that the west wouldn't vaccinate and singling out Wyndham as slow to vaccinate, without a view of our demographic, which shows quite clearly that we are one of the youngest communities in the country.</para>
<para>We are an area that people come to because we have affordable housing. We are a growth corridor. We have families who come from around the world to join us in Wyndham and raise their children. We have the highest number of children in child care in the country. We have the highest number of families with children in child care in the country. That's how young our population is. I'm incredibly proud of that young population and the way they have gotten on board with all of this.</para>
<para>This is our second COVID winter. We were hit hard in the first winter and we have been hit hard again in the second in terms of transmission rates, the number of families in isolation and the number of those who have actually contracted the virus. Our response is responsible. Our response demonstrates that we respect the science, that we respect the medical advice and that we will take that medical advice on board personally and take responsibility for our actions. People thought there was hesitancy, but there was never hesitancy to get vaccinated; there was only a supply issue. And if this federal government had done its job, then the people in my community would have been vaccinated before this second winter. If the vaccine had been available in March, people would have queued up to be vaccinated, as they have done.</para>
<para>I want to finish by thanking our local GPs, not just for the vaccinations but also for talking to people who may be anxious and getting them vaccinated. Thanks to Western Health, who crossed the million-doses mark today; to the Werribee Mercy Hospital, who reached 10,000 doses today; to IPC Health; to our local chemists; and to everyone who has been involved in this grand effort.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Gippsland Electorate: Community Resilience</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CHESTER</name>
    <name.id>IPZ</name.id>
    <electorate>Gippsland</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I also rise with a great deal of pride this evening to reflect on the magnificent people of Gippsland and say thank you to them for their resilience during these very difficult times. These have been troubling times, Mr Speaker, as you well know, and it's easy to become a bit despondent, a bit dejected, even frustrated, as we go through months of lockdown and other challenges. Disaster fatigue is a very real threat in our communities, and it's so important that we continue to work together and support each other during these difficult days. In Gippsland, we have experienced a succession of disasters. There has been the drought, the Black Summer bushfires, coronavirus and its impact on our community, and then the storms and floods. You'd well remember those storm, Mr Speaker. I've never seen so many trees come down, causing so much damage across such a broad area of Victoria. Our challenge in this place, as leaders in our own communities, is to make sure we don't ever fall into the trap of talking ourselves down as a nation and as a community. We can be extremely proud of ourselves as Australians and what we've been able to achieve in the last 20 months. We need to provide optimism and hope for our communities to make sure that they are capable of bouncing back as the opportunities present themselves.</para>
<para>We have so much to be thankful for in this country, and I have so much to be thankful for in my own community of Gippsland, seeing the ways the first responders have rallied. Whether it's the police, the ambulances, the fire services, the SES, or the Australian Defence Force during the Black Summer bushfires, I want to thank them. I want to thank the medical workers—the doctors and nurses on the front line, the receptionists and all the allied health workers—who've managed to keep doing their work during the pandemic, making sure that critical services are being supplied to our community. Then there are people like the transport operators, the truck drivers, the frontline retail workers and the people working on farms, making sure that products still get to market. They've been incredibly resilient and have stuck together, and I thank my community for that.</para>
<para>Finally, tonight I want to reflect a little bit on the students as they approach their year 12 exams. This generation of students has been tested in incredible ways, when you think about it. The last two years of schooling in Victoria have seen an enormous number of days lost due to lockdown and students learning from home. Their resilience has been tested incredibly. I say to those student: think about the oldest person you've ever met. They're probably about 100. Those people were born at the time of the last pandemic, the Spanish flu. They grew up during the Great Depression, when money was short. There was food rationing. It was a very difficult time in Australia. Then they served in World War II. Many of them lost their mates. Those who survived—some injured, some carrying the scars for life—returned to Australia and created this incredible nation that we enjoy today. In many ways they are regarded as the greatest generation of Australians. The young people today, studying and preparing for their exams, have been tested, but there is no reason for them to have anything other than hope, optimism and confidence that they too can be a great generation of Australians. So I say to them: never give up. Take some heart from the previous generations. Recognise the enormous opportunities that are there for you in the future. Think about what you can become rather than what you've lost in these last couple of years.</para>
<para>It is with enormous pride that I stand here tonight. I'm incredibly thankful to the people of Gippsland for the opportunity to represent them here during these really difficult times. As I said in my opening comments, we have every reason to be confident going forward, as the lockdowns start to ease. As we just heard from the member for Lalor, the vaccination rates are increasing right across Victoria. We're going to start to enjoy some freedoms that we may almost have forgotten about in recent months.</para>
<para>So I say to people: as those freedoms come onstream, try to support your local business community. Try to support the hospitality sector, which has been through a tough time. Try to take a break, if you can, in your own state or your own local region and support those local jobs. By putting those local businesses first in these times, you'll make sure there are jobs there for your family, for your kids, in the future and that we continue to make positive strides forward together as a region, as a state and as a great nation. I thank the House.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Defence Procurement</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:50</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOSH WILSON</name>
    <name.id>265970</name.id>
    <electorate>Fremantle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>If the Morrison government's single-minded focus on obfuscation could be turned into an antidetection technology, our Future Submarine program might be in better shape, rather than in a smouldering heap. Sadly, there's nothing subtle about the raging bin fire that the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison submarine program has become. The reality is that right now Australia does not have a Future Submarine program. All we know for sure from the recent announcement is as follows: while our existing submarine capability is reaching the end of its operational life, there is no arrangement in place to address that looming capability gap. We know that huge damage has been done to our relationship with France, which needs to it be a key and trusted partner in our region, and we know that significant damage has been done to our international reputation more generally. That damage is likely to harm Australia's pursuit of its national interest in a range of areas, including trade, and it will persist as long as the current government is in place.</para>
<para>An absence of credibility and trustworthiness is a hallmark of this government. People in my state, Western Australia, have learnt that these past few years. They're not likely to be convinced when the Prime Minister claims he can be trusted not to meddle with WA's hard-won GST arrangements simply because he's the one who did the deal. Someone should tell that to the French! If Western Australians could trust this Liberal government to keep its word, we wouldn't have been dudded in relation to submarine maintenance. True to their tricky form with all the hullabaloo involved in junking the French sub deal, the Morrison government decided to sneak out the announcement that it was snubbing WA when it came to full-cycle docking of the Collins class submarines. After promising a decision by Christmas 2019, running full-page ads in the <inline font-style="italic">West Australian</inline> newspaper promising a fifty-fifty split on defence shipbuilding, and saying they'd decide in the national interest, the Morrison government have ignored all that and made a decision in their own self-interest. People in WA won't forget being dudded on shipbuilding; being lumped with twice as much of the worst NBN copper technology as any other state; being threatened by Clive Palmer, with the financial support of this Liberal government; and being criticised as cave-dwellers, when really it is WA's excellent pandemic management that has kept the Australian economy on two feet. People in WA will not forget.</para>
<para>To come back to the AUKUS arrangement, the critical thing now is for a careful and rigorous conversation to occur about how to deal with the submarine mess created by the coalition. No-one should feel railroaded into whatever the government say is their new plan. No-one should feel obliged to go along with their version of what might occur in 20 or 30 years time. They've presided over a defence procurement nightmare. They've wasted years and billions of dollars and have severely compromised our submarine capability. When we asked questions in the past, we were told: 'It's all fine. The French submarines will be excellent. There's no need for concern about the level of Australian industry participation, the time line or the cost.' That all turned out to be complete rubbish.</para>
<para>So the most important thing is that we ask questions and we expect answers, and that includes a number of questions that remain in relation to nuclear propulsion. Yes, nuclear submarines go faster and can remain submerged indefinitely from a propulsion point of view, but they're also noisier, with a more detectable heat signature because their cooling systems can never switch off. They're also larger and less effective in coastal or littoral environments, which are characteristic of our region. They also cost more, with a larger crew complement, so inevitably you operate fewer submarines, and numbers do matter. There are defence strategists who for some time have called for the US to acquire the specific capability of diesel-electric submarines, and it's always been the view that our submarines operate in a complementary fashion to the larger, less manoeuvrable American boats. Even if the main game is ensuring that we have submarines that can go further and faster underwater for extended periods, the Australian public shouldn't think the choice is only between our existing diesel-electric-propelled submarines and some yet to be determined nuclear option. A number of countries, including Japan and Germany, operate air-independent propulsion based platforms, and the capability of these submarines is improving all the time. It's also a form of technology that much better suits our broader energy tech interests in future, and it will be more likely to be based on a genuine sovereign capability. Of course, it would avoid relying on the use of weapons-grade nuclear material, with the regional non-proliferation consequences of going down that path.</para>
<para>In any case, it's critical, in the aftermath of this government's submarine procurement disaster, that we don't get rushed down a particular path and that we don't allow the people who've made such a mess to dictate what happens next without proper scrutiny.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Defence Procurement</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>19:55</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONNELLY</name>
    <name.id>282984</name.id>
    <electorate>Stirling</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Our very first responsibility as a government is to keep Australians safe and to protect our way of life, our freedom and our values. As the Prime Minister said when he met with fellow world leaders in the US recently, 'No country is safe until we are all safe,' and this is why it's vital that we work together. So, just over one month ago, the historic AUKUS agreement was announced. This involves Australia's partnership with the UK and the US, and it is now going from strength to strength.</para>
<para>The enhanced security partnership is a victory for friendship, freedom and security. It's founded on a shared belief in democratic freedoms for which we have fought side by side: human dignity, the rule of law, independence of sovereign nations, and the peaceful fellowship of nations. If COVID has highlighted anything, it is that our world is dramatically changing, particularly within our region, the Indo-Pacific. We're navigating through one of the most complex challenges in living memory, and it's more important now than ever that we engage with like-minded friends.</para>
<para>Thanks to AUKUS, Australia will become the first nation in 70 years to acquire nuclear-powered submarine technology from the US, enabling us to build at least eight nuclear-powered submarines right here in Australia. This capability will significantly enhance Australia's ability to deter threats and to uphold stability and security in the Indo-Pacific. We are reinforcing our focus on our own backyard and working to support the interests, security and prosperity of our Indo-Pacific family.</para>
<para>Another project to come out of AUKUS which I'm extremely pleased about and which is a monumental win for WA defence industry is the installation of a large vessel dry berth. Essentially, that is a facility where you can float a ship in, close off the dock, drain the water and have the ship sitting on a dry berth. This will enable the build and maintenance of, firstly, those large naval surface combatant ships that Australia is investing in over the next decade and also the build and maintenance of civilian commercial vessels. Further to that, we will also be able to host allied naval vessels in this facility. Currently we have only one such facility, which was built way back towards the end of the Second World War and which is in Sydney. This new facility means that we'll have the ability to support a two-ocean based naval strategy, meaning that we can have, and support, the fleet of our naval ships in Western Australia. Further to this, this facility will involve around $1 billion in construction costs alone but will also provide the opportunity for jobs for generations to come. Indeed we've seen the facility in Sydney last for 75 years already, so we're looking at probably a 100-year lifespan for this facility.</para>
<para>Under this partnership, Australia will also acquire additional long-range strike missile capability, and this will provide Australian strike effects with distance, precision and lethality across our air, land and maritime domains. But it doesn't stop there. Through AUKUS we will also collaborate to enhance our joint capabilities, focusing on cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies and additional undersea capabilities, and all of this is on top of the $270 billion which this Morrison government is investing in defence capability over the next decade. Under the Force Structure Plan, the government will continue to acquire major capabilities. Of course this now includes at least those eight nuclear submarines that, as we've discussed, we will be acquiring, as well as nine Hunter class frigates, joint strike fighters, Boxer combat reconnaissance vehicles and many other capabilities. These investments, hand in hand with AUKUS, will help build a sovereign industrial base that is internationally competitive, innovative and high-tech and will meet Australia's defence capability needs, creating jobs and skills today and into the future. The AUKUS partnership builds on Australia's significant network of other partnerships like ASEAN, Five Eyes, the Quad and the Pacific Islands Forum. It complements our existing investments and builds our presence in the Indo-Pacific. This historic partnership will bolster peace, stability and security for Australia and for our regional neighbours.</para>
<para>House adjourned at 20:00</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>NOTICES</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>NOTICES</type>
      </debateinfo></debate>
  </chamber.xscript>
  <fedchamb.xscript>
    <business.start>
      <body background="" style="" xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main" xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:WX="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2003/auxHint" xmlns:aml="http://schemas.microsoft.com/aml/2001/core" xmlns:pic="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/picture" xmlns:w10="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:wp="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/wordprocessingDrawing" xmlns:r="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships">
        <p class="HPS-MCJobDate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-MCJobDate">
            <a href="Federation Chamber" type="">Monday, 18 October 2021</a>
          </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">The </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">DEPUTY SPEAKER </span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">(</span>
            <span style="font-weight:bold;">Mr Rob Mitchell) </span>took the chair at 10:30.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Line" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Line"> </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Dunkley Electorate: COVID-19</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="300" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Ms MURPHY</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Dunkley</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:30</span>):  I am in parliament in Canberra today in a week that Victorians have done themselves absolutely proud—70 per cent double vaccination rates. The Premier said this morning he anticipates when we hit 80 per cent double vaccination rates we will be at 90 per cent single vaccination rates. It is an extraordinary effort by people in my community and communities across the state to take steps not only to just protect themselves and their families but to protect their communities. It's been an exercise in people looking out for each other. It has been and it will continue to be, let's be under no doubt, incredibly difficult getting through this pandemic but we couldn't have done it without each other.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">This constituency statement today is dedicated to the pandemic heroes of Dunkley. I have a nominate your pandemic hero scheme for people across Dunkley and I have to say the response has been overwhelming and extraordinary. People are nominating others in the community who have done something special over the last 18 or so months which has helped them to get through lockdowns, restrictions and health challenges. I am not going to be able to go through all of them but I want to acknowledge here just some of the representative pandemic heroes of Dunkley.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Emily nominated Kate and Bernadette, who are her midwives at Frankston Hospital. Ashley nominated Joanne Kellet, who is a nurse at Frankston Hospital. Linda nominated Stacey Matheson, who is a nurse at the Nepean School, a special school, and Monash Children's Hospital. Andrew nominated Samuel Vance, a registered nurse at Peninsula Health, and Melissa nominated Anthea Hempel, who is a dialysis nurse at Frankston Hospital. Of course, we have acknowledged the amazing men and women who have run the testing facilities across our electorate.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Chelsea nominated Ainslie Jackel, who has provided free music classes to kids and moderated a mums' page. A lot of the 'COVID crew'—they call themselves—have nominated Andrew Wishart from <span style="font-style:italic;">X Factor</span> Australia for his live music gigs for everyone. Basil wanted a shout-out for Jimmy and Jane Barnes. Jennifer nominated her husband, Renato Simone, who is a cleaner. Cleaners have been frontline pandemic heroes. We have had Trevor's wife, Donna Sweeney; Tammy's husband, Stuart Smith. Silvia nominated the amazing Sikh volunteers. Cody nominated his teacher Anthea at Chisholm TAFE. Rena Walsh nominated her head teacher. Teachers and parents have been extraordinary. Vets and vet nurses and support teams have been nominated by Helen.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Cafes across the electorate have kept people caffeinated.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Banks Electorate</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="80" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Mr COLEMAN</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Banks</span>—<span class="HPS-MinisterialTitles">Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:33</span>):  I want to talk about St George Meals on Wheels, a tremendously important organisation in our local community, based at Olds Park Sports Club. Nahed Soliman and everyone involved at St George Meals on Wheels deserves tremendous credit. They deserve that credit all the time but they deserve it even more for their efforts during the recent lockdown period in Sydney. More than 150 volunteers help out at St George Meals on Wheels, who prepare meals, who drive and who make deliveries. It is a fantastic community organisation. Nahed has led it with tremendous skill for many years now. We are all incredibly conscious of the importance of the work they do. We thank St George Meals on Wheels for its fantastic efforts, not just during the pandemic but always.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Revesby Rovers Football Club has a proud history, dating back to 1950 and has produced two Socceroos in Robbie Slater, who is one of the better-known Socceroos in recent decades, and Steven O'Connor as well. They have a beautiful home ground down at Amour Park, and for all of those decades they have welcomed thousands and thousands of local families and local kids to play and enjoy the beautiful game that is football. More than 10,000 people play football in the Banks electorate. It is by far our largest sporting activity. It's through the efforts of people like Michael Tohmeh, President of Revesby Rovers, and all of the volunteers that so much good activity is able to happen. To Michael and everyone at Revesby Rovers, thank you so much for what you do for our community.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">One of the oldest Girl Guides locations anywhere in Australia is in the Banks electorate at Mortdale. Mortdale Girl Guides has been around since the 1920s, so in the not too distant future it will be celebrating its centenary. The reason it has had such longevity is that the things that the girls learn at Mortdale Girl Guides are so important they have stood the test of time. Wonderful social skills development, making new friends, learning about personal responsibility and important values are so well communicated through the Girl Guides movement. It was good to catch up with Michelle and Karen the other day and talk about all of the work going on at Mortdale Girl Guides, the largest Girl Guides organisation anywhere in the Banks electorate. Thank you to all the volunteers.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Fraser Electorate: COVID-19 Vaccination</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Melbourne: Infrastructure</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="298" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Dr MULINO</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Fraser</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:36</span>):  I was delighted to support leaders of the Vietnamese community in my electorate this weekend to raise awareness and understanding of Australia's safe, free and effective vaccine program. Vaccines are our path back to doing the things that we love and seeing the people that we love. It is very gratifying that in Victoria this week we will reach 70 per cent double dosage and we will see many longstanding restrictions eased. We know we need to improve vaccination rates in some non-English speaking communities in particular and to combat misinformation in some of these communities. I praise the leadership of these communities throughout Melbourne's west and, in particular, in my electorate. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">I want to especially thank the Vietnamese community in my electorate of Fraser for their leadership: the Vietnamese Community in Australia Victoria Chapter, the VMC, Australian Vietnamese Arts and the many Vietnamese-Australian doctors in Fraser. In particular, I call out the work of Dr Hai Phan and Dr Trang Wong, who were at the event I was at on the weekend. They are using their positions of influence for the good of the entire community. The Vietnamese community in Fraser has been literally rolling up its sleeves. Melbourne's west had vaccination rates slightly below Victoria's average for some time, but, like the rest of the west, its vaccination rates have been increasing at above the state average in recent weeks, which is very gratifying to see. I am deeply grateful to these leaders and organisations from across the Vietnamese-Australian community. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">I would also like to thank the frontline workers and health professionals, who have given up so much over the last two years and are giving up so much right now to ensure that our rapid vaccination rates can continue to progress. These people have put themselves at risk, and these people have put in incredibly hard work over a long period of time. It is thanks in large part to their work that our community is going to be experiencing much-needed increased freedom over the coming weeks. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">I'd also like to talk about rail infrastructure in Melbourne's rapidly growing west. I have met with many transport experts and community groups in recent months, talking about the need for increased rail expenditure in Melbourne's west. These include the Victorian Transport Action Group and the Maribyrnong Truck Action Group, which are groups that have been working for the betterment of living standards in Melbourne's west for many years. These groups understand the importance of integrated transport planning and infrastructure that benefits the communities in which it is located. We need more freight onto rail, especially into and out of the Port of Melbourne. We need better use of existing infrastructure and sensible decisions about new projects. The Morrison government should show more leadership and ensure that important initiatives like the North &amp; West Melbourne City Deal and WIFT are delivered and properly funded. Both of these projects are currently drifting, and that is entirely inappropriate given the demands that we see, which are growing and already large in Melbourne's west. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Respiratory Disease</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="171" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Ms HAMMOND</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Curtin</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:39</span>):  Approximately one in three Australians suffer from chronic respiratory conditions, such as lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, mesothelioma and cystic fibrosis. One in nine are asthmatic. In Australia, deaths from respiratory conditions rank second-highest and above heart disease. Further, deaths from chronic lower respiratory diseases have surged by approximately 37 per cent during the last decade. While some respiratory diseases are preventable through taking action like reducing atmospheric pollution and quitting smoking, currently available medicines are only capable of treating symptoms. Supporting and facilitating research is the only way that we can find new treatments and cures for the devastating lung diseases that impact Australians every year.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">I recently visited two organisations leading the way in medical research into respiratory diseases, the Institute of Respiratory Health and the National Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, to learn more about respiratory diseases and the impressive strides both organisations are making in their research. The Institute of Respiratory Health, located in the Harry Perkins institute in my electorate of Curtin, is an independent charitable organisation and Australia's only integrated scientific and clinical research institute dedicated specifically to investigating respiratory diseases. The institute conducts innovative basic and clinical research with the aim of enhancing our understanding of respiratory diseases, improving the diagnosis and management of these conditions and also their prevention. The institute's impressive research spans many areas, including asbestos related research, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer and cystic fibrosis. While at the institute, I also met the director of the National Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, Professor Anna Nowak. Established in 2007, NCARD aims to minimise the impact of asbestos related diseases on the Australian and international community. Asbestos is the No. 1 occupational cause of cancer worldwide, and over 4,000 Australians die each year from asbestos related diseases.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Given that the IRH and the NCARD share a common vision, are co-located and encourage cross-institutional collaboration, a highly productive and synergistic affiliation has been developed between the two organisations. Indeed, through their work, Western Australia has developed a nationally and internationally recognised reputation in the area of respiratory health science. They have phenomenal output in refereed journals and articles. As non-government, not-for-profit organisations, they are heavily reliant on the generosity of the community, organisations and foundations. I would like to thank both organisations and commend them on their outstanding research and work.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Eden-Monaro Electorate: Schools</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="265" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Ms McBAIN</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Eden-Monaro</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:42</span>):  I rise to celebrate and acknowledge the incredible work and achievements of the year 12 students in my electorate. Students in regional areas often do not have the same opportunities as their city counterparts, but these students have gone above and beyond to help others to share their passions, and now they are being recognised for their efforts. I'd like to make a few shout-outs to our future leaders.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">First up is Bega High School's Max Navarrete. I've had the pleasure of meeting Max on a number of occasions, and I can honestly say he's a very deserving recipient of the New South Wales Minister's Award for Excellence in Student Achievement. Max received this award for his demonstrated and strong commitment to his education. His citation noted that he is a well-rounded young man, demonstrating skills performing musically with his band and playing a range of sports at a high level, with high academic achievement in physics, advanced English, maths, PDHPE and music. More importantly, Max is a mentor and role model for younger students as well as a local life saver and learn-to-swim coach.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Another student who has recently been recognised for being a role model for local youth is Snowy Mountains Grammar School student Zac Corcoran. Just last month, the Governor of New South Wales presented Zac with a Youth Community Service Award through the Order of Australia Association, New South Wales, for 'exceptional service or engagement with their local community'. Zac recently represented Jindabyne at the Lions Youth of the Year and progressed all the way to the New South Wales state final. He is the coordinator of the Jindabyne Navy Cadets, volunteers with an aged care facility, tutors younger students in English and music and has organised fundraising in a charity event to support local farmers and families. It's pretty easy to see why he received this award.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">My last shout-out goes to two Lumen Christi Catholic College students, Jade Short and Maxwell Arch, who were recently announced as winners in the 2021 Australian STEM Video Game Challenge. There were 2,800 entries into this competition, with six winners across different categories. Jade and Max were the only winners who were from a regional area. Jade and Max have spent around four months working on their award-winning entry, Murus. They have been making games together now for four years, each year learning and improving and building their game development skills. In fact, these two year 12 students already have their own business, where they connect, inspire and teach game development to people in the local area as well as through their online tutorial videos.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Congratulations to these four inspiring students. This acknowledgement and these awards are well deserved. But I also want to congratulate every student who is finalising school this year and preparing for their upcoming HSC exams. This year's cohort of year 12 students have had to overcome so much uncertainty to get to this point. They've adapted to learning from home and have gone weeks and months without seeing and connecting with their friends face to face, and many have missed out on celebrating important milestones. To all our year 12s out there: congratulations for getting through. You should be so proud of yourself. And I don't want to jinx myself but it's only up from here.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Cole, Ms Ellie Victoria OAM</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Little, Ms Rosemary</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="239" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Mr LEESER</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Berowra</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:45</span>):  I rise to commend the incredible sporting achievements of two of my constituents. Competing at every Paralympic Games since 2008, swimming champion Ellie Cole has won six gold medals, five silver and six bronze, including two medals at the recent Tokyo Paralympic Games. Coles's second relay medal at the Tokyo games gave her the title of Australia's most decorated female Paralympian of all time, with 17 medals from four games. It was therefore wonderful to see Ellie chosen as the Australian flag-bearer for the closing ceremony of the Tokyo Paralympics. As well as her Paralympic achievements, Ellie also played wheelchair basketball for Victoria in 2013 and 2014. At age three, Ellie's right leg was amputated, as she suffered a life-threatening cancer. Rather than dwell on adversity, she has instead shown an incredible ability to overcome the odds. After her outstanding success at the London Paralympic Games in 2012, Ellie endured a heartbreaking shoulder reconstruction and was faced with the prospect of never swimming again. Rather than give in, she fought her way back and won six medals in six events at the Rio Paralympic Games. She was awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia in 2014 for her services to sport. In 2015 she won <span style="font-style:italic;">Cosmopolitan</span> magazine's Sportswoman of the Year Award and was also listed in the Westpac 100 Women of Influence Awards. She has also managed to complete a Bachelor of Health and Exercise Science degree at the Australian Catholic University. It's her humility and her never-say-die attitude that makes her a true inspiration.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Another local hero, Rosemary Little, was 12 years old when she contracted a form of autoimmune encephalitis causing spastic quadriplegia and dystonia. This meant she had to relearn the skills she'd developed up to that point and also means she has no memory of her life between the ages of 12 and 18. Rosemary first took up wheelchair racing after attending a Wheelchair Sports NSW/ACT Come n Try Day in 2003. She excelled in the sport immediately, but she was unfortunately just 0.02 of a second short of qualifying for the 2004 Paralympics. Rosemary then took a break from the sport, returning in 2011. The next year she made the Australian team for the London Paralympic Games, where she won bronze in the 100 metres T34. The following year Rosemary picked up silver in the 200 metres T34 and bronze in the 100 metres T34 at the World Para Athletics Championships in France. Rosemary was again selected to represent Australia at the 2015 IPC World Para Athletics Championships, but she was admitted to hospital the day before competition and was forced to withdraw. Recovering in time for selection, Rosemary was named on the Australian team for the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games, where she achieved top-five finishes in the 100, 400 and 800 T34. Shortly afterwards she was diagnosed with a rare spinal tumour and spent nearly a year in hospital. Once again, she showed amazing strength. When her wheelchair classification was changed, she switched to shotput and went on to win gold in the 2019 Arafura Games in Darwin. In Tokyo she threw a personal best of 6.26 metres to finish a commendable fifth.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Congratulations to Ellie and Rosemary, not only for being great sportswomen but also for the leadership and inspiration that they give to all Australians.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Dobell Electorate: COVID-19</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">COVID-19: Vaccination</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="266" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Ms McBRIDE</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Dobell</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:48</span>):  The past four months have been incredibly tough for people in my community on the Central Coast of New South Wales. We've faced vaccine shortages and an extended lockdown, with learning from home, and a hit to jobs in the local economy. But, when times get tough, Coasties stick together. We stand up for each other and we support each other. People on the Central Coast have made an incredible effort to get vaccinated against COVID-19 despite facing many challenges. Even though our vaccines were ripped away and taken to Sydney, our local pharmacies weren't included in the rollout from the beginning, and the government refused to set up a mass vaccination hub, Coasties still found a way to get vaccinated. Seventy-two per cent of people on the Coast have now received both jabs. This is a remarkable effort, so thank you to everyone who has been vaccinated so far.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">On a personal note as a pharmacist-immuniser, it has been a privilege to join pharmacists across New South Wales and around Australia to boost Australia's vaccination rate. Pharmacists have administered over 898,000 doses of AstraZeneca to Australians so far and around 374,000 doses of Moderna. To pharmacists Robert King and Tim Holt, nurse-immuniser Rachel Foley, and the team at Kanwal Village Pharmacy, the service you're providing to our community is exceptional, and I'm pleased to be on board as a volunteer immuniser. But, having been part of the rollout, I can't understand how the Prime Minister can justify the remuneration to pharmacies. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Now that we've reached the critical vaccination rate, businesses on the coast have started to reopen, but it's not exactly business as usual. While many businesses are keen to open their doors again, many are anxious—which is understandable, because they're on the front lines of the new 'no vax, no entry' rule and they need our support. Small businesses are the backbone of our economy and the heart of our community. Thankfully some were able to trade during lockdown, and they certainly helped us through some tough times, like Ken's Humble Pie Shop at the Entrance, Toast &amp; co cafe and Coco Rice &amp; Noodle Bar—some of the best local food you can find. Others were forced to wind back or close down during lockdown, and now they're coming out the other side. Now we've started to reopen we have taken a big step forward. So, to local businesses on the coast who are standing tall, thank you, especially to those who weren't eligible for support or who are still waiting for support. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">I would also like to thank everyone on the coast who helped our community get through the last four months, including our frontline workers, our volunteers and our community leaders. These include people like Douglas, who is a casual teacher on the Central Coast who spent every day in the classroom teaching students of essential workers. He was on the front line supporting young students to make sure they kept up with their schoolwork and taking care of their wellbeing. Then there's Alice. Alice is an aged-care worker who runs activities for residents. During lockdown she held an in-house Olympics, along with morning bingo sessions and dress-up days. She also took the time to sit down, one on one, with each resident every day to make sure they weren't alone. Then there are also people like Lyn, a volunteer at Meals on Wheels Central Coast. For the past five years she's been delivering meals to locals in need. During lockdown she picked up extra shifts to help out. To people like Douglas, Alice, Lyn, and all the coasties like them, you are true pandemic heroes. Thank you for getting us through this. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Sturt Electorate: Sporting Infrastructure</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="413" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Mr STEVENS</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Sturt</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:51</span>):  It was a pleasure to have Minister Simon Birmingham in my electorate last week. Being a fellow South Australian, and with travel restrictions, it's been hard to get ministerial visits in and out of Adelaide, so having my good friend and the senior South Australian out in the electorate was a particular pleasure. We were able to go and inspect the progress that is being achieved at the Max Amber Sportsfield in Paradise in my electorate. This has had a $5 million contribution from the Commonwealth. With the local Campbelltown City Council, it's a $10 million upgrade of the facilities out at Max Amber. It was a great thrill to see what that money and what that commitment are already achieving at that sports field precinct. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">There are a couple of elements to this project. The most substantial is the demolition and rebuilding of the major club rooms for the Athelstone Football Club and the Athelstone Cricket Club. That's now a two-storey complex, which is going to transform the facilities not just for players, with new change rooms et cetera, but for all the supporters of the club, including family and friends, who love going along on a Saturday. Whether it's during cricket season or footy season, watching good local sport, now they'll have fantastic local amenities. There are good bar and kitchen facilities there so that families and friends can make a really good day of supporting their local cricket and football teams. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Also in this upgrade we've ensured that we've got appropriate facilities for female participation in football and cricket. The previous facilities did not allow for the dignified participation in sport of female and male teams anywhere near each other at the same time. It has been a great development over recent years to see increased female participation in these sports but also appropriate investment by governments in making sure the facilities are appropriate to facilitate female and male participation side by side. </span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Along with that, the tennis club is being rebuilt there. That's a great outcome for the Athelstone Tennis Club. That should be open in just a few weeks. I hope I'm not in isolation on my return to Adelaide and that I won't miss the first game of the season. That will be the first time they get to use that new facility. I hope to be there as part of that, because it's going to be a very exciting day for the tennis club. Soccer has also received a major upgrade to their facilities. Finally, we're creating a new netball club as part of this investment. Two courts are about to have bitumen laid and a synthetic surface. So we get netball, cricket, football, soccer and tennis, as well as the other general recreational attributes of that vast open space in the heart of my electorate in Paradise. I'm thrilled to be part of a government that is investing in vital local sporting infrastructure in my community.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">COVID-19: Morrison Government</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="70" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Ms CHESTERS</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Bendigo</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:54</span>):  It's good to be back, after returning from mat leave. My son, Charlie, is now six months old. For the August sitting I participated remotely because, as you know, Deputy Speaker Rob Mitchell—our electorates are neighbouring—Bendigo, Victoria, has been through another coronavirus outbreak and we've been in and out of lockdown. So it's good to be back in Canberra and able to represent my constituents here.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">A number of constituents and businesses have contacted me over the last fortnight. We've been quite fortunate in Bendigo: we haven't had to go into another lockdown, like some regional areas. Our vaccination rates are high, but we've still had minor outbreaks, and when somebody is infected or they are a close contact they are required to go into isolation, sometimes for 14 days or until they get a negative test result. As a result, a number of businesses in my area have had to close, because they don't have the staff available. Their staff are doing the right thing and are isolating and awaiting test results all because they are close contacts. The businesses get no support though. This government is not supporting these businesses right now as I speak. They've had to close their doors.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Last year, in 2020, there was some support from the federal government. This year there is none. Last year, in 2020, there was JobKeeper. Last year the government helped pay employees to turn up to work. This year the JobKeeper program ran out in March and there's been no support. There has been some support for workers who were in hotspots; the Commonwealth did have a payment for those workers, but, in Bendigo, because we were never declared a Commonwealth hotspot, or a red zone, we didn't receive any support at all. The state government picked up the tab and helped those workers out, but the ludicrous nature of this system is that this year, while we're moving into recovery, the government is paying people to stay at home. Last year, when we were in the depth of the pandemic, the government paid people to turn up to work. You can understand the confusion and frustration of businesses in my area who are trying to go through recovery.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Now that we're in the recovery phase and we're moving into that critical stage of the pandemic where people are vaccinated and we're starting to open up, businesses will have to close from time to time and workers will have to isolate from time to time so we can slow the spread of the virus, yet there is no support for the businesses doing the right thing. I urge the government not to walk away from businesses in central Victoria, but to find the funding to help them get through December and Christmas. They need support now. When workers do the right thing and isolate, when businesses close because they don't have the workers available or because they've been declared a tier 1 site in Victoria, they need cashflow support. Where is the government when the businesses most need it? It's missing in action. It's time that the Prime Minister and the Treasurer realise this and come up with a plan for reopening.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-SubDebate" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-SubDebate">Lindsay Electorate: Roads</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="275" type="MemberSpeech">
              <span class="HPS-MemberSpeech">Mrs McINTOSH</span>
            </a> (<span class="HPS-Electorate">Lindsay</span>) (<span class="HPS-Time">10:57</span>):  I'm passionate about easing congestion; improving safety, particularly on my local roads in the electorate of Lindsay; and making that daily commute safer and quicker for people across my community, helping people to spend more time building their business or at home with their families instead of stuck in traffic. That is why I fought so hard to deliver the $127 million to fully fund the upgrade to Dunheved Road. I knocked on the doors of families who are particularly impacted by this road, who use it every day, and I know how important it is to people in my community to get this upgrade happening.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">Today I'm pleased to announce we've reached the next milestone in this important project. As it is a council road, Penrith City Council will have a community consultation process so local people can have their say. I want this upgrade to deliver the best outcomes for local families and businesses, improving traffic flow and enhancing safety for everyone who uses the road. That's why it is so important that locals make their voices heard and contribute to Penrith City Council's community consultation process. Our community's feedback will help inform the design of the upgrade.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">From today, the consultation period will be open for submissions until Friday 12 November. The project will provide priority upgrades on Dunheved Road between Richmond Road and the Werrington Road and Christie Street intersection to ease congestion. Our community has been at the heart of this project from the beginning, and it was the support of local people for my petition which helped me deliver the full funding. I've always said: when we work together, we can achieve anything in my community of Lindsay, and we've seen this on countless occasions throughout the pandemic and the hard times of the lockdown, when our community banded together. It's what makes Lindsay such an incredible community. Upgrading Dunheved Road will continue to make our community even better. Residents from all over Lindsay have reached out to tell me what this upgrade means to them. I have spoken with people who've travelled this road each day for years, and I know what a significant impact this will have on their commute. For businesses getting their products across the country and around western Sydney and beyond, it will enable them to access new opportunities. This upgrade is so important, I want the people in our community to have their say. It is really important. So please do visit council's consultation page at www.yoursaypenrith.com.au/dunhevedroadupgrade. I can't wait for this upgrade to happen as soon as possible for my community of Lindsay.</span>
        </p>
        <p class="HPS-Normal" style="direction:ltr;unicode-bidi:normal;">
          <span class="HPS-Normal">
            <a href="290" type="MemberInterjecting">
              <span class="HPS-MemberInterjecting">The DEPUTY SPEAKER </span>
            </a>
            <span class="HPS-GeneralBold">(</span>
            <span class="HPS-MemberInterjecting">Mr Rob Mitchell</span>
            <span class="HPS-GeneralBold">):</span>  In accordance with standing order 193, the time for members' constituency statements has concluded.</span>
        </p>
      </body>
    </business.start>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Employment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms CLAYDON</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
    <electorate>Newcastle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I am pleased to stand to speak on this motion moved by the member for Paterson because, like the member for Paterson, I'm acutely aware of the negative impact that this tired eight-year-old Liberal government has had on job security and wages for people in the Newcastle and Hunter region. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to one of the biggest economic crises in Australian history. Yet, unlike previous Labor governments, that successfully navigated the turmoil of earlier economic crises with a strong recovery program, this government has been found very wanting. The Prime Minister had two jobs this year: a speedy and effective rollout of the vaccine, and quarantine. He failed at both, costing millions of workers and their families their livelihoods and wellbeing.</para>
<para>Nowhere has this incompetence been felt harder than in the Newcastle and Hunter region. In June last year, Newcastle's unemployment rate reached its highest level in 17 years. Following nearly a decade of almost non-existent wage growth, the people of Newcastle need a government that's willing to take on the big issues facing workers in this country—issues like the increased use of labour hire companies to avoid proper wages and work conditions.</para>
<para>People in insecure work, like those employed by labour hire firms, are some of the most vulnerable workers in our country. Being in insecure work means that people can't plan for their lives. They struggle to pay their rent or mortgages. They always have to worry if they'll be able to pay their weekly bills. Australians in precarious work—like contractors, freelancers, gig workers and those on temporary contracts or working in labour hire—miss out on the many benefits of a permanent job, like fair pay, guaranteed work hours, leave entitlements and job security. When people don't have a stable job, they have less money to spend in their local economy, and that hurts all of us.</para>
<para>The issue of labour hire and insecure work is one that extends far beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Australian workers today face some of the most precarious work conditions and arrangements of any industrial country. This government will tell you that this precariousness is natural or inevitable, but it's not. It's the result of years of deliberate policy decisions made by Liberal governments to sell out working men and women. The Prime Minister tries to market an image of his government as working for the people, but this government never has and never will. The Prime Minister can say what he wants, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating. This government's policy decisions have consistently prioritised profits over people and the interests of big business over workers. This government has always cared more about the national budget than the household budget of a family in Wallsend or Minmi. Instead of cracking down on cowboy labour-hire firms, this Prime Minister and his government want to give them the green light to continue to exploit workers. They have fought against an increase in the minimum wage. They've created an amnesty now for the dodgy employers who did not pay their workers adequate super entitlements. They've tried to implement Work Choices 2.0 and deliberately suppressed wage growth for hardworking Australians.</para>
<para>Even in my electorate this government has shown that they're no strangers to exploitative labour hire practices. In 2019 the Morrison government placed a cap on public sector hiring, which meant that agencies like the Australian Taxation Office in Newcastle were forced to employ temporary staff under labour hire firms. Last year it was revealed that the Morrison government was spending a jaw-dropping $5 billion per year on labour hire firms within the Australian Public Service, a decision that has not only cost taxpayers more money but which has also left workers employed by these labour hire firms receiving less pay than their colleagues sitting next to them. More recently, we saw BHP tell its miners from the Mount Arthur mine in the Hunter to pack their bags and move interstate if they wanted to have a job—or maybe just resign. Those 80 miners were employed by labour hire companies.</para>
<para>As the member for Newcastle, I'll always stand up for the rights of workers and fight to protect Novocastrians from wage theft, insecure work and the exploitation of working families. That's why an Albanese Labor government has a plan to improve job security for all Australians. Labor believes in the simple principle that if you do the same job then you should not be paid less. We will crack down on cowboy labour hire firms and guarantee 'same job, same pay' for everyone.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I call the member for Groom.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HAMILTON</name>
    <name.id>291387</name.id>
    <electorate>Groom</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Mr Deputy Speaker Mitchell, how good it is to be back and seeing your smiling face once again!</para>
<para>I'm going to go off the talking points and deal with my own views on labour hire, which have changed since I first encountered it quite some years ago. I very much welcome an informed debate on labour hire. I entered the workforce as a miner—I was a mining engineer. In 2001 the mining boom was yet to kick off and there was very little opportunity for mining engineers, but there were still good mining jobs out there. So I began work as a contractor, working with a company by the name of PYBAR and Eroc at a mine called Ridgeway. I became very aware very early on of the very different groups around me—the different contractors and the labour hire groups. At that point I very much formed a contractor's first view of the mining industry.</para>
<para>I think there's something which should be part of a debate on labour hire, particularly in mining: it isn't just about pay or conditions but safety must come into it. I will always firmly believe that a contractor led model, even over an owner-operator, is one of the best mechanisms for that. I think the safety stats do stand with that and that's why, when we look across the industry and see somewhere around 1.1 per cent of employees being labour hire, it probably reflects industry's view as well.</para>
<para>There's a further point here about labour hire which is very important. I think the Labor members may pick up that potentially I have some things in common with them—I know I have a lot in common with the member for Hunter when I speak on this. There are some particular aspects of the mining industry that are relevant to this conversation. It's a very small industry at heart. I can travel from mine to mine and find friends who have worked at one place or the other and I can find mining names I know which are three generations deep. The other issue is that it's quite a dangerous industry at points; it has quite dangerous points. I think there's bipartisan support for the mining industry's work in reducing the risk involved and increasing the safety.</para>
<para>The other aspect that I think is relevant is that the mining industry—if not more than others then it's certainly at the forefront of this—experiences boom and bust in a way that can really play havoc with the careers of those in it. I have certainly watched that myself over time and I've experienced it. I have been in the unfortunate situation of having to lay off a large number of people at once, an experience that I don't think anyone ever comes away from without feeling their humanity pinged.</para>
<para>So mining has these unique challenges and, if I go back and think about my time in the industry, labour hire has some deficits with regard to addressing those things. I think that that's an important conversation for us to have. I strongly believe that there's a conversation around the appropriate use of labour hire. This point is where we will diverge. I will always support a contractor or owner-operator model because I think there's great value in maintaining that corporate knowledge and having the fundamental training that goes with it.</para>
<para>Certainly, if I think of my time working with Macmahon, a great mining contractor out of WA, the depth of experience that was on hand for young people entering the industry was so important. We could partner someone up with a thirty-year miner and have them gradually released into the mining environment knowing that they had full awareness of the risks around them. I stand by that. I may be diverting a little from some of my government talking points, but I think this is an important thing for us to say. I'm very proud of how it got here.</para>
<para>I will say this, though, for those opposite: when push came to shove at the Argyle diamond mine, and for us to maintain health and safety standards, the bottom-dollar realities of cost and risk came to bear. We were faced with an option of almost seeing the entire workforce laid off and very much going back to a minimised skeleton shift. At that point labour hire was the appropriate way to keep those people in employment. That's why I believe it's an important part of a fuller conversation, particularly in the mining industry.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms KEARNEY</name>
    <name.id>LTU</name.id>
    <electorate>Cooper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak to the motion moved by my colleague the member for Paterson. It is an important motion and one that I wholeheartedly support. When people of a country elect a government, elect a party to power, they expect that government to always act in their own interests. You think to yourself, 'There's no way a government that has been elected would do anything that would impact my life, my income or my work that wouldn't be to my advantage.' Well unfortunately in Australia that is exactly what has happened here.</para>
<para>When I was president of the ACTU, we did a very important research project into insecure work in Australia. There are nearly 12 million workers in this country, and our research found that nearly 40 per cent of the workforce are in some form of insecure work. Insecure work has absolutely blossomed under this government—if I can use that word, because it is not something you want to blossom. There's increased casualisation, outsourcing, the gig economy that has absolutely exploded, short-term contracts and, of course, the use of labour hire.</para>
<para>Labour hire is the context of this motion here today. As the previous speaker said, there is a time and place for casual workers to be employed by labour hire firms. But, unfortunately, what we are seeing right now in this country is the use labour hire to undermine wages and conditions. I'm glad that he recognised that this needs to be something that should be looked at. We know the evils with the gig economy. Short-term contracts are an absolute scourge. Outsourcing and casualisation are both ways, along with labour hire, that big business, small business and medium-sized businesses have used time and time again to undermine the decent minimum wage structure and award structures that we have in this country.</para>
<para>In this latest development, we've seen this government team up with big business and dodgy labour hire firms to cut the wages and conditions of workers in the mining sector. We know that they do this. This is a given. It's nothing but a greedy, cost-cutting tactic and it's being endorsed by the government. As a result of the legislation that they've pushed through this place at the direction of their big-business mates, labour hire workers are doing the exact same job as workers who have full-time, permanent, secure jobs; working side by side for less pay and fewer conditions.</para>
<para>Now, you don't mind using labour hire if it is indeed to cover those unexpected peaks and troughs of the labour force; that's what it was invented for. You might go through a boom-and-bust time and there might be a certain part of the workforce that can come and go, and that is what labour hire or casualisation is for. But if you are a worker doing the exact same job, five days a week, week in, week out, you are, for all intents and purposes, a full-time employee, a permanent employee. You should be employed as such, and you should enjoy the same terms and conditions as your fellow workers who are employed on a full-time basis.</para>
<para>Insecure work is a scourge. It leads to anxious lives, people sitting by the phone wondering if they're going to get a shift, day in, day out. This does not make for a secure economy. It does not make for a decent family life. You can't get a loan. You can't buy a car. You can't plan for those weekends. That's bad enough, but when you should be enjoying those terms and conditions you get from a full-time job you can't, because you are employed by a labour hire firm and the big company that employs you doesn't want to pay you what you should be paid or give you those conditions that come with a full-time job.</para>
<para>An Albanese Labor government, on the other side, has a plan for secure jobs. We want people to have secure lives. We want them to know that they can rely on a job they have, that the pay is good enough to put food on the table and to pay the rent. We have a plan. We will make job security an explicit object of the Fair Work Act. We will make sure people in labour hire or the gig economy are better protected. We will criminalise wage theft. We'll make sure workers are paid their entitlements. For those employed in precarious industries or insecure work, we will make sure that their entitlements are portable, at least, so that every worker in this country is given the security of a holiday, paid leave and other entitlements that they have earned. An Anthony Albanese Labor government will be on your side, the side of Australian workers, because we are the party of secure jobs. We are the party of decent jobs.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:16</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr HILL</name>
    <name.id>86256</name.id>
    <electorate>Bruce</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>COVID-19 and the recession have taught our country, I hope, a lot of things and revealed things about us, good and bad. One lesson that I believe we must not let go of is that casual and insecure work in this country has gone too far. The pendulum has swung too far. There are millions of Australian workers now that cannot get a permanent job. They want a permanent job but they're stuck on casual contracts or employed by these insidious labour hire firms that have gone way beyond what they were originally for, a bit of surge or a bit of unexpected work. They now constitute the dominant share of the workforce in some industries and companies. Some people choose this—fair enough—but most people don't. It means they can't get a home loan. How can you ever buy a house if you can't get a home loan, because you're stuck on a labour hire contract? They have no sick leave, and we saw from the pandemic what that did to our health systems. Sick people felt they had to go to work with the virus. They have poorer OH&S outcomes and an increased chance of wage theft and exploitation.</para>
<para>They were originally used for surge and seasonal work, but there are many reasons now why employers are increasingly using them. They use them to cut costs and cut wages. They get around unions, so unions can't collectively bargain for a pay rise. They get greater control over their workers because labour hire inherently splits the contractual and the control relationship. That's what it does. The contractual relationship is with the labour hire firm, and the day-to-day control is with the employer. That means it's much easier to exploit employees and workers to cut corners on safety and cut wages, because you can literally just flick off your labour hire worker overnight if they speak up about anything. If they ask for a pay rise—gone. If they say, 'Hang on, that safety practice isn't right'—gone. In the case of the government, they shifted out the permanent public servants and replaced them with labour hire workers, who were not going to call out their blatant illegality with robodebt. The Federal Court called them out on that scam. But the labour hire workers knew that if they spoke up they'd be given the flick overnight. That's exactly what happened.</para>
<para>For workers who choose this, fair enough. But it's no longer a minor add-on, a small bit of flexibility at the margins. In some sectors, mining for example, labour hire is now significant; it's even the majority of the workforce. Up in north Central Queensland—I've been up there—I've seen in Rockhampton two people doing the same job, side by side, with one of them being paid 30 to 40 per cent less because the labour hire firm clips the ticket on the way.</para>
<para>Even before COVID, wages were falling under the Liberals. They don't like talking about this: their fake good economic record. Wages in this country went backwards under seven years of this failing, miserable government even before the COVID economic crisis, according to OECD data. One of the big reasons is that casualisation of the workforce has gone way too far and workers can never bargain for a pay rise—that's how the employers like it—which means we need structural changes to the rules. A decent government would address this. They'd learn the lessons of the pandemic and the vulnerabilities revealed in our society. Not this mob. Instead, the Morrison government passed laws with their good mate Senator Pauline Hanson and their mate Clive Palmer—now the leader of the Palmer party—to entrench this unfairness: they are anti workers. Pauline Hanson and Clive Palmer are just Liberals in drag, in disguise.</para>
<para>A Labor government will end the labour-hire rorts that rip off casual workers. We've got a clear plan for this. Workers doing the same job should get the same pay. It's a simple, compelling and fair proposition. It's part of Labor's Secure Australian Jobs plan. We'll overturn the government's nasty scheme, end the rorts and restore rights to workers. This is really important stuff. We get to choose the kind of society we want to be. We don't all have to walk like lemmings off the cliff, off to the free market where employers have all the rights and workers do what they're told. We don't have to be that passive. There are choices that we could make.</para>
<para>The government always talks about flexibility. It's funny, isn't it? The solution to every economic problem that the government sees is a cut to wages, and more rights for employers, and a cut to workers' rights. Always. This mad ideology has now infected the Public Service. Their privatisation by stealth through labour hire workers is trashing the Commonwealth Public Service. Tens of thousands of jobs in the Public Service are now labour hire. It wastes money, paying an overhead to a firm instead of employing a public servant.</para>
<para>The Auditor-General has found $2 billion to labour hire workers in the last few years. There's no job security, it's unfair, it's differential pay, someone doing the same job gets less, they don't get the same training, we lose the capability for the taxpayer and the services degrade. We've got the veterans affairs minister now employing McKinsey, we've learnt, to fix services in Veterans Affairs. Why didn't you employ the public servants instead of labour hire workers? They cut the public servants, bring in labour hire workers and then bring in overpriced consultants, who are mates of the government, to try and sort it all out. It's a scam and a sham! <inline font-style="italic">(T</inline><inline font-style="italic">ime expired</inline><inline font-style="italic">)</inline></para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate made an order for the next day of sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Black Spot Program</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VAN MANEN</name>
    <name.id>188315</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes the vital nature of Black Spot Program (BSP) funding in reducing death and serious injury on Australian roads;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) recognises that BSP projects target those road locations where crashes are occurring, which are a major cost to Australians every year;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) commends the Government for its extensive commitment to road safety through infrastructure investment, by providing $1.1 billion to the BSP from 2013-14 to 2023-24, with an ongoing commitment of $110 million each year following; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(4) acknowledges research from the Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics that the Government's BSP reduces death and serious injury from crashes by 30 per cent, on average at treated sites.</para></quote>
<para> </para>
<para>This motion speaks to the importance of the black spot road funding program and its focus on reducing death and serious injury on Australian roads. It recognises, through these projects, the target road locations where crashes are occurring, because we know there are major costs each and every year in deaths and injuries. Over the past nine months of this year in Queensland alone the death toll has climbed significantly. Almost every day you can pick up the newspaper and see a report of somebody dying on our roads.</para>
<para>This important program has had some outstanding results, and it continues to do so. The government, through its extensive commitment to road safety and investment infrastructure, has provided some $1.1 billion to the Black Spot Program from 2013-14 to 2023-24 and, in addition, an ongoing commitment of $110 million each year following that. This is included in our $110 billion long-term infrastructure spending plans. It also notes that the Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics shows the government's black spot road funding program reduces death and serious injury from crashes by 30 per cent at sites where these programs have occurred.</para>
<para>These investments continue to show the importance of investing in our local communities. I'm pleased to note, as I look around my electorate of Forde, the number of projects that have resulted in significant upgrades and improvements to various intersections. Overall, to date, there have been some 2,739 projects over the life of the program: in New South Wales some 926, Victoria 626, Queensland 440, Western Australia 319, South Australia 201, Tasmania 147, Northern Territory 49 and ACT 31. In my electorate of Forde, over $2½ million dollars of funding was recently allocated to provide major safety upgrades at four locations. At the intersection of Mandew Street and Leda Drive at Shailer Park, $120,000 will be invested to install six-aspect right turn lights, amend the traffic signals, install CCTV for traffic management, signalise the left slip lane into Mandew Street and adjust the pedestrian ramps. At the intersection of Chambers Flat Road, Pleasant View Road and Kenny Road at Chambers Flat, $400,000 will be invested to install a new advisory 60-kilometre kerb warning sign, some new pavement, chevron markers along the curve, vehicle-activated signs, and guideposts.</para>
<para>Next are two really important upgrades, given these are very, very busy intersections that are only going to get busier with the residential and industrial development in these areas. The intersection of Park Ridge Road, Clarke Road and Lindenthal Road at Park Ridge will have a $955,000 upgrade to signalise that intersection to include a controlled right turn, to maintain the slip lanes and to reduce the speed limit through the intersection. That intersection now services a big new industrial estate, as well as the growing residential developments in that area, and will be of critical importance to safety. The intersection of Chambers Flat Road and School Road at Park Ridge will receive a $1.1 million investment to signalise that intersection to exclude a filter right turn from Chambers Flat Road into School Road. The use of that intersection over the last few years has grown, given the local residential developments. The upgrade of Chambers Flat Road through that area has also yet to be completed, which will make an enormous change.</para>
<para>These major upgrades under the Black Spot Program will help ensure that my constituents can travel safely through my electorate with a reduced risk of death or serious injury. The Black Spot Program makes an important contribution to reducing the national death toll, and I would like to commend this program to the House.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>M3E</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Hamilton</name>
    <name.id>291387</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PERRETT</name>
    <name.id>HVP</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I'm speaking today from Sunnybank on Yuggera and Turrbal land on the motion moved by the member for Forde, noting that Black Spot funding reduces death and serious injury on Australian roads. Labor and I applaud all initiatives that make our roads safer. After all, the Black Spot Program was originally a Hawke government initiative. In 2016, under the Black Spot Program, an intersection at Blunder Road in Oxley was upgraded at a cost of $1.3 million and a section of Bowhill Road at Willawong was upgraded. In 2019, Beenleigh Road at Runcorn was upgraded at a cost of $1.7 million. Earlier this year, in fact, the intersection at Ponsonby Street and Ipswich Road was upgraded at a cost of nearly $2 million. That's about $5 million in funding from the Black Spot Program for my electorate over the eight years that the program has been running under the coalition government.</para>
<para>But there are other intersections and roads in my electorate of Moreton that need attention right now. Wuraga Road, where it meets Beenleigh Road at the train lines, is one. Just last week, that patch of Beenleigh Road under the Gateway Motorway—the bit that's not double-laned—flooded, as it regularly does. The other intersection that's been a problem for many years is the intersection of Ipswich Road and Venner Road in Annerley. This section desperately needs an upgrade, including some better traffic lights and more turning lanes. It's a very dangerous intersection.</para>
<para>I'm hoping the coalition government will add these two intersections to the Black Spot Program very soon. My Moreton electorate is a busy transport hub. The Southeast Freeway borders my electorate to the east, the Gateway Motorway also runs through the southern portion, the Ipswich Motorway runs in from the west, and I've got rail lines for goods and passenger trains and coal going through the electorate. We've got the Beenleigh line, the Ipswich line and the interstate line all sending trains through my electorate of Moreton. The Barnaby boondoggle for the Inland Rail project actually ends in my electorate at Acacia Ridge, nearly 40 kilometres from the Port of Brisbane. How will goods get to the port from Acacia Ridge? I've been asking this question for years, and I still haven't received a suitable answer from the Liberal-National government. Just last week, Deputy Prime Minister Joyce said you could book in an election commitment of coal trains to Gladstone via the Inland Rail. So the coalition government has committed $10 million to a business case to extend the line from Toowoomba to the Port of Gladstone. They're just making this up as they go along. Their plan for the Inland Rail currently has it terminating at Acacia Ridge in my electorate. They might—it's a big might—build two 16-kilometre-long tunnels from Acacia Ridge to the Port of Brisbane. That was the big new idea announced back in February this year by the member for Bonner, my next-door neighbour. Now they might extend the Toowoomba line to the Port of Gladstone. There is no considered vision with a fair dinkum business case.</para>
<para>I'm worried about my constituents in Moreton. They already live in a very, very busy transport hub. Will they soon have A-double road trains transporting goods through their suburban streets? Will New South Wales coal be coming soon? Will people living in Moreton soon have tunnels being drilled underneath their properties in Sunnybank, Sunnybank Hills, MacGregor and Eight Mile Plains? Tunnels will need to be twice the size of the tunnels being built right now for Cross River Rail to accommodate double-stack trains—or will the Inland Rail bypass Brisbane altogether and go to the Port of Gladstone, which is my preference? We just don't know. More importantly, the Morrison-Joyce government, now in its ninth year, doesn't know either. We've got the Deputy Prime Minister saying it's going to the Port of Gladstone and we've got LNP members in Brisbane—people from 'Team Queensland'—who are saying they're building 16-kilometre-long tunnels.</para>
<para>How much will this rort crossbred with a boondoggle end up costing taxpayers? The Grattan Institute estimated in 2015 that the total cost of Inland Rail would be $9.9 billion, with a worst-case scenario of $10.7 billion. The coalition government has now said the project is estimated to cost $14.9 billion. That's 46 per cent more than their original estimate, and that doesn't take into account the possibility of two 16-kilometre-long megatunnels or an extension of the line from Toowoomba to Gladstone. The Inland Rail is an important investment in national infrastructure but there has to be a plan that makes economic sense, such as the black spot programs do.</para>
<para>I will always encourage infrastructure that improves congestion, makes transport safer and gets product to port more efficiently, but not when there are unintended consequences that may make living in my electorate of Moreton less desirable. I want the roads in Moreton to be safer, not more congested with A-double trucks. I want all our roads to be safer. I applaud the Black Spot Program for the intersections and roads in my electorate that have been upgraded but I'll continue to progress action on the remaining dangerous intersections. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:32</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ARCHER</name>
    <name.id>282237</name.id>
    <electorate>Bass</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] Last year there were 36 deaths on Tasmanian roads, the worst statistic since the terrible year of 2009 when we recorded 63 deaths. For the calendar year to date, Tasmania has seen more than 17 road deaths and more than 130 serious injuries; cold, hard statistics but the flow-on effects on family and friends can last a lifetime. For survivors, the physical, economic and emotional toll can be devastating. As we know, crashes can occur from inattention, speed, driving under the influence and tiredness, and from poor safeguards in place, such as lack of lighting, signage, traffic lights and roundabouts. This is where the government's black spot funding has made driving on our roads safer and has undoubtedly saved countless lives. From major roads in Launceston to remote and rural roads across the northern Tasmanian region, the government has contributed close to $3 million for necessary infrastructure projects across more than 25 locations, including the West Tamar Highway, north of Exeter; Hobart Road and Opossum Road in Kings Meadows; High Street, York Street and Clarence Street in Launceston; Main Road in George Town; and Dalrymple Road in Mount Direction, just to name a few.</para>
<para>Just recently, I was very pleased to announce $365,000 to remodel the intersection in Bridgenorth. It was the site of an extremely tragic accident last year, thought to be the result of a lack of giving way at the intersection, in which two Launceston residents sadly lost their lives. Works are underway to address this issue—which has resulted in three crashes in the past five years—thanks to the black spot funding. The funding has been warmly received by the community, who have long had concerns about the layout of the intersection and visibility. The new remodelling will address the see-through problem, where drivers on the side road approaches don't realise that there's an intersection where they're required to give way. I'm hopeful that this will save lives in this notorious spot. Additional works were also recently completed at another infamous blackspot, north of Lilydale on Golconda Road between Bacala Road and Denison Gorge Road. The project involved road widening, resealing, signage, line marking and guard rails, all improving safety for road users and has been well received by the community.</para>
<para>Our commitment to fixing black spots across the country, with infrastructure investment being over $1.1 billion since its inception in 2013, is seeing demonstrable results. As the member for Forde mentioned in his speech, research from the Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics has shown that this program reduces death and serious injury from crashes by 30 per cent on average at treated sites. The proof is there, and I am proud of our continued investment in ensuring the safety of drivers in communities across the nation.</para>
<para>But road safety infrastructure improvements are just part of the story, and I want to take the opportunity to discuss driver behaviour, in this case fatigue and the impacts that a car crash can have on survivors. A few years ago, our local newspaper here ran a Christmas road safety campaign, and I read the story of Sam Cawthorn, which has stayed with me ever since. In October 2006, in Tasmania, Sam fell asleep at the wheel and crossed onto the wrong side of the road, crashing head on into a truck. Sam died in the crash but, incredibly, emergency crews managed to resuscitate him. Sam's right arm was amputated and his right leg was permanently damaged, and he lives with the physical pain every day. Sam has said: 'I live with phantom pain. If I close my eyes I can still feel every single one of my fingers. It's like the worst pins and needles you have ever experienced but times that by 10 and that's how my arm feels 24/7.' In the years following the accident, Sam has become a motivational speaker, working to educate and inspire others to change their behaviour on the road, telling all drivers to wake up to their behaviours on the road and save their own lives and those of others. From all levels of government to anyone who gets behind the wheel of a car, we all have a role to play to get everyone in our community home safe.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MURPHY</name>
    <name.id>133646</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>While it's of course great that black spot funding is available across electorates, we know that work is needed on local roads to save lives. I was really proud to support a grassroots campaign from my community to use federal government funds with the council to build a pedestrian crossing on McCormicks Road at a nursing home, where, tragically, a local resident was killed crossing that road. But this government likes to compliment itself for doing the bare minimum. It likes to make announcements on things like infrastructure but not deliver them. I stand here as a member for Dunkley, a community that, before the 2019 election, was promised $30 million of federal funding to upgrade intersections at Ballarto Road, not far from the McCormicks Road incident that I just spoke about. It's now October 2021 and there have been no upgrades. I've written to the Prime Minister and I've written to the minister responsible, and whose fault is it? Apparently it's the state government's fault.</para>
<para>My community was promised three separate commuter car parks by this Morrison government before the 2019 election, at Seaford, Kananook and Frankston. It's October 2021 and how many commuter car parks has this government delivered? None. In fact, it took the money out of this year's budget for Seaford and Kananook because it was a promise made without consultation with the community, without consultation with the local council and without consultation with the state government, and there was nowhere to build those car parks on the existing land. Whose fault is it that those car parks at Seaford and Kananook promised solely by the federal government, and in conjunction with the state government at Frankston, haven't been delivered? According to this government, it was the state government's fault. The federal government has now had to acknowledge it couldn't do Seaford and Kananook. I've met with the former Deputy Prime Minister, I've met with the current responsible minister, I've written to the former responsible minister about delivering commuter car parks for my community. Not only does the Kananook area need car parking; the mighty Frankston & District Basketball Association needs investment, and I'm not going to stop until I see this government deliver.</para>
<para>Before the 2019 election, this government campaigned on delivering the extension of the Metro line to Baxter. Now it's October 2021. What's happened? Nothing. For years, they sat on a business case that the state government did. It was released more than 12 months ago now—in fact, I think it was the end of 2019. What have they done since then? Nothing. Whose fault is it? Apparently, it's the state government's fault that it hasn't done a further business case. But the federal government hasn't asked them to. There are now pushes to get this train line extended in stages, but the federal government still hasn't asked the state government to do the business case to get this done.</para>
<para>Since I've been elected, I've been pushing this government to deliver the infrastructure that my local community needs. I've written to the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the responsible ministers; I've made submissions and advocated and made speeches, before this year's budget, for the upgrading of the Emil Madsen Reserve in Mount Eliza, which desperately needs it so that it's the sporting precinct my community in Mount Eliza deserves; for investment in Nairm Marr Djambana, the local Indigenous gathering place in Frankston, so that we can have a gathering place for the growing Indigenous community and for the non-Indigenous members of my community to join with them to celebrate culture; for funding for the McClelland sculpture park and gallery, which is not just a hub for arts and culture in my community but is a tourism destination and could be a tourism mecca for the wider south-eastern Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula region but which needs support. I've mentioned the Frankston & District Basketball Association and the Mornington Peninsula Bay Trail. I will continue to push this government to provide funding.</para>
<para>This government talks about black spot funding. That's great for intersections and roundabouts, but where's the investment in the infrastructure for the future? Where's the investment in renewing the national energy grid so that it can take the renewable energy that we must invest in, for this country, for the economy, for jobs and to reduce emissions? Where's the investment in infrastructure for electric vehicles? Where's the investment in infrastructure for solar batteries in communities and in suburbs? There is none, because who is running things, really, in this country at the moment? It's the Deputy Prime Minister, Barnaby Joyce, and his ragtag Nationals. It's not good enough and it's failing our communities.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RICK WILSON</name>
    <name.id>198084</name.id>
    <electorate>O'Connor</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>As the chair of the Western Australian Black Spot Consultative Panel, I can attest to the benefits of the Commonwealth's long-running Black Spot Program. This financial year, WA will benefit greatly from the program, with 34 dangerous crash sites to be improved at a combined cost of $14.7 million. Over the past five years at these 34 intersections a total of six crashes have caused fatalities and a further 107 have caused injury. As a member for an entirely regional electorate, I'm extremely concerned that, of the 155 people who died on Western Australian roads in 2020, 93 died in regional areas of the state. This overrepresentation of regional fatalities belies the fact that three-quarters of Western Australians live in metropolitan Perth. That's why it's heartening that 47 per cent of WA's black spot projects for 2021-22 are in regional shires and cities.</para>
<para>In my vast electorate of O'Connor, five projects have been funded at a combined cost to the Commonwealth of $1.7 million. These projects are widely distributed across WA's Goldfields, Great Southern, Wheatbelt and South West regions. In the Goldfields, traffic islands will be installed on Lane Street in Kalgoorlie and parking bays modified near a busy shopping centre in the city's CBD. A shared path will be installed, kerbing modified and the paving better marked. This $661,000 black spot project will improve the safety of Lane Street between Dugan Street and Kalgoorlie's best-known thoroughfare, the historic Hannan Street. In the Wheatbelt, a $552,000 black spot project will see a 29-kilometre section of the Williams Narrogin Highway upgraded. Moving onto the beautiful town of Bridgetown in the state's South West, $409,000 will be provided to install kerbing, barriers, culverts and pavement markings to improve Turner Road. Finally, in the Great Southern, Lights Road in Denmark will be made safer, as will Kuringup Road in Nyabing. All these potentially life-saving projects will be undertaken in the 2021-22 financial year. So that's what's happening right now in my electorate and in WA more broadly under the Morrison government's record $1.1 billion 10-year investment in the Black Spot Program.</para>
<para>Turning to the future: what the increased funding and long-term funding stability allows parliamentarians to do is to advocate on behalf of constituents who have raised serious concerns about other black spots. To this end, I'm working closely with the residents of the small Great Southern town of Narrikup to see what we can do about a notorious stretch of the Albany Highway. The highway links the Great Southern and western Wheatbelt to Perth, and is one of WA's main tourist routes. Unfortunately, between Spencer and Jackson roads at Narrikup the Albany Highway is an absolute shocker. In the past five years this 700-metre stretch of road has seen three fatal crashes. Another crash resulted in hospitalisation and three more crashes saw property damaged.</para>
<para>Of course, these crashes are just the ones that have been reported. Concerned members of the Narrikup community tell me that there have been several more unreported crashes that don't show up in official statistics and that there have been many more near misses. These crashes, especially the fatal ones, take a tremendous toll on the people involved and their families and friends. They also affect residents in places such as Narrikup, where the local first responders are called upon to attend the crash scenes. That's why I'm doing everything I can to raise awareness of the horror stretch of highway at Narrikup in order to have this black spot fixed.</para>
<para>To that end, the Black Spot Program follows a clear process that engages local communities and state road authorities in the development of a business case for priority projects. What's also good is that the program dovetails very nicely with other safety initiatives of the Morrison government with, dare I say it, last month's announcement of some big-ticket roadworks around my electorate under the federal Road Safety Program. Firstly, there was $2.7 million of works on the South Coast Highway either side of the small town of Munglinup, which is between Esperance and Ravensthorpe. Then there was $7.1 million provided to improve safety along the Great Southern Highway, which links Kalgoorlie, Coolgardie and Merredin to Perth. And there was $3.5 million to go towards improving various sections of the Donnybrook-Kojonup road; the Coolgardie-Esperance Highway will benefit from $8.6 million of investment; and, finally, but certainly not least, $1.7 million has been provided to make the Lower Denmark Road much less dangerous.</para>
<para>That's an impressive list, but it's not exhaustive. So while it's early days yet in advocating an end to the black spot at Narrikup, the residents there can take heart that the Morrison government takes road safety seriously. With the right combination of analysis and advocacy, worthy road safety projects have been conceived, advanced and completed under the road Black Spot Program.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:47</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr THISTLETHWAITE</name>
    <name.id>182468</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingsford Smith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I congratulate Mr van Manen for moving this motion because we don't talk enough about road safety in this parliament. It's important, because Australia is not getting the results that we should be in reducing road deaths and trauma, and the statistics bear that out. In the 12 months to September 2021, 1,142 Australians died on our roads. Over the 12 months in the preceding year, to September 2020, it was 1,087, so that's an increase. In 2019 it was 1,164 and in 2018 it was 1,200. The statistics tell the same story about serious injury from crashes. The data is not so up-to-date but hospitalisations in 2018-19 were 39,755 and in 2017-18 there were 39,404. And if we go back to 2012 it was a similar picture then.</para>
<para>We have a National Road Safety Strategy. It's a decade-long plan that the country puts together to try to reduce the incidence of road trauma. The last plan ran from 2011 to 2020 and they're currently writing the 2021 to 2030 plan. The 10-year plan from 2011 to 2020 had a target of reducing annual deaths and serious injury on Australian roads by 30 per cent and we're failing that. We aren't going to meet that: we've failed. That plan set out a number of directions and interventions: improved standards of road design and construction; speed limits that better reflect the balance of safety and mobility; safety design features mandated in vehicles; graduated licensing systems; and penalties against irresponsible driving.</para>
<para>In 2018, an independent inquiry into the effectiveness of the National Road Safety Strategy was conducted by Associate Professor Jeremy Woolley from the Centre for Automotive Research and Dr John Crozier, the chair of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Trauma Committee. These two gentlemen, who appear regularly before the Road Safety Committee, have released their findings. They found that 'Australia's road safety performance has stalled,' that 'the scale of the personal and financial cost of road trauma is unacceptable,' that 'current actions and investments are not achieving the desired results' and that 'a dramatic change in road safety management is required in Australia'.</para>
<para>They made 12 recommendations, including a cabinet minister for road safety and a national road safety entity. Thankfully, the government has established the National Office of Road Safety. They suggested $3 billion a year to a road safety fund. The government's put $3 billion but it is over three years—okay, it's a start—and t is an important investment. Other recommendations include speed management initiatives and an accelerated uptake of vehicle road safety technology. Recommendation No. 5 is an important recommendation—that is, the establishment of key performance indicators in the next strategy to measure and report on how harm can be eliminated in the system and to be published annually. To be published annually is really important. The strategy sets ambitions and a plan but there has never been a look at whether anyone is achieving it. The Commonwealth, the states and territories, and local government are not held to account for the decisions that they made around road safety under that strategy.</para>
<para>I will give you a couple of examples of how we can set key performance indicators that will make a difference. On the element of the strategy around reducing speed, we know point-to-point speed cameras work. If a point-to-point speed camera is on a road, it will reduce the fatalities and accidents because people slow down. It has been implemented for trucks. There is a recommendation that has been sitting there for years, to turn on point-to-point speed cameras for all road users in all states. Some states, to their credit, have done it. But in the largest state, in New South Wales, the government refuses to do it, traditionally because the National Party and their members don't like the fact that they would be caught for speeding on roads, so they have obstructed and stopped it. That is completely unacceptable. People are dying on our roads. We have technology that will target speeding to stop it and reduce road deaths but it is not switched on for all road users. That is a key performance indicator that we should have in the next national strategy to say 'states have got until this time to switch it on for all road users or will lose their funding'. That is something that would make a difference. There are plenty more where we can make a difference on road safety if we do a bit more and put our minds to key performance indicators under the strategy.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr McCORMACK</name>
    <name.id>219646</name.id>
    <electorate>Riverina</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Black Spot Program is one of the best programs being implemented by the government. The vital nature of Black Spot funding in reducing death and serious injuries on Australian roads cannot be, in any way, understated. The government is providing $1.2 billion to the Black Spot Program from 2013-14 to 2024-25. I have to say, there is a lot of discussion at the moment about net zero 2050, as there should be. But if there is one zero towards 2050 we should be working towards valiantly, if there is one priority area, it is vision zero, which is making sure that we don't have any deaths on the road by 2050. This government is working diligently towards that. Part of the government's record $110 billion 10-year infrastructure rollout that is supporting and securing jobs, obviously, driving growth and helping rebuild Australia's economy from the COVID-19 pandemic is the Black Spot Program. No matter where you live, the federal government is investing in road infrastructure to get Australians home to their families sooner and safer. It's a noble cause.</para>
<para>I drove to Temora on the weekend. As I drove there, I saw that the line in the middle of the road, which former Nationals leader, former Deputy Prime Minister John Andersen, once described as that 'corridor of uncertainty'. What we are doing is a simple thing. By putting two lines, side-by-side in the middle of the road, it creates a bit more division between vehicles going opposite directions and just gives you that safety and security on those country roads. Not only that but there are audiotactile lines up the middle of that division and certainly on the sides of the roads. It's that line which, if you actually get your wheels on it, goes 'thump, thump, thump' the faster you go—'thump, thump, thump'. I look forward to seeing how Hansard records that! It's only a small measure, but it saves lives.</para>
<para>The Mayor of Bland Shire, Councillor Brian Monaghan, said to me the other day that in 30 years he had not seen the amount of money being spent in local government areas such as we are investing now. Much of that funding is through the Black Spot Program, state governments as well as the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program. It is providing record spending in local government areas. Councils know because they are at the coal face, so to speak. They are talking to people every day as good local members like you, Deputy Speaker Bird, me and others in this room. We are all speaking to our local constituents, knowing where funding is needed. Of course we know where Black Spot funding is needed because, sadly, tragically, unfortunately, there are people losing their lives on those roads and on those streets. We know because the data is there. We know because the statistics tell us the all-too-stark story.</para>
<para>No matter where you live, the government is investing in road infrastructure to ensure that we do get people where they need to be no matter what they're doing. Given COVID-19, it has been an ideal time to upgrade those roads, because there haven't been as many people travelling as would like to be travelling. Sadly, the road toll continues to be far too high. One death on the road is one too many. By specifically targeting road locations with a history of crashes for safety upgrades, the money is going where it needs to be.</para>
<para>I know in the Riverina and Central West, the funding includes Calarie Road between Wyndham Avenue and Daroobalgie Road at Forbes, improving curved shoulders, widening shoulders, marking the road edge lines and installing guide posts with reflectors, curve markers and reflective pavement markers. That's $685,000 that will save lives in the Central West. Middle Trundle Road, east of The Bogan Way intersection at Trundle has a similar sort of thing. Kurrajong Road near Cord Street—I could go on and on. The object of the exercise is to make sure the funding goes where it needs to be, which is identified by data, identified by families who have lost love ones, identified all too often on country roads by those markers and flowers. We don't want to see a continuation of that. We want to see these issues addressed, and we are.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>11:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Black Spot Program is vitally important in any electorate, supporting many much-needed upgrades to our local roads. My electorate of Indi is no exception to that. In recent funding rounds we have seen three projects funded under the Black Spot Program: a new flashing warning sign and intersection signage at Lake Road and the Murray Valley Highway near Old Tallangatta; new safety barriers and guide posts, as well as sealed shoulders on the stretch of Lake Road near Bethanga between the Murray River Road to the north and the Kurrajong Gap Road to the south; and new guide posts, curve warning signs and new markings along the Skyline Road near Eildon between Taylor Bay Road and Fraser Park Road.</para>
<para>Since I was elected, Indi has done very well to secure over $65 million for much-needed upgrades to our local roads. This includes $5 million for the Great River Road, another $5 million for the Dargo High Plains Road through the bushfire recovery program, $17 million through the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program, and $29 million through the Roads to Recovery Program. There are many party politicians on both sides who would say you could only deliver for your electorate if you're a member of a major party. The fact Indi has seen an extraordinary level of investment in our roads under an Independent puts paid to that idea. We can and do deliver. Importantly, on an area as vital as road safety we are seeing great investment.</para>
<para>It is true that despite this enormous level of investment there is still substantial need in Indi for upgrades to our roads. On 21 October 2019, almost two years ago to the day, I stood to speak about an almost identical motion to this in the exact same chamber we are in today. At that time, two years ago, I spoke about the fact that the Black Spur section of the Maroondah Highway, despite a long and distressing history of both fatal and other serious car crashes, is still struggling to attract the safety upgrades it needs. Maroondah Highway is the only direct major road from the Yarra Valley town of Healesville, up towards Narbethong and through to Buxton or across to Marysville. It then goes north to Taggerty. From there it heads on to Alexandra, while another arterial road branches from it at Taggerty to carry traffic to and from Eildon. The highway is critical for business and tourism between Murrindindi communities and Melbourne's east. It's also a spectacular drive, described to me as the range's version of the Great Ocean Road. But the Black Spur remains a serious challenge for people and communities on the highway because, for much of its winding length of about 10 kilometres, it's impossible and illegal to overtake. It's a road that needs better signage, more slow vehicle turn-outs, better sealing, bicycle lanes and active management of old roadside trees, because the road passes through a wonderful forest of ancient mountain ash.</para>
<para>Two years ago, I spoke about how, when trees fall during storms, the road is often closed for hours or days. And, in the middle of June 2021, just a few months ago, a big storm ripped through, and this is exactly what happened. Fifty trees were felled, there was substantial landslide activity, and the road was closed for days. The community has been calling for upgrades to the Black Spur road for 20 years now, and it's time the government listened. Let's make this road, this stretch of road, this important road, as safe as it is iconic. The people and communities of Murrindindi want a safe and reliable highway. The Black Spot Program can help to deliver one, and I'm calling on the government to step up with the funding and finally fix this problem.</para>
<para>The member for Riverina spoke a spoke a few moments ago about the importance of road safety. I want to add to his comments. It's crucial that we make sure we do everything in this place to eliminate avoidable accidents. More than 30 years ago, I worked in the emergency department at St Vincent's Hospital in Melbourne, and I saw with my own eyes the devastation of a road toll which, in those days, was over 1,000 people. We've come a long way since then—seatbelts, driver education, drink driving laws, but also better roads. So I really commend any government in this place to maintain the funding on the Black Spot Program and to address issues such as the Black Spur in Murrindindi, which already has claimed many lives. I don't want to see another life lost there. I call on the government to fund that road and fix that problem once and for all.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>DZP</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Mental Health</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr THISTLETHWAITE</name>
    <name.id>182468</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingsford Smith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The past 18 months have placed an enormous stress on our community, and young people have experienced a unique loss in the pandemic years. Too many have missed out on what should be formative experiences and vital opportunities to develop. It's no wonder then that many of them are struggling with their mental health. Most of us have seen this anecdotally, but the evidence backs it up as well. Researchers at the Australian National University released a report on youth mental health that found that 71 per cent of parents had observed worsening mental health conditions in their family. According to the Black Dog Institute, the rates of psychological distress in young people jumped from one in five in 2012 to over a quarter in 2020. Thankfully, the rates of suicide have fallen over that particular period, but we still know that suicide is the leading cause of death among Australians aged 15 to 24 years old. For our young people, the decision to access mental health care is fragile, and, if they don't have a positive experience, they may not make another attempt to seek help. Youth-friendly mental health services aren't available uniformly to young people. That's why we need to provide targeted, sensitive and effective mental health support for young Australians now more than ever.</para>
<para>Over the past decade we have had an overdue revolution in our understanding of mental health. It's now time we backed that up with actual resources, including in our schools. And that's why we have been calling on the Morrison-Joyce government to increase mental health services and support for young people across all stages of ill health. We also need to focus on building the youth mental health workforce to meet the current and future needs of our young Australians. The recent announcement of a world-first national mental health and wellbeing strategy for Australian children is welcome and desperately needed. But the government has taken far too long to get there. We welcome the plan to tackle mental health issues as young Australians battle through this difficult period. Early intervention as well as the extra funds for support services like Head to Health are welcome initiatives. But it's long overdue. The strategy was in the works well before COVID and should have been implemented much sooner. There's an urgent need to support the mental health and wellbeing of Australian children, especially in the middle of a pandemic.</para>
<para>This plan also fails to embrace and to consider the impact that climate change is having on children's mental health. Australian children are especially vulnerable to anxiety, sleep disorders and a sense of hopelessness because of this government's lack of action and lack of commitment or positive language about taking a positive approach to climate change and investing in renewable energy. Australian children see what happens on the news every night, and when you have someone like the Deputy Prime Minister out there arguing on a constant basis that we don't need to take action on climate change and that there's not a problem, when children know that there is, makes them feel even more anxious and hopeless. There's no consideration of that in the national strategy.</para>
<para>There also needs to be a greater focus on services in the middle, if you like. There's great support for acute mental health services. If you're having a desperate mental health episode, you will be hospitalised and acute services will be available. There are entry-level services, but it's the services in the middle that are vitally important, particularly if someone is young and they are admitted to hospital during a mental health episode. After they're discharged there's very little in the way of follow-up and support in that interim period to get them through. That is the area the government needs to be concentrating on and investing in.</para>
<para>Students are now starting to head back to the classrooms after another lengthy lockdown and it's now more important than ever that they have access to mental health services, particularly those from poorer families. They're going to come back to school maybe not having access to the internet and maybe not having access to catch-up strategies that other students would have had, and they'll feel desperate and they'll feel left behind. That's why it's important that we cater for them and make sure that they have access to the services that they need.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Macquarie for her motion giving us the important opportunity to speak about such an incredibly vital issue, but I simply can't agree with her characterisation of the situation. Though there is more work to be done—I'll readily accept that—the Morrison government and this minister for health have made mental health, and particularly young people's mental health, a great national priority, perhaps more so than any other previous federal government. The government is investing $6½ billion this year in mental health support, more than double what was being spent in 2013. This government has doubled the number of Medicare-subsidised psychological services available to 20, introduced publicly funded telehealth, improved access to these services in regional areas, and increased funding significantly to Lifeline, Beyond Blue and Kids Helpline. For headspace alone, we're delivering an extra $278.6 million to increase the number of services to 164. Many of these new centres are already opening around the country. This government's commitment to youth mental health and suicide prevention has helped to make my own community in Fisher a national and, indeed, world leader in this field. The government has invested $3.2 million in a trial to pilot a new approach to treating eating disorders through our local Primary Health Network. It's provided more than $6 million to endED and the Butterfly Foundation to construct Australia's first ever residential eating disorder facility, operated by the Butterfly Foundation, called Wandi Nerida.</para>
<para>This government has also invested $7½ million in specific programs on suicide prevention and youth mental health at the University of the Sunshine Coast Thompson Institute, led by Professor Jim Lagopoulos. The results of that investment in my own community, and its world-leading expertise, have been unmatched around the country. Thanks to this funding and the hard work of Jim Lagopoulos's team, between 2018 and 2020 the Thompson Institute published 14 book chapters and more than 150 different peer reviewed journal articles filled with world-first research. Its groundbreaking publications about young people's mental health alone have covered subjects as diverse as insomnia, cannabis, binge drinking, early intervention, brain differences in young people with psychotic disorders, the impact of exercise and psychological distress on the brain, pregnancy and mental health, chronic fatigue syndrome sport related concussions, transcranial magnetic stimulation, mindfulness and sexual violence.</para>
<para>Today, that work continues. The Thompson Institute is in the process of conducting the world's first study using functional MRI technology to understand how cyberbullying impacts the brains of our young people, and the first longitudinal study of the developing brains of 12- to 15-year-olds. The Thompson Institute's impact, however, has gone far beyond research. Its insights and training have been spread widely through my community. The Thompson Institute has reached more than 250,000 with its suicide prevention and mental health first aid programs and has run fortnightly community presentations. Its Myndset program has enhanced coordination between the Sunshine Coast University Hospital and headspace in our region and ensured that young people who might otherwise fall between the two have an appropriate service provider. The Thompson Institute has taken its brain changes program into local schools, while its EMERALD wellbeing program is even being exported to Victoria.</para>
<para>Social impact organisation Rooy estimate that the total economic value created by this suicide prevention work on the Sunshine Coast amounts to $13.8 million. It is unquestionably the case that the suicide rate on the Sunshine Coast has come down from 18 per cent above the national average five years ago to 9.1 per cent above the national average. This is still far too high. However, the significant reduction that we have seen over the past five years is a testament to the Thompson Institute's dramatic impact. I'm continuing to work with the Thompson Institute and the government to try and get them continued funding so they can keep doing the great work that they're doing.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:13</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DAVID SMITH</name>
    <name.id>276714</name.id>
    <electorate>Bean</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to support the motion proposed by my colleague the member for Macquarie. The COVID-19 pandemic has been tough for many Australians, but it has been particularly hard on younger Australians. They have faced ongoing disruption to their education and upheaval of the social networks centred on school and university. Year 12 students have had to deal with uncertainty about the timing and format of the year 12 examinations. Young people who relied on part-time or casual work in the hospitality and entertainment sectors saw their jobs vanish in a few days last March. While these jobs slowly returned over last year, the lockdowns this year, caused by the government's quarantine and vaccination failures, have again led to widespread job losses and underemployment, which have particularly affected young people. Compounding these problems has been anxiety about the disease itself. Younger people were at the back of the queue when it came to getting access to vaccines, and it's only in the last few months that vaccines have been readily available to them.</para>
<para>While the pandemic may have exacerbated the poor mental health of many younger people, all was not well at the start of 2020. The mental illness section of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's June 2021 report on Australia's youth brought together a range of data on the mental health of young people. It reported that, in 2013-14, 20 per cent of people aged 11 to 17 had high or very high levels of psychological distress and 14 per cent experienced a mental disorder. In 2017-18 an estimated 15 per cent of young people aged 18 to 24 experienced high or very high levels of psychological distress.</para>
<para>A 2017 study in the <inline font-style="italic">Medical Journal of Australia</inline>, by Associate Professor Sarah Hetrick and her colleagues, reported that the largest burden of disease in young people was due to mental health problems. It noted that half of all mental health disorders suffered by adults emerged by the age of 14 and three-quarters were apparent by the age of 24. The study found that if left untreated these mental health problems have high rates of recurrence and cause negative outcomes for the individual, including reduced economic productivity as well as societal costs.</para>
<para>Given the poor state of young people's mental health, it's reasonable to expect that the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan, agreed by the Commonwealth and all states and territories in 2017, would address this issue. Not only does it not address it, the plan does not even mention youth or young people. The lack of planning for young people's mental health translates to poor access to services.</para>
<para>Various studies published in the <inline font-style="italic">Australian and New Zealand </inline><inline font-style="italic">J</inline><inline font-style="italic">ournal of </inline><inline font-style="italic">P</inline><inline font-style="italic">sychiatry</inline> report that young people made relatively less use of services than older adults and that parents identified high out-of-pocket costs and long waiting times as barriers to access. As well as these barriers to access, the study by Professor Hetrick noted that mental health services have often not been youth oriented and have restricted access depending on age, diagnosis or comorbidities. The study concludes that there has been a crisis in care, where most young people with mental health difficulties do not get the care they need, resulting in high rates of distress, functional impairment and suicidality. In the absence of appropriate services, it's not surprising that almost 80,000 young people turned up in crisis situations at emergency departments in 2019-20, according to the AIHW.</para>
<para>The Commonwealth government already funds two services designed for young people: Orygen and headspace. While these are both excellent services, they exemplify the problems of access. Orygen only deals with more severe mental illness, while headspace does not. Even Professor McGorry, who was central to establishing headspace, has acknowledged that there is a missing middle of young people—those who are too sick for headspace and not sick enough for the very limited provision of care through state government services, and there are large gaps in geographic access.</para>
<para>The National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan expires next year. There's an overwhelming body of evidence that youth mental health is a significant issue with long-term consequences and that current services are not effective in providing access to the necessary treatments and other supports. I urge the Commonwealth government to work with the states and territories to develop a new plan that includes effective services for young people. We need to get this right for our young people's future. I commend the motion to the House.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:18</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALEXANDER</name>
    <name.id>M3M</name.id>
    <electorate>Bennelong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The lockdowns from this pandemic have often led to a debate between health and economics. The more thoroughly we lock down, the better the health outcomes in the fight against COVID but the worse the economic cost for all the struggling businesses that can't open. This dichotomy doesn't cut to the heart of the matter, because economic costs are not the end of the chain; they are merely a step along the way.</para>
<para>When a business can't open, the effects are felt hardest by the owners and the workers. They can lose income they rely on, and the stresses this can lead to are enormous. Ultimately, this results in huge concerns about mental health. So, in reality, the effectiveness of lockdowns is a contest between public health and mental health, and, as we know, the mental health of Australians has taken a huge hit. While all people have been affected, young people have been hit harder than most.</para>
<para>The formative years, between 15 and 24, are full of uncertainty and stress at the best of times, but this year they have been harder than ever. Exams have gone from things that we can prepare for together to terrifyingly solo ordeals. The parties and ceremonies—stress relief values at the end of school—have been cancelled or scaled back. Apprenticeships are upturned. Universities have lost their face-to-face collaboration, not to mention the buzzing social life. Forays into job markets are tougher than ever, and if you already had a job it's likely that it was in one of those low-paid service sectors that have been so ravaged by the lockdowns.</para>
<para>While we don't have data for 2021 yet, research conducted in 2020 showed that one-third of young Australians reported having experienced high or very high levels of distress. This is deeply concerning. Even more concerning is that every year in Australia more than 3,000 people lose their lives to suicide. That equates to approximately nine people dying by suicide each day. Suicide was the leading cause of death in people aged between 15 and 24, and 25 to 44 between the years 2016 and 2019.</para>
<para>Thankfully, mental health and suicide prevention remain one of the Australian government's highest priorities, as they should be. We are committed to delivering meaningful and lasting reform to this important area in reducing suicide towards zero. Young Australians in particular continue to be a focus of the government's investment in mental health to support them reaching their full potential. We want them to receive the help, support and care they need where and when they need it so they can reach their full potential. In the 2021-22 budget, the government invested a record $2.3 billion in the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan to lead landmark reform. This is the largest federal government mental health investment in Australia's history.</para>
<para>Much of this investment is hitting the ground through headspace, the government's flagship program for the provision of services to young people aged 12 to 25 experiencing or at risk of mental health illness. Since it was started by the Howard government back in 2006, they have expanded to 139 centres operating across Australia. Through the 2019-20 and 2021-22 budgets, the government is undertaking the largest single expansion of the headspace network, bringing the total number of headspace services to 164 nationally by 2025-26. There have been over 3.6 million occasions of service provided through headspace since 2006. It's tragic that this much support has been needed but essential that this service is always there to listen, support and respond. If you or any young person you know is suffering from mental health issues, please reach out to headspace at www.headspace.org.au or on 1800650890.</para>
<para>I don't want to decry the usefulness of lockdowns—they have been a vital tool in our fight against this pandemic and have probably been the difference in keeping our case numbers low compared to similar countries—but we must make sure that while we ensure Australians are safe from COVID we don't leave them vulnerable to mental health concerns, and, if we do, that they always have the support and treatment to ensure they are able to manage this safely. We cannot afford to get this one wrong.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURNS</name>
    <name.id>278522</name.id>
    <electorate>Macnamara</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] The member for Bennelong is right, in that the government has increased the number of headspace services, but that is not enough. There is a big systemic issue with headspace, which I'm going to talk about in this speech. First of all, let me say that this motion is really important. The mental ill health of young people in Australia is a growing issue that we all must confront as members of parliament and as people who all care deeply about the future generations, but this is a systemic policy issue that can be addressed by the government today. I'm going to go through two key areas of policy that we should be implementing, not just talking points from the Prime Minister's office.</para>
<para>The first key area is around headspace. The biggest issue with headspace is staff. Yes, there is an increased number of headspace services around the country—that's a good thing, and I acknowledge the government doing that—but, if you're a staff member at headspace working as a therapist, a mental health professional in Australia, the Medicare rebate for a session at a headspace is somewhere in the vicinity of just over $80 for 50 minutes. You can basically bill a young person around $80 for that service via the Medicare rebate system. The way that headspace services work is that most of the staff pay rent. They also have overheads. Many of the professionals, OTs and psychologists would have supervisors as well. There's also the cost to get to and from the headspace service. So what most mental health professionals are earning at a headspace these days is much closer to $27 to $35 an hour for high-quality mental health services for our young people. That's just not sustainable. You can earn a better living stacking shelves or working as a labourer in this country than you would working as a mental health professional helping young people in these really important clinics. Many of the people who turn up to headspace can't afford private mental health services; they are young people who cannot afford to access private clinicians or private therapies. Therefore, what we're seeing is that the really good practitioners in youth mental health can't afford to stay in the headspace services, because they just can't earn enough of a living. So we really need to look at that rebate so that we can provide high-quality staff with adequate pay in order for them to help service and treat young people in our headspace services.</para>
<para>The other big policy issue relating to youth mental health that we need to confront is around the access to adequate care. So many different reviews, including royal commissions in Victoria and other policy reviews, have shown time and time again that the much, much higher interventions—so not just one-hour sessions, but the much more involved and higher levels of intervention, whether it be more wraparound services or a range of other high-intensity mental health treatment services—have only been accessible to people who are, basically, deemed to be at risk of suicide. That is a really high threshold for someone to get to in that spectrum of mental health decline. What we need to do is lower that threshold so that more young people can have access to more interventions and much more involved mental health treatments, so that it's not just the one hour of clinical care—and it is amazing that we have that available and, yes, the therapists and those professionals and staff helping young people in that area are so important in the treatment and the support for young people. But the truth is that too many young people are being locked out of the level of care that they actually need, because of a threshold that is too high.</para>
<para>Just to repeat, we need to increase the Medicare rebate and we need to increase the number of young people who can access the higher level of care. They're the policy changes that we could make today that would make a real difference in this important sector.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr LEESER</name>
    <name.id>109556</name.id>
    <electorate>Berowra</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Mental health issues disproportionately affect young people, and in the past 18 months it's been a real challenge for many as we continue to navigate our way through the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 560,000 children and adolescents in Australia are estimated to have a mental illness, and one in four young Australians aged 16 to 24 experiences mental illness in any given year. Young people are less likely to seek help for mental health issues if they hold negative attitudes towards help-seeking or have had negative past experiences when they've sought help. This needs to change.</para>
<para>Children and young people have been particularly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdowns. Since March 2020 the government has provided more than half a billion dollars of additional funding for telehealth and direct supports to ensure Australians have the mental health support they need during the pandemic. Young Australians continue to be a focus of the government's investment in mental health to support them reaching their full potential. The government is committed to delivering meaningful and lasting reforms driven by the government's zero suicide target. Every year in Australia more than 3,000 people die by suicide. That's approximately nine people each day. We know suicide is the leading cause of death for young people aged 15 to 44, with more deaths from suicide than from cancer or car accidents. That's why support in this area is absolutely critical. In the 2021-22 budget the government invested a record $2.3 billion in a national mental health and suicide prevention plan to lead a landmark reform. This is the largest federal government mental health investment in Australia's history.</para>
<para>There are several mental health and suicide programs serving my electorate which provide vital services. The Northern Sydney Local Health District, which serves my electorate of Berowra, supports young people facing mental health issues. The district has a youth response team, which provides free and confidential services to young people and their families experiencing distress within the community. They also have a safeguards team which provides additional supports for assessments and therapy for young people, in-reach support to emergency departments and community rapid response. Since the beginning of the pandemic there have been 940 emergency department presentations for mental health reasons in people aged zero to 24 in the northern Sydney district and 2,887 new registrations to mental health community teams.</para>
<para>I want to acknowledge the work of the mental health unit at Hornsby hospital, which has admitted a number of these patients during the course of the pandemic. I particularly acknowledge the work of Dr Choong-Siew Yong, the clinical director, and Ayisha Chitakunye, the service director of the child youth mental health service at the hospital. Another key mental health organisation is the Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service, KYDS, a free local and confidential counselling service for young people founded in 2003 by the Lindfield Rotarians, who were concerned about the increasing number of young in Ku-ring-gai people who were struggling with mental health issues, including the stigma associated with it. They raised funds and partnered with Ku-ring-gai council to establish KYDS. On 31 March 2005 KYDS opened its door with a counsellor who operated out of the library. They supported 36 people in their first year. Today a team of 18 passionate and qualified mental health professionals support young people to work through their challenges and help them achieve their potential. Over the past year, they have provided 5,462 counselling sessions to more than 400 young people. KYDS is led by Anthony Rigney and the chair of the board is Helen Jarvis.</para>
<para>Lifeline Harbour to Hawkesbury is another service providing support, led by the outstanding Wendy Carver. They offer support when members of my community are experiencing distress, with access to 24-hour crisis counselling and suicide prevention services. With a workforce of over 90 per cent volunteers, they deliver first-class volunteer management and training that create rewarding experiences for people and meaningful impacts for people in my electorate and across the country. They also work in response to immediate local needs, providing other community services, including in-person financial counselling, community and corporate training programs.</para>
<para>Finally, Youth Insearch, led by Stephen Lewin and chaired by Gary Rothwell, has helped over 30,000 young people rebuild their lives since it was founded in 1985, currently assisting 1,000 people a year across the country, including in my electorate. Youth Insearch runs one of the most successful youth intervention programs in the country. They working with at-risk youth aged 14 to 20, supporting them to turn their disadvantage into an advantage, enabling them to reach their full potential through peer-to-peer support programs and community programs.</para>
<para>I would like to commend the thousands of mental health workers across the country for the outstanding work they have done over the past 18 months. The COVID-19 pandemic has been a challenge for us all but it is their selfless work that has saved so many Australians. They are the ones who pick up the pieces and get peoples' lives back to together. I want to put my thanks on record to them for all of their efforts.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs WICKS</name>
    <name.id>241590</name.id>
    <electorate>Robertson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I too rise to speak on this motion moved by the member for Macquarie because improving mental health, youth mental health in particular and preventing suicide is a key priority of this government and it is a key priority of mine. We recognise that one-in-four young Australians experience a mental health issue each year and approximately nine people die by suicide each and every day. That not only has a devastating and profound impact on the friends and families of each one of the individuals but it also has a devastating impact on our community, on our nation and, of course, on the future that would have been, that will not be because these young people are no longer with us.</para>
<para>My own family has been impacted by the challenges not only of mental health but of losing our loved ones to suicide, with young people in their 20s, lost too soon due to the impact of this devastating sense of hopeless despair that so many young people go through. I know people in my community who have experienced the loss of loved ones, people that they have walked with and who are not with us today, and I know the impact that this has, particularly on our young kids, who deal with so many challenges, often silently. They often wrestle with issues that are bigger than what they can comprehend and that perhaps what we can comprehend. That is why this particular motion is so important and it's why the Australian government is investing a record $2.3 billion in the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan, the largest federal government mental health investment in Australia's history. It builds on the government's significant existing investment in mental health services through the 2019-20 bushfires and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and it brings the total estimated mental health spend to $6.5 billion in 2021-22.</para>
<para>This government is working towards zero suicide. Christine Morgan was appointed as the first National Suicide Prevention Adviser in 2019 and handed down a final report on the issue last year. The federal government is providing $107 million over five years under the National Suicide Prevention Leadership and Support Program for a range of projects designed to help reduce suicide across Australia.</para>
<para>In my electorate of Robertson, the government is funding a number of important local initiatives as well to help support our community, including a Head to Health pop-up service, which is now available for people across the Central Coast who may be experience challenge with mental health due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This clinic is located at Tuggerah, and it offers free services and involves a multidisciplinary team of mental health workers, psychologists, mental health nurses, occupational therapists, social workers and peer workers. It's a really important service that does recognise that many Australians have struggled in recent months during the lockdown, unable to see family members or friends or support people that they might rely on.</para>
<para>The Central Coast also has three headspace centres, at Gosford, Lake Haven and the soon-to-be-opened Wyong facility. During the 2019 election, the government committed an additional $30 million over four years from 2020-21 to establish 10 new or expanded headspace centres, which included the satellite facility in Wyong. I'm pleased that the service is expected to commence from December of this year. I want to thank our local headspace staff for their tireless work in providing support to 12- to 25-year-olds across our region and for their passion and care in all they do. I know that the government will continue to support the important work they do.</para>
<para>In my electorate, given this is such a big issue here on the Central Coast—our suicide rates are higher than the state average—I've convened a committee to tackle these issues. It's supported by many local organisations, including the PHN, the LHD, police, Lifeline, council community services and small businesses. We've been focusing on attracting funding to implement a bespoke suicide prevention initiative for our region. All these groups that are involved in this have been providing their expertise in designing and implementing actions through an analysis of the mental health of young men and people on the Central Coast, and I really want to thank the committee for their time and their expertise. They've identified two key areas: the need for improved integration of services and upgrade to the mental health system to make it easier to navigate and access. We've developed a funding proposal, and I'm going to continuing fight to see this very important initiative become a reality. <inline font-style="italic">(</inline><inline font-style="italic">Time expired</inline><inline font-style="italic">)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>12:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GEORGANAS</name>
    <name.id>DZY</name.id>
    <electorate>Adelaide</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I'm grateful to the member for Macquarie for raising this issue and moving this important motion. We're one of the richest, most privileged countries in the world, and yet in the area of mental health services we're clearly failing those patients and those families. We're facing nothing short of a mental health crisis. To be honest, the numbers are quite frightening. According to Suicide Prevention Australia, suicide is the leading cause of death for people between the ages of 15 and 24, and the vast majority, 70 per cent, are young men. This is tragic. Those numbers are absolutely tragic. The rates of suicide for our Indigenous population, our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth, our LGBTIQ people, our young people who live in rural and remote areas are higher still.</para>
<para>Reports from the ABS have shown that suicide results in the greatest loss of productive years of life in Australia compared to any other cause of death—115,000 years of potential life, if you add them all up, were lost from intentional harm in 2019 alone. That is tragic. This is a far greater number than for cancer, heart disease, et cetera, precisely because of the shocking number of younger people dying tragically early from drug use and mental health issues. What is most heartbreaking is that this number continues to grow year by year. Evidence shows that half of mental disorders first emerge by the age of 14, and 75 per cent by the age of 24. This demonstrates how vital it is that we get youth mental health services correct—that we get them right, accessible and affordable. As a parliament and as a society, we have to give priority to youth specific early intervention strategies.</para>
<para>It is having a significant flow-on effect on our health system. More and more patients present at emergency departments for lack of any other option, for lack of services, for lack of specific clinics that deal with mental illness. According to an article in The Conversation from April earlier this year, there was close to a 40 per cent increase in mental health presentations at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, in my electorate. This 40 per cent increase then puts pressure on all the other services as well. That was between February 2019 and February 2021. This puts increased pressure on our EDs, our doctors and nurses, and contributes to the growth problem of ambulance ramping in our state, which has been horrendous. These people need a specific service, a specific clinic, somewhere they can present 24/7 that will deal with mental health illnesses.</para>
<para>Also, according to some of the paramedics that I speak to here in my electorate in South Australia, on one particular day in September this year there were no ambulances available for 17 high-priority emergencies in Adelaide's southern suburbs because ambulances were tied up ramping at hospitals. A lot of those people were presenting with mental illnesses. This is an enormous problem for South Australia—one that this Liberal state government, the Marshall government, has simply failed to address. The increase in mental health patients and the difficulty these patients face accessing help means that the emergency department is no longer a last resort for care as it should be; it is often the only resort available to many. We need a specific service that deals with people that are able to present themselves 24/7 for a specific mental illness clinic here in South Australia.</para>
<para>The Grattan Institute has previously highlighted that there is a huge gap—in fact, they called it a 'yawning gap'—in services for people who need intensive community support but not inpatient care. In a report published in 2020 it said that federal and state governments need to work more closely to provide appropriate resources for mental health care. Unfortunately, it's not happening, and those people that require mental health care are being left behind, many ending up homeless and many in trouble with the police. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>E09</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired. The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
<para class="italic"> <inline font-style="italic">Sitting suspended from 12:44 to 16:00</inline></para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Refugees</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:00</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms SHARKIE</name>
    <name.id>265980</name.id>
    <electorate>Mayo</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last Wednesday, with volunteer assistance from Willunga Circle of Friends, many in my community spent the afternoon listening to CEO Kon Karapanagiotidis and director of advocacy and campaigns Jana Favero from the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre. They provided us with an update with respect to refugee issues in Australia, including: the plight of those in Afghanistan; those who have sought protection visas; the uncertain future for those on Manus; and the challenges faced by those here in community detention with little or no safety during the COVID lockdowns and no ability for their children to study post-year 12, as they are charged international rates. This year the government reduced our humanitarian intake from 18,750 to 13,750, and I understand the 3,000 Afghans that we have agreed to take are part of that threshold.</para>
<para>We also heard, from Kate Leaney and Fida from the Welcoming Centre, powerful, personal, local stories and a call to action on how we can all help. I would urge the government to consider a refugee sponsorship program where families and communities could sponsor a refugee family seeking safety. We can do this better. Australia is a nation with a big heart because, just as our national anthem says, for those who have come across the sea we've boundless plains to share.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Flynn Electorate: Resources Industry</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:01</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr O'DOWD</name>
    <name.id>139441</name.id>
    <electorate>Flynn</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Resources are still the lifeblood of Flynn. Of course, along with agriculture, it has kept us safe and economically sound through COVID. Our agriculture industry, with beef, cotton, grains, wheat, citrus, nuts and berries, has been very good to us. But it's the gas, thermal coal and coking coal prices that have in some places doubled, tripled and quadrupled what they were prior to COVID. It is a wonderful thing for our community. It's responsible for $1.2 billion in wages in the resources industry across Central Queensland across Flynn, 8,833 full-time jobs and $3.1 billion spent on goods and services based locally.</para>
<para>There are 1,798 local businesses that benefit from the resources industry in Flynn. They contribute to 462 community organisations and $4.5 billion in royalties across the Queensland government. Without that $4.5 billion from Flynn, the state government would have to readjust their budget dramatically. For all this, they only use 0.1 per cent of the Queensland landmass. Unemployment in Flynn has dropped from seven per cent in June 2020 to 6.5 per cent in June 21, and I expect further falls. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Richmond: Animal Pound and Rehoming Centre</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ELLIOT</name>
    <name.id>DZW</name.id>
    <electorate>Richmond</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to speak about a very exciting infrastructure project for my local community. I was so pleased last week to announce that an elected Albanese Labor government will invest $1 million to build a new animal pound and rehoming centre in South Murwillumbah. This is a great local project and is so desperately needed, since the old pound shut down in 2019. This brand-new facility will have 16 dog pens and 11 cat cages, and will include a special Friends of the Pound shelter with up to 28 dog and cat pens, two stables and paddocks for many farm animals too. I'd really like to acknowledge Friends of the Pound, the not-for-profit animal rescue charity, which does such great work in ensuring all these precious animals are cared for and rehomed. I'd also like to acknowledge Tweed Shire Council on the design and commitment to this fantastic new facility.</para>
<para>The fact is, only an Albanese Labor government can be trusted to invest in the infrastructure that our community needs to boost productivity, create jobs and drive economic development, and we have a very strong track record of investing in infrastructure on the New South Wales North Coast. This new animal pound and rehoming facility is a great investment in local infrastructure. It will do so much to improve animal welfare in our community and indeed bring great benefit to so many people right throughout our region.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Barker Electorate: Environment</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:04</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PASIN</name>
    <name.id>240756</name.id>
    <electorate>Barker</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Coorong is an internationally recognised, Ramsar-listed wetland, a national park that, pre-COVID, welcomed thousands of domestic and international visitors each year. The delicate ecosystem supports many significant endangered flora and fauna.</para>
<para>While tourism is an integral part of the region and its economy, the Coorong has also been an important fishing ground for generations of local fishermen. The livelihoods of these small family-run businesses have been devastated in recent years by increasing numbers of New Zealand fur seals, not native to the sheltered waters of the Coorong. In these waters, they are apex predators and, as such, are causing significant environmental and economic harm.</para>
<para>Coorong Wild Seafood is one such business. For three straight years, they've made a loss. From a payroll of around $250,000 a year, employing eight staff, they now employ two casuals. These are jobs and economic activity that the region simply can't afford to lose.</para>
<para>While the fur seal is protected in Commonwealth waters, there is no legislation protecting them in the waters of the Coorong, where they are not native. I'm supporting a call for the ethical and responsible culling of these animals. I call again on the South Australian state government to take action on this matter. Research and surveys and counts aren't enough. It's time to take real action to reduce the numbers and save our local fishermen.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Scullin Electorate: Transport Infrastructure</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:06</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GILES</name>
    <name.id>243609</name.id>
    <electorate>Scullin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Prior to the 2019 election, commuters in the Scullin electorate were promised a new car park at South Morang station. However, once the election was over, the Morrison government quietly dropped the project, no doubt hoping no-one would notice. Last month, Minister Fletcher shamelessly announced that four additional car parks for Melbourne's north from his commuter car park rorts fund would be funded. But each one is an existing Victorian government project already underway. Most egregiously, he announced funding for additional car parking at Epping station in my electorate—a project that's already been completed! And these new car parks are not substitutes for cancelled projects either. Watergardens station is 40 kilometres from South Morang; Sunbury, 50 kilometres away. These stations undoubtedly need additional parking, which is why they were funded under the Victorian government's Car Parks for Commuters Program, but funding already-completed car parks and car parks 50 kilometres away doesn't make up for the Morrison government's comprehensive failures in the administration of the commuter car parks fund.</para>
<para>Australians deserve to get to the bottom of this $660 million rort and the other grants programs the Morrison government has treated as LNP slush funds. We urgently need a real national anticorruption commission, one that operates independently of government and that conducts its own inquiries, to stop these rorts and get to the bottom of who is responsible for each of them.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Grey Electorate: Community Events</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:08</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr RAMSEY</name>
    <name.id>HWS</name.id>
    <electorate>Grey</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>It's been a difficult time for community organisations in Grey as they make decisions about whether or not to progress with their community events, given the vagaries of COVID lockdowns and restrictions. So I was very pleased indeed when it was decided that the Yorke Peninsula Field Days, a biennial event, would go ahead. They'd sought some advice from me and an assurance that the government would not leave them behind if they had to cancel at short notice, and Minister Littleproud was good enough to give me a general comment in that area. They went ahead. We were limited to 5,000 participants a day. I had a stand there. The field days were pretty much sold out every day and were a fabulous success. So well done them. Well done to Martin Kenny, the president, Peter Anderson the CEO, and Paul Correll, who I had quite a bit to do with on this issue.</para>
<para>At the same time, we've had a number of country shows. Some have chosen to cancel, and I bear them no grudge at all. It is difficult enough being on those committees; making those decisions is hard. But the Clare, Cleve, Yallunda Flat and Wudinna shows have all gone ahead, as has the one in my own home town of Kimba. It was one of the best events we've had in many years it would have to be said, and congratulations to Courtney Johnson and her team there. For those who chose not to go ahead, as I said, I've no condemnation. It's a difficult decision. But I was very pleased indeed when the government came out, I think last week or the week before, and announced that there was $25 million on the table to help these types of events to get through this difficult time of cancellations.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Charitable Organisations</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr LEIGH</name>
    <name.id>BU8</name.id>
    <electorate>Fenner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Around Easter, Catholic church members often hold a walk in support of refugees. Yet, as St Vincent de Paul head, Toby oConnor has pointed out, under the government's latest attack on charities if some of those people were blocking a public area and if they failed to move on under direction then any charity that's associated with that march could be disqualified. The most anti-charity government in Australian history is attempting to silence charitable advocacy in measures that the Rev. Tim Costello has compared to Putin's Russia and which Australian Council for International Development CEO, Mark Purcell, has likened to the Burmese junta.</para>
<para>This new measure would give charities commissioner, Gary Johns—who once compared Indigenous women to 'cash cows'—new powers to deregister charities. It's so extreme that a unanimous Senate committee report, chaired by Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, has recommended that parliament disallow the proposed regulation. Opponents of this latest attack on charities include ANTaR; the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services; the Australian Institute of Company Directors; Anglicare; and UnitingCare.</para>
<para>Civil society, religious charities and churches should be able to speak up for their values. Community advocacy and public protests are a valuable part of a healthy democracy, and governments must protect that right—not stifle it. The war on charities must end. The coalition must withdraw this nasty attack on Australian charities.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Women</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:11</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SHARMA</name>
    <name.id>274506</name.id>
    <electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to share with you a speech written by 11-year-old Danni Frelic as part of the Raise Our Voice in Parliament campaign, where participants were asked the question: what do you want Australia to look like in 20 years? This was Danni's response: 'Filling precisely half the chairs in the Senate were women, half in the House of Representatives and everywhere in the entire House. In the surgery room, exactly half the doctors were women and half the nurses too. At the sports field, half the audience were at the women's game and half the competitors were women too. At the building site, half of the construction workers were women. Half of everything was given to women; nothing less, nothing more. This is what I want in the year of 2041.</para>
<para>It's obvious women are unequal to men in terms of work, stereotypes or life in general. How come there are hardly any famous sportswomen in cricket, basketball or rugby? Why do I never see any female construction workers when I walked past a building site? And what about those girls who have dreams to become Prime Minister? Only once has that ever happened—once.</para>
<para>When I'm older I want to be a brain surgeon. However, these days I would expect to be one of the few. During the pandemic women have especially become more unequal than ever. Mothers with kids have even sacrificed their jobs to deal with the otherwise unsupervised children. But we have to come back from this. We girls deserve equality; we deserve the image of 2041.'</para>
<para>Thank you, Danni, for your wonderful contribution and your insightful words.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr THISTLETHWAITE</name>
    <name.id>182468</name.id>
    <electorate>Kingsford Smith</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Our kids future is too important to leave in the hands of the National Party, but that's exactly what the Prime Minister has done. He has left Australia's climate change policy in the hands of the Nationals. After eight long years, Australia still doesn't have a policy to reduce emissions and tackle climate change. Eight long years! They built the Sydney Harbour Bridge in quicker time than it has taken this government to come up with a policy on climate change. For eight years the climate sceptics in this government have held the country and our kids' future to ransom, scuttling any attempt to come up with a credible policy. We've had the National Energy Guarantee, Direct Action, the big stick and 'technology, not taxes': they're all slogans! There's nothing behind them; there's no actual policy to reduce emissions.</para>
<para>Enough is enough! Australians have had enough; they're sick and tired of the government fighting, bickering and arguing over whether or not climate change is real. The people of Australia, and particularly our children, deserve better. They deserve a government that's going to take climate change seriously. The Prime Minister has to stop being a climate change wimp. He has to show some leadership and stand up to the National Party. He has to adopt a policy of net zero emissions and plan a transition where we reduce emissions, support renewables, support electric vehicles, rewire our grid to cater for renewables, invest in batteries, create jobs and encourage investment in Australia. That is the future and it's time for the government to show some leadership on climate change.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sturt Electorate: Campbelltown ArtHouse</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr STEVENS</name>
    <name.id>176304</name.id>
    <electorate>Sturt</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Yesterday I had the great pleasure of having the opportunity to attend the anniversary of the Campbelltown ArtHouse in the heart of my electorate, particularly knowing that I would be here for two parliamentary sitting weeks. It was a thrill to know that I could be there before having to head to the airport yesterday, and to share in that celebration of the fifth anniversary of that great institution. The Campbelltown council has supported it very well, and I was proud to be there and am proud to be a supporter of theirs—and, more importantly, to support them into the future. I really do congratulate James and Ann, who have been the driving force behind creating that community asset. Of course, it's wonderful to be able to provide the opportunity for people to come together and, in this case, participate in artistic endeavours together. They convinced me to attempt to draw something on a landscape that was there on the wall, so I did a tree, which I think looked like a tree. I'm no great artistic expressionist, but I am an admirer of art and those that get such enjoyment out of it. I can say that the people in the community that use that facility find it so valuable. With the challenges of COVID over the last 18 months, it's a timely reminder of how much people value in their community having opportunities to come together in whatever their pursuit or interests might be. At the Campbelltown ArtHouse, this is bringing artists together. So I commend them on their fifth anniversary and their impending move to the Brookside Cellars, and I look forward to supporting them into the future. I congratulate them on their fifth anniversary.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Dobell Electorate: PEP 11</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:15</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBRIDE</name>
    <name.id>248353</name.id>
    <electorate>Dobell</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>My community on the Central Coast of New South Wales is against PEP 11. People living up and down the coast, from Sydney to Newcastle, are against PEP 11. And yet Minister Pitt still hasn't made a decision, eight months after his original deadline. This is a project that will devastate our coastline, our local marine life and our local economy. That's why I stand against it.</para>
<para>Last year I met with members of the Surfrider Foundation and Save our Coast on the lawns of Parliament House, calling on this government to stop PEP 11. In February I stood with my Labor colleagues as Anthony Albanese announced Labor's opposition to PEP11. In April, with Liesl Tesch, state member for Gosford, I joined the Surfrider Foundation and Save our Coast paddling out against PEP 11. In August I joined a virtual town hall with advocacy groups to reaffirm my opposition to PEP 11. I'm not the only one—over 1,800 people in my community have signed a petition to stop this. Thousands of others in Newcastle, Sydney and across Australia have done the same. Even Ben & Jerry's have spoken out, making it clear they do not want this project to go ahead. But the minister still hasn't made a decision.</para>
<para>Now we're preparing for another push against PEP 11. A private member's bill to stop PEP 11 has come before parliament today. I'm prepared to support this bill, but I suspect the Morrison government has zero intention of letting it go to a vote. They have already adjourned debate, trying to keep PEP 11 off the agenda. That's why I'm urging the minister to put an end to this uncertainty for my community. He has the power to stop PEP 11 with the stroke of a pen today. Do what's right, Minister. This has dragged on for too long.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Beenleigh State High School: Paddock to Plate Luncheon</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:17</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VAN MANEN</name>
    <name.id>188315</name.id>
    <electorate>Forde</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I recently had the privilege, during the parliamentary break, of joining the talented students of Beenleigh State High School for their seventh annual Paddock to Plate luncheon. This has become one of the most popular events in our local community calendar, with over 260 guests in attendance this year. It's always wonderful to see the year 11 and 12 students who have been observing this event since they were junior students finally be able to learn and practise their hospitality skills under the experienced guiding hand of Queensland chef Matt Golinski. The skills that they learn in the lead-up to this even are high-end and world-class. Many of these students will carry these skills into their industry practice in the years to come.</para>
<para>Chef Matt Golinski assisted the students to prepare a four-course meal using a range of local and school produce from their garden and agricultural department. This is also a great learning opportunity to show students how they can sustainably source their own produce to create gourmet, healthy meals. This event not only provides a chance to showcase the talented art, hospitality and agriculture students' preparation, performance, skills, farm produce and presentation skills; it also enables them the opportunity to experience success, network with local business and forge future employment opportunities.</para>
<para>I would like to once again congratulate all students at Beenleigh State High School who were involved in holding another wonderfully successful Paddock to Plate.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr BURNS</name>
    <name.id>278522</name.id>
    <electorate>Macnamara</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] For Youth Voice in Parliament Week, this speech was written by Chelsea Rossignolo, a very talented 17-year-old constituent of mine, and the topic was 'What do you want Australia to look like in 20 years?'</para>
<para>'Accountable. In 20 years I know that what I want Australia to look like is accountable—accountable for its tainted past, undervaluing of diversity and abuses of power. For me, this looks like taking the time to listen to marginalised voices and taking on what they have to say not just in theory but in practice. Today my fellow young Australians and I struggle to associate this notion with what has been presented to us. From sexual misconduct scandals, leadership spills and a dismal vaccine rollout, our introduction to the political world has been less than idyllic. We yearn for the innovation and integrity described in our classrooms and the days our political landscape was dominated by pioneers of change, both in and out of our parliament, like Susan Ryan, Eddie Mabo and William Deane. Of course, I don't want our future to look the same as our past, but I hope that we can take inspiration from these figures that push for accountability with us. While it is easy to be disheartened from entering or studying politics right now, I hope that my fellow young Australians can be driven by optimism for what can come and see the potential in Australia that I do.'</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Vasta, Mr Angelo</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:20</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr VASTA</name>
    <name.id>E0D</name.id>
    <electorate>Bonner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise today to honour and celebrate the life of my father, Angelo Vasta. On Wednesday 29 September Dad passed away. At 80 years of age, he'd lived a full life dedicated both to his career and to his family. He was the son of a Sicilian migrant who came to the North Queensland cane fields in 1922 in the hope of a better future for his family.</para>
<para>Growing up, Dad was always there for me and moulded me into the man I am today. He was the father to six children and taught us all the value of service to the public, rather than service to oneself. He illustrated this perfectly during his distinguished legal career. Dad's unwavering passion to keep giving back to the community didn't stop once he left the Supreme Court bench. He threw himself into doing work for the less privileged, especially for the Aboriginal Legal Service, where he was a powerful advocate for Indigenous Australians. My siblings and I were fortunate to have had Dad around as much as we did, and for that I am truly grateful.</para>
<para>On behalf of my family I want to acknowledge and thank the community in my electorate of Bonner for the many kind words relayed through text messages, emails, cards or flowers. My family has been overwhelmed by the very kind expressions of sympathy on Dad's passing. Rest in peace, Dad.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>On behalf of all of us here, warm condolences to you and your family.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms MURPHY</name>
    <name.id>133646</name.id>
    <electorate>Dunkley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm proud to deliver this speech written by 19-year-old Stephanie Gallavich from Skye in my electorate as part of the UNICEF, YWCA Australia, Run for It and Generation: Politics inaugural Youth Voice in Parliament Week. Stephanie's speech is her response to the question: what is your vision for Australia in 20 years?</para>
<para>'Honestly, writing this I found it hard to put into new words how I dream Australia to be 20 years in the future, so, in words said before, I will say that there is no Australia I want more than one that is sustainable, reconciled with the Indigenous people and has justice for women. Future generations and I need an Australia that thrives on sustainable systems and resources, where my choices do not impact future generations in the way it does now. I want Australia to be a place where Indigenous Australians are not discriminated against and can have the rights they have always deserved but never received. As a woman, I want to live in an Australia that has equal opportunities for women in every part of life—in other words: equality. My reasoning for this is simple: put in the wise words of Julia Gillard, 'because we are entitled to a better standard than this'. Maybe we should look at the standard as a goal instead, as we all have set goals in life and we all have achieved goals, and sustainability, diversity and justice are great goals Australia has the ability to achieve.'</para>
<para>Hear, hear, Stephanie. Thank you so much.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Sunshine Coast Veterans Day</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:23</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>COVID-19 disrupted many of our plans in 2020, but one of the saddest losses for me was the cancellation of my Sunshine Coast veterans day. However, I'm delighted to say that, thanks to the generosity of the Irwin family and Australia Zoo, Sunshine Coast veterans day is back on this year, on Thursday 18 November. This has been a tough time for a lot of us, but for many veterans it has been particularly isolating. Many are looking for the opportunity to reconnect with their mates, who understand their experiences, and Sunshine Coast veterans day is designed to give them that chance.</para>
<para>On 18 November, entry to Australia Zoo will be free for veterans, plus one guest each, on presentation of a veteran lapel pin, or white or gold veteran card. I will be there along with the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, meeting local former ADF members, to share the day and to hear about their experiences over the past two years. I want to thank the minister for being willing to join us and local veterans, the Irwin family for partnering with me on this initiative and Robert Irwin in particular for coming along to the launch. I also want to thank Peter Kennedy of Sunshine Coast Young Veterans and all of the local RSLs in Fisher for helping to promote this very, very important event.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Illegal Fishing</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:25</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOSH WILSON</name>
    <name.id>265970</name.id>
    <electorate>Fremantle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Last week, there were reports of illegal fishing vessels at Rowley Shoals within a marine sanctuary in Australian waters. It's vital we maintain and apply the capacity to police our oceans in order to prevent harmful fishing practices and we should, but still don't, have a clear policy that rules out super trawlers.</para>
<para>Let's not forget that 65 per cent of the seafood we consume is imported yet we have no effective mechanism for combatting illegal and unregulated fishing practices, which are the cause of catastrophic over-fishing. In fact, according to Minderoo Foundation's recent <inline font-style="italic">Mending </inline><inline font-style="italic">the </inline><inline font-style="italic">Net</inline> report, we collect only two out of 22 pieces of information required to ensure catch-to-plate traceability. We generally don't know the vessel, the country location, the legality and authorisation of the fishing activity, or the compliance with basic workplace rights and safety conditions. Indeed, more than half of our imported seafood comes from three countries—China, Thailand and Vietnam—which have documented issues with poor fisheries governance and harmful labour practices. A survey by the Marine Stewardship Council shows that nine in 10 Australians want measures in place to ensure that they are not buying unsustainable seafood. Both the US and the EU have taken these steps, and we are behind the game on this issue. Australia should have a framework in place to help protect marine biodiversity and to prevent modern slavery by seeking to eradicate illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing practices.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:26</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs WICKS</name>
    <name.id>241590</name.id>
    <electorate>Robertson</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to commend the many students and young people in the electorate of Robertson who entered the Raise Our Voice Australia competition this year to write a speech to be read by members in this chamber. Many students from the Central Coast wrote great and outstanding speeches. I want to congratulate each and every one of them for the time and effort they put in. I hope to be able to read more of them into the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> in the coming weeks because they really do reflect a disparate, diverse but very considered range of views on Australia, our future and global affairs.</para>
<para>Today I would like to read this speech of John Thomas, 19 years of age, from the electorate of Robertson. His speech begins: 'Australia, it's my home, my country. Each and every single person on this island continent for better or worse is family—one people yet many. We yell and we scream but in the end we care.</para>
<para>What is my vision for Australia over the next 20 years? In the distant horizon of time's infinite possibilities I dare to see to grasp for a greater country. I dare to see the gap closed. I dare to hear no more lies broadcast over TV, radio lines. I dare to speak, debate and celebrate change. I dare to dream of a nation united, despite our different faces and races. Our coat of arms, a kangaroo and an emu, are animals that race forward not back. Let's not forget that. Yet like a dingo that can turn its head 360 degrees, let's not forget our past. Australia's scars and sins are overbearing and vast. Economics, politics and climate have all been divisive. I dare to pray we share more than our opinions one day.'</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:28</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms OWENS</name>
    <name.id>E09</name.id>
    <electorate>Parramatta</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>You won't hear my words in the chamber today but the words of a young woman from my electorate, a young woman who wanted her voice heard and whose voice should be heard. In this inaugural Youth Voice in Parliament Week, organised by Raise Your Voice Australia, these are the words of Reya, aged 15.</para>
<quote><para class="block">Twenty years into the future, I would like to see an Australia where women and others who are cast aside are heard and represented in parliament and other leadership roles in a way that encourages others like them, instead of scaring them. I would like to see an Australia that is not afraid to battle climate change at its core. An Australia that changes the way we see migrants and refugees. One that stops judging, dismissing and is aware of the diversity and vibrance they bring.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Twenty years into the future, I would like to see more diverse representation in the Australian government and media that showcases a more modern Australia. An Australia that is a beacon of support for the world, a beacon that shows the world that we are the centre of change. Despite our isolation geographically from the world, we can still be a beacon that displays change.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Twenty years into the future, I would like to see an Australia that no longer thrives on the suffering of the earth. One that is not starting the process of using renewable resources but one that has been for years. One that understands that to secure the future we have to start now.</para></quote>
<para>So speaks Reya; she said it all.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Future Drought Fund</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:30</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr WEBSTER</name>
    <name.id>281688</name.id>
    <electorate>Mallee</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Dorothea Mackellar had it in one:</para>
<quote><para class="block">I love a sunburnt country,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">A land of sweeping plains,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">…   …   …</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">Of droughts and flooding rains.</para></quote>
<para>While drought has long been part of the Australian agricultural life, mitigating drought is critical, because it is a challenging and recurring and increasing theme. The Morrison-Joyce government is investing almost $115,000 in my electorate of Mallee to enhance drought resilience through the Future Drought Fund.</para>
<para>This week I met with Nicole Byrnes, the new chairperson of Mallee Sustainable Farming, one of the recipient organisations in this first round of funding. I congratulate Nicole on her new position. MSF will use their grant to create an online learning community to allow farmers to engage in discussion and find solutions to manage soil in drought. Farmers listen to farmers. These forums will provide broadacre farmers in Mallee a platform to engage in forums that draw on the latest evidence based information to inform how to protect, manage and repair soils before, during and after drought. I also congratulate the Birchip Cropping Group and the Charlton Neighbourhood House, which will both also receive funding for their projects from the Future Drought Fund. Local farming leaders, such as Nicole from MSF, are on the front foot when it comes to preparing for the future as the climate changes. Our communities rely on lead organisations to pave the way for sustainable solutions to manage drought.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Australia</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:31</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms WELLS</name>
    <name.id>264121</name.id>
    <electorate>Lilley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>To celebrate Youth Voice in Parliament Week this week I am honoured to give voice to 16-year-old Maddie Sheehan from Earnshaw State College in Banyo in my electorate of Lilley. This is Maddie's vision for Australia in 20 years.</para>
<para>'Growing up, my grandparents loved to tell me stories of their childhood, never missing an opportunity to throw around classic phrases like "kids these days" or "back in my day". And though I don't pretend to know the struggles of the generations that came before me, and I have the utmost sympathy for anyone forced to live in a time before television, it made me realise the world was not always this heavy.</para>
<para>My generation is staring down the barrel of an uncertain future, and, instead of being excited and hopeful for what is may hold, I would be lying if I said that I was not scared. I am scared to watch as the fires that burned all summer long climb higher and edge closer to home. I am scared because we are in a slow-motion car crash, and the brakes are perfectly functional, but we all seem to be asleep at the wheel. I am scared to watch as we rewrite the definition of humanity but refuse to acknowledge that we are all human. But, most of all, I am scared that I am right. Please prove me wrong. I am 16 years old, I don't have all the answers, but you have all the power to make change. What side of history will you stand on?'</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo></subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament: Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:34</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WATTS</name>
    <name.id>193430</name.id>
    <electorate>Gellibrand</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The voices of young people in our community are often overlooked in this place, and that's why I'm participating in Raise our Voice Australia's Youth Voice in Parliament campaign this week. Sam from Altona in my electorate is 13, and, on the eve of the COP26 summit in Glasgow, he has a message for us all in this place. Sam is a public-speaking champion, so I hope I can do him proud in this chamber. This is Sam's speech.</para>
<para>'Our wonderful unique wildlife is dying. You know it's true; you've seen countless statistics roll in, heard hundreds of people speak about the matter, and yet our actions to prevent climate change have been limited—held back by people determined to go against the opposing group, no matter what its policy is. My vision is that in 20 years time when I commute to work I won't feel guilty. I will be reassured in the knowledge that the transport I am using isn't affecting the environment around me. In 20 years time, it shouldn't matter who's in which party or who believes in what; decisions should be made for the best of the planet instead of just for personal gain. Twenty years into the future I want to see active, wide-scale efforts to clean up our planet, to reduce and eliminate any further damage from happening. We will be saving species, not losing them. The consequences of your actions and your decisions will be burdened on the youth of this country and the youth of tomorrow. Make your choices wisely, as changes made now could cause irreversible damage'.</para>
<para>Well done, Sam. I hope to take your message forward in the Australian parliament.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Petition: Climate Change</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:36</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ZIMMERMAN</name>
    <name.id>203092</name.id>
    <electorate>North Sydney</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I have to say that in all my work as the member for North Sydney I'm constantly amazed and inspired by the knowledge and enthusiasm of young Australians on issues like protecting our environment. It's a vast improvement from when I was at school, but it does remind me of the fact that the first political act that I undertook was, as an 11- or 12-year-old, to write to the then Labor Minister for Planning and Environment, the late Paul Landa, to call for an end to old-growth forest logging. But it has certainly become more sophisticated today.</para>
<para>Today I want to pay tribute to Alice Harrington, who lives just outside my electorate. Alice was motivated by her concerns about climate change to organise a petition which attracted 5,642 signatures, which I will present to the parliament today and which has been approved by the Petitions Committee. Alice is deeply passionate about climate change and the environment, but she also has been very novel in the way that she helped organise this petition. It snowballed, particularly through her use of TikTok to attract interest in the petition. I want to congratulate Alice and all of the other young people that helped by signing it. She's a 15-year-old student. I know that her work has made her family very proud, including two constituents of mine, her grandparents Anne and David Roxborough. Thank you, Alice, for the work that you're doing. You have every right to be concerned about the future of our environment and our planet, and your efforts will help achieve a better outcome. I am therefore pleased to present this petition.</para>
<para>The petition read as follows—</para>
<quote><para class="block">The Earth is dying. Ecosystems are collapsing. Natural Disasters are of increasing extremity. We can stop this. The recent United Nations IPCC reported the unequivocal scientific evidence that human activity has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land. Widespread, rapid changes have already occurred. Global surface temperature will continue to increase unless we act immediately to make substantial reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is vital. If we continue at the current rate of CO2 production, increasingly severe disasters such as bushfires, floods and droughts will occur. This will have major economic, political and social impacts. It's in Australia's best interest to act now and cut CO2 emissions so the worst effects can be limited. We are in a climate emergency and as Australian citizens/residents we put our safety and future in the Federal Government's hands. It's especially important to act now to protect the lives of all Australian residents and citizens, including those too young to vote or as yet unborn. We must act with their best interest at heart. With climate change being the most significant problem we face as the human race, we must listen to the science. It is imperative that Australia takes immediate and significant action, to ensure the futures and safety of all Australians.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">We therefore ask the House to , as protectors of current and future Australians, to pass a bill ensuring that carbon dioxide emissions are halved by 2030 and Australia will become net zero by 2050.</para></quote>
<para>from 5,642 citizens (Petition No. EN3165)</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament: Mental Health</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:37</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms THWAITES</name>
    <name.id>282212</name.id>
    <electorate>Jagajaga</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I give this speech as part of Raise Our Voice Australia's Youth Voice in Parliament project.</para>
<para>'Dear members of the 46th Parliament of Australia, my name is Anthony Baltatzis, a 16-year-old studying in the electorate of Jagajaga. Today I would like to address the issue of improving the currently overburdened mental health care system in Australia. In light of COVID-19 lockdowns, the number of people requiring mental health support has severely increased, and it scares me about what the future holds if the current system is left to neglect. My vision for the next 20 years involves an expansion of the public healthcare system, Medicare, to treat mental health care in the same manner as physical health care. Presently, Australia has a major scarcity of mental health professionals, which is growing as many psychologists and psychiatrists are beginning to retire. Hence, more funding needs to be implemented to educate the upcoming generation in this field. I would also like to see an adult version of Kids Helpline be subsidised by the federal government, given that Medicare currently limits free psychology services to 10 sessions. Australia should also increase its funding and support for carers of those with a disability or mental illness, given that they are disproportionately coming from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. In essence, the current mental health care system needs a dire overhaul. I propose that Medicare should be expanded to treat mental illnesses as being as important as physical illnesses. If we don't act now, a failed mental health system means a failed economy and society. Thanks for listening'.</para>
<para>Thanks, Anthony, for delivering that speech.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>COVID-19: New South Wales</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:39</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ALEXANDER</name>
    <name.id>M3M</name.id>
    <electorate>Bennelong</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>For over 100 days we have waited for today, through lockdown, isolation, missed anniversaries, endless Zoom meetings, confusion, chaos and this eternal virus. We are finally at the day we have been looking forward to for so many months: New South Wales has hit 80 per cent double vaccination. People across Bennelong can today do all the things we have been waiting to do for so long: family reunions, weddings, parties, community sport, playing tennis and even standing up to have a drink are all back on the cards. Life is returning to normal, and the sense of relief can be seen everywhere.</para>
<para>What's even more exciting is that the first dose is now well above 90 per cent, so in the coming weeks we will hit that level of double dose and be able to go about our lives in confidence that the worst days of the pandemic are behind us. Our next milestone, 1 November, is when we will be able to again travel around New South Wales and around the world. It's fantastic to see the new Premier and my state counterpart in Epping, Dominic Perrottet, opening our borders. I hope soon the federal government can similarly allow more than just Australians back into our country. Bennelong is one of the most multicultural electorates, and many locals have been separated from their families and friends for too long.</para>
<para>Thank you to everybody who has rolled up their sleeves and to every health worker who gave us our jabs. We are clearly in the fifth set now, leading two breaks and serving very well.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Macarthur Electorate: Community Services</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:41</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I enjoyed that ending; thank you to the member for Bennelong. I just want to say thank you to my community for what they have done during the pandemic. They have demonstrated the reason I am so proud of them. They have shown selflessness, they've shown spirit and, above all, they've shown community. In particular I want to call out two of our locals; there are really too many to name.</para>
<para>The first one is Rose from our Arts Centre Cafe. We have a big arts centre at Campbelltown with a wonderful cafe serving fantastic food. Rose and her team have been preparing and giving meals to the most disadvantaged in our community, transported by their staff. They have provided hundreds and hundreds of meals, free of charge, to the most disadvantaged in our community. I congratulate Rose, her team and the Arts Centre itself for the work they have done in our community.</para>
<para>I would also like to congratulate the Lomandra Community Pantry. Lomandra is a specialist school for children with learning and behavioural difficulties, and they have set up a pantry throughout the pandemic to provide food parcels for people who are very disadvantaged, who maybe cannot get out to the shops or cannot afford decent food. They have provided that on an ongoing basis, free of charge.</para>
<para>Thanks to all in my community for their wonderful spirit. It has been a difficult time during the pandemic for many businesses, but they have shown the spirit that Macarthur is famous for.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Ashburton Traders Association</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:42</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALLEN</name>
    <name.id>282986</name.id>
    <electorate>Higgins</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Ashburton Traders Association in my electorate represent and support a diverse array of businesses, including amazing coffee shops like Mr Brownstone; the friendly local butcher, Ashburton Meats; and even the Ashburton deli, which I just love shopping at. The association proudly supports over 140 businesses, and the committee comprises 11 hardworking and dedicated individuals. Despite the pressure of running their own businesses during the pandemic, the Ashburton Traders Association continued to be a pillar of strength for the Ashburton community. Thank you, President Bob Stensholt and your amazing committee, for being so proactive in these challenging times.</para>
<para>The association has worked collaboratively with other trader groups across the City of Boroondara, putting together COVID-safe plans for businesses and even adapting annual events, such as the highly anticipated Ashburton's Got Talent event, to go online. Congratulations must go to them for nominating Ashburton Village, which is now one of three finalists in the Outstanding Management Committee Business Trader Group Award category as part of the Mainstreet Australia awards. I can't thank them enough for the work they are doing. The importance of our local main streets to our economy is so incredibly important and can't be underestimated, particularly in these uncertain times. I wish the Ashburton Traders Association the very best of luck and look forward to the awards gala event on 19 November and hearing of your success.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Youth Voice in Parliament Week: Housing Affordability</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms STANLEY</name>
    <name.id>265990</name.id>
    <electorate>Werriwa</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I also rise to speak as part of the Youth Voice in Parliament this week. I have the privilege of delivering a speech by Angelie Beterov, a 20-year-old university student who lives in the electorate of Werriwa. She says:</para>
<para>'My ambition is similar to most young Australians: to own a home. However, this simple goal has become increasingly unfeasible with the current housing affordability crisis. In the last decade, the average price of home ownership has risen exponentially, while the average income has remained stagnant. This has led to decline in home ownership and a growth in renting. A third of Australians rent, and 60 per cent of rental properties are owned by investor landlords who own two properties or more. What does this mean for my generation? Research suggests an increase in class division; children of families who don't own a home will experience more difficulty when entering the housing market.</para>
<para>Australia needs to develop a national housing strategy where there's more support for those experiencing rental stress; increase funding for social and affordable housing and implement a quality audit of existing stock in the next iteration of the National Housing and Homelessness Agreement. As a current renter and a possible future homeowner, my request to parliament is to make these decisions with the future generation of the housing market in mind.'</para>
<para>I thank Angeline for contacting me and allowing me to give this speech.</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Menzies Electorate: Infrastructure</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:45</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr ANDREWS</name>
    <name.id>HK5</name.id>
    <electorate>Menzies</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>Two years ago I managed to secure some $5 million in funding for congestion-busting works in Eltham. I'm pleased that just recently the Nillumbik Shire Council has approved the project and that the works will start in March of next year. This project will make the Eltham Activity Centre more pedestrian friendly and reduce congestion. Amongst the things in it is a 40-kilometre speed limit on the Eltham Activity Centre local roads; roundabout improvements; new pedestrian crossings and improved operation of traffic lights to coordinate traffic signals along Main Road. This is good news for residents in Eltham.</para>
<para>I'm delighted to have secured the funding and now I hope that the Victorian government, through its planning, will get on with the 200 car parking spaces for Eltham station. There's also funding there to go to Nillumbik and Eltham so that we can improve not just congestion but also the use of public transport.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>In accordance with standing order 43, the time for members' statements has concluded.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
    <debate><debateinfo>
        <title>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</title>
        <page.no>-1</page.no>
        <type>PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS</type>
      </debateinfo><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Commonwealth Integrity Commission</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:46</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—at the request of the member for Clark, I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) notes that the:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">   (a) Government has failed to establish a strong independent federal integrity commission, and on 8 September 2021 it will be 1,000 days since the Prime Minister promised to pass legislation to create one; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">   (b) Government’s proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission is half-baked, creating the weakest watchdog in the country with hearings for all politicians and public servants held behind closed doors, no transparency on findings and penalties for whistle-blowers; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) calls on the Government to:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">   (a) abandon its deeply unpopular Commonwealth Integrity Commission proposal which in its current form is beyond effective amendment and should be scrapped;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">   (b) establish a strong, well-funded, wide-ranging and independent integrity commission through the Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill put forward by the Member for Indi that can launch its own inquiries into criminal, corrupt and unethical behaviour by politicians and their staff, hold public hearings and make public findings; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">   (c) commit to passing such legislation as a matter of urgency.</para></quote>
<para>It has now been well over 1,000 days since the Prime Minister promised Australians a federal integrity commission. Parliament has just emerged from a six-week spring recess and we'd be mistaken in assuming that the corruption scandals which have plagued this government and the opposition would have taken a spring break too. But no; in a few short weeks we've seen fresh evidence emerge about the involvement of the member for Holt in the Victorian Labor branch-stacking scandal. The IBAC hearings revealed that the member deliberately misused taxpayer dollars to employ political staff to undertake factional work. Astonishingly, those staff didn't even turn up to the office. This is an insult to democracy and to the taxpayer.</para>
<para>We have also seen new evidence of pork-barrelling emerge across regional Australia through the $1.38 billion Building Better Regions Fund. Analysis shows that 72 per cent of the latest $300 million round went to Liberal and National Party electorates and that another 16 per cent went to marginal electorates. The analysis shows that this is disproportionate to the spread of government seats in regional Australia. The member for Mallee admitted that a colour-coded spreadsheet was circulated to government MPs, allowing them to push for projects that didn't make the first cut. That's simply unacceptable for the hardworking community groups and local councils who pored over applications. Without an integrity commission, regional Australians simply won't know how hijacked the BBRF is.</para>
<para>We've also seen fresh revelations about the former Attorney General's unacceptable blind trust arrangements. A sitting member of the House of Representatives who has acknowledged receipt of $1 million from anonymous donors refuses to admit that it creates a potential conflict of interest. It's no surprise, then, that the member who operates on such a loose definition of integrity and probity was the same member who drafted the government's completely inadequate Commonwealth Integrity Commission proposal, which would bury any allegations of corruption in political offices rather than air them in public. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter which of the major parties are in government; these scandals still abound. The best way for Australia to achieve a robust federal integrity commission is to come through the middle, through a safe pair of Independent hands on the crossbench.</para>
<para>Earlier today I submitted paperwork to reintroduce my robust Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill to the House next Monday. Once it's introduced, I'll seek leave to move to suspend standing orders and bring on a debate and vote on my bill. If leave is granted, it would only need a simple majority. All eyes would then be on government backbenchers. In many of their electorates over 90 per cent of their constituents are calling for a robust federal integrity commission as soon as possible. Only two of them need to cross the floor to break the deadlock, and I know many of them are people of enormous integrity and want to see this happen. It's time for them to stand with me. If the Leader of the House does not grant leave for a suspension of standing orders it will be clear the government does not want its backbench to have their say on the floor of parliament.</para>
<para>Just last week the member for Curtin expressed her support for a sensible public hearing test and a commitment to make the findings of investigations public. I know the member for Curtin is well versed in the public hearings test in my bill, which is just that: sensible. I also welcome recent comments from the member for Wentworth, who I'll meet with this week, about the need for one set of rules for law enforcement and the public sector. That's a core tenet of my bill and one of the Beechworth principles upon which it's founded. As a former diplomat, I'll be pleased to discuss with the member for Wentworth how my bill would enhance Australia's position in the G20, APEC and United Nations working groups on anticorruption and transparency. I'll also be pleased to meet with member for Higgins, who I know has made her views very clear to the Attorney-General. Earlier today Senator Rex Patrick submitted paperwork to introduce my bill into the Senate this week. The whole Senate crossbench support my bill, which the Centre for Public Integrity has rated the best in the nation.</para>
<para>Before any MPs jump on this motion and start claiming that a robust integrity commission bill like mine would tarnish reputations or lead to reckless public hearings, I want them to admit whether they've actually even read the bill I introduced last year, because it's not the same as New South Wales ICAC, which the Prime Minister was so keen to condemn as a Star Chamber in the wake of the former premier's resignation. Where were the same criticisms about IBAC from the Prime Minister? Nowhere to be seen. The next election is set to be extraordinarily close. There's every chance that the crossbench could soon hold the balance of power in this place, and you can bet your bottom dollar that I am looking very closely at how honest both sides of politics are when they claim to talk about integrity.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>248181</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Mr Bandt</name>
    <name.id>M3C</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:52</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALLEN</name>
    <name.id>282986</name.id>
    <electorate>Higgins</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to speak to the motion moved by the member for Clark and acknowledge his longstanding interest in this matter, and I thank the member for Indi for her comments on his behalf.</para>
<para>Anyone who picks up the paper these days knows that public trust in governments and other institutions has eroded significantly over the last few decades. No-one really knows why that is, but we do know that trust in the integrity of our democracy is key to a democracy's success. The <inline font-style="italic">Economist</inline>'s democracy index makes for an interesting read on this issue. It says that fewer than five per cent of the world's governments are fully functioning democracies. We are indeed fortunate that Australia is one of a handful of countries listed as a full democracy. It says much about how our country provides for basic clinical freedoms and that civil liberties are respected. The US was downgraded to a flawed democracy in 2016.</para>
<para>One of the most important aspects of our high democracy ranking is that we have a political culture conducive to the flourishing of a democracy. Integral to that is ensuring the integrity of those who make the decisions on our behalf, both the lawmakers and law enforcers of our nation. That is why I welcomed the Morrison government's commitment to the establishment of the Commonwealth Integrity Commission at the last election. It is a commitment that was made to the Australian people, and one that must be delivered on. This commission will help restore trust and integrity in our public sector, government and elected officials.</para>
<para>To this effect, the Morrison government has conducted a nationwide consultation process, drafting legislation for the implementation of the Commonwealth Integrity Commission. The consultation has included civil society, academics and key experts across the government and non-government sector. We are determined to get this right. 333 written submissions were received and 47 consultation sessions have been held. The government is now considering this feedback and refining the draft legislation in order for it to be introduced into parliament, I understand, this year. It is anticipated that, following passage through the parliament, the commission will commence operation approximately six months later.</para>
<para>I want to see this commitment delivered in full this term and to have personally provided feedback on the draft bill to the Attorney-General. My constituents in Higgins have told me how important this [inaudible]. They also know how important this commitment is and understand the level of methodical and thorough consultation that is required to get this bill right. The Commonwealth Integrity Commission, I believe, should be able to initiate investigations. I also believe the definition of corruption and when referrals need to be made should be looked at more carefully so that there is clarity about when it is appropriate to initiate investigations.</para>
<para>I note that in the draft bill public officials and politicians are treated differently from law enforcement agencies. I want to see the gap between these entities either narrowed or eliminated. What I do not want to see is for the Commonwealth Integrity Commission to become a politicised body, a body that could be weaponised against elected officials for political gain. Safeguards are needed to prevent the Commonwealth Integrity Commission from becoming a political monster with unintended consequences. We most certainly need to get the balance right.</para>
<para>A crucial element of these reforms to establish a Commonwealth integrity commission is the ability for the commission to formally investigate past conduct and matters that occurred prior to its commencement. We have had an undertaking from the government that this will include over 145 criminal offences that currently exist in legislation, including bribing of an elected official, fraud, abuse of office and falsification of documents. The commission will have more power than a royal commission. This is in line with fundamental principles of our justice system.</para>
<para>It is worth mentioning that on this side of the House we know that in order to have an integrity commission that is powerful, independent and effective it must be properly funded. The government has already put in place the funding required for when the Commonwealth Integrity Commission legislation is passed. To this point, the Morrison government has already committed $106 million of new money to the Commonwealth Integrity Commission in last year's budget, in preparation for the CIC to be established.</para>
<para>It is so important that we get the balance right for Australians and for Australia, and for our democracy. It's so that we can have confidence that the Commonwealth Integrity Commission will operate effectively. It is important to the ongoing integrity of Australia's democracy, and I welcome the debate that is currently taking place.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>16:57</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WILKIE</name>
    <name.id>C2T</name.id>
    <electorate>Clark</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] The community has been calling for a strong and independent federal integrity body for years, and it's devastating that the one proposed by the federal government falls so short of what's so desperately needed. Indeed, I am so concerned by what's on the table that I would go so far as to say that the government's proposal will do nothing to promote integrity within government and, instead, foster corruption and facilitate its cover-up.</para>
<para>There is simply no denying that secrecy breeds corruption and that for any federal integrity agency to be effective it's vital that hearings are public, for all of the public sector. However, the government's proposal prevents public hearings into allegations of corruption involving most of the public sector—effectively creating a two-tiered system, one in which law enforcement officers are subject to public scrutiny but the majority, including politicians, are not. Surely there must be a common set of rules and procedures for all public officials, and this must include public hearings.</para>
<para>Moreover, the definition of corruption in the government's proposal is way too narrow. The integrity agency would be unable to investigate and pursue matters unless there is reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, and this would mean that certain forms of corruption, such as undisclosed conflicts of interest, may quite simply go unchecked. Clearly, this is wrong. The scope of any integrity agency must extend beyond criminal offences to a range of corrupt and unethical behaviour, including donation-fuelled favouritism, cronyism and the rorting of parliamentary entitlement. The threshold in the government's proposal requiring a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed is way too high and would, effectively, paralyse the federal integrity agency as it would be restrained from investigating a matter which, on face value, may not meet the threshold. The proposed agency also fails to recognise that in most circumstances criminal conduct will only be revealed through a thorough investigation.</para>
<para>Furthermore, the government's integrity agency will also be prevented from launching its own investigations and, instead, can only act upon referrals from other agencies, including the Attorney-General, ministers, designated office holders and parliamentarians in certain circumstances. Public service whistleblowers and members of the public will be unable to make complaints regarding the public sector directly to the agency, which is obviously concerning, because corruption and wrongdoing are often facilitated by those in high-ranking positions.</para>
<para>All we have to do is look at the evidence to see the importance of direct referrals from the community: sports rorts, car parks, the Leppington triangle, the Jam Land scandal and the continual misuse of parliamentary entitlements, to name just a few. Moreover, history has shown us that high-ranking officials may disregard allegations brought to them, rather than pursue and investigate, a perfect example being the lack of effective action taken by high-ranking officials within the ADF in response to Major David McBride's internal reports about command failings and deliberate blindness to the conduct of the war in Afghanistan. Alarmingly, the government's proposal would also prevent and deter whistleblowers from making disclosures about suspected wrongdoings within the public sector. Indeed, whistleblowers would even risk prosecution for making unwarranted allegations despite current whistleblower protections.</para>
<para>Australia already has unacceptably low protections for whistleblowers, and we should be working towards strengthening them, not eroding them. Any federal integrity agency must be able to act on its own accord and act on information provided by whistleblowers and members of the public. Preventing it from doing so will not instil public confidence in the system and will greatly restrict its ability to investigate wrongdoings. The Australian public's trust in politicians and the parliamentary process is obviously at an all-time low. It's up to all of us in this place to turn that around, starting with rebuilding a culture of integrity and creating the physical mechanism to restore the community's confidence in its political representatives. To that end, the government must either support the Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2020, introduced by the member for Indi, or the National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2), introduced by Senator Larissa Waters. Alternatively, the government must listen to the community and completely overhaul its dodgy integrity agency proposal. To do anything less would just go and make a dreadful situation even worse.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:02</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ARCHER</name>
    <name.id>282237</name.id>
    <electorate>Bass</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] Once again, I rise to speak on this issue for the third time in less than a year and my second time in less than three months. It's incredibly important to me personally that a bill be introduced as soon as possible, and I've sought assurances from the government that this legislation will come before parliament before the year is out. I thank Minister Cash for her continuing engagement with me on this critical bill. Again, I would like to thank both the member for Indi and the member for Clark for their considered work on this matter and for our ongoing constructive discussions on legislation that truly should and indeed must cross the political divide. I also certainly hope that the views I've expressed previously on this issue have made it clear that I want to see a robust integrity commission that will assist in restoring public confidence. The trust of our constituency is paramount. In the biggest health crisis that our country has faced, we have asked much of our communities across the country in order to keep everyone around us safe. Thankfully, with very few exceptions, those constituents have respected and complied with measures that we couldn't have imagined would be a reality less than two years ago. We cannot and must not take this trust for granted.</para>
<para>In recent years, the trust of our country in their elected officials has eroded. Although as a country we are ranked as one of the least-corrupt countries in the world, ranking equal 11th place with Canada, the UK and Austria, there are some worrying signs. A report from the Scanlon Foundation at the end of 2020 found that there was a temporary upswing in faith in the federal government last year due to handling of the pandemic. Transparency International Australia reported that Australians' faith in democracy has plummeted from 86 per cent in 2007 to 41 per cent in 2018. Alarmingly, 20 years ago, around 70 per cent of Australians felt that their vote made a difference, yet now only 58 per cent do. If this trend continues, by 2025 we would see fewer than 10 per cent of Australians trusting their politicians and political institutions. We shouldn't deem this satisfactory. It is clear that strong democratic reform is needed.</para>
<para>As I've also previously stated, the establishment of a solid integrity commission is one that requires a bipartisan approach. Anything less is, in my view, counterintuitive to enhancing trust and confidence. My fear is that the path to establishing a commission will become politicised. Let's be clear that, just like other issues of late, including discussions around women's safety, there is not one side of politics that has the moral high ground on this. The more political it becomes, the greater the risk of inertia, and we fall further away from creating what needs to be a robust institution that will be essential to ensuring the integrity of our public sector, our government and our elected officials.</para>
<para>I sincerely hope that there is a willingness by all sides to truly put the politics aside and work together in the interests of all Australians. We must get this right. It is critical not only due to the scale of the reform needed but so that Australians can have confidence that the commission will operate effectively.</para>
<para>I fully support the government undertaking extensive consultation on the draft legislation, which included civil society academics and key experts across the government and non-government sectors. I too have consulted widely on this matter to ensure that we get this right. I understand that the feedback is still being considered in order to inform further refinement of the draft legislation. However, there are just four sitting weeks left for 2021. Once passed, the commission would commence operations approximately six months later. So we must end the year with upholding a promise made to the Australian people and present a draft bill that meets the expectations of those who put their trust in us. If this continues to be politicised we will end up in a dire situation where no model will be acceptable, and this is, frankly, unthinkable.</para>
<para>As with so many other issues that arise in parliament, I believe that there really is more that unites us than divides us. I urge everyone in our parliament to think about the role that they can and should play to ensure that the final legislation is what is best for reinforcing our democracy for years to come, instead of what may be best for individual, short-term political gain.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:07</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
    <electorate>Macarthur</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I would like to congratulate the member for Clark and the member for Indi for bringing this motion to the parliament, but, I must say, I do ask myself what those on the government benches have to hide. The Prime Minister, a thousand days ago, said that he would bring a national integrity bill to the parliament. And we have had nothing—</para>
<para>An honourable member: There are only two jobs.</para>
<continue>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Dr FREELANDER</name>
    <name.id>265979</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>This is my third job. There are many more I can think of he should do right as well, including climate policy, but we won't go there.</para>
<para>Those opposite have deemed this unnecessary for reasons I don't understand. History teaches us, certainly coming from New South Wales, that politicians are human beings, and, like other human beings, they are prey to the frailties of the human race. We've seen this since the days of Paddy Crick, a New South Wales lands minister who accepted bribes for land parcels given to people of poor repute and other people in the community, and the days of Rex Jackson, a Labor member of parliament who ended up in jail for accepting bribes to get people out of jail quickly. I grew up in the Askin years in New South Wales, when Bob Askin let illegal casinos flourish by turning a blind eye for bribes. He was a bank teller, yet he left an estate of many millions of pounds when he died.</para>
<para>There's no doubt that we need a national integrity commission that has teeth and will work in a way that can restore confidence in the political process in Australia. We've had sports rorts, car park rorts, rorts of every kind, and the ex-New South Wales Premier thought pork-barrelling was fine; everyone could do it, and it was fine. After deliberately misleading the public in the last election, this government has done nothing to bring about transparency and stamp out the rorts that have been occurring. They blatantly refuse to be held to account. They blatantly refuse to bring forward a bill that would put in place an integrity commission with teeth. This place should have no tolerance for corruption, no tolerance for immoral actions and no tolerance for rorting.</para>
<para>There are many members of this chamber—on this side, on the cross bench and indeed in the government—who stand for integrity and transparency in government and want to have an integrity commission. If successful at the next election the Labor government will, as a priority, establish a powerful, transparent and independent national anticorruption commission. It's time that we put an end to the Morrison government's shameful inaction and lack of transparency. We believe it is now long past time for a Commonwealth body to be established to tackle corruption in federal government and in federal politics. We need a national anticorruption commission that will operate with all the independence, powers and resources of a standing royal commission. It's no good having a body that has no teeth. It is no good having a body that doesn't have the independent power of investigation. We don't want the weak proposal that the government has put forward and failed to deliver. A successful commission will need to have a broad jurisdiction to investigate and hold to account Commonwealth ministers, senior public servants, statutory office holders, government agencies, parliamentarians, personal staff of politicians and other Commonwealth public officials.</para>
<para>We have seen so much money wasted on rorting and really questionable policies. After eight long years in office the Liberals have failed to take any action to tackle corruption, to tackle transparency in government policy. It has left the Commonwealth as the only Australian government without a body dedicated to tackling corruption by public officials. The Morrison Government's refusal to honour its election promise to establish an anticorruption commission is allowing government ministers to avoid being held to account and, indeed, allowing people of other political parties to be held to account. I quite agree with the member for Bass that this needs to be bipartisan and needs to have clear and full support across the parliament. If the government is going to be held to account for the scandals that they've produced, and if the opposition is to be held to account for what they do, we need an anticorruption commission with teeth and that will deliver policies that all Australians can see transparency and community justice from. It's time we put an end to the Morrison government's shameful inaction.</para>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:12</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SHARMA</name>
    <name.id>274506</name.id>
    <electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to thank the member for Indi and the member for Clark for putting this on the motion paper, and also recognise the work they have both done over many years during their time in parliament to advance this cause. I don't doubt their goodwill or the integrity with which they've pursued this, and their good intentions.</para>
<para>I've come slowly to accept the need to act in this space. I was a federal public servant for some 17 years before entering parliament. During my time in the federal Public Service I saw nothing but the highest standards of probity and good conduct; and where that was absent for any reason those matters were dealt with swiftly. So I can't say that I saw a pressing need upon entering the parliament to advance this agenda. But I have, over time, come to accept that there is a need to act—and as much as anything to restore or address at least the loss of public faith in our institutions and particularly in the federal parliament. What I have heard from constituents, but also the broader public, is reflected in polling and other data, which shows that distrust in our system of government is at a higher level than it has been in some time. That does worry me because I'm a believer in our system of government and our democracy; and if the people do not trust it to act in their best interests then ultimately it means that it's ripe for some sort of dramatic or revolutionary change, which I'd rather not see. I do accept that there is a need to act here and I accept that there is a need to establish a federal integrity commission or a Commonwealth integrity commission to reassure the public, or address concerns that the public might have, about the conduct and the behaviour of their federal elected representatives and the federal Public Service more broadly.</para>
<para>That said, though, I'm also cautious about the design because any time we introduce changes to our system of government you always have to be mindful of unintended consequences; changes in the balance of power, if you like, between competing institutions; and how it might change the very nature of government. And, not surprisingly, being from the conservative side of politics I tend to be an incrementalist when it comes to these things. I don't favour dramatic change. I tend to favour small and piecemeal change, and adjusting as needs be, to address concerns. With that caveat in mind, in my view it's important to make sure we have safeguards in any new integrity commission—a safeguard firstly to ensure protections for the accused, if you like, like we expect in all walks of life, that the rights of the innocent are protecte People are entitled to due process. People are entitled to see evidence presented against them and people are entitled to confront their accusers—the rule of law and due process that we expect elsewhere. We need to make sure that any new integrity commission has similar safeguards but be particularly mindful that we are playing with people's reputations. We need to recognise the damage that can be done with those things.</para>
<para>The other important safeguard or caveat I would put on there would be to make sure that decision-making in our democratic system of government resides where it's meant to reside—that is, that elected representatives, who are directly accountable to the public for decision-making at the ballot box, are able to continue to take those decisions. Provided they are done in good faith, in accordance with the law, then ultimately the voters should be deciding whether those decisions were the right ones and ones they will support rather than an elected body.</para>
<para>I'm also acutely aware that there is not one single model of integrity commission out there. Every state and territory jurisdiction that has one in Australia has quite a different model on offer, and they fall across the spectrum, from their ability to initiate prosecutions to the level of privacy or publicity afforded to hearings to protections for the accused. I do agree there's a number of elements to consider here in a Commonwealth integrity commission. We can draw wisdom from a number of the different state experiences and we also draw wisdom from the member for Indi's private member's bill that she has put forward on this and her own contribution to that.</para>
<para>Who is covered by this? I do accept all federal government members should be covered, including elected representatives, but I am of the view that I would prefer to see a single class of people rather than two different classes. I accept that law enforcement officials have unique powers under our constitutional and legal arrangements and they need to be held to a higher standard in the exercise of those powers because they are unique but it would be neater and more logical and coherent if we had a single coverage of all federal government and federal parliamentarians.</para>
<para>It's important that we recognise that corruption needs to be covered but I don't want to see a new commission of integrity second-guess the judgements of elected representatives. I want to make sure it's genuine corruption that is covered by this. I commend the member for Indi for moving the motion.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:17</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms McBAIN</name>
    <name.id>281988</name.id>
    <electorate>Eden-Monaro</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to thank the member for Clark and the member for Indi for moving this motion. But it is an absolute joke that more than a thousand days since the Prime Minister promised to pass legislation to create a strong and independent federal integrity commission, we are here yet again debating that very thing. The government have failed to act and now they are backtracking. Instead of creating a national anticorruption commission with teeth they are proposing the weakest watchdog in the country, with hearings for all politicians and public servants being held behind closed doors, no transparency on findings, and penalties for whistleblowers. It's no surprise, though, when the Deputy Prime Minister equated the New South Wales ICAC with the Spanish Inquisition and said politicians are basically terrified to do their job. I can confidently say that a fully funded and effective federal integrity watchdog doesn't scare me one bit. When I was the mayor of Bega Valley, council had and still has zero tolerance to fraud and corruption. There is a legislated code of conduct, and I was aware that complaints made against councillors or staff would be investigated thoroughly. If there was evidence of serious wrongdoing, it would be reported to the New South Wales Police, the New South Wales Ombudsman or the New South Wales Independent Commission Against Corruption. These investigative bodies don't scare people who do the right thing. Never while I was there was I worried that I would be investigated by ICAC. This government fear implementing a watchdog with teeth because they are frightened that they may be bitten by it.</para>
<para>Time and time again this government have abused taxpayers' money and now they are worried that a federal anti-corruption commission will mean they can no longer sweep things under the rug. Rather than moving on and hoping the Australian public would forget, they would actually need to be accountable, and we know accountability is something the Morrison government knows nothing about. Who was accountable for sports rorts? Who was accountable for commuter car park rorts, for water gate, for paying 10 times the value of airport land, for all of those colour-coded spreadsheets that treated taxpayers funds as the coalition's re-election slush fund. Sitting on the backbench we have the member for Pearce, who refuses to disclose who his donors are after having received up to a million dollars for a private legal matter. In fact, instead of investigating and holding his colleagues accountable, the Prime Minister simply promotes MPs with question marks over their heads. Just last month, the member for Hume was promoted, even though we still have no answers regarding the alleged forged documents in relation to Clover Moore and the City of Sydney.</para>
<para>I used to believe that our existing frameworks for accountability were sufficient. I don't think that anymore, and that's as a direct result of this Prime Minister's lack of leadership. The government has tarnished the conventions that underpin our democracy. The idea of parliamentary accountability is gone. Ministers are supposed to be accountable to the Australian people. Parliament is meant to ensure accountability. When there are huge questions about whether parliamentarians are operating with integrity, it is the Prime Minister's duty to investigate and appropriately deal with the situation, yet we have not seen that. The Australian public deserves to know that decisions over grant funding are made based on merit rather than the political interests of those in power, and the public needs to know that, when rorts are discovered, someone will be held accountable. You need to look at the Prime Minister's response to the former Premier of New South Wales's resignation, where he said that this demonstrates we shouldn't have a strong national Integrity Commission. It's no surprise that the government's proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission is another half-baked idea, when you have a Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister who go out of their way to criticise and demonise an independent body investigating corruption at the state level. The government should be committed to stamping out corruption at all levels.</para>
<para>When I meet with my constituents, time and time again people raise with me their strong desire to see a national, well-funded, wide-ranging, independent anticorruption commission, and every single time it is brought up they say they do not trust that the government is acting with integrity. They want truth in political advertising. They want a federal ICAC. They want to know that we have people working in parliament who are truly working in their best interests. It's a sad state of affairs when many Australians do not trust our politicians. An Integrity Commission will start to rebuild that trust. We need an anticorruption commission to do what Scott Morrison refuses to do—to make sure that politicians are serving in the interests of the people, not serving their own interests.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:22</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GORMAN</name>
    <name.id>74519</name.id>
    <electorate>Perth</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I guess I shouldn't be surprised that there's not another government speaker on this motion. What this government has failed to do over the course of this term and under this Prime Minister, in not legislating any form of federal anticorruption body, is embarrassing, and it lets down the people of Australia. This government went to the 2019 election promising they would do exactly that, and—while they might blame the member for Pearce, who promised it and then was unable to deliver it, even though he had a thousand days to do so—it is inexcusable that this government has failed to deliver any meaningful action.</para>
<para>It is not just about catching things after they happen. The point I want to make in my contribution to this debate is that a strong, powerful anticorruption body also has a very important education and prevention mandate. It is so often lost, when we talk about a body that will look in the rear-vision mirror and find out what happened in the past or say that it will scare people, that, actually, when these bodies are constructed well, they make sure that we educate and prevent corrupt activity from happening.</para>
<para>If you look at the recommendations of the OECD, who have published extensively about this, they say that it's essential, if you want to have a good, ethical government process, to have prevention, and they say:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Communicating standards within public organisations is necessary …</para></quote>
<para>and they continue:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Education is essential for disseminating integrity standards and norms …</para></quote>
<para>If we don't invest in that education, then we'll continue to see the sorts of sports rorts and failures to disclose, and people pretending that that is somehow a completely acceptable way of behaving, because it's all that people have seen; it's all that they know; it's the culture that is accepted within the political party known as the Liberal Party and in the National Party, who currently run our government.</para>
<para>I also want to commend the work that Griffith University and Transparency International have done when it comes to this question of making sure that any anticorruption body is one that takes their education and prevention role seriously. Their report on Australia's national integrity system, which showed that our national integrity system has far too many gaps, said:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Australian anti-corruption agencies, including the new federal agency can only fulfil their mandate as integrity commissions if properly equipped and required to fulfil a clear prevention mandate and coordinate prevention-focused activities.</para></quote>
<para>If you look at the necessity of prevention focused activities, it is clear what this government does on a weekly and daily basis!</para>
<para>These bodies have different names around the place. There's the ICAC and the IBAC. We've got the CCC in Western Australia, a corruption and crime commission that, when the member for Pearce was the Attorney-General in Western Australia, he watered down. He has form on this. I would encourage anyone who is wondering why the member for Pearce failed to actually legislate for a corruption and crime commission or a federal anti-integrity body to look at his record. When he wasn't building up $40 billion of state debt, which was his record as Treasurer in Western Australia, when he was the state Attorney-General, the member for Pearce actually watered down the corruption and crime commission.</para>
<para>It's just very concerning for Western Australia when they think about the sorts of things that this body might look into. I've expressed in this place a number of times my concerns about this government's deep and close connections to Clive Palmer. We saw these deep and close connections that this government has with Clive Palmer expressed when it paid a million dollars for his legal bills because the former Attorney-General chose to support Clive Palmer's bid in the High Court to tear down the WA border in the peak of a global pandemic.</para>
<para>In relation to the recent challenges that we had have around the use of a blind trust, that is something I have had a number of constituents write to me about expressing concern, saying, 'Where do we go and what do we do with our concerns about this blind trust?' It's clear there isn't a body they, as a member of the general public, can appropriately refer their concerns to. It is completely disrespectful to the people of Australia that they have no federal anticorruption body. We've got one in every state and territory. As I often say to my local councillors—there are five local councils in the electorate of Perth—because of this government's failure, those local councillors are under more public scrutiny from anticorruption bodies than those of us in the federal parliament of Australia. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265991</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The time allotted for this debate has expired.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Reading Hour</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:27</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms TEMPLEMAN</name>
    <name.id>181810</name.id>
    <electorate>Macquarie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—at the request of the member for Moreton, I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) recognises that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) books can be an escape from the worries of everyday life;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) reading reduces stress by 68 per cent;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) reading makes your world bigger and makes more things possible;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) literacy and reading are tools that can help you achieve your goals and help others;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(e) reading helps your mind grow;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(f) by reading other people's stories you can walk in their shoes; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(g) books build empathy, connection and help you feel less lonely;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many literary activities;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) major writers' festivals have been interrupted;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) schools have moved to online learning for weeks at a time; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(d) libraries and adult education forums around the country closed their doors to in-person attendees; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(3) acknowledges:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) Tuesday, 14 September 2021 is Australian Reading Hour and this year's theme is, Stories that Matter;</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) Australian Reading Hour is in its tenth year and is a showcase for Australia Reads; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(c) Australian Reading Hour highlights the importance of reading in transforming lives.</para></quote>
<para>The ability of books to transport us has never been more important than in 2021, when the only places we could go to were in our imagination. After fires, floods, COVID, more floods and then, like the rest of Greater Sydney, four months of lockdown, it's no wonder people from my electorate in the Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury sought refuge in books. One of the moments of lightness in my week has been the Megalong Books weekly quiz on Instagram. Thank goodness no-one else sees your score! The independent book shops in my electorate will be please that they can now have the doors open again and people walking in to browse.</para>
<para>I was the kid with the torch reading <inline font-style="italic">Seven Little Australians</inline> under the bed covers, hoping my mother wouldn't notice as she walked down the hallway. I'm one of those people who has to read a few pages of a novel before I fall asleep, although it's more likely to be a self-lit kindle these days. So, in the 10th year of the Australian Reading Hour, on 14 September, I shared one of my favourite books with my community on social media: <inline font-style="italic">Boy Swallows Universe</inline><inline font-style="italic">,</inline> and I asked my local bookworms for their recommendations. I was overwhelmed. From many other people also singing the praises of the exceptionally talented Trent Dalton through to the recommendations for Australian authors like Liane Moriarty, Kristin Hannah to Debra Oswald, literally hundreds of people took to social media to comment on what they were reading and what they liked about their books, including, I might add, the shadow minister for women, who also loves <inline font-style="italic">Boy Swallows Universe</inline><inline font-style="italic">.</inline>We even had talk about books that were yet to be published, like local author Victoria Brookman's 'Burnt Out'. I have an advance copy of that that I can't wait to get started.</para>
<para>My post sparked so many conversations between strangers who found something in common. It helped people find a connection with each other while we were being forced by a global pandemic to be physically apart. I hope it helped some people perhaps feel a little less lonely. That is the beauty of books. That small interaction really was proof that books can be an escape from the worries of everyday life. We can get lost walking in someone else's shoes and for a few precious minutes forget about the homeschooling or working from home or not working. We can all empathise with others.</para>
<para>The statistics bear out the anecdotal evidence. Last year during the first wave of lockdowns, the Australian Institute of Family Studies noted a 30 per cent increase in the number of Australians reading books. Maybe we'd worked out that reading reduces stress by 68 per cent and works faster than listening to music, playing a video game or going for a walk.</para>
<para>My community is filled not just with readers but also with writers. The Blue Mountains is home to Varuna, the National Writers' House, arguably the country's leading development place for literature. People go there to create wonderful stories. Originally the home of writers Eleanor Dark and Dr Eric Dark, Varuna's house and gardens were gifted to the Australian public in 1989 by their son, Mick, to be used as a retreat for writers. More than 200 writers participate in residencies and professional development programs at Varuna every year, with hundreds more readers and writers taking part in workshop programs and literary events. I was very pleased to be able to help support Varuna's work in 2020, helping them secure funding through the Volunteer Grants program.</para>
<para>The Blue Mountains Writers' Festival is a highlight of the Varuna calendar each year, and it should be happening this week. We will miss it, but Varuna has continued to support our writers, recently announcing the 29 winners of its residential fellowship for 2022 from more than 440 submissions received. I congratulate all those who were successful and the team, who've continued to support writers online through this pandemic.</para>
<para>The theme for Australian Reading Hour 2021 was 'stories that matter'. I'd like to end on a story that really matters to the many creatives living in my electorate: the loss of income that they've experienced through the pandemic. While book sales went up, the events that helped them earn income went down. The Australian Society of Authors found that 53 per cent of authors and illustrators had lost events income, so it's not been an easy ride. I'd urge everybody to take the time to explore the world through a book—especially an Australian book. Support our local authors; support our arts and publishing industry. Your mind will grow, your spirit will grow and you might just learn something about yourself.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>00APG</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Stanley</name>
    <name.id>265990</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion and reserve my right to speak.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms HAMMOND</name>
    <name.id>80072</name.id>
    <electorate>Curtin</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I thank the member for Moreton for raising this motion. I was raised with books. While I wasn't raised by books, books certainly played a pivotal role in my childhood and undoubtedly sparked my imagination and shaped my development, my understanding of the world and others within it, my dreams and my goals. Enid Blyton was with me from an early age, from the Faraway Tree and the Wishing-Chair through to the Secret Seven, Famous Five, Malory Towers and St. Clare's series. I then went on to other authors, which included the Trixie Belden and Nancy Drew series, and Australian classics <inline font-style="italic">Seven Little Australians</inline>, the Norah of Billabong series, <inline font-style="italic">Picnic at Hanging Rock</inline> and May Gibbs's Snugglepot and Cuddlepie. Like many, there are books which played an indelible role in my teen years as well: Anne Frank's <inline font-style="italic">Diary of</inline><inline font-style="italic"> a Young Girl</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">To K</inline><inline font-style="italic">ill a </inline><inline font-style="italic">M</inline><inline font-style="italic">ockingbird</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">L</inline><inline font-style="italic">ord of the </inline><inline font-style="italic">F</inline><inline font-style="italic">lies</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">The O</inline><inline font-style="italic">utsiders</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he Bell Jar</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">Nineteen Eighty-Four</inline> and anything by Jane Austen.</para>
<para>As is noted in the wording of the motion moved by the member for Moreton, himself both a prolific reader and writer, reading books has the capacity to not only broaden our minds and increase our knowledge; it can also help with improving our overall wellbeing. It has been said that 30 minutes of reading has similar psychological effects to 30 minutes of yoga—and reading comes with considerably less pain! Reading is shown to reduce stress by 68 per cent, by lowering your heart rate and blood pressure. It can also help to alleviate symptoms of depression, as feelings of isolation can be lessoned by switching away from your own world to an imagined one. In fact, regular readers are 28 per cent less likely to report feelings of depression.</para>
<para>I also note that reading is recommended as part of a healthy regular sleep routine, because the lowering of your heart rate and blood pressure can act as a physical and mental wind-down to the day, allowing your body to transition to sleep. I would note a word of caution on this, however, because there have been many times when I have been so caught up in a book that I have continued to read 'just another chapter' before switching off the light; such is the danger of a really great book that it doesn't necessarily always lead to better or longer sleep!</para>
<para>Australia Reads is a not-for-profit joint initiative of a number of organisations which actively promotes the joy, pleasure and benefits to be had in reading books. In addition to providing excellent resources, including recommended reading lists, for the last 10 years Australia Reads has been promoting the annual Australian Reading Hour, with the goal of highlighting the importance of reading in transforming lives. Held on Tuesday 14 September, it encouraged all Australians to set aside just one hour to read—whatever they wanted, wherever they were located and however they chose to read.</para>
<para>This year's theme celebrated Stories That Matter, acknowledging the vital role reading plays in both our childhood and our adult lives. The book which I was reading during Australian Reading Hour is without any doubt at all truly a story that matters: <inline font-style="italic">The Happiest Man on Earth</inline> by Eddie Jaku, this is Eddie's memoir, chronicling his extraordinary tale of survival, escaping a death march from Auschwitz towards the end of World War II, moving to Australia in the 1950s, settling down, having a family and dedicating his life to teaching about the dangers of intolerance and the importance of hope. Eddie died just last week at the age of 101, and this is a huge loss for all. But because of his book, his legacy and inspiration to all of us will live on.</para>
<para>To that end, I want to finish with the final words from Eddie Jaku's book: 'Seventy-five years ago, I never thought that I would have children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. I was at the bottom of humanity and now, here I am. So after you put this book down, please remember to take time to appreciate every moment of your life, the good, the bad. Sometimes there will be tears, sometimes there will be laughter and, if you are lucky, there will be friends to share it all with, as I have known throughout my life. Please, every day, remember to be happy and to make others happy too. Make yourself a friend to the world and do this for your new friend, Eddie.' Eddie, rest in peace.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>The member for Moreton has the call, and has a tough act to follow there!</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr PERRETT</name>
    <name.id>HVP</name.id>
    <electorate>Moreton</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. I'm speaking to you from Sunnybank on Yuggera and Turrbal lands. I especially thank the wonderful member for Macquarie for moving this motion on my behalf, and the member for Curtin for her lovely words.</para>
<para>Since 2017 I have been co-chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Australian Books and Writers, along with Senator Hughes. When we could, we would meet face to face in parliament. This friendship group has had some memorable events. Trent Dalton attended one of our early events and spoke about his then-new book, <inline font-style="italic">Boy Swallows Universe</inline>, and what a treat that was. In 2018 we had an event to announce the short-listed authors for the Miles Franklin Literary Award. As a group we were really gathering steam and then 2020 hit and everything stopped—everything except reading. If ever there was a time when we all needed our books, as the previous speaker said, these last two years have been it. Whether you have re-read old favourites or found new friends through new authors, books have been a lifeline for so many Australians.</para>
<para>Australia Reads is the leading not-for-profit initiative to promote reading in Australia. Their mission is to get more people reading more books more often. They're passionate about Australian reading because they know through decades of research how reading improves peoples' wellbeing, improves cohesion in our community and stimulates growth in the economy. We know that reading books reduces stress by 68 per cent—more quickly than listening to music, or playing video games or walking. For 10 years, Australian Reading Hour has been the signature showcase for Australia Reads. Authors, booksellers, educators, libraries and publishers all celebrate the importance of reading in transforming lives.</para>
<para>This year, Australian Reading Hour was celebrated on 14 September, while we were in the winter recess, which is why we are talking about this a little bit late this year. The theme was 'Stories that Matter', and I wanted to share the top 10 stories that matter to me. It's always difficult to come up with just 10 Australian novels that matter, but it did make me realise what a breadth of talent we have spread across this great, brown land of ours. We have incredible authors whose stories have changed lives not only here in Australia but all around the world. I won't list all the 10 books again—you can check them out on my social media pages—but I will tell you my No. 1 Australian story that matters to me, and that's Tim Winton's <inline font-style="italic">Cloud</inline><inline font-style="italic">s</inline><inline font-style="italic">treet</inline>, a book I still love and could read again and again. This Miles Franklin Award-winning novel is recognised as one of the greatest works of Australian literature. I'm not the only one who thinks <inline font-style="italic">Cloudstreet</inline> is a special novel. Here's a quote from the wonderful Mem Fox, a living treasure herself and bestselling writer:</para>
<quote><para class="block">If you have not read <inline font-style="italic">Cloud</inline><inline font-style="italic">s</inline><inline font-style="italic">treet</inline>, your life is diminished … If you have not met these characters, this generous community, these tragedies, the humour … It is so wonderful.</para></quote>
<para>Thank you, Mem. You can just hear the pure joy in that quote from Mem Fox. It captures Tim Winton's work so perfectly. Make sure you read it.</para>
<para>Reading books is such a special treat, but sharing our love of books with each other brings its own special delight. A love of books and reading is the best gift you can give your child. Research tells us that literacy skills don't just create educational gains; they promote strong family relationships, improved health choices and employability. But what is really interesting is that reading for pleasure has been revealed as the most important indicator of the future success of a child. I say that as a teacher. It's really that important. I mentioned Mem Fox earlier. Mem's books are often an Australian child's first experience of books and reading. Mem Fox has written more than 40 books for children, including one written in 1983, which I think is read by nearly every Australian child, <inline font-style="italic">Possum Magic</inline>—a delightful book that I read to my two boys. What an amazing contribution Mem Fox has made to educating Australian children. I'm also incredibly pleased to report that she's not done yet. Mem has just released a new children's book called <inline font-style="italic">Ca</inline><inline font-style="italic">t</inline><inline font-style="italic"> Dog</inline> with acclaimed illustrator Mark Teague. I'm actually a little bit envious that I don't have children young enough to be enthralled by a new Mem Fox book, but I am sure it will spark that passion for books and reading like all of Mem's books.</para>
<para>I would like to thank Australia Reads for their passion and their collaboration across the industry with public libraries, authors, illustrators, booksellers and publishers to get more Australians reading more books more often; it is infectious. My love of books and all things literature has been with me all my life. But, every year, the Australian Reading Hour initiatives make me think again about the wonderful books I've read and the ones I still have on my reading list to tick off.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:43</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ARCHER</name>
    <name.id>282237</name.id>
    <electorate>Bass</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link]</para>
<quote><para class="block">Pig was a pug,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">and I'm sorry to say,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">he would often tell lies</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">just to get his own way.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">And when he would fib,</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">he was awfully clever.</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">When Pig got in trouble…</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">he would always blame Trevor.</para></quote>
<para>So begins <inline font-style="italic">Pig the </inline><inline font-style="italic">F</inline><inline font-style="italic">ibber</inline>, just one in a very funny series of books from Australian author Aaron Blabey about a rather mischievous pug. This was the book of choice read by my youngest daughter, Molly, for Australian Reading Hour on 14 September. To be able to read is a joy, and learning to read can set up a lifelong love with the written word, where we understand the power of a book and the feelings it can evoke. I'm sure many of us here have a list of favourite books that have resonated with us for various reasons. <inline font-style="italic">Breath</inline> by Tim Winton, an author beloved by many Australians, is a personal favourite.</para>
<para>My island state—in particular, the northern Tasmanian region—has an ever-growing list of wonderfully talented writers. In recent years, Launceston's Rohan Wilson and Robbie Arnott have become well-known names, penning award-winning novels. Wilson had a start that most authors would dream of, with his first book, <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he Roving Party</inline>, beating out all other unpublished manuscripts in Australia to win the Vogel Award in 2011. Rohan himself admitted that it was the first thing of substance he had ever written and said, 'When I entered the award I didn't even know if I could write.' Wilson has since gone on to write two additional award-winning novels: <inline font-style="italic">To Name Those Lost</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">Daughter of Bad Times</inline>.</para>
<para>Robbie Arnott's debut novel, <inline font-style="italic">Flames</inline>, was shortlisted for the Miles Franklin Literary Award and won the Margaret Scott Prize in the 2019 Tasmanian Premier's Literary Prize and followed up this year with <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he Rain Heron</inline>, which has been nominated for multiple accolades and has taken out the <inline font-style="italic">Age</inline> Book of the Year. For Launceston writer Robyn Friend, author of a number of works, including <inline font-style="italic">Eva</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he Butterfly </inline><inline font-style="italic">St</inline><inline font-style="italic">alker</inline>, her many years of dedication to the writing community and mentoring new writers, particularly in Tasmania, was recognised a few years ago with a nomination from the Society of Women Writers Tasmania for the prestigious Alice Award. The award acknowledges a significant contribution to Australian literature, and Robyn was most certainly a worthy nominee.</para>
<para>As the member for Moreton noted in his speech, COVID-19 has interrupted many literary festivals across the country. In Northern Tasmania, the popular biennial Tamar Valley Writers Festival was, sadly, cancelled in 2020 due to the pandemic. Looking ahead to 2022, where a fully-fledged three-day festival is planned, the committee banded together to create a smaller pop-up festival in September called Word of Mouth. This included the world premiere of <inline font-style="italic">Marjorie Unravelled</inline>, a musical about Tasmania's answer to Dame Edna, Marjorie Bligh. There are also school workshops with authors Lyndon Riggall and Kyle Perry plus a day of writing and storytelling events at Tamar Valley Resort. There are book clubs with morning tea, an editing workshop and a panel discussion on crime writing with award-winning scriptwriters and authors, including Vicki Madden, Kyle Perry, Alan Carter and Tansy Rayner Roberts.</para>
<para>Committee member Johanna Baker-Dowdell told me, 'It was designed to be like a tasting plate of storytelling, conversation and performances, but we also hoped it would keep everyone's spirits up when we had so much being cancelled or changed due to COVID.' I would encourage anyone interested to check out the festival's own podcast, where Lyndon Riggall and Annie Warburton talk to Tasmanian authors, playwrights, comedians, poets and editors about their works, how they draw inspiration from Tasmania and what's in store for them. This can be found on the festival's website page at www.tamarvalleywritersfestival.com.au.podcast.</para>
<para>I'd also like to take this time to acknowledge the role that our local libraries play in our communities. Across Northern Tasmania the Beaconsfield, Bridport, Exeter, George Town, Launceston, Lilydale, Ravenswood and Scottsdale libraries all play a critical role in ensuring that books are accessible to all. Our libraries offer so much more than providing free books—offering courses, literacy programs, school holiday programs and more. A big congratulations to the Launceston Library on its recent 50th birthday celebrations.</para>
<para>Finally, if you're looking to purchase a book, I would encourage you to put your money behind your local small-business book store and encourage everyone to visit australiareads.org.au. <inline font-style="italic">(Time expired)</inline></para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:48</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr JOSH WILSON</name>
    <name.id>265970</name.id>
    <electorate>Fremantle</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'm very glad to speak to this motion and to speak up for the joys and benefits—and, I'd say, the necessity—of reading, to speak up for the centrality of stories and storytelling and everything from identity to entertainment and from problem-solving to politics, and to speak up for Australian writers and Australian publishers.</para>
<para>If I were to make a list of things that have been essential to me, reading would probably rank just behind the basic human needs of food, water, shelter and love. Without reading, I would have struggled in terms of my education and my happiness, especially when I was young. I attended five different primary schools in three countries by the time I was 12, and reading was the glue that held together all the pieces across all the gaps. It was the mainstay of my sense of self, my confidence and wellbeing. It was the main line linking my imagination and curiosity into the wider world. It was occasionally, as the motion describes, a refuge—not from anything particularly terrible but as an escape from the noise and awkwardness and isolation or sadness that many of us feel from time to time.</para>
<para>My fascination with reading became my aspiration, with respect to writing. Unlike the member for Moreton, I never managed to produce anything book worthy. I still believe the efforts I made on the road to being a failed novelist are amongst the most productive, creative and crafty hours that I have spent.</para>
<para>As a dad, I don't know that I've done many things of greater value than to read to my kids and tell them stories. One of my favourite memories is sitting on the carpet with my girls in their bedroom, telling a story, and seeing my son, our eldest, crawl out of his bedroom in the dark to be close enough to hear. My wife, Georgia, surpasses me in everything that I have mentioned, in reading, writing and storytelling, by mentoring writers and by editing and publishing their work at the mighty Fremantle Press. I'm lucky to live in a wordy household and I am blessed to represent a community that holds writing dear. I know I am lucky to enjoy reading. That is a lot easier when you can find yourself represented in stories. It's easier when your folks pass on a love of reading, as mine did. It's easier if you have access to teachers who are supported in their vital work. It would be easier for kids who face disadvantage if we could ensure schools are enabled to respond with the right resources and time for those who need it most.</para>
<para>As part of the broad effort to ensure we welcome diversity and difference, we need our stories to reflect and cherish diversity—to cherish our First Nations heritage and our multicultural and LGBTIQ+ communities and to reflect the experience of all ages and all abilities. Right now it's still the case that the world of published stories, like so many aspects of life, is skewed towards a narrow range of identities and experiences. This is particularly limiting in the form of children's literature. There are people working to change that—people like Jessica Walton, a queer disabled writer and teacher whose latest book, a graphic novel called <inline font-style="italic">Stars in </inline><inline font-style="italic">Their</inline><inline font-style="italic"> Eyes</inline>, is published by Fremantle Press. Jessica has spoken about her experience: 'As I became disabled and then later as I came out as queer I felt the lack of representation. Later as an adult, when I did get a lot more representation, there was that emotional feeling of, "Oh, I didn't have this and now I do," and I am sad for the kid that I was.' Jessica says: 'Your child might not be disabled now, but they might develop a disability at some point in their life or acquire a disability. Let's give them the space to be exposed to disability in literature and film and TV so that when they interact with disabled people in the real world they're not doing so from a place of fear.'</para>
<para>One of the effects of the pandemic has been to spotlight what is most precious to us all: our health, our connection to family and community, our environment, and also books and reading. While writers and publishers and bookshops may have felt that love through this time because book sales have risen, there has nevertheless been harmful impact with the cancellations of festivals and especially with the brutal hit on universities. This affects the livelihood of Australian writers and, as with other workers and businesses in the creative sector, writers and publishers have not been properly supported through the pandemic.</para>
<para>As we look back at the 10th annual Australian Reading Hour, which occurred last month, we should acknowledge that reading is one of the foundation stones of our educational and creative lives. We must support Australian writing to ensure our kids and their kids can see themselves and can hear our distinctive stories and greater diversity in the years to come. In what has been a difficult time, I give a shout-out to all the writers in Australia—not just the famous and successful ones but all the hundreds and hundreds of writers who toil away in the hope of being published one day and who ultimately underpin our vital and diverse Australian literature.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:53</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr ALLEN</name>
    <name.id>282986</name.id>
    <electorate>Higgins</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I rise to thank the member Moreton for moving this motion and providing me, a dedicated bookworm, this opportunity to speak on this topic. Books inspire the future generations of Australians. Books and learning to read play an important role in literacy skills and early development of children. As a paediatrician and mother of four, some of my most special moments were listen to go my children read and seeing their confidence grow, from <inline font-style="italic">Possum Magic</inline> through to the <inline font-style="italic">Harry Potter</inline> series, which I read in its entirety with my children.</para>
<para>Earlier this year, in May, there was a National Simultaneous Storytime. In fact, this was the 21st successive year of this event. This year's event combined literature with science—both of which are passions of mine. Children from right across Australia and New Zealand came together in libraries, schools, preschools, childcare centres, family homes, bookshops and many other places. 2021 was the biggest and most successful National Simultaneous Storytime to date, with over 1.29 million participants at over 14,000 locations, including participants from New Zealand, Thailand, UK, Canada, Singapore, Vietnam and Hong Kong. The book for this year was titled <inline font-style="italic">Give </inline><inline font-style="italic">M</inline><inline font-style="italic">e </inline><inline font-style="italic">S</inline><inline font-style="italic">ome </inline><inline font-style="italic">S</inline><inline font-style="italic">pace</inline><inline font-style="italic">!</inline> and written by Philip Bunting and—quite remarkably—was read by the astronaut Dr Shannon Walker from the International Space Station. The book centres on a young child called Una, who is fascinated by space:</para>
<quote><para class="block">Una dreams of a life in Space. Life on Earth is just so so-so. But how will she get there? And will she complete her mission to discover life in Space?</para></quote>
<para>Una, along with many Australian children who are also finding life 'so-so' through the COVID lockdown, will be able to dream big soon, with the recent announcement by the Morrison government that Australian technology will be sent to the moon, and the pending lifting of COVID restrictions in my home state of Victoria, where we have endured, unfortunately, the longest lockdown in the world. The agreement made between the Morrison government and NASA includes an Australian-built rover, which will be the first piece of Australian technology to be deployed on the moon.</para>
<para>Literacy has never been more important than it is at present. The fight against COVID has been a marathon event. With every vaccination it becomes a less deadly disease for us all, but we can't forget the shadow impacts of the COVID pandemic, including the mental health impacts, particularly on our children. In late August 2021, the Murdoch Children's Research Institute—where I used to work—released a report outlining the enormous impact COVID is having on the mental health and wellbeing of our young, particularly the most disadvantaged. The report says that prolonged school closures and lockdowns will exacerbate these impacts. Due to the lockdowns, students across Australia have been missing out. Through the pandemic, face-to-face learning has been replaced with online classes. And let's be clear: parents have been given a unique insight into the amazing work involved in educating our children.</para>
<para>It is not only parents but also our crucially important public libraries, such as the Stonnington libraries and the Glen Eira libraries in my electorate of Higgins, that have had to pivot and adapt their services to provide important programs for children, such as story time, baby time, children's holiday programs and literacy festivals. These have all been delivered online in my electorate of Higgins. For the most vulnerable in our society, there was also the home library service. But it is not just about the books on shelves that libraries provide. Our libraries have become a source of information during the pandemic, for example, by assisting people with finding where the nearest vaccination hub is or by assisting jobseekers with online courses for resume writing.</para>
<para>Statistics don't lie: reading has so many benefits. Readers are 28 per cent less likely to report feelings of depression. One in five claims that their reading habits prevent feelings of loneliness. Readers are 10 per cent more likely to report high self-esteem than non-readers, and this increases to 18 per cent if they read for at least 30 minutes a week. Readers are also more likely to report greater life satisfaction—and who can argue with losing your head in a book? I reflect on my childhood, when I discovered my passion for reading through my favourite childhood books, Enid Blyton's <inline font-style="italic">The Magic Faraway Tree</inline> and CS Lewis's <inline font-style="italic">The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe</inline>. These books ignited my passion for reading, through magic and mystery. Therefore, I encourage everyone to pick up a book, scroll through an e-book, or listen to an audio book and immerse yourself in the magic of reading, where anything is possible.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>17:58</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr LEIGH</name>
    <name.id>BU8</name.id>
    <electorate>Fenner</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I commend the member for Moreton for bringing forward this vital motion on the value of reading. Time will not permit me to mention all of the books that have touched me during this year, but I want to use the little time I have to give a short rundown of some of them. At the outset I want to give a shout-out to some Canberra region authors: Marion Halligan—hard to ignore—a great writer; crime writer Chris Hammer; historical writer Robyn Cadwallader; the new suspense writer Peter Papathanasiou, who has written a terrific book called <inline font-style="italic">The Stoning</inline>; and Omar Musa, a spoken-word poet and modern novelist.</para>
<para>But books can shape how we think about policy and politics. I think the industry minister would be better off having read Ian McEwan's novel <inline font-style="italic">Machines Like Me</inline>, Walter Isaacson's biographies <inline font-style="italic">Leonardo Da Vinci</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">Einstein</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">Steve Jobs</inline>, and <inline font-style="italic">The</inline><inline font-style="italic">I</inline><inline font-style="italic">nnovators</inline>; Ed Catmull's book <inline font-style="italic">C</inline><inline font-style="italic">reativ</inline><inline font-style="italic">ity, Inc.</inline>; and Kazuo Izuguro's novel <inline font-style="italic">K</inline><inline font-style="italic">lara and the Sun</inline>. The housing minister would be better off for having read Matthew Desmond's book <inline font-style="italic">Evicted</inline>, and the sports minister for having read Bonnie Tsui's <inline font-style="italic">Why We Swim</inline>, Adharanand Finn's <inline font-style="italic">The </inline><inline font-style="italic">Rise of the Ultra</inline><inline font-style="italic"> R</inline><inline font-style="italic">unners</inline> and Alex Hutchinson's <inline font-style="italic">Endure</inline>. The Treasurer should read Amy Klobuchar's <inline font-style="italic">Antitrust</inline> and Tim Wu's <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he Curse of </inline><inline font-style="italic">B</inline><inline font-style="italic">igness</inline>, not to mention Martin Sandbu's <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he </inline><inline font-style="italic">Economics </inline><inline font-style="italic">of </inline><inline font-style="italic">Belonging</inline> and Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo's <inline font-style="italic">Good Economics </inline><inline font-style="italic">for </inline><inline font-style="italic">Hard Tim</inline><inline font-style="italic">es</inline>.</para>
<para>My thinking to climate change this year has been shaped by Bill Gates's <inline font-style="italic">How to Avoid a Climate</inline><inline font-style="italic"> Disaster</inline>, Alan Finkel's 'Getting to Zero' in <inline font-style="italic">Quarterly Essay</inline> and Richard Flanagan's <inline font-style="italic">The Living Sea </inline><inline font-style="italic">o</inline><inline font-style="italic">f Waking Dreams</inline>. Anyone's thinking on education can't fail but be changed by reading Tara Westover's harrowing biography, <inline font-style="italic">Educated</inline>; Alison Gopnik's <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he </inline><inline font-style="italic">Gardener </inline><inline font-style="italic">and the </inline><inline font-style="italic">Carpenter</inline>, a beautiful book about parenting and child education; and Jordan Ellenberg's <inline font-style="italic">H</inline><inline font-style="italic">ow </inline><inline font-style="italic">Not </inline><inline font-style="italic">to </inline><inline font-style="italic">Be Wrong:</inline><inline font-style="italic">The Po</inline><inline font-style="italic">wer of </inline><inline font-style="italic">Mathematical Thinking</inline>. Anyone interested in immigration should of course read my colleague Tim Watts's terrific book <inline font-style="italic">The Golden Country</inline>, not to mention Abul Rizvi's <inline font-style="italic">Population Shock</inline> and Peter Mare's <inline font-style="italic">Not Quite Australian</inline>. The home affairs minister would also do well to read Geoffrey Canada's <inline font-style="italic">Fist</inline><inline font-style="italic">Stick Knife G</inline><inline font-style="italic">un</inline>. Few books have better characterised the way to think creatively about violence. For the health minister it would be beneficial to read Judith Miller's book <inline font-style="italic">G</inline><inline font-style="italic">erms</inline>, on biological warfare, and Michael Pollan's <inline font-style="italic">How </inline><inline font-style="italic">t</inline><inline font-style="italic">o Change Your Mind</inline>, about the emerging science of psychedelics.</para>
<para>All members of parliament should delve into some of the great books that have been written about politics this year: Ezra Kline's <inline font-style="italic">Why We're Polari</inline><inline font-style="italic">z</inline><inline font-style="italic">ed</inline>, Barack Obama's <inline font-style="italic">A </inline><inline font-style="italic">Promised Land</inline> and Anne Appelbaum's <inline font-style="italic">Twilight of Democracy</inline>. We are all being deluged in email, and Cal Newport's <inline font-style="italic">A World Without Email</inline> has a discussion of the problem and some ideas on solving it. Kate Ellis's <inline font-style="italic">Sex</inline><inline font-style="italic">,</inline><inline font-style="italic"> Lies and Question Time</inline> is a vital book in the Me Too era.</para>
<para>When Macgregor Duncan and I wrote an article in 2010 about what parliamentarians were reading, George Orwell topped the list for both sides of the House. The conservative side most loved his novels; the progressive side most loved his essays. In that spirit, I would recommend Dennis Glover's <inline font-style="italic">Orwell's Australia</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">The Last Man </inline><inline font-style="italic">in Europe</inline><inline font-style="italic">:</inline><inline font-style="italic">A No</inline><inline font-style="italic">vel</inline>. Many of my colleagues have been writing books, including Richard Marles's <inline font-style="italic">Tides That Bind</inline> and Kate Thwaites's book with Jenny Macklin, <inline font-style="italic">Enough </inline><inline font-style="italic">i</inline><inline font-style="italic">s Enough</inline>.</para>
<para>Then there are just some great books: John McWhorter's <inline font-style="italic">Nine Nasty W</inline><inline font-style="italic">ords</inline>; Alice Pung's <inline font-style="italic">Unpolished Gem</inline>; Glennon Doyle's <inline font-style="italic">Untamed</inline>; James McBride's <inline font-style="italic">Deacon King Kong</inline>; Maggie O'Farrell's <inline font-style="italic">Hamnet</inline>, the most extraordinary depiction of losing a child; Patrick Keefe's <inline font-style="italic">Say Nothing</inline>, based on the Boston University interview transcripts about the Irish troubles; Douglas Stuart's <inline font-style="italic">Shuggie Bain</inline>, beautiful and brutal at the same time; Oceon Vuong's <inline font-style="italic">On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous</inline>—just some stunning phrases; Seth Stephens-Davidowitz's <inline font-style="italic">Everybody Lie</inline><inline font-style="italic">s</inline>, an extraordinary exposition of big data; Brit Bennett's <inline font-style="italic">T</inline><inline font-style="italic">he </inline><inline font-style="italic">Vanishing H</inline><inline font-style="italic">alf</inline>, one of the best books you'll read about race and identity; and anything by Sam Harris, including <inline font-style="italic">Free Will</inline>, <inline font-style="italic">Lying</inline> and <inline font-style="italic">Waking Up</inline>.</para>
<para>All leaders should be readers. All of us in the parliament should be reading more.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1><subdebate.1><subdebateinfo>
          <title>Australian Defence Force Cadets</title>
          <page.no>-1</page.no>
        </subdebateinfo><speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:03</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs McINTOSH</name>
    <name.id>281513</name.id>
    <electorate>Lindsay</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>by leave—At the request of the member for Ryan, I move:</para>
<quote><para class="block">That this House notes that:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(1) membership of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) Cadets:</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(a) gives young people the opportunity to be members of a team, develop their skills as leaders and develop an individual's capacity to contribute to society; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(b) fosters an interest in Defence Force careers, and is important in developing ongoing support for Defence; and</para></quote>
<quote><para class="block">(2) ADF Cadets contribute greatly to the community and Australian society.</para></quote>
<para>In my electorate of Lindsay there are over 180 cadets and 22 adult volunteers across three cadet units: Training Ship Nepean in Orchard Hills, 21 Army Cadet Unit in Penrith and 345 Squadron in Orchard Hills. I would like to give a big shout-out to particularly all the new cadets, including my son Coby, who has joined the Army cadets, because I know it has been a particularly tough year to join cadets hey're doing a lot via Zoom, learning about each other and about what it takes to be a cadet. I know that Coby and his fellow cadets can't wait to get out and do their camps, do their training and their parading—everything that joining cadets is about. ADF Cadets is an inclusive youth development program and is the largest within the Department of Defence. It gives young people the opportunity to be part of a team, to develop leadership, self-reliance, confidence, teamwork and communication skills. Although when I did ask Coby what he liked most about cadets, he said, 'everything'. These are crucial to the personal growth of all young Australians, to help them become the next generation of leaders in our communities and in our country. No matter what they go on to pursue in work or study, they will be well equipped with these important skills and character strengths on their way to achieving their goals. Some may go on to foster an interest in pursuing a career in Defence. I would like to acknowledge my colleague next to me and all the work you did in the Defence Force—you were a cadet too—in serving our great country.</para>
<para>Cadets also have the opportunity to embark on new and exciting challenges such as the cybersecurity competition, sponsored by CSIRO, named CyberTaipan. This is an Australian cybersecurity competition that's modelled on the US Air Force Association CyberPatriot program. It is part of an international framework for educating and inspiring high school students towards further education and careers in cybersecurity and other STEM subjects. Anything to do with teaching our young people about STEM and the jobs of the future is worth doing, and we need to do more of that.</para>
<para>Whether rural or remote, urban or metropolitan, or on Zoom, the cadets place a strong emphasis on connecting with the community across a wide range of socio-economic and cultural demographics. Even during that Zoom time of lockdown they've continued to have parades every week to maintain their connection and to conduct online training.</para>
<para>I would like to acknowledge that our own Penrith branch—21 ACU—was founded on 26 June 1985. This year the Australian Air Force Cadets celebrate their 80th anniversary, and we congratulate them on this remarkable milestone. It shows that the number of cadets recruitment has increased over the last four years. I know my colleague the Assistant Minister for Defence is working on building and expanding our cadets even further. Defence is proud of its values—service, courage, respect, integrity and excellence—which shape the culture and the entire organisation, including cadets. I've seen this firsthand with our local cadets at our Anzac Day services, our remembrance services. Each time we have a special occasion in our community our young people come out as part of their cadet program. We are really proud to see the effort they make and the work they do as part of their service to our community as cadets. For over 36 years our Penrith branch has developed the skills and contributed to the development of young people in Penrith, and I look forward to what they do in the future with their cadet program. Our community is proud of our young cadets and we can't wait to see them out parading—in person, off Zoom—in the very near future.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>Is the motion seconded?</para>
</interjection>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">Ms Stanley</name>
    <name.id>265990</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>I second the motion.</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:09</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Ms TEMPLEMAN</name>
    <name.id>181810</name.id>
    <electorate>Macquarie</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Defence community has long played a very important role in my electorate of Macquarie, in the Blue Mountains and the Hawkesbury, with both communities part of the RAAF family. RAAF Base Glenbrook is home to Air Command, whose mission is to raise, train and sustain the Air Force's air and space power. RAAF Base Richmond, the first to be established in New South Wales, is best known for being home to our C-130 Hercs, the medium transport aircraft. As such, the Australian Air Force cadets also play a major role in my community, providing many local young people aged between 13 and 18 with the opportunity to develop their self-confidence and leadership skills, as well as explore a future career within the Australian Defence Force. The attendance of the AAFC 336 and 323 squadrons at things like Anzac Day, Vietnam Veterans Day and Remembrance Day, often in blazing heat or freezing cold, is very much appreciated by the veteran, defence and wider community. I think the pride in their duties seems to outweigh the weather conditions, which says something for how much they love being cadets.</para>
<para>For many years now they've had the honour of attending cadet services and marching-out parades. But COVID has obviously meant changes to operations in recent times. Remembrance Day 2020, for instance, saw commemorations spread over two services for 323 Squadron at Glenbrook to allow all the unit's cadets to attend safely. Scheyville, near Windsor, has also functioned as the location of big parades, and the sight of the cadets marching through the disused parade ground is really quite spectacular. Even more than that, I love watching the pride of the parents and the grandparents at these events. Some are new to defence and others are continuing a family tradition. It's a privilege as well to hear the Air Force cadet 3 Wing band when they perform.</para>
<para>The experience of these young cadets can lead them to move into careers with the Defence Force. I spoke to William in just the last week, who is certainly seeing it as a pointer to what life after school might be like. When this happens, this parliament and our nation have a huge obligation to these young people and to their families to support them both when they serve and when they finish serving. As a nation, we are obliged to do everything we can to ensure that supports are there for our service men and women, as well as our veterans should problems arise. While in the cadets we've challenged them and pushed them physically and mentally, and we've given them the opportunity for amazing experiences, our duty of care just doesn't end there. When anyone enters the ADF, we know that we're going to ask a lot of them: to go into crisis environments, to possibly confront distressing and dangerous situations and to often put the needs of the country ahead of their own needs. We have a responsibility to ensure that these men and women learn resilience to deal with what is asked of them.</para>
<para>When they leave the ADF, they need to know that the Department of Veterans' Affairs will be there to treat them with respect, not to go slow on their claims. That means that the DVA has to have enough staff to do that. Right now we know claims are blowing out to 12 to 18 months. The latest announcement of a review of the system by consultants McKinsey is a clear admission by the government that they failed to fix the problems in the department in spite of the 2019 Productivity Commission report, which hasn't been responded to fully let alone implemented. The people who pay the price for the incompetence in sorting out the department and its approach are the veterans themselves, and I think we all experience that. The ability of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to process a pension is a long way from the thoughts of a 17-year-old relishing their cadet role, but it shouldn't be far from our thoughts.</para>
<para>When I look at the young people in the Army and Air Force cadets and think of the bright future that they could have in the Defence Force, I'm also aware of the price that they could pay. If they do take that next step, we need to ensure that we are there for them, that they're supported during their years in defence and that when they leave they're given opportunities to use the extraordinary skills and experience that they will have enjoyed as a serving member, and prepare them for the next stage of their career. That's what I think about what I see these young people brimming with enthusiasm at what a career in defence could be. I think cadets is one of the really important stepping stones to that. I'm so proud to have wonderful people supporting our cadets in my electorate. I think we all know that we have the responsibility to maintain that support all the way through.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:14</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs ARCHER</name>
    <name.id>282237</name.id>
    <electorate>Bass</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] Northern Tasmania has a proud history of training Australian Defence Force cadets that continues to this day. The cadet program is the largest youth development program within the Department of Defence, and one that has provided a strong connection and important pathway for many young Northern Tasmanians who are interested in exploring a career in our defence forces.</para>
<para>In Bass there are around 120 cadets and 31 adult volunteers across five cadet units, including Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">Tamar</inline>, the 508 Squadron and the 62 Army Cadet Unit, all in Launceston; the Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">York</inline> in George Town; and the 67 Army Cadet Unit in Youngtown.</para>
<para>Our government proudly supports the cadet program in regional areas, and in Launceston the Paterson Barracks is home to one of the cadet units and the 16th Field Battery—the oldest artillery unit in Australia—which will soon move all units to the Youngtown Barracks. This will bring an end to our city's long history with the barracks. With many sections of the building underutilised for several years, the move is a great opportunity to revitalise the building through the Launceston City Deal.</para>
<para>Beyond exposing cadets to the possibility of a career path in the forces, the program contributes to the development of youth in rural and regional communities. Importantly, the programs broaden community engagement with Defence by bringing together local youth, volunteers and aspects of military culture. In Tasmania, the cadets participate in school holiday programs with a difference, with robotics, abseiling and weapons training some of the activities on offer to young cadets across Tasmania. Combined with other training aimed at building the character and skills of the individuals involved, the program assists cadets in meeting future life and career goals in study and employment. Despite COVID, many ADF cadet programs have been able to continue in northern Tasmania and across the state in compliance with restrictions.</para>
<para>Just recently, 17 cadets and five adult volunteers from both TS <inline font-style="italic">Tamar</inline> and TS <inline font-style="italic">York</inline> participated with both Army and Air Force cadets in a combined training activity at Stony Head Military Training Area, just north of Launceston. Captain (AAC) Jorden Gunton, Second in Command, Alpha Company, Tasmanian AAC Battalion, has been involved in programs for many years and told me of his love for the program, saying, 'Cadets have the opportunity to undertake military-like activities such as field craft, navigation, radio communications and survival techniques, all in a safe, controlled environment.' The AAC has recently modernised the training to include electives such as flying remotely piloted aerial vehicles, cyberskills, robotics and more. The cadets also undertake a range of community service and remembrance activities, such as providing the catafalque party for a number of RSL sub-branches on Anzac Day to pay attribute to our soldiers, both past and present, and by supporting Legacy during the annual Legacy Week badge sales.</para>
<para>Within the Launceston region we have over we have over 60 cadets supported by members of the ADF and Army cadet staff members. We also receive fantastic support from the veteran community and the wider community. The Australian Army Cadets provide a fantastic opportunity for youth to be involved in our community, to gain leadership and teamwork skills and to make new friends. We are always looking for more cadets to join our ranks. We parade on Wednesday nights during school term, conduct weekend activities throughout the year and week-long camps during the school holidays. It's the opportunity to see a 13-year-old cadet recruit walk in the door, shy and nervous, and then, a few years later, see them rising to the challenge of commanding 200 youth on the parade ground or outfield. Seeing the cadets grow into their self-confidence and independence is one of the most rewarding parts of being an officer of cadets.</para>
<para>In March of this year, the City of Launceston bestowed a unique honour, granting cadets the freedom of the city, the highest honour that any Australian city can award. Coinciding with the 80th anniversary of the Air Force Cadets, northern Tasmanian cadets proudly paraded through the city streets from Princes Square to Paterson Barracks—a wonderful sight to see.</para>
<para>Thank you to all ADF cadets in northern Tasmania who continue to contribute to our community, I commend you.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:19</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr DICK</name>
    <name.id>53517</name.id>
    <electorate>Oxley</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I want to associate myself with the motion before the House today, where we recognise the importance of the membership of Australian Defence Force Cadets, and also recognise the incredible work of the many volunteers—many are parents but many serving members of the ADF support cadet programs in our nation.</para>
<para>The ADF cadet program provides challenging and educational military experience to Australia's young people. It is an invaluable initiative that gives kids purpose and self-esteem throughout their formative years. Currently, there are around 28,000 cadets enrolled in the three cadet programs—the Australian Army Cadets, the Australian Navy Cadets and the Australian Air Force Cadets. These cadets are supported by around 4,200 officers, instructors and approved helpers, who make everything possible by supervising and running the program. In the south-west suburbs of Brisbane and Ipswich, which I proudly represent in this parliament, we have several cadet programs in the Springfield and greater Ipswich area.</para>
<para>I also want to recognise another organisation in my community, Air League Forest Lake, which does so much work in promoting interest in aviation amongst budding future pilots and, hopefully, people serving in our defence forces. I had the opportunity to present Australian flags to No. 230 Squadron based in Springfield and I was incredibly impressed by their dedication, discipline and attitude. I have witnessed this program produce true leaders for our next generation. I also heard about the fantastic opportunities offered to kids in the program, including developing survival skills, gaining first-hand aviation experience, first-aid training, training camps and so much more. Without the cadets program, many kids would not have access to these exciting, enriching opportunities.</para>
<para>While the ADF has an important role to play in the development of our young leaders, it's also an important tool to introduce young people to the possibilities provided by a career in the Defence Force and this makes the cadets program an important and effective source of Defence recruitment for the ADF, with many cadets going on to serve in the permanent ADF or Reserves. I understand from talking to many of the leaders and many of the parents involved just what a critical point this is in ensuring that our young people had a full understanding about the work of the ADF. We should be encouraging and doing everything we can to get more young people to put up their hand to serve their country and to take the many opportunities that comes from a wonderful career in the defence forces. The benefits of this program are clear, and I'm really pleased that today's motion is recognising the outstanding work.</para>
<para>A strong cadets program also means a strong ADF. The annual Defence report shows that, in 2019-20, 93 per cent of permanent force recruitment targets were met and we know that since the 2015-16 white paper we have been failing to meet some of these targets. So whilst it's important to talk about the Defence Force capability and procurement, it's also important to talk about what we can do as a national parliament and particularly a federal government to ensure there are more people joining the Australian defence forces. The values of mateship, camaraderie and honour have been part of the Australian Defence Force for generations. With a program like cadets, we can foster and encourage them to enter promising and fulfilling careers in our Army, Navy or Air Force. It seems we need an urgent focus to support a recruitment campaign within the ADF, particularly as we come out of the pandemic, to ensure that we see more people being encouraged and mentored to enter the ADF, and that's exactly what the cadets program does so well. We want to boost Defence jobs and ensure our defence forces have the personnel they need to do the incredible important job of keeping Australians safe and defending our national interest. The cadet program is the perfect platform to increase ADF recruitment, expand the experiences and capabilities of our nation's young people and create the leaders of tomorrow. I commend the Australian Defence Force cadet program.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:24</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr WALLACE</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
    <electorate>Fisher</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[inaudible] COVID-19 and build our nation's recovery. Team work, leadership and a willingness to contribute are going to be attributes that we need in abundance. We are therefore very fortunate in this country that we have three branches of the ADF cadets, which for decades have helped to instil these values in generations of young Australians.</para>
<para>In the electorate of Fisher we are particularly blessed. We have four units of Army, Navy and Air Force cadets. They are doing a fantastic job in building the future for Sunshine Coast leaders and understand the value and importance of duty and responsibility. TS <inline font-style="italic">Onslow</inline> in Golden Beach has been going since 1976. It is now in great hands under Commanding Officer Lieutenant Peter Peroz and Whole Ship Coordinator Sub Lieutenant Kerry Contessa. The unit is currently undergoing a transition, with a number of senior cadets, including Cadet Petty Officer Barnett having recently aged out. Nonetheless, the unit's 36 cadets have kept up a full schedule, including participating in the PCYC games in Brisbane; a ship visit to HMAS <inline font-style="italic">Mermaid</inline>; rigging, sailing, kayaking and taking part in local remembrance activities.</para>
<para>Equally, the Royal Australian Navy Cadets of TS <inline font-style="italic">Centaur</inline> don't let being up a mountain range in Maleny deter them from taking part in all kinds of naval activities. The unit commemorates the Australian Hospital Ship <inline font-style="italic">Centaur</inline>, which was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine off the southern tip of Moreton Island in 1943 with the loss of some 268 lives. The unit has been running since 1997 and, since that time, its cadets have taken part in sailing and powerboating, as well as bushwalking, camps and parades, which you'd expect from a unit in the hinterland. TS <inline font-style="italic">Centaur</inline> do a terrific job in instilling leadership, self-discipline and teamwork in their cadets, and it's a privilege to watch these traits on display every year when I travel up to Maleny for the Australia Day service.</para>
<para>Number 223 Squadron at Caloundra Aerodrome are also going through a period of transition, ably led by their Acting Commanding Officer David Bentley. At the beginning of this year, their respected commander Pilot Officer Barry McGlynn was promoted and moved on to a regional role, while the cadets have been shifting to a new age range of 12 to 18 years. Despite this, throughout COVID-19, 223 Squadron have managed to maintain almost their full program. Their 92 cadets have continued to parade every Monday night; they've done their usual bivouacs and, perhaps most importantly of all, they've continued to fly.</para>
<para>Earlier this year, I visited 106 Army Cadet Unit, then based at Meridan Plains state college, and met with their commanding officer, Captain Morgan Way. Captain Way is a plumber and builder—so he's got to be a good bloke!—with a decade's experience in teaching young apprentices and he brings that experience, along with a passion for the outdoors, to his work with our local cadets. He is ably assisted by 2IC Lieutenant Rob Couchman and administration officer Lieutenant Allison Couchman. Though 106 Army Cadet Unit and its 90 cadets have recently had to relocate to Caloundra Aerodrome, they now have big plans for taking the unit forward. They are instituting a buddy system, expanding the range of locations and the activities they do, and bringing first aid training to all their senior cadets. Perhaps most importantly, they are elevating the role of senior cadets in the management of day-to-day operational matters and giving them input into decision-making. It's exactly this kind of experience of adult leadership and responsibility which lies at the heart of the value of our cadet programs.</para>
<para>By giving young people a voice and accountability for their actions, we grow their confidence and help them to understand the consequences of the decisions that they make. Ultimately, that is what the ADF cadets are all about. When they join up, cadets make a commitment to our community. They demonstrate their desire to make a contribution and their willingness to take responsibility for themselves and for their fellow Australians. Cadet leaders like Peter Peroz, David Bentley and Morgan Way are fantastic role models, giving up their time to help these young people to develop their skills and providing them with an example of service and passion that I know will stand them and their country in good stead into the future.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:29</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Dr HAINES</name>
    <name.id>282335</name.id>
    <electorate>Indi</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>The Australian Army Cadets is a leading national youth development organisation. Cadets allows young people from 12 to 17 to experience a taste of life in the Australian Defence Force and to develop leadership and life skills that will stand them in good stead no matter what path they choose. The Australian Army Cadets adopt the values of the Australian Defence Force to empower youth to achieve their potential, values like service to country and community; the courage to say and do the right thing, especially in the face of adversity; respect for others; integrity of character; a spirit of excellence; and a willingness to strive to achieve every single day. In Indi we have two cadet groups: 37 ACU Albury-Wodonga, based at the Gaza Ridge Barracks in Bandiana, and 33 ACU, based in the Beersheba Barracks at Wangaratta.</para>
<para>Over the last two years, our young people have had a pretty rough go of things. The impact of lockdowns has been hard on all of us, but for young people having two years of school significantly interrupted is a seriously big deal. For those of us in Victoria especially, there have been so many pivotal moments of growing up that young people have missed out on, not to mention the simple joys of being young: playing sport, exploring our beautiful natural surrounds in north-east Victoria, spending time with friends. As we start to come out of lockdowns and start looking towards life on the other side of this acute phase of the pandemic, programs like the cadets will be needed more than ever. Coming together as a group for activities like camping, navigation, first aid, watermanship, abseiling, drill and ceremony, the cadets gives young people a fantastic opportunity to work together to develop resilience and character and vital life skills. These are the types of group activities we've largely been unable to do these last two years, and these are precisely the types of skills and attributes that our young people need as we look to emerge into a world a little less certain than the one we knew a few years ago.</para>
<para>In a place like Indi, which has a large defence community, programs like cadets are also important to connect young people with the significant local defence and veterans culture. The Bandiana Barracks, which hosts the 37 ACU, is a significant presence in Wodonga. I had the great joy of visiting there recently. There are many hundreds of families across Albury-Wodonga who originally moved to the region because they had a family member stationed at the barracks. For the young men and women of the 37 ACU, to see the families thriving in the community, the opportunities, the jobs, the careers and the service is a fantastic thing for them. At the Bandiana Barracks, when I was there last week, I saw advanced manufacturing, a logistics hub and a training centre. For young people to understand these careers exist, they see this through the cadets, and I think it's an extraordinary opportunity for them. The fact that, through cadets, our young people can be exposed to this world is a wonderful thing not just for them but for our broader community. We just heard from our previous speakers that we need to do everything we can to boost recruitment into the cadets.</para>
<para>I'd like to thank all the people in the 37 ACU and the 33 ACU for giving our young people an opportunity to grow and develop. I'd like to celebrate all the young people in Indi who sign up for the challenge. I love to see you on memorial days. I feel great pride in you. You are our real hope for the future. Young Australians have shown remarkable resilience throughout this pandemic, and I know, when I see you, that our country is in very, very good hands with this next generation of young leaders.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:33</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr CONAGHAN</name>
    <name.id>279991</name.id>
    <electorate>Cowper</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>I'd like to thank the member for Ryan for raising this motion, and I'd like to thank all former and current ADF members for their service to our country. We enjoy the freedoms we have today because of you, and I'd like to acknowledge the member for Stirling, who's sitting right next to me, for your service.</para>
<para>The ADF cadet program is, and has been for a long time, an integral part of not only the Defence Force but the wider fabric of the Australian community since its inception. At its core the cadet program exists to enrich the lives of young people and to provide them with opportunities that they might not otherwise have received. At the age they join, that sets the foundation for the rest of their life, for their adulthood. We need to recognise that opportunity is given to them, but we also need to recognise how they embrace that and how well they embrace that. The program is built on a military-style support and structure. And don't let anybody ever tell you that boys—and girls, but I speak of boys because I have two boys—don't want structure. They desire that structure. They need that structure. The program also provides the ADF customs, traditions and values, and those tenets are the building blocks of a successful future in business, in team building, and to instil a sense of belonging and that critical self-confidence that our youth need to become well-balanced young men and women—to have that self-belief that, quite often, we don't see in young people these days.</para>
<para>The regions have been significant in producing young men and women who go through the ADF program, across a whole range of socioeconomic and cultural demographics, attracting increasing numbers of young women and young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men and women, and also engaging with young people with physical and learning disabilities. This continues to grow year on year, and I see that in my electorate of Cowper. At TS Vendetta in Coffs Harbour the number of cadets has increased by four per cent every year over the past five or six years. It's quite incredible, as the last speaker said, that even during COVID we've seen this exponential growth of cadets. I think that is because of what other young men and women see in their friends who join the cadets.</para>
<para>Just before COVID, I remember going to a memorial service. There was a very impressive young man there with his mother. She told me the story of how, only a few years before, the family had become fractured. Her son had become very angry. He was having learning difficulties. He was in and out of suspensions. That lady took that young man to the Air Force Cadets and, almost overnight, with the mentoring and supervision, and that structure that he desperately needed, he changed. He now has his light aircraft pilot's licence. This young man now has a future because of the ADF program. And that's what we see, time and time again, where young men and women go through the ADF cadet program. I have a list of names, which I won't have time to read out today, just from TS Vendetta in Coffs Harbour, but this is replicated all around Australia. Programs such as these are critical in the moulding and guidance of our local communities' future leaders, expanding horizons and providing possibilities for us as a society to function at our best.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:38</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr GOSLING</name>
    <name.id>245392</name.id>
    <electorate>Solomon</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] I am very pleased to also speak to this motion and I thank the member for Ryan for bringing it forward. Although I did serve in the Australian Army, I wasn't a cadet, but I've seen firsthand here in my electorate the important role that cadets play in our broader defence community. I know that there is a transformative power in being a cadet. I've certainly seen that, and I want to acknowledge all of the volunteers, reservists and full-timers that are working with our cadets around the country. In my electorate, I want to acknowledge Anita Newman from Air Force Cadets up here, who was recently awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia. She served in the Air Force and in the NT Police, and she's a bit of a Territory legend up here. She's a commanding officer of 802 Squadron of the Australian Defence Force Cadets, which is based in Darwin and Palmerston. Anita told me that, through cadets, Australia's best citizens are being formed, and I think she's right. They learn the skills of integrity, teamwork, compassion, responsibility, respect and fair play. Cadets learn critical leadership skills but also, in the Air Force's case, about aircraft recognition, aviation, the military way of life, fieldcraft and STEM skills. There's also a strong component of community service to the cadets that Anita leads and across all of the cadet units up here in the Territory. With the Air Force, they work closely with the aviation museum and the military museum. They work as tour guides and they're an important support for community commemorations as well. The Cadet Drum Corps provides support on Anzac Day, Remembrance Day and Vietnam Veterans' Day. I attend a lot of these events, as do my colleagues around the country, and we all admire the great skill and respect that these cadets bring to important occasions. Well done to 802 Squadron and to Anita Newman in particular. Anita told me, 'I get great joy personally in seeing kids who didn't expect to succeed do so, and I love seeing their faces when they do achieve.' Keep up the great work, Anita.</para>
<para>I also want to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the Australian Army Cadets in my electorate. Recently, nine cadets from the Greater Darwin region, Army Cadet Units 70 and 71, won the National Cadet Drill Competition. It was a great effort. It was the first time that the Australian Army Cadets' Northern Territory Battalion won this competition. It's a tough and prestigious contest with the winning team being awarded the Regimental Sergeant Major of the Army Award, which takes the form of a commemorative pace stick. All those who know RSMs know exactly what a pace stick is. Congratulations to those cadets and to Army cadets in general.</para>
<para>Finally, I go to the senior service, the Navy Cadets. I was so impressed by our Navy Cadets up here in the Top End, who, on Anzac Day this year, held a service at one of our retirement villages here in Darwin. They are ably led by the Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">Darwin</inline>'s officer in charge, Aurora Jan, and a former Army combat veteran, Tynan Garrett. He is the Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">Darwin</inline>'s training officer. They held a service with great respect and thoughtfulness with those navy cadets. They really warmed the hearts of those senior Territorians resident in that home. It was a wonderful ceremony, so I just wanted to say well done to Navy Cadets. That is going to be an ongoing relationship between Navy Cadet Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">Darwin</inline> and some of our retirement villages up here in the Top End. What a great effort. I just want to send out a big thank you to all the volunteers with Training Ship <inline font-style="italic">Darwin</inline>, and I really do hope that more regulars—more Royal Australian Navy personnel regulars, reservists and volunteers—can join the training ship soon, because there are some great staff there doing a brilliant job, but they could always do with a bit more of a hand.</para>
<para>Of course, not every cadet goes on to pursue a career in the Defence Force but, through the experience that they gain, they really get some important skills and perspectives that they'll use throughout their career, whether that's in the ADF or not, and they'll be great citizens. We know that many cadets go on to become members of the Defence Force, and I can't encourage that course of action any stronger. Well done to all the cadets.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:44</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mr SIMMONDS</name>
    <name.id>282983</name.id>
    <electorate>Ryan</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] It's a great pleasure to bring this motion to the House and to speak on it this evening. I would have desperately loved to have been there with you, but such is COVID life these days. I particularly want to thank all my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for the encouraging words that they've had to say about our cadets around the country. It's one of the many issues that bring us together across the aisle—our admiration for our ADF Cadets and their vital service to our country.</para>
<para>Service, courage, respect, integrity and excellence are the values of ADF Cadets, underpinning their mission to lead and serve our local communities. Australian Army Cadets are, of course, a community youth based development organisation that focuses on preserving customs, traditions and values of the Australian Army. But it's so much more than that. As you've heard from previous speakers, it's the opportunity to provide, to instil, young Australian cadets with the values that we all need to foster our next generation of leaders.</para>
<para>My electorate of Ryan, as many of you have heard me say ad nauseam, has a very proud military presence. We are home of the 7th Brigade at the Gallipoli Barracks and we're home to many current and former service men and women, many of whom are former cadets themselves. In May this year I had the privilege of joining Assistant Minister Hastie to launch the Brookfield cadet unit in my electorate of Ryan. This is a brand new unit that's been made possible thanks to the support of the Morrison government, which committed $100,000 to get the unit underway.</para>
<para>I am pleased to update the House that construction of this new facility is due to commence early in the new year. Assistant Minister Hastie, as we all know, is a distinguished ex-serviceman himself, but many may not know that he is also a very proud ex-cadet. He credits the cadets with many of his own values and skills that he learnt and that he is now applying in his everyday life in the parliament today. It inspired him to go on to join the ADF and serve his country with distinction. Like me, he views the cadets as an important institution, in our country, that builds young hearts and minds with service not just for their community but for Australia more broadly.</para>
<para>As a local member I am very pleased to support the cadet unit and I am a strong supporter of this new unit. I have advocated passionately for funding to get this brand new unit off the ground and to provide it as an opportunity for local youth in the Brookfield area. It will be headquartered at Brookfield and has already gathered tremendous support from the local community. Before I talk further on that, I want to pay homage to 129 Army Cadet Unit—also based in my electorate of Ryan—at the Gallipoli Barracks in Enoggera. It has, currently, 144 serving cadets, which just goes to show the need and desire of our youth out there to be part of this important program.</para>
<para>Despite the difficulties 129 Army Cadet Unit have had—as we've all had during these COVID times—they've still managed to conduct regular parades and weekend activities, like their obstacle courses and the like. I want to pay tribute to them and the volunteers for their resilience during these trying circumstances of the COVID pandemic. Given that they have 144 currently serving cadets, there's obviously a strong interest for this new unit. I am delighted that we the federal government could come onboard to help support it.</para>
<para>It's led by a fantastic team out of the Kenmore-Moggill RSL sub-branch, including it's president, Lieutenant Colonel Rick Maher, and the sub-branch treasurer and former officer of the royal engineers of the British army Richard Ponsonby, and Leonie Smit. They have all been instrumental in bringing this initiative to the fore. Rick and Richard, as I said, are both ex-servicemen who are devoted to giving back to the future of our country's Defence Force through the Brookfield cadet unit. They already have more than 40 cadets who have registered a very keen interest to join as soon as possible, with the unit up and running early next year. So I know the support that the Morrison government has provided to enable this unit to occur is going to a very good place.</para>
<para>It is my hope that the local unit, like all cadet units, will foster strong young leaders who are motivated by a selfless desire to serve their local community and, in particular, to serve their country. Our community at Brookfield and the electorate of Ryan will be better off for their efforts. Congratulations to everybody involved in the Army cadets.</para>
</speech>
<speech>
  <talker>
    <time.stamp>18:49</time.stamp>
    <name role="metadata">Mrs PHILLIPS</name>
    <name.id>147140</name.id>
    <electorate>Gilmore</electorate>
  </talker>
  <para>[by video link] My electorate is steeped richly in naval tradition, home since 1948 to HMAS <inline font-style="italic">A</inline><inline font-style="italic">lbatross</inline> near Nowra. The naval air station for the Royal Australian Navy's aviation branch, the Fleet Air Arm, is home base for the four helicopter squadrons of the Navy Aviation Group: 723 Squadron with EC-135T2+ helicopters, 725 Squadron with MH-60R Seahawk helicopters, 808 Squadron with MRH-90 Taipan helicopters, and 816 Squadron with MH-60R Seahawk helicopters. There is also 822X Squadron with unmanned aerial systems. Then there is HMAS <inline font-style="italic">Creswell</inline>, located on the south-western shores of beautiful Jervis Bay within the Jervis Bay territory, home to the Royal Australian Naval College. So, locally, our young people, as members of their respective Navy, Air Force and Army cadet units understand the significance of Defence values—Defence values, which, by extension, are their value of service, respect, integrity, teamwork and excellence.</para>
<para>The weekly parade, over three hours, brings to its core the military-themed youth development program, advancing teenage children with personal confidence, time management and community participation. This is from procedural roll call to uniform inspections, but practical lessons also—for example, from construction of shelters, understanding navigation by utilising compass bearings and necessary radio procedure, through to Australian military history, including medals.</para>
<para>But there's also plenty of activity in the field, on camp and the usually most-enjoyed adventure training. At HMAS <inline font-style="italic">Albatross</inline>, under the base commander, Captain Robyn Phillips, there is now proudly a cadet program for the Australian Navy, Australian Air Force and Australian Army Cadets. The latter were established just last year, with eight cadets at the Sussex Inlet RSL sub-Branch. It now welcomes 26 members, parading within the multipurpose training aviation authority at HMAS <inline font-style="italic">Albatross</inline>.</para>
<para>One of the main concepts within their exercise routines is for the cadets to share a semirealistic idea of what the Australian Defence Force is all about. They learn about the rank structure, how to follow orders and how to give orders, as a great number of cadets will progress and complete promotion courses like lance corporal and corporal and rise to become a cadet under-officer. Once a unit has a cadet with rank, the focus changes so that cadets lead cadets. Upon completion at the age of 18, the grounding is vast and completely transferrable into employment opportunities. Additionally, banking on their developed radio and navigation skills, many become welcome members of local Rural Fire Service, SES and/or marine rescue community services.</para>
<para>I understand that the cadet family at HMAS <inline font-style="italic">Albatross </inline>is hopeful of holding an inaugural tri-service parade in December. Further, within the electorate of Gilmore is also 222 Army Cadet Unit—South Coast. It has an historical lineage that includes being based at Milton from as early as 1911 and a renewal in Ulladulla from 1993 to 2007, before relocating to Broulee—south of Tomakin and north of Moruya. For some time the weekly parades on a Wednesday have been held within a local high school; however, increasing restrictions, given the COVID pandemic, have brought real challenges, with limitations as to what the school can allow the cadets to do. For the last several months, meetings have been limited to online. I'm aware there's consideration to moving the unit to facilities in Moruya.</para>
<para>It is clear to me that the opportunity to form part of a team, one that fosters leadership with consideration of the immediate community, is the real essence of being an Australian Defence Force cadet—and to willingly demonstrate this publicly by supporting local sub-branches and participating directly during commemorative occasions like Anzac Day and Vietnam Veterans' Day. Should this lead in time to an interest in a Defence Force career, then I suppose it's double good luck.</para>
<para>I would like to acknowledge the commitment, energy and guidance of the many volunteers and leaders who guide, coach and mentor our cadets. Their investment with Australian Defence Force Cadets reaps its return not only locally in Gilmore but across Australia. I say thank you.</para>
<interjection>
  <talker>
    <name role="metadata">The DEPUTY SPEAKER</name>
    <name.id>265967</name.id>
  </talker>
  <para>There being no further speakers, the debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next sitting.</para>
<para>Federation Chamber adjourned at 18:54</para>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1></debate>
  </fedchamb.xscript>
</hansard>